Omeka IDOmeka URLTitleSubjectDescriptionCreatorSourcePublisherDateContributorRightsRelationFormatLanguageTypeIdentifierCoveragePublisher(s)Original FormatOxford Dictionary of National Biography EntryPagesParticipantsPen NamePhysical DimensionsPosition End DatePosition Start DatePosition(s)Publication FrequencyOccupationSexSociety Membership End DateSociety Membership Start DateStart DateSub-Committee End DateSub-Committee Start DateTextToURLVolumeDeathBiographyBirthCommittee End DateCommittee of Management End DateCommittee of Management Start DateCommittee Start DateCommittee(s)Council End DateCouncil Start DateDateBibliographyEnd DateEvent TypeFromImage SourceInteractive TimelineIssueLocationMembersNgram DateNgram TextFilesTags
328https://historysoa.com/items/show/328The Author, Vol. 09 Issue 12 (May 1899)<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+09+Issue+12+%28May+1899%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 09 Issue 12 (May 1899)</a><a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101063829988" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=njp.32101063829988</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a>1899-05-01-The-Author-9-12269–288<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=9">9</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1899-05-01">1899-05-01</a>1218990501XT be Hutbot\<br /> (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br /> CONDUCTED BY WALTER BESANT.<br /> Vol. IX.—No. 12.] MAT 1, 1899. [Price Sixpence.<br /> For the Opinions expressed in papers that are<br /> signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br /> responsible. None of the papers or para-<br /> graphs must be taken as expressing the<br /> collective opinions of the Committee unless<br /> they are officially signed by G. Herbert<br /> Thring, Sec.<br /> THE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br /> remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br /> requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br /> important communications within two days will write to him<br /> without delay. AU remittances should be crossed Union<br /> Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br /> letter only. il<br /> Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br /> all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br /> jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br /> returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br /> GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br /> FOB some years it has been the practice to insert, in<br /> every number of The Author, certain &quot; General Con-<br /> siderations,&quot; Warnings, Notices, &amp;c, for the guidance<br /> of HtB reader. It has been objected as regards these<br /> warnings that the tricks or frauds against which they are<br /> directed cannot all be guarded against, for obvious reasons.<br /> It is, however, well that they should be borne in mind, and<br /> if any publisher refuses a clause of precaution he simply<br /> reveals his true character, and should be left to carry on<br /> his business in his own way.<br /> Let us, however, draw up a few of the rules to be<br /> observed in an agreement. There are three methods of<br /> dealing with literary property:—<br /> I. That of selling it outright.<br /> This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br /> price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br /> managed by a competent agent.<br /> II. A profit-sharing agreement.<br /> In this case the following rule ■ should be attended to:<br /> (1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br /> duction forms a part.<br /> (2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br /> profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br /> ▼OL. IX.<br /> in his own organs: or by charging exchange advertise-<br /> ments.<br /> (3.) Not to allow a special charge for &quot; office expenses,&quot;<br /> unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br /> (4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br /> rights.<br /> (5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br /> (6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br /> As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br /> doctor!<br /> (7.) To stamp the agreement.<br /> III. The royalty system.<br /> In this system, which has opened the door to a most<br /> amazing amount of overreaching and trading on the<br /> author&#039;s ignorance, it is above all things necessary to know<br /> what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br /> possible for an author to ascertain approximately and very<br /> nearly the truth. From time to time the very important<br /> figures connected with royalties are published in The Author.<br /> Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br /> &quot;Cost of Production.&quot; Let no one, not even the youngest<br /> writer, sign a royalty agreement without finding out what<br /> it gives the publisher as well as himself.<br /> It has been objected that these precautions presuppose a<br /> great success for the book, and that very few books indeed<br /> attain to this great success. That is quite true: but there is<br /> always this uncertainty of literary property that, although<br /> the works of a great many authors carry with them no risk<br /> at all, and although of a great many it is known within a few<br /> copies what will be their minimum circulation, it is not<br /> known what will be their maximum. Therefore every<br /> author, for every book, should arrange on the chance of a<br /> success which will not, probably, come at all; bnt which<br /> may come.<br /> The four points which the Society has always demanded<br /> from the outset are:—<br /> (1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br /> means.<br /> (2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br /> to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br /> nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br /> withheld.<br /> (3.) That there shall be no seoret profits.<br /> (4.) That nothing shall be charged which has not been<br /> actually paid—for instance, that there shall be no charge for<br /> advertisements in the publisher&#039;s own organs and none for<br /> exchanged advertisements, and that all discounts shall be<br /> duly entered.<br /> If these points are carefully looked after, the author may<br /> rest pretty well assured that he is in right hands. At the<br /> same time he will do well to send his agreement to the<br /> secretary before he signs it.<br /> F F 2<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 270 (#282) ############################################<br /> <br /> 270 THE AUTHOR.<br /> HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br /> I. Ii^ VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br /> JjJ advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br /> lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br /> business or the administration of his property. If, in the<br /> opinion of the Committee and the Solicitors of the Society,<br /> the advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor,<br /> the member has a right to an opinion from the Society&#039;s<br /> solicitors. If the oase is such that Counsel&#039;s opinion is<br /> desirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel&#039;s<br /> opinion. All this without any cost to the member.<br /> 2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br /> and publisher&#039;s agreements do not generally fall within the<br /> experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br /> to use the Society first—our solicitors are continually<br /> engaged upon such questions for us.<br /> 3. Send to the office copies of past agreements and past<br /> accounts with the loan of the books represented. This is in<br /> order to ascertain what has been the nature of your agree-<br /> ments, and the results to author and publisher respectively<br /> so far. The Secretary will always be glad to have any<br /> agreements, new or old, for inspection and note. The infor-<br /> mation thus obtained may prove invaluable.<br /> 4. If the examination of your previous business trans-<br /> actions by the Secretary proves unfavourable, you should<br /> take advice as to a change of publishers.<br /> 5. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br /> posed document to the Sooiety for examination.<br /> 6. The Society is acquainted with the methods, and—in<br /> the oase of fraudulent houses—the tricks of every publish-<br /> ing firm in the country.<br /> 7. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br /> are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you are<br /> reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br /> the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br /> dence of the writer.<br /> 8. Send to the Editor of The Author notes of everything<br /> important to literature that you may hear or meet with.<br /> 9. The Committee have now arranged for the reception of<br /> members&#039; agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br /> safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br /> fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br /> will keep the key of the safe. The Sooiety now offers:—(1)<br /> To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br /> stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br /> them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br /> due according to agreements.<br /> NOTICES.<br /> THE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of the<br /> Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br /> of charge, the oost of producing it would be a very<br /> heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br /> many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br /> 6s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br /> Communications for The Author should reach the Editor<br /> not later than the 21st of each month.<br /> All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br /> whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br /> communicate to the Editor any points connected with then-<br /> work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br /> publish.<br /> Members and others who wish their MSS. read are<br /> requested not to send them to the Office without previously<br /> communicating with the Secretary. The utmost practicable<br /> despatch is aimed at, and MSS. are read in the order in<br /> which they are received. It must also be distinctly under-<br /> stood that the Society does not, under any oircumstanoea,<br /> undertake the publication of MSS.<br /> The present location of the Authors&#039; Club is at 3, White-<br /> hall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary for<br /> information, rules of admission, &amp;c.<br /> Will members take the trouble to ascertain whether they<br /> have paid their subscriptions for the year? If they will do<br /> this, and remit the amount, if still unpaid, or a banker&#039;s<br /> order, it will greatly assist the Secretary, and save him the<br /> trouble of sending out a reminder<br /> Members are most earnestly entreated to attend to the<br /> following warning. It is a most foolish and may be a<br /> most disastrous thing to enter into an agreement binding<br /> for a term of years. Let them ask themselves if they<br /> would give a solicitor the collection of their rents for<br /> five years to come, whatever his conduct, whether he<br /> was honest or dishonest? Of course they would not.<br /> Why then hesitate for a moment when they are asked to<br /> sign themselves into literary bondage for three or five<br /> years?<br /> &quot;Those who possess the &#039;Cost of Production&#039; are<br /> requested to note that the cost of binding has advanced 15<br /> per cent.&quot; This clause was inserted three or four years ago.<br /> Estimates have, however, recently been obtained which show<br /> that the figures in the book may be relied on as nearly<br /> correct: as near as is possible.<br /> Some remarks have been made upon the amount charged<br /> in the &quot; Cost of Production&quot; for advertising. Of oourse, we<br /> have not included any sums which may be charged for<br /> inserting advertisements in the publisher&#039;s own magazines,<br /> or in other magazines by exchange. As agreements too<br /> often go, there is nothing to prevent the publisher from<br /> sweeping the whole profits of a book into his own pocket,<br /> by inserting any number of advertisements in his own<br /> magazines, and by exchanging with others. Some there are<br /> who call this a form of fraud; it is not known what those<br /> who practise this method of swelling their own profits call it.<br /> LITERARY PROPERTY.<br /> I. The Copyright Bill.<br /> ON Monday, April 24, Lord Monkswell moved<br /> the second reading of the Bill in the House<br /> of Lords. He related the action of the<br /> Society of Authors in preparing the Bill which<br /> he had himself introduced into the House of<br /> Lords. The death of Lord Herschell was a great<br /> loss to copyright reform, because he had brought<br /> in a large consolidating measure of literary and.<br /> artistic copyright. The Bill was referred, together<br /> with his own, to a Select Committee of Lords.<br /> The Committee held a great many meetings, but<br /> had not completed the evidence. Meanwhile,<br /> another Bill had been prepared by Lord Thring<br /> dealing with literary copyright. This Bill which<br /> he now proposed to read a second time fixed this<br /> term of copyright to the life of the author and<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 271 (#283) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 271<br /> thirty years after death: the present law being a<br /> term of the author&#039;s life and seven years after, or<br /> forty-two years, whichever should be longer.<br /> The new Bill provided for the dramatisation,<br /> translation, or abridgment of novels: it gave<br /> authors of magazine articles copyright after two<br /> years from the publication of the articles. It<br /> gave copyright in lectures; it gave newspapers<br /> copyright in news for twelve hours after publica-<br /> tion. There were other points which would be<br /> considered in the discussion of the Bill.<br /> It was read a second time and referred to a<br /> Select Committee. iir<br /> II. Walter Savage Landor on Copyright.<br /> A correspondent of the Standard has unearthed<br /> a petition presented to Parliament by Walter<br /> Savage Landor, and published in the Examiner<br /> of April 7, 1839. It is as follows:—<br /> That your petitioner would represent to your Honourable<br /> House his strong persuasion that no property is bo entirely,<br /> and purely, and religiously a man&#039;s own as what comes to<br /> him immediately from God, without intervention or partici-<br /> pation. It is the eternal gift of an Eternal Being; and to<br /> interfere in any way with its benefits and blessings appears<br /> to your petitioner unbecoming and unjust.<br /> Your petitioner therefore humbly submits to your<br /> Honourable House that no Legislature has a right to<br /> confine its advantages to a thousand or ten thousand years,<br /> or to give them away to any person or pereons whatsoever, to<br /> the detriment of an author&#039;s heirs, after any number of ages.<br /> And your petitioner offers the less reluctantly these<br /> observations to your Honourable House, since he himself<br /> proposes no advantages to his descendants from any of his<br /> literary works, all of whioh he has consigned and left in<br /> perpetuity to the discretion of a learned friend.<br /> III.—Author&#039;s Corrections.<br /> As, after many wrestles, T have successfully<br /> bound the &quot;correction&quot; fiend, perhaps the method<br /> evolved may be useful to your readers.<br /> 1. Alter the agreement, liefore signing, to<br /> &quot;author&#039;s alterations &quot;; corrections may include<br /> printers&#039; errors.<br /> 2. Require a free allowance of alterations per<br /> sheet, not an allowance of shillings but of so<br /> many words. I generally ask for about one in<br /> 300. Be reasonable, and guarantee that you will<br /> never overrun a page, and promise to break lines<br /> as bttle as possible. You can always save a page<br /> whole, and seldom break more than two lines, if<br /> careful in arranging. I am referring to detailed<br /> scientific works in saying this; imaginative<br /> writers may find more difficulty.<br /> 3. Correct and alter in pencil freely on one copy<br /> of proof. Then count words and prune if needful<br /> when inking in on the other copy for the printer.<br /> If you expect trouble use red ink for all your own<br /> alterations, and indorse each sheet with number<br /> of your alterations on it.<br /> 4. And now, perhaps, you have exceeded your<br /> allowance at the end of the work. And if you<br /> have but a few words more against you than<br /> agreed on, you will find probably .£5 for correc-<br /> tions put down. Look out the worst page of all;<br /> and see if deducting your alterations there will<br /> bring you within the agreed limit; if not, take<br /> the next worst for alterations also, and so on,<br /> until deducting certain pages squares the agreed<br /> allowance. Then offer to pay for the entire<br /> re-setting of those pages. It is a magnificent<br /> offer; you pay for fifty times the work involved,<br /> and yet it binds the fiend so that he cannot do<br /> entirely as he chooses.<br /> If in course of correcting you want much<br /> alteration in a page—more than a line or two—<br /> dash out the whole page and mark it &quot; Re-set<br /> this page and charge to author.&quot; Then it is<br /> impossible to charge you for more than a few<br /> shillings for setting up one page. This method<br /> answers both with publishers and in direct<br /> contracts with printers.<br /> There is another thing to be said. Accustom<br /> yourself to write clean, without needing to alter<br /> MS., and then you are less liable to need altera-<br /> tions in proof. I seldom alter more than one<br /> word in 200 in MS. To do this, begin by a<br /> rule of never trying to write in bad con-<br /> ditions of temperament or surrounding. If<br /> distracted, cold, weary, or dull, you will never<br /> write a clean page, and the correction fiend will<br /> triumph. Often Bitten.<br /> I am much obliged by the Editor&#039;s note to my<br /> query on author&#039;s corrections. I have kept the<br /> first proofs, as advised by him. My difficulty is<br /> this: Printers often put small letters where<br /> capitals are distinctly indicated in the MS.<br /> They run on where a fresh paragraph is obvious.<br /> Per contra, they leave spaces sometimes when<br /> the directions are to save room. Sometimes the<br /> proof alters the meaning and effect of a para-<br /> graph. This may necessitate an interlineation,<br /> and dislocate a whole page, which, as the Editor<br /> says, takes time, and causes much additional<br /> expense. But must an author be charged with<br /> all this, for at the rates given it mounts up enor-<br /> mously? If an author interlineates owing to<br /> omissions, or erases an unsatisfactory line (as it<br /> seems to him) on appearing in print, I under-<br /> stand he must pay for the luxury, but should he<br /> pay for misplaced or misdivided words, &amp;c.?<br /> A New Member.<br /> IV.—No Author&#039;s Corrections.<br /> You have often pointed out how the charge<br /> made for author&#039;s corrections can be kept down<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 272 (#284) ############################################<br /> <br /> 272<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> by having the MS. type-written. A novel of<br /> mine, &quot;The Passing of Prince Rozan,&quot; had to be<br /> &quot;set&quot; and printed in America. To get proofs<br /> over here, revise and return them, would have<br /> caused such a serious delay that I decided to do<br /> without proofs. My MS. was type-written. I<br /> revised it with the greatest care. I further in-<br /> serted a clause in my agreement that the author<br /> would not require proofs, and that the publishers<br /> (Messrs. Putnam&#039;s Sons) would use their best<br /> endeavours to see that all printer&#039;s errors were<br /> corrected. I am quite satisfied with the result,<br /> and have been saved much trouble and expense.<br /> It is significant that the publishers made objec-<br /> tion to the clause in the agreement, suggesting<br /> that they might have to charge for corrections<br /> made by their reader; but the claim was inserted<br /> and agreed to. John Bickerdyke.<br /> V.—Infringement of Copyright.<br /> On March 29 last, before Mr. Justice Wills and<br /> a common jury, in the Queen&#039;s Bench Division,<br /> was heard the case of Miln v. Ballin. Mrs.<br /> Miln is an American author and journalist who<br /> has travelled a great deal, and has written books<br /> of travel and papers and essays on various<br /> subjects in magazines and papers. Among other<br /> contributions was a series of papers on children<br /> of various countries which she contributed to a<br /> journal called Madame, reserving the copyright.<br /> The defendant owned a paper called Baby, and<br /> had reproduced in its columns paragraphs—some<br /> thirty in all—verbatim from the plaintiffs essays<br /> in Madame. The witnesses for the plaintiff<br /> besides herself were Mr. T. P. O&#039;Connor, Mr.<br /> John Murray, and Mr. F. W. Slater of Harper<br /> and Brothers. The case was practically without<br /> defence, except the plea that very little harm was<br /> done, if any, to the prospects of the plaintiff&#039;s<br /> book. Mr. Justice Wills, however, thought that<br /> a very considerable wrong had been done to the<br /> plaiutiff. The jury assessed the damages at<br /> .£250.<br /> As to the case itself, their could be no doubt of<br /> the result. The amount of damages granted to<br /> the plaintiff must be taken to represent more a<br /> penalty for wrong-doing than an attempt to<br /> estimate the damage done to the forthcoming<br /> book. People who reproduce literary property<br /> without the author&#039;s permission must learn that<br /> they cannot be allowed to help themselves. No<br /> one will ever be able to learn how far the<br /> property has been injured, but property must be<br /> respected. Therefore the result of the action is<br /> quite satisfactory.<br /> VI.—Harrison v. Bloxam.<br /> (In the Westminster County Court of Middlesex,<br /> March 1, 1899.)<br /> Messrs. Haynes and Claremont of 4, Blooms-<br /> bury-square, appeared for the plaintiffs. Defen-<br /> dant was represented by counsel, Mr. C. B.<br /> Marriott (instructed by Messrs. Field, Roscoe,<br /> and Co., 36, Lincoln&#039;s-inn Fields), acting on<br /> behalf of the Society of Authors.<br /> Mr. Marriott stated that his client wasagraduate<br /> of London University and a Research Chemist<br /> carrying out experiments at the Davy-Faraday<br /> Laboratory of the Royal Institution. Mr.<br /> Bloxam was a candidate for the D.Sc. degree of<br /> the University of London, and was required to<br /> present a printed thesis showing the results of his<br /> experimental work. Mr. Bloxam obtained from<br /> Messrs. Harrison an estimate for printing<br /> 100 copies demy 8vo. 32 pp. in paper wrapper,<br /> amounting to £j 2s. Mr. Bloxam&#039;s manu-<br /> script printed out to forty-eight pages, and<br /> for this work an account was sent in by Messrs.<br /> Harrison amounting to .£15 4*. 6d. Mr. Bloxam<br /> considered the charge made to be excessive in<br /> view of the original estimate, and entered into<br /> correspondence with Messrs. Harrison. Mr.<br /> Bloxam was perfectly willing to pay a reasonable<br /> sum, and by letter suggested a meeting for settle-<br /> ment of the amount due. Messrs. Harrison<br /> replied by issuing a County Court summons.<br /> Mr. Bloxam then paid into court £10 10s. and<br /> share of costs as being sufficient to discharge the<br /> debt.<br /> The plaintiff (Mr. Harrison) was called, and<br /> denied that the sum charged was excessive. The<br /> charge was madf? for a pamphlet of 56 pp.,<br /> although defendant recognised only 48 pp. of<br /> printed matter. Plaintiff stated that blank pages<br /> and titles were charged as printed matter, but he<br /> had not warned defendant of this practice.<br /> Plaintiff also admitted that extra cost was<br /> entailed by sending out proofs in slip form, and<br /> that defendant was not consulted on this ques-<br /> tion, and was left in ignorance of any extra cost<br /> thus involved.<br /> Counsel objected on behalf of defendant that no<br /> details of extra charges had been submitted by<br /> the plaintiff, and that defendant had been allowed<br /> to incur extra charges without being warned.<br /> Counsel quoted an estimate by Messrs. Richard<br /> Clay and Sons to print for ii0 14*. 100 copies<br /> of the pamphlet, for which plaintiff claimed<br /> .£15 4*. 6d. Defendant produced manuscript and<br /> proofs, and, on examination by plaintiff and the<br /> judge, the MSS. and proofs were admitted to be<br /> legible and reasonably free from erasure or altera-<br /> tion.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 273 (#285) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 273<br /> The judge was of opinion that the charge made<br /> by the plaintiff was too great in proportion to the<br /> estimate given, and, in addition, that if extra<br /> costs were involved in printing and revision, the<br /> defendant should have been warned of such extra<br /> costs.<br /> Judgment was given for the plaintiff for .£13.<br /> VII.—Yeatman v. The Saturday Review.<br /> The case of Yeatman v. Harris and Others<br /> came before the Court of Appeal on April 12 and<br /> 13, on the application of the plaintiff for judg-<br /> ment or new trial on appeal from the verdict and<br /> judgment of Feb. 15 last, at a trial before the<br /> Lord Chief Justice and a special jury in the<br /> Queen&#039;s Bench Division. In this case the plaintiff,<br /> Mr. John Pym Yeatman, barrister and author,<br /> claimed to recover from Mr. Harris, as the former<br /> editor of the Saturday Review, and from Mr.<br /> F. W. Sabin, as the publisher, and from Messrs.<br /> Spottiswoode, as the printers of the journal,<br /> damages for alleged libels published in 1874,<br /> 1896, 1897, and 1898. The first alleged libel was<br /> in the criticism of a book written by the plaintiff,<br /> called &quot; A History of the Common Law of Great<br /> Britain and Gaul,&quot; one of the statements being:<br /> &quot;Mr. Yeatman would most likely, under any cir-<br /> cumstances, have written nonsense, if he wrote<br /> anything at all. His book is wild and worthless.&quot;<br /> The next libel arose on the publication of a book<br /> in 1896—&quot;The Gentle Shakespeare: a Vindica-<br /> tion &quot;—which the Saturday Review described as<br /> &quot;a rival in absurdity to the cryptogram of Mr.<br /> Ignatius Donelly,&quot; as &quot;miserable twaddle,&quot; and<br /> &quot;an insult to literature.&quot; The third libel (which<br /> Mr. Yeatman said was the most serious, and<br /> injured him in his profession of a barrister)<br /> appeared on May 8, 1897, stating: &quot;The Bar had<br /> its annual general meeting on Tuesday, and we<br /> notice without much surprise that those gather-<br /> ings at Lincoln&#039;s-inn are becoming more and more<br /> a kind of debating society for the cranks of the<br /> profession.&quot; The jury found that none of the<br /> articles were libellous or exceeded the limit of fair<br /> criticism, and judgment was entered accordingly;<br /> hence the present appeal. In giving judgment,<br /> Lord Justice Smith (Lords Justices Collins and<br /> Romer concurring) said there was no ground for<br /> granting the application, and the appeal would be<br /> dismissed with costs.<br /> VIII.—Musical Copyright.<br /> (Chancery Division—Before Mr. Justice Stirling.)<br /> BOOSEY V. WHIGHT.<br /> This case raised a novel and interesting point<br /> under the Musical Copyright Act. Mr. Butcher,<br /> Q.C., and Mr. Scrutton apppeared for the plain-<br /> tiffs, and Mr. Cutler, Q.C., Mr. Moulton, Q.C.,<br /> Mr. Terrell, Q.C., and Mr. Eustace Smith repre-<br /> sented the defendants.<br /> The plaintiffs are well-known music publishers,<br /> and they ask for an injunction to restrain the<br /> defendants from infringing their copyright in<br /> three songs, &quot;My Lady&#039;s Bower,&quot; &quot;The Better<br /> Land,&quot; and &quot; The Holy City.&quot; The defendants are<br /> the sellers of a musical instrument called the<br /> &quot;jEolian,&quot; which is played by means of wind<br /> admitted to pipes or reeds through perforations<br /> in sheets of paper. The plaintiffs&#039; case was that<br /> these perforated sheets were, in fact, records of<br /> the musical compositions in question, by means<br /> of which the music could be reproduced with a<br /> certain amount of human intelligence, and that<br /> they constituted an infringement of their copy-<br /> right in such compositions. The case turned to<br /> a considerable extent upon the construction of<br /> the Copyright Act, 1842. That Act gives pro-<br /> tection to copyright in books, and by its interpre-<br /> tation clause defines a book as meaning and<br /> including {inter alia) &quot;a sheet of music&quot;;<br /> and the question was whether the perforated<br /> rolls of paper used by the defendants in their<br /> instruments were &quot;sheets of music&quot; within<br /> the Act. The defendants had obtained the<br /> evidence of various musicians and others to prove<br /> that the perforated rolls could not be read as<br /> music, and conveyed to the minds of the<br /> witnesses no impression of music.<br /> The judge, having heard the arguments at<br /> length some weeks ago, reserved his judgment,<br /> which he now delivered. Having dealt with the<br /> facts of the case, and the evidence adduced at the<br /> trial, he said the question turned upon the con-<br /> struction to be put upon the Copyright Act,<br /> 1842, and the point was whether these perforated<br /> sheets of paper were &quot;sheets of music&quot; within<br /> the meaning of that Act. Although he was not<br /> prepared to say that the perforation alone<br /> amounted to an infringement, he came to the<br /> conclusion that inasmuch as the words intimat-<br /> ing the time, and the sign denoting the key,<br /> appeared on the paper as on plaintiffs&#039; music, the<br /> sheets, taken as a whole, amounted to an infringe-<br /> ment. He would, therefore, grant an injunction<br /> restraining the defendants from continuing to<br /> publish these sheets in their present form, viz.,<br /> with any words or signs which appeared on the<br /> plaintiffs&#039; music. With regard to the perfora-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 274 (#286) ############################################<br /> <br /> 274<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> tion alone he did not say whether that was an<br /> infringement.<br /> Judgment accordingly.<br /> IX.—Agreements, with Comments.<br /> In all cases in which publishers&#039; agreements<br /> are printed and commented on in The Author a<br /> copy of the paper will henceforth be sent to the<br /> firm concerned, accompanied by a letter drawing<br /> their attention to the comments and offering them<br /> the opportunity of making any reply in The Author<br /> in case they should desire to do so.<br /> Agreement.<br /> Agreement made this day of between<br /> of (hereinafter called the &quot;Author &quot;) of<br /> the one part, and Messrs. of (hereinafter<br /> called the &quot; Publishers &quot;) of the other part, as follows:<br /> 1. The author agrees to transfer to the publishers all his<br /> copyrights and his other rights in a novel written by him and<br /> at present entitled , and the publishers agree to pub-<br /> lish the said novel in one volume form, and to use their<br /> best endeavours to make the same successful.<br /> 2. All expenses of production, advertising, and setting the<br /> ■aid novel shall be undertaken by the publishers, who shall<br /> be entitled to sell 500 copies of the said novel for their own<br /> benefit and without accounting therefor. Subject thereto<br /> the publishers agree to pay to the author one-half of all<br /> profits which they may derive from the publication and sale<br /> of the said book after deducting all expenses incurred in<br /> producing, publishing, selling, and advertising the same. It<br /> is agreed that as part of the expenses as aforesaid the pub-<br /> lishers shall be at liberty to include 5 per cent on the<br /> income from sales in lieu of specific charges for carriages,<br /> bookings, insurance, postages, travelling expenses, and<br /> establishment expenses for which no other charge is to be<br /> made.<br /> 3. The publishers shall have discretion as to the number<br /> and destination of presentation copies for the Press or other-<br /> wise, with a view of helping sales, but they shall on publi-<br /> cation of the book deliver to the author six presentation<br /> copies.<br /> 4. The publishers shall make up accounts to Dec. 31 and<br /> June 30 in each year, and settle the same with the author<br /> within three months after tboee dates.<br /> 5. The author undertakes to keep the publishers indem-<br /> nified against all actions or claims which may be brought or<br /> made against or upon them by reason of the said novel con-<br /> taining any libellous or slanderous matter.<br /> 6. The author agrees to give the publishers the first offer<br /> of the next long novel to be written by him, and which shall<br /> exceed 60,000 words in length, on the same terms as are<br /> contained in this agreement, with the exception that the<br /> publishers shall not in the case of such new book be entitled<br /> to 500 or any free copies (except presentation copies for the<br /> author and review and for influencing sales). The said offer<br /> shall be made by the author submitting the MS. of the said<br /> novel to the publishers, and allowing them one month after<br /> such submission within which to accept or decline the<br /> same.<br /> The first clause in this agreement is entirely to<br /> the disadvantage of the author. No author<br /> should under any circumstances transfer the<br /> copyright in a book to a publisher. In the case<br /> of technical books, scientific books, scholastic<br /> books, such transfer is quite disastrous. The<br /> agreement above quoted, however, is for the pub-<br /> lication of a work of fiction. If the author is<br /> ill-advised enough to transfer the copyright he<br /> should protect himself against the publication of<br /> the book in an altered form, against the sup-<br /> pression of his book, and against the suppression<br /> of his name. These are all-important points. In<br /> the first clause the publishers agree to publish<br /> the said novel, but do not undertake to do so by<br /> any specified time, and as they hold the copyright<br /> they are practically masters of the situation. It<br /> may be argued that if a publisher holds the copy-<br /> right of a book he would be a fool if he did not<br /> publish it, but cases have occurred where a pub-<br /> lisher holding the copyright has delayed publi-<br /> cation for various reasons for a couple of years.<br /> During this time the author naturally is unwilling<br /> to bring out another book to interfere with the<br /> copyright that the publisher holds. Clause 1,<br /> therefore, is an exceedingly bad clause from the<br /> author&#039;s point of view. (1.) As he transfers<br /> his copyright. (2.) As the publisher is not<br /> bound to produce the book by a certain date;<br /> and (3.) he is not bound to produce more than<br /> 500 copies, and therefore it is possible that the<br /> author might obtain no profit at all (see next<br /> clause).<br /> Clause 2 is an exceedingly bad clause from an<br /> author&#039;s point of view, whether the book is a<br /> first book or otherwise. It is sometimes the case<br /> that in a royalty agreement the publisher with-<br /> holds the payment of royalty till after the sale<br /> of 500 copies and then gives a proportionately<br /> high royalty to the author. It is sometimes<br /> worth the author&#039;s while to accept an agreement<br /> of this kind rather than not have his book<br /> published at all. The publisher, however, in the<br /> present agreement has a profit-sharing arrange-<br /> ment with the result that not only does he get<br /> 500 copies free to himself, but he gets half the<br /> cost of production of this 500 copies also paid<br /> for by the author. So much for the 500 to the<br /> publisher. It is only necessary to repeat what<br /> has so often and so urgently been put forward in<br /> The Author: that a half-profit arrangement under<br /> any circumstances is a bad one for the author, as<br /> inclined to lead to disputes and dissatisfaction<br /> from the complicated statements of accounts and<br /> from the small division of profits (if any) that<br /> generally accrues. The latter part of the same<br /> clause is against the author, as if the publisher<br /> is entitled to charge a percentage to cover his<br /> expenses the author ought to be entitled to make<br /> the same charge. Finally, with regard to clause 2,<br /> the author has no chance of checking beforehand<br /> the probable cost of production and no control<br /> whatever over the amount to be spent on adver-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 275 (#287) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 275<br /> tising or where these advertisements are to<br /> appear. This simple reliance of the author on the<br /> arrangement has been mentioned over and over<br /> again and must still be insisted upon.<br /> Clause 3 is also bad as far as the permission<br /> given to the publisher is concerned. The number<br /> of free copies should be limited.<br /> The account clause is a reasonable one, and so<br /> is clause 5, but the 6th clause is again a disas-<br /> trous clause for the author. To bind oneself to a<br /> publisher for another book is at all times a very<br /> dangerous matter. If the publisher treats an<br /> author fairly in the first instance he -would know<br /> that the author would return to him with his<br /> second book, but when a publisher obtains the<br /> signature of an author to an agreement, such as<br /> the one printed above, he may be sure that if in<br /> the meantime the author seeks advice he will not<br /> return to him with a second book unless he binds<br /> the author in the manner shown in clause 6.<br /> That the author should be bound on the same<br /> terms as for the first book with the exception of<br /> the 500 copies makes the matter worse. It may<br /> be pointed out generally that there is nothing<br /> said about American rights, Colonial rights,<br /> translation rights, serial rights, and all other<br /> rights, with the exception that the publisher holds<br /> these. If, therefore, he sells these rights he will<br /> share the profits with the author. A great many<br /> of these rights are sold merely by writing a letter.<br /> In other words, they are rights outside the publi-<br /> cation of the book in England, and as such are<br /> generally treated by agents, who charge 10 per<br /> cent. on the amounts received. Here, however,<br /> the publisher obtains 50 per cent.; a very unwise<br /> arrangement from the author&#039;s point of view.<br /> This is an additional argument against selling<br /> the copyright. It is no wonder that publishers<br /> cry out against agents who desire to take 10 per<br /> cent., when the publisher for doing the same work<br /> secures 50 per cent.<br /> The financial result of this agreement was as<br /> follows:<br /> The cost of production on the debit side was<br /> £120 2s. gd. for an edition of 1500 copies.<br /> In this is included the ordinary items of com-<br /> posing, machining, printing, corrections, and<br /> binding. In addition we find the following in-<br /> cluded:<br /> £ s. d.<br /> Brass binding blocks 2 12 6<br /> Printing 500 show cards 1 7 6<br /> Printing 5000 leaflets 0 9 4<br /> Mounting and composing 8 stereos ... 0 8 0<br /> Making up and printing from red forme 012 6<br /> Design for cover 2 2 0<br /> The sales of the book on the credit side<br /> as follows: £ &lt;<br /> 1 at 3*. icxf o<br /> 9 at 6s. net 2 1<br /> 65/60 at 4*. f less 12$ per cent.<br /> 182/168 at 4s. 2d. I discount<br /> 52/48 at 4*. fleas 10 per cent<br /> 93/86 at. 4*. 2d. I trade discount<br /> 44/41 at 4*. fless 5 per cent.<br /> 52/48 at 4* 2d. \ trade discount<br /> d.<br /> 10<br /> o<br /> 41<br /> 24 15 4<br /> 17 5 10<br /> 86 1 6<br /> And the second account was as follows:<br /> JE s. d.<br /> 4 at 6s 1 4 0<br /> 104 at 48. 2d. Hess 10 per cent.) 20 5 2<br /> 13/12 at 4*. ( discount ) *<br /> 52/48 at 4*. 2d. less 12% per cent. disct. 815 0<br /> 78/72 at 4*. 2d. (less 5 per cent.) l 1Q<br /> 39/36 at 4*. ( discount )<br /> 0<br /> 6<br /> 137 5 .6<br /> The total represents a sale of 788 copies realis-<br /> ing the above figures—the sum of .£137 5*. 6d.<br /> The average price, therefore, is, as nearly as<br /> possible, 3*. 6d., so that the estimate given in<br /> these columns of 3*. 6d. as an average price is<br /> proved to be correct as regards this book.<br /> The 500 copies taken by the publisher must<br /> also be added.<br /> In the end, the publisher takes nearly £100,<br /> and the author ,£5 2s. gd. The result of this<br /> arrangement is, therefore, a most unsatisfactory<br /> one for the author, and in addition the author<br /> has bound himself for the next book to the same<br /> publisher.<br /> THE SIXPENNY BOOK.<br /> 7 11 10<br /> VOL. IX.<br /> &quot;T KNOW a man in my business,&quot; a book-<br /> I seller wrote the other day,&quot; who gets through<br /> 1000 copies of sixpenny novels every week.<br /> Nobody buys any other book. It seems as if the<br /> rest of the books are useless. He makes id. on each,<br /> or £4 3*. 46?. a week out of these novels. And<br /> his rent is .£i0 a week. How long will he last?&quot;<br /> If we look at the bookstall of the nearest<br /> railway station we shall find it covered and<br /> loaded with the sixpenny novel. There is an<br /> increasing disposition, to limit the purchase of a<br /> book to the single 6d.<br /> The greater number of these books are either<br /> non-copyright books or books belonging to the<br /> o g<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 276 (#288) ############################################<br /> <br /> 276<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> publisher; those, namely, on which he has no<br /> royalty to pay.<br /> If there is any royalty it is generally about<br /> Id. on each copy, or £2 10s. for every 1000<br /> copies.<br /> The book costs, say, about 2\d. to produce.<br /> Therefore on a sale of 30,000 copies we have<br /> approximately:—<br /> (1.) The author receives .£75.<br /> . (2.) The bookseller receives .£125.<br /> (3.) The publisher receives .£112.<br /> But a sale of 30,000 copies is high.<br /> As far as the author is concerned, if his new<br /> book was brought out at 6*., on even a 15 per<br /> cent. royalty, he would make more by a sale of<br /> 1700 copies.<br /> The questions which arise on this subject are<br /> many:—<br /> (1.) Would a successful writer do better or worse<br /> by coming out at 6d.?<br /> The class of persons who can read with pleasure<br /> the work of an educated writer is comparatively<br /> small, though it is growing and increasing rapidly.<br /> Outside this number no one buys a book of this<br /> kind, however cheap.<br /> Now, this class manages to read, either by<br /> borrowing, or lending, or buying, most of the<br /> popular works of the day in every branch. If<br /> this class can read a book by borrowing, it will do<br /> so rather than buy it. And this whether it is<br /> priced at 6d. or 6*.<br /> It is undoubted that many popular books sell<br /> in great quantities at 6d. But it is very doubtful<br /> whether this advantage is not a real loss compared<br /> with a book published at a higher price. If, for<br /> instance, Mr. Hall Caine&#039;s &quot;Christian,&quot; which<br /> reached 180,000 copies, had been sold at sixpence,<br /> it may be calculated approximately that the author<br /> would have been a loser supposing his royalty on<br /> the sixpenny book to have been one penny, unless<br /> four million copies at least had been sold.<br /> Or, if we take a calculation of 10,000 sold, and<br /> a royalty of only 20 per cent., or on the six-<br /> penny book, the author would be a loser unless<br /> 240,000 copies were sold.<br /> (2.) What effect will this cheapening of fictioD<br /> produce in other ways?<br /> It will make people unwilling to pay for a<br /> novel more than 6d.<br /> It will lead them to believe that the normal<br /> price for all books must be 6d.<br /> It will necessitate the production of high-priced<br /> books for the libraries, and for the limited class<br /> who will continue to give a high price.<br /> It will make the present stock of six-shilling<br /> books practically unsaleable.<br /> It will probably complete the ruin of the country<br /> bookseller.<br /> It will with equal probability injure the whole<br /> trade of publishing very severely.<br /> It will lower the character and dignity of litera-<br /> ture, because what can be obtained for a few<br /> pence—badly printed; on cheap paper; read and<br /> then thrown away—will be valued at the mental<br /> equivalent for a few pence. This is proved by<br /> the history of the pirated book in America.<br /> An opportune article in Literature, for April 15,<br /> called&#039;attention to the serious danger which is<br /> threatening everybody concerned with the produc-<br /> tion and the circulation of literature. The<br /> figures given by the writer do not altogether<br /> agree with those given here, but they serve to<br /> show the magnitude of the danger.<br /> Can anything be done? The public will buy for<br /> 6d. rather than 6s.—that is certain. It is also<br /> certain that the present price of 6*. or 4*. 6d. is too<br /> high. Publishers can do what they please with their<br /> own property—though they will not allow the<br /> same privilege to booksellers; and if they go on<br /> producing sixpenny books—their own property—<br /> all that authors can do is to protest, and to hope<br /> that the dangers which now seem so threatening;<br /> will either prove illusory, or may end in disaster<br /> quickly, so that we may learn whether the new<br /> method is wisdom or madness.<br /> A writer in the Daily News of April 8 gives,<br /> on the other hand, a different estimate of the<br /> sixpenny book. Literature at this price, he says,<br /> opens up an entirely new field of readers; people<br /> who would never think of buying a six-shilling<br /> book. At the same time, the circulation of the<br /> sixpenny edition is calculated, he thinks, to<br /> stimulate the demand for the more expensive<br /> one; and as sixpenny editions are, at least in<br /> some cases, not reprinted, people who have heard<br /> the book talked of and seen it read by the<br /> sixpenny public, are obliged then to buy the<br /> six-shilling edition if they only apply after the<br /> sixpenny one is for ever exhausted. But while<br /> on the whole the sixpenny novel pays, there is one<br /> deserving individual who is hit very hard by it—<br /> the small bookseller. &quot;The town bookseller is<br /> quite content.&quot; Is he? But see above. &quot;He<br /> can order his thousands and make them pay.<br /> But there are hundreds of suburban booksellers<br /> in London whose struggle for existence grows<br /> keener every day.&quot; One of these spoke of a book<br /> for which, at its first appearance at 6s., there was<br /> &quot;a wonderful demand :—<br /> We sold at least one copy every day—one day we sold<br /> seven. Then, about Christmas, the publishers announced a<br /> sixpenny edition. The sixpenny edition is only just out,<br /> but during the last ten weeks we have only sold two<br /> copies of the book. That is how the sixpenny copyright<br /> novel affects us. It is no use our trying to sell them. What<br /> with disoount, the drapers, and the sixpenny novels, the<br /> small booksellers are on the road to ruin.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 277 (#289) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 277<br /> In reply to the opinion of the Daily News one<br /> asks if cheap books do open up new fields of<br /> readers, or if they only offer the chance of buying<br /> cheaply what would otherwise have been borrowed<br /> of a library? One may also entertain the gravest<br /> doubts as to the stimulating effect of the sixpenny<br /> book. The general experience is that if anything<br /> is offered at sixpence people will never afterwards<br /> give six shillings for it. And the preceding<br /> remarks answer the opinion as to the contented<br /> town bookseller.<br /> SECRET COMMISSIONS AND SECRET<br /> PROFITS.<br /> AT the monthly dinner of the London<br /> Chamber of Commerce Lord Russell of<br /> Killowen spoke on secret commissions<br /> and his promised Bill. He said:—&quot; There was<br /> no reason in the world why men should not<br /> stipulate for any manner of compensation or<br /> commission they might choose, provided always<br /> that it was open and above board. Therefore let<br /> no one for a moment think that the provisions of<br /> his Bill were of so drastic a kind that they<br /> could possibly act with undue severity or harsh-<br /> ness upon any outspoken honest man. . . .<br /> His own interest in this question dated far<br /> back in his professional years, and he had known<br /> many sad instances of the evils resulting from<br /> the prevailing system—evils not stopping short<br /> at the receipt of commissions, but branching<br /> out into an actual course of crime. . . .<br /> But the thing that was so disgusting in this<br /> country was to find men belonging to the learned<br /> professions taking these secret commissions.<br /> Was it not intolerable to be told that medical<br /> practitioners—he was not attacking these profes-<br /> sional men as a whole, for these cases were the<br /> exceptions—would write a prescription and had<br /> a secret arrangement that the druggist should<br /> give him 25 per cent. on the amount of the<br /> drugs? Was it not disgusting to be teld, as a<br /> fact, that if a doctor recommended a particular<br /> undertaker he got a slice of the undertaker&#039;s<br /> business? Anyone who had taken the trouble to<br /> look into the matter would know that these were<br /> facts. They were exceptions—he hoped rare<br /> exceptions; but where this moral corruption<br /> existed it blunted the sense of honour and of<br /> honesty. Not only w.as it morally detrimental to<br /> those who took part in it, demoralising to<br /> individuals and, in part, to the community, but<br /> unjust and unfair to men who maintained a high<br /> standard of probity and of honour.&quot;<br /> How would these remarks applr to secret profits<br /> made by one party to an agreenrofit or the other?<br /> Let us imagine that Lord Russell was speaking<br /> of secret profits.<br /> &quot;There was no reason in the world why men<br /> should not stipulate for any manner of discount<br /> or commission they might choose, provided always<br /> that it was open and above board. It would be<br /> for the other side to accept or to refuse. . . .<br /> His own interest in this question dated far<br /> back in his professional years, and he had known<br /> many sad instances of the evils resulting from<br /> the prevailing system—evils not stopping short<br /> at the secret receipt of discount, but branching<br /> out into charging for advertisements which cost<br /> nothing, and alleged expenses not incurred. . . .<br /> The thing that was so disgusting was to find<br /> men received into clubs as honourable gentlemen<br /> taking these secret profits and making their<br /> charges. . . . When this moral corruption<br /> existed it blunted the sense of honour and of<br /> honesty. Not only was it morally detrimental to<br /> those who took part in it, demoralising to the<br /> individuals concerned, and demoralising to the<br /> cause of literature, but it was unjust and unfair<br /> to those who maintained a high standard of<br /> probity and of honour.&quot;<br /> The question has been already asked whether<br /> Lord Russell&#039;s Bill will include all kinds of<br /> secret profits, and, therefore, the practice now<br /> openly advocated by the committee of the Pub-<br /> lishers&#039; Association. If, as it is hoped, it proves<br /> to include this practice, it will stamp the prac-<br /> tice with legal penalties and greatly discourage<br /> the persons who practise, or continue to advocate,<br /> the taking of secret profits, or the charge of<br /> moneys not spent. For this reason the Society<br /> should regard Lord Russell&#039;s Bill with consider-<br /> able interest.<br /> THE STORY-TELLING REVIEWER.<br /> AT the annual meeting of our Society I called<br /> attention to the somewhat common practice<br /> of giving in a review an outline of the<br /> plot, or, in the slang of the day, of &quot;giving away&quot;<br /> the story. That this was done without the least<br /> desire to injure the author&#039;s or publisher&#039;s inte-<br /> rests in the book I had no doubt whatever; and<br /> I also had no doubt that the practice did in<br /> many instances materially injure the sales of a<br /> book. I pointed out that editors were literary<br /> men themselves, that they had a fellow feeling<br /> for authors generally, and that some at least of<br /> them, if a representation on the subject were<br /> made by the Committee, would be certain to meet<br /> the wishes of authors. I also pointed out that,<br /> if we offered a book for review, we could not com-<br /> plain&quot; if it was condemned and severely handled;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 278 (#290) ############################################<br /> <br /> 278<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> but we might, I thought, justly complain if the<br /> leading features of the plot, and particularly<br /> its termination, were described, and the interest<br /> of possible readers materially lessened.<br /> It was quite evident that these few remarks<br /> met with general approval among the fifty or sixty<br /> authors present, and the matter ended by an<br /> understanding that the question would be dis-<br /> cussed by our Committee, which would very<br /> possibly communicate with the principal editors<br /> on the subject. I am not aware that this has<br /> been done, and I have been asked by the Com-<br /> mittee to deal with the subject in The Author<br /> This I gladly do; at the same time, wishing that<br /> the matter had been placed in the hands of a<br /> novelist of greater standing than myself, and<br /> preferably one who had more reason to complain<br /> of reviewers than I who have been almost invari-<br /> ably treated with the greatest kindness and<br /> consideration. Now and again one gets a spite-<br /> ful review, for there are among reviewers and<br /> critics men lacking the high principles so requi-<br /> site in their branch of literary work, just as there<br /> are, I regret to admit, authors and publishers who<br /> lack those high principles which are so eminently<br /> desirable in all that pertains to our craft.<br /> I have sometimes thought that reviews of the<br /> kind I am more particula rly referring to—perhaps<br /> they should more properly be termed &quot;notices&quot;<br /> —are often written by men in all kindness to the<br /> author. &quot;Here is a book,&quot; I can imagine the<br /> critic saying, &quot;which is neither very good nor<br /> very bad. It is evidently the work of an inex-<br /> perienced hand. I will not help to ruin a young<br /> author&#039;s prospects by too severely condemning<br /> him. I will simply give the readers of the paper<br /> in which my review appears a good idea of the<br /> contents of the book, and they can read it or<br /> leave it unread, as they think proper.&quot; Then he<br /> writes something in this fashion: &quot;From Messrs.<br /> Short and Rigby we have received Mr. John Jones&#039;s<br /> new novel of Welsh life. Many persons will<br /> doubtless read it with interest. The first chapter<br /> opens with. . . .&quot; Then he mentions all the<br /> characters, describes as briefly as he can what<br /> part they take in the story, and very likely ends<br /> by saying &quot; Vice is defeated, Virtue is triumphant,<br /> the hero and heroine are united, and everyone is<br /> as happy as marriage bells.&quot;<br /> For books which depend upon plot and inci-<br /> dent for their interest, such a &quot; review&quot; is almost<br /> fatal. In the case of those novels, the literary<br /> merit of which lies in wit, epigram, and analysis<br /> of character, many novel readers would be<br /> deterred from ordering the book if, from some<br /> notice they have read in the paper, it seemed to<br /> lack plot. Some modern works of considerable<br /> merit contain hardly any plot at all, and m«rely<br /> to give a brief outline of their contents creates a<br /> very false impression concerning them.<br /> To take the opposite case of books of consider-<br /> able length, crammed full of incident, and written<br /> round a most elaborate plot: here the reviewer<br /> who tries to tell the story in brief, necessarily<br /> fails, owing to limitations of space, and does the<br /> author an injustice.<br /> So much for one side of the picture. On the<br /> other hand, there are numbers of reviewers who,<br /> very likely from being authors themselves, are as<br /> fully alive to the effect of telling the whole story<br /> as is any novelist. It is quite a common thing to<br /> find a review terminating with some such words<br /> as these: &quot;To tell more of the story would be<br /> unfair to the author.&quot;<br /> There are some novelists, it is said, who like to<br /> have their story told in the revi ,w. I have a<br /> difliculty in believing that they really approve of<br /> the entire plot being disclosed, from page 1 to<br /> the end. Possibly they mean a description of the<br /> story just a little short of this. However, we<br /> have in The Author a means of communication<br /> which will enable such points to be cleared up.<br /> In conclusion, may I express a hope that the<br /> few lines I have written on the subject may not<br /> be misunderstood? I am quite prepared to have<br /> it stated that I have made an attempt to teach<br /> reviewers their business. Though it has fallen to<br /> my lot to write many reviews, I should be<br /> extremely sorry to have this said. I have no<br /> complaint to make of reviews, but of the notice<br /> which consists of a description of the plot,<br /> and is, in very truth, not a review at all. I<br /> believe newspaper readers, as well as authors,<br /> object to have books noticed in this manner. I<br /> once heard a lady say: &quot;I was going to get Mr.<br /> &#039;s book from the library, but I read the whole<br /> of the story in the Daily Post, and after that I<br /> didn&#039;t care to read the book.&quot; This may be the<br /> case with many novel readers. When asking<br /> people how they like a book, I often get the reply,<br /> &quot;Oh! I really haven&#039;t read it, but I get a very<br /> good idea of it from the review in the Morning<br /> Blazer.&quot; John Bickerdyke.<br /> PARIS NOTES.<br /> THE acquittal of Mme. Chabrie-, whose private<br /> information had been utilised without her<br /> sanction in a series of Press articles by M.<br /> Gaston Mery {Libre Parole), and of M. Urbain<br /> Gohier, whose recent publication, &quot;L&#039;Armee<br /> contre la Nation,&quot; had awakened the censorship<br /> of the authorities, shows that the French nation<br /> at large is awar* «f the primary importance of a<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 279 (#291) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> free Press. The trial of M. G-ohier aroused great<br /> interest, since its issue embraced the solution of<br /> an important point closely affecting the prosperity<br /> of the country—viz., the liberty of the individual<br /> French writer to criticise the tactics of his<br /> military chiefs. After numerous quotations from<br /> the approved works of writers as diverse as<br /> MM. de Cassagnac, Drumont, Rochefort, Jules<br /> Lemaitre, Francois Coppee, and Georges Courte-<br /> line, who were each in turn proved to have pro-<br /> pagated seditious doctrine on this head, Me.<br /> Clemenceau, counsel for the accused, boldly<br /> declared M. Gohier&#039;s criticisms to be salutary to<br /> the true interests of the French Army. He<br /> maintained that his client attacked no one without<br /> furnishing proof of their malversation; if his<br /> tone in so doing appeared occasionally violent, it<br /> must be attributed to the fact that the work<br /> in question was compiled from journalistic<br /> articles—for the journalist resembled the pilot,<br /> in order to be heard he was forced to have recourse<br /> to a speaking trumpet. Me. Clemenceau con-<br /> cluded his defence by expressing a fervent hope<br /> that other writers would follow the example of<br /> his client, this &quot;troubler of apothesises &quot;—since<br /> France would thus be preserved from inscribing<br /> a second time in her annals dates as shameful as<br /> those of Sedan, Metz, Paris. The burst of enthu-<br /> siastic bravos and loud outcries of &#039;Vive Gohier &#039;.&quot;<br /> which greeted the verdict of acquittal preceded by<br /> this eloquent peroration gave palpable proof that<br /> jury and populace were in accord in resenting this<br /> side attack on the liberty of the individual<br /> thinker.<br /> The election of M. Marcel Prevost to the pre-<br /> sidency of the Socie&#039;te&#039; des Gens de Lettres was<br /> flatteringly unanimous, comprising a majority of<br /> twenty votes against three, of which latter two<br /> were blanks. At the previous meeting, in which<br /> M. Henry Houssaye had resigned the same<br /> dignity owing to his term of office having expired,<br /> a rather stormy scene took place. After having<br /> announced that the meeting was convoked to<br /> replace the eight members whose term of office<br /> had expired and also to fill the place left vacant<br /> by the death of the late regretted Albert Bataille<br /> —in all, nine members—M. Brau de Saint-Pol-<br /> Lias continued, &quot; Or rather ten members, since our<br /> rules permit us to erase the name of any person<br /> who has failed to attend six consecutive meetings.<br /> Now, there is a member who has failed in<br /> attending more than six meetings. . . .&quot;<br /> Although no name was mentioned, everyone was<br /> aware at whom these remarks were aimed. M.<br /> Armand Charpentier cried loudly &quot; Vive Zola!&quot;<br /> while the majority of members present pro-<br /> tested against any question of party politics<br /> being introduced. On taking possession of the<br /> fauteuil vacated by M. Houssaye, M. Provost<br /> adroitly stated his opinion on the subject in<br /> sketching out the attitude he desired the Society<br /> to adopt. &quot;Even before being a kind of literary<br /> club,&quot; said he, &quot;we are a commercial society,<br /> a mutual-aid society. Our political opinions<br /> should be mute here, though free. If liberty of<br /> thought were ever proscribed it would belong to<br /> us, men of letters, to offer it an asylum in<br /> our midst. This tolerance is our honour.<br /> When one of our comrades has worked, has<br /> written books by which our Society has profited,<br /> no matter in what measure, in providing pensions<br /> for its superannuated and assistance for its<br /> indigent members; when this comrade has taken<br /> his seat at our table, has aided us with his energy<br /> and effort; if the day comes when he finds himself<br /> exposed to the vicissitudes of public opinion—we<br /> owe it to him, we owe it to ourselves, we owe it to<br /> true literature and French tradition, not to excite<br /> the crowd against him, not to throw stones<br /> against him with the hands he has clasped.&quot;<br /> This generous speech excited warm applause. The<br /> nomination of office-bearers for the present year<br /> then took place, M. Henry Houssaye being elected<br /> honorary president and MM. Lafargue and de<br /> Larmandie vice-presidents. Three new members<br /> were likewise admitted to the Society, of whom<br /> two were women; and it is more than rumoured<br /> that a project was on foot to demand the admis-<br /> sion of feminine members to the committee of<br /> the Society. The ladies, however, not wishing<br /> that two irritating topics should be broached on<br /> the same day, magnanimously agreed to defer<br /> all allusion to the subject until the following<br /> meeting. Its first introduction will, doubt-<br /> less, be hotly combated and criticised, but the<br /> eventual triumph of the fair sex is a foregone<br /> conclusion.<br /> The death of Mme. Clesinger, daughter of<br /> George Sand, has again brought the latter&#039;s name<br /> prominently before the public in the daily papers.<br /> Later evidence has satisfactorily vindicated the<br /> grave charge brought against Mme. Sand by her<br /> contemporaries of having forced her daughter to<br /> accept her own discarded lover, Clesinger, as a<br /> husband. Mme. Clesinger was the author of one<br /> or two novels of inferior merit, and in no wise<br /> inherited her mother&#039;s literary talent. Their<br /> appearance was as dissimilar as their characters<br /> were antagonistic. Solange Cle&#039;singer-Sand had<br /> a masculine type of countenance, an arched nose,<br /> and a frank, almost audacious expression; her<br /> figure was admirably proportioned, and she was<br /> not lacking in wit. Several years after her sepa-<br /> ration from her husband she inhabited a small<br /> suite of rooms in the Rue Taitbout, and among<br /> the intimate friends who frequented her society<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 280 (#292) ############################################<br /> <br /> 280<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> may be mentioned Gambetta, Ferry, Laferriere,<br /> Edouard Herve, Weiss, Taine, Henry Fouquier,<br /> Floquet, and Bethmont. She died at her castle of<br /> Montgivray, and was buried beside her mother.<br /> M. Maurice Eollinat is now engaged in<br /> revising the proofs of the new volume of poems<br /> he intends publishing shortly. M. Rollinat is a<br /> fervent student and admirer of the works of<br /> George Sand and Edgar Poe. He is, likewise, a<br /> most infatuated angler, and not even the red<br /> ribbon which the Government bestowed on him<br /> in 1895 has sufficed to wean him from pursuing<br /> his favourite pastime. To Mme. Sarah Bernhardt<br /> belongs the honour of having discovered this<br /> ichthyophagistic rhymester.<br /> The Soci^te des Gens de Lettres has confided<br /> to M. Falguiere the execution of the statue of<br /> Balzac, to be exhibited at the next Salon. The<br /> bust of M. Henri Houssaye, the work of Mlle.<br /> Aim-lie Colombie, will be exhibited on the same<br /> occasion; the latter is reported to be an excellent<br /> reproduction of the features of the great his-<br /> torian. It is further proposed to celebrate the<br /> two hundredth anniversary of Racine by the<br /> inauguration of two busts, viz:, that of Pascal<br /> at St. Etienne du Mont and that of Racine on<br /> the ruins of Port Royal. The project of erecting<br /> a reduced replica of Guy de Maupassant&#039;s monu-<br /> ment at Paris (pare Monceau) in the square of<br /> his native town of Rouen has met with universal<br /> sympathy, the artists engaged on the work re-<br /> fusing all remuneration beyond the actual cost of<br /> labour and material employed. The unveiling of<br /> the new monument will take place next month;<br /> it will stand in the middle of a small green sward,<br /> opposite Chapu&#039;s medallion of Flaubert, the friend<br /> and master of Guy de Maupassant.<br /> At the recent International Press Congress at<br /> Rome Italy was, of course, so far first in the field<br /> as regards the number of her representatives as<br /> to be quite out of the running. Among foreign<br /> countries France carried off the palm numerically,<br /> being represented by no less than eighty-seven<br /> delegates, in addition to twenty-five wives and<br /> daughters of delegates. Germany stood second<br /> on the list, having sent forty-six representatives,<br /> Austria third, Hungary fourth, Belgium fifth,<br /> and England sixth, while the United States<br /> shared the seventh place with Sweden and<br /> Portugal, each of the three last-named countries<br /> being represented by ten delegates.<br /> The &quot;English mania&quot; that is so frequently<br /> deplored by the French writers of the present<br /> day is steadily invading the Parisian stage.<br /> Shakespeare has evidently come to btay, despite<br /> M. Fouquier&#039;s assertions to the contrary, and his<br /> &quot;Beaucoup de bruit pour rien &quot; now adorns the<br /> programme of the Opera Comique; the Ambigu-<br /> Comique gives us &quot; Les Chevaliers du Brouillard,&quot;<br /> a play adapted from one of Ainsworth&#039;s novels<br /> and in the salle of the Societes savantes we find<br /> &quot;Betsey,&quot; an English play in three acts by<br /> Mr. Burnand. Apropos of theatrical literature,<br /> M. Bergerat&#039;s new play, &quot;Plus que Reine,&quot;<br /> is sharing the fate of its literary predecessors,<br /> &quot;Le Lys Rouge,&quot; &quot; Le Coupable,&quot; &amp;c, viz., it bores<br /> the public. After having heralded its advent with a<br /> fanfaronade of extravagant panegyric, the critics<br /> are now harking back on their first judgment,<br /> and discovering that the play lacks cohesion,<br /> historical accuracy, and dramatic verve. They<br /> are likewise shocked at seeing Mme. Jane Hading<br /> represent the Creole Josephine in a blonde wig,<br /> and scandalised at finding Napoleon&#039;s costume<br /> inoorrect in sundry details. This failure only<br /> bears out our previous assertion regarding the<br /> fallacy of believing that a dramatic and a literary<br /> talent were concomitant attributes.<br /> Translations of modern English literature are<br /> largely patronised here. In addition to devoting<br /> several columns to appreciating the works and<br /> style of Rudyard Kipling—&quot; prince de la ballade<br /> et roi du conte &quot;—the Annales lately endeavoured<br /> to give a specimen of the latter by publishing a<br /> translation of his &quot; White Seal.&quot; Although more<br /> justly rendered than we had imagined possible, it<br /> was nevertheless a very flat narrative in compari-<br /> son with the brilliant originality of the English<br /> version; yet, even under these favourable circum-<br /> stances, we were unable to detect the analogy<br /> the French critics have discovered to exist<br /> between the style of Pierre Loti and that of<br /> Rudyard Kipling.<br /> The death of Mme. Michelet, nie Athemas<br /> Mialaret, widow of the great historian, has<br /> occasioned the publication of some of the letters<br /> which passed between them before the idea<br /> of matrimony was entertained by either. The<br /> whole story reads like a romance. Early left<br /> an orphan and forced by the improvidence<br /> of her parents to earn her livelihood, Mlle.<br /> Mialaret accepted the post of governess in<br /> a private family at Vienna. The indifferent<br /> kindness meted out to her by her employers<br /> failed to satisfy her moral and intellectual<br /> requirements. She fell into a state of profound<br /> melancholy. At this juncture in her career she<br /> chanced to read one of Michelet&#039;s works entitled<br /> &quot;Le Pretre.&quot; It touched her so profoundly that<br /> she wrote to the author, confiding to him her<br /> mental and moral distress. He replied by an<br /> admirable letter to which she gratefully responded;<br /> and when a few months later her failing health<br /> forced her to return to the milder climate of<br /> Paris, the acquaintance commenced on paper<br /> speedily ripened into a warmer sentiment than-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 281 (#293) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 281<br /> platonic friendship and esteem. The affection<br /> was mutual, though the great historian was in his<br /> fifty-second and theyoung governess in her twenty-<br /> third year at the date of their union. Neverthe-<br /> less the marriage proved an extremely happy one;<br /> and during the twenty-five years that elapsed<br /> between her husband&#039;s and her own death Mme.<br /> Michelet lived devoted to his memory. For years<br /> she refused to have any renovations made in the<br /> suite of rooms they had occupied together;<br /> finally, she consented to permit certain necessary<br /> repairs, though still refusing to quit the premises.<br /> She caught cold through sleeping in the midst of<br /> the damp plaster, and died eight days later from<br /> a violent attack of pleurisy. She had reached<br /> the ripe age of seventy-two years, and was a<br /> graceful and sympathetic writer.<br /> The recently published memoirs of Alfred de<br /> Musset by his old housekeeper, Mme. Adele Colin-<br /> Martellet, contain much interesting matter.<br /> Among other anecdotes she narrates that the poet<br /> had a little dog, named Marzo, to whom he was<br /> greatly attached. When his master died Marzo<br /> believed him only absent, and every evening<br /> patiently awaited him at the accustomed hour.<br /> For seven years Marzo nightly waited thus, at<br /> the end of which time the poor little fellow died<br /> with his eyes fixed on the door by which he still<br /> fondly hoped to see his master enter. Mme.<br /> Martellet&#039;s husband carried off the small corpse<br /> intending to inter it in one of the adjacent plots<br /> of waste land. At the corner of the rue Boileau<br /> he came across a companv of workmen engaged<br /> in making a new road and there deposited<br /> Marzo&#039;s remains, covering them with several<br /> shovelfuls of earth. By curious coincidence this<br /> new street is to-day known as the rue de Musset.<br /> During the past month French literature has<br /> registered the following deaths in addition to<br /> those above cited, viz., that of M. Erckmann, who,<br /> in collaboration with M. Chatrian, wrote the<br /> famous series of tales, respectively entitled<br /> &quot;Waterloo,&quot; &quot;1&#039;Ami Fritz,&quot; &quot;l&#039;lllustre Docteur<br /> Mathews,&quot; &quot;Madame Therese,&quot; &quot;Blocus,&quot;<br /> &quot;Souvenirs d&#039;un homme du peuple.&quot; &amp;c., and<br /> whose character sketches were so just and fine<br /> that the phrase—&quot; C&#039;est un personnage d&#039;Erck-<br /> mann-Chatrian &quot;—has passed into current usage;<br /> of M. Paul Bonnetain, Government commissioner,<br /> author of several original and interesting novels,<br /> respectively entitled &quot;Passagere,&quot; &quot;le Tour du<br /> monde d&#039;un troupier,&quot; &quot;Au Tonkin,&quot; &quot;le Journal<br /> d&#039;un marsouin,&quot; &amp;c.; of M. Paul Mahalin, who<br /> gained notoriety as a master of the &quot;roman-<br /> feuilleton &quot; genre; of M. Vaucheret, who, under<br /> the pseudonym of Jean Bruno, has for almost<br /> fifty years been a prolific contributor to the fiction<br /> column of numerous periodicals; and of M.<br /> Berthold Zeller, Professor of History at the Sor-<br /> bonne, and author of numerous important his-<br /> torical works which have each successively had<br /> the honour of being &quot;couronne par l&#039;Academie<br /> fran9aise.&quot; Darracotte Dene.<br /> NOTES AND NEWS.<br /> THE annual dinner of the Royal Literary<br /> Fund was duly held, and the usual hat<br /> went round in the familiar manner. The<br /> chairman, according to the only report that I have<br /> read, seems to have refrained very wisely from<br /> advocating the necessity of increasing the income<br /> of the society on account of increasing demands.<br /> On the other hand, he did not represent—the<br /> statement would certainly have chilled the gene-<br /> rosity of the charitable—the fact that the Council<br /> cannot spend on deserving cases one half of their<br /> present income. Nor can I believe that all the<br /> donations which were announced—to the amount<br /> of .£ii50—would have been contributed had the<br /> donors realised or understood this broad fact,<br /> which is, that the Royal Literary Fund has at<br /> last got quite enough money for its present<br /> wants. If its resources should prove insufficient,<br /> there is no doubt that more money would be<br /> forthcoming. As is pointed out in another<br /> column, there is reason to fear that there may be<br /> an increase in the demands should the sixpenny<br /> book kill the profession of literature; but there is<br /> still time to provide against that catastrophe.<br /> Meantime, the subject may rest until next<br /> February, when I hope that the point may be<br /> seriously and officially advanced. This year it<br /> was asked too late. It will take the form of a<br /> plain question: Why does the Council ask for<br /> more money when the present income is more<br /> than double the amount of the calls made<br /> upon it? nic&gt;<br /> A writer in Literature says that although I<br /> maintain that the capital sum invested by the<br /> Royal Literary Fund is sufficient to meet all<br /> demands likely to be made upon it—a contention<br /> which is proved by the report—I also ask that<br /> the Civil Pension Grant shall be confined to<br /> persons distinguished in literature, science, and<br /> art, &quot; which seems to indicate,&quot; I read,&quot; that he<br /> is not always, equally sure of the prosperity of<br /> men of letters.&quot; I fail to perceive this indica-<br /> tion. Besides, if my critic would only read further<br /> he would, I think, discover that I ask for a<br /> substitution in place of the words &quot;or other<br /> persons worthy of Her Majesty&#039;s bounty,&quot; the<br /> words &quot;or widows or daughters of persons so<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 282 (#294) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> distinguished.&quot; This I propose in order that the<br /> practice now common in the administration of<br /> this grant should be recognised by a resolution of<br /> Parliament, and that the widows of persons dis-<br /> tinguished in literature, science, or art, should be<br /> legally entitled to receive these pensions, but not<br /> the widows of Colonial Governors or other<br /> deserving and distinguished persons. But the<br /> Grant and the Fund have nothing to do with each<br /> other. The former gives pensions: the latter<br /> gives temporary relief. Without any reference to<br /> the former, it is proved that the latter could only<br /> find last year twenty-two distressed men or<br /> women of letters. Only twenty-two out of the<br /> thousands who live by the pen!<br /> This fact is to my mind a very signal proof—<br /> one not to be disputed—of the general welfare of<br /> the Folk of Letters. It is now a numerous Folk:<br /> they are legion: and out of so many there are<br /> only twenty-two deserving cases: not one turned<br /> away from want of funds; and .£2000 invested<br /> out of income. In face of all the facts I can no<br /> longer admit that the profession is precarious,<br /> any more than any other profession. Of course,<br /> there is risk of ill-success in every profession, but<br /> less risk, given the natural aptitude, which is of<br /> course necessary, than in any other. Why is this<br /> contention, which has been advanced on several<br /> occasions, called &quot; optimist&quot;? Why is it always<br /> received with a strange unwillingness and a still<br /> stranger dislike? The only reason that I can<br /> discover is that it upsets a rooted tradition, and<br /> to tear up old traditions makes people uncomfor-<br /> table. Authors, we have always been taught, are<br /> a beggarly company. Grub Street even parades<br /> its rags. Well: but where is Grub Street r Show<br /> those rags. Produce those beggars. Are they<br /> in the clubs? There are literary men by the<br /> hundred in the Athenaeum, the Savile, the<br /> Authors&#039;, the Savage, the Garrick, and other clubs.<br /> They sit down with the other men, and, appar-<br /> ently, they can pay for their dinners: they<br /> present an outward show of broadcloth: they<br /> even wear gloves: they preserve an appearance of<br /> solvency: one might take them for City men.<br /> They seldom become bankrupt; I remember only<br /> one or two cases of the bankruptcy of a literary<br /> man.<br /> At this moment, while I know writers who<br /> would like to make more by their pen, I<br /> doubt if I know one who has had occasion to<br /> go to the Royal Literary Fund. There may be,<br /> and very likely are, people who would like<br /> above all things to be men or women of letters.<br /> One can hardly call persons followers of literature<br /> who have attempted and proved incompetent.<br /> A man is not a poet who has produced a volume<br /> of feeble rhyme. Again, there is an excellent<br /> reason why Literature is a much less precarious<br /> profession than Medicine or either branch of the<br /> Law; namely, that it has so many branches. And,<br /> as I said before, they overlap each other. If one<br /> may, without offence, produce examples, I need<br /> go no farther than the accomplished editor of<br /> Literature himself, who is historian, poet,<br /> essayist, critic, and editor: I might point out<br /> Mr. W. E. Henley, poet, biographer, editor, and<br /> dramatist: Mr. J. M. Barrie, essayist, novelist,<br /> and dramatist: Dr. Conan Doyle, novelist, poet,<br /> and dramatist: the late William Biack, jour-<br /> nalist and novelist: Mr. Andrew Lang, scholar,<br /> poet, novelist, historian, journalist, and critic:<br /> Mr. Justin McCarthy, novelist and historian. It<br /> may be objected that I am taking extreme cases.<br /> They are certainly cases of successful writers.<br /> But these cases illustrate my position, viz., that<br /> if a man proves himself able to write (if he is an<br /> attractive writer) a scholar and an authority,<br /> there is certainly no other profession in which he<br /> would be so safe. The chief danger is that<br /> common to every profession, that a man&#039;s health<br /> may break down; there is also the danger that,<br /> for some reason or other, he may lose his charm.<br /> Anthony Trollope lost his charm at the end, or<br /> seemed to do so; but he kept it till much past<br /> sixty. This also is a danger in every other<br /> profession. Literature, I repeat, is no longer a<br /> precarious profession—if the candidate possesses<br /> the natural aptitude. Cannot the same thing be<br /> said of every other profession? Does a lawyer<br /> succeed who is no lawyer?<br /> Let me turn over two or three leaves, at random,<br /> of that useful annual with the wonderful name of<br /> &quot;Who&#039;s Who.&quot; Here are a few examples: (1)<br /> Novelist, humourist, journalist: (2) story-teller,<br /> journalist, caricaturist: (3) preacher, theologian,<br /> scholar: (4) novelist, historian, poet: (5) pro-<br /> fessor, editor, critic: (6) preacher and poet:<br /> (7) journalist, editor, critic, dramatist: (8)<br /> journalist, biographer, historian: (9) novelist<br /> only: (10) archaeologist and historian: (11) bio-<br /> grapher, historian, traveller: (12) artist, author,<br /> and journalist. These names have been found<br /> in half a dozen consecutive pages of the<br /> book. I think they prove my point, that the<br /> many-sided character of the literary profession<br /> goes far to remove its former reputation for<br /> uncertainty. Of great prizes I do not speak.<br /> Nor do I speak of the incompetent and their<br /> sufferings. A far greater number of incompetent<br /> persons attempt literature than any other pro-<br /> fession because it seems to want no apprenticeship<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 283 (#295) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 283<br /> and it appears to be so easy. We cannot allow<br /> that those persons belong to the literary life any<br /> more than we call those students who cannot<br /> pass their examinations lawyers or physicians.<br /> Now, the examination which every literary man<br /> must pass, and every successful literary man<br /> must pass in honours, is twofold: he must be<br /> examined by the critic, and he must be examined<br /> by the public. _<br /> A contributor to the New York Writer (Ruth<br /> Hall), endeavouring to show that new writers<br /> find it very difficult to get into American maga-<br /> zines, gives a few statistics :—<br /> 1. Harper&#039;s Magazine for February contains<br /> twenty-three articles. Of these, one short story,<br /> one essay, and three poems are by unknown<br /> writers.<br /> 2. The Century for February contains twenty-<br /> seven contributions, of which seven are by unknown<br /> writers.<br /> These figures, however, seem to prove exactly<br /> the reverse of her proposition. When we consider<br /> that a magazine is not run with the object of<br /> advancing writers but of advancing the pro-<br /> prietor: that the editor&#039;s first duty is to find out<br /> what will instruct and attract: tbat popular<br /> authors are certain to attract: and that untried<br /> and unkno wn authors can only attract by reason<br /> of the very rare condition of having something to<br /> tell which is new and curious: and that popular<br /> authors can almost always be had if the editor<br /> will pay them—we can understand how difficult<br /> it must be for a new writer to get a hearing.<br /> We can also understand how the English maga-<br /> zine of the older kind seems sinking into a kind<br /> of atrophy because the editor and proprietor will<br /> not understand the simple rule of supply and<br /> demand. To sit down in a chair and wait for<br /> things is the editing of the past. To arrange<br /> beforehand with an eye to what will please and<br /> attract readers, yet with a door open to the new<br /> comer, is the editing of the present and the future.<br /> The new comer, when he finds that in Harper&#039;s<br /> Magazine there are five out of twenty-three<br /> papers, and in the Century seven out of twenty-<br /> seven, contributed by unknown writers, may take<br /> courage. There is still the open door.<br /> Walter Besant.<br /> CORRESPONDENCE.<br /> I.—Against Difficulties.<br /> THE March number of your paper has just<br /> come into my hands, and I am greatly<br /> interested in the letter of Mr. Julian<br /> Croskey, a gentleman whose career I have<br /> followed carefully during the last two years.<br /> The advice he gives to the parents of young<br /> men who are determined to devote their lives<br /> to literature is, I think, excellent; but how<br /> many parents will listen to his counsel? Very<br /> few, if any. I myself am determined to adopt<br /> the literary profession, but I have not the neces-<br /> sary means; rich relatives are scarce, and parents<br /> unwilling. Meanwhile, I am miserable. But<br /> what can I do? Nothing! I have had sufficient<br /> success to warrant me believing that in two years<br /> from now I could, by constant work and hard<br /> writing, earn a &quot;comfortable income.&quot; But I<br /> am chained to office work, and my evenings are<br /> as miserable as my mornings and afternoons, for<br /> what literary work can a man do who comes home<br /> tired-out, despondent, and swearing softly to<br /> himself? o-o Waiting.<br /> II. Charity for Brain-Workers.<br /> I thought the days when people of title<br /> honoured themselves by taking authors and<br /> artists under their patronage had passed, but I<br /> seem to be mistaken. In a recent number of the<br /> Academy particulars were given of a home of<br /> rest in the Riviera for tired brain-workers. A<br /> lady of title is apparently the originator of the<br /> scheme. Men are to pay their own expenses to<br /> and from the place, they are to pay a minimum<br /> of a pound a week for board and lodging, and in<br /> return they are evidently to get what any person<br /> with a pound a week to spare can command in<br /> decent habitations in the South of France, while<br /> they are to be governed by a set of rules which<br /> ought never to be tolerated on the free side of a<br /> gaol or a workhouse. A man who can afford to<br /> pay a sovereign a week can afford to keep clear<br /> of a retreat of this description. A Member.<br /> III.—The Extravagant Dinner.<br /> Dissatisfaction among the members of the<br /> Authors&#039; Society, tnough perhaps occasionally<br /> inevitable, is surely a thing to be avoided so far<br /> as possible. I believe considerable dissatisfaction<br /> does exist among many members at the high price<br /> charged for the annual dinner ticket. If we<br /> were a society of Stock Exchange men, or pub-<br /> lishers, or racehorse owners, or company pro-<br /> moters, a guinea would perhaps be fitting and<br /> proper; but we are poor authors, few of us with<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 284 (#296) ############################################<br /> <br /> 284<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> even the incomes of a bishop, many of us women<br /> and stragglers for life. Our Committee, I take<br /> it, are among the successful. Cannot they show<br /> their sympathy for the poorer members of the<br /> Society by following the example of almost every<br /> other club and society in England, and fixing the<br /> dinner ticket at a more moderate sum? The<br /> guinea, I know, includes wine, but this is most<br /> unfair to those, particularly women, who drink<br /> little or none. In ninety-nine public dinners out<br /> of a hundred the guests pay for the wine they<br /> consume. Why should not we do likewise?<br /> If two-thirds of the price of the ticket were paid<br /> to the funds of The Author, or some other such<br /> admirable object, our grievance would be lessened;<br /> but I believe most members of the Society will<br /> agree with me that to force those who wish to<br /> meet their fellow members at the annual dinner<br /> into an act of wasteful extravagance, is bad policy<br /> on the part of our executive. When a dinner<br /> was given in honour of yourself, at the Holborn<br /> Restaurant, the price of the ticket was only 5$.,<br /> and the arrangement worked well enough. The<br /> attendance was enormous, and there was really<br /> nothing to complain of. Annual dinners have a<br /> remarkable effect in keeping clubs and societies<br /> of all kinds together, but ours loses much of this<br /> effect owing to the price of the ticket, which<br /> actually equals a year&#039;s subscription to the<br /> Society.<br /> I hope other members will express their<br /> opinions on this subject in the pages of The<br /> Author. Diane.<br /> IV.—Typewriting Offices.<br /> May I ask for the insertion of these few words<br /> in answer to two letters which appeared in your<br /> issues of February and March, condemning in a<br /> wholesale fashion the typewriting offices?<br /> It appears to me both your correspondents are<br /> not fully acquainted with the real facts connected<br /> with the typing industry, or the former would not<br /> suggest that the payment of gd. a thousand was<br /> an adequate sum to offer a woman, even a home<br /> worker.<br /> The typist who does Mr. Goodrich Freer&#039;s<br /> work at gd. a 1000 makes, if she is a fairly quick<br /> worker, and works, say, eight hours a day, 26s. a<br /> week. That is to say, she can copy 6000 words<br /> in a day, taking at the lowest computation two<br /> hours a day for the examining of the copy with<br /> the MSS. Now, take the case of the girl who<br /> has been trained in shorthand and typing in a<br /> first-class office; she is then able to take a<br /> situation, either in a typewriting office or in a<br /> mercantile office, where she can secure regular<br /> work, and scores over the home worker in the<br /> following way: First, as to hours, she works nine<br /> hours a week less, bemuse office hours in the<br /> typewriting offices are 10 to 6, and she has<br /> Saturday afternoon off; secondly, she has no<br /> worry in securing work, as she is paid whether it<br /> is slack or not; thirdly, she can make in a good<br /> office, without languages, 30s. to 35*. a week;<br /> fourth, she has not to find machine, ink, or<br /> stationery. In a mercantile office she can make<br /> up to £2, but their hours, as a rule, are rather<br /> longer—9.30 to 6. In the typewriting office she<br /> certainly does some of the work when she is suffi-<br /> 2iently proficient to be trusted with it, but how<br /> else will she learn her business?<br /> I cannot see any justice in calling the typewriting<br /> office people &quot; clever exploiters of other people&#039;s<br /> labour,&quot; as it must be remembered that the pupils<br /> are given an opportunity which can be given in<br /> no other way to learn their profession properly,<br /> and so become capable of earning a fair wage,<br /> which I do not consider Mr. Goodrich Freer&#039;s 265.<br /> a week to be. Madeleine Greenwood.<br /> V.—Payment on Acceptance.<br /> I notice in The Author for April a letter<br /> from Mr. Herbert D. Williams saying that<br /> Great Thoughts invariably pays for articles on<br /> acceptance. I regret to say that this is not my<br /> experience. An article of mine was accepted at<br /> the end of 1893, and appeared in February, 1894.<br /> I accordingly asked for payment, which was<br /> refused, because I had not stipulated for it when<br /> I sent the article. I was offered instead a bound<br /> volume of Great Thoughts.&#039; This was a &quot; hair of<br /> the dog&quot; with a vengeance. I refused even this.<br /> It was only the second article of mine that had<br /> been accepted, and I felt the injustice most<br /> keenly. H. Stanley Tayler.<br /> OBITUARY.<br /> SIR MONIER MONIER - WILLIAMS,<br /> K.C.I.E., Boden Professor of Sanscrit in<br /> the University of Oxford since i860, whose<br /> Sanscrit-English dictionary (which occupied him<br /> for twenty years) and other works are well known<br /> to every Sanscrit student, died at Cannes on<br /> April 10, in his eightieth year.<br /> Mr. Edmund Sheridan Purcell, the biographer<br /> of Cardinal Manning, died on April 12, aged 76.<br /> He has left in manuscript, almost completed<br /> (says the Academy), a biography of Ambrose de<br /> Lisle, the prototype of Eustace de Lyle in<br /> &quot;Coningsby.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 285 (#297) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 285<br /> BOOK TALE.<br /> EROM copyright novels at 6d., the step has<br /> soon been taken to copyright novels at id.<br /> Messrs. Pearson are about to issue a series<br /> at this price, consisting of works by Ouida, John<br /> Oliver Hobbes, Mr. Robert Buchanan, Mr. Grant<br /> Allen, Rita, Mrs. Hungerford, Mr. Louis Becke,<br /> Mr. Fergus Hume, Mr. Clark Russell, Mrs.<br /> Hodgson Burnett, and other writers. The same<br /> firm have projected also another series of penny<br /> books, such as &quot;How to be Happy though<br /> Married,&quot; &quot;Helen&#039;s Babies,&quot; &quot;Trooper Peter<br /> Halket,&quot; &amp;c.<br /> With regard to the forthcoming biography of<br /> Mrs. Lynn Linton, Mr. G. S. Layard asks<br /> owners of letters, portraits, or other material<br /> connected with the subject. to be kind enough to<br /> forward them to him at Lorraine Cottage,<br /> Malvern, promising that these will be taken care<br /> of and returned as soon as he has done with<br /> them.<br /> Mr. Rudyard Kipling, having sufficiently<br /> recovered from his illness to be able to work,<br /> is revising a privately-printed volume of letters,<br /> and making sundry additions to them in view of<br /> their publication. This work will be called<br /> &quot;From Sea to Sea,&quot; and among its contents will<br /> be found Mr. Kipling&#039;s &quot;Letters of Marque&quot;<br /> and &quot;City of Dreadful Night,&quot; both of which<br /> were published here some years ago and imme-<br /> diately withdrawn on account of difficulties con-<br /> cerning the copyright.<br /> Mr. Stephen Crane is at work on a new novel.<br /> Before this appears, however, the public will get<br /> a new volume of verse from Mr. Crane, entitled<br /> &quot;War is Kind.&quot;<br /> The late Sir Benjamin Ward Richardson left<br /> virtually completed a series of biographies of<br /> leaders of medicine, and these are now about to<br /> be published by Messrs. Hutchinson in two<br /> volumes, called &quot; Disciples of .^sculapius.&quot;<br /> Mr. Lewis Melville has completed his &quot;Life of<br /> Thackeray,&quot; and the work, which has occupied<br /> him ten years, will be ready in a few days. It<br /> consists of two volumes, and will be the first<br /> complete biography of Thackeray. Meanwhile,<br /> the splendid Biographical edition of Thackeray<br /> has just been completed by the publication of the<br /> thirteenth volume. This edition, of course, is<br /> unique by reason of the biographical introduc-<br /> tions contributed by the novelist&#039;s daughter, Mrs.<br /> Ritchie.<br /> &quot;Curiosities of Light and Sight,&quot; by Mr.<br /> Shelford Bidwell, F.R.S., will be published in a<br /> few days by Messrs. Swan Sonnenschein and Co.<br /> It is illustrated with diagrams, and treats of<br /> structural defects of the eye, optical illusions, and<br /> various recently-observed phenomena of vision.<br /> Mrs. Gertrude Atherton is engaged on a new<br /> novel. Earlier forthcoming novels include-<br /> &quot;England&#039;s Peril,&quot; by Mr. William Le Queux;<br /> &quot;The Stepmother,&quot; by Mrs. Alexander; &quot;Twice<br /> Dead,&quot; by Miss Adeline Sergeant; &quot;A Name to<br /> Conjure With,&quot; by John Strange Winter.<br /> One of the most important publications during<br /> April was Dr. Douglas Hyde&#039;s &quot; Literary History<br /> of Ireland.&quot; The present literary movement in<br /> that country has also given birth to a small<br /> volume of articles, by Mr. W. B. Yeats, Mr. John<br /> Eglinton, &quot; A. E.,&quot; and Mr. William Larminie,<br /> entitled &quot; The Literary Ideal in Ireland,&quot; which<br /> the same publisher will shortly have ready. These<br /> articles appeared originally in a Dublin paper.<br /> In his new story, &quot;The Violet Flame,&quot; Mr.<br /> Fred. T. Jane is combining &quot;with a thrilling<br /> love story the development of some uncanny<br /> scientific discoveries, the result of which is the<br /> destruction of the world by a catastrophe of un-<br /> paralleled horror.&quot; The story is to appear in<br /> the English Mechanic.<br /> The American Authors&#039; Guild has changed its<br /> name to the Society of American Authors. The<br /> following are the recently elected officers and<br /> managers of the society :—President, Rastus S.<br /> Ransom; vice-presidents, Mrs. Julia Ward Howe,<br /> General Lew Wallace, Dr. Thomas Dunn English,<br /> Hubert Howe Bancroft, Mrs. Ellen Hardin Wal-<br /> worth, and Miss Grace Denio Litchfield; treasurer<br /> and counsel, Morris Patterson Ferris; secretary,<br /> John Beverly Robinson.<br /> &quot;Rita&#039;s&quot; new novel will be produced early<br /> this month. It is entitled &quot;An Old Rogue&#039;s<br /> Tragedy.&quot;<br /> &quot;Pictures of Travel,&quot; Mr. Mackenzie Bell&#039;s<br /> recent volume of poems, has been favourably<br /> received by the critics. It has also been well<br /> received by the public. Including the copyright<br /> edition in&quot; the United States, 2000 copies have<br /> been printed.<br /> &quot;Calumnies&quot; is the title of the new novel by<br /> Mrs. E. M. Davy (author of &quot; A Prince of Como,&quot;<br /> &quot;A Daughter of Earth,&quot; &amp;c.), which Messrs.<br /> Arthur Pearson will publish the first week in<br /> May.<br /> A series of China stories by the author of<br /> &quot;The Shen&#039;s Pigtail &quot; will appear in the English<br /> Illustrated Magazine under the title of &quot;Chips<br /> of China.&quot;<br /> &quot;English Roses &quot; is the title of the latest book<br /> of poems from F. Harald Williams, B.A. It is<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 286 (#298) ############################################<br /> <br /> 286<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> published at 6*. by Messrs. Simpkiu, Marshall,<br /> and Co. It is a volume containing some<br /> 600 pages. The book is divided into six sections,<br /> as follows: 1, English Roses; 2, Blood and Iron;<br /> 3, Laughing Philosophy; 4, Euphrasy and Rue;<br /> 5, Brake and Brier; and 6, Palms and Passion<br /> Flowers.<br /> &quot;Songs of Hope and Love,&quot; by F. \V. Pitt,<br /> has just been published by Messrs. S. W. Part-<br /> ridge and Co. (price 2s. 6rf.). These poems have<br /> been well reviewed by various papers, and should<br /> have a ready sale.<br /> The title of Mrs. Richmond&#039;s new book pub-<br /> lished by Messrs. Longmans should have been<br /> described in last month&#039;s &quot;Book Talk,&quot; as<br /> &quot;Through Boyhood to Manhood; a Plea for<br /> Ideals.&quot; Price 2s. 6d.<br /> &quot;The Story of &quot;William Penn,&quot; by Frances E.<br /> Cooke, has just been published by Messrs.<br /> Headley Bros. Price is. 6d.<br /> Messrs. W. Clowes and Sons have now ready<br /> &quot;The Officer&#039;s Field Note and Sketch Book and<br /> Reconnaissance Aide-Memoire,&quot; by Lieut.-Col. E.<br /> Gunter. 6*. 6d. net.<br /> &quot;Marianna and other Stories,&quot; the title of a<br /> new book which Mr. Burleigh will immediately<br /> publish for &quot; Georgette Agnew.&quot;<br /> An original poem in the style of the &quot;Lady<br /> of the Lake,&quot; by the author of the &quot;Rani of<br /> Jhansi&quot; and other Eastern works, will shortly be<br /> published by Mr. Burleigh. The tale is a<br /> thrilling one, illustrating the state of unrest in<br /> Western India during the downfall of the rule of<br /> the Moguls at Delhi, and giving graphic descrip-<br /> tions of female infanticide, sati (widow-burning),<br /> and other native manners and customs.<br /> In his &quot; Fragments of an Autobiography,&quot; Mr.<br /> Felix Moscheles records his early impressions, and<br /> introduces episodes of the artist&#039;s life in Paris.<br /> He sketches many celebrities in the musical,<br /> artistic, and political world he has frequented,<br /> and devotes special chapters to his trips to<br /> America, the Paris Commune, his godfather Felix<br /> Mendelssohn, and to Mazzini, Rossini, and<br /> Browning.<br /> Messrs. George Newnes (Limited) have nearly<br /> ready for publication a new standard work entitled<br /> &quot;The International Geography.&quot; Seventy authors<br /> have collaborated in its production, including<br /> the leading geographers and travellers of Europe<br /> and America; the work has been planned and<br /> edited by Dr. H. R. Mill, who also wrote the chapter<br /> on the United Kingdom. Among the authors<br /> are Dr. Fridtjof Nansen (Arctic Regions), Mr.<br /> F. C. Selous (Rhodesia), Sir Clements Markham,<br /> F.R.S. (Ecuador, Bolivia, and Peru), Professor<br /> A. Kirchoff (German Empire), Professor W. M.<br /> Davis (United States), Professors de Lapparent<br /> and Ravenau (France), Sir John Murray.<br /> F.R.S. (Antarctic Regions), Count Pfeil<br /> (German Colonies), Mr. James Bryce, M.P.<br /> (the Boer Republics), Sir H. H. Johnston, the<br /> late Sir Lambert Playfair, Sir F. J. Goldsmid,<br /> Sir Martin Conway, Sir George S. Robertson,<br /> Sir William MacGregor, Sir Charles Wilson,<br /> F.R.S., the Hon. D. W. Carnegie, Mrs. Bishop.<br /> Dr. A. M. W. Downing, F.R.S., Dr. J. Scott<br /> Keltie, and Mr. G. G. Chisholm, the editor of<br /> the &quot;Times Gazetteer.&quot; The book is illustrated by<br /> nearly 500 maps and diagrams, which have been<br /> specially prepared. It is designed to present in<br /> the compact limits of a single volume an authori-<br /> tative conspectus of the science of geography and<br /> the conditions of the countries of the world at<br /> the close of the nineteenth century. The Ameri-<br /> can publishers are Messrs. D. Appleton and Co.,<br /> New York.<br /> THE BOOKS OF THE MONTH.<br /> [March 23 to April 22—263 Books.]<br /> Adams, Francis. Essayb in Modernity. 5/- net.<br /> AHalo, F. G. (ed.). The Cost of Sport. 6/-<br /> Aitken, J. The Ahiding Law. 2/6.<br /> Alaine, B. A Subtle Enchantress. 2/-<br /> Alexander, Rupert Maureen Moore. 67-<br /> Lanc.<br /> Murray.<br /> Oliphant.<br /> Stockwell.<br /> Burleigh.<br /> Allbutt, T. C. (ed.). A System of Medicine. Vol . 6. 25/- net.<br /> Macmillan.<br /> Anonymous. Robespierre. 1,-net. Effingham Pub. Co.<br /> Anonymous. Well beloved of the Father. 3/6. Scott.<br /> Anonymous (J. B.). Borne from the Inside. 1 - Clarke.<br /> Anonymous, The Story of London. 1/6. K Arnold-<br /> Anonymous Autoblography of a Child. 6/- Blackwood.<br /> Anonymous iauthor of &quot;Owen Dale&#039;s Ordeal &quot;). The Sport of Fate.<br /> 1/6. Stevens.<br /> B. (H. T.). Some Leading Scriptural Truths. 1/6. Skeffington.<br /> Bailey, J. C. Studies in some Famous Letters. 6/- Burleigh.<br /> Balck, Captain (tr. by L. R. M. Maxwell). Modern European Tactics.<br /> Vol. 1. 7/6 net. Sands.<br /> Barnett, Edith A. Snnningham and the Curate. 6/- Chapman.<br /> Barr, W. M. Boilers and Furnaces considered in their relations to<br /> Steam Boilers. 18/- Lippincott<br /> Bearne, C. Lives and Times of Early Valois Queens. 10/6. ITnwin.<br /> Beaven, E. W. Tales of the Divining Bod. 5/- Stockwell<br /> .<br /> Beeby, C. E. Defence of &quot; Creed and Life.&quot; 1/- net. Simpkin.<br /> Beerbohm, Max, More. 4/6 net. Lane.<br /> Bell, John. In the Shadow of the Bush. 3/6.<br /> Berry. T. W. Model Answers in School Management. 2/- Simpkin.<br /> Bickerdyke, John. The Passing of Prince Bozan. 6/- Burleigh-<br /> Binyon, L. (illus. by W. Strang). Western Flanders. 42/- net.<br /> Unicorn Press.<br /> Black, W. G. Ocean Rainfall: General and Special Oceans, lt1&#039;64-T.*&#039;-<br /> 81. 2/6 net. Livingstone.<br /> Bloundelle-Burton. J. Fortune&#039;s My Foe. 6/- Pearson.<br /> Boevey, S. M. C. Dene Forest Sketches. Second Series. 6/-<br /> Burloigh.<br /> Bodkin, M. McD. The Rebels. 6/- Ward and L<br /> Bot6ford, G. W. HUtory of Greece for High Schools and Colleges.<br /> 6/6 net. Macmillan<br /> Bottomley, G. Poems at White-Nights. 2/6 net. Unicorn Pres.&lt;*.<br /> Bourgogne, Sergeant, Memoirs of. (1812-13) 6/- Heinemann.<br /> Bowles F. G. In the Wake of the Sun. 2/6 net. Unicorn Prees.<br /> Brought on. Rhoda. The Game and the Candle. 6/- Macmillan.<br /> Brown, Campbell-Rae. Resurrection of His Grace. 2/6. Greening.<br /> Brown, Mary W. The Development of Thrift. 3/6 net. Macmillan.<br /> Bucban, John. Grey Weather. 6/- Lane.<br /> Burnle, R. W. The Catholic Brief against Sir William Harcourt and<br /> others. 2/6. Gay and B.<br /> Oaffyn, Mrs. M. (&quot; Iota&quot;). Anne Mauleverer. 6/- M&lt;&#039;thuen.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 287 (#299) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOIt.<br /> 287<br /> Carter, T. T. Spirit of Watchfulness, &amp;o. 5/- Longman.<br /> Catas, E. M. H. On Christmas Day. 3/6. Putnam.<br /> Chandler, P. W. The Land Tax. 3/6 net. Beeves and Tamer.<br /> Chapman, E. J. The Snake Witch, and other Poems. Paul.<br /> Charleton, R. H. Useful Information for Gold Mining Investor l/-<br /> E. Wilson.<br /> Clifton, W. Notes on Colour. »/- Bichards.<br /> Colby, C. W. Selections from the Sources of English History. 6/-<br /> Longman.<br /> Cole, W. H. Light Railways at Home and Abroad. 16/- Griffin.<br /> Coll, B. A Strange Executor. 6/- Pearson.<br /> Crockett, S. R. The Black Douglas. 6/- Smith and E.<br /> Cust, Lady E. Records of the Oust Family of Pinchbeck, Stamford,<br /> and Belton in Lincolnshire, from 1479 to 1700. 30/- Mitchell .fc H.<br /> Danbeny, G. A. Strength and Decay of Nations. 1/- Simpkiu.<br /> Daudet, L. (tr. by C. DeKay). Alphonse Daudet. 5/- Low.<br /> Davidson, J. M. Annals of Toil. 6/- Reeves.<br /> Davy, E M. Calumnies. 6/- Pearson.<br /> Day, Lewis F. William Morris and his Art. 2/6 Vl-tue.<br /> Denison, T. S. My Invisible Partner. 6/- Gay.<br /> D&#039;Espe&#039;rance, E. Northern Lights and other Psychic Stories.<br /> 36 net. Bedway.<br /> Deverell, F. H. My Tour in Palestine and Syria. 5/- Eyre and S.<br /> Deville, E. Photographic Surveying. 10/6. Low.<br /> Devine, Arthur. The Sacraments explained according to the<br /> Teaching and Doctrine of the Catholic Church. 6/- net.<br /> Wash bourne.<br /> Dewar, G. A. B. South Country Trout Streams. 5/-<br /> Lawrence and B.<br /> Dickens, Mary A. On the Edge of the Precipice. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Dickson, J. Emeralds chased in Gold. 6/- Oliphant.<br /> Dobson, Austin. A Paladin of Philanthropy, and other Papers. 6/-<br /> Chatto.<br /> Doyle, A. Conan. A Duet, with an Occasional Chorus. 6/-<br /> Blchards.<br /> Drummond, W. H. Phil-o-Bum&#039;s Canoe and Madeleine Vercheres.<br /> Putnam.<br /> &quot;Dryasdust.&#039;* Tales of the Wonder Club. 3/6. Harrison.<br /> Dublin Express. Wireless Telegraphy and Journalism. Dublin Express.<br /> Dndeney, Mrs. H. E. The Maternity of Harriet Wicken. 6/-<br /> Heinemann.<br /> Duff, C. M. Chronology of India from Earliest Times to Beginning<br /> of 16th Century. 15/- net. Constable.<br /> Dunbar, P. L. The Uncalled. A Novel. 5/- Service.<br /> Eldridgc, It. F. The Scheming of Agatha Kenwick. 6&#039;-<br /> Sonnenschein.<br /> Ehnslie, W A. Among the Wild Ngonl. 3/6. Oliphant<br /> Emery, G. F. Executors and Administrators. 2/- net. E. Wilson.<br /> Englishman, An. Shueypingsin. A story made from the Chinese<br /> romance u Haoukewchen,&quot; 3/6. Paul.<br /> Eacott, T. H. S. A Trip to Paradoxia. 5/- net. Greening.<br /> Evans, A J., and Fearenside, C. S. The Certificate History of<br /> England, 1700-1789. 3/6. Clive.<br /> Fanshawe, R. Two Lives. Poems. 4/6. Bell.<br /> Farjeon, B. L. Samuel Boyd of Catchpole Square. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Fisher, S. G. The True Benjamin Franklin. 10/6. Lippincott.<br /> Fiske, A. K. The West Indies. 6/- Putnam.<br /> Fletcher, J. S. The Death that Lurks Unseen. 3/6. Ward and L.<br /> Fowler, E len T. A Double Thread. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Fuhrer, Dr. Monograph on Buddha&#039;s Birthplace. 6/- Low.<br /> Fuller, Morris Relations of Church and State. 1/- Skemngton.<br /> Fyler, Colonel. Development of Cyprus. 7/6. Lund.<br /> Gardiner, S. R. Letters and Papers relating to the First Dutch War,<br /> l6&quot;,2-54. Navy Records Society.<br /> Goldsworthy, Arnold. Hands in the Darkness. 3/6. Pearson.<br /> Graeme, A. (Mrs. F. T. Marryat). Romance of the Lady Arbell.<br /> «/- White,<br /> riraham, Cunninghame. The Inane. 2/- Unwin.<br /> Gray, Annabel Forbldden Banns. 6/- White.<br /> Green, J. L. English Country Cottages. 5/- Rural World Pub. Co.<br /> Gregory, R. A, and Slmmons, A. T. Elementary Physics and<br /> Chemistry. 16. Macmillan.<br /> Greville, M. E. From Veldt and Street. Bhymes. II- E. Wilson.<br /> Griffiths, R. The Inebriates Acts and Habltual Drunkards. 1/-<br /> Stevens.<br /> Griffiths-Jones, E. Ascent through Christ. 7/6. Bowden.<br /> Gonter, A. C. Jack Ourzon. 6/- Boutledge.<br /> Gwynn, Stephen. Highways and Byways in Donegal and Antrim.<br /> 6/- Macmillan.<br /> H. The Grain of Gold. 1/-net. Artistic Press.<br /> Halifax, Robert. The Man Between. 6/- Richards.<br /> Halifax, Viscount. Bights of the Church of England under Reforma-<br /> tion Settlement. 1/- Longman.<br /> Hall, R N. Bulawayo Jack. 2/6. Western Mail.<br /> Hamilton, A. The Four Faeardins. 21/- net. Smithors.<br /> Hammond, J. The Church and Her Accusers. 2/- Skofflngton.<br /> Hansel. H. F., and Reber, W. Practical Handbook on Muscular<br /> Anomalies of the Eye. 6/- net. Kimpton.<br /> Harnack, A. (tr. by W. Gilchrist). History of Dogma. Vol. 6.<br /> 10/6. Williams and N.<br /> Harnack, A (tr. by T. B. Sounders). Thoughts on Present Position-<br /> of Protestantism. 1/6 net. Black.<br /> Harper, J. W. The Foundations of Society. 6/- Ward and L.<br /> Harradon, Beatrice. The Fowler. 6/- Blackwood.<br /> Hasluck. P. N. Decorative Designs. 1/- Oassell.<br /> Headlam, Cecil. The Story of Nuremberg. 3/6 net. D»nt.<br /> Hearne, L. Exotics and Retrospectives. 8/6. Low.<br /> Hubert, M. (tr. by Hon. W. Gibson). Plato and Darwin. »/-<br /> Longman.<br /> Herschcll, G. Constipation. 2/6. Olaisher.<br /> Hillis, N. D. Foretokens of Immortality. 1/- Oliphant.<br /> Hoare, E. Communion and Communicant. 1/- Bel. Tract Soc.<br /> Hobson, R. P. Sinking of the &quot; Uerrimac.&quot; 7/6. Unwin.<br /> Holgate, C. W. Winchester Long Rolls, 1653-1721. 10/- net.<br /> Winchester: Wells.<br /> Howard, Conrad. For Better or Worse? 6/- Unwin.<br /> Hudson, H. Wild Humphrey Kynaston. 6/- net. Paul.<br /> Hull, Eleanor. The Cuchullin Siga in Irish Literature. Tr. from-<br /> Irish by various scholars. 7/6 net. Nutt.<br /> Huime-Beaman. E. The Faith that Kills. 6/- Hurst.<br /> Hume Fergus. The Silent House in Pimlico. 3/6. Long.<br /> Huntly, Hope. Onr Code of Honour. 6/- Low.<br /> Hutchinson, Horace G., and others. The Book of Golf and Golfers.<br /> 18/- net. Longman.<br /> Hyde, Douglas. Literary History of Ireland. 16/- Unwin.<br /> Irvine, W. B. British Possessions and Oolonies. 1/- Belfe,<br /> Israfel. Ivory, Apes, and Peacocks. 5/- net Unicorn Press,<br /> Jacks, W. The Life of Prince Bismarck. Maolehose.<br /> Jackson, T. O. Practical Lessons in Book-keeping. 8/6. Clive.<br /> James, Alice L. Catering for Two, 3/6. Putnam.<br /> Jensen, G. J. G. Modern Drainage Inspection. 2/6 net.<br /> Sanitary Pub. Co.<br /> Jepson, E., and Beames, D. On the Edge of the Empire. 6/-<br /> Heinemaun.<br /> Johnson, W. A. History up to Date Oonoise Account of the War of<br /> 1899 between U.S. and Spiln. 6/- Allenson.<br /> Joyce, A. J. A Roman Anil-Christ. 2/6 net. Digby.<br /> Kenealy, Arabella. A Semi-Detached Marriage. 6&#039;- Hutchinson.<br /> Kennard, Mrs. E. Morals of the Midlands. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Kidd, B. J. The Thirty-Nine Articles. History, *o. Vol. 1. 1/-<br /> Rivington.<br /> Kingsley, Rose G. History of French Art, 1100-1899. 12/6 net.<br /> Longman.<br /> Kirby, T. F. Wykeham&#039;s Register. Vol. 2. 21/- net. Simpkin.<br /> Korschelt, E., and Holder. K. (tr. by M. Bernard). Text-Book of<br /> Embryology of Invertebrates. Vol. 2. 12/- Sonnonschein.<br /> Lee, O. A. J. Among British Birds. Part 14. 10/6 net. Douglas.<br /> Lee, Sidney (ed.). Diet, of National Biography. Vol. 58. 15/- net.<br /> Smith and E.<br /> Leigh, J. G. God&#039;s Greeting. A Story. 6/- Smith and E.<br /> L&#039;Epine, C. The Lady of the Leopird. 3/6. Greening.<br /> Levy, J. H. Necessity for Criminal Appeal as IIlus. by the Mtybrlck<br /> Case. 10/6 net. King.<br /> Lewis, A S., and Gibson, M. D. The Palestinian Syriac Lectionary<br /> of the Gospels. 42/6 Paul.<br /> Lindsay, H. More Methodist Idylls. 6/- Bowden.<br /> Linklater, R. The Limits of Ritual in the Church. 5/- Longman.<br /> Littlejohns, J. The Portent of Revolution.<br /> Lampeter: Welsh Church Press.<br /> Liversidge. J. G. Engine-room Practice. 6/- Griffin.<br /> Lubbock, Sir John. On Buds and Stipule. 5/- Paul.<br /> Lumsden, General Sir P. S., and Elsmle, G. R. Lumsden of the<br /> Guides. 16/- Murray.<br /> Lyttelton, Right Rev. Hon. A. T. The Place of Miracles In Religion.<br /> 5/- Murray.<br /> Macdonald, R. F. A School Arithmetic. 2/6. Macmillan.<br /> Macdonald, R. G. History of the Dress of the Royal Regiment of<br /> Artillery, 1625-1897. 25/- net. Sotheran.<br /> Mactaggart, J. Macklnnon and the Bards. 2/6. Oliphant.<br /> Maitland, Ella F., and Pollock, Sir F. The Etchingham Letters. 6&#039;-<br /> Smith and E.<br /> Manners, Lady V. Notes on the Tapestry in Haddon Hall. 1/-<br /> Bemrose.<br /> Manning, J. Future of the Metric and Imperial Systems. 6d.<br /> Sonnens&lt;<br /> Marchant, J. Theories of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.<br /> Williams.<br /> Margoliouth. G. Hebrew-Babylonian Affinities. 1/- net. Nutt.<br /> Marks,M. (ed.). Home Arts Cyclopaeiia. 7/6 net. Pearson.<br /> Marquis, T. G. Marguerite de Kooerval. 6/- Unwin.<br /> Meade, L. T., and Eustace, R. The Brotherhood of the Seven Kings.<br /> 5/- Ward and L.<br /> lleldrum, D. S. Holland and the Hollanders. 6/- Blackwood.<br /> Melrose, C. J. Solo Whist. 3/6. L. U. Gill.<br /> Mesia, Alesia (tr. from Sp.). Devotion of the Three Hours&#039; Agony on<br /> Good Friday. 1/6. Sands.<br /> Mitford, Bertram. The Weird of Deadly Hollow. 3/6. White.<br /> Moore, F. Frankfort. Well. After All. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Moynihan, B. G. On Betro-Perltoneal Hernia. 7/6. Ballliere.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 288 (#300) ############################################<br /> <br /> 288<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Myers, F. (&quot; Telemachus&quot;). Ablshag the Shunamite. 3/tf.<br /> Sonnenschein.<br /> Newton, R. H. Christian Science. Putnam,<br /> Nicoll, W. R. Ascent of the Sool. 1/ net. Isblster,<br /> Nlsbet, J. F. The Human Machine. 6/- Richards.<br /> Nordau, Max. The Drones must Die. 6/- Helnemann.<br /> . Odgers, W. Blake. Local Government. 3/6. Macmillan.<br /> Official, An. The Guardian&#039;s Guide. Knight.<br /> Ohlemann, F. W. M. (tr. and ed. by C. A. Oliver.). Ocular Thera-<br /> peutics for Physicians and Studcnta 7/6 net. Kimpton.<br /> Oliver, V. L. History of the Island of Antigua. Vol. 3. 70/-<br /> Mitcheli and H.<br /> .Ormerod, E. A. Report of Observations of Injurious Insects and<br /> Common Farm Peats during 1898. 1/6. Slmpkin.<br /> O&#039;Sullivan, Vincent. The Green Window. 3/6 net. . Smithers.<br /> Pakenham, Lady, and Winslow, Mrs. E. (cds.). How to Do It. .&quot;,/-<br /> Simpkin.<br /> iParrington-Poole, I. The Deil&#039;s Grannie. 3/6. Digby.<br /> Parsons, H. de B. The Tall Buildings under Test of Fire. 1/<br /> British Fire Prevention Committee,<br /> Payson, K. P. Suggestions toward an Applied Science of Sociology.<br /> 5/- Putnam.<br /> Pemberton, Max. The Garden of Swords. 6 - Cassell.<br /> Perkins. R. C. L. Fauna Hawaiiensis (edited by D. Sharp). Vol. I.,<br /> Part 1: Bymenoptera Aculeata. 16/- net. Clay.<br /> Pike, G. H. Oliver Cromwell and His Times. 6/- Umvin.<br /> Pot and Swears. The Scarlet City. 6/- Sands.<br /> Praed, Mrs. Campbell. Madame Izan. 6/- Chatto.<br /> Prichard, K. and Hesketh. A Modern Mercenary. 6/- Smith and E.<br /> Primm.P. Belling the Oat. 6/- White.<br /> Pritchard. M. J. The Passion of Rosamund Keith. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Psellus, The History of. Ed. by C. Satbas. (Byzantine Texts).<br /> 15/- net. Methuen.<br /> Quantock, Andrew. Tandra. 3/6. Pearson.<br /> (Rait, R. S. (ed.) Mary Queen of Scots. »/- Nutt.<br /> Rawlins, W. D. The Specific Performance of Contracts. 5/- net.<br /> Sweet.<br /> .Read. C. H., and Dalton, O M. Antiquities from the City of Benin<br /> and from other part* of West Africa in the British Museum.<br /> British Museum.<br /> [Reader, Kmily E. Priestess and Queen. 6/- Longman.<br /> Bealf, R. Poems. 10 - Funk and W.<br /> Becejac. E. (tr. by S. 0. Upton). Essay on the Basis of the Mystic<br /> Knowledge. Paul.<br /> Reld, Sir Wemyss (ed.). Life of W. E. Gladstone. 7/6. Cassell.<br /> &#039;Richardson, Mrs. A. Famous Ladies of the English Court. 16/<br /> Hutchinson.<br /> &#039;Ritchie, F. Easy Latin Passages for Translation. 2/- Longman.<br /> Bivington, Luke. The Roman Primacy, A.D. 430-451. 7 6. Longman.<br /> iBooBevelt, Blanche A Riviera Romance. 6/- Downev.<br /> Ropes. J. C. The Story of the Civil War in America. Part II. 12/6.<br /> Putnam.<br /> iRothonstein, W. Paul Verlalne. Three Drawings. 42/- net<br /> Hacon and R.<br /> Rothenstein, W. Liber Juniorum Six Drawings. 10*/- net<br /> Unicorn Press.<br /> Bowntree, J., and SherwelL, A. The Temperance Problem and<br /> Social Reform. 6/- Hodder.<br /> Russell, Dora. Her Promise True. 6/- Digby.<br /> iBussell, T. Baron. The Mandate. 8/- Lane.<br /> Saunders, M. Rose a Oharlitte. 6/ Methuen.<br /> Saunders, T. B. The Quest of Faith. 7/6. Black.<br /> Savage, R. H An Awkward Meeting. 2/6. White.<br /> Sedgwick, Anne D. The Confounding of Camelia. 6/- Helnemann.<br /> ShinUcr. R. Mission Work among the Hop-pickers in the Weald of<br /> Kent. 2/- net Stockwell.<br /> Smith, F. W. Natural Waters of Harrogate. 1 , net. Dawbain.<br /> fitead, W. T. The United States of Europe on the Eve of the Parlia-<br /> ment of Peace. 2/6. Review of Revietcs.<br /> Stebhing, W. Probable Tales. 4/6. Longman.<br /> Stewart, A. M. Origins of Scottish Presbytery. 1 - net. Oliph<br /> Stubba, C W. Rryhtnoth&#039;s Prayer, and other Poems, 1/&#039;6. Unwln.<br /> Suffling, E. R. The Decameron of a Hypnotist 1/- L. U. Gill.<br /> Synnot, Mrs. Marcus. Angus Faulkener. 3/6. Sonnenschein.<br /> Takahashi. Sakinje. Cases of International Law during the Chino-<br /> Japaneso War. 10/- Clay.<br /> Tangye, Sir R. The Two Protectors [The Cromwells]. 10 6.<br /> Partridge.<br /> Tegetmeler, W. B. The House Sparrow. II- Vinton.<br /> Thackeray, W. M. Ballads, Critical Reviews, Ac. With Biographical<br /> Introduction by Mrs. Ritchie. 8/- Smith and E.<br /> Theobald, F. V. Text-Book of Agricultural Zoology. 8/6.<br /> Blackwood.<br /> Tberese, Poems of (tr. by E. Frothlngham). Putnam.<br /> Thomas, C. Introduction to the Study of North American Archov<br /> o&#039;ogy. 8/- net Gay and B.<br /> Thomson, A. Compendium of Modern Equity. 30 - Clowes.<br /> Thorne, Sir R. T. The Administrative Control of Tuberculosis. 3 6.<br /> Ballii-re.<br /> Tomlinson. J. T. Lay Judges in Church Courts. Ji - Church Assoc.<br /> 3 6&#039;<br /> Tyaok, G. S. Lore and Legend of the English Church. 7/6. Andrews.<br /> lTnderhill, Arthur. Law of Partnership. 3/6.<br /> Butterworth.<br /> Veblen, T. The Theory of the Leisure Class. 7/- net. Macmillan.<br /> Verner, Lleut.-Ool. W. A British Rifleman. 10/6. Black.<br /> Wagner. L. How to Get on the Stage. 2/6. Chatto.<br /> Wagner, R. Parsifal in English Verse. From German by Alfred<br /> Forman. 5/- net A. r<br /> Walters, C. The Mystery of Shakespeare&#039;s Sonnets. 3/6.<br /> New Century 1<br /> Ward, Mrs. Wilfrid. One Poor Scruple. HI- Longman.<br /> Warner, G. F. Illuminated MSS. in the British Museum. 15 Plates.<br /> 50/- net. Frowde.<br /> Webb, J. (tr.). A French Metrical History of the Deposition of King<br /> Richard H. 1/- Bell.<br /> Webb, Mrs. Naomi: Last Days of Jerusalem. 2 6. Hodder.<br /> Wells, A. Poems. */- Glasgow: Hodge.<br /> Wheeler, Ella. Poems of Passion. 1/- Drane.<br /> Wheatley, H. B. Pepysiana. (Supplementary volume to &quot; Diary.&quot;).<br /> 106. Bell.<br /> White, Percy A Millionaire&#039;s Daughter. 6/- Pearson.<br /> Whit-way. R. S. Rise of the Portuguese Power in India, 1497-1550.<br /> 15/- net. Constable.<br /> Wilkinson, S.(ed.). From Cromwell to Wellington: Twelve Soldiers<br /> 10/6. Lawrence.<br /> Williams, Charles. John Thaddens Mackay. A Novel. 6/- Burleigh<br /> Williams, N. W. The Green Field. A Novel. 6/- Chapman.<br /> Winter, John Strange. A Summer Jaunt 3/6. White.<br /> Winter, C. G. Morals and Mistakes. 3/6. Simpkin.<br /> Wirgman, A. T. Constitutional Authority of Bishops in the Catholic<br /> Church. 6/- Longman.<br /> Wormeley, K. P. (tr. and ed.). Memoirs of the Due de Saint-Simon<br /> in the Times of Louis XIV. and the Regency. 73&#039;6 net<br /> THE AUTHOR.&quot;<br /> SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> Front Page<br /> Other Pages<br /> Half of a Page<br /> Quarter of a Page<br /> Eighth of a Page<br /> Single Column Advertisements<br /> Bills for Insertion<br /> £4 0 I)<br /> see<br /> l 10 o<br /> 0 15 0<br /> 0 7 S<br /> per inch 0 6 0<br /> per 2000 3 0 .1<br /> JVCp. J. Eveleigh jvfash,<br /> AMBERLEY HOUSE, NORFOLK STREET,<br /> STRAND. W.C.<br /> Wordsworth, John. The Episcopate of Charles Wordsworth, Bishop<br /> of St. Andrews. 15/- Longmans.<br /> Wyllarde, Dolf. Guardians of Panzy. 6/- Hutchinson.<br /> Yeats, W. B. The Wind among the Beeds. 3/6 net. Mathews.<br /> Young. T. E. On Centenarians. 7/6. Layton.<br /> Younghusband, G. J. The Philippines and Bound About. 8/6) net.<br /> Macmillan.<br /> Reductions made for a Series of Six or Twelve Insertions.<br /> All letters respecting Advertisements should be addressed to the<br /> Advkrtisrmknt Manager, The Author Office, 4, Portugal-street.<br /> London, W.C.https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/328/1899-05-01-The-Author-9-12.pdfpublications, The Author