495 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/495 | The Author, Vol. 14 Issue 10 (July 1904) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+14+Issue+10+%28July+1904%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 14 Issue 10 (July 1904)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1904-07-01-The-Author-14-10 | | | | | 253–284 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=14">14</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1904-07-01">1904-07-01</a> | | | | | | | 10 | | | 19040701 | The Huthor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vor. XIV.—No. 10.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br />
AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
<br />
o—~<f ©<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
Tu Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
Te attention of members is called to the<br />
fact that, in accordance with the decision of the<br />
Committee, only ten numbers of The Author<br />
will be printed during the year. The August<br />
and September numbers are not issued.<br />
<br />
—~<<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tur List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
published October, 1902, at the price of 6d., and<br />
the elections from October, 1902, to July, 1903, as<br />
a supplemental list, at the price of 2d., can now be<br />
obtained at the offices of the Society.<br />
<br />
They will be sold to members or associates of<br />
the Society only.<br />
<br />
Vou, XIV.<br />
<br />
Juny isr, 1904.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[Prick SIxPENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
Tun Trustees of the Pension Fund met at the<br />
Society’s Offices on the 19th of February, and<br />
having gone carefully into the accounts of the<br />
fand, decided to purchase £250 London and North<br />
Western 3 % Debenture Stock. Accordingly, the<br />
investments of the Pension Fund at present stand-<br />
ing in the names of the Trustees are as follows.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock ; the<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
Consols 24 %...sssersecseeeerenerereneress £1000 0 O<br />
<br />
Local Loans ......---sceceeeeeereseetetes 500 0 0<br />
Victorian Government 3 % Consoli-<br />
dated Inscribed Stock .....-.--.++++- 291 19 11<br />
Wear LOa 6.6022 -e--eeeecee eet 201. 9 38<br />
London and North Western 3 % Deben-<br />
ture Stock .......cececeeeeeereee es eneee 250 0 O<br />
otal 1.2... £2,248 9 2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Subscriptions from October, 1903.<br />
<br />
£ s. a.<br />
Noy. 13, Longe, Miss Julia . 0 5 0<br />
Dec. 16, Trevor, Capt. Philip QO: 5 0<br />
1904.<br />
Jan. 6, Hills, Mrs. C. H. . 0 5 0<br />
Jan. 6, Crommelin, Miss 010 O<br />
Jan. 8, Stevenson, Mrs. M. E. 0 5 0<br />
Jan. 16, Kilmarnock, The Lord . 010 0<br />
Feb. 5, Portman, Lionel 10 0<br />
Feb. 11, Shipley, Miss Mary 0 5b 0<br />
Mar. _Diiring, Mrs. . : : 7 0 5 0<br />
Mar. Francis Claude dela Roche . 0 5 0<br />
April18, Dixon, W.Scarth . : - 0 5 0<br />
April18, Bashford, Harry H. ; . 010 6<br />
April19, Bosanquet, Eustace ae - 0 10 6<br />
April 23, Friswell, Miss Laura Hain . 09 5 0<br />
May 6, Shepherd, G. HB. . i 0-0 0<br />
June 24, Rumbold, Sir Horace, Bart.,<br />
G.C.B. ; ; tl 170<br />
<br />
Donations from October, 1908.<br />
<br />
Oct. 27, Sturgis, Julian : ‘<br />
Nov. 2, Stanton, Ve : ~ 5b 0 0<br />
<br />
<br />
254 THE AUTHOR<br />
<br />
& se d,<br />
Nov. 18, Benecke, Miss Ida. 1 0 0<br />
Nov. 23, Harraden, Miss Beatrice - D0 0<br />
Dee. Miniken, Miss Bertha M. M.. 0 5 0<br />
<br />
1904.<br />
<br />
Jan. 4, Moncrieff, A. R. Hope . - B00<br />
Jan. 4, Middlemass, Miss Jean . - 0 10°70<br />
Jan. 4, Witherby, The Rev. C. . - 0 5 0<br />
Jan. 6, Key, The Rev. 8. Whittell . 0 5 0<br />
Jan. 14, Bennett, Rev. W. K.,.D.D. . 015 0<br />
Jan. 2, Roe, Mrs., Harcourt . . 010 0<br />
Feb. 11, Delaire, Miss Jeanne. . 010 0<br />
May 16, Wynne, C. Whitworth . - 5 0 0<br />
June 23, Kirmse, R. . : : . 08. 0<br />
<br />
June 23, Kirmse, Mrs. R. a)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HE Managing Committee of the Society of<br />
Authors held its June meeting at 39, Old<br />
Queen Street, on the 13th. The minutes<br />
<br />
of the last meeting were read, and the elections<br />
were then taken.<br />
<br />
Twenty-one members and associates were elected,<br />
bringing the total for the current year as high as<br />
131. This is largely in excess of the number of<br />
members elected during past years up to the same<br />
period. It is. hoped that the increase will con-<br />
tinue, and that those writers who hold secured<br />
positions and are not members will be moved by<br />
an unselfish impulse to join the Society which<br />
has done so much for them and their profession<br />
directly and indirectly.<br />
<br />
At the May meeting, as noted in the last number<br />
of The Author, the Committee decided to send an<br />
address to the Spanish Academy on the tercentenary<br />
of the publication of Don Quixote. It has now<br />
been decided to appoint Mr. Leonard Williams,<br />
who suggested the idea, as delegate of the Society<br />
to hand the address to the Spanish Academy when<br />
the celebrations take place. Although the wording<br />
of the address has been settled, and approved by<br />
the President, the outward form has not yet been<br />
agreed upon.<br />
<br />
There were a good many cases before the Com-<br />
mittee for their consideration. One case dealt with<br />
a complaint against the big distributing libraries,<br />
but the Committee regretted that they were unable<br />
to take the matter up as they could not hope that<br />
the interference of the Society would bring about<br />
any useful result.<br />
<br />
Similar questions have, from time to time, been<br />
considered, and exhaustively dealt with by the<br />
Committee. Members are referred to the early<br />
numbers of The Author.<br />
<br />
In April, the Committee decided to take counsel’s<br />
opinion on a series of contracts existing between<br />
members of the Society and a firm of Canadian<br />
publishers. Since this decision was arrived at,<br />
the publishers in question have promised the<br />
authors with whom they contracted to forward<br />
accounts in July. The matter was again before<br />
the Committee, and they decided to postpone action<br />
until the time mentioned by the publishers had<br />
expired.<br />
<br />
In two cases arising out of disputes as to the<br />
amounts due from authors to publishers for work<br />
done, the Committee after exhaustive enquiry and<br />
after reading the report of their solicitors, came<br />
to the conclusion that they should give their<br />
support in one case, but could not, from the<br />
evidence before them, take up the other.<br />
<br />
The dispute between an author and an agent<br />
before the Committee in May was again up for<br />
consideration. Counsel’s opinion, which had been<br />
obtained in the meantime, was read, and the<br />
Committee decided to advise the member to act in<br />
accordance with the view expressed by Counsel.<br />
<br />
A question of a contentious nature between an<br />
author and a publisher also came before the Com-<br />
mittee. The publisher had agreed to spend a sum<br />
on advertisements. The question was whether the<br />
amount had actually been expended. The Com-<br />
mittee decided to appoint an accountant to vouch<br />
the advertisement charges.<br />
<br />
A letter from the Foreign Office notifying the<br />
action of Sweden in joining the Berne Convention,<br />
a letter from the American Copyright League with<br />
regard to United States Copyright Law, and other<br />
correspondence, were read before the Committee.<br />
<br />
—1——<br />
<br />
Cases.<br />
<br />
SINCE the last issue of Zhe Author nine cases<br />
have passed through the Secretary’s hands. Five<br />
have been demands for money against magazines<br />
and publishers. Of these three have already ter-<br />
minated successfully, aud there is every probability<br />
of equal success with the other two. There has<br />
been one demand for accounts, which the publisher<br />
in answer to a letter hastened to produce. Two<br />
demands for the return of MSS., of which one has<br />
been successful ; the other case has only just<br />
come into the Secretary’s hands. The last, a ques-<br />
tion of the termination and cancellation of contracts<br />
and final settlement of accounts between author<br />
and publisher, has been carried through to a<br />
satisfactory conclusion.<br />
<br />
Of the cases quoted in former numbers of The<br />
Author, there are but three still open. There is a<br />
dispute between an author and a publisher in the<br />
United States, the conclusion of which is naturally<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Bi Oe ties Sac<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
slow owing to the time which must elapse between<br />
each mail. The other two cases have almost been<br />
concluded—one dealing with an amount due from<br />
a publisher, and the other to a dispute as to the<br />
exact number of words in a MS. In the latter<br />
case the difficulty arose owing to the fact that the<br />
writer was paid by the number of words. The<br />
publisher has willingly accepted the Society’s<br />
arbitration.<br />
<br />
June Elections.<br />
<br />
Anson, Sir William, D.C.L. All Soul’s<br />
Oxford.<br />
<br />
Bigelow, Mrs. M. E. . c/o Miss M. Yueill,<br />
3,445—60 Street,<br />
Chicago, U.S.A.<br />
<br />
Bremner, Robert Locke . Glencairn, Dunblane,<br />
Perthshire.<br />
<br />
Deane, H. F. W. . . Gower Lodge, King’s<br />
Road, Windsor.<br />
<br />
Deeping, Warwick . . “Oaklands,” Has-<br />
<br />
Colleges<br />
<br />
tings.<br />
De la Pasture, Mrs. Henry Llandogo.<br />
Evans, Mrs. . : . The Elms, Begbroke,<br />
<br />
near Oxford.<br />
Hills, Miss Christine D. I’. Littlehampton, Sussex.<br />
Keating, Joseph. 19; oe Square,<br />
W.C.<br />
Moffatt, Miss E. B. . Chinthurst Cottage,<br />
Shalford, Surrey.<br />
Morris, Mrs. Frank . 63, FitzGeorge<br />
Avenue, Auriol Rd.,<br />
West Kensington.<br />
<br />
Newland-Smith, Ernest . 76, Belgrave Road,<br />
S.W.<br />
<br />
Pereira, Miss Louise . 24, Morningside Drive,<br />
Edinburgh.<br />
<br />
Rumbold, The Right 127, Sloane Street,<br />
<br />
Hon. Sir Horace, Bart., S.W.<br />
G.C.B.<br />
Sieveking, J. Giberne . Lyon Road, Harrow,<br />
<br />
N.<br />
<br />
Soutar, Miss Lucy H. . Mayfield, Falkirk, N.B.<br />
<br />
Steynor, B. N. : . “Pembridge,” Mal-<br />
vern.<br />
<br />
Weekes, Charles, B.L. . 20, Gainsborough<br />
Mansions, Queen’s<br />
Club Gdns., W.<br />
<br />
Weekes, Miss Rose K. . Sutton Vicarage,<br />
<br />
Dartford.<br />
74, Merrion Square,<br />
<br />
Wynne, Miss Fiorence<br />
Dublin.<br />
<br />
One member does not desire the publication of<br />
either his name or address.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. O55<br />
<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS OF<br />
THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
(In the following list we do not propose to give more<br />
than the titles, prices, publishers, etc., of the books<br />
enumerated, with, in special cases, such particulars as may<br />
serve to explain the scope and purpose of the work.<br />
Members are requested to forward information which will<br />
enable the Editor to supply such particulars.)<br />
<br />
ART.<br />
<br />
Great Masters. Parts XV.,XVI., XVII. With Descrip-<br />
tive Text by Str Martin Conway. Heinemann.<br />
5s, n. each.<br />
<br />
Toe Art or J. MAcWHIRTER, R.A. By Mo<br />
SPIELMANN, With five full page and numerous text<br />
illustrations. 144 x 10%, 22 pp. Hanfstangel.<br />
<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
OppITIES, OTHERS AND I. By HENRIETTE CORKRAN.<br />
9 x 6,328 pp. Hutchinson. 16s.<br />
<br />
THE LIFE OF MAJOR GENERAL WAUCHOPE, CB. CMG,<br />
By Str GEORGE DOUGLAS. 9 x 6, 431 pp. Hodder<br />
and Stoughton. 10s, 6d.<br />
<br />
ECONOMICS.<br />
<br />
Free TRADE. By THE RIGHT HONBLE. THE LORD<br />
AVEBURY, P.C. 9 X 53, 164 pp. Macmillan. 5s. n.<br />
INTERNATIONAL TRADE. By J. A. Hopson. 73 X 5,<br />
<br />
202 pp. Methuen. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
FICTION.<br />
<br />
THE EARTHLY PuRGATORY. By L. DOUGALL. 7% X 5,<br />
345 pp. Hutchinson. 6s.<br />
<br />
Extracts From ADAM’s Diary. By Mark TWAIN,<br />
8} x 54, 89 pp. Harper's. 2s. 1.<br />
<br />
Op Henprick’s Taues. By Capr. A. O. VAUGHAN.<br />
73 x 5}, 234 pp. Longmans. 6s.<br />
<br />
LycuGate Hany. By M. E. Francis (Mrs. Francis<br />
Blundell). 73 X 54, 347 pp- Longmans. 6s.<br />
<br />
My FRENCH FRIENDS. By CONSTANCE Maup. 7} X 5,<br />
323 pp. Smith, Hlder & Co. 6s.<br />
<br />
MaLincourt KEEP. By ADELINE SERGEANT. 73 X 5,<br />
310 pp. J. Long. 6s.<br />
<br />
A WomAN OF Business. By MAJOR ARTHUR GRIFFITHS.<br />
72 X 6, 335 pp. J. Long. 6s.<br />
<br />
Nyria. By Mrs, CAMPBELL PRAED. 73 X 5, 432 pp.<br />
Unwin. 6s. ;<br />
<br />
THE CARDINAL'S PAWN. By L. MONTGOMERY. T. Fisher<br />
Unwin. 6s. n.<br />
<br />
INCOMPARABLE BELLATRS. By AGNES AND EGERTON<br />
CASTLE. 7§ X 4%, 326 pp. Constable. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe ORDEAL BY Fire. By ALLEN UPWARD. 7 x 43,<br />
320 pp. Digby Long & Co.<br />
<br />
En. By MARMADUKE PICKTHALL. 73 x 5, 350 pp.<br />
Constable. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe GREAT PRO-CoNSUL. By SYDNEY C.Grigr, 7} x 5,<br />
440 pp. Blackwood. 6s.<br />
<br />
LizA oF LAMBETH. By W. SOMERSET MAUGHAN,<br />
(Cheap Edition.) 84 X 54%, 99 pp- Unwin. 6d.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HISTORY.<br />
<br />
Tre Spirit or IsuaM. By the Hon. Mr. Justice AMEER<br />
Aut. (Popular Edition, published in Calcutta: S. J.<br />
Lahiri). London: Kegan Paul & Co.<br />
<br />
A SHoRT HISTORY OF THE SARACENS. By the Hon, MR.<br />
Justice AMEER ALI, Macmillan & Co. 7s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
<br />
256<br />
<br />
LAW.<br />
<br />
COMMENTARY ON THE BENGAL TENANCY ACT. By M.<br />
FINUCANE, M.A., and the Hon. Mr. JUSTICE AMEER<br />
Awl. Thacker, Spink & Co., Calcutta ; Thacker & Co.,<br />
London.<br />
<br />
MAHOMMEDAN LAw. Vol. I. j<br />
AMEER ALI. 3rd Edition. Thacker, Spink & Co.,<br />
Calcutta ; W. Thacker & Co, 28s. n.<br />
<br />
THE STUDENTS’ HANDBOOK OF MAHOMMEDAN LAW. By<br />
the Hon. Mr. Justice AMEER ALI. 4th Edition.<br />
Thacker, Spink & Co., Calcutta ; Thacker & Co., London,<br />
4s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
By the Hon. Mr. Justice<br />
<br />
MEDICAL.<br />
<br />
ScHooLt HYGIENE. By ARTHUR NEWSHOLME.<br />
320 pp. Sonnenschein. 38.<br />
<br />
MEDICO-THEOLOGICAL.<br />
<br />
DIVINE HYGIENE—THE SANITARY SCIENCE OF THE<br />
SACRED SCRIPTURES. By ALEX. RATTRAY, M.D<br />
2 Vols. 730—750 pp. Nisbet & Co. 32s.<br />
<br />
7% X 44,<br />
<br />
MILITARY.<br />
<br />
THE SECOND AFGHAN WAR, 1878-79-80.<br />
Its ConpuctT, AND ITS CONSEQUENCES.<br />
<br />
Its CAUSEs,<br />
By Cou.<br />
<br />
H. B. Hanna. Vol. Il. 9 x 6, 372 pp. Constable.<br />
15s. n.<br />
<br />
THE ARMY ON ITSELF. By H. A. GWYNNE. 7 X 43,<br />
193 pp. Warne. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
MUSIC.<br />
<br />
THE DIVERSIONS OF A Music LOVER.<br />
84 x 53,260 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
HANDBOOK ON THE ART OF TEACHING AS APPLIED TO<br />
Music. WARRINER, Mus. Doc. 74 X 5,176 pp. A.<br />
Hammond & Co., 6 King Street, Regent Street, W.<br />
<br />
28. 6d.<br />
<br />
By C. L. GRAVES.<br />
<br />
SPORT.<br />
PRACTICAL HIN1S ON ANGLING IN Rivers, LAKES, AND<br />
<br />
Sea. By W. M. GaLLIcHAN. 74 X 5, 116 pp.<br />
Pearson. Ils.<br />
FISHING (‘‘ The Country Life” Library of Sport). 2 Vols.<br />
<br />
Edited by H. G. HUTCHINSON. 91 X 6. 526 X 445 pp.<br />
Newnes. 2s 6d. n.<br />
SOCIOLOGY.<br />
<br />
Success AMONG NATIONS. By EMILE REICH.<br />
270 pp. Chapman and Hall. 10s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
9 x 6,<br />
<br />
ASPECTS OF SocIAL Evo.LuTion. First Series. Tem-<br />
peraments. By J. LIONEL TAYLER, M.R.C.S. 84 x 5},<br />
297 pp. Smith Elder. 7s. 6d.<br />
<br />
THEOLOGY.<br />
<br />
CONCERNING THE Hoty BiBLE. ITs UsE AND ABUSE.<br />
By THE RicHT Rey. Monsicgnor JoHN 8. VAUGHAN.<br />
74 X 4%. Washbourne. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
“Hora BIBLICA.’”’ By ARTHUR CARR, M.A.<br />
Hodder and Stoughton. 6s.<br />
<br />
TOPOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
THE QUANTOCK HILLS: THEIR COMBES AND VILLAGES.<br />
By BrHATRIX F. CResswELb. 74 xX 5, 106 pp. The<br />
Homeland Association. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Near Oxrorp. By THE Rey. H. T. Inman. 61 xX 5,<br />
215 pp. Oxford: Alden. Is. and 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
218 pp.<br />
<br />
TRAVEL.<br />
<br />
THE ALps. Described by SIR MARTIN Conway. Painted<br />
by A. D. McCormick. 9 X 6}, 294 pp. Black.<br />
208. n.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
NOTES.<br />
<br />
—~<+ ——<br />
<br />
N “The Masters of English Literature,”<br />
I Mr. Stephen Gwynn seeks, by a process of<br />
selection, to give a readable account of the<br />
development of English literature from Chaucer’s<br />
time onwards. He deals, in all, with almost fifty<br />
authors, and of most of them a tolerably full and<br />
critical account is given.<br />
<br />
Mr. Grant Richards published, early in June,<br />
the second volume, dealing with sporting dogs, of<br />
“The Twentieth Century Dog,” compiled by Mr.<br />
Herbert Compton from the contributions of some<br />
five hundred experts.<br />
<br />
“Major Weir,” by K. L. Montgomery, author<br />
of “The Cardinal's Pawn,” will be published<br />
during the coming season by Mr. Fisher Unwin.<br />
The book is a romance, with the noted wizard<br />
Thomas Weir, for the central figure.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Barnicott and Pearce, of Taunton, have<br />
published, at the price of 6d., a work entitled ‘‘ The<br />
Country Gentleman’s Reference Catalogue to the<br />
best Works on Agriculture, Gardening, Botany,<br />
Natural History, Sporting, Recreations and Kindred<br />
Subjects.”<br />
<br />
In a lecture at the Royal Institution, dealing<br />
with the subject of ‘ The State and Literature,”<br />
Mr. H. G. Wells pleaded for the more leisurely and<br />
larger criticism found in books, the duty of litera-<br />
ture in this sense being to teach men and classes<br />
their place in the world, and in the social scheme.<br />
He stated further, that the most important litera-<br />
ture, personal relationship, was to be found to<br />
some extent in good essays, sermons, biographies,<br />
and autobiographies, but that the great bulk of<br />
the people desired it served them in novels and<br />
plays. They went to see the latter and delighted<br />
to read the former, partly because they liked stories,<br />
but very largely, consciously or unconsciously, from<br />
social curiosity. If these interpretations in novel<br />
and in play were well done, the State would endure ;<br />
if badly done, it must go to pieces. The literature<br />
of personal life and emotions was to be found in<br />
poetry and philosophy, which should be looked to<br />
to keep the whole mass of the social order in<br />
sympathy and-in one key one with another.<br />
<br />
The third edition of ‘The Commentary on the<br />
Indian Evidence Act,” by the Honourable Mr.<br />
Justice Ameer Ali, and Mr. Justice Woodroffe, will<br />
appear in December of the current year.<br />
<br />
Mr. Justice Ameer Ali, who will also produce,<br />
early in 1905, the fifth edition of “The Students’<br />
Handbook of Mahomedan Law,” is at present<br />
engaged on a “History of Mahomedan Civilisa-<br />
tion in India,” with an introduction dealing with<br />
the pre-Mahomedan period.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
During the autumn, Mrs. Croker will publish<br />
her new book, “The Happy Valley,” through<br />
Messrs. Methuen & Co.<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles Garvice’s two books, “In Cupid’s<br />
Chains,” and “Just a Girl,” have gone into a<br />
second and third edition respectively. ‘The former<br />
has been translated by Miss Mary Otteson into<br />
Norwegian for a Norwegian syndicate.<br />
<br />
Mr. Garvice’s last novel, “ Redeemed by Love,”<br />
is being syndicated by the National Press Agency<br />
in England, and by Messrs. George Munro’s Sons<br />
in America.<br />
<br />
The same author has also completed, in col-<br />
laboration with Mr. Denman Wood, a dramatic<br />
version of his book “Nance,” which will be<br />
produced at Mr. Wood’s theatre, the New Court,<br />
Bacup, in the autumn. :<br />
<br />
The following verse is taken from the title page<br />
of Mr. John Oxenham’s new novel, ‘“‘A Weaver<br />
of Webs,” which Messrs. Methuen & Co. have<br />
published :—<br />
<br />
“Warp and woof and tangled thread—<br />
<br />
Weavers of webs are we<br />
<br />
Living, and dying, and mightier dead,<br />
<br />
For the shuttle once started shall never be stayed—<br />
Weavers of webs are we.”<br />
<br />
Mr. W. L. Courtenay’s essays on the work of<br />
Maurice Meeterlinck, which appeared in the Daily<br />
Telegraph, were published in book form in the<br />
middle of June by Mr. Grant Richards. The<br />
book also contains sketches of other foreign<br />
writers, including D’Annunzio, Turgenieff, Tolstoy,<br />
Gorky, and Merejowski.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Rowland’s new novel, entitled “ Capricious<br />
Caroline,” which is now running serially in The<br />
Times weekly edition, will be published in book<br />
form in the middle of September by Messrs.<br />
Methuen & Co., who are also publishing new<br />
editions of “ Love and Louisa,” and “Peter a<br />
Parasite,” by the same authoress. In addition,<br />
Mrs. Rowlands has in hand a series of stories for<br />
The Tatler, and a series of articles for Zhe Daily<br />
Chronicle, besides a number of short stories com-~-<br />
missioned by other papers, such as The Bystander<br />
and London Opinion.<br />
<br />
Miss J. S. Wolff, author of ‘“ Les Francais en<br />
Menage,” “Les Francais en Voyage,” etc., has<br />
just published a series of “Object Lessons in<br />
Practical French” (Blackie & Son), and is prepar-<br />
ing a second volume of her French History series,<br />
“Tes Francais du dix-huitieme Siecle” (Edward<br />
Arnold). Vol. I., “ Les Francais d’Autrefois,”<br />
appeared last September.<br />
<br />
The Chromoscopist for June, contains a character<br />
study by ‘‘ Mancy,” entitled “Jacky.” ‘“ Mancy”<br />
<br />
has also an article in the June number of The<br />
Spiritualist, entitled “ Palmistry and Its Benefits.”<br />
We understand that Messrs,<br />
<br />
Constable & Co.<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
257<br />
<br />
have changed their address from 2, Whitehall<br />
Gardens, and will remove to larger premises at 16,<br />
James Street, Haymarket, S.W.<br />
<br />
“Behind the Footlights,” Mrs. Alec Tweedie’s<br />
last work, which was published by Messrs. Hutchin-<br />
son & Co., with twenty full page illustrations at<br />
the price of 18s., has gone into a second edition.<br />
<br />
«A Voice from the Void ” is the title of a book<br />
by Miss Helen Boddington, which Messrs. Methuen<br />
& Co. will publish during the autumn.<br />
<br />
The twenty-sixth Congress of the International<br />
Literary and Artistic Association will take place<br />
in Marseilles from the 24th to the 29th of Septem-<br />
ber next. The subjects set down for discussion<br />
are: 1. Musical authors’ rights; 2. Publishers’<br />
agreements respecting artistic works; 3. Pro-<br />
tection of photographs; 4. Moral rights, and<br />
public copyright as applied to monuments of the<br />
past ; 5. A study of the countries in which several<br />
languages are spoken, and of copyright in transla-<br />
tions from one to another of the languages in use<br />
within the country ; 6. The publication of works<br />
of history and criticism ; 7. Protection of archi-<br />
tectural designs; 8. Protection of engineers’<br />
plans ; 9. The International situation in various<br />
countries ; 10. The revision ofthe Berne Convention.<br />
<br />
Mr. Grant Richards will publish in a few days<br />
“The Server’s Handbook,” by the Rev. Percy<br />
Dearmer. It is the fifth volume in the “ Parsons’<br />
Handbook” series.<br />
<br />
« Derek Vane,” author of “The Three Daughters<br />
of Night,” etc., has disposed of the serial rights of<br />
her new novel, ‘ The House on the Black Water,”<br />
to Messrs. Cassell. She is writing some humorous<br />
articles for the Boudoir, and has short stories<br />
appearing in the Outlook, Manchester Chronicle, etc.<br />
<br />
Miss Jean Delaire’s book, « Around a Distant<br />
Star,” which we noticed lately as about to be<br />
published, has met with favourable reviews in the<br />
Daily News, The Glasgow Herald, and The Sheffield<br />
Telegraph.<br />
<br />
Miss Marie Corelli has a series of articles on<br />
“Pagan London” running in The Bystander.<br />
The first of these articles appeared on June 22nd.<br />
<br />
“ Suggestions for a New Political Party, with<br />
principles, methods, and some Application,” is the<br />
title of an article by Dr. Beattie Crozier which will<br />
appear in one of the coming numbers of The<br />
Fortnightly Review.<br />
<br />
«The Reverend Jack” is the title of a novel by<br />
Naunton Covertside (Naunton Davies) which will<br />
shortly be published by Mr. Henry Drane, at the<br />
<br />
rice of 6s.<br />
<br />
Mr. Stanley Weyman has received a testimonial<br />
to the popularity of his work, which has much<br />
touched him. His book “The Long Night” deals<br />
with the history of the city of Geneva. Such<br />
interest has it aroused that some of the most<br />
<br />
<br />
258<br />
<br />
prominent of Geneva’s citizens, in token of their<br />
appreciation, have forwarded to the author an<br />
address with a small bronze statuette of Calvin.<br />
A short extract from the document itself will<br />
convey better than words from our pen, the feeling<br />
of those who have acted in the matter.<br />
<br />
‘*We are anxious that so ideal a relationship (7c.<br />
between Mr. Weyman and the City) should not vanish,<br />
without placing in your hands some material evidence of<br />
our grateful admiration.<br />
<br />
“The statuette of Calvin is no unbecoming ornament<br />
for the writing table of one whose works, like yours, are<br />
founded on that vast Anglo-Saxon influence which has in<br />
every part of the world cherished the religious and political<br />
views of the Reformer, views of faith and liberty which<br />
have become for you the foundation and the inspiration of<br />
your Art.”<br />
<br />
We heartily congratulate Mr. Weyman on receipt<br />
of a compliment as pleasant as it was unexpected.<br />
<br />
Everyone will have been amused and interested<br />
in the Poet Laureate’s position as an anonymous<br />
author. A full statement of the circumstances<br />
under which his play was accepted by Mr. Bourchier<br />
has appeared in all the papers, and demonstrates<br />
the fallacy of the statement so often made, that<br />
managers do not read plays that are sent to them<br />
by unknown writers. The comedietta, for it is but<br />
aslight piece, was produced on June 16th, and runs<br />
for about halfan hour. It met with a very cordial<br />
reception. Mr. Bourchier and Miss Bateman took<br />
the chief parts.<br />
<br />
The play founded on Mrs. Croker’s novel,<br />
“Terence,” which has, for the last ten months,<br />
been attracting good audiences in New York,<br />
Boston, Washington, Chicago, and other cities of<br />
the United States, will, we understand, have a<br />
further run in the same country during the next<br />
season.<br />
<br />
“ Beyond the Vale” is the next of Mrs. Croker’s<br />
novels to be dramatised, with a view to production<br />
in the States. :<br />
<br />
+»<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—_1~>—+<br />
<br />
HE Académie Francaise has awarded the<br />
Bordin prize of 3,000 francs to be divided<br />
into two prizes of 1,000 francs, to M. Paul<br />
<br />
Gautier, for his book on “Mme. de Staél et Napo-<br />
léon,” and to M. Michaud for “ Sainte Beuve avant<br />
les lundis,” and two other prizes of 500 francs. The<br />
Marcel Guérin prize of 5,000 francs is divided into<br />
four prizes of 500 and three of 1,000 francs. M.<br />
Dunand and Ivan Strannik are among the authors<br />
who have shared this prize.<br />
<br />
The Archon Despérouse prize is divided into one<br />
of 1,000 francs, awarded to M. Vermenouze for his<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
poem “ Mon Auvergne,” and the rest into prizes of<br />
500 francs to other poets.<br />
<br />
The Montyon prize of 19,000 francs is awarded<br />
to Capitaine Lenfant for his book ‘Le Niger” ;<br />
Félix Régamey for “Le Japon”; Colonel de<br />
Pélacot for his ‘ Expédition de Chine de 1900” ;<br />
Paul Acker for “Petites Confessions” ; Paul Labbé<br />
for his ‘‘Bagne Russe”; Jean Reibrach for<br />
“Sirénes” ; Jean Viollet and Charles Frémine<br />
for “ Petit Coeur” and “ Poemes et Récits.”<br />
<br />
Other prizes have been awarded to Abbé Laveille,<br />
Louis de Foureaud, the Marquis de Segonzac, Abbé<br />
Piolet and Pierre Guzman.<br />
<br />
“La Société Francaise pendant le Consulat:<br />
Aristocrates et Républicains,” by Gilbert Stenger.<br />
This volume is the second of a series which the<br />
author is writing on the epoch he has so carefully<br />
studied. In the first volume, “ La Renaissance de<br />
la France,” we had a picture of the times when<br />
Napoleon I. was Général Buonaparte.<br />
<br />
In the first part of this new volume we have an<br />
account of the “ Emigration,” and the miseries of<br />
the aristocrats in exile. The second part is devoted<br />
to the study of the Republicans and the work-<br />
ings of the Consulate. he book is most interest-<br />
ing, and a faithful picture of the times. We have<br />
anecdotes about the celebrities of the day, and<br />
excellent portraits of Talleyrand, Lebrun, Fouché,<br />
and many other well-known historical charac-<br />
ters, including Benjamin Constant and Camille<br />
Jordan.<br />
<br />
“ Le Marquis de Valeor,” by Daniel Lesueur, is<br />
a most dramatic novel with a strong plot, and<br />
mystery enough to satisfy the most ardent lovers<br />
of intrigue. Unlike some of the other novels by<br />
this author, there is not so much psychology in the<br />
‘“‘Marquis de Valvor,” or, rather, the psychology is<br />
left for the reader to discover between the lines, as<br />
it were. One has to study the characters by their<br />
actions, as the events follow each other so quickly<br />
that until one closes the volume one has not<br />
time to come to any conclusions. ‘To tell the<br />
plot of the book would no doubt spoil it for many<br />
readers. It is written in the same admirable<br />
style as the other works which have brought<br />
Daniel Lesueur to the front rank of contemporary<br />
novelists.<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles Foley, of the “Telephone” play<br />
fame, has been tempted to build up a novel on<br />
a certain rumoured episode which was a great.<br />
topic of conversation some ten or twelve years<br />
ago. In “ Fleur d’Ombre” we have the story of a<br />
French girl named Lolette who marries a young<br />
foreigner and for a year or two has an ideally<br />
happy life. She then makes the terrible dis-<br />
covery that she has married a prince in disguise.<br />
Through the death of his brother her husband<br />
becomes heir to a throne. Lolette and her baby-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
boy are considered de trop by her royal husband’s<br />
family.. A more suitable wife is provided for the<br />
heir apparent, a princess who had been engaged to<br />
the brother who died, and Lolette is expected to be<br />
resigned as the “ widow » of a distinguished living<br />
husband.<br />
<br />
The story is well told with all the delicate<br />
veiled irony in which Mr. Foley excels, and in<br />
France the book is having great success.<br />
<br />
“Sur la Branche” is the title of the new book<br />
by Pierre de Coulevain, the author who had such<br />
success in France and America with ‘* Noblesse<br />
Américaine” and ‘“ Eve Victorieuse,” both of<br />
which works won for the writer Academy prizes.<br />
The new book is undoubtedly stronger than either<br />
of the other two novels. It is extremely original,<br />
and one wonders after reading it whether to call<br />
it a novel. It seems to be, rather, a true study<br />
of life, of real every-day life with all the small<br />
things and all the great things woven together.<br />
The author is a keen observer, with absolute faith<br />
in the great plan “ to which all creation moves.”<br />
Tae woman who is supposed to be writing the<br />
story is living alone “on the branch,” or, in other<br />
words, her home is broken up and she goes from<br />
one hotel to another, and from one country to<br />
another, believing that the romance of her own<br />
life is over, but watching with deep interest the<br />
comedies and tragedies around her. As time goes<br />
on she discovers that her own romance is by no<br />
means over, and the threads are once more put into<br />
her hands by destiny, so that she may do the part<br />
assigned to her in weaving the web of life. From<br />
her own bitter experience and grief she has learnt<br />
much, a larger tolerance and an immense opti-<br />
mism. The book appears to have been published<br />
at just the right moment and is being greatly<br />
discussed.<br />
<br />
“Tsolée,” by Brada, is a most charming novel<br />
and a psychological study from the first chapter to<br />
the last. The young girl, whose isolation gives<br />
the title to the book, is a Mlle. Charmoy who has<br />
been brought up in the approved French way, but<br />
who on the death of her relatives in France, is<br />
handed over to some English relatives. She is<br />
distinctly out of her element in the English home<br />
to which she is consigned. Not only does her<br />
“Latin soul” revolt against much that she disap-<br />
proves in the Anglo-Saxon atmosphere, but she has<br />
unfortunately lost her heart to a French cousin,<br />
and this detail complicates matters considerably.<br />
It is always a delicate and usually a thankless task<br />
for a French or English novelist to place his<br />
characters ina foreign milieu. Brada has succeeded<br />
in giving us a faithful picture of a certain kind of<br />
British home, but it is of that kind where a vulgar-<br />
minded woman with plenty of money and an intense<br />
admiration for all that is “smart” reigns supreme.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
259<br />
<br />
We are therefore inclined to think that the French<br />
girl’s loneliness in England is not so much due to<br />
her exile from her native country as to her exile<br />
from a refined home. As a French novelist’s<br />
study of English life the book is extremely<br />
interesting.<br />
<br />
M. André Maarel has written a novel entitled<br />
“La Chevauchée,” which is really a study of the<br />
political world. Lucien Surget is a politician who<br />
sets out with the idea of helping his country in<br />
many ways, but who finds that the path of a<br />
politician is by no means an easy one. Un<br />
semblant de bon sens pratique,” he says “ Vameénera<br />
doucement aux compromissions, et sa vanité, sur<br />
excitée par la flatterie, lui fera bientdt confondre<br />
Yidée de son devoir avec Vidée de sa prosperité<br />
<br />
ersonnelle.”<br />
<br />
Without the authorisation of Madame Lardin de<br />
Musset, the sister of Alfred de Musset, a volume<br />
of the poet’s correspondence with George Sand has<br />
just been published in Belgium. Some years ago<br />
Madame Lardin de Musset refused her consent to<br />
having her brother's letters made public, so that<br />
with great indelicacy the persons responsible for<br />
the appearance of this volume have taken it to<br />
another country for publication. If these letters<br />
were to be given to the public, in common fairness<br />
it should have been done by the de Musset and the<br />
George Sand representatives together. If there<br />
are passages detrimental to George Sand which<br />
have been omitted, the same should have been<br />
done for de Musset, otherwise the book is of<br />
no value as a justification of George Sand’s<br />
conduct.<br />
<br />
Among the new books are the following :<br />
“ Bldorado,” by Paul Brulat; “ Au Pays du<br />
Mystére,” by Pierre de Maél ; “ Marie Claire,” by<br />
Francois Deschamp ; “Mes premiéres Armes<br />
Littéraires et Politiques,” by Madame Adam ;<br />
“Récits et Legendes d’_ Alsace Lorraine,” by<br />
Genevieve Lanzy ; ‘La Vie de Paris,” by Jean<br />
Bernard ; “ Les Francais de mon temps,” by the<br />
Vicomte G. d’Avenel.<br />
<br />
‘he theatrical season is practically over, but some<br />
of the plays are still running, and at one or two of<br />
the theatres the summer season has commenced.<br />
As so many foreigners are in Paris during these<br />
months this sammer season is becoming quite<br />
important.<br />
<br />
The Odéon commenced its celebration of George<br />
Sand’s centenary with “ Le Démon du Foyer,” and<br />
a George Sand exhibition in the foyer of the theatre.<br />
“ Glaudie” will be given at the Francais.<br />
<br />
A delightful innovation in Paris is the out-door<br />
theatre in the Bois de Boulogne, the ‘héatre de<br />
Verdure of the Pié Catelan. On the 22nd of June<br />
the Comédie-Francaise gave “ Oedipe roi”; the<br />
Odéon gave the foarth act of the “Ariésienne ”;<br />
<br />
<br />
260<br />
<br />
the ballet of “ Manon”’ was danced by the corps de<br />
ballet of the Opéra Comique. It is fifty years<br />
since any performance has been given at the Pré<br />
Catelan.<br />
<br />
Atys Hauuarp.<br />
<br />
—~<- «<br />
<br />
UNITED STATES NOTES.<br />
<br />
—~_<br />
<br />
(WNHE trail of the November Presidential election<br />
is over everything this year, not excluding<br />
literature. Histories of the Republican<br />
<br />
Party, lives of their candidate, and similar pro-<br />
<br />
ductions are as plentiful as blackberries ; and even<br />
<br />
the clear stream of fiction is perceptibly a little<br />
muddied with politics.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile we have had a few biographies whose<br />
real concern is with the past. Dr. Joseph Barrett’s<br />
‘Abraham Lincoln and his Presidency ’”’ is based,<br />
indeed, upon a “campaign biography,” written<br />
with its subject’s assistance ; but the work in its<br />
present form is of quite a different character, and<br />
is a useful solvent of much myth that has gathered<br />
round its hero.<br />
<br />
Mr. Thomas E. Watson, going further back, has<br />
added to Jefferson literature a somewhat episodical<br />
but rather entertaining volume. He complains<br />
bitterly of the deification of New Englandism, and<br />
handles none too gently contemporary writers on<br />
his subject, such as Woodrow Wilson, Henry<br />
Cabot Lodge, and Elroy Curtis.<br />
<br />
A notable biography also is “The Life of John<br />
A. Andrew,” Governor of Massachusetts during<br />
the Civil War, which has been written by Henry<br />
Greenleaf Pearson. With all his admiration for<br />
Lincoln the ardent war governor found the<br />
President’s cautious methods rather trying. This<br />
and other matters, such as the relations of Andrew<br />
with General Butler, are handled in an admirable<br />
manner, and the whole work is remarkable for<br />
scholarship and literary power.<br />
<br />
The “ Memoirs of Henry Villard,” on the other<br />
hand, though of no slight interest and importance,<br />
are of very uneven merit. That part of the work<br />
which recounts the author’s career as a war<br />
correspondent, and generally all of it that deals<br />
with his life as a journalist, is eminently satis-<br />
factory ; but, from easily excusable causes, what<br />
is told us of Villard as the financial organiser of<br />
the north-west is presented in a sadly fragmentary<br />
manner. One is glad to hear, however, that its<br />
shortcomings are likely to be remedied in a supple-<br />
mentary publication. The life of a man who did<br />
so much for America deserves the fullest possible<br />
treatment in all its phases.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
One other biography we must mention, viz., Mr.<br />
Francis Newton Thorpe’s “ Life of Dr. William<br />
Pepper,” Provost of Pennsylvania University. It<br />
tells sympathetically, if a little diffusely, the life-<br />
story of a really great personality—a man who not<br />
only created a university, but left a great pro-<br />
fessional reputation both as a medical writer and<br />
a practising physician. He literally wore himself<br />
out before his time by sheer pressure of work. It<br />
is not a little refreshing to read of this go-ahead<br />
character sticking up for Greek and Latin before<br />
the Modern Languages Association—he himself<br />
spoke French fluently; and the opinion of such<br />
a man that the purification of American public<br />
life was to be sought rather in educational work<br />
than in ward politics is at least worthy of serious<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
The Supreme Court has decided that books are<br />
books and not periodicals. They will, therefore ,<br />
no longer be able to go through the mails as<br />
“second class” matter.<br />
<br />
The “ Encyclopedia Britannica” has found a<br />
protector in Judge Lacombe, who has restrained<br />
the Tribune Association of New York City from<br />
printing and selling as a premium a so-called<br />
“‘Americanised Encyclopedia Britannica.” The<br />
latter, it was held, had formed their eight volumes<br />
by cancellations and mutilations of two-thirds of<br />
the English work. A large amount of doca-<br />
mentary evidence was put in. Actions were also<br />
brought against the publishers, the Saalfield Pub-<br />
lishing Company, of Akron, O., by Appleton &<br />
Co., who alleged that the ‘“ Americanised ” supple-<br />
ment infringed the copyright of their “ Cyclopedia<br />
of American Biography.”’ They obtained damages<br />
as well as an agreement to destroy copies and<br />
stop sales.<br />
<br />
The author of “Mrs. Wiges of the Cabbage<br />
Patch” has also obtained relief from the law.<br />
Mrs. Bass had been so pestered by the unwelcome<br />
attentions of “hoboes” and others, that she at<br />
length had recourse to strong measures, and last<br />
April found herself charged with assault in the<br />
form of throwing a pitcher upon the head of one<br />
Mrs. Emily Smith, of Hazlewood, Ky. The<br />
Louisville police justice dismissed the charge “on<br />
general principles,” expressing the view that Mrs.<br />
Wiggs had had great provocation.<br />
<br />
The plaintiff’s plea that she was under the<br />
impression that the author of “big-sellers ” was in<br />
need of charitable relief was distinctly piquant ;<br />
and certainly not less so was the testimony of the<br />
defendant, who left the court saying “ Now maybe<br />
Tl be able to spend my old age in peace, and<br />
maybe my trees ‘ll grow out where all them<br />
memorals has been pulled off, and maybe my yard<br />
won’t be full of strange people every Sunday,<br />
and I can move downstairs, where I used to live.”<br />
<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
"To return to literature. America is not wanting<br />
in clever novelists, but her poets are few and far<br />
between. All the greater then is our pleasure in<br />
pointing to the achievement of Mr. William<br />
Vaughan Moody, who has followed up his highly<br />
promising “ Masque of Judgment” with ‘The<br />
Fire-Bringer,” a drama of even greater merit.<br />
The two, it seems, are designed as parts of a<br />
trilogy, the remainder being yet to come. We<br />
trust that there may be a few who will find leisure<br />
from politics and fiction to make acquaintance<br />
with literature that has attained so high a level.<br />
<br />
Some weeks ago’ we were astonished to see<br />
printed in that usually sane and carefully edited<br />
organ, the Dial, a “communication” headed “ In<br />
Re Shakespeare-Bacon” and signed “ Francis<br />
Bacon Verulam Smith,” which is about the most<br />
fatuous piece of literary criticism that we have<br />
ever read in a serious paper. Were it not for the<br />
well-known character of the publication one should<br />
certainly have dismissed the thing as a somewhat<br />
impudent jew d’ésprit. The writer of the “com-<br />
munication” sets out to follow up a “line of<br />
proof” adopted some time ago by a contributor<br />
to the English paper Literature. ‘The latter seems<br />
to have propounded the somewhat untenable<br />
hypothesis that every great author is commonly<br />
associated with his chief creation. This is how<br />
Francis Bacon Verulam Smith follows up the clue:<br />
«« What, now, is the chief, the best known character<br />
in the so-called Shakespearian dramas? Hamlet,<br />
to be sure; and in the name lurks a very clever<br />
<br />
erypto-pun—Ham [i.¢., Bacon] let [or, hindered<br />
from openly declaring his identity]. Let us goa<br />
step further. What is Hamlet’s most famous<br />
speech? The immortal soliloquy. And the most<br />
familiar line therein? The first. Let us examine<br />
this line. ‘Be’ is phonetic for the second letter<br />
of the alphabet, and the line thus becomes ‘To<br />
B[acon] or not to B[acon are these plays to be<br />
ascribed], that is the question.’ And how is the<br />
question decided? In the affirmative, of course.<br />
The soliloquist determines against self-annihila-<br />
tion. The Baconian authorship is thus established.”<br />
We notice that the communicator hails from St.<br />
Albans, presumably in England. Can it be that<br />
the editor has been had by some wicked under-<br />
graduate? Shelley, according to Hogg, would<br />
indulge in somewhat similar practical jokes.<br />
<br />
And now we must grapple with Fiction. The<br />
book which headed the list of the Six Best Sellers<br />
at the end of May was Miss Johnston’s “Sir<br />
Mortimer,” a romance of Elizabethan times, Ellen<br />
Glasgow’s “The Deliverance” coming second. As<br />
to the precise altitude of literary merit reached by<br />
the first there is room for some difference of<br />
opinion ; that the second has really great dramatic<br />
power there can be none. The scene is Virginia ;<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
261<br />
<br />
the time, the reconstruction period after the Civil<br />
War ; and the central theme, the power of love to<br />
overcome the spirit of vengeance. Mrs. Atherton’s<br />
“ Rulers of Kings” will scarcely add to her reputa-<br />
tion ; but Stewart White has fully maintained his<br />
with “The Silent Places.” It is the story of two<br />
Hudson Bay Company’s runners hunting a default-<br />
ing Indian trapper, and of the passion of an<br />
Ojibway girl for one of the whites.<br />
<br />
Amongst other historical novels which attain a<br />
respectable level may be mentioned “Robert<br />
Cavelier,”’ by William Dana Orcutt; “ When<br />
Wilderness was King,” by Randall Parrish ; and<br />
George Morgan’s “The Issue,” the last and best<br />
of the three, containing some faithful descriptive<br />
passages concerning the battles and personages of<br />
the Civil War.<br />
<br />
The political novel is strongly represented by<br />
Francis Lynde’s western study called ‘The<br />
Grafters,” a well constructed if somewhat over-<br />
technical work, and by David Graham Phillip’s<br />
powerful depiction of Wall Street ways, “ The<br />
Cost.” Arthur Coton’s “ Port Argent’ also deals<br />
largely in matters political. One may express a<br />
hope, fond and foolish as it may seem, that such<br />
books as these may have power enough to react a<br />
little upon public opinion.<br />
<br />
Promising first appearances in fiction have been<br />
made by Mrs. Beatrice Demarest Lloyd and Miss<br />
Margery Williams ; “ The Pastime of Eternity ” is<br />
the imposing title given by the former to her tale<br />
of incompatible temperaments.<br />
<br />
“The Price of Youth” is rather audacious in<br />
places, and perhaps a little reminiscent in others,<br />
but has genuine pathos, and fidelity to the life<br />
described, though the writer, we understand, is an<br />
Englishwoman.<br />
<br />
Miss Miriam Michelson has made an undoubted<br />
hit with her “In the Bishop’s Carriage,” whose<br />
heroine is a thief who gets caught by a theatrical<br />
manager and converted—into an actress. The<br />
Bishop’s carriage has little to do with the main<br />
interest of the story ; but it is probable that the<br />
poster which pourtrays the incident connected with<br />
it is having much to do with its financial success.<br />
<br />
Another book which has “caught on” mightily<br />
is the versatile Mr, Severy’s detective story, “The<br />
Darrow Enigma.” Melvin L. Severy has tried his<br />
hand with some success not only at journalism,<br />
playwriting and art, but has also devoted himself<br />
to science and patented various inventions.<br />
<br />
Finally Mrs. Edith Wharton has published a<br />
volume of striking short stories; George Burr<br />
McCutcheon has made a hero of a dog, though<br />
quite unlike that of the author of “The Call of<br />
the Wild” ; Byron’s career has been embodied in<br />
fiction in Miss Rives’s “The Castaway” ; and<br />
Winston Churchill has followed up “ The Crisis”<br />
<br />
<br />
262<br />
<br />
and “ Richard Carvel” with a new romance, “ The<br />
Crossing.” :<br />
<br />
The Japanese novel has also made its first<br />
appearance in English through the enterprise of<br />
American publishers.<br />
<br />
Our obituary list is happily a short one. It<br />
includes, besides Edgar Fawcett, a poet and novelist,<br />
who died in England, Guy Webmore Carryl, best<br />
known by his collection of Parisian stories, entitled<br />
“Zut,” aman who seemed but at the threshold of<br />
a brilliant career; Mrs. Abby Morton Diaz, author<br />
of some successful books for children; Mrs.<br />
Sarah Jane Lippincott, who wrote under the name<br />
of Grace Greenwood, and founded ‘The Pilgrim ” ;<br />
and Colonel Augustus C. Buell, the biographer of<br />
Paul Jones and Sir William Johnson. To these<br />
should perhaps be added the widow of Nathaniel<br />
P. Willis, though she was not an author, and<br />
Mrs. Clemens.<br />
<br />
Se<br />
<br />
LEGAL NOTES.<br />
<br />
——+—<br />
What’s in a Name?<br />
<br />
VENTURED to discuss in last month’s Author<br />
the position of the writer of a new book with<br />
regard to a title which has been used before<br />
<br />
by another writer, and to suggest that in most<br />
cases the new writer can afford to disregard the<br />
previous one, on the ground that the author of a<br />
book which has been published has only a right to<br />
prevent another from using his title in certain<br />
circumstances. The author of the previous work<br />
apparently can do this when he can show that<br />
his book is known to the public by the name which<br />
he has given to it, and that his market is likely to<br />
be interfered with by a new book which may be<br />
mistaken for his, but not otherwise. The device<br />
used by some newspaper owners of publishing<br />
dummy copies in order to protect a title of which<br />
they claim to have the monopoly, is useless for any<br />
practical legal purpose.<br />
<br />
I take it, however, that the author (or the owner<br />
of the copyright or right to publish) would have<br />
the right to prevent another book from being sold<br />
under the name of his, in any case where his book<br />
was being publicly bought and sold ; it would not<br />
be necessary for him to show that it was being sold<br />
by the original publisher at the time. He might<br />
have produced a limited edition, the price of which<br />
was daily rising, and the sale and reputation of<br />
which would be injured by the new book annexing<br />
the well known name. In the case of plays, the<br />
fact that a play can be revived at any time is of<br />
course material. No one would be justified in<br />
bringing out a new play and calling it “Hast<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Lynne” or “The Importance of being Earnest,”<br />
and because at that time no play of the name was<br />
being performed. It would be a question of fact<br />
for the tribunal hearing the case, should an action<br />
be brought, whether the book or play in question<br />
was so far alive or liable to be revived as to be<br />
entitled to protection.<br />
<br />
Sometimes the question is asked whether a<br />
person publishing a book of a different kind from<br />
another under a similar title could be prevented<br />
from doing so. Presumably, if the sale of the<br />
second book is likely to interfere with that of the<br />
first from their being mistaken for one another,<br />
the use of the title causing the confusion could<br />
be prevented. In this case it would again be a<br />
question of fact how far the error would be possible.<br />
<br />
A title must often be equally applicable to two<br />
books of a totally different character. Suppose<br />
that at the time when “‘ Vanity Fair” was begin-<br />
ning to enjoy fame, a popular preacher in a West<br />
End church had chosen to bring out a book of<br />
sermons with the same name, an old lady writing<br />
to her library for “ Vanity Fair” (the sermons)<br />
might have received Mr. Thackeray’s masterpiece,<br />
and never have read, the sermons at all; or another<br />
having been recommended the novel might by a<br />
similar mistake have received the sermons and,.<br />
obedient to their precepts, might never have<br />
opened a book of romance again. It is certainly<br />
not easy to lay down any rule to the effect that<br />
books of similar titles upon different subjects will<br />
not clash with one another.<br />
<br />
If, however, the state of things is simply this,<br />
that the writer of a new work must not use a title<br />
that will interfere with the prosperity of an existing<br />
one, it seems fairly clear that the legal right to<br />
prevent the adoption of a title cannot often belong<br />
to those who claim it. This was suggested in the<br />
last issue of Zhe Author, but I should like to lay<br />
emphasis upon it. What really belongs to the<br />
previous author in most cases is simply the power<br />
to annoy, and possibly the opportunity to exact a<br />
small payment as compensation for an imaginary<br />
wrong, a payment, however, which could not be<br />
enforced in a Court of law.<br />
<br />
There is a conceivable case in which the author<br />
of a dead book might bring out a new edition for no<br />
other purpose than to interfere with the sale of the:<br />
new one, and it would be very difficult to prevent<br />
him from doing so, and from thus supplying some<br />
evidence of vitality. Should this occur it would<br />
not be easy to prove that the re-publication was:<br />
only for the purpose of extorting compensation,<br />
and the possibility of such a thing being done is a.<br />
contingency to be reckoned with.<br />
<br />
It must be conceded therefore, that however:<br />
seldom the author of a book who has inadvertently<br />
taken the title of another, which he has never<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
.<br />
a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
heard of before, can be prevented legally from<br />
proceeding to use it, no one would willingly or<br />
wittingly choose a name already used if he had<br />
any means ready to his hand of ascertaining the<br />
previous use. The remedies suggested seem to be<br />
twofold, namely, a full official list of all names<br />
made use of, or secondly, a system of formal<br />
registration conveying some right of protection such<br />
as is conferred by registration upon owners of<br />
registered trade marks and devices, or names used<br />
as such.<br />
<br />
With regard to the mere official recording of<br />
published names there are a few observations<br />
to be made. Supposing such a list were to be<br />
compiled, it would be a very long one, even if it only<br />
contained the books separately published in each<br />
year, but probably it would have to contain more<br />
than this. Books serialised would have to go in,<br />
and so would short stories and articles. I gave<br />
the instance of my own experience when the author<br />
of a short story, who said (no doubt trulv) that<br />
she was going to republish it, caused my publisher<br />
to insist on my altering the name of a novel which<br />
had been already announced for publication. In<br />
order to prevent this, I should, I suppose, had<br />
such lists as those imagined been in existence,<br />
have had to look through them for ten or twenty<br />
years back, a search which would have been<br />
certainly tiresome and possibly useless for practical<br />
purposes. Take such a title as “Some Emotions<br />
and a Moral.? Under what word would it be<br />
indexed? If tabulated only under the first word,<br />
“Some,” the person desirous of publishing “ An<br />
Emotion and a Moral,” would miss finding it, as he<br />
would have only looked under the word “ An.”<br />
And yet this latter title would clearly be liable to<br />
be mistaken, and its use would be indefensible.<br />
Tf more than one of the elements were indexed, so<br />
that “Some Emotions and a Moral,” would be<br />
found under “Some,” under “Emotion,” and<br />
under “Moral,” the list would be increased still<br />
more, and the staff of clerks necessary to keep it<br />
complete, orderly, and up-to-date would have to<br />
be a large one. In urging the making of such a<br />
list officially as a remedy for the existing grievance,<br />
it must be remembered that the cure proposed<br />
should be a practical one, such as Parliament would<br />
be likely to adopt. It is not easy to show that<br />
the receipt of a book would compensate a public<br />
or national library for the trouble and expense of<br />
indexing its title, and enabling searchers to have<br />
access to the list thus compiled. It is still more<br />
difficult to argue that the receipt of a threepenny<br />
magazine or a halfpenny newspaper should reward<br />
the public institution for selecting from its con-<br />
tents the titles which ought to be recorded.<br />
<br />
This refers to the mere recording of titles<br />
officially without the concurrence or assistance of<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 263<br />
<br />
the authors or publishers. The regis/ration of titles<br />
by authors, so that only those registering shall<br />
acquire a right to use and to protect those titles is<br />
a larger question, the discussion of which I propose<br />
to defer.<br />
<br />
E. A. ARMSTRONG.<br />
<br />
— oe<br />
<br />
The “ Encyclopedia Britannica” in Canada.<br />
<br />
A. & CG. Buack v. THe Iupeertan Book CoMPANY<br />
or TORONTO.<br />
<br />
Wuen the judgment in this important action<br />
was delivered (January, 1903) the present writer<br />
at least thought the world had heard the last<br />
of it. The Imperial Book Company, however,<br />
took it to appeal, and it has now once more been<br />
determined in favour of the English publishers,<br />
Messrs. Adam and Charles Black. As the case<br />
was commented upon at some length in Zhe Author<br />
for April of last year, it is not proposed to repeat<br />
here all the old arguments over the old issues, but<br />
only to consider such parts of it as have acquired<br />
a fresh importance at the appeal trial. And first<br />
the case may be briefly stated.<br />
<br />
Messrs. A. & GC. Black, the owners of the<br />
“Encyclopedia Britannica,” had authorised the<br />
Clark Company of Toronto to publish that work<br />
in Canada, and this firm was actually publishing it<br />
when it was found that another company—The<br />
Imperial Book Company—was importing into<br />
Canada for sale their copies of the same work<br />
printed in the United States. To the action—for<br />
injunction, delivery up of the piracies, and account<br />
of profits—which followed, the defence made by the<br />
Imperial Book Company was shortly as follows :—<br />
<br />
1. That the Copyright Act is not in force in<br />
Canada.<br />
<br />
2. That a certificate of registration at Stationers’<br />
Hall is not (even in the absence of rebutting evi-<br />
dence) proof of ownership of copyright.<br />
<br />
3. That Messrs. Black, having assigned their<br />
copyright to the Clark Company, could not sue ;<br />
and that the Clark Company, not having registered<br />
the assignment, likewise could not maintain the<br />
action.<br />
<br />
4, That notice had not been properly given to<br />
the Customs, as required by the Customs Laws<br />
Consolidation Act, 1876 (39 & 40 Vict. c. 36, s. 152)<br />
<br />
There were other minor and technical points<br />
raised ; but these were the clear issues, a decision<br />
favourable to the defendants, upon any one of<br />
which would have destroyed Messrs. Black’s right<br />
to their property in Canada. The judge below<br />
<br />
decided adversely to the defendants upon all of<br />
them, the fourth point evidently giving him the<br />
264<br />
<br />
most trouble. And this fourth point again became<br />
the real question upon which the case turned at<br />
the appeal trial, two judges out of three (Moss,<br />
C.J.0., Maclennan and Maclaren, JJ.A.: April<br />
19th, 1904) devoting their judgments entirely to<br />
it; and one out of three dissenting from the<br />
opinion of the other two, and being in favour of<br />
reversing the judgment of the Court below. It<br />
may be assumed that the learned judges were in<br />
agreement on all the other points.<br />
<br />
Well, then, as to this fourth point. The question<br />
was: Should Messrs. Black have given proper<br />
notice to the Customs that they wished to bar the<br />
importation of these “ Encyclopedias,” printed<br />
without their authority, into Canada? They said<br />
“No”; The Imperial Book Company said “ Yes.”<br />
Two of the judges said “No”; the third said<br />
“Yes.” Tt all turned on the construction of<br />
Sections 151 and 152 of the Customs Act. Section<br />
152 expressly states that notice must be given.<br />
But Section 151 states as expressly that the Customs<br />
Acts are to apply to all British Possessions except<br />
such as shall by local Act or ordinance make entire<br />
provision for the management and regulation of the<br />
Customs of any such Possession, or make, nm like<br />
manner, express provisions in lieu or variation of<br />
any of the clauses of the saad Act.<br />
<br />
Was Canada such a Possession? Moss, C.J.,<br />
said “Yes”; Maclennan, J.A., said “Yes” ;<br />
Maclaren, J.A., said “No.” As this is the sole<br />
question upon which the judgment turned, so it is<br />
the sole question in the case which demands of the<br />
interested reader some attention before he can<br />
master the reasons for and against it ; because, in<br />
dissenting from his learned brothers, the last judge<br />
showed very skilfully how a Copyright Act may<br />
get confused with a Customs Act, resulting in<br />
serious differences of opinion in construing them,<br />
as in the present case.<br />
<br />
Now Section 151 of the Act says, “ Such Posses-<br />
sion as shall make entire provision for the regula-<br />
tion of its Customs.” “ But,” asked Maclaren, J.A.,<br />
“is Section 152 to be regarded as part ofa Customs<br />
Actatall 2?” Isit not an amendment of the English<br />
Copyright Act ? Section 17 of that Act states at<br />
large that piracies must not be imported; it<br />
savs nothing about notice to the Customs.<br />
Then comes this Section 152 of the Customs Act,<br />
cutting down the right given by making notice<br />
necessary. Well, then, is not this Section 152<br />
really a Copyright Act? But, if so, it does not<br />
matter how much provision Canada might have<br />
made for the regulation of her Customs—this<br />
Section 152 is outside her control ; in other words,<br />
the notice required by it should have been given.<br />
But, again, Section 151 says: ‘‘ Such Possession as<br />
shall make entire provision for the regulation of its<br />
Customs.” And Canada had made, in regard to<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the importation of books, no provision at all!<br />
Therefore, again, Section 151 does not operate to<br />
exclude Canada from the effect of Section 152.<br />
<br />
The opinion of the dissenting judge has here<br />
been given first, in order that the judgment of the<br />
agreeing judges may be more easily grasped as by<br />
way of reply to it. The Chief Justice said :<br />
<br />
“ Section 152 undoubtedly forms part of the<br />
Customs Act... and I do not see how it<br />
can be separated from Section 151 . . . which<br />
nowhere says that it is when the British<br />
Possession has provided protection for the<br />
owners of copyrights that the exception is to<br />
take effect.”<br />
<br />
That is to say: Whether Canada had or had not<br />
made provision for the regulation of copyright is<br />
not the question. She had made provision for the<br />
regulation of her Customs ; these provisions did<br />
not happen to touch the present case ; but the fact<br />
of her having made them excludes her from the<br />
effect of Section 152 by bringing her under the<br />
operation of Section 151.<br />
<br />
In like manner Maclennan, J.A. :<br />
<br />
“Tt is argued that Section 152 is not a<br />
Customs but a Copyright Act . . . and that,<br />
therefore, it applies to Canada notwithstanding<br />
Section 151... . Itis also argued that Section<br />
17 of the Copyright Actis also a Customs Act,<br />
and is withheld from application to Canada by<br />
Section 151, in which case importation would<br />
no longer be illegal! I cannot agree with<br />
either contention. Section 17 provides against<br />
importation into England and the British<br />
Possessions. . . - If all the Customs Acts<br />
were repealed this enactment would not be<br />
effected. ... No more is Section 152 a<br />
Copyright Act, nor less part of a Customs Act<br />
because, in order to facilitate the transaction<br />
of Customs business, it permits the importation<br />
of copyright works as a penalty for omitting<br />
to give notice. . . . Section 152 is applicable<br />
to the United Kingdom, and to all British<br />
Possessions as have not made provision for the<br />
regulation of their own Customs, but it is not<br />
applicable to Canada.”<br />
<br />
To the student of Copyright law and its intricacies.<br />
it may still seem a trifle doubtful as to which side<br />
has the better of what is after all a mere technical<br />
point, and he may look forward still to seeing the<br />
case before the Privy Council. There will, however,<br />
be little doubt as to which side is in the right.<br />
The space at disposal does not permit of reference<br />
to the other chief but simpler points in the case,<br />
all of which underwent clear and thorough elucida-<br />
tion at the hands of the learned judges. Particularly<br />
interesting and lucid was the distinction which<br />
Judge-Advocate Maclennan drew between an<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
assignment and a licence ; and Mr. MacGillivray<br />
came in for another compliment in being quoted<br />
by the Court of Appeal as well as in the Court<br />
below.<br />
<br />
CHARLES WEEKES.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
COPYRIGHT LEGISLATION IN THE 58TH<br />
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES.<br />
<br />
—_e<br />
<br />
(From The United States Publishers’ Weekly).<br />
<br />
F the bills to amend the Revised Statutes<br />
relating to copyrights only one became law,<br />
namely, that providing for copyright pro-<br />
<br />
tection to exhibitors at St. Louis.<br />
<br />
The amendment to Section 4952 of the Revised<br />
Statutes, making provision for an extension of the<br />
present system of providing for authorised transla-<br />
tions, was favourably reported in both houses, but<br />
did not secure a vote.<br />
<br />
Bill 5314, introduced in the Senate by Mr. Platt,<br />
of Connecticut, to limit free importation of books<br />
copyrighted in the United States, was read twice<br />
and referred to the Committee on Patents. The<br />
modification, given below in italics, occurs in<br />
Chapter 3, Section 4956 :<br />
<br />
“ . . but the privilege accorded to certain institu-<br />
tions, under paragraph 515 of Section two of the said<br />
Act, to import, free of duty, not more than two copies<br />
of books, maps, lithographic prints and charts, shall<br />
apply to the importation of books, maps, lithographac<br />
prints and charts, which have been copyrighted in the<br />
United States, only when holders of the American<br />
copyrights thereof in writing consent to such importa-<br />
tion; and except in the case of persons purchasing<br />
for use and not for sale, who import subject to the<br />
duty thereon and with the written consent of the<br />
holders of the American copyrights, not more than<br />
two copies of such book at any one time.”<br />
<br />
The Bill No. 13355, introduced in the House by<br />
Mr. Tawney, requiring the filing of proof that<br />
copyright books, etc., are printed from type set<br />
within the limits of the United States and provid-<br />
ing a penalty for the making of false proof or<br />
wilful failure to comply with the condition of the<br />
present law, passed the House, but did not reach<br />
the Senate. ‘The amendment was proposed to take<br />
the place of the last two provisions of Section 4956,<br />
and reads as follows :<br />
<br />
“That accompanying the two copies of the<br />
book, photo, chromo or lithograph required to be<br />
delivered or deposited, as herein provided, there<br />
shall be an affidavit under the official seal of any<br />
officer authorised to administer oaths within the<br />
United States, duly made by the person desiring<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
265<br />
<br />
the said copyright or by his duly authorised agent or<br />
representative residing in the United States, setting<br />
forth that the two copies required to be so deposited<br />
have been printed from type set within the limits<br />
of the United States or from plates made there-<br />
from or from negatives or drawings on stone made<br />
within the limits of the United States or from<br />
transfers made therefrom; and the place within<br />
the limits of the United States at which such type<br />
was set, or plates or negatives were made, and by<br />
whom.<br />
<br />
“Sec, 2. That any person violating any of the<br />
provisions of this Act or who shall be guilty of<br />
making a false affidavit as to his having complied<br />
with the conditions thereof for the purpose of<br />
obtaining a copyright shall be deemed guilty of<br />
a misdemeanour, and upon conviction thereof shall<br />
be punished by a fine of not more than one thou-<br />
sand dollars, and of all his rights and privileges<br />
under said copyright shall thereafter be forfeited.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Otis, from the Committee on Patents, sub-<br />
mitted a report on Mr. Tawney’s amendment, which<br />
concludes as follows :<br />
<br />
“The law now provides that no person shall be<br />
entitled to a copyright unless he shall on or before<br />
the day of publication in this or any foreign<br />
country deliver at the office of the Librarian of<br />
Congress or deposit in the mail within the United<br />
States addressed to the Librarian of Congress a<br />
printed copy of the title of his publication or other<br />
matter for which he applies for copyright. He is<br />
also required by the existing law, not later than<br />
the day of publication, to deposit with the Librarian<br />
of Congress two copies of such copyright book,<br />
map, chart, etc., and the law expressly provides<br />
that these two copies ‘shall be printed from type<br />
set within the limits of the United States, or from<br />
plates made therefrom, or from negatives or<br />
drawings on stone made within the limits of the<br />
United States, or from transfers made therefrom.’<br />
The law which thus requires the deposit of two<br />
copies of the publication and that the same shall<br />
be printed from type set within the limits of the<br />
United States, etc., before a copyright can be<br />
obtained, does not require any proof to be filed<br />
that such books have been thus printed within the<br />
limits of the United States, nor does it impose any<br />
penalty whatever upon an author or publisher who<br />
obtains a copyright without having first complied<br />
with this condition as to the printing from type set<br />
within the limits of the United States.<br />
<br />
“ After investigation your committee have reason<br />
to believe that it is not only possible, but that in<br />
some instances the present law has been evaded<br />
and violated to the injary of American labour, and<br />
that this can be done with comparative ease under<br />
the existing law ; that there is no remedy and no<br />
means of enforcing this condition as to printing<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
264<br />
<br />
most trouble. And this fourth point again became<br />
the real question upon which the case turned at<br />
the appeal trial, two judges out of three (Moss,<br />
C.J.O., Maclennan and Maclaren, JJ.A.: April<br />
19th, 1904) devoting their judgments entirely to<br />
it; and one out of three dissenting from the<br />
opinion of the other two, and being in favour of<br />
reversing the judgment of the Court below. It<br />
may be assumed that the learned judges were in<br />
agreement on all the other points.<br />
<br />
Well, then, as to this fourth point. The question<br />
was: Should Messrs. Black have given proper<br />
notice to the Customs that they wished to bar the<br />
importation of these “ Encyclopedias,” printed<br />
without their authority, into Canada? They said<br />
“No”; The Imperial Book Company said “ Yes.”<br />
Two of the judges said “No”; the third said<br />
“Yes.” Jt all turned on the construction of<br />
Sections 151 and 152 of the Customs Act. Section<br />
152 expressly states that notice must be given.<br />
But Section 151 states as expressly that the Customs<br />
Acts are to apply to all British Possessions except<br />
such as shall by local Act or ordinance make entire<br />
provision for the management and regulation of the<br />
Customs of any such Possession, or make, in like<br />
manner, express provisions in lieu or variation of<br />
any. of the clauses of the said Act.<br />
<br />
Was Canada such a Possession? Moss, C.J.,<br />
said ‘“ Yes”; Maclennan, J.A., said “Yes”;<br />
Maclaren, J.A., said “No.” As this is the sole<br />
question upon which the judgment turned, so it is<br />
the sole question in the case which demands of the<br />
interested reader some attention before he can<br />
master the reasons for and against it; because, in<br />
dissenting from his learned brothers, the last judge<br />
showed very skilfully how a Copyright Act may<br />
get confused with a Customs Act, resulting in<br />
serious differences of opinion in construing them,<br />
as in the present case.<br />
<br />
Now Section 151 of the Act says, “ Such Posses-<br />
sion as shall make entire provision for the regula-<br />
tion ofits Customs.” “But,” asked Maclaren, J.A.,<br />
“tis Section 152 to be regarded as part of a Customs<br />
Actatall 2?” Isit not an amendment of the English<br />
Copyright Act? Section 17 of that Act states at<br />
large that piracies must not be imported; it<br />
says nothing about notice to the Customs.<br />
Then comes this Section 152 of the Customs Act,<br />
cutting down the right given by making notice<br />
necessary. Well, then, is not this Nection 152<br />
really a Copyright Act? But, if so, it does not<br />
matter how much provision Canada might have<br />
made for the regulation of her Customs—this<br />
Section 152 is outside her control ; in other words,<br />
the notice required by it should have been given.<br />
But, again, Section 151 says: ‘“‘ Such Possession as<br />
shall make entire provision for the regulation of its<br />
Customs.” And Canada had made, in regard to<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the importation of books, no provision at all!<br />
Therefore, again, Section 151 does not operate to<br />
exclude Canada from the effect of Section 152.<br />
<br />
The opinion of the dissenting judge has here<br />
been given first, in order that the judgment of the<br />
agreeing judges may be more easily grasped as by<br />
way of reply to it. The Chief Justice said :<br />
<br />
“Section 152 undoubtedly forms part of the<br />
Customs Act... and I do not see how it<br />
can be separated from Section 151 . . . which<br />
nowhere says that it is when the British<br />
Possession has provided protection for the<br />
owners of copyrights that the exception is to<br />
take effect.”<br />
<br />
That is to say: Whether Canada had or had not<br />
made provision for the regulation of copyright is<br />
not the question. She had made provision for the<br />
regulation of her Customs ; these provisions did<br />
not happen to touch the present case; but the fact<br />
of her having made them excludes her from the<br />
effect of Section 152 by bringing her under the<br />
operation of Section 151.<br />
<br />
In like manner Maclennan, J.A. :<br />
<br />
“Tt is argued that Section 152 is not a<br />
Customs but a Copyright Act . . . and that,<br />
therefore, it applies to Canada notwithstanding<br />
Section 151... . Itis also argued that Section<br />
17 of the Copyright Actis also a Customs Act,<br />
and is withheld from application to Canada by<br />
Section 151, in which case importation would<br />
no longer be illegal! JI cannot agree with<br />
either contention. Section 17 provides against<br />
importation into England and the British<br />
Possessions. . . . If all the Customs Acts<br />
were repealed this enactment would not be<br />
effected. ... No more is Section 152 a<br />
Copyright Act, nor less part of a Customs Act<br />
because, in order to facilitate the transaction<br />
of Customs business, it permits the importation<br />
of copyright works as a penalty for omitting<br />
to give notice. . . . Section 152 is applicable<br />
to the United Kingdom, and to all British<br />
Possessions as have not made provision for the —<br />
regulation of their own Customs, but it is nob<br />
applicable to Canada.”<br />
<br />
To the student of Copyright law and its intricacies<br />
it may still seem a trifle doubtful as to which side<br />
has the better of what is after all a mere technical<br />
point, and he may look forward still to seeing the<br />
case before the Privy Council. There will, however,<br />
be little doubt as to which side is in the right.<br />
The space at disposal does not permit of reference —<br />
to the other chief but simpler points in the case, —<br />
all of which underwent clear and thorough elucida-<br />
tion at the hands of the learned judges. Particularly -<br />
interesting and lucid was the distinction which —<br />
Judge-Advocate Maclennan drew between an<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
assignment and a licence; and Mr. MacGillivray<br />
came in for another compliment in being quoted<br />
by the Court of Appeal as well as in the Court<br />
below.<br />
<br />
CHARLES WEEKES.<br />
<br />
of 6<br />
<br />
COPYRIGHT LEGISLATION IN THE 58TH<br />
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES.<br />
<br />
—“~-<br />
<br />
(From The United States Publishers’ Weekly).<br />
<br />
F the bills to amend the Revised Statutes<br />
relating to copyrights only one became law,<br />
namely, that providing for copyright pro-<br />
<br />
tection to exhibitors at St. Louis.<br />
<br />
The amendment to Section 4952 of the Revised<br />
Statutes, making provision for an extension of the<br />
present system of providing for authorised transla-<br />
tions, was favourably reported in both houses, but<br />
did not secure a vote.<br />
<br />
Bill 5314, introduced in the Senate by Mr. Platt,<br />
of Connecticut, to limit free importation of books<br />
copyrighted in the United States, was read twice<br />
and referred to the Committee on Patents. The<br />
modification, given below in italics, occurs in<br />
Chapter 3, Section 4956 :<br />
<br />
“ . . but the privilege accorded to certain institu-<br />
tions, under paragraph 515 of Section two of the said<br />
Act, to import, free of duty, not more than two copies<br />
of books, maps, lithographic prints and charts, shall<br />
apply to the importation of books, maps, lithographic<br />
prints and charts, which have been copyrighted in the<br />
United States, only when holders of the American<br />
copyrights thereof in writing consent to such importa-<br />
tion; and except in the case of persons purchasing<br />
for use and not for sale, who import subject to the<br />
duty thereon and with the written consent of the<br />
holders of the American copyrights, not more than<br />
two copies of such book at any one time.”<br />
<br />
The Bill No. 13355, introduced in the House by<br />
Mr. Tawney, requiring the filing of proof that<br />
copyright books, etc., are printed from type set<br />
within the limits of the United States and provid-<br />
ing a penalty for the making of false proof or<br />
wilful failure to comply with the condition of the<br />
present law, passed the House, but did not reach<br />
the Senate. The amendment was proposed to take<br />
the place of the last two provisions of Section 4956,<br />
and reads as follows :<br />
<br />
“That accompanying the two copies of the<br />
book, photo, chromo or lithograph required to be<br />
delivered or deposited, as herein provided, there<br />
shall be an affidavit under the official seal of any<br />
officer authorised to administer oaths within the<br />
United States, duly made by the person desiring<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
265<br />
<br />
the said copyright or by his duly authorised agent or<br />
representative residing in the United States, setting<br />
forth that the two copies required to be so deposited<br />
have been printed from type set within the limits<br />
of the United States or from plates made there-<br />
from or from negatives or drawings on stone made<br />
within the limits of the United States or from<br />
transfers made therefrom; and the place within<br />
the limits of the United States at which such type<br />
was set, or plates or negatives were made, and by<br />
whom. :<br />
<br />
“Sec. 2. That any person violating any of the<br />
provisions of this Act or who shall be guilty of<br />
making a false affidavit as to his having complied<br />
with the conditions thereof for the purpose of<br />
obtaining a copyright shall be deemed guilty of<br />
a misdemeanour, and upon conviction thereof shall<br />
be punished by a fine of not more than one thou-<br />
sand dollars, and of all his rights and privileges<br />
under said copyright shall thereafter be forfeited.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Otis, from the Committee on Patents, sub-<br />
mitted a report on Mr. Tawney’s amendment, which<br />
concludes as follows :<br />
<br />
“The law now provides that no person shall be<br />
entitled to a copyright unless he shall on or before<br />
the day of publication in this or any foreign<br />
country deliver at the office of the Librarian of<br />
Congress or deposit in the mail within the United<br />
States addressed to the Librarian of Congress a<br />
printed copy of the title of his publication or other<br />
matter for which he applies for copyright. He is<br />
also required by the existing law, not later than<br />
the day of publication, to deposit with the Librarian<br />
of Congress two copies of such copyright book,<br />
map, chart, etc., and the law expressly provides<br />
that these two copies ‘shall be printed from type<br />
set within the limits of the United States, or from<br />
plates made therefrom, or from negatives or<br />
drawings on stone made within the limits of the<br />
United States, or from transfers made therefrom.’<br />
The law which thus requires the deposit of two<br />
copies of the publication and that the same shall<br />
be printed from type set within the limits of the<br />
United States, etc., before a copyright can be<br />
obtained, does not require any proof to be filed<br />
that such books have been thus printed within the<br />
limits of the United States, nor does it impose any<br />
penalty whatever upon an author or publisher who<br />
obtains a copyright without having first complied<br />
with this condition as to the printing from type set<br />
within the limits of the United States.<br />
<br />
« After investigation your committee have reason<br />
to believe that it is not only possible, but that in<br />
some instances the present law has been evaded<br />
and violated to the injury of American labour, and<br />
that this can be done with comparative ease under<br />
the existing law ; that there is no remedy and no<br />
means of enforcing this condition as to printing<br />
<br />
<br />
(266<br />
<br />
from type set by American labour and within our<br />
own country. That being the case, your committee<br />
is of the opinion that the person applying for a<br />
copyright should be required as a condition prece-<br />
dent to furnish proof in the form of an affidavit<br />
that all of these conditions with respect to the<br />
labour employed in the printing and the place of<br />
printing the copies of books to be deposited have<br />
been complied with, and in the event that any<br />
false statement is made in said affidavit concerning<br />
a material fact, and upon conviction thereof, the<br />
person thus attempting to obtain a copyright<br />
should be punished and the copyright forfeited.”<br />
<br />
oo —<br />
CoMMENT.<br />
<br />
Tue United States publishers have always been<br />
to the fore in promoting satisfactory Copyright<br />
Legislation, but the heart of the politician is<br />
hardened and he still seeks to hamper the litera-<br />
ture of his own country for the benefit of the<br />
printer and typesetter.<br />
<br />
Commenting on the question of extended trans-<br />
lation rights The Publishers’ Weekly states as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
“It is certainly to be hoped that some relief will be<br />
given to foreign authors by replacing the requirement for<br />
simultaneous publication with a provision permitting time<br />
for making adequate arrangements between an American<br />
author and a foreign author, and for the actual work of<br />
translation. So strong has been the German feeling<br />
against the present limitation, or nullification, of pro-<br />
tection for translations, that there is a movement in<br />
Germany among authors and publishers to request the<br />
German Government to withdraw from copyright relations<br />
with this country. This would be doubly unfortunate, as<br />
it would not help here in bringing about better arrange-<br />
ments, and would definitely harm the German music and<br />
art interests, which are protected under the present<br />
copyright law.”<br />
<br />
This action on the part of Germany is the first<br />
sign of dissatisfaction with and retaliation against<br />
the United States Act. The United States<br />
publishers see the danger, and with the strenuous<br />
exertions of Mr. Putnam have succeeded for atime<br />
in removing it. If the amendment is passed Ger-<br />
many may be temporarily satisfied, though there<br />
are other nations not altogether satisfied with the<br />
so-called reciprocity created by the present Act.<br />
<br />
Ifthe amendment is not passed Germany may<br />
think fit, as she has already threatened, to cancel<br />
her treaty, and the politician will begin to reap the<br />
fruit of his hardness of heart. When the clamour<br />
of the United States authors, who are now, even<br />
under this limited protection, growing in numbers,<br />
is heard, he will perhaps realise who are the real<br />
producers of a country’s literature.<br />
<br />
The question of the importation of copies is not<br />
one of great account, and it can be passed over,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
but the question of insisting upon an affidavit being<br />
made, and an affidavit before an officer authorised<br />
to administer oaths in the United States, will not<br />
only seriously hamper all foreign authors in obtain-<br />
ing copyright, but will be another difficulty to the<br />
producers of literature in the United States itself.<br />
The Publishers’ Weekly makes the following<br />
comment :—<br />
<br />
“The proposal to require from publishers affidavits as to<br />
manufacture in this country seems to be an unnecessary<br />
annoyance, unless it can be shown that this is necessary to<br />
carry out the manufacturing clause, on which the present<br />
law is centred. We have become affidavit crazy in this<br />
country, and the number of affidavits to be taken by a<br />
business man, especially for governmental accounts, is so<br />
great that the oath has become as perfunctory as the<br />
signature of government officials. It was claimed at the<br />
hearing in this proposal that many publishers were import-<br />
ing plates as junk and printing from them copyright<br />
editions. If this can be shown to be true to any consider-<br />
able extent, that would be sufficient reason for the proposed<br />
affidavit, which otherwise would be considered unnecessary.<br />
<br />
“It is to be regretted by the friends of a true international<br />
copyright that so little progress has been made in this<br />
country since 1891 towards a better system, such as is<br />
almost universally adopted by other civilised countries<br />
under the terms of the Berne Convention. The need is<br />
generally felt, and now generally expressed, of a larger<br />
treatment of the question than is possible in piecemeal<br />
legislation, and the pressure for a copyright commission is<br />
becoming so general that before long we should see a body<br />
of experts representing the several interests involved,<br />
including those of authors and readers as well as manu-<br />
facturers, appointed by Congress or under Congressional<br />
authority by the President.’’<br />
<br />
The publishers take a clear and correct view of<br />
the situation. It is clear and correct from the<br />
standpoint of those who produce the work, from<br />
whose minds the stories are evolved, and by whose<br />
labour they are made into a marketable commodity,<br />
Germany has threatened to retaliate if the amend-<br />
ment relating to translations is not passed ; but<br />
this question of affidavits may bring forward<br />
retaliation on the part of other countries, and<br />
if the retaliation is followed by a demand for<br />
strict reciprocity, or carried further by the<br />
cancellation of the existing arrangements, the<br />
authors of the United States will find themselves<br />
face to face with the loss of a great part of their<br />
income and some of their largest markets, and the<br />
publishers with that dread competition in pirated<br />
works which was one of the reasons that caused the<br />
American trade to throw the whole of its support<br />
on the side of a satisfactory copyright law.<br />
<br />
When before 1891 piracy was legitimate, the<br />
United States had but few authors and little<br />
literature, and it was with difficulty owing to their<br />
small numbers they got a hearing for the protection<br />
of their rights, but, under this present copyright<br />
law, full of limitations as it is, the protection<br />
afforded has brought to the front many writers,<br />
and much literature, and has given a strong stimulus<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
to the publishing trade. It is not likely, therefore,<br />
that this body of writers, now numerous and<br />
influential, will allow itself tamely to be sat upon<br />
by those trades who fancy they may suffer.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the day will come when the United<br />
States as a whole will grasp the fact that the<br />
larger the protection given to their authors the<br />
greater will be the literature of their country, and,<br />
no doubt, as a corollary the greater will be the<br />
business which will accrue to the typesetter and<br />
printer.<br />
<br />
—_——_—__—_—_e——__—_<br />
THE UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT<br />
LEAGUE.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
HE American Copyright League, communi-<br />
cating with the Society, expressed a desire<br />
that the Committee of the Society of Authors<br />
<br />
should make a Report, expressing in their opinion<br />
the present difficulties existing under the United<br />
States Copyright Act.<br />
<br />
The League, however, barred from the discus-<br />
sion the question of printing in the United States.<br />
This is, of course, the most important point of<br />
difference, one which particularly needs amend-<br />
ment; but in accordance with the wishes of the<br />
American Copyright League, the Committee, after<br />
full consideration of the subject, forwarded a Report,<br />
omitting this question entirely. It may interest<br />
the members to see the points set ont in detail ;<br />
the Committee have therefore decided to print<br />
the Report with the answer of the Copyright<br />
League.<br />
<br />
It is drafted in the form of a letter from the<br />
Secretary of the British Society to the Secretary of<br />
the United States League.<br />
<br />
Report of the Copyright Sub-Committee on the Amendment<br />
of the United States Copyright Law.<br />
To<br />
THE SECRETARY THE AMERICAN COPYRIGHT LEAGUE,<br />
<br />
March 29th, 1904.<br />
<br />
DEAR §1R,—While thanking your Association once more<br />
for the desire you have expressed that the Author’s Society<br />
should send a report of its views on the amendment of the<br />
United States Copyright Act, the Committee feel that you<br />
have placed them in a somewhat difficult position by the<br />
exclusion from the discussion of the question of type-<br />
setting in the United States, the point to which, before all<br />
others, they attach the greatest importance.<br />
<br />
In accordance with the information contained in my<br />
former letter, on the authority of the Managing Com-<br />
mittee, the Copyright Sub-Committee was called together.<br />
They met at the offices of the Society on March 25th, and,<br />
after careful consideration and discussion, desire the<br />
following report to be forwarded to you.<br />
<br />
Firstly, they would place before you the question of<br />
simultaneous publication. They consider that the term<br />
should be more clearly defined, and if possible a longer<br />
period allowed for the production in the United States of<br />
<br />
267<br />
<br />
work published in England. The Committee would like to<br />
draw your attention to the definition on page 17 of the<br />
draft Bill enclosed.* This Bill embodies, so far as it goes,<br />
the present views of British authors and publishers as to<br />
the amendment of the existing British Copyright Law, and<br />
it will, no doubt, form the basis of any alteration of the<br />
law that may be passed by the Government. At present,<br />
however, there appears to be no immediate prospect of the<br />
Government taking up the matter, and the Bill is only set<br />
before you to draw your attention to various points, and to<br />
afford an example of the present trend of copyright amend-<br />
ment in this country. On page 17 referred to, you will see<br />
a proposed definition of “‘ simultaneously,’’ and the Society<br />
of Authors considers that it would be a great advantage, if,<br />
in the United States, you could put forward some similar<br />
definition. The period to be fourteen days at the least.<br />
Any longer period which might be suggested would, of<br />
course, be of still greater advantage to British authors.<br />
<br />
The second point to which the Committee would draw<br />
your attention is the duration of copyright.<br />
<br />
In the present Act of the United States, copyright exists<br />
for twenty-eight years, and for a further period of fourteen<br />
years in certain circumstanees. We would like to call<br />
your attention to Sec. 4, Sub-sec. C., of the Bill enclosed.<br />
After taking into consideration all the conflicting interests,<br />
the Committee have come to the conclusion that the best<br />
length for the duration of copyright would be the life of<br />
the author and thirty years. In some cases, no doubt,<br />
under the present British law, copyright might endure for<br />
a longer period, since, as you are no doubt aware, the<br />
present term of copyright is for forty-two years from<br />
the date of publication, or the life of the author, and<br />
seven years afterwards, whichever is the longer period,<br />
so that, in exceptional circumstances, a change in the law<br />
might reduce the term of copyright twelve years. But the<br />
Society of Authors supports the change for two reasons,<br />
firstly, it does away with the necessity of determining the<br />
exact date of publication ; secondly, it is in conformity<br />
with the period of copyright which finds most favour in<br />
European countries, and might thus, if generally adopted,<br />
form a step towards the codification of the international<br />
law on the subject.<br />
<br />
The third point to which we should like to draw attention<br />
is the necessity for a summary remedy in cases of infringe-<br />
ment of copyright and dramatic rights, in regard to which<br />
the Committee beg to refer you to page 9, Clause 25, of the<br />
Bill. It has been found on many occasions difficult to<br />
secure any adequate protection against one who infringes<br />
copyright or performing right, owing to the fact that there<br />
is no summary procedure. The Committee understand that<br />
this difficulty has also occurred in the case of infringement<br />
of dramatic rights in the United States, where an actor<br />
manager has infringed a performing right in one State, and<br />
has entered the jurisdiction of another State. With regard<br />
to musical copyright, infringement in Great Britain has<br />
been so universal, and has inflicted such a serious loss upon<br />
the holders of musical copyright property that the Govern-<br />
ment has been forced to pass a small Amending Act (see<br />
copy enclosed) by which musical copyright holders are<br />
empowered to take very stringent and summary proceedings,<br />
and a further Amending Bill is now before Parliament (see<br />
copy enclosed). Proceedings of a similar nature, we suggest,<br />
would prove a great advantage in the United States.<br />
<br />
Finally, our Committee desire to call your attention to<br />
copyright in a review or a magazine, Section 10, page 5,<br />
in order that the ownership of the copyright in these circum-<br />
stances may be more clearly defined.<br />
<br />
There is one further point, which does not so much deal<br />
with the amendment of the copyright law, as the method of<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* The Committee enclosed the final Draft of the last<br />
Copyright Bill.<br />
268<br />
<br />
administration of the present Act. An article or a book<br />
may be copyrighted in the United States as well as in<br />
England. For some reason or other there is a desire to<br />
introduce the work into the United States, printed and pro-<br />
duced in England. For this purpose the English copyright<br />
owner prints on the copy “ Copyright in the United States,”<br />
under the terms of your Act. The Custom House authorities<br />
refuse to pass the book, because of the imprint ‘* Copyright<br />
in the United States,” which they say is contrary to the<br />
law. ‘This may, no doubt, be the case ; but if, on the other<br />
hand, the book is introduced without this notice, pirates in<br />
the United States assert that they have obtained a copy<br />
which does not bear the requisite copyright notice under<br />
the Act, and that, in consequence, the copyright has not<br />
been properly secured. The pirates, therefore, consider that<br />
they are at liberty to reprint in any form they think fit.<br />
It would seem that if these literary thieves secured only<br />
one book, on which the copyright Notice was omitted,<br />
there would be a danger of the work being pirated,<br />
<br />
It must be clearly understood that in regard to simul-<br />
taneous publication, and to the duration of copyright for<br />
the life of the author and thirty years, the reforms herein<br />
suggested could not be put in operation in the United<br />
Kingdom until an amendment of the existing law had been<br />
passed.<br />
<br />
The Committee feel honoured by the distinction you<br />
have conferred upon the Society by asking its opinion on<br />
this most difficult question, and I trust that the report<br />
which they are submitting herewith, together with the<br />
draft Bill enclosed, may be of material assistance in bring-<br />
ing about some alteration in the United States Copyright<br />
Act.<br />
<br />
Believe me to be, yours very truly,<br />
G. HERBERT THRING,<br />
Secretary.<br />
<br />
April 27th, 1904.<br />
<br />
DEAR SrR,—At a meeting of the Executive Council of<br />
the American Copyright League held yesterday, I had the<br />
honour of presenting your letter of March 29th, 1904,<br />
which was carefully considered by the Council. On behalf<br />
of the Council I thank your Society for your attention to<br />
our request, and also for the drafts of the proposed British<br />
copyright legislation. Your Society’s suggestions will be<br />
given full attention in any legislation covering the scope<br />
of them.<br />
<br />
On one point I may call the attention of your Committee<br />
to a misapprehension. There is no lack of protective<br />
legislation in this country relative to the infringement<br />
of dramatic rights. The Society of Dramatic Authors,<br />
supported by this League, some years ago procured from<br />
Congress a Bill enabling the process of one judicial district<br />
to be enforced against a violation of copyright law in<br />
another district, thus putting an end to the previous<br />
security of the one-night stand pirate, whose peripatetic<br />
offences against the law could not be promptly reached.<br />
In addition to this there are eight of our States in which<br />
special legislation has been passed, making it a misdemeanor<br />
to produce plays without permission of the owner of the<br />
copyright, and this legislation is likely to be still further<br />
extended. You will therefore see that there is really<br />
nothing left to be done in the matter of American security<br />
for dramatic copyright. This is the only form of copyright<br />
invasion which is an offence against both the civil and the<br />
criminal law,<br />
<br />
T am, indeed,<br />
<br />
Very respectfully yours,<br />
<br />
R. U, JOHNSON,<br />
Secretary.<br />
G, HERBERT THRING, Esq.,<br />
<br />
Secretary Incorporated Society of Authors,<br />
<br />
39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s Gate, 8. W.,<br />
London, England.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
<br />
— +<br />
<br />
THE BOOKMAN,<br />
<br />
Three Nature Writers — ‘ Isaac<br />
<br />
| Walton,’ “ Gilbert<br />
White,” “ Richard Jefferies.”<br />
<br />
By G. Forrester Scott,<br />
<br />
BLACKWOOD’sS MAGAZINE,<br />
A Scottish Philosopher's Autobiography.<br />
The late Prof. York Powell.<br />
In “ Musings without Method,’’<br />
Mr. Boutmy’s Generalisations,<br />
A Great Proconsul.<br />
<br />
THE CONTEMPORARY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Frances Power Cobbe. By the Rev. John Verschoyle.<br />
The Riddle of the Universe. By Prof. C. Lloyd Morgan,<br />
Jean Louis Nicode, By A. E, Keeton.<br />
<br />
THE CORNHILL MAGAZINE.<br />
<br />
Sir John Moore.<br />
Maxwell, Bart.<br />
<br />
By the Right Honble. Sir Herbert<br />
<br />
THE FORTNIGHTLY.<br />
Shakespeare's Protestantism. By W. 8. Lilly.<br />
Herbert Spencer : His Autobiography and his Philosophy.<br />
By Francis Gribble,<br />
The Prologue of Arcturus. By Edmund Gosse.<br />
The Plague of Novels. By J. Cuthbert Hadden.<br />
<br />
INDEPENDENT REVIEW.<br />
Leslie Stephen, By Sir Frederick Pollock.<br />
Mr, Sturge Moore’s Poems. By Robert Trevelyan,<br />
MACMILLAN’S MAGAZINE,<br />
<br />
The Girlhood of George Sand.<br />
<br />
THE MONTHLY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
A Note on Leslie Stephen. By R. E. Crook.<br />
<br />
Thackeray's Boyhood. By the late Rev, Whitwell<br />
Elwin,<br />
<br />
John Dyer.<br />
<br />
Frederick York Powell.<br />
<br />
By J. C. Bailey.<br />
By Theodore Andrea Cook.<br />
THE NATIONAL REVIEW.<br />
The New Ireland. By Sir Gilbert Parker.<br />
Napoleon and the United States. By J. R. Fisher,<br />
The Poet’s Diary, No. 6. Edited by Lamia,<br />
THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.<br />
How They ‘Train Actors in Paris, By Richard Whiteing.<br />
The Kingsley Novels. By Walter Frewen Lord,<br />
THE PALL MALL MAGAZINE,<br />
<br />
Our Degenerate Stage—Opinion and Suggestions of<br />
French Dramatists and Actors: M. Paul Hervien, M.<br />
Francois Coppee, M. Jules Bois, and M. Coquelin.<br />
<br />
THE WORLD'S WORK.<br />
<br />
Herbert Spencer's Life.<br />
<br />
The Making of a Time Table. By W. J. Scott.<br />
<br />
There are no articles of literary, dramatic or musical<br />
interest in Zhe Month or Longman’s Magazine.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
—+<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if @ proper price can be<br />
obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
Il. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duetion forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
III, The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth, From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Ze Author.<br />
<br />
IV. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book,<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author,<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright,<br />
<br />
s—~><br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
og<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
269<br />
<br />
: 3. There are three forms of dramatic contrac<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory, An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(>.) Sale of performi i i<br />
<br />
( p ing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale -of gross receipts<br />
<br />
t for plays<br />
<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum inadvance of percentages. A fixed<br />
<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed. :<br />
<br />
(¢.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.c., fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (@.) apply<br />
also in this case. :<br />
<br />
4. Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved. :<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time, This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance.<br />
<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘hey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration,<br />
<br />
9, Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative: that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
<br />
><br />
<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal with—performing right and copyright, He<br />
270<br />
<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
<br />
——— ee<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
1, VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
K advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor, but if there is any<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements. Fuller particulars of the Society’s work<br />
can be obtained in the Prospectus.<br />
<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
This<br />
The<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements.<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution.<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
10, The subscription to the Society is £1 4s. per<br />
annum, or £10 10s for life membership.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
—-——+ —<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic works, and when it is possible, under<br />
<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
<br />
fee is one guinea,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
+—<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
Se<br />
<br />
HE Editor of Zhe Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
Communications for Zhe Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor not later than<br />
the 21st of each month.<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
NE<br />
<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the<br />
Editor on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
—+~><br />
<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
LEGAL AND GENERAL LIFE ASSURANCE<br />
SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—+ e+ —<br />
<br />
ENSIONS to commence at any selected age,<br />
either with or without Life Assurance can<br />
be obtained from this socieiy.<br />
<br />
Full particulars can be obtained from the City<br />
Branch Manager, Legal and General Life Assurance<br />
Society, 158, Leadenhall Street, London, E.C.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
—_1~9—+—<br />
<br />
HERE has been fresh discussion raised in<br />
the papers as to the 100 best books, and<br />
various lists have been printed and various<br />
<br />
comments have been made.<br />
<br />
After all, there is only one satisfactory answer<br />
from any person who, in these days of education,<br />
has read as many as a hundred books, that is, there<br />
is only one list—his own.<br />
<br />
Tue Musical Copyright Bill is dead for the<br />
present. We chronicle the fact with regret.<br />
There will be a meeting of protest held on<br />
July 4th, in order to urge the Government, if<br />
possible, to save the Bill.<br />
<br />
We see it mentioned in one of the papers that<br />
Mr. Boosey, of Chappell & Co., states, as an argu-<br />
ment that publishers do not make handsome profits,<br />
that Messrs. Chappell & Co. only pay 5 per cent. to<br />
their ordinary shareholders, and that out of 100<br />
songs published last year only ten paid for the<br />
cost of printing, circulating and advertising. It<br />
would appear that this is rather an argument that<br />
some publishers are bad tradesmen and do not<br />
know their business; and not that music publishing<br />
cannot bring in profits if conducted on proper<br />
lines. It is most unsatisfactory for composers<br />
that publishers should continue this gambling<br />
with the composer’s property. It ruins the<br />
publishing business, and necessitates those<br />
terrible contracts against which we have often<br />
inveighed, on one of which we comment in this<br />
issue. When will composers make a_ united<br />
endeavour to resist this method of doing business ?<br />
<br />
From a cutting in the Lilerary World it appears<br />
that the articles in The Author on Agents, signed<br />
«G. H. T.” and Gale Pedrick, have called forth<br />
the following comment :—<br />
<br />
“ A question of some interest to beginners in fiction—for<br />
it is only in that class of writings that it can ordinarily<br />
arise in practice—is whether an author should bind himself<br />
by a contract with a publisher to give him the right to<br />
bring out the next two books he may write on the same<br />
terms (or slightly modified ones) as those proposed for the<br />
book under discussion. Both sides of the case have been<br />
ably stated by ‘G. H. T.’and Mr. Gale Pedrick, in The Author,<br />
The former strongly advises against the practice, but the<br />
latter, who is the managing director of a literary agency,<br />
puts forward very plausible reasons for conceding the point<br />
in certain cases. He cites an instance where an author,<br />
anxious to secure publication, accepted such an offer against<br />
his agent’s advice, with the result that his book, which<br />
would otherwise most probably have remained unpublished,<br />
has already gone into a fourth edition. The argument, of<br />
course, turns almost entirely on the worth of the assump-<br />
tion as to the probability of non-publication on other<br />
<br />
271<br />
<br />
terms. If a sufficient number of publishers made the<br />
‘next two books’ clause a sine qua& non, authors would<br />
naturally have no option.”<br />
<br />
We should like to call particular attention to the<br />
last sentence of the quotation.<br />
<br />
The writer seems to forget, in the American<br />
phrase, that “there are others,” and if a large<br />
number of publishers endeavoured to force an<br />
unequal clause on the producers of literary pro-<br />
perty, fresh publishers would at once arise who<br />
would be willing to enter into a fair contract. A<br />
remark of this kind reminds one somewhat of the<br />
suggestion made by one of the trade, that if authors<br />
insisted on demanding better terms they would<br />
destroy the trade of publishing and be unable to<br />
obtain a market at all. The question, of course,<br />
is one of supply and demand. If, however, all the<br />
publishers at present in existence withdrew from<br />
business, the author could still place his work<br />
before the public by his own efforts should he<br />
desire to do so, although he might not in his<br />
infantile beginnings obtain so large a market in<br />
the first instance. :<br />
<br />
THE Jorning Post makes public the following<br />
particulars of a publishing contract :—<br />
<br />
“An author sent a little song to a publisher of the<br />
highest repute, and received an offer of a certain amount<br />
for ‘all serial rights.’ This she accepted, and on sending<br />
another song, she was told that it would be accepted ‘on<br />
our usual terms.’ Several others were taken in the same<br />
way. Then the publishers issued a book of songs which<br />
included some of these. The author wrote and protested,<br />
as she had hoped to bring her songs together in a book of<br />
her own. The publishers serenely replied that ‘our usual<br />
terms’ meant ‘serial rights and copyright.’”<br />
<br />
The Morning Post comments strongly on the<br />
publisher’s action, and deservedly so. Ifthe author<br />
had been a member of the Society and had cared<br />
to lay the matter before the committee, there is<br />
little doubt but that they would have taken the<br />
case vigorously in hand with a view to obtaining<br />
justice. It is just such a case as this that should<br />
be published in Ze Author, with the names of the<br />
publishers concerned. We have known some<br />
extraordinary contracts from publishers of books,<br />
and more extraordinary contracts from the pub-<br />
lishers of music, but it is not often that a bargain,<br />
or rather, a trick, to the discomfort of the author,<br />
so bad as that quoted above, is brought off.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Ir is the custom of the Editor of 7ruth to make<br />
caustic remarks on matters that come under his<br />
ken from time to time.<br />
<br />
During the past month he has devoted one or two<br />
paragraphs to the Biographical Press Agency, and<br />
suggests taking up this form of business himself, as<br />
he seems to think it would be highly remunerative.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
272<br />
<br />
It appears that those gentlemen who have paid<br />
£10 10s. to the agency secure thereby fifty copies<br />
of their biography written by themselves, adorned<br />
with their portraits, executed by the agency’s photo-<br />
graphers, plus the possible satisfaction of seeing<br />
the biography published in the Gossip columns of<br />
a halfpenny newspaper.<br />
<br />
In addition to the economic question which<br />
Truth has so criticised, there is this further danger<br />
to be considered, namely, the danger of assigning<br />
the copyright either in your own photograph or in<br />
your own biography. If the distinguished gentle-<br />
men who have paid their guineas thus dispose of<br />
their rights and allow them to slip beyond their<br />
control they may find their biographies printed and<br />
their photographs published at times inopportune,<br />
and in places unsatisfactory.<br />
<br />
It is important to those whose position entitles<br />
them to the doubtful honour of publicity to be<br />
able to control where and when their biographies<br />
should appear and their photographs be reproduced.<br />
As Truth points ont, the economic side of the<br />
question is very instructive, as nowadays the<br />
competition for the personal paragraph is so great<br />
that the editor ought to be more anxious to pay<br />
for the information he receives than the subject for<br />
the information he gives.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In the Westminster Gazette we see it stated that<br />
Miss Beatrice Harraden’s novel, “Ships that Pass<br />
in the Night,” brought her only the sum of £125.<br />
The writer states, “It is a remarkable object lesson<br />
on the mistake of an unknown author parting with<br />
the entire copyright of her first book.” With this<br />
statement we heartily agree.<br />
<br />
But the price which Miss Harraden received is<br />
quite a record when compared with the prices paid<br />
by one well-known publisher who, in order to<br />
induce young authors to accept his terms, lays<br />
before them the fact that other authors, whose<br />
names he mentions, have received the same sum—<br />
from £20 to £30—-for the entire rights of their<br />
first works. He also states, with the same show<br />
of generosity, that it is not an uncommon thing to<br />
take up a first book paying the author a royalty<br />
after the sale of 2,000 copies. Readers will naturally<br />
suppose that after the sale of so large a number<br />
the author reaps his reward by a large return, but<br />
no, the royalty that the publisher vouchsafes after<br />
2,000 copies is a modest 10 per cent. It would be<br />
interesting to know how many of these first books<br />
with this royalty ever sell more than 2,(00 copies.<br />
<br />
A publisher with a true sense of his position,<br />
instead of making a boast of his cheap bargains<br />
to authors ought rather to be silent. Such open-<br />
ness is not as good a bait as a spinning minnow<br />
in a trout stream.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
EPITAPH FOR AN AUTHOR’S TOMBSTONE,<br />
<br />
—><br />
<br />
O child beloved of the Gods, nor born<br />
In the fortunate glow of a climbing star ;<br />
No prince, no hero of hope forlorn<br />
Was the dust beneath me, tra la la.<br />
<br />
Fame, a harlot, as all assert<br />
<br />
Who slide from the slope of her hazardous car,<br />
Passed him by with a close-drawn skirt<br />
<br />
Like an honest woman, tra la la.<br />
<br />
Wealth he knew not, nor greed of place,<br />
But loved green valleys, and wandered far,<br />
Counting the voluble waves that race<br />
<br />
O’er the scrambling shingles, tra la la.<br />
<br />
Faith he lost where the cities sweat<br />
<br />
In grime to the sky, where the dogmas are,<br />
But found in meadow and rivulet<br />
<br />
A foolish comfort, tra la la,<br />
<br />
He died, and was buried under me,<br />
Hopeless, heedless of Avatar,<br />
<br />
Far from the city, close to the sea,<br />
Tra la, tra la Ja, la la, la la!<br />
<br />
Sr. Joun Lucas.<br />
<br />
Lg ag<br />
<br />
THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.*<br />
<br />
—_-<br />
<br />
a last volume of Sir Leslie Stephen’s work,<br />
displaying, as it does, his power of sane,<br />
<br />
clear-sighted criticism wholly undimmed, is<br />
a fitting climax to more than thirty years of<br />
scholarly labour. Of the five lectures which it<br />
contains, the first is devoted to a defence of the<br />
historical and inductive method of criticism—a<br />
method employed by Sir Leslie Stephen himself in<br />
the course of the lectures, whilst the remainder<br />
deal with the periods terminated respectively by<br />
the death of Queen Anne (1714), the declaration<br />
of War with Spain (1739), the close of the Seven<br />
Years’ War (1763), and the year of the Regency<br />
‘Bill (1788). To this time—<br />
<br />
“The century, as its enemies used to say, of coarse<br />
utilitarian aims, of religious indifference and political<br />
corruption; or, as I prefer to say, the century of sound<br />
common-sense and growing toleration, and of steady social<br />
and industrial development,”<br />
he applies the modern method of criticism which<br />
holds that<br />
<br />
“ Literary history . . . isan account of one strand, 80 10<br />
speak, in a very complex tissue; it is connected with the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* “English Literature and Society in the Righteenth |<br />
<br />
Century.” (Ford Lectures, 1903.) By Leslie Stephen<br />
(Duckworth.)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2 ee Be Soe<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
intellectual and social development; it represents move-<br />
ments of thought which may sometimes check and be<br />
sometimes propitious to the existing forms of art; it is<br />
the utterance of a class which may represent, or fail to<br />
represent, the main national movement ; it is affected more<br />
or less directly by all manner of religious, political, social,<br />
and economical changes; and it is dependent on the<br />
occurrence of individual genius for which we cannot even<br />
profess to account.”<br />
Certainly no period inthe history of our Literature<br />
is so apt as the Highteenth Century in affording<br />
an illustration of the dependence of literary form<br />
on national movement. The drama, to take a<br />
single line of literature as an example, ceased to<br />
be fine not because, as Matthew Arnold asserted,<br />
the Puritans crushed it; for in reality the Puritans<br />
only became powerful when the drama was already<br />
dancing down the road of decadence ; but because,<br />
as Sir Leslie Stephen shows, the cleavage between<br />
the Court and the nation had destroyed the<br />
popularity, and hence the means of existence of<br />
that essentially aristocratic institution, the Stage.<br />
This example of the method employed by the<br />
“inductive” critic affords an agreeable contrast<br />
to the judicial attitude which held that every new<br />
author was to be tried by a kind of court-martial<br />
with Aristotle’s poetics asa code of law, and<br />
caused Voltaire to utter ineptitudes on Dante and<br />
Shakespeare. ‘The critic’s function is rather to<br />
enquire<br />
<br />
“What pleased men, and then, why it pleased them ;<br />
not to decide dogmatically that it ought to have pleased<br />
or displeased on the simple ground that it is or is not<br />
congenial to himself.”’<br />
Sir Leslie Stephen was already stricken with<br />
mortal illness when he wrote these lectures, but<br />
the lucidity of the style, so simple, so energetic,<br />
and so buoyant, never flags ; and the philosophic<br />
breadth of view, the wide knowledge, and fine<br />
sense of proportion, render the book as delightful<br />
as anything that he has written, One can<br />
scarcely think of higher praise than this.<br />
<br />
+ 0<br />
<br />
THE ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON<br />
MEMORIAL.<br />
<br />
—*<br />
<br />
HE Memorial to Robert Louis Stevenson was<br />
unveiled in St.Giles’s Auld Kirk, Edinburgh,<br />
on Monday, June 27th, by Lord Rosebery,<br />
<br />
No fitter place could have been chosen than “ The<br />
auld Kirk ” of that city, which is so full of personal<br />
reminiscences of the author, with which so many<br />
of the characters in his books are associated. The<br />
fitness of the place was equalled by the beauty of<br />
the memorial itself. It is a bronze in low relief of<br />
Stevenson lying on that couch from which it was<br />
<br />
273<br />
<br />
his misfortune so often to be compelled to write,<br />
with paper on knee and pen in hand. It is a fine<br />
work of art.<br />
<br />
A large crowd assembled early, and the period<br />
of waiting was filled in by a recital on the organ.<br />
Then at two o'clock Lord Rosebery entered the<br />
building and took his place on the platform. He<br />
stated that he had not come to make a long speech<br />
or indulge in a eulogy of Stevenson. All that took<br />
place eight years ago, when the movement was<br />
taken in hand which was completed that day. He<br />
asked that the services of those who had assisted<br />
in carrying out the object before them, those<br />
willing givers of time and money, should be re-<br />
membered. He called especial attention to the<br />
labours of the sculptor (Mr. Saint Gandens)<br />
and the work of the secretary (Mr. Napier). It<br />
was a memorial of a man of genius by a man of<br />
genius; but, he continued, great as was the result as<br />
a work of art, the true memorial to Louis Stevenson<br />
was not here. It was in the hearts of the readers,<br />
and, he might say, the worshippers, of his writings ;<br />
and, lastly, in that great edition of his works that<br />
they had seen produced. It was no doubt a sad<br />
reflection that one who had loved the Scottish hills<br />
and dales with so true an affection, and who had<br />
chronicled his love with so vigorous a pen, should<br />
be buried far off in the Pacific islands in Samoa.<br />
But genius was world-wide, and took no count of<br />
time or place.<br />
<br />
His Lordship then stepped forward and un-<br />
veiled the bronze, given, as he stated, by the bounty<br />
and piety of the author’s fellow-countrymen, and<br />
many other lovers of his work.<br />
<br />
Mr. Sidney Colvin, Stevenson’s old friend, then<br />
handed over the monument to the Very Rev. J.<br />
Cameron Lees, minister of the church. His speech<br />
was full of sad recollections of the struggle of the<br />
indomitable spirit against the weakness of the body.<br />
He called to mind the characteristic attitude of<br />
Stevenson, so ably set forth in the memorial, when<br />
physical weakness resulting from dangerous heemor-<br />
rhage necessitated his lying on a couch. He told<br />
how often, when he was not allowed to speak,<br />
Stevenson used to converse in writing, cheerful and —<br />
indefatigable. He stated that for some reasons he<br />
was glad that the execution of the undertaking<br />
had not come till eight years after Stevenson’s<br />
death. ‘Time must always be the test of genius,<br />
and he saw no falling off in the rising generation<br />
of that love for Stevenson’s Romances which was<br />
also in the heart of his contemporaries. He then<br />
formally handed over the work, and the Rev. J.<br />
Cameron Lees, who had known the author in his<br />
early years, spoke a few suitable words in acceptance.<br />
<br />
The following gentlemen were present on the<br />
platform :—Lord Rosebery, Chairman; to the:<br />
right of the chair—Mr. Sidney Colvin, the Very<br />
274<br />
<br />
Rey. J. Cameron Lees, Principal Donaldson, of<br />
St. Andrew’s University, Prof. Campbell Fraser,<br />
Mr. J. D. G. Dalrymple, of Meiklewood, Mr. Charles<br />
Beckett, of Glasgow, Mr. John Maclauchlan and<br />
Mr. James Cunningham, of Dundee ; to the left<br />
of the Chairman—Prof. Masson, Lord Kinross, Prof.<br />
Baldwin Brown, Prof. Flint, Mr. Holmes Ivory,<br />
W.S., Mr. Rufus Fleming, United States Consul,<br />
Mr. W. B. Blaikie, Mr. W. D. M‘Kay, R.S.A., Mr.<br />
G. Herbert Thring, representing the Incorporated<br />
Society of Authors. :<br />
<br />
The following were also present :—Sir Arthur<br />
Mitchell, Sir James Guthrie, P.R.S.A., Sir Charles<br />
Logan, Rev. David Macrae, Rev. Dr. W. W. Tul-<br />
loch, P. W. Adam, R.S.A., Pittendrigh Macgilli-<br />
vray, R.S.A., R. J. Mackenzie, Esq., M.A., David<br />
Robertson, A.R.S.A. (President Scottish Arts<br />
Club), Bailie Murray (Senior Magistrate of Edin-<br />
burgh), A. N. Paterson, M.A., A.R.I.B.A., Glasgow,<br />
G. Stratton Ferrier, R.I., R.S.W., J. Campbell<br />
Mitchell, P.S.S.A., Very Rev. Archibald Scott,<br />
D.D., J. B. Sutherland, 8.8.C., J. Wilson Brodie,<br />
Esq., Harry Cheyne, Esq., W.S., J. B. M‘Intosh,<br />
Esq., W.S., R. Jameson Torrie, Esq., W.S., T. N.<br />
Hepburn, Prof. Neicks, Prof. Cossar Ewart, Prof.<br />
Rankine, Prof. A. R. Simpson, John A. Inglis,<br />
Esq. (representing the Speculative Society), John<br />
Harrison, Esq. (Master of the Merchant Company),<br />
Alex. Buchan, LL.D., Representatives of the<br />
St. Giles’s Board, Representatives of the St. Giles’s<br />
Kirk Session, Mr. J. H. Napier, Solicitor (Secretary<br />
ito the Memorial Committee).<br />
<br />
It was felt a great pity that it had been impos-<br />
sible to bring together a larger attendance of his<br />
fellow-workers in fiction. The notice, however, was<br />
‘Short, and the time somewhat inopportune, while<br />
.the distance from London was great.<br />
<br />
The Secretary had to chronicle a long: list of<br />
regrets. Among the number who were unavoid-<br />
-ably absent, he mentioned the names of George<br />
Meredith (President of the Society of Authors),<br />
Douglas Freshfield (Chairman of the Committee<br />
-of the Society), J. M. Barrie, Thomas Hardy,<br />
A. T. Quiller Couch, Anthony Hope Hawkins,<br />
Andrew Lang, Stanley Weyman, Edmund Gosse,<br />
Augustine Birrell, A. W. Pinero, Sir A. Conan<br />
Doyle, Miss Beatrice Harraden, Robert Bridges,<br />
Dr. John Watson (“ Ian Maclaren”), Lord Balfour<br />
-of Burleigh, Right. Hon. A. J. Balfour, Prof.<br />
Dowden, Prof. Saintsbury, Dr. Richard Garnett,<br />
Prof. Bradley, Oxford, R. Maclehose (Treasurer,<br />
Glasgow Committee), H. Bell (Treasurer, Liver-<br />
pool Committee), A. Bennie (Treasurer, Man-<br />
chester Committee), W. S. Gilbert, and many<br />
-others.<br />
<br />
_ Oe<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE WOMEN WRITERS’ DINNER.<br />
<br />
nl<br />
<br />
T the annual dinner of the Women Writers<br />
on June 20th there were some 200 members<br />
present. Miss Beatrice Harraden under-<br />
<br />
took the position of chairwoman. She made a brief<br />
and light speech, in which she said she had been<br />
told by the secretaries that she was to speak ten<br />
minutes. This, she averred, she had never done in<br />
her life, and was quite incapable of doing either<br />
then or at any other time, also, that there were so<br />
many subjects tabooed. Man, for instance: she<br />
could have spoken eloquently upon man—or love,<br />
or the Fiscal Question, or the iniquities of the<br />
Income Tax, or on any of those subjects of which<br />
too much has already been heard elsewhere. She<br />
would, therefore, only congratulate the Women<br />
Writers on their annual meeting to eat, drink,<br />
smoke and talk together, having numbered its<br />
fifteenth anniversary. Others might affirm that it<br />
was love that made the world go round, but that,<br />
for her own part, she believed that it was tact—<br />
tact, that quality in which all women excelled, and<br />
our hon. secretaries more than any.<br />
<br />
Miss Harraden having resumed her chair, Mrs.<br />
Sidney Webb gave a very brilliant and clever speech.<br />
She rose, she said, at the request of the secretaries<br />
to speak, because, she supposed, she must appear<br />
to be the very opposite to the novelist—a mere dull<br />
economist. But that whereas the novelist dealt<br />
with the facts of life, the economist dealt with the<br />
fictional side—the mighty fiction of the “ average<br />
man.” ‘The novelists drew men and women as they<br />
found them, or read them, the fictional part of<br />
their work lay in the plot; and it was from the work<br />
of the novelists that the economists sought for the<br />
great ruling motives that influenced the average<br />
man. She laid at the doors of Swift, Gay and<br />
Fielding, and the writers of the eighteenth century,<br />
the horrors of the sweating system, because it was<br />
the habit of that time, and of those writers, to dwell<br />
upon the motives of insatiable grasping after<br />
wealth and pleasure in mankind. I think some of<br />
Mrs. Sidney Webb’s hearers felt a trifle aghast at<br />
this calling to account of the mighty dead, and<br />
welcomed her story of Herbert Spencer who, when<br />
he wished to study the subject of matrimony, asked<br />
her, and others, what novels he should read. She<br />
said she herself read all the best novels that came<br />
out, but that they bored her horribly. There was<br />
one thing that bored her more, and that was a<br />
poem. She concluded by warning novelists to<br />
write with charity and hope of mankind, because of<br />
that strange truth that what is believed in, and<br />
insisted upon, becomes at last a truth,<br />
<br />
Mrs. De La Pasture returned in her speech<br />
to lighter themes. She pointed out how the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
incomparable Jane Austen used in her old-fashioned<br />
day to throw a cover over her work when anyone<br />
came to see her. Mrs. De La Pasture suggested<br />
that when the modern novelist wrote anything that<br />
might hurt the young, or offend the old, that they<br />
should throw over it the “handkerchief of Jane<br />
Austen.” We, hearing her, and remembering<br />
much of modern work, were inclined to think that<br />
the sale of pocket handkerchiefs would be enor-<br />
mously increased if Mrs. De La Pasture’s advice was<br />
acted upon.<br />
<br />
The committee for 1904 consisted of the follow-<br />
ing distinguished ladies :—Chairwoman of Dinner,<br />
Miss Beatrice Harraden ; Mrs. Baillie-Reynolds,<br />
Mrs. Hugh Bell,* Miss Clementina Black,*<br />
Mrs. Burnett-Smith,* Mrs. W. K. Clifford, Mrs.<br />
Craigie,* Miss Ella Curtis, Madame Sarah Grand,*<br />
Mrs. M. St. Leger Harrison,** The Honourable Mrs.<br />
Henniker,* Mrs. Percy Leake, Mrs. L. T. Meade,*<br />
Miss Elizabeth Robins,* Miss Adeline Sergeant,*<br />
Mrs. Alfred Sidgwick, Mrs. Steel, Dr. Margaret<br />
Todd, Miss Billington, Mrs Francis Blundell, Miss<br />
Christabel Coleridge, Mrs. B. M. Croker, Mrs. De<br />
La Pasture, Mrs. Alfred Felkin (i. Thorneycroft<br />
Fowler),* Mrs. J. R. Green, Miss Violet Hunt,<br />
Mrs. Belloc-Lowndes, Miss Honnor Morten, Miss<br />
Evelyn Sharp, Mrs. Arthur Stannard,* The<br />
Duchess of Sutherland,* Mrs. Alec Tweedie,”<br />
Mrs. L. B. Walford, Mrs. Humphry Ward,* Hon.<br />
Secretaries (Miss G. M. Ireland Blackburne, Miss<br />
L. R. Mitchell) ; and the following were appointed<br />
to preside at the tables :—Table 7, Mrs. Steel and<br />
Miss Netta Syrett ; Table 6, Miss Ella Curtis and<br />
Mrs. Baillie-Reynolds ; Table 5, Mrs. J. R. Green<br />
and Mrs. Croker; Table 4, Miss Beatrice Harraden<br />
and Mrs. Francis Blundell; Table 3, Mrs. De La<br />
Pasture and Mrs. W. K. Clifford; Table 2, Mrs.<br />
Belloc-Lowndes and Mrs. Walford ; Table 1, Mrs.<br />
Stepney Rawson and Miss Violet Hunt.<br />
<br />
ArtHuR Hoop.<br />
<br />
Oa<br />
<br />
DINNER AT THE AUTHORS’ CLUB.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
HE last Dinner of the Authors’ Club for the<br />
present season was held at 3, Whitehall<br />
Court, on Monday, the 30th of May, and<br />
<br />
passed off most successfully.<br />
<br />
Mr. J. M. Barrie was the Chairman of the<br />
evening, and Mr. P. F. Warner was the guest.<br />
<br />
Amongst those present were Sir Arthur Conan<br />
Doyle, Capt. Wynyard, Mr. K. J. Key, and Mr.<br />
Hesketh-Prichard. There was no vacant seat in<br />
the room.<br />
<br />
Mr. Barrie’s enthusiasm for cricket is well<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* Unavoidably absent.<br />
<br />
275<br />
<br />
known, and in proposing the health of the guest of<br />
the evening he gave further evidence of this. He<br />
stated that when the news arrived of Mr. Warner’s<br />
successful attempt to bring back an article which<br />
he would not particularise, he had read the account<br />
in Piccadilly, with hansoms and four wheelers<br />
passing over him, though he scarcely felt them.<br />
He was glad to chronicle the fact thaf Mr. Warner<br />
had done something far bigger than merely win the<br />
rubber. He had had entrusted to him the reputa-<br />
tion of the game for honesty, fair play, and<br />
courtesy. He had brought it back unsullied. Up<br />
to the present he (Mr. Barrie) had only had the<br />
pleasure of seeing Mr. Warner play cricket twice.<br />
On one occasion he had made one run, and on the<br />
other occasion he had not been so successful.<br />
Finally, he remarked that if Shakespeare had not<br />
invented cricket, as no doubt he did during the<br />
two years when even Mr. Lee did not know what<br />
he was about, Mr. Warner would have been bound<br />
to have done so.<br />
<br />
Mr. Warner responded to his health in a some-<br />
what more serious vein. He did not think he<br />
could have done much in Australia if he had not<br />
been perfectly sure of the loyalty and confidence of<br />
the other members of his team. With regret it<br />
must be stated that in his opinion the Austra-<br />
lians at the present time were not as good as they<br />
were some Six or Seven years ago, that their bowl--<br />
ing seemed to have deteriorated. He hoped that<br />
when they came over here next year the Test<br />
Matches would be played out to a finish. He<br />
closed his speech with the remark that, although<br />
many, taking a pessimistic view of the cricket of<br />
the present day, said it was going to the dogs,<br />
he personally could find nothing wrong with the<br />
game, or in the method of playing it.<br />
<br />
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle proposed the health of<br />
the Chairman.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTES OF SPAIN.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
OUIS PARDO, the well-known author, has<br />
<br />
just published an erudite work, entitled<br />
<br />
“De arte al comienzo del siglo” (Art at<br />
<br />
the Commencement of the Century), and those<br />
<br />
interested in the evolution of taste will read with<br />
<br />
pleasure the information given by a man so well<br />
versed in his subject.<br />
<br />
‘Las Confesiones de un pequeiio plosofo” (Con-<br />
fessions of a Little Philosopher), by J. Martinez<br />
Ruiz, is a book which commends itself to Spanish<br />
ladies, from its interest as a psychological study of<br />
a child, given in a form so sympathetic and charm-<br />
ing that it opens a new and easily opened door to<br />
Castilians in the study of children.<br />
276<br />
<br />
Don Augusto C. de Santiago has just given to<br />
the world a book called “ La Jura de la bandera”<br />
(The Oath of the Banner). The trend of the<br />
work is to foster the patriotism of Spain by cele-<br />
brating the thoughts and deeds of men, both past<br />
and present, who have served their country well.<br />
The national colours on the cover, and the portrait<br />
and biography of King Alfonzo XITI. at the begin-<br />
ning of the work, shows the place occupied by<br />
the young monarch in the ideal of patriotism.<br />
Indeed hardly a day passes without Spain being<br />
more and more assured of the sympathy of her<br />
King in all that is for her welfare ; and the pre-<br />
diction voiced by Colonel Figuerola Ferretti on<br />
page 149 of his celebrated “ Cantos de Espaiia ”<br />
(Songs of Spain, or the History of the Regency in<br />
a lyrical form), that a visit of the King to Barcelona<br />
would banish the shadow of separation has proved<br />
true, and the land bodes well to be one in its<br />
interests. Not only has Alfonzo XIII. notified his<br />
intention of learning Catalan, and patronised the<br />
chief meetings for the welfare of Catalonia, but<br />
the warm welcome recently given at Madrid to the<br />
Catalonian theatrical company of Enrique Borras,<br />
shows that Barcelona can also feel in sympathy<br />
with its sister city in the realm of drama, which is<br />
a door to the understanding of the psychological<br />
characteristics of each. This was especially seen<br />
in the plays of “‘Mar y cel” and ‘Sierra baja,”<br />
portraying ideas and customs quite different to<br />
those of Madrid, and the consummate acting of<br />
Borras, the manager, with that of Fernando<br />
Mendoza, Thuillier, Fuentes, etc., soon won the<br />
sympathy and the admiration of the audience. It<br />
is said that the manager was extremely nervous<br />
before making his début on the stage of Madrid,<br />
but his fears were unfounded—his genius was at<br />
once felt, and Madrid, both social and intellectual,<br />
figuratively fell at his feet.<br />
<br />
The Apolo theatre has lately given with great<br />
success the new play by Caballero, called “ Hl<br />
abuelito,” which hangs mainly on the subject of<br />
divorce.<br />
<br />
Tt seems strange that the tragic fate impending<br />
on a man’s career as a picador is not more often<br />
treated in Spanish plays. The serious injuries<br />
recently received by the two picadors, Mazzantini<br />
and Rodas, at a bull fight in Madrid, excited and<br />
interested the whole city, but one cannot but think<br />
that “prevention would be better than cure.”<br />
<br />
Much sorrow was expressed in Spain at the<br />
death of Urrabreta Vierge, a Spanish author of<br />
great repute, who has been living in Paris since<br />
1869. He is well known for his illustrations of<br />
“Don Quixote,” ‘Gil Blas,” etc.<br />
<br />
In a country like Spain, where oratory plays<br />
such an important part, it is flattering to see Azorin<br />
cite English orators as the most clever, and this<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
by dint of their power of enforcing expression by<br />
well regulated pauses and judicious lowering of<br />
the voice. In these particulars Sefior Maura, the<br />
Prime Minister, seems to excel.<br />
<br />
The celebrated physician, Ion Francisco Huertas,<br />
was distinguished the other day by being received<br />
as a member of the Academy by Alfonzo XIII.<br />
With his customary intelligence the young<br />
monarch expressed his interest in all that con-<br />
cerns the intelligence and culture of his country, to<br />
the delight of the learned Corporation, and the<br />
numerous sages who assisted at the ceremony. It<br />
was not long ago that the young King won the<br />
hearts of all at the important conference, held at the<br />
Atheneum on Agriculture, when he said : “ It ismy<br />
wish to be the first agriculturist in Spain.” It is<br />
by such expressions that a king makes willing slaves<br />
of his subjects.<br />
<br />
Whilst the terribly vexed question of capital and<br />
labour causes so much trouble in Spain, the notable<br />
book called “ Socialismo y democracia christiana,”<br />
by D. Mariano Pascual Espamol, is welcomed as a<br />
possible solution of some of the difficulties. The<br />
work is the result of long study and labour, and his<br />
comparison of the two forces, with the physical<br />
elements kept in their right spheres by the atmo-<br />
sphere, which if removed would cause combustion,<br />
is philosophical, and his appeal to this atmosphere<br />
of reason to equilibriate the powers of labour and<br />
capital comes with the authority of justice, as his<br />
methods of equilibriation are stated as the result of<br />
long enquiry.<br />
<br />
“Love, Duty and Honour” is the title of a<br />
striking play just published by Lieut.-Colonel<br />
Figuerola Ferretti. The scene is laid in Cuba<br />
during the war, of which he can speak with the<br />
dramatic force of one who took part in it, and the<br />
different standpoints from which these three great<br />
qualities are viewed and acted upon show that the<br />
author is a psychologist of no mean order. The<br />
situations and the conversations seem to commend<br />
the play for the boards as much as for a mere<br />
book. The three women characters are clever<br />
presentments of three kinds of love.<br />
<br />
The late Prime Minister Siloela has again shown<br />
himself a true exponent of the Ideal. In his well-<br />
attended conference on the necessity for Spain of<br />
centres of instruction both technical and practical,<br />
as seen in other lands, he spoke eloquently of the<br />
necessity of love in education “for (he said) it is<br />
the indestructible basis of all ideas and the princi-<br />
ples that affect the hearts and minds of men, for all<br />
ideas and all doctrines devoid of love are bound to<br />
die.”<br />
<br />
The present Summer Exhibition of Fine Arts at<br />
Madrid shows that Spain holds her own in that<br />
domain, ‘The visit of the Infanta Dofia Eulalion<br />
with the popular Infanta Dofia Isabel during the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 277<br />
<br />
election of the gold medallist exhibitor, excited<br />
<br />
much enthusiasm, and one only felt sorry that .<br />
<br />
Sefior Rancés, the sub-secretary of Public Educa-<br />
tion, who presided at the election, was obliged to<br />
declare that not one of the competitors had received<br />
the requisite number of votes. José Mongrell is<br />
distinguished as a master of colouring—especially<br />
seen in his “ Tormenta,” and his portrait of a lady.<br />
Fillol is one of the chief Spanish painters who ex-<br />
presses ideas in his pictures, and “ Hl hijo de la<br />
Revolucion” (The Sons of the Revolution), and<br />
“‘Hijos de quien” (Whose sons?) are pictures<br />
of life’s tragedies. Blasco Ibanez and Rodrigo<br />
Soriano are also dramatic in their works. In a<br />
picture called “ Barcelona in 1902” Casas gives a<br />
large presentment of the Civil Guard and a crowd,<br />
and the same picture would doubtless do for the<br />
same circumstance on other occasions. Bilbao,<br />
who ever since his great success in 1887, when his<br />
picture “ Idilio” was so deservedly applauded, has<br />
never failed his country, is seen at his best in his<br />
“Salida de la Fabrica de Tabaco.” Nobody who<br />
has witnessed the girls leaving the cigar factory at<br />
Seville can ever forget the picturesqueness of the<br />
scene, and it is only a master of form and colouring,<br />
like Bilbao, who can make it a living picture in a<br />
frame.<br />
Percy Horspur.<br />
<br />
1 —>—<br />
<br />
SWEDEN AND THE BERNE CONVENTION.<br />
<br />
—+—~<>—+ —<br />
<br />
HE following letter from His Majesty’s<br />
Representative in Sweden, sent to the<br />
Foreign Office, has been forwarded to the<br />
<br />
Society of Authors. The Committee have much<br />
pleasure in printing the information.<br />
<br />
STOCKHOLM,<br />
May 20th, 1904.<br />
<br />
My Lorp,—With reference to Sir W. Barring-<br />
ton’s despatch of this series, No. 30 of the 16th of<br />
December last, I have the honour to report that the<br />
Bill framed with a view to enabling the Swedish<br />
Government to adhere to the Copyright Union has<br />
now been voted and will become law on the Ist of<br />
July next.<br />
<br />
According to this Bill paragraph 3 of Chapter I.<br />
and paragraph 14 of Chapter II. of the Law of<br />
August 10th, 1877, respecting copyright in this<br />
country are modified as follows :—<br />
<br />
CHAPTER I. PARAGRAPH 3.<br />
<br />
_“ Literary work which an author publishes<br />
simultaneously in different languages, and the fact<br />
whereof is stated on the title page or first pages of<br />
<br />
the work, shall be considered as having been com-<br />
posed in each of the languages used. No transla-<br />
tion can be made without the author’s consent<br />
within ten years of the publication of the work.” |<br />
<br />
CHAPTER II. PARAGRAPH 14.<br />
<br />
“The rights of authors and translators mentioned<br />
in this chapter hold good during the lifetime and<br />
for three years after their death. If authors or<br />
translators have not put their names to their works<br />
any one can print or perform them five years after<br />
publication.”<br />
<br />
The Bill also contains the following clause :<br />
<br />
“This law enters into force on the 1st of July,<br />
1904. It affects all literary productions published<br />
previously. ‘Translations which were made before<br />
that date and which have been published in<br />
accordance with the terms of the former law without<br />
the consent of the author may continue to be<br />
published.<br />
<br />
“If anyone, before this law enters into force,<br />
has in accordance with the former law and by per-<br />
mission performed dramatic, musical or musico-<br />
dramatical works, he may continue to do so.”<br />
<br />
Certain formalities will, I understand, have to be<br />
gone through before the adhesion of the Swedish<br />
Government to the Berne Union can take place,<br />
and I could gain no information at the Ministry<br />
for Foreign Affairs as to the probable date when<br />
the matter would be finally settled.<br />
<br />
I have, &c.,<br />
(Signed) F. 8. CLARKE.<br />
Tue Marquess oF LANsDowNE, K.G.,<br />
&e., &¢c., &.<br />
<br />
<><br />
<br />
THE VALUE OF RELICS AND POETRY.<br />
<br />
—<_e<br />
<br />
N the summer of 1877, at the Albert Memorial<br />
I Hall, some relics of Lord Byron were dis-<br />
played. Among other things were a little<br />
silver watch, a meerschaum pipe, two helmets<br />
which the poet wore in Greece, a drinking glass<br />
given by Byron to his butler, and five pieces of<br />
hair lent by Lady Dorchester, the Rev. H. M.<br />
Robinson, D.D., Mr. John Murray, and Mr. E. J.<br />
Trelawney. It is recorded that the hair was not<br />
of fine texture and was brown mixed with grey.<br />
<br />
The exhibition, I believe, was not a success.<br />
Could it well be otherwise ?<br />
<br />
What profit is there to the mind in such<br />
mementoes of departed greatness ?<br />
<br />
«The poet’s eye ina fine frenzy rolling’’ looked<br />
upon Nature, and ideas were rendered into words.<br />
which are a treasure for all generations. Let the<br />
lover of Byron’s verse imagine—surely imagina-<br />
tion is inherent in those who read and appreciate<br />
278<br />
<br />
poetry—himself or herself at the Albert Hall in<br />
1877. The watch, the pipe, two helmets, a drink-<br />
ing glass, and five pieces of hair! They belonged,<br />
at one time, to the poet ; does the sight of these<br />
call forth any pleasurable sensations? I opine it<br />
does not.<br />
<br />
Let the same reader of Byronic stanzas imagine<br />
himself or herself—on the occasion of the usual<br />
autumnal holiday—in sight and within sound of<br />
the rolling waves. Is there not a natural beauty<br />
in the expanse of the wild, wind swept waters ?<br />
Is there not health in the briny breeze? Is there<br />
nothing more ?<br />
<br />
Not much—always, of course, remembering that<br />
health and beauty are two of the most glorious<br />
gifts Nature offers—without the aid of the poet.<br />
But with the words which he penned there is a<br />
charm added to what one looks upon—the charm<br />
of human sympathy, of human thought of no mean<br />
power, ;<br />
<br />
“Roll on thou deep and dark blue ocean.”<br />
<br />
“ Do not the words appeal to us, not so much as<br />
a quotation from a poem, as a reflex of our own<br />
unuttered feeling? And then we will take together<br />
the two fine images or visions which are conjured<br />
up by the following lines :—<br />
“Ten thousand fleets sweep over thee in vain ;<br />
<br />
Man marks the earth with ruin—his control<br />
<br />
Stops with the shore...<br />
<br />
The armaments which thunderstrike the walls<br />
<br />
Of rock-built cities, bidding nations quake,<br />
<br />
And monarchs tremble in their capitals.<br />
<br />
. - . These are thy toys.”<br />
<br />
Surely there is here--to quote Byron in favour<br />
of Byron—-that which :—<br />
<br />
‘Lends to loneliness delight.”<br />
<br />
The veriest lad of any village school will under-<br />
stand and appreciate the personal element in<br />
this :— .<br />
<br />
*‘ And T have loved thee, ocean! and my joy<br />
Of youthful sports was on thy breast to be<br />
<br />
Borne like thy bubbles onward ; from a boy<br />
I wantoned with thy breakers.”<br />
<br />
Consider now the lounger by the sounding sea<br />
turning away from the shore towards the rooms<br />
he or she occupies. The evening is passing into<br />
night ; the lights of the town are flashing ; the<br />
stars are not yet out; at least not in thronging<br />
multitudes. One parting glance is given at old<br />
ocean, and with that glance the ever-beautiful<br />
word-picture is once again remembered :—<br />
<br />
‘Thou glorious mirror, where the Almighty’s form<br />
| Glasses itself in tempests ; in all time,<br />
Calm or convulsed—in breeze, or gale, or storm,<br />
icing the pole, or in the torrid clime<br />
Dark heaving, boundless, endless and sublime.<br />
<br />
* * * * *<br />
<br />
Time writes no wrinkle on thine azure brow—<br />
Such as creation’s dawn beheld, thou rollest now.’?<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
It would be a prosaic mind, indeed, that could<br />
assert Byronic stanzas had not materially heightened<br />
the pleasure of this meditative stroll.<br />
<br />
J. Harris Briguouse,<br />
ae PP<br />
<br />
THE IDEAL PUBLISHER.<br />
<br />
—— 4<br />
A Dream or Farr Traps.<br />
<br />
HE other night I hada curious and unusually<br />
circumstantial dream. I thought I was walk-<br />
ing along a narrow, dingy street which seemed<br />
<br />
to be Paternoster Row at one end and Henrietta<br />
Street at the other. On nearly every door was the<br />
name of a well-known publisher—it was really a<br />
most literary thoroughfare. I had a heavy brown-<br />
paper parcel under my arm which I knew contained<br />
& manuscript ; nevertheless I hurried past the im-<br />
posing buildings, which housed the well-known firms<br />
(my haste may have been partly due to the fact<br />
that I’d had business dealings with most of them)<br />
till I came to a modest-looking frontage at the end<br />
of the street, on the windows of which was the<br />
legend, *‘The Open Books Publishing Company.”<br />
‘The name aroused my curiosity and I was attracted<br />
by the simplicity of the exterior, having good reason<br />
to distrust “marble halls” in connection with<br />
publishing. ¢t-entered, and instead of being re-<br />
ceived with cold suspicion and studied arrogance<br />
by the clerks in the outer office, 1 was welcomed<br />
with respectful cordiality. ‘“ Yes, Mr. Jay, the<br />
manager, is here; he always is from nine till<br />
six,” said a responsible-looking person. ‘“ He’s<br />
disengaged now.” And I was ushered into the<br />
sanctum in a state of bewilderment, since never<br />
before had I seen a publisher until I had awaited<br />
his pleasure for at least ten minutes in a virulent<br />
draught. Mr. Jay was a young man of “good<br />
appearance,” as the advertisements say, but he<br />
did not attempt to patronise me, nor did he<br />
greet me as a dear old friend. He bowed in a most<br />
business-like manner, and inquired what he could<br />
do for me. I told him that I had a MS. to place,<br />
and that I had been attracted by the title of his<br />
company. Would he please explain what it<br />
meant. :<br />
<br />
“If you have had any experience of literary<br />
business,” he said, “ you will know how essential it<br />
is that confidence should be restored between author<br />
and publisher.” a<br />
<br />
This struck me as an unpromising beginning be-<br />
cause each of the eight distinguished publishers with<br />
whom I had had previous dealings, had put forward<br />
the same platitude ; so I looked my doubts.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
S<br />
<br />
ao<br />
<br />
ilstAsaVEIS ORE Caste<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
“‘ Hitherto,” he continued, ‘‘publishers have<br />
demanded the complete confidence of authors, as<br />
between tried and trusty friends, and any attempt<br />
to conduct the sale of a manuscript on an ordinary<br />
business footing has called forth sentimental<br />
reproaches. Now publishing is the only trade, so<br />
far as I can discover, in which all parties directly<br />
interested are not given equal opportunities of know-<br />
ledge where the conduct of the business is con-<br />
cerned. No trustful sentiment is demanded from<br />
persons with a claim to a share in the profits of<br />
other commercial enterprises, but the books are<br />
examined and passed by chartered accountants.”<br />
<br />
‘*The fact that authors don’t usually risk any<br />
money in the business is supposed to make. a<br />
difference,” I said.<br />
<br />
“ But the author of a book is in precisely the same<br />
position, commercially speaking, as the author of a<br />
play,” he replied. ‘And in every properly-con-<br />
ducted theatre the accountants go in on Saturday<br />
nights to examine the books, and each week the<br />
persons with a claim to a percentage of the profits<br />
—there are often several involved—receive their<br />
share, as vouched for by the accountants. When I<br />
started this business, I determined to run it on<br />
ordinary commercial lines, and to throw overboard<br />
all the publishing shibboleths and conventions—<br />
otherwise tricks of the book trade. I could not<br />
stand being alweys under suspicion, and for my own<br />
sake I have my books periodically inspected by a<br />
firm of chartered accountants recommended by the<br />
Society of Authors. I pay half the expense myself,<br />
and the remaining half is distributed among my<br />
authors.”<br />
<br />
«That sounds satisfactory,” I said, “as long as<br />
one can trust to the books being correctly kept.<br />
But, of course, mistakes might creep in.”<br />
<br />
“JT have arranged for another safeguard,” he<br />
proceeded. “I have often heard writers complain<br />
that they have no means of knowing how many<br />
copies of their books have been sold. Accordingly<br />
I have borrowed an idea from the music-trade, and<br />
I have each copy of an edition stamped with a<br />
number. I also invite authors to visit my ware-<br />
house at stated times in order that they may see for<br />
themselves how many copies of their books remain<br />
on hand.”<br />
<br />
“But how about the American market ?” I<br />
inquired, for my distrust was too deep-rooted to be<br />
easily allayed. ‘‘ You publishers usually take fifty<br />
per cent. of the profits on an American edition, and<br />
you never seem able to dispose of the copyright.<br />
You send out so many hundred copies in sheets,<br />
and the profits are amazingly small.”<br />
<br />
“ Not amazingly swall,” hecorrected. “Ifyou<br />
remember that most English publishers are openly<br />
or secretly in partnership with a firm on the other<br />
side. They tell you, don’t they, that the American<br />
<br />
279<br />
<br />
publisher will only give a nominal price per copy,<br />
hardly enough to cover expenses ie -<br />
<br />
“Yes,” I exclaimed. “ And I often see that a<br />
book is selling well in the States at four or five<br />
times the price nominally paid for it to the English<br />
publisher, while the author’s total profits amount<br />
to something like ten pounds. I have often asked<br />
for items of the American sales and expenses, but<br />
have always been refused.”<br />
<br />
“Exactly,” he returned, with an air of satisfaction,<br />
“and you naturally suspect that the actual profits<br />
on the transaction are divided between the English<br />
and American partners. The direct result of this<br />
wide-spread suspicion has been the rise of the<br />
literary agent, who is content with ten per cent.<br />
of the American profits. It is bad policy to<br />
starve or frighten away the goose that lays the<br />
golden eggs. Now I’m offering to arrange for<br />
the publication of my authors’ books in America<br />
for the same percentage charged by agents—ten<br />
per cent. I shall probably extend this system to<br />
Indian and Colonial editions.”<br />
<br />
“JT have heard it stated,” I observed, ‘that,<br />
owing to the immense competition in the publish-<br />
ing trade, it is impossible to make the business<br />
pay on straightforward commercial lines—that is,<br />
without secret profits.”<br />
<br />
«That is absurd,” he returned. ‘I’m convinced<br />
that publishers lose money every year owing to<br />
their system of keeping authors in the dark. For<br />
example, certain methods of publishing have fallen<br />
into absolute discredit—I mean publishing on com-<br />
mission, and on the half-profits system. There are<br />
plenty of writers who would be willing to publish<br />
works dealing with specialised subjects on commis-<br />
sion, if they could be certain of straightforward<br />
treatment. Again, many young euthors would<br />
sign a half-profits agreement if they knew that the<br />
balance-sheets would be passed by a qualified<br />
accountant. For a young publisher without<br />
much capital, who is anxious to build up a<br />
business, these two methods of publishing offer<br />
modest profits with the minimum of risk.”<br />
<br />
“Are you introducing any other new methods<br />
into the publishing trade?” I asked.<br />
<br />
“Yes. I render accounts half-yearly in the old<br />
way ; but I pay my authors one month, instead of<br />
four or six months, later. Then, so far as the<br />
author is concerned, I don’t count thirteen copies<br />
as twelve, because that is an arrangement made<br />
between publishers and booksellers for their own<br />
(supposed) convenience, and the author has never<br />
been consulted in the matter. Then I’ve got<br />
several new ideas on the subject of advertising—<br />
there is a lot of money spent on the advertising of<br />
books in England, with very poor results. Also,<br />
I’ve patented a new detachable cover, which I<br />
propose to use for copies supplied to circulating<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
280<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
libraries. The cost is very small, and it can be<br />
replaced as soon as it gets soiled or damaged,<br />
Again % :<br />
<br />
At this point he was interrupted by a rapping at<br />
the door. I was just about to hand him my manu-<br />
script, and ask if he would undertake its publica-<br />
tion, when a voice in my ear said :<br />
<br />
“Right o’clock, and [ve turned on the water in<br />
the bath-room.”<br />
<br />
I awoke with a start, and realised to my bitter<br />
disappointment that the Open Books Publishing<br />
Company was only a dream.<br />
<br />
But why shouldn’t it be a reality ?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
E. M.S:<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
~~<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
“FATTY DEGENERATION OF THE SOUL.”<br />
—1 +<br />
SUPPOSE there is something in a habit of<br />
| silence that encourages people to make those<br />
who wear it the recipients of their confi-<br />
dence. That habit, at all events, is one of mine,<br />
and upon no other hypothesis can I explain the<br />
fact that I am entrusted with what I think must be<br />
an unusual amount of early intelligence of what<br />
my friends are doing and planning in the shape of<br />
literature. Sometimes I attribute it, with a feeling<br />
of humility, to the probability that it never occurs<br />
to them to regard me as a possible competitor with<br />
themselves: they know I am keenly interested in<br />
literature in general and their owncontributions toit<br />
in particular, but they regard me as too , L do<br />
not know precisely what, but something unflattering<br />
to my vanity, to be afraid to unbosom themselves<br />
to me. Whatever the reason may be, I am, at one<br />
time and another, given glimpses into the inner<br />
self of some of my friends which I cannot believe<br />
they permit to many others. All of these glimpses<br />
furnish me with material for thought; some of<br />
them are amusing ; some of them are sad ; for the<br />
imaginative man, if frequently vain, is always<br />
sensitive, and the road up Parnassus is girt about<br />
with thorns.<br />
<br />
One such glimpse was permitted me a night or<br />
two ago. A young fellow of my acquaintance<br />
whom I had invited to dine with me, made a<br />
mistake in the date, with the result that he had<br />
myself .as entire audience. I discharged my<br />
functions so successfully that from being merely<br />
garrulously agreeable he became gravely con-<br />
fidential.<br />
<br />
Our talk had turned upon the income to be<br />
derived from literature as distinct from journalism,<br />
and I quoted the substance of a passage in ‘“ The<br />
Private Papers of Henry Ryecroft,” which, by the<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
way, my friend had never read, where N—, a<br />
representative of the best and brightest side of<br />
literary success, informs his host that in the<br />
twelve months just concluded he has earned two<br />
thousand pounds. My guest, I should premise, is<br />
a particularly glossy youth, always, as he would<br />
phrase it, very well groomed, and J, knowin<br />
nothing of his private affairs had always suppose<br />
him to be the recipient of a handsome allowance<br />
from his father who is a drysalter in a large way of<br />
business.<br />
<br />
My guest was interested.<br />
<br />
“J don’t know who N— may be,” he remarked,<br />
“but that is pretty good hunting.” For a moment<br />
he seemed a trifle envious, but then added hope-<br />
fully : “Still, I ought to makeas much soon. I’ve<br />
made over nine hundred this year, and it is not<br />
ended yet.”<br />
<br />
I was amazed. I knew that he was what<br />
another friend of mine terms “a writing cove,”<br />
but that is a vague term which might cover<br />
anything from a professional addresser of enve-<br />
lopes to a leader-writer on the Z%mes, neither of<br />
whom, I imagine, would earn so much. I fear,<br />
too, that my opinion of him was enhanced : ‘‘ fear,”<br />
becanse one’s estimation of a man should not be<br />
affected by his income.<br />
<br />
“Do you do much journalism ?” I enquired.<br />
<br />
“Oh! no,” he answéred ; it is all from fiction.”<br />
<br />
I cast my mind back over a considerable period<br />
of time, but could not recall a single book bearing<br />
his name ; then at the risk of seeming ignorant or<br />
discourteous, I said so, hazarding an enquiry as to<br />
whether he used a pseudonym. :<br />
<br />
“‘ Several,” he replied, “‘ but I write over my own<br />
name too. It depends on how many stories I have<br />
running simultaneously.”<br />
<br />
Again I was amazed, for this was a revelation of<br />
fecundity undreamed of by me. Then he explained<br />
that he wrote serial stories for newspapers.<br />
<br />
“J am writing three now,” he said quite simply.<br />
<br />
“Not writing them simultaneously ?” I pro-<br />
tested.<br />
<br />
“ Certainly,” he answered ; “but they are all for<br />
weekly papers: five thousand words a week each,<br />
and I send in the copy three weeks in advance.<br />
It’s a bit of a teazer sometimes when you're<br />
writing for a daily.”<br />
<br />
I supposed it might be.<br />
<br />
‘“« What papers do you write for?” was my next<br />
question.<br />
<br />
He named three, of not one of which had I ever<br />
heard before.<br />
<br />
‘« And how long are the stories ?” I asked.<br />
<br />
“That depends on how they go down with the<br />
readers,” he said. ‘I go on just as long as they<br />
are keen, and bombard the editors with corre-<br />
spondence about the yarn.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
“So you don’t work out the whole thing<br />
according to your own ideas, and simply publish<br />
a finished story in instalments ?”<br />
<br />
“Oh! no,” he said again. “The editors give<br />
me the tip as to what bits are catching on with<br />
the public, and I work those up for all I am worth.<br />
Sometimes, of course, they send me sensational<br />
pictures to write up to.”<br />
<br />
There was no suggestion of irony in his tone<br />
when he said “of course.”<br />
<br />
“Whether they are @ propos of the story or<br />
not ?” I asked.<br />
<br />
“T make them & propos,” he replied.<br />
<br />
“It is very ingenious of you,” I said weakly; I<br />
could not at the moment think of a happier<br />
phrase ; ‘‘but—forgive me—is not the story a<br />
little—well, spotty, in the event ?”<br />
<br />
“Perhaps it is,” he admitted. “But it’s all<br />
right,” he jerked out suddenly. “The editor’s<br />
happy and the readers are happy, and nine hundred<br />
pounds is nine hundred pounds.”<br />
<br />
T allowed that that was true; but I detected a<br />
look of vague discontent on his clean-shaven face.<br />
<br />
“And are you happy?” I asked with affected<br />
nonchalance.<br />
<br />
It was then I got the glimpse of the inner man<br />
<br />
‘ which has prompted me to record the conversation.<br />
His own story was sufficiently common-place. His<br />
father, a respectable and successful business man,<br />
had followed the policy, common nowadays, of<br />
giving his sons a public school and university<br />
education, with the result, also common nowadays,<br />
that they deemed themselves too good for the<br />
trade to which they were indebted for their<br />
advantages, and were inclined to disparage the<br />
father who had begotten them. This particular<br />
lad left the university with the smattering of many<br />
things and inadequate knowledge of any one, which<br />
seems so contemptible to men of his father’s kidney,<br />
and after an acrimonious debate flatly refused to<br />
adopt drysaltery, and announced his intention of<br />
embracing literature.<br />
<br />
Perhaps if his father had been inexorable and<br />
had cut off all supplies from this recalcitrant son,<br />
so that he had come to know what it really means<br />
to be cold and hunery, the muses might have<br />
smiled upon him, and his dilettantism might have<br />
been hardened into something enduring ; but his<br />
mother’s heart was infinitely large and his father’s<br />
purse was capacious ; his allowance was diminished,<br />
it-is true, but only so much as to compel him to<br />
burn pipe tobacco instead of cigars before the altar<br />
of the goddess Fame, and he was never placed in<br />
the position of being obliged to write for dear life.<br />
It is the overloaded stomach that causes night-<br />
mare, but I fancy it is the empty one that knows<br />
visions. My young friend in his comfortable little<br />
Gat found time pass not unpleasantly, but at the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
281<br />
<br />
end of the two years which are generally supposed<br />
to enable a man to judge whether or not he has it<br />
in him to attain some measure of success in the<br />
world of letters, he was no further forward than<br />
when he forsook the parental home at Tooting for<br />
the less decorous purlieus of the King’s Road.<br />
<br />
_ Then he was given an opportunity of getting<br />
into this fiction mill, and seizing the chance was<br />
whirled merrily round and round, grinding words<br />
as he went, to which, for whatever reason, he did<br />
not attach his name, and earning an income which,<br />
as I have said, amounted to nine hundred pounds<br />
in a fraction under the last twelve months.<br />
<br />
_His method of work is simple. He dictates<br />
his stories into a phonograph and the records are<br />
transcribed in a typewriting office and sent direct<br />
to the newspapers; thence the stories return to<br />
him in proof, and he corrects the literal mistakes<br />
and keeps a casual look-out for howlers. He has<br />
dozens of stories, of enormous length, cut from the<br />
variegated papers in which they appear and pasted<br />
up in exercise books, and it was the recollection of<br />
these volumes that brought the expression of dis-<br />
content to his face when I asked him if he was<br />
happy. For that is the end of his stories. No<br />
publisher will look at them ; no critic of standing<br />
has ever heard of them; no literary agent thinks<br />
it worth while to accept him as a client; these<br />
last cannot help him in his serial work which,<br />
from time conditions alone, does not allow of<br />
intervention by any third person ; and the reputa-<br />
tion be has made in his particular line has become<br />
an insuperable obstacle to his making any reputa-<br />
tion in literature. He has, in short, committed<br />
the fatal mistake of making the wrong reputation,<br />
to lose which is much more difficult than it is to<br />
make a right one at the outset. The fluidity of<br />
language which enables him to keep pace with his<br />
engagements is incompatible with the nicety of<br />
language necessary to the production of literature ;<br />
he has lost all sense of the values of words in a<br />
calculation of their vaine; his apprehension of a<br />
dramatic idea has been shaken by his passion for a<br />
melodramatic situation. He has discovered that<br />
in doing work of a lower kind in order to earn the<br />
means to live while doing work of a higher, he has<br />
lost the power to do the latter. This last discovery<br />
has, indeed, been tested practically. A publisher<br />
of repute, who lay under some obligation of friend-<br />
ship to the old drysalter, hearing that his friend’s<br />
son was an author, asked him to write a novel;<br />
full of hope, the son complied ; but the taint of<br />
the cheap serial was over it all, and the book was<br />
hopeless; after a second unsuccessful essay the<br />
plan was abandoned by consent. My author,<br />
instead of being fed like a running horse, bas been<br />
fattened, and, to use George Gissing’s pregnant<br />
phrase, heisavictim to fatty degeneration of thesoul.<br />
282<br />
<br />
Is it an incurable disease? That. is what I<br />
should greatly like to know, for I fancy there are<br />
not a few “ writing-coves” amongst us, to whom<br />
an answer would be fraught with interest.<br />
<br />
Of course I know it is an ancient story. Nearly<br />
a hundred and fifty years ago the suggestion was<br />
put forward, and put forward well, if rather dog-<br />
<br />
matically. Here is the passage ; and if my g euest<br />
of the other night should happen to see this<br />
article, it may amuse him to trace the quotation,<br />
and it will assuredly benefit him to read the little<br />
work in which it appears:<br />
<br />
“The author, when unpatronized by the great, has<br />
naturally recourse to the bookseller. There cannot per-<br />
haps be imagined a combination more prejudicial to taste<br />
than this. It is the interest of the one to allow as little<br />
for writing, as of the other to write as much as possible.<br />
Accordingly tedious compilations and periodical magazines<br />
are the result of their joint endeavours. In these circum-<br />
stances the author bids adieu to fame, writes for bread, and<br />
for that only, imagination is seldom called in. \ He sits<br />
down to address the venal muse with the most phlegmatie<br />
apathy; and, as we are told of the Russian, courts his<br />
mistress by falling asleep in her lap. His reputation never<br />
spreads in a wider circle than that of the trade, who gene-<br />
rally value him, not for the fineness of his compositions, but<br />
the quantity he works off in a given time.<br />
<br />
“ A long habit of writing for “bread thus turns the ambi-<br />
tion of every author at last into avarice. He finds that he<br />
has written many years, that the public are scarcely<br />
acquainted with his name; he despairs of applause, and<br />
turns to profit, which invites him. He finds that money<br />
procures all those advantages, that respect, and that ease<br />
which he vainly expected from fame. Thus the man who,<br />
under the protection of the great, might have done honour<br />
to humanity, when only patronized by the bookseller<br />
becomes a thing little superior to the fellow who works at<br />
the press.”<br />
<br />
A YS.<br />
—————_+—_>—¢<br />
<br />
CIVIL LIST PENSIONS.<br />
<br />
——>—+—_.<br />
<br />
HE following pensions have been granted<br />
during the year ending March 31, 1904,<br />
under the provisions of the Civil List Act,<br />
<br />
1901 :—<br />
<br />
Mrs. Anna Johnson Henley £125<br />
In consideration of the literary merits of. her late<br />
- husband, Mr. W. E. Henley, and of her inadequate<br />
means of support.<br />
<br />
Sir William Laird Clowes :<br />
In recognition of his services to naval literature.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Charlotte Michael Stopes ..<br />
In consideration of her literary work, and of her<br />
straitened circumstances.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Mary Gertrude Henderson<br />
In consideration of the distinguished services of<br />
her late husband, Lieutenant- Colonel G. F.C.<br />
Henderson, C.B.<br />
<br />
Maria, Lady Gilbert<br />
In recognition of the services of her ‘late hasband,<br />
Sir Henry Gilbert.<br />
<br />
100<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Lucy Allen ...<br />
In recognition of the services of her late husband,<br />
Mr. R. W. Roberts, Master, R.N., in connection with<br />
the disembarkation of troops during the Crimean<br />
War.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Sarah Elizabeth May<br />
In recognition of the artistic merits of ‘her late<br />
husband, Mr. Phil May, and of her straitened<br />
circumstances.<br />
<br />
Emma, Lady Fitch<br />
In consideration of the ser vices of her late busband,<br />
and of her straitened circumstances.<br />
<br />
John Wesley Hales S<br />
In consideration of his services to English literature,<br />
<br />
Miss Henrietta Keddie ...<br />
In consideration of her services to literature, and ‘of<br />
her straitened circumstances,<br />
<br />
Leonard Gissing and Alfred Gissing ...<br />
In consideration of the services to literature of their<br />
late father, and of their straitened circumstances.<br />
<br />
Alfred Theobald Palmer.. ;<br />
In consideration of his services to history.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Edith Louisa Stopford Porson<br />
In consideration of the services rendered to astrono-<br />
mical science by her late husband.<br />
<br />
Frances Elizabeth Dobson<br />
<br />
Mary Dobson<br />
<br />
Julie Dobson A<br />
In recognition of the s services rendered to zoological<br />
science “by their late brother, Sur. ‘geon-Major George<br />
Edward Dobson.<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
—_1+—~< +<br />
CRITIC AND PUBLISHER.<br />
<br />
Srr,—Last autumn Messrs. Harper and Bros.<br />
published Vol. III. of my ‘“ History of the German<br />
Struggle for Liberty,” a work which is mapped<br />
with a view to making six volumes.<br />
<br />
Many honest critics hold me responsible because<br />
my publishers have published this volume without<br />
an index. They also note with just surprise that<br />
the book pretends to be complete in three volumes.<br />
Also, they note that the illustrations are not in<br />
harmony with the character of the work.<br />
<br />
So far I have passed the matter over in silence.<br />
Now, however, it may be of service to my fellow<br />
victims to enquire if a law cannot be framed to<br />
protect us in the future. I was not consulted in<br />
regard to my book either as to illustrations, title<br />
page, or index. The publishers had no excuse for<br />
their conduct save the stereotyped one, against<br />
which I am protesting—to wit, that they know<br />
best what is good for a book.<br />
<br />
Would it not be fair to the author if the pub-<br />
lisher warned the reader, and especially the book<br />
reviewer, whenever he has seen fit to print a page<br />
or picture without the knowledge or consent of<br />
the author? I have literary sins of my own in<br />
abundance, and I object to carrying any for<br />
publishers, however scholarly they may be.<br />
<br />
Pouttney BiGELow.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 283<br />
<br />
EXETER ENGLISH.<br />
<br />
I.<br />
<br />
Str,—Almost all writers, whatever their emi-<br />
mence, are guilty of solecisms and bad grammar, but<br />
this does not justify the deliberate perpetuation of<br />
<br />
‘such errors by inscription of them in public places.<br />
<br />
Numbers of good authors are extremely hazy about<br />
the difference between the perfects and participles<br />
of tie and lay, but “laid awake”’ or “ there let him<br />
Jay,” would not look well in Exeter or any other<br />
cathedral. “ Destruction and happiness is in their<br />
ways” may be good old English, as ‘et Venus et<br />
puer risit ” would be capital Horatian Latin, but<br />
a plural subject with a singular verb is now merely<br />
a sign of slovenly writing, just as ‘‘to try and do”<br />
is a mistake, though countenanced by Demosthenes,<br />
and a plural verb with the disjunctive “neither ”—<br />
“nor,”’ as, for instance, “neither he nor his brother<br />
are coming” is wrong, whoever uses it.<br />
Your obedient servant,<br />
REGINALD HAINES.<br />
<br />
—— +9<br />
<br />
Il.<br />
<br />
Smr,—Perhaps it may be of interest to quote<br />
the opinion of some of the greatest of modern<br />
French writers on the question of using a plural<br />
verb with a singular subject having a tail tacked<br />
on to it by means of the preposition “ with.”<br />
<br />
On the 31st of July, 1900, M. Leygues, then<br />
Minister of Public Instruction, issued some new<br />
“rules” (or rather “tolerations”) for French<br />
Grammar. Amongst them the following appeared ;<br />
“On tolérera toujours le verbe au pluriel dans : Le<br />
général avec quelques officiers sont sortis (ou est<br />
sorti) du camp.”<br />
<br />
_ The Académie appointed a committee to con-<br />
sider these new rules, consisting of such men as<br />
Henry Houssaye, Gaston Boissier, Hervieu, Gaston<br />
Paris, Mezieres, Gréard Brunetiére, Coppée, de<br />
Vogué, Jules Lemaitre, de Héredia, Gabriel<br />
Hanotaux. ‘he criticisms made by this committee<br />
were adopted by the Académie.<br />
<br />
‘I'he remark made on the above rule was: “ Dans<br />
exemple ; le général avec quelques officiers sont<br />
sortis (ou est sorti) du camp, le mot avec n’étant<br />
pas un adverb d’énumération, mais une préposition,<br />
le pluriel est irrégulier.”<br />
<br />
__ Surely this is the only logical conclusion. Even<br />
if good writers have used a plural verb in a fit of<br />
absentmindedness, there is no reason why we<br />
should imitate them in their faults.<br />
<br />
Yours truly,<br />
G. H. CLARKE.<br />
<br />
Dovus.e Tires or Books.<br />
<br />
Smr,—I wish to draw attention to a curious<br />
phenomenon of modern date. I remember a time<br />
when every book was reviewed under the title<br />
which the author gave it. But a fashion has since<br />
arisen whereby the reviewer is ashamed of quoting<br />
such a title, because he prefers to show his ability<br />
in improving upon it. As this fashion is fast<br />
becoming universal, I think I am doing no harm in<br />
quoting two examples from the June number of<br />
Lhe Author, At p. 237, a book entitled “'The<br />
Making of English” is reviewed under the title<br />
“English in the Making”; and another book<br />
entitled ‘‘Stones from a Glass House,” is reviewed<br />
under the title of “ A Round Stone or Two.”<br />
<br />
There is a great practical inconvenience about<br />
this custom. The unreal and secondary title is<br />
the one under which the review is quoted in the<br />
“Contents” and in the “Index.” Consequently<br />
the author or other student who wishes to consult<br />
the review is denied any help which an index may<br />
afford him. And no author has now the oppor-<br />
tunity of ascertaining that a review of his book<br />
has appeared in a given journal. I venture to<br />
think that this is undesirable and inconvenient in<br />
a very high degree.<br />
<br />
T am unable to understand the underlying prin-<br />
ciple. Ifa title has been deliberately chosen by<br />
an author, why should it be deliberately neglected,<br />
to the confasion of all to whom an index is<br />
supposed to be helpful? Surely this is not busi-<br />
ness, but something more nearly approaching to<br />
a thoughtless indifference to the wants of a serious<br />
student.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, the custom proves that<br />
authors are wholly wrong in complaining of the<br />
difficulty of finding good titles. For whatever<br />
titlean author may select, it can always be bettered<br />
(at any rate in the estimation of a competent<br />
critic, for they are all competent) by an alternative<br />
arrangement. Why do not authors compile lists of<br />
alternative titles from old journals? Ifa book is<br />
reviewed in six journals, it obtains six alternative<br />
titles, all of them (by the nature of the case) better<br />
than the original! Surely this is a phenomenon<br />
<br />
worthy of attention. :<br />
Water W. SKEAT.<br />
<br />
—_— st<br />
<br />
LIQUIDATION IN THE UNITED STATES.<br />
<br />
Str,—The following may serve as a warning.<br />
In December, 1902, I received a notice from a firm<br />
of lawyers in Boston that an assessment was to be<br />
made of the affairs of an American journal to<br />
which I had contributed for thirty-two years. I<br />
agreed to the winding up of the company—all the<br />
creditors being asked to do so.<br />
284<br />
<br />
Time went on and I received no information.<br />
Last summer a friend wrote to some one in Boston<br />
to enquire into the case on my behalf. He was<br />
informed that all creditors had been paid 10 per<br />
cent. except the foreign contributors “as their<br />
accounts did not agree with those of the company.”<br />
My account was £24—in the company’s books it<br />
was £17. The head of the firm said he had<br />
8 dollars odd in my name, which he would send<br />
over as soon as he had enquired into the dis-<br />
crepancy.<br />
<br />
I wrote in October to the effect that I desired<br />
payment of the 8 dollars held by him.<br />
<br />
No answer has been sent, and I have written<br />
three or four times. In my last letter I said if<br />
they did not send me the amount by return, I<br />
should make the matter public in 7e Author, with<br />
your permission.<br />
<br />
Surely it is strange that the foreign contributors<br />
(an Italian and myself—possibly more) should all<br />
have made mistakes in their accounts, and that<br />
they alone amongst the creditors are not paid !<br />
<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
8. B.<br />
<br />
~~<br />
<br />
ANCIENT Sirtver Bouquet Houpers.<br />
<br />
Dear Srtr,—Can any of your readers, or members<br />
of the Incorporated Society of Authors, give me<br />
any information upon the subject of ‘Ancient<br />
Silver Bouquet Holders,” or refer me to any work<br />
treating of such articles ?<br />
<br />
Yours truly,<br />
W. J. Hassan.<br />
<br />
Stretton-on-Dunsmore, Rugby,<br />
<br />
June 13th, 1904.<br />
<br />
1s<br />
<br />
AutHors’ AGENTS.<br />
<br />
Srr,—I have read with much interest the various<br />
insertions in Zhe Author on “ Authors’ Agents,”<br />
and the “ Rights of Authors.”<br />
<br />
My view is that a great many of the troubles of<br />
authors, and the small sums they obtain for their<br />
works, really arise from the great ignorance of<br />
the authors themselves. They know s0 little about<br />
the business side of getting out a book.<br />
<br />
I would advise all authors to study to some<br />
extent :—(1) The law of contracts ; (2) the law of<br />
copyright (including International copyright) also<br />
the Berne Convention ; (3) the cost of production<br />
of books, paper, printing, moulds, stereotypes, etc. ;<br />
(4) and last but not least the management of<br />
accounts (including bookkeeping by double entry).<br />
<br />
Accounts sent in by publishers are frequently<br />
most bewildering, and require a trained accountant<br />
with access to the publishers’ books to understand.<br />
<br />
Added to above it is useful to know the law of<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
accountancy, or .rather the law as it affects<br />
accountants,<br />
<br />
A man who knows nothing about the art of<br />
driving horses is not likely to succeed in driving<br />
well at his first or second attempt, nor will he be<br />
able to do so till he has really learnt his business.<br />
And so it is also with the author and book<br />
production.<br />
<br />
The reader may possibly get frightened at what<br />
T have said, and think to himself, “I have so much<br />
to learn.” But he need not be scared at what I<br />
have advanced. The secretary of the society will<br />
no doubt put him in the way of suitable books to<br />
read on the various subjects I have named, and<br />
armed with the knowledge obtained from these<br />
books the author will be able to contend against<br />
imposition, over charges, and secret profits, all of<br />
which are more or less attempted to the injury of<br />
the unbusiness, unskilful author. —<br />
<br />
All the tricks practised in the past for the pur-<br />
pose of imposing on the author have been brought<br />
about by the dense agnorance of the author himself,<br />
and many will say he deserved it, for if he will not<br />
look after, and learn what so closely concerns him-<br />
self, he must needs suffer, nor is the world as yet<br />
so fair a planet that the well-informed will teach the<br />
lazy as against the material interests of the former.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, much as to the art of publish-<br />
ing has been kept dark, which art is now more fully<br />
known.<br />
<br />
Why should not authors rouse themselves, and<br />
let them remember that “God helps those who.<br />
help themselves.” A few words I should like to<br />
add as to the great usefulness of the Authors’<br />
Society. To myself it would appear that all literary<br />
men, whether novelists, dramatic writers, poets,<br />
historians, or musical writers, should do all in<br />
their power to uphold the Society, and by carefully<br />
reading the monthly publication of the Society (The<br />
Author), the most unlearned will more easily learn<br />
the art of publishing, and the knowledge he will<br />
thus attain will be invaluable to him.<br />
<br />
Publishing has distinctly entered on a new era,<br />
and the sooner authors learn this truth it will be<br />
the better for them and for all concerned,<br />
<br />
Messrs. Sprigg, Pedrick & Co., Limited, write<br />
learnedly about authors’ agents. They say: ‘He,<br />
the author, should never entrust his work to an<br />
agent unless he is confident in the first place that<br />
the man he employs conducts his general business.<br />
with an entire absence of favouritism.”<br />
<br />
Alas for authors’ agents if I read the late Sir<br />
Walter Besant aright. There appeared to him at<br />
the time he wrote that there were but two agents.<br />
he could recommend. And authors who know<br />
their business can tell pretty correctly who those<br />
two agents were.<br />
<br />
A<br />
<br />
SENEX. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/495/1904-07-01-The-Author-14-10.pdf | publications, The Author |