485 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/485 | The Author, Vol. 13 Issue 10 (July 1903) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+13+Issue+10+%28July+1903%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 13 Issue 10 (July 1903)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1903-07-01-The-Author-13-10 | | | | | 253–280 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=13">13</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1903-07-01">1903-07-01</a> | | | | | | | 10 | | | 19030701 | Che #uthor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR<br />
<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
JUNE Ist, 1903.<br />
<br />
Vou. XIII.—No. 9.<br />
<br />
[Prick SrxpPENnog.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE TELEPHONE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Telephone connection has now been estab-<br />
lished, and the Society’s number is—<br />
<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
———_—__—_+—~@—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—-~<> +<br />
<br />
OR the opinions_expressed in papers that are<br />
K signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
THE Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
— +<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
THE List of Members of the Society of Authors,<br />
published 1902, can be obtained at the offices of<br />
the Society, at the price of 6d. net.<br />
<br />
It will be sold to the members of the Society<br />
only.<br />
<br />
—-—>+—<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
THE investments of the Pension Fund at<br />
present standing in the names of the Trustees are<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock; the<br />
<br />
Vou, XIII.<br />
<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
Coagole 25 Fees. £1000 0 6<br />
POCH) LOANS obec. 500 0 0<br />
Victorian Government 3 ‘ Consoli-<br />
<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ...............<br />
We lon<br />
<br />
291 19 Tt<br />
201 9 3s<br />
<br />
otal o1,995 9 2<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
<br />
1908.<br />
Jan. 1, Pickthall, Marmaduke 010 6<br />
»» Deane, Rey. A.C. . 010 06<br />
Jan. 4, Anonymous 0) 5. 6<br />
- Heath, Miss Ida 0 5 0<br />
“ Russell, G. H. ; Ll 0<br />
Jan. 16, White, Mrs. Caroline 0.5 06<br />
», Bedford, Miss Jessie 0 5. 0<br />
Jan..19, Shiers-Mason, Mrs. 0 35.0<br />
Jan. 20, Cobbett, Miss Alice ; 1 0 5 0<br />
Jan. 30, Minniken, Miss Bertha M.M. 1 0 0<br />
Jan. 31, Whishaw, Fred : - 0 10 0<br />
Feb. 3, Reynolds, Mrs. Fred 0 5b 0<br />
Feb. 11, Lincoln, C. . ; 0 5 0<br />
Feb. 16, Hardy, J. Herbert . 0° 5 0<br />
» Haggard, Major Arthur . 0° 5 0<br />
Feb. 23, Finnemore, John . 05 0<br />
Mar. 2, Moor, Mrs. St. C. . 1° 0 6<br />
Mar. 5, Dutton, Mrs. Carrie 015 6<br />
Apl.10, Bird, ©. PB. . : A - 0 10.6<br />
Apl. 10, Campbell, Miss Montgomery. 0 5 0<br />
May Lees, R. J... : ; 1 0<br />
: Wright, J. Fondi . ; ~ 905 6<br />
Donations.<br />
<br />
Jan. 8, Wheelright, Miss E. : , 0 10 6<br />
» Middlemass, Miss Jean . ~ 010 0<br />
<br />
Jan. 6, Avebury, The Right Hon.<br />
The Lord . D0 0<br />
» Gribble, Francis. : . 010 0<br />
Jan. 13, Boddington, Miss Helen . . 010 6<br />
Jan. 17, White, Mrs. Wollaston 11 0<br />
» Miller, Miss E. T. . 0 5.0<br />
Jan. 19, Kemp, Miss Geraldine 010 6<br />
<br />
<br />
226<br />
<br />
Jan. 20, Sheldon, Mrs. French . - 0) 5) 0<br />
Jan. 29, Roe, Mrs. Harcourt : . 0 16 0<br />
Feb. 9, Sherwood, Mrs. . : » 0-10 6<br />
Feb. 16, Hocking, The Rev. Silas 210<br />
Feb. 18, Boulding, J. W. . : . 010 6<br />
, Ord, Hubert H. . ‘ de)<br />
Teb. 20, Price, Miss Eleanor : . 010 0<br />
» Carlile, Rev. J. C.. : . 010 0<br />
Feb. 24, Dixon, Mrs. . : : a2 0-0<br />
Feb. 26, Speakman, Mrs. . : . 010 0<br />
Mar. 5, Parker, Mrs. Nella 2 0 10° 0<br />
Mar. 16, Hallward,N. LL. . : ll 0<br />
Mar. 20, Henry, Miss Alice . : - 0 8.9<br />
» Mathieson, Miss Annie . . 010 0<br />
<br />
» Browne, T. A. (“ Rolfe Boldre-<br />
wood”) . j : : 12 0<br />
Mar. 23, Ward, Mrs. Humphry. 110.0. 0<br />
Apl. 2, Hutton, The Rev. W. H. - 2070<br />
Apl. 14, Tournier, Theodore : 0 2) 0<br />
May King, Paul H. : : ~ 010-90<br />
: Wynne, Charles Whitworth .10 0 90<br />
» 21, Orred J. Randal . : pedo E70<br />
<br />
The following members have also made subscrip-<br />
tions or donations :—<br />
<br />
Meredith, George, President of the Society.<br />
<br />
Thompson, Sir Henry, Bart., F.R.C.S.<br />
<br />
Rashdall, The Rev. H.<br />
<br />
Guthrie, Anstey.<br />
<br />
Robertson, C. B.<br />
<br />
Dowsett, C. F.<br />
<br />
There are in addition other subscribers who do<br />
not desire that either their names or the amount<br />
they are subscribing should be printed.<br />
<br />
Se<br />
Sir Walter Besant Memorial Fund.<br />
Tur amount standing to the credit<br />
<br />
of this account in the Bank is......... £336 4 9<br />
May 22, Orred J. Randal............... Lied<br />
—____—<>—_e____\_<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
ee<br />
<br />
HE Committee of the Society of Authors met<br />
on May 6th. Mr. Douglas Freshfield took<br />
the chair.<br />
<br />
‘Twelve members and associates were elected to<br />
the Society. The list is printed below.<br />
<br />
The case of Parry v. Gollancz, with all the papers<br />
and letters, was laid before the Committee and<br />
carefully considered. The Committee decided to<br />
issue a summary of the case with comments in<br />
The Author, (See article, page 232.)<br />
<br />
The agent of the Society in New York has been<br />
forced to give up the work of the Society owing to<br />
the fact that he has taken up the work of a<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
literary agent. As he candidly expresses it, “ he<br />
found it difficult to have to write peremptory<br />
letters of demand to editors and publishers, when<br />
at the same time he might be offering them MSS.<br />
for acceptance.” Accordingly, the Society has<br />
been obliged to appoint another agent, and the<br />
Committee have nominated Mr. Morris P. Ferris,<br />
counsellor-at-law.<br />
<br />
‘There were two or three cases before the Com-<br />
mittee. One dealt with the loss of a MS. by a<br />
publisher. It was decided to take the matter up<br />
on behalf of the member, as from the circumstances<br />
connected with the case, it appeared that the<br />
publisher had shown considerable negligence.<br />
<br />
Another case, that of alleged breach of agree-<br />
ment by a publisher, the Committee found they<br />
were unable to support, as the solicitors of the<br />
Society did not consider that there was cause for<br />
legal action.<br />
<br />
It was decided not to republish the list of<br />
members during the current year, but in the<br />
autumn, to publish a supplementary list of those<br />
members who had been elected since the last<br />
publication.<br />
<br />
oo<br />
<br />
Cases,<br />
<br />
Tue last statement of the cases taken up by<br />
the Society was printed in the March number of<br />
The Author. Since that date forty-three have been<br />
before the Secretary. They may be subdivided as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
Ten for the return of MSS. ; three for accounts ;<br />
five for accounts and money ; eighteen for money<br />
due ; one dealing with the false advertisement of a<br />
book; one with the infringement of copyright ;<br />
five embracing disputes which cannot be classed<br />
under any particular heading.<br />
<br />
The Secretary is pleased to report that all the<br />
cases chronicled in the March number of The<br />
Author have either been settled or have been placed<br />
in the hands of the solicitors.. All the cases from<br />
that date up to the beginning of April have also<br />
been settled or placed in the solicitors’ hands, with<br />
the exception of one case, where the author—<br />
unfortunately living abroad—had a claim against a<br />
magazine for non-payment.<br />
<br />
The record of the ten claims for the return of<br />
MSS. is as follows :—<br />
<br />
One case has been placed in the hands of the<br />
Society’s solicitors, to enable the member to claim<br />
damages for loss of a MS. by a publisher, as it<br />
appeared clear to the Committee that the publisher<br />
had been negligent. In two cases there has been<br />
<br />
no evidence that the MSS. had been received at<br />
<br />
the office of the paper. In the remaining seven<br />
<br />
the MSS. have been returned at the request of the<br />
<br />
Secretary.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Set<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In the three demands for accounts the Secretary<br />
has been able to obtain the requisite statement,<br />
with the exception of one case against a well-known<br />
firm that is always dilatory in meeting the demands<br />
of the author or the Secretary of the Society for<br />
details of this kind. No doubt a little mild<br />
persuasion will bring about the requisite result,<br />
<br />
There has been an increase with regard to demand<br />
for unpaid moneys, and the result. of the Secretary’s<br />
applications may be catalogued as follows :—<br />
<br />
In the claims for accounts and money two have<br />
been partially settled—this means that part of the<br />
money due has been paid, the rest will no doubt<br />
follow. One has been completely settled, and two<br />
are still in the course of negotiation. The last are<br />
demands against an American publisher, whose<br />
name is well known on the English market, but<br />
whose methods of doing business when it comes to<br />
the settlement of accounts appear to be far from<br />
satisfactory. In six cases the money has been<br />
paid without any difficulty. In five the matters<br />
have had to go into the hands of the Society’s<br />
solicitors. Two cases are still unsettled, and in one<br />
it is impossible to enforce the Society’s claim owing<br />
to the fact that the member resides abroad.<br />
<br />
This is, on the whole, a satisfactory record,<br />
especially when it is remembered that those matters<br />
referred to the solicitors deal with magazines that<br />
are most probably either in liquidation or on the<br />
verge of Jiquidation. The case of infringement of<br />
copyright has been satisfactorily settled. A full<br />
statement of this was printed in 7he Author. The<br />
false advertisement has also been remedied, and<br />
the remaining matters—various disputes on con-<br />
tracts—are in the course of negotiation.<br />
<br />
Out of thewhole forty-three there are only thirteen<br />
which have not been closed as far as the work of<br />
the Secretary is concerned. Some of them, as<br />
mentioned above, are being continued in other<br />
hands, it is hoped with satisfactory result.<br />
<br />
NEES “ESSE<br />
<br />
May Elections.<br />
4, Gray’s Inn Squares<br />
<br />
W.C.<br />
<br />
Scarborough.<br />
<br />
Wentworth House, Key-<br />
mer, Sussex.<br />
<br />
The Cedars, Denmark<br />
Avenue, Wimbledon,<br />
<br />
Aitken, Robert<br />
<br />
Alcock, Joseph Crosby .<br />
Arthur, Miss Mary<br />
<br />
Bedford, Mrs.<br />
<br />
SW.<br />
Dickinson, F. James 6, Claremont Terrace,<br />
Hargreaves, F.R.S.L. Claremont Park,<br />
Blackpool.<br />
<br />
Lees, Robert James<br />
<br />
. Engelbery, Ilfracombe.<br />
Macdonald, Mrs. A. E. .<br />
<br />
Gordon Road, Gordon,<br />
Sydney, N.S. Wales,<br />
Australia.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 227<br />
<br />
Merriman,<br />
B.C,<br />
Pickering, Sidney .<br />
Smith, Miss M. C,<br />
<br />
Labor A., Freetown, Sierra Leone.<br />
<br />
Stratton, Falmouth.<br />
<br />
Gretna Hall, Gretna<br />
Green,<br />
<br />
200, Stockwell Road,<br />
Brixton, 8.W,<br />
<br />
Colonial Institute,<br />
Northumberland<br />
Avenue, W.C.<br />
<br />
Trost, Johann<br />
<br />
Wright, Edward Fondi .<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
+-—<—e<br />
<br />
OUR BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
ae<br />
<br />
| PROFESSOR RHYS DAVIDS’ “Buddhist<br />
<br />
| India” in the Stories of the Nations Series,<br />
<br />
may be out any day now. It was all passed<br />
for press some time ago, but it is being printed in<br />
America. he Professor has just finished editing<br />
the issues of the Pali Text Society for 1903 ; they<br />
form the Journal of that Society. He has also<br />
edited the second volume of “The Digha” in<br />
conjunction with Mr. E. Carpenter. These are<br />
now ready for distribution to members.<br />
<br />
The Government of India has determined to<br />
publish, through the Royal Asiatic Society, two<br />
series of historical volumes. Of these, one is on<br />
the History of India before the arrival of the<br />
English, and will be under the editorship of<br />
Professor Rhys Davids.<br />
<br />
The first volumes to be published will deal with<br />
the historical geography of ancient India, and<br />
with the historical evidence contained in the<br />
Vedas. The other series, to be called The Records<br />
Series, will embrace the period after the arrival of<br />
the English, and will consist mainly of official<br />
documents. The first volume will deal with the<br />
events connected with the Black Hole of Calcutta.<br />
<br />
Mr. Arnold White has had a trying experience :<br />
He lost, during the fire at the Hotel du Palais, at<br />
Biarritz, the MS. of the work on which he was<br />
engaged. It is a continuation of the series on<br />
Efficiency which began eighteen years ago in “The<br />
Problems of a Great City,” and ended in his last<br />
two books—* Efficiency and Empire,” and “ For<br />
Efficiency.”<br />
<br />
Mr. White, however, hopes in the course of the<br />
next twelve months to re-write and complete a<br />
work on National Efficiency, especially with regard<br />
to government and municipal administration, and<br />
its effects on the pockets, the health, and the lives<br />
of citizens of the Empire.<br />
<br />
Miss Mabel Quiller Couch, whose short stories<br />
are well known, has published two volumes of them<br />
under the titles of “The Recovery of Jane Vercoe,”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
228<br />
<br />
and “Some Western Folk.” At present she is<br />
completing serial work already ordered, but she<br />
means in the near future to write a story for girls<br />
on somewhat new lines. Our readers may remember<br />
a very interesting volume entitled, “ The Holy Wells<br />
of Cornwall,” which Miss Mabel Quiller Couch wrote<br />
in conjunction with her sister.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Mary M. Banks is engaged in editing a<br />
MS. collection of tales of the fifteenth century for<br />
the Early English Text Society. Some two years<br />
ago Mrs. Banks edited the alliterative ‘‘ Morte<br />
Arthur,” published by Messrs. Longmans. Since<br />
then she has given lectures on modern literature,<br />
besides writing articles on literary subjects.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Swan Sonnenschein have in preparation<br />
for the autumn a romance of Italy in the thirteenth<br />
century, by Emily Underdown (Norley Chester).<br />
This firm lately published “ Dante and Beatrice,”<br />
a play in blank verse suggested by episodes in the<br />
Vita Nuova, by the same author. It forms one of<br />
a series started by Miss Elsie Fogerty. “ Dante<br />
and Beatrice” is also published in a tastefully<br />
got-up edition, with a reproduction of Rossetti’s<br />
painting, “ Dante’s Dream,” as a frontispiece.<br />
<br />
Members of the Society will be interested to<br />
know that Mr. Poulteney Bigelow has been asked<br />
to address the United States Naval War College<br />
at Newport, on German Colonisation, on the 16th<br />
of June. This is the college before which Captain<br />
Mahan delivered his lectures on “‘ The Influence of<br />
Sea Power on History ”—a book which has been<br />
translated into almost every tongue, and yet<br />
which, at the time, was declined by the Harpers.<br />
<br />
Lismore, which the King is to visit next<br />
August, is the “ Innisdoyle ” of Julia M. Crottie’s<br />
“ Neighbours,” a book of Irish sketches, published<br />
by T. Fisher Unwin a year or two ago. Lismore<br />
is a quiet old town, beautifully situated on the<br />
poet Spenser’s Blackwater, and although now<br />
fallen away from its ancient importance, still<br />
possesses some features of interest in its fine old<br />
abbey and castle.<br />
<br />
Mr. Frank Rutter, the editor of To-day, has<br />
just published, through R. A. Everett & Co.,<br />
a little volume of scenes and characters from<br />
eee life. ‘‘’Varsity Types” is the title<br />
of it.<br />
<br />
“Varsity Types” has a dozen illustrations by<br />
Stephen Haweis. The dedication runs thus—‘‘ To<br />
those who unconsciously have posed as models for<br />
the following sketches, this little volume is grate-<br />
fully and affectionately dedicated by the author.”<br />
Among the entertaining characters are ‘“ The<br />
Swot,” “The Trophy Maniac,” “ The Snob,” and<br />
“The Bedder,” while “‘ Ditton Corner,” “ An Art-<br />
less Dean,” and “An Academic Court-Martial,”<br />
are scenes to laugh over.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Miss Julie Sutter’s book on the Social Problems<br />
—Brirain’s Next Campaign ”—has just been<br />
issued at a shilling net (320 pp.) by R. Brimley<br />
Johnson, 4, Adam Street, Adelphi, W.C. The<br />
Daily News this winter thought it worth while to<br />
publish a series of articles from its pages, and Sir<br />
John McDougall (as chairman of the London<br />
County Council) invites ‘every Londoner, official<br />
on non-official, to make himself acquainted with<br />
this book.” Both he and Canon Scott Holland<br />
head the volume with a preface.<br />
<br />
Mr. F. Stroud’s publishers will issue almost<br />
immediately a much-enlarged edition of his Judicial<br />
Dictionary. It will be in three thick volumes of<br />
about nine hundred pages each. The work is<br />
unique in that, whilst it is a dictionary in the<br />
ordinary sense of that word, yet the pivot on which<br />
it moves is that it deals with the English of affairs<br />
as expounded by the English Judges and by<br />
Parliament.<br />
<br />
To search for verbal definitions through the<br />
many hundreds of volumes of Reports of Cases,<br />
and the Statute Book from Magna Charta down-<br />
wards, and to harmonise the authoritative exposition<br />
of words and phrases culled from these sources,<br />
must have been an enormous task, requiring much<br />
prior knowledge and the unfailing patience of years.<br />
The idea of this edition is to bring down the<br />
exposition from the earliest times to the end of the<br />
nineteenth century. Whilst we should imagine it<br />
to be indispensable to the practising lawyer, the<br />
book cannot fail to be of general interest, for inci-<br />
dentally it frequently presents striking phases of<br />
the picturesque past.<br />
<br />
Mr. Percy White has been kind enough to send<br />
us the following interesting extract from a letter<br />
written to him by a great admirer of George<br />
Meredith. The writer is himself a novelist and<br />
man of letters :—<br />
<br />
“THE Two MEREDITHS.<br />
<br />
“T am reading ‘ Evan Harrington,’ in the original edition<br />
of 1861. I find that in the final edition, published by<br />
Constable, many admirable passages have been cut out, and<br />
a good deal of broad humour and fun has been lost. An<br />
interesting little paper might be made on a comparison of<br />
the two editions—the old Meredith pruning the younger.<br />
It is remarkable how completely ‘modern’ this book of<br />
1861 reads—a book which might have been written to-day,<br />
whilst its successful contemporaries, ‘ Framley Parsonage,’<br />
‘The Silver Chord,’ ‘The Woman in White,’ &c., are all as<br />
old-fashioned and uncouth as the crinolines, matador hats,<br />
and chenille hair nets of the early sixties.”<br />
<br />
“ Park Lane” is the title of Mr. Percy White’s<br />
new novel—needless to say a very readable one—<br />
which has been published by Messrs. Constable<br />
at 6s.<br />
<br />
Mr. G. W. Forrest, O.1.E., ex-Director of Records,<br />
Government of India, and author of “ Sepoy<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Generals,” has published through the same firm a<br />
copiously illustrated book called ‘‘ Cities of India”<br />
(10s. 6d. net). Mr. Forrest, who is one of the<br />
greatest living authorities on the ancient and<br />
modern history of India, has seen with his own<br />
eyes the cities he so admirably describes. The<br />
illustrations are excellent.<br />
<br />
’ The Transactions of the Royal Society of Litera-<br />
<br />
ture are being edited, as indeed they have been<br />
‘since 1894, by Perey W. Ames, LL.D., F.S.A.<br />
Besides publishing the following addresses : ‘‘ Posi-<br />
tivism in Literature,” “Supposed Source of the Vicar<br />
of Wakefield,” ‘‘ Racial and Individual Tempera-<br />
ments,” ‘‘ Superstition, Science, and Philosophy,”<br />
“Poetry and Science of Archeology,” &c., &c., Dr.<br />
Ames, in 1900, edited, with introduction and one<br />
lecture, “‘Chaucer Memorial Lectures.” In 1898<br />
he edited, with an historical sketch of the Princess<br />
Elizabeth and Margaret of Navarre, “The Mirror<br />
of the Sinful Soul.” Before that he edited, with<br />
an introductory address, a volume of “ Afternoon<br />
Lectures on English Literature.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Sydney Lee has brought to a close his tour<br />
in America. He has been accorded an enthusiastic<br />
reception in the Hastern and the Western States.<br />
He has given fifty-three Jectures, and has travelled<br />
by rail more than ten thousand miles. Besides<br />
delivering addresses before the Library Association<br />
at Washington and the State University of North<br />
Carolina, Mr. Lee lectured at Staten Island, New<br />
York, at the request of Mr. William Winter, in aid<br />
of the library founded by him in memory of his son,<br />
the late Mr. Arthur Winter.<br />
<br />
Mr. Lee also gave addresses on Shakespeare at<br />
Indianapolis and before the State Universities of<br />
Ohio and Indiana.<br />
<br />
Among recently published books by members of<br />
the Society is Mr. Justin McCarthy’s ‘British<br />
Political Leaders” (T. Fisher Unwin: 7s. 6d.<br />
net). Though all may not agree with his point<br />
of view, may not see eye to eye with him, yet<br />
readers can scarcely fail to find this volume attrac-<br />
tive. It is charmingly written.<br />
<br />
There is also a couple of volumes issued by Mr.<br />
John Murray, entitled, ‘‘ More letters of Charles<br />
Darwin,” being a record of his work in a series of<br />
hitherto unpublished letters, edited by Francis<br />
Darwin, Fellow of Christ’s College, and A. C.<br />
Seward, Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge.<br />
(32s. net.)<br />
<br />
Then, Mrs. Gertrude Atherton, whose remarkable<br />
novel, “The Conqueror,’ we all remember, has<br />
now published, through Harpers, “A Few of<br />
Hamilton’s Letters.” Those who are interested in<br />
<br />
that famous man’s personality will find this selection<br />
from his correspondence well worth reading.<br />
<br />
229<br />
<br />
Professor E. Ray Lankester, F.R.S., etc., Direc-<br />
tor of the British Museum of Natural History,<br />
has contributed a Preface to Mr. S. Theodore<br />
Andrea Cook’s book, ‘ Spirals in Nature and Art”<br />
(John Murray). This is a study of spiral forma-<br />
tions based on the manuscripts of Leonardo da<br />
Vinci, with special reference to the architecture of<br />
the open staircase at Blois in Touraine, now for<br />
the first time shown to be from his designs. This<br />
interesting volume is 7s. 6d. net.<br />
<br />
Miss Marie Corelli recently addressed a crowded<br />
meeting of the O. P. Club in the large hall of<br />
the Criterion Restaurant. Miss Corelli spoke<br />
on “The Trust on behalf of the Nation at<br />
Stratford-on-Avon.” She protested against the<br />
destruction of any buildings in Heniey Street, par-<br />
ticularly such old and valuable ones as were seen<br />
and known by Shakespeare, and were on that<br />
account priceless to the literary and dramatic<br />
world of to-day. Especially did she plead for the<br />
quaint little half-timbered dwelling of Thomas<br />
Green, once town clerk of Stratford and cousin of<br />
Shakespeare.<br />
<br />
Miss Corelli protested against the proposed<br />
destructive alterations, and earnestly requested<br />
that a committee might be formed to inquire<br />
into the case she put forward. She considered<br />
that the culpable ignorance and carelessness of<br />
the Executive Committee of the Shakespearean<br />
Trust proved that the time had come when their<br />
national duty should be taken up by a wider,<br />
more educated and more Shakespearean body. An<br />
appeal to Parliament for the preservation of Henley<br />
Street was being sent out for signature, and there<br />
was every reason to believe that it would bereceived<br />
with favour.<br />
<br />
The clause in the Employment of Children Bill<br />
which prohibits the appearance of children under<br />
fourteen upon the stage has evoked a series of<br />
protesting letters in the Daily Telegraph from<br />
such authorities as Sir Henry Irving, Miss Ellen<br />
Terry, Miss Ellaline Terriss, Mr. George Alexander,<br />
Mr. Beerbohm Tree, Messrs. Frederick Harrison<br />
and Cyril Maude, and Mr. Arthur Collins and<br />
Mr. F. W. Wyndham. We have room for two<br />
quotations only. Miss Ellen Terry says :<br />
<br />
“T cannot remain silent when I hear of disaster threaten-<br />
ing our future actors and actresses. Sir Henry Irving and<br />
others have urged the cruelty of taking joy and pleasure<br />
from the lives of children by prohibiting their employment<br />
on the stage. I go further, and say that the effect of such<br />
a law will be to take education from them, education in the<br />
widest sense technical. I can put my finger at once on the<br />
actors and actresses who were not on the stage when<br />
children. Withall their hard work they can never acquire<br />
afterwards the perfect unconsciousness which they learn<br />
then soeasily. .. . lam anactress, but first 1 am a woman<br />
and I love children. I don’tsay that the conditions under<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
230<br />
<br />
which they work on the stage are perfect. I could point to<br />
many things which IJ should like tosee altered, particularly<br />
the practice of their being too many hours at a stretch in<br />
the theatre, as is the case when they are employed in two<br />
performances on one day. But surely it is not right to<br />
sweep away a fine training for children because it has<br />
faults ?”<br />
<br />
The second extract is from Mr. Tree’s letter :<br />
<br />
“T will leave to others the task of pointing out in detail<br />
how desirable it is for the children of poor parents to have<br />
the opportunity of learning in their early years those<br />
habits of obedience, cleanliness and orderliness which are<br />
part of the discipline of every well-regulated theatre ; also<br />
the social value to them in after life of daily mixing, while<br />
still young, with those who can teach them good manners<br />
and self-respect. The one point I am most anxious to<br />
make is this: The Bill as it stands would not only deprive<br />
the children of these benefits, but would also deprive<br />
hundreds of thousands of the public of the pleasure they<br />
derive from those theatrical performances (such as panto-<br />
mime, and the like), from which the services of children<br />
areinseparable. Moreover, any such new legislation would<br />
practically banish from our stage many of Shakespeare's<br />
most-admired plays, such as “The Midsummer Night's<br />
Dream,” “ The Tempest,” “ A Winter’s Tale,” ‘The Merry<br />
Wives of Windsor,” ‘Richard III,” “King John,” and<br />
other classical works. It is needless to point out that these<br />
remarks apply equally to grand opera and public concerts<br />
whenever the services of children form an integral part of<br />
the entertainment.”<br />
<br />
All the letters are worthy of careful considera-<br />
tion, and we refer our readers to the particular<br />
issue of the Daily Telegraph from which we have<br />
quoted, 7.¢., that of Monday, May 18th.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
———_—_—__- ~~<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—— ><br />
<br />
ANATOLE FRANCE’S novel, “ Histoire<br />
Mi e Comique,” is now published in volume<br />
form, after running through the Revue<br />
de Paris as a serial. There is nothing comic<br />
about it except the one word in the title. It is, in<br />
fact, a most gruesome story. Félicie, an actress<br />
who is considered a star, has deserted her lover of<br />
less prosperous days for a young aristocrat, Robert<br />
de Ligny. ‘The ex-lover, Chevalier, warns her of<br />
his own jealousy and begs her to return to him.<br />
She pays no attention to his words and one day,<br />
when she is coming away from a rendezvous<br />
with de Ligny, Chevalier commits suicide in her<br />
presence.<br />
From this day forth Félicie has no peace of<br />
mind. The dead man’s face seems to haunt her,<br />
and at the most unexpected times and places she<br />
fancies that she sees him.<br />
<br />
Chevalier had been an actor, and all his thea-<br />
trical friends undertake the arrangements for his<br />
funeral. The Church refuses the burial service on<br />
account of the suicide, and Félicie, who hopes that<br />
the holy water may lay the ghost of the dead man,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
joins with her comrades in insisting on the religious<br />
rites being performed. A certain Dr. Trublet, the<br />
medical adviser of the theatre to which Félicie<br />
belongs, is the philosopher whom we usually meet<br />
in Anatole France’s books. In this instance the<br />
artistes have recourse to him for a certificate<br />
proving that Chevalier was insane when he shot<br />
himself. A priest had suggested, in a wily way,<br />
that the dead man had, perhaps, not been respon-<br />
sible for his actions, and that if this could be<br />
proved the Church would not refuse to bury him.<br />
Dr. Trublet accordingly searches among his learned<br />
books, and finds various instances of temporary<br />
insanity. He delivers a long harangue on the<br />
subject of free will and determinism. His con-<br />
cluding argument is that the world is an amusing<br />
place on the whole, and that Chevalier must have<br />
been more insane than other men, since he had<br />
voluntarily resigned his place here. The certificate<br />
that he makes out is so full of technical terms that<br />
the doctor declares that it is “ too utterly devoid<br />
of any sense to contain a lie.”<br />
<br />
The funeral service is accordingly held in the<br />
church, All the artistes attend the ceremony and<br />
then proceed to the cemetery, but they are all so<br />
much occupied with their own private affairs and<br />
with ull the gossip and scandal they have to tell<br />
each other, that they only remember at intervals<br />
what has brought them all there together.<br />
Immediately after the funeral Félicie goes with<br />
her lover to luncheon at a _ restaurant, and<br />
endeavours to forget the dead man.<br />
<br />
It is of no use, though, and to the end of the<br />
story she is haunted by his reproachful eyes.<br />
There is not much plot and there is a great deal<br />
that is unpleasant in the book, but the keen<br />
observation, the delicate sarcasm, and, above all, the<br />
perfect style and language are all to be found in<br />
“ Histoire Comique” as in every work by Anatole<br />
France.<br />
<br />
In Brada’s new novel, “Retour du Flot,” we<br />
have a subject which lends itself well to the<br />
weaving of a romance. The mystery is that it<br />
has not been adopted more frequently by authors.<br />
<br />
It is the story of a woman who, after several<br />
years of happiness in her married life, loses her<br />
little girl and cannot recover from her grief. Her<br />
husband, who was also devotedly fond of the child,<br />
wearies of the gloominess of his home and the<br />
constant sadness of his wife and seeks amusement<br />
elsewhere.<br />
<br />
On discovering that he has been faithless to her<br />
his wife applies for a divorce and will hear of no:<br />
compromise.<br />
<br />
After two or three years of loneliness and misery<br />
she consents to marry a cousin who has always<br />
loved her, and who is a man of fine character. She<br />
is quite resigned to her new lot in life when, on the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 231<br />
<br />
sixth anniversary of her little girl’s death, as she<br />
is walking past her old home, she meets her first<br />
husband. He saves her from being knocked down<br />
by a vehicle as she is crossing the road. It is the<br />
first time they have met since their divorce, and<br />
they both realise, as they talk to each other once<br />
more, the fatal mistake they made in the old<br />
days.<br />
<br />
The struggle which now takes place in the<br />
woman’s heart between the love which has never<br />
died and her new duties is described with great<br />
delicacy.<br />
<br />
The loneliness and misery of the man who had<br />
formerly been everything to her appeal to her ;<br />
and when he begs her to meet him again she con-<br />
sents, Her life during the next few months is<br />
almost unbearable. The book is charming to the<br />
very end, and the dénowement seems most natural.<br />
All the characters live, and there is no seeking<br />
after effect. It is merely a simple story told in the<br />
most simple and natural way possible.<br />
<br />
During the last year the books which have been<br />
most discussed here have been those written by<br />
women. ‘This may seem rather flattering to the<br />
fortunate writers of them, but it is only fair to add<br />
that much of the discussion has been on the subject<br />
of the exaggeration of women writers, as shown in<br />
several of their recent novels.<br />
<br />
Judging by some specimens of these realistic<br />
novels that have been before the public, it seems<br />
as though “women rush in where men fear to<br />
tread.”<br />
<br />
In “La Maison du Péché” we had an example<br />
of this, and still more recently in “ La Nouvelle<br />
Espérance.” “ I,’ Inconstante,” too, is a novel that<br />
has astonished everyone, coming, as it does, from<br />
the pen of a woman.<br />
<br />
Exaggeration of this kind cannot be attributed<br />
to Madame Daniel Lesueur in the novel she has just<br />
published, “ Le Coeur Chemine.” It is a delight-<br />
fully natural story of a woman who makes the dis-<br />
covery that she is not as happy as she thought<br />
she was in her married life. Thanks to a poet<br />
whom she had known years before, and whom<br />
she meets by accident at Antwerp, she makes this<br />
discovery. She has accompanied her husband on<br />
one of his business journeys to Antwerp and<br />
Bruges, and the poet wanders through the<br />
museums and churches with her, with the result<br />
that she realises how prosaic her life is.<br />
<br />
There is no strong plot running through this<br />
book: it is just a psychological study from beginning<br />
toend. The poet makes love to the wife of the<br />
prosaic husband, and she is tempted to promise, at<br />
any rate, to be his friend and his muse. Things<br />
cannot stop at this stage, but just at a critical<br />
moment the wife discovers the nobility of character<br />
of her husband and remains faithful to him. As<br />
<br />
the years go by life is again most monotonous, and<br />
once more the poet crosses her path. She has<br />
another terrible struggle with herself, and once<br />
more comes out victorious,<br />
<br />
The minor characters in the story are all well<br />
drawn, and the author only attempts to show us<br />
the workings of the heart of all these human beings<br />
without trying to explain at all why so much that<br />
is unsatisfactory should remain so to the end. It<br />
is, as she says, a most pitiful mystery that one<br />
should be compelled to make sacrifices which, as<br />
far as we can see, do no final good, although they<br />
cost us so much.<br />
<br />
The second volume of “Souvenirs sur Madame<br />
de Maintenon” has just been published by the<br />
Count d’Haussonville and M. Hanotaux. It is one<br />
of the most interesting books that has yet appeared<br />
on this subject, as it contains the famous “ Cahiers<br />
de Mademoiselle d’Aumale.” We get a detailed<br />
account of life at the French Court under Louis XIYV.,<br />
dating from his liaison with Madame de Montespan.<br />
<br />
In the Preface, by M. Hanotaux, we are told<br />
that Madame de Maintenon wished “to remain an<br />
enigma to posterity,’ and that she only intended<br />
those papers about her life to be published which<br />
she had prepared for publication. It was on this<br />
account that Madame de Maintenon destroyed all<br />
her correspondence with Louis XIV, and with<br />
various other persons. ‘<br />
<br />
Mademoiselle d’Aumale commences her memoirs<br />
with a chapter on “Madame de Maintenon and<br />
Madame de Montespan.” Another chapter is on<br />
the ‘‘Duchesse de Bourgogne,” and there is also<br />
an account of the death of Louis XIV., which<br />
Mademoiselle d’Aumale witnessed,<br />
<br />
“Zette”’ is the title of the new story by MM.<br />
Paul et Victor Margueritte.<br />
<br />
“L’Amoureuse Rédemption,” by M. Armand<br />
Charpentier, is a strong book which appears to be<br />
having great success.<br />
<br />
Among other new novels are “ Ballons Rouges,”<br />
by Madame de Bovet, “TL Etape Silencieuse,” by<br />
Jean Saint-Yves, and “ Petite Fille d’Amiral,” by<br />
Pierre Maél.<br />
<br />
A new poet has also come to the front with a<br />
volume entitled “Jamais,” the preface of which<br />
is written by M. Sully Prudhomme. The poet is<br />
M. Charles Reculoux.<br />
<br />
Various books on religious questions have been<br />
published recently, and are no doubt due to the<br />
agitation now going on here with reference to the<br />
Congregations.<br />
<br />
One of these books is “ Le Concordat de 1801,<br />
ses Origines et son Histoire,” by Cardinal Mathieu ;<br />
and another is “La Révolution Francaise et les<br />
Congrégations,” by M. Aulard.<br />
<br />
At the last meeting of the French Academy<br />
literary prizes were awarded to Madame Bentzon<br />
<br />
<br />
232<br />
<br />
and to MM. Adolphe: Brisson, Mandat-Grancey,<br />
Pontsevrez, Victor du Bled, de Pommerol and<br />
A. Halley.<br />
<br />
The chief theatrical event here has been the<br />
production of Maeterlinck’s new play, “ Joyzelle,”<br />
at the Gymnase Theatre. Space forbids our giving<br />
<br />
any details about this piece this month.<br />
<br />
There is an excellent article on “ The Works of<br />
Maeterlinck ” in the May number of the Interna-<br />
tional Theatre, which gives a very good idea of the<br />
chief features of this author’s books and plays.<br />
<br />
M. Mirbeau’s piece at the Francais may be pro-<br />
nounced a success, and we hear it is to be put on<br />
the English stage by Mr. Alexander as “ Business<br />
is Business.”<br />
<br />
The great theme of the play is the influence of<br />
money in modern society. It is a somewhat daring<br />
piece and the banker is a cleverly drawn type of<br />
the financier of our times.<br />
<br />
“Le Ruban Rouge” is a melodrama taken from<br />
the novel by M. Pierre Sales, whose success as a<br />
« fenilletonist” has been as marked. It has been<br />
put on at the Ambigu, and was very much<br />
appreciated by the house.<br />
<br />
In honour of M. Rostand’s reception at the<br />
Academy, Madame Sarah Bernhardt will revive<br />
“J Aiglon” at her theatre, and M. Coquelin will<br />
give ‘Cyrano de Bergerac” at the Porte Saint-<br />
<br />
Martin.<br />
Auys HALLARD.<br />
<br />
__ 9<br />
<br />
PARRY y. MORING AND GOLLANCZ.<br />
<br />
—+—~<—+ —<br />
<br />
N this action, to which two members of the<br />
Society, Judge Parry and Mr. Gollancz, were<br />
parties, a point of considerable literary im-<br />
<br />
portance was decided, and several others were raised<br />
either in the pleadings or in the newspaper con-<br />
troversy which followed it.<br />
<br />
The facts on which the action was based are<br />
briefly as follows :—<br />
<br />
In 1888 Judge Parry obtained from their then<br />
owner, the Rev. 8. R. Longe, with a view to pub-<br />
lication, copies of the original letters written before<br />
marriage by Dorothy Osborne to Sir William<br />
Temple in A.D. 1652-4. To the originals them-<br />
selves he had no access. The copies were made<br />
by the daughter-in-law of the owner, and the<br />
gratuitous offer of them had been occasioned by<br />
the publication in April, 1886, in the English<br />
Illustrated Magazine, of a sketch by Judge Parry,<br />
compiled from Courtenay’s “ Life of Temple,”<br />
and entitled Dorothy Osborne, Judge Parry<br />
re-arranged the letters, many of which were<br />
undated, in what he believed to be their proper<br />
sequence, and spent some time in modernising<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
their spelling and English and in annotating<br />
them. He proceeded to publish the letters after,<br />
at the request of his publisher, making excisions’<br />
amounting in all to about 100 lines, in a guinea<br />
volume, entitled Zhe Letters of Dorothy Osborne<br />
to Sir William Temple. He registered the copy-<br />
right of his book on June 15th, 1888. In October,<br />
1888, a second edition was issued at the price of 6s.<br />
_No mention appears to have been made at the<br />
time by the original owner, or by Judge Parry, of the<br />
copyright in the letters ; nor was any notice given<br />
of the copyright having been previously dealt with<br />
when in 1891 the original letters were, after the<br />
death of the Rev. 8. R. Longe, sold by the then<br />
owner to the British Museum, where the librarian<br />
arranged and bound them (with one exception)<br />
in the same order in which Judge Parry had<br />
printed them.<br />
<br />
In November, 1902, Judge Parry’s attention<br />
was called to the advertisement of a volume<br />
entitled Zhe Love Letters of Dorothy Osborne to<br />
Sir William Temple. Newly Edited from the original<br />
MSS. by Israel Gollancz. On the 1st December<br />
Messrs. Boote, Edgar & Co., Judge Parry’s<br />
solicitors, wrote to Mr. Moring, the publisher<br />
of the proposed volume, stating that their client:<br />
had copyrighted his publication, of which he was<br />
preparing another edition, and that if necessary he<br />
would take steps to prevent the publication adver-<br />
-tised by Mr. Moring. Mr. Moring answered, on the<br />
2nd December, that the work in question had been<br />
prepared from the original letters in the British<br />
Museum, and that under these circumstances he<br />
presumed Judge Parry would take no further steps.<br />
in the matter. Messrs. Boote, Edgar & Co.<br />
repliedfon the 4th December stating that they and:<br />
Judge Parry were unable to understand how Mr.<br />
Moring claimed to be entitled to publish the book<br />
advertised by him, and under what permission or<br />
sanction from the British Museum he claimed<br />
such authority.<br />
<br />
On the 8th December Mr. Gollancz wrote to<br />
Judge Parry, alleging that “the fact of the originals<br />
now being the property of the nation made the<br />
letters common property,” and offering “to con-<br />
nect the new edition with your esteemed name.”<br />
On the 9th December Judge Parry referred Mr.<br />
Gollancz to his solicitors, and on the same day<br />
Messrs. Boote, Edgar & Co., wrote to both the<br />
defendants calling on them “to discontinue the<br />
issue of the edition published by you.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Moring, however—after three months delay<br />
issued the volume at 2s. 6d. in March, 1903; and<br />
on the 18th March Judge Parry filed an affidavit in<br />
the Chancery Division of the High Court in support<br />
of an action to restrain its further issue. In<br />
this he did not insist on the claim suggested<br />
in the correspondence to an exclusive copyright in<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the original letters, but based his case on the<br />
allegation that the copyright in his work already<br />
described had been infringed with regard to (1) his<br />
notes, (2) his arrangement of the letters, (3) his text,<br />
and (4) his title. The defendants replied by affi-<br />
davit alleging that “they had not made any unfair<br />
use of the plaintiff’s book,” and as to the notes,<br />
they contested in detail the evidences of any such<br />
use brought forward by the plaintiff. Mr.<br />
Gollancz for himself denied having copied the<br />
order of the letters, stating that he had followed<br />
with one or two exceptions (based on his own<br />
researches) the British Museum order. He ad-<br />
mitted that, “as rough working copy, a print was<br />
set up of the letters as appearing in the plaintiff’s<br />
book,” but he alleged that the editor had collated it<br />
with the original letters “ at least ten times” and<br />
corrected “about 2,000 errors and differences,”<br />
and restored numerous omissions extending from<br />
one line to thirty, “the result being a new<br />
and very superior text.” He entered into detailed<br />
explanation of the cases in which he was charged<br />
with having copied or retained errors in Judge<br />
Parry’s notes. He submitted that his title was<br />
no infringement of copyright. He added, “I<br />
have always bond fide believed that I was acting<br />
within my strict rights, and in a way that could<br />
not be thought unfair to other editors, or in<br />
particular to the plaintiff.”<br />
<br />
The case came on before Mr. Justice Farwell gn<br />
April 8rd, 1903, on an application for an interim<br />
injunction. The Judge ut once expressed his<br />
opinion that the defendants’ admission that they<br />
had taken Judge Parry’s book and had copied it<br />
was fatal. In reply to the argument that they<br />
might “‘have made it their own by ten or a dozen<br />
comparisons with the manuscripts,” he added, “ It<br />
seems to me the substratum is fatal to you ; you<br />
cannot use your scaffolding.”<br />
<br />
On this point, and on this alone, the case was<br />
decided. The defendants’ counsel, “ who stated<br />
“‘they were not altogether taken by surprise,”<br />
submitted to’ judgment for delivery up on oath<br />
of all the books and documents constituting the<br />
infringement, and an inquiry as to damages and<br />
costs down to the trial.<br />
<br />
There can be little doubt that the judgment,<br />
which was so readily accepted by the defendants’<br />
counsel, was sound in law.<br />
<br />
No decision, it will be noted, was arrived at by<br />
the Court on the three further alleged infringements<br />
of copyright brought forward—the title, the<br />
arrangement of the letters, and the notes—nor<br />
does the Committee presume to express an opinion<br />
on the legal points involved. :<br />
<br />
With regard to the notes the question is a<br />
complicated one. The following sentences convey<br />
the opinion furnished to the Committee by an<br />
<br />
233<br />
<br />
eminent counsel on the general rules likely to be<br />
applied by a Court of Law dealing with similar<br />
cases: ‘The principle of the law, as laid down<br />
in various judgments, appears to be that an<br />
author may use his predecessor’s work, but must<br />
not copy it. He must, by adding something<br />
of his own, or derived from other and separate<br />
sources, by amalgamating and assimilating his<br />
literary material, create a new product. He must<br />
incorporate what he takes in his own work. Inthe<br />
words of Lord Eldon, he is allowed ‘ the legitimate<br />
use of a publication in the fair exercise of a mental<br />
operation deserving the character of an original<br />
work.’ Mere unintelligent copying, especially if<br />
mistakes are copied, will be stopped. Intelligent<br />
verification and assimilation of previous research<br />
in a work of substantial originality will: not be<br />
interfered with. The application of this principle<br />
to individual cases must be guided by the study of<br />
the particular facts involved.”<br />
<br />
The result of the trial gave rise to a newspaper<br />
correspondence, in which some well-known scholars<br />
took part. Dr. Furnivall, in the Zimes, asserted<br />
that the case had been decided on a technical<br />
point, and that a substantial injustice had been<br />
done by declaring illegal a practice which he<br />
asserted to be common among scholars and essen-<br />
tial in the interests of literature. His letter,<br />
however, was not mainly directed to the points<br />
brought before the Court, and still less to the<br />
point decided. He preferred to lay stress on<br />
Judge Parry’s assertion of his own belief that “if<br />
at any time an honest attempt were made to copy<br />
the MSS. in the British Museum, he could show<br />
circumstances entitling him to restrain publica-<br />
tion of such a copy if he so desired,” or, as Dr.<br />
Furnivall put it, “that he could show circumstances<br />
that would entitle him to restrain publication of<br />
these manuscripts in the British Museum if he<br />
so desired.” Professor Skeat also wrote calling<br />
attention to the excisions made by Judge Parry<br />
in his text, and commenting severely on his descrip-<br />
tion of it as “a complete edition.”<br />
<br />
In the opinion of the Committee there can be<br />
no question that any legal hindrance to the use<br />
of manuscripts in a national collection would be<br />
a misfortune to literature. But this claim was not<br />
put before the Court, and Judge Parry has speci-<br />
fically stated that he will never seek to enforce it.<br />
It may therefore be dismissed from the discussion.<br />
<br />
The Committee are unable to regard the point on<br />
which the case was decided as purely technical. Mr.<br />
Gollancz had the original letters at his disposal. It<br />
was open to him to copy them, and to collate his<br />
copies with his predecessor’s version if he thought<br />
it desirable. He preferred to take the opposite<br />
course. He borrowed: his predecessor’s text, and,<br />
without reference to Judge Parry, made it the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
234<br />
<br />
basis of his own. It can be no defence to allege<br />
that Judge Parry’s work was at once faulty and<br />
defective. If it is the custom among scholars to go<br />
to a faulty version, when the original is at hand,<br />
or to use a living editor’s text without communi-<br />
cating with him until after he has threatened legal<br />
proceedings, the Committee consider that the law<br />
has done a service to literature in declaring that<br />
such practices are illegal.<br />
<br />
The Committee have not overlooked the literary<br />
aspect of the case. Judge Parry’s edition of the<br />
letters is admittedly incomplete, and the reason<br />
assigned by him for the excisions, namely, the request<br />
of his publisher, cannot be considered adequate. It<br />
is not disputed that his text and notes stand in<br />
considerable need of revision. Although the<br />
second edition of his volume was published as<br />
far back as October, 1888, he had apparently not<br />
availed himself of the accessibility since 1891 of<br />
the original MSS. in order to revise his text. For<br />
it was not till January, 1903, that Judge Parry<br />
employed a copyist to compare the letters in his<br />
book with the originals in the British Museum,<br />
But, while admitting these considerations, the<br />
Committee feel that Judge Parry was entitled to<br />
be consulted before any use was made of his work<br />
in the preparation of a new edition of the letters.<br />
<br />
Finally, as in the Z%mes correspondence the<br />
action of the Secretary of the Society has been<br />
referred to, the Committee think it desirable to<br />
state the part he has taken in the matter.<br />
<br />
Before the trial Mr. Gollancz, as a member of<br />
the Society, called on the Secretary, who, at his<br />
desire, wrote to Judge Parry in the following<br />
terms :—<br />
<br />
THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS,<br />
Mareh 20th, 1903,<br />
<br />
DEAR SIR,—<br />
<br />
I have now perused your affidavit. I have also<br />
seen Mr, Gollancz, who has given me his view of the<br />
position. :<br />
<br />
Mr. Gollanez has asked me to put this offer before you—<br />
but without prejudice to his legal position if you do not<br />
accept it—that either I should endeavour to arrange the<br />
matter between you, or he is willing to abide absolutely by<br />
any decision come to by an arbitrator appointed by the<br />
Committee of Management of the Society.......<br />
<br />
Yours truly,<br />
(Signed) G. HERBERT THRING.<br />
<br />
The omitted portion of the letter is private, and<br />
does not refer to any offer.<br />
<br />
Judge Parry, in his reply, stated that any offer<br />
Mr. Gollancz desired to make must be made through<br />
the usual channels. This information was com-<br />
municated to Mr. Gollancz by the Secretary.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
PROPERTY.<br />
<br />
a<br />
Opinions on United States Copyright Law.*<br />
<br />
I.<br />
<br />
Music Booxs DrEniep ImportTATION<br />
FEBRUARY 15, 1898.<br />
<br />
I. Reprints of musical compositions are pro-<br />
hibited importation.<br />
<br />
II. The term ‘ books” in the prohibiting clause<br />
includes music books.<br />
<br />
III. Music books made up partly of copyrighted<br />
and partly of uncopyrighted compositions cannot<br />
be imported.<br />
<br />
TV. Destruction of unlawfully imported musi¢<br />
books, pursuant to rules of the Secretary of the<br />
Treasury, is legal.<br />
<br />
By the Solicitor-General.<br />
<br />
I. The Act of March 3, 1891, prohibits “ during<br />
the existence of such copyright, the importation<br />
into the United States of any book, chromo, litho-<br />
graph, or photograph so copyrighted.”<br />
<br />
Musical compositions are usually lithographed or<br />
set from type. They thus fall within the class<br />
prohibited. The act indicates an intent to pro-<br />
hibit copyrighted compositions, which includes<br />
musical compositions, when reprinted by type set<br />
or by drawings on stone made outside of the<br />
United States.<br />
<br />
Il. In the clause prohibiting importation, the<br />
word “books” signifies the mechanical means to<br />
place the author’s intellectual work in_ saleable<br />
shape. Courts have construed “books” in this<br />
sense to include a musical composition though on<br />
but one sheet. The reprint may be a book, a<br />
lithograph, or a photograph, according to the pro-<br />
cess. In any of these forms the reprint cannot be<br />
imported during the life of the copyright.<br />
<br />
III. Music books made up in part of copy-<br />
righted compositions are prohibited. A prohibited -<br />
article cannot be admitted by being attached to an<br />
article which is not prohibited. A book is an<br />
entity. If part is not admissible, it must all be<br />
excluded.<br />
<br />
IV. Under the convention with Canada pro-<br />
viding for the reciprocal return of mail matter<br />
which is “not delivered from any cause,” books<br />
imported in violation of law need not be returned.<br />
The Secretary of the Treasury and the Postmaster-<br />
General have power ($4958, R. 8.) to make rules<br />
to prevent importation of prohibited articles.<br />
Under this general authority rules for the forfeiture<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* Extracts from a pamphlet published by the Americam<br />
Publishers’ Copyright League.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
and destruction of prohibited articles unlawfully<br />
imported may be framed so as to provide “ due<br />
process of law.”<br />
<br />
II.<br />
DrRaMatic RIGHTS IN AMERICA JUNE 80, 1896.<br />
<br />
An unpublished drama need not be copyrighted<br />
to protect stage-rights.<br />
<br />
By Mr. Rives.*<br />
<br />
An American publisher is requested by an Eng-<br />
lish author ‘‘to copyright a dramatisation” of a<br />
forthcoming story by producing a simultaneous<br />
technical performance.<br />
<br />
In the United States stage-right rests entirely<br />
on common law right of property, not upon<br />
statute. An unpublished play is protected. The<br />
play is still unpublished if the text of the drama<br />
has not been printed, although the play has been<br />
produced on the stage and the novel from which it<br />
is taken has been published.<br />
<br />
The simultaneous performance desired is un-<br />
necessary to protect the stage-right.<br />
<br />
II.<br />
<br />
Notice oF CopyricuHt; Form or<br />
1897.<br />
<br />
Marcu 4,<br />
<br />
When a story, published in a magazine and<br />
copyrighted, is reprinted in book form by another<br />
publisher, under an assignment of the copyright,<br />
the notice therein should give the date of the<br />
original copyright and name of the original<br />
publisher.<br />
<br />
By Mr, Rives.<br />
<br />
A story was copyrighted by the J. B. Lippincott<br />
Company when published in its magazine. The<br />
copyright was assigned to Dodd, Mead & Company,<br />
who are about to publish the story in book form,<br />
and who inquire as to the proper form for the notice<br />
of copyright.<br />
<br />
The law requires a notice to be printed in every<br />
book in order to entitle it to protection under its<br />
coypright. The notice must be in the required<br />
words, Congress declares it must give ‘the year<br />
the copyright was entered and the name of the<br />
party by whom it was taken out.” If the story is<br />
reprinted in the same form the notice should be<br />
“ Copyright, 1896, by J. P. Lippincott Company.”<br />
If it is not to be published in exactly the same<br />
form as in the magazine it may be copyrighted as a<br />
new edition, and the notice should be “ Copyright,<br />
1896, by J. P. Lippincott Company ; Copyright,<br />
1897, by Dodd, Mead & Company.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* My. Rives is the Counsel to the League.<br />
<br />
hd<br />
oe<br />
Or<br />
<br />
IV<br />
<br />
RE-BINDING CHEAP Eprrions ror SALE<br />
APRIL 3, 1899,<br />
<br />
Can the owner of a copyright, who sells a<br />
cheap edition of the book, prevent its being put in<br />
another cover, so as to compete at lower prices with<br />
a better edition of the same book ?<br />
<br />
By Mr. Rives.<br />
<br />
The question of how far the owner of a copy -<br />
right can impose restrictions upon the use of his<br />
book has often been before the Courts. The ques-<br />
tion seems to depend on the consideration whether<br />
the owner of the copyright has sold the book. If<br />
the owner of the copyright has nof sold the book he<br />
can restrict its use. So in case of an edition of<br />
Blaine’s “Twenty Years in Congress,” the<br />
publisher had not sold it to canvassing agents and<br />
the bookseller, who got a few copies, knowing of<br />
the agreement under which the agents got the<br />
book, was restrained. But the moment the book<br />
is sold, even though conditions are attached to the<br />
sale, the owner of the copyright must rely on his<br />
remedy for breach of contract, and not on his right<br />
to restrain an infringement of copyright.<br />
<br />
So, where books damaged by fire were sold toa<br />
dealer on condition “that all books be sold as<br />
paper stock only and not placed on the market as<br />
anything else,” but the books were rebound and<br />
put on sale, the Court held the remedy was not for<br />
violation of the copyright, but of the terms of the<br />
contract.<br />
<br />
The question next arises how far an owner of a<br />
copyright who se//s his books can protect himself<br />
by imposing conditions on their use. I think an<br />
agreement by which a dealer undertakes, for an<br />
expressed consideration, to sell the books only in a<br />
certain form would, be valid and enforceable as a<br />
contract ; without reference to any copyright.<br />
<br />
A greater difficulty arises with respect to the<br />
one to whom the first purchaser may sell. The<br />
contract might also provide that the first purchaser<br />
should insert similar conditions in any contract of<br />
sale with a subsequent purchaser. How far a con-<br />
tract between B. and C., made for the benefit of A.,<br />
is enforceable by A., is hard to say. The rule<br />
varies in different States, but usually A. would have<br />
no remedy against C.<br />
<br />
I advise, the safest course is for the publisher to<br />
have a carefully drawn agreement with the dealer<br />
providing that the dealer shall not dispose of the<br />
books except in proper covers ; and also that in<br />
selling to other dealers the original purchaser shall<br />
agree to impose the same condition ; and that any<br />
breach shall be compensated by liquidated damages.<br />
It would also be well to print a notice in each copy<br />
of the book referring to the original contract.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
236<br />
<br />
Such contract should be enforced against the first<br />
purchaser, and he might be trusted to enforce it<br />
against the dealers to whom he sold.<br />
<br />
Vv.<br />
<br />
PUBLICATION TO SECURE COPYRIGHT<br />
OcToBER 30, 1901.<br />
<br />
Is publication of a book necessary to secure<br />
copyright ?<br />
<br />
ae By Mr. Rives.<br />
<br />
The text of the statute is silent on this point.<br />
The act, however, assumes that every copyrighted<br />
book is to be published. Copies of the book must<br />
be deposited “not later than the day of publica-<br />
tion.” No action for infringement can be brought<br />
unless a notice is printed in the “ copies of every<br />
edition published.’ The question is what the<br />
Court will infer from this language. In “ Drone<br />
on Copyright,” it is said that “ publication is made<br />
an essential prerequisite to securing copyright ; and<br />
hence there can be no statutory copyright in an un-<br />
published work.” The case of Boucicault v. Hart<br />
(Circuit Court of the United States in New York)<br />
held that a mere filing of title conferred no rights,<br />
unless there was a publication in a reasonable time.<br />
There is, however, a dictum in the case of Farmer<br />
vy. Calvert (Circuit Court in Michigan) that publi-<br />
cation 1s not necessary. The point, therefore, is<br />
somewhat doutbful. ‘he Constitution empowers<br />
Congress to pass copyright laws, not only to pro-<br />
tect authors, but (as it declares) ‘to promote the<br />
progress of science and useful arts,” or, in other<br />
words, to encourage the diffusion of knowledge.<br />
Part of the price an author pays for protection is<br />
that his work shall be available for consultation by<br />
all who desire it.<br />
<br />
I am, therefore, of the opinion that the purpose<br />
of the law is that the author shall, within some<br />
reasonable time, make his work public.<br />
<br />
As the question is not definitely settled, I should<br />
consider it unwise for a publisher to defer actual<br />
publication for a long time, as it would be running<br />
a serious risk of having his copyright declared<br />
invalid if he afterwards tried to prevent an<br />
infringement. ®<br />
<br />
———+—<br />
<br />
A Curious ‘Case.<br />
<br />
In the autumn of 1902 a member of the Society<br />
received a communication from a firm of the name<br />
of Messrs, J. E. Stannard & Co., calling itself<br />
advertising agents aad contractors, offering to<br />
procure the copyright of certain of her books in<br />
America, for a fixed price. As, however, the books<br />
<br />
had already been published in England the author<br />
_ was advised that this would be impossible.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
The contractors, however, were not to be beaten<br />
and claimed that they had a method of obtaining<br />
protection, although the work had already been<br />
published in England. They promised great things<br />
from the circulation of the book and offered to<br />
obtain the control of the whole American market.<br />
<br />
Still the author hesitated, but finally, under the<br />
advice of the Secretary of the Society, refused to<br />
accept the offer. The Secretary pointed out that<br />
as the American copyright was lost, it would be<br />
much better for her to deal with her former<br />
American publishers —an old-established and<br />
reliable firm—if she desired to test the American<br />
market. Her English publishers gave her the same<br />
advice. Still Messrs. Stannard & Co. were per-<br />
sistent, “ considering that it must be disheartening<br />
to theauthor to feel that rights worth somethousands<br />
of pounds might slip away at any moment.” Again,<br />
in a letter dated October Ist, 1902, they state as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
“We think it decidedly unfair that after we have taken<br />
the trouble to do for you what neither of your ‘ firms of<br />
standing’ ever thought of doing, that is, telling you how<br />
to rescue what you have lost, you straightway go and turn<br />
over the information to someone else. We could have<br />
secured the copyrights ourselves and no one would have<br />
blamed us for so doing, instead of which we offered to get<br />
them for you. Our clients learn to rely on us for straight-<br />
forwardness, and it is natural that we should expect the<br />
same in return. We should be pleased to hear from you in<br />
due course. We are tempted with an offer which would<br />
amply recoup us for our trouble, but as it would not be any<br />
<br />
to your advantage if we accepted it we have postponed the<br />
reply until you come to a decision.”<br />
<br />
The author was still obdurate.<br />
In a letter from Messrs. Stannard & Co., dated<br />
October 24th, we find the following paragraphs :—<br />
<br />
‘Since we are not in business as philanthropists we have<br />
advised our American manager by this mail to secure copy-<br />
rights of your books if possible, and retain them in our<br />
name.<br />
<br />
“Failing this, he is to issue a par. to the American<br />
Literary Press that the American Literary Copyrights are<br />
not secured.<br />
<br />
“ Since respectability does not enter into the methods of<br />
American business men, we have no doubt that this will<br />
<br />
have the desired effect, and if some cute American publisher .<br />
<br />
copyrights the works in his own name and prevents you<br />
from issuing them in the U.S.A. you cannot say that timely<br />
warning was not given you.<br />
<br />
‘* As we have pointed out before, the copyrights are worth<br />
as much to us as they are to you. If we get them, the law<br />
is with us. Under no circumstances will we sign your<br />
publisher’s agreement, and unless you are willing to agree<br />
to the terms stated in our agreement we must follow our<br />
own course in the matter.<br />
<br />
“A cablegram (prepaid) will be the only course open<br />
if you wish our American manager to await further<br />
instructions.<br />
<br />
“Since much valuable time has been wasted, we must<br />
ask for a final decision at your earliest convenience.”<br />
<br />
The daring of the gentleman who writes for the<br />
<br />
firm is interesting quite apart from his legal know-<br />
<br />
ledge, which is peculiar, It is abundantly clear<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 237<br />
<br />
to those who have any knowledge of American<br />
Copyright Law that if any person actually obtains<br />
copyright in America without the English author’s<br />
sanction, he must be taking that which does not<br />
belong to him—that is to say, supposing the pub-<br />
lication in both countries to be simultaneous. If<br />
he does not obtain the author’s copyright, but<br />
merely publishes on the American market, he is<br />
only acting as a common but legalised pirate,<br />
<br />
On the 21st of January of the present year,<br />
Messrs. Lane and Stannard, presumably repre-<br />
senting the same firm in the United States,<br />
wrote as follows from New York :—<br />
<br />
“Re the U.S.A. copyrights of your books. We beg to<br />
inform you.that they have been secured in accordance with<br />
the law, and should therefore be pleased to hear from you<br />
with respect to the publishing of the same in this country.<br />
<br />
“As the general publishing price in this country is<br />
$1.50, and the wholesaler’s price but half that amount,<br />
it isnot possible to import an edition and sell at a profit, as<br />
there is a duty of 45 per cent. on imported books. Taking<br />
your offer of two shillings and sixpence (or 60 cents) per<br />
volume, and adding the cost of freight and duty, you<br />
will see that the importing cost would be at least $1 per<br />
volume, and therefore cannot be entertained as a business<br />
proposition.<br />
<br />
“Weare willing and ready to deal with you on equitable<br />
terms for the printing and publishing here, and offer and<br />
require similar terms given to your publishers in England,<br />
with exceptions which you will note in the enclosed<br />
agreement. Under these terms you can have full control<br />
over the MSS., and the books can go to press exactly as<br />
written, which I understand you keenly desire.<br />
<br />
“We wish you to understand, however, that unless they<br />
are purchased by you, the copyrights will remain in our<br />
possession, and we reserve the right, if you refuse our offer,<br />
to sell to an American publishing firm, without stipulation<br />
as to the editing of the MSS. Should, however, you desire<br />
to purchase, your offer would receive premier consideration.<br />
<br />
“In case you accept our offer to publish, the books will<br />
be issued by a New York firm, and will be advertised widely<br />
but economically. Please cable your reply on or before<br />
February 5th, as after that date we shall conclude that you<br />
refuse our offer and shall feel at liberty to conclude negotia-<br />
tions with a firm here for the sale of copyrights with the<br />
privilege of editing the MSS. as they desire.<br />
<br />
‘‘We must warn you that any further shipments of your<br />
English edition to this country will be liable to be seized<br />
and confiscated, but we will, of course, allow you reasonable<br />
time to warn your publishers and agents.”<br />
<br />
The agreement that they asked the author to<br />
sign is interesting and instructive. There are<br />
three books in question: 25,000 copies of two<br />
of the books are to be published, and 50,000 of the<br />
third. The author agrees to pay all expenses of<br />
printing and publishing, including illustrating,<br />
binding, packing, freights, etc., and also one-half<br />
of the total cost of efficiently advertising the said<br />
books, No limit is fixed for the cost of production<br />
or for the advertisements, and the author has to<br />
deposit in cash a sum equal to the estimated cost<br />
of production and in addition a sum equal to the<br />
estimated initial cost of advertising with the Trust<br />
Company of the City of New York. Such deposit<br />
<br />
to be subject only to the draft or cheque of the said<br />
firm on the certification of such bills of indebtedness<br />
by the author if residing in New York, or in her<br />
absence by her legally appointed representatives.<br />
Should, however, bills or accounts as above stated<br />
be presented for certification and no action taken<br />
on the same within seven days, then the said bank<br />
or Trust Company is hereby authorised to pay such<br />
cheques or drafts out of the aforesaid deposits on<br />
receiving an affidavit by the said firm setting forth<br />
such default or negligence. And lastly, in con-<br />
sideration of the above articles being faithfully<br />
performed and carried out, the said firm agree to<br />
pay half profits.<br />
<br />
It is hardly necessary to make any comment on<br />
the above extraordinary agreement or upon the<br />
proposals made during the course of negotiations.<br />
The facts speak for themselves,<br />
<br />
Although the first letters were full of large<br />
promises of profits of all kinds to the author, yet<br />
the last offer is quite distinct. It is possible that<br />
the author might have been led away by the<br />
temptation held out of large returns arising from<br />
obtaining copyright in the United States, but no<br />
author, however unaccustomed to the ways and<br />
methods of publishers and their dealings in literary<br />
wares, could possibly be deceived by the final letter<br />
and the finalagreement. Nothing farther remains<br />
to be done. The author must stand and wait. If<br />
the books are produced in the United States, they<br />
are pirated copies of the English edition. If they<br />
are produced as copyright, under the American<br />
law, the firm will be subject to severe penalties,<br />
and if the books are produced as an authorised<br />
edition, the author’s remedy is to make the whole<br />
case public,<br />
<br />
G. HE.<br />
<br />
“FAIR COMMENT.”<br />
<br />
— oe<br />
<br />
HE Court of Appeal has now given its<br />
judgment in the case of McQuire v. The<br />
Western Morning News Company, Limited.<br />
<br />
The case is a very interesting one, not only from<br />
the point of view of the dramatist, but from the<br />
point of view of the author. All members of the<br />
profession of literature are subject to criticism.<br />
Although each particular case of “unfair com-<br />
ment’? must be to a certain extent decided on its<br />
own especial facts, yet there are certain broad<br />
rules which the Court lays down in order to<br />
determine on what lines and to what extent a<br />
criticism may be libellous.<br />
<br />
The case was brought by an actor who repre-<br />
sented a piece at the Theatre Royal, Plymouth,<br />
<br />
<br />
238<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
and objected to the comment that appeared next<br />
day in the Western Morning News.<br />
<br />
In the Court of first instance judgment was<br />
given for the plaintiff with £100 damages. The<br />
defendant company pleading that the words were<br />
not libellous, but fair and bond fide criticism on a<br />
matter of public interest.<br />
<br />
The defendants appealed, and on the appeal the<br />
judgment in the Court below was reversed,<br />
<br />
The Master of the Rolls, in delivering an<br />
elaborate judgment, made some very weighty com-<br />
ments on the law of “ libellous criticism.”<br />
<br />
Firstly, as the libel complained of was a dramatic<br />
criticism of the play publicly acted, unless it<br />
exceeded “fair comment,” it could not be counted<br />
as libellous.<br />
<br />
After going carefully over the statements of the<br />
plaintiff and defendants, he proceeded to raise the<br />
most important question of what are the limits of<br />
“ fair comment.”<br />
<br />
“ One thing,” he said, “is perfectly clear. That<br />
the jury have no right to substitute their own<br />
opinion of the literary merits of the work for that<br />
of the critic, or to try the fairness of the criticism<br />
by. any such standard.”<br />
<br />
This point is most important, and although it<br />
has been made before, yet it cannot be sufficiently<br />
insisted upon. If the verdict of whether the<br />
criticism was fair or not depended upon the jury’s<br />
verdict of the merits of the piece, the result might<br />
be in a good many cases extraordinary. Authors<br />
and dramatists know but too well how even the<br />
highest critics have been known to disagree when<br />
writing about or discussing the features of works<br />
of art.<br />
<br />
Secondly, the Master of the Rolls quoted a<br />
saying of Lord Ellenborough’s bearing on this<br />
subject :—<br />
<br />
“The Commentator must not step aside from<br />
the work or introduce fiction for the purpose of<br />
condemnation. Had the party writing the criti-<br />
cism followed the plaintiff into domestic life for<br />
the purpose of slander, that would have been<br />
libellous.”<br />
<br />
And again, from the same judgment, “ Show me<br />
an attack upon the moral character of the plaintiff,<br />
or upon his character unconnected with his author-<br />
ship, and I shall be as ready as any judge that ever<br />
sat here to protect him.”<br />
<br />
Lastly, he states, “I think the word ‘ fair’<br />
embraces the meaning of honest and also of rele-<br />
vancy.” And later, “‘ The comment, in order to be<br />
within the protection of the privilege, had to be<br />
fair, 7.¢., not such as to disclose in itself actual<br />
malice. It also had to be relevant; otherwise it<br />
never was within it. And the judge could hold,<br />
<br />
as a matter of law, that the privilege did not extend<br />
to it.’<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
These are some of the general points, and in<br />
this particular case the Master of the Rolls stated<br />
that he was clearly of opinion that the verdict was<br />
against the weight of evidence, and that he con-<br />
sidered the latter part of the summing-up of the<br />
judge in the Court of first instance might have led<br />
the jury to apply the standard of their own taste<br />
to the appreciation of the thing criticised, and to<br />
measure the rights of the critic accordingly.<br />
<br />
Members of the Society from time to time come<br />
to the office with questions of this kind, and it is<br />
very useful to put before them those fundamental<br />
facts on which alone an action for libellous criti-<br />
cism will rest.<br />
<br />
G. Hoo.<br />
<br />
—$-—<—-—____<br />
<br />
A COMMA AND A COW.<br />
<br />
++<br />
<br />
PWHE British Medical Journal of the 28th of<br />
March, 1903, had an interesting account of<br />
a dairy visited during an investigation into<br />
“The Milk Supply of Large Towns.” One of the<br />
incidents was described as follows :—<br />
<br />
“The driver having finished milking, his cow<br />
offered to take me into an adjoining room, where<br />
the milk was cooled.”<br />
<br />
In its following issue the British Medical Journal<br />
commented upon the freak of the “ devil” who had<br />
thus with the aid of a comma created a bovine<br />
successor to Balaam’s ass, and gave two amusing<br />
instances of the powers of misplaced punctuation.<br />
In the one a well-known Nonconformist divine,<br />
wishing to disclaim any ambition to appear in the<br />
black coat and white tie, or stock, of orthodoxy, was<br />
credited with a public declaration that he would<br />
“wear no clothes, to distinguish him from his<br />
fellow-Christians.”<br />
<br />
In the other, a Canadian firm having placed a<br />
new patent nursing-bottle on the market, accom-<br />
panied it with these recommendations, for the<br />
guidance of anxious mothers:<br />
<br />
“When the baby is done drinking it must be<br />
unscrewed, and laid in a cool place under a tap.<br />
If the baby does not thrive on fresh milk it should<br />
be boiled.”<br />
<br />
The last example would seem to require some-<br />
thing more than the minding of stops, in order to<br />
satisfy a critical literary taste. It is not, however,<br />
recorded that any baby suffered. In such a case<br />
an interesting question of legal responsibility might<br />
have been raised by an action for negligence against<br />
the vendors of the bottle brought by a chilled or<br />
par-boiled infant suing through his or her “next<br />
friend.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br />
<br />
++<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br />
price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br />
managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement),<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
C.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher,<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
Ill. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
It is above all things necessary to know what the<br />
proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br />
for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br />
the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br />
connected with royalties are published in Zhe Author,<br />
Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br />
** Cost of Production,”<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production,<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book,<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
C1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld,<br />
<br />
o—~<>—<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
—< +<br />
<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
<br />
2. [t is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,;<br />
<br />
239<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for PLAYS<br />
<br />
IN THREE OR MORE ACTs :<br />
<br />
(a.) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT,<br />
<br />
This is unsatisfactory, An author who enters<br />
<br />
into such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br />
<br />
tract for production of the piece by a certaindate<br />
<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(b.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF PERCENTAGES<br />
on gross receipts. Percentages vary between<br />
5 and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(¢.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF ROYALTIES (e.,<br />
fixed nightly fees). This method should be<br />
always avoided except in cases where the fees<br />
are likely to be small or dificult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
<br />
4. PLAYS IN ONE ACT are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event, It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved,<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time, This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance. :<br />
<br />
7, Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that AMERICAN RIGHTS may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘hey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative: that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11, An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, THOSE AUTHORS DESIROUS OF FURTHER INFORMA«#<br />
TION ARE REFERRED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&—~<}P— —<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the<br />
advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor<br />
the member has a right to an opinion from the Society’s<br />
solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel’s opinion is<br />
desirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel’s<br />
opinion, All this without any cost to the member,<br />
<br />
bs Ly VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
240<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4. BEFORE SIGNING ANY AGREEMENT WHATEVER, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of literature in promoting the<br />
independence of the writer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements,<br />
<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts submitted to them by literary<br />
agents, and are recommended to submit them for inter-<br />
pretation and explanation to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
.8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society ; so do<br />
some publishers. Members can make their own deductions<br />
and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
—_—_+—>_ +—___—_—_<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
— to<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach, The term<br />
JISS. includes NOT ONLY WORKS OF FICTION, BUT POETRY<br />
AND DRAMATIC WORKS, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
————_——__.——_o—_____<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
———>+<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s, 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Communieations for Zhe Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor NOT LATER<br />
THAN THE 21st OF EACH MONTH,<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
COMMUNICATIONS AND LETTERS ARE INVITED BY THE<br />
EDITOR on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever, Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
—+— +<br />
<br />
THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
ge<br />
<br />
R. G. H. PUTNAM, the Secretary of the<br />
American Publishers’ Copyright League,<br />
has forwarded to the offices a pamphlet<br />
<br />
privately printed for the League, entitled “ Opinions<br />
on Questions of Copyright.”<br />
<br />
The pamphlet contains opinions upon the more<br />
important issues that have been in dispute during<br />
the last ten years ending December, 1902. Mr.<br />
Putnam, in his letter to the Secretary, states, ‘he<br />
will be very pleased to meet any special require-<br />
ments that may arise for copies on the part of the<br />
managers of the Society.”<br />
<br />
If, therefore, any member for a special purpose<br />
should desire to have a copy of the pamphlet he is<br />
requested to communicate with the Secretary, who<br />
will, no doubt, under Mr, Putnam’s favour, obtain<br />
the work in question.<br />
<br />
We see, with interest, that the Publishers’ Asso-<br />
ciation of America means to print at different<br />
intervals further similar summaries as they are able<br />
to secure records of decisions on Copyright Cases.<br />
These publications will in time no doubt grow to<br />
great importance, as it will be possible in a handy<br />
form to have a collection of all the leading Copy-<br />
right Cases. We thank Mr. Putnam for his<br />
courtesy and consideration.<br />
<br />
Amone@ the Correspondence we print a letter<br />
from Mr. Thomas Hardy.<br />
<br />
It comes at a very suitable time, as the same<br />
subject was treated in the May number of The<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Author, on page 206, when comment was made on<br />
the Annual Meeting of the Publishers’ Association,<br />
In that article we stated as follows :—<br />
<br />
“ Firstly, we have insisted, and now insist again,<br />
that it is absolutely essential that contracts deal-<br />
ing with the subject of serial rights should be<br />
clear and limited and should not be general or<br />
indefinite, and when serial rights are sold they<br />
should be sold either to one paper or to a limited<br />
circle of papers for one issue only or for a limited<br />
time.”<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, Mr. Hardy seems to have<br />
suffered from a complaint which is not infrequent<br />
among authors, the revival of an earlier work<br />
without any reference to the author. Legally, the<br />
position is quite correct. If the copyright has<br />
been sold or if serial rights without any limitation<br />
have been transferred, the position is often very<br />
unsatisfactory both for the author, or, as in the<br />
case quoted in the May number, for the publisher.<br />
It is necessary to warn authors who publish serial<br />
work to be careful about their agreements.<br />
<br />
In the early days of the past month the papers<br />
were full of the Stock Exchange walk from London<br />
to Brighton, and applauded the fact vociferously<br />
that out of some 90 starters 72 covered the<br />
distance under thirteen hours. From a physical<br />
point of view no doubt the result is highly satis-<br />
factory. : : :<br />
<br />
In the American Author there is an interesting<br />
article on the mental activity of authors. Mr. John<br />
Swinton, “journalist, orator, and economist,” was<br />
desired to write a novel based on certain economical<br />
questions, consisting of 500 octavo pages, small<br />
pica type, in twenty days. Reckoning a page to<br />
contain about 250 words, this meant a book of<br />
125,000 words. Mr. Swinton objected, but the<br />
representative of the publishing firm was<br />
inexorable, and at last the author stated that<br />
he would make an effort. His own words are<br />
as follows :—<br />
<br />
“He demanded the preface of my book at once. I<br />
pondered. I was familiar with the subject, having thought<br />
and spoken and written much upon it in other years. I<br />
hastily sketched a plan as I talked with him.<br />
<br />
‘“‘He said he would wait in the house till I had written<br />
the preface, which he desired to take to Philadelphia that<br />
evening. Becoming desperate under his urging eye, I sat<br />
down, and in an hour gave him the preface. The first<br />
chapter was mailed in a few days. Chapter followed<br />
chapter. I worked day and night, keeping up pluck with<br />
never-ending pots of coffee. Three hundred of the five<br />
hundred pages were written, and time was nearly up. I<br />
padded. I put in things I had formerly written. The<br />
twenty days were out, and over one hundred pages were<br />
yet needed. I had to get a few days of grace. Finally the<br />
book of 500 pages and 125,000 words was finished. Its<br />
title is ‘Striking for Life,’ ”’<br />
<br />
This was certainly fine mental athletics, but the<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
241<br />
<br />
article goes on to quote from another American<br />
periodical, the Bookman, a few facts which have<br />
no doubt been fully verified by the writer.<br />
<br />
For instance—Frank Norris wrote 125,000 words<br />
in 89 days. Mrs. Oliphant always wrote at night,<br />
and more than once completed a three volume<br />
novel in six weeks. The following interesting<br />
statements about English authors, from the same<br />
article, may come as a surprise to some :—<br />
<br />
““Weyman writes one novel a year, and cannot be per-<br />
suaded to attempt more. It took Hall Caine three years to<br />
write ‘The Manxman,’ Barrie four to write ‘ Sentimental<br />
Tommy,’ and four more to produce ‘Tommy and Grizel.’<br />
Maurice Hewlett wrote ‘The Forest Lovers’ four times<br />
before he was willing to let it go from his hands, and the<br />
late Bret Harte tore up a dozen pages of manuscript for<br />
every one that he completed. Harold Frederic was five<br />
years writing ‘The Damnation of Theron Ware. ”<br />
<br />
But for sound mental athletics, consider gravely<br />
an offer made by a certain well-known publisher to<br />
a gentleman, whom he desired to employ to grind<br />
out fiction. This offer was quoted in’ the April<br />
number of Zhe Author, and is absolutely authentic.<br />
The serial writer was to have £600 a year. To<br />
earn this money he would have to produce 5,000<br />
words a day for six days a week, without any<br />
provision for sickness or holidays. It will be seen<br />
that work under this offer comes nearly up to that<br />
of Mr. Swinton, but has to be continued year in<br />
and year out, until the publisher, the public, and<br />
the author are tired, and the last, a useless wreck,<br />
loses his position.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
In the American Critic an article entitled<br />
“Uncertainties of Literature,” written by Elliot<br />
Flower, follows the same lines as the articles that<br />
appeared in the February and March (1902) num-<br />
bers of Zhe Author, on “Some Free Lance Expe-<br />
riences.”<br />
<br />
In reading the record it would appear that the<br />
struggling ree Lance meets with much the same<br />
treatment on both sides of the water. The record<br />
is tabulated.<br />
<br />
Out of 53 MSS., each MS. had to be sent on<br />
its travels on an average slightly over five times<br />
before it could be placed. Nine were accepted at<br />
once, and 12 on a second trial, but at the other<br />
end of the scale, one was sent out 30 times before<br />
acceptance, one 18 times, and two 13 times.<br />
<br />
There is no doubt that when an author has<br />
reached a certain point of facility in writing there<br />
is nothing like persistence to bring success.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tux following rhyme, written, perchance, with a<br />
view to ridicule, has been dropped into the Society’s<br />
post bag.<br />
<br />
We print it for what it is worth, in the hope that<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
249<br />
<br />
the author will put aside his cloak of modesty and<br />
discover himself.<br />
<br />
No doubt, he calls it an epigram. If so, he<br />
would, we feel sure, be a proper inmate for one of<br />
those beautiful and sanitary buildings that adorn<br />
the hills of Surrey and Sussex.<br />
<br />
To tHE Society of AUTHORS, 39, QUEEN STREET,<br />
SrorEY’s GATE.<br />
You flourish on Authors’ alarms ;<br />
You arouse the unfriendly in Man ;<br />
Then you sell healing balms,<br />
To stifle their qualms,<br />
At the cost of One Guinea per ann.<br />
<br />
But pause for a moment, I pray,<br />
A pen stroke :—your ruin is clear,<br />
From the Street that is clean,<br />
With the name of the QUEEN,<br />
To the street that is doubtful and QUEER.<br />
<br />
ee <><br />
<br />
THE LYTTON CENTENARY.<br />
<br />
— +<br />
<br />
HE Lytton centenary has produced the<br />
ordinary crop of commemorative articles, the<br />
best being Mr. Francis Gribble’s paper in<br />
<br />
the Fortnightly Review, and the more sober appre-<br />
ciation in Blackwood’s Magazine. Of these two<br />
papers we think the latter has the greater value as<br />
criticism, for Mr. Gribble’s virile intolerance of any-<br />
thing savouring of affectation prompts him to con-<br />
vey the suggestion, though he does not actually<br />
formulate the charge, that Lytton’s vapourings<br />
about the Beautiful and the True originated in<br />
preciousness ” and were therefore insincere, and<br />
his resentment of the seeming insincerity prompts<br />
him to do scant justice to Lytton’s compensating<br />
merits.<br />
<br />
With the intolerance of affectation we are in full<br />
sympathy, but we do not endorse the very common<br />
opinion that Lytton was insincere. He was despe-<br />
rately in earnest, ever painfully conscious of his<br />
“mission”; he had indeed that high seriousness<br />
which, according to Matthew Arnold, comes from<br />
absolute sincerity. With it, too, he had a sense of<br />
humour ; “ Kenelm Chillingly” proves that, even<br />
as it proves its author’s funereal gravity and fathom-<br />
less sentimentality. And with those two qualifica-<br />
tions, high seriousness and humour, it is odds but<br />
what any man will go far. The mistake Lytton<br />
made was in allowing his mission to get in the<br />
way of his art. “In forming his conception,”<br />
<br />
Mr. Worsfold says, “the artist should be guided<br />
by the test of ‘great ideas ’; in executing his con-<br />
ception he must be guided by the ‘rules of art,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
He, on the one hand, can never be, by the nature<br />
of things, so independent of the mass of mankind<br />
as to make artistic excellence his sole object; on<br />
the other, moral worth, however distinctive, can<br />
never of itself suffice to endow his work with the<br />
characteristic charm of art.” Lytton’s moral inten-<br />
tions were above suspicion, and his literary facility<br />
was so extraordinary that it is not surprising that<br />
he neglected the rules of art when, without them, he<br />
could achieve such an extraordinary vogue as he<br />
did at once.<br />
<br />
The measure of success that was meted out to<br />
him might well, indeed, have turned the brain of a<br />
much more robust man, and the wonder is, not<br />
that he enjoyed such a vogue in the earlier part of<br />
his career, but that he was not spoiled by it and<br />
wholly incapacitated for doing the much better<br />
work that he actually produced in the latter half<br />
of his career.<br />
<br />
Whether Lytton was a great artist or not is a<br />
question little likely to be brought up for discussion<br />
now ; the centenary merely offers opportunity for<br />
reconsidering him as a writer at the expiration of<br />
a given period. What he wrote, he wrote ; some<br />
of it suited and has been accepted ; “and that’s<br />
success.” ‘To describe him in a single epithet is<br />
not possible, but the epigrammatic criticism passed<br />
upon him by a writer in the Academy is pro-<br />
bably as fair a one as could be devised : that he<br />
was so full of talent that there was no room left in<br />
him for genius. That his bicentenary will be com-<br />
memorated, and those books which are read now<br />
be read a hundred years hence, may, we think, be<br />
assumed ; and of many a better writer so much<br />
could not be said.<br />
<br />
Or<br />
<br />
THE DISTRIBUTION OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
(Reprinted by kind permission from the Publishers’<br />
Circular, May 2nd.)<br />
<br />
R. ANDREW LANG has been “ pitching<br />
in” to the booksellers in the Morning<br />
Post—or, what is much the same thing,<br />
<br />
he has borrowed the stick of a “ trenchant critic ”<br />
who writes in 7’e Author and re-applied it—with<br />
reservations. He lets his “author” point the<br />
moral, and then he adorns the tail, with another<br />
sting of the stick.<br />
<br />
«The bookseller’s affair is,” he says, “to know<br />
about books and men. My author, however,<br />
‘believes that it is nearly impossible to exaggerate<br />
the lethargy and incapacity of the ordinary retail<br />
bookseller.” Mr. Lang kindly adds: “These be<br />
very brave words ; I should hesitate to apply them<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
PohCenSORNRRI<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
to his Majesty’s ministers, much more to the<br />
ordinary retail bookseller.” Then why, Mr. Lang,<br />
did you not hesitate before-taking such an unfair<br />
statement out of its coffin and publishing it to the<br />
world ?—it would have remained stillborn had you<br />
not godfathered it. ‘“ ‘The habit of reading,’ says<br />
my author, ‘is being all over the country dis-<br />
couraged by the insutficiency of the vast majority<br />
of booksellers.’” Mr. Lang quotes this silly libel,<br />
and adds that he deems it “ much too sweeping.”<br />
How much ?<br />
<br />
“*The country,’ says my author ferociously,<br />
‘would be benefited by the bankruptcy of the<br />
<br />
whole lot of booksellers, and the transference of<br />
<br />
their business to more competent hands.’” Mr.<br />
Lang’s comment is: “This man _ has suffered<br />
much.” How much? Anyone would think the<br />
whole of the booksellers of the United Kingdom<br />
had united to offend him by refusing to stock his<br />
works, but all we are told is that some unnamed<br />
“suburban bookseller” failed to get him a cheap<br />
copy of Milton’s poems.<br />
<br />
“The book never came, but at the end of a<br />
fortnight the bookseller found energy enough to<br />
send a messenger to say it could not be procured.”<br />
<br />
If this cock-and-bull story were true, what<br />
ground is there in it for libelling the whole book-<br />
selling trade of the country ? Another ‘“ example,”<br />
as Mr, Lang calls it, of this man’s sufferings at the<br />
hands of the whole trade is that, despairing of<br />
getting a learned work on Egyptology from the<br />
suburban bookseller—apparently he did not even<br />
ask for it—he gives its title and the address of its<br />
publisher to a tobacconist, who at once procured it<br />
—whether the confiding tobacconist ever got paid<br />
for it we are not told. But why should Mr. Lang<br />
give credence and publicity to such a Blue Fairy<br />
story as this ? ’<br />
<br />
“The larger part of the reading public cannot<br />
get the books it desires,” says Mr. Lang’s “ tren-<br />
chant critic.” If this is trne it only goes to prove<br />
that the larger part of the public is what Carlyle<br />
said it was.<br />
<br />
How interesting it would be to have the name<br />
and address of this “author” who would like to<br />
see the whole bookselling trade made bankrupt<br />
because some apocryphal suburban bookseller could<br />
not procure for him a copy of the “ Chandos’<br />
Milton. Mr. Lang’s pen is not often dipped in<br />
disappointed author’s bile, and it is not as if he<br />
believed the charges were true; then why give<br />
currency to anonymous and unfounded abuse of<br />
the booksellers ?<br />
<br />
There are thousands of booksellers in the United<br />
Kingdom selling millions of books every year, and<br />
yet they are all condemned in this wholesale way<br />
because some nameless author says he could not<br />
get a cheap book from some unnamed bookseller.<br />
<br />
243<br />
<br />
It is true that one or two other “examples ” are<br />
given by Mr. Lang. Some old lady in Norway<br />
wrote for Mr. Lang’s books to an Edinburgh book-<br />
seller, who gaily replied that they were all out of<br />
print. Are we to infer from the strange conduct<br />
of this prevaricating Edinburgh bookseller that<br />
Mr. Lang has no honour in his own country ?<br />
Heaven forbid! Booksellers would be the last to<br />
claim that their knowledge and methods were never<br />
at fault—but even those of authors are not perfect.<br />
<br />
o—~<—<br />
<br />
HALF-PROFITS ON SHEETS TO<br />
AMERICA,<br />
<br />
— +<br />
<br />
T may seem dull reading to the constant reader<br />
of The Author to see the repetition of certain<br />
forms of agreement, certain clauses, certain<br />
<br />
methods of publishing, accompanied with the same<br />
comments; but as long as publishers persist in<br />
bad clauses so long must Ve Author's objections<br />
persist also.<br />
<br />
There is a clause often embodied in agreements<br />
issued by the best houses in London in which the<br />
author, who does not obtain the American Copy-<br />
right, is entitled to half of the profits on the sale<br />
of sheets to America. If this clause is inserted in<br />
the usual half-profit agreement there is little to be<br />
said against it. The only points at issue, then,<br />
are, Is a profit-sharing agreement desirable? In<br />
what proportion should profits be divided between<br />
author and publisher? But if the clause is inserted<br />
in an agreement where the author is to obtain a<br />
royalty on the publication of the English edition,<br />
there are two very strong points of objection.<br />
<br />
This sale to an American house is mere agency<br />
work. If conducted through the medium of an<br />
author’s agent the latter would be highly pleased<br />
with the payment of 10 per cent. on the net result.<br />
Not so the publisher, although he is constantly<br />
crying out against the agent and his charges, It<br />
is a well-known fact—instances have often been<br />
quoted—that the publisher, although he expresses<br />
strong disapproval of the intervention of the agent<br />
who charges a modest 10 per cent., makes—when<br />
he endeavours to undertake any of the agent’s<br />
duties—a general charge of 50 per cent. The<br />
lowest percentage which has ever been seen in any<br />
agreement before the Secretary of the Society was<br />
25 per cent. Further arguments against allowing<br />
a publisher to undertake an agent’s work need not<br />
be repeated here.<br />
<br />
The second objection rests on the fact that a<br />
clause drafted on these lines is a distinct pitfall to<br />
the author. It is a pitfall for the following<br />
reasons :—1. Because to the ordinary person the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
244<br />
<br />
difficulties with which the clause is pregnant are<br />
altogether invisible. 2. Because the amount the<br />
author receives in royalty is always calculated—<br />
see the books of the Society on the point—on the<br />
basis that the full cost of composition is charged<br />
against the English edition. If this were not<br />
the case, the author ought to receive a higher<br />
royalty on British sales. :<br />
<br />
Let us explain what we mean more fully.<br />
<br />
ake the ordinary 6s. book :—<br />
<br />
Cost of composition of 3,000 copies ... £30 0 0<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Cost of printing ; ee 16 0 8<br />
Cost of paper a 2 58 0 0<br />
Total... ..£104 0 0<br />
<br />
Of the 3,000 copies the publisher sends 2,000 to<br />
America, and receives for the same (say) 1s. a copy<br />
£100. The cost of composition was compulsory<br />
for the completion of the English edition, the<br />
author’s royalty, as stated, being based on_ this<br />
understanding ; but the publisher takes two-thirds<br />
of this cost towards the American edition, as well<br />
as two-thirds of the cost for the print and the paper,<br />
leaving to be divided between himself and the<br />
author—<br />
<br />
By sale of 2,000 copies to America ...£100 0 0<br />
‘Two-thirds cost of production ~ 69 6 8<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
£30 13 4<br />
<br />
As the cost of composition has no right to be<br />
charged against the American edition, but only the<br />
cost of print and paper, the difference would work<br />
out as follows :—<br />
<br />
By sale of 2,000 copies to America ...£100 0 0<br />
‘Two-thirds cost of print and paper... 49 6 8<br />
<br />
£50 13 4<br />
<br />
Instead, therefore, of the author receiving<br />
£25 6s. 8d., by the publisher’s method of calcu-<br />
lation of half profits, the author receives<br />
£15 6s. 8d. and the publisher £35 6s. 8d. It<br />
is almost as reasonable an arrangement as the<br />
ordinary half-profit agreement, whose clauses and<br />
workings have so often been exposed in Zhe<br />
Author.<br />
<br />
To show how this method may be worked out in<br />
the interests of untrustworthy publishers unfairly to<br />
the author, say the publisher in the first instance<br />
only publishes a thousand copies. The cost of<br />
composition would still be £30; printing, £10;<br />
paper, £20. He sells 500 copies to America, and<br />
on the same principle the following sum is worked<br />
out —<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Half cost of production .. £30 0 0<br />
By sale of 500 copies to America at 1s.<br />
<br />
per copy ... one ae «=. 202 0 0<br />
<br />
£5 0.0<br />
<br />
This would leave a deficit against the author’s<br />
account of £2 10s., as the sale to America has<br />
failed to cover the cost of production.<br />
<br />
As soon as the edition is sold and the amount is<br />
worked out against the author he prints 10,000<br />
copies for the English edition, but never takes into<br />
account the proportion of the cost of production of<br />
the 500 sent to America to the 10,000 printed in<br />
England. Again, supposing you take the first<br />
instance and 20,000 were subsequently sold, the<br />
cost of the 2,000 sold to America is still taken in<br />
proportion to the cost of the 3,000 of the first<br />
edition printed, and not in proportion to the whole<br />
cost.<br />
<br />
It will be seen, therefore, that, quite apart<br />
from the contract being unfair and a pitfall<br />
to the unwary (as on the face of the agree-<br />
ment the difficulty is invisible), even if it is<br />
worked out by a publisher with an honest idea of<br />
doing nothing dishonourable, the result of its<br />
working, its natural evolution, becomes a fraud<br />
on the author, as it is impossible to calculate this<br />
sale to America on the basis of future sales. It<br />
must always be calculated upon the sales that have<br />
already been made. The position is ridiculous. It<br />
is to be hoped that the Publishers’ Association will<br />
dissociate themselves from this form of agreement.<br />
<br />
G. H. T.<br />
<br />
—_—--<br />
<br />
AUTHORS AND MODERN THRIFT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
II.—The Purchase of an Annuity.<br />
<br />
O possess an annuity is the dearest desire of a<br />
poor man’s heart. An income assured for life,<br />
against which neither the rumours of wars<br />
<br />
nor the depressions of the money market has any<br />
effect, isperhaps the most comforting of all prospects.<br />
For this reason doubtless—the immunity from finan-<br />
cial worry—the lives of annuitants extend beyond<br />
the common span. One company, in a recent report,<br />
stated that the average age of the annuitants dying<br />
during the year under review was eighty-eight.<br />
The records of other companies confirm this experi-<br />
ence, which is remarkable in view of the fact that<br />
many of the annuitants are in weak health when<br />
they effect their policies, and would not be accept-<br />
able for life insurance except at special rates.<br />
<br />
The Moral Objection is one which arises in the<br />
consideration of the annuity. It is held that as<br />
the capital invested with the company is forfeited<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
to them at the death of the assured ; that the con-<br />
tract is a peculiarly selfish one; at least this is<br />
often the opinion of near relatives. The question,<br />
however, depends wholly upon circumstance. For a<br />
married man with distracting responsibilites to<br />
sink all his available capital might very well be an<br />
unwise step. On the other hand, there area variety<br />
of situations in which to purchase an annuity might<br />
be a most prudent step, inasmuch as the annuitant<br />
is relieved immediately of all anxiety—providing<br />
the annuity is of sufficient amount—as regards<br />
his future.<br />
<br />
Annuity versus Investment—It is generally<br />
agreed by financial authorities that the highest<br />
return on money it is possible to obtain from abso-<br />
lutely secure investment is 8 per cent. he<br />
return from the annuity is much higher, varying<br />
from 5 to 20 per cent., according to age. A<br />
man of sixty would receive £30 a year from his<br />
investment of £1,000, whereas the annuity would<br />
produce him an income of £94. The difference<br />
might very well mean to him the path from penury<br />
to comfort. In consequence of the curious life-<br />
giving properties of the annuity it is regarded with<br />
disfavour by some of the insurance companies, as it<br />
is not a department which is very profitable to<br />
them. The occasional early death of an annuitant<br />
does not recompense them for the abnormally long<br />
lives on which they continue to make a high return.<br />
Another aspect of the annuity in comparing it with<br />
investments is that the return never varies. The<br />
recent depreciation in the value of Consols and<br />
certain railway stocks indicates a risk which<br />
attaches even to “ gilt-edged”’ investments.<br />
<br />
The choice of an annuity is necessarily confined<br />
to persons of capital. But the return per hundred<br />
pounds is the same as per thousand, and to persons<br />
whose income comes to them, as it were, in flashes,<br />
a few hundred pounds might very well be sunk in<br />
producing a small income which has the immense<br />
advantage of being guaranteed to them for life.<br />
The choice of an annuity, being a perfectly simple<br />
contract untroubled by side issues, is one which<br />
offers no difficulty. All the well-known British<br />
offices are absolutely safe. The object, therefore,<br />
should be to purchase the annuity in the office<br />
offering the largest return for the particular age.<br />
The returns differ far more than in ordinary<br />
insurance. For example, a man of sixty can pur-<br />
chase for £1,000 a life annuity of £94 in one<br />
office, whilst another will return him only £80 10s.<br />
The difference is over 14 per cent. Both offices<br />
are of the highest standing, but a man would be<br />
very unwise to take the latter policy when the<br />
former is obtainable. ‘The differences indicated at<br />
several ages is clearly shown in the following<br />
table. The terms quoted by the Post Office are<br />
<br />
also given for the purpose of comparison.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
245<br />
INVESTMENT oF £1,000,<br />
Males.<br />
|<br />
| Age 40. Age 50,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Highest re-| £ 5, d.| £ s.. d.| & $d. & sg<br />
2 Gunn 62 10 0173 10.0104. .0 1134 oO 8<br />
Lowest re- |<br />
<br />
tora =... | 62 1 0.) 63 10 0130-10 06 114 8 6<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Difference..| £9 15 0/10 0 0/1810 01/19 15 0<br />
<br />
Average of |<br />
50 offices. | 5 |<br />
<br />
! W1t 8) 68 7 6 | 8812 61196 6 §<br />
Post Office..| 55 17 6 |.66 18 4187 1 8 195 9 9<br />
Females.<br />
<br />
: ee<br />
Age 40, | Age 50 Age 60. | Age 70,<br />
|<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
d.| ee a A es as ga.<br />
<br />
Highest re-} £ s. | £ 8.<br />
CHI cs 56 12 0 | 66 10<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
O18 0 0 1193 0 6<br />
Lowest re- | |<br />
nibunloy eee 48 0 0/5616 8| 7218 4|105 6 8<br />
Difference..|£8 12 0| 918 4/1211 8|1713 4<br />
Average of<br />
50 offices.| 52 11 8 | 62 1 817915 O1115 0 0<br />
Post Office..|] 50 5 0{60 510/78 8 4 111416 8<br />
|<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
-Vote.—For the return per £100 in each instance divide:<br />
by ten.<br />
<br />
There is no doubt, however, that the complete<br />
surrender of capital to the company is a material<br />
objection, in some minds, to the purchase of an<br />
annuity. “Should I die the day after, they argue,<br />
the money is absolutely lost, and my estate receives<br />
nothing!” The number of annuitants dying in<br />
the early days of their contract is so small as to be<br />
beyond practical consideration ; but all the same<br />
this objection remains. To meet this several com-<br />
panies have lately devised a plan by which the<br />
income is guaranteed over a stated number of years,<br />
usually ten or twenty. This provides against the<br />
early death of the annuitant, as, in any case, a<br />
return of ten or twenty payments is guaranteed to.<br />
the estate. We have shown that the best return<br />
obtainable for age sixty for £1,000 is £94 per<br />
annum. With the annuity guaranteed for tem<br />
years the return would be £80 3s. and for twenty<br />
years £62 9s. Such tables would appeal to persons.<br />
who wish to provide their estate against the risk<br />
of early death. But, on the other hand, most per-<br />
sons of mature age are more or less covered by life<br />
insurance, and it is perhaps better business to<br />
accept the slight risk of early death in order to:<br />
procure the materially higher income.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
246<br />
<br />
THE ANNUAL DINNER OF THE SOCIETY<br />
OF AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
1+<br />
<br />
HE annual dinner of the Society, held at the<br />
Hotel Cecil, on Thursday, April 30th, was<br />
attended by about 170 members and guests.<br />
<br />
Mr. Douglas Freshfield, Chairman of the Committee<br />
of Management, was in the chair, with Captain<br />
Sverdrup, of the Fram, one of the gold medallists<br />
of the Royal Geographical Society for this year,<br />
on his right hand and Sir Clements Markham,<br />
K.C.B., President R.G.S., on his left ; and the<br />
vice-chairs were occupied by Mr. G. H. Thring<br />
(Secretary), Mr. Rider Haggard, Mr. Anthony<br />
Hope Hawkins, and Dr. 8. Squire Sprigge. When<br />
dinner was over the Chairman proposed the health<br />
of the King in a brief speech, followed by that of<br />
the Queen and Royal Family.<br />
<br />
After these loyal toasts had been duly honoured,<br />
Mr. Douglas Freshfield rose again to propose the<br />
toast of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
Making reference to the important work done by<br />
the Society for authors at large and for its members<br />
in particular in enabling them to obtain the full<br />
market value for their work, he described it as a<br />
Society for the Protection of Authors. In their<br />
business relations with publishers authors often<br />
needed protection. He deprecated the idea that<br />
the Society led a crusade against publishers, and<br />
preferred to consider it as working to promote<br />
an alliance necessary to both; he likened it rather<br />
to a trades union, having, however, no power to call<br />
its members out on strike. Mr. Freshfield also<br />
referred to the subject of the foundation of an<br />
Academy of Literature, as a question of interest to<br />
authors, on which he believed that there was some-<br />
thing to be said on both sides, though he indicated<br />
his own doubts as to the advantages to literature<br />
and the public taste that might be derived from<br />
such a body counterbalancing the obvious draw-<br />
backs and difficulties connected with its creation<br />
and renewal.<br />
<br />
Mr. Rider Haggard replied for the Society in a<br />
vigorous speech, in which he deprecated the<br />
expression of any desire by authors for the institu-<br />
tion of an Academy, and inquired what the methods<br />
were likely to be by which election to such an<br />
Academy might be secured. He declared that he<br />
had no wish to see authors—men of letters—touting<br />
round to other men of letters in order to secure<br />
election to the Academy. He asked by what stan-<br />
dard it was proposed that their claims to election<br />
should be judged. Was popularity to be the test,<br />
and was the author of whose work many thousand<br />
copies were sold before it appeared to be the one<br />
elected to the Academy, or he whose work was<br />
considered to have high literary qualifications ?<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
He hoped that the question of the Academy<br />
would be left alone, and expressed the belief<br />
that every class had the right to combine<br />
for the mutual comfort and protection of its<br />
members, and that this was the spirit which<br />
actuated those who founded the Society of Authors,<br />
of which he had been a very early member. While<br />
alluding to the question of the prices paid for<br />
literary work and the success of the Society in<br />
bettering the position of authors with regard to<br />
payment, Mr. Haggard asked why Milton sold<br />
““Paradise Lost” for £10? He answered his own<br />
question by saying, with emphasis, that it was<br />
because he could not get any more. For unpaid<br />
work, amateur work, he expressed no great respect,<br />
indeed he questioned the merits of work done<br />
without hope of reward in such terms that some of<br />
his hearers were inclined to express dissent from<br />
his views. In the course of his speech Mr. Haggard<br />
referred to the friendly relations which he believed<br />
to be those that should rightly exist between<br />
author and publisher, and in conclusion he paid a<br />
graceful tribute to the memory of Sir Walter<br />
Besant.<br />
<br />
In proposing the toast of the guests of the<br />
Society of Authors, Mr. Richard Whiteing referred<br />
to those preseut who, representing science, had<br />
maintained the connection ever existing between<br />
science and literature. He mentioned among those<br />
present Mr. C. Longman, Dr. Clifford Allbutt, Dr.<br />
Mill, Sir William Church, P.R.C.P., Sir Henry<br />
Howse, P.R.C.S., and Mr. G. W. Prothero. In par-<br />
ticular he made allusion to the work done recently<br />
by Captain Sverdrup on board the Fram, and to the<br />
kindred services to science and exploration with<br />
which the name of Sir Clements Markham is<br />
associated. With these gentlemen he joined Mr.<br />
Henry Newbolt as representing the guests of the<br />
Society.<br />
<br />
In replying for the guests, Sir Clements Markham<br />
laid emphasis upon the recent achievements of<br />
Captain Sverdrup in the department of scientific<br />
Polar exploration, and mentioned that Captain<br />
Sverdrup himself would probably find difficulty in<br />
making a lengthy reply to the toast in any but a<br />
foreign tongue. Unfortunately this was the case,<br />
and Captain Sverdrup, to the regret of his hosts<br />
and fellow-guests, confined himself to a_ brief<br />
expression of thanks for the cordial welcome<br />
received by him.<br />
<br />
Mr. Henry Newbolt, replying in his turn for the<br />
guests, described himself as being in a sense a<br />
publisher as well as an author, and was inclined to<br />
think that the attitude of author and publisher<br />
towards one another must necessarily be charac-<br />
terised by some hostility due to their relative<br />
positions and interests. Referring to standards by<br />
which modern literature may be judged, Mr.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Newbolt took a hopeful view of his contemporaries,<br />
but compared their passage past our range of<br />
vision to that of a procession, pointing out that<br />
the procession as it goes by seems to be a confused<br />
succession of units, while the relative merit of the<br />
figures and groups composing it can best be appre-<br />
ciated as it passes into the distance.<br />
<br />
At the conclusion of Mr. Newbolt’s speech Mr.<br />
Oscar Browning rose to give the health of the<br />
chairman. Mr, Browning avowed himself able in<br />
doing this to speak from long acquaintance with<br />
the subject of his speech, whom he had first<br />
known as climbing Mont Blane while a school-<br />
boy at Eton, when he was himself a master<br />
there, and with whose work as an explorer of<br />
mountain peaks and ranges, and discoverer of<br />
ground untrodden by previous climbers, he had<br />
been familiar from his earliest days.<br />
<br />
Mr. Freshfield, in thanking those present for the<br />
warmth with which they had received the toast,<br />
made graceful reference to his memories of Mr.<br />
Browning as an Eton master, and to the long<br />
friendship with him which so many Eton and<br />
Cambridge men had enjoyed.<br />
<br />
A soirée was held after the toasts had been<br />
drunk, and the members and guests had an oppor-<br />
tunity of meeting one another.<br />
<br />
The following is a list of those present :—<br />
<br />
Ackermann, A. 8. E.<br />
Ackermann, Mrs.<br />
Allbutt, Prof. Clifford<br />
Armstrong, E. A.<br />
Ashley, Mrs.<br />
Back, Mrs. Eaton<br />
Baildon, H. Belsize<br />
Batty, Mrs. Braithwaite<br />
Begbie, Miss A, H.<br />
Bell, Mackenzie<br />
Berene, Sir<br />
K.C.M.G.<br />
Besant, Geoffrey<br />
Besier, Rudolf<br />
Bird, C. P.<br />
Boddington, Miss Helen<br />
Bolam, the Rev. C. E.<br />
Boutwood, Arthur<br />
Boutwood, Mrs.<br />
Browning, Oscar<br />
Bryden, H. A.<br />
Buxton, Dudley<br />
Buxton, Mrs. Dudley<br />
Campbell, Miss Mont-<br />
gomery<br />
Carlile, John C.<br />
Childers, Erskine<br />
Church, Sir William &.,<br />
PEC, P,<br />
Churchill, Lt.-Col. Seton<br />
<br />
Henry,<br />
<br />
Colquhoun, Archibald<br />
<br />
Colquhoun, Mrs. Archi-<br />
bald<br />
<br />
Craig, Lt.-Col. R. Mani-<br />
fold<br />
<br />
Crawshay, Mrs.<br />
<br />
Croker, Mrs. B. M.<br />
<br />
Davidson, Miss L. C,<br />
<br />
Davy, Mrs. E. M.<br />
<br />
Doudney, Miss Sarah<br />
<br />
Douglas, Sir George,<br />
Bart.<br />
<br />
Dowsett, C. F.<br />
<br />
Duncan, Miss Sarah<br />
Jeanette<br />
<br />
Esler, Rentoul<br />
<br />
Esler, Mrs. Rentoul<br />
Free, the Rey. Richard<br />
Freshfield, Douglas<br />
Galpin, H.<br />
<br />
“ Wirt Gerrare ”<br />
Gowing, Mrs. Aylmer<br />
Grierson, Miss<br />
<br />
Griffin, H. M.<br />
<br />
*‘ Victoria Cross ”’<br />
Groser, Horace G.<br />
Gunter, Lt.-Col. E.<br />
Haggard, Miss Dorothy<br />
Haggard, Miss Angela<br />
Haggard, H. Rider<br />
<br />
Hallett, Col. W. Hughes<br />
Harrison, Miss Rose<br />
Hawkins, A. Hope<br />
Henslowe, Miss<br />
Hepburn, David<br />
Hills, A. E.<br />
Hodges, W. O.<br />
Holman, Martin<br />
Howse, Sir Henry G.,<br />
P.R.C.S.<br />
Humphreys, Mrs. Des-<br />
mond (‘‘ Rita ’’)<br />
Hutchinson, the Rey,<br />
HN,<br />
lliffe, Mrs.<br />
Irvine, Mrs. Duncan<br />
Irvine, Duncan<br />
Jacobs, W. W.<br />
James, Miss W. M.<br />
( Austin Clare”)<br />
Jenkins, Mrs. L. Hadow<br />
Keltie, J. Scott<br />
Kenealy, Miss Arabella<br />
Lechmere, Mrs.<br />
Lechmere, Mr.<br />
Lee, Miss Alice<br />
Lefroy, Mrs.<br />
Lennox, Lady William<br />
Little, J. Stanley<br />
Little, Mrs.<br />
Longman, C. J.<br />
Lowndes, Mrs. Belloc<br />
‘Maarten Maartens ”<br />
Magnus, Laurie<br />
Markham, Sir Clements,<br />
KO. BE RS:<br />
Marks, Montagu<br />
Mason, Miss EH. M.<br />
Meadows, Miss<br />
Mill, Dr. H. R.<br />
Montagu, Mrs. Drogo<br />
<br />
247<br />
<br />
Morris, Mrs. Frank<br />
Moscheles, Felix<br />
Newbolt, H.<br />
Oppenheim, E. Phillip<br />
Pennethorne, Deane<br />
Pennethorne, Mrs.<br />
Perrin, Mrs.<br />
<br />
Perris, G. H.<br />
Petano, D. K.<br />
Phibbs, Miss I. M.<br />
Praed, Bulkeley<br />
Praed, Mrs. Campbell<br />
Prelooker, Jaakoff<br />
Prothero, G. W.<br />
Rae, John<br />
<br />
* Allen Rainé”<br />
Reeves, Mrs.<br />
<br />
Reich, Emil<br />
<br />
Rogers, A.<br />
<br />
“ Leicester Romayne ”<br />
Royle, William<br />
Savory, Miss Isabel<br />
Stanton, Miss H. M.<br />
Stanton, Stephen J. B.<br />
Stroud, F.<br />
<br />
Stroud, Miss<br />
<br />
Smith, Mrs. Isabel<br />
Spielmann, M. H.<br />
Sprigge, Mrs. Squire<br />
Sprigge, 8. Squire<br />
Sverdrup, Capt.<br />
Thring, Mrs.<br />
Thring, G. H.<br />
Trench, Herbert<br />
Tweedie, Mrs. Alec<br />
Walrond, Charles<br />
Wells, Mrs.<br />
<br />
Wells, H. G.<br />
<br />
White, Arnold<br />
Whiteing, R.<br />
Wilson, Mrs.<br />
<br />
—_——___—_1+—>—_ 2 —____—-<br />
<br />
EDUCATE YOUR OWN CHILDREN.<br />
<br />
9<br />
<br />
EFORE the South African War it was some-<br />
times asked whether such and such a<br />
colony was really loyal.<br />
<br />
That question has been answered. ‘To-day, at any<br />
rate in Canada, an Englishman may be forgiven<br />
if he sometimes asks of himself “ Does the old<br />
country really want to keep us?”<br />
<br />
If she does not, why not say so openly, and let<br />
those who wish to, return to her, and those who<br />
wish to, join hands with the States.<br />
<br />
But if England really wants to keep Canada,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
248<br />
<br />
why does she allow the United States to educate<br />
the public opinion of her colony ?<br />
<br />
It is not enough that most of our daily news<br />
comes to us coloured to suit America, that our<br />
telegrams are not altogether reliable, that there<br />
are so many Americans amongst us and such go-a-<br />
head American towns close to us, that our people<br />
must take some tones and colours from their<br />
neighbours which an Englishman born would<br />
rather they did not ?<br />
<br />
To all this is added, for the sake of a few paltry<br />
pounds in the pocket of the English Post Office,<br />
the fact that almost all our light literature and<br />
practically all our magazines are American.<br />
<br />
The way of it is thus: American periodicals<br />
are not better than English. Far from it. Better<br />
illustrated two or three of them may be, but no<br />
one who could get a Blackwood would, I assume,<br />
take any ten American magazines in exchange<br />
for it.<br />
<br />
And our people know this; but the American<br />
magazines are cheaper than ours, thanks to the<br />
extremely high postal rates which our magazines<br />
have. to pay.<br />
<br />
Magazines which cost the same at the offices of<br />
publication differ as one to two in price when they<br />
reach the Canadian market.<br />
<br />
Here is an illustration: The Strand and<br />
Pearson's are both published in New York as well<br />
as in London. Our booksellers sell the old-style<br />
edition, of course, which costs them 74 cents in<br />
New York, and is mailed to them at 1 cent<br />
per lb. If they bought the English edition they<br />
would have to pay about 9 cents in London, and<br />
8 cents per 1b. postage.<br />
<br />
The result of this kind of thing is that, taking<br />
the figures of one of our booksellers here as a<br />
criterion, we seil four American magazines for<br />
every British magazine, though we are a British<br />
people and like our own wares best.<br />
<br />
My first.point is a national one.. If you want<br />
to keep Canada British, you had better feed her<br />
mind on British literature.<br />
<br />
My second is for the authors. If you want to<br />
keep a market for British books in Canada, you<br />
had better ask British publishers to advertise a<br />
little (not necessarily in the vilely bad taste common<br />
on this continent, but in such a way that a man’s<br />
intimate friends may have a chance of finding out<br />
that he has written a book), and press for such<br />
postal rates as will allow the magazines in<br />
which they advertise to compete with American<br />
magazines,<br />
<br />
If any one is sufficiently interested in my subject<br />
to pursue it for himself, let him take up any of the<br />
leading magazines of the States and see how they<br />
advertise their books.<br />
<br />
When “David Harum” came out you could<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
not walk through the streets of Ottawa without<br />
being flipped in the face by long streamers of<br />
“extracts ” which floated from the booksellers’<br />
doors ; you could not open a magazine without<br />
setting free a shower of notices ; the book haunted<br />
you. As to our books, I had to start a crusade<br />
against our booksellers, to wake them up to the<br />
fact that ‘The Four Feathers ” had been written.<br />
<br />
Are we not big enough as a nation to sacrifice a<br />
few dollars, that our children may learn at their<br />
mother’s knee, and not at another’s ?<br />
<br />
CLIVE PHILLIPPS-WOLLEY.<br />
—_—_____» <> ____<br />
<br />
“SIR MACKLIN.”<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
OLLECTIVE psychology is a subject which,<br />
as this volume” testifies, has not escaped the<br />
attention of Mr. A. B. Walkley, but one<br />
<br />
reader, at least, inclines to the opinion that he has<br />
not applied his knowledge with sufficient particu-<br />
larity in this present instance. Had he done so he<br />
would not have forgotten that devices proper to<br />
the rhetorician are not always proper to the author<br />
and that a looseness of argument may pass un-<br />
challenged in the spoken word, but cannot escape<br />
so lightly in the written word: in short, that good<br />
lectures do not necessarily make good books.<br />
There is a certain sort of banter, wholly or partly<br />
good-humoured, that frequently is not only lawful but<br />
expedient to a lecturer who desires to carry with<br />
him the last obstinate objector in his audience ;<br />
but the same banter may have a contrary effect<br />
when the lecture is reproduced in the unsympathetic<br />
medium of printer’s ink and submitted to the<br />
leisurely consideration of the same individual in<br />
the seclusion of his library.<br />
<br />
I seem to detect such partly good-humoured<br />
banter in the first lecture in the volume before me.<br />
I am conscious of an attempt on Mr. Walkley’s<br />
part to anticipate any suggestions I may make of<br />
flaws in his work and to dispose of them before-<br />
hand by belittling my qualifications to estimate its<br />
value. He puts me in my place, so to speak, and<br />
the human nature in me is disposed to rebel<br />
against the operation.<br />
<br />
‘Everyone who expresses opinions, however<br />
imbecile, in print calls himself a ‘critic.’ The<br />
greater the ignoramus, the greater the likelihood<br />
of his posing as a ‘critic.’” Sentences of this<br />
kind may serve to raise an unthinking laugh and<br />
break the ice between lecturer and audience, but<br />
they are not worthy of being perpetuated in print ;<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* “ Dramatic Criticism,’ by A. B. Walkley. London:<br />
John Murray, 1903. (5s. net.)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 249<br />
<br />
their inaccuracy is only equalled by their antiquity.<br />
The sole reason that 1 can find for their preserva-<br />
tion here is a desire to rule me, and others like me,<br />
out of court by writing me down an ass before I<br />
begin to suggest that perhaps Mr. Walkley does<br />
not embody all the law and the prophets. As a<br />
mere caudal appendage of “that great baby, the<br />
public,” I may be a barbarian, or, isolated, a harm-<br />
less citizen or a placid British vestryman ; with<br />
luck I may be an amateur of culture, in which<br />
case my judgment is probably spoiled by the<br />
literary bias, or a mundane person, in which case<br />
I have a bias either of the individual or the vogue.<br />
Whatever I may be, I don’t matter, which is a<br />
soothing reflection for Mr. Walkley and a chasten-<br />
ing one for me. And yet I can’t help wondering<br />
if it is quite true.<br />
<br />
“From the people whom the critic criticises it<br />
would be unreasonable to expect sympathy,” Mr.<br />
Walkley remarks ; he omits to say what it would<br />
be reasonable to expect from the people who<br />
criticise the critic ; perhaps the possibility never<br />
entered his head. But he also observes that ‘just<br />
as one solid body cannot collide with another with-<br />
out the manifestation of a form of energy which<br />
we call heat, so one mind cannot impinge upon<br />
another without the manifestation of that form of<br />
energy which we call criticism.” Inasmuch as it<br />
is due to Mr. Walkley, with Mr. Murray as a con-<br />
tributory party, that his mind has impinged upon<br />
mine, it is not only excusable but natural that I<br />
should manifest energy with the best of them.<br />
<br />
My dissatisfaction with this book is due to the<br />
fact that it does not take me any further forward<br />
than I was before ; it is nebulous and inconclusive.<br />
Portentously serious in intention it is not a serious<br />
contribution to the literature of criticism. The<br />
author has an irritating trick of proving all sorts<br />
of things, and then, when he has triumphantly<br />
written Q.E.D. at the end of his argument, hastening<br />
to explain that the theorem is wholly immaterial.<br />
He reminds me of Sir Macklin, who, as every<br />
schoolboy knows,<br />
<br />
“was a priest severe<br />
In conduct and in conversation,<br />
<br />
It did a sinner good to hear<br />
Him deal in ratiocination.<br />
<br />
“ He could in every action show<br />
Some sin, and nobody could doubt him,<br />
He argued high, he argued low,<br />
He also argued round about him.”<br />
<br />
It is not for me to suggest whom to cast for the<br />
bishop in the story.<br />
<br />
Thus he refers to Gibbon’s division of critics<br />
into three classes, takes leave to reduce them to<br />
two, compares these two, showing in the process<br />
that there is not so much difference between them<br />
as they themselves suppose, and then, having<br />
<br />
compared and contrasted them to his own entire<br />
satisfaction, war's us that the contrast must not be<br />
taken too seriously. By such a device the most<br />
exiguous contribution to literature might be<br />
bumped out to the most ample proportions, but<br />
its value, when so bumped out, would be open to<br />
question.<br />
<br />
On page 20 he quotes Mr. Birrell as follows :—<br />
<br />
“T have had some experience of authors, and have<br />
always found them better pleased with the ‘ unprofes-<br />
sional’ verdicts of educated men, actively engaged in the<br />
work of the world than ever they were with the laboured<br />
praise of the so-called ‘ expert.’ ”<br />
<br />
Then on page 35 he examines the passage as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
“ After the crowd, the average or uncultivated amateur,<br />
let us turn to Mr. Birrell’s candidate for the critical post—<br />
the man of affairs or of the world who dabbles in the arts ;<br />
in other words, the amateur of culture. Mr. Birrell puts in<br />
a very artful plea for this class. He says the authors like<br />
them, preferring their verdicts of approval to the ‘ laboured ’<br />
praise of the so-called ‘expert.’ Here, however, we must<br />
be on our guard against the rhetorical device of the pro-<br />
fessional advocate—the familiar device of comparing one<br />
thing at its best with another thing at its worst. The<br />
praise of the ‘expert’ is not necessarily ‘laboured.’ And<br />
you will observe that the authors like the men of the world<br />
when they deliver verdicts of approval. What the authors<br />
think of this class when they deliver verdicts of disapproval<br />
we are not told.”<br />
<br />
I have italicised the words in these two passages<br />
which reveal the discrepancy between the text as<br />
given by Mr. Walkley and the text as criticised<br />
by him. I refrain from giving the exact text<br />
of Mr. Birrell’s words, and merely submit that the<br />
discrepancy ought not to have been passed in a<br />
considered argument, not so much because it<br />
affects, or does not affect, Mr. Walkley’s point<br />
as because it affects his credit as a dialectician.<br />
<br />
That there is plenty of good stuff in the book, of<br />
course, goes without saying ; most of it is Aris-<br />
totle’s, and a perverse and tricksy memory brings<br />
before me some lines from an obscure burlesque :—<br />
<br />
“My grievance is that in these modern plays,<br />
<br />
There's nothing new and good ; whate’er of praise<br />
<br />
Their lines deserve, you'll find in the antique ;<br />
<br />
Whatever's idiotic isn’t Greek.”<br />
<br />
With the necessary modifications the quotation<br />
has point, and in all seriousness I cannot think<br />
<br />
: : :<br />
that this volume will add to Mr. Walkley’s<br />
reputation.<br />
<br />
Meandering has a fascination for most ‘‘amateurs<br />
of culture.” I would like to meander a little and<br />
express an opinion which, however imbecile, I hold<br />
: : : z<br />
in common with a good many other people. That<br />
opinion is that what is wrong with the dramatic<br />
critic of the day is his appalling lack of the sense<br />
of humour. It is all very well for M. Anatole<br />
France to talk about “the adventures of a soul<br />
among master-pieces,” and for Mr. Walkley to<br />
announce that “judices nati’? may still be found<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
250<br />
<br />
amongst us. I admire the pretty fancy of the one<br />
and rejoice at the good tidings of the other ; but<br />
recent happenings in the dramatic world dispose<br />
me to think that so far as the stage is concerned<br />
people take themselves much too seriously. Mr.<br />
Walkley snorts at the fatuity of the question,<br />
«« What is the wse of dramatic criticism?” Well,<br />
it is a fatuous question. Mr. Walkley replies to<br />
it from the point of view of the dramatic critic :—<br />
<br />
“ The use of any art is asa channel for the communication<br />
of ideas and emotions between man andman. It is a mode<br />
by which the producer of the art shares out his moods, his<br />
soul-states, his views of life, with the consumer. This is<br />
what is meant in popular language by ‘ being interesting.’<br />
Just as you may have an interesting novel or an interesting<br />
play, so you may have an ‘interesting ’ dramatic criticism.<br />
And that is the use of it.”<br />
<br />
I find that answer very satisfactory, and hope<br />
that the “ club of play-goers ”—there is a world of<br />
sarcasm in the employment of that form of the<br />
genitive case—will perpend it. From the point of<br />
view of the manager a dramatic criticism in, say,<br />
the 7'imes, at the price of a stall costs only sixpence<br />
more than the hire of ten sandwich-men at a<br />
shilling a head for the day, and it carries farther.<br />
It advertises the “show.” And that is another<br />
use of it.<br />
<br />
As I suggested at the outset, I hesitate to put<br />
forward these comments as a “criticism” of Mr.<br />
Walkley’s book ; they are merely indicative of my<br />
soul’s adventures in that masterpiece. I hope I<br />
shall not be deemed irreverent if 1 speed them with<br />
yet one more quotation, protesting that they are<br />
quite honest in intention, and not born of that<br />
little-emindedness which finds pleasure in cheap<br />
sneers :<br />
<br />
“Go, soul, the body’s guest,<br />
Upon a thankless arrant ;<br />
Fear not to touch the best,<br />
The truth shall be thy warrant.”<br />
Vy. iE. M.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
POPULARITY.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
OBERT VINCENT, historian and man of<br />
letters, had received his death sentence.<br />
The physicians gave him one short year to<br />
live ; but their word was the signal for a cloud,<br />
impalpable as yet, but darker than that of death,<br />
to rise upon the dying man’s horizon. He was a<br />
young man, and it seemed to the world as if it was<br />
but yesterday that he had succeeded in making<br />
his name. But the world was mistaken. The<br />
initiated knew that the reputation which Robert<br />
Vincent had won was of no mushroom growth.<br />
He had won it by sweat, by blood, by years of<br />
patient labour and research. Nay, as was being<br />
proved now, he had bought it with his very life.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
To this small band of scholars Robert Vincent<br />
had been known for years, young as he still was,<br />
as the rising historian of the day, as a writer in<br />
whom in the highest degree scholarship, imagina-<br />
tiveness, and honesty were combined.<br />
<br />
To this small band he was the ideal historian<br />
for whom the world had waited so long. Scholarly<br />
historians there have been. Honest historians’ are<br />
not altogether unknown. Picturesque writers of<br />
history have made their works as household words<br />
tous. But the combination of the three qualities<br />
in one person has often been pronounced to be an<br />
impossibility. 1t appeared in Robert Vincent, and<br />
scholars awaited with bated breath its further<br />
development. But the world in general, the<br />
world which nearly every man secretly craves to<br />
enlist on his side, even when he most professes to<br />
despise it, turned, for a long time, a deaf ear to<br />
the teaching of the historian. To those who<br />
knew, this deafness was simply a question of time.<br />
The world would hear, and hearing would accept<br />
Robert Vincent at his true value. The event proved<br />
that, for once ina way, those who knew were right.<br />
<br />
Robert Vincent won his place as a world power<br />
in literature by the publication of his great book,<br />
“The Welding of the Races.”<br />
<br />
It was a great book in every way. Great in<br />
conception, great in execution. Well balanced,<br />
accurate, and judicial, yet written in language<br />
almost passionately picturesque. ‘The Welding of<br />
the Races ” threw its search light on a period of<br />
English History at once the most obscure and the<br />
most salient. ‘‘As at the touch of an enchanter’s<br />
wand,” the darkness which for hundreds of<br />
years had lain upon the early middle ages was<br />
dissipated, and Englishmen knew at last the secret<br />
of the greatness of their country. “The dark<br />
ages have for England ceased to exist,” was the<br />
judgment of the greatest German critic.<br />
<br />
The wisdom of the small band of scholars<br />
was justified. The world knew and, knowing,<br />
acclaimed, as with one voice, Robert Vincent as the<br />
greatest writer of the century. The author him-<br />
self would have been more than human if he had<br />
not exulted in his triumph. He was young and<br />
he was ambitious, and it is given to few men<br />
indeed to realise, to any great extent, the ambition<br />
of their lives.<br />
<br />
“The Welding of the Races” rapidly proved<br />
itself the success of the day, and the fortunate<br />
author felt that his name had been made for all<br />
time, that he was destined to be numbered with<br />
the great ones of the earth. “‘ Westminster Abbey,”<br />
<br />
he said laughingly to his wife, “ will know me yet.”<br />
And then the end came.<br />
<br />
No prank which the Great Jester loves to play<br />
is dearer to his heart than the summoning of a<br />
man from the prize to gain which he has given<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE<br />
<br />
the best years of his life, given his very soul,<br />
when it is almost within his grasp. We die just<br />
when we are beginning to know how to live. So<br />
it was to prove with Robert Vincent.<br />
<br />
Perhaps it was due to the strain which the<br />
completion of his work had put upon him, perhaps<br />
there was an original weakness of constitution<br />
hitherto unsuspected, or perhaps—. Anyhow,<br />
whatever may have been the cause, at the very<br />
height of his fame the sentence, from which there<br />
is no appeal, was pronounced, “ You must die!”<br />
<br />
There is no need to dwell on the dull, sickening<br />
sense of hope frustrated which fell like a black<br />
shadow on Robert Vincent’s heart when he knew<br />
that he must leave the world, which appeared to<br />
him just then to be so full of brightness and<br />
beauty. But he was no coward, his life had shown<br />
that, and he resolved to face the music like a man,<br />
<br />
“My body will die,” he said to his wife, “but<br />
my soul will live ; for that I have won immortality.<br />
I have put my whole soul into ‘The Welding of<br />
the Races,’ and while England lasts it will last<br />
also.” This he said in no vainglorious spirit.<br />
To him it was a simple fact. But as he grew<br />
weaker there came upon him a mental uneasiness<br />
which puzzled greatly his wife and his doctors.<br />
To some extent, but to some extent only, it seemed<br />
to be assignable to the stress of previous literary<br />
work. The fact was, the dark, impalpable cloud<br />
gathered blackness and substance as time went on.<br />
It pressed in upon him, making the last few weeks<br />
of his life into a hideous, waking nightmare.<br />
<br />
“Qlang, clang! throb, throb! What are they<br />
printing so close to me? Who are printing? Is<br />
it Gradband & Shimmery ?”<br />
<br />
“No, dear,’ said his wife gently, “there is no<br />
printing near you.’ The doctor, who overheard<br />
the mutterings, looked grave and asked the wife<br />
<br />
“Did your husband ever have any dealings with<br />
these publishers, Gradband & Shimmery ?”’<br />
<br />
“No,” she replied, ‘not that I know of. I<br />
never heard their names.”<br />
<br />
“Of course not,” said the doctor with a smile,<br />
“it is scarcely likely that Mr. Vincent would have<br />
had anything to do with publishers of that class.”<br />
<br />
The doctor was quite right. It was indeed<br />
unlikely—the most unlikely thing in the world.<br />
For Messrs. Gradband & Shimmery were known<br />
as publishers of fiction of the baser sort, fiction<br />
which had an enormous circulation among City<br />
¢lerks and shop girls.<br />
<br />
The stuff which this firm turned out in vast<br />
quantities was lurid and sensational to a degree,<br />
especially that for which “Sydney Trevor,”<br />
popularly supposed to be an assumed name, was<br />
responsible, but it could no more claim to be<br />
literature than a farthing rushlight could claim<br />
to be the moon.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
251<br />
<br />
Of course it was too wildly absurd to suppose<br />
that Robert Vincent, of all people in the world,<br />
could have had any dealings with such a firm as<br />
this. And the doctor made a mental note of his<br />
uneasiness as a curious illustration of an obscure<br />
brain lesion. But this did very little good to the<br />
patient himself. The noise of the printing presses<br />
at work seemed to become louder and more insis-<br />
tent every day. Every day too his imagination<br />
seemed to be haunted by a terror which ever drew<br />
closer and closer. His lucid intervals proved to<br />
those about him that he had no fear of death, nor<br />
even of the act of dying; but even his lucid<br />
intervals were haunted by the shadow of the fear<br />
which oppressed him so terribly in his delirium.<br />
Whatever the fear might be, it was associated with<br />
the idea of printing, and with the names of<br />
Gradband & Shimmery. Nothing that his wife<br />
could do or say—no news she might bring him of<br />
the ever increasing success of his book, no assur-<br />
ances of the high position, daily becoming more<br />
manifest, which he had secured for himself in<br />
literature, was able to expel this fear devil from<br />
his soul. Thereit sat, grinning at him till he died.<br />
<br />
As soon as Robert Vincent’s death was an-<br />
nounced, steps were taken by those whose word<br />
carried weight with the authorities to secure a<br />
place for him in Westminster Abbey. It seemed<br />
likely that their efforts would be crowned with<br />
suecess, and that the historian’s jesting remark to<br />
his wife would prove to be a true prophecy.<br />
<br />
It was urged that the country had only one<br />
way now of paying the recognition it owed to an<br />
admitted genius. What the leaders of thought<br />
said, the general public echoed with all its heart.<br />
No name was so constantly on men’s lips and<br />
before their eyes during these days as the name of<br />
Robert Vincent, historian and man of letters.<br />
Westminster Abbey was the place for him, and to<br />
Westminster Abbey he must be taken. And then<br />
suddenly all this talk stopped.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Gradband & Shimmery flooded the<br />
country with their advertisements—newspapers,<br />
<br />
hoardings, omnibuses, trains, sandwich-men—<br />
every available means of advertisement were<br />
<br />
pressed into the service of Messrs. Gradband &<br />
Shimmery. There had never been known, since<br />
books were first printed, such gigantic enterprise<br />
in advertising methods. Wherever men looked<br />
they saw the names of Gradband & Shimmery ;<br />
and underneath, only in larger characters, the<br />
name of “Sydney Trevor” in inverted commas ;<br />
and below that the name of Robert Vincent ; and<br />
below that again a list of books whose lurid and<br />
sensational titles spoke for them.<br />
<br />
Then the world learnt that Robert Vincent was<br />
identical with ‘Sydney Trevor,” and Westminster<br />
Abbey knew him not. CO. L:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ESSAY ON CRITICISM.<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
(Reprinted from Longman’s Magazine, by kind permission<br />
of the Author and the Publisher).<br />
<br />
(By A Lapy NoveEtist).<br />
<br />
S there no real critic on these shores<br />
Yet to be found? O Tempora, O Mores !<br />
How shall they judge who measure all by<br />
rule<br />
While Genius, for them, might dwell in Thule?<br />
Tis quality, not quantity, decides<br />
The merit of such work as mine—Quid rides ?<br />
When will they learn the truth that each great<br />
writer<br />
<br />
Of prose or poetry—non fit—nascitur ?<br />
When cease to sneer with condescending smile<br />
At woman—vyarium et mutabile ?<br />
Yet why should I the critics heed? Whate’er<br />
They say, ’tis mine—aequam mentem servyare.<br />
My place among the Immortals is secure,<br />
*Tis mine—divino ac humano jure.<br />
I feel within my breast the sacred fire,<br />
And I—I know it—non omnis moriar.<br />
Already on Parnassus’ sacred slope<br />
I dwell with Melpomene and Calliope.<br />
No marble tomb I crave, no trophies pious,<br />
My monument is—aere perennius.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
FR.<br />
<br />
a a<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
—1—~> +<br />
<br />
AN ANSWER TO “A PROTEST.”<br />
<br />
Sir,—In reference to a letter entitled “A Pro-<br />
test’ in last month’s Author, I would like to say<br />
a few words in common justice to all concerned in<br />
the arrangement of the Society’s annual social<br />
function.<br />
<br />
In the first place, it is a puzzle how the receipt<br />
of the announcement of a dinner could shock even<br />
the most highly strung and sensitive nerves.<br />
<br />
If Shakespeare had lived in the twentieth century<br />
he would no doubt have participated in a meal at<br />
the Hotel Cecil with as much equanimity—and<br />
perhaps even enjoyment—as any other author.<br />
<br />
Next I would like to point ont to the writer in<br />
question that as the Soviety is formed for the pro-<br />
tection and maintenance of literary property, it<br />
must needs respect itself. So, if the Society of<br />
Authors were to hold its annual festival at a third<br />
or fourth rate restaurant, and charge a low price,<br />
as suggested, it would certainly be considered an<br />
inferior concern, and be looked down upon<br />
accordingly. :<br />
<br />
Further, the writer contradicts himself, for he<br />
says that he has attended several dinners each at<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
increased cost, and then confesses having been<br />
present at a guinea one. Comment is needless. If<br />
the protester could be present at a guinea dinner<br />
it seems inconsistent that the suggestion of a 10s.<br />
one should give him a shock.<br />
<br />
As I did not attend any of the guinea functions<br />
I cannot speak from personal experience as to<br />
whether it would have been “ dear at eighteenpence,’””<br />
but I can honestly say that at all the four dinners<br />
which I have attended the food was as good and<br />
as well served as one could wish.<br />
<br />
I have always understood that the Society does<br />
not wish to make money by the dinner, but charges<br />
a price sufficient to cover expenses. If the com-<br />
plainant refers to the ‘ Annual Report,” he will<br />
find that the Society was 5s. 10d. out of pocket by<br />
last year’s dinner ; hence, no doubt, the decision<br />
to raise the price.<br />
<br />
With regard to the guests, it seems to me that<br />
the Society is honowred by the presence of such<br />
men as Sir Clements Markham, Captain Sverdrup.<br />
and others ; men noted for their good and useful<br />
work, some in one field, some in another. I have<br />
never heard of the Society asking subscriptions,<br />
so I don’t quite see how it can be brought down<br />
to the level of a charitable organisation.<br />
<br />
Lastly, I will say that I am so far in sympathy<br />
with the writer of “A Protest” that I think it<br />
would be more agreeable if it were possible to<br />
arrange a festival, or annual gathering, in which<br />
all the members could participate. It is clearly<br />
impossible to please everyone in a large body of<br />
people like the Authors’ Society, and if authors are<br />
“proverbially irritable,” what a large amount of<br />
self-control is needed by a committee formed of<br />
authors, whose task in endeavouring to please all<br />
can scarcely be an enviable one.<br />
<br />
H. M. E. Stanton.<br />
May 4th, 1903.<br />
<br />
SERIAL RIGHTS IN STORIES.<br />
<br />
S1n,—As I receive inquiries concerning my “new<br />
story” in the Sphere for May 2nd and 9th, will you<br />
allow me space to say that, so far from. being new,<br />
it is a resuscitated old story which appeared in a.<br />
country journal nearly twenty years ago, and that<br />
I am in no way responsible for its publication as if<br />
new ? ae<br />
<br />
I make this an opportunity of reminding inex-.<br />
perienced writers of fiction that, in disposing of<br />
‘serial rights” in their productions, they should<br />
take care to limit the time during which such<br />
rights may be exercised.<br />
<br />
Tuomas Harpy. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/485/1903-07-01-The-Author-13-10.pdf | publications, The Author |