529 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/529 | The Author, Vol. 23 Issue 09 (June 1913) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+23+Issue+09+%28June+1913%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 23 Issue 09 (June 1913)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1913-06-01-The-Author-23-9 | | | | | 249–278 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=23">23</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1913-06-01">1913-06-01</a> | | | | | | | 9 | | | 19130601 | Che<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Muthor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
<br />
Monthly.)<br />
<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ay) : Vor. XXTII.—No. 9.<br />
<br />
JUNE 1, 1913.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[PRIcE SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TELEPHONE NuMBER:<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
+ TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS:<br />
: AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
<br />
a 0<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—_+-~> +<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that<br />
<br />
4 are signed or initialled the authors alone<br />
<br />
are responsible. None of the papers or<br />
<br />
paragraphs must be taken as expressing the<br />
<br />
opinion of the Committee unless such is<br />
especially stated to be the case.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tue Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The<br />
Author that the cases which are quoted in The<br />
Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of<br />
the Society, and that those members of the<br />
Society who desire to have the names of the<br />
publishers concerned can obtain them on<br />
application.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ARTICLES AND: CONTRIBUTIONS.<br />
<br />
Tue Editor of The Author begs to remind<br />
members of the Society that, although the<br />
paper is sent to them free of cost, its production<br />
would be a very heavy charge on the resources<br />
of the Society if a great many members did not<br />
_ forward to the Secretary the modest 5s. 6d.<br />
_ subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
' Communications for The Author should be<br />
_ addressed to the offices of the Society, 1, Cen-<br />
<br />
' tral Buildings, Tothill Street, Westminster,<br />
$§.W., and should reach the Editor not later<br />
<br />
| than the 21st of each month.<br />
Communications and letters are invited by<br />
the Editor on all literary matters treated from<br />
<br />
Vou. XXIII.<br />
<br />
the standpoint of art or business, but on no<br />
other subjects whatever. Every effort will be<br />
made to return articles which cannot be<br />
accepted.<br />
<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
<br />
On and after June 13 Messrs. Matthews’<br />
Advertising Service, Staple Inn Buildings,<br />
High Holborn, W.C., will act as agents for<br />
advertisements for ‘The Author.” All<br />
communications respecting advertisements<br />
after that date shouid be addressed to them.<br />
<br />
As there seems to be an impression among<br />
readers of The Author that the Committee are<br />
personally responsible for the bona fides of the<br />
advertisers, the Committee desire it to be stated<br />
that this is not, and could not possibly be, the<br />
ease. Although care is exercised that no<br />
undesirable advertisements be inserted, they<br />
do not accept, and never have accepted, any<br />
liability.<br />
<br />
Members should apply to the Secretary for<br />
advice if special information is desired.<br />
<br />
eg<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE SOCIETY’S FUNDS.<br />
<br />
ee ek<br />
<br />
“[_\ROM time to time members of the Society<br />
K desire to make donations to its funds in<br />
<br />
recognition of work that has been done<br />
for them. The Committee, acting on the<br />
suggestion of one of these members, have<br />
decided to place this permanent paragraph in<br />
The Author in order that members may be<br />
cognisant of those funds to which these con-<br />
tributions may be paid.<br />
<br />
The funds suitable for this purpose are:<br />
(1) The Capital Fund. This fund is kept in<br />
reserve in case it is necessary for the Society to<br />
incur heavy expenditure, either in fighting a<br />
question of principle, or in assisting to obtain<br />
copyright reform, or in dealing with any other<br />
<br />
"2<br />
250<br />
<br />
matter closely connected with the work of the<br />
Society.<br />
<br />
(2) The Pension Fund. This fund is slowly<br />
increasing, and it is hoped will, in time, cover<br />
the needs of all the members of the Society.<br />
<br />
Ce See oe<br />
<br />
THE PENSION FUND.<br />
<br />
———1 —<br />
<br />
le January, the secretary of the Society<br />
laid before the trustees of the Pension<br />
<br />
Fund the accounts for the year 1912, as<br />
settled by the accountants. After giving the<br />
matter full consideration, the trustees in-<br />
structed the secretary to invest a sum of £300<br />
in the purchase of Buenos Ayres Great<br />
Southern Railway 4% Extension Shares, 1914,<br />
£10 fully paid. The number of shares pur-<br />
chased at the current price was twenty-five<br />
and the amount invested £296 1s. 1ld, The<br />
trustees are also purchasing three more Central<br />
Argentine Railway New Shares at par, on<br />
which as holders of the Ordinary Stock they<br />
have an option.<br />
<br />
The trustees desire to thank the members<br />
of the Society for the continued support which<br />
they have given to the Pension Fund.<br />
<br />
The nominal value of the investments held<br />
on behalf of the Pension Fund now amounts<br />
to £4,764 6s., details of which are fully set out<br />
in the following schedule :—<br />
<br />
Nominal Value.<br />
<br />
£ os. 2.<br />
Local Loans ........+5.2+005+% 500 0 0<br />
Victoria Government 3% Consoli-<br />
<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ........ 291 19 11<br />
London and North-Western 3%<br />
<br />
Debenture Stock ............ 250 0 0<br />
Egyptian Government Irrigation<br />
<br />
Trust 4% Certificates ........ 200 0 0<br />
Cape of Good Hope 34% Inscribed<br />
<br />
Stock. 0.0.0.5. ten 200 0 0<br />
Glasgow and South-Western Rail-<br />
<br />
way 4% Preference Stock . 228 0 0<br />
New Zealand 34% Stock ....... 247 9 6<br />
Trish Land 22% Guaranteed Stock 258 0 0<br />
Corporation of London 23%<br />
<br />
Stock, 1927—57 ........-.45- 4388 2 4<br />
Jamaica 34% Stock, 1919—49 .. 182 18 6<br />
Mauritius 4% 1987 Stock ....... 120 12 1<br />
Dominion of Canada, C.P.R. 34%<br />
<br />
Land Grant Stock, 1938 ...... 198 8 8<br />
Antofagasta and Bolivian Railway<br />
<br />
5% Preferred Stock .......... 237 0 0<br />
Central Argentine Railway Or-<br />
<br />
Aynary Stock ..64.....5.5.55. 232 0 0<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
‘prior to October, nor does it include sub-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Nominal Value.<br />
<br />
s. d.<br />
$2,000 Consolidated Gas and<br />
Electric Company of Baltimore<br />
44% Gold Bonds .......-.+- 400 0 0<br />
250 Edward Lloyd, Ltd., £1 5%<br />
Preference Shares ..........-- 250 0 O<br />
<br />
55 Buenos Ayres Great Southern<br />
Railway 4% Extension Shares,<br />
1914 (fully paid) ..........--<br />
<br />
8 Central Argentine Railway £10<br />
Preference Shares, New Issue.. 30 0 O-<br />
<br />
PENSION FUND.<br />
age<br />
<br />
Tue list printed below includes all fresh dona-<br />
<br />
tions and subscriptions (7.é., donations and<br />
<br />
subscriptions not hitherto acknowledged)<br />
<br />
received by, or promised to, the fund from<br />
October 1, 1912.<br />
<br />
It does not include either donations given<br />
<br />
scriptions paid in compliance with promises<br />
made before it.<br />
<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
<br />
1912. £ 5. 4<br />
Oct. 10, Escott, T. H. S. . . 0-5 @<br />
Oct. 10, Henderson, R. W. Wright. 0 5 0<br />
Oct. 10, Knowles, Miss M. W. - 0 5 8<br />
Oct. 11, Buckley, Reginald . 0 5 O<br />
Oct. 12, Walshe, Douglas 010 0<br />
Oct. 12, ‘‘ Penmark”’ . : 010 0<br />
Oct. 15, Sinclair, Miss Edith. 010 6<br />
Oct. 16, Markino, Yoshio 1 1°06<br />
Oct. 20, Fiamingo, Carlo 70s 8<br />
Oct. 29, Henley, Mrs. . 4 yo ia 8<br />
Nov. 8, Jane, L. Cecil . . 0 8 6<br />
Nov. 14, Gibb, W. 0 5 0<br />
Dec. 4, De Brath, SS. . : 0 5 0<br />
Dec. 4, Sephton, The Rev. J. 0 5 0<br />
Dec. 4, Cooper, Miss Marjorie 010 0<br />
Dec. 7, MacRitchie, David 0 5 OF<br />
Dec. 11, Fagan, James B. 10 04<br />
Dec. 27, Dawson, Forbes. . 010 6<br />
<br />
1913.<br />
<br />
Jan. 8, Toynbee, William (in addi-<br />
tion to his present sub-<br />
scription). . .<br />
<br />
Jan. 9, Gibson, Frank .<br />
<br />
Jan. 29, Blackley, Miss E. L. ‘.<br />
<br />
Jan. 31, Annesley, Miss Maude .<br />
<br />
Feb. 6, Rothenstein, Albert . ‘<br />
<br />
Feb. 10, Bradshaw, Percy V. .<br />
<br />
April 8, Caulfield-Stoker, TT. ‘<br />
<br />
2°<br />
<br />
eeocescsceo<br />
—<br />
Aontonane<br />
<br />
SAaAanDSSS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
vtDec.<br />
<br />
| 7<br />
ec<br />
<br />
| \oafDec.<br />
oatDec.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 251<br />
<br />
Donations.<br />
<br />
7 1912.<br />
<br />
‘oyNov. 20, Kennard, Mrs. N. H. :<br />
A, McEwan, Miss M. S. .<br />
4, Kennedy, E. B. . :<br />
<br />
11, Begarnie, George ;<br />
11, Tanner, James T. . :<br />
11, Toplis, Miss Grace .<br />
<br />
ve(Dec. 14, Watson, Mrs. Herbert A..<br />
- \9afDec. 14, French, Mrs. Warner :<br />
<br />
(Dec.<br />
ri iofDec.<br />
aa(Dec.<br />
<br />
17, Smith, Miss Sheila Kaye .<br />
17, Marras, Mowbray . ‘<br />
27, Edwards, Percy J. :<br />
<br />
oan 1913.<br />
<br />
ag Jan.<br />
‘a Jan.<br />
igJan.<br />
is Jan.<br />
‘eiJan.<br />
+ aed an.<br />
: ald an.<br />
<br />
Jon.<br />
‘elJan.<br />
.asiJan.<br />
aelJan.<br />
_asiJan.<br />
al Jan.<br />
‘si Jan.<br />
ialJan.<br />
we isi Jan.<br />
atl Jan.<br />
48 Jan.<br />
A alJan.<br />
' agLJan.<br />
48 Jan.<br />
‘cal Jan.<br />
| “i Jan.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
1, Risque, W. H. ‘<br />
<br />
1, Rankin, Mrs. F. M.<br />
<br />
2, Short, Miss L. M.<br />
<br />
2. Mackenzie, Miss J. A<br />
<br />
2, Webling, Miss Peggy Z<br />
<br />
3, Harris, “Mrs. E. H.. :<br />
<br />
S, Church, Sir Arthur,<br />
K.C.V. O., ete. :<br />
<br />
4, Douglas, James A. : ;<br />
<br />
A, Grant, Lady Sybil<br />
<br />
6, Haultain, Arnold<br />
<br />
6, Beveridge, Mrs. 2<br />
<br />
6, Clark, The Rev. Henry<br />
<br />
6, Ralli, C. Scaramanja . :<br />
<br />
6, Lathbury, Miss Eva .<br />
<br />
6, Pryce, Richard -<br />
<br />
7, Gibson Miss L. S. :<br />
<br />
10, K. ‘ :<br />
<br />
10, Ford, Miss May<br />
<br />
12, Greenstreet, W. J.<br />
<br />
14, Anon<br />
<br />
15, Maude Aylmer<br />
<br />
16, Price, Miss Eleanor .<br />
<br />
17, Blouet, Madame<br />
<br />
, 20, P. H. and M.K. . :<br />
. 22, Smith, Herbert W. . ‘<br />
.25, Anon. . ‘ ‘<br />
. 27, Vernede, R. E. :<br />
<br />
. 29, Plowman, Miss Mary .<br />
. 29, Todd, Miss Margaret, M.D.<br />
, 31, J acobs, W. W. c :<br />
1, Davy, Mrs. E.M. .<br />
<br />
. 8, Abraham, J. J. .<br />
. 4, Gibbs, F. L. A. :<br />
. 4, Buckrose, J. E. ‘ :<br />
. 4, Balme, Mrs. Nettleton :<br />
. 6, Coleridge, The Hon. Gilbert<br />
. 6, Machen, Arthur i<br />
. 6, Romane-James, Mrs. .<br />
. 6, Weston, Miss Lydia . :<br />
. 14, Saies, Mrs. F. H. (in addi-<br />
<br />
tion to her subscription)<br />
<br />
Feb. 14, O’Higgins, H. J. é<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
aH<br />
Ooo eeoceoogaonoonoancoooooecooooeooooooo cooooo ocooooeoooce:<br />
<br />
a<br />
oe OR Or OLOLO O-<br />
<br />
_<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
COOCSCSCO CHOCO CONMSCSCOMM<br />
OHTA A OO<br />
<br />
bent<br />
<br />
tet a<br />
oot QQaQek Ke OH OM ONE NPR OOCOHR EK ORM AAO OOOOH NS OH<br />
<br />
ooo COFMPRF OF OCrFONFOSCOCOCOBE OF COOCOCOBROWOORNWH!<br />
=<br />
<br />
et<br />
<br />
&<br />
<br />
ed<br />
Ror oN:<br />
<br />
Feb. 15, Stephens, Dr. Ricardo<br />
Feb. 15, Jones, Miss E. H.<br />
Feb. 17, Whibley, Charles<br />
Feb. 22, Probert, W. S.<br />
Feb. 24, S. F. G.<br />
Feb. 27, XX. Pen Club :<br />
Mar. 7, Keating, The Rev. J.<br />
Lloyd. . -<br />
Mar. 7, Tharp, Robert C. . :<br />
Mar. 10, Hall, H. Fielding . :<br />
Mar. 18, Moffatt, Miss Beatrice<br />
Mar. 14, Bennett, Arnold .<br />
Mar. 17, Michell, The Right Hon.<br />
Sir Lewis, K.C.V.O, .<br />
Mar. 17, Travers, Miss Rosalind :<br />
Mar. 26, Hinkson, H. A. A 5<br />
Mar. 26, Anon. . : . :<br />
April 2, Daniel, E. J. . : ‘<br />
April 2, Hain, H. M. :<br />
April 7, Taylor, Miss Susette M.<br />
April 7, Harding, Newman .<br />
April 9, Strachey, Miss Amabel<br />
April 10, Aspinall, Algernon .<br />
April 15, Craig, Gordon<br />
<br />
naomoso OrRoooh<br />
<br />
SO Or Or<br />
<br />
moocoocoourorF<br />
ececooconooeoso SSeSoSoo cocoa eo oe<br />
<br />
SK Oranano ore ar<br />
<br />
oH<br />
<br />
CoMMITTEE’S CONFERENCE WITH EDITORS AND<br />
. NEWSPAPER PROPRIETORS.<br />
<br />
ene<br />
<br />
Durrine the past few months a considerable<br />
correspondence has passed between the Com-<br />
mittee of Management of the Society and the<br />
editors and publishers of papers, in order, if<br />
possible, to agree to some _ standardised<br />
arrangement for the payment of accepted<br />
contributions.<br />
<br />
It will be remembered that the committee<br />
notes published in the May issue of The Author<br />
contained a reference to a proposal to hold a<br />
conference on the subject in that month.<br />
Accordingly a circular was forwarded to the<br />
editors of magazines, putting forward the<br />
following proposal, that accepted articles,<br />
stories and illustrations should be paid for<br />
on publication or within six months from<br />
acceptance, whichever should be the shorter<br />
period. A number of letters were received in<br />
response and an influential gathering met to<br />
discuss the question. It was found impossible<br />
to pass any definite resolution at the meeting<br />
owing to the fact that some of the editors<br />
present were bound to refer the matter to the<br />
proprietors of the papers they represented,<br />
but they promised to do this, and the meeting<br />
accordingly was adjourned till Thursday,<br />
252<br />
<br />
June 19, when it is hoped that some definite<br />
issue may be reached, which it will be possible<br />
to announce in The Author.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dramatic SuB-COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
Tur May meeting of the Dramatic Sub-<br />
Committee was held at the offices of the<br />
Society on Friday, May 23. After the<br />
minutes of the previous meeting had been<br />
read and signed, on a letter received by Mr.<br />
Bernard Shaw from Sir Herbert Beerbohm<br />
Tree the question of meeting delegates of<br />
the West End‘ Managers’ Association was<br />
discussed. It was decided that Mr. Shaw,<br />
Mr. Carton, Mr. Jerome and the secretary,<br />
subject to their consent, should act as delegates<br />
of the Dramatic Sub-Committee, and the<br />
secretary was instructed to write to the<br />
Society of West End Managers with a view to<br />
a meeting, if possible, early in June.<br />
<br />
The question of amateur rights was next<br />
dealt with, and a letter from the Association<br />
of Amateur Dramatic Clubs was laid before<br />
the mecting. The secretary was appointed<br />
as delegate to meet the association, and to<br />
discuss with that body the possibility of getting<br />
into touch with their members for the produc-<br />
tion of plays by the dramatists of the Society.<br />
<br />
A letter from Mr. H. M. Paull was also laid<br />
before the meeting, as also was a letter from<br />
Mrs. Maxwell Armfield. The secretary<br />
received instructions to reply. The questions<br />
contained in both the letters referred to<br />
amateur performances and the Collection<br />
Bureau of the Society, which is about to<br />
circularise the amateur clubs on behalf of the<br />
members.<br />
<br />
The secretary then reported to the sub-<br />
committee the plays with which the Bureau<br />
was dealing, and the number of dramatists<br />
for whom it was acting.<br />
<br />
The question of foreign dramatic agents<br />
appointed by the Society was considered and<br />
the sub-committee suggested that their names<br />
and addresses should be published monthly<br />
in The Author.<br />
<br />
It was decided to adjourn the Dramatic<br />
Conference till the autumn, after the meeting<br />
with the delegates of the West End Managers’<br />
Association.<br />
<br />
The sub-committee decided to ask the<br />
Committee of Management to obtain the<br />
opinion of a Dutch lawyer on the peculiar<br />
position arising out of the fact that Holland had<br />
only just joined the Berlin Convention. It<br />
appears that the Dutch are anxious to produce<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
English plays, but the question has arisen ag<br />
to the rights both of English dramatists and<br />
Dutch translators.<br />
<br />
The secretary then reported the legal cases —<br />
which had been taken up by the Society,<br />
After the discussion of the details of one case<br />
the sub-committee passed a recommendation ~<br />
to the Committee of Management that it —<br />
would be advisable to submit the matter to<br />
arbitration. i<br />
<br />
The consideration of the Dramatic Contract<br />
and Pamphlet was next commenced, and after<br />
considerable discussion the secretary was<br />
instructed to draft a fresh contract, for a period<br />
of years, between dramatists and managers.<br />
as this seemed to the sub-committee a more<br />
suitable form of contract for the benefit o<br />
members than the contract already embodied<br />
in the pamphlet.<br />
<br />
—_+ =<<br />
<br />
ComposERS’ SUB-COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
A MEETING of the Composers’ Sub-Com.<br />
mittee was held at the offices of the Society o<br />
Saturday, May 26. After reading the minute<br />
of the former meeting, a circular, which it wai<br />
proposed to send round to composers, wa<br />
considered and settled. The secretary wai<br />
instructed to send it round as soon as possibl<br />
that composers might be given an opportunit<br />
of answering the questions put before them,<br />
with a view to a closer combination of the<br />
profession.<br />
<br />
The sub-committee then considered thi<br />
names of members of the Society who might b<br />
suggested to the Committee of Managemen<br />
to fill the vacancy caused by the resignatio<br />
of Mr. Herbert Sullivan, and the secretary wa<br />
instructed to put forward their recommen<br />
dation at the next meeting.<br />
<br />
It had been suggested that the Mechanica<br />
Instrument Trade should be _ invited<br />
co-operate with the Society in order to obtai<br />
a joint opinion from counsel on question<br />
relating to copyright and mechanical repro<br />
duction. The secretary reported to the sub<br />
committee that the trade’ were unwilling<br />
adopt the suggestion, giving as their reaso<br />
the fact that they had, already, taken man<br />
opinions and that they did not see that an,<br />
good purpose would be served by taking<br />
further opinion. The sub-committee regrette<br />
they had adopted this view, as it seemed<br />
them that a joint opinion might have bee<br />
very useful to all parties and, if all parties ha<br />
decided to abide by it, would have saved<br />
considerable amount of litigation in the fut<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
‘A contract proposed by a German Society<br />
_ fin respect to the collection of mechanical<br />
‘epinstrument fees was next considered, and<br />
sathe secretary was instructed to write for<br />
“pfurther particulars in the hope that a satis-<br />
ioefactory agreement might be settled, by which<br />
ermembers of the Society could have their<br />
»rmechanical instrument fees collected in<br />
*o»Germany.<br />
<br />
A letter from a French society for the<br />
lecollection of fees was also considered, and the<br />
‘ssecretary was instructed to ask for further<br />
jaidetails.<br />
<br />
! The replies from music publishers to a<br />
ovicircular sent to them, on the instructions of<br />
eithe sub-committee, on the question of the<br />
“uniform rendering of accounts, were next<br />
soconsidered, and the secretary was instructed<br />
/ eto tabulate the answers and to print an article<br />
son the matter in The Author.<br />
<br />
: After due consideration it was found<br />
“impossible to adopt a proposal to circularise<br />
Jpvillage musical clubs with a list of composers’<br />
tovworks suitable for reproduction by their com-<br />
‘“semunities. With regret the sub-committee felt<br />
“compelled to abandon the idea. The view of<br />
sdthe sub-committee was that the matter was<br />
afone for the publishers rather than for the<br />
<br />
sor Society.<br />
—_ + <-> —<br />
<br />
Cases.<br />
<br />
Durie the month twelve cases have passed<br />
«i through the secretary’s hands. It is curious<br />
'@ to note the increasing number of cases abroad.<br />
iC Of the twelve, four are foreign cases, two being<br />
“in the United States, and two in France.<br />
*s Last month four of the total number were<br />
’# cases in foreign countries, one beingin Hungary,<br />
+7 two in the United States and one in Russia.<br />
1The majority of cases this month are disputes<br />
fon terms of agreement. Five come under this<br />
so head ; of these, two have been settled, but the<br />
1% other three are still open. Disputes on agree-<br />
of ments generally take a longer time to arrange<br />
sf than ordinary claims for money and accounts,<br />
9% because, as a rule, a considerable amount of<br />
‘1, correspondence is necessary.<br />
(There are four cases of claims for the<br />
‘9 return of MSS. Two of these have been<br />
om successful and the MSS. have been returned<br />
9 to the members ; in the third case, the person<br />
6 to whom the MS. was sent has made every<br />
»-effort to find it, but the author had no evidence<br />
© to show that it actually came to hand. The<br />
‘a6 last case has only recently come to the office.<br />
"There are two cases for money and accounts.<br />
‘one being in France and one in the United<br />
<br />
r<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
253<br />
<br />
States. These are both open, as sufficient time<br />
has not yet elapsed in which to receive a reply.<br />
<br />
The last question is one of accounts which<br />
has only come to the office just before going to<br />
press.<br />
<br />
There are two cases open from former<br />
months, one being in Hungary. As it is<br />
a dispute on an agreement and therefore a<br />
matter for negotiation, some time must elapse<br />
before it is finally settled, but the Socicty’s<br />
lawyers in Hungary have been successful in<br />
getting into favourable communication with<br />
the defendants. The second is an ordinary<br />
question of settlement of ageeement and as<br />
has already been stated, settlements of<br />
disputes on agreements take a longer time than<br />
mere questions of claims for liquidated<br />
amounts.<br />
<br />
Elections.<br />
<br />
Arthurs, George . . 22, Shandon Road,<br />
S.W. :<br />
<br />
Ivy Cottage, Clare-<br />
morris, Co. Mayo.<br />
97, Finborough<br />
Road, Earl’s Court.<br />
Knocke - sur - mer,<br />
Belgium.<br />
The Towers,<br />
dlesham.<br />
Oaklands, Elstree.<br />
Lyceum Club, Picca-<br />
dilly, W.<br />
<br />
43, Chisholm Road,<br />
Croydon.<br />
<br />
Aylward, Frank<br />
Banner, Joseph<br />
Brentwood, Evelyn<br />
<br />
Elvey, G. F. Handel Win-<br />
Everett, P. W. . S<br />
Graham, Miss Bertha N.<br />
<br />
Hardy, Dr. H. Nelson,<br />
<br />
F.R.C.S., Edin.<br />
Hosie, Miss Lillie C.<br />
Jerningham, Charles E. 14, Pelham Crescent,<br />
Thurloe Square,S.W.<br />
c/o Messrs. H. Massie<br />
& Co., 21, Tavistock<br />
Street, Covent Gar-<br />
dens, W.C.<br />
<br />
Landi, Caroline F. M.,<br />
Countess Zanardi<br />
<br />
Louis, Edward Z<br />
Manahan, William A. . 110, Seville Place,<br />
North Strand, Dub-<br />
lin.<br />
<br />
12b, London Road,<br />
St. Albans.<br />
Whitehall Hotel, 18,<br />
Montague Street,<br />
Russell Square,<br />
and Summit, W.C. ;<br />
New Jersey, U.S.A.,<br />
36, Priory Terrace,<br />
Stamford, Lines.<br />
<br />
Nuttall, G. Clarke ,<br />
<br />
Porter, Grace Cleveland<br />
<br />
Raythorne, Miss Valerie<br />
254<br />
<br />
Temple, The Rev. W. . The Hall, Repton,<br />
Burton-on-Trent.<br />
<br />
. The Towers, St.<br />
Stephens Road,<br />
Bath.<br />
<br />
West, Mrs. Katherine East<br />
S: Sussex.<br />
<br />
Willis, William 20, Belmont Road,<br />
Nicholas. Twickenham, S.W.<br />
<br />
Talbot, Mrs. :<br />
<br />
Grinstead,<br />
<br />
——_+—>—_+—___—_<br />
<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS.<br />
<br />
—— +<br />
<br />
While every effort is made by the compilers to keep<br />
this list as accurate and exhaustive as possible, they have<br />
some difficulty in attaining this object owing to the fact<br />
that many of the books mentioned are not sent to the office<br />
by the members. In consequence, it is necessary to rely<br />
largely upon lists of books which appear in literary and<br />
other papers. It is hoped, however, that members will<br />
co-operate in the compiling of this list, and, by sending<br />
particulars of their works, help to make it substantially<br />
accurate.<br />
<br />
ART.<br />
<br />
Wantep: A Mruistry oF Fine Arts.<br />
DewHurst. Reprinted from the<br />
84 x 54. 101 pp. Hugh Rees. 1s. n.<br />
<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
Wui1am Morris. A Study in Personality. By A.<br />
Compton Rickert. 82 X 5}. 325 pp. Herbert<br />
Jenkins. 7s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Goxtpwin SMITH’s CoRRESPONDENCE.<br />
Haviram. 9 x 53. 540 pp. Werner Laurie.<br />
<br />
BOOKS OF REFERENCE.<br />
<br />
Tue SraresMan’s YuAR Boor. 1913. Edited by<br />
J. Scorr Kerrie, LL.D. Assisted by M. Epsrzrn,<br />
Ph.D. 74 x 43. 1452 pp. Macmillan. 10s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
DRAMA.<br />
<br />
Prays or Onp Japan. Tue “No.” By Mane C.<br />
Sroxzs, D.Sc., and Proressor Jogi SakuRal. With<br />
a Preface by His Excettency Baron Karo. 8} X 54.<br />
103 pp. Heinemann. 5s. n.<br />
<br />
Tus Marrrep Woman. A Play in Three Parts. By<br />
Cc. B. Fernatp. 74x 5. 111 pp. Sidgwick &<br />
Jackson. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Toe “Minp THE Paint” GIRL.<br />
Acts. By Arraur W. PINzERO.<br />
Heinemann. ls. 6d.<br />
<br />
FICTION.<br />
<br />
Lorz or PROSERPINE. By MauricE HEWLETT.<br />
288 pp. Macmillan. 5s. n.<br />
<br />
TurovcH THE Winpow. By Mary E. Many.<br />
319 pp. Mills & Boon. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tue Bonp or Freepom. By A. B. SPENS.<br />
316 pp. Everett. 6s.<br />
<br />
Bistine Dawn. By Hanoitp Bzcain. 7} x 5.<br />
Hodder & Stoughton. 68.<br />
<br />
Tun Destroyine ANGEL. By Louis J. VANCE.<br />
309 pp. Grant Richards. 68.<br />
<br />
Ix tue Grre or Destiny. By Cuaruzs E.<br />
74 x 5. 301 pp. George Allen.<br />
Tue Sxy-Line. By ErueEL CaNNIne.<br />
<br />
Digby, Long. 6s.<br />
<br />
By WyYNFORD<br />
Art Chronicle.<br />
<br />
Edited by ARNOLD<br />
18s. n.<br />
<br />
A Comedy in Four<br />
62 x 5. 234 pp.<br />
<br />
72 x Sh.<br />
72 x 5.<br />
7% x 5.<br />
312 pp.<br />
7} x 5.<br />
SrERNY.<br />
<br />
7h x 5. 381 pp.<br />
<br />
THE AUTAOR.<br />
<br />
Hearts at War. By Erris ADELAIDE ROWLANDS_<br />
72x 5. 336 pp. Hurst & Blackett. 6s.<br />
<br />
Oncz Rounp. By SterHen Knorr. 73 x 5. 366 pp,<br />
Murray & Evenden. 6s.<br />
<br />
Love Lerrers or A WorLDLY Woman, By Mrs. W. K.<br />
Cuirrorp. Newand Enlarged Edition, 277 pp. Con-<br />
stable. 2s. 6d, n.<br />
<br />
Tur Pursuit or Mr. Favret.<br />
<br />
6} x 4}. 380 pp. Nelson. 7d. n.<br />
<br />
Tur Sprvster. By Husert Waxes. (Cheap Edition)<br />
74 x 43. 320 pp. John Long. Is. n.<br />
<br />
I wut Repay. By Tae Baroness Onczy.<br />
<br />
74 x 44. Hodder & Stoughton. Is. n.<br />
<br />
So ir Is WITH THE DaMSEL. By Nora VYNNE.<br />
Stanley Paul. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tun Kryepom. By H. ErspaLe Goap.<br />
pp. Heinemann. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tur Hovse or Sanps. By L. M. Wart.<br />
<br />
312 pp. Martin Secker. 6s.<br />
<br />
Mr. Laxwortuy’s ADVENTURES. By E. P. OPPENHEIM<br />
7% x 5. 312 pp. Cassell. 3s. 6d.<br />
<br />
Tur Mixp Reaper. By Max RITTENBERG.<br />
325 pp. Appletons. 6s. :<br />
<br />
Tus Gops ARE Atuirst. Authorised Translation. B<br />
A. Attinson. 8} x 5}. 285 pp. Lane. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tue Pomp oF THE Lavierres. By GisERT PARKER<br />
64 x 4}. 223 pp. Methuen. 7d. n. :<br />
<br />
Tue STRENGTH OF THE Hits. By HaLirwELt SUTCLIFFE-<br />
732 x 54. 307 pp.<br />
<br />
Hatr anp Harr TRAGEDY.<br />
By A. R. Horn. 8 X 5}.<br />
<br />
E1iza’s Son. By Barry Pain. 7} X 5.<br />
Cassell. Is. n. ]<br />
<br />
Tas Woorne or Miranwy. Second Edition. By<br />
Eprru C. Kenyon. Holden & Hardingham. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe WINNING oF GwENoRA. By Epira C. Kenyon-<br />
Holden & Hardingham. 6s.<br />
<br />
HISTORY.<br />
<br />
A GxgweraL History oF THE WORLD. By Oscar<br />
BROWNING, Senior Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge,.<br />
ete. With Maps and Genealogical Ta les. 74 X 5.<br />
799 pp. Arnold. 7s. 6d. n. School Edition. 5s. n.<br />
<br />
it x 5<br />
<br />
Stanley Paul. 6s.<br />
<br />
Scenes in Black and White.<br />
58, 8<br />
119 pp.<br />
<br />
340 pp. Black.<br />
<br />
LAW,<br />
<br />
Pmorace Law. Being the Pilotage Act, 1913. With<br />
Introduction, Notes and Appendices. By E. AYLMER.<br />
Diasy, Lieutenant R.N. (retired), Secretary to Depart-<br />
mental Committee of Pilotage, 1909—11. Barrister-at-<br />
Law, and 8. D. Corz, Member of the Departmental ©<br />
Committee on Pilotage, 1909—11, Solicitor of the ~<br />
Supreme Court. 8} X Bf. 108 pp. Sweet & Maxwell.”<br />
<br />
_ 56. nD.<br />
LITERARY.<br />
<br />
Jovous Garp. By A. C. BEnson. 7x 5. 235 pp-<br />
Murray. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
THe VULGATE VERSION OF THE ARTHURIAN RoMANCES. ©<br />
Edited from Manuscripts in the British Museum. By —<br />
Hi. Oskar Sommer. Vol. VI., Le Aventures ou las:<br />
Queste del Saint Graal: La Mort de Roi Artus..<br />
12 x 94.’ 390 pp. Washington : The Carnegie Insti<br />
tute of Washington. :<br />
<br />
Tan Joy or THE THEaTRE. By GitpeRT CANNANS<br />
7x 5. Batsford. 2s. n. ,<br />
<br />
Tur Country. By E. THomas. 7 X 5. 60 pp. Bats<br />
ford. 2s, n.<br />
<br />
MISCELLANEOUS.<br />
<br />
‘Tan Perrect GentLEMaN. A guide to Social Aspirants.<br />
By Harry GRraHAM. New Edition. 7$ x 5. 212 pp<br />
Arnold. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NATURAL HISTORY.<br />
<br />
‘oul FLowrrLess Puants. How and Where they Grow.<br />
i ‘By S. Lzonarp Bastry. 8} x 5}. 152 pp. Cassell.<br />
‘Oo 68. n.<br />
<br />
“if Tur Brrps or Austra. By<br />
‘sf ‘~-Vol. IIT., Part II. 143 x 10}. 105—204 pp..<br />
<br />
SOCIOLOGY.<br />
<br />
~ | Inprviptcm wunp STaat: UNTERSUCHUNGEN UBER DIE<br />
nied GRUNDLAGE DER Kuttur. By GrorGEs CHATTERTON-<br />
ca . Hin, Ph.D. Verlag von<br />
<br />
oa. J.C. 'B. Mohr.<br />
<br />
G. M. Marraews<br />
Witherby<br />
<br />
xvii x 207 pp. Tiibingen:<br />
<br />
TOPOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
By Himatre BELLoc.<br />
7s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
TRAVEL.<br />
<br />
c70) Queer THINGS ABOUT JAPAN. By Dovetas SLADEN.<br />
Fourth Edition, to which is added a Life of the late<br />
“ +Emperor of Japan. 8} x 54. 443 pp. Kegan Paul.<br />
: 6s. n.<br />
/an—) me Conressions oF A TENDERFOOT.<br />
Grant Richards. 10s. 6d.<br />
<br />
‘a— Tue Stane STREET. 83 x 6.<br />
<br />
304 pp. Constable.<br />
<br />
By Ratpx Stock.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
re<br />
<br />
MITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
NOTES.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Ts HE late Professor Goldwin Smith’s<br />
Bt ‘Correspondence’? has been _ pub-<br />
: lished by his literary executor, Mr.<br />
“@* Arnold Haultain, through Mr. T. Werner<br />
I Laurie. The book, which is demy §8vo,<br />
560 pages, with illustrations, costs 18s. net,<br />
“ee .and comprises letters written, not only by<br />
_ Goldwin Smith, but also to him by Matthew<br />
Arnold, W. E. Gladstone, Frederick Harrison,<br />
Lord Cromer, and many other famous people,<br />
living and dead.<br />
<br />
The ‘Life of the Right Hon. Sir Alfred<br />
“Comyn Lyall,” by Sir Mortimer Durand<br />
(Messrs. Blackwood & Sons, 16s. net),<br />
noticed in another column.<br />
<br />
M. Maurice Bourgeois, the sole authorised<br />
French translator and producer of the late<br />
J. M. Synge’s “Playboy of the Western<br />
World ” and ‘‘ Well of the Saints,” is bringing<br />
out, in September, through Messrs. Constable,<br />
.a work entitled ‘“‘ John Milligan Synge and the<br />
Irish Theatre.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Douglas Sladen’s new novel is ‘‘ The<br />
‘Curse of the Nile ’’—a story of Egypt in Khar-<br />
tum and Omdurman days. The publishers<br />
-are Messrs. Stanley Paul & Co.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Duckworth & Co. publish Mr. J.<br />
‘Quigley’s “‘ Leandro Ramon Garrido: His<br />
Life and Art,” with twenty-six full-page<br />
‘reproductions of the painter’s art.<br />
is 5s. net.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
The price<br />
<br />
255<br />
<br />
Dr. Henry Lansdell has brought out the<br />
fourth part of his history of “ Princess 4lfrida’s<br />
Charity” (Messrs. Burnside, Ltd., 6d., by<br />
post 7d.), describing Morden College under its<br />
early trustees, ete.<br />
<br />
** Pilotage Law ”’ (described in the sub-title<br />
as ‘* The Pilotage Act, 1913, with Introduction,<br />
Notes, and Appendices’) is the joint pro-<br />
duction of Messrs. E. Aylmer Digby, lieutenant<br />
R.N., retired, and Sanford D. Cole, author of<br />
‘* The Shipmaster’s Handbook to the Merchant<br />
Shipping Acts,” etc. Messrs. Sweet & Maxwell<br />
are the publishers.<br />
<br />
Mr. Humfrey Jordan’s novel, ‘“‘ Patchwork<br />
Comedy,” is being produced by Messrs. Put-<br />
nam in three editions—English, American, and<br />
Australian.<br />
<br />
‘“Feigning or Folly’ is the name of Miss<br />
A. V. Dutton’s latest story (Messrs. Heath,<br />
Cranton & Ouseley).<br />
<br />
Mrs. J. G. Frazer has produced, through<br />
Messrs. Heffer & Sons, of Cambridge, ‘* First<br />
Aid to the Servantless,” a book for all who<br />
would reduce the work of the house to a<br />
minimum without sacrificing its comforts.<br />
The price is 1s. net, and 2,000 copies have<br />
already been sold.<br />
<br />
Mr. R. H. Forster, the Northumbrian author,<br />
is bringing out with Messrs. John Long, Ltd.,<br />
** The Little Maister,”’ another historical novel<br />
dealing with his favourite portion of England.<br />
<br />
Mr. R. F. Johnston, author of ‘‘ From Peking<br />
to Mandalay,” ete., has written a book on<br />
** Buddhist China,”’ which is to be published by<br />
Mr. John Murray.<br />
<br />
Miss Grace Porter’s forthcoming work will<br />
be a collection of traditional negro plantation<br />
singing-games, most of them transcribed by<br />
the author with the guidance of an old negress ;<br />
to which is added a group of French Canadian<br />
folk singing-games played by the “‘ Habitants.”<br />
It will be published by Messrs. Curwen.<br />
<br />
“A Grey Life,” by ‘“‘ Rita’ (Mrs. Desmond<br />
Humphreys), is already in its fourth edition.<br />
<br />
Under the title of “Letters to Jack’s<br />
Mother,’ Mr. Edgar W. Martin has written a<br />
little pamphlet on the training of a child—at<br />
the request of a lady social worker in Bir-<br />
mingham. Messrs. Cornish Brothers, of that<br />
city, publish it at 1s. 8d. a dozen copies,<br />
including postage.<br />
<br />
** Life’s Many Colours” is a collection of<br />
essays by Mr. J. C. Wright, F.R.S.L.<br />
<br />
A new and cheaper edition of ‘‘ The Perfect<br />
Gentleman: A Guide to Social Aspirants,”’ by<br />
Captain Harry Graham, has been issued by<br />
Mr. Edward Arnold. The pen-and-ink sketches<br />
by Mr.. Lewis Baumer are included.<br />
256<br />
<br />
Mr. Ralph Stock, whose travel book, “ The<br />
Confessions of a Tenderfoot,” is chronicled<br />
elsewhere in this issue, has published a novel,<br />
entitled ‘‘ The Pyjama Man,” through Messrs.:<br />
Hutchinson & Co., during the past month.<br />
The first book is a record of the author’s world<br />
wanderings and experiences during the last<br />
twelve years in Canada, America, the South<br />
Pacific Islands, and Australia, illustrated with.<br />
eighty-five photographs taken by Mr. Stock.<br />
The second book is the love story of a young<br />
Englishman in Australia.<br />
<br />
It is announced that this spring MM. Payot<br />
& Cie., of Lausanne, intend to issue a French<br />
translation, by E. Combe, of Mr. W. A. B.<br />
Coolidge’s book entitled ‘‘ The Alps in Nature<br />
and History” (published by Messrs. Methuen<br />
in 1908). Mr. Coolidge asks us to state that<br />
this translation has been neither authorised<br />
nor approved by him, so that he declines to be<br />
held responsible for any mistakes or alterations<br />
that may be contained therein.<br />
<br />
Mr. Basil Stewart edits ‘‘ The Lecture Year<br />
Book, 1913-4,’ which Messrs. Heath, Cranton<br />
& Ouseley publish at 3s. 6d. net. Lecturers,<br />
the Preface states, are perhaps the only pro-<br />
fessional class hitherto without their annual<br />
reference book, and this is an endeavour to<br />
supply the lack. Portraits of various pro-<br />
minent lecturers and lecture-secretaries are<br />
included.<br />
<br />
“Christopher Columbus: An Historic<br />
Drama in Four Acts,’’ is published for the<br />
author, Mr. Roland Hill, by Messrs. Sampson,<br />
Low, Marston & Co.<br />
<br />
‘People (thither coming out of a region<br />
wherein disasters are met as if they were a jest)<br />
whom You may Meet at the Fair ” is the name<br />
given by Mr. Adair Welcker, of Berkeley, Cali-<br />
fornia, to a work of which a copy has been<br />
forwarded to us by him. We take a passage<br />
from the Foreword: ‘‘ One of the great labors<br />
that through this book will eventually be seen<br />
to have been accomplished is this: All pub-<br />
lishers, and all authors of the world, are to be<br />
shown that to a work not miscalled ‘ literature ’<br />
will the attention of mankind be, to the limit<br />
of its reading capacity, given, without the<br />
adoption into the world of business by any<br />
publisher, and use . . . of the various methods<br />
that by prescription have become the property<br />
of (and therefore of which they should not be<br />
despoiled) mendicants — beggars — lazaroni.”<br />
In other words, Mr. Welcker has published the<br />
book himself.<br />
<br />
We regret to record the death, on April 25,<br />
of Mrs. Harcourt-Roe, of Hurst, Berks, for<br />
many years a member of the Society. Her<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
chief literary work lay in novel writing, though<br />
her latest publication, ‘ as a March<br />
Hare,” or “The Land of Shadows,” could —<br />
hardly be designated as such, being a political<br />
skit. Among her novels were ‘‘ The Bachelor<br />
Vicar of Newforth?” ‘‘ Whose Wife?” ‘* The<br />
Silent Room,” ‘‘ A Man of Mystery,” ete., all<br />
of which earned the appreciation of her public,<br />
In connection with *‘ A Man of Mystery ”’ Mrs.<br />
Harcourt-Roe received many letters from the<br />
late Lady Isabel Burton and others on the<br />
subject of its exposition of the Buddhist<br />
religion and its suggestion of the force of will-<br />
power. Her favourite line of thought was of<br />
a high spiritual order, thrown into the form of<br />
a novel, and she took great interest in all<br />
literary affairs.<br />
<br />
Soho Square—‘“‘the prettiest square in<br />
London,”’ according to Sir Walter Besant—<br />
has been the scene of a reception by Messrs.<br />
A. and C. Black to the contributors of the<br />
‘*Englishwoman’s Year Book,’’ one of the<br />
many annuals issued by them. The guests.<br />
were received by the editor, Miss G. E. Mitton,<br />
supported by the consultative committee, Lady<br />
Strachey, Lady Huggins, Mrs. Hertha Ayrton,<br />
M.1.E.E., Miss S. A. Burstall, M.A., Mrs. J. R.<br />
Green, and Dr. Margaret Todd; also by Mr.<br />
Adam Black and his partner, and other mem-<br />
bers of the firm. After tea the many treasures<br />
in possession of Messrs. Black were displayed,<br />
including the famous interleaved set of the<br />
Waverley Novels, in which Sir Walter Scott<br />
made his additions and corrections for the final<br />
edition.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
DraMarIc.<br />
<br />
At the Court Theatre, on May 12, Miss<br />
Horniman revived “The Pigeon,” Mr. John<br />
Galsworthy’s three-act fantasy, originally pro-<br />
duced at the same theatre a year and a half ago.<br />
The sketch ‘“‘ The Widow Woos,” which is<br />
now the curtain-raiser to “* The Headmaster ”<br />
at the Playhouse, is a dramatisation by Mrs.<br />
Francis Blundell and Mr. Sydney Valentine of<br />
a short story by the former.<br />
On May 17 a new musical play, “ The Mar-<br />
riage Market,”’ was produced at Daly’s Theatre,<br />
being the work of Messrs. Brody and Martos,<br />
adapted for the English stage by Miss Gladys<br />
Unger, with lyrics by Messrs. Arthur Anderson<br />
and Adrain Ross, and music by Mr. V. Jacobi.<br />
On May 29 Mr. Bernard Shaw’s “ Cesar and<br />
Cleopatra ”’ was played by Mr. Forbes Robert-<br />
son for the last time at Drury Lane. On the<br />
following day there was a revival of the<br />
dramatic version of Mr. Rudyard Kipling’s<br />
“The Light that Failed.”<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
_ At the Aldwych Theatre, from May 27 to<br />
-/May 31, a new musical play, “‘ Claude Abroad,”<br />
swas staged, in aid of the Middlesex Hospital.<br />
The book was by Mr. and Mrs. Charles Scott-<br />
eaatty, and the music by Mr. Charles Scott-<br />
asatty, Sir Alfred Scott-Gatty, and Mr. Cecil<br />
oForsyth.<br />
‘| During the Croydon Repertory Season, at<br />
uche Grand Theatre, Mr. Keble Howard pre-<br />
-asented, for the third week, Mr. Charles<br />
~9McEvoy’s four-act comedy, “* The Situation at<br />
»Newbury,”’ first seen at the Liverpool Reper-<br />
scory Theatre last year.<br />
MUSICAL.<br />
_ At the Queen’s Hall, on the evening of<br />
aMay 6, the London Choral Society gave an<br />
anniversary concert in memory of King<br />
5Edward’s death, May 6, 1910. The pro-<br />
“sgramme consisted chiefly of works by Miss<br />
~sMargaret Meredith, including settings of Mr.<br />
biRudyard’s Kipling’s “‘ Recessional’”’ and Mr.<br />
“wOwen Seaman’s ‘“ Passing of King Edward<br />
IVIL.,” for choir, organ, and piano. Among the<br />
»oerformers were Sefior Casals (violoncello),<br />
»2iMiss Ada Forrest, Miss Phyllis Lett, and Mr.<br />
s9cecil Fanning (vocalists), and Miss Meredith<br />
wterself (pianoforte). The whole concert was<br />
seleserving of a larger audience than was<br />
»eooresent ; but, as it was, encores lengthened it<br />
© yy nearly half an hour.<br />
<br />
——_—__—_—_+——_e_—__.<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
— a<br />
<br />
[ A MAISON ”’ is the title of the latest<br />
novel by Henry Bordeaux. It is<br />
the autobiography of a boy, Francis,<br />
“iavhich, with the exception of certain details,<br />
‘uinight be the autobiography of hundreds of<br />
“iaoys of provincial France of to-day. The<br />
shitle, “La Maison”? would be extremely<br />
oth ifficult to render in English, as it means here<br />
“ She ancestral house, the symbol of the past,<br />
') f£ the family which has inhabited it for<br />
/ofenerations. It is one of the most essentially<br />
rench books which has been published for<br />
long time and, in order to appreciate it, the<br />
“Peeader must be able to place himself in the<br />
<br />
murroundings described by the author.<br />
“T The book is extremely interesting as a<br />
“oysychological study. The boy’s father is the<br />
“iqypical head of the family, his mother a very<br />
ypical French wife and mother, upholding the<br />
ditions of the race. Then comes a curious<br />
gure in the person of the boy’s grandfather,<br />
‘man who would break through the traditional<br />
stters and who, perhaps more out of bravado<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
257<br />
<br />
~~’<br />
<br />
than from real conviction, professes to have<br />
gone over to the new order of things. Francis<br />
is greatly influenced by his grandfather. He<br />
begins to look disdainfully on the rest of his<br />
family and their old-fashioned ways. He<br />
accompanies his grandfather to a café, where<br />
he hears all kinds of theories propounded.<br />
He is at first amazed, but gradually becomes<br />
quite accustomed to the new ideas. Nothing<br />
could be more slight than the story. There<br />
are very few events interesting to anyone but<br />
the family immediately concerned. The whole<br />
interest centres in the psychology of the various<br />
members of the family, including the typical<br />
spinster aunt, with her ever-ready duster and<br />
brush. It is not until Francis finds himself<br />
unexpectedly the head of the family that he<br />
realises all that it means and rouses to a sense<br />
of responsibility. This novel is, perhaps, the<br />
strongest and most concise of any yet written<br />
by M. Bordeaux, who is a typical representative<br />
of conservative France.<br />
<br />
‘““Au Hasard de la Vie,” by Edouard<br />
Lockroy, has just been published, with a<br />
preface by Jules Claretie. This volume of<br />
notes and souvenirs represents half a century<br />
of the author’s life. M. Lockroy, who was<br />
formerly Minister of the Navy, has known<br />
most of the interesting Frenchmen of his<br />
time. He is an extremely cultivated man and<br />
an ardent patriot. The volume is composed<br />
of a series of articles on the most varied topics<br />
imaginable. The author writes of his recol-<br />
lections of the year 1848, of Garibaldi, of<br />
Renan. M. Lockroy accompanied Renan on<br />
his scientific mission to Phoenicia and he now<br />
gives us some excellent portraits of one of the<br />
most interesting of Frenchmen. Several<br />
chapters are devoted to this expedition, which<br />
is most graphically described. A large part of<br />
the volume treats of the various episodes of<br />
the war of °70. Autour de Metz, Autour du<br />
4 Septembre, Pendant le Siege and A Versailles,<br />
are the titles of these chapters. M. Lockroy<br />
also gives us two excellent chapters on M. de<br />
Bulow and Victor Hugo.<br />
<br />
In a volume, entitled ‘“‘ Les Fantoches de la<br />
Peur,” Charles Foley has grouped the various<br />
individuals who have inspired fear. We have<br />
Les Fantoches de la Bastille, Dupes, Dupeurs,<br />
Dupes, Fantoches burlesques, Fantoches tra-<br />
giques, Folies burlesques, Folies tragiques.<br />
In the last chapter, Leur Fraternité, the author<br />
sums up the chief principle of this fraternity in<br />
the celebrated phrase, ‘‘ Sois mon frére, ou je te<br />
tue,” which is the main principle of nearly all<br />
political and religious fanaticism. In this<br />
work the author has gone back to the accounts<br />
<br />
<br />
258<br />
<br />
of contemporaries, and the consequence is that<br />
we find quite another La Fayette, Biron,<br />
Hanriot and Fouquier-Tinville than those<br />
which later historians have painted. The<br />
grouping of the fantoches is an excellent idea,<br />
and the various anecdotes and quotations make<br />
the accounts most entertaining.<br />
<br />
“ J;’Entraineuse ” is the title of the novel by<br />
Charles Esquier from which the piece now<br />
being given has been taken. It is a novel<br />
which appeals more directly to the Latin race ;<br />
the story of a wife sacrificing everything for<br />
her husband, a weak man, whom she loves<br />
with an almost maternal love. The play is<br />
having as much success as the novel.<br />
<br />
‘* Parvati,”’ by Robert Chauvelot, is a story<br />
of one of the désenchantées of India. The<br />
author tells us the tragic story of a beautiful<br />
young woman, who, after finishing her educa-<br />
tion in European countries, is destined for the<br />
wife of a Maharajah. Her husband sends for<br />
a celebrated French artist to paint her por-<br />
trait, with the result that the artist falls hope-<br />
lessly in love with his model. We then have<br />
some very graphic descriptions of the ways and<br />
customs of the country to which the woman<br />
belongs, and we follow the lovers through the<br />
various episodes of their escapade to the tragic<br />
dénouement.<br />
<br />
“En Colonne ” is the title of a volume by<br />
General Bruneau, in which the intrepid<br />
soldier and explorer gives us an account of his<br />
various expeditions. Among the subjects are :<br />
Souvenirs de V Insurrection Kabile, Le Sanglier<br />
Marabout, Une Vision des Temps Prehistoriques,<br />
Un Affut a la Panthere, Un Raid_d'Infanterie,<br />
Entre la Vie er la Mort, and A la Légion.<br />
<br />
An extremely valuable historical work has<br />
just been published by Mlle. Emilie Cher-<br />
buliez. It is entitled ‘“‘ Mémoires de Isaac<br />
Cornuaud sur Genéve et la Révolution de 1770<br />
421795.” The book will be greatly appreciated<br />
by all who are interested in the history of<br />
Switzerland. Isaac Cornuaud was one of the<br />
ardent patriots of his day, a man who con-<br />
tributed largely to the political history of his<br />
country. Mlle. Cherbuliez has compiled the<br />
volume from ten huge manuscript volumes, of<br />
about 500 pages each, written between the<br />
years 1785 and 1796 by her great-great-grand-<br />
father. Isaac Cornuaud was the great-grand-<br />
father of Victor Cherbuliez, and, thanks to his<br />
position and personality, he had_ excellent<br />
opportunities for seeing and knowing every-<br />
thing which concerned the life, at that critical<br />
time, of the “ political atom,” as he styles<br />
Geneva. The Introduction to the volume is<br />
written by Gaspard Vallette, and the bio-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
graphical notice by Mlle. Cherbuliez. Among<br />
the twenty-three chapters are the following;<br />
Introduction a Vhistoire des Natifs jusqu'a 1766,<br />
including the Rapports des Natifs avec Voltaire;<br />
Le Plan de Conciliation; La Prise d’armes dus<br />
fevrier 1781; Entrée des troupes étrangeres %<br />
Geneve; Genéve, apres la Révolution de 1782;<br />
La Révolution de 1789; L’égalité politique; Le ~<br />
gouvernement révolutionnaire; and Questions sae"<br />
administratives et économiques.<br />
<br />
At the Odéon, ‘‘ David Copperfield ” is being — -<br />
played. ‘‘ La Demoiselle de Magasin is now #<br />
being given at the Gymnase, and, at the | «<br />
Athenée, ‘‘ La Semaine Folle.”<br />
<br />
At the ThéAtre des Champs-Elysées “ Boris<br />
Godounow”’ is now on the bill, and at the ©<br />
Gymnase we are to have a series of Polish plays, |<br />
<br />
Atys Hatuarp,<br />
<br />
“La Maison.’ (Plon.)<br />
<br />
<< Au Hasard de la Vie.”’ (Grasset.)<br />
<br />
“Les Fantoches dela Peur.” (Blond.)<br />
<br />
“L’Entraineuse.” (Calmann-Lévy.)<br />
<br />
“Parvati.” (Michel.)<br />
<br />
«En Colonne.” (Calmann-Lévy.)<br />
<br />
“Mémoires de Isaac Cornuaud sur Genive et la<br />
Révolution de 1770 4 1795.’ (A. Jullien.)<br />
<br />
+—<—_+—___—_-<br />
<br />
LEGAL CASES.<br />
<br />
———+ —<br />
Copyricut TECHNICALITIES 1N THE U.S.A, — =<br />
I<br />
<br />
EGAL cases in the United States ate ©<br />
matters of almost equal interest to<br />
United States authors and to British<br />
<br />
authors. The case quoted below is of special<br />
importance as it shows the difficulties into»<br />
which it is possible to run when the law makes |<br />
technicalities essential for securing copyright. | ~<br />
There is hardly any copyright case taken im<br />
the United States but the pirate or other’ ©<br />
offender bases his defence on the technicalities ~<br />
necessary under the United States Act. Tne :<br />
case quoted is taken from the New York Times :<br />
and that paper in its leader on the subject,<br />
states as follows :—‘ Section 12, upon while<br />
the Court based judgment, says that no action<br />
or proceedings shall be maintained for oe<br />
ment of copyright until the copies of<br />
pea have been deposited in the mails<br />
n vain the counsel for The Times pointed out<br />
to the Court that the action was not for<br />
infringement of copyright, it was not 4 suit)<br />
to recover damages, it was an equity pro="<br />
ceeding to restrain a threatened violation of | 3,<br />
its copyright.” It further adds :—* If the) ©<br />
law is to be construed as it has been constru Ls ;<br />
in the present case, ‘ what may we expect when’<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
oo ee<br />
<br />
Bae<br />
<br />
Mico SG<br />
<br />
sete<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
28 Sh wig<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
’ Pole,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the Courts are asked to pass on the meaning<br />
of the “registration” in Section 127°” The<br />
matter is, of course, a very serious matter, and<br />
it is a real blessing that under the new English<br />
Copyright Act no technicalities whatever are<br />
necessary. This has its disadvantages, but the<br />
advantages running with no technicalities are<br />
overwhelming, and the plenipotentiaries who<br />
met at the Convention of Berlin, as at the<br />
Convention of Berne, fully understood its<br />
importance.<br />
<br />
The Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed<br />
the decree of the United States District Court,<br />
dismissing on demurrer the complaint of The<br />
New York Times Company against The Sun<br />
Printing and Publishing Association in an<br />
equity suit to secure an injunction forbidding<br />
the publication by the defendant of Amund-<br />
sen’s account of his discovery of the South<br />
of which copyright had been secured by<br />
The Times. The decree of the District Court<br />
is sustained on the ground that at the time the<br />
injunction was applied for The Times had not<br />
complied with that provision of the copyright<br />
law which requires that two complete copies<br />
of the publication must be deposited in the<br />
mails addressed to the Register of Copyrights<br />
at Washington.<br />
<br />
The history of the case is that The Times<br />
acquired by purchase from the London<br />
Chronicle the full American rights of publica-<br />
tion and copyright in Amundsen’s personal<br />
narrative. The Amundsen story was cabled<br />
to The Times on the afternoon of March 8,<br />
1912. The matter was put in type, bound in<br />
book form with a copyright notice on each<br />
copy, and prior to the application for injunction<br />
it was publicly exposed for sale and copies were<br />
sold. ‘This step was taken in order to secure<br />
a copyright under section 9 of the Copyright<br />
Act, which provides—<br />
<br />
“That any person entitled thereto by this Act may<br />
secure copyright for his work by publication thereof with<br />
the notice of copyright required by this Act ; and such notice<br />
<br />
shall be affixed to each copy thereof published or offered<br />
for sale in the United States by the authority of the copy-<br />
<br />
right proprietor.”<br />
<br />
The Times felt that this publication with<br />
copyright notice had made the copyright secure.<br />
The word ‘‘ secure” is used in section 9. The<br />
word is again used in section 12—<br />
<br />
“that after copyright has been secured by publication of<br />
the work with the notice of copyright as provided in<br />
section 9 of this Act.”<br />
<br />
If the provisions of section 9 and section 12<br />
mean anything, they mean that by publication<br />
of the Amundsen story in book form with<br />
copyright notice, The Times had before 10 P.M.<br />
of March 8 secured its copyright.<br />
<br />
259<br />
<br />
Now as to the mailing provision. Sec-<br />
tion 12 provides that after copyright has been<br />
secured by publication with the copyright<br />
notice,—<br />
<br />
“there shall be promptly deposited in the copyright office<br />
or in the mail addressed to the Register of Copyrights,<br />
<br />
Washington, D.C., two complete copies of the best edition<br />
thereof then published.”<br />
<br />
It is perfectly true, as Judge Lacombe said<br />
in his opinion, on which the decree of the<br />
District Court was made, that The Times,<br />
had in its possession copies of the publication,<br />
two of which it might at once have deposited<br />
in the mails. But on the evening in question<br />
The Times had before it the rules and regula-<br />
tions established by the Register of Copyrights<br />
for procedure in such cases. One of these<br />
rules related to the form of the affidavit to be<br />
submitted to the Register with the copies<br />
mailed or deposited by the applicant. It is<br />
here quoted :—<br />
<br />
“Noricy.—The date of the execution of this affidavit<br />
must be subsequent to the stated date of the publication<br />
of the book.”<br />
<br />
That is not permissive, but mandatory.<br />
The date of the publication of the book was<br />
March 8. Therefore two copies of the book<br />
with the accompanying affidavit were deposited<br />
in the mails addressed to the Register of Copy-<br />
rights at Washington a few minutes after mid-<br />
night. The copies were mailed, that is, on<br />
March 9. But as The Times had been put no<br />
notice of an intention on the part of some of<br />
its contemporaries to publish the Amundsen<br />
story, it was necessary that the application<br />
for an injunction to restrain such acts in<br />
violation of its copyright should be made<br />
before midnight on March 8. The application<br />
was so made and a restraining order issued.<br />
Both the application and issue necessarily<br />
preceded the deposit of the copies in the mails<br />
addressed to the Register of Copyrights, which<br />
did not take place until a few minutes alter<br />
midnight.<br />
<br />
On this account the District Court set aside<br />
the restraining order, and on this ground the<br />
Circuit Court of Appeals affirms the decree<br />
dismissing the injunction proceedings. The<br />
court bases its affirmance upon this provision<br />
of section 12 of the copyright law :—<br />
<br />
“No action or proceeding shall be maintained for infringe-<br />
ment of copyright in any work until the provisions of this<br />
Act with respect to deposit of copies and registration of<br />
such work shall have been complied with.”<br />
<br />
This decision would seem proper enough in<br />
a suit for damages for infringement begun<br />
before the deposit of copies in the mails. But<br />
The Times had begun no such suit; its pro-<br />
<br />
<br />
260<br />
<br />
ceeding on the night of March 8 was taken for<br />
the purpose of preventing, not punishing,<br />
infringement. Section 86 of the Copyright<br />
Act provides—<br />
<br />
“That any such Court or Judge thereof shall have power,<br />
upon bill in equity filed by any party aggrieved, to grant<br />
injunctions to prevent and restrain the violation of any right<br />
secured by said laws.”<br />
<br />
Taking the words of section 9, “‘ may secure<br />
copyright for his work by publication thereof<br />
with the notice of copyright,” in connection<br />
with those of section 36 just quoted, it would<br />
seem to the lay mind that The Times had a<br />
clear right to protection, by injunction, against<br />
intended theft. But the Court holds otherwise.<br />
<br />
It seems a curious matter that The New York<br />
Times, instead of disputing the decision and<br />
carrying the action to a second Court, did not,<br />
having registered their copyright, begin a<br />
second action for infringement. This would<br />
no doubt have been the cheaper proceeding<br />
of the two.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
RESERVATION OF Dramatic RIGHTS,<br />
IN THE U.S.A.<br />
II.<br />
{Reprinted from the Bulletin of the Author League of<br />
America.) :<br />
<br />
Tue case of Dam v. Kirk La Shelle Com-<br />
pany, decided in the United States Circuit<br />
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, in Janu-<br />
ary, 1910, is of such importance to writers<br />
for magazines and other periodicals as well<br />
as to publishers that it deserves careful<br />
attention. This case may be said to be the<br />
last important decision on the question of what<br />
protection the blanket copyright secured by a<br />
magazine publisher, upon his magazine, affords<br />
the authors of the various storiés, articles and<br />
poems contained in it. The facts were briefly<br />
as follows :—<br />
<br />
Henry J. W. Dam wrote a story in 1898,<br />
called “ The Transmogrification of Dan.” In<br />
1901 he sent the manuscript to the Ess. Ess.<br />
Publishing Company, a corporation publishing<br />
the “Smart Set Magazine.” The editor<br />
accepted the story and sent a check in return<br />
for $85, together with a receipt reading :—<br />
<br />
“Received of the Ess, Ess. Publishing<br />
<br />
Company $85 in full payment for story<br />
<br />
entitled *‘ The Transmogrification of Dan.’ ”<br />
<br />
This Dam signed and mailed back to the<br />
editor. At no time did he have any interview<br />
with the editor or any correspondence bearing<br />
on the understanding with which the story was<br />
sold.<br />
<br />
The story came out in the ‘‘ Smart Set ”’ for<br />
<br />
Erc.,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
September, 1901, and the particular number<br />
in question was copyrighted by the Ess. Ess,<br />
Publishing Company, in its own name, and<br />
bearing a notice which read :—<br />
<br />
‘“‘ Copyrighted, 1901, by Ess, Ess. Pub-<br />
lishing Company.”<br />
No steps were taken by the magazine or b<br />
Dam to copyright the story separately from the<br />
<br />
magazine.<br />
<br />
Some time afterward Paul Armstrong wrote<br />
a play entitled ‘‘ The Heir to the Hoorah,”<br />
which Dam claimed was founded on his story,<br />
“The Transmogrification of Dan.” The<br />
defendant, Kirk La Shelle Company, presented<br />
the play by arrangement with Paul Armstrong,<br />
<br />
On October 27, 1905, the Ess. Ess. Pub-<br />
lishing Company assigned to Dam its copy-<br />
right of the particular number of the ‘‘ Smart<br />
Set ’ in which his story had appeared, in so<br />
far as it covered or protected his story, and all<br />
its interest in the story itself and any claim or<br />
demand which it might have for the infringe-<br />
ment of the copyright in question.<br />
<br />
In due course Dam sued for a preliminary<br />
injunction against the defendant, and in his<br />
affidavit swore :—<br />
<br />
““T have not at any time parted with any<br />
right or interest in said literary work entitled<br />
* The Transmogrification of Dan,’ except the<br />
right for publication thereof in said number<br />
of the ‘ Smart Set ’ for September, 1901.”<br />
<br />
Later on, the complaint was amended so as<br />
to allege simply that Dam sold and assigned<br />
the story in question to the Ess. Ess. Pub-<br />
lishing Company.<br />
<br />
Among other things in defence the Kirk La<br />
Shelle Company set up the claim that Dam’s<br />
original statement, sworn to in his complaint<br />
to the effect that he had not sold any of his<br />
rights in the story to the “‘ Smart Set,” except<br />
the right of publication in the particular<br />
number in question, must be taken as true;<br />
and that it followed as a necessary consequence<br />
that the blanket copyright secured by the Ess.<br />
Ess. Publishing Company, on the particular<br />
issue of the magazine, only operated to afford<br />
such protection as the Publishing Company<br />
needed as publishers of the magazine, and did<br />
not operate to protect the rights which Dam<br />
retained, whatever they might have been,<br />
including the right of dramatisation which<br />
Dam claimed had been infringed, and for<br />
which he asked an injunction.<br />
<br />
The Circuit Court of Appeals.found as a fact<br />
that Dam’s statement that he had parted with ~<br />
no right or interest in the story except that of<br />
serial publication was not the case, and (in spite<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NDE Zo pete EG ee ee ae ess<br />
ae Pe en SR ee ee ES SS<br />
feet ee Se) OO ree St EN ewe en<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 261<br />
<br />
of Dam’s original allegations to the contrary)<br />
that when he mailed the story to the “ Smart<br />
Set ’ and the editor sent him a check for $85<br />
this constituted an absolute sale without<br />
reservations, and that the Ess. Ess. Publishing<br />
Company thereby acquired all rights in the<br />
story, including the dramatic rights.<br />
<br />
This, in itself, would have been a decision of<br />
considerable importance, in view of the widely<br />
prevalent belief that when a magazine writer<br />
sends his product to a magazine, without an<br />
accompanying letter specifying the terms under<br />
which the story or article is offered, he is selling<br />
merely the serial rights thereto. But the<br />
Court in discussing the facts in general, went<br />
somewhat beyond the precise point in issue,<br />
and held that if it had been true that Dam had<br />
offered for sale and sold to the Ess. Ess. Pub-<br />
lishing Company only the right to print the<br />
story in serial form, that probably, as matter<br />
of law, the dramatic rights would never have<br />
been copyrighted at all, since it was a funda-<br />
mental proposition that no one could copy-<br />
right that which he did not own, and, if the<br />
Ess. Ess. Publishing Company had purchased<br />
only the serial rights in the story, the copy-<br />
right upon the particular number of the<br />
“Smart Set ’’ would have operated to protect<br />
only those serial rights, and that as Dam had<br />
taken no further steps to protect or copyright<br />
the rights or interests in the story which he had<br />
reserved, and as the story had been published,<br />
there would have been an abandonment of it<br />
to the public and no protection for the dramatic<br />
rights at all.<br />
<br />
The opinion of the Court is reported in 176<br />
Federal Reporter, page 902, and reads as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
**Tt is claimed, however, that such steps<br />
accomplished no more than to obtain such<br />
protection needed as publishers of the<br />
magazine. Assuming that Dam retained<br />
the dramatic rights to the story, there would<br />
be much force in this contention. In such<br />
a case we doubt very much whether the steps<br />
which the publisher took to copyright his<br />
magazine, especially in view of the form of<br />
the copyright notice, would have been<br />
sufficient to protect the dramatic rights.”<br />
<br />
After referring to the case of Mifflin v. Dutton<br />
<br />
et} (190 U. S. 265), the Court continued :—<br />
<br />
** In view of this decision by the Supreme<br />
Court, we think that had Dam retained the<br />
dramatic rights to his story, the entry of the<br />
magazine and the notice of copyright would<br />
have been insufficient to protect them. . . .<br />
In the case of the reservation of dramatic<br />
rights, in addition to the notice of the copy-<br />
<br />
right of the magazine, it may well be that it<br />
should appear in some distinct way that such<br />
reservation of such rights to the particular<br />
story is made for the benefit of the author.<br />
Indeed, it may be that the author should<br />
contemporaneously take out in his own<br />
name a copyright covering such rights.”<br />
<br />
The Court then proceeded to hold that inas-<br />
much as the Ess. Ess. Publishing Company had<br />
in fact acquired all rights to the story, the copy-<br />
right which they secured on the particular<br />
number of the magazine in question did operate<br />
to protect all rights, including the dramatic<br />
rights; and that, since there had been a re-<br />
assignment by the Ess. Ess. Publishing Com-<br />
pany to Dam of the dramatic rights, he could<br />
properly ask for an injunction and an account-<br />
ing, and they thereupon awarded to the com-<br />
plainant, who, at the time the decision was<br />
rendered, was the administratrix of Dam’s<br />
estate, the total profits received by the Kirk<br />
La Shelle Company from its production of the<br />
play. The case was not appealed to the<br />
Supreme Court, but has since been settled, and,<br />
therefore, represents the law to-day, which may<br />
be stated as follows :—<br />
<br />
(a) The sale by an author of a story to a<br />
magazine, and the acceptance of a sum of<br />
money ‘‘in full payment for the story,”<br />
without any further agreement, is in legal<br />
fact an absolute sale without reservation,<br />
carrying with it as an incident of ownership<br />
the exclusive right to dramatise the story.<br />
<br />
(b) The copyright of such magazine is suffi-<br />
cient to secure the copyright of the story pub-<br />
lished therein, and protects the right to<br />
dramatise it when the publisher is the owner<br />
of both the story and the dramatic rights.<br />
<br />
(c) (Dictum.) Where the owner of a story<br />
sells the same only for magazine or serial<br />
publication, the copyright of the magazine<br />
does not protect those rights which the author<br />
retains, unless he takes some independent steps<br />
to copyright them himself; and since the<br />
publishing of the story in the magazine<br />
operates as an abandonment of such rights,<br />
if the story is thereafter dramatised by a third<br />
party, the author can have no redress.<br />
<br />
The action, although a recent one, was<br />
brought under the former copyright law, but<br />
there would not seem to be anything in the<br />
present Act which would qualify or render less<br />
significant the decision. The attorney for the<br />
Authors’ League of America doubts seriously<br />
whether the dictum of the court (c) is the view<br />
which will ultimately prevail if the point 1s<br />
eventually properly raised either before the<br />
Circuit Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court<br />
<br />
<br />
262<br />
<br />
of the United States. He believes that this<br />
court could have reached the same decision in<br />
the Dam case by another process of reasoning<br />
more consistent with the general understanding<br />
under which authors are accustomed to submit<br />
their manuscripts to editors and publishers.<br />
This he believes to be that, in default of any<br />
written or oral agreement between the parties,<br />
an editor or publisher of a magazine who pur-<br />
chases a manuscript does so on the implied<br />
understanding that he shall copyright the<br />
same and hold the copyright thereof in trust<br />
for the author, thus protecting not only the<br />
dramatic rights, but all other rights for the<br />
author’s benefit. If this be so, the author can<br />
compel a reassignment of the copyright to him-<br />
self when necessary, such as Dam secured<br />
voluntarily from the Ess. Ess. Company.<br />
<br />
But, in any event, so long as this and similar<br />
matters remain in doubt, both authors and<br />
publishers should, for their own protection,<br />
agree on some system whereby the dramatic<br />
and all other rights sre thoroughly safeguarded.<br />
This can be accomplished in either of two<br />
ways :—<br />
<br />
(a) The editor can copyright each story or<br />
article separately in the author’s name,<br />
printing at the bottom of the first page thereof<br />
a proper copyright notice, as follows :—<br />
<br />
‘Copyright, John Doe, 1913.”<br />
<br />
The author should then immediately on pub-<br />
lication mail one copy of the magazine to the<br />
Registrar of Copyrights in Washington, in<br />
conformity with the requirements of the<br />
present Act, enclosing the fee of One Dollar.<br />
This is perhaps the simplest way, although it<br />
involves a separate registration of the magazine<br />
for each story or article so copyrighted.<br />
<br />
(b) Or the author can sell his story outright<br />
to the editor or publisher, and safely reserve<br />
his equitable interests in the dramatic or other<br />
rights thereto by attaching to his manuscript<br />
a “rider” or slip somewhat as follows :—<br />
<br />
“This manuscript is submitted with the<br />
understanding that if accepted for publication,<br />
the same shall be copyrighted by the pub-<br />
lishers, and all rights under said copyright<br />
(except that of magazine publication) shall be<br />
held in trust for the benefit of the writer or his<br />
assigns, and will be reassigned to him upon<br />
demand.”<br />
<br />
The writer believes that, under the present<br />
state of the law, only by one of the two methods<br />
outlined above can a magazine writer be sure<br />
that his rights will be properly protected.<br />
<br />
Arruur C. TRAIN,<br />
Attorney for Authors’ League of America.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
MAGAZINES AND THEIR CONTRIBUTORS.<br />
<br />
——<br />
<br />
HE attention of the committee of the<br />
Society of Authors has been called to<br />
certain transactions by proprietors and<br />
<br />
editors of magazines which bring great hard-<br />
ship upon those authors who contribute to their<br />
journals. The difficulty arises owing to the fact<br />
that neither editor nor author makes a clear<br />
statement of the terms of the contract under<br />
which the one desires to sell his work and the<br />
other desires to publish it. The author sends<br />
his work up to a journal, the editor writes a<br />
letter stating that he is willing to accept the<br />
work; the work is. published and the author<br />
receives a cheque with a receipt either on a<br />
separate paper or endorsed at the back of the<br />
cheque, purporting to convey certain rights<br />
which the author never contemplated con-<br />
veying, and which, when obtained, are often<br />
of no value to the proprietor or editor. The<br />
receipt purports to convey either the whole<br />
copyright or all serial rights. In the first<br />
case, that is where the receipt is a separate<br />
document, the author is able to cash the cheque<br />
and to alter the receipt according to the<br />
implied terms of the contract that has been<br />
entered into. The hardship in this case<br />
arises out of the fact that an author sometimes<br />
is afraid to alter the receipt because he thinks<br />
such alteration may prejudice him in future<br />
in his negotiations with the firm. This has<br />
not infrequently been shown to be the result.<br />
When, however, the receipt purporting to<br />
convey the copyright or all the serial rights<br />
is printed on the back of the cheque, the<br />
bankers, as a rule, have instructions not to<br />
cash the cheque if any alteration is made in<br />
the receipt. The author anxious, first, to<br />
obtain the money, and secondly, not to have<br />
any trouble with the proprietors for the reasons<br />
already given, signs the document and thus<br />
sells his birthright for a mess of pottage.<br />
<br />
To a certain extent there is fault on both<br />
sides, for the author, if he was really business-<br />
like, would forward his article to the magazine<br />
and would state clearly, in a covering letter,<br />
the rights he desired to sell, and the price<br />
at which he desired to sell those rights.<br />
If the editor then accepted the MS., it<br />
would be accepted, on the terms of the letter<br />
which had been sent, unless the editor made<br />
some special stipulation before publication.<br />
The case is unbusinesslike from the editor’s<br />
point of view, for when he accepts the work<br />
he ought to state clearly what rights he desires<br />
to buy, and the price he desires to give for those<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
rights. A worse complexion, however, is<br />
thrown on the case where the author sends up<br />
his work and it is printed without any accept-<br />
ance whatever. There is, no doubt, some<br />
implied contract where no terms are specified<br />
and the implied contract seems to be quite<br />
clear. When a person sends an article up to a<br />
magazine, the implied contract is, that he<br />
grants to the magazine the first serial use of<br />
that article for that paper. He doesn’t grant<br />
all his serial rights, for no doubt in many<br />
cases secondary serial rights are very valuable.<br />
He certainly doesn’t grant his copyright, and<br />
indeed, under the present copyright law, he<br />
could not assign away his copyright except in<br />
writing.<br />
<br />
It is, therefore, very unbusinesslike or unjust<br />
of proprietors and editors to put the author<br />
in the awkward position of having to sign<br />
away his rights, or of being boycotted for<br />
the future.<br />
<br />
As several complaints have come to the<br />
<br />
- Committee of Management of the methods of<br />
<br />
certain magazines and certain publishers who<br />
acted on these lines, a circular was issued from<br />
the Society’s office, asking for the editors’<br />
opinions in the circumstances put forward.<br />
Out of a dozen letters that were issued, under<br />
the committee’s authority, some half-dozen<br />
replies were received. An answer from the<br />
Religious Tract Society stated that no endorse-<br />
ment was made on the cheques, but a<br />
separate receipt was sent. As, however,<br />
the separate receipt asked for the copyright,<br />
it was clear that there was no alleviation of<br />
the author’s position, except that he got<br />
his money and had the power to alter the<br />
receipt. But on his altering the receipt<br />
considerable dispute arose, and the editor, in<br />
a letter addressed to the author, stated clearly<br />
that all matter printed in his paper was<br />
the copyright of the paper, and that he had<br />
no record of any arrangement by which the<br />
author had reserved the copyright of his story.<br />
An editor who had any knowledge of the<br />
business side of his position would know that,<br />
as an universal rule, an author does not intend<br />
to convey his copyright to a magazine, and<br />
that it is not for the author to reserve the<br />
copyright, but for the editor, if he desires to<br />
have the copyright, to make a special contract<br />
for it.<br />
<br />
In a letter received from the Amalgamated<br />
Press, Ltd., the manager says that the rights<br />
that have been acquired are specified at the<br />
back of the cheque, and at the same time<br />
states that great inconvenience would be<br />
caused if every short story or article that was<br />
<br />
263<br />
<br />
purchased was the subject of a written agree-<br />
ment. This may be frue in some circumstances,<br />
but the procedure adopted in this case turns<br />
out all for the advantage of the papers repre-<br />
sented by this manager. For, if anagreement<br />
has not been entered into beforehand (and<br />
apparently the manager considered and acted<br />
upon the consideration that it would be a great<br />
inconvenience to enter into an agreement on<br />
every occasion), then it is quite clear that the<br />
only right acquired would be the first serial<br />
use of the story in the paper to which it<br />
had been forwarded. If the manager was pre-<br />
pared to fill in the endorsement on the back<br />
of the cheque on these lines, in those cases,<br />
where no written agreement had been made<br />
beforehand, then there would be no objection<br />
to this method of carrying on the business,<br />
and a great deal of difficulty might be saved ;<br />
but if the endorsement on the cheque exceeds<br />
the first serial use, it is needless for the<br />
manager to say, as he states in his letter, that<br />
‘the author in endorsing the cheque would<br />
note the form and could at once raise any<br />
question as to the rights acquired by the com-<br />
pany,” for that places the author under the<br />
very hardship that was mentioned at the<br />
beginning of this article.<br />
<br />
A third letter from Messrs. Cassell & Co.,<br />
states that they have received no complaints<br />
in regard to the points raised in the com-<br />
mittee’s circular. This statement is not<br />
endorsed by the information which has come<br />
to the office on several occasions. It would<br />
be as well, perhaps, if this manager had<br />
made closer enquiries before he responded<br />
tothe circular. Another well-known proprietor<br />
of magazines stated, as in the first instance,<br />
that the company did not place a printed form<br />
of receipt on their cheques, but that a separate<br />
slip was enclosed in which the terms of purchase<br />
were plainly stated. This, as has already been<br />
pointed out, has a great advantage if the terms<br />
are disputed.<br />
<br />
Finally, the last letter received was from<br />
the ‘English Review.” The manager recog-<br />
nised the difficulty and suggested that the<br />
Society should draw up some form, and<br />
should organise some method which would<br />
be simpler for both the authors and the<br />
proprietors.<br />
<br />
It would be useless to multiply cases, but<br />
it may be of interest to quote an example<br />
of what very frequently happens, and the<br />
committee are able to give the particulars of a<br />
very clear case that ‘is before them. A<br />
member of the Society sent up a copy of<br />
verses to a magazine, the proprictors of which<br />
<br />
<br />
264<br />
<br />
are Messrs. Dent & Co. The verses were<br />
published without any communication what-<br />
ever to the author. In due course the author<br />
received a cheque, with a formal receipt<br />
accompanying, asking for the whole of the<br />
copyright ; the receipt running as follows :—<br />
<br />
** Received this day of from<br />
(publishers) the sum of in<br />
payment of the amount agreed to be paid<br />
by them to me for a poem entitled<br />
a ” in the number of<br />
on the terms that the copyright in any<br />
work therein shall belong to the said<br />
(publishers) absolutely.”<br />
<br />
The payment was very inadequate, even for the<br />
first serial use. It was absolutely absurd for<br />
the copyright of a work, and the receipt is<br />
inaccurate for it contains the words ‘“ the<br />
amount agreed to be paid by them to me,”<br />
and ‘‘on the terms that the copyright...<br />
shall belong to the publishers absolutely,”<br />
though no agreement whatever had been<br />
come to on either point. In this special<br />
case the author altered the receipt, returned<br />
it, did not fight about the absurd smallness<br />
of the payment, but handed the cheque<br />
over to the Pension Fund of the Society<br />
of Authors. In this case, all the points<br />
that have been raised are clearly set out.<br />
First, the author receives an inadequate<br />
payment even for the serial use; secondly, he<br />
receives a receipt asking him to convey the<br />
whole copyright, the only saving point being<br />
that the receipt was not at the back of the<br />
cheque.<br />
<br />
It is all very well for proprietors to maintain<br />
also that the author can dispute the rights,<br />
but many authors do not understand the legal<br />
technicalities contained in the words and may<br />
be, and often are, quite unconsciously, selling<br />
rights which they never intended to sell. In<br />
this special instance, it must be remembered<br />
that the power of selling poetry, especially<br />
if it is fitted for production to music, is exten-<br />
Sive, as sometimes two or three composers<br />
will set a song to music, and for each licence<br />
the author may obtain from two to five pounds.<br />
The committee, however, desire, in order, if<br />
possible, to come to some satisfactory arrange-<br />
ment, to propose the following :—<br />
<br />
1. That no receipt whatever should be<br />
demanded by the process of endorsement<br />
to the cheque.<br />
<br />
2. That in the case where, owing to pressure<br />
of business or other matters, it is impossible<br />
to make a formal written agreement with the<br />
author, and failing any covering letter sent<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
by the author to the publisher, the receipt<br />
should run as follows :—<br />
<br />
“* Received of the sum of<br />
being payment for the first serial use of<br />
the article entitled in maga-<br />
zine. The author hereby, undertakes not<br />
to produce the said work in serial or book<br />
form for a term of months from the<br />
<br />
date of such publication,”<br />
<br />
The committee have given the time limit<br />
their serious consideration. They consider<br />
that in many cases where a striking story or<br />
striking poem has been published ina magazine,<br />
review or paper, it is only fair that the<br />
magazine, paper or review should benefit by<br />
the increase in its circulation for a limited time<br />
after the publication of the work. They<br />
think that in special cases a six months’ limit<br />
is reasonable, but in the majority of cases the<br />
limit should be much less, and that, if any-<br />
thing, this limit gives an advantage to the<br />
magazine rather than to the author.<br />
<br />
ST<br />
<br />
MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
a,<br />
British REVIEW.<br />
The Popular Taste. By R. A. Scott James.<br />
<br />
CoNTEMPORARY.<br />
<br />
Wagner in 1913. By Ernest Newman.<br />
Shakespeare and Pictorial Art.<br />
<br />
CoRNHILL.<br />
The Little Brothers of the Pavement. By Gilbert<br />
Coleridge.<br />
Encuish REVIEW.<br />
Boceaccio. By Walter Raleigh.<br />
Mr. Newton-Robinson’s Poems. By William Steb-<br />
<br />
bing.<br />
FORTNIGHTLY.<br />
<br />
By Oliver Onions.<br />
<br />
Henry Ospovat.<br />
By W. L. Courtney.<br />
<br />
Realistic Drama, I.<br />
<br />
NINETEENTH CENTURY AND AFTER.<br />
<br />
Gobineau, Nietzsche, Wagner. By Georges Chatterton-<br />
Hill.<br />
<br />
SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[ALLOWANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY 20 PER CENT.)<br />
<br />
Front Page dee . £4 0 0<br />
Other Pages vee one se ae see ase a 8 0 0<br />
Half of a Page ... aes en aes Ca oie eek wea ks 10> 0<br />
Quarter of a Page uae oan ves on on ae on O16 6<br />
Highth of a Page ce se ms - $ cs a OT 8<br />
Single Column Advertisements perinch 0 6 0<br />
<br />
Reduction of 20 per cent. made for a Series of Sia and of 25 per cent, for<br />
Twelve Insertions.<br />
<br />
All letters respecting Advertisements should be addvessed to J. F.<br />
Brimont & Co., 29, Paternoster Square, London, E.G.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
i<br />
3<br />
a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
i. VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
iD advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor; but if there is any<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel's opinion without<br />
any cost to the member. Moreover, where counsel's<br />
opinion is favourable, and the sanction of the Committee<br />
is obtained, action will be taken on behalf of the aggrieved<br />
member, and all costs borne by the Society.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
8. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
4. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no direct benefit to yourse!f, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
<br />
5. The Committee have arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br />
(1) To stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action<br />
upon them. (2) To keep agreements. (3) To enforce<br />
payments due according to agreements. Fuller particu-<br />
lars of the Society’s work can be obtained in the<br />
Prospectus.<br />
<br />
6. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
7. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements,<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution,<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
This<br />
The<br />
<br />
8. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
9. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br />
annum, or £10 10s. for life membership.<br />
<br />
Oi<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
—_=<—+—_<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
<br />
265<br />
<br />
obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
Il. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement),<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation,<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements,<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth. From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Zhe Author,<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement,<br />
<br />
The main points are :-—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production,<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book,<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author,<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means,<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
<br />
++ —____—___<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with any one except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills,<br />
264<br />
<br />
are Messrs. Dent & Co. The verses were<br />
published without any communication what-<br />
ever to the author. In due course the author<br />
received a cheque, with a formal receipt<br />
accompanying, asking for the whole of the<br />
copyright ; the receipt running as follows :—<br />
<br />
‘* Received this day of from<br />
(publishers) the sum of in<br />
payment of the amount agreed to be paid<br />
by them to me for a poem entitled<br />
a *? in the number of<br />
on the terms that the copyright in any<br />
work therein shall belong to the said<br />
(publishers) absolutely.”<br />
<br />
The payment was very inadequate, even for the<br />
first serial use. It was absolutely absurd for<br />
the copyright of a work, and the receipt is<br />
inaccurate for it contains the words “the<br />
amount agreed to be paid by them to me,”<br />
and ‘“‘on the terms that the copyright...<br />
shall belong to the publishers absolutely,”<br />
though no agreement whatever had _ been<br />
come to on either point. In _ this special<br />
case the author altered the receipt, returned<br />
it, did not fight about the absurd smallness<br />
of the payment, but handed the cheque<br />
over to the Pension Fund of the Society<br />
of Authors. In this case, all the points<br />
that have been raised are clearly set out.<br />
First, the author receives an inadequate<br />
payment even for the serial use; secondly, he<br />
receives a receipt asking him to convey the<br />
whole copyright, the only saving point being<br />
that the receipt was not at the back of the<br />
cheque.<br />
<br />
It is all very well for proprietors to maintain<br />
also that the author can dispute the rights,<br />
but many authors do not understand the legal<br />
technicalities contained in the words and may<br />
be, and often are, quite unconsciously, selling<br />
rights which they never intended to sell. In<br />
this special instance, it must be remembered<br />
that the power of selling poetry, especially<br />
if it is fitted for production to music, is exten-<br />
sive, as sometimes two or three composers<br />
will set a song to music, and for each licence<br />
the author may obtain from two to five pounds.<br />
The committee, however, desire, in order, if<br />
possible, to come to some satisfactory arrange-<br />
ment, to propose the following :—<br />
<br />
1. That no receipt whatever should be<br />
demanded by the process of endorsement<br />
to the cheque.<br />
<br />
2. That in the case where, owing to pressure<br />
of business or other matters, it is impossible<br />
to make a formal written agreement with the<br />
author, and failing any covering letter sent<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
by the author to the publisher, the ;<br />
should run as follows si receipt<br />
<br />
“Received of the sum of<br />
being payment for the first serial use of<br />
the article entitled in maga-<br />
zine. The author hereby, undertakes not<br />
to produce the said work in serial or book<br />
form for a term of months from the<br />
date of such publication.”<br />
<br />
The committee have given the time limit<br />
their serious consideration. They consider<br />
that in many cases where a striking story or<br />
striking poem has been published in a magazine,<br />
review or paper, it is only fair that the<br />
magazine, paper or review should benefit by<br />
the increase in its circulation for a limited time<br />
after the publication of the work. They<br />
think that in special cases a six months’ limit<br />
is reasonable, but in the majority of cases the<br />
limit should be much less, and that, if any-<br />
thing, this limit gives an advantage to the<br />
magazine rather than to the author.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
<br />
——— +<br />
<br />
British REVIEW.<br />
The Popular Taste. By R. A. Scott James.<br />
CoNTEMPORARY.<br />
Wagner in 1913. By Ernest Newman.<br />
Shakespeare and Pictorial Art.<br />
CoRNHILL.<br />
<br />
The Little Brothers of the Pavement.<br />
Coleridge.<br />
<br />
By Gilbert<br />
<br />
Eneuish REVIEW.<br />
Boccaccio. By Walter Raleigh.<br />
Mr. Newton-Robinson’s Poems.<br />
bing.<br />
<br />
By William Steb-<br />
<br />
FORTNIGHTLY.<br />
<br />
Henry Ospovat. By Oliver Onions.<br />
Realistic Drama, I. By W. L. Courtney.<br />
<br />
NINETEENTH CENTURY AND AFTER.<br />
<br />
Gobineau, Nietzsche, Wagner. By Georges Chatterton-<br />
Hill.<br />
<br />
SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS,<br />
<br />
[ALLOWANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY 20 PER CENT.}<br />
<br />
Front Page ie see ee tee me << sau es a<br />
Other Pages ae ste see obs ee “se “8 ose )<br />
Half of a Page ... ake owe wee a<br />
<br />
Quarter of a Page tee 5<br />
EHighth of a Page sae Ge<br />
Single Column Advertisements<br />
<br />
Q<br />
<br />
6<br />
os au 0 T 0<br />
. perinch 0 6 O<br />
Reduction of 20 per cent. made for a Series of Six and of 25 per cent. for<br />
<br />
Twelve Insertions.<br />
<br />
All letters respecting Advertisements should be addressed to J. F.<br />
<br />
Bextoont & Co., 29, Paternoster Square, London, B.C.<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
i. VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
K advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor; but if there is any<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel’s opinion without<br />
any cost to the member. Moreover, where counsel’s<br />
opinion is favourable, and the sanction of the Committee<br />
is obtained, action will be taken on behalf of the aggrieved<br />
member, and all costs borne by the Society.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinarysolicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
4. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no direct benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer,<br />
<br />
5. The Committee have arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of thesafe. The Society now offers:<br />
(1) To stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action<br />
upon them. (2) To keep agreements. (3) To enforce<br />
payments due according to agreements. Fuller particu-<br />
lars of the Society’s work can be obtained in the<br />
Prospectus.<br />
<br />
6. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
7. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements,<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution.<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
This<br />
The<br />
<br />
8. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
9. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br />
anoum, or £10 10s. for life membership.<br />
<br />
Or<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
een gece<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I, Selling it Outright.<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
<br />
265<br />
<br />
obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement),<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor |!<br />
<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth. From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Zhe Author,<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement,<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production,<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book,<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author,<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
<br />
he<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
N Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with any one except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
8. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills,<br />
<br />
<br />
266<br />
<br />
(v.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent, An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(c.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.c., fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (0.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
<br />
4, Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time, This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction<br />
is of great importance.<br />
<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘hey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration,<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
REGISTRATION OF SCENARIOS AND<br />
ORIGINAL PLAYS.<br />
<br />
——$- 9<br />
<br />
ne ape typewritten in duplicate on foolscap paper<br />
forwarded to the offices of the Society, together with<br />
a registration fee of two shillings and sixpence, will<br />
<br />
be carefully compared by the Secretary or a qualified assis-<br />
tant. One copy will be stamped and returned to theauthor<br />
and the other filed in the register of the Society. Copies<br />
of the scenario thus filed may be obtained at any time by<br />
the author only at a small charge to cover cost of typing.<br />
<br />
Original Plays may also be filed subject to the same<br />
rules, with the exception that a play will be charged for<br />
at the price of 24. 6d. per act,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
DRAMATIC AUTHORS? AND AGENTS.<br />
<br />
—t<br />
RAMATIC authors should seek the advice of the<br />
Society before putting plays into the hands of<br />
agents. As the law stands at present, an agent<br />
who has once had a play in his hands may acquire a<br />
perpetual claim to a percentage on the author's feeg<br />
from it. As far as the placing of plays is concerned,<br />
it may be taken as a general rule that there are only<br />
very few agents who can do anything for an author<br />
that he cannot, under the guidance of the Society, do<br />
equally well or better for himself. The collection of fees<br />
is also a matter in which in many cases no intermediary is<br />
required. For certain purposes, such as the collection of<br />
fees on amateur performances, and in general.the trans-<br />
action of frequent petty authorisations with different<br />
individuals, and also for the collection of fees*in foreign<br />
countries, almost all dramatic authors employ agents; and<br />
in these ways the services of agents are real and valuable,<br />
But the Society warns authors against agents who profess<br />
to have influence with managers in the placing of plays, or<br />
who propose to act as principals by offering to purchase<br />
the author's rights. In any case, in the present state of<br />
the law, an agent should not be employed under any<br />
circumstances without an agreement approved of by the<br />
Society.<br />
ee<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal with—performing right and copyright. He<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
<br />
Oi<br />
<br />
STAMPING MUSIC.<br />
<br />
The Society undertakes to stamp copies of music on<br />
behalf of its members for the fee of 6d. per 100 or part<br />
of 100. The members’ stamps are kept in the Society’s<br />
safe. The musical publishers communicate direct with the<br />
Secretary, and the voucher is then forwarded to the<br />
members, who are thus saved much unnecessary trouble.<br />
<br />
re<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
— ><br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic works, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works, The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea,<br />
—— ee<br />
<br />
REMITTANCES.<br />
<br />
a :<br />
<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post.<br />
All remittances should be crossed Union of London and<br />
Smiths Bank, Chancery Lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
COLLECTION BUREAU.<br />
<br />
——_-—<br />
<br />
| due to authors, composers and dramatists.<br />
<br />
1. Under contracts for the publication of their<br />
works.<br />
<br />
2. Under contracts for the performance of their works<br />
and amateur fees.<br />
<br />
3. Under the Compulsory Licence Clauses of the Copy-<br />
right Act, i.e., Clause 3, governing compulsory licences for<br />
books, and Clause 19, referring to mechanical instrument<br />
records.<br />
<br />
The Bureau is divided into three department :—<br />
<br />
1; Literary.<br />
2. Dramatic.<br />
3. Musical.<br />
<br />
The Society does not desire to make a profit from the<br />
collection of fees, but will charge a commission to cover<br />
expenses. If, owing to the amount passing through the<br />
office, the expenses are more than covered, the Committee<br />
of Management will discuss the possibility of reducing the<br />
commission.<br />
<br />
For full particulars of the terms of collection, application<br />
must be made to the Collection Bureau of the Society.<br />
<br />
The Bureau is in no sense a literary or dramatic<br />
agency, for the placing of books or plays.<br />
<br />
—___—_+—~>—_+-—____—_-<br />
<br />
GENERAL NOTES.<br />
<br />
THEATRICAL CONDITIONS IN HOLLAND.<br />
<br />
F We have received a very interesting report<br />
<br />
from Mr. A. Reyding, the Society’s recently<br />
appointed agent in Holland, touching the<br />
theatrical conditions obtaining in that country.<br />
Mr. Reyding informs us that while the fees<br />
paid for representations in Amsterdam are not<br />
those which could be obtained in London or<br />
Paris, they are by no means to be despised.<br />
Amsterdam possesses five theatres of import-<br />
ance, and a few smaller ones, apart from<br />
music halls and numerous cinematograph<br />
theatres. Four managers in Amsterdam and<br />
one in Rotterdam are continually in search of<br />
good plays which have attained success in<br />
London.<br />
<br />
One of the most important theatrical<br />
institutions is the “Royal Company” in<br />
Amsterdam. It is managed by a board of<br />
directors and liberally subsidised by the<br />
Queen. Moreover, it is allowed to give<br />
performances in the “ Municipal Theatre,”<br />
a large, modern building. Practically the<br />
management run two companies, alternatively<br />
travelling in the provinces.<br />
<br />
Another first-rate enterprise is the ‘‘ Crystal<br />
Palace Theatre’? in Amsterdam. It is man-<br />
aged by a gifted and energetic actor-manager,<br />
who has already achieved great successes<br />
during the short period of his directorship.<br />
Here again a double company is maintained<br />
with a view to travelling.<br />
<br />
267<br />
<br />
As third and fourth in rank, the ‘‘ Holland<br />
Theatre” and the ‘Grand Theatre” in<br />
Amsterdam may be mentioned, both under the<br />
management of a well-known author. The<br />
company engaged by this director is so numer-<br />
ous that it allows of dividing into three or<br />
even four parts, according to circumstances.<br />
<br />
The ‘Rembrandt ‘Theatre’ produces<br />
musical comedies only.<br />
<br />
Among the smaller theatres, two are worthy<br />
ofattention. Firstly, the “‘ Frascati Theatre,”<br />
managed by a young, intelligent actor-manager,<br />
and presenting good performances of the<br />
Paris ‘‘ Theatre des Varietes ’’ repertory and<br />
light comedy in general. Secondly, the<br />
‘Plantage Theatre,” cultivating detective-<br />
drama.<br />
<br />
As to gross box receipts, these are naturally<br />
inferior to London figures, owing to the fact<br />
that the charges for seats remain far below<br />
cosmopolitan standard prices and that, practi-<br />
eally, real full houses occur on Sunday nights<br />
only. At a rough estimate, £40 may be con-<br />
sidered as the average gross takings on a<br />
week-day in any principal theatre, always<br />
provided that the play is a success. And the<br />
receipts on Sunday nights may amount to<br />
£120, and even more in one or two houses.<br />
It follows that the totality during each week<br />
might be valued at about £360 in favourable<br />
cases.<br />
<br />
Series of a hundred consecutive representa-<br />
tions are by no means the longest on record ;<br />
the way in which Amsterdam companies are<br />
being managed allows of continuous runs.<br />
An exception, however, must be made for the<br />
“Royal Company,” where the “ Comedie<br />
Francaise” example is followed, the playbill<br />
changing about every day. Nevertheless, if<br />
a play produced by that company prove<br />
successful, it may become a repertory play,<br />
yielding profits during many years. Other<br />
companies only re-start a play in case of its<br />
run having been interrupted by the end of<br />
the season, or on the ground of some other<br />
urgent cause; for, as a rule, re-starting a<br />
piece does not pay.<br />
<br />
Amsterdam may be called the centre of<br />
theatrical life in Holland, yet Rotterdam<br />
possesses a fine playhouse and an excellent<br />
company of its own. But as that city has a<br />
relatively small number of inhabitants, long<br />
runs never occur there. A series of twenty<br />
representations may be considered as a maxi-<br />
mum. As to receipts there is no sensible<br />
difference between Amsterdam and Rotterdam<br />
figures.<br />
<br />
It. may be taken as a general rule that, in<br />
<br />
<br />
268<br />
<br />
Holland, translators’ fees are paid by the<br />
managers, quite separate from authors’ fees.<br />
English authors, therefore, should never put<br />
their plays into the hands.of would-be trans-<br />
lators, who offer to divide equally the profits<br />
derived from representations in Holland.<br />
<br />
Concerning authors’ fees for cinematograph<br />
performances, up to this moment films of<br />
British origin have only been produced here<br />
by way of exception, and in these cases the<br />
usual course seems to be that the manufac-<br />
turers pay a sum once to the author of a<br />
plot.<br />
<br />
Music PUBLISHERS AND FoREIGN MECHANICAL<br />
Ricuts.<br />
<br />
WE have already called attention to the<br />
claim of the English music publisher to take<br />
50% of the composer’s mechanical fees. This<br />
claim, when admitted by composers, reduces<br />
their fees under the compulsory licence clauses<br />
of the Copyright Act to something near the<br />
vanishing point, so far as the United Kingdom<br />
is concerned. ‘But the mischief does not end<br />
here. There are the foreign mechanical fees<br />
to be considered, and from correspondence<br />
which has come to the Society’s office, it<br />
would seem that the case of the composer in<br />
respect of these fees, is even worse than it is<br />
in the United Kingdom.<br />
<br />
For example, reference may be made to the<br />
sale of mechanical reproductions in Germany.<br />
The practice of the English music publisher<br />
is to assign the mechanical rights to the German<br />
publisher, subject to the payment to the<br />
English house of half the fees which their sale<br />
produces. The effect of this is that the<br />
English music publisher gets 50°% of what the<br />
German publisher receives, and the English<br />
composer 50% of what the English publisher<br />
receives, or 25% of the figure actually paid by<br />
the mechanical trade in Germany, less the cost<br />
of collection by the agent who is employed to<br />
carry through the collection.<br />
<br />
It may seem strange to the composer that<br />
the English publisher should be willing to<br />
yield to the German publisher 50% of the<br />
fees. Composers are quite accustomed to the<br />
music publisher’s request that they should<br />
surrender 50% of their fees, but the willingness<br />
of the publisher to make a similar surrender<br />
does not coincide with their experience of<br />
his ability to look after himself in these<br />
matters.<br />
<br />
An explanation, however, occurs to us. It<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
may not be the correct one, but as it certainly<br />
would explain a practice otherwise almost<br />
inexplicable, we think it worth while to put it<br />
forward. We shall be very glad to learn that<br />
it is incorrect.<br />
<br />
Is there a reciprocal arrangement between<br />
the British and German music publisher, by<br />
which each surrenders 50°% of the mechanical<br />
fees produced in their respective countries ?<br />
For example, the English publisher may<br />
accept half the mechanical fees in Germany<br />
for one of his composer’s works on condition<br />
that the German house allows him the same<br />
share in the mechanical fees in Great Britain<br />
of the work of a German composer.<br />
<br />
An arrangement of this kind protects both<br />
parties against loss. But what of the two<br />
unfortunate composers. They are obviously<br />
in a different position. Depending as each of<br />
them does on the popularity of his own<br />
compositions, neither is able to reap any<br />
advantage from an arrangement of the kind<br />
indicated. In consequence, this alliance, if<br />
our deduction is correct, is admirable from the<br />
point of view of the publishers in the two<br />
countries, but is extremely unsatisfactory from<br />
the standpoint of the composer, alike in Ger-<br />
many and in the United Kingdom.<br />
<br />
Movine Pictures.<br />
<br />
Ir is with much pleasure we note that the<br />
valuable report by Mr. Cecil Raleigh on<br />
Moving Pictures that appeared in last month’s<br />
issue, has raised considerable interest not only<br />
with the producers of cinematograph films,<br />
but also with the authors that write the plots.<br />
<br />
The Bioscope has interviewed Mr. Raleigh<br />
and the Daily Chronicle has inserted a long<br />
article from his dictation.<br />
<br />
As we pointed out in last month’s Author<br />
the matter is of the greatest importance; it<br />
must not be reckoned that that report is final.<br />
Mr. Raleigh, himself, does not consider it so.<br />
Since it was produced, further information<br />
has come to his knowledge and to the office of<br />
the Society. It appears that the French<br />
Society has also issued a report, and a report<br />
has also come through from Germany ;<br />
further details are also to hand from America.<br />
It is likely, therefore, that at no distant date<br />
a subsidiary report will have to be made,<br />
dealing with these new facts. It seems quite<br />
clear that there will be a large and increasing<br />
market for good plots for films, and if properly<br />
handled there should be a considerable income<br />
for those authors who study the public tastes.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
BOOK PUBLISHING IN THE UNITED<br />
STATES,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
R. GEORGE P. BRETT has been<br />
or writing in the April number of the<br />
Atlantic Monthly on ‘* Book Publish-<br />
ing and its present Tendencies.” We take it<br />
that he refers to book publishing in America.<br />
He arrives at the conclusion that although the<br />
number of books put on the market has greatly<br />
inereased during the past few years, the total<br />
circulation of books in the United States has<br />
not increased in anything like the same pro-<br />
portion; and he further explains that many<br />
of the publishers who were known for a particu-<br />
lar class of book have gone in for general<br />
publishing business. He draws the conclusion<br />
that the gross circulation has not increased<br />
owing to the fault in distribution, and his<br />
solution of the difficulty appears to be that<br />
books should be published at a cheaper rate,<br />
and as a corollary, that the authors must take<br />
smaller royalties. It is quite true that if books<br />
are published at a cheap rate, the authors<br />
cannot take the same amount of royalty as<br />
they can if the book is published at a higher<br />
price, but it does not follow by any means that<br />
if the book is produced in the first instance at a<br />
low price that the increase in the circulation<br />
will be at all proportionate. I mean by that,<br />
that the publisher and the author will arrive at<br />
the same amount of profit in the end. Indeed,<br />
all evidence goes to show that the deduction<br />
isfalse. There are no doubt a few authors who<br />
make a universal appeal, that is, an appeal to<br />
all people who can read and write, but the<br />
number who can make this appeal can be<br />
reckoned on the fingers of one hand. The<br />
general author has a certain following, and,<br />
however cheap his books are, that following<br />
will not be increased very perceptibly by<br />
publishing at a cheaper rate.<br />
<br />
The Society of Authors went into the figures<br />
as far as the English market is concerned, in<br />
great detail, and issued a report not long ago on<br />
the subject. Mr. Brett instances France and<br />
Germany, but the case in France certainly has<br />
tended to reduce the profits, and has not been<br />
a financial success from the author’s point of<br />
view.<br />
<br />
In England, for instance, supposing an<br />
author gets 1s. on a 6s. book, published<br />
subject to discount, he would get, perhaps,<br />
_ 14d. on.a 1s. net book. He would, therefore,<br />
have to obtain eight times the circulation in<br />
order to make his returns equivalent, and this<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
269<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
extra circulation he does not, as a rule, obtain.<br />
Indeed, the publication of so many cheay<br />
books is very often, as the booksellers pointed<br />
out, disastrous to the bookselling trade.<br />
The booksellers having no room in which to<br />
display the crowd of new and cheap books,<br />
in consequence find their shops filled with<br />
unworkable stock. Mr. Brett says, “‘ the<br />
successful experiments in the publishing of<br />
cheap editions of books abroad are usually<br />
with those books which are either out of copy-<br />
right, and consequently pay no royalty to<br />
the authors, or for which a very low rate of<br />
royalty can be arranged.” By abroad, no<br />
doubt he includes England, but although no<br />
doubt the English classics are published in<br />
cheap form, there is, at the same time, an<br />
enormous output of copyright books pub-<br />
lished also in the cheap form, but—after they<br />
have already appeared in a more expensive<br />
edition.<br />
<br />
The article contains some very interesting<br />
statements, but statements which are not by<br />
any means satisfactory from the author’s.<br />
point of view, statements which by no means<br />
apply to the English market, even if they do<br />
to the American. Has Mr. Brett really made<br />
an exhaustive study from all points ? or is he<br />
only feeling his way as a publisher? I<br />
cannot at all agree with Mr. Brett that the<br />
solution of the difficulty, at any rate as far as<br />
England is concerned, is by issuing books at<br />
alow price. It is always possible to reduce the<br />
price of a book half-a-dozen years after its<br />
original publication, if it is clear that there<br />
is still a continuing demand for it, but the result<br />
of this reduction in the price is by no means<br />
always financially successful to the author<br />
and the publisher for the reasons already given.<br />
If the book shows that it is likely to have a<br />
universal appeal, then no doubt, after a run<br />
at a higher price, it will be best to produce<br />
the book in cheap form, but if there is not<br />
sufficient vitality to carry the book through<br />
five or six years, then a cheap edition is not<br />
desirous but disastrous; and probably if the<br />
book had originally been published at a low<br />
price, the financial result to the author and<br />
the publisher would have been unsatisfactory<br />
and destructive to both their interests. The<br />
main point of Mr. Brett’s arguments, as has<br />
already been pointed out, lies in the fact that<br />
he considers authors are too grasping. From<br />
the author’s point of view, neither Mr. Brett’s<br />
deductions nor his arguments can for a<br />
moment be admitted.<br />
<br />
G. H. T.<br />
<br />
<br />
270 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE COMMERCIAL SIDE OF MUSIC.<br />
<br />
————_<br />
<br />
(Reprinted from “The English Review” by<br />
kind permission of the Editor.)<br />
<br />
1 is a degradation to the profession that<br />
any composer should be asked to sign<br />
the common form of agreement that is<br />
<br />
at present being put forward by some of the<br />
best houses in the music publishing trade.<br />
<br />
There has been considerable correspon-<br />
dence in The Times and other papers about<br />
the sale by Mr. Coleridge Taylor of his copy-<br />
right in ‘“‘ Hiawatha” to Messrs. Novello<br />
& Co. outright for a sum down. But it is<br />
not on this form of contract that I desire to<br />
comment, but on a much more subtle form,<br />
namely, a contract for the payment of a<br />
royalty on the assignment of the copyright.<br />
This form is distinctly more subtle, for it seems<br />
to the composer that by securing a royalty he<br />
may be gaining his just reward, whereas he<br />
may still be losing by the assignment every-<br />
thing that is worth holding. When a publisher<br />
of literary works asks for a licence to publish,<br />
he is generally contented with a licence to<br />
ublish in book form; in some cases even this<br />
1s limited to book form at a certain price or<br />
during a certain period, and if the publisher<br />
does not keep the book on the market the<br />
contract is at an end. He does not ask for<br />
—or should he ask for, does not get—the<br />
dramatic rights, the rights of translation, the<br />
American copyright and cinematograph rights ;<br />
but the music publisher, who should be content<br />
with a licence to publish in printed form, asks<br />
for an assignment of copyright which carries<br />
the performing rights—equal to dramatic<br />
rights; the rights of publication in foreign<br />
countries—infinitely more valuable than the<br />
translation rights, for music is a universal<br />
language; the rights in the United States—<br />
infinitely more valuable than an author’s<br />
United States rights, because the heavy tax<br />
of printing in the United States is unnecessary<br />
in the case of music; and the rights of repro-<br />
duction by mechanical instruments—at the<br />
present time more valuable still than the<br />
cinematograph rights in a book.<br />
<br />
After this preamble, it may be useful to<br />
print an ordinary form of music publisher’s<br />
agreement :—<br />
<br />
y ieee se OL aise ca in consideration of the royalties<br />
hereinafter reserved and of the sum of one shilling (the<br />
receipt of which I hereby acknowledge as an advance pay-<br />
ment) hereby assign to.....; SAOr el (hereinafter<br />
called the Publishers) their successors and assigns the entire<br />
and exclusive copyright, rights of representation and<br />
<br />
arrangement of whatever kind, rights of reproduction tipon<br />
mechanical instruments of every description and all othe ‘<br />
rights whatsoever in the United Kingdom of Great Britain<br />
and Ireland its Colonies and Dependencies and in all<br />
foreign countries their Colonies and Dependencies now or<br />
hereafter conferred or created of and in the following<br />
original work of which I am the composer and compiler<br />
<br />
The Royalties shall be<br />
<br />
(a) In the United Kingdom its Colonies (except Canada)<br />
and Dependencies at the rate of pence on all copies<br />
sold by the Publishers or their successors or assigns.<br />
<br />
(b) And in the United States of America and Canada<br />
and on the Continent of Europe one half of that rate.<br />
<br />
No royalty on copies gratuitously distributed nor on<br />
Band parts. :<br />
<br />
7 copies shall be counted as 6.<br />
<br />
On Mechanical Reproductions :—<br />
<br />
50 per cent. of the nett amounts received by the Pub-<br />
lishers therefor :<br />
<br />
AS WITNESS &c.<br />
<br />
It is surely a mockery to call such a document<br />
an agreement ; and, indeed, many of the music<br />
publishers realise this fact,,as they refuse or<br />
neglect to send the composers a copy signed<br />
by the firm; and if the composer has not the<br />
business acumen to keep an exact copy, he<br />
is left in the humiliating position of having to<br />
appeal to the publisher should he subsequently<br />
desire to have particulars of the document he<br />
has so rashly and foolishly signed.<br />
<br />
Before discussing this particular form, it will<br />
be as well to repeat here some of the legal<br />
difficulties which arise out of an assignment of<br />
copyright.<br />
<br />
To begin with, if anything should happen<br />
to the firm, if it should become bankrupt, or<br />
—if a company—go into liquidation, the<br />
composer would have no right, according to<br />
existing decisions of the Court, to prevent<br />
the assignment of the copyright to another<br />
purchaser, and he might find that his property<br />
had come into the hands of a most undesirable<br />
assignee.<br />
<br />
But there is worse to follow, for the com-<br />
poser would have no claim for royalties against<br />
the assignee, and would be in a worse position<br />
than if he had sold his copyright for a sum<br />
down.<br />
<br />
Secondly, after the work has once been<br />
published, even in a limited degree, no power<br />
on earth can force the publisher to continue to<br />
<br />
keep the work on the market, and the com- *<br />
<br />
poser might have to buy back that which the<br />
publisher refuses to utilise at the publisher’s<br />
owr price.<br />
<br />
Thirdly, if after the work is put on the<br />
market an action for infringement of copyright<br />
is threatened—this case actually occurred—<br />
even though the composer may have the<br />
strongest evidence that there is no infringement<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the publisher may refuse to run the risk and<br />
has power to withdraw all copies. Again the<br />
eomposer is without a remedy.<br />
<br />
Finally, the publisher may alter the work<br />
within the limit of libel, produce a chorale as<br />
a waltz, or adapt the airs for other purposes<br />
than those originally designed by the composer.<br />
Such alterations, which might be the cause of<br />
the greatest annoyance to the composer, need<br />
not, and probably would not, give him a right<br />
of action.<br />
<br />
These are some of the legal difficulties<br />
arising out of the assignment of copyright.<br />
The financial loss is also considerable, for the<br />
performing rights, save in few cases, are<br />
squandered by the publishers for the adver-<br />
tisement of their own wares, when these rights<br />
might be husbanded by the composer, and, if<br />
properly marketed, bring in, in this country,<br />
as good a return as they bring in to foreign<br />
composers. Reference will be made later to<br />
the Toss to the composer arising from the<br />
assignment of his mechanical instrument rights.<br />
<br />
The faults to which attention has been drawn<br />
are, however, faults of commission ; but look<br />
at the faults of omission.<br />
<br />
The publishers do not undertake to put the<br />
work on the market. No doubt, as payment<br />
of a royalty on every copy sold is part of the<br />
consideration, publication would be an implied<br />
term of the contract. But what kind of pub-<br />
lication? In what form? At what price ?<br />
By what date?<br />
<br />
As the royalty is a fixed royalty of so many<br />
pennies a copy, it is of great importance that<br />
the published price should be fixed, for what<br />
might be a fair royalty if the work was issued<br />
at one price might be a very unfair royalty<br />
if the work was issued at another price. Then,<br />
again, all mention of the date is omitted. It<br />
is not unknown in the publishing trade that<br />
where no date has been fixed, delays of six,<br />
twelve, or eighteen months have occurred.<br />
<br />
Again, there is no clause to compel the<br />
publisher to continue publishing, or, alterna-<br />
tively, having published, to give up his rights<br />
if he does not intend to use them further<br />
when the work is out of print.<br />
<br />
There is not even a common form clause: by<br />
which the composer is to receive accounts<br />
properly issued at fixed dates.<br />
<br />
Many other points might be noted, but for<br />
the present purpose these are sufficient.<br />
<br />
The answer of the man of business is clear :<br />
“What a fool the composer must be.” To<br />
some extent this is true, but it must be reme-<br />
bered that the marketing of works of art is<br />
different from the marketing of merchandise.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
271<br />
<br />
The artist is a man often in absolute ignorance<br />
of his rights and their potentialities, and he<br />
is dealing with a man whose business in life<br />
has been to study every detail of artistic<br />
property from the commercial standpoint.<br />
<br />
No wonder, then, that music publishers grow<br />
fat and prosper, and that, as far as financial<br />
returns are concerned, there are many<br />
Coleridge Taylors among the rank and file of<br />
the profession. What wonder, also, when one<br />
of the leading members of the profession in<br />
his smug prosperity says he sees no need for<br />
a combination of composers to strengthen the<br />
chances of his struggling confreres ; when<br />
another states in public that he is too busy to<br />
look after his royalties (he may be quite sure<br />
the publisher is not) ; when another writes that.<br />
most of his contracts are made across his<br />
publisher’s dinner-table. If the leaders are so<br />
weighted with chains, whether of gold or of<br />
inertia or of prejudice, no wonder that the<br />
young composer sees so little chance.<br />
<br />
But the young generation is vigorous and<br />
full of life. If it is neglected by those who<br />
ought to make it their duty to help, by those<br />
who have known what it is to be told that if<br />
they did not like to put their name to a con-<br />
tract of slavery, the publisher will never<br />
publish anything more for them, still, let<br />
it fight on until it carves the way to its own<br />
salvation.<br />
<br />
Rights of Reproduction on Mechanical Instru-<br />
ments.—When the Copyright Act of 1911 came<br />
into force, a splendid opportunity occurred<br />
for the composer to break away from his<br />
bondage. The rights of reproduction on<br />
mechanical instruments were then, for the first<br />
time, included under Statutory Copyright,<br />
and in order that composers who, before the<br />
Act, had assigned their copyrights, might not<br />
lose by such conveyance rights of property<br />
which, prior to the Act, had not existed, the «<br />
Act placed those rights, in spite of the assign<br />
ment of copyright, in their hands to deal with.<br />
But it stipulated that composers should receive<br />
a fixed royalty. The publishers, seeing what<br />
was about to happen, at once took steps to<br />
counteract the benefits that the Act bestowed.<br />
The Society of Authors wrote a letter to The<br />
Times to point out to composers their position<br />
under past contracts. But the publishers<br />
proceeded to form a company for the collection<br />
of fees, by the rules of which, after deducting<br />
all the expenses of collection—a quite indeter-<br />
minate quantity—80 per cent. of the royalties<br />
on the property, which, by the Act, was the<br />
composer’s absolutely, was transferred to the<br />
publishers’ pockets. The music publishe<br />
<br />
<br />
272 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
claimed that he was entitled to a percentage<br />
of these fees because, by publishing the<br />
composer’s music, he had made the mechanical<br />
reproduction rights valuable. This may or<br />
may not have been true, but if it were true it<br />
was a matter to be decided between the com-<br />
<br />
oser and the publisher, and not arbitrarily<br />
& a company which was started on a business<br />
basis and not for the settlement of an ethical<br />
question. It is certain, however, that in the<br />
near future it will be the music publisher<br />
who will have to’ thank the mechanical<br />
reproducer for the advertisement rather than<br />
the mechanical reproducer the publisher.<br />
Mechanical reproduction is going ahead very<br />
fast, and many owners of pianolas, gramo-<br />
phones, etc., go to the retail dealers and<br />
try reproductions, quite irrespective of the<br />
music publisher, and make their choice for<br />
purchase or hire, quite irrespective of whether<br />
they have heard the original played from sheet<br />
music. This practice will become more and<br />
more common, so that the music publisher’s<br />
argument that he is entitled to a share in the<br />
mechanical instrument rights, if ever it was<br />
good, grows less and less valid. But I do not<br />
admit it was good. The music publisher is<br />
the agent of the composer to produce his music<br />
in a certain form specified in the contract, and<br />
the author’s royalty is based on this considera-<br />
tion. He is not the principal, to claim from<br />
the composer control over his rights. The<br />
editor of a magazine might as well claim<br />
a share in the book production, or the pub-<br />
lisher of a book claim a share of the serial<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
But the rules of this company contained<br />
other interesting statements.<br />
<br />
The committee of the company was to be<br />
allowed to conduct or defend’ such legal<br />
proceedings, as they might sanction, appar-<br />
ently, without reference to the composer who<br />
was the owner of the rights. Under this rule<br />
they might neglect, perhaps for financial<br />
reasons, to protect the composer’s rights,<br />
and in that case the composer would have no<br />
means of obtaining redress for infringements,<br />
as the transfer of his rights to the company<br />
would have prevented his taking independent<br />
action. Secondly, the committee might decide<br />
to take action in a case to which the composer<br />
might strongly object; and thirdly, the com-<br />
mittee might take action in respect of the repro-<br />
duction of the rights of one of its members,<br />
and get involved in a complicated lawsuit,<br />
leaving the rest of the members to bear the<br />
expenses of the proceedings, however indis-<br />
creetly the committee may have acted. The<br />
<br />
only limit upon the expenses was the total<br />
amount of all royalties collected. Generally,<br />
a society can rely on the subscriptions received,<br />
and no member is liable for anything more,<br />
But in the case of the company referred<br />
to, the whole income of the members for<br />
royalties on mechanical reproductions was at<br />
stake.<br />
<br />
The principles embodied in the rules of this<br />
company have been put forward at some<br />
length. It may be that some of the rules<br />
have been altered since they were first pro-<br />
mulgated ; that milder methods have been<br />
suggested.<br />
<br />
But the idea underlying the publishers’<br />
action is still the same ; they desired to obtain<br />
80 per cent. of property to which they had no<br />
right, which, under the very wording of the<br />
Act, was declared to be the composer’s<br />
absolutely.<br />
<br />
But there is something more bitter behind.<br />
<br />
The management of the company was to<br />
be under the control of a board consisting of<br />
six publishers, three composers and three<br />
authors. I understand that composers have<br />
been ready to accept places on_ that<br />
board.<br />
<br />
Under the Act another difficulty has arisen.<br />
It has been pointed out that the composer,<br />
although he had assigned his copyright before<br />
the Act came into force, was still allowed to<br />
maintain the right of mechanical reproduction<br />
in spite of such assignment. It seems, how-<br />
ever, from recent evidence, that composers<br />
consider that the same principle applies to<br />
any contract entered into after the Act has<br />
come into force. This deduction is entirely<br />
false. Any assignment of copyright after<br />
the Act has come into force assigns to the<br />
publishers the rights in mechanical repro-<br />
duction.<br />
<br />
In the agreement printed on a previous<br />
page the publisher has taken advantage of<br />
this and claims 50 per cent. This is kind and<br />
generous, for, as he held the copyright, he<br />
might have taken everything ; but he has also<br />
the power to license or refuse to license the<br />
reproduction. That they should retain this<br />
in their own hands is a matter which some<br />
composers might consider to be of the utmost<br />
importance.<br />
<br />
Is it true, then, that composers are letting<br />
slip their opportunities, and are coming back<br />
to a worse slavery owing to the fact that<br />
copyright now means much more than it<br />
did? If it is true it is the fault of those in the<br />
forefront of the profession, who from their<br />
position could make a firm stand, but refuse to<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
do so. It is not the negative side, the faults<br />
of omission, which is making it so hard for<br />
those who are struggling to rise; it is the<br />
positive action and the sins of commission.<br />
While these continue it is much to be feared<br />
that there will be little change in the customary<br />
form of pseudo-agreement on which I have<br />
reluctantly been compelled to comment.<br />
<br />
G. HERBERT THRING.<br />
<br />
—_—_____e —~.— +<br />
<br />
LIBELS, LIBELLERS AND THE<br />
LIBELLED—ALLEGED.<br />
<br />
———+ —<br />
<br />
T least three recent libel actions,<br />
A widely reported and more or less<br />
“ sensational’? in character, have<br />
ended in verdicts for the defendants, for which<br />
reljef those gentlemen are no doubt duly<br />
thankful. They have good reason to be so,<br />
for juries who have awarded undeserved<br />
damages in the past, and judges who also<br />
have been found not without sympathy with<br />
the plaintiffs, have contributed to render the<br />
bringing of actions in respect of alleged libels<br />
not altogether unprofitable. The successes<br />
of his predecessors have, in fact, tended to<br />
give the would-be plaintiff an idea that apart<br />
from the merits of his case, which he is not<br />
likely to underrate, he will start with odds<br />
in his favour. The plaintiff's case may, of<br />
course, be a perfectly just one. The libel or<br />
supposed libel from which authors, composers<br />
and artists, the members of the Society,<br />
are most likely to suffer, is that which is<br />
contained in criticism upon a_ published<br />
work. Criticism that is unfair exists ;<br />
sometimes it may err through negligence<br />
inexcusably, but more or less inadver-<br />
tently ; sometimes it is deliberately intended<br />
to wound or injure. Authors, however, and<br />
the others mentioned, although not insensitive<br />
to criticism, as a rule know how to take<br />
their knocks philosophically ; they have too<br />
much good sense to air their wrongs in litiga-<br />
tion, and criticism that is neither fair nor<br />
reasonable is tolerated and condoned because<br />
it is not worth while to take notice of it.<br />
This, however, has nothing to do with the<br />
actions for libel to which reference has been<br />
made, which have ended in verdicts for defen-<br />
dants who have had to watch big bills of<br />
costs being piled up, a considerable proportion<br />
of which in any event must be paid by them.<br />
Actions of this kind interest authors rather<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
273<br />
<br />
as potential writers of libels than as victims<br />
of defamation. They cause reflections as to<br />
the ease with which law suits may be launched,<br />
and unhappy writers compelled to spend their<br />
money in self-defence.<br />
<br />
Alleged libellers who call for sympathy as<br />
such are of two kinds, if they may be classified<br />
roughly—those who, writing honestly and<br />
from a sense of duty, criticise deliberately and<br />
unfavourably the acts or writings of others,<br />
which either invite or challenge criticism ; and<br />
those who write without any idea that an article<br />
not aimed at any such mark may wound<br />
the feclings of a hyper-sensitive individual.<br />
There is also the class of persons involved by<br />
law in the blame where any supposed libel is<br />
published, as publishers and even as printers ;<br />
these are more or less connected with the<br />
latter group. In the class of those who<br />
deliberately criticise and have to take their<br />
risks would be included the authors of the<br />
criticism, which was claimed to_be libellous<br />
by Miss Lind-af-Hageby and Lord Alfred<br />
Douglas in the recent cases referred to, It<br />
is not necessary to recall the details of either<br />
case, except to say that observations which<br />
juries have found not to be such that the<br />
plaintiff deserved damages in respect of them,<br />
were the occasion of two trials of length unusual<br />
in actions of any kind involving far more im-<br />
portant issues,' and that such actions may be<br />
brought at any time in respect of criticism<br />
upon any person’s conduct, which may<br />
eventually be found to be perfectly fair and<br />
reasonable in view of the facts. The Times,<br />
in commenting upon these cases, pointed out<br />
most reasonably that the tendency of such<br />
actions must be to deprive the public of the<br />
benefit of wholesomé criticism in such matters<br />
as are of public interest. Newspapers, con-<br />
ducted with the care with which English<br />
newspapers are conducted, do not, as a rule,<br />
err in the direction of over-candid or searching<br />
criticism, even where the facts demand. it,<br />
and this, no doubt, is largely due to fear of<br />
the law being set in motion, and perhaps<br />
successfully set in motion, owing to some<br />
trifling slip or inaccuracy in an otherwise<br />
correctly revised article. No one desires to<br />
see slap-dash and indiscriminate onslaughts<br />
made upon persons or institutions deserving<br />
censure, but it cannot be for the public good<br />
that criticism should be restricted or kept<br />
out of existence by the fear of consequences<br />
wholly disproportionate to any fortuitous<br />
error which may be discovered in it.<br />
<br />
In the criticism of literature, of music, and<br />
of art, a veiled and gentle reticence may be<br />
<br />
<br />
274<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
more agreeable to the feelings of individuals<br />
immediately affected, but» can hardly be<br />
beneficial to the public taste, stimulating to<br />
authors, or conducing to the general good of<br />
literature, art and music. This, however, is<br />
but a small section of the subject-matter upon<br />
which comment is made in newspapers and<br />
in books. For example, many persons are<br />
actively engaged in making money at the<br />
expense of the rest of their fellow men by means<br />
which vary in the degree of honesty employed.<br />
The methods of company promoters, of quack<br />
medicine vendors, of exploiters of new religions<br />
and other movements affecting the pockets or<br />
the health, bodily or otherwise, of their fellow<br />
men demand and deserve criticism in the<br />
public interest. A variety of causes contribute<br />
to their either escaping it or only obtaining it<br />
toned down to a point which renders it useless<br />
in the public interest, and it is submitted that<br />
not the least of those causes is the condition<br />
of the law with regard to libel, and the feeling<br />
that the courts are far more likely to reward<br />
the plaintiff beyond his deserts than to<br />
safeguard the defendant against oppression.<br />
As The Times observed in the article referred<br />
to even an unsuccessful action has been known<br />
to give a thoroughly profitable advertisement<br />
to the plaintiff.<br />
<br />
The other type of libel is that which arises<br />
more or less accidentally, and generally in<br />
fiction, through some foolish person fitting<br />
upon his own head a cap which may properly<br />
become him but which the unhappy defendant<br />
never intended for the personal misuse of an<br />
individual. Sometimes the fortuitous adop-<br />
tion of a name makes the supposed picture<br />
more complete by suggesting that of the<br />
injured person. If this is the case, or if other-<br />
wise one or two circumstances combine to<br />
make the likeness assured, the unhappy<br />
defendant runs a poor chance of being believed.<br />
Everyone must remember cases of this kind,<br />
in which juries have awarded damages although<br />
the defendant, an honourable man, has never<br />
swerved from his original statement that he<br />
wrote nothing which he intended to refer to<br />
the plaintiff, of whom (according to his evi-<br />
dence) he may never have heard. Cases of<br />
this kind supply some of the trivial but<br />
irritating libel actions which The Times<br />
suggests might be brought in the county court.<br />
No doubt, originally, the idea was that the<br />
possibility of a county court action for libel<br />
or slander would involve the multiplying of<br />
petty suits of this kind. That is still the chief<br />
argument against such an innovation. The<br />
<br />
Times compares petty libel actions to those<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
brought to recover small tradesmen’s bills,<br />
but the parallel is not a close one. The<br />
tradesman is not claiming an unascertained<br />
sum as damages for a supposed wrong. Still,<br />
if the change could be tried as an experiment<br />
it would be interesting, and perhaps persons<br />
obviously (even to themselves) likely to re-<br />
cover small damages only, would ‘abandon<br />
the attempt to do so if they felt that it would<br />
be imprudent to launch a High Court action.<br />
There is less publicity and less fame attaching<br />
to success in the county court. Perhaps, also,<br />
libel actions would be better tried, if it could<br />
so be provided by statute, without juries, by<br />
judges sitting alone. On the other hand,<br />
reference has been made above to sympathetic<br />
judges, and on the whole it must be said that<br />
judges have in the past shown in libel actions<br />
some leaning towards the side of the plaintiff.<br />
It used to be said at the bar of one or two<br />
occupants of the bench that they had often<br />
had to submit to criticism in the press without<br />
the opportunity to reply, and that they were<br />
taking it out of libellers whenever they got the<br />
chance. Perhaps the recent cases to which<br />
reference has been made show that a more<br />
impartial spirit now pervades the judicial<br />
bench.<br />
<br />
ANTONIO FOGAZZARO.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
IFE on earth, if taken as the sum total<br />
of all experiences and of all sensations of<br />
which we are conscious, holds much that<br />
<br />
is of the flesh and much that is of the spirit ;<br />
life everlasting, if we could conceive it in its<br />
entirety, would hold more of the spirit than of<br />
the flesh—so it is with love sacred and profane.<br />
As exponents of these different aspects of<br />
life and love in modern Italian literature, two<br />
eminent writers stand out prominently:<br />
Antonio Fogazzaro, who believes in the<br />
spiritualisation of love capable of carrying<br />
man into regions of everlasting glory beyond<br />
earthly life, and Gabriele d’ Annunzio, who<br />
stands for the materialisation of love and the<br />
gratification of desire through possession ; the<br />
first appeals to the spirit, the second to the<br />
senses. I will endeavour to followtheir thoughts<br />
in their quest after love and ts ine a without<br />
attempting to discuss their methods of reaching<br />
the ideal. Each reader knows whether he is<br />
spiritually or materialistically inclined: if<br />
he loves spiritually let him read one by one<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the books of Fogazzaro, of which there are<br />
translations into English; if sensually, he will<br />
find food for thought in the works of Gabriele<br />
@’ Annunzio, which I will deal with in a coming<br />
issue of The Author.<br />
<br />
Antonio Fogazzaro was born in Vicenza on<br />
March 25, 1842, he wrote some verses between<br />
1863—1872, but his first book, ‘* Miranda,”’<br />
did not appear till 1874. Then came:<br />
“ Valsolda”’? (1876), ‘‘ Malombra”’ (1881),<br />
“ Daniele Cortis ” (1885), ‘Il mistero di un<br />
Poeta”’ (1888), ‘* Piccolo mondo antico”<br />
(1896), ‘‘ Piccolo mondo moderno” (1901),<br />
“T] Santo” (1905), and “ Leila »» (1910).<br />
He died a few months after the publication<br />
of this book. He also went in for philosophical<br />
dissertations (1891—1898), which have since<br />
been collected.<br />
<br />
Fogazzaro understood life as a harmony of<br />
which music was the language; he said of it<br />
that it was a generator of vague shadows, of<br />
sentiments of joy, sorrow, desire, dismay, pity,<br />
all without definite causes, and also of superb<br />
daring and an impulsive courage to achieve<br />
the impossible. He said that the best music<br />
also suggested confused images to the imagina-<br />
tion, signifying turbidly a narration, dialogue<br />
or drama, incomprehensible in its magnitude,<br />
because the language in which it is expressed<br />
is unknown to us, and unlike any language with<br />
which we are familiar, a language far removed<br />
from daily speech, but gifted with the sound<br />
of human passions, many of which are even<br />
correctly ordered, in proper sequence, following<br />
the methods of the highest reasoning in the<br />
world.<br />
<br />
Fogazzaro’s first book, “* Miranda ’’ (1874),<br />
initiates one in his belief with regard to love,<br />
a belief which he held to the last, and which<br />
gives a special “stamp ” to all his works.<br />
He shows love as a light, a sentiment capable<br />
of lifting man to spiritual perfection through<br />
self-denial and renunciation.<br />
<br />
Some of his earlier critics condemned him<br />
for dwelling too much on lofty passions and<br />
glorified love, instead of on the love of ordinary<br />
mortals in everyday life. This may be so, but<br />
one must not overlook the fact that he held<br />
the belief that physical attraction was an<br />
instinct outside man’s will, whilst the intel-<br />
lectual power of love could be cultivated into<br />
a thing of moral beauty, which was more<br />
lasting than mere mortal life, and more<br />
powerful than instinct.<br />
<br />
In “ Miranda” the heroine is a simple girl<br />
brought up amongst the flowers of the fields.<br />
There is no hypocrisy, no study or fictitious<br />
innocence in her purity; she is pure, simply<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
275<br />
<br />
because she has never come in contact with<br />
vice, and when the man she loves discloses<br />
its existence through his materialistic and<br />
pleasure-seeking tendency, she is horrified, and<br />
her whole being rebels against it. But she<br />
cannot give up the man she loves, even though<br />
she thinks him unworthy. She is of the women<br />
who love once and for ever, but with a profound<br />
religious sentiment which holds feminine<br />
chastity supreme, and forbids her from falling<br />
in with his views. So she offers her life to the<br />
Almighty as a sacrifice, so that the man she<br />
loves may be redeemed.<br />
<br />
Her object is reached. He is redeemed through<br />
the force of moral love which, emanating from<br />
the human heart, is capable of regenerating<br />
the world. Throughout all Fogazzaro’s works<br />
the mission of love is that of conversion and<br />
redemption; human love thus becomes a<br />
path leading to divine love. This idea of<br />
the necessity for renunciation came to<br />
Fogazzaro through his conception of the<br />
immortality of the soul. He believed that<br />
the human body had evolved from a lower<br />
species, and that the soul of man, also evolved.<br />
from a rudimental, primordial soul, to a soul<br />
of transcendental beauty. He compares the<br />
birth of a soul to the striking of the hour ina<br />
clock; the hour is not complete until the<br />
clock strikes ; so at a given moment, when man<br />
reached a spiritual state capable of expression,<br />
when his hour was about to strike, with an<br />
infinitesimal change, God created in him an<br />
immortal soul which was not his before.<br />
Through this soul he can get in touch with<br />
the Supreme Being, his intellect guided by the<br />
Divine Spark making him capable of con-<br />
ceiving an abstract idea, and love lifted from<br />
a physical passion to a spiritual power.<br />
Because he believed utterly in the communion<br />
of souls, by some he was looked upon as an<br />
ascetic; because he fought all forms of<br />
limitation, and aspired to a free church for<br />
free men, with free souls capable of out-<br />
standing earthly passions, desires and sins, he<br />
was condemned by the Church as irreligious.<br />
Because in the “ Mystery of a Poet’ he<br />
declared that he saw “in every soul some<br />
reflection of an unknown light,” he was<br />
accused with dabbling in the occult and<br />
mysterious.<br />
<br />
In reality he had a pure conscience, a pure<br />
aim, and only pure art inspired him. He was<br />
rightly termed “ the Chevalier of the Spirit,”<br />
who believed in the ultimate apotheosis of all<br />
created things to a final perfect state of love,<br />
grace and beauty.<br />
<br />
Whoever reads his books may agree or<br />
276 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
disagree with his theories and_ principles,<br />
may find his men too perfect, and his women<br />
too frail, but whoever believes in the soul’s<br />
immortality will take fresh heart, and acquire<br />
a stronger faith in the ascension of man to<br />
perfection by Fogazzaro’s exposition of a<br />
superhuman love, which we may not have<br />
met in our lives, but for the existence of which<br />
at some time we have surely longed.<br />
<br />
E. S. Romero-Topesco.<br />
<br />
RICHARDSON’S LAW OF COPYRIGHT.*<br />
<br />
—— ++<br />
<br />
R. RICHARDSON marshals his com-<br />
ments and explanations relating to<br />
the Law of Copyright and _ the<br />
<br />
changes effected in it by the Act of 1911<br />
in a form different from that commonly<br />
adopted in legal text-books dealing with<br />
statute law. He gives as his reasons for<br />
abandoning the obvious and usual method of<br />
dealing with a branch of the law that has been<br />
codified, by commentary upon the Codifying<br />
Act, that in the first place the Copyright<br />
Act, 1911, does not lend itself easily to commen-<br />
tary. By this presumably he means that to<br />
quote sections or parts of sections of the new<br />
Act and to append to them notes explaining<br />
them and comparing their provisions with<br />
the law as it stood before they came into<br />
force or as it stands with regard to matters<br />
not affected by the new Act, is a method<br />
which he has tried and has found difficult to<br />
employ satisfactorily.<br />
<br />
In the second place, he considers that to<br />
adopt the method indicated would have<br />
involved unnecessary length, and he has<br />
preferred the task of summarising the new<br />
Act briefly where he deals with it in his notes.<br />
He further adds that it is difficult in dealing<br />
with the law of copyright to work in the old<br />
law while commenting upon the new. He,<br />
therefore, relegates the text of the Act of 1911<br />
to his first appendix, where he sets it out<br />
verbatim and commences with a short outline<br />
of the history of copyright, chiefly literary<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* “The Law of Copyright,’ by J. B. Richardson, M.A.,<br />
LL.B. (Cantab.), of the Middle Temple and the North-<br />
Eastern Circuit, Barrister-at-Law, late holder of a student-<br />
ship awarded by the Council of Legal Education. Jordan<br />
& Sons, Limited, London, 1913. Pp.390. Price, 6s. net.<br />
<br />
copyright, explaining its position before July”<br />
1912, and summarising the principle changes<br />
which came into being on the first day of<br />
that month. Thence he proceeds to discuss.<br />
the general system now established, and<br />
lastly he treats in detail the various branches of<br />
copyright law as distinguished by the subject-<br />
matter of the right conferred. In subsequent<br />
chapters Colonial copyright is considered,<br />
and the international system arising out of the<br />
Berlin Convention and the Act of 1911.<br />
Mr. Richardson’s notes are clear and _ brief,<br />
and the form in which he has thus presented<br />
them to his readers is well adapted for the<br />
purposes of those who desire to obtain rapidly<br />
a bird’s-eye view of the law, past and present,<br />
affecting a particular point of copyright law.<br />
They would, no doubt, be convenient also to<br />
anyone desiring to study the law of copyright<br />
for the purpose of passing an examination<br />
in it. It is, however, a matter for individual<br />
opinion, how far the method followed has had<br />
as its result a text-book useful for the purpose<br />
of reference to a lawyer in practice, and how<br />
far it may be safe for an author to depart in<br />
such matters from precedents which have<br />
been tried and generally accepted.<br />
<br />
The answer to the question is not one easy for<br />
a reviewer to supply authoritatively, and must<br />
be answered rather by the barrister or solicitor<br />
who, when he has consulted a book a few times<br />
for professional purposes, will not have great<br />
difficulty in making up his mind as to whether<br />
he can find his way about in it easily, and<br />
put himself upon the track of that which he<br />
seeks to discover. At all events, Mr. Richard-<br />
son’s work contains a good deal of useful<br />
information within a moderate compass. We<br />
note that he condemns as a very doubtful<br />
experiment the system of royalties introduced<br />
in section 8, and the liberty given to republish<br />
without leave of the owner of the copyright<br />
twenty-five years after the author’s death,<br />
an experiment tried with a view to the con-<br />
ciliation of those who objected to a lengthened<br />
term of copyright, which certainly will not<br />
have the merit of simplifying the conditions<br />
of book publishing. ;<br />
<br />
He also condemns the limitations of the<br />
subject-matter of copyright laid down in<br />
section 1, sub-section 1, of the Act, but does<br />
not suggest that it prescribes a narrower area<br />
of protection than prevails in other countries,<br />
an aspect of the situation which presumably<br />
was taken into consideration when the section<br />
was framed. The rules made under the<br />
new Act will be found with other necessary_or<br />
useful information in an appendix.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 277<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
AN AMERICAN “ WRITER'S YEAR<br />
BOOK.’”*<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
1,001 addresses of places where manu-<br />
scripts can be sold, or any other<br />
} pumber,is not —. nor does this particular<br />
ti much matter. It must be presumed that a<br />
| title of this sort makes an appeal to some<br />
or it would not have been chosen ; yet<br />
pad that to others it may not seem quite<br />
bon ton. The work is intended as a guide<br />
essentially for writers on the other side of the<br />
‘Atlantic, and the greater number of its pages<br />
are justly devoted to periodicals published in<br />
the United States. We are able to judge of<br />
the value of its information respecting such<br />
publications only by inference. In the case<br />
‘of the journals with which we are acquainted<br />
the information is correct and the advice a<br />
. The chapter devoted to “ English<br />
Magazines that ty American MSS.” is dis-<br />
ey = done. The general hints given in<br />
preface are also admirable. There can<br />
be no doubt that the classification of the<br />
various periodicals into chapters (** Advertising<br />
ogg [ oo Journals,” and so<br />
h) has its advantages; but it has dis-<br />
Advantages also; as it is not always an casy<br />
‘Matter to find any particular journal that is<br />
seg We _. that the work would be<br />
Much improved by an index. The work<br />
eontains a chapter dedicated to ‘‘ Publishers<br />
Books,” in which “ the endeavour has been<br />
have this a list of publishers of standing.”<br />
yang that this chapter may be of value<br />
ne ish authors, independently of other<br />
‘Mivice respecting openings on the other side<br />
the Atlantic which they will find in the work.<br />
gre that English work is not very likely<br />
accepted appears, however, to be fairly<br />
penn preferences expressed for “* Ameri-<br />
th, i. New England Stories,” aud so<br />
ong “Fraternal Publications ”’<br />
<br />
What they may be we do not know) the Red<br />
. en's Official Journal “ do [sic] not use matter<br />
t than that we dig up or is furnished by<br />
co. from members of the order.”<br />
‘ournal, e official announcement of the<br />
for which the editor of ‘ 1,001<br />
<br />
: a Manuscripts must not be held<br />
<br />
W voor ad there are really in this work<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
. “100<br />
+ Ba; 1 Places to Sell Manuscripts.”<br />
<br />
i Ninth edition.<br />
itor Company, Ridgewood, New Jersey. 1913.<br />
<br />
AUTHOR AND AGENT.<br />
<br />
Dear Sir,—In the last month I have had<br />
three separate firms of agents ‘‘ butting in”<br />
to my business. They come to me with<br />
proposals of remarkable magnificence from<br />
Messrs. A. and Messrs. B., and so forth. Why<br />
Messrs. A. and Messrs. B., and so forth, do not<br />
communicate directly with me, I cannot under-<br />
stand. Whatever I am prepared to sell to<br />
Messrs. A., B., and so on, for £100 I shall<br />
obviously want £110 for, if they insist upon the<br />
intervention of Messrs. Agency, Clause & Co.<br />
I know of no way of stopping this increasing<br />
nuisance of agents, except by proclaiming<br />
clearly that, like all saucibhs authors, I do not<br />
employ agents except for specific jobs. There<br />
is, | believe, a growing tendency on the part of<br />
agents to go to firms of publishers and represent<br />
themselves with no authority at all as acting<br />
on an author’s behalf. I am not lawyer<br />
enough to determine how far that is illegal, but,<br />
at any rate, it is one that needs to be violently<br />
discouraged at the present time.<br />
<br />
Very sincerely Yours,<br />
H. G. WELLs.<br />
<br />
UNREVIEWED Books.<br />
<br />
Dear Srr,—lI have been much interested in<br />
the article and letters regarding “ Unreviewed<br />
Books ” that have appeared in your columns.<br />
If for one moment your correspondents would<br />
place themselves in the position of the dis-<br />
tressed literary editor, they would refrain from<br />
suggesting such impossible alternatives to the<br />
present system as (a) the sending of stamps<br />
for the return of books that have not been<br />
reviewed, or (b) that the editors should write<br />
to publishers stating what books they can<br />
notice.<br />
<br />
To take the first of these two suggestions.<br />
Last year there were nearly 13,000 books<br />
published, of which the principal papers<br />
received in all probably not less than 10,000,<br />
Imagine the additional Jabour involved in<br />
sorting out ten thousand lots of stamps!<br />
Then what is to become of the stamps sent<br />
with those books that are reviewed ? If they<br />
are to be returned also, there would be the<br />
writing of 10,000 envelopes or labels.<br />
<br />
The other suggestion that editors should<br />
write and state what books they can review 18<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
278<br />
<br />
ve impracticable. Suppose an editor<br />
oe aanon ae a mabiishee's list “* Golden<br />
Agates,” a novel by James Blank, and he has<br />
never heard of James Blank, how in the name<br />
of all that is inspired can he tell whether or no<br />
he be prepared to give space to reviewing the<br />
book? The lot of the literary editor is suffi-<br />
ciently difficult without our adding to the<br />
burden of his responsibilities.<br />
<br />
Authors and publishers must be sportsmen<br />
and optimists, and if they be men of the<br />
literary world also they will appreciate that<br />
everybody connected with books is keenly on<br />
the look out for that which is good. If only<br />
a small percentage of the copies sent out for<br />
review produces notices, then the book does<br />
not appear to the literary editors to be a work<br />
likely to interest their readers. An editor is<br />
in every sense of the word the servant of the<br />
public. He must fill his columns with attractive<br />
matter. He can guide his readers to some<br />
extent ; but on the whole he has to consider<br />
what the public wants. I know many literary<br />
editors, and that in the triple capacity of<br />
author, reviewer and publisher, and I have a<br />
profound admiration for their ability and fair-<br />
ness.<br />
<br />
One point that seems to have been over-<br />
looked is that all the books sent in are acknow-<br />
ledged under the heading of ‘“ Books Re-<br />
ceived.” If your correspondents will remember<br />
that there are some thirteen thousand books<br />
yearly endeavouring to storm the slopes of<br />
Parnassus, they will realise that of necessity<br />
there must be a list of slain and wounded.<br />
<br />
If a book fail to get a place do not let us<br />
regard it as wasted; but rather that as an<br />
‘also ran ” it has helped to make the pace for<br />
the others. This requires a Spartan philosophy<br />
with erhaps some admixture of humour ; but<br />
it will prove very comforting.<br />
<br />
I am, Sir,<br />
Your obedient Servant,<br />
HERBERT JENKINS,<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
CONCERNING “ Cart ATHLETICS,”<br />
<br />
IN a recent number J é :<br />
<br />
: of the New York Times<br />
se Supplement Mr. Grant Richards<br />
sere “at — - the methods employed by<br />
<br />
4 ‘ American ishers -<br />
trast a te sae publishers, and con<br />
odious features of the English Jjte ,<br />
is the fiction that has paid to Sop bl<br />
<br />
The first question js; i}<br />
<br />
that “ one of the most<br />
market<br />
t published.”<br />
pays to<br />
<br />
Tho be<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
published—and why? And the second : What<br />
publishers accept payment Webes<br />
why ?<br />
<br />
Answer (to the first question): Who<br />
to be published, and why ?<br />
of this paper, has paid. Paid twice.<br />
to an American publisher and once<br />
English one for publishing Justice's novels,<br />
Justice wrote as a free lance for twenty vears—<br />
for money. Yet, until Mr. Wells enlightened<br />
his fellow-craftsmen in the May Author<br />
Justice had supposed the unknown novelist<br />
always paid to publish because 80 informed<br />
Justice’s publishers. In each case, too, wit<br />
the exception of the publishers’ obligato<br />
announcements of fortheoming productions,<br />
Justice was inveigled into “ doing the adver.<br />
tising ” because * decent publishers don’t like<br />
descending to the tricks of the trade.”<br />
also consented to the 13 as 12 clause, to six<br />
‘“author’s copies ”—and bought in, “at the<br />
lowest possible author's rates,” copies to<br />
bestow upon “friends” who couk n't—or<br />
wouldn't buy. For having the first novel<br />
published, in America, Justice was asked to<br />
pay, and paid, $330. For publishing the<br />
second novel, in London, Justice paid £98,<br />
Answer to the second question : What pub-<br />
lishers accept payment for publishing? The<br />
names of aforesaid publishers are at the disposi-<br />
tion of any serious literary worker requiring<br />
useful information for self-protection, from<br />
Justice, through the Authors’ Society.<br />
<br />
In answer to why the publishers exact<br />
money from novices? Well—ask the pub-<br />
lishers !<br />
<br />
Dear Fettow-Autnors,—Can’t we be-<br />
ginners in our beloved profession hence-<br />
forward, to defeat the “ shark ” publisher,<br />
establish a league to be known as the Wells<br />
League that has for its ideal agreement the<br />
one Mr. Wells advises, and for its actual one<br />
something just as near it as feasible ?<br />
<br />
Mr. Wells writes: ** The ideal thing for the<br />
author to do is to fix up a standing agreement<br />
on the lines I have given above with a big<br />
solvent firm—and think no more of these<br />
things.”’<br />
<br />
Did Mr. Wells “think no more of these<br />
things” in the days before he, on his. own<br />
terms, advertised the publishers—gratis?<br />
<br />
Won’t Mr. Wells tell us somet hing of -<br />
“green and salad” experiences with Pho<br />
lishers ? We can’t write as he does. ;<br />
can? But Napoleon was no less Na —<br />
St. Helena than at Corsica, was he? at Wate<br />
than at Austerlitz. Jou<br />
<br />
to publish, andi<br />
<br />
Justice, the writer}<br />
Onee }<br />
to anf<br />
<br />
Justice &<br />
<br />
egypt | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/529/1913-06-01-The-Author-23-9.pdf | publications, The Author |