499 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/499 | The Author, Vol. 15 Issue 02 (November 1904) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+15+Issue+02+%28November+1904%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 15 Issue 02 (November 1904)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1904-11-01-The-Author-15-2 | | | | | 29–60 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=15">15</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1904-11-01">1904-11-01</a> | | | | | | | 2 | | | 19041101 | The Hutbor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
“FOUNDED BY SIR<br />
<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. XV.—No. 2.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br />
AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
<br />
—_____—_e—<>—_e_—_—_—_<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
——+—~— 4<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to he the case.<br />
<br />
Tus Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tux List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
published October, 1902, at the price of 6d., and<br />
the elections from October, 1902, to July, 1903, as<br />
a supplemental list, at the price of 2d., can now be<br />
obtained at the offices of the Society.<br />
<br />
They will be sold to members or associates of<br />
<br />
the Society only.<br />
— ++.<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
Tue Trustees of the Pension Fund met at the<br />
Society’s Offices on the 19th of February, and<br />
having gone carefully into the accounts of the<br />
fund, decided to purchase £250 London and North<br />
Western 3% Debenture Stock. Accordingly, the<br />
investments of the Pension Fund at present<br />
<br />
Vou, XV.<br />
<br />
NovEMBER I1sT, 1904.<br />
<br />
[Prick SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
See ese er<br />
<br />
standing in the names of the Trustees are as<br />
<br />
follows.<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock ; the<br />
<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Oonsols 2h %. 2... cceccscecccnsereseeren es £1000 0 0<br />
Tecal Hoans -.. 6... ssf 500 0 0<br />
Victorian Government 8 % Consoli-<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ............... 291 19 12<br />
War bon 220 2). et. . 201 3 8<br />
London and North Western 3 % Deben-<br />
bare SOCK ie. 250 0 0<br />
Pobal . Gak ce: 62,248 9 2<br />
Subscriptions from April, 1904.<br />
<br />
£ 8. a.<br />
April18, Dixon, W. Scarth . ‘ 1 0 5 8<br />
April18, Bashford, Harry H. E 27010. 6<br />
April19, Bosanquet, Eustace I’. . - O10 6<br />
April23, Friswell, Miss Laura Hain . 0 5 O<br />
May 6, Shepherd,G. H. . : - 0 5 0<br />
<br />
June 24, Rumbold, Sir Horace, Bart.,<br />
Ge.B. . : : tod 0<br />
July 27, Barnett, P. A. : ‘ . 0 10 0<br />
<br />
Donations from April, 1904.<br />
May 16, Wynne, C. Whitworth .. . 5 0 0<br />
June 23, Kirmse, R. . 5 : <0 720 0<br />
June 23, Kirmse, Mrs. R. : ; 5 0<br />
<br />
July 21, The Blackmore Memorial<br />
Committee . : -20 0 6<br />
Aug. 5, Walker, William 8. : - 2.0 6<br />
Oct. 6, Hare, F.W.E., M.D. - 11 1 0<br />
Oct. 6, Hardy, Harold - 0.10 0<br />
Oct. 20, Cameron, Mrs. Lovett 010 0<br />
<br />
++<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
ee<br />
<br />
HE first meeting of the Committee after the<br />
vacation was held at the Society’s offices on<br />
October 8rd.<br />
<br />
The business of the meeting, as usual, com-<br />
menced with the election of members. The Com-<br />
mittee are pleased to state that during the vacation<br />
Se<br />
<br />
30 THE AUTHOR. :<br />
<br />
over fifty election forms were sent to the office,<br />
making the number of elections during the first<br />
ten months of the year over 190. The list is<br />
printed below. If the same rate of election con-<br />
tinues to the end of the year, 1904 will stand out<br />
far above the average of the last six or seven years.<br />
The Committce welcome this increase as a sign of<br />
the growing interest that members of the pro-<br />
fession of letters take in the Society, and the real<br />
benefit they derive from its work. :<br />
<br />
Further discussion arose respecting our agent in<br />
the United States, and the Chairman reported that<br />
Mr. James Bryce was making enquiries on the<br />
Society’s behalf in New York.<br />
<br />
The London County Council have officially ex-<br />
pressed their readiness to accept the Society’s offer<br />
to provide a replica of the Besant Memorial which<br />
was unveiled in the crypt of St. Paul’s Cathedral.<br />
The subscriptions that have been promised and are<br />
to hand make tbe total within a few pounds of<br />
amount required. Should any members of the<br />
Society desire to make further contributions,<br />
cheques may be forwarded to the Secretary.<br />
Mr. Frampton, the sculptor, has been instructed<br />
to cast the replica. Due notice will be given in<br />
The Author as soon as the final arrangements have<br />
been made. The County Council have proposed,<br />
with the approval of those specially interested, to<br />
place the bronze on one of the granite pedestals on<br />
the Embankment near Waterloo Bridge.<br />
<br />
A question with regard to the contracts between<br />
sundry members of the Society and a Canadian firm<br />
of publishers, which has been mentioned under<br />
the Committee Notes from time to time, was again<br />
considered by the Committee, and the Secretary<br />
has been instructed to take further action on behalf<br />
of the members involved.<br />
<br />
Another matter under discussion was the position<br />
of Roumania in the matter of International Copy-<br />
right. From information which had been received<br />
by the Secretary from the Bureau at Berne, it<br />
appeared that the present copyright law of Rou-<br />
mania would enable that country to enter into a<br />
treaty with His Majesty’s Government, and the<br />
Secretary was instructed, therefore, to lay this in-<br />
formation before the Secretary of State for Foreign<br />
Affairs, in the hope that a satisfactory copyright<br />
treaty might be negotiated.<br />
<br />
Several members of the Society have, from time<br />
to time, placed before the Secretary questions<br />
arising on the payment of Income Tax on literary<br />
profits. The subject is full of interest to all aathors,<br />
and in view of its importance, a statement will be<br />
drawn up and laid before counsel in order that<br />
some clear understanding may be arrived at.<br />
<br />
An application from Mr. Howard Collins that<br />
the Society should affix its imprimatur on his forth-<br />
coming work, “ Author’s and Printer’s Handbook,”<br />
<br />
was considered. The Committee, while fully<br />
appreciating the merits of Mr. Collins’ work, and<br />
the disinterestedness of his labours in producing it,<br />
decided that a departure from the practice of<br />
declining to give the imprimatur of the Society to<br />
works issued by its members was likely to lead to<br />
difficulties in the future, and therefore inexpedient.<br />
<br />
One or two other matters were dealt with by the<br />
<br />
Committee.<br />
—— +<br />
<br />
Cases.<br />
<br />
Durine the past month eight cases have been<br />
laid before the secretary—four for the return of<br />
MSS., three for payment of money, and one<br />
for accounts. In three cases the MSS. have been<br />
returned, and in the remaining one the Editor has<br />
promised to look up the matter and forward the<br />
MS. when found. ‘Two of the claims for money<br />
have been settled; the third case, taken in hand<br />
a few days ago, is still in course of negotiation.<br />
The accounts have been duly rendered.<br />
<br />
The secretary regrets to state that, of those<br />
cases before him during the long vacation, there<br />
are a considerable number still open, but six<br />
of the total—seven in all—refer to American<br />
publishers and editors. Publishers, who live out-<br />
side Great Britain, are not always so ready to<br />
attend to the requests of the secretary as they<br />
would be if they lived within the British Isles, and<br />
even when ready, letter and answer take some<br />
time to cross the water. Sometimes, however,<br />
publishers in the United States take advantage of<br />
the fact that they live some distance from the<br />
author, and not only disregard the demands of the<br />
Society but their contracts also. It is hoped that,<br />
as soon as the Society has another agent in the<br />
United States, it will be possible to obtain prompt<br />
satisfaction.<br />
<br />
The seventh case refers to a demand for money,<br />
but is a little complicated as it is difficult to ascer-<br />
tain the exact amount until fuller accounts have<br />
been rendered. Negotiations are still proceeding,<br />
and during the month of November it is hoped<br />
that the whole matter will be cleared up.<br />
<br />
—— + —<br />
<br />
October Elections.<br />
<br />
. Broad Park Avenue,<br />
Ilfracombe.<br />
Balfour, The Right Hon. 10, Downing Street,<br />
A. J., M.P- S.W<br />
<br />
Allen, James . .<br />
<br />
Ballin, Ada 8. . . 18, Somerset Street,<br />
' Portman Square,<br />
<br />
W., and 4, Agar<br />
<br />
Street, Strand.<br />
<br />
Barrington, Michael<br />
<br />
<br />
hie<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Bell, Mrs. Hugh<br />
<br />
Bennett, Miss Etta<br />
<br />
Buchanan<br />
<br />
Berrington, the Rev. B. 8.<br />
<br />
Best, Dr. George Payne .<br />
<br />
Booth, Mrs. Annie M.<br />
Bradley, A. C.<br />
<br />
Briggs, Lady .<br />
Buckland, C. E., C.1.E.<br />
Cameron, Mrs. Lovett<br />
Carter, Joseph<br />
<br />
Cook, &. 71.<br />
Coward, T. A.<br />
<br />
de Zuylen de Nyevelt<br />
Baronne §.<br />
<br />
Emanuel, Walter<br />
<br />
Evans, John William<br />
Fletcher, A. Woodroofe<br />
<br />
“A Foreign Resident ”<br />
Fox, J. A.<br />
<br />
Frankau, Mrs. (“ Frank<br />
<br />
Danby ”<br />
Gouldsbury, Charles E.<br />
Hardy, Harold<br />
<br />
Hare, F. W. E., M.D.<br />
Hellyer, Miss M. Maud<br />
<br />
Herbert, the Hon. Auberon<br />
<br />
Holt, W. G.<br />
<br />
Humberstone,<br />
Lloyd<br />
<br />
Kennedy, Bart<br />
<br />
Koch, Mrs. Mary<br />
<br />
Maclaverty, Mrs. A. (‘N.<br />
<br />
Atling ’’)<br />
<br />
Macquoid, Capt. C., D.S.0.<br />
<br />
(XX. Deccan Horse)<br />
<br />
Thomas<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 31<br />
<br />
95, Sloane Street, S.W.<br />
Park Mount, Albert<br />
Road, Southport.<br />
Marnixstraat, Amster-<br />
<br />
dam.<br />
<br />
26, Strawberry Hiil<br />
Road, Twickenham.<br />
<br />
1, Kingstown Square,<br />
Gloucester.<br />
<br />
9, Edwardes Square,<br />
Kensington, W.<br />
<br />
5, Charles Street, St.<br />
James’ Square, 8. W.<br />
<br />
61, Cornwall Gardens,<br />
S. Kensington, S.W.<br />
<br />
Millbrook House,<br />
Shepperton.<br />
<br />
260, North End Road,<br />
Fulham, 8.W.<br />
<br />
1, Gordon Place, W.C.<br />
<br />
Brentwood, Bowdon,<br />
Cheshire.<br />
<br />
69, Parkstraad, The<br />
Hague, Nether-<br />
lands.<br />
<br />
89, Ladbroke Grove,<br />
W.<br />
<br />
75, Craven Park, N.W.<br />
<br />
St. Anne’s Passage,<br />
Manchester.<br />
<br />
38, Conduit Street, W.<br />
<br />
48, Melrose Avenue,<br />
Willesden Green,<br />
N.W.<br />
<br />
11, Clarges Street, W.<br />
<br />
Authors’ Club, 3,<br />
Whitehall Court,<br />
S.W.<br />
<br />
1, Dr. Johnson’s Build-<br />
ings, Temple, E.C.<br />
<br />
New Holme, South<br />
Hill, Bromley,<br />
Kent.<br />
<br />
Old House, Ringwood.<br />
<br />
Coton, Tamworth.<br />
<br />
Toynbee Hall,28,Com-<br />
mercial Street, E.<br />
<br />
Ryemead, Rickmans-<br />
worth,<br />
<br />
21, Castlenau, Barnes,<br />
S.W.<br />
<br />
Llangattock Manor,<br />
Monmouth.<br />
<br />
c/o Messrs. Thomas<br />
Cook & Son, Lon-<br />
dow and Bombay,<br />
<br />
Mason, Frank H.,R.B.A., Lindisfarne, Trinity<br />
Road, Scarboro’.<br />
Moore, William ; . 84, Fairview Road,<br />
<br />
S. Tottenham.<br />
<br />
29, Beechcroft Road,<br />
Oxford.<br />
<br />
Market Buildings,<br />
Rockhampton,<br />
Queensland,<br />
Australia,<br />
<br />
68, Lower Essex Street,<br />
Birmingham.<br />
<br />
9, Old Square, Lin-<br />
coln’s Inn, W.C.<br />
<br />
Onions, Charles Talbut<br />
<br />
Parker, Thomas<br />
<br />
Plumbe, 8. W.<br />
Pocock, Archibald Henry<br />
<br />
Reinhardt, Charles . 18, Embankment<br />
Gardens, Chelsea,<br />
S.W.<br />
<br />
Ricci, Luigi Park House, Ealing,<br />
Middlesex.<br />
<br />
Sandwith, Mrs. Harold Johannesburg, South<br />
Alfrica,<br />
<br />
Speer, Capt. A. E. . Sandown Lodge, Esher,<br />
Surrey.<br />
<br />
Speight, E. E., F.R.G.S.<br />
<br />
Tomlinson, Miss Ella<br />
(* Brown Linnet’’) ter, Sussex.<br />
<br />
Tracy, Louis . : . c/o Messrs. Sprigg,<br />
Pedrick & Co., Ltd.,<br />
110, St. Martin’s<br />
Lane, W.C.<br />
<br />
Horsted Keynes, Sus-<br />
SeX.<br />
<br />
3, Clifton Villas, St.<br />
John’s Wood, N.W.<br />
<br />
22, Carson Road, West<br />
Dulwich, 8.E.<br />
Three Members do not desire either their names<br />
<br />
or addresses to be printed.<br />
<br />
Shaldon, Teignmouth.<br />
Fishbourne, Chiches-<br />
<br />
Trevor, John .<br />
Vredenburg, Hdric .<br />
<br />
Watson, Aaron<br />
<br />
<> —__<br />
<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS OF<br />
THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—_-——+—<br />
<br />
(In the following list we do not propose to give more<br />
than the titles, prices, publishers, etc., of the books<br />
enumerated, with, in special cases, such particulars as may<br />
serve to explain the scope and purpose of the work.<br />
Members are requested to forward information which will<br />
enable the Editor to supply such particulars.)<br />
<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
THE STORY OF AN IRISHMAN. By JusTIN McCARTHY.<br />
9 x 6,411 pp. Chatto and Windus, 12s.<br />
<br />
CoLerRIDGE. By DR, RICHARD GARNETT, Gh xX. 4<br />
lll pp. Ball. 1s.<br />
<br />
Lerrers or WILLIAM STUBBS, Bishop of Oxford, 1825—<br />
1901, Edited by the Rev, W. H. Hurron, 9 xX 53,<br />
428 pp. Constable, 17s. 6d, n.<br />
i<br />
ii<br />
<br />
4<br />
<br />
4<br />
i<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
32<br />
<br />
By WILFRID WARD. 9} X 6,<br />
14s, n.<br />
<br />
AUBREY DE VERE.<br />
428 pp. Longmans.<br />
<br />
BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG.<br />
LITTLE PETERKIN AND His BroTHER. By EH. M. GREEN.<br />
ik xX 6,157 pp. S8.P.C. K. Is. 6d.<br />
ENDERLEY PARK. By F. BAYFORD-HARRISON.<br />
160 pp. S. P.C. K. 1s. 6d.<br />
THE NEw WoRrLD Farry Book.<br />
8 x 6, 354 pp. Dent. 4s. 6d. n.<br />
THE BROowN Farry Book. Edited by ANDREW LANG.<br />
74 X 5,350 pp. Longman’s. 6s.<br />
Mystery Isuanp. A Tale of the Pacific. : By FRED.<br />
WnisHaw. 8} X 54, 316 pp. Shaw. 35s. 6d.<br />
For TRIUMPH ORTRUTH. By SYDNEY C. GRIER. 8} X 58,<br />
<br />
7k Xx 5,<br />
<br />
By H, A, KENNEDY.<br />
<br />
310 pp. Shaw. 3s, 6d.<br />
THE PHANTOM Spy. By Fox Russenn. 7} X 54,<br />
288 pp. Nelson. 2s. 6d.<br />
<br />
By ERNEST THOMPSON SETON,<br />
6s. 1.<br />
<br />
Two LITTLE SAVAGES.<br />
<br />
8} x 53,552 pp. Grant Richards.<br />
<br />
“THE DRAMA.”<br />
<br />
WHICH Is THE LUNATIC (a farce in oneact). By HENRY<br />
<br />
Francts. Published by Zhe Pioneer, Allahabad<br />
Price one rupee.<br />
EDUCATIONAL.<br />
ITALIAN GRAMMAR FOR ENGLISH STUDENTS. By LUIGI<br />
<br />
Riccr. 74 xX 5, 129 pp. Walter Scott Publishing<br />
Co. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
New ScHooL ARITHMETIC. Part Il. By C. PENDLEBURY,<br />
7h x 5, pp. 207—468.. Bell. 2s. 6d. ‘<br />
<br />
EXAMPLES IN ARITHMETIC. By C. PENDLEBURY,<br />
<br />
assisted by F, E. Ropinson. 74 X 5, 223 pp. Bell. 2s.<br />
<br />
FICTION.<br />
<br />
Tue EDGE OF CIRCUMSTANCE (a story of the sea). By<br />
EDWARD NoBLE. William Blackwood & Sons.<br />
<br />
A VoICE FROM THE VOID. By HELEN BODDINGTON.<br />
73 x 54,306 pp. Hurst and Blackett. 6s,<br />
<br />
TRAFFICS AND DISCOVERIES. By RUDYARD KIPLING.<br />
8 x 54, 393 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
<br />
THEOPHANO. By FREDERIC HARRISON.<br />
343 pp. Chapman and Hall. 10s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
THe Farm oF THE DaGcG@ER. By EDEN PHILLPOTTS.<br />
74 x 5, 812 pp. Newnes. 3s. 6d.<br />
<br />
THp ABBESS OF VLAYE. By STANLEY J.<br />
7% x 53, 391 pp. Longmans. 6s.<br />
SEA PurITANS. By F. T. BULLEN.<br />
<br />
Hodder and Stoughton. 6s.<br />
<br />
Masor Weir. By K. L. MONTGOMERY.<br />
Unwin. 6s.<br />
<br />
Mary Lovisa QUAYNE (or a BELATED LOVE AFFAIR).<br />
By EmILy PEARSON FINNEMORE. 73 X 5, 252 pp.<br />
8. P.C. K. 2s. 6d.<br />
<br />
SCENES OF JEWISH LIFE. By Mrs. ALFRED SIDGWICK.<br />
73% X BZ, 302 pp. Arnold, 6s.<br />
<br />
THE GAME OF LOVE. By GERTRUDEWARDEN. 73 X 5,<br />
<br />
7% X 5, 299 pp.<br />
<br />
a 68;<br />
<br />
WEYMAN,<br />
7k X 5, 365 pp.<br />
7% X 5, 398 pp.<br />
<br />
320 pp. Digby Long. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE SILENT WomMAN. By “RITA.”<br />
Hurst and Blackett. 6s.<br />
<br />
SomE LOVES AND A Lirr. By Mrs. CAMPBELL PRAED,<br />
72 x 54,309 pp. White. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE PROGRESS OF RACHEL. By ADELINE SERGEANT.<br />
7% xX 5,229 pp. Methuen. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE BRIDGE OF LiFrs (a novel without a purpose). By<br />
DoroTHEA GERARD. 7} X 5},309-pp. Methuen. 6s.<br />
<br />
Captain AMYAS (being the career of D'Arcy Amyas,<br />
<br />
R.N. R., late Master of the R. M. 8. Princess). By<br />
<br />
Doty WYLLARDE. 7? X 54,264pp. Heinemann, 6s,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE CHRONICLES OF Don: Q, By K. and HESKETH<br />
PRICHARD. 7} X 5,307 pp. Chapman and Hall. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tue Kin@’s CoMING. By FLORENCR WYNNE. 7% X 5,<br />
489 pp. Skeffington. 6s,<br />
<br />
THE Foop OF THE GoDS AND How IT CAME TO EARTH.<br />
By H. G. WeLis. 7% X 54, 317 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
<br />
Kate oF KATE Hau. By ELLEN THORNEYCROFT<br />
Fowuer and A.L. FeLKIN. 7% x 5. Hutchinson. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE BRETHREN. By H. RIDER HAGGARD. 7% x 5,<br />
342 pp. Cassell. 6s.<br />
<br />
In DEWISLAND. By S. BARING GOULD.<br />
Methune. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE DIVINE FirE, By MAY SINCLAIR.<br />
Constable. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE Lovers OF MIss ANNE,<br />
8 x 5}, 408 pp. Clarke. 6s.<br />
<br />
MERELY Mary ANN. By I. ZANGWILL (New Edition).<br />
<br />
_ 74 x 43,160 pp. Heinemann. 1s. n.<br />
<br />
A BRIDE FROM THE BusH. By E.<br />
8$ x 59,122 pp. Newnes. 6s.<br />
<br />
HEARTS IN EXILE. By JOHN OXENHAM. 73<br />
300 pp. Hodder and Stoughton. 6s.<br />
<br />
CAPRICIOUS CAROLINE. By MARIA ALBANESI. 7} X 5,<br />
327 pp. Methuen. 6s.<br />
THE MERRY-GO-ROUND. By WILLIAM<br />
MAUGHAM. 73 X 54. Heinemann. 6s.<br />
For HEART 0’ GOLD. By CONSTANCE SMEDLEY. 73 X 5.<br />
303 pp. Harpers. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE BETRAYAL. By E. PHILLIPS OPPENHEIM. 73 X 5,<br />
316 pp. Ward, Lock. 6s.<br />
<br />
At THE Moorines. By Rosa<br />
7% x 5,451 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
<br />
SOONER OR LATER, By VioLEr Hunt. 7} X 5}, £35 pp.<br />
Chapman and Hall. 6s.<br />
<br />
7% x 5, 306 pp.<br />
72 x 5, 667 pp.<br />
<br />
By 8. R. CROCKETT.<br />
<br />
W. HORNUNG.<br />
<br />
x 5,<br />
<br />
SOMERSET<br />
<br />
NoUCHETTE CAREY.<br />
<br />
A Great PATIENCE. By L. G. Moperny. 8. W.<br />
Partridge. 2s.<br />
Tur DREAM OF Peace. By FRANCIS GRIBBLE. 73} X 5,<br />
<br />
305 pp. Chapman and Hall. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe MarriaGe Yoke, By ARABELLA KENEALY.<br />
72 x 54,348 pp. Hurst and Blackett. 6s.<br />
<br />
Smatinou. By J. H. Yoxaut, M.P. 7} x 5, 307 pp.<br />
Hutchinson. 6s.<br />
<br />
HELMSLEY’s PRINCESS. By J.B. ForD. 7 X 4%, 133 pp.<br />
Simpkin Marshall. 1s. n.<br />
<br />
THE HEART OF PENELOPE. By Mrs, BELLoc LOWNDES.<br />
72 x 5. 336 pp. Heinemann. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE CELESTIAL Sur@eon. By F. F. MONTRESOR.<br />
72 xX 5}, 375 pp. Arnold, 6s.<br />
<br />
THE RED DERELICT. By BERTRAM MITFORD. 7] X 54,<br />
303 pp. Methuen. 6s.<br />
<br />
JoHN Riegpon. By C, P. PLANT,<br />
Sonnenschien. 6s.<br />
<br />
Sir RocEr’s Herr. By F, FraNKForT Moore. 7} X 5,<br />
352 pp. Hodder and Stoughton. 6s.<br />
<br />
74 xX 5, 372 pp.<br />
<br />
HISTORY.<br />
A History OF SCOTLAND, FROM THE ROMAN. OCCUPA-<br />
<br />
TIoN. By ANDREW LANG. Vol. III, (1625—1689).<br />
9 x 53,424 pp. Blackwood. 15s. n.<br />
LAW.<br />
<br />
Tae LAw or Torts, By Sir F. Pouuock, Bart., LL.D.<br />
Seventh edition. 8% x 53,679 pp. Stevens and Sons.<br />
<br />
25s,<br />
LITERARY,<br />
THE Port’s DIARY, Edited by Lamia, 8} X 54, 255 pp.<br />
Macmillan. 7s. 6d.<br />
<br />
By JoHN ‘OLIVER<br />
<br />
LETTERS FROM A SILENT STUDY.<br />
3s 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Hoppes. 72 X %#, 235 pp. Appleton.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AN IMPRESSIONIST IN ENGLAND.<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR. 33<br />
<br />
LETTERS ON LIFE. By CLAupIUS CLEAR (Dr. Robertson<br />
Nicoll). 8% x 53,95 pp. Hodder and Stoughton. 6d.<br />
<br />
A Nore Book oF FRENCH LITERATURE. By P. C.<br />
YorKE. Vol. IL., Vineteenth Century. 8 x 54, 490 pp.<br />
Blackie. 4s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
NATURAL HISTORY.<br />
<br />
CREATURES OF THE SEA (being the life stories of some<br />
sea birds, beists, and fishes) By F. T. BULLEN,<br />
F. R.G.S. 82 x 52,430 pp. R.T.S. 7s. 6d.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
PAMPHLETS.<br />
<br />
‘REFLECTIONS SUGGESTED BY THE NEW THEORY OF<br />
<br />
MATTER (being the Presidential Address before the<br />
British Association for the Advancement of Science).<br />
Cambridge, August 17th, 1904. By THE RicHT Hon.<br />
A, J. BALFouR, M.P. Longman’s. ls. n.<br />
<br />
POETRY.<br />
<br />
THE TESTAMENT OF A PRIME MINISTER. By JOHN<br />
Davipson. 72 X 53,103 pp. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Lost MASTERPIECES AND OTHER VERSES. By St. JOHN<br />
HANKIN. 7 x 43,73 pp. Constable. 3s 6d. n.<br />
<br />
BEAUTIFUL Days. By ADELAIDE L. J. GOSSET.<br />
Third edition. Partridge & Co. 1s.<br />
<br />
QUAINT CHARMS, KNOTS AND VERSES.<br />
thousand. Walker. Is.n.<br />
<br />
BRIGHT EVENING THOUGHTS FOR LITTLE CHILDREN.<br />
By ADELAIDE L. J. GossET. 32 pp. 382 illustrations.<br />
George Allen. 2s. n.<br />
<br />
“HEAVEN'S WaAY.”—QUAINT CorDs, CoILs, AND LOVE-<br />
Twists. By ADELAIDE L. J. GosseT. Elkin Mathews<br />
ls. n.<br />
<br />
A Harvest oF CHAFF. By OWEN SEAMAN.<br />
147 pp. Constable. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
32 pp.<br />
44 pp. Fifth<br />
<br />
i x 44,<br />
<br />
POLITICAL.<br />
Russia: WHAT SHE WAS AND WHAT SHE Is. By<br />
<br />
JAAKOFF PRELOOKER. 7 X 5,148 pp. Simpkin, Mar-<br />
shall. 2s. 6d.<br />
SCIENCE.<br />
Srupies IN Astronomy. By J. ELLaRD_ GORE,<br />
F.R. ALS. 73° 5, 336 pp. Chatto and Windus. 6s.<br />
<br />
SCIENTIFIC.<br />
Sick Nursinc at Home. By L. G. Moperty, Scientific<br />
Press. 1s.<br />
<br />
ELecTROCHEMISTRY. By Proressor R. A. LEHFELDT,<br />
Voll. 268 pp. Longmans. 5s,<br />
<br />
THEOLOGY.<br />
<br />
SEVEN Year’s Harp. By RicHArD FREE. 8}. x 54<br />
<br />
268 pp. Heinemann, 5s. n.<br />
<br />
TOPOGRAPHY.<br />
Living Lonpon. ‘Edited by Gro. R. Sims. Part I.<br />
‘114 x 84, 32 pp. Cassell. 7d. n.<br />
<br />
TRAVEL.<br />
<br />
By F. H. Rose.<br />
72 x 54, 305 pp. Dent. 4s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
SUNSHINE AND SENTIMENT IN PorRTUGAL. By GILBERT<br />
Warson. 9 x 6,295 pp. Arnold, 12s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
NOTES.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
€ HE Poet’s Diary, edited by Lamia,” is the<br />
title of a new prose work, written by the<br />
Poet Laureate, and published by Messrs.<br />
Macmillan & Co.<br />
<br />
The same firm has issued a new and chearer<br />
edition of Lord Avebury’s work on “ The Scenery<br />
of England.” The edition contains all the original<br />
illustrations.<br />
<br />
The English Text Society has issued Part 1 of the<br />
“ English Fifteenth Century Translation of Etienne<br />
de Besancon’s Collection of Tales for Sermons,” by<br />
Mrs. M. M. Banks. Part 2 of the same work will<br />
appear shortly.<br />
<br />
Laura Hain Friswell is at present engaged upon<br />
her reminiscences, which will contain anecdotes of<br />
Dickens, Swinburne, Louis Blanc, Cruikshank,<br />
Tennyson, Toole, Irving, and many others. The<br />
work will be a girl’s impression of literary people<br />
and literary and journalistic society in the last<br />
century.<br />
<br />
The same authoress wrote a serial which ran<br />
through the Daily Chronicle at the beginning of<br />
last month, under the title of “ His Uncle’s Wife.”<br />
<br />
Mr. John Davidson’s, “The Testament of a<br />
Prime Minister,’ published on October 5th, is the<br />
fourth of a series of poems in which Mr. Davidson<br />
“ states fact in terms of poetry.”<br />
<br />
Edith ©. Kenyon’s tale for young people, en-<br />
titled, “A Girl‘in a Thousand,” has just been<br />
published, with beautiful illustrations by Messrs.<br />
S. W. Partridge & Co. It is an up-to-date version<br />
of the Cinderella story.<br />
<br />
Mr. Kipling’s new volume of stories, “ Traffics<br />
and Discoveries,” published by Messrs. Macmillan<br />
& Co., derives inspiration from many sources.<br />
“The Captive” reflects the view of an American<br />
inventor, unwillingly drawn into the fighting line,<br />
on the British methods of conducting the Boer<br />
War. “A Sahib’s War” presents the point of<br />
view of a Sikh soldier on the same operations ;<br />
while a third story, with a South African setting,<br />
shows Tommy Atkin’s attitude towards the accusa-<br />
tion of “barbarous methods.” Standing out from<br />
all the rest of the volume in great contrast both in<br />
matter of subject and in treatment is a story of<br />
dream children, entitled “ They.”<br />
<br />
In addition to Mr. Kipling’s volume, Messrs.<br />
Macmillan announce the publication of the follow-<br />
ing six-shilling novels: “ Whosoever shall Offend,”<br />
by E. Marion Crawford ; “The Food of the Gods,<br />
and How it came to Earth,” by H. G. Wells;<br />
and “Atoms of Empire,” by ©. J. Cutcliffe Hyne.<br />
<br />
The same publishers are also issuing a new series<br />
of English Men of Letters. Among the volumes<br />
SS ay<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
34<br />
<br />
contained in the series may be mentioned “Thomas<br />
Moore,” by Stephen Gwynn ; “ Andrew Marvell,”<br />
by Augustine Birrell; “ Edward FitzGerald,” by<br />
A. C. Benson; and “Sir Thomas Browne,” by<br />
Edmund Gosse. :<br />
<br />
Messrs. Seeley & Co. will issue shortly a new<br />
work for young children, entitled “ The Crusaders,”<br />
by Professor Church.<br />
<br />
“The Church Universal, Brief Histories of her<br />
Continuous Life,” is the title of a new series, in<br />
eight volumes, edited by the Rev. W. H. Hutton,<br />
which Messrs. Rivingtons are publishing ; and to<br />
which, besides the editor, the Rev. Leighton<br />
Pullan, Mr. D. J. Medley, Mr. Herbert Bruce, and<br />
the Rev. J. P. Whitney contribute.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Alec Tweedie, whose book, “ Behind the<br />
Footlights,” lately ran into a second edition, has<br />
another volume in the press. This time she has<br />
returned to her old love of travel. The book,<br />
which will appear in the autumn in England and<br />
America, is entitled, “ Sunny Sicily, its Rustics and<br />
its Ruins.” Hutchinson is the English publisher.<br />
<br />
Mr. Lewis Melville is publishing this month<br />
through Messrs. A. & C. Black a volume on<br />
“The Thackeray Country.” The book deals with<br />
those localities which are of primary interest to<br />
those who are acquainted with the life and writing<br />
of the novelist. It treats of Thackeray’s London<br />
homes, and the salient features and associations of<br />
<br />
-their neighbourhood, as well as of Thackeray in<br />
<br />
Paris and in America. Special attention is given<br />
to those places that are made the back ground of<br />
well-known scenes in the novels.<br />
<br />
“By Nile and Euphrates: a Record of Dis-<br />
covery and Adventure,” post octavo, price 8s. 6d.,<br />
has been published by Messrs. T. & T. Clark, of<br />
Edinburgh. The author is Mr. Valentine Geere,<br />
who served on the American Excavations at<br />
Nippur, and: assisted Prof. Petrie and Dr. Gren-<br />
fell and Dr. Hunt in their work in Egypt. His<br />
volume gives an account of his experiences at the<br />
mounds and in his journeys in out-of-the-way<br />
places. It is amply illustrated by original photo-<br />
graphs and plans.<br />
<br />
John Oliver Hobbes (Mrs. Craigie) will shortly<br />
publish, through Mr. T. Werner Laurie, “The<br />
Artist’s Life, and other Essays.” In the volume,<br />
which is illustrated, are included her lectures<br />
before the Dante Society, the Ruskin Society, and<br />
the Philosophical Institution of Edinburgh.<br />
<br />
A new work by Mrs. Fred Reynolds, entitled<br />
“The Book of Angelus Drayton,” is published<br />
this month by Mr. John Long. The scene is laid<br />
in Yorkshire.<br />
<br />
We have received the fifth edition of Mr. E. A.<br />
Reynolds-Ball’s “‘ Mediterranean Winter Resorts,”<br />
published by Messrs. Hazell, Watson and Viney,<br />
at 8s. 6d. each, in two parts, or combined volume<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
on Indian paper, 6s. It is a complete and practical<br />
guide to all the health and pleasure resorts on the<br />
shores of the Mediterranean, as, indeed, its title<br />
suggests. It contains other interesting matter,<br />
and special articles on the principal invalid stations<br />
by resident English physicians.<br />
<br />
The calendars for 1905 are already being<br />
issued. Two neat memorandum forms arranged<br />
by “Autolycus” have been received at the Society’s<br />
office. The price is 1s. net each, and copies can<br />
be obtained either from Miss Rossi, of 202,<br />
Adelaide Road, Hampstead, N.W., or Mr. G. J.<br />
Glaisher, bookseller, 58, High Street, Notting Hill<br />
Gate, W. A peculiar feature of the calendar lies<br />
in the fact that at the beginning of every week ~<br />
there is a quotation from some well known<br />
author.<br />
<br />
We have received Messrs. George Newnes, Ltd.,<br />
trade circular for the current month. There are<br />
several interesting notes concerning books by<br />
members of the Society, which will shortly be<br />
before the public. .<br />
<br />
Mr. W. W. Jacobs’s story, ‘ Dialstone Lane,”<br />
which has been running through The Strand, is<br />
about to be produced in crown octavo at the price<br />
of 6s. The illustrations are by Mr. Will Owen.<br />
Mr. Jacobs’s method of dealing with the<br />
characteristics of coastwise sailormen is well<br />
known to all readers of The Strand Magazine. A<br />
fresh book from his pen will be welcome.<br />
<br />
Mr. Eden Phillpotts, who has for many years<br />
written such strong fiction with the west country<br />
as background, will publish through the same firm<br />
a book entitled “The Farm of the Dagger,” crown<br />
octavo, 3s. 6d. The story deals with the adven-<br />
tures of an American prisoner in England during<br />
the War of Independence (18121815), and is full<br />
of incident.<br />
<br />
Astory from Miss Marie Corelli will be published<br />
as a companion to The Strand Magazine Christmas<br />
Number. Ii will be issued separately from The<br />
Strand, at the price of 1s., and will be illustrated<br />
by Mr. H. R. Millar.<br />
<br />
Mr. R. S. Warren Bell is publishing a work<br />
through the same firm, entitled “Jim Mortimer,<br />
Surgeon.” The story deals with the Hooligan-<br />
infested district of Blackfriars. :<br />
<br />
E. Nesbit’s pleasant fairy tale, “The Phoenix<br />
and the Carpet,” will also appear as a Christmas<br />
book. The authoress’s delightful fancy is further<br />
exemplified in this new effort of her pen.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Macmillan & Co. are issuing new and<br />
revised editions of Mr. Vincent T. Murche’s<br />
manuals of object lessons in elementary science.<br />
In these new issues several improvements have been<br />
<br />
‘made with a view to rendering them even more<br />
<br />
useful to teachers. :<br />
A selection has been made by Canon Beeching<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
from the sermons of the late Master of the Temple.<br />
‘They will be issued in a volume by Messrs.<br />
Macmillan, under the title of ‘The Gospel and<br />
‘Human Life.” Broadly speaking, the editor has<br />
omitted from his selection of twenty-four sermons<br />
all those dealing especially with the dogmas of the<br />
Church. The proof of the suitability of religion<br />
to human needs as they are revealed by experience<br />
of life is the aspect which is most prominently set<br />
forth in this posthumous work, with the result,<br />
Canon Beeching hopes, that it will be regarded as<br />
thoroughly characteristic of the individual preacher.<br />
<br />
The November number of Zhe Lady's Realm<br />
will contain the opening chapters of a new story<br />
entitled “ Starve Crow Farm,” by Stanley Weyman.<br />
The scene is laid in the North Country in the<br />
year 1819, when the working classes, impoverished<br />
by the long struggle against Napoleon, were<br />
seething with discontent and latent rebellion.<br />
<br />
« With a View to Matrimony” is the title of a<br />
book of short stories by Mr. James Blyth, author<br />
of “Juicy Joe” and ‘“ Celibate Sarah,” which Mr.<br />
Grant Richards published towards the end of<br />
October. Readers will have the opportunity of<br />
renewing their acquaintance with several of the<br />
places and people figuring in those two novels.<br />
The humorous side of village life predominates.<br />
<br />
Mr. Grant Richards has also published a new<br />
edition of “A Book of Verses for Children,” com-<br />
piled by Mr. E. V. Lucas.<br />
<br />
A military novel entitled “ The Queen’s Scarlet,”<br />
was published last month by Messrs. S. C. Brown,<br />
Langham & Co., of New Bond Street. The book<br />
is from the pen of Mr. Horace Wyndham, and deals<br />
in an intimate manner with life in the ranks, at<br />
home and abroad, in barracks and camp, in peace<br />
and war. The action commences at an Army<br />
crammer’s, in South Kensington, and concludes in<br />
South Africa. Mr. Wyndham is the author of two<br />
other books on military matters, ‘The Queen’s<br />
Service,” and “Soldiers of the Queen.”<br />
<br />
Messrs. Cassell & Co. have just brought out a<br />
book by the author of “The Rejuvenation of Miss<br />
Semaphore.” The title, ‘‘ Aliens of the West,” was<br />
suggested by a line in one of Sliabh Cuillin’s<br />
poems, “Ourselves Alone.” The volume deals<br />
with certain sides of Irish life, which are practically<br />
new in fiction, and which will have interest, not<br />
only for the Irish, but for the general reader. It<br />
differs widely from the usual Irish novel, both in<br />
theme and in treatment.<br />
<br />
Mr. Norman Alliston wishes to give notice that<br />
towards the middle of this month he will issue a<br />
small “Edition d’héte” of his new work, “The<br />
Rationale of Art.”<br />
<br />
Owing to what he considers the exorbitance and<br />
apathy of publishers in dealing with commissioned<br />
business, Mr. Alliston is publishing the book for<br />
<br />
35<br />
<br />
himself at Kamesburgh, Beckenham, and managing<br />
all arrangements—down to shopping the single<br />
copies. Mr. Alliston will ask “A crown for his<br />
thoughts ”—five shillings net, post free.<br />
<br />
In the 14th Edition of Chitty on Contracts, by<br />
Mr. J. M. Lely (Sweet & Maxwell, 30s.), the editor<br />
has, “with reluctance made an exception to the<br />
rule that judgments of the House of Lords should<br />
be merely recorded and not criticised,” and sub-<br />
mitted six reasons why that judgment though right<br />
upon authority is wrong in its construction of the<br />
18th Section of the Copyright Act. Attention is<br />
called in the preface to various points “ which seem<br />
to require remedial legislation,” such as the too<br />
little known rules of law, that money at a bank not<br />
drawn upon for six years becomes the property of<br />
the banker, that the executors of a lessee may be<br />
personally liable on his covenants for repair, that if<br />
A. undisputedly owes B. £100, and B. agrees to<br />
take £90 in full satisfaction, B. can, nevertheless,<br />
sue A. for the remaining £10, that the barely<br />
intelligible 18th Section of the Copyright Act<br />
requires recasting, and that a master is under no<br />
obligation in England or Scotland (as he is in<br />
Ireland), to give a servant a character, however<br />
long and faithful the service may have been.<br />
<br />
In the Quiver of the current month<br />
commences the opening chapters of Mr. John<br />
Bloundelle-Burton’s new romance, “ The Sword of<br />
Gideon.” The story, which centres round that<br />
portion of the War of Succession in Spain which<br />
took place in Flanders, will be the serial for the<br />
year.<br />
<br />
In the same month a new romance of Mr.<br />
Bloundelle-Burton’s, entitled “The Land of Bond-<br />
age,” will be published by F. V. White & Co., Ltd.<br />
The scene is laid principally in Virginia, and deals<br />
with the kidnapping of redemptioners, and the<br />
tragedies that, in many cases, resulted therefrom.<br />
Most of the descriptions are taken from MS.<br />
papers and letters written by the planters and<br />
colonists of the actual period, that of George IL.,<br />
which were handed to Mr. Bloundelle-Burton by<br />
the last survivor of an old Virginian family.<br />
<br />
“The Temple of Art: A Plea for the Higher<br />
Realisation of the Artistic Vocation,” is published<br />
by Messrs. Longmans, Green & Co., at the price of<br />
3s. 6d. The author—Mr. Ermest Newlandsmith—<br />
takes the view that at the present time the greater<br />
number of so-ealled works of art are only exhibitions<br />
of technical display, failing to infect those who come<br />
under their influence with any true or definite<br />
emotion.<br />
<br />
A revised and enlarged edition of “ Printing,”<br />
by Chas. T. Jacobi, published by Messrs. George<br />
Bell and Sons in their Technological Series, is now<br />
in the press and will be ready in November. This<br />
is a recognised text-book for the student and useful<br />
<br />
<br />
SS al<br />
<br />
See ST<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
‘86<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
for all interested in the art of printing. This<br />
third edition will possess some new features.<br />
<br />
Early last month Miss Theodora Wilson Wilson<br />
published a novel, entitled ‘Father, M.P.,” with<br />
Messrs. Thos. Nelson & Sons.<br />
<br />
he same author has also made arrangements<br />
with Messrs. Harper Bros. for the production of a<br />
work next year. The title is “ Langbarrow Hall,”<br />
and the novel deals with the North Country, in a<br />
district of sand and peat, moss and scaur.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Blackie and Sons have just issued Vol. 2<br />
of Mr. Philip C. Yorke’s work, “A Note Book of<br />
French Literature.” This volume, which deals<br />
with authors of the nineteenth century, is worked<br />
out on the same plan as that adopted by the author<br />
in Vol. 1, and consists of biography, bibliography,<br />
critical note, and illustrative extract to each<br />
author. The work is preceded by an introductory<br />
chapter.<br />
<br />
Mr. Pinero’s new play was produced on the stage<br />
of Sir Charles Wyndham’s Theatre, on the night<br />
of October 12th. The title, which gives the key<br />
to the piece, is “A Wife without a Smile—a<br />
Comedy in Disguise.” It is full of cynical<br />
humour, and the characters were excellently played<br />
throughout.<br />
<br />
A new play by Mr. Bernard Shaw, “John<br />
Bull’s Other Island,” written for the Irish Literary<br />
Society, will be produced in England at the Court<br />
Theatre for six matinées, on the Ist, 3rd, 4th,<br />
8th, 10th, 11th of November. The date of the<br />
Irish performance has not, as yet, been fixed.<br />
There will be some further performances of<br />
Mr. Shaw’s well known play, “Candida,” in<br />
December. Another play by the same author,<br />
“ How He Lied to Her Husband,” has been pro-<br />
duced under the management of Mr. Arnold Daly,<br />
with considerable success, in New York. It has<br />
been described as a travesty of Candida ; but this<br />
isa mistake. It deals with the adventures of a<br />
young poet and a fashionable lady who catch the<br />
Candida craze, and try to imagine themselves<br />
Candida and Eugene in real life, with ridiculous<br />
consequences.<br />
<br />
Mr. Shaw’s play, “ Cesar and Cleopatra,” which<br />
was to have been produced at the Berlin Deutscher<br />
Theater last spring, will be produced there next<br />
year.<br />
<br />
————1->o—__—_<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
6“ OUVENIRS des vertes Saisons,” by André<br />
Theuriet, is a charming sketch of the child-<br />
<br />
hood, early manhood, and career of this<br />
author. He tells us of his early writings and of<br />
his first publication in the Revwe des Deua-<br />
Slondes. He speaks, too, of his contemporaries,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Daudet, Flaubert, the de Goncourts, &c. ; and there<br />
is a touching account of the poet André Lemoyne,<br />
and of the way in which he wrote his verses.<br />
<br />
“Te Double Jardin,” by Maurice Meeterlinck,<br />
proves that the author is by no means a pessimist.<br />
“Nous sommes,” he writes, “au moment ou nais-<br />
sent autour de nous mille raisons nouvelles de<br />
prendre confiance dans les destinées de notre<br />
espéce.”<br />
<br />
“Le Sillon,” by Resclauze de Bermon, is a story<br />
of self-sacrifice. It is both romantic and pathetic,<br />
and altogether a novel well worth reading.<br />
<br />
In “Les Sirénes,” by Jean Reibrach, the chief<br />
interest is also the self-sacrifice of the man who, at<br />
an advanced age, has fallen in love with the orphan<br />
daughter of a fellow officer. She is engaged to<br />
him, but before the marriage takes place he dis-<br />
covers that he has a rival in the girl’s affections,<br />
and not only does he stand aside himself but he<br />
facilitates things for the lovers. There are some<br />
exquisite passages in the book, and the picture of —<br />
provincial life is well drawn. The characters, too, ~<br />
all live and stand out in excellent contrast.<br />
<br />
“Félicien, souvenir d’un étudiant de 48,” by<br />
Charles-Louis Chassin, is an excellent book for<br />
giving a picture of the times about which the ~<br />
author writes. ‘There is the proclamation of the<br />
Republic, the eventful 13th of June, the manifesta-<br />
tion of the students against the closing of Michelet’s —<br />
lectures, and an account of the author’s life when<br />
in the Mazas Prison. Jules Vallés and Leconte<br />
de Lisle are to be found in this story figuring ~<br />
under other names.<br />
<br />
“Madame de Ferneuse,” by Daniel Lesueur, is<br />
the sequel to the ‘“ Marquis de Valcor.” The —<br />
interest of the story is well sustained, the characters ~<br />
all live, and the book itself is written admirably.<br />
<br />
“ Légendes de mort et d’amour,” by M. Gaston-<br />
Routier, is a volume of legends and impressions<br />
written after a voyage in Spain. The author has<br />
written a number of historical and geographical<br />
works, and is considered an authority on subjects<br />
connected with the early history and literature of<br />
Spain.<br />
<br />
Among other new books are: ‘Le Fils de la<br />
Mer,” by Nelly Hager; “La Macédoine et: les<br />
puissances,” by M. Gaston-Routier ; “ Le peuple<br />
chinois,” by Fernand Farjenel ; “ La Bosnie popu-<br />
laire,” by Albert Bordeaux ; ‘‘ Les Giuvres des<br />
autres,” by Madame Jeanne France.<br />
<br />
There is an attempt now being made by French<br />
authors to protect their works in Canada. It<br />
appears that plays, short stories, and novels are —<br />
constantly reproduced in the papers or published<br />
in book form without the consent of the writers.<br />
<br />
The Society of Canadian-French journalists has<br />
taken the matter up, and in reply to a question<br />
addressed to the Government there, the Honourable<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
1M. Scott has replied that he believes the Canadian<br />
<br />
o'Government adheres to the Convention of Berne.<br />
<br />
‘Should this be so French writers have it in their<br />
<br />
wvown hands to protect their works. One of the<br />
<br />
‘most important publishing houses of Canada,<br />
<br />
Messrs. Beauchemin, is always loyal in dealing<br />
<br />
‘-with French anthors ; and M. Heurion, the manager<br />
<br />
‘of the ThéAtre des Nouveautés, of Montreal, has<br />
<br />
been over to Paris and made arrangements about<br />
<br />
slplaying the “ Retour de Jérusalem”’ and “ La plus<br />
i-faible,” but various newspapers and publishing<br />
<br />
‘houses are at the present time using works by<br />
<br />
iesome of the best known French authors with no<br />
<br />
ssregard whatever to the question of literary property.<br />
The matter is now being taken up seriously in<br />
<br />
France.<br />
<br />
‘| Inthe Mercure de France there is an excellent<br />
- szarticle on “ Les Racines de l’Idéalisme,” by Remy<br />
» ade Gourmont, and a curious study by M. Bélugou,<br />
| jgentitled “Le Pouvoir de Imagination chez les<br />
/ Enfants.” There is also an interesting criticism of<br />
' odthe “ Peintres de la terre belge” by M. Marius-Ary<br />
‘a. Leblond.<br />
<br />
| In La Revue of October 15th there is an article<br />
“yby M. Charles Pagot, “Comment reformer l’enseigne-<br />
wment classique,” and another one by M. Georges<br />
*Pellissier on “ La Littérature a thése.” The writer<br />
simaintains that in the roman a these the personages<br />
: @do not live: they are so many puppets whose<br />
‘strings are pulled by the author. When they<br />
‘jspeak we recognise the author’s voice prompting<br />
“oitheir role, and all their acting is in support of the<br />
‘theory he wishes to prove.<br />
<br />
| In a recent article in the Nouvelle Revue M.<br />
+o Morel asks what is to be done with all the books<br />
‘which have to be deposited at the Bibliotheque<br />
Nationale. He believes that with the present<br />
system the catalogue itself cannot be completed<br />
until the year 1930, and that it will consist of 136<br />
volumes.<br />
<br />
In the Quinzaine M. Giraud writes on Chateau-<br />
briand and his critics.<br />
<br />
In the Revue des Deur-Mondes M. Fouillée<br />
discusses the moral and social consequences of<br />
“{ Darwinism. In the same review Madame Arvede<br />
@ Barine gives details with regard to the romance<br />
' Lof “La Grande Mademoiselle,” and M. Edouard<br />
9) Rod writes on Ada Negri’s new book.<br />
ty In the Revue de Paris there is an interesting<br />
°9¢ account of Count Valentin Esterhazy, and M. Paul<br />
“oe Stapfer writes of his acquaintance with Victor<br />
4) Hugo when the poet was at Guernsey.<br />
ef At the Comédie Francaise “Les Affaires sont<br />
les Affaires” has been put on again.<br />
<br />
The Odéon is now giving the new play by<br />
M. Brieux, “ La Déserteuse.”<br />
<br />
_ Parle Fer et par le Feu,” the piece now running<br />
at the Théatre Sarah Bernhardt, is taken from the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
37<br />
<br />
celebrated novel by Sienkiewicz. Madame Bern-<br />
hardt read the book when on tour in America, and<br />
suggested to her son, M. Maurice Bernhardt, the<br />
idea of adapting it for the stage. For the last two<br />
years he has been at work on it, and in September<br />
it. was read to the artistes. While Madame Bern-<br />
hardt is away on her tour the new play is being<br />
given at her theatre.<br />
<br />
M. Antoine is still faithful to his bill of short<br />
plays, and is at present giving four instead of<br />
three: ‘ Petite Femme,” “La Main de Singe,”<br />
“Discipline,” and “ Asile de Nuit.”<br />
<br />
At the Vaudeville “‘ Les Trois Anabaptistes”’<br />
is to be followed by M. Henry Bataille’s new play,<br />
“Madame Colibri.”<br />
<br />
Atys HALLARD.<br />
<br />
——_———__+—~<>_ + —_____-<br />
<br />
SPAIN AND BOOK PRODUCTION.<br />
<br />
— ++<br />
<br />
HE following correspondence has been re-<br />
ceived by the Secretary at the Society’s<br />
Office :—<br />
<br />
The Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs<br />
presents his compliments to the Secretary to the<br />
Society of Authors, and is directed by the Secretary<br />
of State for Foreign Affairs to transmit to him to<br />
be laid before the Society the accompanying paper<br />
respecting the exemption from duty of books<br />
imported from certain countries into Spain :—<br />
<br />
SPANISH EMBASSY,<br />
July 12th, 1904.<br />
<br />
My Lorp,—I have the honour to inform your<br />
Excellency that the Government of the King, my<br />
august Sovereign, animated by the desire to<br />
strengthen the bonds of union between Spain and<br />
other nations her friends or allies, bonds which are<br />
certainly stronger in proportion as the communica-<br />
tion of ideas between the different countries is<br />
rendered more easy, presented to the Cortes a Bill<br />
amending the regulations respecting the present<br />
Customs tariff as regards the importation of books,<br />
and that this Bill, having been passed by the<br />
Chambers and sanctioned by His Majesty, has been<br />
promulgated as a law of the kingdom, dated March<br />
4th last.<br />
<br />
Great Britain being, in view of the fact that her<br />
tariffs grant the exemption from duty, included in<br />
the terms of Article 2 of this law, Iam instructed by<br />
my Government to communicate it to His Majesty’s<br />
Government, in order that advantage may be taken<br />
of it by any British subjects who may desire to<br />
introduce books into Spain, and who shall have<br />
complied with the other conditions mentioned in<br />
the law.<br />
<br />
I transmit herewith to your Excellency a copy of<br />
<br />
<br />
‘36<br />
for all interested in the art of printing. This<br />
third edition will possess some new features.<br />
<br />
Early last month Miss Theodora Wilson Wilson<br />
published a novel, entitled “Father, M.P.,”’ with<br />
Messrs. Thos. Nelson & Sons.<br />
<br />
he same author has also made arrangements<br />
with Messrs. Harper Bros. for the production of a<br />
work next year. The title is « Langbarrow Hall,<br />
and the novel deals with the North Country, in a<br />
district of sand and peat, moss and scaur.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Blackie and Sons have just issued Vol. 2<br />
of Mr. Philip ©. Yorke’s work, “A Note Book of<br />
French Literature.” This volume, which deals<br />
with authors of the nineteenth century, is worked<br />
out on the same plan as that adopted by the author<br />
in Vol. 1, and consists of biography, bibliography,<br />
critical note, and illustrative extract to each<br />
author. The work is preceded by an introductory<br />
chapter.<br />
<br />
Mr. Pinero’s new play was produced on the stage<br />
of Sir Charles Wyndham’s Theatre, on the night<br />
of October 12th. The title, which gives the key<br />
to the piece, is “A Wife without a Smile—a<br />
Comedy in Disguise.” It is full of cynical<br />
humour, and the characters were excellently played<br />
throughout.<br />
<br />
A new play by Mr. Bernard Shaw, “John<br />
Bull’s Other Island,” written for the Irish Literary<br />
Society, will be produced in England at the Court<br />
Theatre for six matinées, on the Ist, 3rd, 4th,<br />
8th, 10th, 11th of November. The date of the<br />
Irish performance has not, as yet, been fixed.<br />
There will be some further performances of<br />
Mr. Shaw’s well known play, “Candida,” in<br />
December. Another play by the same author,<br />
“ How He Lied to Her Husband,” has been_pro-<br />
duced under the management of Mr. Arnold Daly,<br />
with considerable success, in New York. It has<br />
been described asa travesty of Candida ; but this<br />
isa mistake. It deals with the adventures of a<br />
young poet and a fashionable lady who catch the<br />
Candida craze, and try to imagine themselves<br />
Candida and Eugene in real life, with ridiculous<br />
consequences.<br />
<br />
Mr. Shaw’s play, “ Caesar and Cleopatra,” which<br />
was to have been produced at the Berlin Deutscher<br />
Theater last spring, will be produced there next<br />
year.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
—__——_—_—_+—>—_o—_____—_<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—1-~—<br />
<br />
‘ OUVENIRS des vertes Saisons,” by André<br />
Theuriet, is a charming sketch of the child-<br />
hood, early manhood, and career of this<br />
<br />
author. He tells us of his early writings and of<br />
<br />
his first publication in the Revwe des Deuz-<br />
He speaks, too, of his contemporaries,<br />
<br />
Mondes.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Daudet, Flaubert, the de Goncourts, &c. ; and there<br />
is a touching account of the poet André Lemoyne,<br />
and of the way in which he wrote his verses.<br />
<br />
“Te Double Jardin,” by Maurice Meeterlinck,<br />
proves that the author is by no means a pessimist.<br />
“Nous sommes,” he writes, “au moment ou nais-<br />
sent autour de nous mille raisons nouvelles de<br />
prendre confiance dans les destinées de notre<br />
espéce.”<br />
<br />
“Le Sillon,” by Resclauze de Bermon, is a story<br />
of self-sacrifice. It is both romantic and pathetic,<br />
and altogether a novel well worth reading.<br />
<br />
In “Les Sirénes,” by Jean Reibrach, the chief<br />
interest is also the self-sacrifice of the man who, at<br />
an advanced age, has fallen in love with the orphan<br />
daughter of a fellow officer. She is engaged to<br />
him, but before the marriage takes place he dis-<br />
covers that he has a rival in the girl’s affections,<br />
and not only does he stand aside himself but he<br />
facilitates things for the lovers. There are some<br />
exquisite passages in the book, and the picture of<br />
provincial life is well drawn. The characters, too,<br />
all live and stand out in excellent contrast.<br />
<br />
“Félicien, souvenir d’un étudiant de 48,” by<br />
Charles-Louis Chassin, is an excellent book for<br />
giving a picture of the times about which the<br />
author writes. There is the proclamation of the<br />
Republic, the eventful 13th of June, the manifesta-<br />
tion of the students against the closing of Michelet’s<br />
lectures, and an account of the author's life when<br />
in the Mazas Prison. Jules Vallés and Leconte<br />
de Lisle are to be found in this story figuring<br />
under other names.<br />
<br />
“Madame de Ferneuse,” by Daniel Lesueur, is<br />
the sequel to the ‘“ Marquis de Valcor.” The<br />
interest of the story is well sustained, the characters<br />
all live, and the book itself is written admirably.<br />
<br />
“Légendes de mort et d’amour,” by M. Gaston-<br />
Routier, is a volume of legends and impressions<br />
written after a voyage in Spain. The author has<br />
written a number of historical and geographical<br />
works, and is considered an authority on subjects<br />
connected with the early history and literature of<br />
<br />
ain.<br />
ies other new books are: “Le Fils de la<br />
Mer,” by Nelly Hager; “La Macédoine et les<br />
puissances,” by M. Gaston-Routier ; “ Le peuple<br />
chinois,” by Fernand Farjenel ; “ La Bosnie popu-<br />
laire,” by Albert Bordeaux; ‘‘ Les Giuvres des<br />
autres,” by Madame Jeanne France.<br />
<br />
There is an attempt now being made by French<br />
authors to protect their works in Canada. It<br />
appears that plays, short stories, and novels are<br />
constantly reproduced in the papers or published<br />
in book form without the consent of the writers.<br />
<br />
The Society of Canadian-French journalists has<br />
taken the matter up, and in reply to a question<br />
addressed to the Government there, the Honourable<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 37<br />
<br />
M. Scott has replied that he believes the Canadian<br />
Government adheres to the Convention of Berne.<br />
Should this be so French writers have it in their<br />
own hands to protect their works. One of the<br />
most important publishing houses of Canada,<br />
Messrs. Beauchemin, is always loyal in dealing<br />
with French authors ; and M. Heurion, the manager<br />
of the Thédtre des Nouveautés, of Montreal, has<br />
been over to Paris and made arrangements about<br />
playing the “ Retour de Jérusalem”’ and “ La plus<br />
faible,” but various newspapers and publishing<br />
houses are at the present time using works by<br />
some of the best known French authors with no<br />
regard whatever to the question of literary property.<br />
<br />
The matter is now being taken up seriously in<br />
France.<br />
<br />
In the J/ercure de France there is an excellent<br />
article on “ Les Racines de l’Idéalisme,” by Remy<br />
<br />
_ de Gourmont, and a curious study by M. Bélugou,<br />
' entitled “Le Pouvoir de l’Imagination chez les<br />
' Enfants.”<br />
<br />
There is also an interesting criticism of<br />
the “ Peintres de la terre belge” by M. Marius-Ary<br />
<br />
1, Leblond.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
| strings are pulled by the author.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In La Revue of October 15th there is an article<br />
by M. Charles Pagot, “Comment reformer l’enseigne-<br />
<br />
| ment classique,” and another one by M. Georges<br />
<br />
Pellissier on “ La Littératurea these.” The writer<br />
maintains that in the roman d these the personages<br />
do not live: they are so many puppets whose<br />
When they<br />
speak we recognise the author’s voice prompting<br />
their réle, and all their acting is in support of the<br />
theory he wishes to prove.<br />
<br />
In a recent article in the Nowvelle Revue M.<br />
Morel asks what is to be done with all the books<br />
which have to be deposited at the Bibliotheque<br />
Nationale. He believes that with the present<br />
system the catalogue itself cannot be completed<br />
until the year 1930, and that it will consist of 136<br />
volumes.<br />
<br />
In the Quinzaine M. Giraud writes on Chateau-<br />
briand and his critics.<br />
<br />
In the Revwe des Dewr-Mondes M. Fouillée<br />
discusses the moral and social consequences of<br />
Darwinism. In the same review Madame Arvede<br />
Barine gives details with regard to the romance<br />
of “La Grande Mademoiselle,” and M. Edouard<br />
Rod writes on Ada Negri’s new book.<br />
<br />
In the Revue de Paris there is an interesting<br />
account of Count Valentin Esterhazy, and M. Paul<br />
Stapfer writes of his acquaintance with Victor<br />
Hugo when the poet was at Guernsey.<br />
<br />
At the Comédie Francaise “Les Affaires sont<br />
les Affaires” has been put on again.<br />
<br />
The Odéon is now giving the new play by<br />
M. Brieux, “ La Déserteuse.”<br />
<br />
“ Par le Fer et par le Feu,” the piece now running<br />
at the Thédtre Sarah Bernhardt, is taken from the<br />
<br />
celebrated novel by Sienkiewicz. Madame Bern-<br />
hardt read the book when on tour in America, and<br />
suggested to her son, M. Maurice Bernhardt, the<br />
idea of adapting it for the stage. For the last two<br />
years he has been at work on it, and in September<br />
it was read to the artistes. While Madame Bern-<br />
hardt is away on her tour the new play is being<br />
given at her theatre. |<br />
M. Antoine is still faithful to his bill of short<br />
plays, and is at present giving four instead of<br />
three: “Petite Femme,” “La Main de Singe,”<br />
“Discipline,” and “ Asile de Nuit.” :<br />
_ At the Vaudeville “Les Trois Anabaptistes”<br />
is to be followed by M. Henry Bataille’s new play,<br />
‘“‘ Madame Colibri.”<br />
<br />
Auys HALLARD.<br />
<br />
et<br />
<br />
SPAIN AND BOOK PRODUCTION.<br />
<br />
——+—~—+<br />
<br />
HE following correspondence has been re-<br />
ceived by the Secretary at the Society’s<br />
Office :— :<br />
<br />
The Under-Secretary of State for Foreign A ffairs<br />
presents his compliments to the Secretary to the<br />
Society of Authors, and is directed by the Secretary<br />
of State for Foreign Affairs to transmit to him to<br />
be laid before the Society the accompanying paper<br />
respecting the exemption from duty of books<br />
imported from certain countries into Spain :—<br />
<br />
SPANISH EMBASSY,<br />
July 12th, 1904.<br />
<br />
My Lorp,—I have the honour to inform your<br />
Excellency that the Government of the King, my<br />
august Sovereign, animated by the desire to<br />
strengthen the bonds of union between Spain and<br />
other nations her friends or allies, bonds which are<br />
certainly stronger in proportion as the communica-<br />
tion of ideas between the different countries is<br />
rendered more easy, presented to the Cortes a Bill<br />
amending the regulations respecting the present<br />
Customs tariff as regards the importation of books,<br />
and that this Bill, having been passed by the<br />
Chambers and sanctioned by His Majesty, has been<br />
promulgated as a law of the kingdom, dated March<br />
4th last.<br />
<br />
Great Britain being, in view of the fact that her<br />
tariffs grant the exemption from duty, included in<br />
the terms of Article 2 of thislaw, Iam instructed by<br />
my Government to communicate it to His Majesty’s<br />
Government, in order that advantage may be taken<br />
of it by any British subjects who may desire to<br />
introduce books into Spain, and who shall have<br />
complied with the other conditions mentioned in<br />
the law.<br />
<br />
I transmit herewith to your Excellency a copy of<br />
<br />
<br />
38<br />
<br />
the law and a copy of the Royal Order respecting<br />
the effects and the forms of its application.<br />
T have, &c.,<br />
(Signed) Manpas.<br />
<br />
Don Alfonso XIII., by the grace of God, &e., &c.<br />
<br />
‘Article 1.—Are exempted from custom duties,<br />
from the date of the promulgation of this law, all<br />
classes of books imported into Spain provided that<br />
they fulfil the following requirements —<br />
<br />
(1) That they are written in the language of the<br />
country whence they come directly or with a<br />
direct invoice, and that they are published and<br />
printed in the same country ; an -<br />
<br />
(2) That they are the original works of a citizen<br />
of the said country, who has acquired the right of<br />
literary property in them. :<br />
<br />
‘Article 2.—The exemption referred to in the<br />
preceding article shall only apply to nations which<br />
have treaties in regard to literary property, and<br />
which grant the same exemption to books printed<br />
in Spain, as a measure of reciprocity.<br />
<br />
Article 8.—The Ministry of Finance shall give<br />
the necessary orders for the execution of this law.<br />
<br />
Therefore we give order, &c., &c,<br />
<br />
Given at the Palace, March 14th, 1904.<br />
<br />
(Signed) THE Kine.<br />
(Signed) Tum MINISTER OF FINANCE,<br />
GuILLERMO J. DE OSMA.<br />
<br />
MINISTRY OF FINANCE.<br />
RoyaL ORDER.<br />
<br />
Srr,—For the due application of the law of the<br />
14th March last, published in the Madrid Gazette<br />
of the 15th idem, providing for the exemption from<br />
customs duties of books imported from abroad and<br />
printed in the language of the country of origin,<br />
the King, in view of the information supplied by<br />
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and by your office,<br />
has been pleased to order—<br />
<br />
(1) That the following’ countries, which have<br />
<br />
treaties with Spain respecting intellectual property,<br />
<br />
and whose respective tariffs also grant exemption<br />
from duties to Spanish books, are henceforth to be<br />
considered as included under Article 2 of the<br />
above-mentioned law as regards the exemption<br />
referred to: Germany, England, Belgium, France,<br />
Italy, Japan, Siberia, Luxemburg, Monaco, Tunis,<br />
Columbia, Guatemala, Ecuador, Mexico, Norway,<br />
Paraguay, Argentine Republic, and Salvador ;<br />
<br />
(2) That until further notice the same treatment<br />
ghall be extended to Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the<br />
Philippines, in virtue of their having, in the Treaty<br />
of Paris, acknowledged the right of intellectual<br />
property, and of the fact that Spanish scientific and<br />
literary works imported into these countries now<br />
enjoy exemption from duties ;<br />
<br />
(3) That the fulfilment of the requirement of<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Article 1 of the same law, for the application of<br />
the exemption, to the effect that the works must be<br />
the original production of a citizen of the country<br />
of origin, who must also have acquired the right of<br />
literary property in them, must be proved by docu-<br />
ments issued by the office which has charge of the<br />
registration of intellectual property in the respective<br />
countries, certified by the Spanish Consul ;<br />
<br />
(4) The exemption which applies to books does<br />
not extend to their bindings, which in consequence<br />
must continue to pay the duties of their class, as<br />
determined by Note 49 of the present tariff ; and<br />
<br />
(5) That consignments of books brought before<br />
the Customs without the above-mentioned proof, or<br />
which do not comply with the other requirements<br />
of Article 1 of the law, or proceed from any other<br />
territory than those mentioned, shall pay the duties<br />
laid down in the same tariff.<br />
<br />
(Signed) Osa,<br />
Director-General of Customs.<br />
Maprip, June 15th, 1904.<br />
<br />
————__+—>—_<br />
<br />
COPYRIGHT IN GERMANY.<br />
<br />
——<br />
<br />
HE evolution of copyright property in<br />
Germany follows in many points the evolu-<br />
tion of copyright property in other countries.<br />
<br />
Shortly after the invention of printing, privileges<br />
were conferred on printers to protect them against<br />
piracy ; this fact showed that it was the movement<br />
of the trade that first secured any defence for<br />
literary property. But the German evolution<br />
differs to this extent from the evolution of other<br />
countries, in that, for a long period, the author’s<br />
rights were not looked upon as existing, but only<br />
the rights of reproduction when transferred to the<br />
printer or publisher. To such an extent has this been<br />
carried that even at the present time a law has been<br />
passed dealing with publishers’ rights in addition<br />
to the copyright law. A German author, writing<br />
on this subject, states as follows :—<br />
<br />
“ As, shortly after the invention of printing, or at any<br />
rate in the earliest times, the privileges conferred for pro-<br />
tection against piracy were only granted to the publishers,<br />
and to them even were often granted for all works in<br />
<br />
common which appeared in their establishments ; so under<br />
these circumstances the question : In what relation the<br />
<br />
publisher stood to the author, if he received the sanction of<br />
the latter to the reproduction of the work concerned or —<br />
<br />
not, never came to the fore at all; the idea that the right<br />
<br />
of protection for his productions originates in the personof 70<br />
the author, that this might first have been made over by —<br />
<br />
the author to another in order to be operative, does not yet :<br />
<br />
appear in the light of day.’’<br />
Gradually,<br />
<br />
recognised by statute, and at the end of the o9@<br />
<br />
however, the publisher’s rights (it<br />
ought to have been the author’s rights) began to be -<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
aN<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 39<br />
<br />
eighteenth century—the period which is full of<br />
copyright legislation in all countries—legislation<br />
was carried on in the German Confederacy. The<br />
most important statute, however, was not passed<br />
till well into the nineteenth century. This was,<br />
without doubt, the Prussian law of 1837. It<br />
formed the basis of most of the subsequent legis-<br />
lation. Under it copyright protection was granted<br />
for life and thirty vears, and the exclusive right of<br />
representation for life and ten years.<br />
<br />
The fact that a large number of small States,<br />
although they might collectively agree to certain<br />
broad principles, each legislated for its own benefit,<br />
necessarily stood in the way of uniformity. In<br />
consequence, the desire for codification became<br />
urgent. The German Booksellers’—really Pub-<br />
lishers——Guild (Borsen-Verein) was the principal<br />
mover in the matter. A committee was appointed,<br />
and a comprehensive code partly based on the<br />
Prussian law was drawn up. After consideration<br />
this was laid before the Diet on May 19th, 1864:<br />
but with the dissolution of the German Con-<br />
federacy and the creation of the North-German<br />
Federacy and the German-Empire, the subject<br />
entered on a new stage. Article 4 of the Con-<br />
stitution of the North-German Federacy (1867) at<br />
once made the protection of intellectual property<br />
a matter of Confederate Legislation, and a law was<br />
passed in May, 1870, which came into force in 1871.<br />
Although this law was to a certain extent satis-<br />
factory, in the course of time deficiencies became<br />
apparent, and attempts were made, among those<br />
interested, to obtain a series of essential alterations.<br />
<br />
The Imperial offices of justice yielding to ex-<br />
ternal pressure, made preparations for the draft<br />
of a new law. Introductory consultations with<br />
experts—publishers, authors, and musicians—were<br />
instituted, and the result was put forward for public<br />
discussion in 1899. ‘Ihe draft, as finally settled,<br />
was approved by the Imperial Government. In<br />
January, 1901, the law was referred to a com-<br />
mission of twenty-one members, was passed on<br />
May 2nd, 1901, and came into active force on<br />
January ist, 1902. One of the great alterations<br />
from the former law of 1870 was that the new law<br />
was drafted as far as possible to facilitate inter-<br />
national legal intercourse.<br />
<br />
So far the outline of domestic copyright alone<br />
has been dealt with. It is necessary to look back<br />
some years and notice the evolution of inter-<br />
national relations. No doubt the fact that the law<br />
of 1901 was drafted along lines which might facili-<br />
tate international arrangements was due to the<br />
wider protection that was given to authors under<br />
the Berne Convention, and to the wider views<br />
universally adopted of author's property. The<br />
Berne Convention, as all English authors know,<br />
was an arrangement between the various countries<br />
<br />
who were signatories to protect the property of<br />
their authors, dramatists, artists, &c. It became<br />
binding on those countries that adhered to it in<br />
1886. The idea of an international agreement<br />
arose when experts saw the difficulties that were<br />
bound to follow in any endeavour to carry out<br />
the many divergent treaties existing between the<br />
nations. To get simplicity therefore out of the<br />
chaos it was essential that these arrangements,<br />
often very similar in their clauses and details,<br />
should be codified into one Convention. Those<br />
willing to adopt this course met together and<br />
finally came to the agreement cited above.<br />
Germany was among those who signed. She also<br />
signed the subsequent Act of Paris in 1896, an<br />
amplification of the former Convention. With the<br />
United States Germany has a special treaty. The<br />
mere proclamation of the President was found to<br />
be insufficient, according to the German law, to<br />
make the half-hearted reciprocity allowed by the<br />
States binding. The treaty gives copyright<br />
between the two countries on exactly the same<br />
basis as the copyright existing between Great<br />
Britain and the United States. The essential<br />
difference in its working arises from the fact that<br />
the two languages are not the same ; this has been<br />
found to be an enormous handicap to German<br />
authors. A discussion of this difference does not<br />
come into this paper. It has been mentioned in<br />
previous numbers of Zhe Author.<br />
<br />
Finally, Germany entered into a treaty with<br />
Austria-Hungary, and the exchange of ratifications<br />
took place in Berlin in May, 1901. Now, there-<br />
fore, domestic and international copyright legisla-<br />
tion in the empire of Germany is as widely ex-<br />
tended as in any other country.<br />
<br />
Before we consider the German law at present<br />
in force, it will be interesting to look into the<br />
philosophical and ethical view adopted by the<br />
Teuton mind.<br />
<br />
The German philosopher has turned on the<br />
moral rights of authors as he has on many other<br />
different subjects, his inquisitorial methods.<br />
<br />
It is true that the first copyright legislation in<br />
England was brought about by the publishers with<br />
a view to protecting the economic use of their<br />
property; in taking this action they recognised<br />
that it was the awthor’s property in the first<br />
instance ; but this point of view did not hold in<br />
Germany, or rather in the German States. The<br />
legislature in Prussia did not deem that there<br />
was any property in the author, merely because he<br />
had been the originator and evolver of the book,<br />
but there was property in the economic use ot<br />
what the author had originated and evolved,<br />
and, in consequence, a resultant monopoly for<br />
the author.<br />
<br />
Therefore, in the first instance the law aimed<br />
<br />
<br />
40. THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
only at the protection of the economic use of intel-<br />
lectual activity, but when the rights of the author<br />
became more fully recognised and established in<br />
other countries, Germany and her philosophers had<br />
to shift their position somewhat in order to come<br />
into line, though even at this day two laws have<br />
been passed, one dealing with authors’ rights<br />
(copyright as understood in other countries) and<br />
one with publishers’ contracts (the original basis<br />
of copyright property as understood by the German<br />
philosopher). :<br />
<br />
Tt is understood now that an author’s copyright<br />
embraces considerably more than the mere right<br />
of reproduction of copies. Though this is the<br />
definition of copyright given under the English<br />
Statute of 1842, yet case law shows the ethical<br />
and moral right of an author embraces much<br />
more. It embraces the personal interest. The<br />
author may desire to keep his mental work<br />
from becoming public. He has, therefore, beyond<br />
the exclusive right of publishing, the right of<br />
withholding from publication or the right of<br />
publication to a limited number of individuals<br />
or for a limited number of years, or in a fixed<br />
form ; but according to the German philosopher<br />
this right of withholding from publication is not<br />
a proprietary right. The proprietary right is the<br />
right of obtaining money out of the reproduction<br />
of copies.<br />
<br />
But although this was the original view of copy-<br />
right the present legislature looks at the matter<br />
from a different standpoint, for either the concep-<br />
tion of proprietary rights has been extended in<br />
order to comprise within it author’s rights, or<br />
personal rights have been recognised together with<br />
proprietary rights as being contained within the<br />
author’s rights, or, finally, both have been placed<br />
on an entirely new basis, that of moral personal<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
When this important point had been decided,<br />
there arose the question of the rights after the<br />
death of the author.<br />
<br />
Authors’ rights, so far as they were personal<br />
rights, were considered to perish with the death of<br />
the author, and to be inheritable only on account<br />
of their proprietary nature, as they always con-<br />
tained within them the germ of their economic use.<br />
This deduction followed that the exclusive right<br />
to make alterations in the work belonged to the<br />
heirs as formerly to the author, and that the<br />
author’s rights in unpublished works could not<br />
become the object of compulsory execution without<br />
the consent of the heirs.<br />
<br />
In order to explain the limitation of the copy-<br />
right, Z.e., the lapsing of the proprietary rights after<br />
a certain time, the old argument of the claims of the<br />
public was brought forward—that an intellectual<br />
work may be the possession of the nation—indeed,<br />
<br />
of the whole world. ‘The most probable argument,<br />
however, for the limitation of copyright—which limi-<br />
tationis gradually lessening under recent legislation,<br />
__ig that in olden times, when the economic value<br />
of the production of a man’s brains for many<br />
reasons, but chiefly for the reason that printing<br />
had not been?invented, was unremunerative, the<br />
public deemed it had secured a right which perhaps<br />
might be comparable to a right of way. When the<br />
economic value suddenly became of importance,<br />
the public tried to argue that this right of way in<br />
reality existed, and so strong was this inherited<br />
feeling that it was many years before authors could<br />
obtain any recognition of their property. This,<br />
however, they finalty secured for a limited period.<br />
In most countries this period grew with the<br />
development of the economic value. So much for<br />
the German view of the author’s rights—that is the<br />
moral rights inherent in the author as against the<br />
proprietary rights resulting from the economic use<br />
of his property. But as from the German stand-<br />
point the two rights have always been separated,<br />
so they are still separated, and two laws have been<br />
<br />
passed, the one dealing with the Copyright Law,<br />
<br />
the other with the Law of Publishers’ Contracts.<br />
<br />
Law oF CopyRicHT.<br />
<br />
The Law of Copyright was passed in June,<br />
1901, and came into force in January, 1902. It<br />
is divided into five parts :—1. Those who obtain<br />
protection. 2. The limitations of the privileges<br />
secured by those who obtain protection. 3. The<br />
time limitation of those privileges. 4. How and<br />
to what extent those privileges can be infringed.<br />
5. Final decrees : points not included in the other<br />
divisions.<br />
<br />
Those who obtain protection include the authors<br />
of writings, lectures, speeches, musical works, and<br />
the whole list of producers and their assigns ex-<br />
haustively defined. In the second division follow<br />
the definitions of the author’s privileges—that is,<br />
the rights an author has with regard to his own<br />
property, such as translation rights, dramatic<br />
rights, musical rights, &e. ; and in the same divi-<br />
sion is set forth those classes of property which,<br />
generally included in this law, are for special<br />
reasons of public policy not subject to protection,<br />
for instance, the reprinting of laws, &e., &e. OF<br />
these exceptions there appears to be a long list.<br />
<br />
‘hen follows, in the third division, the duration<br />
of the protection accorded, practically the life of<br />
the author and thirty years.<br />
clauses under this heading which deal with joint<br />
works, works published after death, and other<br />
matters connected with the duration of the term.<br />
<br />
The fourth division deals with the infringement<br />
of the rights, which have already been fully defined<br />
under the second division; the methods of the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
There are various.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 4}<br />
<br />
proceedings to be taken by those mentioned ‘in<br />
the first division whose rights are infringed in<br />
order to protect their property ; and what actions<br />
amount to infringement, together with the penal-<br />
ties accruing. All these matters are dealt with in<br />
considerable detail, in fact the law seems to be<br />
crowded up with detail, and somewhat diificult of<br />
interpretation in consequence.<br />
<br />
The final division deals with registration and<br />
other matters connected with the property not<br />
included under any of the previous headings.<br />
<br />
Law RESPECTING PUBLISHERS’ CONTRACTS.<br />
<br />
Finally comes the law that deals with publishers’<br />
rights, or, as we term them in England, rights<br />
existing under a licence to publish. This law is a<br />
most curious example of meticulous legislation.<br />
It deals with the form of contract between author<br />
and publisher, a matter generally left to be settled<br />
by the parties themselves; it may be a careful<br />
exposition of the case law embodied in_ the<br />
form of a statute. It is most interesting reading,<br />
as it practically sets out in detail what, in the<br />
<br />
absence of special arrangement, the German legis- .<br />
<br />
lature would consider a reasonable contract, and<br />
unfortunately, as so often happens, the party with the<br />
money has obtained the advantage over the party<br />
with the intellect. This was likely to be the case<br />
in a country where the publishing and bookselling<br />
combination has been so strong as almost to<br />
strangle the free development of literary talent.<br />
It is impossible to go through the Act section by<br />
section, though in some subsequent issue it may be<br />
published in full. It will suffice at the present to<br />
deal generally with the tendency of the law, and<br />
in particular with individual sections.<br />
<br />
It would appear (section 1) that where an author<br />
transfers his rights, without limitation, to the pub-<br />
lisher, publication is an inherent part of the con-<br />
tract. This point is settled by law. In England<br />
there has been no statutory enactment or case law<br />
on the subject. It would be interesting to see<br />
what line would be taken if the English Courts<br />
were asked to decide the question where the pub-<br />
lisker who had purchased the copyright refused to<br />
produce. Owing to the unreasonable delay of one<br />
or two publishers the Society has on occasions<br />
threatened to take action, but has never been<br />
actually forced into doing so owing, under pressure,<br />
to she final production of the books. The author<br />
(section 2) is forbidden during the continuation of<br />
the contract to reproduce in Germany, but still<br />
holds a great many of his original rights, such as<br />
translation, dramatic rights, elaboration of musical<br />
work, and, curiously enough, to reproduce in a<br />
collective edition if twenty years have elapsed<br />
since the first year in which the work was pub-<br />
lished. The publisher (section 5) is restrained in<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
his right of publication of the work in various<br />
editions during the term of copyright, and is only<br />
entitled to produce one edition of one thousand<br />
copies. If, however, he has the right of producing<br />
other editions, then they are supposed to be pro-<br />
duced under the same agreement that holds good<br />
for the first edition. Section 10 is an example of<br />
the minute legislation dealing with the subject, as<br />
the author is bound to deliver the copy fit for<br />
publication. He is bound (section 11), if the work<br />
is not already written, to write it within a certain<br />
time ; he is allowed (section 12) to make ordinary<br />
corrections, but if his corrections exceed the ordi-<br />
nary usage he is bound to defray the expense. The<br />
publisher is bound to publish as soon as possible<br />
<br />
‘(section 18) after he has received the completed<br />
<br />
work, and is bound to produce the number of<br />
copies that he is entitled to. The publisher (sec-<br />
tion 20) is bound to provide proofs tor correction.<br />
(Section 21.) He is allowed to fix the price of the<br />
work, and may lower the price as long as the just<br />
interests of the author are not injured. If there is<br />
no arrangement as to terms (section 22) it is tacitly<br />
implied that the publisher pays a fair remuneration.<br />
(Section 23.) The remuneration must be made on<br />
the delivery of the work. When it depends upon<br />
the sale (section 24) the publisher must render<br />
annual accounts, and his books are to be open<br />
to investigation if necessary. (Section 27.) The<br />
publisher is bound to restore the MS. to the author.<br />
Under section 28 the publisher’s rights are trans-<br />
ferable. This is contrary to the case law on the<br />
same subject in England. If the publisher's<br />
agreement (section 29) is confined to a definite<br />
number of editions or copies, the contract ceases<br />
when the edition or copies areexhausted. It iscurious<br />
that such a point as this should have demanded<br />
legislation. ‘The publisher may repudiate the con-<br />
tract (section 30) under certain conditions, owing<br />
to delay on the author’s part, and the same<br />
arrangement for the repudiation of a contract or<br />
for a claim for damages is applicable in favour of<br />
the author.<br />
<br />
Then follows (sections 36, 37, 38) reference to the<br />
bankruptcy of publishers and the rights of the<br />
author, and the right of cancellation under certain<br />
circumstances,<br />
<br />
Section 45 gives the author a right, if his work<br />
has not been published within a year from the<br />
delivery to the Editor, to cancel the contract,<br />
but his right to remuneration remains intact.<br />
This is a most useful regulation, as the delay of<br />
editors of some English reviews has become<br />
proverbial.<br />
<br />
The law is complete in 50 sections, and as<br />
already stated is a most entertaining example of<br />
minute legis!ation on points most of which could<br />
easily, and without difficulty, be settled by private<br />
<br />
<br />
42,<br />
<br />
contract, and the rest by judicial interpretation of<br />
doubtful contracts. Most of the sections are com-<br />
mon-sense interpretations of possible contracting<br />
difficulties ; some are more in favour of the<br />
publisher than the author, but on the whole the<br />
author has not much to grumble at, and is always<br />
able to contract out, should he so desire,<br />
<br />
It remains to be seen whether this attention to<br />
minutiz in the law may not render disputes more<br />
difficult of settlement. It will be interesting to<br />
follow its working during the years which will<br />
elapse before another statute on the same subject<br />
is passed.<br />
<br />
Whether the two laws are all that could be<br />
desired is doubtful; the Germans, however, must<br />
be congratulated on taking the subject of copy-<br />
right in hand and dealing with it exhaustively,<br />
<br />
The authors of Great Britain have not been so<br />
fortunate in the matter of legislation.<br />
<br />
GH, 1.<br />
<br />
—————_+—<br />
<br />
A PUBLISHER’S PRACTICE.<br />
<br />
———<br />
STATEMENT.<br />
<br />
TATEMENT of a publisher’s practice in<br />
making up accounts to authors for works<br />
of which the profits are divided between<br />
<br />
author and publisher.<br />
<br />
A. The publisher bears the entire cost and risk<br />
of printing and publication.<br />
<br />
Except only in the event of the cost of correc-<br />
tions in proofs exceeding 25 per cent. of the cost<br />
of composition, when such excess is borne by the<br />
author.<br />
<br />
The entire proceeds of sales are in the first<br />
instance devoted to the repayment of the cost of<br />
production ; if after meeting this liability they<br />
yield a surplus, all such surplus is treated as profit<br />
and is divided between author and publisher in<br />
the proportion agreed upon. In cases where the<br />
cost is never covered by the yield, the publisher<br />
bears the loss.<br />
<br />
B. The cost is reckoned at the invoiced cost—<br />
which is almost invariably 5 per cent. more than<br />
net cost. It includes only direct expenditure—no<br />
charge is made for office expenses, rent, bad debts,<br />
insurance, travellers’ expenses, or for the work of<br />
any employé of the publisher.<br />
<br />
C. The proceeds of sales are accounted for as<br />
nearly as possible at the actual sums received by<br />
the publisher from the bookseller, after making all<br />
trade discounts and allowances—this is to say<br />
copies are reckoned at two thirds of the published<br />
price (thirteen copies as twelve if the published<br />
price be 10s. 6d. or less, or twenty-five as twenty-<br />
four if more than 10s. 62.) less 10 per cent.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
The yield from books published at a net price is<br />
reckoned in the same way as the above, except<br />
that instead of two-thirds of the published price,<br />
five-sixths is reckoned.<br />
<br />
The yield for educational books proper is also<br />
reckoned in the same way (on the net or non-net<br />
basis respectively, as may be the case), except that<br />
only 74 per cent. is deducted instead of 10 per cent.<br />
<br />
The above terms do not apply to special sales<br />
(ie. special quotations made for large numbers in<br />
special cases), or to ‘remainder,’ Colonial or<br />
American sales, or to sales of plates or rights,<br />
These are not averaged, but are all made a<br />
particular note of and accounted for at exactly<br />
what each yields,<br />
<br />
D. Twelve free copies are presented to the<br />
author, and he may purchase further copies at<br />
two-thirds of the published price, or five-sixths in<br />
the case of net books.<br />
<br />
BE. Accounts are made up to Midsummer, and<br />
vouchers for all payments and receipts can be seen<br />
on request.<br />
<br />
F. The copyright of the work remains the<br />
<br />
- property of the author, but the rights of publica-<br />
<br />
tion are vested in the publisher so long as he<br />
faithfully acts up to this understanding.<br />
<br />
CoMMENT.<br />
<br />
The agreement or method of making up accounts<br />
that we have printed was submitted by one of the<br />
London publishing houses to an author, and puts<br />
forward proposals for publishing on the basis of<br />
profit-sharing. The agreement, as is usual, deals<br />
with the subject from the publisher’s view. This<br />
article will put forward the author’s standpoint.<br />
In clause A., it will be noted that the publisher<br />
bears the entire cost of printing and publication,<br />
and the entire proceeds of the sales are in the first<br />
instance devoted to the repayment of the cost of<br />
production. To the uninitiated, the word “entire”<br />
would lead one to suppose that the exact price of<br />
printing and publication was charged neither more<br />
nor less, and the exact proceeds of the sales credited<br />
neither more nor less. In clause B., however, it<br />
is shown that the “entire” cost does not agree<br />
with this definition, “the invoiced cost, which is<br />
almost invariably 5 per cent. more than the net<br />
cost,” is charged. This is certainly an open state-<br />
ment on the part of the publisher, but by no<br />
means, satisfactory. It is almost invariably—so<br />
the publisher states—5 per cent. more than the net<br />
cost, but there is nothing in this method of render-<br />
ing accounts to prevent it being 10 per cent. more<br />
than the net cost, or even a higher figure still. It<br />
is not for a moment hinted that such a charge<br />
would be made if the author was dealing with one<br />
of the first class publishing houses, but still it is<br />
necessary to draw the author's attention to a point<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
which is indeterminate, and therefore faulty. If<br />
exactly 5 per cent. more is to be charged then this<br />
should be stated, but the figure should not be left<br />
indefinite. Finality is essential not only to enable<br />
the author to calculate his liabilities but in order that<br />
he should not subsequently have a cause for dissatis-<br />
faction, but whether the percentage is 74 5, or 3, it<br />
is certainly an advantage to have the plain state-<br />
ment that some percentage is taken. But is there<br />
any justice in making this charge ? Surely not. It<br />
is always as well that the exact cost of production<br />
should be settled before the agreement is entered<br />
into—that is, the exact price per sheet for composi-<br />
tion, print, and paper, and per 100 copies for<br />
binding. Then the author has definite figures and<br />
can reckon, if he has studied arithmetic at school,<br />
his probable return. The publisher must be con-<br />
gratulated on the fact that no charge is made for<br />
office expenses, etc. This is a great advance.<br />
Generally a fixed percentage on the cost of produc-<br />
tion is calculated, and so far only that it is fixed<br />
is satisfactory, but the real question is whether<br />
any charge at all should be made. This item is<br />
covered by the publisher’s share of the profit, other-<br />
wise the author ought to have a similar allowance.<br />
We next come to clause C. Here again it is<br />
evident that the word “entire” in clause A. will<br />
not bear the construction that it suggests, as the<br />
books are to be charged in the account at a certain<br />
fixed rate. Now all who know anything of the<br />
book trade know very well that there is no fixed<br />
trade price. Many books are sold at one figure,<br />
and many at another, and some across the pub-<br />
lisher’s counter at the full price. It is sometimes<br />
more convenient for both author and publisher to<br />
charge a fixed price, then the author should see<br />
that the price is a fair average and not the lowest<br />
price charged to the trade.<br />
<br />
It is unfair to take as the average the price after<br />
deducting “all trade discounts and allowances,”<br />
and the words “as nearly as possible at the actual<br />
sums received, etc.,” are misleading. But the end<br />
of the clause puts the matter in its proper light,<br />
and gives a definite though unsatisfactory state-<br />
ment as to the calculation that will appear in the<br />
accounts. The results of this calculation will be<br />
instructive to those who want to see their possible<br />
returns, and are as follows :—<br />
<br />
Price of Discount Book at 12s. 6d.<br />
<br />
1. For a book costing more than 10s. 6d., and<br />
published subject to the usual discounts, author<br />
receives—<br />
<br />
oe 7? |. . :<br />
-3*%55~%19 7 i957 2'° of the published price.<br />
<br />
If the published price is 12s. 6d.=150d.,<br />
‘576 x 150=86'4. A little more than 7s. 24d.<br />
<br />
43<br />
Price of Discount Book at 6s.<br />
<br />
2. For a book costing less than 10s. 6d., and<br />
<br />
published subject to the usual discounts, the author<br />
receives—<br />
<br />
= 2 ey of the published pri<br />
3% 13% i065 published price.<br />
If the published price is 6s. =72d.,<br />
<br />
‘554 x 72=39°88. A little more than 8s. 33d.<br />
<br />
Price of Nett Book at 12s. 6d.<br />
<br />
8. For the “nett” book costing more than<br />
10s. 6d., author receives—<br />
<br />
524, 9 18<br />
<br />
6 20710 254<br />
<br />
If the published price is 12s. 6d.=150d.,<br />
‘72 x 150 =108 = 9s.<br />
<br />
‘72 of the published price.<br />
<br />
Price of Nett Book at 6s.<br />
<br />
4, For the “nett” book costing less than<br />
10s. 6d., author receives—<br />
<br />
oo ‘692 of the published price<br />
<br />
G18 10 ls S i<br />
If the published price is 6s.=72d.,<br />
<br />
692 x 72 =49°824. A little more than 4s. 12d.<br />
<br />
Price of Educational Books.<br />
<br />
The educational book may be “ non-nett” or<br />
“nett,” and cost either more or less than 10s. 6d.<br />
Four cases are consequently possible, in all of<br />
which 7°5 per cent. is deducted instead of 10 per<br />
cent.<br />
<br />
For the four cases the author receives the following<br />
proportions of the published price :—<br />
<br />
(a) “ Non-nett ” over 10s. 6d. :<br />
<br />
2 24 92.5<br />
3 * 25" 100<br />
(0) “ Non-nett”’ under 10s. 6d. :<br />
2 17 825<br />
3 x 13 x = — ‘569,<br />
(c) “ Nett” over 10s. 6d. :<br />
52h 92°5<br />
6 25. 100.<br />
(d) “Nett” under 10s. 6d. :<br />
5.12 9:25<br />
a 19 100 aa 711,<br />
(a) If the price be 12s. 6d.= 150d.,<br />
-592°x 150 =88'8. A little more than 7s. 43d.<br />
<br />
= 002;<br />
<br />
‘74,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
44 THE<br />
<br />
(b) If the price be 6s.= 72d.,<br />
<br />
-569 x 72 =40°968. Very nearly 3s. 5d.<br />
<br />
(c) If the price be 12s. 6d. = 1504d.,<br />
<br />
-74x150=111. Exactly 9s. 3d.<br />
<br />
(d) If the price be 6s.= 72d.,<br />
<br />
‘711 x72=51'192, A little more than 4s. 3d.<br />
<br />
It seems interesting to note how rapidly<br />
quantities are diminished when multiplied by<br />
fractions whose denominators but slightly exceed<br />
their numerators.<br />
<br />
Thus the thirteenth copy, which gives the author<br />
only twelve-thirteenths of his two-thirds, and the<br />
10 per cent. discount, which gives him only nine-<br />
tenths of that, reduces his two-thirds to but little<br />
more than half.<br />
<br />
2 260 , 36<br />
<br />
: : 916 1.195<br />
2” which author receives = :.=<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
3 390° 65 390. 2 390°<br />
That is to say, that against each £100, the<br />
author does not receive £61 13s. 4d., but<br />
<br />
£55 7s. 8d.<br />
<br />
With these figures before him the author can<br />
reckon out his gross takings on what he may think<br />
a fair sale.<br />
<br />
Clause D is the usual clause.<br />
need be raised.<br />
<br />
Annual accounts (clause E) are not satisfactory.<br />
It is always better to have semi-annual accounts,<br />
and the amount due on the accounts should be<br />
paid within a month of their rendering ; but the<br />
readiness of the Publisher to produce vouchers<br />
is to be highly commended. Clause F, again,<br />
is much too indefinite. If the rights of publi-<br />
cation are to be vested in the publisher, they<br />
should be limited to a certain form and a certain<br />
price. As the agreement is at present worded the<br />
publisher would have serial rights as well as book<br />
rights, and might produce in any form and in any<br />
country he thought fit. There should be an arrange-<br />
ment by which, when the sale of the book has<br />
ended, the agreement should be cancelled and the<br />
right of republication should revert to the author.<br />
<br />
We do not desire to draw attention to the other<br />
omissions, which are many, as the document does<br />
not purport to’ be a formal agreement, although<br />
there is no doubt that the acceptance by an author<br />
of this form would constitute a legal and binding<br />
contract. As it is printed it is not sufficiently<br />
definite and therefore unsatisfactory. If it is<br />
<br />
To it no objection<br />
<br />
meant to be a definite agreement then it is bad<br />
in substance, on account of the errors of com-<br />
mission explained and the errors of ommission left<br />
unexplained.<br />
<br />
If it is not meant to be a definite agreement<br />
then the publisher should state that a proper<br />
contract would be submitted.<br />
<br />
G. H. T.<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
(LireraRy, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL.)<br />
OCTOBER, 1904.<br />
BLACKWOOD'S MAGAZINE,<br />
An Ambassador of the Republic of Letters.<br />
Gregory Smith.<br />
Crities and Criticism.<br />
THE BOOKMAN.<br />
The Bronté Fascination. By Angus M. Mackay.<br />
THE CONTEMPORARY REVIEW.<br />
By E. Wake Cook,<br />
By W. E. Keeton.<br />
THE CORNHILL MAGAZINE.<br />
Historical Mysteries :—The Case of Captain Green. By<br />
<br />
Andrew Lang.<br />
THe EDINBURGH REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Some Recent French and English Plays.<br />
<br />
The Intellectual Condition of Roman Catholics in<br />
Germany.<br />
<br />
Prosper Merimee.<br />
<br />
By 8.<br />
<br />
Progress or Decadence in Art.<br />
Tshaikovski as a Ballet Composer.<br />
<br />
THE FORTNIGHTLY REVIEW.<br />
Three Sketches by Stijn Streuvels, By Alexander de<br />
Teixeira Mattos.<br />
The Origins of the Alphabet.<br />
French Life and The French Stage.<br />
donald.<br />
Graszia Deledda and ‘‘ Cenere.”<br />
<br />
By Andrew Lang.<br />
By John F. Mae-<br />
<br />
By May Bateman.<br />
<br />
Tar INDEPENDENT REVIEW.<br />
First Aid to the Critic. By C. F. Keary.<br />
Modern Languages in Public Schools. By G. Winthorp<br />
Young.<br />
<br />
“ The Dynasts.”’ By John Pollock.<br />
<br />
LoNGMAN’S MAGAZINE.<br />
The Wren-Bush. By Maud EK. Sargent.<br />
<br />
MACMILLAN’S MAGAZINE.<br />
By W. Beach Thomas,<br />
<br />
THE MONTH,<br />
<br />
The Oldest Life of St. Gregory.<br />
Thurston.<br />
Subjective Idealism. By the Rev. Thomas Rigby.<br />
<br />
The Song of Birds.<br />
<br />
By the Rev. Herbert<br />
<br />
THE NATIONAL REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Scottish Letters. By ‘‘ Glasgow.”'<br />
An Old Almanac. By the Hon. Maud Lyttleton.<br />
<br />
THE PALL MALL MAGAZINE.<br />
<br />
A Royal Painter and His Friends. By Georg Brochner.<br />
<br />
About Our Fiction. John Oliver Hobbes, H. G. Wells,<br />
Andrew Lang, Edmund Gosse,W. L. Courtney, and Walter<br />
Frewen Lord.<br />
<br />
THE QUARTERLY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
The “ Advocatus Diaboli’’ on the Divina Commedia.<br />
<br />
The Influence of Cant on Modern Thought. By the<br />
Master of Baliol.<br />
<br />
Thomas Treherne and the Religious Poets of the 17th<br />
Century. By Professor W. Lewis Jones.<br />
<br />
TEMPLE BAR.<br />
<br />
The Progress of English Criticism. By Walter Lewin.<br />
<br />
There are no articles dealing with Literary, Dramatic, or<br />
a subjects in Chambers’s Journal or the World's<br />
Tork,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 45<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for ‘“ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
IlI. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth. From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Zhe Author.<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
— 9 —<br />
<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br />
<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
1s unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills,<br />
<br />
(b.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum inadvance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(¢e.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.c., fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (3.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
<br />
4, Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time, This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. ‘The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance,<br />
<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘hey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative: that he. runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
—____—_—_-—<>—_o___<_<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. ‘The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal, with—performing right and copyright. He<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
46<br />
<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into part.cular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
<br />
eo =<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
SO<br />
<br />
1 VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. | The<br />
<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor, put if there is any<br />
<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements. Fuller particulars of the Society’s work<br />
can be obtained in the Prospectus.<br />
<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society. :<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeayour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
10. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. pe<br />
annum, or £10 10s for life membership. :<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
HE Society undertakes to stamp copies of music on<br />
behalf of its members for the fee of 6d. per 100 or<br />
part of 100. The members’ stamps are kept in the<br />
<br />
Society’s safe. The musical publishers communicate direct<br />
with the Secretary, and the voucher is then forwarded to<br />
the members, who are thus saved much unnecessary trouble.<br />
<br />
——_———_1 > +>—__—_<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
-<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic works, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
—_____+ >_><br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
So<br />
<br />
HE Editor of Zhe Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
Communications for “The Author” should be addressed<br />
to the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, 8.W., and should reach the Editor not later than the<br />
21st of each month.<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the<br />
Editor on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
—+<br />
<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
—_—_—_—___o << o_____<br />
<br />
LEGAL AND GENERAL LIFE ASSURANCE<br />
SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
————<br />
<br />
ENSIONS to commence at any selected age,<br />
either with or without Life Assurance, can<br />
be obtained from this society. a<br />
Full particulars can be obtained from the City<br />
Branch Manager, Legal and General Life Assurance<br />
Society, 158, Leadenhall Street, London, H.C.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 47<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
—-—— +<br />
<br />
E should like once again to call the atten-<br />
tion of musical composers and song writers<br />
to the fact that the Society undertakes to<br />
<br />
stamp, in accordance with the custom in the music<br />
trade, the copies of the works of its members. For<br />
this the Society charges the ordinary fee of sixpence<br />
per one hundred or part of one hundred. Every<br />
member for whom the Society undertakes this duty<br />
is thus saved a great deal of trouble and worry,<br />
He sends a notice to the publisher, who, when there<br />
is any music to be stamped, notifies the secretary<br />
direct. On receipt of the notice the music is<br />
stamped at once and the voucher forwarded.<br />
<br />
Members’ stamps are kept in the safe, and cannot<br />
be handled by anyone except the secretary or his<br />
duly appointed agent.<br />
<br />
At the end of each half year an account giving<br />
full details of the amount due is forwarded to the<br />
member, which is easily checked from the vouchers<br />
he has received,<br />
<br />
As this work is undertaken for the benefit of<br />
members and without any profit to the Society, it<br />
is hoped that it will be patronised by all those<br />
connected with the musical profession.<br />
<br />
Members of the Society will callto mind certain<br />
articles printed in 7’he Author dealing with the<br />
question of the sale of American magazines and<br />
newspapers in Canada, and the amount of postage<br />
charged by the authorities.<br />
<br />
These articles appear to have been widely read,<br />
and gave rise to certain questions in the House<br />
of Commons. There was a note on the subject<br />
in the October number.<br />
<br />
The answers to the questions put in the House<br />
of Commons were, unfortunately, unsatisfactory,<br />
but the committee endeavoured to pursue the<br />
matter further, and instructed the Secretary to<br />
write to the Postmaster-General, in the hope that<br />
it would be possible to raise the question at the<br />
next meeting of the Postal Union, and to the<br />
Canadian Authors’ Society, with a view to obtaining<br />
their support. The reply of the Postmaster-General<br />
is printed below. The Secretary of the Society has<br />
not as yet heard from the Canadian Society of<br />
Authors,<br />
<br />
GENERAL Post OFFICE, LONDON.<br />
<br />
Srz,—In reply to your letter of the 12th instant, Iam<br />
directed by the Postmaster-General to inform you that the<br />
next Postal Union Congress is to be held at Rome in<br />
April, 1905,<br />
<br />
With regard to your inquiry whether it would be possible<br />
to consider at that congress the question of the postage<br />
charged on printed matter sent from the United Kingdom<br />
to Canada, I am to observe that it is already open to the<br />
Postmaster-General to arrange special terms with the<br />
Canadian Post Office should he desire to do so,<br />
<br />
But, as stated in the House of Commons in reply toa<br />
question put a short time ago, a reduction of the present<br />
rate would necessarily have to be of a general character,<br />
and the Postmaster-General, in view of the serious loss of<br />
revenue which would be involved, is not prepared to<br />
recommend it,<br />
<br />
I an, Sir,<br />
Your obedient servant,<br />
(Signed) E. Crass,<br />
For the Secretary.<br />
G, HERBERT THRING, Esq.<br />
<br />
WE see from the United States Publishers’<br />
Weekly that at the annual meeting of the German<br />
Publishers’ Association at Leipzig a very strong<br />
group of delegates was in favour of renewing the<br />
memorial previously presented to the Reichstag for<br />
the repeal of the present Copyright Convention<br />
with the United States, and that the Authors’<br />
Association of Germany was quoted as being also<br />
in favour of renewing this application.<br />
<br />
The Publishers’ Weekly proceeds to state: “ It<br />
need hardly be pointed out that such a step on the<br />
part of Germany would not only constitute a<br />
decided misfortune to the cause of copyright<br />
throughout the world, but would also constitute a<br />
very serious additional difficulty in the way of<br />
securing favourable attention from Congress in the<br />
fall for the pending amendment.”<br />
<br />
It is the old story that it is easy to point to<br />
“the mote ” in your brother’s eye, but it is difficult<br />
to realise “the beam” that is in your own eye.<br />
No doubt such a step on the part of the Fatherland<br />
would be retrogression so far as International<br />
Copyright is concerned. Do the authorities in the<br />
United States, however, fully realise the fact that<br />
if Germany did withdraw from the Treaty they<br />
would still be far ahead of the United States in<br />
their position with regard to the ideal International<br />
Copyright, and that the sooner the United States<br />
grasp the fact the better will it be for the fulfilment<br />
of that ideal ?<br />
<br />
Much better than lament overa possible German<br />
retrogression, let the United States of America<br />
show some signs of progression.<br />
<br />
In the April number of 7'he Author the subject<br />
of agents was dealt with at some length, and the<br />
difficulties that might arise between author and<br />
agent were fully set forth. It is necessary from<br />
time to time to write articles dealing with points<br />
of vital interest to members, in order that they<br />
should be fully cognisant of the dangers which<br />
they may encounter. :<br />
<br />
Although there is no need within so short a time<br />
to repeat the full tale of difficulties, yet owing to<br />
the fact that the notice of the Society has been<br />
called again to one or two cases where agents have<br />
acted outside their legitimate agency work, it is<br />
<br />
<br />
48<br />
<br />
essential once more for the protection of members<br />
to place before them the following points :—<br />
<br />
First, the case of those authors who have<br />
proposals submitted to them from publishers or<br />
editors, through agents. Here it often happens<br />
that the agents are really acting for the publishers<br />
or the editors rather than for the author. If the<br />
editor or the publisher is anxious > obtain the<br />
author he should pay the agent for the work done,<br />
and it should be fully understood that the agent<br />
is acting for the publisher. The line of demarca-<br />
tion, however, may be difficult to ascertain when an<br />
offer is submitted to an author who is already on the<br />
agent’s books. In the case of those authors who<br />
are not on the agent’s books the matter seems to<br />
be quite clear. ‘As a matter of fact some agents<br />
<br />
rint on their paper the names of magazines and<br />
<br />
ublishers with whom they are in connection, thus<br />
openly proclaiming themselves not to be the agents<br />
of the author.<br />
<br />
The author should then approach with diffidence,<br />
and not blindly give that confidence which ought<br />
to exist between the author and his agent.<br />
<br />
The second point is the danger of dealing -with<br />
those agents who sometimes act as principals. This<br />
is no uncommon danger, and not infrequently arises<br />
from the importunity of the author who is desirous<br />
of obtaining the wherewithal to buy his daily bread.<br />
For this, he has no hesitation in selling his birth-<br />
right—or his copyright. If the act is done openly<br />
very little can be said except to advise the author<br />
that such a transaction must necessarily be unsatis-<br />
factory. The sale itself may be bond fide from the<br />
agent’s point of view, yet, as has been frequently<br />
pointed out in Zhe Author, is dangerous in the<br />
extreme. The same transaction, however, is tinged<br />
with fraud when the agent acts as principal without<br />
disclosing the fact. When such a case is discovered<br />
it should be ruthlessly exposed.<br />
<br />
Tur following cutting from the Daily Chronicle<br />
will, no doubt, prove interesting to many of the<br />
readers of The Author now that the address of the<br />
ao offices lies within the precincts of Storey’s<br />
<br />
ate :—<br />
<br />
« The announcement of the closing for repairs of the road-<br />
way by Storey’s Gate must have set a few people wondering<br />
who Storey was that a gate should be named after him.<br />
Edward Storey was employed by Charles II. to carry out<br />
those improvements in St, James's Park which converted<br />
the neglected pleasaunce of Tudor times into something<br />
like the park as we know it. It was owing to his having<br />
a house on this site that the name arose. In the Daily<br />
Courant of September 5th, 1705, is the following advertise-<br />
ment :—‘ Dropt in St. James’s Park, September the 3rd,<br />
1705, betwixt Mr. Story’s and the Duke of Buckingham’s<br />
House, a Gold Minuit Pendulum Watch, &c. ; if offered to<br />
<br />
be Sold or pawn’d, you are desired to stop the same and:<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
give notice to Mr. Padington at his house in Princes Court<br />
near Mr. Story’s.? From that we may see how ‘ Mr.<br />
Story’s’ nad become, as it were, a postal address ; and so:<br />
it came to pass that a mere contractor shared the eponymous<br />
honour given to an Emperor, a Prince, or a Queen.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Ir is with much regret that we lave to chronicle:<br />
the death of Lady Besant, which occurred in<br />
Devonshire on Friday, October 7th.<br />
<br />
Lady Besant had been a member of the Society<br />
since its foundation, and was always in warm sym-<br />
<br />
athy with her husband’s work. It is the irony<br />
of fate that she did not live to see the permanent<br />
memorial to her husband, which the County<br />
Council have consented to set up on the Embank-<br />
ment, as a gift from members of the Society and<br />
others.<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
HINTS ON DIALOGUE.<br />
<br />
——_-——+—_<br />
<br />
HESE hints are intended solely for beginners,<br />
and can only bore or madden the practised<br />
writer. I hope he will accept this warning.<br />
<br />
Many beginners say to me, “ I cannot find a good<br />
plot.” They never say, “ I cannot write good<br />
dialogue.” Yet sometimes they cannot write<br />
good dialogue.<br />
<br />
Of the two dialogue is the more important.<br />
You must first of all get a person, before you tell<br />
us what he does. If you cannot make him seem<br />
to be a real person, it will not matter in the least<br />
what he does. If he is absolutely unreal, it will<br />
not matter though he hypnotises a dead ostrich in<br />
a cavern full of hidden treasure thousands of feet<br />
beneath the bed of the Atlantic. That is to say,<br />
it will not matter except to the uneducated novelette<br />
people whom you should not wish to attract.<br />
<br />
From the point of view of the story writer words<br />
speak louder than deeds. If every word that your<br />
invented person speaks is convincing evidence that<br />
he is real and living, he may do almost anything.<br />
The reader may find his action incomprehensible,<br />
and yet be convinced. In real life a man’s actions<br />
are often incomprehensible.<br />
<br />
The indirect method is always better than the<br />
direct method in story telling. If you wish your<br />
reader to gather a certain fact which we will call<br />
“ B,” it is better to tell him another fact which we<br />
will call “A,” and let him deduce “‘B” from it.<br />
Tf, for instance, you wish to describe a perfectly<br />
charming woman, you may describe the general<br />
adoration which she receives rather than analyse.<br />
in what her charm consists. So, too, it is better<br />
that your reader shall deduce the exact kind of<br />
person you have invented from what he says than<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
that yon should give a long and cumbrous descrip-<br />
tion of him. It is apt to make very tiresome<br />
reading, and in any case carries less conviction<br />
with it.<br />
<br />
Let me suppose, for instance, that I wrote as<br />
follows : ‘‘ He was weak rather than bad-natured.<br />
He tried to cover an inextinguishable brag with<br />
slabs of humility. He was without tact or taste,<br />
and had the kind of mind that remembers and<br />
enjoys out of date phrases. He had no sense of<br />
humour.” That may possibly give you some idea<br />
of the man; but now turn to “ Sandra. Belloni,”<br />
and read these words which Mr. Meredith puts<br />
into the mouth of Mr. Pole, addressing a “ courtly<br />
poor man” :—<br />
<br />
“ Giving a semi-circular sweep of his arm : ‘ Here<br />
you see my little estate, sir,’ he said. ‘ You’ve<br />
seen plenty bigger in Germany, and England too.<br />
We can’t get more than this handful in our tight<br />
little island. Unless born to it, of course. Well!<br />
We must be grateful that all our nobility don’t go<br />
to the dogs. We must preserve our great names.<br />
I speak against my own interest.’ ”<br />
<br />
All that I have said in my flat description can<br />
be gathered from that piece of dialogue, and it can<br />
be gathered in a much more interesting and much<br />
more convincing manner.<br />
<br />
Your aim is to make your reader know things,<br />
but not to let him know how he knowsthem. You<br />
can do this with dialogue.<br />
<br />
Granted, therefore, that in the making of real<br />
persons the words that you give them to speak are<br />
of the first importance, we now come to the difficulty<br />
of getting these words right.<br />
<br />
Real life must be studied exactly : it must not<br />
be copied exactly. You must transmute : you must<br />
not report. Your aim is not to put down real life<br />
on paper : your aim is to produce the effect of real<br />
life by what you put down on paper. And it is<br />
exactly in its relation to real life that dialogue<br />
becomes so difficult./Spoken dialogue and written<br />
dialogue are judged quite differently. Spoken<br />
conversations are judged rapidly through the ear<br />
alone, with the critical faculty more or less in<br />
abeyance, without the inclination or, as a rule, the<br />
opportunity for further examination. Written<br />
conversations are judged through the eye that may<br />
dwell, if it will, on the written words, with the<br />
critical faculty wide awake, and with every oppor-<br />
tunity of exercising it. If you read a good play,<br />
where the dialogue is made to be spoken, you will<br />
find it very different from the kind of dialogue you<br />
get in a good novel where it is made to be read.<br />
Take, for instance, the following passage from the<br />
second Act of ‘‘ The Notorious Mrs. Ebbsmith ” :—<br />
<br />
“ Lucas: Why, what has brought about this<br />
change in you?<br />
<br />
“ Agnes: What ?<br />
<br />
49<br />
<br />
* Lucas : What ?<br />
<br />
“ Agnes: I know.<br />
<br />
Lucas: You know ?<br />
<br />
: pie 2 Exactly how you regard me.<br />
<br />
Lucas: I don’t understand you.”<br />
<br />
_And probably the reader does not understand<br />
either, but Mr. Pinero has made no mistake. He<br />
was writing words that were to be spoken, and it<br />
was all perfectly intelligible and seemed even<br />
inevitable when spoken by Mr. Robertson and<br />
Mrs. Campbell at the Garrick Theatre. oe<br />
<br />
The writer of stories must, therefore, allow for<br />
the difference in the conditions. Here are a few<br />
instances of allowances that must be made :<br />
(1) Cold print has more strength than the spoken<br />
word. What seems merely flippant or a little<br />
slangy when one hears it spoken, will seem posi-<br />
tively vulgar when it is read in print. If an exact<br />
shorthand report of all that he had said during the<br />
day could be given to a man of average refinement<br />
and sensibility, he would go away and commit<br />
suicide. The exaggerations that we all commonly<br />
use with no idea that they are exaggerations stand<br />
up and shout their futility when they are written.<br />
<br />
(2) The wit and humour of real life are generally<br />
wretched, and are welcomed or forgiven because<br />
they have no pretensions. Print has an ineradic-<br />
able pretension, and the kind of dialogue which<br />
seems amusing enough in real life must be made<br />
more amusing before it will produce the same effect<br />
upon a printed page. But this improvement must<br />
not be overdone, as it frequently has been even<br />
by capable writers. At the twentieth successive.<br />
epigram your reader will be extremely likely to pull<br />
up and say to himself: “This is all very funny,<br />
but nobody ever did or could talk like this.” And<br />
the moment a reader says that about your story,<br />
your story is lost.<br />
<br />
(3) Spoken conversation generally contains<br />
many unfinished and broken sentences. In print<br />
these must be far fewer, or an unpleasant jerky<br />
effect will be produced which would have been<br />
absent from the conversation if spoken.<br />
<br />
(4) In spoken conversation there is much more<br />
than the mere words. ‘There are expression of<br />
face, tone of voice, and sometimes gesture, all of<br />
which have a modifying effect on those words.<br />
You must allow for this in one way or another ;<br />
you can record the expression, tone, or gesture<br />
(this becomes tiresome if it is done too frequently),<br />
or you can alter the words to the effect.<br />
<br />
But as a rule the beginner is not likely to copy<br />
real life too exactly. He is more likely to get too<br />
far away from it and to copy what he has seen in<br />
books. Originality is very much a matter of<br />
practice, and at first the young writer tends to<br />
use the observation of others rather than his own.<br />
If he has been influenced by the old-fashioned<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
50<br />
<br />
‘storical fiction, he will be likely to. make his<br />
fats talk “essays. His -hero will express<br />
noble and generous sentiments for two pages and<br />
a half without a break, and yet be permitted to<br />
survive by his audience. ‘These things are too<br />
improbable. Or the author may make characters<br />
his own mouthpiece ; that is to say, he may make<br />
them speak to propagate his own opinions. This<br />
is all wrong, and is particularly common In the<br />
novel with a purpose.<br />
<br />
‘he words that your characters speak must<br />
primarily illuminate these characters to make it<br />
clearer to the reader exactly what kind of people<br />
they are. But there may be another purpose as<br />
well. It may be necessary for a character to tell<br />
a story and give the reader information. In this<br />
case there must be a double melody. He may tell<br />
the story, but he must tell it in character, and he<br />
must be showing what he himself is throughout<br />
and concurrently. This point is very often missed,<br />
and the narration is given in terms which the<br />
narrator would not have used, It is worth while<br />
to turn back to “ Sandra Belloni,” to the sixth<br />
chapter, where Emilia recounts her history. That<br />
is perfect ; there is at no point any possibility of<br />
forgetting that it is Emilia speaking. She happens<br />
to be telling her own story, but it is perhaps her<br />
manner of telling it which throws most light upon<br />
her. Look, too, at Laura Tinsley’s description of<br />
the Brookfield tragedy, towards the end of the<br />
book. She is speaking of others, but she is also<br />
illuminating Laura Tinsley for the reader.<br />
<br />
Speak your dialogue aloud as you write it. You<br />
will find that a fair, rough test, whether you are<br />
slipping out of the conversational into the literary<br />
style, and whether the words are in keeping with<br />
the character who speaks them. Also it will often<br />
suggest what alteration, if any, you must make in<br />
transferring the words from speech into writing.<br />
Very frequently, of course, no alteration is required.<br />
<br />
Never attempt to remember all these hints while<br />
you are writing your dialogue, There must _be<br />
absolute concentration for the creative effort. Use<br />
them afterwards, when you are correcting and<br />
improving what you have written, and never<br />
correct until twenty-four hours after writing.<br />
After that interval it will be easier to place<br />
yourself in the position of your reader. Naturally,<br />
as time goes on, you may employ these hints at<br />
the time of writing, but you will employ them<br />
unconsciously. For instance, you will not con-<br />
sciously remember that it is a good test to speak<br />
your dialogue aloud as you write it, but you will<br />
find yourself speaking it.<br />
<br />
BaRry PAIN,<br />
<br />
———_+<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
“THE EDITOR REGRETS——”<br />
<br />
se<br />
<br />
T’ isn’t a mere euphemism, either. He really<br />
I does regret—though the literary aspirant,<br />
murmuring bitterly over his cherished and<br />
rejected article, “I don’t believe he ever looked at:<br />
it,” will not readily credit such an assertion. He<br />
thinks, poor author, being for the moment a<br />
pessimist of the deepest dye, that the editor has<br />
forgotten his own apprenticeship and has grown<br />
hard and unsympathetic in his prosperity. Nota<br />
bit of it. On the contrary, he often wonders, as<br />
curly sheets of paper twine themselves round his<br />
fingers and absolutely refuse to be coaxed into<br />
flatness, how he, who had a weakness for rolling his<br />
manuscripts, ever came to the front at all. He<br />
would dearly like to give the unconscious offender<br />
a hint, but Well, the fact is, he did do it<br />
once, in the early and enthusiastic days of his<br />
first editorial work, and the avalanche of corres-<br />
pondence that, as a result, he brought down on his<br />
devoted head, cured him altogether of the desire to<br />
make excursions outside his own domain.<br />
<br />
It hasn’t the ghost of a chance—that frivolously<br />
curly creation—for when its first page is released<br />
all the others rush in over the distracted reader<br />
like breakers on the seashore, and a great deal of<br />
work having to be compressed into a very short<br />
space of time, he puts it back carefully into its<br />
neat little cardboard mausoleum, and “regrets ””—<br />
its demise.<br />
<br />
The soiled manuscript, too, thumbed, marked,<br />
dog’s-eared, bearing obvious signs of having passed<br />
through many hands—all, presumably, unapprecia-<br />
tive—may just as well stay at home. The editor<br />
is human, and doesn’t want the leavings of his<br />
confréres, and so, if the writer is convinced—and<br />
he usually is—that by withholding his contribution<br />
he would be depriving the said editor of the chance<br />
of a lifetime let him, at least, revise and re-write<br />
it. It will seldom lose anything by the process.<br />
<br />
It should be superfluous—but, unfortunately, is<br />
not—to say that every MS., every time it is<br />
returned, should be re-examined before being sent<br />
out again, clean and smart, on its new venture.<br />
The pages should be numbered and have the title<br />
on each of them, and the wrapper, stamped and<br />
addressed, should be large enough to contain the<br />
packet without making fresh folds in the latter,<br />
and sufficiently strong for the contents.<br />
<br />
It is labour in vain to inflict a long letter on the<br />
editor, but a slip stating the title and number<br />
of words is distinctly useful to a busy man or<br />
woman. A brief—it must be very brief—resumé<br />
of the subject-matter is also, in the case of lengthy<br />
MSS., advisable,<br />
<br />
Granted, then, that the “copy,” properly<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
equipped, lies ready for despatch, the next question<br />
that arises is, “ Where is it likely to meet with<br />
acceptance ?”<br />
<br />
It is simply inviting disaster to post it off, hap-<br />
hazard, to the first magazine or newspaper that<br />
suggests itself. Politics and religion play a lerge<br />
part in the Press—even in that portion of it<br />
devoted to fiction—and the length of an article is<br />
a powerful factor in its fate. A great deal of<br />
information, supplied by editors themselves, is con-<br />
tained in the “ Literary Year-book”’; and the Press<br />
Directories, to be seen at any public library, supple-<br />
ment it most usefully by classifying the whole<br />
output of the Press as “fiction,” ‘* science,”<br />
“humorous,” and the like, and it is therefore<br />
significant of a very careless writer to forward his<br />
efforts to manifestly unsuitable journals.<br />
<br />
Literary persons not infrequently deserve their<br />
unenviable reputation for lack of method, but I<br />
once saw an extremely workmanlike register kept<br />
by an author. A large book of the exercise type<br />
was ruled off into spaces, headed respectively,<br />
“Date despatched and postage required. Title of<br />
MS. and number of words. Offices where sent.<br />
Accepted. Declined. Remarks.” The remarks—<br />
the others speak for themselves—contained such<br />
memoranda as the following :—<br />
<br />
“Exceptionally courteous refusal —written.<br />
(The Treasury, The Gentleman’s Magazine, The<br />
Girls Realm.)”<br />
<br />
“ Offices of the magazine changed.”<br />
<br />
“Printed form of refusal—unsigned and un-<br />
dated. (Very usual.)”<br />
<br />
“Very prompt in reading all contributions.<br />
(Quiver, Pearson’s, Sketch, and most of the weekly<br />
illustrateds.)”<br />
<br />
“¢ Commended—too long—invited to send some-<br />
thing shorter.”<br />
<br />
“Has two forms of refusal—one of which<br />
intimates that the editor would like to see more<br />
of the author’s work. (Windsor.)”<br />
<br />
“Encloses a form of subscription, with the<br />
statement, ‘Articles, short stories, and sketches<br />
can only be accepted from subscribers.’ (Judy.)”<br />
<br />
“Various reasons for refusal tabulated with<br />
much elaboration, and the specific one, or ones,<br />
indicated by a cross. (Pearson’s.)”<br />
<br />
“Cheque on acceptance. (Most of the weeklies.)”<br />
<br />
“Payment after publication. (Many of the<br />
monthlies.)”’<br />
<br />
“Retains manuscripts from a week to ten days.<br />
(Quiver, Idler, Treasury, Longman’s, Windsor.)”<br />
<br />
“Specially encouraging to new writers. (All<br />
Messrs. Harmsworth’s publications.)”<br />
<br />
The value of such a record is evident, and shows,<br />
at least, a desire to neglect no trifle that may con-<br />
tribute to success—a desire most editors are quick<br />
to recognise and appreciate, It is seldom, indeed,<br />
<br />
51<br />
<br />
that a scrupulously clean manuscript is not returned<br />
80, and if a faint odour of excellent tobacco some-<br />
times creeps out from its pages, it is, after all,<br />
pretty plain proof that the hard-hearted autocrat<br />
to whom it was consigned has—looked at it !<br />
<br />
‘All contributions must be in type-script,” is<br />
the legend appearing now-a-days in most editorial<br />
notices, but I feel sure some of those who issue it<br />
would infinitely rather consider neat handwriting<br />
than the work executed by illiterate clerks in cheap<br />
offices. I have seen such work—ill-spelt, uneven,<br />
a curiosity in punctuation—sent out without a<br />
qualm. Being “typed” it conforms with the<br />
regulations, but—is it very surprising ?—it invari-<br />
ably returns to its owner.<br />
<br />
Don’t, then, dear reader—if, in conclusion, I<br />
may strike a personal note—waste your own time<br />
and editors’ unless you can attend to these trifles.<br />
Don’t write to know whether the article has been<br />
received—it is like pulling up a plant to see<br />
whether it is growing. Do not, above all things,<br />
send your uninvited article to the editor’s private<br />
address—an Englishman’s house is his castle.<br />
Besides, if he can’t see it from your point of view<br />
when he has any number of worse ones around<br />
him, he certainly won’t when it invites comparison<br />
with the latest achievement of his favourite author,.<br />
between which and him it has presumed to thrust.<br />
itself,<br />
<br />
ANNIE Q. CARTER.<br />
<br />
——o——__o-__—_<br />
<br />
A LITERARY CRISIS.<br />
<br />
—_—+<br />
<br />
N the career literary of novelists may some-<br />
times be observed a notable and regrettable<br />
feature—I do not presume to consider this in<br />
<br />
a spirit of cold criticism, but with that instinct<br />
of the physician which makes for a remedy.<br />
<br />
An author having written a number of books of<br />
gradually increasing merit (although perhaps of<br />
varying interest) produces one which is pre-<br />
eminently an advance upon all previous work,<br />
either in artistic excellence or in human interestp—<br />
it may be in both,<br />
<br />
The book is straightway a success. It is praised<br />
by the critics, it is praised and discussed by the<br />
reading public. New editions are called for.<br />
America reads it. The Colonies read it. Tauchnitz.<br />
seeks permission to include it in his list. It sells<br />
in numbers. ‘The writer awakes to find laurels on<br />
his pillow.<br />
<br />
Then comes the surprising sequel. The reading<br />
public and the critics have looked forward with<br />
keenness to the now noted writer’s next book. All<br />
the faults the reviewers had been able to find in<br />
<br />
<br />
52<br />
<br />
the last were mainly venial faults, faults which<br />
needed but for their correction that timely prick<br />
of criticism which the critics with their accustomed<br />
geniality had supplied. They saw no lack of<br />
promise. Their part being done, they prophesied<br />
great things of the writer. :<br />
<br />
What then is their astonishment and the dis-<br />
appointment of readers to find in their protege s<br />
succeeding book a distinct and undeniable falling<br />
off! The promise of its predecessor 1s stultified.<br />
The reviewer's prophecies have come to nought.<br />
Readers (and publishers) are disappointed.<br />
<br />
The book is, it may be, the poorest thing the<br />
author has produced. At all events it is markedly<br />
inferior to the book which brought him into<br />
notice.<br />
<br />
This thing has happened so frequently as almost<br />
to establish a rule. One may not cite names, of<br />
course, albeit a number, and these including some<br />
of our foremost writers, present themselves.<br />
<br />
The fact being indisputable, it is interesting and<br />
it may be helpful, to seek the reason. Is it due to<br />
exhaustion following upon supreme effort? Is it<br />
due to some noxious miasma exhaling in the tropic<br />
heats of success? Is it the pernicious influence of<br />
teas, of dinners and of other smiling functions<br />
whereto Mrs. Leo-Hunter bids the last-discovered<br />
Beast in order that he may roar for the eritertain-<br />
iment of her guests ?<br />
<br />
Or is it merely that Messrs. Mammon (the<br />
author’s publishers) having tasted the savour of<br />
successful editions, unduly spur him to repeat his<br />
efforts, and spoil his work by haste ?<br />
<br />
Personally, 1 doubt that the explanation lies in<br />
any of these factors. For the phenomenon is found<br />
in those who refuse to have their pace of produc-<br />
tion set by Messrs. Mammon, in those who are<br />
proof against social miasmata, in those who con-<br />
sign Mrs. Leo-Hunter actually to the fire-grate,<br />
or mentally (provided they are privileged by sex)<br />
to flames less temperate.<br />
<br />
I cannot help thinking that the explanation is<br />
more profound. I venture to offer the following<br />
suggestions toward it: That the productive methods<br />
of the novelist differ materially from those of any<br />
other form of brain work. While the historian,<br />
philosopher, or journalist evolves ideas, constructs<br />
theories, or narrates facts, the novelist creates<br />
persons, entities with individualities, wills, emo-<br />
tions, destinies, over which, when once created, he<br />
in many cases has little more control, perhaps even<br />
less, than a parent has over the development and<br />
destinies of his sons and daughters. That while<br />
the journalist, for example, remembers what he<br />
sees and describes it in language which presents it<br />
more or less clearly before his readers, the creative<br />
writer does not write from memory at all. His is<br />
the faculty to absorb and assimilate scenes and<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR:<br />
<br />
circumstances and emotions and to compound them<br />
into a new substance, a substance which spon-<br />
taneously evolves itself into drama and story, as<br />
clouds may be seen to evolve themselves perpetually<br />
into new shape.<br />
<br />
That while the story itself is worked out by<br />
sub-conscious faculties of mind (the subliminal<br />
consciousness as it has been styled) the more purely<br />
intellectual faculties are employed mainly in re-<br />
cording these sub-conscious and spontaneous<br />
operations. The true creative power, the inspira-<br />
tion which gives life, lies in the sub-consciousness,<br />
<br />
and is only hampered and hindered when the active,<br />
<br />
intelligence interferes and attempts to control the<br />
persons and developments of the drama.<br />
<br />
If I may cite my own case (and doubtless the<br />
psychological processes of the humblest are some-<br />
what as those of the highest) I am able frequently<br />
to perceive this dual action of my brain, the more<br />
actively intellectual portion standing apart (like a<br />
spectator with a note-book) watching the spon-<br />
taneous developments of another portion and<br />
rapidly clothing these in language which my pen<br />
sets down. I am able even to see in this sub-<br />
conscious stratum of my brain tiny moving figures<br />
which seem intensely alive and seldom pause for<br />
word or action, but play out their play like actors<br />
who know their parts perfectly. When I take up<br />
my pen in the morning I experience the utmost<br />
interest to know what they are going todo. For<br />
if I know, it is because they have subtly informed<br />
me, not because I have consciously decided for<br />
them. When, from fatigue (from having roared<br />
the previous evening, it may be, for Mrs. Leo-<br />
Hunter) my actors on some mornings are inert,<br />
experience has taught me not to jerk them into<br />
action, or they will merely play their parts like<br />
puppets moved by wires. I wait till they begin to<br />
move again spontaneously.<br />
<br />
The methods of all writers are not of course<br />
similar. With some the persons and course of a<br />
story are consciously and carefully fabricated and<br />
elaborated by the active intellectual faculties, in order<br />
to illustrate some theory or problem or to adorn<br />
some ingenious plot.<br />
<br />
But in these cases, in order to vitalise such a<br />
plot and to give life and reality to the persons of<br />
the story, the writer must first cast his notions<br />
into his sub-consciousness, to be there clothed with<br />
flesh and made to live aud breathe. Otherwise<br />
they will be no more than automata, pegs whereon<br />
the plot or problem hangs.<br />
<br />
Now I venture to offer as an explanation of the<br />
oftentimes injurious influence of success the sug-<br />
gestion that the self-consciousness to which it may<br />
give rise, hampers the normal working methods.<br />
The author is over-anxious to be worthy of the<br />
praise accorded him, to surpass himself. His<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 53<br />
<br />
natural methods of production are disturbed.<br />
The delicate balance between active consciousness<br />
and brooding consciousness (so to term it) is lost.<br />
In his striving to do well, he is afraid to trust<br />
enough to his less determined mental faculties.<br />
He plots and re-plots, constructs and re-constructs.<br />
Like a boy or a girl who has planted a seed in the<br />
ground, he interferes with its natural processes of<br />
erowth by perpetually examining and over-hauling<br />
it, in order to be sure that it is sprouting.<br />
<br />
The book is the child ef his intellect, instead of<br />
being the child of his nature. Everyone is disap-<br />
pointed. He himself, having devoted so many<br />
pains and so much attention to it, perhaps regards<br />
it as his best work.<br />
<br />
Those more qualified to judge find it artificial,<br />
unconvincing, full of notions it may be, and of<br />
“situations,” but lacking the life and health and<br />
harmonious perfection of a spontaneous natural<br />
growth.<br />
ARABELLA KENEALY.<br />
<br />
—_—__—_—_—_—_+—>__+____—_—_-<br />
<br />
LITERATURE AND LAW IN THE UNITED<br />
STATES.<br />
<br />
So<br />
[FIRST ARTICLE. |<br />
<br />
E, here in England, complain of our copy-<br />
right lav—and American authors complain<br />
of theirs !<br />
<br />
Turn to the preface of any standard English<br />
work on copyright, and you will find the bitter<br />
complaint reiterated in every edition. Turn to the<br />
introduction of Mr. Arthur S. Hamlin’s admirable<br />
compilation of ‘‘ American Cases and Decisions ”’*<br />
(just published by Messrs. Putnam’s Sons), to<br />
read of—<br />
<br />
“| |. The unnecessary complexity of the provisions of<br />
the existing statute, the difficulty, and, in some cases, the<br />
impracticability, of fulfilling the obligations imposed<br />
by it.”<br />
<br />
It has quite a home-like familiar sound! It<br />
might have been written in England of English<br />
Copyright law.<br />
<br />
But the curious—shall I say, the amusing ?—<br />
part of Mr, Hamlin’s complaint is not here. We<br />
are all complaining animals. For us, the amusing<br />
part of Mr. Hamlin’s introduction will be his<br />
<br />
_* Copyright Cases: A Summary of Leading American<br />
Decisions on the Law of Copyright and on Literary<br />
Property, from 1891 to 1903; together with the Text of the<br />
United States Copyright Statute, and a Selection of Recent<br />
Copyright Decisions of the Courts of Great Britain and<br />
Canada, Compiled by Arthur S. Hamlin. Published for<br />
the American Publishers’ Copyright League by G. P.<br />
Putnam's Sons. 1904. $2.<br />
<br />
splendid eulogy of the copyright laws of other<br />
countries—in which he doubtless includes our own<br />
—and his finding in their perfeetions his strongest<br />
argument for damning the imperfections of his<br />
own. That is the unkindest cut of all! We break<br />
out periodically into ravines against our law. Listen<br />
to Mr. Hamlin on it :—<br />
<br />
“All the existing copyright statutes of the world,<br />
excepting that of the United States, have been the work<br />
of commissions of experts. The members of these com-<br />
missions have had authority to summon witnesses, and to<br />
take testimony, and, after having devoted sufticient time to.<br />
the mastery of the details of a subject which is of necessity<br />
complex, and which certainly calls for expert training, and<br />
for expert experience, they have presented their conclusions<br />
in the form of a report containing the specifications of the<br />
legislation recommended .. .. ” and so forth,<br />
<br />
Having read which, one turns in amazement to.<br />
the English law, involuntarily exclaiming: And<br />
tas is what we get! After all that noble work by<br />
those expert and experienced persons described by<br />
Mr. Hamlin—we take his account of it just as it<br />
stands—/his is the net result :—<br />
<br />
“ Numerous and ill-drafted Acts,”<br />
says Mr. Scrutton.<br />
<br />
‘* Nothing has been done to ameliorate the lamentable<br />
condition in which the Commissioners found the law,”<br />
<br />
says Mr. MacGillivray. These are the opinions of<br />
our distinguished experts. If we turn to the<br />
“opinions” of those who are not experts—well, |<br />
that way madness lies! “The bull in the net”<br />
is the only suitable metaphor.<br />
<br />
So, Mr. Hamlin is, to say the least, a little<br />
puzzling. And, reading this excellent and most<br />
useful compilation of his, as I have read it, from<br />
cover to cover, I have tried, during the last few<br />
days, to puzzle it all out. All laws are imperfect in<br />
this imperfect yet progressive world. I cannot<br />
for the life of me see that this work—a record and<br />
condensation of United States cases from 1891 to<br />
1903—takes up in its drag-net any considerable body<br />
of cases pointing directly at the “ complexities,”<br />
“ difficulties,” ‘ impracticabilities,” of which Mr.<br />
Hamlin complains. With the heartiest will in the<br />
world to confound American copyright law, I find<br />
myself unable to be any more kind to Mr.<br />
Hamlin than at least he is to us. I will not<br />
actually go so far as to praise his law. Nil<br />
aamirari should be our motto when we are con-<br />
fronted by the comfortable optimist who points<br />
out to us the excellent time authors are now having<br />
compared with the old days of “ patronage.” We<br />
will not forget so quickly as all that ‘the shambles<br />
where they died.” But I must ask him why, at<br />
least, he did not nail down some specific cases in<br />
this book in which these “complexities” were<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
52<br />
<br />
the last were mainly venial faults, faults which<br />
needed but for their correction that timely prick<br />
of criticism which the critics with their accustomed<br />
geniality had supplied. They saw no lack of<br />
promise. Their part being done, they prophesied<br />
great things of the writer. ;<br />
<br />
What then is their astonishment and the dis-<br />
appointment of readers to find in their proteges<br />
succeeding book a distinct and undeniable falling<br />
off! ‘The promise of its predecessor 1s stultified.<br />
The reviewer’s prophecies have come to nought.<br />
Readers (and publishers) are disappointed.<br />
<br />
The book is, it may be, the poorest thing the<br />
author has produced. At all events it is markedly<br />
inferior to the book which brought him into<br />
notice.<br />
<br />
This thing has happened so frequently as almost<br />
to establish arule. One may not cite names, of<br />
course, albeit a number, and these including some<br />
of our foremost writers, present themselves.<br />
<br />
The fact being indisputable, it is interesting and<br />
it may be helpful, to seek the reason. Is it due to<br />
exhaustion following upon supreme effort? Is it<br />
due to some noxious miasma exhaling in the tropic<br />
heats of suecess ? Is it the pernicious influence of<br />
teas, of dinners and of other smiling functions<br />
whereto Mrs. Leo-Hunter bids the last-discovered<br />
Beast in order that he may roar for the eritertain-<br />
inent of her guests ?<br />
<br />
Or is it merely that Messrs. Mammon (the<br />
author’s publishers) having tasted the savour of<br />
successful editions, unduly spur him to repeat his<br />
efforts, and spoil his work by haste ?<br />
<br />
Personally, I doubt that the explanation lies in<br />
any of these factors. For the phenomenon is found<br />
in those who refuse to have their pace of produc-<br />
tion set by Messrs. Mammon, in those who are<br />
proof against social miasmata, in those who con-<br />
sign Mrs. Leo-Hunter actually to the fire-grate,<br />
or mentally (provided they are privileged by sex)<br />
to flames less temperate.<br />
<br />
I cannot help thinking that the explanation is<br />
more profound. I venture to offer the following<br />
suggestions toward it: That the productive methods<br />
of the novelist differ materially from those of any<br />
other form of brain work. While the historian,<br />
philosopher, or journalist evolves ideas, constructs<br />
theories, or narrates facts, the novelist creates<br />
persons, entities with individualities, wills, emo-<br />
tions, destinies, over which, when once created, he<br />
in many cases has little more control, perhaps even<br />
less, than a parent has over the development and<br />
destinies of his sons and daughters. That while<br />
the journalist, for example, remembers what he<br />
sees and describes it in language which presents it<br />
more or less clearly before his readers, the creative<br />
writer does not write from memory at all. His is<br />
the faculty to absorb and assimilate scenes and<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR:<br />
<br />
circumstances and emotions and to compound them<br />
into a new substance, a substance which spon-<br />
taneously evolves itself into drama and story, as<br />
clouds may be seen to evolve themselves perpetually<br />
into new shape.<br />
<br />
That while the story itself is worked out by<br />
sub-conscious faculties of mind (the subliminal<br />
consciousness as it has been styled) the more purely<br />
intellectual faculties are employed mainly in re-<br />
cording these sub-conscious and spontaneous<br />
operations. The true creative power, the inspira-<br />
tion which gives life, lies in the sub-consciousness,<br />
and is only hampered and hindered when the active,<br />
intelligence interferes and attempts to control the<br />
persons and developments of the drama.<br />
<br />
If I may cite my own case (and doubtless the<br />
psychological processes of the humblest are some-<br />
what as those of the highest) 1 am able frequently<br />
to perceive this dual action of my brain, the more<br />
actively intellectual portion standing apart (like a<br />
spectator with a note-book) watching the spon-<br />
taneous developments of another portion and<br />
rapidly clothing these in language which my pen<br />
sets down. I am able even to see in this sub-<br />
conscious stratum of my brain tiny moving figures<br />
which seem intensely alive and seldom pause for<br />
word or action, but play out their play like actors<br />
who know their parts perfectly. When I take up<br />
my pen in the morning I experience the utmost<br />
interest to know what they are going todo. For<br />
if I know, it is because they have subtly informed<br />
me, not because I have consciously decided for<br />
them. When, from fatigue (from having roared<br />
the previous evening, it may be, for Mrs. Leo-<br />
Hunter) my actors on some mornings are inert,<br />
experience has taught me not to jerk them into<br />
action, or they will merely play their parts like<br />
puppets moved by wires. I wait till they begin to<br />
move again spontaneously.<br />
<br />
The methods of all writers are not of course<br />
similar. With some the persons and course of a<br />
story are consciously and carefully fabricated and<br />
elaborated by the active intellectual faculties, in order<br />
to illustrate some theory or problem or to adorn<br />
some ingenious plot.<br />
<br />
But in these cases, in order to vitalise such a<br />
plot and to give life and reality to the persons of<br />
the story, the writer must first cast his notions<br />
into his sub-consciousness, to be there clothed with<br />
flesh and made to live and breathe. Otherwise<br />
they will be no more than automata, pegs whereon<br />
the plot or problem hangs.<br />
<br />
Now I venture to offer as an explanation of the<br />
oftentimes injurious influence of success the sug-<br />
gestion that the self-consciousness to which it may<br />
give rise, hampers the normal working methods.<br />
The author is over-anxious to be worthy of the<br />
praise accorded him, to surpass himself. His<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
natural methods of production are disturbed.<br />
The delicate balance between active consciousness<br />
and brooding consciousness (so to term it) is lost.<br />
In his striving to do well, he is afraid to trust<br />
enough to his less determined mental faculties.<br />
He plots and re-plots, constructs and re-constructs.<br />
Like a boy or a girl who has planted a seed in the<br />
ground, he interferes with its natural processes of<br />
growth by perpetually examining and over-hauling<br />
it, in order to be sure that it is sprouting.<br />
<br />
The book is the child ef his intellect, instead of<br />
being the child of his nature. Everyone is disap-<br />
pointed. He himself, having devoted so many<br />
pains and so much attention to it, perhaps regards<br />
it as his best work.<br />
<br />
Those more qualified to judge find it artificial,<br />
unconvincing, full of notions it may be, and of<br />
“situations,” but lacking the life and health and<br />
harmonious perfection of a spontaneous natural<br />
growth.<br />
ARABELLA KENEALY.<br />
<br />
——____+—}_+-____—_—_-<br />
<br />
LITERATURE AND LAW IN THE UNITED<br />
STATES.<br />
<br />
[FIRST ARTICLE. ]<br />
<br />
E, here in England, complain of our copy-<br />
right law—and American authors complain<br />
of theirs !<br />
<br />
Turn to the preface of any standard English<br />
work on copyright, and you will find the bitter<br />
complaint reiterated in every edition. Turn to the<br />
introduction of Mr. Arthur 8. Hamlin’s admirable<br />
compilation of ‘ American Cases and Decisions ”’*<br />
(just published by Messrs. Putnam’s Sons), to<br />
read of—<br />
<br />
“|, The unnecessary complexity of the provisions of<br />
the existing statute, the difficulty, and, in some cases, the<br />
impracticability, of fulfilling the obligations imposed<br />
Dy i.”<br />
<br />
It has quite a home-like familiar sound! It<br />
might have been written in England of English<br />
Copyright law.<br />
<br />
But the curious—shall I say, the amusing ?—<br />
part of Mr. Hamlin’s complaint is not here. We<br />
are all complaining animals. For us, the amusing<br />
part of Mr. Hamlin’s introduction will be his<br />
<br />
_* Copyright Cases: A Summary of Leading American<br />
Decisions on the Law of Copyright and on Literary<br />
Property, from 1891 to 1903; together with the Text of the<br />
United States Copyright Statute, and a Selection of Recent<br />
Copyright Decisions of the Courts of Great Britain and<br />
Canada. Compiled by Arthur 8. Hamlin. Published for<br />
the American Publishers’ Copyright League by G. P.<br />
Putnam's Sons. 1904, $2.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
58<br />
<br />
splendid eulogy of the copyright laws of other<br />
countries—in which he doubtless includes our own<br />
—and his finding in their perfections his strongest<br />
argument for damning the imperfections of his<br />
own. That is the unkindest cut of all! -We break<br />
out periodically into ravings against our law. Listen<br />
to Mr. Hamlin on it :-—<br />
<br />
“All the existing copyright. statutes of the world,<br />
excepting that of the United States, have been the work<br />
of commissions of experts. The members of these com-<br />
missions have had authority to summon witnesses, and to<br />
take testimony, and, after having devoted sufficient time to<br />
the mastery of the details of a subject which is of necessity<br />
complex, and which certainly calls for expert training, and<br />
for expert experience, they have presented their conclusions<br />
in the form of a report containing the specifications of the<br />
legislation recommended .... ” and so forth.<br />
<br />
Having read which, one turns in amazement to<br />
the English law, involuntarily exclaiming: And<br />
this is what we get! After all that noble work by<br />
those expert and experienced persons described by<br />
Mr. Hamlin—we take his account of it just as it<br />
stands—/his is the net result :—<br />
<br />
“ Numerous and ill-drafted Acts,”<br />
says Mr. Serutton.<br />
<br />
“ Nothing has been done to ameliorate the lamentable<br />
condition in which the Commissioners found the law,”<br />
<br />
says Mr. MacGillivray. These are the opinions of<br />
our distinguished experts. If we turn to the<br />
“opinions” of those who are not experts—well,<br />
that way madness lies! ‘The bull in the net”<br />
is the only suitable metaphor.<br />
<br />
So, Mr. Hamlin is, to say the least, a little<br />
puzzling. And, reading this excellent and most<br />
useful compilation of his, as I have read it, from<br />
cover to cover, I have tried, during the last few<br />
days, to puzzle it all out. All laws are imperfect in<br />
this imperfect yet progressive world. I cannot<br />
for the life of me see that this work—a record and<br />
condensation of United States cases from 1891 to<br />
1903—takes up in its drag-net any considerable body<br />
of cases pointing directly at the “ complexities,”<br />
“ difficulties,” ‘‘ impracticabilities,” of which Mr.<br />
Hamlin complains. With the heartiest will in the<br />
world to confound American copyright law, I find<br />
myself unable to be any more kind to Mr.<br />
Hamlin than at least he is to us. I will not<br />
actually go so far as to praise his law. Wal<br />
admirari should be our motto when we are con-<br />
fronted by the comfortable optimist who points<br />
out to us the excellent time authors are now having<br />
compared with the old days of “ patronage.” We<br />
will not forget so quickly as all that “the shambles<br />
where they died.” But I must ask him why, at<br />
least, he did not nail down some specific cases in<br />
this book in which these “complexities” were<br />
<br />
<br />
54<br />
<br />
particularly marked. His rare, and admirable foot-<br />
notes are given in the mildest and most scholarly<br />
spirit of humility, after his learned United States<br />
Courts Judges have done their worst on the<br />
evidence. So I seek in vain for some justification<br />
of his extreme if indirect praise of “all existing<br />
statutes of the world,” and his brisk condemnation<br />
of his’ own. I could easily find him, amongst<br />
English copyright decisions, a few hard cases to<br />
better anything in his bag. So much for single<br />
instances.<br />
<br />
On the general question: Has he not over there<br />
the most remarkable system ever devised for<br />
“keeping the money in the family” and bleeding<br />
strangers ? He may retort (though, of course,<br />
he won't): ‘ Yes, it’s all very well for printers and<br />
publishers!” Well then, has he not over there<br />
something that pretends to bring literary and<br />
artistic property into one protecting fold ; some-<br />
thing that at least pretends to a codification ?<br />
Again one’s thoughts revert to the English law,<br />
and one involuntarily asks—in perfect serious-<br />
ness: Is it, after all, only that this great nation of<br />
the West, so young, so eager for reform, is im-<br />
patient of the restraint to which we old fogeys<br />
have long grown accustomed, that in reality the<br />
“complexities” at which he hints are as nothing<br />
compared with our own? We have an Act for<br />
books, Acts for drama and music, many Acts for<br />
engravings, paintings, drawings and photographs ;<br />
an Act for sculpture ; International Acts ; the<br />
Conventions ; the Colonial Acts! We are im-<br />
patient of them, of course ; and we sigh for a<br />
better time and for the passage of Lord Thring’s<br />
Bill. But we jog along somehow, realising,<br />
perhaps, the small part after all that books and art<br />
make even now in our national affairs, and the<br />
wonderful way things have of adjusting themselves<br />
to our needs. Certainly our Acts, such as they are,<br />
have grown—slowly indeed—with our own growth,<br />
yielding to extreme pressure only, but allowing<br />
us, so long as we have no need to invoke them, a<br />
wonderfully free hand outside of them.<br />
<br />
“ Outside of them”! Just there, I think, is to<br />
be fixed Mr. Hamlin’s grievance. He cannot get<br />
outside of his Statute law. A citizen of the United<br />
States cannot, like us, acquire copyright by merely<br />
publishing a book. If he attempt it, down comes<br />
the guillotine—his head is off, his work is public<br />
property. In other words he must register before<br />
publication. We, with our strangely free and elastic<br />
methods, need not register. Every Englishman<br />
(and every friendly alien) from the moment he<br />
publishes his book, enjoys the blessing of statu-<br />
tory copyright in that book without fulfilling any<br />
other condition whatever. He has merely to pub-<br />
lish. It is true he must register if his book become<br />
the subject of copyright litigation. But how often<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
does that happen? Say we publish over here<br />
5,000 books a year: do fifteen annually become<br />
the subject of copyright litigation? So, if we<br />
avoid litigation we have « tolerably lazy time ; and<br />
the one objection to the Authors’ Society is that it<br />
fosters our laziness, An author has only to send his<br />
guinea a year to the Society to be entirely relieved of<br />
the necessity of complaining about “ complexities,”<br />
“intricacies,” and so forth. And thus the Authors’<br />
Society (curious malevolence of things !) prevents<br />
our getting better laws.<br />
<br />
Now, of the half dozen important differences<br />
between our law and United States law the chief, for<br />
practical purposes, is this one of registration. In<br />
the United States not only does an author fail to<br />
get protection unless he register, but, even after he<br />
has registered, unless he has done so in the correct<br />
manner :<br />
<br />
(1.) Deposit of title and copies.<br />
<br />
(2.) In due time.<br />
<br />
(3.) Made in the United States.<br />
<br />
(4.) Bearing, when published, the proper notice,<br />
—he may at any moment have some claimant<br />
starting up to contest his right to his property on<br />
the mere technical form of his registration.<br />
<br />
For example, the renowned Augustin Daly (who<br />
appears to have been a somewhat lively litigant)<br />
deposited a title of a play as “ Under the Gaslight :<br />
A Romantic Panorama of the Streets and Homes of<br />
New York.” He published it under the title (evi-<br />
dently a second thought): “Under the Gaslight: A<br />
Totally Original Picturesque Drama of Life and Love<br />
inthese Times.” It may be said that the man who<br />
could be guilty of a title like that deserved any fate ;<br />
andshortly there started up one, Webster, who calmly<br />
appropriated the important scene in the play and<br />
dragged Daly through three trials, from the Circuit<br />
Court to the Supreme Court, before he was beaten.<br />
<br />
In like manner Howard Patterson deposited a<br />
title, “The Captain of the Rajah,” with a couple<br />
of lines of sub-title. This sub-title he cut down<br />
on publication. The book was promptly infringed<br />
on that ground. Injunction for him at first trial,<br />
certainly ; but he had to go to Court to protect his<br />
work. Mrs. Osgood was not so fortunate. She<br />
wrote an excellent hook on the application of glaze<br />
and colours to china, but unfortunately forgot that<br />
her two copies must be deposited not later than the<br />
date of publication, and that the notice (otherwise<br />
correct) must bear her name. Her suit was dis-<br />
missed on these grounds, and the defendant profited.<br />
Carr painted a picture and deposited the title and<br />
a photograph, but forgot the “description.” It<br />
took two trials to prove to him that Mr. Bennett,<br />
the millionaire proprietor of the New York Herald,<br />
could reprint his work without asking leave. ‘Three<br />
trials was the result of the famous American’sport-<br />
ing magazine, Outing, reprinting, without leave,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ct ORES DIRE CST ARIE a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. '<br />
<br />
the picture of the yacht Vigilant, which one Bolles<br />
had registered as “ Copyright by Bollesof Brooklyn.”<br />
“ Bolles of Brooklyn” was regarded as not pro-<br />
viding adequate means of identifying the photo-<br />
grapher, though he won in the end. Heertel took<br />
an action for penalties against Raphael Tuck &<br />
Sons for printing a false notice of copyright on<br />
fancy cards. Judge Lacombe held that it was not<br />
a false notice, because it was no notice at all—the<br />
date was omitted. Heertel lost. Raphael Tuck<br />
& Sons again came off best as against McLaughlin.<br />
They printed books with a false copyright notice—<br />
but in Germany. They only sold them in the<br />
United States, and they sold them prior to the<br />
passage of the Act prohibiting-such sale. Though<br />
the name Raphael Tuck appears rather frequently<br />
in cases of false notice, it must be remembered<br />
that our free English law gives copyright in<br />
books without any registration at all, and so any<br />
respectable firm may easily fall into the practice of<br />
putting the word “copyright” on everything it<br />
turns out.<br />
<br />
Cases could be multiplied indefinitely. It is<br />
curious the shifts to which people will go to evade<br />
the law in this respect, or to redress, after the<br />
guillotine has dropped, some fatal initial blunder.<br />
Mrs. Snow published a photograph without<br />
registering it. Thereafter, seeing her blunder, she<br />
had etched into the negative a cane in the hand of<br />
one of the figures. This negative she then “ copy-<br />
righted.’ Held that she had merely made an<br />
attempt to reclaim what she had already abandoned<br />
to the public, and that in any case her action was<br />
wrong. She claimed copyright in a “ photo.” But<br />
the only thing that could be the subject of it was<br />
not a “photo” but an etching—namely, the cane!<br />
Of course she lost.<br />
<br />
After this gallery of failures it is interesting to<br />
find the great Edison winning a case. He claimed<br />
copyright in a celluloid sheet of 4,500 kinetoscope<br />
photographs of the launching of the yacht Jeteor<br />
(infringed by one Lubin). It took two trials to<br />
decide that, for the purposes of registration, the<br />
4,500 pictures constituted but one subject.<br />
<br />
Now, if we are inclined to condemn the Ameri-<br />
can law on the evidence of complexities afforded by<br />
the above cases, we have not only to remember<br />
that the law itself is of somewhat recent date, but<br />
also that for large commercial purposes American<br />
arts and letters were born but yesterday. Yet no<br />
species of property takes so long to establish its<br />
rights, to become truly adjusted to the life of those<br />
great communities in which alone it can flourish,<br />
or requires greater precision and intelligence for<br />
its proper management. And of the cases quoted,<br />
several resulted from just this lack of precision,<br />
which only such exemplary cases can ultimately<br />
cure. I have written elsewhere in this number of<br />
<br />
55<br />
<br />
the advantages of our method of letting books<br />
fight their own battles and take their chances in the<br />
struggle for existence. Let me say here that I am<br />
not acquainted with one detail in the system of<br />
registration at the Library of Congress. I do not<br />
know whether the librarian would decline to accept<br />
for registration one of two books bearing the same<br />
title. Yet I can see that such a system would<br />
also have its advantages in excluding late comers<br />
from the field, in putting a premium on, at least,<br />
originality combined with a quick despatch in<br />
literary affairs, and in providing a permanent<br />
record of titles.<br />
<br />
This is the A B C of American copyright law—<br />
proper registration. It does not seem to be unduly<br />
complex, nor to require any hard thinking, any-<br />
thing more than absolute accuracy (in other words,<br />
good advice by your man of business) for its<br />
successful working. ‘There is much to be said for<br />
it. It is, in any case, the gateway to American<br />
copyright ; and, good or bad, it strikes the mere<br />
outsider as a straight and simple way in, leaving<br />
little to chance. We have scarcely anything over<br />
here that exactly resembles it—the “ reservation ”<br />
notice on music, perhaps, and the necessity of<br />
registering paintings, drawings, and photographs<br />
before an alleged infringement ; but these do not<br />
provide us with much litigation.<br />
<br />
Next month I hope to go deeper into American<br />
law, illustrating, as far as possible, from Mr.<br />
Hamlin’s book, its working in more difficult cases as<br />
compared with our own.<br />
<br />
CHARLES WEEKES.<br />
<br />
—_————_1—_>_+—____—_-<br />
<br />
AFTER WORK.*<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
T is the prerogative of all men, after arriving<br />
at a certain age, to have reminiscences, and<br />
the privilege of some to record them. ‘To the<br />
<br />
latter category belongs Mr. Edward Marston, one<br />
of the oldest members of the publishing trade.<br />
His long connection with the trade has brought<br />
him into intimate touch with a number of interest-<br />
ing people for whom he published. In a_book<br />
entitled “ After Work: Fragments from the Work-<br />
shop of an old Publisher,” he has modestly sunk<br />
his own identity and given to the public some<br />
entertaining particulars of those with whom he<br />
has come into personal contact :—such as Bulwer<br />
Lytton, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Wilkie Collins,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ee ee eee<br />
<br />
* ‘After Work: Fragments from the Workshop of an Old<br />
Publisher.’ William Heinemann. 10s. net.<br />
<br />
<br />
56<br />
<br />
R. D. Blackmore, Sir Henry Morton Stauley,<br />
William Black, and many others. But, beyond<br />
these notes, there are matters which are of<br />
interest to members of the Society. Mr. Marston<br />
explains how The Publishers’ Circular—that useful<br />
trade organ—was originally started, and gives<br />
many details concerning the business side of<br />
literature. He quotes, at length, the agreement<br />
entered into between his firm and Bulwer Lytton<br />
for the publication of that fascinating romance,<br />
“A Strange Story,” for which the firm paid £1,500<br />
for a licence to publish for two years. It would<br />
be a good thing if nowadays more authors made<br />
similar contracts, assigning merely a licence to<br />
publish for a limited period. ‘The amount received<br />
by Lord Lytton was, without doubt, large, if the<br />
position of authors and publishers at that time 1s<br />
taken into consideration, but the payment was<br />
justified by the result. Later in the book, Mr.<br />
Marston, with a little bitterness, proclaims the<br />
price that Mr. Wilkie Collins received for “No<br />
Name.” He points out that that gentleman had<br />
a perfect knowledge of his own value, and that he<br />
stood in no need of a literary agent to make a<br />
‘bargain for him. The price paid by Messrs. Sampson<br />
Low was £3,000. Apparently, from Mr. Marston’s<br />
statement, the book resulted in no loss, though he<br />
asserts that the risk, from his point of view, was<br />
great, and forced upon his firm by a very vigorous<br />
competition. Many of the letters quoted by Mr.<br />
Marston from his authors, standing outside busi-<br />
ness, draw out their special characteristics. Mr.<br />
Blackmore writes about his vines and fruit trees.<br />
Sir H. M. Stanley writes about his trials and<br />
perils. It would be unfair to the book to make<br />
any large quotations, but the letters should not be<br />
missed by any who care for a knowledge of the<br />
personalities of their favourite authors.<br />
<br />
There are, besides, one or two points with which<br />
the reviewer is forced to deal, as they touch the<br />
work and reputation of the Society of Authors.<br />
The last chapter of the book Mr. Marston entitles<br />
“Dealings with Authors.” He makes the astound-<br />
ing pronouncement that Sir Walter Besant and<br />
others in the early days of the Society stated that<br />
publishers could not make any losses. This kind of<br />
rash generality, when Besant was alive, was con-<br />
stantly put forward and as strenuously denied.<br />
Perhaps Mr. Marston will refer to the exact<br />
page in 7'he Author or the publications of the<br />
Society where this statement occurs. Again, he<br />
says that the Society began its operations by<br />
making sweeping and ungenerous attacks upon all<br />
publishers, assuming that all alike were robbers,<br />
and proving by balance sheets drawn from its<br />
Imagination that publishers could not, by any<br />
possibility, make a loss. In the proverbial phrase,<br />
<br />
Mr. Marston has ‘drawn upon his imagination<br />
<br />
’ THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
for his facts,” and it is a pity that an otherwise<br />
admirable book should, to a certain extent, have<br />
been spoilt by the misstatements and biassed, un-<br />
generous comments contained in the last chapter.<br />
With this exception the book is one which<br />
should appeal to all those who, in their fondness<br />
for literature, care to make themselves better<br />
“acquaint ” with the individualities of the writers.<br />
<br />
o—~-<br />
<br />
IS POETRY READ AS IT USED TO BE?<br />
<br />
he<br />
<br />
R. W. D. HOWELLS, in Harper's Magazine,<br />
<br />
VI has lately made a futile endeavour to<br />
<br />
ascertain by the votes of its readers the<br />
present popularity of poetry in the United States.<br />
The subject awaking no interest or curiosity there,<br />
has for the present fizzled out. Perhaps the times<br />
were not ripe for the computation of poetical<br />
readers in such+an enormous area of land, or the<br />
clash and clang of more practical serious interests<br />
may have silenced the inquiry.<br />
<br />
However, the subject having a definite sugges-<br />
tiveness to literature and a relative value to<br />
thought, is worth attention.<br />
<br />
Of course, the curious and interesting question<br />
can never be brought under the range of statistics.<br />
Whether or not the readers of poetry in the<br />
United Kingdom are more numerous to-day than<br />
formerly is'a problem which cannot be easily<br />
solved, but one can endeavour to glance at the<br />
probabilities one way or the other. ‘To pierce the<br />
heart of the subject is an impossibility: but in<br />
wandering around its skirts a few gleams of the<br />
truth may be visible.<br />
<br />
The first query that naturally arises is: Who<br />
are the readers of poetry ?<br />
<br />
They consist, I should imagine, of two classes.<br />
One suggestive word comprises the first: Youth !<br />
whose password is hope, whose look-out on life is<br />
fresh and wonderful ; whose lot, as yet, has not<br />
been soured and chilled by relentless circumstance<br />
and experience. Those who predominate in this<br />
class, by reason of their emotions, susceptibilities<br />
and sensitiveness, are young women; the band<br />
of light-hearted, dream-haunted, romance-loving<br />
girls, who find in poetry a response to their ,vague<br />
questionings and an interpretation of their<br />
mysterious imaginings.<br />
<br />
The second class comprises all those who make<br />
a hobby and study of poetry, and whose lives are<br />
imbued with what must always be the highest<br />
and truest expression of literature. Neither age,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
‘<br />
2<br />
<br />
£<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
=<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 57<br />
<br />
fashion, nor change can ever stale or wither the<br />
vivid joys of this eager pursuit. In Palgrave’s<br />
apt words :-— :<br />
<br />
«The magic of this art can confer on early<br />
years, Experience; on maturity, Calm ; on age,<br />
Youthfulness.”<br />
<br />
A small portion of this class, the scouts of the<br />
army, is that numerous throng who, over-burdened<br />
with poetic lore and fancy, must record it all in<br />
their own fashion and words: and thus there is<br />
always an immense legion of pseudo-poets, versi-<br />
fiers, minor minstrels who indite and publish their<br />
volumes of musical verse., Sometimes these appeal<br />
to unheeding ears ; often imperfection and weak-<br />
ness spell failure, and very occasionally the appre-<br />
ciation of a thoughtful reviewer may encourage the<br />
new versifier to further and worthier efforts.<br />
<br />
Having now set forth the classes who read<br />
‘poetry, the following queries assert themselves :—<br />
<br />
Has the interest in poetry waned? Have<br />
poetical votaries diminished ? Have readers<br />
fallen off ?<br />
<br />
In answering these questions in a decisive,<br />
strong affirmative, I. shall endeavour to deduce<br />
reasons for my own opinion.<br />
<br />
The enormous production and circulation of<br />
novels in late years have lessened and almost<br />
destroyed the love of poetry amongst the very<br />
class to which it appeals the most. ‘The grades of<br />
fiction, from the garish covered penny horror to a<br />
novel like “he Cardinal’s Snutf Box,” or “The<br />
Column,” in their number and diversity, are<br />
somewhat appalling to consider; but in every<br />
novel which is literature as well as fiction, there<br />
are elements and constituents of poetry to minister<br />
and satisfy the subtle, romantic instincts of the<br />
young. In them are found the pictured scene ;<br />
the sweetness of exquisite words ; the vivid portrai-<br />
ture; the play of thought; the illumination of<br />
life’s truths or pathos—all the glints and glows<br />
of unfettered verse woven into a story of<br />
humanity !<br />
<br />
Thus, the enthralling influence of novels which -<br />
<br />
paint and depict ideals in life and human nature<br />
has weakened the hold of poetry upon the imagi-<br />
nation of youth. ‘The novel has supplanted the<br />
poem, and perhaps for a while, till the output of<br />
fiction brings the weariness of satiety, the youthful<br />
readers of poetry will continue to dwindle.<br />
<br />
There is also another potent reason. The health-<br />
ful love of open air pursuits and pleasures in. our<br />
day has spoilt the zest for indoor, poetic musings.<br />
The gladdening impulses and ardours of youth find<br />
anatural vent in the freedom of country games,<br />
exercises and sports. ‘The spiritual glow of rhythmic<br />
verse is exchanged for the living glow of physical<br />
well-being. The meditative maiden is no longer<br />
sad or happy in unison with delicate phrasings of<br />
<br />
thought, or with the brilliant surprise of trope or<br />
metaphor ; instead, her poetry exists amidst the<br />
“pomp of woodland and resounding shore,” with<br />
perhaps an interlude for an innocent flirtation.<br />
And thus, her already exuberant life is intensified<br />
by vigorous open air enjoyment.<br />
<br />
But the reasons which are creating a distaste of<br />
poetry amongst youthful readers have no signi-<br />
ficance.amongst the students and lovers of poetry<br />
of all ages. The causes of their callousness are<br />
deeper and stronger. ‘The burdens and the<br />
influences of the times and the period have<br />
affected their allegiance to the divine art. The<br />
efforts which are giving living wonders for the<br />
usefulness and weal of the nations and mankind<br />
are weaning them from their delight in the<br />
glamours of modulated thought.<br />
<br />
The spell of contrivance ; the marvel of being<br />
able to annihilate time and space ; the magic of<br />
discovery to baffle disease ; the power of being<br />
able to rule the fairy realms of science ; every<br />
thing that makes for progress and tends to<br />
enlightenment ; the animating ardour that inspires<br />
the leaders of men to combat error and inculcate<br />
truths for the nation’s weal: all these things<br />
drive the man “ Housed in a dream at a distance<br />
from his kind,” to a field of broader issues and<br />
more strenuous purposes.<br />
<br />
And it is because no “ bard sublime ” has arisen<br />
to translate and enshrine these undertakings and<br />
discoveries, and no creative voice is heard to inter-<br />
pret the struggle or herald the victory, that poetry<br />
is becoming decadent to its most earnest votary. It<br />
may be said in extenuation of this, that the verses<br />
of Rudyard Kipling respond to the nation’s poetic<br />
cravings. It is affirmed with laudatory emphasis<br />
that the spell of this wonderful era has been truly<br />
invoked in poetry by this successful author. And<br />
to a certain extent he has interpreted many of the<br />
age’s aspirations, perplexities, doubts, struggles ;<br />
but, to my mind, there is scope still for the larger<br />
vision, wider outlook, and deeper insight in some<br />
great poet of the future.<br />
<br />
In the meantime, whether due to the causes<br />
briefly touched upon, or to others which I cannot<br />
fathom, readers of poetry are gradually falling off ;<br />
the creative art itself is languishing, and no. one<br />
wonders. When the hope of a true poetic revival<br />
will resolve itself into a certainty, and another<br />
masterpiece like ‘Childe Harold” or the “ Idylls<br />
of the King” staitle a waiting world, then, per-<br />
haps, the vivifying influence of the art will again<br />
illuminate a land so opulent in its poetic treasures<br />
<br />
bequeathed by the past.<br />
Tstporr G. ASCHER.<br />
<br />
oO =<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
58<br />
<br />
THE GRAND GUIGNOL.<br />
<br />
oa<br />
A Quire Imaginary CONVERSATION.<br />
<br />
WHY do people talk of the extraordinary<br />
A . brilliancy of the French and German<br />
theatres of the present day ?<br />
<br />
B. Because the French and German theatres of<br />
the present day are extraordinarily brilliant.<br />
<br />
A. That sounds a very unlikely reason.<br />
<br />
B. The truth is always wildly improbable.<br />
<br />
‘A. L seem to have heard a good deal about the<br />
Italian theatre of late. Can you account for that<br />
in the same way?<br />
<br />
B. The Italian Renaissance has, at all events,<br />
drawn the most famous of living poets to the<br />
theatre.<br />
<br />
A. Oh—I take it that the Norwegian theatre is<br />
resting on its past ?<br />
<br />
B. Possibly ; but that past is very recent and<br />
very glorious.<br />
<br />
A. Does anybody talk of the extraordinary<br />
brilliancy of the British theatre of the present<br />
day ?<br />
<br />
B. Certainly. Mr. William Archer.<br />
<br />
A. How very interesting. Can you account for<br />
that ?<br />
<br />
B. I can try.<br />
<br />
A. Would you mind making the effort ?<br />
<br />
B. Mr. Archer has been watching the British<br />
theatre very closely for the last twenty years, and<br />
has seen, during that time, a good deal of very<br />
remarkable work.<br />
<br />
A, And he thinks that our drama is at last<br />
waking from the sleep of centuries ?<br />
<br />
B. “Centuries” is a big word; and “ waking”<br />
much too small a one.<br />
<br />
A. The drama has waked from its sleep ?<br />
<br />
B. I am sure of it.<br />
<br />
A. But don’t you think that there is any danger<br />
of its dropping off again ?<br />
<br />
B. Ah<br />
<br />
A. I think I follow you. Do youagree with the -<br />
<br />
method proposed for keeping it awake ?<br />
<br />
B. You mean the building of a fine roomy<br />
theatre, for it to take exercise in ?<br />
<br />
A. Yes; they say there is nothing like compul-<br />
sory exercise for the sleeping sickness. Have you<br />
faith in a grand National British Theatre ?<br />
<br />
B. I have more faith in the National Irish<br />
Theatre.<br />
<br />
A. Why ?<br />
<br />
B. Because it isn’t grand. “Things comes by<br />
degrees,” as the little Dublin boy said to Dickens.<br />
<br />
_A. I suppose there would be difficulties about a<br />
big new theatre. Money, to begin with. England<br />
seems to be too poor to support art as the conti-<br />
nental nations support it.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
B. Money is the least of difficulties, always.<br />
The right man with the right scheme could pretty<br />
certainly get together the few thousands needed<br />
—assuming that the man exists and the scheme is<br />
possible.<br />
<br />
A. You assume too much. But assuming a<br />
good deal more—assuming that a successful start<br />
were made—don’t you think that there would still<br />
be difficulties in the way ?<br />
<br />
B. I do.<br />
<br />
A. Then you are hopeless ?<br />
<br />
B. I may be, but I didn’t say so.<br />
<br />
A. Do you think a more modest undertaking<br />
would do any good ?<br />
<br />
B. It might do much more good, if it is all we<br />
are ready for at present. Among other things, it<br />
might pave the way for the larger scheme.<br />
<br />
A. Personally, I don’t believe in these’ self-<br />
conscious efforts to improve the arts, little or big.<br />
I agree with Tony Lumpkin and Mr, Sydney<br />
Grundy, “If P’'m to have any good let it come of<br />
itself, and don’t keep ding-dinging it into my<br />
ears.”<br />
<br />
B. The Gospel of Silence.<br />
but history is against it.<br />
<br />
A. Has anybody ever regenerated the drama<br />
intentionally ?<br />
<br />
B. Certainly.<br />
<br />
A. Euripides, I suppose—or Victor Hugo. Can<br />
you give me any more modern example ?<br />
<br />
B. The most modern. The brilliant French<br />
comedy of Augier and Dumas had had its day, and<br />
everyone was talking of the decadence to come,<br />
when Antoine spoke—and in half a generation a<br />
school far more brilliant had arisen.<br />
<br />
A. Do you put Rostand, and Donnay, and the<br />
rest of them, all down to Antoine ?<br />
<br />
B. One man by himself could have done nothing,<br />
of course ; but Antoine had the Third Republic at<br />
his back, like all that is greatest in modern France,<br />
Still, he showed the way—and on a small scale.<br />
Forgive the mixture of the metaphor.<br />
<br />
A. All really great metaphors are mixed. Then<br />
what you want, I take it, is an experimental<br />
theatre ?<br />
<br />
B. You have put it in two words.<br />
<br />
A, Antoine has outgrown the experimental stage.<br />
Is there anything in Paris now which more nearly<br />
meets our want ?<br />
<br />
B. There is the Grand Guignol.<br />
<br />
A. And what is a Grand Guignol ?<br />
<br />
_ B. It is almost exactly the thing we need.<br />
<br />
A. Thank you; but I had rather you explained.<br />
<br />
B. The Grand Guignol was a shabby little<br />
lecture-hall up a backyard not far from the Moulin<br />
Rouge ; but with its success it has been recon-<br />
structed, and it is now quite a pleasant little—<br />
theatre-hall.<br />
<br />
It sounds tempting,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
4 i<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 59<br />
<br />
A. What do they act there ?<br />
<br />
B. Five one-act plays every evening.<br />
<br />
A. Good gracious !<br />
<br />
B. Four would be enough in England.<br />
<br />
A. I think so.<br />
<br />
B. The expenses are microscopic. Actors of<br />
very little experience can carry through a one-act<br />
play—clever authors of no stage-experience can<br />
write one; and in this work young authors and<br />
young actors may learn their business, as they have<br />
little chance of learning it under the long-run<br />
Jong-play system.<br />
<br />
A. And there is a public for them ?<br />
<br />
B. There is undoubtedly a public for them. The<br />
Grand Guignol is such a success that it has<br />
imitators all over the place—the Capucines, the<br />
Mathurins, half-a-dozen others.<br />
<br />
A. I suppose the prices are low ?<br />
<br />
B. Not very. The stalls are about half the<br />
price of those at the fashionable theatres ; but the<br />
second seats are, I think, not cheaper than the pit.<br />
And there are no third seats.<br />
<br />
A. People can drop in at any time, of course.<br />
<br />
B. Then there is something to suit all tastes.<br />
Realism, sensation, comedy, poetry<br />
<br />
A. And—h’m. Sensational realism, eh ? Do<br />
they go a little far that way ?<br />
<br />
B. It is quite true that they have owed part of<br />
their success to their powers of shocking even a<br />
Parisian audience; but this is by no means the<br />
beginning and end of their story.<br />
<br />
A: I should think that such a little theatre<br />
could easily be carried on as an adjunct to a big<br />
one—His Majesty’s or the St. James’s. The little<br />
company could consist largely of the understudies<br />
and minor actors of the large one, with occasionally<br />
a first-rate man glad to fill up an interval “on<br />
easy terms.” Such a company would quite well<br />
bear the burden of a one-act play—it’s not like<br />
sustaining heavy parts throughout an evening of<br />
three hours. And many aclever writer of dialogue<br />
could give us such a piece, and at the same time<br />
be learning how to write a longer one<br />
<br />
B. Rem acu tetigisti. You have touched the<br />
spot.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Epwarp Ross.<br />
<br />
—_—_—__+—_>_+—_____-<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
—_+—~<—+ —<br />
“ Wuat’s in A NAME?”<br />
<br />
Srr,—I do not wish to answer the letter of<br />
Mr. Charles Richard Panter in The Author of<br />
last October at too great length or too seriously,<br />
but I am a little puzzled to know why he should<br />
treat the opinions which I put forward in a tone<br />
<br />
at once so aggrieved and so aggressive. He says<br />
“In the second paragraph of his first letter,<br />
Mr. Armstrong asserts the right to the name of a<br />
book is not copyright. Why should it not be.”<br />
The answer might be given to this conundrum,<br />
“ Because it is not,” or “ Because it is a right of<br />
another description,” but perhaps Mr. Panter had<br />
better consult some work on copyright, or read the<br />
case of Dick y. Yates,in which the Court of Appeal<br />
laid down the law on the subject in 1881. I can<br />
assure Mr. Panter that I had nothing to do with<br />
it. I was not a member of the Court of Appeal of<br />
that day, nor do I expect to take part in the<br />
deliberations of that tribunal at any future period<br />
of my modest career. I only “asserted”? what I<br />
believed to be the law, because I entertained a<br />
not ill-founded opinion upon the subject, which<br />
Mr. Panter may show to be wrong if he can do so.<br />
Mr. Panter’s allusions to “cribbing” a title, and<br />
his not very courteous suggestion that my “ book<br />
did not sell” because of my not being “ allowed to<br />
adopt the title of another author’s work,” show that<br />
he does not fully grasp the nature of the difficulty<br />
from which authors suffer. They do not desire,<br />
nor do they complain, of not being permitted inten-<br />
tionally to take other men’s titles, but they do find<br />
it tiresome to fix upon a title and then to be<br />
informed, with threats of legal proceedings, that it<br />
has already been used for a work of which they<br />
never before heard.<br />
<br />
In my own case, as I explained, a lady desired to<br />
prevent me from using for a novel a name which<br />
she had once given to a short story, and which she<br />
intended thereafter to use as the title of a volume<br />
of short stories, and I gave way, although part of<br />
my book was already in page. | will give the title,<br />
as it affords a good instance of want of originality<br />
on the author’s part and its result. I had chosen<br />
the simple and inoffensive, but not very dis-<br />
tinguished or striking participle “ Drifting.” I<br />
don’t know whether the lady referred to ever pro-<br />
duced her book under the name which [ resigned<br />
to her, but I know that a clever and successful<br />
book came out some years afterwards under the<br />
same title, and if she attempted to stop its circula-<br />
tion Iam not aware that she succeeded. I hope,<br />
however, that whether they agree with me or not,<br />
I made my meaning clearer to other readers of<br />
The Author than to Mr. Panter.<br />
<br />
Yours, &c., :<br />
E. A. ARMSTRONG.<br />
<br />
———+<br />
<br />
Trrues AND Mr. C. R. PANTER.<br />
<br />
Srr,— Who is this that darkeneth counsel by<br />
<br />
words without knowledge ?” . :<br />
Mr. Panter asks: “Pray, what is that right<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
60<br />
<br />
[of an author to the title of his book] if not<br />
copyright ?”” I reply : Common law right.<br />
<br />
“ (opyright,” says he, “ is the one right known<br />
to authors as capable of protecting their works.<br />
I reply : Not at all. :<br />
<br />
«« What would be thought,” he proceeds energetic-<br />
ally to ask, “of the man who declared he had a<br />
right to his own person as Mr. Penman Dryasdust,<br />
but no right whatever to his Christian and sur-<br />
name?” The reply is: Most people would think<br />
him an idiot. But let us examine Mr. Panter’s<br />
analogy, and see whither it will lead us. Here are<br />
the four feet, so to speak, on which his analogy<br />
stands :—<br />
<br />
According to Mr. Panter—<br />
<br />
1. Mr. Dryasdust ...... Has a right to his own<br />
person which thecom-<br />
mon law will recog-<br />
nise. True.<br />
<br />
12. A Book. (... ies Has a right against<br />
<br />
infringers which the<br />
<br />
common law will<br />
recognise. alse.<br />
<br />
; 8. Mr. Dryasdust ...... Has a right to his own<br />
name asname. alse.<br />
(He has no more right<br />
to it than anyone who<br />
has had the misfortune<br />
to be born with it.<br />
The law will protect<br />
only the property and<br />
rights for which the<br />
name stands.)<br />
<br />
AoA Withee 5 Has no right atcommon<br />
law (or Mr. Panter<br />
evidently thinks so).<br />
<br />
L false.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
That is Mr. Panter’s analogy. One true state-<br />
ment to three false. I am tempted. to enquire<br />
whether he understands the nature and uses of<br />
analogical reasoning. Of law and copyright law<br />
he appears to have no knowledge. For, taking the<br />
analogy the other way, let us begin with statement<br />
No. 2, and say: “A book has a right against<br />
infringers which the copyright law will recognise.”<br />
This is true, but here the analogy, of a book to Mr.<br />
Dryasdust, suddenly undergoes complete extinction,<br />
since the copyright law has nothing in the world<br />
to do with Mr. Dryasdust’s defence of his person<br />
or name.<br />
<br />
But I should be filling up your November issue<br />
if I went any deeper into the energetic Mr. Panter’s<br />
fallacies. i shall drop them, and try to clear up<br />
this confusion of words about the rights in titles<br />
of books.<br />
<br />
Copyright, Mr. Panter should learn, is not a<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
natural right like a man’s right to his own<br />
person, his tables, chairs, and “ house utensils.’”<br />
Tt is a temporary monopoly, created by statute, analo-<br />
gous to the right in a patent or trade mark. So,<br />
therefore, it is conditioned by the Statute. Its<br />
duration is only for the statutory period —forty-two<br />
years (or life and seven years). It gives pro+<br />
tection to a species of property which otherwise<br />
would have none—books.<br />
<br />
Now of the books published each year which are<br />
so protected, about seven-eighths are valueless.<br />
They sink into oblivion before forty-two days have<br />
expired. Nevertheless, if the wisdom of the framers<br />
of the Act (including the great Macaulay) was not<br />
brilliantly shown in thus giving a protective<br />
monopoly for so long a time to rubbish, it was<br />
shown in this : it gave no monopoly in titles. If<br />
a book have a value (possibly the framers argued)<br />
the chances are about ten to one that it will shortly<br />
become a valuable article of commerce. In this<br />
state it can protect its own title quite adequately at<br />
common law. But if.on the other hand it have no<br />
value, the chances are about ten to one that it will<br />
shortly sink into oblivion. Now, in this state was<br />
it to be allowed to exclude other books of more value<br />
from the market by monopolising the exclusive<br />
right to its title? Does Mr. Panter see the<br />
point ?<br />
<br />
Let me enlarge for a moment on the ambiguous<br />
word “ value,” so that I may make myself quite<br />
clear to him. The “ value” referred to is not<br />
literary, nor artistic, nor scientific, nor theological<br />
value. it issimply—commercial. Why? Because<br />
we all agree as to money value ; and we all differ<br />
as to literary, artistic, and similar values. In process<br />
of law, indeed, you may hear counsel and even the<br />
Bench discuss literary and artistic values; but<br />
legislators (though they may state in their preamble<br />
that the Act is for “ the greater encouragement of”<br />
learning) cannot take direct cognisance of these<br />
things. Nor can legislators take cognisance of<br />
unhappy exceptions to general averages, like the<br />
case of “Lorna Doone,” “ Omar Khayydm,” etc.<br />
A bill framed to cover all possible exceptions, and<br />
to satisfy everybody’s nice opinions as to literary<br />
and artistic values, would never get to the Lords.<br />
So far our law is doubtless imperfect. But let Mr.<br />
Panter be consoled ; its neglect to protect titles is<br />
not one of its shortcomings.<br />
<br />
One wonders if such an idealist as Mr. Panter<br />
can come down from the heights of his burning.<br />
eloquence at all. He seems to think that plagiarism<br />
is an indictable offence. We are a very advanced<br />
nation, doubtless, but we have not yet advanced<br />
quite so far as that. I wish we had.<br />
<br />
CHARLES WEEKES.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
36, Southampton Street,<br />
Strand, W.C. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/499/1904-11-01-The-Author-15-2.pdf | publications, The Author |