479 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/479 | The Author, Vol. 13 Issue 04 (January 1903) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+13+Issue+04+%28January+1903%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 13 Issue 04 (January 1903)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1903-01-01-The-Author-13-4 | | | | | 81–108 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=13">13</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1903-01-01">1903-01-01</a> | | | | | | | 4 | | | 19030101 | The Huthor.<br />
<br />
{ Tg<br />
i 6<br />
of<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR<br />
<br />
Monthly.)<br />
<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. XIIT.—No. 4.<br />
<br />
JANUARY Ist, 1903.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE TELEPHONE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Telephone connection has now been estab-<br />
lished, and the Society’s number is—<br />
<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
eg<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
pe ee<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
K signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
Tue Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of 7he Author<br />
<br />
_ that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
++ —<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tur List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
can now be obtained at the offices of the Society,<br />
at the price of 6d. net.<br />
<br />
It will be sold to the members of the Society<br />
only.<br />
<br />
—+->-+—_<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
Tur investments of the Pension Fund at<br />
present standing in the names of the ‘Trustees are<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock; the<br />
<br />
Vou, XIII,<br />
<br />
[Prick SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
ee £816 5 6<br />
Wocal Goans =) a 404 10 0<br />
<br />
Victorian Government 8 % Con-<br />
solidated Inscribed Stock............ 291 19 11<br />
WearciGal 2. QOL 9.23<br />
Total 33.5. £1,714 4 8<br />
<br />
SPECIAL APPEAL.<br />
<br />
Tur Appeal sent out by the Chairman of the<br />
Society at the request of the Pension Fund Com-<br />
mittee has been very successful.<br />
<br />
Up to and including the 19th of December, the<br />
list of subscriptions and donations promised and<br />
given is set forch below. Further subscriptions<br />
and donations will be acknowledged as they<br />
come in.<br />
<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
<br />
Nov. 14, Tuckett, F. F. ' ; .£1 0 0<br />
S Cox, Miss Roalfe 0 5 0<br />
<br />
, Loynbee, William . 010 6<br />
<br />
, Anonymous . : : L070<br />
<br />
» odd, Miss Margaret, M.D. tt 0<br />
<br />
» Pearson, Mrs. Conney 2 2 0<br />
<br />
5 Seaman, Owen : ; - tt 8<br />
<br />
, Abbot, Rey. Edwin A, D.D.. 1 0 0<br />
<br />
. . Witherby, Rey. C. . 0 5.0<br />
<br />
» Salwey, Reginald E. 0 10 0<br />
Vacher, Francis 110<br />
<br />
Nov. 15, Parr, Mrs... ; 1 fr 0<br />
4 Davy, Man EO. : . 010 6<br />
<br />
. Allingham, Wiliam, FRCS. 1 1 9<br />
<br />
,» Armstrong, Miss Frances 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Holmes, Arthur H. (condi-<br />
<br />
tional) ; : :<br />
Rattray, Alex. : ‘ :<br />
,, Brodrick, ‘The Honble. Mrs. .<br />
Noy. 17, Nisbet, Hume : ; :<br />
Keene, H. G., C.5.1. : :<br />
Bayly, Miss A. E. (Edna Lyall)<br />
3 Forbes, E. . : : .<br />
ss Spiers, Victor.<br />
<br />
”<br />
<br />
a?<br />
<br />
owe oor cre<br />
—<br />
<br />
en bo Re OO Rt Ot<br />
<br />
eceocoooocosoo<br />
<br />
<br />
82<br />
<br />
Noy. 17, Kroeker, Mrs. Freiligrath<br />
» Burrowes, Miss Elsa<br />
» Cooke-Taylor, R. W.<br />
Noy. 18, Voysey, Rev. Charles<br />
, vones, W. Braunston<br />
» Anonymous .<br />
5 Salmond, Mrs. Walter<br />
» Amonymous .<br />
» Clough, Miss B. AL<br />
» Stanton, Miss H. M.<br />
» “Lucas Malet”<br />
Nov. 20, E. G.<br />
ao enkins, Miss Hadow<br />
Morrah, H. A. A<br />
Hatton-Ellis, Mrs. .<br />
Bertouch, The Baroness de<br />
,» Anonymous<br />
Nov. 21, Parr, Miss Olive<br />
Nov. 22, Forbes, Lady Helen<br />
» Twycross, Miss M.<br />
Nov. 24, Smythe, Alfred<br />
» Haggard, Mrs. John<br />
,, Anonymous ‘<br />
», Dale, Miss Nellie .<br />
oe Tresham Quaines” .<br />
Noy. 25, Young, W. Wellington .<br />
Nov. 26, Young, Capt. Charles<br />
Dec. 1, Finnemore, Mrs. .<br />
Dec. 3, Caulfield, Miss Sophia<br />
Dec. 5, Hecht, Mrs. :<br />
5» Hamilton, Mrs. G. W.<br />
Brinton, Selwyn<br />
Dec. 9, Dill, Miss Bessie<br />
Dec. 18, Sutherland, Her Grace the<br />
Duchess of<br />
Dec. 19, Toplis, Miss Grace .<br />
<br />
”<br />
<br />
”<br />
<br />
Donations.<br />
<br />
Noy. 13, Bullen, EF. A<br />
is Roberts, Morley (an annual<br />
subscriber). :<br />
Nov. 14, Rossetti, W.M. . :<br />
es Marshall, Capt. Robert .<br />
»» Hoyer, Miss ‘ :<br />
. EM 8B.<br />
“ Lefroy, Mrs. .<br />
» Sinclair, Miss May (an annual<br />
subscriber) . : ‘<br />
» McBride, Capt. E. E.<br />
» Garnier, Russell .<br />
Noy. 15, Burchell, Sidney H.<br />
» Spero” :<br />
5 “ Cecil Medlicott v<br />
», Harker, Mrs. Allen<br />
» Banks, Mrs. M. M.<br />
», Spielmann, M. H.<br />
» Garnier, Col. J. .<br />
», Benecke, Miss Ida .<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
or So by<br />
<br />
oor Of ©<br />
<br />
KSPR wWOoOOCCNOFRFS<br />
<br />
connnacd oro<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
illo e e<br />
aooccunce o orn HONS OO COLON OH HOA OLOTS OLD OH OHMS WN<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
He<br />
Howonmonworcneu<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
oacocoococoo<br />
<br />
=><br />
<br />
oo cCooaoocooeoeoo soso S OS Soo RSS<br />
<br />
So<br />
<br />
ecocoocoacaoceo eoocooocoo<br />
<br />
Nov. 15, Atton, Henry ; 05 0<br />
<br />
Nov. 17, Panter, Rev. C. R.. 0 5 0<br />
<br />
» Keene, H.G,CSi . 0 5 0<br />
<br />
», Spielmann, Mrs. M. H. . 1 i4@<br />
<br />
» Begbie, Harold ; . 8 3 0<br />
<br />
», Stevenson, J.J. . -10 0 0<br />
<br />
, Minniken, Miss Bertha M. 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Noy. 18, From sale of autograph . 124<br />
<br />
» Wintle, H. R. 010 0<br />
<br />
» Brickdale-Corbett, H. M. 010 0<br />
<br />
» Defries, Miss Violet : 010 6<br />
<br />
Nov. 19, Stanton, Miss Hannah M. 1 0 ¥<br />
» Warren, Major-General Sir<br />
<br />
Charles, K.C.M.G. 1 0.98<br />
<br />
» “lucas Malet”. 5 5 0<br />
<br />
Nov. 20, Wynne, Charles Whitworth 5 &<br />
<br />
Nov. 22, Skeat, The Rev. Prof. W. W.. 5 0 0<br />
<br />
Nov. 25, Jacobs, W.W. ; : 1 194<br />
<br />
; Young, W. Wellington . 0 5 0<br />
<br />
» Batty, Mrs. Braithwaite . 010 0<br />
<br />
Nov. 26, Cook, C. H. . 1.1 ¢@<br />
<br />
Noy. 27, Gleig, Charles 010 0<br />
<br />
» Harraden, Miss Beatrice 1 1@<br />
<br />
. Frankland, F. W. 1 0 0<br />
<br />
,» d Auvergne, Mrs. 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Nov. 28, Sutcliffe, Halliwell 1 2 8<br />
<br />
Nov. 29, Weyman, Stanley J. 5 0 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 1, Sanderson, Sir J. Burdon 5 0 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 2, Trevor- Batty e, Aubyn 1 14<br />
<br />
» Marks, Mrs. . ; 010 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 9, Moore, Henry Charles 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 11, Lutzow, Count 2 0 0<br />
<br />
« Leicester Romayne ” 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Dee. ‘12, Croft, Miss Lily 0 5 0<br />
<br />
a Panting, J. Harwood 010 0<br />
<br />
. Tattersall, Miss Louisa . 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 19, Egbert, Henry 0 5 0<br />
<br />
The following members have also made subscrip-<br />
tions or donations :—<br />
<br />
Meredith, George, President of the Society.<br />
<br />
Thompson, Sir — Bart., F.R.C.S.<br />
<br />
Rashdall, The Rev. H<br />
<br />
Guthrie, Anstey.<br />
<br />
Robertson, Cc. B.<br />
<br />
‘There are in addition other subscribers who do<br />
not desire that either their names or the amount<br />
they are subscribing should be printed.<br />
<br />
The total amount of cash actually received is<br />
£190 3s. 6d.<br />
<br />
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Mr. Hamilton Drummond, who is a member of<br />
our Society, has offered a subscription of £10 for<br />
five years, if nine other members of the Society<br />
will promise the same contribution before 31st<br />
March, 1903.<br />
<br />
We sincerely hope that sufficient members of<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
- ef the Society will be found to come forward and<br />
<br />
ose meet Mr. Drummond’s generous offer, and that<br />
<br />
. dee ‘before the time expires we may be able to print in<br />
<br />
», of the columns of Zhe Author the full list of ten<br />
» dae subscribers of the required amount.<br />
<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
<br />
ive Hawkins, A. Hope . : _£10° 0 0<br />
erisa@ Barrie, J. M. . : : ‘ ~ 10-0 0<br />
jaca Drummond, Hamilton : ; 10-02-60<br />
veg Wynne, Charles Whitworth . 2 19 0-9<br />
es<br />
Tue Pension FunD COMMITTEE.<br />
a In order to give members of the Society, should<br />
<br />
ed: they desire to appoint a fresh member to the<br />
,-a89 Pension Fund Committee, full time to act, it has<br />
-98e been thought advisable to place in Zhe Author a<br />
<br />
_ (I full statement of the method of election under the<br />
foe Scheme for administration of the Pension Fund.<br />
>a Under that Scheme the Committee is composed of<br />
ad three members elected by the Committee of the<br />
~- 908 Society, three members elected by the Society at<br />
si the General Meeting, and the Chairman of the<br />
908 Society for the time being, ex officio. The three<br />
‘9m members elected at the General Meeting when the<br />
os Fund was started, were Mr. Morley Roberts, Mr.<br />
<br />
' Wf M. H. Spielmann, and Mrs. Alec Tweedie. Last<br />
98) year, Mrs. Alec Tweedie resigned in due course,<br />
Sf and submitting her name for re-election was<br />
l/:Gh unanimously re-elected. This year, Mr. Morley<br />
1 99 Roberts in turn, under the Rules of the Scheme,<br />
09) tenders his resignation and submits his name for<br />
\/-@ re-election. The members have power to put for-<br />
‘ey ward other names under Clause 9 which runs as<br />
<br />
wolle follows :—<br />
<br />
ae! * Any candidate for election to the Pension Fund Com-<br />
if mittee by the members of the Society (not being a retiring<br />
s@ member of such Committee) shall be nominated in writing<br />
© to the Secretary, at least three weeks prior to the General<br />
~ Meeting at which such candidate is to be proposed, and the<br />
‘6 nomination of each such candidate shall be subscribed by,<br />
4; at least, three members of the Society. A list of the names<br />
+ of the candidates so nominated shall be sent to the members<br />
? of the Society with the annual report of the Managing<br />
_ Committee, and those candidates obtaining the most votes<br />
+ at the General Meeting shall be elected to serve on the<br />
*) Pension Fund Committee.”<br />
<br />
Tn case any member should desire to refer to the<br />
“| List of Members, a copy complete, with the excep-<br />
tion of those members referred to in the note at<br />
| the beginning, can be obtained at the Society’s<br />
| Office.<br />
<br />
It would be as well, therefore, should any of the<br />
members desire to put forward candidates, to take<br />
the matter within their immediate consideration.<br />
The General Meeting of the Society has usually<br />
been held towards the end of February or the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
83<br />
<br />
beginning of March. It is essential that all<br />
nominations should be in the hands of the<br />
Secretary before the 31st of January.<br />
<br />
—_——1—_—-<br />
<br />
Sir Walter Besant Memorial Fund.<br />
<br />
THE amount standing to the credit<br />
of this account in the Bank is......... £330 8 6<br />
<br />
There are a few promised subscriptions still<br />
outstanding. The total of these is, roughly,<br />
about £4, The subscriptions received from July 1st<br />
to the date of issue are given below :—<br />
<br />
Patterson, A. . : ‘ : fl 1 0<br />
Salwey, Reginald E. : : : 010 0<br />
Gidley, Miss E. C. : : 010 0<br />
Nixon, Prof. J. E. 0% 6<br />
Dill, Miss Bessie 0. 5.0<br />
Moore, Henry Charles 0 5 6<br />
<br />
———————_1——______<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
tt<br />
<br />
HE Committee held the last meeting in 1902<br />
on Monday, the 1st of December. They<br />
proceeded to the election of members. The<br />
<br />
list of those elected is set forth below. The post-<br />
age of magazines was one of the questions discussed.<br />
The Chamber of Commerce is dealing with the<br />
matter and the Committee are supporting its action.<br />
Two disputes were up for discussion. In the one<br />
negotiations are being carried forward, and in the<br />
other it was decided, if it was possible to obtain<br />
the support of the member concerned, to take the<br />
matter into Court. As the point under discussion<br />
is one of principle, and concerns a very common<br />
clause in authors’ agreements, it is hoped that the<br />
matter may be tried in Court in order that a test<br />
case may be put forward.<br />
<br />
During the past month one case has been tried<br />
in the County Court. The debt and costs were<br />
paid. The Secretary has forwarded four claims<br />
against American magazines for money due to<br />
the Society’s American agent. The Committee<br />
hope that they will terminate satisfactorily. With<br />
the sanction of the Chairman asmall County Court<br />
case was taken in hand. It was placed with the<br />
solicitors of the Society, but before the summons<br />
was issued the debt was paid.<br />
<br />
The Secretary during the past month has dealt<br />
with ten cases. Five refer to the rendering of<br />
accounts, three to claims for money due, and two<br />
deal with the return of MSS. Five of the cases<br />
have been satisfactorily concluded, two for money<br />
84<br />
<br />
due and three for accounts. The County Court case<br />
referred to must be reckoned as one of the five.<br />
There is every hope that the balance will terminate<br />
to the advantage of the authors without calling in<br />
the aid of the law.<br />
<br />
pee<br />
<br />
Election, December, 1902.<br />
<br />
The following members and associates were<br />
elected on December Ist, 1902.<br />
Burke, Arthur M. . 2, Carlyle Gardens,<br />
Cheyne Row, S.W.<br />
Carlile, Rey. John C.<br />
<br />
Davidson, Miss Lillias Graemsdyke, Cranes-<br />
Campbell water Park, Southsea.<br />
Foster, Arnold R. 38, Yew Tree Road,<br />
<br />
Withington, Lancs.<br />
<br />
Hextable, Swanley,<br />
Kent.<br />
<br />
Calle de Buenos Aires,<br />
Las Palmas, Canary<br />
Islands.<br />
<br />
Stanhope, The Hon. and Byford Rectory, Here-<br />
Rey. Berkeley ford.<br />
<br />
Nye, George .<br />
<br />
Meyer, Charles<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
<br />
——$+—<—¢—<br />
<br />
IR ROBERT BALL is at present engaged on<br />
<br />
a treatise on “Spherical Astronomy.” His<br />
<br />
latest work, ‘‘ The Earth’s Beginning,” was<br />
practically an account of a recent course of lectures<br />
<br />
given by him at the Royal Institution. It has<br />
been published here by Messrs. Cassell. There is<br />
<br />
also an American edition ; and quite recently Sir<br />
Robert Ball received a copy of a Dutch translation,<br />
with the title “ Het Onstaan der Aarde,” trans-<br />
lated by Dr. B. C. Goudsmit.<br />
<br />
Edna Lyall’s new book, “The Burgess Letters,”<br />
just published by Messrs. Longmans, Green & Co.<br />
at 2s. 6d., is a record of child-life in the sixties.<br />
It is not fiction, but is a genuine record of this<br />
popular authoress’s own childhood. This interest-<br />
ing record has a coloured frontispiece, and eight<br />
full-page illustrations by Walter S. Stacey.<br />
<br />
Edna Lyall is just beginning to write a novel,<br />
the scene of which is laid partly in Italy and partly<br />
in England. It will be remembered that in the<br />
spring of 1902 this writer published through<br />
Messrs. Longmans a short story called “The<br />
Hinderers,” which upholds the Quaker view as to<br />
the unlawfulness of war.<br />
<br />
We must not expect anything from Miss Annabel<br />
<br />
Gray at present, as she is recovering from a most<br />
dangerous illness.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Lord Avebury’s “The Use of Life” has bee<br />
translated into Gujerathi and Urdu, and, like “The<br />
Pleasures of Life,” into Mahratti. The translation<br />
into Mahratti has an interesting preface by the<br />
translator, who states that his principal object was.<br />
to show that Englishmen had a cheerful view of<br />
life, while his countrymen’s view of life was just<br />
the reverse.<br />
<br />
Mr. Mackenzie Bell’s religious lyric, “ Lord<br />
Teach us to Pray,” which is set to music as am<br />
anthem by Herr Georg Liebling, has been trans-<br />
lated into German verse by the Rev. Professor Carl<br />
Glebe, of Westphalia, for use throughout Germany.<br />
The second edition of the anthem, just published<br />
in London by Dr. Charles Vincent, has both the<br />
English and the German words.<br />
<br />
Mr. Harold Begbie’s latest book, “ Bundy in the<br />
Greenwood” (Isbister, 5s.), is illustrated by<br />
Gordon Browne. It is Mr. Begbie’s first venture<br />
into the nursery, and it was only published after<br />
he had amended the MS. according to the criticism<br />
of his eldest daughter, rising six.<br />
<br />
This writer has just begun a series of ‘‘ Master<br />
Workers” in the Pall Mall Magazine. The first<br />
article dealt with the Bishop of London; the<br />
second with Sir William Crookes ; and the next<br />
two will deal with psychic research and the mys-<br />
tery of the subliminal consciousness. The object<br />
of the series is to convince the ordinary man that<br />
there is a vast amount of work proceeding in the<br />
modern world of which he knows very little.<br />
<br />
Austin Clare’s new north-country novel, “The<br />
Tideway,” will be published immediately by<br />
Messrs. Chatto and Windus.<br />
<br />
‘“‘The Cardinal’s Dawn,” the serial finishing in<br />
the January issue of Macmillan’s Magazine, is by &<br />
new writer, H. L. Montgomery. The novel is<br />
placed in Italy in the imquecento, and is based on<br />
the intrigues for and against Bianca Capelli.<br />
<br />
Mr. Austin Dobson has undertaken to write @<br />
life of ‘‘ Fanny Burney ” for Messrs. Macmillan’s<br />
“English Men of Letters,” and Mr. Edmund Gosse<br />
is at work on a life of “Jeremy Taylor” for the<br />
same series.<br />
<br />
Mr. Dobson’s “Side-walk Studies,” recently<br />
issued by Messrs. Chatto and Windus, is an enter-<br />
taining book. ‘There is an informing chapter on<br />
“Mrs. Woffington”; another on “The Vicar of<br />
Wakefield and its Illustrators ” ; there is “‘ A Walk<br />
from Fulham to Chiswick” ; and perhaps the most<br />
fascinating of all, “Dr. Johnson’s Haunts and ~<br />
Habitations.”<br />
<br />
From Mr. Dobson’s “Samuel Richardson’<br />
(Macmillan’s “English Men of Letters” Series) we<br />
should like to quote at length, but space permits<br />
only an extract or two. Referring to the recently-<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
«ie raised question of Richardson’s indebtedness to<br />
self Marivaux’s “ Vie de Marianne,” he says :—<br />
Es “That there are superficial affinities between Richardson<br />
_ (@ and Marivanx may at once be conceded. Both hit upon<br />
s4) the novel of analysis, and in this connection, no doubt,<br />
-js;1f Marivaux precedes Richardson. Their manners of writing<br />
+o» -were also similar in some respects ; and when Crébillon the<br />
voy younger, describing Marivaux, affirms that his characters<br />
jon not only say everything that they have done, and every-<br />
ogid) thing that they have thought, but everything that they<br />
».uo® would have liked to think but did not—he almost seems<br />
<br />
| 91 to be describing Richardson as well. .. .<br />
ie “There is not, as far as we are aware, a particle of evidence<br />
«/) that Richardson ever saw the earlier volumes of this version<br />
<br />
jo) (of ‘Vie de Marianne’). In fact, the only discoverable<br />
<br />
455 aeference he makes to Marivaux is contained in the post-<br />
(8. script to ‘ Clarissa,’ and that occurs in a quotation from a<br />
«4 French critic (translated) taken from the Gentleman's<br />
voll Magazine for August, 1749. That he knew no French is<br />
-. “ef demonstrable, and he could not therefore have studied<br />
sl Marivaux in the original, Moreover, he was not in any<br />
sass sense a novel reader ; and in‘ Pamela.’ the idea of which<br />
bad had been in his mind twenty years before he wrote it, he<br />
vif aimed at a moral work rather than a story.<br />
<br />
“ Richardson has given so circumstantial and reasonable<br />
<br />
ean account of the independent origin and development of<br />
<br />
04 ed) the book, that it seems superfluous to go outside it in order<br />
<br />
6) to establish his obligation to a French author, however<br />
<br />
fis gifted, of whom, when he first sat down to write the<br />
<br />
ias% * Familiar Letters’ to which ‘ Pamela’ owed its birth, he<br />
«; bee had probably never even heard the name.”<br />
<br />
1 In the last chapter, entitled ‘Last Years and<br />
oo) General Estimate,” there is an admirable bit of<br />
summing-up :—<br />
<br />
* His popularity is certain with the few—with those who,<br />
| like Horace Walpole, either read what nobody else does, or,<br />
| like Edward Fitzgerald and Dr. Jowett, read only what<br />
} takes theirfancy. He must always find readers, too, with<br />
<br />
‘the students of literature. He was the pioneer of a new<br />
‘movement ; the first certificated practitioner of sentiment ;<br />
4 the English Columbus of the analytical novel of ordinary<br />
i life. Before him, no one had essayed in this field to<br />
describe the birth and growth of a new impression, to show<br />
the ebb and flow of emotion in a mind distraught, to follow<br />
the progress of a passion, to dive so deeply into the human<br />
ieee heart, as to leave—in Scott’s expressive words—‘ neither<br />
: noe head, bay, nor inlet behind him until he had traced its<br />
<br />
‘92 soundings, and laid it downin his chart, with all its minute<br />
00a sinuosities, its depths and shallows.’ ”<br />
<br />
“ The Splendid Idle Forties,” by Gertrude Ather-<br />
ton (Macmillan & Co.), is a revised and enlarged<br />
© edition of her former book, “ Before the Gringos<br />
#2 Came.” The tales give a vivid and striking<br />
<br />
| picture of old Californian life before and during<br />
| the American conquest, of the beauty, grace, and<br />
<br />
passion of the Spanish women, and their fierce<br />
resentment against their country’s invaders.<br />
<br />
Mr. Stephen Gwynne has an interesting article<br />
‘on “Celtic Sagas” in the December number of<br />
Macmillan’s Magazine. He seeks to illustrate, by<br />
the method of resemblance and difference, the<br />
ancient poetry of Ireland, as represented by Lady<br />
Charlotte Guest’s famous version of ‘The<br />
Mabinogion.”<br />
<br />
Miss Henriette Corkran’s “‘ Celebrities aud I,”<br />
published a short while ago by Messrs. Hutchinson<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
85<br />
<br />
& Co., is a handsome volume brim full of enter-<br />
taining gossip and amusing anecdotes. Miss<br />
Corkran, who is a painter by profession, gives us<br />
her crisply-written impressions of the many<br />
celebrities she has known and met.<br />
<br />
Of Thackeray, kind friend of her childhood, we<br />
hear a good deal. ‘Then there are interesting<br />
anecdotes about the Brownings, Tennyson, W. G.<br />
Wills, the dramatist, Sir Frederick Leighton, etc.,<br />
etc. ; and last and latest, we are given an impres-<br />
sionist sketch of Mr. Richard Whiteing, the famous<br />
author of “ No. 5, John Street.”’ “ Celebrities and<br />
I” has been widely reviewed, and it ought to do<br />
very well.<br />
<br />
Mr. Andrew Lang’s “ The Disentanglers” is a<br />
series of stories, of more or less fantastic adven-<br />
ture, under one cover. (Longmans, 6s.) The<br />
interest which holds them together is supplied by<br />
the connection of some of the characters with an<br />
agency for the disentangling of matrimonial diffi-<br />
culties. We have, among others, “ Adventure of<br />
the Rich Uncle,” “Adventure of the Office Screen,”<br />
“ Adventure of the Exemplary Earl,” and “ Adven-<br />
ture of the Miserly Marquis.” It is an amusing<br />
book.<br />
<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope delivered a_ lecture last<br />
month in Edinburgh, before the Philosophical<br />
Society.<br />
<br />
He said (we quote from the Daily Chronicle) ‘‘the average<br />
man viewed his own sphere of life as normal ; he viewed<br />
as real what he saw existing among his neighbours, and<br />
regarded as real what was before him in ninety-nine cases<br />
out of a hundred. The ninety-nine he called real, and the<br />
one case in the hundred he viewed as unreal.<br />
<br />
“The average man had little adventure; his time was<br />
marked down for him, and he saw little hope of becoming<br />
other than what he was. The lot of the labouring classes<br />
was the most common, but the man who wrote about this<br />
class was marked down by the wealthy classes as a cynic.<br />
In a true and deep picture the novelist could not leave out<br />
the physical side of a man, for often his physical pleasure<br />
was his only pleasure, and in his pleasurable excesses often<br />
lay the man’s deepest temptation.<br />
<br />
“The notions of the man in the street were generally<br />
cousin once removed to truth. He had small sympathies<br />
with the parent who wrote to the newspapers that he liked<br />
to feel safe in handing a book to his girl to read. It did<br />
not do to have the truth told in all circumstances, but<br />
there was generally in a book a message for someone. The<br />
words romance and realism were too often the catchwords<br />
of criticism. Realism widened their views and broadened<br />
<br />
their sympathies.”<br />
<br />
We have received a dainty paper-covered booklet<br />
of selections from the works of John Greenleaf<br />
Whittier, entitled “ A Whittier Treasury.” The<br />
selections have been made by the Countess of<br />
Portsmouth.<br />
<br />
Mr. Percy White’s latest novel, “The New<br />
Christians,” has gone into a second edition. So<br />
has Mr. Morley Roberts’ “Immortal Youth.”<br />
Both these novels well deserve their undoubted<br />
<br />
SUCCESS.<br />
<br />
?<br />
<br />
<br />
86<br />
<br />
Mrs. Edward Kennard’s “ The Motor Maniac”<br />
is a capital story somewhat on the lines of her<br />
successful ‘ The Golf Lunatic.”<br />
<br />
Lieut.-Colonel E. Gunter (late East Lanes. Regi-<br />
ment) has published, through Messrs. Wm. Clowes<br />
& Sons, Ltd., 23, Cockspur Street, Charing Cross,<br />
a sixth edition of his well-known “ Officer’s Field<br />
Note and Sketch Book and Reconnaissance Aide-<br />
Mémoire.”<br />
<br />
“Harvest Home”? is the title of the latter-day<br />
poems of Mr. Thomas Winter Wood (Vanguard),<br />
of Plymouth. “ Harvest Home” contains poems<br />
which must appeal to many minds, and we refer<br />
our readers to the volume that they may taste for<br />
themselves. Messrs. Simpkin, Marshall are the<br />
publishers; the price is 3s. 6d. net.<br />
<br />
A volume of poems has been published by<br />
Ernest Western through Thomas Burleigh, 376,<br />
Strand. It is called ‘“ Creeds, Crosses, and Cre-<br />
denda,” and may be commended to those who care<br />
for pleasant verse.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Kegan Paul have published a new poem<br />
by Mr. Ernest A. Tietkens, author of ‘The<br />
Heavenly Link,” entitled “The Loves of the<br />
Flowers: a Spiritual Dream.” It is 2s. 6d. net.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Harcourt Roe, who has paid a six months’<br />
visit to New Brunswick, purposes writing some<br />
articles on New Brunswick and the very primitive<br />
condition of parts of the country there.<br />
<br />
Copies of those excellent and quite indispensable<br />
publications, ““Who’s Who” and ‘“ The English-<br />
woman’s Year Book for 1903” have been received<br />
at our office.<br />
<br />
a re<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—+—<br />
<br />
FTER the Balzac statue comes the Balzac<br />
Orphanage. It seems that Madame Barbier,<br />
in whose house Balzac lived for some years,<br />
<br />
has founded a home for twenty orphan girls in<br />
memory of the great novelist.<br />
<br />
She is now seventy-five years of age, and she<br />
still owns the house in the Rue Raynouard ‘in<br />
which Balzac wrote so many of his books from<br />
1840 to 1847, the year of his marriage. Until<br />
last year Madame Barbier lived in this house.<br />
She and her daughter have given up their entire<br />
fortune in order to found this orphanage, and in<br />
spite of all the sacrifices they have made they will<br />
be short of two thousand francs to make up this<br />
year the thirty-two thousand of their expenses.<br />
M. de Braisne, an influential member of the Société<br />
des Gens de Lettres, has written a most touching<br />
account of Madame Barbier’s efforts and sacrifices,<br />
hoping that any admirers of the author of the<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
“ Comédie Humaine” may come forward and offe<br />
their contributions to the Balzac Orphanage.<br />
The new novel by Anatole France, “ Histoir<br />
Comique,” commences with a tragedy. It is now<br />
appearing in serial form in the Revue de Paris, an<br />
will afterwards be published with illustrations ag<br />
an édition de luxe. It is a decidedly up-to-dai<br />
novel, and the story opens in the dressing-room 0<br />
an actress.<br />
“La Statue ensevelie,”’ by Ivan Strannik, i<br />
well worth reading. It is a novel with remarkabl<br />
little plot, and the whole interest of the sti<br />
centres in the état d’dme of the heroine. She is”<br />
one of the unfortunate women with an artisti<br />
temperament, and an obtuse, egotistical husband<br />
She naturally, under these circumstances, finds<br />
marriage a failure, and so takes refuge in art an<br />
in the friendship of a devoted cousin. There is<br />
nothing particularly original in the story itself,<br />
but the heroine is Russian, and the intense prid<br />
sullenness, and passion of the Russian temperament<br />
make the novel an interesting psychological study.<br />
“Sur la Branche” is the title of the new novel<br />
by Pierre de Coulevain, the author of “ Eye<br />
Victorieuse.” In the latter book we had a study<br />
of the American society woman at home and<br />
abroad, her faults and her qualities being compared<br />
with those of the French woman in the same rank<br />
of life. In this new novel the author gives us his<br />
candid opinion about England and the English.<br />
The general verdict of the English critics after<br />
reading “Eve Victorieuse” was that Pierre deCoule-<br />
vain thoroughly understood Americans. It will be<br />
interesting to read the opinion of the same critics<br />
after the publication of “Sur la Branche.” The<br />
last chapters of this novel are not yet written, but<br />
it is probable that the volume will be published<br />
early in the year.<br />
“TL Argent del’Autre,” by M. Charles de Rouvre,<br />
is an excellent novel. It is the story of a man<br />
who has no fortune of his own, and who falls<br />
desperately in love with a wealthy young widow,<br />
whom he eventually marries. His torment begins<br />
soon after this event. The idea of owing every<br />
thing to his wife humiliates him, particularly as<br />
the wealth she now owns comes to her from he<br />
first husband. The story is cleverly worked out,<br />
so that the reader enters thoroughly into th<br />
sufferings of the husband, and realizes all th<br />
humiliation of his position in the home.<br />
<br />
M. Waldeck Rousseau has just published a book<br />
entitled “ L’Action républicaine et sociale,” treat-<br />
ing of all the reforms that have been accomplished<br />
from 1899 to 1902.<br />
<br />
The French Society of Dramatic Authors he<br />
been fortunate in discovering a most capable ma<br />
as successor to M. Roger, whose death occurred<br />
some two or three months ago. M. Robe<br />
<br />
<br />
te: Gangnat, who has been elected Agent-Général_ of<br />
2 of the Society, is an advocate by profession. He<br />
2 -s% was secretary to M. Pichon, the present French<br />
iil/ Minister in Tunis, and attaché under M. Bourgeois,<br />
sail! Minister of the Interior and Minister of Foreign<br />
tit ® Affairs.<br />
al In 1898, M. Gangnat joined the staff of the<br />
Wl Matin as dramatic critic, and from 1891 to 1894<br />
sy of he was President of the dramatic society known<br />
<br />
es, as “Les Escholiers,” a society which stages the<br />
«toy works of unknown but talented authors. M.<br />
ae} Gangnat is therefore well known in the theatrical<br />
» 109 world, whilst his legal knowledge and experience<br />
. {lis will be invaluable to the Society he now represents.<br />
ae Things theatrical seem to be of the greatest<br />
ja importance, judging from the amount of literature<br />
duc published this season on subjects concerning the<br />
_ ed: theatre in France and in other countries.<br />
<br />
*__ A volume by M. Jules Claretie entitled “ Profils<br />
of de Théatre’’ is interesting from the first line to<br />
' 94 the last. M. Claretie, as director of the Théatre<br />
_voa9 Francais, has exceptional opportunities for writing<br />
ot aa book of this kind. He has the good fortune,<br />
* 90, too, to possess an excellent memory, so that the<br />
“fo volume, with its anecdotes of artistes living and<br />
ssi dead, is like an album of photographs. M. Claretie<br />
» (fs tells us of Dejazet refusing to act in “‘ La Dame<br />
“ui aux Camélias ” and of Frédéric Lemaitre’s pride in<br />
1 sit his “ Robert Macaire.” He tells us, too, interesting<br />
ine! details about Got, Reichenberg and Monnet Sully.<br />
<br />
‘As a kind of postscript to this book of M.<br />
sf Claretie’s comes a volume by M. Adrien Bern-<br />
igt heim, entitled “Trente Ans de Théatre.” The<br />
19g) author gives us details about the working and the<br />
sigh statistics of the four state theatres of France.<br />
ve 9) He also, like M. Claretie, gives us the benefit of<br />
ei his souvenirs, and finishes the volume with an<br />
©59; account of the Society called the “'Trente Ans de<br />
, $901 Théatre,” in which he is so deeply interested, and<br />
<br />
iy which was originally started as a kind of relief<br />
tie fund for artistes.<br />
-°4 Notcontent with giving us so much information<br />
«od, about the French stage, M. Georges Bourdon has<br />
$e been studying in England all things connected<br />
i dig with the English theatre, and as a result he has<br />
q published a volume entitled “Les Théatres<br />
Anglais.” M. Jusserand, too, has taken up the<br />
subject, and has just published a most interesting<br />
article on “The London Theatres in the time of<br />
Shakespeare.” It appears that the first permanent<br />
theatre was built in Paris in 1548, and that the<br />
first one in London dated from 1576.<br />
<br />
ay The two great successes of this season, so far,<br />
. 84 are undoubtedly the “ Resurrection” at the Odéon,<br />
and “La Chatelaine” at the Renaissance.<br />
<br />
“Le Joug,”’ which Madame Réjane has been<br />
playing since her return to Paris, has not been<br />
‘enthusiastically received. It is no doubt a clever<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
87<br />
<br />
piece, and the dialogue is bright and witty, but<br />
the French public is getting tired of this kind<br />
of play.<br />
<br />
“Le Cadre” is another play of the same stamp.<br />
It was well received as it was admirably put on,<br />
but the public soon tired of this, too.<br />
<br />
Byron’s “ Manfred” was M. Lugne Poe’s latest<br />
venture, but it must be confessed that most people<br />
were disappointed with this play on the stage.<br />
<br />
At the Opéra Comique, “La Carmélite,” by<br />
M. Catulle Mendés, has been the great event of<br />
the season in the musical world. The theme of<br />
this opera has given rise to much discussion, as<br />
the more devoted Catholics strongly objected to<br />
the taking of the veil being employed as a stage<br />
effect.<br />
<br />
M. Paul Hervieu is the fortunate dramatic<br />
author who has produced a new play for Madame<br />
Sarah Bernhardt. M. Hervieu has had this piece<br />
on hand for about a year.<br />
<br />
The International Theatre is making great<br />
headway here. “Infedele,” by Roberto Bracco,<br />
and “Di Notte,” by Sabatino Lopez, are the two<br />
pieces now being given, and M. Bour has scored<br />
an immense success with both of them. The<br />
latter is a most curious play, and shows up the<br />
striking difference between the Italian and French<br />
theatres. The piece is full of surprises, unexpected<br />
incidents seem to be tacked on to the drama, and<br />
in one or two instances the tragedy borders on<br />
comedy. M. Bauer is excellent in his réle, and<br />
M. Bour’s acting is. as finished as in his famous<br />
“Alleluia.”<br />
<br />
“ Infedele”’ is a comedy in three acts, and is<br />
admirably put on. M. Bour, Mlle. Mylo d’Arcylle,<br />
and M. Bourny have the three chief parts. The<br />
play is an Italian variation on the “eternal<br />
theme,” so dear to French dramatic authors.<br />
The dialogue is witty, but most daring, and the<br />
piece demands extremely clever and finished<br />
acting.<br />
<br />
Attys HALLARD.<br />
———__1——_e—___—_—_-<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
PROPERTY.<br />
<br />
oe eS ie<br />
Kipling +, Putnam.<br />
<br />
UDYARD KIPLING’S suit for $25,000<br />
damages against George Haven Putnam<br />
and Irving Putnam, constituting the pub-<br />
<br />
lishing firm of G. P. Putnam’s Sons, for infringe-<br />
ment of copyright and trademark, came up again<br />
for argument before the United States Circuit<br />
Court of Appeals on Kipling’s appeal from Judge<br />
Lacombe’s decision against him,<br />
<br />
<br />
88<br />
<br />
John L. Hill, in arguing for Mr. Kipling,<br />
said that at the time the critical sickness of<br />
the author in New York and the death of his<br />
little girl were exciting intense interest in him<br />
and his works, the defendants decided “ to shake<br />
the tree and get all the apples they could,” and<br />
that the Brushwood edition followed. He believed<br />
the intention was to forestall the sale of the<br />
“Outward Bound” edition, the authorized<br />
edition. ;<br />
<br />
Stephen H. Olin, for the Putnams, said the<br />
publishers had attempted no deceit whatever, and<br />
that only fifteen sets had borne the elephant’s<br />
head and autograph, which the plaintiff says were<br />
used to give the edition the colour of an authorised<br />
edition.<br />
<br />
The Court reserved decision.<br />
<br />
— +<br />
<br />
Literary Property and Copyright in the United<br />
States.<br />
<br />
Ix 1890 an American publisher entered into a<br />
contract with an English author, having in pre-<br />
paration a novel to be published serially in an<br />
English magazine, by which he agreed to pay<br />
£20 “in return for the sole and exclusive use of<br />
advance sheets of said novel in the United States<br />
and Dominion of Canada”; the price to be paid<br />
“on publication of the novel in America.” The<br />
author agreed to deliver to the publisher a complete<br />
copy of the work, either in advance sheets or<br />
manuscript, at least two months prior to the com-<br />
pletion of its serial publication in England. Prior<br />
to the publication of the work in America, in<br />
October, 1891, the greater portion of it had been<br />
published serially in England. Until July Ist,<br />
1891, there was no statute in the United States<br />
under which a copyright could be secured on a<br />
work by a foreign author. Held that, construing<br />
the contract in the light of such facts, it conferred<br />
no rights of proprietorship in the manuscript of<br />
the work which entitled the American publisher<br />
to copyright the same in the United States, but<br />
only the right to the exclusive use of the advance<br />
sheets to enable him to publish the work in<br />
America coincidently with or in advance of its<br />
publication in England.<br />
<br />
The bill charges that Mr. Barrie, the author of<br />
“The Little Minister,” a novel to be issued serially<br />
in the year 1891 in the magazine Good Words,<br />
published in London, on May 8th, 1890, entered<br />
into a contract with John W. Lovell as follows :<br />
<br />
“This contract entered into and made this<br />
eighth day of May, 1890, between J. M. Barrie, of<br />
London, and John W. Lovell, of New York,<br />
witnesseth: (1) In consideration of the premises,<br />
the said J. M. Barrie hereby grants and assigns to<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the said John W. Lovell the sule and exclusive<br />
right to publish from advance sheets in the United —<br />
States and Dominion of Canada,.a novel by him to<br />
be issued serially in a magazine, known as Good —<br />
Words, during the year 1891. And. the said —<br />
J. M. Barrie agrees to deliver to the said John W.<br />
Lovell a complete copy of such work, either in the<br />
form of advance sheets or MS., at least two<br />
calendar months prior to the serial completion of<br />
such work in England ; and in the event of his —<br />
failure to do so, this contract, at the option of the<br />
said John W. Lovell, shall become inoperative and —<br />
void. (2) The said John W. Lovell agrees in<br />
return for the sole and exclusive use of advance<br />
sheets of the said novel in the United States and<br />
the Dominion of Canada to pay the said J. M,.<br />
Barrie £20 on publication of the novel in America,”<br />
Lovell assigned this contract to the United States<br />
Book Company, which company, on June 19th, ~<br />
1891, deposited with the Librarian of Congress at. —<br />
Washington a printed copy of the title of the book,<br />
and on October 14th, 1891, deposited two copies of<br />
the book in that office. The publication of the<br />
novel was begun in the January, 1891, number of<br />
the monthly periodical Good Words, in London.<br />
and continued throughout that year. Thirty-eight.<br />
chapters had been thus published prior to the<br />
publication of the completed book by the United<br />
States Book Company in America, and prior to the<br />
deposit of the copies with the librarian; the<br />
remaining seven chapters of the book being —<br />
published in the London magazine subsequently,<br />
The book, as. published in the United States by<br />
the United States Book Company, contained the<br />
notice in form required by the law of copyright,<br />
and the bill charges full compliance: with the<br />
requirements of law with respect to copyrights,<br />
whereby, as it is claimed, the United States Book<br />
Company became the sole owner of the copyrigh<br />
of the book in the United States of America, On<br />
May 29th, 1900, the complainant became the<br />
owner of the rights of the United States Book<br />
Company under the contract between Barrie and<br />
Lovell, and of the copyright, if any, secured’ by<br />
that company. It is further charged that Mr,<br />
Barrie, in 1897, without the consent of Lovell o<br />
any of his successors in interest, dramatised the<br />
novel “The Little Minister,” and secured it<br />
production and performance upon the stage within<br />
the United States under contract with th<br />
defendant Frohman ; that such dramatisation is in<br />
four acts, of which acts 3 and 4 are founded in<br />
plot, incident and characters upon, and much 0<br />
its language is contained in chapters 39 to 4<br />
inclusive, of the novel, and such acts are importan:<br />
parts of the dramatisation ; that the defendants<br />
Yack and Hards are managers or actors in the<br />
theatrical company associated with Frohman, an<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
wen BD<br />
<br />
3 op ox. 9<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
od Shs Fa! ES ca GR ee ee<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 89<br />
<br />
were about to produce the play and perform therein<br />
at certain places stated in the bill, within the<br />
jurisdiction of the court. The bill sought an<br />
Injunction restraining the performance of the<br />
drama. Yack and Hards demurred to the bill<br />
upon the grounds (1) that at the date of the<br />
contract the laws of the United States did not<br />
authorise a copyright in favour of the works of a<br />
foreign author; (2) that the story was first to be<br />
published in the English magazine, before any<br />
right of publication in the United States ; (3) that<br />
the right granted by the contract was merely a<br />
licence granting the exclusive right to publish the<br />
novel from advance sheets after publication thereof<br />
by the author ; (4) that the United States Book<br />
Company never became the proprietor of the book,<br />
and had no authority to procure a copyright ; (5)<br />
laches by the complainant in the assertion of his<br />
alleged right. On May Ist, 1901, the court<br />
sustained the demurrer and dismissed the amended<br />
bill for want of equity (105 Fed., 787), and on<br />
October 29th, 1901, an appeal was allowed to this<br />
‘court.<br />
<br />
Millard R. Powers for appellant; George A.<br />
Dupuy for appellees.<br />
<br />
JENKINS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts<br />
as above).—The office of all construction and<br />
interpretation of contracts is to ascertain the inten-<br />
tion of the parties, and the meaning of the words<br />
they have used—their real design as disclosed by<br />
the whole contract. For that purpose we may<br />
resort to surrounding circumstances and the condi-<br />
tion of the parties at the time, not to ascertain<br />
what they may have secretly intended, but to<br />
resolve doubtful expressions and to ascertain the<br />
true meaning of the agreement, And this is to be<br />
judged, not from any separate provision or dis-<br />
connected expression in the writing, but taking it<br />
in its entirety.<br />
<br />
It is insisted for the appellant that the right<br />
acquired by Lovell to the manuscript of “The<br />
Little Minister,” so far at least as concerns the<br />
United States of America and Canada, was that of<br />
proprietor, and that, therefore, he had under the<br />
Jaw the right of copyright. At the date of this<br />
contract, May 8th, 1890, copyright was not<br />
authorised in this country in favour of foreign<br />
authors (Rey. St., sect. 4952); nor, as it would<br />
‘seem, could a foreign author assign or transfer to<br />
a citizen his manuscript or common law right of<br />
property therein, so that the latter could have<br />
copyright protection within the United States<br />
(Yuengling v. Schile, C. C., 12 Fed. Rep., 97, 102-<br />
107). The international copyright law granting<br />
copyright to foreign authors was passed March 3rd,<br />
1891, and went into effect July 1st, 1891 (26 stat.,<br />
1106-1110, chap. 565). It thus appears that the<br />
contract in question was entered into nearly ten<br />
<br />
months prior to the passage of this law. At its<br />
date Mr. Barrie had no right to acquire copyright<br />
within the United States, and could grant no such<br />
right. Nor could an assignee of his manuscript<br />
and common law right therein acquire such copy-<br />
right. It is, therefore, manifest that it was not,<br />
and could not have been, within the contemplation<br />
of the contracting parties to grant or to acquire a<br />
right to that which did not exist and was not the<br />
subject of a grant. Unless, therefore, by the<br />
agreement in question Lovell became the owner<br />
and the proprietor of the manuscript, to the<br />
exclusion of Mr, Barrie’s right therein, and could<br />
avail himself, with respect to that work, of the<br />
privilege conferred by subsequent legislation, he<br />
has no right to copyright of the work. The parties<br />
at the execution of the contract were thus circum-<br />
stanced: Mr. Barrie was engaged in writing a<br />
novel for serial publication in an English<br />
magazine, to be therein published monthly, com-<br />
mencing with the January number, 1891. By the<br />
agreement, Mr. Barrie granted and assigned to<br />
Mr. Lovell “the sole and exclusive right to<br />
publish from advance sheets, in the United<br />
States and Dominion of Canada,” the work to be<br />
published serially in the English magazine during<br />
the year 1891, and agreed to deliver to Lovell a<br />
complete copy of the work, either in the form of<br />
advance sheets or MS., at least two calendar<br />
months prior to the serial completion of such<br />
work in England.’ In consideration thereof,<br />
Lovell agreed to pay “for the sole and exclusive<br />
use of advance sheets of the said novel in the<br />
United States and the Dominion of Canada” £20<br />
upon its publication in America. It may be<br />
doubted whether the contract contemplated the<br />
serial publication of the work in America, as it<br />
provides for the delivery of the advance sheets or<br />
manuscript at least two calendar months prior to<br />
the serial completion of the work in England; and<br />
we are not informed by the bill concerning the fact<br />
of serial publication here, so that we can judge of<br />
the practical construction placed upon the contract<br />
by the parties. If Mr. Barrie was not bound to<br />
furnish any advance sheets or any portion of the<br />
manuscript until two months prior to the com-<br />
pletion of the serial publication in England then it<br />
is clear that as to the parts published ia England<br />
before the filing of copies of the book with the<br />
Librarian of Congress, namely, the first thirty-<br />
eight chapters, there was no possible right of<br />
copyright under the international copyright law<br />
(Holmes v. Hurst, 174 U.S., 82, 19 Sup. Ct. 606,<br />
43 L. Ed., 904 ; Same v. Donohue, C. C., 77 Fed.,<br />
179). The story contained forty-five chapters,<br />
and was completed in England in the December<br />
number of the magazine, and all but seven chapters<br />
were published in England prior to the deposit of<br />
<br />
<br />
90<br />
<br />
the book in the office of the Librarian of Congress.<br />
At the most, therefore, copyright could only com-<br />
prehend the last seven chapters of the work.<br />
Bearing in mind that upon publication in England<br />
of the work or parts of the work, there could be no<br />
copyright in the United States under the inter-<br />
national copyright law of the parts thus published,<br />
and that at the time of the contract there was no<br />
international copyright law, the meaning of the<br />
contract would seem tobe clear. Mr. Barrie could<br />
only secure any sum for publication of the work<br />
in America by granting the use of his manuscript<br />
in advance of its publication in England, for any<br />
American publisher could after such publication<br />
issue it here without liability to Mr. Barrie or to<br />
Mr. Lovell. It could be reproduced with impunity.<br />
An American publisher could only be first upon<br />
the market here by publishing it simultaneously<br />
with or in advance of its publication in England,<br />
and that could only be accomplished by obtaining<br />
advance sheets of the manuscript before the<br />
appearance of the story or any of its parts in the<br />
English magazine. It is clear to us that the<br />
purpose of the contract was to accomplish this<br />
simultaneous publication. Mr. Barrie did not<br />
sell his manuscript, or dispose of his common law<br />
right thereto. He merely agreed to furnish<br />
advance sheets, and gave to Lovell the exclusive<br />
right to publish them either simultaneously with,<br />
or within a short time before, the completion of<br />
the serial publication in England. Lovell agreed<br />
to pay £20, not for the work, not to become pro-<br />
prietor of the work, but “for the sole and exclusive<br />
use of the advance sheets” of the novel in the<br />
United States. ‘This is a mere licence to Lovell,<br />
giving him the advantage of the use of advance<br />
sheets. That use, it is true, was to be exclusive ;<br />
that is to say, Mr. Barrie agreed on his part that<br />
he would not furnish advance sheets to another.<br />
Lovell only acquired a qualified interest. He did<br />
not become the absolute owner. One of the<br />
qualities of absolute ownership in a work is that<br />
the author has the right to withhold it from<br />
publication if he so desire. Lovell could not do<br />
that. Under this contract he was bound to<br />
publish it, for the consideration expressed in the<br />
contract was not payable until publication. This<br />
construction of the instrument is fortified also by<br />
the amount of the consideration. As the author<br />
had no right of copyright, and as upon publication<br />
in England any one had right to publish it in<br />
America, the author could receive nothing for the<br />
work published here, except such as he might be<br />
able to obtain by allowing its publication here<br />
simultaneously with or in advance of its publica-<br />
tion in England. That accounts for the trifling<br />
consideration in the contract, and speaks the<br />
intent of the parties. It is inconceivable that a<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
distinguished author would have disposed of pro-<br />
prietorship in his manuscript for so inconsiderable.<br />
asum. We are of opinion that the contract con-<br />
ferred no rights of proprietorship in the manuscript<br />
but only the right of publication coincidently with<br />
or in advance of the publication of the work in<br />
England.<br />
The decree is affirmed.<br />
<br />
[Reprinted by kind permission of The Times.]<br />
<br />
Moul v. Boosey.<br />
<br />
THIS was an action for alleged libel. The defen-<br />
dant relied on the defence of fair comment on a<br />
matter of public interest.<br />
<br />
Mr. Lush, K.C., and Mr. 8. O. Henn Collins<br />
were for the plaintiff; Mr. Avory, K.C., and Mr,<br />
P. Rose-Innes for the defendant.<br />
<br />
It appeared that the plaintiff, Mr. Alfred Moul,<br />
was the chairman of the Alhambra, and had been<br />
a composer of musical works, and was the agent<br />
for the British Empire of the Société des Auteurs,<br />
Compositeurs, et Editeurs de Musique de France.<br />
The defendant, Mr. William Boosey, was now<br />
managing director of Chappell & Co. (Limited),<br />
music publishers. The plaintiff alleged that before<br />
the Copyright (Musical Compositions) Act, 1888,<br />
one Harry Wall had taken an active part in the<br />
institution of proceedings for penalties for the<br />
unauthorized performance of musical compositions,<br />
and that he had acted dishonourably and oppres-<br />
sively in the institution of these proceedings. The<br />
defendant, on March 18, 1902, had written a letter<br />
to the Daily Mail, saying that “ Mr. Alfred Moul,<br />
who protests in your columns against justice being<br />
done to English composers, publishers, and music-<br />
sellers, is the same gentleman who has for years<br />
been unsuccessfully attempting to persuade English<br />
music publishers to follow the example of French<br />
music publishers, and to demand from the public<br />
a performing fee for all the minor works in their<br />
catalogues. The piecemeal copyright legislation<br />
that Mr. Moul complains of is, no doubt, the Copy-<br />
right Act of 1882, which was a short Act passed<br />
as a matter of urgency by Parliament to assist the<br />
public in their dealings with a gentleman who was<br />
in Mr. Moul’s own line of business.”” The Act of<br />
1882 required the proprietor of the copyright, if<br />
he desired to retain the right of performance, to<br />
notify the same on each copy. The plaintiff alleged<br />
that the defendant meant the Act of 1888, that it<br />
was passed in consequence of actions for penalties<br />
brought by Wall, and that these words meant that<br />
the plaintiff conducted his business as agent of<br />
the above-mentioned society oppressively and dis-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 91<br />
<br />
honourably. The defendant also wrote to the<br />
Referee a letter, which appeared on March 21,<br />
1902, asking that paper to strain every nerve in<br />
their protest against a system of legalized highway<br />
robbery. This letter went on to say of the plain-<br />
tiff:—‘ He is neither composer, publisher, nor<br />
music-seller. He is not even a street pirate. He<br />
is merely the English representative of a society of<br />
French composers and publishers, who levy a tax<br />
upon the British public for the performance of<br />
waltzes, songs, and other small works in their<br />
catalogues. It is in the interest of these clients<br />
that Mr. Moul complains of our piecemeal legisla-<br />
tion—the said piecemeal legislation consisting of<br />
the Copyright Acts of 1882 and 1888, which, while<br />
admittedly very imperfect, at all events served<br />
their purpose to a certain extent.” The plaintiff<br />
alleged that this letter meant that he was dis-<br />
honestly representing himself to be acting in the<br />
interests of English composers, and that he carried<br />
on his business in a discreditable manner.<br />
<br />
The plaintiff stated that he had never brought<br />
an action for penalties, as distinguished from fees,<br />
for performance, and these fees his society divided<br />
with the publishers ; but the theory of many pub-<br />
lishers was that it would be better to do away with<br />
the right to fees for performance, as they thought<br />
they would sell more copies under such a<br />
system.<br />
<br />
Mr. W. M. Tilson stated that it was general<br />
knowledge that the Act of 1888 (which gave the<br />
Judge a discretion as to the amount of penalties<br />
for the performance of musical copyright works,<br />
instead of 40s. per performance, as under 3 & 4<br />
Wm. IV., c. 15), was passed in consequence of<br />
Wall’s suing for penalties in a great many<br />
cases.<br />
<br />
Mr. John Hollingshead said that he took the<br />
last words in the letter to the Daily Mail to refer<br />
to Wall, who did not carry on an honourable busi-<br />
ness. Mr. Moul’s business was the perfectly<br />
honourable one of collecting fees for his French<br />
clients ; but Wall sued for penalties for the benefit<br />
of his own pocket after performances had been<br />
given by people who did not know that they were<br />
making themselves liable to penalties.<br />
<br />
Corrohorative evidence having been given for<br />
the plaintiff, letters were read for the defence<br />
wbiols had been written to the papers by Mr. Moul,<br />
calling the music publishers pirates, and complaining<br />
of the copyright legislation as being piecemeal and<br />
in the interests of the music publishers, and it<br />
was said that the alleged libels were fair comment<br />
on a matter of public interest, as giving reasons<br />
why the plaintiff was not a proper person to inter-<br />
fere in the discussion, as he was really doing<br />
in a modified form what Wall had been doing<br />
before.<br />
<br />
The defendant, Mr. William Boosey, a music<br />
publisher, of New Bond Street, said that when he<br />
wrote the letters complained of he knew that Wall<br />
had used his rights in an oppressive manner, and<br />
that the Acts of 1882 and 1888 had been passed<br />
to limit those rights. By “line of business” he<br />
meant the collection of fees in respect of minor<br />
pieces of music ; and his objection was that, as<br />
Mr. Moul could not publish a list, the public had<br />
either to subscribe to his society or to run the risk<br />
of being sued, There was no ground for suggest-<br />
ing that he was hostile to the plaintiff. He did<br />
not intend to suggest that the plaintiff carried on<br />
a dishonourable business.<br />
<br />
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for<br />
£150.<br />
<br />
Judgment accordingly.<br />
<br />
Photographic Copyright.<br />
<br />
A CASE of some interest has been tried during<br />
the last month before Mr. Justice Ridley and a<br />
common jury, entitled Boucas v. Cooke and<br />
Others.<br />
<br />
The defendant Cooke is known, we believe, as<br />
“The Boy Preacher.” He went to the plaintiff<br />
and asked him to execute the photograph for the<br />
purpose of advertising his meetings, and, it appears,<br />
promised to purchase the negative if he was satis-<br />
tied with the photograph. When the photograph<br />
was made, defendant took it to one of the other<br />
defendants who was a party to the action, and the<br />
second defendant had a number of copies printed<br />
off, which were distributed at the meetings. The<br />
plaintiff registered the copyright of the photograph<br />
and then claimed the right of reproduction. The<br />
second defendant registered the copyright of his<br />
print from the original photograph, and sub-<br />
sequent to the date of the plaintiff’s registration<br />
sold several thousand copies. The question was<br />
whether the employment of the photographer was<br />
such an employment as to come under the first<br />
section of the Copyright Act, 1862, the words of<br />
which run as follows :—<br />
<br />
“ Provided that when the negative of any photograph<br />
shall be made or executed for or on behalf of any other<br />
person for a good or valuable consideration,” &c.<br />
<br />
If the photograph had been made on these terms<br />
the right of reproduction would have belonged to<br />
the defendant.<br />
<br />
The judge, in summing up, came to the con-<br />
clusion that the copyright in the negative was the<br />
property of the plaintiff, and the jury assessed the<br />
damages at £20.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
<br />
92<br />
PUBLISHERS’ PROFITS ON NETT BOOKS.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HE question of the nett book has been<br />
a6 agitating the minds of the publishers and<br />
booksellers for some time.<br />
<br />
In the United States the system was begun<br />
tentatively, and has taken firm hold. At first<br />
applied only to certain kinds of books, at certain<br />
prices, its success was so assured that it is probable<br />
the nett book will become universal, or nearly so.<br />
Mr. Charles Scribner, the president of the Pub-<br />
lishers’ Association of the United States, explained<br />
the whole case in Zhe Author of April.<br />
<br />
A similar evolution is gradually taking place in<br />
the English book trade. Here also it seems not<br />
unlikely that the nett book system, as its advan-<br />
tages become evident, will by slow degrees cover<br />
the whole market. What is the reason of this?<br />
What are its charms ? Why was it started ?<br />
<br />
Originally books were sold at full price. Then<br />
some enterprising bookseller discovered that he<br />
could still make sufficient profit for himself and<br />
undersell his rival by giving his customers a<br />
discount. This process of underselling continued<br />
till the public received five-and-twenty per cent.<br />
discount, but the small bookseller was no longer<br />
able to make a living profit. Then his voice was<br />
raised in the land, and the reaction set in. Butas<br />
there are always either those who, owing to the<br />
power given into their hands by a large capital, or<br />
those who, having no capital, are unscrupulous on<br />
the point of extravagant trading, it became<br />
necessary that some combination of the trade<br />
should be formed sufficiently powerful to enforce<br />
an equitable plan upon all, the willing and the<br />
unwilling. Such a combination was at hand in<br />
the Publishers’ Association.<br />
<br />
It is not for the author to look upon these<br />
universal trading laws with indifference, nor to<br />
cover himself with the warm cloak of his artistic<br />
temperament, imagining that the temperature is<br />
mild and the sun is shining when the bitter cold<br />
of competition is over all the land. For other-<br />
wise he may be overcome with that sleep which<br />
will surely assist in bringing his career to a<br />
close.<br />
<br />
In plain words, it is most important for the<br />
author that he should carefully watch the methods<br />
of distribution of his wares ; that he should study<br />
with interest trade currents and trade evolution,<br />
and should give his help where and when he is<br />
able, to assist the trade for his own preferment.<br />
He should, at the same time, keep a watchful eye<br />
that the trade does not assist itself at his<br />
expense.<br />
<br />
Many will say that all this careful watching is<br />
mean and sordid. But this view of the case should<br />
<br />
-<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
still be kept in mind by the writer, that in his<br />
profession all this meanness and sordidness—if<br />
such it is—may be an incident, but is not the<br />
ultimate object, the ideal; whereas in trade it<br />
is ‘the be-all and the end-all.” Further, it is<br />
the highest interest not of the author alone but<br />
also of literature that the circumstances under<br />
which the general public can buy should be<br />
thoroughly understood. But enough. There need<br />
be no question of meanness or sordidness on either<br />
side.<br />
<br />
The Publishers’ Association set itself the task of<br />
enforcing certain terms on the bookselling trade,<br />
with the full consent of all the most responsible<br />
booksellers. ‘To the publishers, as to the authors, —<br />
it was just as important that the great distributing<br />
medium should not be wiped out. It may be<br />
candidly stated that, except so far as the improve-<br />
ment of the bookseller was an advantage to the<br />
publisher, there was not a sign that the great<br />
middleman at that time had any other aim before<br />
him. Was this, however, the case ?<br />
<br />
It is the object of this article to show that not<br />
only did the booksellers benefit, but the publishers<br />
also—the former certainly to a greater extent than<br />
the latter. The author and the printer gained no<br />
advantage, and the public—the ultimate arbiter in<br />
all cases of trade—had to pay for the advancement.<br />
So long as the public is prepared to pay, the<br />
other parties must fight the fight between them-<br />
selves.<br />
<br />
The author, then, has this matter for considera-<br />
tion. He was quite willing to acquiesce in the<br />
nett system in order to benefit the distributing<br />
agent, the man who really ought, if he traded<br />
successfully, to be the only person on whom he<br />
need rely for a public appreciation of his efforts.<br />
But is he willing to give a further profit to the<br />
publisher? Ought he not to demand some share<br />
of the increase obtained from the consumer ?<br />
Certainly he ought.<br />
<br />
The publisher has always been affirming that the<br />
nett book is for the benefit of the bookseller<br />
only.<br />
<br />
The following example will demonstrate that this<br />
is not the case, and will show the difference in the<br />
returns of the publisher and the bookseller in<br />
which the author ought to share. The 6s. book<br />
does not, at present, fall within the nett system,<br />
For convenience sake a book costing 12s. 6d. has<br />
been taken. Judging by the book lists it is a<br />
common price for books above 6s. Perhaps owing<br />
to the fact that it is exactly 150d.<br />
<br />
The figures and prices following are taken from<br />
an existing case—a sound and average example—<br />
and can be relied upon as correct. It would not<br />
be necessary to state this, if the figures in The<br />
Author had not so constantly been contradicted.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
It is not essential to go into the details for this<br />
article, but the figures may be verified by any<br />
member.<br />
<br />
Let it be supposed that an edition of 1,050<br />
copies with binding and advertising costs £170,<br />
and that the author receives 10 per cent. on the<br />
published price.<br />
<br />
This is a low percentage, but so long as the<br />
figure is constant in both examples it will not<br />
interfere with the deduction — namely, the<br />
difference between the publisher’s and _book-<br />
seller’s profit.<br />
<br />
In the first instance the book is sold at 12s. 6d.<br />
nett.<br />
<br />
The whole 1,050 copies will in no case be<br />
sold.<br />
<br />
Under the Copyright Act six copies go to the<br />
public libraries, the author usually receives some<br />
presentation copies, and a considerable number<br />
are sent to the Press for review.<br />
<br />
If 100 copies are reckoned for these purposes<br />
the allowance will be liberal, for it must be<br />
remembered that the book is 12s. 6d. nett—an<br />
expensive book.<br />
<br />
The basis of calculation, therefore, must be the<br />
sale of 1,050 — 100 copies = 950 copies. As these<br />
copies alone bring in a return, the cost of pro-<br />
duction must be divided amongst them.<br />
<br />
The amount paid for a single copy of the book<br />
by the purchaser is the sum of four different<br />
amounts. 1. The amount per copy of the cost<br />
of production. 2. The royalty per copy paid to<br />
the author. 3. The amount of the publisher's<br />
profit on each copy. 4. The amount of the book-<br />
seller’s profit per copy.<br />
<br />
Let W = cost of production.<br />
X = the author’s royalty.<br />
Y = the publisher’s profit.<br />
Z = the bookseller’s profit.<br />
<br />
In each case on a single copy.<br />
<br />
Thus W +X%+Y+2Z = 12s. 6d.<br />
= 150d.<br />
<br />
Going back to the sale of 950 copies, the cost of<br />
production of a single copy must be ascertained.<br />
Thus— ‘<br />
<br />
£170 _ 40,800d.<br />
<br />
ee ae<br />
<br />
= 42°94d,<br />
950<br />
<br />
We can now write<br />
<br />
42°94 ++ X + Y¥ + Z = 150<br />
X+Y+2Z = 107°06.<br />
<br />
That is to say, that the sum to be divided<br />
between the author, the publisher, and the book-<br />
seller is—<br />
<br />
107:06d. = 8s. 11:06d.<br />
<br />
93<br />
<br />
Next the author’s royalty per copy must be<br />
ascertained. On a nett book the author usually<br />
receives his royalty on every copy sold. He is not<br />
compelled to count thirteen as twelve, a pernicious<br />
custom that has crept in for the publisher’s<br />
benefit, sanctioned, we regret to say, by authors’<br />
agents,<br />
<br />
The royalty is always paid on the published<br />
price.<br />
<br />
10 per cent upon 12s. 6d. or 150d. = 15d.<br />
<br />
The author receives ls. 3d. per copy. Then<br />
substituting 15d.—<br />
<br />
X + Y + Z = 107-06.<br />
165+Y+2Z2=10706. Y+2Z = 92°06.<br />
<br />
It is necessary now to solve the question of<br />
Y + Z, the publisher’s and_ the bookseller’s<br />
profit.<br />
<br />
Here the problem is complicated, owing to the<br />
fact that the publishers sell the book to different<br />
booksellers at different prices.<br />
<br />
It is interesting to note the following point not<br />
in relation to the present subject, but in order to<br />
show the faultiness of publishers’ methods. In<br />
those agreements where the author’s remuneration<br />
depends wholly or in part on the nett amounts<br />
received from the trade by the publishers, the<br />
words, ‘‘the usual trade terms,” are taken to<br />
express the sale to the trade, and in the accounts<br />
the price is generally rendered as uniform, and<br />
that—it is perhaps unnecessary to remark—not<br />
the highest price received. This is a trade<br />
method. “—<br />
<br />
The paragraph is an obiter dictum.<br />
<br />
What are these prices? What is the truth ?<br />
<br />
1. The bookseller who takes a single copy has<br />
it at 2d. in the shilling less than the nett price.<br />
If the book is expensive, a large number of sales.<br />
are made at this figure.<br />
<br />
2. If the bookseller takes thirteen copies, he has.<br />
them at the price of twelve.<br />
<br />
3. Certain houses and all export houses demand<br />
a further discount of 10 per cent.<br />
<br />
4, One house pays only two-thirds of the nett.<br />
price, minus 10 per cent.<br />
<br />
If an average of these four prices is taken the<br />
result is as follows :—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1. The single copy . 10s. 5d. -<br />
2. 13 as 12, per copy 9s. 7°38d.<br />
3. Export, per copy . 8s. 785d.<br />
4. Lowestterms, percopy 7s. 6d.<br />
36s. 2°23d.<br />
8, 2°23d. :<br />
Average = we i. = 9s. 0°557d,<br />
<br />
Thus the average exceeds 9s. 04d. by a small<br />
fraction, and is based on the assumption that the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
94<br />
<br />
publisher sells at_least one-quarter of the copies at<br />
the lowest price. By assuming the price to be 9s. 1d.,<br />
a small advantage would be given to the publisher.<br />
But the publisher is always in dread lest, his profits<br />
should be over-stated, so to calm his mind, and in<br />
order to leave no door of escape open, 98. shall be<br />
the figure he receives from the trade. It follows,<br />
then, that the bookseller buying at 9s. and selling<br />
at 12s. 6d., makes 3s. 6d. on each copy.<br />
Repeating the formula :—<br />
<br />
W+x+Y+2Z=150<br />
42°94 +15 + Y + 42 = 150<br />
, Y = 50°06<br />
<br />
All the four quantities are now ascertained.<br />
42°94 +15 + 50:06 + 42 = 150<br />
<br />
The proportions of profit will be made more<br />
clear by stating them in percentages.<br />
Thus—<br />
<br />
28°63 + 10 + 33°37 + 28 = 100<br />
<br />
The same process of reasoning must now be<br />
applied to the discount book.<br />
<br />
In this case the work is sold to the public at a<br />
discount of 25 per cent., or 3d. in the shilling.<br />
<br />
The purchaser pays 9s. 44d. or 112°5d.<br />
<br />
The cost of production is constant, and the<br />
number of copies available for sale is constant.<br />
<br />
Therefore again—<br />
<br />
Wi X35 Y 4751125,<br />
42°94 4% +7947 = 1125,<br />
X+Y+2Z= 69°56.<br />
<br />
That is to say, the sum to be divided between<br />
the author, the publisher, and the bookseller is<br />
5s. 9°56d. A trifle more than 5s. 94d.<br />
<br />
The author’s royalties are nominally the same,<br />
that is 10 per cent., but in the case of the discount<br />
book the author has to allow thirteen copies to<br />
reckon as twelve. This never used to be the case<br />
in old days, but the author’s agent weakened in<br />
the bargains of important authors who could<br />
demand the full amount, and the smaller fry<br />
had in consequence to yield also.<br />
<br />
The royalty per copy is therefore—<br />
<br />
12 180<br />
—— 5 — ——.<br />
13% 15d. = 13<br />
The equation now stands—<br />
<br />
X+Y+2Z= 69°56.<br />
13°84 + Y + Z= 69°56.<br />
. Y + Z = 55°72.<br />
It only remains to discover how the publisher<br />
<br />
and booksellers divide the remainder.<br />
As with the Nett book, so with the Discount<br />
<br />
=13°84,<br />
<br />
“Sy,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
book: the publishers sell to the bookseller at<br />
various prices.<br />
<br />
The following is a statement of the prices for a<br />
pook published at 12s. 6d. and sold subject to<br />
discoant :—<br />
<br />
For a subscribed book one-third less than the<br />
published price—<br />
<br />
13 as 12 at 8s. 4d. and 5<br />
count = 7s. 4d.<br />
<br />
Single copies at 8s. 4d. and 5 per cent. dis-<br />
count = 7s. 11d.<br />
<br />
After subscription—<br />
<br />
13 as 12 at 9s. and 5 per cent. discount = 7s. 10d.<br />
<br />
Single copies at 9s. and 5 per cent. dis-<br />
count = 8s. 7d.<br />
<br />
If, then, the average is taken of these four prices<br />
—presuming by this that the publisher sells half<br />
the edition on subscription—<br />
<br />
per cent. dis-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
—— = 7s, 11d. = 95d.<br />
<br />
Then the bookseller buys at an average price of<br />
7s. 11d., and sells at 9s. 4$d., therefore—<br />
<br />
'.L=1s. 54d. = 175d.<br />
Then<br />
Y + 175 = 55°72d.<br />
Y = 38:22a,<br />
All the four quantities are now ascertained—<br />
42°94 + 13°84 + 38°22 + 17°5 = 1125.<br />
If expressed in percentages—<br />
38°17 + 12°3 + 33°97 + 15°56 = 100.<br />
If these figures are correct, and on this point we<br />
are clear—although the fact is sure to be denied by<br />
the other side—this very instructive result is clear,<br />
<br />
that the publishers’ and booksellers’ profits stand<br />
out as follows—<br />
<br />
Publisher. Bookseller.<br />
Nett Book ...... 4s. 2°06d.......88. 6d.<br />
Discount Book... .3s. 2°22d....... 1s. 54d.<br />
<br />
The bookseller benefits to the extent of 2s. 04d.,<br />
and the publisher to the extent of 11°84d., or<br />
almost a shilling. Speaking roughly, a ratio of<br />
two to one.<br />
<br />
The profit to the bookseller, we are told, must be<br />
left with him in order to enable him to live, but<br />
the publisher can already live and flourish.<br />
<br />
It might be rightly claimed, then, that the extra<br />
shilling should belong entirely to the author. At<br />
any rate, he ought to gain something.<br />
<br />
‘Again, according to the publisher's statement the<br />
following ought to be the figures :—<br />
<br />
Publisher. Bookseller,<br />
Discount Book....3s. 2°22d....... ls, 54d.<br />
Nett Book ...... $5. O°22d.. 75... 4s. 8°84d.<br />
<br />
Either way the profit is not unreasonable, but it<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
_ i is less in comparison for the publisher, who, in<br />
<br />
bbe addition to office and other expenses, places his<br />
<br />
ye9 eapital out with the printers and binders.<br />
<br />
The bookseller risks nothing.<br />
<br />
,/_ A close study of the figures and percentages has<br />
bel led to an interesting result. In another paper it<br />
<br />
o 1) is hoped to put forward some further matters for<br />
a9 consideration.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4<br />
<br />
A MUSICAL AGREEMENT.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
HE samples of perfect Agreements issued by<br />
<br />
the Publishers Association and approved,<br />
<br />
: so we must take it, by all those time honoured<br />
oe houses which the public have been accustomed to<br />
‘0! look upon as the kindly protectors of the.profession,<br />
»7e— gave the members of the Society a powerful insight<br />
ia into the equitable mind of the trade.<br />
‘Nothing could have been said if it had been<br />
*¢- openly avowed that they represented the extreme<br />
‘ei¥ view of the publishers, but this was not the case.<br />
af As readers of The Author may remember, they<br />
fy were put forward as equitable between party and<br />
Ts. party.<br />
by We refrain from argument.<br />
They bring their own condemnation.<br />
Again, the worn-out formulas put forward to per-<br />
su. suade some authors to give their signature, firstly,<br />
sq that the agreement is reliable, ‘it has been approved<br />
? v by King’s Counsel,” or, secondly, that “it isa form<br />
fl ib all my authors sign,” may deceive the one-book<br />
* man and secure to his publisher a temporary<br />
advantage, but can hardly affect those who care-<br />
fully peruse these pages.<br />
oe Yet in spite of all warning for barefaced com-<br />
® 98 mercial impudence the following—a common form<br />
209 among the still unrepentant musical publishers—<br />
will take the first prize against all comers, It has<br />
come before the Society from three different<br />
houses.<br />
<br />
In ordinary business the seller usually submits<br />
terms and gains the advantage, if any, but in<br />
publishing, the process is reversed.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
IN CONSIDERATION of a royalty of pence per<br />
copy, seven copies to count as six, the first two hundred to<br />
be free of said royalty—paid to me, the undersigned author,<br />
by the music publishers, the receipt whereof I do hereby<br />
acknowledge, I do hereby sell and assign absolutely to<br />
the said publishers all my copyright and interest of<br />
whatever kind for Great Britain, Ireland, the Colonies,<br />
“amd every other country, of and in the music and<br />
_ words of *<br />
<br />
And also the sole and exclusive right and liberty of<br />
representing or performing the same, and causing or per-<br />
mitting the same to be represented or performed, and also<br />
the copyright and theright of representation or performing,<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
95)<br />
<br />
or causing or permitting the same to be represented or<br />
performed, in every foreign state in which such copyright<br />
or other rights aforesaid, or any of them, now exist or may<br />
hereafter be obtained. And I do hereby agree that the<br />
said publishers shall be entitled to arrange, use, and publish<br />
the said work, musie and words or any portion thereof, in<br />
any other separate form free from any other consideration<br />
in respect of such use and publication.<br />
<br />
And I, the undersigned, warrant and declare to the said<br />
publishers, that I am solely and absolutely entitled to the<br />
premises expressed to be hereby assigned and that free from<br />
incumbrances. Further, only half the above royalty pay-<br />
able on copies sold in the United States of America, :<br />
<br />
Witness my hand, this day of , in the<br />
year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred Z<br />
<br />
Tt is not intended to put forward a useful<br />
Author’s Agreement, but merely to comment on<br />
the extraordinary form in which this document is<br />
drafted, and to explain some of the more extrava-<br />
gant points.<br />
<br />
On the same principle that it takes two to make<br />
a quarrel, it has always been looked upon as<br />
necessary to have two parties to an agreement.<br />
But the Musical Publisher is above such con-<br />
siderations. He is a law unto himself, and appa-<br />
rently to the composer also.<br />
<br />
It is pitiful to consider that for years uncounted,<br />
ever since music was a property, composers,<br />
without a murmur, without a sigh, have been<br />
willing to resign their rights with such a childlike<br />
trust.<br />
<br />
Even now there are leading members of the<br />
profession who do not think that there is any need<br />
for an organisation to withstand this wholesale<br />
abandonment of valuable property.<br />
<br />
After consideration of the parties, or rather<br />
party—for, as we have pointed out, there is only<br />
one party who signs this estimable agreement—it<br />
is necessary to consider what the composer is<br />
conveying.<br />
<br />
He conveys all his copyright and interest in the<br />
piece for all the world, and the sole and exclusive<br />
right and liberty of performing the same. He is<br />
paid, it will be noticed, a certain sum on the sale<br />
of every copy—it is needless to say that the sum is<br />
inadequate in comparison with the cost of produc-<br />
tion, that the copies are reckoned seven as six, and<br />
two hundred given away free for advertising<br />
purposes—but on the performing rights he is<br />
paid nothing. :<br />
<br />
The publisher may say that on performing<br />
rights in England no money is paid. ‘This is not<br />
absolutely true. Take for example, musical operas,<br />
songs sung in music halls, and the many other<br />
forms of musical composition the performing rights<br />
of which are valuable. At no distant date a com-<br />
bination may be formed which will enable the<br />
composer to demand a certain sum for every public<br />
performance. This right in France is very valuable,<br />
simply because French composers and those who<br />
<br />
<br />
96<br />
<br />
publish French compositions have banded them-<br />
selves together in order to obtain a fall reward for<br />
the property they create. To assign these per-<br />
forming rights, therefore, is altogether inadvisable.<br />
Quite apart from the monetary side of the question<br />
it may be justly argued that the composer, under<br />
certain circumstances, would object to perform-<br />
ances at certain times or in certain places. He<br />
could not, however, stop them under the present<br />
arrangement. In addition, as the publisher holds<br />
the right of performance in foreign countries, the<br />
work might be performed in France, where these<br />
rights are exceedingly valuable. In that case<br />
the publisher would obtain a substantial return,<br />
in which the composer would have no share<br />
whatever.<br />
<br />
So far it<br />
agreement.<br />
<br />
But worse is to follow.<br />
<br />
The publisher not only has all copyright and<br />
performing right, put he also receives the right to<br />
arrange, use, and publish the said work in any other<br />
separate form free from any other consideration 1n<br />
respect of such publication. So that if, as not<br />
infrequently happens, a song runs pleasantly in<br />
waltz time, it would be possible for the publisher<br />
<br />
to adapt the air to a waltz with a new setting,<br />
publish it, and sell thousands of copies.<br />
<br />
seems impossible to imagine a worse<br />
<br />
There<br />
are many other methods of re-arranging an air.<br />
With these the publisher has every right to deal<br />
according to his agreement, and on the sale of<br />
this new arrangement nothing will return to the<br />
composer.<br />
<br />
Take one further instance. How many quad-<br />
rilles, polkas, and other dance music are there that<br />
are merely variants of the popular airs of the<br />
day ?<br />
<br />
The composer receives half royalty on copies<br />
sold to America. There might be some slight<br />
reason for a small reduction, but why a reduction<br />
of fifty per cent.? We should be glad if the<br />
publishers would furnish figures.<br />
<br />
Lastly, a few remarks must be made before the<br />
question is closed, concerning the remuneration<br />
that composers receive for their labours.<br />
<br />
It is the custom to pay exceedingly small<br />
royalties on a song or other musical composition.<br />
The royalty in all cases must be finally determined<br />
by the amount of capital invested by the publisher,<br />
and the return the publisher obtains over and<br />
above the sum invested. Compare for one instant<br />
the cost of production of a book beside that of a<br />
song.<br />
<br />
Any book from the pen of a popular author,<br />
which is sold at 2s. nett will bear a royalty of 2d.<br />
in the 1s.; but the cost of production of a book<br />
excluding advertising is more than twice as large<br />
as the cost of production of a song excluding<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
advertising. It will cost perhaps 15/. to produce —<br />
2,000 copies of a song which will sell at 2s. nett,<br />
the advertising, of course, coming outside this<br />
amount.<br />
<br />
Say 307. are spent on advertising, and 500 copies —<br />
of the song given away for all purposes, this leaves<br />
1,500 copies to be sold at, say, 1s. 2d. per copy. The<br />
return is therefore 87/. 10s. If from this the cost.<br />
of production is deducted, 42/. 10s. is left to be<br />
divided between author and publisher.<br />
<br />
Fourpence per copy royalty will, therefore, give<br />
the publisher a handsome profit, and the author a<br />
reasonable return. If the sales exceed 1,500, then<br />
the reproduction is in every way cheaper and the<br />
return to the author larger.<br />
<br />
It should be remarked also that the cost of pro-<br />
duction and advertisement, and number of free<br />
copies is reckoned on a very liberal scale. In<br />
many cases 30/. is an outside price for the advertise-<br />
ment of one song and less than 500 copies are usedi<br />
as gratis copies.<br />
<br />
Musical composers<br />
position.<br />
<br />
should reconsider their<br />
<br />
THE R. D. BLACKMORE MEMORIAL.<br />
<br />
—-—— + —<br />
<br />
MEETING of the Blackmore Memorial<br />
Committee was held at Stationers’ Hall on ~<br />
Wednesday, November 26th, Mr. James —<br />
<br />
Baker in the chair. Mr. R. B. Marston, the hon. ©<br />
treasurer, announced that the subscriptions received<br />
amounted to over £200, the total promised to date —<br />
being £223 1és. Designs from the sculptor, Mr. —<br />
Harry Hems, were submitted showing a medallion<br />
portrait on marble slab. Various suggestions were<br />
made, and it was decided to close the subscription om<br />
December 9th, and at the next committee meeting —<br />
to make final arrangements for putting the work<br />
in hand. Amongst those present were Professor<br />
Raphael Meldola, Mr. Mackenzie Bell, Mr. Herbert<br />
A. Morrah, Mr. James Baker, Miss Pinto Leite,<br />
and Mr. G. E. N. Ryan.<br />
<br />
On December 10th a further meeting of the —<br />
committee was held. Mr. Hems, the sculptor,<br />
produced a fresh design, which was unanimously<br />
approved. Mr. Hems stated that the work would —<br />
be completed and ready for erection early in April<br />
next.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 97<br />
<br />
GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br />
Ae<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property —:<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br />
price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br />
managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
C1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duciion forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for ‘ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
It is above all things necessary to know what the<br />
proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br />
for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br />
the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br />
connected with royalties are published in Zhe Author.<br />
Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br />
** Cost of Production.”<br />
<br />
IVY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
eg ge ee<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for PLAYS<br />
IN THREE OR MORE ACTS :—<br />
<br />
(@.) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT,<br />
This is unsatisfactory. An author who enters<br />
into such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br />
tract for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(2.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF PERCENTAGES<br />
on gross receipts. Percentages vary between<br />
5 and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(e.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF ROYALTIES (i.¢.,<br />
fixed nightly fees). This method should be<br />
always avoided except in cases where the fees<br />
are likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (0.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
<br />
4, PLAYS IN ONE ACT are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in anyevent. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance.<br />
<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that AMERICAN RIGHTS may be excced-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘They should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, THOSE AUTHORS DESIROUS OF FURTHER INFORMA-<br />
TION ARE REFERRED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY,<br />
<br />
eg<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
i VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the<br />
advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor,<br />
the member has a right to an opinion from the Society’s<br />
solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel’s opinion is<br />
desirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel’s<br />
opinion, All this without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
<br />
98<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4, BEFORE SIGNING ANY AGREEMENT WHATEVER, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of literature in promoting the<br />
independence of the writer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements.<br />
<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts submitted to them by literary<br />
agents, and are recommended to submit them for inter-<br />
pretation and explanation to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society ; so do<br />
some publishers. Members can make their own deductions<br />
and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
+-—<>—__ + —_____—-<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
—_1-——+—_<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes NOT ONLY WORKS OF FICTION, BUT POETRY<br />
_AND DRAMATIC WORKS, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
+><br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
Sa<br />
<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Communications for Zhe Author should be addressed to:<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor NOT LATER<br />
THAN THE 21st OF EACH MONTH,<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
—_+——_o__—_——_-<br />
<br />
COMMUNICATIONS AND LETTERS ARE INVITED BY THE<br />
EpITorR on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
——<br />
<br />
Tur SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
rVNVHE case of Aflalo & Cook v. Lawrence & Bullen,<br />
which has been supported by the Society<br />
throughout, was heard on Appeal before<br />
Lord Justice Vaughan Williams, Lord Justice<br />
Romer, and Lord Justice Stirling, on Thursday,<br />
the 18th of December.<br />
<br />
Readers of Zhe Author may remember that<br />
judgment in the first instance was given in the<br />
favour of the plaintiffs, with costs. Against this.<br />
judgment the defendants appealed. The Appeal<br />
has been dismissed with costs. Lord Justice<br />
Romer and Lord Justice Stirling decided against<br />
the appellants, Lord Justice Vaughan Williams<br />
dissenting.<br />
<br />
The case is one of considerable importance, as it.<br />
deals with the interpretation of the 18th section of<br />
the Copyright Act. It has already been pointed out<br />
in the pages of The Author that this section is<br />
perhaps one of the worst sections that has ever been<br />
drafted in an Act of Parliament, and is difficult of<br />
interpretation and complicated.<br />
<br />
Every case, therefore, that tends to make it<br />
more explicit must be of importance to those:<br />
interested in literary property. It is hoped that in<br />
the next number of 7'he Author it will be possible<br />
to give a full statement of the judgment.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
We understand that King Oscar, one of the few<br />
royal authors, has been contributing an article to<br />
the magazine of the Swedish Authors’ Union.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 99<br />
<br />
Though it is the privilege of every crowned head<br />
to be egotistical—the subject of the paper was his<br />
own writings in fiction and poetry—yet he dealt<br />
some very frank criticism on his work. He used, he<br />
said, to be very proud of his lyrical productions,<br />
but doesn’t consider them now to be first class.<br />
The poem he considers his best is ‘The Baltic.”<br />
He trusts that his readers’ opinions will coincide<br />
with his own.<br />
<br />
No sooner has King Oscar finished criticising<br />
his own works than another royal personage<br />
comes before the public as an author. “La<br />
Carriére d’un Navigateur” is the title of a work<br />
by Albert I., Prince of Monaco, and, like King<br />
Oscar, in his own line he proves himself an author<br />
of no mean capacity. The book is full of the love<br />
of the sea. It is imaginative and, in places, poetical.<br />
The work is published in Paris.<br />
<br />
Under “ Literary, Dramatic, and Musical Pro-<br />
perty,” we have, with the kind permission of the<br />
Editor of The Times, reprinted the case of Jfoul<br />
vy. Boosey, dealing with the performing rights of<br />
musical pieces.<br />
<br />
We desire again to bring this point before those<br />
composers who are members of the Society, and<br />
again to call their attention to the fact that owing<br />
to a strong combination of French composers the<br />
property in performing rights has become exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. In Germany and France, we believe<br />
that a royalty agreement on the sale of a song or<br />
musical composition is almost unknown, and the<br />
composers make their money from their performing<br />
rights. In England the reverse holds good. There<br />
is no reason, however, why both rights should<br />
not become a valuable property, and bring in a<br />
considerable income.<br />
<br />
The fact that a certain Mr. Wall in former<br />
years took advantage of the unsatisfactory state<br />
of the law to levy contributions from illegal per-<br />
formances, is no reason why the performing rights<br />
should therefore be allowed to run to waste.<br />
<br />
We trust that musical composers will give the<br />
matter their serious consideration.<br />
<br />
Various friends of the late Mr. J. T. Nettleship,<br />
the well-known animal painter, are desirous of<br />
placing a tablet to his memory in the fine old<br />
church of Kettering, his native town, to be<br />
supplemented, if practicable, by some small<br />
memorial in London. Besides being noteworthy<br />
as an artist, Mr. Nettleship was an accomplished<br />
<br />
writer, his ingenious essays, on the poetry of<br />
Robert Browning, first published as far back as<br />
the “sixties,” having done much to promote: a<br />
more general appreciation of the poet’s work.<br />
Mr. Alfred East, A.R.A., Mr. Alfred Parsons, A.R.A.,<br />
Mr. T. C. Gotch and Mr. William Toynbee have<br />
undertaken to organise a fund in London, and<br />
subscriptions may be sent to Mr. Toynbee, Hon,<br />
Treasurer, at 4N, Portman Mansions, W.<br />
<br />
John Kendrick Bangs—so states the American<br />
Author—agrees with Jules Verne that the novel is<br />
passing, and that in a hundred years from now<br />
there will be no such form of literature, or, at<br />
least, not as we knew it. “If wireless telegraphy,<br />
why not bookless romances, typeless novels, page-<br />
less poems? We already have jokeless comic<br />
papers. These things are surely coming, and I<br />
foresee the day when without novels, poetry or<br />
drama the public will be surfeited with romances<br />
and tales of the most stirring character, poems of<br />
stately measure and uplifting concept; psycho-<br />
logical studies of the deepest dye; and dramas<br />
that will take the soul of man and twist it until it<br />
fairly shrieks for mercy—and all of these things.<br />
men and women will get while they sleep.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
A LITERARY ACADEMY.<br />
<br />
—1+~<<br />
<br />
L.<br />
<br />
AM so little instructed in the theory of literary<br />
I academies that it is only after reading the<br />
clever letters published on the subject in The<br />
Author by such authorities as Messrs. Herbert<br />
Trench, H. G. Wells and Morley Roberts, and<br />
Lucas Malet, that I feel emboldened to form a<br />
hasty opinion, entirely on the reading of the<br />
aforesaid letters.<br />
<br />
My blood boils, as does that of us all, including<br />
Mr. Herbert Trench, at the prevalence amongst us<br />
of what I will call the “ tub-novelist.” But would<br />
the establishment of an Academy of Letters in this<br />
country exercise any control over this variety of<br />
literary caterer? Would he not adapt his chair to<br />
the same purpose as he did his tub, and wave his<br />
academic crown to the tune of so much per<br />
thow’ as before ? Mr. Zangwill’s blunt, or<br />
rather pointed, allusion to the ‘“ vulgarity of the<br />
epoch’ seems to sum up the case for me, only I<br />
would substitute for vulgarity the adjective ‘“non-<br />
critical.” Weare, as a nation, non-critical—thank<br />
goodness we are, as a nation, creative. The<br />
French are both, the latter perhaps in a lesser<br />
degree. But in France, though there is a<br />
<br />
<br />
100<br />
<br />
tremendous fertility in rubbish, as with us, Litera-<br />
ture proper completely ignores the out-put. The<br />
books one reads to soothe the toothache, or to<br />
ameliorate a railway journey, are not the books one<br />
criticises. :<br />
<br />
The three unmentionable “ Claudines” that<br />
have had such a vogue over there were read with<br />
‘more or less amusement and cast aside—never<br />
considered seriously for one moment. But the<br />
English counterparts to ‘laudine—Heaven forbid<br />
that I should name them !—are on every decent<br />
table, and are gloated over by discreet K.C.’s and<br />
M.P.’s and discussed seriously in would-be literary<br />
salons. We do not distinguish.<br />
<br />
In France, the garcon de café, the demoiselle<br />
de comptoir read their Anatole France, their<br />
Huysmans, and are able to criticise and discuss<br />
him. ‘The French literary man varies from his<br />
‘English prototype just as much as his audience<br />
does. The labour of a French author has an<br />
absurdly unnecessary concomitant. He takes pains<br />
__jmmense pains. He does not, as a rule, have<br />
the tendency which Lucas Malet deplores in some<br />
-of his English confréres. He does not regard<br />
letters as a means, but as an end. He does not<br />
-aspire to rise from author to “ minister,” and he<br />
never hopes to have time for society. M. Pierre<br />
D’Alheim, the author of “La Passion de Maitre<br />
Fran¢éis Villon,” spent fifteen years over the pro-<br />
duction of this masterly study of the Middle Ages.<br />
And it is one of a trilogy, of which the other two<br />
are still to be written! M. Huysmans lives the<br />
‘life of a hermit—a genial one, par example ; he<br />
does not hate his fellow creatures, he simply has<br />
not time for them.<br />
<br />
It is my humble opinion that until we have a<br />
few more authors of this stamp in England, it is of<br />
no use arranging an Academy for them. The few<br />
truly earnest labourers in the literary field that<br />
we do possess would be obliged to double their<br />
parts and crown themselves. There are so few of<br />
them. And even then the enlightened critical<br />
public who should haste to acclaim the judgment<br />
‘would be wanting !<br />
<br />
VioteT Hunt.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
II.<br />
<br />
On the subject of a Literary Academy Mrs.<br />
‘Clifford writes as follows :—<br />
<br />
«J would gladly contribute to the discussion on<br />
an Academy of Letters, but I am too busy, too tired<br />
to think out even what I feel on the subject—<br />
though I feel a good deal.” She continues :<br />
““My views so far are in entire agreement with<br />
those expressed by Mr. Herbert Trench. I think<br />
<br />
the only criticism I have to make upon his article<br />
<br />
touches the constitution of the committee, which<br />
-seems to me to be hardly far-reaching enough.” She<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
gives the names of a few gentlemen whom she<br />
would recommend as members, other than those<br />
mentioned by Mr. Trench.<br />
<br />
Under any circumstances; the selection of a<br />
committee of this kind would be difficult, and<br />
might lead to a considerable amount of heart-<br />
burning on the part of some and disgust on the<br />
part of others; but Mrs. Clifford proceeds: “A<br />
committee of this sort should be composed of the<br />
lovers of all kinds of literature, but above all, it<br />
should be composed of those who love it for its<br />
own sake, of those to whom it would be impossible<br />
to think of reward or advertisement, of pushing<br />
forward or holding back for personal reasons. In<br />
short, of men who have no axes to grind, except<br />
the one for which the Academy was instituted,<br />
that of immortalising good literature.”<br />
<br />
Surely it is not possible that any one can quarrel<br />
with Mrs. Clifford’s definition of the real<br />
Academician.<br />
<br />
oS<br />
II.<br />
<br />
I entirely agree with all that Mr. Arthur C.<br />
Benson says in his admirable article in favour of<br />
an Academy of Letters.<br />
<br />
Is it not the education of the masses which is in<br />
some way responsible for the down-hill road litera-<br />
ture is taking, and do not writers of the present day<br />
instinctively lower their standard of composition<br />
to a level which can be appreciated by the larger<br />
public ?<br />
<br />
If an Academy could influence this great _com-<br />
munity, and could inspire it with the desire to<br />
read only what is best, by holding before it high<br />
examples, its work would indeed gain a glorious<br />
crown, and we might hope before long to see the<br />
death of such debasing fiction as appears in our<br />
halfpenny newspapers.<br />
<br />
With things remaining as they are at present,<br />
with no powerful, saving hand held out to check<br />
this downward tendency in letters, the future state<br />
of affairs is not a happy one to contemplate. But<br />
we ought to strive to make it a happy one, and an<br />
Academy might be just the new force in the world<br />
of literature capable of doing it.<br />
<br />
To educate a great crowd of human beings is<br />
one thing ; this assists it in its active walk of life,<br />
but if we allow its leisure moments to be degraded<br />
by the perusal of the vitiating, worthless reading<br />
which pours forth from the press of cheap journals<br />
and elsewhere, the whole ideal of education is<br />
shattered. Let an Academy of Letters come to<br />
the rescue, and let it inspire both our authors and<br />
our public with the aim of crushing out of exist-<br />
ence all that is of bad quality in literature. | Then<br />
the author will produce the best that is in him, and<br />
the public will read it.<br />
<br />
F, I. W1nzott.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
i= we ele Eee<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
iy<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
IV.<br />
[With kind permission of the Editor of the Morning<br />
Leader. |<br />
<br />
One ought to have an opinion on the often-<br />
mooted proposal for establishing a British Academy<br />
of Literature; and by the time I have finished<br />
this article it is possible that an opinion may<br />
have taken root in my mind. Bat as yet I<br />
am unable to work up any conviction either for<br />
or against the proposal. Mr. Herbert Trench<br />
and the distinguished novelist who chooses to<br />
be known as “Lucas Malet” have written to<br />
The Author—the trade paper of the literary class<br />
—strongly recommending an Academy as a pos-<br />
sible, and even probable, remedy for the miserable<br />
decline into which English literature has fallen.<br />
“The present state of affairs,” says Mr. Trench,<br />
“jis nothing less than the merest tumultuous<br />
anarchy. . . . Every year our people, as a whole,<br />
like those of the United States, seem to be<br />
marching steadily, slumberously, into new and<br />
vaster Dark Ages; Dark Ages, not of mere<br />
ignorance, but of the wildest positive error. The<br />
weltering Anglo-Saxon peoples have no intel-<br />
lectual standards, no thought centre, no axis.”<br />
The flippant might be tempted to reply that the<br />
academician - saviours heralded by Mr. Trench<br />
would have too many axes—to grind. But flip-<br />
pancy is out of place in this grave debate. I<br />
repent the untimely levity, and pass on. ‘‘ Lucas<br />
Malet’s” view of the situation is not much more<br />
cheerful than Mr. Trench’s. ‘“ English literature,”<br />
she writes, ‘in its higher and more distinguished<br />
expression, is sick, almost sick unto death.” “ It is,”<br />
she continues, “over-prolific and under-vitalised.<br />
The right of private judgment has run mad,<br />
thanks to a grafting of so-called modern ideas<br />
upon the old Protestant stock.” Wherefore “‘some<br />
of us,” she says, “hail the idea of an English<br />
Academy of Letters, regarding it as a possible<br />
remedial agency.”<br />
<br />
Now, before we can hail the remedy with any<br />
ardour of conviction, it behoves us to be certain<br />
that we have rightly diagnosed the disease. Is<br />
English literature in such a desperate case as<br />
Mr. Trench and “Lucas Malet” would have us<br />
think ? I have touched on the question before in<br />
this column, and have pointed out how Macaulay,<br />
writing in the very heyday of that Victorian period<br />
to which we now look back as to an age of giants,<br />
adopted exactly the same tone of despondency.<br />
Still more aptly did Mr. Gosse remind us, in his<br />
speech at the “ Encyclopeedia Britannica” dinner,<br />
that Montaigne in France, and Ben Jonson in<br />
England, each believed himself to be living in an<br />
age of hopeless literary decadence. I admit, how-<br />
ever, that there isa great difference between assert-<br />
ing the probability, and proving the fact, of illusion.<br />
<br />
101<br />
<br />
A great deal may be said, no doubt, in favour of<br />
Mr. Trench’s view of the present situation. While<br />
every age has had its loudly-applauded and extra-<br />
vagantly advertised charlatans—its Robert Mont-<br />
gomerys and Martin Tuppers—it must be owned<br />
that the present age is particularly prolific of these<br />
gentlefolks, and that they are “boomed” with a<br />
hitherto unexampled impudence of puffery. But<br />
does not the very word I have employed suggest<br />
the explanation of the phenomenon ? The modern<br />
literary “boom” is more deafening than the similar<br />
manias of bygone generations because the half-<br />
educated reading public is now so much larger..<br />
But in that there is no great harm ; the mischief<br />
would be if we found the manias of the half-<br />
educated public infecting the judgment of the<br />
educated public. Of this I confess I see no<br />
indication. When Thackeray was asked by an<br />
American, “ What do you, in England, think of:<br />
Tupper?” his reply was, “ We don’t think of<br />
Tupper.” With the same promptitude and con-<br />
viction all educated Englishmen of to-day might<br />
reply to a similar question, ‘We don’t think of<br />
What’s-his-name or Thingumbob.” There may be<br />
certain writers on the borderlands of literature<br />
whom some educated people discuss too seriously ;.<br />
but these are precisely the men who, one fears,.<br />
would worm themselves into an Academy. As for<br />
the tendency of mediocrity—as distinguished from.<br />
sheer blatant incompetence—to swamp command-<br />
ing talent, does not that arise from the fact that<br />
our mediocrity is really entitled to rank much.<br />
higher than the mediocrity of fifty years ago? If<br />
we have fewer writers of the very first rank (and.<br />
even that may be an illusion), have we not a great<br />
many more writers—not only absolutely, but in<br />
proportion—whose work attains a more than<br />
respectable standard of intellectual merit ? And<br />
if this be the case, can it be said that literature is<br />
altogether going to the dogs ?<br />
<br />
Let us assume, however, that our pessimists are:<br />
right in their diagnosis of the disease, and inquire<br />
a little into the further question, whether the:<br />
remedy they prescribe is likely to “ touch the spot ””<br />
—if so unacademic an expression may be forgiven..<br />
On this point ‘‘ Lucas Malet ” writes :—<br />
<br />
“ Ts it too much to hope that a recognised central autho-<br />
rity—-to which the elect among themselves may presently<br />
belong—an association of the most distinguished and<br />
enlightened minds of our day, might provoke in the rank<br />
and file a finer ambition and higher conception of the<br />
dignity of their calling, a sounder scholarship, a greater<br />
humanity and love of beauty, a greater self-forgetfulness in.<br />
work ?”’<br />
<br />
‘<br />
<br />
Mr. Trench takes a somewhat less ideal view.<br />
He would have us look upon the Academy as a.<br />
sort of accredited advertising agency, which should,<br />
‘in order to guide the public, confer titles of merit.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
102.<br />
<br />
or excellence at the end of each year on works of<br />
worth.” In this way, he thinks, an Academy<br />
would have brought Fitzgerald’s “ Omar Khayyam”<br />
into its due prominence at once, instead of leaving<br />
+t to be “discovered” after the lapse of a genera-<br />
tion. ‘ What qualified person,” he asks, “believes<br />
that the poetry of Matthew Arnold—so pure, so<br />
salutary for our time—yet occupies its just place<br />
in the minds of the multitude, who still acclaim<br />
Tennyson as a demi-god ?” The example does not<br />
seem to be very happily chosen, for it is scarcely<br />
conceivable that any academic laurels could have<br />
made Matthew Arnold popular with “ the multi-<br />
tude.” Arnold seems to me to have been entirely<br />
successful in seeking out his elective affinities. An<br />
Academy could at best have hastened the process<br />
a little. I would rather say that perhaps such a<br />
<br />
poet as Coventry Patmore, or, in our days, Mr..<br />
<br />
Robert Bridges or Mr. Francis Thompson, might<br />
be enabled, by academic recognition, to reach a<br />
larger public. Again, Mr. Trench thinks that the<br />
existence of “some such Society of the Spirit”<br />
would attract to literature “men of powerful talent,<br />
now absorbed by the Bar and commerce. Those<br />
men would be induced to speak who now stand<br />
aloof and silent, in overwhelming disgust.” This<br />
argument, I confess, appeals to me but little. I<br />
do not believe in the existence of the man who,<br />
having anything to say, and any power of saying<br />
it, is deterred by his despair of finding an audience<br />
worthy of his genius. I don’t doubt fora moment<br />
‘that there are men who, in their own esteem,<br />
-oceupy this pinnacle of intellectual superiority ; but<br />
I think the chances are that the pinnacle would<br />
prove as barren after as before the establishment of<br />
an Academy.<br />
Let us remember, however, that a case may be<br />
a very good one, though the arguments brought<br />
forward in support of it are individually insufficient.<br />
‘The worst of our national habits, to my thinking,<br />
is that of seizing on any plausible objection to a<br />
proposed reform and making it an excuse for<br />
sitting still and doing nothing. Mr. Trench very<br />
justly insists that “it is weak to plead that an<br />
Academy would be a prey to wire-pullers and<br />
intriguers. Any dignified human society that is<br />
worth framing must undergo, and can weather,<br />
such dangers.” Mr. H. G. Wells fears that the<br />
Academy will be swamped by “ well-bred influential<br />
amateurs ” such as Lord Rosebery and Mr. Balfour.<br />
This possibility has no terrors for me. I think a<br />
British Academy which excluded such a man as<br />
Lord Rosebery would be ridiculous. In sum, I am<br />
.-so far with the supporters of the proposal that I<br />
think its opponents have wholly failed to show<br />
that it could do any harm ; and since many people<br />
think it would do good, why not try it ?<br />
<br />
Winiuram ARCHER.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vv.<br />
<br />
A few words more are asked for on the<br />
subject of an Academy of Letters. It must<br />
be difficult for any distinguished. man of<br />
letters to advance and say, “ Come let us form<br />
a society to save literature from the public dis-<br />
esteem into which it has fallen.” Yet I believe<br />
that were Tennyson, Browning, and Arnold living,<br />
they would have been willing to come forward.<br />
The natural inertia and shamefacedness of the<br />
Englishman would not have overcome them. The<br />
might well have made, and we should all have<br />
responded to, such an appeal.<br />
<br />
Tt seems to me that a public institution is required<br />
which shall image, symbolize, and stand for excel-<br />
lence in literature. For this reason I am gratefal<br />
to famous novelists like Lucas Malet, and to such<br />
admirable writers as Mr. Arthur Christopher Benson,<br />
Mrs. W. K. Clifford, Mr. Benjamin Swift, and Mr.<br />
William Archer, who have in these pages openly<br />
expressed sympathy not only with the aims in<br />
view, but with the means proposed.<br />
<br />
It is idle to say that such a society would wield<br />
no influence. Well could it safeguard its own<br />
dignity. ‘True; writers like Mr. Meredith would<br />
probably find no leisure for criticism, but, as Mr,<br />
Benson has suggested, the society could devolve its<br />
judgments and awards to a carefully-chosen critical<br />
committee. Andin what respect could an Academy<br />
do harm? The recurrent elections of its members,<br />
the merits of their work, might conceivably indeed<br />
elbow from the topics of the dinner tables some<br />
turf scandal or fashionable divorce. Intellectual<br />
and beautiful achievement would in fact stand<br />
some chance of their proportionate share of public<br />
attention. Directly or indirectly the Academy<br />
would become the main organ of English criticism,<br />
an elucidator of our chaos, a simplifier, an orderer,<br />
a guide to judgment.<br />
<br />
Why is this neglected field so important? Be-<br />
cause, surely, art, and in chief the art of literature,<br />
live by the sympathy, and increase the sympathetic<br />
intelligence, of all classes. Art tends to unify<br />
society and makes for solidarity. The novel, play,<br />
poem, are the village greens of the nation. In<br />
art the out-wearied master-printer, with brain<br />
exhausted by the technicalities and intense com-<br />
petitions of his trade, who now at his day’s end<br />
relapses faute de mieux on the mushroom romances<br />
of the boudoir, may learn to share interests with<br />
his foreman (chief reader of the. future), who,<br />
attending all day to the intricate, steady spinning<br />
of some comprehensive machine, returns home at<br />
night less fatigued than his master, and soon will<br />
be less easily satisfied. Art in letters is the reve-<br />
lation of themselves to the young, the invisible<br />
trysting-place of the sexes, the common ground of<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 103.<br />
<br />
the specialists, who, with theramifying of knowledge,<br />
tend to become ever remoter and mutually more<br />
unintelligible. Art is the only speech preserved in<br />
our Tower of Babel. It behoves greatly, therefore,<br />
that we guard this sympathetic art of literature ;<br />
see that it falls not into emptiness and dishonour,<br />
and that for the State’s own sake some honest<br />
endeavour is made to distinguish and reward those<br />
who practise this art with signal excellence.<br />
<br />
But let us take account of objectors. An<br />
“ Academy” must be “academic,” says Mr.<br />
Morley Roberts, foisting on us, with a smile, a<br />
play upon words. “The appeal of literature is<br />
individual, is personal. A bedy of men is a lower<br />
organism,” says Mr. Roberts. But it is from the<br />
rabble, from the chance of crowds, and the tender<br />
mercies of journalistic judgment, that I would save<br />
writers above the average. Let us give them a<br />
revising body, an enduring Court of Appeal, less<br />
tardy than that of Time, a court where the deciduous<br />
sentences of the daily papers are replaced by words<br />
of steadier attention. Nothing in Nature is more<br />
sure than that works of genius die and perish utterly<br />
unknown. Genius bears no sovereign amulet<br />
against mischance, and the majestic stupidity of<br />
numbers. Common sense alone can by organiza-<br />
tion set human barriers and safeguards for our great<br />
men against ill destiny and oblivion. ‘ Conven-<br />
tion,” “monotony,” “aridity,” “conservatism,”<br />
<br />
- sighs Mr. Morley Roberts apprehensively. ‘Masters<br />
<br />
of literature, if once publicly recognized, become<br />
fossils,” gently implies Mr. Max Beerbohm. But,<br />
“Tam compelled to ask, “Is there anything more<br />
conventional than the range of ideas in the Old<br />
Kent Road?” Intellectual civilization is free. It<br />
is the savage societies, and the clichés forced now<br />
on us in the guise of novels, that are, above all,<br />
arid and monotonous.<br />
<br />
We have no men, says (I think) Mr. Zangwill.<br />
What! We have still Mr. Swinburne, Mr. John<br />
Morley, Mr. Robert Bridges, Mr. Meredith, Mr.<br />
Pinero, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Yeats, Mr. Joseph Conrad,<br />
Mr. Shorthouse, Mr. Bury, Mr. Bryce, Mr. A.<br />
E. Housman. Are not these a brave beginning ?<br />
<br />
The truth is that, as Lucas Malet forcibly puts<br />
it, a central standard of taste is increasingly<br />
required in the double combat to be waged against<br />
the taste of the mob, and the influence of the<br />
millionaire (whom we have always with us). We<br />
must not look for help from the “ upper classes.”<br />
The French courtiers of the seventeenth century<br />
salons, the eighteenth century groups of English<br />
country gentlemen round Pope and Addison, round<br />
Johnson and Burke, were recruited from educated<br />
aristocracies. It was these gentlemen who formed<br />
noble libraries, and paid for splendid editions.<br />
They had gone on the “grand tour” to France, Italy,<br />
and Greece, to the older and wiser civilizations, and<br />
<br />
so had improved a naturally good eye for the taste-<br />
ful and the humane. But the modern grand tour<br />
is to the United States for a rich wife. Or our<br />
young aristocrat, if more wholesomely disposed,<br />
returns with the imperfect tastes of frontier<br />
peoples. Our young barbarian becomes accom-<br />
plished in Rhodesia or the Klondyke. He returns,<br />
perhaps, no worse a man than were the sons of<br />
Halifax, Temple, Fox, Walpole or Chesterfield.<br />
But as a judge of letters he is probably less complete.<br />
In our quandary no help is to be expected of him.<br />
No help, either, from our mob-deity the millionaire,<br />
who may found libraries till every Sheffield has its<br />
British Museum, yet cannot provide a living for<br />
literature. No! The writers of England, if they<br />
are to restore the dignity of their craft, must do it<br />
themselves. Their task, owing to the vast augmen-<br />
tation of the reading populace, and the all-perva-<br />
siveness of vulgar wealth, is harder far than it was<br />
for any French king or English aristocracy. But,<br />
on the other hand, is not that task tenfold better<br />
worth the doing? Its result may be the gradual<br />
ennoblement, not of clique in a capital, but of an<br />
entire nation.<br />
<br />
No idea of his function can be pitched too high<br />
for the weal of the artist. Priest of the mind and<br />
heart, he is the chief truth-teller left to humanity.<br />
“Treasure words,” said Gogol; “they are the<br />
noblest gift of God.” And the object I have in<br />
writing these lines is boldly to ask those who have<br />
the honour of English letters at heart to form<br />
themselves into a “ Guild of Literature,” as did the<br />
craftsmen painters of Flanders and Italy—a guild<br />
open to any fairly-accredited writer to join. From<br />
this guild should be elected, chiefly (1 think) by<br />
writers themselves, a number of leaders—Masters<br />
of the Craft—to protect it, to represent it, and do<br />
it honour.<br />
<br />
Such a public association of the distinguished<br />
and enlightened would act, as Lucas Malet says,<br />
as an immense encouragement to the rank and file<br />
of writers, especially those of the younger genera-<br />
tion. It would stimulate to steady work—concen-<br />
trate attention on noble ambition and pure reward.<br />
It would help year-long labour like “ that slow and<br />
scientific ” labour of Titian. It would secure for<br />
living writers praise and recognition far earlier than<br />
now is possible. Why, when we light upona splendid<br />
short tale by a living master, like the newly-pub-<br />
lished “Youth” of Mr. Joseph Conrad, should<br />
the knowledge of its beauty and perfection be<br />
confined to the chances of a few Press notices in<br />
London? Why should Mr. Conrad not improbably<br />
have to wait till he is old before he can enjoy the<br />
success he deserves? Why must Mr. George<br />
Meredith wait thirty-eight years after the publica-<br />
tion of “Richard Feverel” before his existence is<br />
acknowledged in the Quarterly Review 2 It must<br />
<br />
<br />
104<br />
<br />
be because England is all lawn or marsh. There<br />
is no broad culture among our people. There is<br />
no fit organ of letters to honour living artists and.<br />
maintain the magnificent tradition of the dead.<br />
‘The English take all things seriously—religion,<br />
love-making, family, politics, and commerce—all<br />
things, that. is to say, except art and literature.<br />
‘Her young writers, not regarding their craft as all-<br />
important, do not give it their best and yet<br />
we propose to reform national education—to<br />
multiply training colleges! It is in vain. You<br />
-cannot multiply wise teachers and simultaneously<br />
despise living literature. It is a kind of stupid<br />
‘hypocrisy. Recruited from the intellectual refuse<br />
.of Europe, the Churches, nominal custodians of<br />
-education, are soulless and decaying. The brains<br />
are out, the man must die. From them we may<br />
-get chicane in Houses of Lords, but we shall not<br />
-get light in the minds of the people. We must<br />
look to Art and Science to bear on the Torches<br />
‘relinquished by Religion. Let us therefore found<br />
this new Society of the Spirit—this new Guild of<br />
‘Literature—to spur and inspirit workers, and to<br />
‘strengthen them by fellowship. But the chief<br />
-yalue of such a Guild would be not so much its<br />
-substantive as its symbolic value.<br />
<br />
HERBERT TRENCH.<br />
<br />
Oi<br />
<br />
AMERICAN NOTES.<br />
<br />
—-—~>+ —<br />
<br />
LTHOUGH at the time we write our infor-<br />
mation is not so complete as to enable us<br />
to give definite figures, everything points<br />
<br />
to the conclusion that the output of books during<br />
‘the fall of 1902 has been almost unprecedented.<br />
“The bulk of this was, of course, made up of new<br />
‘fiction ; but other departments of literature, with<br />
the exception of verse, were not inadequately<br />
‘represented.<br />
<br />
Greater attention than ever has been paid to the<br />
«make-up and illustration of new works. Whether<br />
‘there has been a corresponding advance in the<br />
-quality of the contents may be more open to<br />
- question.<br />
<br />
One thing is noticeable as a sign of the times.<br />
It is this: that the success of a book by a popular<br />
author no longer helps the sale of his previously<br />
‘stocked works to anything like the extent which<br />
it used to do. The American public will have<br />
everything brand-new nowadays.<br />
<br />
As the book of the day, Winston Churchill’s<br />
“Crisis” has been displaced by Owen Wister’s<br />
“The Virginian.” This breezy romance of the<br />
“West, which holds its own against all newcomers,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
is especially remarkable for its description of the<br />
lynching of the cattle-thieves. The book would<br />
undoubtedly have won its way to popularity on its<br />
own merits; but the dedication to President<br />
Roosevelt, and the curiosity excited by the<br />
allusion to the page which his delicate humanity<br />
caused to be rewritten, probably helped it not a<br />
little.<br />
<br />
One of the most notable productions of the early<br />
autumn was “ New France and New England,” the<br />
last of the late John Fiske’s historical writings.<br />
Unfortunately the author only lived to give final<br />
form to the first two chapters, which deal with the<br />
early history of what is now Canada; the rest<br />
consists of his unrevised lectures worked up by<br />
another hand. The motif of the whole is to show<br />
the effect on the development of New England of<br />
the French conquests and losses on the North<br />
American continent.<br />
<br />
Mr. J. N. Larned, of the Buffalo Public<br />
Library, has, in his “Literature of American<br />
History,” made some attempt at the bibliography<br />
of an enormous subject. Although his biblio-<br />
graphical guide gives an annotated list of four<br />
thousand titles, and is brought down to the year<br />
1900, one is not surprised to discover that it is by<br />
no means exhaustive.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile President Woodrow Wilson, of<br />
Princeton, has just finished for Harper and<br />
Brothers his “ History of the American People,”<br />
which is contained in five volumes, and comes<br />
down to the accession of Mr. Roosevelt. It is<br />
being offered on the monthly instalment system,<br />
the total sum to be paid amounting to twenty-five<br />
dollars. It is a great achievement.<br />
<br />
A work of still greater magnitude is “ The New<br />
International Encyclopedia,” published by Messrs.<br />
Dodd, Mead & Co., and edited by Dr. Daniel Coit<br />
Gilman, Dr. Harry Thurston Peck, and Dr. Frank<br />
Moore Colby. An especial feature is the substitution<br />
for the signed article of most European encyclo-<br />
pedias of contributions supplied originally by<br />
experts, but modified by the criticism of others,<br />
and finally issued by the editors in a form which is<br />
judged to combine the virtues of original individual<br />
research and those of co-operative criticism. This<br />
is a highly-interesting departure, and can hardly<br />
fail to work well in its application to scientific<br />
matters, whatever may be its weak points when<br />
employed in departments where the personal<br />
equation has a more legitimate field of action. A<br />
great effort has also been made to get rid of the<br />
traditional encyclopedic style, and thus to present<br />
in the attractive manner of Larousse matter which<br />
has been prepared on lines suggested by a study of<br />
the best German methods.<br />
<br />
The same publishers have issued a kind of<br />
poetical epitome of the world’s history under the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
3<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
title of ‘Every Day in the Year.” This compilation,<br />
the work of James L. Ford and Mary K. Ford,<br />
contains some eight hundred English poems com-<br />
memorative of great historical events.<br />
<br />
Anyone who is desirous of studying the making<br />
of the American army officer should read Mr. Hu.<br />
Irving Hancock’s ‘“ Life at West Point,” which is<br />
the work of a thoroughly competent observer.<br />
<br />
Those whose interests lie in the direction of the<br />
religious world will find much that is worthy of<br />
notice in Dr. Cuyler’s “ Recollections of a Long<br />
Life.’ While far from strong on the literary side,<br />
the book contains records of the writer’s acquaint-<br />
ance, not ouly with preachers and divines such as<br />
Spurgeon, Dean Stanley, and Henry Ward Beecher,<br />
but also with poets of the rank of Wordsworth and<br />
Whittier, and statesmen like Lincoln.<br />
<br />
Another biographical work which should not be<br />
passed by is the “ Men and Memories ” of the late<br />
John Russell Young, editor of the New York<br />
Tribune, which his widow has seen through the<br />
press. In the course of a public life of nearly half<br />
a century, Young came into contact with such<br />
diverse celebrities as President Lincoln, Horace<br />
Greeley, Henry George, Charles Dickens, and Walt<br />
Whitman, so that his recollections can hardly fail<br />
to be worth glancing at.<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles E. Benton, in the personal experiences<br />
of the Civil War, which Messrs. Putnam have<br />
published under the title, “As Seen from the<br />
Ranks,” contests Stephen C rane’s views as to the<br />
state of mind produced by warfare on the mind of<br />
the combatants. He himself was a member of a<br />
regimental band, but was often under fire when<br />
called upon, in the usual course, to do hospital<br />
duty.<br />
<br />
The numerous lives of Edgar Allan Poe have now<br />
been followed by an elaborate edition in seventeen<br />
volumes of his complete works, edited by Professor<br />
James A. Harrison. Besides the inevitable fresh<br />
life, there are some new letters. First editions of<br />
the most imaginative of American wrilers have<br />
realised fabulous prices of late years.<br />
<br />
An unpublished essay of Thoreau has been<br />
unearthed by Mr. F. B. Sanborn and printed by<br />
Goodspeed, of Boston. It is entitled, “The Service.”<br />
An ardently enthusiastic biographical study, “ The<br />
Hermit of Walden,” has come from the pen of<br />
Annie Russell Marble. :<br />
<br />
Among recent biographies of other American<br />
classical writers there is Professor Woodberry’s<br />
“Hawthorne,” showing the author of “The Scarlet<br />
Letter” “ shaking the dust of his native place from<br />
his feet, and frankly taking upon himself the<br />
character of the unappreciated genius”; and Colonel<br />
Higginson’s “ Longfellow,” yielding some new light<br />
upon the poet’s early married life and his career<br />
as Harvard professor.<br />
<br />
105:<br />
<br />
Before giving our readers a few jottings upon<br />
the latest luminaries In the sky of fiction, we would<br />
mention in passing one little volume that stands out<br />
from among the not too interesting mass of Christ-<br />
mas publications. It is “The Book of Joyous<br />
Children,” by James Whitcomb Riley. The veteran:<br />
verse writer 1s, we may add, well supported by his.<br />
illustrator, J. W. Vawter. There is plenty of fun<br />
and even a little poetry in the somewhat fancifully-<br />
named gift-book. ;<br />
<br />
Mr. Thomas Bailey Aldrich has brought out an<br />
appendix to his complete works in the form of a.<br />
volume of short stories entitled, “‘ A Sea Turn and<br />
Other Matters.”<br />
<br />
The latest work of that popular favourite,.<br />
Augusta Evans Wilson, “ ‘The Speckled Bird,”’<br />
has been productive of a somewhat sensational<br />
literary incident. Nettled at some not over-<br />
kind, but so far as we can judge perfectly<br />
bond fide, criticism in The Bookman, the novelist<br />
sent the editor of the offending paper a reply in)<br />
the form of a fable. This the editor decided to<br />
print in parallel columns with the reprinted.<br />
review ; and we think that the impartial reader<br />
will decide that he was not ill-advised in doing s0,.<br />
for the errors of taste into which the injured<br />
vanity of the author has betrayed her far exceed<br />
any surplus captiousness with which the critic—<br />
she, too, a fair one—may be justly charged. The<br />
curious may be referred to the November number-<br />
of the periodical above-mentioned.<br />
<br />
Mr. Richard Harding Davis has probably<br />
added to his reputation by his new novel, “Cap--<br />
tain Macklin”: and the same may be said of Sir<br />
Gilbert Parker’s “ Donovan Pasha.” George Barr<br />
McCutcheon’s second venture, “ Castle Craney-<br />
croft,” is thought by his admirers to be as full of”<br />
exciting incident as was “ Graustark,” his first-<br />
born. One of them has christened it “ Around the<br />
World in Eighty Chapters” ; but the castle itself<br />
was, we learn, situated in Luxembourg.<br />
<br />
One of the great hits of the season has been<br />
Mr. F. Hopkinson Smith’s “ Fortunes of Oliver:<br />
Horn,” a romance of the south and of artistic life<br />
in the New York of the fifties.<br />
<br />
George Horton’s “ The Long Straight Road ” is<br />
of the realistic school, a story of every day family<br />
life in Chicago. It is distinctly to be commended, .<br />
if only on account of its treatment of the child<br />
element. The short stories of Will Payne range<br />
round the same region ; but “On Fortune’s Road”<br />
is nothing if not humorous.<br />
<br />
The author of “ Uncle Remus” has written a.<br />
very readable complete story, which compares very<br />
favourably with the latest efforts of certain other:<br />
veterans. ‘Gabriel Tolliver” is the name of his<br />
southern reconstruction tale. Mr. Marion Crawford<br />
has added another item to his long list. The scene:<br />
<br />
<br />
106.<br />
<br />
of his “ Cecilia” is modern Rome, and the treat-<br />
ment is such as we are accustomed to expect from<br />
this novelist. ' :<br />
<br />
Perhaps the best piece of fiction produced in<br />
America during the present season is Newton Booth<br />
Tarkington’s “The Two Vanrevels.” It is a tale of<br />
Indiana in the days of President Polk ; love and<br />
politics are the main themes. To say that the<br />
characterisation shows a distinct advance upon that<br />
of “Monsieur Beaucaire ” would be awarding it but<br />
faint praise in comparison with its merits. Mr.<br />
Tarkington has been much quizzed in some<br />
quarters for the modesty of his proposal that<br />
the Indiana Legislature should endeavour to pro-<br />
mote literature by an annual offer of 500 dollars in<br />
prizes. :<br />
<br />
In conclusion, we must not omit to mention the<br />
swansongs of Paul Leicester Ford (‘ Wanted, a<br />
Chaperon”) and Bret Harte. “The Condensed<br />
Novels ” of the latter master of parody are worthy<br />
to rank with Thackeray’s “Novels by Eminent<br />
Hands,” and will doubtless afford much enjoyment<br />
to their subjects.<br />
<br />
The chief names in our obituary list are those of<br />
Edward Eggleston and Frank Norris. The former<br />
will be remembered not less by his successful<br />
exertions in the cause of international copyright<br />
than by his Hoosier Stories and historical works.<br />
The latter was looked upon by many good judges<br />
as likely to become the best American novelist of<br />
his generation. His first work, “ M’Teague,” was<br />
striking, but unpleasant. For ‘‘ The Octopus,” no<br />
one had anything but high praise. It was the<br />
first of a projected trilogy of wheat, the second<br />
part of which will appear early next year as “ The<br />
Pit.” The concluding portion had not got beyond<br />
its title, “The Wolf,” when the young author died<br />
at San Francisco at the early age of thirty-two, a<br />
victim to appendicitis. Before “ commencing<br />
novelist” he had been to South Africa and China<br />
as special correspondent.<br />
<br />
To the names of Eggleston and Norris we have<br />
to add those of Major J. W. Powell, sometime<br />
president of the Washington Anthropological<br />
Society and of the American Association for the<br />
Advancement of Science, and at his death Director<br />
of the Bureau of American Ethnology and editor<br />
of more than one scientific journal; and of William<br />
Allen Butler, author of “Nothing to Wear” and<br />
“Flora McFlimsey of Madison Square,” poems<br />
that once had as much vogue as Bailey’s “ Festus,”<br />
and whose names are even now by no means<br />
forgotten.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE NOBEL PRIZES.<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
CCORDING to a telegram from Stockholm,<br />
this year’s Nobel prizes have been awarded<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
Literature, Professor Theodor Mommsen, of<br />
Berlin.<br />
<br />
Peace, Professor Friedrich Martens, Pro-<br />
fessor of International Law in St. Petersburg.<br />
<br />
Medicine, Major Ronald Ross, of the School of<br />
Tropical Medicine, Liverpool.<br />
<br />
Chemistry, Professor Emil Fischer, of Berlin.<br />
<br />
Physics, divided between Professors Lorenz and<br />
Zeemann, of Holland.<br />
<br />
All the gentleman named are authors.<br />
<br />
They have all written books dealing with the<br />
subjects to which they have devoted their lives.<br />
In fact it is almost impossible nowadays that any<br />
man could spend his life on a matter of research<br />
for the benetit of all humanity without at one time<br />
or another committing himself to a book.<br />
<br />
Of all the awards, that to Professor Theodor<br />
Mommeen will interest members of the Society<br />
most. Many will remember his Roman History<br />
as the bugbear of their school and college days,<br />
and perhaps from the standpoint of the schoolboy<br />
or the undergraduate will be ready to join issue<br />
with the Swedish Academy on their award.<br />
<br />
Several candidates were mentioned as probable<br />
recipients of the prize. It is evident in the<br />
selection of Professor Mommsen that the members<br />
of the Academy are giving a wide and generous<br />
interpretation to the letter of the document that<br />
limits their choice.<br />
<br />
Professor Mommsen was born on the 30th of<br />
November, 1817. He is now, therefore, eighty-five<br />
years of age. He was educated in the Gymnasium<br />
at Altona, and graduated at the University of Kiel.<br />
It is curious that a man who has spent his life in<br />
the dry research incidental to the writing of<br />
history should have commenced authorship by<br />
publishing a book of poetry. This, however, is the<br />
case ; the work was issued under the authorship of<br />
himself and his brother, Tycho Mommsen, in 1839.<br />
In 1848 he obtained a grant from the Government<br />
of Denmark, which enabled him to make a journey<br />
into Italy, and this, no doubt, was the turning<br />
point in his career. From that moment he began<br />
his wonderful study of the History of Rome, and<br />
the many subjects connected with such a labour.<br />
It is on his work as a Roman Historian that his<br />
world-wide reputation is based.<br />
<br />
Between 1854 and 1856 he published three<br />
volumes of his history, and at once became famous.<br />
It was not so much the great learning and exhaus-<br />
tive study shown in the volumes which forced<br />
the attention of everyone to his work as the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
aS —a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
if<br />
g<br />
a<br />
ie<br />
¥<br />
5<br />
<br />
'<br />
[<br />
eek<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
- characters of those mighty men of old.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
insight into the life and character of the nation<br />
about whom he wrote and his new reading of the<br />
All<br />
applauded his methods, though they did not neces-<br />
sarily approve his deductions.<br />
<br />
One remembers his panegyric<br />
Augustus.<br />
<br />
Again, Cicero, whom it is customary to look<br />
upon as one of the most important men of letters<br />
and the greatest advocate of his times, Mommsen<br />
wrote down as a mere journalist, and Pompey he<br />
despised as little more than a recruiting sergeant.<br />
<br />
After the production of the three volumes, he<br />
for many years spent his time in studying the old<br />
Roman inscriptions, and produced in 1861 the first<br />
issue of the “Corpus Inscriptionum,” which was<br />
afterwards followed by sixteen other volumes. No<br />
man living has ever had such an insight into<br />
Roman life, Roman learning, and Roman law.<br />
There is no one who can rival his knowledge on<br />
any of these subjects. Though he never actually<br />
completed his History (it brought him to<br />
the fall of the Republic), he has written so many<br />
papers and collected so much knowledge that he<br />
has provided others with the requisite material.<br />
Everyone who has made careful study of his work<br />
will agree that he is a worthy recipient of the<br />
honour that has been conferred upon him.<br />
<br />
of Cesar<br />
<br />
THE REY. JOSEPH PARKER, D.D.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Y the death of Dr. Parker London has lost<br />
<br />
a great personality and a powerful orator.<br />
<br />
The Society has lost a member who<br />
<br />
since 1890 has been a constant supporter of its<br />
aims and objects.<br />
<br />
He was born on the 9th of April, 1830, at<br />
Hexham-on-Tyne, and privately educated at<br />
University College, London. He began his<br />
career as a Minister at Banbury, Oxford, in<br />
1869. Over thirty years ago he came to the<br />
City Temple, London.<br />
<br />
He was not a great author, or an author of<br />
many works; but from those he wrote and<br />
ublished it was clear that he was a man of<br />
large mind and generous spirit. His work, the<br />
“Pulpit Bible,” has been of great use to all<br />
Christian preachers of whatever denomination,<br />
but it is not as an author that Dr. Parker will<br />
be remembered. It is as preacher and as auto-<br />
erat of the City Temple.<br />
<br />
——_———_———__+——— —____——_-<br />
<br />
107<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
——<br />
BOOK DISTRIBUTION.<br />
<br />
Srr,— Would it not be possible to extend more<br />
generally the privilege accorded to the large buyers<br />
of books, of inspection before purchase? There<br />
must be a large public who would increase their<br />
purchases if their opportunities of selection were<br />
enlarged.<br />
<br />
For example :—Acting upon the only evidence<br />
obtainable—the title, the name of author and<br />
publisher, the reviews that happen to come my<br />
way—l order a certain book. On its arrival I see<br />
at the first glance it is not what I expected, or<br />
what I want. I would willingly, there and then,<br />
accept a small fraction of the price of the book, to<br />
be rid of it. It isnot only the wasted money, but<br />
the space on the shelves filled by these undesirables,<br />
that makes book buying so unpopular.<br />
<br />
Again, if I want to inspect the recent books<br />
upon a given subject, or to choose the most<br />
attractive edition of a certain classic, I must<br />
conduct the search myself in the British Museum.<br />
<br />
Surely it would pay the book purveyor to assist<br />
the possible buyer, to help him to keep out of his<br />
house the undesired books, and to discover for him<br />
the desired books ; to encourage him in the forma-<br />
tion of a library of works selected and approved<br />
by himself. One of the chief factors in the success<br />
of the circulating library is the opening of a large<br />
book area to inspection ; only a few of the books<br />
received are selected for reading ; and there is no<br />
accumulation of printed matter in the house.<br />
<br />
It should be the aim of the publisher to convert<br />
the reader from a borrower to a purchaser, by<br />
giving him opportunities for inspection with a<br />
view to purchase. All recent books, and all older<br />
designated books, might be collected in a shop, a<br />
fee being charged for examination. Books might<br />
also be brought to the reader’s door, or sent him<br />
by post, either for an inspection fee, or for a fixed<br />
proportion of the price of each book returned.<br />
<br />
It is the present surprise-packet system, with<br />
its inevitable disappointments to the purchaser,<br />
that stops business.<br />
<br />
Norwoop Youne.<br />
<br />
— 11 —_<br />
<br />
MODERN LITERATURE,<br />
<br />
Sir,—It cannot be denied that the opponents<br />
of Sir E. Clarke’s theory regarding the degeneracy<br />
of modern English literature have certain case<br />
to argue. It is true that in the beginning of the<br />
Victorian era, there was an inequality of workman-<br />
ship which would not have been possible at its<br />
close; and a somewhat indiscriminating public<br />
<br />
<br />
108<br />
<br />
judgment passed this by with too much indulgence.<br />
This will account for the success of Sam Warren<br />
and Harrison Ainsworth, for the temporary popu-<br />
larity of Tupper and the too high estimate of<br />
Edgar Allan Poe. On the other hand, these<br />
opponents may point to such writers as Hardy and<br />
Blackmore, Swinburne, Meredith, and Kipling, as<br />
instances of good taste on the part of the more<br />
recent public which has duly appreciated these<br />
writers. But it will be noticed that their work is<br />
more or less of the kind technically known as<br />
“light.” Their works are not so likely to endure<br />
as classics as those of the earlier writers who<br />
undertook to convey to mankind intimations of<br />
greater moment. Amongst those will be remem-<br />
bered not only the names of Carlyle, and Newman,<br />
and Ruskin, but also of Emerson and Lowell; these<br />
latter, though Americans, “‘ spoke their American<br />
with a strong British accent,” and have been fully<br />
welcomed as English writers. Such literary work<br />
is perhaps hardly to be expected in the present<br />
conditions of our race. Decadent Latin nations<br />
are undeveloped ; peoples in the more Eastern<br />
regions may produce great craftsmen in arts and<br />
letters; but the eutonic races are otherwise<br />
engaged. ‘Their invention is shown in adminis-<br />
trative problems or in labour-saving machinery ;<br />
their eloquence is reserved for diplomatic dis-<br />
patches and political harangues. ‘To races so<br />
occupied the Muses are compelled to descend from<br />
Parnassus and content themselves with the<br />
humbler office as instruments for man’s occasional<br />
recreation.<br />
H. G. KEENE.<br />
<br />
THE CRITIC.<br />
<br />
Srr,—In glancing through the columns of the<br />
Morning Post the other day (8th December, 1902,<br />
p. 6) I came across a brief notice of a new number<br />
of the Pilot, a periodical which I understand has<br />
recently died and come to life again, and the fol-<br />
lowing passages in the review in question attracted<br />
my attention. ‘Lovers of good English and<br />
sound sense will welcome the reappearance of the<br />
Pilot. ... In glancing through the pages, how-<br />
ever, we have found the word ‘ relation’ standing<br />
in one case at least, and, so far as we can see, in<br />
the second also, for ‘relative.’ There is no reason<br />
why we should meet with this mode of speech in a<br />
journal like the Pilot.”<br />
<br />
Now, I should have thought (I have no privilege<br />
to weight my humble opinions with an editorial<br />
“we ”) that there was no reason why the critic of<br />
the Morning Post should not have been a little<br />
more explicit in his fault-finding, so as to mete out<br />
instruction to the ignorant in general as well as<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
blame in particular to the illiterate contributor to<br />
the Pilot. The question which the casual reader<br />
of such a criticism as this has to ask himself is,<br />
“In what possible meaning, out of many which it-<br />
is entitled to bear, can ‘relation’ be made to stand,<br />
improperly, for ‘ relative’?”’ To read through the<br />
Pilot is a possible course open to me which would<br />
perhaps supply the information, but it is one to<br />
which, perhaps owing to inherent laziness, I decline-<br />
to resort. ‘I'o some extent, however, I object to<br />
doing so, on principle, as I contend that the critic<br />
who apparently makes a charge against another<br />
writer of using bad English should do so clearly,<br />
so that those who read may understand the precise<br />
accusation brought. The obvious common mean-<br />
ing of “relation” and “relative” is that of<br />
“kinsman.” Does the writer in the Jorning<br />
Post refer to this? I am an old-fashioned person<br />
myself, so that Dr. Johnson, and the authorities.<br />
which he cites, together with what I believe to be<br />
universal usage, are good enough for me. There<br />
may possibly be some new fad as to the usage of<br />
“relation” and “relative” as synonyms for “ kins-<br />
man,” which everybody who knows anything ought<br />
to know, but with which I am unfortunately not.<br />
acquainted. Does the editor of the Morning Post,<br />
as the word “we” would suggest, endorse the<br />
views of his critic; and, if so, does he forbid “ rela-<br />
tion” as a synonym for “relative” in all the columns<br />
under his august control? Of course, I may be<br />
making an altogether absurd suggestion in even<br />
hinting that this could be the meaning of the<br />
criticism of the Pilot’s English. In that case I<br />
can only repeat what I have said before, that the<br />
charge of using bad English should have been<br />
made in terms to be understood by the ordinary<br />
reader of the daily newspaper in question or else<br />
not made at all. An accused person and the jury<br />
who are to try him have the right to know exactly<br />
what the charge is that is brought against him.<br />
<br />
EL A. AC<br />
<br />
AN AMERICAN EXPERIENCE.<br />
<br />
Dear Srr,—I beg to warn music critics against<br />
contributing to the Concert Goer, New York.<br />
That estimable organ, after duly appointing me its<br />
London correspondent, published articles written by<br />
a person whose opinions and methods of expressing’<br />
himself are not the same as mine, signing them.<br />
with my name.<br />
<br />
A London correspondent is, I understand, again,<br />
required by the Concert Goer, of New York.<br />
<br />
GEORGE CECIL.<br />
November 18th.<br />
<br />
BREINER<br />
<br />
Se<br />
uk. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/479/1903-01-01-The-Author-13-4.pdf | publications, The Author |