470 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/470 | The Author, Vol. 10 Issue 08 (January 1900) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+10+Issue+08+%28January+1900%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 10 Issue 08 (January 1900)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1900-01-01-The-Author-10-8 | | | | | 165–184 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=10">10</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1900-01-01">1900-01-01</a> | | | | | | | 8 | | | 19000101 | Che<br />
<br />
Fluthor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
CONDUCTED BY WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. X.—No. 8.]<br />
<br />
JANUARY 1, Tgoo.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
For the Opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the<br />
collective opinions of the Committee unless<br />
they are officially signed by G. Herbert<br />
Thring, Sec.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Pees<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br />
remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br />
requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br />
<br />
important communications within two days will write to him<br />
without delay. All remittances should be crossed Union<br />
Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br />
all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br />
jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br />
returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
eae<br />
<br />
GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. THAT OF SELLING IT OUTRIGHT.<br />
<br />
This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br />
price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br />
managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Il. A PROFIT-SHARING AGREEMENT (a bad form of<br />
agreement). ;<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to :<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreemeat in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs: or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
VOL. X.<br />
<br />
*<br />
<br />
Til. THE ROYALTY SYSTEM.<br />
<br />
It is above all things necessary to know what the<br />
proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br />
for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br />
the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br />
connected with royalties are published in The Author.<br />
Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br />
“Cost of Production.”<br />
<br />
IV. A COMMISSION AGREEMENT.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
GENERAL.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
oc<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
i. No sign an agreement without submitting it tc<br />
the Secretary of the Society of Authors or some<br />
competent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. Never negotiate for the production of a play with<br />
anyone except an established manager.<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract :—<br />
<br />
(1) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT.<br />
This is unsatisfactory. An author who enters<br />
into such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br />
tract for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of bis name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(2) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE PROFIT-SHARING SYSTEM.<br />
This method can only be entered into when a<br />
fixed sum is agreed per week for cost of produc-<br />
tion. It is not a common method.<br />
<br />
Q2<br />
<br />
<br />
156<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
(3) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF PERCENTAGES<br />
(i.e., royalties) on gross receipts. Royalties vary<br />
between 5 and 15 per cent. An author should<br />
obtain a percentage on the sliding scale of gross<br />
receipts. Sbonld obtain a sum in advance of<br />
royalties. A fixed date on or before which the<br />
play should be performed.<br />
<br />
4. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
7. Never send a copy of the play to America unless it is<br />
protected by a preliminary performance in the United<br />
Kingdom.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that American rights may be exceedingly<br />
valuable. They should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
g. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
Never admit a collaborator when once the actual work of<br />
writing the play has begun or after it is finished.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative: that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information are<br />
referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
t. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the<br />
<br />
advice sought is such as can be given best by a solici-<br />
tor, the member has a right to an opinion from the<br />
<br />
Society’s solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel’s<br />
<br />
opinion is desirable, the Committee will obtain for<br />
him Counsel’s opinion. All this without any cost to the<br />
member.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publisher’s agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts with the loan of the books represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br />
posed document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br />
are fighting the battles cf other writers, even if you are<br />
reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br />
the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br />
dence of the writer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br />
safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br />
fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br />
will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :—(1)<br />
To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br />
stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br />
them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br />
due according to agreements.<br />
<br />
=<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
N “EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
26, branch of their work by informing young writers of<br />
Their MSS. can be read and treated<br />
The Readers are<br />
The fee is one<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
its existence.<br />
az a composition is treated by a coach.<br />
writers of competence and experience.<br />
guinea.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of the<br />
Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br />
of charge, the cost of producing it would be a very<br />
<br />
heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
6s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
Communications for The Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 4, Portugal-street, Lincoln’s-inn<br />
Fields, W.C., and should reach the Editor not later than the<br />
21st of each month. :<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
The present location of the Authors’ Club is at 3, White-<br />
hall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary for<br />
information, rules of admission, &c.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tue IncorporateD Socrery or AUTHORS.—<br />
Pension Funp ScHEME.<br />
<br />
N view of the fact that the Royal Literary<br />
Fund is not in the habit of granting<br />
pensions, and that its donations are of a<br />
<br />
purely eleemosynary description, and that the<br />
amount available from the Civil List for literary<br />
pensions does not as a rule exceed £400 a year, it<br />
appears to the Committee that it would be in<br />
the interest of literature and of this Society to<br />
establish a pension fund for authors to be sup-<br />
ported by authors themselves, and not by appeals<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 167<br />
<br />
to the public at large, and to be administered by<br />
a Committee chosen from the Society of Authors<br />
as hereinafter appointed.<br />
<br />
The Committee, therefore, put forward the<br />
following points as the basis on which the fund<br />
should be worked, and consider that the minor<br />
details of its constitution should be settled by<br />
Counsel when a sufficient sum of money is placed<br />
in the bank to show that the scheme will be<br />
fairly supported :<br />
<br />
1. That the fund collested shall be utilised for<br />
the payment of pensions only, and not of dona-<br />
tions.<br />
<br />
2. That the fund shall be held in the names of<br />
three trustees, any two of whom shall sign cheques<br />
for the payment of the pensions and of incidental<br />
expenses, such cheques being countersigned by<br />
the Secretary, or, in his absence, by a member of<br />
the pension Committee.<br />
<br />
3. That a Committee consisting of six members<br />
and the Chairman of the Managing Committee<br />
of the Society for the time being shall be the<br />
sole arbiters as to the recipients of the pensions,<br />
and the trustees shall sign cheques on the autho-<br />
rity of the Committee only. That the Secretary<br />
of the Incorporated Society of Authors do act as<br />
the secretary of the Committee.<br />
<br />
4. That the Committee of six members shall<br />
consist of three members of the Society elected by<br />
the Committee of the Society, and three members<br />
of the Society elected at the general meeting of the<br />
Society by the members of the Society. That the<br />
candidates elected by the members of the Society<br />
shall be nominated in writing to the Secretary at<br />
least three weeks prior to the General Meeting,<br />
and each candidate shall be supported by the<br />
names of at least five members. A list of the<br />
names of the candidates so nominated shall be<br />
sent to each member of the Society with the<br />
report of the Society, and those candidates<br />
obtaining the most votes at the General Meeting<br />
shall he elected to serve on the Committee, which<br />
shall be called the “ Committee of the Pension<br />
Fund of the Incorporated Society of Authors.”<br />
<br />
5. That one member of those elected by the<br />
Managing Committee of the Society of Authors,<br />
and one member of those elected by the members<br />
of the Society at the General Meeting shall retire<br />
annually, but may be re-elected.<br />
<br />
6. In default of the election of sufficient candi-<br />
dates by the members of the Society the Manag-<br />
ing Committee of the Society shall fill the vacan-<br />
cies by the election of members of the Society not<br />
being members of the Committee.<br />
<br />
7. That the pensions given shall not be less<br />
than £30 nor more than £100 per annum.<br />
<br />
8. That pensions shall not be given to anyone<br />
who has not attained the age of sixty years, pro-<br />
<br />
vided that in the absence of satisfactory candi-<br />
dates over sixty years of age, or in the case of<br />
total inability to work and during the continuance<br />
of such inability, the Committee of the Pension<br />
Fund may assign pensions to members of the<br />
Society of a less age.<br />
<br />
g. That no pensions shall be given to anyone<br />
who has not been a member of the Society of<br />
Authors for ten years at least, or a life member,<br />
but that membership to the Society gives no right<br />
to a pension.<br />
<br />
10. Save as excepted in clause 8, That such<br />
pensions shall be tenable for life, but that the<br />
Committee of the Pension Fund may in their<br />
absolute discretion discontinue any pension for<br />
any one or more of the following reasons :—<br />
<br />
i. In the case of bankruptcy.<br />
<br />
ii. In the case of a pensioner’s conduct<br />
being such as would disqualify him<br />
from membership of the Society of<br />
Authors.<br />
<br />
iii. In the case of a pensioner subsequently<br />
receiving an independent income<br />
sufficient to provide for his support.<br />
<br />
11. That the Committee of the Pension Fund<br />
in giving pensions to applicants shall consider not<br />
only the necessity of each case but also the merits<br />
of the writings of the applicant.<br />
<br />
12. That ail applications laid before the Com-<br />
mittee of the Pension Fund shall be confidential,<br />
but the names of the recipients of the pensions<br />
and the amount given shall be stated in The<br />
Author.<br />
<br />
13. That contributions may be made either by<br />
a single donation or by a donation spread over<br />
three, four, or five years, or by annual subscrip-<br />
tions.<br />
<br />
14. Subject to the paym-nt of working<br />
expenses, not less than two-thirds of all such<br />
annual subscriptions shall be added to the capital<br />
of the Pension Fund; the other third may, in<br />
the discretion of the Committee of the Pension<br />
Fund, be devoted to the payments of pensions or<br />
in the purchase of anuuities to satisfy pensions<br />
granted.<br />
<br />
15. That all selections of securities in which<br />
the capital may from time to time be invested be<br />
subject to the unanimous decision of the trustees,<br />
and, after the establishment of the Fund, to the<br />
agreement therewith of a majority of at least<br />
two-thirds of the Committee of the Pension<br />
Fund.<br />
<br />
16. That with the consent of two-thirds of the<br />
trustees and the Pension Committee sitting<br />
together, this scheme may be varied from time<br />
to time as need arises, provided always that the<br />
Fund shall be administered by a Committee con-<br />
sisting of members of the Society of Authors, and<br />
<br />
<br />
168<br />
<br />
for the benefit of the members of such Society for<br />
the time being.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Committee hope to start the scheme early<br />
in 1900, and now invite sub-criptions from the<br />
members of the Society. Immediate contributions<br />
are desired to form a nucleus for the fund and to<br />
enable the Committee to meet working expenses.<br />
A form for subscribers is appended.<br />
<br />
Opinions, suggestions, and criticism will be<br />
cordially welcomed by th+ Committee, and care-<br />
fully considered previously to the scheme being<br />
submitted to Counsel for final settlement.<br />
<br />
The following subscriptions have been already<br />
promised :—<br />
<br />
Mr. George Meredith (President of the Society)... £100<br />
Mr. J. M. Barrie (if nine others subscribe the<br />
<br />
SAMO BMOUDG) coo... 2 eco enters et vere ayeesew anes taerses 100<br />
Mr. A. W. a Beckett (per annum) ..................... 5<br />
Sir Walter Besant ........0..0..0...cccc eee 100<br />
The Rev. T. G. Bonney (for present year, and con-<br />
<br />
tinue same a3 long as existing circumstances also<br />
<br />
GONGINUG) sce, ieee eae ce wate gen as 5<br />
Mr. Austin Dobson (as much as possible per<br />
<br />
BNNUNT) oc a es a nave eee tenes ye namen =<br />
Dr. Conan Doyle (per annum, when the scheme<br />
<br />
assumes a practicai basis)................06..) cesses 10<br />
Mr. Douglas Freshfield (if nine others subscribe<br />
<br />
the Same AMOUUE) 665.0 ioes sche een sees Gi uesennenes 100<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins ........................ 200<br />
Mr. Jerome K. Jerome (per annum, and perhaps<br />
<br />
MORO) 86 ie i ees 5<br />
Mr. J. Scott Keltie (per an: um for five years)...... 5<br />
Mr. Rudyard Kipling...................:::ceeeeeee tees 100<br />
Mr: Gilbert Parker....... 2.6.0 100<br />
Mrs. Humphry Ward (per annum) ................... 10<br />
<br />
G. H. T<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
LITERARY PROPERTY.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
J.—ExcHaNncEe AND THE Contra ACcouUNT.<br />
TTENTION has been frequently called in<br />
A these pages to the charging, in an account<br />
rendered to the author, of advertisements<br />
not paidfor. In our last number the case of Mr.<br />
Endean and Messrs. Sampson Low and Co. was<br />
reported. In this case the sum of £15 was<br />
charged, the greater part of which had not been<br />
spent. This case, however, was explained on the<br />
ground of an error on the part of a clerk.<br />
We have to do here with facts that are not<br />
errors.<br />
There are three ways of charging for advertise-<br />
ments which have cost nothing. (We need not<br />
<br />
consider a clerk’s error in setting down advertise-<br />
ments that have not even been inserted.) The<br />
first method is tu charge for advertisements which<br />
have appeared in the publisher's own organs. It<br />
is obvious that any publisher who claims this<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
right claims as well the right to take as much as<br />
he pleases of the proceeds, because he can adver-<br />
tise a book as often as he pleases, and in any way<br />
he pleases, and he can always pretend that the<br />
advertisement was for the good of the book. It<br />
is also obvious that in a profit-sharmg agreement<br />
he is legally bound to charge only money that is<br />
actually spent.<br />
<br />
Another way is to exchange advertisements<br />
with other publishers who have magazines, and to<br />
charge the author’s account with every such<br />
advertisement.<br />
<br />
A third way is to insert advertisements in other<br />
publishers’ magazines; to pay for them, perhaps<br />
getting discount; to receive other publishers’<br />
advertisements, aud to send in a“ contra account,”<br />
having the receipt for the first payment to prove<br />
that payment has been actually made, if ques-<br />
tions are asked.<br />
<br />
In order to ascertain the extent to which<br />
publishers advertise in each other’s organs an<br />
examina'ion has been made of the principal<br />
magazines for the month of December.<br />
<br />
It will be remembered that in the “ Draft<br />
Agreements (Equitable) ” the publishers preserved<br />
a profound silence on this subject. Is it too<br />
much to infer that their silence, after all that has<br />
been urged and pointed out, and after the opinions<br />
of counsel had been taken twice, may be con-<br />
strued into a determination not to condemn the<br />
practice P<br />
<br />
The magazines have been divided into two<br />
groups. ‘The first consists of the older maga-<br />
zines and their publishers.<br />
<br />
Macmillan’s )<br />
<br />
Temple Bar \- published by Macmillan and Co.<br />
<br />
The Century ¢<br />
<br />
The Edinburgh<br />
<br />
Review<br />
<br />
Longman’s<br />
<br />
The Quarterly, published by Murrey.<br />
<br />
The Cornhill, published by Smith, Elder and<br />
Co.<br />
<br />
The Nineteenth Century, published by Samp-<br />
son Low and Co.<br />
<br />
The Contemporary, published by Isbister<br />
and Co.<br />
<br />
The Fortnightly, published by Chapman and<br />
Hall.<br />
<br />
Harper’s, published by Harper and Brothers.<br />
<br />
Blackwood’s, published by Blackwood.<br />
<br />
The Gentleman's, published by Chatto and<br />
Windus.<br />
<br />
The Pall Mall Magazine is omitted because it<br />
does not belong to a publisher.<br />
<br />
The table appended gives the names of the<br />
following firms and the magazines in which they<br />
advertised in the month of December :—<br />
<br />
) published by Longman and<br />
Co.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
{ | | | | |<br />
| | > | | |<br />
} > } | |<br />
} | e = | | | |<br />
(ei ais | >| 3 Sit S| |<br />
i ae > <= : y = eg tee | KS S Ae ‘<br />
si eae QS<br />
a. & ee Se<br />
e . & eS ee ae:<br />
4 Oo US | = | Ss 1s Ses | a! § s 3<br />
Z, g Poo = 2 Ss SS) Ses | StS S| eS<br />
| Pos = 3 s Ss 3 : s<br />
S oS SN .<br />
Ree | ro 2 | 1 - |<br />
| ~ =<br />
| | | | is |<br />
ee i<br />
oo eee Poe<br />
a oe | | |<br />
r tela ee<br />
[es | is<br />
: (eee eo eal ae =<br />
Leo 10.1 E Spies as Ss S ) ee<br />
3 = SISIElsisieielais 2|s eS<br />
toe S +~ | zg aS = ort os | oot bss Tw;<br />
Ss & 2 Pe sl oe ae eS Bel Se | Se | Ble<br />
a2 > |4 14 a See eS ls | Se ls<br />
Z, a [eia Simlieicibiciaelsi s 4<br />
5 le lel e Si8i8isiSisisi#is2<br />
| as Pet 5<br />
e \ |e l8 Ce | 5<br />
liso is n<br />
| | | | | | |<br />
Bice itis oe eee ae<br />
ee | | |<br />
Name oF ADVERTISER. | | | | |<br />
BeigckwOOd | 26.6 kiss eee . | a [S | .<br />
| | jee ees<br />
Chapman and Hall .................... | | & . » |<br />
| | eae | | |<br />
Chatto and Wimdus....................-| oe. | : | |<br />
| | | | | |<br />
| | | | |<br />
Harper he eee kasi ee ee 33] | x - o | | 95 | | a +<br />
| | | | | | peau<br />
| sone |<br />
- | | | |<br />
Sut aud Bier yr ed on 1 |» |» be a a ls Ls :<br />
| Posen: Rees fees eau<br />
A | | | | | |<br />
S Low and Co...........cennsese- 1+ o> ee ee | Pee ee | 8 |<br />
—_—— —— ——|—|—_ |||<br />
| | | |<br />
VON GMAE 6 cers esc ; wes aa Pa le a a ee<br />
| | | | | Ke | Petar ea<br />
oe | Pa<br />
Ne ee | Da eee eee<br />
Ta cacoceceaaneeol Be eee ee ene 1 | ae<br />
M Pe | 8<br />
MITA, ....-,-15- | ade | cae | os | a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
It will be observed by an examination of the<br />
<br />
table that there are thirteen magazines :<br />
<br />
advertise in five.<br />
, four.<br />
<br />
Murray<br />
Chapman and Hall<br />
<br />
9<br />
Macmillan and Co. advertise in twelve. Chatto and Windus > », three.<br />
Longmans. y ,, eleven. It will also be observed if we take one of<br />
Smith and Elder A ,, eleven. these publishers, the one which seems to adver-<br />
Sampson Low and Co. ,, » ten, tise the most in magazines — Macmillan and<br />
Harper Brothers n » seven. Co,—that<br />
<br />
Macmillan advertises in—<br />
Longman’s Edinburgh Review ....<br />
<br />
Harper’s Harper’s ..........<br />
<br />
Murray’s Quarterly ..... eas ; oe ee<br />
Chapman and Hall’s Mortnightly ............... ks<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
And receives a page in an organ of his own from—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Longman<br />
<br />
Murray<br />
<br />
Chapman and Hall<br />
Harper<br />
<br />
Sampson Low<br />
<br />
Sampson Low’s Nineteenth Century ieee<br />
Smith and Wlder's CormmAill, .. 0... .cce cesses civ cecsewsecues<br />
Chatto and Windus’s Gentleman’s ....cc ccc cesnen ccc cen erence ean eeeees<br />
<br />
Smith and Elder<br />
Chatto and Windus.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
170<br />
<br />
A second group of magazines was then taken.<br />
Jt included those published by Newnes, Pearson,<br />
Harmsworth, the Religious Tract Society, and<br />
many others. The circulation of these magazines<br />
ig enormous—ten and twenty times that of some<br />
of the older periodicals. Yet there are hardly<br />
any publishers’ advertisements in them. Why is<br />
this? Is it due to the absence of any arrange-<br />
ment about exchanges or “contra accounts ” ?<br />
<br />
Let us now see how a firm of publishers might<br />
work the “contra account” to the ruin of the<br />
author.<br />
<br />
A. B. sends a full-page advertisement of a<br />
certain book among others to a dozen maga-<br />
zines, paying for each and charging the author<br />
his share of the page according to the tariff. He<br />
may do this as often as he pleases and whenever<br />
he pleases. If the author’s share in each page is<br />
10s., he has £6 charged against him for one month’s<br />
advertising in the magazines. If the publisher<br />
continues this mode of advertising for six months<br />
—all for the good of the book—the account of<br />
the book is loaded with £36 for advertising in the<br />
magazines.<br />
<br />
But the other twelve publishers send each a<br />
full page advertisement to A. B. and pay for<br />
every page. Therefore the “contra account”<br />
becomes the mere acknowledgment of an ex-<br />
change. The honest A. B. has spent not one<br />
farthing of the £36 charged, all of which goes<br />
into his own pocket. One would like to see any<br />
defence of this practice if it exists.<br />
<br />
Understand that it is not a question whether<br />
certain magazines offer a good medium for adver-<br />
tisers: perhaps they do. It is a question whether<br />
the author is to be charged where nothing has<br />
been paid. It is obviously necessary to guard<br />
against a practice in which the opinion of a<br />
judge and the verdict of a jury seem to be very<br />
much wanted.<br />
<br />
The methods of safeguarding are (1) to pro-<br />
hibit by the agreement any advertising in maga-<br />
zines except by the “ contra account” arrange-<br />
ment, which costs nothing; (2) to insist on<br />
all the details of the charge for advertise-<br />
ments; (3) to disallow all such charges, whether<br />
provided against by the agreement or not, and<br />
to bring the case before the Committee of the<br />
Society.<br />
<br />
These are plain facts: the publishers have a<br />
perfect right to make exchanges ; or, if they prefer,<br />
to pay for each advertisement, and to send in<br />
a “contra account.’ Nor is it suggested that<br />
any of these firms do charge their authors for<br />
such advertisements. We again refer to the<br />
recent case in which Messrs. Sampson Low and<br />
Co. explained that such a charge was the error of<br />
a clerk — an explanation which involves their<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
denial of the practice. These are facts which, if<br />
one month is taken as representing all, go far to<br />
prove the custom of exchanges between publishers<br />
who own magazines. To prove the custom beyond<br />
doubt would involve the analysis of the adver-<br />
tisements for a whole year. They do not prove,<br />
of course, that authors are charged for these<br />
exchanges, but a statement or expression of<br />
opinion on the subject from the Publishers’<br />
Association would be welcome.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
IIl.—Somez Points FoR CONSIDERATION.<br />
IL—A PUBLISHING LICENCE.<br />
<br />
There are one or two points lately brought<br />
before the Secretary of the Society which have<br />
been commented on in previous numbers of The<br />
Author.<br />
<br />
As, however, the difficulties have arisen again<br />
and the dangers have not disappeared, itis worth<br />
while bringing them once more to the notice of<br />
the members of the Society.<br />
<br />
The case is as follows: An author goes to one<br />
of the most influential houses in England and,<br />
after the perusal of his manuscript, is told that<br />
the house will publish his book on a fixed royalty<br />
basis. The amount paid in royalties does not<br />
affect the matter.<br />
<br />
The publisher further states that he will<br />
forward to the author the agreement embodying<br />
these terms.<br />
<br />
In due course the author receives the printed<br />
form of agreement, in which the publisher under-<br />
takes to publish the work on the terms suggested<br />
and settled between them, but with this addition,<br />
that the copyright of the work, the translation<br />
rights, the dramatic rights, and all other rights<br />
that the author can at any future time possess<br />
shall be the publisher's.<br />
<br />
On one or two occasions the author, trusting to<br />
the assumed probity of the firm, has signed the<br />
agreement, thinking it in accordance with his<br />
previous verbal arrangement.<br />
<br />
On other occasions he has brought the agree-<br />
ment to the Society.<br />
<br />
If the publisher in the first instance had<br />
desired to purchase all the rights from the<br />
author, he should have then candidly stated to<br />
the author that he would produce the book on<br />
the royalty basis on the understanding that all<br />
these further rights were transferred to him.<br />
This he did not do. His arrangement with the<br />
author was practically as stated above, a pub-<br />
lishing licence subject to a payment of royalties<br />
to the author.<br />
<br />
On one occasion when it was pointed out that<br />
the printed agreement was not in accordance<br />
with the original arrangement made, the pub-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
lisher put forward the excuse that the agreement<br />
represented his usual printed form.<br />
<br />
The real difficulty of the case is apparent. The<br />
author, ignorant of his own rights, too often<br />
trusts to the publisher.<br />
<br />
The publisher, on the other hand, ought not to<br />
omit the most important items of the contract and<br />
afterwards to embody them without comment in<br />
his agreement. The agreement should differ<br />
from the verbal contract in its minor clauses<br />
only.<br />
<br />
The golden rule is never to part with the copy-<br />
right.<br />
<br />
II.—THE DEFERRED ROYALTY.<br />
<br />
Another point has come to the notice of the<br />
Secretary, to which it is necessary to draw the<br />
attention of authors.<br />
<br />
A large publishing firm whose half - profit<br />
agreements have become famous, has, it is<br />
believed, decided to issue agreements on the basis<br />
of the deferred royalty.<br />
<br />
The agreement on the basis of deferred royalty<br />
is only one point better than the half-profit agree-<br />
ment, but it is not even this point better when<br />
the royalty is deferred till the cost of production<br />
has been covered, as you not only get all the<br />
difficulties of accounts in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction, the advertising, and other items are<br />
included and tend to complicate matters, but the<br />
author gets a considerably less sum in payment<br />
of deferred royalty than he would have done by<br />
half profits.<br />
<br />
The deferred royalty agreement is one point<br />
better when the royalty is paid after a certain<br />
number of copies have been sold. It is better for<br />
this reason only, that the accounts are simpler<br />
and are more easily checked. The author will<br />
not, however, obtain a greater return from the<br />
royalty.<br />
<br />
In case any members of the Society receive<br />
offers of agreements on the deferred royalty basis<br />
it may be as well to point out the serious diffi-<br />
culties that have been known in the past to arise<br />
from this form of agreement. It is likely that an<br />
author will be offered the same amount of royalty<br />
after a certain number of copies are sold as he<br />
would have been offered if the royalty had been<br />
paid at the beginning.<br />
<br />
If the publisher has practically repaid the cost<br />
of the production owing to the deferred royalty<br />
(and this he generally takes care to do), then the<br />
author should receive at least 30 per cent. royalty<br />
on the published price.<br />
<br />
Another danger is that it is not to the interests<br />
of the publisher in many cases to push the sale of<br />
the book beyond the number on which no royalty<br />
is paid.<br />
<br />
VOL, x.<br />
<br />
171<br />
<br />
The publisher is not really looking to the<br />
benefit likely to accrue to the author, but only<br />
looking to obtaining a reasonable return on the<br />
money expended by himself.<br />
<br />
This difficulty should be guarded against by a<br />
clause inserted in the agreement, stating that the<br />
publisher undertakes, in the first instance, to<br />
print considerably more copies than the number<br />
on which he does not intend to pay royalty.<br />
<br />
There are other points in this form of<br />
agreement; for these the author is referred<br />
to the “Methods of Publishing,’ and “The<br />
Addenda.”<br />
<br />
Tt is an agreement full of pitfalls, and must<br />
not be entered into without careful advice.<br />
<br />
One of the worst points is the fact that the<br />
publisher’s and the author’s interests are opposed<br />
and not at one. G. Hy 7.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TII.—Lirerary AGENTS.<br />
<br />
I have been hitherto under the impression that<br />
the literary agent made for the author all possible<br />
arrangements for publication, serial and im book<br />
form, in the British Empire and abroad, and<br />
secured the author better terms than he could<br />
get for himself. Last week, however, I was<br />
shown an agreement for a work which had been<br />
placed in an agent’s hands, containing the<br />
following clause: “The publishers shall arrange<br />
for the issue of an edition in America, and they<br />
shall pay the said [author's name| an amount<br />
that shall be equal to ro per cent. of the actual<br />
sum received by them for the said edition.” I<br />
wish to know—(1) Why, if the work is placed<br />
in an agent’s hands, the arrangements for the<br />
American edition are to be made by the pub-<br />
lisher? (2) Whether it is usual for agents to<br />
leave American editions to be arranged by the<br />
publisher? (3) Why the publisher is to take<br />
go per cent. and the author only to, seeing that<br />
an opposite arrangement would have been a<br />
fairer division, the publisher having done but<br />
very little? And finally (4) whether this is<br />
evidence that an author should be as careful in<br />
the choice of his agent as in the choice of his<br />
publisher ? Se mK<br />
<br />
IV.—Tur New German Copyrient Bri.<br />
<br />
The sketch of a new copyright law for the<br />
German Empire, officially published in the spring<br />
of 1899, continues to occupy much attention, and<br />
to evoke not a little criticism on the Continent in<br />
all circles devoted to the study of copyright.<br />
<br />
Our German contemporary, Das Recht der<br />
Feder, is by no means satisfied with many of the<br />
new provisions, and we may add that we entirely<br />
agree with the criticisms of the law which have<br />
appeared in its pages, and earnestly hope that<br />
<br />
R<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
172 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
they may assist to bring about some important<br />
modifications of the suggested enactment.<br />
<br />
In its present shape the new law will be little<br />
better than a half-measure, by which all the<br />
interests of authors will be by no means properly<br />
safeguarded.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
V.—Mvsic ComposERS AND PUBLISHERS.<br />
<br />
The letter signed ‘“ Musical Publisher” in tha<br />
December issue of The Author surprises me and<br />
interests me as the Secretary of the Society of<br />
Authors.<br />
<br />
Ihave pointed out in The Author on several<br />
occasions that the position of musical composers<br />
when contracting with the largest and most<br />
responsible musical publishers in London is a very<br />
unfortunate one.<br />
<br />
The general form of contract issued by the big<br />
musical publishing houses takes, as a rule, every-<br />
thing, leaving the composers nothing, and the<br />
composers generally sign these contracts in igno-<br />
rance of the value and nature of the property<br />
they are handing over on the faith of the name<br />
of the house with which they are dealing.<br />
<br />
A typical contract was published in The<br />
Author for July, 1899, with explanations.<br />
<br />
I should like “‘ Musical Publisher” to refer to<br />
that number. If musical publishers, as a rule,<br />
accepted leases of the composer’s work for a<br />
limited time composers would have a_ better<br />
chance of reaping the rewards of their own work<br />
and labour.<br />
<br />
If “Musical Publisher” sees this letter I<br />
should be very glad if he would enter into com-<br />
munication with me.<br />
<br />
G. Herserr THrRina,<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
os<br />
<br />
THE METHOD OF THE FUTURE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTE will be found in the correspondence<br />
of the month on “The Method of the<br />
Future.” This method, which is simply<br />
<br />
the publishing on commission by means of a<br />
commission agent or commission publisher, who<br />
publishes in no other way and who takes his<br />
commission and nothing more, is a_ widely<br />
different thing from publishing by commission,<br />
as it is generally understood.<br />
<br />
A simple comparison between the two methods<br />
is shown by a reference to the publishers’ Draft<br />
Agreements (Kqutable). Thus the latter claim<br />
(1) a preliminary fee: (2) a blank commission<br />
on printing, paper, binding, advertising, and<br />
other disbursements, wiru the right to take dis-<br />
count on every item: (3) to be paid in advance,<br />
<br />
although the printer, &c., will not be paid for<br />
three months or more after publication : (4) to<br />
<br />
take a blank commission on sales: (5) to account |<br />
<br />
for the sales not at the actual price realised, but at<br />
“customary” trade prices, whatever he may<br />
choose to name: and (6) to render accounts<br />
annually, but not to pay for a period of blank<br />
months afterwards.<br />
<br />
The commission agent of the future charges a<br />
commission and nothing else—no discounts: no<br />
percentages : nothing<br />
<br />
For instance, a book may cost, say, £150 for<br />
production and may realise, say, £300. The<br />
commission agent will take 10 per cent.—say<br />
£30—and send the author, as the money comes<br />
in, the remainder, £270, out of which he pays<br />
£150 for production. ‘<br />
<br />
Tf, on the other hand, the book is sent on<br />
commission to a general publisher, it will be<br />
obvious, by applying the claims set up as detailed<br />
above, that the Cost of Production may be very<br />
easily swollen to about £220, while the returns,<br />
by making a liberal use of the ‘‘ customary trade<br />
price ” clause and of the commission, may easily<br />
be reduced to about the same sum; so that the<br />
unhappy author would not only pay £70 more<br />
than the book cost, but would actually get<br />
nothing back of his outlay. This is no fanciful<br />
portion. It is actually made possible by the<br />
clauses in the Publishers’ Draft Agreements<br />
(Equitable).<br />
<br />
This method is strongly advocated (1)’in the<br />
case of successful authors of every kind. It may<br />
be that at the outset there might be a little<br />
friction with the machinery, but that would soon<br />
be eased because it would be entirely and com-<br />
pletely the interest of the commission publisher<br />
to act for the best advantage of the authors.<br />
Perhaps in a few cases, but very few, this general<br />
publisher would offer so large a royalty that it<br />
would seem to be the advantage of the author to<br />
remain with him. What assurance, however,<br />
would there be that a true return of the sales<br />
would be returned? A very high royalty might,<br />
in unscrupulous hands, be reduced by a reduction<br />
in the returns.<br />
<br />
In the second place, the method is strongly<br />
advocated in the case.of that large class of books<br />
—not novels—written by specialists and designed<br />
for a special purpose, addressed to a special<br />
audience, where publication would advance the<br />
author’s interests apart from any possibility of<br />
wide circulation. Surely in such cases this<br />
method offers the greatest possible advantages.<br />
It must never be forgotten that the committee of<br />
the Publishers’ Association have insisted on their<br />
right to every one of the additions to the cost and<br />
the deductions from the sales which are set forth<br />
<br />
iets<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
above : every one, except that of charging adver-<br />
tisements not paid, and this is passed over<br />
with silence deliberate, which, after all that has<br />
been said and written on the subject, can only<br />
mean that they approve or allow of the practice.<br />
And it must be remembered that these monstrous<br />
claims have never been disavowed or withdrawn.<br />
The Method of the Future then is a Method of<br />
pure Self Defence. Nor must this method be<br />
confused with that of paying what is humorously<br />
called part of the Cost of Production.<br />
<br />
The old advice given by the Society over and<br />
over again still remains ‘Never pay for what<br />
publishers refuse to produce at their own<br />
expense.’ The reasons are illustrated by what<br />
precedes. The commission agent or publisher<br />
may also, on his side, refuse to produce, even<br />
upon commission, He simply says: “I publish<br />
on commission only, and in no other way. I do<br />
not want bad and unsaleable books. Good and<br />
saleable books I produce on terms which are better<br />
than any profit sharing agreement or royalty or<br />
ordinary commission by a general publisher can<br />
possibly offer. The business of distribution and<br />
collection is done by me, and for that I take a<br />
moderate commission and nothing else. All is<br />
above board—estimates—vouchers— discounts —<br />
everything.”<br />
<br />
exe<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
5, rue Chomel, Paris.<br />
<br />
FYNHE scurrilous tone adopted by several low-<br />
<br />
class French publications in dealing with<br />
<br />
the Transvaal War has justly excited the<br />
indignation of the Anglo-American colony in<br />
Paris. But it is a mistake to imagine that the<br />
majority of the better - class French public<br />
approve the virulent, personal attacks directed<br />
against the noble Woman and aged Empress-<br />
Queen, who stands foremost—in virtue, as in age<br />
—among the contemporary European sovereigns<br />
of the twentieth century. As regards the pre-<br />
vailing sentiment respecting these attacks, I<br />
venture to quote the following phrases taken<br />
from a recent leading article in the Jvgaro, than<br />
which no French paper is conducted on higher<br />
lines, or offers a better mirror of the general<br />
feeling of the cultured upper classes: ‘ Nos<br />
facons de polémique,” writes Le Passant, ‘“ n’ont<br />
pas ¢té inventées 4 lusage des Anglais. Nous<br />
faisons pour eux comme pour nous, et ce ne sont<br />
méme que des obus perdus qui passent les<br />
frontiéres. Le gros de la canonnade est pour<br />
notre propre usage. Cela n’empéche pas que ces<br />
attaques inconsidérées ne soient tres regrettables.<br />
La reine d’Angleterre, 4 défaut de toute autre<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
173<br />
<br />
considération, aurait du en étre préservée par son<br />
erand ige.” Nevertheless, a few lines later we<br />
are informed that, if Her Majesty reigned in<br />
France, ‘“‘ Les journaux -francais lui en diraient<br />
bien d’autres!” Under such circumstances, the<br />
lot of a French sovereign is scarcely more to be<br />
envied than that of its actual President.<br />
<br />
THe Osiris PRIZE.<br />
<br />
The commandant Marchand has received the<br />
“Prix Audiffred ” of 15,000 francs. This was a<br />
foreseen occurrence, and occasioned much satis-<br />
faction but little surprise, since the Audiffred<br />
Prize was expressly founded to recompense “ les<br />
plus beaux, les plus grands dévouements, de<br />
quelque genre quwils soient.” But the ‘“ Prix<br />
Audiffred”’ sinks into comparative insignificance<br />
beside the magnificent triennial prize of 100,000<br />
francs, founded by M. Daniel Osiris to recom-<br />
pense the most remarkable discovery, or work,<br />
produced during a period of three years’ dura-<br />
tion, whether the said discovery, or work, come<br />
under the heading of science, art, letters, or the<br />
medical and industrial professions. In making<br />
the Institute of France the trustees of the Prix<br />
Osiris, the donor takes the opportunity to<br />
intimate his preference for surgical and patho-<br />
logical discoveries, on the ground that they are,<br />
generally speaking, the most efficacious in<br />
alleviating the suffering of humanity at large.<br />
On all ordinary occasions only Frenchmen will<br />
be allowed to compete for this prize; but when-<br />
ever an international exhibition coincides with<br />
the date of the adjudgment of the Prix Osiris,<br />
all nationalities are invited to enter the lists.<br />
Even if the exhibition takes place one or two<br />
years later, the awarding of the prize (which, in<br />
the latter instance, would amount to 166,000<br />
francs) may be retarded during this period.<br />
Should the successful effort prove the combined<br />
outcome of several minds, the prize will be<br />
divided among the fortunate collaborators. If<br />
any would-be competitor desire further details on<br />
the subject, M. Georges Picot, Secrétaire Perpétuel<br />
de Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques,<br />
will undoubtedly be glad to furnish any infor-<br />
mation that may be required.<br />
<br />
A SeLect CoLuecs.<br />
<br />
In 1881, M. Jules Claretie called attention to<br />
the fact that the Paris “de la rive gauche”<br />
enjoyed a monopoly of intellectual instruction to<br />
the detriment of the wealthy aristocrats of the<br />
Faubourg St. Germain, whose means permitted<br />
them to dwell in the more luxurious Paris “ de la<br />
rive droite.” He suggested the establishment of<br />
a national College on the right bank, in order<br />
that the élite of society might be kept in touch<br />
174<br />
<br />
with the march of modern intellect, without being<br />
forced to cross the bridges which separated them<br />
from the poorer inhabitants of the Latin Quarter.<br />
In 1899 M. Claretie may rejoice in seeing his<br />
suggestion become a realised fact. A little<br />
Sorbonne was opened on Dee. 5 at the Bodinitre ;<br />
it is rendered select by the fact that only paying<br />
members are admitted. This small “ Université<br />
mondaine” proposes to deal with the masterpieces<br />
of the Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and French litera-<br />
ture; and among the names on its programme we<br />
find those of MM. Leo Claretie, Hugene Len-<br />
tilhac, Aug. Dorchain, René Doumic, Emile<br />
Faguet, and Mme. Jane Dieulafoy. Since the<br />
death of Mme. Rosa Bonheur, the latter is the<br />
only woman in France who is legally entitled to<br />
walk the streets of Paris in man’s attire—a per-<br />
mission of which she avails herself to the full, for<br />
she is never seen in feminine garb. As a lecturer<br />
she possesses a remarkable facility of language,<br />
devoid of the picturesque exaggeration so common<br />
to her sex. Mme. Dieulafoy is a great traveller.<br />
She and her husband have lived many years in<br />
Persia, enjoying the precarious favour of the<br />
tyrannical Nassr ed Din; and many of the wild<br />
scenes she has witnessed, and in which she has<br />
played a part, rival in interest the sensational<br />
“Mille et une Nuits” of Dr. C. Mardrus, of<br />
which the second volume has lately been given<br />
to the public.<br />
Arounp M. Bourcer.<br />
<br />
Despite his reputation for dandyism, M. Paul<br />
Bourget is one of the most fertile authors of his<br />
school. He has just returned to Paris, and is<br />
already publishing a new serial—an interesting<br />
study of a fin-de-siecle Parisian ménage—entitled<br />
“Te Luxe des Autres.’ He has recently averred<br />
that his mental attitude towards our race has<br />
undergone a complete transformation. The more<br />
he appreciates our good qualities, the more<br />
keenly is he aware of the invisible barrier, the<br />
“ divergences irréductibles” which alienate his<br />
sympathies from us. In brief, he no longer feels<br />
his former warm admiration for the English race.<br />
This change is not to be attributed to any petty<br />
“trimming” for popular favour. The ardent<br />
disciple of Hippolyte Taine; the enthusiastic<br />
hero-worshipper who revered Balzac before<br />
Balzac was a fashionable idol, and who carried<br />
his imitation of his hero to such an extreme that,<br />
for several years, he went to bed at eight o’clock<br />
every night and rose at three o'clock every<br />
morning, breakfasting on a bowl of black coffee<br />
prepared over-night—because, forsooth, Balzac<br />
had recorded that such was his own usual<br />
méthode; the successful writer and honoured<br />
member of the French Academy, who boldly<br />
defied current opinion by perseveringly register-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
ing his vote (the solitary one) in favour of M.<br />
Emile Zola’s admission to the charmed circle—<br />
is not the man to be influenced by any baser<br />
considerations. Once, in speaking of the leader<br />
of the realistic school, M. Bourget remarked :<br />
<br />
“No one here suspects the reputation which<br />
Zola enjoys abroad. His books are read every-<br />
where—in the smallest American towns. He is<br />
considered the chief, the father, of the modern<br />
French novel. Nowhere has he met with such<br />
severe censors as those of his own country ; and,”<br />
added M. Bourget, emphatically,<br />
<br />
“Vraiment la jeune critique n’a pas assez de<br />
respect pour cette gloire!”<br />
<br />
Ture Brainnines or M. Mevrice.<br />
<br />
M. Paul Meurice is still busily engaged in<br />
superintending the rehearsals of his adaptation<br />
of “Les Miscrables” of Victor Hugo, at the<br />
Porte-Sainte-Martin Theatre. This play has<br />
been much talked of, and is expected to prove<br />
one of the greatest hits of the season. M.<br />
Meurice is no novice among dramatists, being<br />
the author of “ Struensée” and many other suc-<br />
cessful plays. He is almost an octogenarian, and<br />
to talk with him is to be transported into a bye-<br />
gone era. He made his dramatic début by the<br />
aid and with the collaboration of Dumas pére.<br />
It happened in this wise :—<br />
<br />
On one occasion the latter deigned to confide to<br />
the shy slender student his project of founding a<br />
theatre which should alternately mount his own<br />
works and those of foreign classics, Calderon,<br />
Lope de Vega, Shakespeare. . . .<br />
<br />
“ Ah!” sighed Dumas, reflectively, “if I had<br />
only the time to translate ‘Hamlet’! What a fine<br />
spectacle that would be for the opening night!”<br />
<br />
“T have a translation of ‘Hamlet’ all ready,”<br />
murmured the student, blushing at his own<br />
temerity.<br />
<br />
«A translation in verse ?”’<br />
<br />
“ Certainly.”<br />
<br />
Meurice Was dispatched to fetch his work.<br />
Dumas read it and was satisfied.<br />
<br />
‘Ma foi, mon enfant,” he said complacently,<br />
“je deviendrai ton collaborateur, si, du moins, cela<br />
te plait?”<br />
<br />
The offer was eagerly accepted; but Dumas<br />
was procrastinating, and a wearisome period inter-<br />
vened before “ Hamlet” was finally produced at<br />
the Saint-Germain-en-Laye Theatre. At this<br />
epoch the great man was living in princely state<br />
at Monte Cristo, submerged in debt, conde-<br />
scendingly offering champagne to the bailiffs<br />
who came to mouut guard over his furniture.<br />
All the critics were invited to be present at the<br />
first representation of ‘‘Hamlet.” Meurice<br />
shamefacedly hid himself in the side-scenes, while<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE<br />
<br />
Dumas sat enthroned in a “fauteuil de balcon,”<br />
his broad breast literally covered with glittering<br />
stars, decorations, and orders. He appeared<br />
totally to forget that the piece was his, or rather<br />
that he had read and signed it, since it was he<br />
who led the applause. But modesty was never<br />
the prominent characteristic of this great genius<br />
and wholesale plagiarist.<br />
<br />
‘- Passions Silencieuses ” is the pathetic title of<br />
the novel which M. Henri Gaillard, editor of the<br />
Journal des Sourds Muets and secretary-general<br />
of the Fédération des Sociétés Frangaises de<br />
Sourds Muets, is about to publish. M. Gaillard<br />
is physically more highly gifted than the afflicted<br />
community over which he presides; for though<br />
he totally lost the sense of hearing at the early<br />
age of eight years, he has preserved almost intact<br />
the faculty of speech, and he will occupy a promi-<br />
nent position in the three-day international<br />
“Congres du Silence des Sourds Muets,” which<br />
will be held in Aug. 1900, in the stately white<br />
palace now being erected in the vicinity of the<br />
Pont de l Alma.<br />
<br />
And still further @ propos of the Great Exhibi-<br />
tion may be mentioned the exquisite bzbelot<br />
which M. Christian, director of the Imprimerie<br />
Nationale, is preparing to delight the virtuosos<br />
and lettrés of the year 1900. The volume in<br />
question bears the date MCM, and is a perfect<br />
“chef d’ceuvre’’ of the dual arts of engraving<br />
and typography, in addition to containing the<br />
history of printing in France during the 15th<br />
and 16th centuries. M. Christian has already<br />
been engaged two years in its compilation. In<br />
the preface he states that “en imprimant cet<br />
ouvrage notre ¢tablissement national a surtout<br />
pour but d’offrir aux bibliophiles les spécimens<br />
les plus curieux et les moins connus de Vart<br />
typographique essentiellement francais et @’établir<br />
la prééminence de nos artistes par influence<br />
qwils exerctrent sur les émules des nations<br />
vyoisines 4 |’époque de la Renaissance.” He has<br />
certainly succeeded admirably in his aim.<br />
<br />
Mapame Apam’s Successor.<br />
<br />
M. P. B. Gheusi, who claims kinship with<br />
Gambetta, in addition to being one of the most<br />
elegant writers of the present day, has succeeded<br />
Mme. Juliette Adam in the editorship of the<br />
Nouvelle Revue. Indeed, M. Gheusi is the<br />
modern French Crichton who has ‘“ touché a tout<br />
sans se spécialiser, méme a la diplomatie ’—since<br />
he has recently returned from a diplomatic<br />
mission in Asia Minor. Although only thirty<br />
years of age, he has already made his mark as<br />
an archeologist, poet, lecturer, administrator,<br />
novelist, and dramatic author. He isa Toulou-<br />
sian by birth, but offers the curious anomaly of<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
we<br />
<br />
an undemonstrative Toulousian who prefers reflec-<br />
tion to exuberance. He possesses a striking per-<br />
sonality, being tall, with intensely black hair,<br />
eyes, and beard, finely-cut features, and olive<br />
complexion. He has embraced the tenets of M.<br />
Constans, and it is reported that he intends to<br />
metamorphose the Nouvelle Revue. The latter<br />
magazine was founded by Mme. J uliette Adam,<br />
who is universally acknowledged to be one of the<br />
most brilliant and talented French authoresses of<br />
the nineteenth century.<br />
<br />
Tue Enp or PresipENT Favre.<br />
<br />
“Ta Fin d’une Présidence ” is the title of M.<br />
Witness’ new novel, a “roman a clef” reviving<br />
one of the popular legends current at the death<br />
of M. Felix Faure. The latter is easily recog-<br />
nisable under the pseudonym of “ Prosper Puis-<br />
sant,” as is also the case in regard to the fair<br />
actress denominated Mlle. Agnes, who was<br />
reported to be present at the President’s death,<br />
but who was, in reality, engaged elsewhere in the<br />
exercise of her profession at the moment when<br />
this sad event took place. Nevertheless, ‘ La<br />
Fin @’une Présidence” is being widely read, and<br />
many persons are firmly convinced of the truth<br />
of the fictitious narrative therein contained. In<br />
case any of our readers should desire to judge its<br />
contents for themselves, we would mention that it<br />
is published chez Chamuel.<br />
<br />
Among books of the month we find ‘le<br />
Rappel des Ombres,” by M. B. M. de Vogiié<br />
(chez Armand Colin et Cie.) ; ‘‘ L’Ennemie des<br />
Réves,” by M. Camille Mauclair (chez Ollen-<br />
dort); “4 lAube,” by M. Jean Reibrach ; “‘ Les<br />
Boers,” by M. Eugene Morel; “En Mémoire<br />
dun Enfant,’ by M. Emile Blémont; ‘ Shake-<br />
speare,’ by M. E. Legouis ; and “ Emancipées,”<br />
by M. Albert Cim.<br />
<br />
: DarRAcorre Scott.<br />
<br />
—___—_ecz<br />
<br />
NOTES AND NEWS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HAVE to invite very earnest attention to the<br />
<br />
I scheme for establishing a Pension Fund in<br />
connection with the Society. There is no<br />
pension for literary folk except their share cf the<br />
Civil List. This should give literature another<br />
£400 every year. Of late years the administra-<br />
tion of the fund has greatly improved, although<br />
it still leaves something to.be desired. Yet the<br />
grants of pensions are capricious and arbitrary :<br />
the pension offered is sometimes ridiculously<br />
small, at other times it is absurdly large, consider-<br />
ing the small sum at the donor’s disposal. Some-<br />
times a case, which would seem especially designed<br />
<br />
<br />
176<br />
<br />
when the annual grant was first proposed, is<br />
refused without rhyme or reason: sometimes a<br />
person receives a pension while in the full enjoy-<br />
ment of his working powers. The pension fund<br />
of the Society proposes to grant pensions 1o<br />
followers of literature being members of the<br />
Society when they grow old or are broken down.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The method of raising the necessary income is<br />
explained in the paper furnished by the com-<br />
mittee. Certain members have led off with<br />
promises which, as will be seen,provide a nucleus :<br />
others offer a yearly subscription. In publishing<br />
the names of the donors it is believed that a<br />
great many of our members will follow their<br />
example. Besides the donations and the annual<br />
subscriptions given for this special purpose it will<br />
perhaps be possible, after the number of members<br />
has reached a certain figure, to devote a propor-<br />
tion of the annual subscriptions to the Pension<br />
Fund.<br />
<br />
Thus, if we begin with a capital sum of £1500<br />
from donations and a promised annual subscrip-<br />
tion of £500 for this object: and if we are able<br />
to set aside every year, say, another £250 from<br />
the annual subscriptions, we should in five years,<br />
if we waited for that period before granting any<br />
pensions, have a sum of about £5600, producing<br />
an annual income of about £150 a year, increasing,<br />
if we add £750 a year to our principal, by £20 a<br />
year; so that in ten years there would be a sum<br />
of £250 a year available in pensions. If, on the<br />
other hand, we begin at once by using the interest<br />
of our capital for pension purposes, we ought to<br />
be able to give for the first year £40: for the<br />
second, £60: for the third, £80 a year: and so<br />
on. It is quite obvious that even a small pension<br />
of £30 a year would be in some cases regarded as<br />
avery great help. These figures, however, depend<br />
entirely upon the way in which the scheme is<br />
taken up.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Members will observe that it is not intended to<br />
appeal for help—after the manner of the Royal<br />
Literary Fund—to the benevolent. The Literary<br />
Profession ought to be quite able—it is quite<br />
able, if its followers will only think so—to look<br />
after those who break down or can work no longer.<br />
At the same time I do not suppose that the Com-<br />
mittee would refuse to accept gifts from friends<br />
and well-wishers.<br />
<br />
There is another reason for creating a Pension<br />
Fund: that of adding stability to the Society. At<br />
present, if we admit 200 new members every year,<br />
there is sure to be a withdrawal of a certain<br />
number, perhaps a hundred or more. ‘These<br />
members withdraw because they think that the<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Society is of no use to themselves personally, for-<br />
getting that if it is to be of use to any one there<br />
must be a great preponderance of guinea subserip-<br />
tions over the number of cases which are taken<br />
up, nearly all of which cost the Society a certain<br />
amount of law expenses. Now, with a Pension<br />
Fund growing every year, it is quite clear that a<br />
very strong inducement will be held out to<br />
members who might otherwise withdraw to<br />
continue. It is not a noble motive: one would<br />
far rather find them continuing in the hope of<br />
helping those who want help: but we must be<br />
thankful that we have our steady supporters—<br />
nearly 1500 strong—who do believe in standing<br />
by the weaker brethren.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In the last number appeared a letter from Mr.<br />
Robert Maclehose,of Glasgow. It was prefaced<br />
by a few words on the general situation, and<br />
followed by a reprint of the report of our sub-<br />
committee on the subject. All three documents<br />
made quite clear the fact that the majority of<br />
booksellers are willing to try the experiment of<br />
coercion: we had already recognised that fact,<br />
and we proposed that booksellers should have<br />
their own way without opposition from our-<br />
selves for such a term as would make it possible<br />
to decide on the value of the scheme. At present<br />
it certainly looks as if the booksellers would get<br />
nothing out of it. But we shall see. Mr. Maclehose<br />
does not meet two very important points.<br />
<br />
(1) That the Authors’ Society was not con-<br />
sulted on the final adoption of the measure: and<br />
the Authors’ Society, representing the original<br />
creators and proprietors of the property, is not<br />
likely to allow their own interests to be used as<br />
a means of increasing the power and importance<br />
of the middle man.<br />
<br />
(2) It does not meet the awkward fact that<br />
the agreement binds the bookseller, but does not<br />
bind the publisher. Mr. Maclehose says that book-<br />
sellers were unwilling to “imply a doubt of the<br />
honour of the members of the Publishers’ Asso-<br />
ciation.” This is truly wonderful. Not to doubt<br />
the honour of the association? Has Mr. Macle-<br />
hose read a certain book called ‘“ Methods of<br />
Publishing” ? Or, to put it generally, are all<br />
men of business to be bound by contracts and<br />
conditions except publishers, who alone among<br />
mortals are to be held divine and above the<br />
reach of temptation? The simplicity of the<br />
statement is almost incredible were it not that<br />
it is obviously advanced in perfect good faith.<br />
We do not, as Mr. Murray was good enough to*<br />
say that we did, accuse all publishers of dis-<br />
honesty, but one thing may be stated as a law of<br />
humanity that, where any body of men have it in<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
their power to rob, cheat, thieve, and le with<br />
‘impunity, then there will be among them a<br />
certain proportion of those who will take advan-<br />
tage of this impunity.<br />
<br />
So that we end as we began: that the book-<br />
sellers will have no kind of interference from the<br />
Authors’ Society: after a certain time they will<br />
probably be asked what advantage they have<br />
gained. And meantime the depression of the<br />
book trade is growing steadily worse, and the<br />
impoverishment of the bookseller is increasing.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The extension of the term of copyright con-<br />
tinues to be advocated. It is, of course, always<br />
advanced as a measure in the interests of the<br />
author and his heirs. Nothing could be more<br />
absurd. The extension of copyright, if the pre-<br />
sent methods are preserved, would be entirely in<br />
the interests of the publisher. Those who so<br />
confidently talk of the author’s interests are<br />
probably unaware that nearly every agreement<br />
between author and publisher assigns to the<br />
latter the exclusive right of publishing the book<br />
in this country, or the copyright, during the<br />
legal term. It is, of course, evident that any<br />
agreement which might be fair for a limited term<br />
might be very much the contrary in the case of a<br />
book so fortunate as to be still in demand for an<br />
extended term. The extension of the term of<br />
copyright would, in fact, affect very few books<br />
indeed ; but in the case of those which it did<br />
affect the ordinary royalty, or the price given<br />
for a sale outright, would be quite inadequate<br />
for a book so exceptional,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The only way to meet the case is for the author<br />
to assign the right of publication, in this country<br />
at least, for a short term of years. Thus, if a five<br />
years’ term were adopted, the book at the end of<br />
that time would be dead and forgotten, or it<br />
would be still a property. In the former case, no<br />
publisher would want to produce it again ; in the<br />
latter case, the author would be able to make new<br />
terms for another short period. If sucha plan<br />
were adopted, the legal terms of copyright cannot<br />
be too much extended. Another advantage would<br />
be that it would keep the publisher in check. He<br />
would know very well in the case of a valuable<br />
book that if he failed in his duty towards the<br />
author he would lose that book at the end of the<br />
period agreed upon. Also it would make quite<br />
clear to his mind that the present view of some<br />
publishers, that literary property is theirs by<br />
right, to do what they like with, is based upon a<br />
strange confusion.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
The Manchester Guardian proposes that after<br />
an author’s death his books shall all be thrown<br />
<br />
177<br />
<br />
open to any publisher who pleases to produce<br />
them, subject to some royalty to the author’s<br />
heirs—it says the “same” royalty, meaning<br />
apparently the same which was paid in the<br />
author’s lifetime. But that might be a most<br />
unjust and unfair royalty. Moreover, in the case<br />
of very popular books, publishers would have the<br />
power of underselling each other—we have seen<br />
the cut-throat folly of the sixpenny edition—to<br />
the loss and detriment of the author's heirs.<br />
<br />
It is difficult to legislate for the protection of<br />
those wao own property or for those who ought<br />
to own it. I should rather suggest that the<br />
author’s heirs should have the power t) grant the<br />
right of publishing to any they please on any<br />
terms they please—but for a limited period only.<br />
In other words, they would not be allowed to<br />
part with the property out of the family. It<br />
would be like a landed estate which is not divided<br />
among all the heirs but goes as a solid possession<br />
<br />
to one. How many authors in one century would<br />
create a solid possession? In the nineteenth<br />
century Scott, Dickens, Marryatt, Thackeray,<br />
<br />
among novelists, and a few scattered novels besides ;<br />
among poets there would be a property large or<br />
small in the work of Wordsworth, Scott, Byron,<br />
Keats, Tennyson, Browning, Swinburne. Legisla-<br />
tion would not be for a class, but for one or two<br />
here and there.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Will my correspondent who signed a letter in<br />
the last number of this paper “ M. St. J.” kindly<br />
send me his name and address? I have mislaid<br />
both.<br />
<br />
Water Besant.<br />
<br />
=<br />
<br />
THE AUTUMN OUTPUT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
~N the November number of The Author were<br />
offered certain comments on the list of publi-<br />
cations announced for the autumn and<br />
classified by Literature. One would like the<br />
phrase “ promised by ” the publisher to be dropped.<br />
A pound of tea is not “ promised” by the grocer :<br />
and the publisher conducts his business strictly<br />
on the same principles. He “offers” the public,<br />
through a bookseller, a book which he has reason<br />
to believe will be acceptable to a certain circle of<br />
readers who will buy it. A “high class jam” is<br />
offered in the same spirit. Always we must<br />
distinguish between the commercial and the<br />
literary side of literature.<br />
<br />
Among the books—1500 in number—classified<br />
and enumerated were 353 novels. Naturally the<br />
world regarded this threatened cataract of novels<br />
with terror. Some there were, however, who<br />
<br />
<br />
178<br />
<br />
were doubtful. A list has now been made of all<br />
the novels actually published between the rst Oct.<br />
and the 15th Dec. As was expected by the<br />
doubter, the announcements were in a great many<br />
cases merely made for the purpose of swelling a<br />
list. Out of the whole number of 353 in the first<br />
list only 242 have appeared. Perhaps the depressed<br />
condition of the book market has had something<br />
to do with the Slaughter of the Innocents.<br />
This depression was severely felt early in the<br />
year—it has become steadily worse. It is now<br />
by some attributed to the war, which stimulates<br />
rather than depresses the reading public, though<br />
at first chiefly in the direction of subjects con-<br />
nected with South Africa. Chiefly it 1s due to<br />
the same causes which have been pointed out by<br />
the sub-committee of this Society—causes which<br />
continually aggravate the impoverishment of<br />
booksellers. No bookseller, however, if he had<br />
the wealth of Lombard-street at his back, could<br />
afford to risk his money in subscribing to the<br />
great mass of books now produced and offered to<br />
him.<br />
<br />
The fact, however, remains that a third of<br />
the novels announced have not appeared. The<br />
prudence of this withdrawal is to be commended.<br />
<br />
Tt is next necessary to consider by whom the<br />
new novels are written, and what is their chance<br />
of success.<br />
<br />
A closer examination of the list shows about<br />
sixty names which may be presumed to carry<br />
weight. That is to say, there are sixty out of all<br />
these novels which are tolerably certain to enjoy a<br />
remunerative circulation. In many cases the<br />
remuneration may be very small. Still, prac-<br />
tically there is no risk in producing them.<br />
<br />
There remain 182. Does this large nuimber<br />
represent the speculative spirit of the publishers<br />
—the sporting or gambling side? Not quite.<br />
We may divide them into three classes :<br />
<br />
(1.) Books written by new writers which have<br />
been strongly recommended by the reader, and<br />
are taken on their merits on the strength of<br />
that opinion. This class is very small.<br />
<br />
(2.) Books in which the authors pay part of<br />
the cost of production. This is a very consider-<br />
able class. Judging from the number of offers<br />
to publish on these terms it is a much larger<br />
class than would be generally believed.<br />
<br />
(3.) Books which the better publishers have<br />
unanimously refused, and which are published by<br />
the miserable shops where the author is misled, by<br />
promises of large profits and no “further risk,”<br />
to undertake the whole cost himself.<br />
<br />
As regards the first: class, all that is to be said<br />
is that there is hope for them. The opinions of<br />
an experienced reader are generally cautious. He<br />
does not recommend a risk unless he clearly per-<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
ceives that the chances of success are greater<br />
than the chances of failure. We may confidently<br />
expect that out of the autumn list one or two<br />
new names will emerge, to be added to the list of<br />
those which command a certain clientéle. It is,<br />
of course, impossible to say how many of the 182<br />
belong to this class.<br />
It is, however, quite possible to point to a good<br />
many books which have no chance at all of success.<br />
Among these are the books issued—one cannot<br />
say published—by the worthy gentlemen whose<br />
reader is always so favourably impressed,—and<br />
so quickly—that by return post after the MS.<br />
has been received, they offer the “ following most<br />
advantageous terms,” viz., three-fourths, or two-<br />
thirds, or nine-tenths of the profits: an edition of<br />
750 copies: no risk to the author beyond a little<br />
preliminary cheque of £75—or anything else—<br />
all future editions to be the care of the firm, and<br />
cheques every half-year. It is amazing to note<br />
how this bait catches the unwary and the credu-<br />
lous. There are never any profits; no bookseller<br />
will subscribe a copy; the Stoke Pogis Gazette<br />
is the only paper which notices the production.<br />
Another class of unfortunates is that of those<br />
who agree to guarantee a certain number of<br />
copies and omit to notice that nothing is said<br />
about advertising, and nothing about any share<br />
of profits if the book succeeds. It never does<br />
succeed. The profits are less than those made by<br />
Bob Sawyer in his general practice at Bristol.<br />
There is the class, again, of those who pay part<br />
of the vost, and are humorously informed that<br />
they are to share the profits. A perusal of the<br />
publishers’ “Draft Agreements” (Equitable)<br />
should enlighten these unhappy ones as to the<br />
nature of the share. “Half the risk and half<br />
the profits.” Admirable! Equitable indeed!<br />
Lastly, there is a small class of those who<br />
boldly undertake the publishing of their books<br />
by means of a commission publisher who charges<br />
no unpaid advertisements, no “ office expenses,”<br />
and takes his commission only. Let us encourage<br />
this class by any means in our power.<br />
<br />
=P OKs<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
L—<Tur Mernop or THE FUTURE.”<br />
<br />
° HE method of the future” is with us—<br />
|" has been for, at least, mouths. Time<br />
will soon arrive to inquire if it is<br />
<br />
to justify its description. To the editor of<br />
this paper literature is largely indebted for its<br />
genesis ; to him all those who write owe it to see<br />
that the description he has given it shall be<br />
justified. It is of tremendous importance to<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE<br />
<br />
letters that it should be adequately supported.<br />
Yet it would not appear that any work of first-<br />
rate importance, appealing to the general public,<br />
and commanding a large sale, has been thus pub-<br />
lished. Is it not permissible to call the attention<br />
of the lords of the literary world to the position,<br />
and to ask if even one is willing to demonstrate<br />
his confidence in the system, and give it the<br />
powerful impetus which a work of assured success<br />
would command for it? Will Mr. Hall Caine,<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope, Mr. Zangwill, Mr. Gilbert<br />
Parker, Mrs. Humphry Ward, or another of the<br />
Upper Ten bring up one of their 4.7in. guns?<br />
Now is the time to strike for freedom.<br />
OBSERVER.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Il.—On Weritine ror THE MAGAZINES.<br />
<br />
Your note about magazine writing seems to<br />
me a little misleading. You say that only four<br />
writers contribute as many as five articles in the<br />
course of a year to any single magazine or review.<br />
That must surely be only true with a reservation.<br />
Besides Mr. Lang in Longman’s there is the<br />
“Tooker On” in Blackwood, and the writer of<br />
“ Conferences ” in the Cornhill. Also you do<br />
not allow for the fact that the regular magazine<br />
writer sometimes, for one reason or another, does<br />
not sign. I have myself published unsigned<br />
articles in magazines three or four times in the<br />
last two years.<br />
<br />
Also your purview omits the quarterlies.<br />
<br />
But the essential point is that a writer in any<br />
demand can easily dispose of a dozen articles in<br />
the year among the different periodicals, 1.€., can<br />
add from £150 to £200 or more to his income.<br />
That is sufficiently proved by the fact that I,<br />
with no particular reputation to assist me, have<br />
had well over a score of articles published in<br />
what I should call the best periodicals between<br />
the years 1898 and 1899.<br />
<br />
The Author, I think, might very properly recog-<br />
nise the service done to literature, or at least<br />
to the literary men and women who wish to write<br />
other things than fiction, by those publishers<br />
who issue quarterlies and monthlies which either<br />
make a loss at the year’s end or a very small<br />
profit, but pay handsomely a large number of<br />
people for writing about subjects on which they<br />
speak with special knowledge or special compe-<br />
tence. It is in fact the magazines which enable<br />
the critic to exist and to write without hurry and<br />
with a reasonable space at his command. Ss.<br />
<br />
(‘The “ serials,’’ which include running “ Confer-<br />
ences,” were expressly excluded. As regards the<br />
service done to literature by the existence of<br />
magazines, that is undoubted—but it is not the<br />
point.<br />
<br />
As for the “loss or the very small<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
179<br />
<br />
profit,” if the magazines did not pay they would<br />
be soon dropped. But they pay in many ways,<br />
even though they may show some loss at the<br />
year’s end: they pay m getting the publishers’<br />
name known and advertised ; in attracting good<br />
writers to a firm; and (see p. 168) perhaps by<br />
exchange and the contra account.—ED. |<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I1].—Tue Same Otp Srory—Ever New.<br />
<br />
The story is the same, ’tis only the case that<br />
is new. The invalid daughter of a literary man<br />
tries to support herself by literature and fails.<br />
Not because she has not the essential qualifica-<br />
tions for success, but because the editors who<br />
accept her MSS. defer payment for two years. Kt<br />
she ventures to remind them of the guineas over-<br />
due, back comes the MS. We know that this is<br />
no new thing in literary life, but Zhe Author,<br />
by creating a reasonable public opinion on the<br />
subject, will make such unbusiness-like ways an<br />
old evil memory. E. L. WriLiraMs.<br />
<br />
TV.—TuHe UnproressionaL JOURNALIST.<br />
<br />
I wish to indorse what has been repeatedly<br />
stated in The Author, that journalism, magazine<br />
and review writing, does not as a rule provide an<br />
income. I am one of the writers qaoted in your<br />
November number, who had one article in a big<br />
review in the course of one year. In lesser<br />
magazines I had two or three within the same<br />
period, besides weekly articles in sixpenny papers.<br />
L otten receive as little as half-a-guinea for a<br />
short article, and sums of a guinea or less for<br />
paragraphs, notes, and short reviews of books.<br />
However, I get the books and keep them, and<br />
these are to me valuable assets.<br />
<br />
I can’t say that I am very disappointed if IL<br />
find at the end of the year that I have only<br />
earned £100. This year I fancy that I shall<br />
exceed that sum by a good margin. I have now<br />
launched a novel at no risk to myself, and I am<br />
to have a royalty when it passes out of serial<br />
into book form.<br />
<br />
You will, of course, be shocked to learn that I<br />
have condescended to aceept as little as one<br />
guinea for each of my short stories. But my idea<br />
is that if my stories over a pseudonym win a<br />
little favour from the public, i shall thus have<br />
advertised my wares and shall be able perhaps to<br />
ask higher terms.<br />
<br />
But I have wasted space in your columns if in<br />
the end Ido not disclose my object in writing.<br />
This is to ask your readers if introductions to<br />
other writers could not be effected by means of<br />
the Society. For instance, if only I knew who<br />
are the authors who live in my locality and are<br />
180<br />
<br />
members of the Society, I could in the usual<br />
manner procure personal introductions through<br />
neighbours, without breach of etiquette or of the<br />
«“ convenances” of society. This at least would<br />
assist the interchange of experience, and authors<br />
of my calibre not too overburdened with work<br />
would find a pleasant and perhaps profitable<br />
connection with others able to advise and assist<br />
<br />
in literary matters. Di ett<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
V.—Epiror1AL PROMPTNESS.<br />
<br />
Would you allow me to call attention to a<br />
general grievance amongst “ scientific’? writers,<br />
and at the same time as an example to refer to an<br />
error that has probably disappointed some of the<br />
public, and which appeared in an article in a<br />
certain magazine for October, entitled “ The Great<br />
Meteor Shower of 1899.” In thisitis stated “ that<br />
the culmination of the shower is expected in the<br />
early morning hours of Tuesday, Nov. 14. 3<br />
There will be a thin crescent moon.” This descrip-<br />
tion of the age of the moon, however, must have<br />
been written for last year, as it did not correspond<br />
to its condition on that date for 1899. More-<br />
over, the very date was wrong; for reliable calcu-<br />
lations for this year made it the 15th-16th. The<br />
error is interesting, particularly to specialist<br />
writers on any subject whatever, as exhibiting<br />
what is probably due to a magazine editor’s<br />
usual want of promptness and his frequent in-<br />
difference to appropriateness. The probability in<br />
this case was that the article was written in 1898<br />
and held over till 1899. This fault is common<br />
to most European magazines, and is frequently<br />
occasioned by changes in the editorial staff. The<br />
fact, however, remains that the moon this year on<br />
Nov. 14 was three days from being full moon,<br />
and that the Leonid shower, or what remained of<br />
it, ought to have been at its grandest about<br />
6 a.m. on the 16th, twenty-eight hours only before<br />
full moon.<br />
<br />
I recall several provoking yet amusing instances<br />
of editorial (magazine) indifference to fact. A<br />
few years ago an article of mine appeared with<br />
a plan of an ancient house that I had carefully<br />
drawn to a scale of 1-200th; the plan, however,<br />
without my being consulted, was reduced in size<br />
without any alteration of the scale index, which<br />
must have been between 1-400th and 1-52oth, thus<br />
implying that the original house was less than<br />
half the size I indicated. A German friend of<br />
mine, a Government architect, sent an important<br />
archeological paper to an editor in his own<br />
country, who held it over for a year before pub-<br />
lishing it, thus giving someone else the chance to<br />
pose as the first exponent of the subject. This<br />
indifference does not affect the daily Press to such<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
a degree, but in Italy an amusing case occurred<br />
which was told me, as far as I remember, by<br />
my friend Signor G. Grahlovitz, the learned<br />
director of the two seismic observatories in<br />
Ischia. It seems that Professor Palmieri of the<br />
Vesuvian Observatory had been misquoted in a<br />
Neapolitan daily paper about some seismic matter,<br />
and that he wrote to the editor to protest; the<br />
only consolation which he received was a com-<br />
munication from the editor to the effect that<br />
“We have made you say it, and you must now<br />
stick to it!”<br />
<br />
As for the advantages to be gained by publish.<br />
ing an article in time, I suppose that the average<br />
busy office-bound magazine editor, unless a man |<br />
of the world, cannot see across the Channel so<br />
easily as the more free public and also those<br />
specialists who watch their subjects from a wider,<br />
European, or even more extended, area of view.<br />
<br />
Dec., 1899. H. P. FitzGreratp Marriorr,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ViI.—Tue Question oF REVIEWS.<br />
<br />
Undoubtedly reviews advertise a book, and it is<br />
equally without doubt that there is not sufficient<br />
space in our papers for the adequate reviewing of<br />
all the books that appear. But can anyone tell<br />
me why so much space is always devoted to those<br />
authors who, having “arrived,” need no adver-<br />
tising save the announcement that a new work<br />
of theirs has come out; while the new-comers,<br />
the “ unarrived,”’ are hastily dismissed with a few<br />
lines, half a column at the most, of careless,<br />
indiscriminate, useless praise or blame ?<br />
<br />
Now I submit that if a practically unknown<br />
writer produce a work of any merit at all, there<br />
is no reason why he should be docked of a fairly<br />
exhaustive review in order that the refined gold<br />
of the popular author may have an extra gilding.<br />
For to the beginner, advertisement, encourage-<br />
ment, and criticism are of the utmost value: he<br />
may be able by their aid to take his proper place<br />
<br />
in the field of literature, to learn his strength —<br />
<br />
and his weakness; while the celebrity, who has<br />
probably half-a-dozen more books sketched out,<br />
or perhaps appearing in magazines, requires no<br />
such assistance. Of course critics and editors are<br />
naturally more interested in their tried favourites<br />
than in new men, but the question is—have they<br />
any right to consult personal taste at all? Is<br />
criticism to be a mere matter of what I like or<br />
you like ?<br />
<br />
[ feel sure most persons will agree with me<br />
that the columns, and even pages, of flattery 80<br />
lavishly bestowed upon the successful—together —<br />
with the lengthy abuse often directed against bad<br />
work—take up at least two-thirds of the space<br />
allotted to the reviewing of books in our papers,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
and that there might well be reform in this direc-<br />
tion. If an author be already famous, why<br />
“boom” him? If a book be undeniably feeble,<br />
why not let it die in peace’ QUERIST.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
VII.—On Tryinc More tHan One Epiror.<br />
i<br />
<br />
T’m rather afraid that I could not have made<br />
my meaning very clear, for the editor misunder-<br />
stands me.<br />
<br />
It is quite certain that weeklies sometimes<br />
publish without sending the author a proof or an<br />
acceptance notice. For the editor himself tells<br />
us, in “ My First Book,” that this occurred with<br />
an article which he sent to Once a Week. “ The<br />
first notice that I received,” he says, “ that the<br />
paper was accepted was when I saw it in the<br />
magazine, bristling with printer's errors.” And<br />
the same thing has occurred within my own<br />
experience. Manifestly, therefore, the sending of<br />
copies of the same article to more than one<br />
weekly is a somewhat dangerous device; and I,<br />
for one, should never employ it with weeklies.<br />
But with monthlies there ought, one would think,<br />
to be no danger at all. Has any contributor ever<br />
had an article published in a monthly magazine<br />
without first receiving either a proof or a simple<br />
notification that the “copy”? had been sent to<br />
press ? Perry Barr.<br />
<br />
[Note.—The incident is true, but the cause of<br />
it was an accident. The paper had just changed<br />
hands; the new editor found my article in proof,<br />
but could not find the name of the author. He<br />
published it, and on my calling to expostulate<br />
explained the matter with apologies. Such a<br />
thing has never again happened to me in more<br />
than thirty years of writing for magazines.—<br />
Eprror. |<br />
<br />
II.<br />
<br />
The question revived by Perry Barr as to the<br />
expediency (for it is only one of expediency)<br />
of sending the same work to several editors is<br />
one on which I should say that the wiser course<br />
was not to do it. If I were the editor, and a<br />
writer asked me to send back an article sub-<br />
mitted to me, as it had been already accepted by<br />
another editor, I should certainly send back every<br />
article sent me by that writer without examina-<br />
tion. Asa writer of magazine articles of many<br />
years’ experience (I have contributed to the<br />
Atlantic from the month in which it was founded<br />
by James Russell Lowell, and to most of the<br />
older magazines, English and American), I have<br />
made it my rule never to send an article without<br />
first asking the editor if he would read it, and if<br />
I broke the rule, it would be with the expectation<br />
of having it sent back to me. I have rarely had<br />
<br />
181<br />
<br />
an article rejected, and I think that of those<br />
which on second reading I thought it worth while<br />
to keep in MS. there are not in my drawer more<br />
than two or three serious essays and two stories.<br />
Tf Mr. Barr had had a little editorial experience<br />
of the enormous quantity of articles some editors<br />
have to look at, for of reading all of them there<br />
can be no question, he would hardly expect a<br />
prompt answer except in the case of the rejection<br />
of the article from sheer want of literary interest.<br />
In such cases as that of the magazine instanced<br />
in the communication of “A member of the<br />
Society of Authors,” I think the publication of<br />
the name of the magazine in the pages of The<br />
Author would be a proper service to be rendered<br />
the body of writers, of whom only the weak<br />
members would be likely to trouble that editor<br />
thereafter. Personally I have always found the<br />
editors of those magazines to which I have had<br />
the privilege of contributing of unexceptionable<br />
politeness, and have in only one case met with<br />
discourtesy, even in the form of the refusal, from<br />
the editor of a magazine to which I had never<br />
before contributed, and to which I never offered<br />
another article. But if I offered my articles to<br />
two or three editors simultaneously, I should<br />
expect after a short experience to be treated very<br />
curtly.<br />
<br />
My experience with both English and American<br />
magazines is that the articles which, after the<br />
preliminary demand as to the desire for an article<br />
on the subject proposed, are accepted, are sent to<br />
me in proof as the sole intimation of acceptance.<br />
A writer who sends an article to an editor, not<br />
knowing if the subject is one on which the maga-<br />
zine is not already loaded with one or more on the<br />
same theme, risks very uselessly a rejection with-<br />
out any reference to the quality of his article.<br />
If my memory serves me rightly the Century has<br />
had 3000 essays sent in in the course of a year.<br />
T have had articles accepted by it and not pub-<br />
lished for years, which is easily understood when<br />
we know that it has had on hand in the form of<br />
articles accepted (and generally paid for on<br />
acceptance), with illustrations appertaining, to<br />
the value of £200,000. Of these many, accepted<br />
and paid for, have to go overboard. Inexperienced<br />
magazine writers have no conception of the<br />
amount of matter the leading magazine editors<br />
have to do with, and the least they can do is to<br />
ascertain if there is a market for the article they<br />
have to dispose of.<br />
<br />
W. J. STILLMAN.<br />
Ill.<br />
<br />
Tf one has sent copies of the same article<br />
to more than one magazine, two editors might<br />
publish it simultaneously, neither of them having<br />
communicated with the author, who in that case<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
182<br />
<br />
will probably never approach either of them<br />
with success again. I may say that I have<br />
had an article published in a monthly (a new and<br />
struggling one, without having received any<br />
proofs, though not without previous communica-<br />
tion from the editor.<br />
<br />
Another point has occurred to me. Suppose an<br />
author has sent duplicates of an article to two<br />
monthlies, one of which pays better than the<br />
other, and that the editor of the one which<br />
pays at the lower rate accepts his article<br />
before the other editor has read it. He will<br />
then have to write and withdraw his article<br />
from the better paying magazine, and that, pos-<br />
sibly, just as the editor was about to send him a<br />
proof. This would be disastrous ; though, on the<br />
other hand, in the case of an article dealing with<br />
some topic of the moment, which must be pub-<br />
lished at once or not at all, it might be a less risk<br />
than the likelihood that the contribution will be<br />
kept until valueless by the first magazine to which<br />
it is sent, and then rejected<br />
<br />
M. C. A.<br />
<br />
> 0<——_____—_<br />
<br />
BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
\ | R. EDWARD CLODD is writing a<br />
memoir of the late Mr. Grant Allen,<br />
but according to present intentions it<br />
<br />
will not be a book by itself. It will, that is to<br />
<br />
say, be incorporated with some one of Grant<br />
<br />
Allen’s volumes of scientific essays. This is<br />
<br />
following the precedent Mr. Clodd set im the case<br />
<br />
of another personal friend, Henry Walter Bates,<br />
to whose “ Naturalist on the Amazons” he pre-<br />
<br />
fixed a memoir in 1892.<br />
<br />
Mr. Leslie Stephen is busily occupied upon his<br />
new work, “The English Utilitarians,” and it will<br />
probably appear in the spring. It is in three<br />
volumes, and deals especially with Bentham, and<br />
James and John Stuart Mill.<br />
<br />
Mr. Barrie’s story, “Tommy and Grizel,”<br />
begins in Scribner’s Magazine this month. It is<br />
a sequel to “ Sentimental Tommy,” who, of course,<br />
is said to have been sketched from R. L.<br />
Stevenson.<br />
<br />
Among other notable contributions to Seribner’s<br />
during the year will be a series of articles on<br />
present-day Russia by Mr. Henry Norman, who<br />
has recently made an extensive journey through<br />
that country.<br />
<br />
A new racing story by Mr. Edward H. Cooper,<br />
entitled ‘The Monk Wins,” will be published<br />
this month by Messrs. Duckworth.<br />
<br />
Stories by Mr. G. R. Sims (“In London’s<br />
Heart ”) and Mr. Algernon Gissing (“A Secret<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
of the North Sea”) will be published shortly<br />
by Messrs. Chatto and Windus.<br />
<br />
“Folly Corner” is the title of a new story by<br />
Mrs. Henry Dudeney, which Mr. Hememann will<br />
publish in a week or two.<br />
<br />
Among the books of the spring season will be<br />
a volume of stories by Mr. Robert Barr, entitled<br />
«The Strong Arm,” and a volume of war stories<br />
by Mr. Stephen Crane.<br />
<br />
New volumes to appear in Messrs. Blackie’s<br />
“Victorian Era Series” include a monograph on<br />
Beaconsfield, by Mr. Harold Gorst ; an account<br />
of Ireland in the Queen’s reign, by Mr. J. A. BR.<br />
Marriott; and a volume on India since the<br />
Mutiny, by Mr. R. P. Karkaria.<br />
<br />
The Argosy will henceforth be published by<br />
Mr. George Allen instead of Messrs. Macmillan.<br />
Tts new editor is Mr. Herbert Morrah, who<br />
iutends to develop the magazine and mtroduce<br />
new features. Another change of the kind is that<br />
the Badminton Magazine, hitherto published by<br />
Messrs. Longmans, will now be published by<br />
Mr. Heinemann.<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles Lowe is the author of “ Our<br />
Greatest Living Soldiers,” which Messrs. Chatto<br />
and Windus are about tc publish. It consists of<br />
biographical sketches of Lord Wolseley, Lord<br />
Roberts, Sir Evelyn Wood, Lord Kitchener, Sir<br />
Donald Stewart, and other famous soldiers.<br />
<br />
Professor Skeat has just been made the re-<br />
cipient of his portrait, subscribed for by many<br />
friends and admirers. The presentation took<br />
place at the annual meeting of the Modern Lan-<br />
guages Association, of which the Professor was<br />
president this year. Another distinguished<br />
scholar who has been honoured is Professor<br />
Pasquale Villari. ‘To mark Professor Villari’s.<br />
completion of forty years as a teacher, his friends<br />
have established a ‘Fondazione Villari,’ for<br />
historical studies, in connection with the Instituto<br />
Superiore of Florence.<br />
<br />
“The Semitic Series ” is the latest collection of<br />
books to be announced. Its object is to present<br />
in popular scientific form an account of the<br />
Babylonians, Assyrians, and other ancient<br />
Semitic races. Professor Sayce is to edit the<br />
handbooks, each of which will be written by a<br />
specialist. The first is by himself — “ Baby-<br />
lonians and Assyrians.” Mr. John Nimmo is<br />
the publisher.<br />
<br />
Mr. T. F'. Dale is writing the life of the late<br />
Duke of Beaufort, which Messrs. Constable will<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
The recent vicissitudes in the affairs of Messrs.<br />
Harper and Brothers have culminated, says the<br />
Chicago Dial, in the formal transfer of the busi-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE<br />
<br />
ness to a trustee, under the conditions of a mort-<br />
gage for a large sum held by Messrs. J. Pierpoint<br />
Morganand Co., bankers. The trustee has appointed<br />
as agent Mr. G. B. M. Harvey, proprietor of the<br />
North American Review, who has thus become<br />
the legal and actual manager of the Harper estab-<br />
lishment. It is stated that this step was taken<br />
by mutual agreement, and with the full approval<br />
of the Messrs. Harper, as being the best method<br />
of effecting a permauent readjustment of their<br />
affairs. Although the amount of their indebted-<br />
ness is given as over a million sterling, the assets<br />
are believed to exceed that sum considerably, and<br />
with the fresh assistance, financial and adminis-<br />
trative, which the house will receive, there will,<br />
adds the Dial, be no impairment of its credit or<br />
efficiency. The house of Harper and Brothers<br />
was founded nearly a century age.<br />
<br />
New stories by Mrs. Humphry Ward and Mr.<br />
Zangwill will appear in Harper's Magazine this<br />
year.<br />
<br />
“Managers are literally at their wits’ end to<br />
know where to get plays,” says a recent article in<br />
Literature.<br />
<br />
A performance of John Oliver Hobbes’s new<br />
play, ‘“‘Osbern and Ursyne,” has been given in<br />
New York by Mr. Charles Frohman. The author<br />
has two other plays in hand, one on behalf of<br />
Mr. George Alexander and the other with parts<br />
for Mr. and Mrs. Cyril Maude.<br />
<br />
Mr. Kinsey Peile is dramatising “ Red Pottage x<br />
in collaboration with the author of the novel, Miss<br />
Cholmondeley.<br />
<br />
Mr. Kyrle Bellew has secured a new play on<br />
the subject of modern life in London, by Mr.<br />
Louis Parker and Mr. Addison Bright, as well as<br />
the rights of Mr Henry Hamilton’s adaptation of<br />
Dumas’ “ Count of Monte Cristo.’’ The former<br />
will be produced first when Mr. Bellew fixes upon<br />
a theatre.<br />
<br />
Mr. Wyndham intends to revive “ Dandy<br />
Dick” about the end of January. After that,<br />
“ Cyrano.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Tree will produce “ A Midsummer Night's<br />
Dream” at Her Majesty’s on the roth inst. In<br />
the event of its not running until the end of the<br />
season, he will revive “ Rip Van Winkle,” but in<br />
a new version.<br />
<br />
A copyright performance of General Wallace’s<br />
“Ben Hur” has been given by Mr. Frohman’s<br />
company at the Duke of York’s. The play will<br />
shortly be produced in London.<br />
<br />
The Actors’ Association discussed on Dec. 15,<br />
under Mr. Tree’s presidency, and in his theatre, a<br />
scheme brought forward by the committee with a<br />
view to providing for the election, training, and<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
183<br />
<br />
registration of actors. The scheme proposed that<br />
teachers of acting and elocution with ten years’<br />
experience of the stage should be entitled to apply<br />
for a diploma enabling them to select and train<br />
recruits for presentation to a Central Board for<br />
examination. Another clause provided that three<br />
years’ work and a diploma from the Central<br />
Board should entitle members to write F.A.A.<br />
(Fellow of the Actors’ Association) after their<br />
names. Mr. Tree said there was a widespread<br />
feeling that those who set out to be actors should<br />
be capable of acquiring a rudimentary knowledge<br />
of the practice of the art in its initial stages. Mr.<br />
Forbes Robertson and Mr. J. D. Beveridge moved,<br />
and Mr. Wilson Barrett and Mr. Acton Bond<br />
supported, the adoption of the scheme. Mr.<br />
Hare, Mr. Edward Terry, Mr. Henry Neville, and<br />
Mr. Cecil Raleigh were amongst the majority who<br />
opposed it, however, and on a show of hands<br />
being taken it was decided to refer the scheme<br />
back to the committee for further consideration.<br />
Mr. Hare spoke of the attempt of a few years ago<br />
to form an Academy of Acting, and said that he<br />
himself threw up the sponge in the face of evidence<br />
that the right men to do the teaching would not<br />
become teachers.<br />
<br />
Mr. John Hollingshead’s benefit performance<br />
will take place at the Empire on Tuesday after-<br />
noon, Jan. 30. Among those who will take part<br />
in the entertainment is Miss Nellie Farren, who<br />
will be seen with Kate Vaughan, Edward Royce,<br />
and Edward Terry in a “ Gaiety Quartette.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BOOKS AND REVIEWS.<br />
<br />
(In these colwmns notes on books are given from reviews<br />
which carry weight, and are not, so far as can be learned,<br />
logrollers.)<br />
<br />
PAoLo AND FRANCESCA, by Stephen Phillips (Lane, 4s. 6d.<br />
net), a poetic drama, presents ** the story of the tragedy of<br />
Malatesta in its simplest form, without the accessories<br />
which various commentators of the sixteenth century have<br />
added to the story as told by Dante.” The Times adds that it<br />
is “a very beautifnl and original rendering.” The Daily<br />
Telegraph says that no one who reads the book ‘“ can have<br />
any doubt that we possess in Mr. Stephen Phillips one who<br />
redeems our age from its comparative barrenness in the<br />
higher realms of poetry.” The Daily News says that Mr.<br />
Phillips “is indeed a capable and conscientious workman ” ;<br />
and the Spectator says that Mr. Phillips ‘‘ has touched the<br />
story with a master’s hand, and in the noblest spirit of<br />
tragedy.”<br />
<br />
TeNNYSON, RusKIN, MrILx, and Other Literary Estimates,<br />
by Frederic Harrison (Macmillan, 8s. 6d.), are studies, says<br />
the Daily Chronicle, “ for all to read who desire in historical<br />
literature some golden mean between partisan romance and<br />
minute erudition.” Besides the writers named above, the<br />
volume deals with Arnold, Symonds, Froude, Freeman, and<br />
also with Gibbon, Lamb, and Keats. In the opinion of the<br />
Chronicle, the most valuable portion of the book is that<br />
<br />
<br />
184<br />
<br />
devoted to Mr. Ruskin as “ Master of Prose” and as<br />
“ Prophet.”<br />
<br />
Srupy AND STaGcz, by William Archer (Richards, 5s.),<br />
and Framers oF Minp, by A. B. Walkley (Richards, 53.),<br />
are reviewed together in Literature and the Daily Chronicle.<br />
The books contain the views of the writers “on literature,<br />
the stage, and, implicitly, on life. Their methods entirely<br />
differ.’ Mr. Archer, says Literature, “ gives us the skirl<br />
of Highland music, the note of war. His criticism kills<br />
with cut and thrust,” and his book “‘is valuable both asa<br />
record and on account of its intrinsic interest.” Mr.<br />
Walkley’s taste is for the French manner of wounding; he<br />
does his business with equal effect to “the lascivious<br />
pleasing of a lute,” and his book is “ extremely welcome.”<br />
The Daily Chronicle also discusses the “two tempera-<br />
ments,” and describes both books as containing “ brilliant<br />
work.”<br />
<br />
On Books anv Arts, by Frederick Wedmore (Hodder and<br />
Stoughton, 6s.), “ is a little book of short and lively essays,”<br />
says Literature, ‘pleasant to look at and to look into.”<br />
The greater number deal with questions of art, “ but to see<br />
the writer at his best one should turn to his dramatic<br />
notes, such as that in which he compares Joe Jeffer-<br />
gon’s pathos with that of Elia, or to his discourse on<br />
the short story, or to where he runs on engagingly about<br />
his curios, deprecatingly labelled as ‘My Few Things.’<br />
In all these we find examples of a well-cultivated taste in<br />
irony.”<br />
<br />
Tue Decay oF SENSIBILITY, by Stephen Gwynn<br />
(Lane, 6s.), consists of literary essays. The first, from<br />
which the book takes its name, “is a clever piece of criti-<br />
cism on Miss Austen,” and the Spectator adds of the book<br />
<br />
-as a whole that it ‘“ will be read with great pleasure, but<br />
the reader will lay it down with the slightly ruffled sense<br />
of having been a good deal contradicted.”<br />
<br />
Tur BACKWATER OF LiFE; or, Essays of a Literary<br />
Veteran, by James Payn (Smith, Elder and Co., 6s.), “is<br />
probably destined,” says the Daily News, “to close the long<br />
list of the productions of that prolific and delightful<br />
writer. ‘The twelve papers which are comprised within its<br />
covers are eminently characteristic of the author, above all<br />
in the subtle blend of humour and pathos—the vein of wise<br />
reflection, the cheerful views of life which have so often<br />
given pleasure to his readers.” Literature, in welcoming<br />
the volume, describes Mr. Leslie Stephen’s introduction to<br />
it as “warmly sympathetic, but, at the same time, finely<br />
critical.” The Daily Telegraph remarks that the book is<br />
“written with conspicuous charm and grace.”<br />
<br />
Pre-RAPHAELITE DraRizgs AND LuetTrTers, edited by<br />
William Michael Rossetti (Hurst and Blackett, 6s.) ‘‘is a<br />
book of odds and ends about Rossetti and his circle, very<br />
trivial and pointless sometimes, but containing many<br />
interesting things by the way; and full of humour.” That<br />
is the Daily News verdict.<br />
<br />
How Souprers Fiaut, by F. Norreys Connell (Bowden,<br />
3s. 6d.), ‘‘ will do something,” says the Daily Chronicle,<br />
“to give the non-military reader an idea of what modern war<br />
is like.” The illustrations are ‘‘largely the work of well-<br />
known military artists, and they help the reader to realise<br />
what fighting looks like.”<br />
<br />
TEMPERATE CHILE; A PROGRESSIVE SPAIN, by W.<br />
Anderson Smith (Black, 10s. 6d.) is a book “‘ not only charm-<br />
ing and amusing to read,” says the Daily Chronicle, ‘* but<br />
of sterling value to the naturalist.” Mr. Smith is a member<br />
of the Scottish Fisheries Board, who was deputed by the<br />
Government to report upon the fish and sea-birds of “ this<br />
land of myriads of islands and creeks, with its marvellous<br />
vegetation, with its incredible wealth of fin and feather, and<br />
its rainfall of 160in. per annum.”<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THe CHRISTOLOGY oF JESUS, by the Rev. James Stalker<br />
(Hodder and Stoughton, 6s.), consists of six lectures, treating<br />
of the various titles of our Lord. “ Dr. Stalker has handled<br />
the subject,” says the Spectator, “not only with learning,<br />
but (what is rarer) with judgment; steering his way with<br />
a fine critical and religious tact among the numberless<br />
ingenious theories that are so freely produced in Germany.”<br />
<br />
In CoNNECTION WITH THE Dr WILLOUGHBY CLAIM,<br />
by Frances Hodgson Burnett (Warne, 6s.), is a story of<br />
rural life in the Southern States, before and after the war,<br />
and, says the Spectator, “is excellent both in matter and<br />
manner. The plot may best be described as a variant on :<br />
the story of the Ugly Duckling.” Tom de Willoughby, — —<br />
although belonging to a “ first family,’ was a “ sport,” for :<br />
his figure was ungainly, his address awkward, and his<br />
intellectual outfit sadly to lack. It is with the expansion of<br />
his nature that the book deals. The Daily Chronicle says<br />
that the author’s pathos has never been truer, her humour :<br />
never more engaging, than in this new work. The Daily Teles ae<br />
graph calls it “one of the most moving novels of the :<br />
year.”<br />
<br />
Tus STtoRY OF THE TREASURE SEEKERS, by E. Nesbit<br />
(Unwin, 6s.), sets forth the adventures of a family of six<br />
motherless children living in a London suburb, and is “‘ one<br />
of those rare books,” says the Spectator, ‘‘ which enable a<br />
reviewer to earn the gratitude of the public by the simple f<br />
act of cordial recommendation.” “It will entertain and T<br />
touch any adult reader who is not destitute of natural affec-<br />
tions.”<br />
<br />
Some ExpERIENCES oF AN Ir1sH R.M., by E. Gi. Somer-<br />
ville and Martin Ross (Longmans, 6s.) leads the Spectator<br />
to remark that “if there were many women writers like iste<br />
Miss Martin and Miss Somerville, the discussion whether<br />
their sex is deficient in the sense of humour would be not<br />
merely otiose but impertinent.” “ But it must not be thought<br />
that these stories are mere pieces of caricature”: the<br />
various typical personages introduced are all drawn from<br />
the life of modern Galway and Cork.<br />
<br />
“THE AUTHOR.”<br />
<br />
SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Front Page ave oe £4 0 0<br />
Other Pages 8 ee<br />
Half of a Page ... - 110 0<br />
Quarter of a Page . 015 0<br />
Eighth of a Page eA oye aay wee OE<br />
Single Column Advertisements perinch 0 6 0<br />
Bills for Insertion... aay per 2000 3 0 0<br />
<br />
Reductions made for a Series of Six or Twelve Insertions. &<br />
<br />
All letters respecting Advertisements should be addressed to the fb<br />
<br />
ADVERTISEMENT MANAGER, The Author Office, 4, Portugal-street, :<br />
London, W.O,<br />
<br />
Mr. J Eveleigh Nash,<br />
<br />
LITERARY AGENT,<br />
AMBERLEY HOUSE, NORFOLK STREET,<br />
<br />
STRAND, W.C. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/470/1900-01-01-The-Author-10-8.pdf | publications, The Author |