493 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/493 | The Author, Vol. 14 Issue 08 (May 1904) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+14+Issue+08+%28May+1904%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 14 Issue 08 (May 1904)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1904-05-01-The-Author-14-8 | | | | | 197–224 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=14">14</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1904-05-01">1904-05-01</a> | | | | | | | 8 | | | 19040501 | Che Huthbor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. XIV.—No. 8.<br />
<br />
May Ist, 1904.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[Prick SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br />
AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
<br />
_—________¢ ~<—e —___—_-<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—+—<> +<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
Tue Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
_<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tue List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
published October, 1902, at the price of 6d., and<br />
the elections from October, 1902, to July, 1903, as<br />
a supplemental list, at the price of 2d., can now be<br />
obtained at the offices of the Society.<br />
<br />
They will be sold to members or associates of<br />
the Society only.<br />
<br />
—_+—+——<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
Tx Trustees of the Pension Fund met at the<br />
Society’s Offices on the 19th of February, and<br />
having gone carefully into the accounts of the<br />
fund, decided to purchase £250 London and North<br />
Western 3 % Debenture Stock. Accordingly, the<br />
investments of the Pension Fund at present<br />
standing in the names of the Trustees are as<br />
follows.<br />
<br />
Vou. XIV.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock; the<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
Gorisols 24 96.5.2... .... £1000 0 O<br />
Local laosis: <...-..2--. 6.7...) 500 0 0<br />
Victorian Government 3 % Consoli-<br />
<br />
dated Inscribed Stock .............--<br />
War loan 3... ees<br />
London and North Western 3 % Deben-<br />
<br />
GUC SLOCK 00h ee<br />
<br />
291 19 11<br />
20k 9 8<br />
<br />
250 0 0<br />
<br />
Subscriptions from October, 1903.<br />
<br />
Nov. 18,<br />
Dec. 16,<br />
1904.<br />
<br />
Jan. 6, Hills, Mrs. C. H. .<br />
<br />
Jan. 6, Crommelin, Miss .<br />
<br />
Jan. 8, Stevenson, Mrs. M. BE. .<br />
Jan. 16, Kilmarnock, The Lord .<br />
Feb. 5, Portman, Lionel .<br />
<br />
Feb. 11, Shipley, Miss Mary<br />
<br />
Mar. Diiring, Mrs. . : :<br />
Mar. Francis Claude de la Roche<br />
April18, Dixon, W. Scarth .<br />
April18, Bashford, Harry H.<br />
April19, Bosanquet, Eustace F.<br />
April23, Friswell, Miss Laura Hain<br />
<br />
Longe, Miss Julia.<br />
Trevor, Capt. Philip<br />
<br />
OS Oo 1 So or<br />
<br />
on<br />
<br />
SGCanmnocooocorooooo<br />
<br />
Se<br />
NDOOrn<br />
<br />
Donations from October, 19038.<br />
Oct. 27, Sturgis, Julian<br />
Nov. 2, Stanton, V.H. .<br />
Noy. 18, Benecke, Miss Ida.<br />
<br />
Nov. 23, Harraden, Miss Beatrice :<br />
Dec. Miniken, Miss Bertha M. M. .<br />
1904.<br />
Jan. 4,<br />
Jan. 4,<br />
<br />
ooococo<br />
<br />
Moncrieff, A. R. Hope .<br />
Middlemas, Miss Jean .<br />
Jan. 4, Witherby, The Rev. C. .<br />
Jan. 6, Key, The Rey. S. Whittell<br />
Jan. 14, Bennett, Rev. W. K., D.D.<br />
Jan. 2, Roe, Mrs. Harcourt<br />
<br />
Feb. 11, Delaire, Miss Jeanne<br />
<br />
ee ooo co}<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
T the meeting of the Committee held on<br />
Wednesday, April 13th, at the Office of<br />
the Society, twenty-five members and<br />
<br />
associates were elected, making the elections for<br />
the current year one hundred and three. The<br />
recent steady increase in the Society’s numbers is<br />
well maintained.<br />
<br />
A suggestion was laid before the Committee that<br />
the Society should take up the additional duties of<br />
Authors’ agents. The Committee, after careful<br />
consideration rejected the proposal on the ground<br />
that to take such action would be contrary to the<br />
principles on which the Society was founded.<br />
<br />
Several members of the Society entered into<br />
contracts some years ago with a firm of publishers<br />
for the publication of certain works in a series<br />
which the firm stated it was their intention to<br />
issue. This series appears at present to be incom-<br />
plete. No accounts have been rendered and the<br />
firm asserts that under the existing agreements it<br />
is not liable either to render accounts or to pay<br />
anything. So far, accordingly, the members have<br />
received no remuneration for the works whichhave<br />
been published. The legal position is difficult and<br />
involved. The Committee decided to take Counsel’s<br />
opinion in order to ascertain whether it would not<br />
be possible, under the contracts, to force the firm<br />
in question to render accounts, and pay royalties<br />
on the books already issued.<br />
<br />
Since the last issue of The Author the Committee<br />
have taken further steps with regard to the infringe-<br />
ment of copyright in the case of Mr. Rudyard<br />
Kipling’s “ Barrack Room Ballads.” They have<br />
received an answer to the Report which was laid<br />
before the Chief Commissioner of the Police, and<br />
they have placed a full statement of the case in the<br />
hands of the Home Secretary. It is the intention<br />
of the Committee to take all the steps in their<br />
power to obtain an alteration in the existing law.<br />
<br />
The Report of the Copyright Sub-Committee on<br />
the United States Copyright Law was read to the<br />
Committee. It had already been forwarded, in<br />
accordance with the Committee’s former instruc-<br />
tions, to the American Copyright League. The<br />
Committee propose to print the Report in a future<br />
number of Zhe Author.<br />
<br />
There was one contentious matter before the Com-<br />
mittee, and they decided on the advice of the<br />
Society’s solicitors to take action against the<br />
publisher involved.<br />
<br />
1<br />
Cases.<br />
<br />
One of the county court cases taken in hand<br />
last month has been satisfactorily settled—the<br />
debt and costs were paid the day before the hearing.<br />
<br />
In another county court case which was placed in<br />
the hands of the Society’s solicitor, the money was<br />
paid and the matter settled before the summons<br />
was taken out.<br />
<br />
Ten cases have been in the secretary’s hands.<br />
Of these, two were for accounts, four: for money,<br />
and four for MSS. Prompt settlements have been<br />
the rule. The accounts have in one case been<br />
rendered, and will, doubtless, be rendered in the<br />
other case also, though the matter must be delayed<br />
owing to the fact that the demand is against a<br />
New York firm. In the four cases where money<br />
has been demanded, three claims have been satisfied,<br />
whilst the fourth is still waiting settlement. Two<br />
of the four cases for the return of MSS. have been<br />
settled, but in the other two—more recent—the<br />
issue is still open.<br />
<br />
Of the cases remaining in the hands of the<br />
secretary from former months there are only two<br />
unsettled, one of which for the cancellation of an<br />
agreement, is very nearly adjusted. There has<br />
been some correspondence, but the final arrangement<br />
has not yet been arrived at. In the other case<br />
the publisher has promised to forward the accounts<br />
which are in demand, but they have not yet come<br />
<br />
to hand.<br />
ES<br />
<br />
April Elections.<br />
<br />
Alliston, Norman . . Kamesburgh, Becken-<br />
ham, Kent.<br />
<br />
Daly’s Theatre.<br />
<br />
Education Office,<br />
<br />
Maritzburg, Natal.<br />
<br />
Barrington, Rutland<br />
Barnett, P. A.<br />
<br />
Bashford, Henry Howarth<br />
Bissett, J. L. ; :<br />
<br />
80, Sherwell Street,<br />
Johannesburg, 8S. A.<br />
Nethercote, Colwyn<br />
Bay, North Wales.<br />
Woodsgate, Pembury,<br />
Tunbridge Wells.<br />
Vevey La Tour, Swit-<br />
zerland.<br />
Mount<br />
Hampstead.<br />
41, Princes Square, W.<br />
11, The Mount, York.<br />
22, Grafton Street, W.<br />
Les Quenetens, Bar-<br />
riere Rouge, Pont<br />
de Briques, P. de<br />
C., France.<br />
St. Michael’s Vicarage,<br />
Burleigh Street, W.C.<br />
“ Seabreeze,” Netley<br />
Abbey, Hants.<br />
Aber Maw, Wimble-<br />
don, 8.W.<br />
<br />
Bolton, Miss Anna<br />
<br />
Bosanquet, Eustace F.<br />
(S. Ashton) : :<br />
Chesney, Major-General<br />
F. R.<br />
Chidell, E. F. (Viator) . 2, Vernon,<br />
Davidson, A.F..<br />
Dixon, William Scarth<br />
Harcourt, R. Vernon<br />
Hight, G. A. . :<br />
<br />
Hunt, Rev. W. Henry<br />
Metcalfe, Ethel E. . :<br />
<br />
Myall, Mrs. Ambrose<br />
(Laura Hain Friswell)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
15, Woodville Gardens,<br />
Ealing, W.<br />
<br />
26, Rue du Mont Tha-<br />
bor, Paris.<br />
<br />
Oxenham, John<br />
<br />
Pavitt, A. (Saxo-Norman)<br />
<br />
Plunkett, The Right<br />
Hon. Sir Horace,<br />
<br />
105, Mount Street, W.<br />
37, Norfolk Square, W.<br />
Evening Mail Cham-<br />
bers, Nutchett<br />
Street, Bendigo,<br />
Australia.<br />
27, Southampton Street,<br />
Strand, W.C.<br />
“Plasisaf” Caerwys,<br />
Flintshire.<br />
One member does not desire the publication of<br />
name or address.<br />
<br />
9<br />
<br />
K.C.V.0., F.RB.S., ete.<br />
Prideaux, Miss 8. T.<br />
Taylor, Charles E.<br />
<br />
Weymouth, Edward S. .<br />
Williams, E. C.<br />
<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS OF<br />
THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
(In the following list we do not propose to give more<br />
than the titles, prices, publishers, etc., of the books<br />
enumerated, with, in special cases, such particulars as may<br />
serve to explain the scope and purpose of the work.<br />
Members are requested to forward information which will<br />
enable the Editor to supply such particulars.)<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
ART.<br />
<br />
THe PHin May Fouio of Caricature Drawings and<br />
Sketches in Line Block, Half-Tone, and Photogravure.<br />
With a Biography. 17$ x 11, xv. + 245 pp. Thacker.<br />
£2 28. n.<br />
<br />
Greav Masters. Part XI. With Introduction by SIR<br />
MARTIN Conway. Heinemann. 5s. n.<br />
Great Masters. Part XII. With Introduction and<br />
<br />
Descriptive Text by Str MARTIN CONWAY. Heine-<br />
<br />
mann. 58. n.<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
<br />
Kines AND QuEENS I HAVE<br />
VACARESCO. 9 X 5%, 320 pp. Harpers. 10s. 6d.<br />
<br />
New Lerrers or THOMAS CARLYLE. Edited and Anno-<br />
tated by ALEXANDER CARLYLE. Two Vols. 8% X 5%,<br />
xiii. + 326 + 359 pp. Lane. 25s. n.<br />
<br />
Str WiLtLIAM Henry Fiower, K.C.B., F.R.S., &c., late<br />
Director of the Natural History Museum, and President<br />
of the Royal Zoological Society. A Personal Memoir.<br />
By C. J. Cornisu, F.Z.S., author of “ The Naturalist on<br />
the Thames,” &c. 9 x 6,274 pp. Macmillan. 8s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
Rosserr1.—By A.C. Benson. (English Men of Letters.)<br />
745, 238 pp. Macmillan. 2s, n.<br />
<br />
Known. By HELENE<br />
<br />
BOOKS OF REFERENCE.<br />
<br />
THe STATESMAN’S YEAR-Book, 1904. Edited by J.<br />
Scorr Ketrte. Forty-first Annual Publication.<br />
<br />
74 x 5, 1,398 pp. Macmillan. 10s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
DRAMA.<br />
<br />
His PontricaAL Conscience. By HA,RoLxo. 2nd edition,<br />
9 x 54,73 pp. Burleigh. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
199<br />
<br />
ECONOMICS,<br />
<br />
FiscaAL Facts AND Fictions. By F. G, SHAw, F.G,.S.,<br />
Assoc. M. Inst. C.E., &c. 83 X 54, 240)pp. Bailliere.<br />
5s. n.<br />
<br />
FICTION.<br />
<br />
THE CELEBRITY AT Home. By VIOLET HUNT.<br />
304 pp. Chapman and Hall. _ 6s.<br />
<br />
Wuat OvugHt SHE TO Do? By FLORENCE WARDEN.<br />
73 x 5,311 pp. Chatto and Windus. 6s.<br />
<br />
Tatty. By EMILy PEARSON FINNEMORE.<br />
304 pp. Hurst and Blackett. 3s. 6d.<br />
<br />
THe GAGE OF RED AND WHITE. By GRAHAM HOPE.<br />
73 x 5, 323 pp. Smith, Elder. 6s.<br />
<br />
73 x 5h,<br />
<br />
7% x 54,<br />
<br />
Comin’ THRO’ THE RyE. By HELEN MATHERS. Popu-<br />
lar Edition. 7 X 5,437pp. Simpkin, Marshall. 1s.<br />
JOHNNY FoRTNIGHT. By EDEN PHILLPOTTS. (Cheap<br />
<br />
Edition.) 84 x 54,127 pp. Arrowsmith. 6d.<br />
<br />
THE MoNEyY-MakeER (Le Brasseur D?’Affaires). 3y<br />
GeEorGES OHNET. Translated by F. ROTHWELL.<br />
72x5, 851 pp. Chatto and Windus. 6s.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Ayuwin. By THEODORE WATTS - DUNTON. (The<br />
World’s Classics.) 6 X 4, xv. + 486 pp. Grant<br />
Richards. 1s. n.<br />
<br />
RuLeRs oF Kinas. By GERTRUDE ATHERTON. 7? X 5},<br />
358 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe AMAZING VERDICT. By MARIE LEIGHTON.<br />
<br />
73 X 54, 468 pp. Grant Richards. 6s.<br />
<br />
RANDAL OF RANDALHOLME. By AUSTIN CLARE. 7$ X 5,<br />
341 pp. Chatto and Windus. 6s. 7<br />
<br />
THE ORIGINAL WOMAN. By FRANKFORT MOORE.<br />
343 pp. Hutchinson. 6s.<br />
<br />
THE FIGHT FOR THE Crown. By W.E. Norris. (Cheap<br />
Edition.) 84 x 53,120 pp. Seeley. 6d.<br />
<br />
“ SrpE SHows.” By HELEN MATHERS. Popular Edition.<br />
74 X 4%, 245 pp. Simpkin Marshall. 1s.<br />
<br />
Nepo THE NAILER. By 8. BARING-GOULD.<br />
Edition.) 8% X 53,123 pp. Cassell. 6d.<br />
<br />
THE CourT OF SACHARISSA. A Midsummer Idyll. By<br />
HvuGH SHERINGHAM and NEVILL MEAKIN. 7%} X 5,<br />
314 pp. Heinemann. _ 6s, ’<br />
<br />
By SNARE oF Love. By A. W. MARCHMONT. 7} X 54,<br />
375 pp. Ward, Lock. 6s.<br />
<br />
Mapr oF Money. By DoroTHEA GERARD. 7} X 54,<br />
<br />
1= X 6,<br />
<br />
(Cheap<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
330 pp. Methuen. 6s<br />
ANNA, THE ADVENTURESS. By E. PHILLIPS OPPEN-<br />
HEIM. 7# X 5,320 pp. Ward, Lock. 6s.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A DANGEROUS QU<br />
Long. 68.<br />
<br />
st. By F. E. Youne. 7? x 43, 319 pp.<br />
<br />
THe SANYASI. By F. E. PENNY. 7% X 5, 328 pp.<br />
Chatto and Windus. 6s.<br />
<br />
THe VINEYARD. By JOHN OLIveR HOBBES. 7% X 5,<br />
376 pp. Unwin. 6s. e :<br />
<br />
URIAH THE HITTITE. By DoLF WYLLARDE. 7% X 4§,<br />
307 pp. Heinemann. 6s. A<br />
<br />
THe SuccEssor.—By R. Pryce. 735,332 pp. Hutchin-<br />
son. 62.<br />
<br />
Happy THougutTs.—By Sir Francis C. BURNAND.<br />
<br />
7x 4g, 244 pp. Bradbury, Agnew. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
A DEAD RECKONING.—By JOHN BLOUNDELLE BURTON.<br />
725, 306 pp. White. 6s,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
PAULETTE D’EsterRE. By HAROLD VALLINGS. 7}X5,<br />
307 pp. J. Long. 6s.<br />
HISTORY,<br />
INDIA IN THE VicTORIAN AGE.—By RomesH Dutt,<br />
<br />
C.1.E., Lecturer on Indian History at University College,<br />
London. 84 x 53.628 pp. Kegan Paul. 10s. 6d.<br />
<br />
A Hisrory oF SourH Arrica. From the First Settle-<br />
ment by the Dutch, 1652, to the Year 1903. By H. A.<br />
BRYDEN. 8 X 5,363 pp. Sands. 6s.<br />
<br />
<br />
200<br />
<br />
By ELIZABETH<br />
<br />
SocIAL LIFE UNDER THE STUARTS.<br />
Grant Richards.<br />
<br />
GopFREY. 93 x 53, xxiii. + 273 pp.<br />
12s. 6d. n.<br />
LITERARY.<br />
THE DANTE SOCIETY LECTURES.<br />
Austin, H. J. CHAYTOR, and Others.<br />
The Athenzeum Press. 2s. 6d.<br />
<br />
Vol. I. By ALFRED<br />
64 X 44, 241 pp.<br />
<br />
MUSIC,<br />
<br />
To MeEmoriIzE Music, with<br />
By C. Frep Kenyon.<br />
<br />
Numerous Musical<br />
<br />
How<br />
7% X 54, 56 pp.<br />
<br />
Examples.<br />
Reeves. 1s. :<br />
OLIVET TO CALVARY CHURCH CANTATA for Lent. By<br />
<br />
J. H. Maunder. Novello. Ils, 6d.<br />
<br />
PAMPHLETS.<br />
<br />
THE FOUNDATIONS OF A NATIONAL DRAMA — A<br />
Lecture delivered by HENRY ARTHUR JONES at the<br />
Royal Institution, Albemarle Street, W., on Friday<br />
evening, March 18, 1904. Chiswick Press,<br />
<br />
POETRY,<br />
Porms.—By ST. JOHN Lucas. 73X5},127 pp.<br />
<br />
be. n.<br />
POLITICAL.<br />
<br />
THE New Far East. By A. Diosy,<br />
83 X 53, xviii. + 368 pp. Cassell. 38. 6d.<br />
[ With brief new preface. |<br />
<br />
REPRINTS.<br />
<br />
THE HAMPSTEAD SHAKESPEARE. With THE LIFE OF<br />
SHAKESPEARE, by S. LEE. Four Vols. 7} x 54, 544+<br />
6444 666+xxvi.+495 pp. Finch. 21s. and 27s, n.<br />
<br />
SPORT.<br />
<br />
GREAT GOLFERS.—Their Methods at a Glance.<br />
BELDAM. 9 X 6, xxiv.+480 pp. 12s. 6d. n.<br />
FISHING HoLipAys.—By STEPHEN GWYNN.<br />
<br />
299 pp. Macmillan. 7s. 6d.<br />
<br />
Constable<br />
<br />
4th Edition.<br />
<br />
By G. W.<br />
<br />
84x54,<br />
<br />
TRAVEL<br />
THE BALKANS FROM WITHIN.—By R. Wyon, 9 x 53<br />
475 pp. Finch. 15s. n.<br />
<br />
2<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
NOTES.<br />
<br />
————+_.<br />
<br />
7. Autobiography of Mr. Herbert Spencer<br />
has been published in 2 Vols. demy octavo,<br />
<br />
with his Portrait and other illustrations, at<br />
the price of 28s. net.<br />
Mr. Spencer himself, in the Preface, states as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
“Tt has seemed to me that a natural history of myself<br />
would be a useful accompaniment to the books which it has<br />
been the chief occupation of my life to write.<br />
<br />
In the following chapters I have attempted to give such<br />
a Natural History. That I have fully succeeded is not to<br />
be supposed, but perhaps I have succeeded partially. At<br />
any rate, one significant truth is made clear—that in the<br />
genesis of a system of thought the emotional nature is a<br />
ree factor, perhaps as large a factor as the intellectual<br />
nature.”<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
An American friend of Mr. Herbert Spencer, who<br />
has read the book, says :-—<br />
<br />
“Tt is as broad and many-sided as human experience,<br />
and the marvel and charm of it is its simple, straight-<br />
forward, and obvious truthfulness. It seems to me to<br />
exceed any of his former works in interest and practical<br />
value, and I have been a constant reader of his writings<br />
from their first publication in this country. Mr. Spencer’s<br />
supreme loyalty to truth and his native frankness have made<br />
his account of his life very open and unreserved.<br />
<br />
The report which was circulated in the St. James’<br />
Gazette that Dr. Richard Garnett had written a<br />
play with Shakespeare as the leading character for<br />
production at a West End house is incorrect. We<br />
have Dr. Garnett’s authority for stating that he has<br />
written a play, which will shortly be published,<br />
founded on an incident in the life of Shakespeare,<br />
but it was written without any view to the stage,<br />
and the possibility of its performance has not yet<br />
been considered.<br />
<br />
Mr. Richard Pryce’s new book, “ The Successor,”<br />
has just been issued by Messrs. Hutchinson. If<br />
the subject—-an unspoken understanding between<br />
a husband and wife—is a little risky, the papers<br />
appear to acquit the author of any offence in the<br />
treatment.<br />
<br />
The exhaustive “Guide for Authors, Editors,<br />
Correctors of the Press, Compositors, and Typists,”<br />
on which Mr. F. Howard Collins has been working<br />
continuously for moresthan two years, and in which<br />
Mr. Herbert Spencer took a practical interest until<br />
prevented by ill-health, is now completely in type,<br />
and the revision well in hand. Among those who<br />
have read all the proofs may be mentioned Prof.<br />
Skeat, Mr. Henry Bradley (of the Oxford English<br />
Dictionary), Mr. Theo. L. De Vinne, of New York,<br />
the Oxford and Cambridge University Presses,<br />
some of the largest firms of English and Scotch<br />
Printers, and many members of the London<br />
Association of Correctors of the Press.<br />
<br />
Miss Constance Hill’s book “Juniper Hall,”<br />
with illustrations by Ellen G. Hill, has been<br />
published by Mr. John Lane at the price of<br />
£11s.net. It is a pleasant account, with some<br />
hitherto unpublished particulars, of certain French<br />
refugees, who lived for a time at Juniper Hall near<br />
Mickleham in Surrey, and it contains, incidentally,<br />
the story of the courtship and marriage of Fanny<br />
Burney, afterwards Madame D’Arblay.<br />
<br />
One of the expensive books of the season will be<br />
the forthcoming “Master of Game,” the oldest<br />
English hunting book, which singularly enough has<br />
hitherto remained unpublished. A modern text as<br />
well as the old one will be given. It is illustrated<br />
with 52 plates. President Roosevelt has written<br />
the Foreword for the American edition, but it<br />
will also be given in the English edition. His<br />
Majesty the King as well as the Prince of Wales<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
have become subscribers. Ballantyne, Hanson &<br />
Co. are publishing it for the editors, Mr. and Mrs.<br />
Baillie-Grohman. Ordinary copies £5, edition de<br />
luxe £30, of the latter only two remain unsubscribed.<br />
It will be out this month. -<br />
<br />
We are pleased to see that The Country Life<br />
Library of Sport, under the editorship of Mr.<br />
Horace G. Hutchinson, is slowly increasing.<br />
The books are demi-octavo, illustrated, bound in<br />
cloth, at the price of 12s. 6d. a copy. Cricket<br />
and Shooting have already been issued, and<br />
Fishing is about to appear. Mr. Hutchinson’s<br />
name is a sufficient guarantee for the accuracy of<br />
the works.<br />
<br />
The next volume in the Woburn Library pub-<br />
lished by Messrs. Hutchinson and Co. will be<br />
Mr. F. G. Aflalo’s work on “ British Salt Water<br />
Fishing.” This book, like all its predecessors in<br />
the series, will be iilustrated with coloured plates.<br />
Mr. Aflalo, as the former editor of “ The Encyclo-<br />
peedia of Sport,” is well known as a great authority<br />
on all fishing, but especially on sea fishing.<br />
<br />
Theatrical papers, like Ze Fra, have welcomed<br />
Mrs. Alec. T'weedie’s last volume, “ Behind the<br />
Footlights.” Messrs. Hutchinson are the publishers.<br />
The price is 18s. net. In Sicily, Mrs. Alec. Tweedie<br />
has found much material for a new volume, which<br />
she hopes to have ready for autumn publication.<br />
<br />
Edith C. Kenyon’s new serial, “ Rex Harley’s<br />
Stratagem,” will commence shortly in the columns<br />
of Woman’s Life. Her serial, “Two Girls in a<br />
Siege” is nearing its conclusion in Our Own Gazette.<br />
“Little Robin Grey,” by the same writer, is in the<br />
press, and “A Girl ina Thousand” by her will<br />
also be published in the autumn.<br />
<br />
Mr. James Blyth, the author of “ Juicy J oe,” has<br />
written a new novel, “Celibate Sarah.” Like its<br />
author’s first book, it treats of life in the marsh-<br />
lands and the question of the regeneration of the<br />
marsh people. Mr. Grant Richards published the<br />
book on April 20th.<br />
<br />
“ Oddities, Others and I,” is the title of a new<br />
book which Miss Henrietta Corkran has published<br />
through Messrs. Hutchinson & Co. The price is<br />
16s. net. It is, as the title suggests, a revelation<br />
of the author herself, and her impressions of the<br />
people she has met.<br />
<br />
The same firm has also published Mr. Frankfort<br />
Moore’s new novel entitled ‘‘ The Original Woman.”<br />
It is a story of modern life with the element of<br />
witchcraft interwoven. He treats the ancient cult<br />
from the standpoint of the modern man of science.<br />
“ The White Causeway ” is the title of another work<br />
by Mr. Moore, the opening chapters of which will<br />
appear in the May number of 7'he Lady's Realm.<br />
<br />
‘A second edition of Mr. W. H. Wilkins’ book,<br />
“A Queen of Tears,” has been issued by Messrs.<br />
Longmans and Co. at the price of 36s.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
201<br />
<br />
Messrs. Longmans also announce the publication<br />
of a new romance entitled “‘Lychgate Hall,” by<br />
M. E. Francis (Mrs. Francis Blundell) at the price<br />
of 6s.<br />
<br />
“Qld Hendrik’s Tales,” by Capt. Arthur 0.<br />
Vaughan, is a collection of animal stories gathered<br />
by the author from the Hottentots during the<br />
recent Boer War. Messrs. Longmans and Co. are<br />
the publishers.<br />
<br />
A new novel, by the author who writes under the<br />
pseudonym of “ Airam,” entitled “ Rudderless<br />
Ships,” will be published shortly by Mr. Henry<br />
Drane, at the price of 6s. It is a novel with a<br />
purpose—its purpose being to endeavour to prevent<br />
the increase of insanity by deterring children whose<br />
parents have any taint of insanity from marrying.<br />
The author has for many years had much to do with<br />
the treatment of mental disorders, and has felt the<br />
necessity for some steps to be taken to prevent<br />
their increase.<br />
<br />
The Gentleman’s Magazine for April contains a<br />
Russian story, in four chapters—* A Painter of<br />
Shrines ”—by Robert Bowman.<br />
<br />
«The Padre,” by Rose Harrison (author of<br />
“Esther Alington’’) is a story which depicts the<br />
stress, storm, and triumph of human experience in<br />
a world of temptation.<br />
<br />
Mr. Grant Richards has published a new sensa-<br />
tional story by Marie Connor Leighton, entitled<br />
“The Amazing Verdict.”<br />
<br />
Mr. T. Werner Laurie, for many years manager<br />
to Mr. Fisher Unwin, will shortly commence<br />
publishing on his own account. His address till<br />
June 30th, is 11, Paternoster Buildings, H.C.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Smith, Elder & Co. have published a<br />
novel by his honour Judge Parry, entitled<br />
“ England’s Elizabeth.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Brimley Johnson has just published a new<br />
shilling edition (5th imprint) of “A Maid of the<br />
Manse,” by Mrs. E. Rentoul Esler. The book<br />
is excellently produced, in a tasteful paper<br />
cover. The new edition has a preface by the<br />
author.<br />
<br />
“The Shrine in the Garden.””—As applications<br />
are being made for this work, the Orient Press<br />
finds it necessary to state that its publication is<br />
unavoidably delayed. The book in question, which<br />
is a portion of the diary of a person recently<br />
deceased, is being kept back pending a legal<br />
decision in regard to certain matters with which it<br />
deals.<br />
<br />
Professor Lewis Campbell has edited a selection<br />
from the Poems of Thomas Campbell for inclusion<br />
in Messrs. Macmillan & Co.’s Golden Treasury Series.<br />
The poems are specially arranged for this issue,<br />
and a biographical and critical introduction is<br />
contributed by the editor.<br />
<br />
Mr. R. Mounteney Jephson, who has just<br />
<br />
<br />
202<br />
<br />
returned from the South of France, has been<br />
astonished to find his death reported in the Daily<br />
Chronicle.<br />
<br />
The paragraph referring to the republication in<br />
cheaper form of Mr. Jephson’s excellent story,<br />
“Tom Bulkeley,” stated that the Author died as<br />
recently as 1885, and that he had written eight or<br />
nine military and sporting novels. Mr. Jephson,<br />
we are glad to say, has returned from his stay<br />
abroad in the best of health, and is about to<br />
publish a new novel entitled “Froth.” The<br />
publisher is Mr. G. A. Morton, Edinburgh.<br />
The book is in two parts and written with a light<br />
<br />
en.<br />
= ?Op o’ my Thumb,” the one act play by<br />
Messrs. Frederick Fenn and Richard Pryce which<br />
was produced last month by the Stage Society has<br />
been bought by Mr. Frank Curzon for Miss Hilda<br />
Trevelyan, who made so great a success in the<br />
title-role.<br />
<br />
“Saturday to Monday,” by the same authors,<br />
was produced by Mr. George Alexander at the<br />
St. James’s Theatre, on April 14th.<br />
<br />
Mr. R. C. Carton’s new comedy, ‘The Rich<br />
Mrs. Repton,” was produced at The Duke of<br />
York’s Theatre, on Wednesday, April 20th. Miss<br />
Compton took the leading part.<br />
<br />
eg ae ge<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—-—o— 1 —_<br />
<br />
HE French Academy has awarded the Gobert<br />
Prize of 10,000 francs to the Marquis Pierre<br />
de Ségur for his work entitled “ Le maréchal<br />
<br />
de Luxembourg.” The second prize of 1,000 francs<br />
is awarded to M. Thouvenel for his works, “ Pages<br />
de Phistoire du second Empire ” (1854-1866) and<br />
“Trois années de la question d’Orient” (1856-<br />
1859).<br />
<br />
The Thiers Prize of 3,000 francs for the encou-<br />
ragement of historical literature and research has<br />
been given to the Abbé Sicard for his book in three<br />
volumes, entitled, “ Ancien Clergé.”’<br />
<br />
_ The Academy of Moral and Political Sciences has<br />
divided the Audiffred Prize between M. Henri<br />
Hauser, for a book on the teaching of Social<br />
Science; M. Piolet on “La France hors de<br />
France” ; M. Vast for his volume on “ PAlgérie<br />
et les colonies francaises,” and to M. Salaun for<br />
his work on ‘1’Indo-Chine.”<br />
<br />
The laureates of the Societé de Géographie are<br />
M. Sven-Hedin, who has been presented with the<br />
gold medal, the Capitaine Lenfant, M.M. Alfred<br />
Lacroix, Paul Pelet, Lieutenant Chédeville, Lieu-<br />
tenant Drot, Lieutenant Nieger, M. Bonnel de<br />
Mézieéres, the Commandant O. Barré.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
“Force ennemie,” the novel by M. John-Antoine<br />
Nau, which has won for its author the first prize<br />
awarded by the Académie Goncourt, is a most<br />
remarkable book. It is supposed to be written by<br />
a madman who realises in his lucid moments that<br />
he is living in a private lunatic asylum. He gives<br />
an account of his coversations with his keeper, his<br />
doctor, and various inmates of the asylum. He<br />
analyses his own state of mind, discusses the<br />
various arrangements of the house, criticises the<br />
doctors, and describes in detail many of the inci-<br />
dents that take place. One of the other lunatics<br />
discusses with him their mental state and explains<br />
that the cause of their misfortune is the “ Force<br />
ennemie” within them. This idea haunts Veuly,<br />
and as time goes on he is convinced that it is true,<br />
and that he is “inhabited” by another creature<br />
who obliges him to do and say things entirely con-<br />
trary to his own inclinations. Unlike. Guy de<br />
Maupassant’s ‘‘ Horla,” this unwelcome guest is<br />
no second self, but a visitor from another planet,<br />
who introduces himself to Veuly by the name of<br />
“Kmdéhotn.” He informs his host that he had<br />
been waiting to find a human body to inhabit, and<br />
that he chose Veuly, because from one pole to the<br />
other he could never have found a man s0 easy-<br />
going, so wanting in energy, and altogether so<br />
weak-minded and imbecile. Veuly is not precisely<br />
flattered by this preference, and he is horrified at<br />
the thought that he can never again be alone, that<br />
whether he should wish it or not, from henceforth<br />
he must share every secret thought with this<br />
uncanny visitor. There is much unpleasant reading<br />
in the book, as the “ Force ennemie” induces<br />
Veuly to act entirely against his own judgment, so<br />
that he earns for himself a terrible reputation and<br />
can never succeed in explaining to the doctors that<br />
he is not responsible for his actions when under<br />
the influence of his unpleasant guest. The book<br />
is extremely curious and original, and the unplea-<br />
sant parts are relieved by the amusing conversations<br />
of the keeper. The author, who was comparatively<br />
unknown, has come to the front, thanks to the ©<br />
Goncourt Prize, and his book is now in the seventh<br />
edition. :<br />
<br />
“Le Lac Noir,’ by M. Henri Bordeaux, is an<br />
entirely different book from anything to which this<br />
author has accustomed us. Once again the scene<br />
is laid in Savoy. The story turns on a trial for<br />
murder and the zeal of the lawyers employed in<br />
the case.<br />
<br />
The object of the book appears to be to give a<br />
psychological study of a conscientious lawyer and<br />
magistrate, and also to prove how much super-<br />
stition still exists among the peasant classes of<br />
Savoy. The whole volume is delightfully written,<br />
and the various characters live, but the story itself<br />
is gruesome.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
“La Vie Amoureuse de Francois Barbazanges,”<br />
by Marcelle Tinayre, is an exquisite picture of<br />
seventeenth century life in the quaint little town of<br />
Tulle. The authoress of “La Maison du Péché ”<br />
has given us another gem of literary workmanship.<br />
The story opens in 1673 with the birth of Francois.<br />
His father, M. Barbazanges, is devoted to astrology,<br />
and he at once studies the heavens in order to<br />
calculate his son’s horoscope. Francois grows up<br />
an imaginative boy with romantic ideas. Just<br />
as the hero of the “ Maison du Péché ” is steeped<br />
in religious traditions so Frangois is devoted to old-<br />
world romance. He grows up unlike other youths<br />
and is always in search of the ideal Jadye of his<br />
dreams. His various adventures on his way<br />
through life until he meets her take up the<br />
greater part of the volume. His strange meet-<br />
ing with his ideal woman, and his tragic fate are<br />
told in the final chapters. There is no strong plot<br />
to the story, and the charm of the book lies in<br />
the word-painting and the faithful evocation of the<br />
seventeenth century in provincial France.<br />
<br />
“Le Fléau,” by Gustave Guitton, is a book that<br />
might be read with profit in England as well as in<br />
France. It is a story of life in the working class,<br />
and shows the temptation which is placed in the<br />
way of the working-man in manufacturing<br />
districts by the drink shop, which is always so<br />
near to the factory. The author has taken the<br />
trouble to get statistics in proof of what he asserts.<br />
He tells us that in 1830 there were 281,000 public<br />
houses in France, that in 1899 there were 540,000,<br />
and that since that date there are 10,000 more.<br />
<br />
In this novel we follow a workman in his<br />
career and see how almost impossible it is for<br />
him to steer clear of the temptations with which<br />
he is beset. It isa tragic story and most pitiful<br />
as regards the hereditary taint in his children,<br />
When finally he is being tried for manslaughter his<br />
advocate boldly asserts that if his client should be<br />
condemned it would be unjust for the wealthy<br />
members of Parliament who have won _ their<br />
fortunes by his degradation to get off with no<br />
penalty. He declares that “drunkenness is a<br />
State institution, that through it the budget is<br />
‘supplied with vast sums of money, that it is the<br />
source and foundation of many hundreds of huge<br />
fortunes, and that it is tacitly approved and<br />
encouraged by many members of Parliament, who<br />
are styled ‘ Honorable,’ and who are treated as<br />
honest men.” The book is well worth reading, as<br />
many facts are set forth which are worthy of con-<br />
sideration.<br />
<br />
Several interesting translations have appeared<br />
recently from various languages.<br />
<br />
Among these is “Le Troisitme Sexe,” by<br />
<br />
Ernst von Wolzogen, translated by the Prince B.<br />
Karageorgevitch. The translation is excellent,<br />
<br />
203<br />
<br />
and the book seems to gain rather than lose by its<br />
conversion into a more concise and elegant<br />
language.<br />
<br />
The “third sex’ is an admirable title, as without<br />
this definition one would be ata loss where to place<br />
the group of “creatures” described by the German<br />
author. Judging by this novel, one would imagine<br />
that just as in the “modern style” craze many of<br />
the German artists exaggerated the new idea until<br />
their designs were mere caricatures, so the “‘ New<br />
Woman” in German dress appears to be a carica-<br />
ture. Looked upon as a third sex she is merely a<br />
curiosity.<br />
<br />
We are introduced in this novel by M. von<br />
Wolzgen to the most extraordinary individuals.<br />
There is a doctoress of medicine and two sisters<br />
who are bankers, a she-lawyer, and then a group of<br />
the kind of men who can admire these specimens of<br />
the “ third sex.” Altogether the persons to whom<br />
one is introduced are not the kind one would care<br />
to know in real life, but meeting them in this way<br />
one is entertained by their conversation, their<br />
theories about life, their philosophy, their egotism,<br />
and, above all, their absurdities. The book is a<br />
clever satire and well worth reading, and, as we<br />
have already said, it is more readable in French<br />
than in the original.<br />
<br />
In the theatrical world the subject of a Theatrical<br />
Trust is once more being agitated. The Société<br />
des Auteurs dramatiques is very firm on this<br />
point, and will not hear of a “Trust” being<br />
formed.<br />
<br />
M. Deval, actor-manager of the Athénée, and<br />
M. Richemond, manager of the Folies Drama-<br />
tiques, have had great success with these two<br />
theatres. M. Roy, a banker, took over the lease<br />
of the Bonffes, and wished to be nominal<br />
manager of this theatre, with Messrs. Deval and<br />
Richemond to run it. The Société des Auteurs<br />
dramatiques objected to this arrangement, and a<br />
lawsuit is now going on between M. Roy and the<br />
Société. More recently M. Alphonse Franck,<br />
manager of the Gymnase, applied to M. Roy,<br />
and there was a plan formed for running this<br />
theatre on new lines.<br />
<br />
Once more the Société des Auteurs dramatiques<br />
has interfered. Another lawsuit is the consequence,<br />
so that M. Roy’s “ Theatre Trust” does not seem<br />
likely to succeed.<br />
<br />
M. Alfred Capus, President of the Committee of<br />
the Société des Auteurs dramatiques, explains<br />
that it would be against the interests of the authors<br />
and artistes to allow several theatres to be in the<br />
hands of one man. “The author’s rights,” he<br />
<br />
says, ‘‘the percentage on every performance exacted<br />
by the Société would be given up, a play would<br />
be bought for a fixed sum varying according to<br />
If the “ Trust” only<br />
<br />
the celebrity of the author.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
204 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
bought from these authors, what would then<br />
become of the others who are anxious to make a<br />
beginning ?”<br />
<br />
M. Deval and M. Richemond reply to this by<br />
quoting the words of M. Capus, who declares that<br />
“authors need artistic managers to control the<br />
theatres, and not directors of financial companies.”<br />
M. Deval then goes on to say that if authors want<br />
theatres at all for their pieces, they will have to sub-<br />
mit to having their theatres supported by financiers.<br />
As regards the author's rights, MM. Deval and<br />
Richemond declare that “ they are prepared to pay<br />
the same as the present contract with the Société<br />
exacts, 12 per cent. on the gross receipts and the<br />
100 frances of billets de faveur for each performance.”<br />
They then go on to answer the other objections<br />
raised by the Société, and they propose that<br />
a clause should be added to the contract, stipu-<br />
lating that every year each theatre should be com-<br />
pelled to put on a piece by an author who either<br />
does not belong to the Société, or who has had no<br />
piece played for five years.<br />
<br />
It is very evident that the idea of this “Trust”<br />
is very tempting to the capitalists, but the Sociéte<br />
des Auteurs dramatiques holds the reins in France,<br />
and it does not consider that authors would gain<br />
much by following the example of Americans with<br />
regard to Theatre Trusts. It might be good for<br />
the few, but not for the majority, and as M. Capus<br />
is one of the most successful of French authors,<br />
one cannot help admiring the way in which he is<br />
fighting for his confreres.<br />
<br />
The great theatrical event is of course the new<br />
play at the Sarah Bernhardt Theatre. “ Varennes ”<br />
is a piece in six tableaux by MM. Lavedan and G.<br />
Lendtre. It is most admirably staged, and as<br />
regards the historical details it is well known that<br />
M. Lendtre is one of the greatest living authorities<br />
on this period. M. Sardou frequently consults him<br />
on any doubtful points of history, so that with<br />
M. Lendtre’s knowledge of the subject and M.<br />
Lavedan’s brilliant dialogue, the success of the<br />
literary side of the play was assured. Everyone<br />
was curious to see Madame Bernhardt in the réle<br />
of Marie Antoinette. She is admirable in her<br />
part, so admirable in fact that the great regret of<br />
everyone is that her réle is not enough. In the<br />
scenes where she does not appear there is a general<br />
feeling of disappointment—the other artistes are<br />
excellent, M. Magnier as Fersen, Mme. Dufréne as<br />
Mme. de Rochereux, M. Guy most amusing in his<br />
part; but the whole company cannot make up for<br />
the absence of Madame Sarah Bernhardt, and the<br />
spectators were inclined to blame the authors for<br />
causing them this disappointment.<br />
<br />
As regards the other theatres, “Le Retour de<br />
Jérusalem ” is certainly the greatest success of the<br />
season. At the Vaudeville “1’Esbroutfe” is still<br />
<br />
running, and at Antoine’s “ Oiseaux de Passage,”<br />
At the Gaité “a Montansier,” and at the Ambignu<br />
M. Pierre Decourcelle’s piece “ La Baillonnée ” ig<br />
a great success. At the Athenée, with the “ Prince<br />
Consort,” there is always a full house, and at the<br />
ThéAtre Victor Hugo M. Bour has put on “ Don<br />
Quichotte.”<br />
Atys HALLarp.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
SPANISH NOTES.<br />
<br />
—-~>+—_<br />
<br />
i<br />
T is difficult for English people to realise the<br />
important part played by the imagination<br />
in Spain. “'<br />
<br />
The King has lately issued a Royal Decree with<br />
respect to the celebration of the tri-centenary of<br />
the publication of “ Don Quixote” in May, 1905,<br />
which shows the place taken by that book in the<br />
hearts of the Spaniards. For this Royal Decree<br />
commands that a Committee be formed of the<br />
President of the Congress, the Ministers of State,<br />
War, Navy, and Public Instruction ; representatives<br />
of the Royal Academy of Fine Arts of San Fernando ;<br />
the Society of Authors and Artists; and the<br />
Scientific, Literary, and Artistic Atheneum of<br />
Madrid, with the Director of the National Library,<br />
etc., etc., to consider the best modes of doing honour<br />
to the great work of Cervantes in their different<br />
departments.<br />
<br />
“After the present Prime Minister questioned<br />
the right of a newspaper editor, who is a deputy,<br />
to publish the uncalled-for attacks consequent on<br />
his appointment of Sefior Nozaleda as Archbishop<br />
of Valencia, several telegrams purporting to come<br />
from the land of Shades were read aloud at the<br />
Press Banquet to give voice to the spirit of censure<br />
against Senor Maura ; and the other day one of<br />
the leading newspapers published a long discourse<br />
supposed to have been sent by Sagasta from the<br />
other world. ‘The Republicans who recently strove<br />
to start disloyal discourses in the public streets<br />
were quickly silenced, ana the speeches of such<br />
dissentients in the Congress as Canalejas, Moret,.<br />
Villaverde, etc., are more easily controverted than<br />
an attack from such an unassailable source as that<br />
of the deceased Prime Minister." Sagasta is sup-<br />
posed to mock at Seftor Maura’s ideal of making<br />
the Congress “the point of contact between the<br />
Crown and the country,” which he is hoping to:<br />
accomplish by the reform in the Parliamentary<br />
Elections whereby the deputies would be voted<br />
for at the public polls instead of being appointed<br />
by the ministers, which has been the custom since<br />
1812. ‘This idea was first propounded in Colonel<br />
Figuerola Ferretti’s loyal Petition to his beloved.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
cd<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
sovereign on 3rd November, 1902.* Had Sagasta<br />
allowed the Petition to reach King Alfonzo, who<br />
is always anxious for the welfare of his country, the<br />
successive governments of Silvela and Villaverde<br />
would probably not have been so quickly over-<br />
thrown and the present one in such danger now,<br />
for it was respectfully suggested that a Provisional<br />
government composed of sections of each party<br />
with a Royal decree sanctioning the elections at<br />
the polls for a new government, would secure the<br />
adhesion to the Monarchists of those who waver to<br />
Republicanism from their despair of seeing this<br />
reform. Many members of a well-known London<br />
Club addressed Colonel Figuerola Ferretti a letter<br />
appreciative of a patriotism sincere enough to<br />
seek the consolidation of the monarchy even at<br />
a sacrifice, presumably only temporary, of his own<br />
position at Court. His “ Cantos de Espana”<br />
(giving the history of the Regency) breathe<br />
devotion to the King and Queen and present an<br />
interesting lyrical picture.<br />
<br />
Speaking of literature reminds me that Galdos, the<br />
great novelist and dramatist, has just produceda new<br />
drama in Madrid called “ El abuelo ” (the Grand-<br />
father) which is shortly to be performed in German<br />
in Berlin, Frankfort, Munich, and Vienna. Senor<br />
Linares Rivas-Astray (son of the government<br />
minister) has just given to the stage a striking<br />
picture of “high life” in Madrid, in a play called<br />
“ Aire de Fuera,” in which the well-known actress<br />
Sefiora Guerrero, wife of Senor Diaz de Mendoza,<br />
a grandee of Spain, takes the first part. Women<br />
also begin to rank as dramatists in Spain, for<br />
Senora Emilia Pardo Bazan’s piece at the theatre<br />
of the Princesa called ‘lia Suerte”? (Fate) was the<br />
one chosen for the Benefit of Maria Tubau.<br />
<br />
“Ta Catedral,” the last work of Blasco Ibanez,<br />
has now also excited great attention in Madrid, but<br />
the author’s Republican views detract from the<br />
interest of the féte given in his honour. The<br />
Spanish capital is looking forward with great<br />
enthusiasm to greeting the wife of Maurice<br />
Maeterlinck this month, for under her well-known<br />
name of Georgette Leblanc she is to play in her<br />
husband’s celebrated play of “ La Joyzelle” at one<br />
of the leading theatres.<br />
<br />
Music also claims much attention in Madrid<br />
just now. The daughter of the well-known pro-<br />
fessor Sefior Benaiges has shown great talent in<br />
her recent pianoforte recital, and Sauer’s concert<br />
was a great success, under the patronage of the<br />
Royal family.<br />
<br />
His Majesty King Alfonso has testified his<br />
appreciation of practical literary work in pre-<br />
senting Don Ezequiel Solana with the prize as the<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
* The Paris New York Herald of November 12th, 1902,<br />
applauded this movement.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 205<br />
<br />
first teacher in Madrid; for this energetic director<br />
of a boys’ school has just published as the outcome<br />
of his two years’ travel and study, “A Manual of<br />
the Schools of Europe,” and two other Spanish<br />
books entitled respectively, “ Primary Education<br />
in Italy” (“ La Enseianza primaria en Italia”),<br />
and “Practical Guide to Manual Educative Work”<br />
(“Guia practica del trabajo manual educativo ”).<br />
The King’s trips into the provinces tend greatly<br />
to add to his popularity in the country, for not<br />
only was his important rencontre with the<br />
Emperor of Germany at Vigo preceded by most<br />
successful visits to Segovia and Toledo, but his<br />
time in Barcelona bids fair to dispel the shadow of<br />
separatism.<br />
<br />
The literary taste of Sefior Silvela (the late<br />
Prime Minister) is evidenced by the active part he<br />
took in the weekly conferences held at the charm-<br />
ing theatre of San Luis. On the one day he held<br />
forth on the life and character of Maria de Agreda,<br />
the potent counsellor of Philip IV., and on another<br />
his lecture on Beatrice Galindo, the governess and<br />
companion of Isabel I. of Spain, shows that he<br />
appreciates the power exercised in the past by the<br />
fair sex in his country.<br />
<br />
The Infanta Dona Maria de la Paz, sister of the<br />
late King Alfonso XII. and wife of Prince Louis<br />
Ferdinand of Bavaria, of world-wide reputation<br />
in the science of surgery, has recently published a<br />
charming little book called ‘* Mi Peregrinacion a<br />
Roma,” which gives a most interesting account of<br />
her visit to the “ Eternal City.” The wondrous<br />
churches and picture galleries are described in the<br />
poetic spirit characteristic of the Princess. Her<br />
emotion at the benediction of her children by the<br />
late Pope shows the fervour of her religious senti-<br />
ment, and her pleasure at again meeting Cardinal<br />
Rampolla, known to her in her youth as the Pope’s<br />
Nuncio in Madrid, and her enthusiasm at the sight<br />
of the Spanish pilgrims at St. Peter’s testify to her<br />
abiding love of her own country. The secretary<br />
of the royal authoress tells me that the book has<br />
just been translated into English by Frau Johanna<br />
Szeliuska.<br />
<br />
Echegaray’s new play “ La Desequilibriada”’ has<br />
excited great interest in Spain. The heroine, as<br />
the title shows, is an unbalanced character—<br />
unbalanced in her love which she sets against her<br />
admirer’s sense of honour in a matter of business ;<br />
so unbalanced in her hatred of her husband when<br />
she found that his subterfuge had won her as his<br />
wife, that she compassed his death ; and finally so<br />
unbalanced in her sense of maternal duty that she<br />
abandons her child for ever, leaving him in the<br />
care of her lover, from whom her remorse also<br />
separates her.<br />
<br />
Senor A. Palacio Valdés, well known in England<br />
by his novels, “ Froth,” “The Grandee,” and “The<br />
<br />
<br />
206<br />
<br />
Fourth Estate,” has added to his reputation by his<br />
last work, entitled “ La Aldea Perdida” (the Lost<br />
Hamlet). The sweet harmonious joys of a Spanish<br />
village, described from the experiences of the<br />
author’s own boyhood form a truly pastoral poem,<br />
but the romantic becomes tragic when the un-<br />
bridled passions of the new-comers who work the<br />
mines, cause the death of two of the four chief<br />
characters.<br />
<br />
When mentioning Galdos’s new play of “ El<br />
Abuelo,” which has created such a furore in<br />
Madrid by its masterly presentation of the force<br />
of the human passions and the superhuman power<br />
of gratitude, I should have added that the great<br />
novelist and dramatist has himself elicited that<br />
virtue by the generous way he has just devoted the<br />
<br />
rofits of his Benefit to the Chipiona Sanatorium<br />
for Sick Children.<br />
<br />
When Senor Picon, the well-known author of<br />
“Bl Enemigo” (the Enemy), declined the other<br />
day the invitation of the President of the Congress<br />
to make a speech, the newspaper called Hspana<br />
said the writer evidently wished to show that deeds<br />
are of more value than words, and in this Sefior<br />
Galdos has excelled.<br />
<br />
Percy Horspur.<br />
<br />
———_————— 2 —__—_<br />
<br />
LEGAL NOTES.<br />
<br />
+4<br />
<br />
The Attempt to Maintain Net Prices in the State of<br />
New York.<br />
<br />
N important case for authors and publishers<br />
who place books upon the market within<br />
the state of New York has recently been<br />
<br />
decided by the New York Court of Appeals. It is<br />
one also which, owing to the principles involved, is<br />
of interest to those who do not publish books<br />
within the jurisdiction of the Court in question.<br />
<br />
The appellants sought to establish the legality<br />
under Chapter 690, laws 1899, New York, of a<br />
combination of publishers and book agents to keep<br />
up net prices, by refusing all dealings with retail<br />
booksellers who sold books published at a net price<br />
below that price, or who had any connection, either<br />
proved or suspected, with any such underselling.<br />
The combination had been declared unlawful in<br />
the court below and the Court of Appeal upheld<br />
this ruling by a majority of five judges to two.<br />
<br />
The act in question was passed :<br />
<br />
“To prevent monopolies in articles or commodities of<br />
<br />
common use and tojprohibit restraints of trade and<br />
commerce... .”<br />
<br />
And it provides that—<br />
<br />
“ Every contract agreement, arrangement or combination,<br />
whereby a monopoly in the manufacture production or sale<br />
in this state of any article or commodity of common use 1s<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
or may be created, established or maintained, or whereby<br />
competition in this state in the supply or price of any such<br />
article or commodity is or may be restrained or prevented,<br />
or whereby for the purpose of creating, establishing or<br />
maintaining a monopoly within this state of the manufac-<br />
ture, production or sale of any such article or commodity,<br />
the free pursuit in this state of any lawful business, trade<br />
or occupation is or may be restricted or prevented, is<br />
hereby declared to be against public policy, illegal and<br />
void.”’<br />
<br />
Those alleged to have offended against this law<br />
were the American Publishers’ Association and<br />
others connected with the publishing business,<br />
representing about 90 per cent. of the book trade,<br />
and the complainants were R. H. Macy & Co., a<br />
firm conducting a “department store” in New<br />
York, in which they do a very large business and<br />
own a book department of considerable size.<br />
Messrs. Macy & Co.’s complaint alleged—<br />
<br />
“That during the year 1900 a number of prominent<br />
publishers, including defendants hereinbefore described as<br />
publishers for the purpose of securing to themselves an<br />
unreasonable and extortionate profit and at the same time<br />
with intent to prevent competition in the sale of books and<br />
for the purpose of establishing and maintaining the prices<br />
of all books published by them, or any of them, and all<br />
books dealt in by them, or any of them, and preventing com-<br />
petition in the sale thereof, unlawfully, illegally and con-<br />
trary to the public policy and the statutes of the state of<br />
New York . .. combined and associated themselves<br />
together ’’ etc.<br />
<br />
The methods used were further described thus :<br />
<br />
“ That as a part of said unlawful scheme and combination<br />
the members of said association agreed that such net copy-<br />
righted books, axd all other books, whether copyrighted or<br />
not, or whether published by them or not, should be sold<br />
by them to those booksellers only who would maintain the<br />
retail net price of such net copyrighted books for one year,<br />
and to those booksellers and jobbers only who would<br />
furthermore sell books [the word “ copyrighted ’’ is omitted<br />
at this point] at wholesale to no one known to them to cut<br />
or sell at a lower figure than such net retail price, or whose<br />
name would be given to them by the association as one who<br />
cut such prices.”’<br />
<br />
In explaining and commenting upon the arrange-<br />
ment thus described Chief Justice Parker made the<br />
following observations :<br />
<br />
“It will be seen that while the leading object of this<br />
portion of the agreement apparently is to maintain the<br />
retail net price of copyrighted books, it operates in fact so<br />
as to prevent the sale of books to dealers who sell books of<br />
any kind to one who retails copyrighted books at less than<br />
the net retail price.<br />
<br />
“ And the agreement further provides that evidence shall<br />
not be required by the bookseller or jobber in order to<br />
restrain him from selling to one who has been blacklisted,<br />
but that all that shall be required to govern his action, and<br />
to prevent him from selling to such a person, shall be that<br />
the name has been given to him by the association as one<br />
who cuts such net prices. It has been admitted, and must<br />
be, that the agreement may be so worked out as to deprive<br />
a dealer from selling any books whatever, thus breaking up<br />
his business.’’<br />
<br />
The actual carrying out of the agreement thus<br />
entered into was also referred to, and after<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
®<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
reviewing its terms and the facts, which were not<br />
disputed, the learned chief justice held it to be an<br />
undertaking to interfere with the free pursuit of a<br />
lawful business in which any member of the com-<br />
munity was free to engage. He accordingly, with<br />
the assent of the judges who concurred with him,<br />
dismissed the appeal.<br />
<br />
In delivering a dissenting judgment of some<br />
<br />
length, Judge Gray pointed out that the agree-<br />
ment of the appellants only endeavoured to govern<br />
the sale of copyright books to be sold at net price,<br />
and not that of others.<br />
<br />
“The contract,’? he observed, ‘ did not extend to the<br />
copyrighted books other than by way of penalty, as the<br />
refusal to deal in them might be incidental to the refusal<br />
to deal with booksellers who would not co-operate in an<br />
agreement to maintain the net retail price of a copy-<br />
righted book. It is not unlawful for a person to refuse to<br />
deal with others as his judgment or fancy may impel him.<br />
His business is his own, and the only limitation upon his<br />
pursuit of it is that he shall not interfere with the legal<br />
rights of others. It seems to me that what he may law-<br />
fully do himself he may unite with others in doing, if of<br />
some common advantage.”<br />
<br />
The other dissentient judge, Judge Bartlett,<br />
followed the same line of argument; he asserted<br />
the right of the individual to trade with whom he<br />
pleased, and maintained that more than one might<br />
combine to do what one might do alone, adding<br />
that<br />
<br />
“The refusal to maintain trade relations with a given<br />
individual is an inherent right which every person in<br />
business may exercise for reasons which he deems<br />
sufficient, or for no reason whatever.”<br />
<br />
Judge Bartlett also made some pregnant obser-<br />
vations on the cutting of prices by big traders to<br />
the injury of small ones and of the trade generally,<br />
characterising the procedure adopted as one of the<br />
saddest phases of modern business life.<br />
<br />
“Tt is a well-known fact,’’ he said, “that the great<br />
department stores of the country have encroached upon<br />
many lines of trade entirely distinct from the main and<br />
legitimate business in which they are engaged. As an<br />
illustration, a dry goods establishment, engaged in selling<br />
a vast number of articles legitimately related to its busi-<br />
ness, concludes, in order to promote its principal trade, to<br />
offer for sale books, furniture, druggists’ sundries and<br />
numerous other articles that need not be mentioned, at cut<br />
prices, representing only the cost of production, and often-<br />
times far below it. The inevitable effect of this policy is<br />
to draw a large number of people to these establishments,<br />
and in the final result the dealer makes good his losses in<br />
the outside trade by the prices he obtains in his legitimate<br />
business.<br />
<br />
It may be fairly assumed that the general business is<br />
conducted at a profit.<br />
<br />
The result is a large number of the retail dealers in the<br />
various kinds of articles thus undersold are driven out of<br />
business, many of them at a time of life when they are<br />
unable to reinstate themselves in some other calling.<br />
<br />
It also results in great damage to manufacturers, pro-<br />
ducers, and wholesale dealers in loss of customers, who have<br />
been driven into insolvency.”<br />
<br />
207<br />
<br />
To this he added that no doubt the proprietors<br />
of department stores had a right to sell as cheaply<br />
as they pleased, or, indeed, to give away their<br />
goods to their customers, but that equally manu-<br />
facturers, producers, and wholesale dealers had a<br />
right to protect themselves by dealing or not<br />
dealing as they pleased, such a right being inci-<br />
dental to the right to exist and to act in self<br />
defence.<br />
<br />
With regard to this case it may be observed that<br />
the wording of the New York law as quoted appears<br />
to justify the finding of the New York Court of<br />
Appeals, although the principles laid down by<br />
the dissenting judges will commend themselves to<br />
many as being based upon justice and sound sense.<br />
In England, combinations alleged to be in restraint<br />
of trade have, from time to time, occupied the<br />
attention of the Courts. These have usually had todo<br />
with the relations between masters and workmen,<br />
and it was in a case of this kind (Allen . Flood, 1898,<br />
A.C. 1) that the law upon the subject was recently<br />
reviewed at great length. It seems impossible from<br />
the judgments in that case to conclude that a com-<br />
bination among publishers such as that which has<br />
been held illegal under the New York law could be<br />
successfully attacked by a bookseller under the<br />
Common Law of England. The opportunity, how-<br />
ever, is not likely to arise. The difficulty of com-<br />
bining and of organising the numerous units which<br />
make up the publishing trade in Great Britain and<br />
Ireland so as to drive out of the book trade all<br />
retailers suspected of disregarding net prices would<br />
be too great. In the State of New York it was<br />
possible to obtain the co-operation of 0 per cent.<br />
of the publishing houses, all unanimous in support-<br />
ing a policy of net prices. Similar efforts have<br />
been made in England, but not upon so compre-<br />
hensive a scale, and without such unanimity and<br />
without the power to crush or to injure seriously<br />
the trade of the recalcitrant bookseller, the action<br />
of only a limited number of publishers, even though<br />
they acted in unison, could hardly be open to the<br />
suggestion of illegality, or even of moral turpitude.<br />
There are two ways, moreover, in which an arrange-<br />
ment for the restraint of trade may be looked at.<br />
The agreement entered into may be void as between<br />
the parties to it, so that they cannot legally enforce<br />
it against one another, without being illegal so as<br />
to lay it open to attack from without. This, how-<br />
ever, may be described as a matter of legal detail.<br />
Attempts to bind down the retail dealer to a<br />
minimum price, below which he may not sell<br />
whether at a profit to himself or not, are not, of<br />
course, confined to the book trade. In any trade, how-<br />
ever, in England in which a large number of manu-<br />
facturers, both great and small, are engaged, it has<br />
been found difficult as a rule to secure the necessary<br />
unanimity and organisation. In the bicycle trade,<br />
<br />
<br />
208<br />
<br />
to quote a recent example, great efforts were at one<br />
time made to keep up prices, and retailers who did<br />
a large cash business in machines and in their<br />
accessories were ‘‘ boycotted’ or an endeavour was<br />
made to “ boycott” them by manufacturers, whose<br />
small customers naturally protested that they could<br />
not compete with the prices of their stronger rivals.<br />
Of the precise position of the matter at the present<br />
day I am not aware, but a considerable cheapening<br />
of everything has taken place, and I think I am<br />
right in saying that the artificial keeping up of<br />
prices by combination among manufacturers and<br />
wholesale distributors has been found impracticable.<br />
As to the conditions under which it is possible in<br />
the book trade, the Macy case in New York isa<br />
good example. :<br />
<br />
Only the questions of legality, and of the<br />
possibility of combination have been discussed in<br />
this article. The desirability of maintaining net<br />
prices, and of keeping up the price of books<br />
generally has not been gone into. It involves the<br />
consideration of whether such a policy would keep<br />
in the trade a greater number of small booksellers,<br />
while it curtailed the trade of bigger dealers, and<br />
this again would raise doubts as to whether the<br />
larger number of smaller dealers selling at higher<br />
prices or the smaller number of larger dealers<br />
selling at lower prices is the better condition for<br />
the author, for the publishers, and last but not<br />
least, for the reading public. These are interesting<br />
problems which have frequently been ventilated in<br />
the Author, and no doubt will continue to be so in<br />
the future.<br />
<br />
E, A, ARMSTRONG.<br />
<br />
<> ¢<br />
<br />
THE LITERARY YEAR BOOK.*<br />
<br />
a<br />
General.<br />
<br />
HE “Literary Year Book” for 1904 is now<br />
a before the public. ‘his is the eighth year<br />
of issue.<br />
<br />
In the main features of this useful annual<br />
publication no alteration has been made, and, on<br />
the whole, the 1904 edition is an improvement on<br />
its predecessors. Like other works of reference its<br />
tendency is to increase in size, so that the editor<br />
may expect, before long, to be confronted by the<br />
necessity of omitting those parts which are least<br />
wanted. The “calendar” and “signs used in<br />
correcting proofs” could be easiest dispensed with,<br />
and the resumé, which occupies twenty-seven pages,<br />
might be considerably condensed. Nevertheless,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* “Literary Year Book,’ 1904: George Allen, 5s.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
rather than delete any feature or reduce the size of<br />
the type, it would be more serviceable were the<br />
book printed on thinner paper. Without increasing<br />
the bulk of the work, extra pages could then be<br />
added after the style of the “ Unique Manuscript<br />
Register” (A. J. Baynes, 441, Strand), on which<br />
the author could record conveniently an account of<br />
his year’s labours for future reference. The advan-<br />
tage of this to the “ Year Book” publisher would<br />
be, that the volume so used would not be lent, and<br />
each author would have to buy his own copy.<br />
<br />
To ensure a work of this character being gene-<br />
rally referred to, every list given ought to be as<br />
complete as possible. Turning to the ‘ Calendar”?<br />
we miss a record of the birthdays of the following<br />
well-known authors :—In January—Maria Edge-<br />
worth, R. Savage, Aikin, Bentley ; in February—<br />
Archbishop Whateley, Hallam the historian, About,<br />
Lowell, Grimm and Lover; in March—Manzoni ;<br />
April—Mme. de Staél and Froude; May—Le Sage,<br />
J. S. Mill and Lytton; July—Klopstock and<br />
Petrarch ; August—Fénélon; September—Chateau-<br />
briand, M. J. Daumas, Korner, Jane Taylor and<br />
Mrs. Hemans; October—S. T. Coleridge and<br />
Adelaide Procter; November—Hans Sachs and<br />
Shenstone ; December—E. Burritt, Mary Mitford,<br />
A. Cunningham and Samuel Smiles.<br />
<br />
The “Obituary” section has no note of the<br />
death of the eminent musical writer, H. J. Hipkins,<br />
author of the monumental ‘‘ Musical Instruments,”<br />
published by Black, the “ History of the Piano-<br />
forte” (Novello), and contributor of upwards of<br />
five hundred articles in Grove’s “ Dictionary of<br />
Music” and the “Encyclopedia Britannica.”<br />
Other names excluded from last year’s death list<br />
are Mrs. E. T. Cook, author of “The Bride’s<br />
Book,” ‘Highways and Byeways of London”<br />
(d. June 19); J. A. McNeill Whistler, author of<br />
the “Gentle Art of Making Enemies” (July 17) ;<br />
Wilfrid Cripps, C.B., F.S.A., author of “Old<br />
English Plate,” “Old French Plate,” (Oct. 26) ;<br />
James Innes Minchin, translator of Dante’s<br />
“Divine Comedy” (Jan. 13) and Richard Savage<br />
(Oct. 11). In the section devoted to “ Books of<br />
Reference” there is no mention of the “ World<br />
Directory of Music,” published by De Witt,<br />
Leipzig.<br />
<br />
Coming to “Authors,” when lesser lights are<br />
included, why are the following names overlooked ?<br />
Gilder, Joseph B., author of ‘‘Carnegie’s Gospel<br />
of Wealth,” ‘“Lowell’s Impressions of Spain,”<br />
&e.; Bruce, John Mitchell, author of much medical<br />
literature and assistant editor of Quain’s Dic-<br />
tionary ; Parkin, G. R., author of ‘ Imperial<br />
Federation,” “Round the Empire,’ “The Great<br />
Dominion,” &c.; Edwards, Osman, author of<br />
“Studies of Theatrical Life,’ “A Gauntlet,”<br />
“ Japanese Plays and Playfellows,” &c. ; Watson,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Aaron, author of “ Brown Studies,” ‘ Waifs<br />
and Strays,” “For Lust of Gold,” &c. ; Foakes<br />
Jackson, Rev., author of the “ History of the<br />
<br />
Christian Church,” &c. ; Angus, Orme, author of,<br />
<br />
“Sarah Tuldon,” a Story of Wessex Life ; Ford,<br />
William, author of “ Baja the Freebooter,” “ Pun-<br />
jaub Coach,” &c. ; Forrest, Sir John, author of<br />
‘ Explorations in Australia,” &c.; Prowl, Ebenezer,<br />
author of about a dozen authoritative text books<br />
on music which have been translated into French,<br />
German, and Italian ; Fraser, J. Foster, author of<br />
“ Round the World on a Wheel,” &c. ; Lancaster,<br />
W. J. Cosens, author of many excellent nautical<br />
novels. Victor Spiers is mentioned, but why is<br />
R. Phené Spiers, the author of valuable architectural<br />
works, left out ?<br />
<br />
Space restricts our naming more omissions of<br />
general writers, but, if we particularise in one<br />
department, and turn to the topic of most interest<br />
this year—i.e. the War—and recall the books<br />
dealing with Russia, Korea, and Japan brought<br />
before the public towards the end of last year, we<br />
will find that the writers of such works are con-<br />
spicuous by their absence in the “ Literary Year<br />
Book,” published last March. There is no mention<br />
of the authors of the following :—“‘The Russian<br />
Advance ” (Albert Beveridge), “Sixteen Years in<br />
Siberia” (Leo Deutsch), “ In the Uttermost East”<br />
(Chas. H. Hawes), “The World’s History “(Dr<br />
H. F. Helmolt), “Manchuria” (Alex. Hosie),<br />
“The Far East: its History and its Question ”<br />
(Alex. Krausse), “‘The Path of Empire” (George<br />
Lynch), “History of Russia” (Alfred N. Ram-<br />
baud), “The Great Siberian Railway ” (Michael<br />
M. Shoemaker), “Korean Sketches” (Rev. J.<br />
S. Gale), “Japanese Girls” (Alice M. Bacon),<br />
“Japan: its History, &c.” (Captain F. Brink-<br />
ley), “The Heart of Japan” (C. L. Brownell),<br />
“Things Japanese” (Basil Hall Chamberlain),<br />
“ Handbook of Japan” (W. Mason), “ Evolution<br />
of the Japanese” (Sidney Gulick), “ Japanese<br />
Training” (H. Irving Hancock), “Japan and<br />
her People” (Anna ©. Hartshorne), “ Kokoro”<br />
(Lafcadio Hearn), “ Feudal and Modern Japan”<br />
(Arthur May Knapp), “Tales of Old Japan”<br />
(A. B. Mitford), “History of Japan ” (Fred.<br />
Millard), “Japan and its Trade” (J. Morris),<br />
“Japan in Transition” (S. Ransome), “ Tmpres-<br />
sions of Japan” (G. H. Rittner), ‘‘ Three Rolling<br />
Stones in Japan” (Gilbert Watson), “ Japan :<br />
Aspects and Destinies” (Petrie Watson), and<br />
“ Ships and Shipping” (Francis Miltoun). Many<br />
of the above topical works are new editions of<br />
old ones, and few of the authors are novices.<br />
The incompleteness of the List of Authors seems,<br />
indeed, to imply that the value of the “ Year<br />
Book” for personal reference is overlooked. A<br />
reliable directory of the iiterary world would enable<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 209<br />
<br />
a publisher to communicate direct with any author<br />
he pleases. In these days, when an author seldom<br />
confines himself to one publisher, the public also<br />
should be able to refer to the “‘ Year Book” for a<br />
complete list of the works of a favourite author ;<br />
and, to facilitate such inquiry, the addition of a<br />
List of Titles, classified under Theology, Travel,<br />
Science, Fiction, Poetry, &c., would be welcome.<br />
<br />
The list of periodical publications needs also<br />
more careful revision. For instance, the London<br />
addresses of the following papers are wrong :—<br />
Belfast News Letter, 435, Strand ; Daily Dispatch,<br />
Manchester, 68, Fleet Street ; Newcastle Chronicle,<br />
22, Essex Street ; Norfolk Chronicle, 149, Strand ;<br />
Nottingham Daily Express, 75, Fleet Street.<br />
<br />
Musical periodicals are nearly all omitted. Not<br />
one of the following well-known papers is given :—<br />
British Bandsmen, 188,Strand, W.C. ; Music Trades<br />
Review, 1, Racquet Court, E.C.; Journal of the<br />
Incorporated Society of Musicians, 19, Berners Street,<br />
W.; Musical Record, 199, Regent Street, W. ; Music,<br />
188, Wardour Street, W.; J/usical Opinion, 35,<br />
Shoe Lane, E.C. ; Musical Standard, 83, Charing<br />
Cross Road, W.C.; Orchestral Association Gazette,<br />
28, Gerrard Street, W.; Organist and Choirmaster,<br />
9, Berners Street, W.; Strad, 3, Green Terrace,<br />
Rosebery Avenue.<br />
<br />
Amongst the Press Cutting Agents no German<br />
firm is mentioned, and amongst magazine photo-<br />
graphers one of the most enterprising firms—the<br />
City Art Photo. Co. (manager, Mr. W. D. Horn)<br />
—is overlooked.<br />
<br />
We offer the foregoing criticisms in the friendliest<br />
spirit, our desire being that so excellent a publica-<br />
tion may be made as perfect and complete as<br />
possible, for there is no reason why, with proper<br />
organization, the “Literary Year Book” should<br />
not be as comprehensive and up-to-date as<br />
“Dod’s” Peerage or “Crockford’s” Clergy List.<br />
If advantage is taken of such hints as those we<br />
have given, the result will be profitable to the<br />
publisher and the immense community to which<br />
he appeals.—A. R.<br />
<br />
Legal.<br />
<br />
The legal side of the book is one which, more than<br />
any other, needs the consideration of members of<br />
the Society of Authors.<br />
<br />
The articles included deal with the numerous<br />
points on which authors desire information and<br />
protection, but in most cases, though correct,<br />
so far as they go, are insufficient. This is the<br />
real difficulty in the production of a book of this<br />
kind. Insufficient information may often lead an<br />
author into serious errors, but we do not desire to<br />
cavil and find fault. We fully recognise that it is<br />
impossible for an editor to provide against all<br />
<br />
<br />
210<br />
<br />
contingencies on any question, more especially<br />
when those questions deal with copyright and the<br />
legal side of literary property. Even with the<br />
added assistance of the “ Literary Year Book” an<br />
author should be particularly careful, and in many<br />
cases should not consider himself secure without<br />
special expert advice. : :<br />
<br />
Agreements and copyright, in their respective<br />
chapters, with some slight deflections, are admir-<br />
ably dealt with, clearly and lucidly expounded, and<br />
very accurate.<br />
<br />
The agreements are classed under the following<br />
four heads— :<br />
<br />
Royalty Agreement ; Sharing profits ; The author<br />
commissioned ; The publisher commissioned.<br />
<br />
This is a fairly satisfactory division, but The<br />
Author Commissioned is rather a different form of<br />
agreement to the sale outright. If the publisher<br />
commissioned a book from an author he would be<br />
entitled to make larger demands from the author<br />
than if he merely purchased the copyright. On<br />
the whole, the divisions set forth in The Author<br />
are the more satisfactory. Sale Outright, Profit<br />
Sharing Agreement, The Royalty System, and The<br />
Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles Weekes, who is responsible for these<br />
chapters, sets out a series of usual clauses, explains<br />
them, and notes their omissions, but expresses no<br />
opinion as to how far he considers an author has a<br />
right or is entitled to make demands from a pub-<br />
lisher. From his point of view, as editor, he is<br />
justified in taking this line, if, indeed, it is not the<br />
only line he could adopt.<br />
<br />
The question of serial rights is treated hardly at<br />
sufficient length. This is often the most important<br />
side of the property of the writers of fiction, and<br />
also of writers of educational and technical works.<br />
The Editor states, ‘‘ All serialisation should cease<br />
when the book is published”; but difficulty often<br />
arises owing to the lack of finality in the contract<br />
with editors when the sale takes place.<br />
<br />
It would have been a good thing if he had dealt,<br />
perhaps in a separate article, with serial rights and<br />
the contract for the sale of those rights, and the<br />
difficulty that surrounds it.<br />
<br />
There is also another omission of great import-<br />
ance to authors—the agreements made between<br />
authors and their agents ; for as the agent is ina<br />
position more confidential to the author than the<br />
publisher or anyone else who deals with his pro-<br />
perty, it is essential that his agreement should be<br />
carefully controlled, and the author should see,<br />
when dealing with the agent, that he is not dealing<br />
with a man who is also acting on behalf of the<br />
publisher.<br />
<br />
There is very little fault to find with the other<br />
comments Mr. Weekes has made. In “The Author<br />
Commissioned” it might be as well for the author<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
to insist as one term of the contract that no altera-<br />
tion should be made in the MS. without his<br />
sanction, for although it is stated “that the<br />
assignment of copyright does not convey the right<br />
<br />
‘to alter or revise the book in such a manner that<br />
<br />
the author’s reputation suffers,” yet there are<br />
many alterations possible which would annoy and<br />
disgust an author, but which need not necessarily<br />
be considered by a judge and jury as damaging to<br />
his reputation.<br />
<br />
Turning from the Agreements to the chapter on<br />
Copyright, we are pleased to say that the errors<br />
are few, as far as the exposition of the copy-<br />
right law is concerned. Only those who have<br />
tried the task can imagine how exceedingly<br />
difficult it is to compress a subject of this kind<br />
into so small a space, but the statements made<br />
are clear, correct, and, within limits, satisfying.<br />
The author, under the heading of “ Extent,” says<br />
that an assignment for any less period than the<br />
whole term of copyright, would be a licence only.<br />
From whence does he get this statement? Surely,<br />
it is possible to assign the whole copyright for a<br />
limited period, without merely assigning a licence<br />
to publish; otherwise, there would be no need for<br />
the registration of assignments at Stationers’ Hall.<br />
<br />
Under the heading of Magazines and Periodicals,<br />
the distinction that exists under the eighteenth<br />
section between Encyclopedias and Reviews,<br />
Magazines, etc., is hardly sufficiently emphasised.<br />
To anyone who read the paragraph as an amateur<br />
the difference would certainly not be clear. The<br />
writer states under the same heading, ‘‘ The work<br />
of a servant would vest in his employer from the<br />
first.” This point, in the absence of any evidence<br />
to the contrary, must be yielded; but he continues,<br />
“it is doubtful if the sender of a voluntary con-<br />
tribution, though his work was used, would have<br />
any rights unless the terms were expressly men-<br />
tioned.” This sentence is enigmatical. Does the<br />
writer intend to convey that the author in those<br />
cases where a contribution has been sent without<br />
a special demand to an editor, and the contribution<br />
has been printed and paid for, would possess no<br />
rights whatever, and would therefore be considered<br />
to have sold the copyright ? Surely, this deduction<br />
cannot be correct.<br />
<br />
Again, under the heading of “Drama,” the<br />
following statement appears—<br />
<br />
“ After publication in print, but before authorised<br />
representation, it is doubtful whether a common<br />
law action would lie against an unauthorised per-<br />
former.” This is contrary to the view taken by<br />
Mr. Scrutton, whose statement of the law we<br />
personally are inclined to follow. Under the same<br />
heading, the writer is certainly ambiguous in the<br />
following sentence :—<br />
<br />
“As to performing right and copyright as they<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
may be retained or lost by first performance or<br />
publication outside the United Kingdom, first<br />
performance in ‘America does not divest the Com-<br />
mon Law right here.” This passage surely needs<br />
a little further explanation for the uninitiated.<br />
<br />
Under the “International” heading, it will be<br />
seen that Austria and Hungary are included in the<br />
Berne Convention. This is not correct. Austria<br />
and Hungary have a special Treaty with Great<br />
Britain, and some other countries, but they are<br />
not members of the International Convention.<br />
<br />
To sum up, however, the impression conveyed<br />
to a critic of that portion of the work, dealing with<br />
the legal side of literary property, is thab it is<br />
sound and trustworthy, and may, with limitations,<br />
be safely employed by those who seek information<br />
on the points which the writer has sought to<br />
elucidate. G. H. T.<br />
<br />
——_+—>—_+—___——_<br />
<br />
MUSICAL COPYRIGHT.<br />
<br />
————+—<br />
Minority Report.<br />
<br />
N the March number of 7'he Author we printed a<br />
summary of the majority report on the ques-<br />
tion of Musical Copyright, issued by the<br />
<br />
departmental committee.<br />
<br />
Since that date the Musical Copyright Bill<br />
introduced by Mr. Mount has come up and passed<br />
a second reading in the House of Commons, and<br />
has been referred to the Standing Committee on<br />
Law. It has gone even further, It has been<br />
amended, and printed as amended.<br />
<br />
Mr. Caldwell, the sole author of the minority<br />
report, took the opportunity of placing his views<br />
before the House of Commons in his speech on the<br />
second reading ; perhaps, however, it would be<br />
fairer to take the statement of his views from his<br />
considered report rather than from his speech.<br />
<br />
In the opening paragraph he states as follows :—<br />
<br />
“The general evidence given disclosed the existence of<br />
another interest—that of the general public interested in<br />
the cultivation of music—an interest, however, which was<br />
not specially represented at the enquiry ; which is prac-<br />
tically ignored in the report of the majority of the Com-<br />
mittee, but which, nevertheless, fails to be considered in any<br />
amendment of the law which may be deemed necessary.<br />
<br />
“The whole of the witnesses examined (excepting the<br />
‘King of the Pirates’) regard musical copyright as a right<br />
of property, such as a man has in his watch, entitling the<br />
owner of the copyright to exercise his right of property in<br />
any manner he pleases without any regard to the interests<br />
of the general public or to the advancement of music in the<br />
community. It is also upon that assumption that summary<br />
proceedings, analogous to those of the criminal law, seem to<br />
be recommended.<br />
<br />
“ A slight consideration will show that copyright is not<br />
such an absolute right of property as is claimed, but is a<br />
‘liberty’ or privilege, conferred by Parliament, with the<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
211<br />
<br />
view of encouraging music in the general community into<br />
which the public interest enters, as well as that of the<br />
owner of the copyright, and over the exercise of which by<br />
the owner of the copyright Parliament has and exercises a<br />
right of control.’<br />
<br />
In order to prove the final contention he quotes<br />
at length the Acts on which copyright is founded.<br />
<br />
We venture to think that his judgment is<br />
entirely incorrect, and that a deeper consideration<br />
of the subject would have secured a sounder<br />
opinion.<br />
<br />
The Government found a certain form of pro-<br />
perty existing, which, perhaps, more than any<br />
other, should be reckoned the sole property of its<br />
originator. They found that this property was<br />
ill-secured and easily filched from the owner.<br />
Accordingly, in order to secure it, they passed<br />
Copyright Statutes. At that time a cry was raised<br />
by people who, like Mr. Caldwell, considered they<br />
represented the public ; but the plea of the public<br />
was shown many years ago by the most distin-<br />
cuished authorities, and those who had given the<br />
matter their fullest attention to be without<br />
foundation. It is late in the day to bring up the<br />
question again, and it would take too much space<br />
to quote the learned authorities referred to. It<br />
would be interesting to enquire whether Mr. Cald-<br />
well has studied the legislation dealing with copy-<br />
right property since the passing of the Act of<br />
1842; whether he has noted that all modern<br />
legislation in all the countries of the world has<br />
been to confirm the property in the author, to give<br />
him wider limits, not only as far as country but also<br />
as far as time! is concerned ; and that in the great<br />
majority of cases which have been taken into the<br />
courts of law the Acts have as a rule received the<br />
most liberal interpretation in favour of the authors<br />
of literary, dramatic, and musical property.<br />
<br />
He goes on to state that the owners of musical<br />
copyright have exercised their sole and exclusive<br />
“liberty” in a manner highly detrimental to the<br />
interests of the general public, as well as to the<br />
advantage of music, and have practically tempted<br />
and induced piracy.<br />
<br />
“To find anything like an approach to the present piracy<br />
of musical copyright, one has to go back to the piracy of<br />
books by American editions, owing to the high prices<br />
charged for books in this country placing books of educa-<br />
tional value quite beyond the reach of the general public,<br />
notwithstanding the cheapness of paper and printing. By<br />
the issue of cheaper editions for the general public the<br />
temptation to piracy has been removed ; and the public<br />
being now supplied at a reasonable price there is no market<br />
for pirated books, notwithstanding the somewhat irrelevant<br />
reference in the concluding paragraph of the report of the<br />
majority as to the alleged piracy of Mr. Arthur Balfour's<br />
pamphlet and Mr. Kipling’s poems.<br />
<br />
“The evidence has disclosed that the author or composer<br />
of a musical composition does not himself publish the sub-<br />
ject of his copyright. A trade or business has sprung up<br />
<br />
of publishers, who purchase musical copyrights either for a<br />
small sum, cash down, in the case of unknown composers,<br />
<br />
<br />
212<br />
<br />
or for a royalty of from one penny up to fourpence per copy<br />
sold—the customary royalty being threepence per copy,<br />
subject to a deduction of one-seventh. The publisher in<br />
the case of such purchases takes the place of the original<br />
owner of the copyright, with the same powers and subject<br />
to the same limitations and responsibilities.<br />
<br />
“ The publishers who are purchasers of copyright appear<br />
to have an arrangement amongst themselves with regard to<br />
the prices to be charged. The prices charged to the public<br />
seem to be the same in all cases, irrespective of the royalty<br />
paid to the author and composer, although the discount to<br />
the trade may vary as regards individual compositions and<br />
individual publishers. The successes are made to pay for<br />
the failures ; and as the failures are said to be five-sixths of<br />
the total, a heavy tax is by this arrangement laid upon the<br />
general public. A business arrangement of this kind is not<br />
contemplated by the Copyright Acts, which, although<br />
necessarily permitting sales of copyright, confer no further<br />
power in the assignee than that which existed in the<br />
original owner of the copyright.”’<br />
<br />
The statements contained in the first paragraph<br />
just quoted are not in accordance with fact ; it<br />
must, therefore, logically follow that the deductions<br />
are equally erroneous.<br />
<br />
No doubt he is, to a certain extent, correct with<br />
regard to the attitude of the publishers. They<br />
purchase, in many instances for small prices, from<br />
the composers, and then market the music for<br />
their profit without any consideration for the<br />
public which Mr. Caldwell so boldly champions.<br />
<br />
This point of view has been well set forth in a<br />
statement received from a member of the Society,<br />
dealing with the present situation :—<br />
<br />
“ Hitherto the public has only been acquainted with the<br />
matter from the point of view of the publishers. Inasmuch<br />
as the publisher and shopkeeper are bosom friends, the<br />
composer, unless he is a genius with business ability who<br />
can look after himself, comes off worse even than the public,<br />
in the bargain. In private, the composer is willing enough<br />
to air his grievances, but in public, inasmuch as there is no<br />
combination amongst composers for mutual defence, the<br />
individual musician who has suffered, being afraid that his<br />
further compositions may not be accepted, thinks that dis-<br />
cretion is the better part of valour, Unfortunately for<br />
the composer there is no Sir Walter Besant in the musical<br />
profession. Zhe Musical News, which could do much for<br />
him, concentrates its attention on the evils of bogus colleges<br />
which interfere with the earnings of the music teacher, but<br />
the members of the syndicate owning that paper who could<br />
criticise music publishing methods if they liked, much to<br />
the distaste of the publishing houses, preserve a policy of<br />
silence. As nearly all the other musical periodicals, like<br />
the Musical Times and Musical Record, are owned by pub-<br />
lishers themselves, the individual composer, who is of little<br />
use to the advertisement manager, has no channel through<br />
which to air his wrongs.”<br />
<br />
But we cannot agree with Mr. Caldwell in com-<br />
paring the present musical piracy with the piracy<br />
of works in the United States some years ago, and<br />
a moment’s consideration will show his reason to<br />
be false. It must be clear to anyone who has<br />
studied the subject, that any literary, dramatic or<br />
musical property can always be produced by the<br />
pirate at a cheaper rate than it can be produced on<br />
behalf of the owner of the copyright. The pirate<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
has merely to think of his profit on the cost of<br />
production ; the legitimate publisher has to con-<br />
sider the profit of the author, in addition to the<br />
profit on the cost of production. Mr. Caldwell is,<br />
no doubt, right in some of his deductions as to the<br />
profit that is paid to the composer, as it is clear<br />
from the frequent instances which come before the<br />
Secretary of the Society, that the unfortunate com-<br />
poser is in a much worse position than is the author<br />
of literary and dramatic pieces, owing to his un-<br />
willingness to join an organised body of defence,<br />
which exists in the Society; but if the composer<br />
obtained the full share of the profit of the work, the<br />
outcome of his brain, it is not likely that the price<br />
of music would be appreciably reduced to the<br />
public. Mr. Caldwell should also remember that<br />
the surest way of increasing the study of music is<br />
by protecting adequately the producers of this<br />
work. If one, who has within him the capacity of<br />
a great composer, is to obtain a living wage, he<br />
must receive some fair security for his labours.<br />
This security, confirmed by Statute, must necessa-<br />
rily raise the price of these labours to the public.<br />
Mr. Caldwell states, with a precision which is<br />
hardly justified : “ Piracy of musical composition<br />
is due, therefore, to the same causes which at one<br />
time produced piracy in the case of books, and<br />
which, in the case of books, has been removed by<br />
the issue of cheaper editions, at a price within the<br />
reach of the general public.”<br />
<br />
The piracy of musical compositions is not really<br />
due to the same causes which brought about the<br />
piracy of books in the United States. The piracy<br />
of books in England never existed to a great<br />
extent, and the piracy of books in the United<br />
States only existed because there was no protective<br />
law, and not for the reason put forward by Mr.<br />
Caldwell, that they desired cheaper books on the<br />
market. There are many other interesting remarks<br />
in the minority report which have not been dealt<br />
with, and there are many interesting remarks in<br />
the evidence of Mr. James Frederick Willetts,<br />
known as “The Pirate King,” who wishes to pose<br />
as an altruist and public benefactor ; but it is hardly<br />
worth while to deal with the question at great<br />
length.<br />
<br />
It was essential, however, that members of the<br />
Society should comprehend fully some of the argu-<br />
ments—fallacious though they be—which are still,<br />
unfortunately, put forward to prevent remedial<br />
legislation for the protection of copyright property.<br />
There are, no doubt, many disputed points in<br />
copyright law, arising from the different interests<br />
of authors and publishers, but it is astonishing in<br />
the twentieth century to see arguments soberly<br />
put forward, which ought to have been laid in<br />
their graves seventy years ago.<br />
<br />
G. HoT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE PUBLISHERS’ ASSOCIATION.<br />
<br />
——<br />
<br />
HE Report of the Annual General Meeting<br />
a of the Publishers’ Association was printed<br />
too late to be inserted in the April number<br />
<br />
of The Author. We are pleased to hear that Mr.<br />
<br />
’ Reginald Smith, K.C., of Messrs. Smith, Elder and<br />
<br />
Co., has been elected to the Presidency of the<br />
Association. We congratulate Mr. Smith on his<br />
honourable appointment, and the Association on<br />
having secured so able a President.<br />
<br />
There seems to have been, at the meeting and<br />
during the past year, considerable work done in<br />
dealing with the sale of educational books and the<br />
question of preferential discounts to educational<br />
houses. ‘The matter is one of great importance to<br />
all writers of educational works.<br />
<br />
We are pleased to see that the Publishers’ Asso-<br />
ciation made a substantial grant to the expenses<br />
of the defendants in the case of Aflalo and Cook v.<br />
Lawrence and Bullen. Mr. Longman, in his speech,<br />
said that the resulting judgment established a<br />
principle of considerable importance to the publish-<br />
ing trade. The Committee of the Authors’ Society<br />
also considered the legal point important. The<br />
fact that the Publishers’ Association supported the<br />
defendants on the grounds put forward by their<br />
President finally does away with the ill-considered<br />
conclusion hastily arrived at by some members of<br />
the trade, that the action, commenced by the<br />
plaintiffs and supported by the Society, was<br />
frivolous and vexatious,<br />
<br />
In the Report are also issued the definitions of<br />
some simple publishing terms, which it would be<br />
useful for authors to remember :—<br />
<br />
Inpression—A number of copies printed at any one<br />
time. When a book is reprinted without change it<br />
should be called a new “impression,’’ to distinguish<br />
it from an “edition,’’ as defined below.<br />
<br />
Edition. An impression in which the matter has under-<br />
gone some change, or for which the type has been<br />
re-set.<br />
<br />
Re-issue.-—A republication at a different price, or in a<br />
different form, of part of an impression which has<br />
already been placed on the market.<br />
<br />
It is exceedingly useful to have these explana-<br />
tions authoritatively promulgated, and it is hoped<br />
that they will be strictly enforced. We can-<br />
not help, however, putting forward once again<br />
that it would be still more advantageous if the<br />
Association settled on the unit of an impression,<br />
and insisted on the members adopting the unit<br />
universally. Thus, if the unit was fixed at 1,000<br />
copies, a limited issue of 500 copies would be half<br />
an impression, a sale of 100,000 copies would be<br />
100 impressions. If this rational course was<br />
adopted, the trade would get rid of the absurdity<br />
of an imprint on a book of “Third impression”<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 213<br />
<br />
when only thirty copies had been sold. Such<br />
action is not only ridiculous, but it constitutes a<br />
mild fraud on the public.<br />
<br />
—_———_<$*_1———_e———____<br />
<br />
THE APRIL MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
LiveRARY, Dramatic, AND Musical<br />
<br />
BLACKWOOD’S MAGAZINE.<br />
<br />
Lord Acton’s Letters—The Scientific Historian in Theory<br />
and Practice—Tacitus and his Translations in “ Musings<br />
without Method.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CONTEMPORARY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Lord Acton’s Letters. By Augustine Birrell, K.C,<br />
Tshaikovski’s Operas. By A. E. Keeton.<br />
<br />
CORNHILL MAGAZINE.<br />
Sir Leslie Stephen. By Frederick Harrison.<br />
Memories of “The Times.’’ By Alex. Innes Shand.<br />
<br />
THE EDINBURGH REVIEW.<br />
The Philosophy of Herbert Spencer.<br />
Mr. Morley’s Life of Gladstone.<br />
The Letters of Ernst Curtius.<br />
The Letters of Horace Walpole.<br />
Sir George Trevelyan on the American Revolution.<br />
<br />
THE FORTNIGHTLY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Of the True Greatness of Thackeray. By H. H.<br />
Statham.<br />
<br />
Mr. Bodley on the Crown. By Justin McCarthy.<br />
<br />
D’ Annunzio’s New Play. By May Bateman.<br />
<br />
Letters on the Drama. Madame Navarro; Mrs.<br />
Craigie.<br />
<br />
INDEPENDENT REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Lord Acton at Cambridge. By John Pollock.<br />
<br />
Mr. Paul’s History of England. By Augustine Birrell,<br />
K.C<br />
<br />
“To Soria-Moria Castle.’’ By Edmund Garret,<br />
<br />
MACMILLAN’S MAGAZINE,<br />
Alfred Ainger. By the Master of Peterhouse.<br />
<br />
THE MonTHLy REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Edward Fitzgerald. By the late Whitwell Elwin.<br />
<br />
The True Story of the Stratford Bust. By Mrs. Stopes.<br />
THE New LIBERAL REVIEW.<br />
<br />
The Rise of the Drama in Ireland. By John Campbell.<br />
<br />
THe NINETEENTH CENTURY REVIEW.<br />
The Place of Whistler. By Frederick Wedmore.<br />
Aeschylus and Shakespeare. By the Rev. R. §. De<br />
Courey Laffan.<br />
<br />
THE QUARTERLY REVIEW.<br />
<br />
Gabrielle d’Annunzio. By Henry James.<br />
Leslie Stephen and his Works.<br />
<br />
The Novels of 'homas Hardy.<br />
<br />
Marco Polo and his followers in: Central Asia.<br />
<br />
TEMPLE BAR.<br />
<br />
On Browning in a Library. By the Rey. Archie F.<br />
Wibling.<br />
<br />
<br />
214<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
BEDE<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
obtained, But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements,<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “ office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not,to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It isnow<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth. From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Zhe Author.<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Neyer sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
C1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means. :<br />
<br />
@.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
<br />
——_+—>—_<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
og<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays.<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(b.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(c.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to:<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.c.. fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (0.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
<br />
4. Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time, This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance. :<br />
<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. They should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are reterred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
oe<br />
<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal with—performing right and copyright. He<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
<br />
——__—__—_—_—_+—>—_>—__—_<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
so<br />
<br />
1. VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor, but if there is any<br />
<br />
special veason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
<br />
Solicitors of the Society. _ Further, the Committee, if they<br />
<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
2, Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.’<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preser ration in a fire-<br />
proof safé. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements. Fuller particulars of the Society’s work<br />
can be obtained in the Prospectus.<br />
<br />
7, No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
10. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br />
annum, or £10 40s for life membership.<br />
<br />
215<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
— 1+<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach, he term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic works, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—-—+—<br />
<br />
TYNHE Editor of Zhe Author begs to remind members of<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
Communications for Zhe Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, §.W., and should reach the Editor not later than<br />
the 21st of each month.<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
— nl<br />
<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the<br />
Editor on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
ge<br />
<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
++<br />
<br />
LEGAL AND GENERAL LIFE ASSURANCE.<br />
SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
ENSIONS to commence at any selected age,<br />
either with or without Life Assurance can<br />
be obtained from this socieiy.<br />
<br />
Full particulars can be obtained from the City<br />
Branch Manager, Legal and General Life Assurance<br />
Society, 158, Leadenhall Street, London, E.C.<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
19<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
N the month of May, 1905, the Spanish<br />
I nation will celebrate the Tercentenary of the<br />
<br />
production of Don Quixote.<br />
<br />
To publish at this period an article on the<br />
subject, and the sonnet, the reproduction of<br />
which Mr. Austin Dobson has kindly sanctioned,<br />
may seem to some anticipating events; but the<br />
Spaniards were making arrangements for the fétes<br />
in honour of this celebration so early as the end<br />
of 1903. If the Spaniards are taking action we<br />
musi not be behindhand. In a future number of<br />
The Author we shall give full details of the pro-<br />
posed fétes. The arrangements are in the hands<br />
of a Special Commission, including among its<br />
members the Mayor of Madrid, the Prime<br />
Minister, and other influential people, and a<br />
large sum has been voted towards the expenses.<br />
It has always been a kindly jest against the<br />
Spaniards that they put off everything till “ to-<br />
morrow,” but in this case they seem to be taking<br />
‘time by the fore-lock.”<br />
<br />
WE regret to see in the March number of The<br />
American Author notice that the periodical will<br />
cease to exist with that issue. This must bea very<br />
serious matter to all those who have wished for the<br />
success of the American Authors’ Society. The<br />
Editor states that “the periodiocal joins the long<br />
phalanx of publications which have failed for lack<br />
of financial backing.” This can only mean that<br />
the majority of the Authors of the United States<br />
have not joined the combination of their profession<br />
as they should have done. What is the reason of<br />
this? Perhaps we can give some explanation from<br />
our own experience. For many years now we have<br />
been endeavouring to obtain the cost of production<br />
of different forms of American books. We have<br />
applied frequently to the American Authors’<br />
Society asking for information on this point,<br />
but so far without success. When passing through<br />
New York we had the honour of meeting the Secre-<br />
tary and the President of the Society, and suggested<br />
the advisability of issuing books on the same lines<br />
as the English Society’s Cost of Production, and<br />
Methods of Publishing, as on these two points was<br />
based the whole system of authors’ profits. Is it<br />
possible that the citizens of a nation like the United<br />
States, who flatter themselves that they are so<br />
go-ahead and possessed of such strong business<br />
capacity, have shown themselves in the question of<br />
authorship alone wanting in the power of combina-<br />
tion, and lacking in the solution of the practical<br />
issues. We sincerely hope the withdrawal of The<br />
Amerwan Author is only temporary, and that at<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
no distant date, when the Authors’ Society shall<br />
embrace all those whose names are constantly<br />
swelling the ranks of writers, the periodical will<br />
be started again under more healthy auspices.<br />
<br />
WE regret to chronicle the death of Mr. Julian<br />
Sturgis, who was a warm supporter of the Societ<br />
and its aims, He was a subscriber of £50 to the<br />
Pension Fund, and joined the Society in 1892.<br />
<br />
—_1.—~»~—+ ___<br />
<br />
SIR EDWIN ARNOLD.<br />
<br />
—_— 1<br />
<br />
N Sir Edwin Arnold, whose death took place<br />
I in South Kensington on March 24th, English<br />
literature has lost an ardent worker, and a<br />
host of friends a personality whose charm was<br />
appreciated best by those who had the privilege of<br />
the most intimate acquaintance with it. Born in<br />
June, 1832, the distinguished writer had thus nearly<br />
completed his seventy-second year at the time of<br />
hisdeath. Educated at King’s School, Rochester,<br />
and King’s College, London, he won a scholarship<br />
at Oxford, and it was there his taste for letiers<br />
showed itself, almost his first essay in poetry, the<br />
“Fall of Balshazzar,” winning the Newdigate<br />
prize for English verse. His love for Oxford and<br />
University College is indicated by the fact that<br />
vnly two months ago, at the other extreme of a<br />
strenuous life spent in the continuation of studies<br />
to which Oxford gave him the first incentive, he<br />
asked that his ashes, after cremation, might go<br />
back and rest in her classic precincts.<br />
<br />
After leaving College with a Master of Arts<br />
degree, he was attached for a time to King<br />
Edward’s school, Birmingham, and from thence,<br />
with his wife and one young child, went out to<br />
India as Principal of the Government Deccan<br />
College at Poona. If Oxford had filled him with<br />
the learning of Greece and Rome the East opened<br />
his mind to the knowledge of still earlier civiliza-<br />
tions. He took an instant and heart-whole delight<br />
in a people whose ancient philosophies and beliefs<br />
it is one of his best memorials to have done more<br />
than any other Englishman to make intelligible to<br />
his countrymen at home. “The Light of Asia,”<br />
though not written till long afterwards, was the<br />
outcome of actual contact with those to whom the<br />
great epic is a living reality. It is undoubtedly<br />
Sir Edwin Arnold’s chief work as a poet, yet it was<br />
written not in the calm seclusion that would have<br />
seemed essential to such a labour, but during the<br />
stress of busy London life, and amongst scenes the<br />
very antipode of those with which it deals.<br />
<br />
After five years in India Sir Edwin returned to<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
England, and subsequently joined the staff of the<br />
Daily Telegraph, working unceasingly for that<br />
paper practically up to the day of his death, and<br />
“ contributing to its columns an incalculable volume<br />
of material, historical, descriptive, or imaginative,<br />
and worthy to rank with the very best journalistic<br />
work of its generation.”<br />
<br />
A great traveller in all parts of the world, to him<br />
to travel and write were inseparably connected.<br />
Few of his books in this branch of literature have<br />
been so popular as those upon Japan. He made<br />
that charming land his own, and foresaw her place<br />
amongst the nations long before alliances or<br />
successful wars had awarded it to her. His third<br />
wife was a Japanese lady, to whom it fell to<br />
lighten the burden of his last days, a task accom-<br />
plished with unswerving tenderness. In the course<br />
of such a life, in the centre of politics and society,<br />
it was inevitable Sir Edwin should make innumer-<br />
able friendships, and the volume of his Memoirs<br />
which is to appear shortly will be not the least<br />
interesting of the many such books which have<br />
appeared of late. At one time a keen sportsman,<br />
and always a lover of nature and the country, Sir<br />
Edwin, moved by the kindly precepts of the<br />
religions he had studied, latterly put by rod and<br />
gun and devoted himself to yachting, for which he<br />
had a great fondness. None but those who knew<br />
him intimately could value fully the gentleness of<br />
his nature, the brightness of his outlook on life and<br />
the future, or the immense stores of knowledge to<br />
which even his books give but hasty and inadequate<br />
expression. To such his loss is indeed irreparable.<br />
<br />
The position that Sir Edwin Arnold held among<br />
the writers of the day and the value and beauty of<br />
his work has been dealt with so fully in the papers<br />
that it would be superfluous to say anything more<br />
in this short article. It must be added that he<br />
was a member of the Society and Council since its<br />
foundation.<br />
<br />
It is sad at so short an interval to have to<br />
chronicle the death of another of the earliest<br />
members of the Society.<br />
<br />
——__+—<_+____—__<br />
<br />
SIR HENRY THOMPSON, BART.,<br />
M.B.LOND., F.R.C.S.ENG.<br />
<br />
——_— +<br />
<br />
IR HENRY THOMPSON, whose death took<br />
place on April 18th, after a few days’ illness,<br />
<br />
wag one of the earliest members of the Society of<br />
Authors. He joined almost on the foundation of<br />
the Society, and showed genuine sympathy with<br />
our efforts at a time when the scheme of our asso-<br />
ciation was barely formulated, and when the support<br />
of a man so well-known in artistic, literary, social<br />
and scientific circles was especially valuable to us.<br />
<br />
217<br />
<br />
Sir Henry Thompson was born in Framlingham,<br />
a small Suffolk town, where his father was long in<br />
business. He was educated at a local Grammar<br />
School, and elected rather late in life to be a<br />
medical man, for he was twenty-eight years of age<br />
when he entered University College, London, as a<br />
medical student, and in the “forties” it was cus-<br />
tomary for the medical man to commence his<br />
curriculum at the age of sixteen or seventeen.<br />
His University career was one of unmitigated<br />
success. He took prizes and scholarships in most<br />
subjects, graduated with honours at the earliest<br />
opportunity, and immediately received a junior<br />
appointment at University College Hospital. Suc-<br />
ceeding within four years of obtaining his first<br />
surgical diploma to a place on the staff of the<br />
hospital, he was marked out for a career of excep-<br />
tional brilliance, and he fulfilled his promise. He<br />
was an admirable artist, heredity probably playing<br />
a part here, for his mother was the daughter of<br />
Samuel Medley, the portrait painter; he was also<br />
the possessor of a clear literary style, and had a<br />
logical way of arranging his knowledge. It is not<br />
surprising, therefore, that his medical writings<br />
were an immediate success, and as his hospital<br />
work gave him full opportunities for perfecting his<br />
practice in the special departments of surgery to<br />
which his theories mainly related, he soon became<br />
one of the best known surgeons in the world. He<br />
operated upon the late King of the Belgians and<br />
the late Emperor of France, and for at least a quarter<br />
of a century his name was a synonym for the per-<br />
fection of skill and resource in his particular branch<br />
of operative surgery.<br />
<br />
Sir Henry Thompson joined our body, however,<br />
as an author of fiction, for, as is now well-known,<br />
he was the writer, under the pseudonym of Pen<br />
Oliver, of two novels, “ Charlie Kingston’s Aunt,”<br />
and “ All But.” The first of these books achieved<br />
considerable success, which it deserved, for it<br />
contained an excellent situation, while it furnished<br />
an accurate and interesting picture of the manners<br />
of the London medical student in what may be<br />
termed the mid-Victorian epoch. But as a painter<br />
he was much more in his own groove than he was<br />
asa novelist. His pictures, which for some years<br />
were hung regularly in the Academy and some-<br />
times in the Salon, were the result of careful<br />
observation and skilled training; there is no<br />
doubt that if his professional calling had failed<br />
him his skill as an artist would have brought him<br />
into prominence. As a host Sir Henry Thompson<br />
was famous for his dinners of eight courses for<br />
eight persons at eight o’clock, known as “ octaves.”<br />
He was a skilled gastronomist, and until recently<br />
knew every one in the literary, artistic, and<br />
<br />
scientific worlds, and he gave as much thought to<br />
the selection of the company at his table as to the<br />
<br />
<br />
218<br />
<br />
preparation of the food. He aimed at making his<br />
‘“‘ octaves” as much a mental as a gustatory treat,<br />
and invariably he hit his mark. :<br />
<br />
Sir Henry Thompson was President of the<br />
Cremation Society, a keen opponent of municipal<br />
abuses, and an ardent automobilist, and his pen<br />
was constantly active in the columns of The Times<br />
or The Lancet, now praising modern locomotion,<br />
now denouncing the crude methods of earth to<br />
earth burial, and now calling attention to the<br />
shortcomings of our sanitary authorities. Old age,<br />
which came slowly upon him, was accompanied by<br />
no abatement of ardour in his many pursuits;<br />
rather, by bringing him leisure from his surgical<br />
work, it left him more free to expend energy in<br />
other and multifarious directions.<br />
<br />
The Society of Authors has lost a useful friend<br />
in this brilliant and many-sided man.<br />
<br />
—— ee<br />
<br />
THE TRUE SPIRIT OF DON QUIXOTE OF<br />
MANCHA.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
T is reserved for only the very greatest<br />
| makers of fiction to create a character the<br />
interest of whose individuality shall equal or<br />
exceed the author’s. Dickens has done this; so<br />
has Thackeray ; and, in a more conspicuous degree,<br />
Cervantes. I do not know how Thackeray died ;<br />
but I remember, one by one, the last moments of<br />
Colonel Newcome. Most of us could write offhand<br />
a biography of Don Quixote; but it takes a<br />
specialist, with years of wearying research behind<br />
him, to produce a biography of Cervantes. And<br />
has not Argamasilla de Alba a wider fame as the<br />
birthplace of the Sorrowful Knight than Alcala<br />
de Henares as the birthplace of the Sorrowful<br />
Novelist.<br />
<br />
Many will think it late in the day to analyse<br />
Don Quixote’s character with any critical or cor-<br />
rective purpose. Nevertheless, it has been said<br />
and echoed by the vulgar of all time that<br />
Cervantes’ object in producing the Quijote<br />
was to sweep away a certain class of literature.<br />
Once more I protest against this fallacy. There is<br />
no moral aim in Cervantes’ chapters, any more than<br />
there is a moral aim in Shakespeare’s plays. No<br />
work “with a purpose” could soar so high or<br />
live so long. The aim is flawless portraiture,<br />
the only base of all immortal art. Homer,<br />
Velazquez, Dante, Cervantes, Shakespeare—serene,<br />
dispassionate, punctilious portraiture denotes them<br />
every one. The more the artist haggles over this<br />
or that opinion, the more he subdivides his interest.<br />
He pleads a selfish cause—his own. Notso if he<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
presents a portrait. Something of ourselves will<br />
<br />
certainly be here, broad enough and bold enough<br />
Therefore it is not his own _<br />
<br />
for all to recognise.<br />
selfishness that the author should indulge, but that<br />
<br />
of his audience, offering them a fragment, more or __<br />
<br />
less considerable, of their personal image. And we<br />
<br />
are so inexorable in this selfish expectation that it<br />
gives us greater pleasure to see our own vices<br />
<br />
delineated, than the virtues of another.<br />
<br />
The motive for the introduction of the books of<br />
chivalry was technical, not moral.<br />
Don Quixote’s exploits is the treeless, thinly-popu-<br />
lated region of La Mancha, possessing at the most.<br />
a wild Titanic beauty derived from emptiness and<br />
space, but never from diversity. It is nota region<br />
fitted for adventure. Similarly the Manchegans<br />
are not—are not reported tc have been—a com-<br />
munity of adventure-seekers. To frame a narrative<br />
out of these chilling factors demands some stimulus<br />
extraordinary, beyond the people and the place.<br />
This stimulus was provided by the books of<br />
chivalry, a means of making incident, where inci-<br />
dent, under normal circumstances, was sheerly<br />
inconceivable. Don Quixote must plunge into<br />
adventure ; yet if he lead a regular Manchegan<br />
life no possible adventure can encounter him. In<br />
a little world whose motto is tranquillity, only the<br />
criminal or the madman can tweak society’s nose<br />
and make a veritable stir. The criminal in this<br />
case was inadmissible. Therefore Don Quixote<br />
must be mad ; just mad enough to turn the hum-<br />
drum upside down, but never incoherent to the<br />
point ot idiocy. He must, in fact, be cursed (or<br />
blessed) with just a half or quarter madness, such<br />
as most of us are credited with, His mania, too,<br />
had better be grandiose and kindly. And so with<br />
aquiline perception Cervantes pounced upon a<br />
fashionable and attractive madness, a Spanish<br />
megalom: nia, the craze for knight-errantry. Here<br />
were pa‘. .os, humour, energy, in abundant store,<br />
together vith vital interest in the portraiture for<br />
manya paniard and non-Spaniard to behold their<br />
own ru.zction. Such, I am positive, was the<br />
genesis of Don Quixote’s “ eccentricity.”<br />
<br />
Apart from detail of this nature it is no slur<br />
upon the Spaniards to say that Don Quixote is a<br />
permanent likeness of their inmost shape and<br />
quality. The church and the sword, or perhaps I<br />
had better say the monastery and the sword, have<br />
created between them the whole of Spanish history.<br />
What is Don Quixote but a joint embodiment of<br />
the ascetic and the warrior? He wages war; he<br />
worships women ; but his warfare, like his gallantry,<br />
is that of a Sir Galahad :—<br />
<br />
““ My good blade carves the casques of men,<br />
My tough lance thrusteth sure,<br />
My strength is as the strength of ten,<br />
Because my heart is pure.<br />
<br />
The theatre of 7<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 219<br />
<br />
« How sweet are looks that ladies bend<br />
On whom their favours fall !<br />
For them I battle till the end,<br />
To save from shame and thrall.”<br />
<br />
All women in Don Quixote’s eyes are equally<br />
beautiful, equally supramundane. All of us<br />
at some time have attempted to believe the same.<br />
Here, then, are lines of universal portraiture ; and<br />
as we titter at Don Quixote’s madness, we stumble<br />
with asudden cry upon our own.<br />
<br />
Returning to the eminently Spanish features of<br />
our hero. Don Quixote, regarded as typical of<br />
Spain, displays to us a nation whose magnanimity<br />
is equalled by her roughness. The singular im-<br />
pulse marking the crusader and the knight-errant,<br />
particular apostles of those only objects of peren-<br />
nial worship, God and woman—has lasted longer<br />
in Castile than anywhere, developing, throughout<br />
that region and between the eighth and eighteenth<br />
centuries, into an over-ripeness highly detrimental<br />
to the commonwealth. Even now this spirit in<br />
Spain is not extinct. Manuel Bueno asserts with<br />
perfect truth that his countrymen are at once<br />
generous and inhuman. The paradox, borne out<br />
by Fouillée and other authorities, applies with<br />
obvious fitness to Don Quixote. I would suggest,<br />
however, that the Spaniard’s generosity is older<br />
and less eradicable than his inhumanity ; witness,<br />
once more, Don Quixote. The baser quality is the<br />
fruit of centuries of fighting. The nobler is<br />
apparently indigenous.<br />
<br />
Then, as the complement of Don Quixote the<br />
Spaniard, we have Don Quixote the brother of us<br />
all, or even (dropping modesty and clinging to our<br />
comfortable classic*) our very self. His character<br />
is therefore regional and extraterritorial. Compare<br />
him in this aspect with Hamlet, miscalled the<br />
Dane. Both fragile Hamlet and the fragile<br />
champion of La Mancha are exquisitely human,<br />
but only Don Quixote is exquisitely national<br />
besides. Hamlet is one of us; Don Quixote one<br />
of us, and also one of our friends the Spaniards.<br />
To this extent Don Quixote’s is the fuller portrait.<br />
He has been described as “the emblem of faith.”<br />
Tf this be so, Hamlet is just as much “ the emblem<br />
of doubt”; and faith and doubt between them<br />
keep the world a-spin. But faith and doubt in<br />
these two instances are carried to an ecstasy, and<br />
want of mental balance is the outcome. We must<br />
not doubt, we must not hope—except with modera-<br />
tion. Is it not insignificant that of these two<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* “Whilst [| study to find how I am a Microcosm, or<br />
little World, I find myself something more than the great.<br />
There is surely a piece of Divinity in us, something that<br />
was before the Elements, and owes no homage unto the<br />
Sun. Nature tells me I am the Image of God, as well as<br />
Scripture: he that understands not thus much, hath not<br />
his introduction or first lesson, and is yet to begin the<br />
Alphabet of man.”—Religio Medici.<br />
<br />
characters, Hamlet and Don Quixote, who stand<br />
together upon the very pinnacle of fiction, one<br />
should be mad and the other mad enough to be<br />
suspected of madness? This sometimes prompts<br />
me to suppose that only the insane is worth<br />
recording in the chronicles of human thought.<br />
“What is beyond?” is the question which Don<br />
Quixote always asks. The same question is always<br />
on the lips and in the heart of Hamlet. But<br />
where Don Quixote asks with confidence, the other<br />
asks with dread. Otherwise, what have they not<br />
in common? “A virgin heart in work and will”<br />
belongs to both. Hamlet’s words are very<br />
frequently as “ wild and whirling ” as Don Quixote’s<br />
deeds ; but the ambitions and aspirations of either<br />
are equally sound and equally charitable.<br />
<br />
How often, as I roamed across La Mancha, did<br />
I believe myself to contemplate Don Quixote in<br />
the flesh and in the soul. How noble was his<br />
forehead, how fearless and benign his glance, his<br />
upward gaze how earnest and inspired, how lucid<br />
and majestic his address. Each of these aspects<br />
and emotions came upon me with a jewel crisp-<br />
ness :—<br />
<br />
Parea ciascuna rubinetto, in cui<br />
Raggio di sole ardesse si acceso,<br />
Che ne’ miei occhi rifrangesse lui.<br />
<br />
As to the scenes Don Quixote has immor-<br />
talized—somnolent Argamasilla, the mournfal<br />
Cave of Montesinos, the sedgy meres, with their<br />
Arthurian sadness, of Ruidera—these seem to stand<br />
before me even now, detached with meteor clear-<br />
ness from the firmament of memory, and crystal-<br />
lized by time and truth into unclouding splendour.<br />
<br />
LronarpD WILLIAMS.<br />
-——<—_<br />
<br />
DON QUIXOTE.*<br />
ao<br />
EHIND thy pasteboard, on thy battered hack,<br />
Thy lean cheek striped with plaster to and<br />
fro,<br />
Thy long spear levelled at the unseen foe,<br />
‘And doubtful Sancho trudging at thy back,<br />
Thou wert a figure strange enough, good lack !<br />
To make Wiseacredom, both high and low,<br />
Rub purblind eyes, and—having watched thee go—<br />
Dispatch its Dogberrys upon thy track :<br />
Alas ! poor Knight ! alas ! poor soul possest !<br />
Yet would to-day when Courtesy grows chill,<br />
And life’s fine loyalties are turned to jest,<br />
Some fire of thine might burn within us still !<br />
Ah, would but one might lay his lance in rest,<br />
And charge in earnest . . . were it but a mill!<br />
Austin Dosson.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* Printed from the last Edition, 1902, of Mr. Austin<br />
Dobson's collected poems, with his kind permission.— Ep,<br />
220<br />
THE ANNUAL DINNER.<br />
<br />
—1—<—+—_<br />
<br />
(PNHE Annual Dinner of the Incorporated<br />
Society of Authors, was held on April 20th,<br />
at’ the Hotel Cecil, the Chairman of the<br />
<br />
Committee of Management, Mr. Douglas Freshfield,<br />
<br />
occupying the chair. Nearly 150 members and<br />
<br />
guests were present, the latter including Lord<br />
<br />
Alverstone, Lord Chief Justice of England, and<br />
<br />
Sir W. B. Richmond, R.A., who occupied seats to<br />
<br />
the right and left of the Chairman, the Right Rev.<br />
<br />
the Lord Bishop of Bristol, Admiral Edward<br />
<br />
Field, C.B., Sir Harry Johnston, Major Darwin,<br />
<br />
Mr. Appleton, the well-known New York pub-<br />
<br />
lisher, Mr. W. Heinemann, and many others. At<br />
<br />
the conclusion of dinner, for which grace was<br />
said by the Bishop of Bristol, the usual loyal<br />
toasts were duly honoured, and the Chairman rose<br />
} to propose success to the Society, for which he<br />
suggested a more appropriate name might have<br />
been “The. Society for the Protection of Authors,”<br />
or even ‘“ The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty<br />
to Authors,” since it was concerned with the legal<br />
and business rather than with the literary aspects<br />
of authorship. They were equally ready to protect<br />
the rights of a writer on golf or of an immortal<br />
poet. Their Committee discussed not matters’ of<br />
style and taste, but of accounts and agreements.<br />
Business had been said to be the bane of author-<br />
ship. But this was an antiquated and obsolete<br />
view. The days of Grub Street were long past,<br />
and no one now seriously held that it was incon-<br />
sistent with the dignity of authorship to write for<br />
money. With regard to the relations of author<br />
and publisher, the public was apt to pay too much<br />
regard to the pecuniary risk run by the publisher,<br />
| and to disregard the value of the capital introduced<br />
| by the writer, consisting of that which the average<br />
| common-sense man did not so much esteem, and<br />
i perhaps did not keep a stock of—brains. / Mr.<br />
Freshfield went on to refer to the decision in<br />
» Aflalo vy. Lawrence and Bullen in the House of<br />
_ Lords. The satisfactory point about this decision<br />
was that, although it had entailed heavy expenses<br />
to the Society, it had finally determined a doubtful<br />
and very important question in copyright law. In<br />
arriving at this result it was a satisfaction to the<br />
Committee to feel that they had been acting in<br />
co-operation with the Publishers’ Association,<br />
which, recognising the importance of the point<br />
involved, had, it was announced, contributed to<br />
the costs of the defendants. While he in no way<br />
presumed to question the decision arrived at, Mr.<br />
<br />
Freshfield thought that as to one matter of fact<br />
<br />
the Law Lords had gone astray. It was surely<br />
<br />
unfair to argue that the mere fact that a contri-<br />
<br />
butor to a magazine or encyclopedia received a<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR:<br />
<br />
snbstantial sum for his article was evidence that<br />
he intended to part with all his rights in it. The<br />
amount of the return the publisher might reason.<br />
ably expect, or had actually obtained, from the<br />
original periodical publication, as well as the<br />
amount paid down by him, was an_ essential<br />
element in the consideration of the bargain. Re-<br />
ferring to the present multiplication of middlemen<br />
in literature, Mr. Freshfield suggested that the<br />
main work to be done by the Author’s Society was<br />
to make the best of the present system of book<br />
production. He looked back with regret to the<br />
eighteenth century. In those days, under the old<br />
system of subscriptions, the author went round to<br />
his friends. He collected their money, and he had<br />
not to wait twelve months to get it. Publishers<br />
and booksellers had not then been differentiated,<br />
and he simply went to the publisher and had his<br />
book printed and distributed. Nowadays there<br />
was the printer, the illustrator, the bookbinder,<br />
and after they had passed by them they had to<br />
reckon with the literary agent, the publisher, and<br />
the bookseller. All of them must make their<br />
profit, and he did not say they made an exorbitant<br />
profit. Fortunes were not made by publishers at<br />
all to be compared with the great fortunes that<br />
were made in other businesses. ‘The Dictionary<br />
of National Biography ” was published not with<br />
the profits of publishing, but, as Mr. Murray Smith<br />
often used to avow, with the profits of Apollinaris.<br />
Mr. Freshfield next made allusion to a recent<br />
article on the subject of Literary Agents in The<br />
Author, and expressed a wish to see a reply to it<br />
which should indicate the proper sphere of such<br />
agency, which he understood had been found<br />
serviceable by many distinguished authors, though<br />
it was no doubt open to abuse. He also touched<br />
upon the correspondence concerning the “ ghost”<br />
in literary work, pointing out that the system of<br />
making use of a “ ghost ” for latin verses was one<br />
of very old standing in public schools, where the<br />
employer, when discovered, was likely to receive at<br />
the hands of the headmaster a summary lesson in<br />
{literary morals. /In conclusion, Mr. Freshfield paid<br />
/ a tribute to the honourable dealings of the better<br />
i class of publishers, and reverting to his comparison<br />
between the Society and that for the protection of<br />
children, suggested that while many authors are<br />
in their business dealings very like children, pub-<br />
lishers might be considered like parents, as defined<br />
by a member of the rising generation, as ‘‘ good on<br />
the whole, but the better for being looked after.”<br />
The toast of the Society was replied to by Mr.<br />
Sidney Lee, who alluded early in his speech to the<br />
confidence of all members in the Committee and in<br />
the Secretary, as carrying on the traditions of the<br />
founder of the Society, Sir Walter Besant. He<br />
also referred with satisfaction to the decision in<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the Aflalo case as settling a doubtful legal point.<br />
In touching upon the relations between author and<br />
publisher, Mr. Lee spoke of the Committee as<br />
exercising judicial functions, and pointed out that<br />
publishers were not the ogres that the fancies of<br />
some authors painted them, whereas there existed<br />
arrogant humbugs among authors. The author's<br />
grievance, he observed, might really be against the<br />
reading public, but that it was for the interest of<br />
both author and publisher to encourage the main-<br />
tenance of a high standard of literary work.<br />
<br />
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle proposed the health of<br />
the guests in a vigorous speech, declaring that as<br />
a man was known by his friends so a society was<br />
known by its guests. The Author’s Society had as<br />
its guests the Lord Chief Justice of England and<br />
Sir William Richmond, the former of whom was a<br />
lawyer, an author, and a sportsman, whose fair<br />
play and ruthless honesty recently displayed in<br />
connection with the Alaska arbitration, would<br />
make-the name of Lord Alverstone descend as a<br />
peer of those great men who made his office famous.<br />
With regard to Sir William Richmond, Sir Arthur<br />
Conan Doyle pointed out that he had turned his<br />
back upon a life of ease and material gain in order<br />
to serve the community upon the London County<br />
Council, a body of which it might be said that<br />
none on earth needed the presence of an artist<br />
more, if London was to cease being a city of mean<br />
streets and lost opportunities, and to become the<br />
greatest city that the world had ever seen. In<br />
conclusion, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle observed that<br />
a schoolboy had defined ‘“‘elocution” as “an<br />
American method of putting criminals to death,”<br />
and suggested this as a reason for not prolonging<br />
hisspeech. With the names of guests mentioned he<br />
associated those of the Bishop of Bristol, Admiral<br />
Field, Sir Harry Johnston, and Major Darwin.<br />
<br />
Before Lord Alverstone rose to reply for the<br />
guests, the Chairman read a friendly message which<br />
he had justreceived from the Institute of Printers and<br />
Kindred Trades, who were dining in another room,<br />
and he informed the society that he had returned<br />
suitable good wishes and congratulations in reply.<br />
<br />
The Lord Chief Justice, after thanking Sir<br />
Arthur Conan Doyle for the complimentary terms<br />
in which reference had been made to his own<br />
judicial and other public services, expressed his<br />
admiration of and gratification at the manner with<br />
which the Authors’ Society regarded its litigation,<br />
and particularly the late adverse decision in the<br />
House of Lords. He expressed himself wishful<br />
that all litigants might accept their defeats in the<br />
law courts in the same calm spirit. One of his<br />
predecessors, Lord Coleridge, had said that it was<br />
the duty of a judge to dismiss all suitors from his<br />
court wquos placatosque, and he should himself look<br />
forward in the future to seeing both sides satisfied<br />
<br />
221<br />
<br />
because a point of law had been settled and<br />
established. His Lordship expressed his pleasure<br />
and interest in social intercourse with authors,<br />
dwelling upon the distinction between the lawyer's<br />
task in dealing with facts, having but little<br />
scope even in advocacy for the play of his fancy,<br />
and the work of the author, who could give his<br />
imagination free play.<br />
<br />
Sir W. B. Richmond, K.C.B., R.A., observed<br />
that he had trained himself for the position of<br />
Alderman which he had accepted upon the London<br />
Council, by serving first upon the Council in his<br />
borough, and spoke of the work that he had done<br />
in combating Philistinism. Referring to the<br />
decoration of St. Paul’s, he declared that if crimes<br />
in that connection were charged against him the<br />
Bishop of Bristol, who sat near him, had been a<br />
culprit with him. With regard to the cry of<br />
“ Art for Art’s Sake,” Sir William avowed him-<br />
self unable to understand its meaning, but he<br />
deprecated any doctrine that one art should divorce<br />
another. Alluding to any demand that might be<br />
made that artists should paint “on lines of highest<br />
technique,” Sir William Richmond likened the<br />
stress laid upon technique, in art criticism, to<br />
judging the author of a book by his handwriting.<br />
He dwelt on the inspiration derived by artists<br />
from the Bible, from the works of Homer,<br />
Sophocles, Virgil, Shakespeare, Milton, and other<br />
classic writers. He also alluded in complimentary<br />
terms to the subjects for his skill which the artist<br />
might find in the works of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.<br />
“ Great authors,” he said, “ stimulate painters with<br />
ideas.”<br />
<br />
In proposing the health of the Chairman, the<br />
Bishop of Bristol protested against Mr. Freshfield<br />
posing as merely a business man. He was, his<br />
lordship said, a distinguished author who, like Sir<br />
Leslie Stephen, began writing through his desire<br />
to describe the Alps. His volumes upon the<br />
Caucasus were among the “ heaviest” books in his<br />
(the Bishop of Bristol’s) library, but there was not<br />
a dull page among them, and he had recently added<br />
to them an excellent description of the Himalaya.<br />
<br />
Mr. Freshfield, in reply, regretted that the Pre-<br />
sident of the Society, Mr. George Meredith, should<br />
be prevented by ill health from taking the chair,<br />
and expressed his thanks to the company for the<br />
kindness they had shown to him as a substitute.<br />
In excusing himseif from prolonging the evening<br />
by anything but a brief speech, he mentioned that<br />
at a previous dinner of the Society he had over-<br />
heard one lady author say to another on her way<br />
from the dining hall, “ My dear, [am nearly dead,”<br />
to which the other had answered, “I am quite.”<br />
Mr. Freshfield had no desire to diminish the number<br />
of the Society’s Members in the manner indicated,<br />
and he accordingly invited those present to adjourn<br />
<br />
<br />
222<br />
<br />
to the next room, where the usual conversazione<br />
was held, and where the rest of a highly successful<br />
evening was spent.<br />
<br />
The following members and guests were present :<br />
Madame Albanesi, W. W. Appleton, E. A. Arm-<br />
strong, Miss Agnes Armstrong, A. W. a’Beckett,<br />
The Rev. F. W. Bamford, Robert Bateman, Mrs.<br />
Beville, Miss Helen Boddington, Miss Philippa<br />
Bridges, Clifford Borrer, Oscar Browning, Mrs.<br />
Mona Caird, F. Carrel, Miss Challice, A. R.<br />
Colquhoun, Mrs. Colquhoun, Sir William Charley,<br />
Mrs. E. M. Davy, Miss Jean Delaire, Miss Sarah<br />
Doudney, C. F. Dowsett, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle,<br />
Miss O’Connor Eccles, Mrs. Edison (“ George<br />
Frost’), T. Mullett Ellis, W. B. Home Gall,<br />
»R. Garnett, C.B., Mrs. Aylmer Gowing, Horace G.<br />
Groser, Lady Glover, A. P. Graves, Francis<br />
Gribble, Mrs. Gribble, Major Arthur Haggard,<br />
Major-General Sir Reginald Hart, K.C.B., A.<br />
Hope Hawkins, Miss Henslowe, Miss Con-<br />
stance Hill, Mrs. Katherine Tynan Hinkson, Mrs.<br />
Willoughby Hodgson, H. Martin Holman, Miss<br />
M. C. Home, Mrs. Humphreys (“ Rita’’), The Rev.<br />
Henry N. Hutchinson, Miss Ionides, Scarboro<br />
Johnson, Mrs. Jordan, C. A. Kelly, G. T. Knight,<br />
Mrs. Knight, Sidney Lee, Robert J. Lees, Mrs.<br />
Low, Mrs. Belloc Lowndes, ‘‘ Maarten Maartens,”<br />
Miss M. M. Macpherson, Miss Constance Maud,<br />
Athol Maudsley, Mrs. Maudsley, E. K. Muspratt,<br />
E. P. Oppenheim, Louis N. Parker, 8. F. Pells,<br />
Mrs. Perrin, Major Douglas Phillott, C. Harvard<br />
Pierson, Lionel Portman, Jaakoff Prelooker, G. W.<br />
Prothero, Miss Lucy Redpath, Sir W. B. Richmond,<br />
K.C.B., Mrs. Reeves (‘Helen Mathers”), Emil<br />
Reich, A. Rogers, Miss Rossi, “ Leicester Romayne,”<br />
William Royle, C. M. Russell, Miss May Sinclair,<br />
Prof. W. W. Skeat, LL.D., Mrs. Michael Smith,<br />
Mrs. Isabel Smith, Miss Hannah Stanton, A. A.<br />
Strong, F. Stroud, Miss Stroud, Arthur J. Thomas,<br />
G. Herbert Thring, Mrs. Thring, Herbert Trench,<br />
Mrs. Alec Tweedie, Miss E. Underdown, H. Faure<br />
Walker, Mrs. Faure Walker, Percy White, “ Dolf<br />
Wyllarde,” R. Whiteing, and W. Wellington<br />
<br />
Young.<br />
9<br />
<br />
“WHAT’S IN A NAME?”<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
HERE is no copyright in the name of a book<br />
or play. It does not form part of the thing<br />
copyrighted, which is the “composition,”<br />
<br />
a.¢., the play or the book.<br />
<br />
In the year 1881 the Judges of the Court of<br />
Appeal held that no one could seize upon a few<br />
words of the English language and create a<br />
monopoly in them by saying that thenceforth<br />
nobody else could apply them publicly as the name<br />
or description or label of another composition.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Such few words are not capable of giving rise to<br />
any proprietary rights such as copyright involves,<br />
<br />
But, and it is obviously a large But, the ordinary<br />
common law doctrine of fraud or misrepresentation<br />
applies, that is to say, according to the technical<br />
phrase of the common law an action of “ deceit”<br />
will lie, wherever one man tries to pass off his goods<br />
as if they were another’s. For example, if a book<br />
or a play by A.has acquired a market value (or draws<br />
the public) and is known to the public by a certain<br />
name, X., then B. cannot use the name X. in such<br />
a way as to induce the public to come and buy or<br />
see his own, a different, book or play, under the<br />
belief that it is the well-known X.<br />
<br />
You will observe that it is an essential fact in —<br />
such a case that the particular book or play by A.,<br />
named X., has acquired already a trade reputation<br />
with the public. who identify it by the name X.<br />
The result is that when two or more books or<br />
plays are brought out at the same, or practically<br />
about the same time, under the same title, none of<br />
them can stop the others from using that title ;<br />
for in the early stages there can be no public repu-<br />
tation grown round any of them. That was the<br />
case which came before the Court of Appeal, where<br />
two serial tales appeared both in the same year,<br />
entitled ‘‘Splendid Misery,” one being by Miss<br />
Braddon.<br />
<br />
With a play, no doubt, if it were a success,<br />
the public reputation would grow round it, and<br />
become attached (as part of its “ goodwill’) very<br />
rapidly. But if a play be a failure, I take it that<br />
anybody can always produce another under the<br />
same name, for the whole doctrine of “ deceit ” or<br />
“* passing off” could not apply in such a case.<br />
<br />
When a play from its age or from its inferiority<br />
has no market reputation to draw the public it is<br />
obvious that no one who uses its name for another<br />
work is trying thereby to trade upon the reputation<br />
of the prior play.<br />
<br />
If two plays appeared about the same time at<br />
West End London theatres by authors of. equal<br />
fame or equally unknown, under the same title—<br />
although it might be an inconvenient thing, no<br />
action would lie—in the absence, that is to say, of<br />
any other evidence of “ deceit ” or of desire on the<br />
part of the less successful venture to create confu-<br />
sion in the public mind between the two plays.<br />
<br />
When the older play had a well-established<br />
market reputation attaching to it—which might<br />
accrue very rapidly—it would clearly be a risky<br />
business to bring out a new play under the same<br />
title, for the public would be sure to confuse the two,<br />
and the author of number 2 could hardly prove<br />
the innocence of his intentions in using that title.<br />
<br />
Between new plays a very slight difference in<br />
title would clearly prevent confusion.<br />
<br />
W. S. SHERRINGTON.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
—_1——+<br />
Tas New DEPARTURE IN EpITING.<br />
<br />
Drar?Str,—Will you allow me a few lines to<br />
reply to M.P.’s letter in the April Author on “ The<br />
New Departure in Editing ?”<br />
<br />
In the first place neither of the phrases which<br />
he quotes—* Feeble in plot” and “ Weak in style”<br />
—appears in the printed form which we send with<br />
returned manuscripts : and in the second place,<br />
our editorial comment 7s welcomed, as our corre-<br />
spondence testifies, by many hundreds of writers<br />
who have submitted stories for our consideration.<br />
<br />
It is difficult to understand M.P.’s attitude ;<br />
have editors been unkind to him ; is he an unsuc-<br />
cessful aspirant to literary fame ? I do not know.<br />
But I feel sure of one thing. No “self respecting<br />
writers ” (to use his own phrase) would wish to<br />
associate themselves with his views.<br />
<br />
A person who describes as impertinent a sugges-<br />
tion which, whatever its merits, was conceived in<br />
the interests of writers and is undoubtedly appreci-<br />
<br />
ated by them : who deliberately misquotes, or who ©<br />
<br />
does not take the trouble to read the document<br />
which he is criticising: and who speaks dis-<br />
paragingly of the stories published in magazines to<br />
which every author of repute is contributing, has<br />
certainly little claim for consideration at the hands<br />
of either author or editor.<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
Tue Epitor,<br />
Pearson’s Magazine.<br />
<br />
—1— 1 —<br />
<br />
Wuat’s In A NAME?<br />
<br />
Sir,—The pages of The Author have already<br />
chronicled certain views upon the important<br />
subject of the ownership of book-titles. Those<br />
interested in the matter—and who of us is not ?<br />
—-should refer to the October and December, 1896,<br />
and May, 1898, numbers of this journal, wherein<br />
sundry defensive methods similar to those now pro-<br />
posed by Miss Mary Cholmondeley were put forward.<br />
<br />
“(Can anything be done?” this lady aptly<br />
enquires. The passage of years has increased<br />
rather than lessened the difficulties of a solution.<br />
I imagine, however, the idea of a registration<br />
bureau of some sort founded on the lines indicated<br />
still finds most favour ; with, presumably, a time<br />
limit for the shelter of any bantling which may be<br />
catalogued.<br />
<br />
It certainly does seem hard that all the labour<br />
expended upon selecting an appropriate attractive<br />
name for a work in process of construction may<br />
become liable to wreckage through an unfortunate<br />
conflict of choice. The experience of many writers<br />
must point to vexatious collisions of this nature ;<br />
<br />
223<br />
<br />
in my own humble way I have been the victim of<br />
mishap. be ee<br />
<br />
It will be wise, therefore, to seek a safe remedy<br />
for one of the by no means minor trials which<br />
beset the paths of authorship. Union is strength.<br />
Combined effort should surely result in the dis-<br />
covery of some satisfactory scheme for the relief of<br />
a troubled community.<br />
<br />
Grcin CLARKE.<br />
<br />
—-—>—+—<br />
<br />
Srr,—I have adopted the above title, not because<br />
I intend to answer the question which it embodies,<br />
but because 1 propose to deal with some of the<br />
contents of Mary Cholmondeley’s communication<br />
under that heading in the April issue of The<br />
Author.<br />
<br />
In that are raised, among others, the questions of<br />
how to ascertain whether a title is new ; whether<br />
it is possible to institute a register of the titles of<br />
books, to which all new ones should be added ; and<br />
whether it is possible for arrangements to be made<br />
for securing a title in advance of the publication<br />
of the work, on payment of a fee.<br />
<br />
All of these questions are intimately connected<br />
with those of Registration of Copyright and the<br />
management of our National Library ; and, in<br />
what follows, I confine myself to books and to the<br />
British Isles.<br />
<br />
The suggestion of securing a title in advance of<br />
publication was mentioned in 7’%e Author of June,<br />
1894 (p. 6), as having been made by Mr. George<br />
Haven Putnam. It is one which could very easily<br />
be carried out if the chaos which, in this country,<br />
goes by the name of copyrighting were reduced to<br />
system.<br />
<br />
Such a proposed new title would, of course,<br />
need to be entered in a register, and that register<br />
would (likewise, of course) need to be kept at the<br />
office of registration. ‘The office at which pro-<br />
yisional copyright is thus to be secured would<br />
need, of course, to be the Copyright Registry, or<br />
Office; and, to enable the registrar to know<br />
whether any proposed title were new, he would<br />
need to be able to consult the register of titles<br />
already used.<br />
<br />
At present there is no such register ; there is<br />
only a list of those titles which have been regis-<br />
tered at Stationers’ Hall, and the British Museum<br />
catalogue. Now, Stationers’ Hall, where copy-<br />
rights are registered, is not a government institu-<br />
tion, but the head-quarters of the Company of<br />
Stationers, to whom the registering of copyright<br />
has been delegated, and it has no other means of<br />
ascertaining what title is new than from its own<br />
registers, which are not consulted unless the<br />
applicant makes special payment therefor. The<br />
British Museum catalogue is an author’s, and not a<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
224<br />
<br />
title-catalogue—except in the case of anonymous<br />
works—and search therein for a title is, therefore,<br />
extremely difficult.<br />
<br />
For the purposes of copyright in this country,<br />
registration of a work (which would, of course,<br />
include the title) is not necessary ; copyright comes<br />
into being from the mere fact of publication; neither<br />
is it necessary, to secure copyright, to deposit a<br />
copy of any work either at the Copyright Registry<br />
or at the National Library. Consequently, many<br />
works are not entered on the copyright register,<br />
although copies of them are to be found in the<br />
British Museum ; and, also, many works are not<br />
sent to the British Museum, because, although the<br />
delivery of a copy of all British-published books<br />
thereat is by law compulsory, there is such laxity<br />
in enforcing the law, that advantage is taken of it<br />
not to deliver them.<br />
<br />
There is, thus, no complete catalogue of British-<br />
published books.<br />
<br />
What is wanted to remedy this state of affairs<br />
is, first of all, that the Copyright Registry be made<br />
a branch of the National Library, and the registers<br />
of books in possession of the Company of Stationers<br />
be transferred to the British Museum. The<br />
second thing required is that the British Museum<br />
compile a titles-catalogue which, besides containing<br />
all the titles in the Stationers Company’s registers<br />
and in its own catalogue, should contain those of<br />
all books known to have been published in the<br />
British Isles, whether in the library or not. Those<br />
not in the library would be easy distinguishable<br />
from those present by the absence of a press-mark.<br />
<br />
The third thing required is that, to secure copy-<br />
right, registration of the work and the copyright-<br />
owner’s name, at the National Library, should be<br />
compulsory on the day of publication ; and that,<br />
at the time of registration, there should be delivered<br />
at the Copyright Registry (which would be the<br />
National Library) a copy of the work registered.<br />
No copyright should exist in any work published<br />
in this country unless those two conditions be<br />
fulfilled, and any one should be at liberty to<br />
reprint and sell such British-published works as<br />
had not been thus dealt with.<br />
<br />
A further condition, in the case of an anonymous<br />
work, should be the depositing, at the time of<br />
registration, a sealed envelope containing the<br />
writer’s name, which, unless permission be given<br />
previously, should be revealed at the expiration of,<br />
say, fifty years, or at the writer’s death.<br />
<br />
No charge should be made in the first instance<br />
for registration of the copyright, the book being<br />
regarded as its equivalent in value ; but charges<br />
might be made for a certified copy of any entry ;<br />
for the transference of a copyright ; and, where it<br />
is desired to register a title in advance, for an<br />
examination of the register.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
By the above-suggested means the ownership of<br />
the copyrights of all British-published books would<br />
always be beyond dispute, and all British-published<br />
books and their titles would find their way auto-<br />
matically into the National Library and its<br />
catalogue.<br />
<br />
As the novelty or otherwise of a title would,<br />
thus, be instantly ascertainable, an outcome of this<br />
proposed plan could easily be the registration, in<br />
a separate register, of new titles, in advance of<br />
publication, for a period of, say, one year, on pay-<br />
ment of, say, one guinea; and the ability, to<br />
secure a title temporarily would be a great con-<br />
venience to many writers, besides being a source<br />
of revenue to the Copyright Registry.<br />
<br />
The completing, so far as possible, the list of<br />
British-published works, would, I believe, help<br />
largely to complete a national collection of them ;<br />
and to have, as nearly as possible, a complete<br />
collection of British-published books is, it seems to<br />
me, one of the chief functions of a British National<br />
Library.<br />
<br />
Huprert Hags.<br />
——*——+—<br />
<br />
A PLEA FoR PEDANTRY.<br />
<br />
Sir,—I have been interested to see the mention<br />
of “that terrible compound whatever” in your<br />
correspondent’s letter under the above title. I<br />
am well aware that the word is under a ban. But<br />
I must confess that I have never understood the<br />
exact rationale of the ban. And I sometimes<br />
doubt whether those who are most inexorable in<br />
enforcing it themselves know exactly what it<br />
means. Does it mean that not whatever but what-<br />
soever is the correct form? Or does it mean,<br />
for this is what some of the expressions used seem<br />
to imply, that whatever is simply a vulgar equiva-<br />
lent of what? But whilst whatever and whatsoever<br />
are evidently interchangeable, it seems to me that<br />
there is the same distinction between what and<br />
whatever as between where and wherever, or between<br />
the Latin guod and quodcunque. And I think it<br />
would require some courage, or ignorance, to assert<br />
that quod and quodcunqgue have identical meanings.<br />
Of course to use whatever for what is a blunder ;<br />
but it is not an equal blunder to use what for<br />
whatever. When Rossetti (“House of Life,”<br />
Sonnet XLVII. 9) writes :—<br />
<br />
But now, whatever while the soul is fain<br />
To list that wonted murmur—<br />
<br />
it is evident that whatsoever might (if the verse<br />
would admit it) be substituted for whatever, but<br />
what would alter the meaning. 1 too “ am not an<br />
expert,” but I wish that one of your readers who is<br />
would kindly make the situation logically plain.<br />
<br />
ANOTHER MEMBER OF THE SOCIETY. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/493/1904-05-01-The-Author-14-8.pdf | publications, The Author |