483 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/483 | The Author, Vol. 13 Issue 08 (May 1903) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+13+Issue+08+%28May+1903%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 13 Issue 08 (May 1903)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1903-05-01-The-Author-13-8 | | | | | 193–224 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=13">13</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1903-05-01">1903-05-01</a> | | | | | | | 8 | | | 19030501 | Che Huthor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. XIII.—No. 8.<br />
<br />
May ist, 1903.<br />
<br />
[PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE TELEPHONE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Telephone connection has now been estab-<br />
lished, and the Society’s number is—<br />
<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
——_>— > —_____<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—— +<br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
K signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
Tue Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
—+-—~— + —_<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tue List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
can now be obtained at the offices of the Society,<br />
at the price of 6d. net.<br />
<br />
It will be sold to the members of the Society<br />
only.<br />
<br />
——— +<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
THE investments of the Pension Fund at<br />
present standing in the names of the Trustees are<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock; the<br />
<br />
Vou. XIII.<br />
<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
RO 2 en £1000 0 0<br />
G8 08s 500 0 0<br />
<br />
Victorian Government 3 % Consoli-<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ............... 291 19 11<br />
We A i 201 8 8<br />
otal 2. £1,993 9 2<br />
<br />
SPECIAL APPEAL.<br />
<br />
Tue Appeal sent out by the Chairman of the<br />
Society at the request of the Pension Fund Com-<br />
mittee has been very successful.<br />
<br />
The total amount of subscriptions and donations<br />
up to Dec. 1st is :—Subscriptions, £46 8s. 6d.;<br />
donations, £116 14s. 6d. Further additions to<br />
either list are set out below.<br />
<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
Dec. 1, Finnemore, Mrs. . . £0<br />
Dec. 3, Caulfield, Miss Sophia < 0-1<br />
Dec. 5, Hecht, Mrs. . s 02<br />
» Hamilton, Mrs. G. W. 1<br />
. Brinton, Selwyn 0<br />
Dec. 9, Dill, Miss Bessie 0<br />
<br />
Dec. 18, Sutherland, Her Grace the<br />
Duchess of : : :<br />
Dec. 19, Toplis, Miss Grace .<br />
Dec. 22, Anonymous ;<br />
Dec. 29, Seton-Karr, H. W.<br />
Pike Clement, E.<br />
19038.<br />
Jan. 1, Pickthall, Marmaduke<br />
3 Deane, Rev. A.C. .<br />
Jan. 4, Anonymous<br />
Heath, Miss Ida<br />
i Russell, G. H. :<br />
Jan. 16, White, Mrs. Caroline<br />
5, Bedford, Miss Jessie<br />
Jan. 19, Shiers-Mason, Mrs.<br />
Jan. 20, Cobbett, Miss Alice : ;<br />
Jan. 30, Minniken, Miss Bertha M. M.<br />
<br />
—<br />
OOS Orn ooocoece<br />
ooocoo oOocooaceg<br />
<br />
9<br />
<br />
22<br />
<br />
me Oo Oo Or COCO So OS Oo > bo<br />
or<br />
<br />
on<br />
eoooocoocooooan<br />
<br />
<br />
194<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Jan. 31, Whishaw, Fred. > 6<br />
Keb. 3, Reynolds, Mrs. Fred 0<br />
Feb. 11, Lincoln, C. 0<br />
Feb. 16, Hardy, J. Herbert . 0<br />
» Haggard, Major Arthur . 0<br />
Feb. 23, Finnemore, John . : 0<br />
Mar. 2, Moor, Mrs. St. C. . 1<br />
Mar. 5, Dutton, Mrs. Carrie 0<br />
Apl. 10, Bird, C. P. 0<br />
Apl. 10, Campbell, Miss Montgomery . (<br />
<br />
oC<br />
<br />
Donations.<br />
<br />
Dec. 1, Sanderson, Sir J. Burdon<br />
<br />
5<br />
<br />
- Smith, G. C. Moore 1<br />
Dec. 2, T'revor-Battye, Aubyn 1<br />
» Marks, Mrs. . 0<br />
Dec. 9, Moore, Henry Charles (0<br />
Dee. 11, Lutzow, Count 9<br />
», “Leicester Romayne ” 0<br />
<br />
», Hellier, H. George. 1<br />
Dee. 12, Croft, Miss Lily 0<br />
», Panting, J. Harwood 0<br />
<br />
» ‘attersall, Miss Louisa . 0<br />
Dec. 19, Egbert, Henry 0<br />
Dec. 23, Muirhead, James F. 0<br />
Dec. 28, A. 8. 1<br />
» Bateman, Stringer . 0<br />
Dec. 31, Cholmondeley, Miss Mary . 10<br />
<br />
1908.<br />
<br />
Jan. 3, Wheelright, Miss E. : 0<br />
5 Middlemass, 1] Miss Jean . 0<br />
<br />
Jan. 6, Avebury, The R ight Hon.<br />
The Lord . :<br />
» Gribble, Francis :<br />
Jan. 13, Boddington, Miss Helen .<br />
Jan. 17, White, Mrs. Wollaston<br />
» Miller, Miss E. T. .<br />
Jan. 19, Kemp, Miss Geraldine<br />
Jan. 20, Sheldon, Mrs. French<br />
Jan. 29, Roe, Mrs. Harcourt<br />
Feb. 9, Sherwood, Mrs...<br />
Feb. 16, Hocking, The Rey. Silas<br />
Feb. 18, Boulding, J. W. .<br />
5, Ord, Hubert H.<br />
Feb. 20, Price, Miss Eleanor<br />
» Carlile, Rev. J. CO. .<br />
Feb. 24, Dixon, Mrs.<br />
Feb. 26, Speakman, “Mrs.<br />
Mar. 5, Parker, Mrs. Nella<br />
Mar. 16, Hallward, N. L. .<br />
Mar. 20, Henry, Miss Alice .<br />
Mar. 20, Mathieson, Miss Annie .<br />
Mar. 20, Browne, T. A. “ Rolfe Boldre-<br />
wood” A<br />
Mar. 23, Ward, Mrs. Humphry :<br />
Api. 2, Hutton, The Rev. W. H.<br />
Apl. 14, Tournier, Theodore<br />
<br />
cCorcezocoorecocooresm<br />
<br />
fon<br />
= tec<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Or Or<br />
<br />
or or<br />
<br />
— ee<br />
acnc<br />
<br />
es<br />
acounorce<br />
<br />
e<br />
<br />
H<br />
corcauno Cire<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
i0<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
caoamoococceo<br />
<br />
cooooccoococeocesco<br />
<br />
eageocooco<br />
<br />
eoocoo<br />
<br />
The following members have also made subscrip-<br />
tions or donations :—<br />
<br />
Meredith, George, President of the Society.<br />
<br />
Thompson, Sir ood Bart., F.R.C.S,<br />
Rashdall, The Rey. H<br />
<br />
Guthrie, Anstey.<br />
<br />
Robertson, C,<br />
<br />
Dowsett, G, R<br />
<br />
‘here are in addition other subscribers who do<br />
not desire that either their names or the amount<br />
they are subscribing should be printed.<br />
<br />
SPECIAL. CONDITIONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS.<br />
<br />
Subscriptions,<br />
Hawkins, A. Hope<br />
<br />
: ‘ £10 0 6<br />
Barrie, J. M. . ; : : . 10 0 0<br />
Drummond, Hamilton : ; - 10.0 0<br />
Wynne, Charles Whitworth : - 10 0 0<br />
Gilbert, W. 8S. . : : ; - 10-0 9<br />
Sturgis, Julian . : : : - 10 0 0<br />
<br />
oe<br />
Sir Walter Besant Memorial Fund.<br />
THE amount standing to the credit<br />
of this account in the Bank is......... £330 3 6<br />
<br />
There are a few promised subscriptions still<br />
outstanding. The total of these<br />
about £4. The subscriptions received from July 1st<br />
to the date of issue are given below :—<br />
<br />
Patterson, A. . : : 8<br />
Salwey, Reginald E.<br />
<br />
Gidley, Miss E. C.<br />
<br />
Nixon, Prof. J. E.<br />
<br />
Dill, Miss Bessie<br />
<br />
Moore, Henry Charles<br />
<br />
Kemp, Miss Geraldine<br />
<br />
Clarke, Miss B.<br />
<br />
ao<br />
acnanoor<br />
<br />
_<br />
<br />
eco coc oF<br />
<br />
—_—_——_——_-—___+____—_<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
—+-~> +<br />
<br />
T the meeting of the Committee held on<br />
the 30th of March twelve new members<br />
and associates were elected to the Society.<br />
<br />
Their names are, as usual, printed below.<br />
<br />
Mr. George Gissing and Mr. Justin McCarthy<br />
were elected members of the Council. They have<br />
consented to accept the responsibilities of the<br />
position.<br />
<br />
There was only one case before the Committee,<br />
and it was adjourned for fuller information on one<br />
or two points.<br />
<br />
is, roughly, ©<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
nt<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Elections.<br />
<br />
“Ben Marlas”’<br />
<br />
Bird, C. P. (D. I, M.) Drybridge House,<br />
Hereford.<br />
<br />
Bowman, Robert Cynwyd, Curwen, N.<br />
Wales.<br />
<br />
Corelli, Miss Marie. Mason Croft, Stratford-<br />
on-A von.<br />
<br />
11, Chaleote Gardens,<br />
England’s Lane, N.W.<br />
Exeter College, Oxford.<br />
<br />
Dearmer, The Rev. Percy<br />
<br />
Donovan, P. V. de P.<br />
<br />
Douglas, Miss Maud 28, Oakley Street,<br />
Tsidore Chelsea, S.W.<br />
Douglas, Robert Langton 50c, South Street,<br />
Dorking.<br />
Lechmere, Mrs. (Cecil 29, Cadogan Gardens,<br />
Haselwood) S.W.<br />
Stott, Miss Beatrice Moorside Road, Flix-<br />
ton.<br />
Sutro, Alfred 10, Russell Mansions,<br />
W.-C:<br />
Wyatt, Geo. Herbert Henley House, West<br />
Side, Wandsworth<br />
<br />
Common, 8.W.<br />
<br />
—_—>—+—<br />
<br />
Another Pension.<br />
<br />
Iy the month of May the Pension Fund Com-<br />
mittee will proceed to consider applications for<br />
pensions to be granted under the Pension Fund<br />
Scheme of the Society of Authors. Pursuant to<br />
the power to make bye-laws for regulating appli-<br />
cations for pensions vested in the Committee by<br />
the Schenie, the Committee have made and hereby<br />
give notice of the following regulations :—<br />
<br />
1. All applications must be in writing and<br />
addressed to the Secretary of the Society of<br />
Authors at the Offices of the Society (39, Old<br />
Queen Street, Storey’s Gate, S.W.), and must reach<br />
the Secretary on or before June Ist, 1903.<br />
Envelopes should be marked “ Confidential.”<br />
<br />
2. Applications may be made (a) by the appli-<br />
cant for a pension, (/) by any two members of the<br />
Society on the applicant’s behalf. In the latter<br />
case the Committee may require the applicant to<br />
signify in writing his willingness to accept a<br />
pension if granted.<br />
<br />
3. Applications must state, to the best of the<br />
knowledge and belief of the person or persons<br />
making the same :<br />
<br />
(a) The fall name, description, and present<br />
address of the applicant. If the applicant has<br />
<br />
written under an assumed name such name should<br />
also be given,<br />
<br />
(6) The age of the applicant and the date at<br />
which the applicant became a member of the<br />
If the applicant has ceased to be a<br />
<br />
Society.<br />
<br />
member, the date of his or her retirement must<br />
be given.<br />
<br />
(¢) The financial position of the applicant,<br />
including an account of the applicant’s entire<br />
annual income from all sources (including volun-<br />
tary allowances, if any).<br />
<br />
(d) The names of the publications relied on to<br />
establish the merit of the applicant’s literary work.<br />
<br />
4, Applications may, if desired, be accompanied<br />
by not more than two testimonials to the appli-<br />
cant’s character, and to merits of the applicant’s<br />
works or either of them, and bya further statement<br />
of the applicant’s financial position from some<br />
person acquainted therewith.<br />
<br />
5. Applications and the contents of all state-<br />
ments relating thereto will be treated as confiden-<br />
tial, the names of the recipients of the pensions<br />
and the amounts granted alone being stated in Zhe<br />
Author.<br />
<br />
6. All communications’ whatever must be ad-<br />
dressed to the Secretary, and to him only.<br />
Canvassing of members of the Committee, either<br />
by or on behalf of the applicant, is prohibited.<br />
<br />
7. The pension created will be granted as from<br />
March 25th, 1903, and will be payable, as to the<br />
first instalment immediately, and thereafter in<br />
quarterly instalments in advance on the usual<br />
English quarter days.<br />
<br />
By order of the Pension Fund Committee,<br />
<br />
G. HERBERT THRING,<br />
Secretary.<br />
4<br />
<br />
OUR BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
i<br />
HE Rev. Edwin A. Abbott, D.D., formerly<br />
Headmaster of the City of London School,<br />
and author of “ The Spirit on the Waters,”<br />
** Newmanism,” “ Through Nature to Christ,” etc.,<br />
has just published (Adam and Charles Black) a<br />
very interesting and scholarly pamphlet, entitled<br />
“ Contrast; or, a Prophet and a Forger.”<br />
<br />
Dr. Abbott is convinced that the author of the<br />
Fourth Gospel is often, historically as well as<br />
spiritually, closer than the Synoptic Evangelists<br />
to the truthful conception of the birth, nature,<br />
life, and resurrection of our Lord. At the same<br />
time he is firmly convinced that the author was<br />
not the son of Zebedee, nor an eye-witness of the<br />
facts he relates. He was one who considered him-<br />
self but the pen of John the son of Zebedee, and<br />
gave unity to the preaching and revelations of<br />
John.<br />
<br />
Dr. Abbott has in the press a work entitled<br />
“From Letter to Spirit; an Attempt to Reach<br />
through Voicesand Words the Man beyond them”’<br />
(Adam and Charles Black).<br />
196<br />
<br />
Sir Lewis Morris has added to the last edition of<br />
his works, to be published immediately, several<br />
poems written last year, including the lines on<br />
“The Peace Thanksgiving in St. Paul’s,” “The<br />
Coronation Ode,” written by the King’s request,<br />
and set to music by command, by Dr. Cowen ;<br />
“ Peripeteia,” or an pode, which appeared in the<br />
Times ; the announcement of the King’s illness ;<br />
the lines on “The Last Pageant,” of October<br />
26th, and the “Ode on the Installation of the<br />
Prince of Wales as Chancellor of the Welsh<br />
University at Bangor.” ‘The new issue comprises<br />
also the lines on “The Jubilee of the Free<br />
Libraries at Manchester,” held as late as the 3rd<br />
of the present month. Sir Lewis, we understand,<br />
is now desirous of bringing his poetical career to a<br />
close, if his friends the public will permit.<br />
<br />
Lieut.-Colonel E. Gunter has published, through<br />
Messrs. Wm. Clowes & Sons, Limited, 28, Cock-<br />
spur Street, S.W., a seventh edition of his military<br />
pocket-book, ‘‘ The Officer’s Field Note, and Sketch<br />
Book and Reconnaissance Aide-Mémoire,” which<br />
was much used by officers during the late Boer<br />
War. This edition, which has been brought up to<br />
date, contains the amendments in war establish-<br />
ments, new sketches, showing the latest designs for<br />
field trenches, etc., as the result of the war experi-<br />
ences, and other matter useful for field training,<br />
<br />
besides materials for Field Sketches and Reports.<br />
The Religious Tract Society has shown its<br />
appreciation of Sir William Charley’s recent<br />
work, “The Holy City, Athens and Egypt,” by<br />
placing in their saloon, 56, Paternoster Row, and<br />
65, St. Paul’s Churchyard, copies of the work for<br />
<br />
sale. This volume is founded on personal obser-<br />
vation and the researches of modern explorers, and<br />
is a vindication of the Bible narrative against the<br />
assaults of the Higher Criticism. Sir William has<br />
written a lecture on “The Higher Criticism and<br />
the Bible,” which he will shortiy deliver.<br />
<br />
Sir William Charley’s legal works, “The Real<br />
Property Acts” (Sweet) and “The Judicature<br />
Acts” (Waterlow), each ran through three<br />
editions and are now out of print. But there<br />
are three of his books still in circulation: “The<br />
Crusade against the Constitution; an Historical<br />
Vindication of the House of Lords” (7s. 6d.,<br />
Sampson Low); “Ending and Mending the<br />
House of Lords” (2s. 6d., Simpkin, Marshall); and<br />
the above-mentioned “The Holy City, Athens and<br />
Egypt” (10s. 6d., Marshall Bros.).<br />
<br />
“The Sword of Azrael,’ Mr. R. E. Forrest’s<br />
latest novel, is a chronicle of the Great Mutiny.<br />
The title-page has it that the writer is Major-<br />
General John Hayman, late Hon. E.I.C.S., edited<br />
by R. E. Forrest. This is, of course, a mere<br />
literary device. We will not divulge the plot<br />
of this vividly written story; our readers can<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
follow John Hayman’s realistic narrative for<br />
themselves ; they will find it very interesting,<br />
<br />
, Mr. Forrest has published four books, all con-<br />
nected with India. The first one, entitled “The<br />
Touchstone of Peril,” was most favourably re-<br />
viewed. The second, “ Hight Days,” came out<br />
in the Cornhill Magazine, and in book form went<br />
through four or five editions. The third was<br />
“The Bond of Blood” (Little Novels series :<br />
T. Fisher Unwin). It was a small book that<br />
evoked many long reviews; notably it had a<br />
favourable mention in an Ldinburgh Review<br />
article on Anglo-Indian Novelists, known to<br />
have been written by Sir Alfred Lyall.<br />
<br />
Miss Beatrice Marshall has in hand a story of<br />
London in the time of the Commonwealth, which<br />
will be published next autumn by Seely & Co.<br />
Her “ The Siege of York,” a story of the days of<br />
Thomas Lord Fairfax (Seely & Co.), published<br />
last year, proves that she has inherited her<br />
mother’s literary gifts. This was Miss Marshall’s<br />
second historical romance, the first being “ Old<br />
Blackfriars in the Days of Sir Anthony Vandyck.”<br />
<br />
When Mrs. Emma Marshall died in 1899 her<br />
last story was left incomplete. At the request of<br />
her publishers it was-finished by her daughter, and<br />
so successfully finished that Miss Beatrice Marshall<br />
was encouraged to tread further in her mother’s<br />
footsteps. Previous to this she had contributed<br />
articles, chiefly on modern German literature, to<br />
several papers. Two of these, one on Nietzsche<br />
and another on Gerhard Hauptmann, appeared in<br />
the Fortnightly Review.<br />
<br />
After the appearance of her translation of<br />
Sudermann’s great novel “Der Kalzensky”<br />
(John Lane), Messrs. Smith Elder invited her<br />
to take part in the translation of the Bismarck<br />
Memoirs. The biographical sketch of her mother<br />
has gone into a second edition. It contains a por-<br />
trait of that prolific novelist besides twelve illus-<br />
trations (6s., Seeley & Co.). The writing of it<br />
was a real labour of love.<br />
<br />
Mr. William Westall, in spite of ill-health, has<br />
nearly finished a present-day novel which he pro-<br />
poses to call “ Dr. Wynne’s Revenge.” He hopes<br />
soon to begin a long contemplated Lancashire story,<br />
dealing with the stirring period of the cotton famine<br />
and the American Civil War.<br />
<br />
Ian Maclaren (the Rev. John Watson) is not at<br />
present engaged in any literary work owing to<br />
considerations of health.<br />
<br />
Mr. Walter Jerrold is editing a big collection of<br />
Nursery Rhymes for Messrs. Blackie. There are<br />
to be numerous illustrations by Charles Robinson.<br />
Besides this Mr. Jerrold is editing (1) Mrs.<br />
Gaskell’s “Life of Charlotte Bronté” for Dents’<br />
Temple Classics; (2) “ Longfellow’s Poetical<br />
Works” for a new series of Poets to be published<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
by Messrs. W. Collins & Sons; (3) and he is also<br />
editing Dents’ edition of Thackeray’s Prose Works.<br />
<br />
Mr. Robert Machray’s new serial, “ The Mystery<br />
of Lincoln’s Inn,” started in 7%t-Bits on April<br />
11th, where it will appear for the next three or four<br />
months. The story, which Mr. Machray describes<br />
as an ‘“‘experiment in sensation,” will be published<br />
in book form by Messrs. Chatto and Windus in<br />
September. ‘The Mystery of Lincoln’s Inn” is<br />
built round that somewhat familiar fact of every-<br />
day life, the defaulting solicitor.<br />
<br />
Miss Montgomery-Campbell has written a Pre-<br />
face to a volume, shortly to be issued, entitled “ Old<br />
Days in Diplomacy.” It is by the daughter of Sir<br />
Edward Cromwell Disbrowe, En. Ex., Min. Plen.,<br />
G.C.G., and is inscribed to the Honble. Mrs.<br />
Richard Boyle (E. V. B.). This volume, illustrated<br />
with portraits, is 7s. 6d. net—by post 7s. 11d.<br />
The edition is strictly limited, and the price will<br />
probably be raised in the case of those who do not<br />
subscribe for it.<br />
<br />
“Old Days in Diplomacy,” written at the<br />
request of many friends, gives an account of life<br />
at the Courts of Russia, Wiirtemberg, Sweden,<br />
and the Netherlands, during the first half of<br />
the nineteenth century. The ceremonies at the<br />
foneral of the Emperor Alexander and the Coro-<br />
nation of the Emperor Nicholas are described, also<br />
the official visits of the Dukes of Wellington and<br />
Devonshire to St. Petersburg, as well as the inter-<br />
course with Prince Metternich. It contains many<br />
most interesting personal recollections of royalties<br />
and celebrities at home and abroad.<br />
<br />
A fifteenth edition of Lieut-Colonel Sisson C.<br />
Pratt’s “Military Law, its Procedure and Prac-<br />
tice,” was published a short time ago, and a fifth<br />
edition of the “ Military Law Examiner” (Gale and<br />
Polden) will be issued this spring. Before long<br />
Lieut.-Colonel Pratt will have to take in hand the<br />
revision of the official “‘ Précis of Modern Tactics,”<br />
which was re-written by him, and in view of the<br />
recent experiences in South Africa a new edition<br />
will be of general interest.<br />
<br />
Mr. Morley Roberts’ new book, ‘‘ The Promotion<br />
of The Admiral, and other Sea Comedies,” is a<br />
volume of short stories well worth reading. The<br />
first, which gives the book its title, is in two parts,<br />
and tells how Shanghai Smith, of San Francisco,<br />
tries to get even with a sailor who had once given<br />
him a thorough licking; this sailor being now<br />
Rear-Admiral Sir Richard Dunn, K.C.B. How<br />
Shanghai Smith is himself paid out and how the<br />
Admiral comes up top we will not reveal.<br />
<br />
“The Scuttling of the Pandora,” the last in the<br />
book, is a remarkable little tale of an unlucky ship.<br />
Here is a passage from it :—<br />
<br />
‘‘T want to see her sink,” Joe said savagely. “I want<br />
to see ’er go where she’s put so many good men. What<br />
<br />
197<br />
<br />
right ‘as we to save ’er to do more ’arm? It ain’t alone as<br />
she’s drownded my chum or the others, but she ’as a black<br />
record that ain’t finished unless we finish it. She’s strong<br />
and will go on killin’ for twenty years, Geordie. She'll<br />
oa praney for them as doesn’t care, but what of the likes<br />
of us ?*<br />
<br />
He was greatly moved.<br />
<br />
“She’s caulked with men’s lives, and painted with their<br />
blood!” he cried passionately. “I'd rather she sunk with<br />
me than sailed the seas any more.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Charles Whitworth Wynne, author of «Ad<br />
Astra,” &c., has just published through Messrs.<br />
Kegan Paul a drama in five acts, called “David<br />
and Bathshua.” It is founded on the story in<br />
the Bible, and Saul, Jonathan, Abner, Uriah,<br />
Natham, Michal, and Merab are among the<br />
dramatis persone.<br />
<br />
Mr. F. Marion Crawford’s fascinating book “ Ave<br />
Roma Immortalis,” being studies from the<br />
Chronicles of Rome, has gone into a second and<br />
cheaper edition.<br />
<br />
In his “Studies in Contemporary Biography,”<br />
Mr. Bryce gives us twenty graphic impressions of<br />
twenty notable men. Lord Beaconsfield, Mr.<br />
Gladstone, Dean Stanley, Anthony Trollope, Mr.<br />
Parnell, Archbishop Tait, Cardinal Manning, Lord<br />
Acton, are among the personalities presented to us<br />
in these interesting pages of biographies. This is<br />
a book not to be missed.<br />
<br />
Miss May Crommelin’s “Midge” forms No,<br />
51 of the Weekly Telegraph novels. This is<br />
“‘a monthly series of copyright books by the best<br />
authors.” “Midge” is a readable story. Miss<br />
Iza Duffus Hardy has written No. 31 of this<br />
series, ‘‘ Hearts or Diamonds.”<br />
<br />
John Strange Winter has contributed No. 46<br />
of the same series, “Mignon’s Secret.’ No.<br />
48 is “The Dancer in Yellow,” by Mr. W. E.<br />
Norris; No, 47, “The Peer and the Woman,”<br />
is by E. P. Oppenheim. ;<br />
<br />
“Helen” is the name of a new story by Cherry<br />
Rowland—a pleasant tale with a happy ending.<br />
Copies can be had of the writer at Llwyn-y-brain,<br />
Whitland, South Wales.<br />
<br />
Mr. I. Zangwill’s “ The Grey Wig ” (Heinemann)<br />
is a collection of stories old and new. ‘“ Merely<br />
Mary Ann” is an old one, but is none the less<br />
welcome for that. “The Grey Wig,” the first, and<br />
we fancy one of his latest, is very good indeed.<br />
<br />
In his recently published book “The Danger<br />
of Innocence,” Mr. Cosmo Hamilton has given us<br />
asmart Society satire. It is published by Greening<br />
& Co. at 6s.<br />
<br />
Mr. J. Bloundelle Burton’s novel, “A Branded<br />
Name” (Methuen, 6s.), is full of incident. The<br />
name, branded on a woman’s shoulder, was a mark<br />
that would remain upon that shoulder as long as<br />
her life would last.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
198<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The “Star-Dreamer,” by Agnes and Egerton<br />
Castle, is full of charm—‘ the story of a woman’s<br />
influence.’ The atmosphere of a herb-garden and<br />
a laboratory respectively permeate the tale.<br />
<br />
In Sydney ©. Grier’s “The Advanced Guard”<br />
(Blackwood, 6s.), the hero is Sir Dugald Haigh,<br />
who was doubtfully blest with an uncomfortable<br />
wife. The story begins in India; the time is, the<br />
‘* Dickens period.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Rider Haggard’s new romance, “Pearl<br />
Maiden” (Longmans, 6s.), is interesting from<br />
start to finish. Miriam, the Pearl Maiden, is born<br />
aboard a Phcenician merchant galley bound for<br />
Alexandria. Miriam is brought up among the<br />
Essenes. She endures many things during and<br />
after the siege and fall of Jerusalem. In this<br />
portion of the romance Mr. Rider Haggard has<br />
surpassed himself.<br />
<br />
Mr. William Archer’s article in the April Fort-<br />
nightly Review has been attracting a great deal of<br />
attention. He advocates the formation of a<br />
Critical Court of Honour to which disputed ques-<br />
tions theatrical should be referred. He suggests<br />
that a body of six delegates should be selected<br />
from the representative societies of the different<br />
classes interested, viz., the Society of Authors, the<br />
Institute of Journalists, and the Actors’ Associa-<br />
tion. ‘These delegates to elect an additional<br />
member as president with a casting vote. Com-<br />
plainants would be expected to appear before this<br />
board, and Mr. Archer says, ‘‘ We may be sure that<br />
a plaintiff who had refused to submit his case to<br />
its arbitration would go into the law courts under<br />
a heavy handicap.”<br />
<br />
We understand that the leading réle in Mr.<br />
Sydney Grundy’s new play, Zhe Gipsy, is to be<br />
played—created, in fact—by Miss Fay Davis.<br />
<br />
—_—— + +-____-<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
—1—~<—+<br />
<br />
MONG the recent novels which have had<br />
the greatest success here are “ Dona-<br />
tienne,” by M. René Bazin; “L’Inutile<br />
<br />
Effort,” by M. Edouard Rod, and ‘‘ La Nouvelle<br />
Espérance” by the Comtesse de Noailles.<br />
<br />
Curiously enough, in each of these three books<br />
the most prominent feminine character is an<br />
absolutely selfish woman singularly devoid of<br />
conscience.<br />
<br />
Donatienne, in M. Bazin’s story, is the young<br />
wife of a Breton peasant. She is the mother of<br />
<br />
three children and the idol of her husband, but<br />
poverty compels her to leave the little cottage<br />
Just<br />
<br />
home and engage herself as nurse in Paris.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
continual presence of the husband’s<br />
<br />
_ details to the end of the volume.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
at first she sends her earnings to her husband to<br />
enable him to keep the little home together until<br />
better times. Gradually, however, she becomes<br />
accustomed to the luxuries and amusements of her<br />
new life Her letters to her husband are rare and<br />
finally cease altogether.<br />
<br />
The poor Breton peasant is somewhat slow of<br />
comprehension, but when it dawns upon him that<br />
his wife hus no intention of returning to her<br />
family, the little home, with its memories, becomes<br />
unbearable to him, and with his three children he<br />
sets out with a vague idea of seeking his fortune<br />
elsewhere.<br />
<br />
The story is most pathetic and the dénouement<br />
both touching and tragic. It is told with a<br />
simplicity that adds greatly to the pathos. There<br />
is not a word too much, not a line of any descrip-<br />
tion which could be omitted, and the book is<br />
certainly one of the finest of M. Bazin’s novels.<br />
<br />
“L’Inutile Effort” is a. masterly study of<br />
character. Leonard Perreuse is the ambitious<br />
man of our modern society, the man whose one<br />
object in life is to succeed. He is seconded by a<br />
wife who is narrow-minded, selfish and unscrupu-<br />
lous. They are both somewhat hampered by the<br />
brother<br />
Raymond, a man who has not advanced or rather<br />
degenerated with the times, and who is old-<br />
fashioned enough to have a conscience. The<br />
story of the book turns on the trial of a French<br />
girl in London, who has been arrested on the<br />
charge of murdering her child by pushing it into<br />
the Thames.<br />
<br />
On reading the account in the newspaper both<br />
brothers are convinced that the child is Leonard’s,<br />
and they are equally convinced that the poor girl<br />
whom he deserted is incapable of the crime of<br />
which she is accused. Raymond, who had always<br />
blamed his brother’s conduct in this matter, had<br />
taken an interest in the girl, kept up a corre-<br />
spondence with her for some years, and helped her<br />
when, through illness, she had been in difficulties.<br />
He persuades Leonard that their duty now is to go<br />
to London and give their evidence in favour of the<br />
prisoner. Leonard’s wife, fearing the consequences<br />
of ascandal for herself and her children, insists that<br />
her husband must relinquish this plan. Raymond,<br />
in his indignation, refuses to enter his brother's<br />
house again. “Ihe unfortunate girl is condemned<br />
to death, and from that moment Leonard’s punish-<br />
ment begins. His conscience is aroused at last,<br />
and in desperation he leaves everything and goes<br />
with Raymond to London to see if anything can<br />
now be done.<br />
<br />
We will not spoil the story by telling all the<br />
It is a book in<br />
which all the characters live, and it is undoubtedly<br />
the strongest of M. Rod’s novels.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
As regards ‘La Nouvelle Espérance,’ by the<br />
Comtesse de Noailles, the title is quite misleading.<br />
From the first page to the last of the book one<br />
searches in vain for the “new hope.” With such<br />
a fine title one naturally expects some elevated<br />
thoughts and ideas, but the whole book is “ of the<br />
earth, earthy,” with a woman as the principal<br />
character who is positively repulsive. ‘‘ The<br />
Degenerates’”’ would have been a more suitable<br />
title for such a novel, as, with the exception of the<br />
unfortunate husband of the heroine, all the cha-<br />
racters are more or less unwholesome. There is<br />
very little plot or even story to the book. It is<br />
merely the account of an idle, selfish, luxurious<br />
woman, who imagines herself ultra-refined and<br />
who has no aim or object in life. She has<br />
a devoted husband whose chief fault appears to<br />
be his blindness to his wife’s defects. Having<br />
absolutely nothing to do, she is naturally bored to<br />
death, and being an extremely self-centred person<br />
she spends hours brooding over her own feelings<br />
and sensations.<br />
<br />
She then endeavours to make love to various<br />
friends of her husband. Her third attempt, only,<br />
is a success, and this liaison with a married man<br />
relieves the monotony of her life until the new<br />
lover discovers that he has a conscience and retires<br />
with his wife to the country.<br />
<br />
The extraordinary feature of this book is the<br />
<br />
absolute depravity of the woman, which, consider-<br />
ing her education and surroundings, makes the<br />
whole story appear unreal. When her lover goes<br />
away she decides that she cannot live without him,<br />
and without the slightest compunction as far as her<br />
husband is concerned, she prepares a strong dose of<br />
morphia, writes a farewell letter to the recreant<br />
lover, which she leaves for her husband’s sister to<br />
forward, and when the clock strikes midnight<br />
takes her departure from this world. In this<br />
farewell letter she says, “Vous m’aimiez et vous<br />
€tes parti parce que votre femme et votre fils yous<br />
Pont demandé. . . . Vous avez fait ce que vous<br />
deviez faire : les hommes ont de la conscience. Les<br />
femmes, mon ami, n’ont pas de conscience ; elles<br />
ont une épouvantable volonté de n’étre pas plus<br />
malheureuses qu’elles ne peuvent.”<br />
_ On closing the book one can only wonder why<br />
it should have been written. As a great French<br />
eritic said about the works of another author:<br />
“ When such things are read and meet with success,<br />
eritics can only write a page of history on the<br />
Manners and customs of a society which reads such<br />
00ks,”<br />
<br />
“La Bastille des Comédiens ” is the title of the<br />
new book by M. Frantz Funck-Brentano, the well-<br />
snown author of “ Le Drame des Poisons” and<br />
L’ Affaire du Collier.”<br />
<br />
In January, 1902, the Société de I’Histoire du<br />
<br />
199<br />
<br />
théatre opened a competition for a study on For<br />
PEvéque, the famous prison in which so many<br />
comedians, dramatic authors and critics were incar-<br />
cerated. So little was known about this old prison<br />
that it has been no easy task to collect the necessary<br />
information from the various libraries and the<br />
national archives.<br />
<br />
M. Funck-Brentano’s work was unanimously<br />
declared to be the best, and the volume now pub-<br />
lished, illustrated with eleven engravings, is a most<br />
interesting study of Old Paris and its history and<br />
customs. About a third of the book is taken up<br />
with a description of the prison itself and its<br />
history, while the remaining two-thirds tell us of<br />
the strange customs of those bye-gone days, when<br />
prisoners were notified that they were sentenced to<br />
a few days’ seclusion, and accordingly wended their<br />
way to the prison unescorted.<br />
<br />
The author tells us amusing stories, too, of the<br />
way in which fathers could have their sons im-<br />
prisoned for a short time. In 1744 a M. Thibaut,<br />
of Bordeaux, writes to the police-lieutenant of<br />
Paris to the effect that his son, aged thirty, is in<br />
the gay capital. ‘He is leading a dissipated life,”<br />
writes the anxious father, “and the result may be<br />
that he will disgrace his family.” All that’ the<br />
father asks is that his son may be detained in<br />
prison for a short time and he is quite willing to<br />
pay the expenses. The police-lieutenant investi-<br />
gates the case, and signs a paper on the 5th of<br />
April, “ Bon pour prison, aux dépens du pere.” The<br />
son objects to the hospitality provided for him and<br />
appeals for a release. The father’s consent to this<br />
is necessary, and on the 25th of April, evidently<br />
considering that the lesson has had time to be<br />
beneficial, he signs the paper for the release of<br />
his son.<br />
<br />
Comedians who were wanting in respect either<br />
to the king or to their public were detained at For<br />
l’Evéque for a time, and we are told many amusing<br />
anecdotes about them. Life in this prison was by<br />
no means monotonous, and some of the inmates<br />
entertained their friends in the most hospitable<br />
manner. ‘The celebrated actress, Mlle. Clairon,<br />
gave “des soupers divins et nombreux,” and<br />
carriages filled the street from morning till night<br />
as long as she was in prison.<br />
<br />
When the artistes of the Francais were im-<br />
prisoned they were always allowed liberty for their<br />
performances and rehearsals, as the Comédie could<br />
not dispense with their services.<br />
<br />
In the magazines there are some excellent<br />
articles this month.<br />
<br />
In the International Theatre M. Max Nordan<br />
writes on “Theatrical Censorship.” The authorities<br />
in Berlin have forbidden the production of Paul<br />
Heyse’s “Mary of Magdala,” and M. Nordau<br />
thinks that “all civilised Europeans should blush<br />
<br />
<br />
200<br />
<br />
to tolerate the existence of that degrading vestige<br />
of feudal despotism : theatrical censorship.”<br />
<br />
The English are specially favoured in the cur-<br />
rent number of this theatrical paper.<br />
<br />
M. Sardou has allowed the editor to publish<br />
photographic reproductions of the principal scenes<br />
of his new play “ Dante,” which is to be produced<br />
soon by Sir Henry Irving. About eight of these<br />
scenes are reproduced, accompanied by an excellent<br />
article giving an idea of Dante’s original concep-<br />
tion of the Inferno.<br />
<br />
Madame Réjane has had to postpone until next<br />
season the new play she was rehearsing: “ La<br />
Meilleure Part.”<br />
<br />
“Ta Rabouilleuse” is a success at the Odeon.<br />
It is a four-act play cleverly adapted by M. Emile<br />
Fabre from Balzac’s “ Ménage de Garcon.”<br />
<br />
Ouida’s “ Two Little Wooden Shoes ” has been<br />
produced at the Opéra Comique as “ Muguette.”<br />
The music is by M. Missa.<br />
<br />
“Tyes Affaires sont les Affaires,” by M. Octave<br />
Mirbeau, is the event of the moment at the<br />
Francais. It is an extremely up-to-date satire on<br />
the omnipotence of wealth. The piece is a literary<br />
triumph, the dialogue brilliant and the interest<br />
well sustained.<br />
<br />
“T’Autre Danger,” by M. Maurice Donnay, is<br />
still a success at the Francais. It is admirably<br />
put on, but the subject is a very delicate one—of<br />
the same nature as that of M. Paul Bourget’s novel,<br />
“Le Fantome.”<br />
<br />
“Lucifer” was the title of the last piece of this<br />
season produced by M. Bour at his International<br />
Theatre. It is a very strong play in four acts,<br />
translated by M. Monnier from the Italian of<br />
M. Butti.<br />
<br />
Lucifer is the name given to a free-thinker, who<br />
was formerly a priest, by the students to whom he<br />
lectures. This ex-priest has married and has a<br />
son and daughter, whom he has brought up as<br />
atheists. An old friend of his comes to live near<br />
him as Professor at the University. This friend is<br />
a religious man, and has an only daughter. The<br />
ex-priest’s son falls in love with her, but her father<br />
refuses his consent to their marriage on religious<br />
grounds. The lovers elope, and after their marriage<br />
return to the ex-priest’s home. In the last act the<br />
young wife has taken a severe chill and is dying.<br />
Her husband, in the presence of Death, implores<br />
his atheist father to teach him a prayer, as in his<br />
desperation he suddenly feels the need of religion<br />
and the certainty that there is something beyond<br />
this life. The struggle between his pride as a<br />
savant and atheist and his family affection is very<br />
terrible, and the scene between the father and son<br />
is most dramatic.<br />
<br />
M. Bour was remarkably fine in this réle.<br />
“Lucifer” and “ Alléluia” are undoubtedly his two<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
best creations. M. Bourny, as the son, was also<br />
excellent. M. Bauer had only a small part, but he<br />
was as fine as usual in it.<br />
<br />
M. Bour has also produced another play by M.<br />
Robert Bracco, a one-act piece entitled “Don<br />
Pietro Carusi,” which is quite a chef d’wuvre.<br />
<br />
ALys HALLARD.<br />
<br />
9<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
PROPERTY.<br />
<br />
es<br />
Literary Larceny.<br />
<br />
R. HARTLEY ASPDEN, the Editor of the<br />
Sunday Companion and Sunday Circle, has -<br />
laid before the Secretary of the Society of 7 iw<br />
<br />
Authors a case of literary larceny of a very serious |<br />
character. |<br />
<br />
As it is probable that similar cases may have oe:<br />
occurred, and as it has always been the object of —F<br />
the Authors’ Society to maintain the rights of<br />
authors against all comers, members of their own<br />
profession or not, it has been thought right to<br />
publish the facts in detail.<br />
<br />
In January of this year, Mr. Aspden, as Editor<br />
of the papers mentioned, received from a Mr.<br />
Reginald Nash, a story entitled “Through Great f°. *<br />
Tribulation.” This story he was inclined to accept,<br />
and wrote to the author as follows :— B iyky<br />
<br />
DEAR S1R,—My reader has reported favourably on your :<br />
story “Through Great Tribulation.” Please tell me if you<br />
are the author of the story, and if you are willing to accept<br />
£15 (our usual price for these stories) for it.<br />
<br />
Yours faithfully.<br />
THE EDITOR.<br />
<br />
The author’s reply was on a post card, to the<br />
<br />
following effect.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dar SrR,—Received offer for story entitled ‘Through _<br />
<br />
Great Tribulation,’ which I accept.<br />
Believe me, I am,<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
(Signed) R. NASH.<br />
<br />
By chance Mr. Aspden discovered that the story<br />
had already been published about two years pre-<br />
viously in another of his publications entitled Golden<br />
Stories. The story was word for word the same,”<br />
with the exception that the title had been changed<br />
and the name of one of the characters. He<br />
thereupon wrote a second time to the author, and —<br />
requested to know whether the story was his own<br />
production.<br />
<br />
In answer, he received a letter stating it was the<br />
author’s own production, and implying that he was”<br />
a contributor to many other magazines. . :<br />
<br />
The original story was written by Mrs. H. B.<br />
Welch. If Mrs. Welch had been a member of the”<br />
Society of Authors the Committee would, no doubt,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
have gladly taken up the case on her behalf and<br />
exposed the matter in the courts, but the Com-<br />
mittee had no locus standi, and left it therefore to<br />
Mr. Aspden to bring the affair before the public.<br />
Further correspondence made it clear that this<br />
was not the only story that had been taken from<br />
other papers and forwarded to editors as the anthor’s<br />
own work, and we are indebted to Mr. Aspden for<br />
having thrashed out the matter carefully. In con-<br />
sequence Mr. Nash has written, signed and published<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
in the Norwood Free Press the following apology :<br />
<br />
I, Reginald Nash, of No. 1, Dassett Road, Knight’s Hill,<br />
West Norwood, beg humbly to apologise to the Editor of<br />
Sunday Stories and Golden Stories for having, without his<br />
knowledge and consent, taken stories published in those<br />
journals, and endeavoured to dispose of them for payment<br />
as my own original compositions, and I hereby promise not<br />
to repeat this offence in the case of Golden Stories or<br />
Sunday Stories or any other paper.<br />
<br />
(Signed)<br />
Witness, H. Brown,<br />
Dated 18th Mareh, 1903.<br />
<br />
The matter is of serious interest to all members<br />
of the Authors’ Society, and we think it expedient<br />
to publish in full this apology, which has already<br />
appeared in one newspaper.<br />
<br />
REGINALD NASH.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
An Unwarrantable Infringement.<br />
<br />
ANOTHER case has been brought to the notice of<br />
the Secretary. In the autumn of last year a paper<br />
entitled the Science and Art of Mining gave a<br />
prize for the best answer to certain questions<br />
concerning mining.<br />
<br />
One of the questions was :<br />
<br />
‘« What are the chief causes of boiler explosions ?<br />
—What precautions would you take ?”<br />
<br />
The prize was awarded to John R. Ford.<br />
<br />
Mr. Powis Bale, who is a member of our Society,<br />
an engineer, and a writer of some valuable books on<br />
the subject, discovered in a roundabout fashion that<br />
the answer to the prize question was copied directly,<br />
without any acknowledgment, out of his book<br />
“Steam Engineering,” although one of the rules of<br />
the competition especially forbade this.<br />
<br />
If those who enter prize competitions are in the<br />
habit of competing on these lines the sooner the<br />
fault is exposed the better.<br />
<br />
Mr. Bale placed the matter in the hands of the<br />
Secretary, who at once wrote to the editor of the<br />
paper.<br />
<br />
It is quite clear from the answer of the pro-<br />
prietors that they were unaware of Mr. Ford’s<br />
methods. They have at once taken steps to express<br />
their regret in a public manner, by publishing in<br />
their paper a statement of the facts approved by<br />
the author whose copyright they had unwittingly<br />
infringed.<br />
<br />
201<br />
<br />
Mr. Ford’s mistake has been acknowledged, and<br />
Mr. Powis Bale has kindly consented to refrain<br />
from taking any further action on the publication<br />
of the apology set forth below :—<br />
<br />
In the autumn of 1902, the Science and Art of<br />
Mining proposed a prize competition, one of the<br />
conditions of which runs as follows :<br />
<br />
“Original answers are specially desired. In all cases<br />
where quotations or extracts are made. the source and<br />
authority must be stated. Any breach of this regulation<br />
which comes to our notice will debar the offender from all<br />
future competitions in these columns.”<br />
<br />
Contrary to the rule quoted, I copied my answer<br />
—consisting of 205 lines—to Question 5, entitled,<br />
“What are the Chief Causes of Boiler Explosions ?<br />
—What Precautions would you take?” from Mr.<br />
Powis Bale’s well-known book, “A Handbook for<br />
Steam Users,” published by Messrs. Longmans,<br />
Green & Oo.<br />
<br />
As my answer won the Prize, it was published in<br />
the issue of the above periodical on October 11th,<br />
1902, infringing Mr. Powis Bale’s copyright.<br />
<br />
I tender my sincere regret to the Author of the<br />
Book and the Editor of the Paper, and in order to<br />
make my apology public, I give leave that you<br />
should publish it in the Engineer, Engineering, and<br />
the Mechanical World, and in any two others you<br />
may think fit.<br />
<br />
(Signed) Joun R. Forp.<br />
<br />
To M. Powrs Bats, Esq.,<br />
16 & 17, Appold Street,<br />
London, E.C.<br />
<br />
eo<br />
<br />
THE AUTHORS’ ASSOCIATION.<br />
<br />
Oe<br />
<br />
N last month’s Author a short article was pub-<br />
I lished referring to this association. One of<br />
the statements contained in that article was<br />
<br />
as follows :—<br />
<br />
‘Every member, we must mention, has the right<br />
to have one MS. of 5,000 words criticised each<br />
year, free of charge.”<br />
<br />
We have had a letter from Mr. Galloway Kyle<br />
in which he points out that we have misquoted the<br />
words of his prospectus, which run as follows :—<br />
<br />
‘Hach member is entitled to have one novel, or<br />
three shorter MSS. of not more than 5,000 words<br />
each, dealt with thoroughly per year.”<br />
<br />
Weare glad to correct this inaccuracy, and express<br />
our regret that it should have occurred.<br />
<br />
The publisher, whose offices are situated at 62,<br />
Paternoster Row, E.C., which was referred to in the<br />
same article as the temporary address of the Asso-<br />
ciation, writes to inform us that this address is no<br />
longer connected in any way with the Association.<br />
202<br />
<br />
AN AMERICAN POINT OF VIEW.<br />
<br />
ee a<br />
<br />
(This Article is taken from the American Book and<br />
News Dealer, March, 1903).<br />
<br />
Of Interest to Authors, Publishers, Booksellers,<br />
Printers, Compositors and Electrotypers.<br />
<br />
+ NDER the heading “ A Plea for the Abolition<br />
<br />
of the Duty on Books,” Mr. George F,<br />
<br />
Brett has recently written a pamphlet for<br />
<br />
private circulation, which was published for the<br />
author by the Macmillan Company.<br />
<br />
Mr. Brett says :<br />
<br />
“Tf it be conceded that a duty on books was<br />
needed in the early development of our country,<br />
either for purposes of revenue or to protect the<br />
printing and allied trades, or, more important<br />
still, for the purpose of fostering and encouraging<br />
the original work of our native authors, it must be<br />
clear that such a duty is no longer for any of these<br />
reasons either necessary or expedient.”<br />
<br />
The argument here used is precisely<br />
ment used by all Free Traders to show why<br />
protective tariffs should be abolished.<br />
<br />
It is possible that the next Presidential campaign<br />
will be fought on the Tariff issue ; but if so it is<br />
not probable that the Free Trade party would be<br />
willing to wage the campaign against a special<br />
branch of trade or industry that<br />
<br />
the argu-<br />
all<br />
<br />
would directly<br />
antagonise ail American authors, publishers, book-<br />
sellers, printers, compositors and electrotypers.<br />
<br />
It is certain that the Ways and Means Com-<br />
mittee of the Congress would give a hearing to<br />
representatives of these important industries before<br />
reporting to the House a Bill that would strike<br />
down all protection they now enjoy under the<br />
protective tariff.<br />
<br />
The undertaking to carry such important legis-<br />
lation through the Congress is worthy of one who<br />
is credited with the overweening ambition to<br />
publish all of the books for all of the American<br />
people.<br />
<br />
But Mr. Brett continues :<br />
<br />
« When we turn to the matter of protection for<br />
<br />
the printing and allied trades, the duty is unneces-<br />
sary, as these important trades can no longer be<br />
called ‘infant industries’ in any sense of this<br />
‘much-abused term, and in the production of the<br />
cheaper classes of books this country may, without<br />
doubt, I think, claim to lead all English-speaking<br />
countries, both in the amount of material produced<br />
and in the cheapness of its costs of manufacture.<br />
«Tf protection to these trades, moreover, were<br />
still needed, it is already provided, and in a much<br />
more effective form, by the provision of our Inter-<br />
national Copyright Act, which makes a copyright<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
in this country depend upon the manufacture of<br />
the article copyrighted within the limits of the<br />
United States.”<br />
<br />
If it be true that the International Copyright<br />
Act affords ample protection for the manufacturing<br />
branches of the book trade, then why repeal the<br />
protective tariff laws that protect and foster these<br />
trades? If they are amply protected under the<br />
one law, why not give them the benefit of both ?<br />
<br />
Does not Mr. Brett seek to have this law<br />
repealed in order that he may import still more<br />
English-made books without paying any revenue<br />
into the United States Treasury ?<br />
<br />
Would not the repeal of the tariff law materially<br />
lessen the amount of work now done by the<br />
American book-manufacturing trades, in setting<br />
up the type, making the paper, electrotyping the<br />
plates and printing the English books that are now<br />
reprinted in this country ? If not, then why<br />
repeal the law ?<br />
<br />
Again, Mr. Brett continues :<br />
<br />
«When we turn to the more important reason<br />
for the existence of the duty, the only reason, if<br />
there be one, worthy of serious attention, 7¢., the<br />
necessity of fostering a native literature, a litera-<br />
ture which shall echo the needs and voice the<br />
sentiments of our national life, it still appears that<br />
we may with entire safety abandon the duty on<br />
books, a duty which has been often and aptly<br />
termed ‘a tax on knowledge.’<br />
<br />
“ Here, again, the workings of our International<br />
Copyright Act, an act of ‘justice to foreign<br />
authors, has had results of great importance to<br />
our own people. Our younger and less known<br />
authors have, since the passage of the Act, found a<br />
much more ready welcome and appreciation at the<br />
hands of American publishers, who are no longer<br />
able to appropriate and exploit the works of<br />
foreign authors without payment.<br />
<br />
“ Let us, then, remove the duty on books as ‘a<br />
tax on knowledge’ and freely welcome what<br />
English authors may have to offer us that is<br />
worthy of acceptance, in order that we may move<br />
forward to our manifest destiny as the greatest<br />
nation the world has yet seen, whether we are<br />
judged by the standards of finance, commerce,<br />
literature or art.”<br />
<br />
Here, again, it is urged that the International<br />
Copyright Act affords ample protection to American<br />
authors ; but if so, why repeal the law? Would<br />
not its repeal again result in flooding the American<br />
market with the product of English authors, manu-<br />
factured and published in England ? Are American<br />
authors prepared to make the test ?<br />
<br />
Do American booksellers wish again to have<br />
the American market flooded with cheaply-made<br />
English books ?<br />
<br />
There is bu} little profit in the sale of cheap books,<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 203<br />
<br />
especially when the trade discount afforded by the<br />
importer is so short that it allows a sales profit<br />
less than the actual cost of handling the books.<br />
Would not such a measure directly antagonise all<br />
American booksellers ?<br />
<br />
It is pertinent to enquire whether the publication<br />
of this pamphlet by a house of English publishers<br />
is the beginning of a Free Trade propaganda ‘to<br />
break down the American industry of writing,<br />
publishing and selling books. If this is not<br />
true, it would be well for the English house of<br />
Macmillan & Co. to disavow such purpose before it<br />
estranges the goodwill of all American booksellers,<br />
<br />
If the impression created is allowed to go un-<br />
disputed, it will be necessary for all English<br />
authors, who hope for a fair measure of patronage<br />
in the American market, to take to cover in self-<br />
defence.<br />
<br />
Neither English authors nor English publishers<br />
can afford to have their books sold in this country<br />
by booksellers who would be compelled to band<br />
together in self-defence, and to sell only so many<br />
of such books, from under the counter, as may be<br />
necessary to hold their favourite customers. In<br />
such case it would be necessary for English authors<br />
to place their books with such English publishers as<br />
have American connections of such character as can<br />
command the goodwill and patronage of the American<br />
bookselling trade !<br />
<br />
It will be recalled that William McKinley was<br />
exalted to the Presidential chair, in Opposition to<br />
the combined influence of the leading politicians<br />
of New York, New England and Pennsylvania, by<br />
the American people, simply because he had become<br />
recognised as the leading apostle of the American<br />
policy of protective tariffs.<br />
<br />
Since the enactment of the Dingley Law, the<br />
American people have been enjoying a great wave<br />
of prosperity, that has been constantly accelerated<br />
by cumulative energy, until our thriving industries<br />
have made this great nation the cynosure of all<br />
eyes and the object of envy by our European rivals.<br />
This is the priceless heritage left to the American<br />
people by our late martyred President. Can it be<br />
supposed fer a moment that we will lightly cast<br />
it aside ?<br />
<br />
9<br />
<br />
LITERARY COPYRIGHT: THE PERIOD<br />
OF PROTECTION.<br />
Se<br />
<br />
ONSIDERABLE differences of opinion exist<br />
as to what should constitute the period of<br />
protection for literary matter. Some con-<br />
<br />
sider that the existing period of protection is not<br />
<br />
long enough; others contend that literary pro-<br />
perty should be regarded like other forms of<br />
property, and that copyright should be perpetual.<br />
Authorities differ, and distinguished authors dis-<br />
agree, as to the expediency of permitting the period<br />
of protection to be indefinite. It has been said<br />
that an author’s right to his work is, on every<br />
ground of reason and justice, absolute ; and that<br />
in the whole sphere of property, there is probably<br />
no right which rests on such solid foundation, as<br />
that of creation.<br />
<br />
Mr. Edward Jenkins, a member of the Copy-<br />
right Commission of 1876-8, appointed to consider<br />
the chaotic condition of the existing Copyright<br />
Acts, in his report said: “The statute law creates,<br />
it does not recognise, copyright. There is no such<br />
thing as an inalienable natural right to the form<br />
in which a man has embodied his ideas. The<br />
copyright law is, like the patent law for inven-<br />
tion, a creation of a temporary monopoly, for the<br />
encouragement of learning. It is the outcome of<br />
expediency and not of principle.”<br />
<br />
Sir James Stephen, a member of the Copyright<br />
Commission, said: “ The law of copyright ought,<br />
in my opinion, to protect money interests only ;<br />
and I think that the only money interests which<br />
it should protect are those which it creates—that<br />
is to say, the money interest of the author of a<br />
work of literature or art which is capable of being<br />
reproduced by mechanical means in such a manner<br />
that every copy is as valuable as the original. I<br />
approve of copyright in books, because the MS.<br />
has no value till it is printed, and because when it<br />
has been printed, every copy is of equal value, so<br />
that unless a copyright law existed the author of<br />
the most valuable book would have no money<br />
reward for writing it.”<br />
<br />
Sir Louis Mallet, who was also a member of the<br />
Copyright Commission, in the course of his report,<br />
said : “I do not consider that a copyright law, or,<br />
in other words, a law which enables a copyright<br />
owner to prevent other persons from copying pub-<br />
lished works, rests on the same grounds of public<br />
expediency as those which justify the recogni-<br />
tion by law of proprietary rights generally. Nor<br />
does it appear that in modern times it has been<br />
ever so regarded by the legislation of the countries<br />
where it exists. The right conferred by a@ copy-<br />
right law derives its chief value from the discovery<br />
of the art of printing ; and there appears no reason<br />
for giving to authors any larger share in the value<br />
of a mechanical invention, to which they have con-<br />
tributed nothing, than to any other member of the<br />
community. It is not even claimed that an author<br />
should have a right of property in ideas, or in<br />
facts, or in opinions. It is impossible ever to<br />
ascertain or to define how far these are the product<br />
<br />
<br />
204 THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
of his own thought or of his own labour. It<br />
is merely the form in which they are presented for<br />
which this claim is advanced, and for this all that<br />
is in principle required appears to me to be that<br />
he should be protected in any contract which he<br />
desires to make once for all in the original publi-<br />
cation of his works. Some of the witnesses whose<br />
evidence has been received have urged the claim<br />
of authors to perpetual copyright, on the ground<br />
that the right of an author to property in his<br />
published works is as complete and extends as far<br />
as the right of any person to any property what-<br />
ever. If this analogy were admitted, it appears to<br />
me that it would be difficult to dispute the claim<br />
of an author to perpetual copyright ; but I ven-<br />
ture to submit that the claim of an author to a<br />
right of property in his published work rests upon<br />
« radical economic fallacy, viz., a misconception of<br />
the nature of the law of value. . . . Property exists<br />
in order to provide against the evils of natural<br />
scarcity. A limitation of supply by artificial<br />
causes creates scarcity in order to create property.<br />
To limit that which is in its nature unlimited, and<br />
thereby to confer an exchangeable value on that<br />
which, without such interference, would be the<br />
gratuitous possession of mankind, is to create an<br />
artificial monopoly which has no warrant in the<br />
nature of things, which serves to produce scarcity<br />
where there ought to be abundance, and to confine<br />
to the few gifts which were intended for all. It is<br />
within this latter class that copyright in published<br />
works must be included. Copies of such works<br />
may be multiplied indefinitely, subject to the cost<br />
of paper and of printing, which alone, but for copy-<br />
right, would limit the supply, and any demand,<br />
however great, would be attended not only by no<br />
conceivable injury to society, but on the contrary,<br />
in the case of useful works, by the greatest possible<br />
advantage. .. . The policy, then, of copyright<br />
laws must be sought in another order of ideas, and<br />
be made to rest on some ground other than that<br />
which is the foundation of rights of property in<br />
whatever is the subject to a natural limitation of<br />
supply.”<br />
<br />
Mr. Farrer, now Lord Farrer, secretary to the<br />
Board of Trade at the time of the Copyright<br />
Commission, in a paper prepared by him_ for<br />
the members of the Commission, said: ‘“‘ Pro-<br />
fessor Huxley, and I think Mr. Spencer and<br />
Professor Tyndall agree with him, states in<br />
the strongest and clearest terms his view that<br />
the foundation of copyright law is the absolute<br />
right of the author once and for ever to the<br />
form in which he has uttered his thoughts, and he<br />
ingeniously suggests that this law is merely a<br />
convenient substitute for a sale by the author of<br />
each copy, with a condition attached that the<br />
purchaser shall not copy. It is needless to say<br />
<br />
that this suggestion is as fictitious as it is<br />
ingenious. A chattel going about the world with an<br />
implied covenant by every one, who with or with-<br />
out consideration gets possession of it, that he<br />
will not imitate it, would certainly be a legal<br />
novelty. The real history and fact of copyright<br />
law are very different. As to the absolute and<br />
perpetual right, not only has it never been recog-<br />
nised as a matter of fact, but analogies are against<br />
it. Words, thoughts, and actions, when uttered or<br />
done, pass, as a general rule, into the common<br />
domain, and it is thus that human life is carried<br />
on. In those productions of the human mind which<br />
are most essentially original, and which are at<br />
the same time the most useful to mankind ; in such<br />
things as the moral doctrine of the Sermon on the<br />
Mount, the intellectual theory of gravitation, of<br />
evolution, or of the conservation of energy, there<br />
is and can be no exclusive right. Nor, again, is<br />
there, as a matter of practice, any exclusive right<br />
in more ephemeral matters, ¢.g., in the news,<br />
information, or articles of a newspaper, or in a<br />
political speech. It is only when put into the<br />
particular form of a book, or a lecture, or a picture,<br />
that an exclusive right over the productions of the<br />
human mind has been recognised, and that with<br />
certain limitations and for a certain specified<br />
purpose.”<br />
<br />
It has since been decided that for copyright<br />
purposes the author of the report of a speech is<br />
the “ author” of the speech within the meaning of<br />
the Act.<br />
<br />
The existing period of protection according to<br />
the Act of 1842, passed ‘‘to afford greater<br />
encouragement to the production of literary works<br />
of lasting benefit to the world,” is forty-two years<br />
from the date of publication, or life and seven<br />
years, whichever term may be the longer. As to the<br />
adequacy or otherwise of this term we might very<br />
well refer to the report of the Copyright Commis-<br />
sion. The particular paragraphs read as follows :<br />
<br />
‘““ We have already stated that we consider some<br />
kind of protection in the nature of copyright<br />
desirable ; and it appears to us that the existing<br />
terms are not more than sufficient, if indeed they<br />
are sufficient, to secure that adequate encourage-<br />
ment and protection to authors which the interests<br />
<br />
of literature, and therefore of the public, alike —<br />
<br />
demand from the State. We proceed, therefore,<br />
to call attention to the three objections to the<br />
present duration of copyright :<br />
<br />
“ First, the period is said not to belong enough.<br />
The chief reasons for this assertion are that many<br />
works, and particularly those of permanent value,<br />
are frequently but little known or appreciated for<br />
many years after they are published, and that they<br />
do not command a sale sufficient to remunerate<br />
the authors until a considerable part of the term<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
of copyright has expired. Some works, as, for<br />
instance, novels by popular authors, command an<br />
extensive sale and bring to the authors a large<br />
remuneration at once, but the case is altogether<br />
different with others, such as works of history,<br />
books of a philosophical or classical character, and<br />
volumes of poems. In some instances works of<br />
these kinds have been known to produce scarcely<br />
any remuneration until the authors have died and<br />
the copyrights have nearly expired. It is also<br />
urged that in the case of many authors who make<br />
their living by their pens, their families are left<br />
without provision shortly after their deaths, unless<br />
their works become profitable very soon after they<br />
are written.<br />
<br />
“These arguments and others of a like kind,<br />
which will be found not only in the evidence we<br />
have taken, but in the debates in Parliament, are<br />
in our opinion of great weight, but on the other<br />
hand, we do not lose sight of the public interest<br />
which, it has been urged upon us, would be<br />
prejudiced by prolongation of copyright. Greater<br />
freedom of trade and competition are said to be<br />
desirable that books may be more abundant and<br />
cheaper in price.<br />
<br />
‘The second objection to the present duration of<br />
copyright is, that copyrights belonging to the same<br />
author generally expire at different dates. That it<br />
-is well founded is manifest, for if an author writes<br />
several works, or one work in several volumes<br />
which are published at different times, as is<br />
frequently the case, the copyrights will expire<br />
forty-two years from the respective dates of pub-<br />
lication, unless the author happens to live so long<br />
that the period of seven years after his death is<br />
beyond forty-two years from the publication of his<br />
latest work or volume.<br />
<br />
“ Under the present system, moreover, copyright<br />
in an earlier edition expires before copyright in<br />
the amendments in a later edition of the same<br />
work. We have had evidence that in one case the<br />
first and uncorrected edition of an important work<br />
was republished before the expiration of the copy-<br />
tight in the later and improved editions. But<br />
if the alteration in the existing term of copyright,<br />
which we suggest hereafter, were adopted, namely,<br />
that it should be for the life of the author and a<br />
fixed number of years after his death, all the<br />
copyrights of the same author would expire at the<br />
same date, and it would then be open to any pub-<br />
lisher to put out a complete edition of all the<br />
author’s works, with all the improvements and<br />
emendations which have appeared in the last<br />
edition, in a uniform shape and at a uniform price.<br />
<br />
“The third objection to the present duration of<br />
copyright is that it is frequently difficult, if not<br />
impossible, to ascertain its termination, owing to<br />
the fact that the expiration of the period depends<br />
<br />
205<br />
<br />
upon the time of publication. It is in most cases<br />
easy to ascertain the date of a man’s death, but<br />
frequently impossible to fix with any certainty the<br />
date of the publication of a book. Under the<br />
present law it is uncertain what constitutes pub-<br />
lication; but whatever may be a publication<br />
sufficient in law to set the period of copyright<br />
running, it generally takes place in such a manner<br />
that the precise date is not noted even if known.<br />
It is sometimes said that the date printed in the<br />
title page of a book should be considered the date<br />
of publication, but books are frequently post-<br />
dated, and in many cases bear no date at all.<br />
This objection is one which, in our opinion, should<br />
be removed.”<br />
<br />
The above, I think, is a fair presentment of the<br />
points considered by the Royal Copyright Com-<br />
mission. Many years have elapsed and we still<br />
find that little has been done to co-ordinate the<br />
various Copyright Acts which were considered by<br />
the Royal Commissioners to be in a chaotic con-<br />
dition, and frequently unintelligible.<br />
<br />
In the Bill drafted by Lord Thring, based on<br />
the recommendations of the Copyright Commission,<br />
it was proposed that “the copyright in a book<br />
shall begin with the publication thereof, and shall<br />
subsist for the term of the author's life and thirty<br />
years after the end of the year in which the author<br />
dies, and no longer.” The effect of such an Act<br />
would obviously be that, although the copyrights<br />
of authors’ works would expire simultaneously,<br />
immature efforts would enjoy a longer term than<br />
works of greater value, though, of course, it does<br />
not thereby follow that the sales of the former<br />
would be the greater. Some time ago, the writer<br />
approached several of the leading publishers for<br />
their opinions as to the duration of the period of<br />
protection.<br />
<br />
Mr. John Murray considers that a new Copy-<br />
right Act is urgently needed in this country. He<br />
thinks the period of protection ought to be life<br />
and fifty years. Perpetual copyright, though it<br />
would be equitable, is impossible, he considers.<br />
<br />
Messrs. Macmillan think that the present period<br />
of protection is insufficient ; life and thirty years<br />
would be more satisfactory. They see no reason<br />
to dissent from the view taken by Mr. Alexander<br />
Macmillan, a former head of the firm, in his evi-<br />
dence before the Royal Commission in favour of<br />
perpetual copyright.<br />
<br />
Mr. William Heinemann, while favouring the<br />
fullest protection possible for literary property,<br />
thinks it would be a matter of serious national<br />
loss, if literary productions were not, after some<br />
time, made popularly accessible.<br />
<br />
Mr. E. Marston considers perpetual copyright an<br />
impossible idea. He thinks that life and thirty<br />
years would prove a satisfactory term.<br />
<br />
<br />
208<br />
<br />
Messrs. Kegan Paul & Co, remark that un-<br />
doubtedly the limitation of copyright tends to the<br />
general diffusion of good literature, though they<br />
think it hard that a man of outstanding genius,<br />
having produced property of value calculated to<br />
survive his own life, should not have the privilege<br />
of leaving the interest in the property to his<br />
descendants.<br />
<br />
Messrs. George Bell & Sons certainly think the<br />
present period of protection insufficient. They<br />
favour the proposed extension to thirty years<br />
from the author's death. They are also inclined<br />
to think favourably of a suggestion that has been<br />
made, that direct descendants of an author should,<br />
on certain conditions, have the privilege of obtain-<br />
ing further extensions for successive terms of years<br />
so that a valuable copyright might be kept alive<br />
for an indefinite time.<br />
<br />
Mr. A. Nutt can see no reason why literary<br />
property should be placed in a different category<br />
trom other property. In any case, copyright, he<br />
thinks, should have a clear hundred years’ run<br />
from the death of the author.<br />
<br />
Another publisher, who has issued a large number<br />
of charming reprints, thinks that the present period<br />
of protection is long enough, except in exceptional<br />
cases ; he does not think that anyone can argue<br />
that the time presses hardly upon any relatives of<br />
a man’s family if, after forty-two years and seven<br />
years, the copyright is given to the public. In all<br />
patented works, it is acknowledged that the public<br />
have rights, and in books, it seems to him that so<br />
long as a man has been comfortably paid for his<br />
labour, the books belong to the public more than<br />
even matters of invention.<br />
<br />
Thus we have a variety of opinions upon an<br />
interesting and somewhat complicated subject.<br />
We can assume that the life of the average book<br />
is not forty-two years. Novels which have an<br />
<br />
immense sale at the time of first publication have<br />
their day and practically cease to be, in many<br />
instances. How many of them will be in demand<br />
thirty years after the decease of the authors or in<br />
some cases the manufacturers of them ?<br />
<br />
Text books, of course, get out-of-date. Similarly<br />
with works of reference. Comparatively few books<br />
are absolutely original in every respect. In the<br />
majority of cases, the authors are dependent to a<br />
more or less degree upon the labours of their pre-<br />
decessors. And literary matter would be of com-<br />
paratively little commercial value in the absence<br />
of any method whereby 1t could be rapidly repro-<br />
duced in quantity. ‘he peculiar nature of literary<br />
property is obvious. In the course of the life of the<br />
author, plus thirty years, it ought to be possible to<br />
find a sufficient demand to make most worthy<br />
books remunerative to author and publisher, if<br />
the field is properly worked, But in special cases,<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
such as in regard to books which have involved<br />
special labour and expense to produce, and which<br />
have not proved sufficiently remunerative during<br />
the period of protection, it ought to be possible<br />
for the publisher, or author, to obtain an extension.<br />
If it were practicable the period of protection<br />
should depend on the degree of originality of the<br />
matter. This would obviously be a difficult question<br />
to decide.<br />
J. A, Ret.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
<br />
THE PUBLISHERS’ ASSOCIATION.<br />
<br />
Oo ¢<br />
<br />
The Annual Meeting.<br />
<br />
HE screeds Association has held its annual<br />
general meeting, under the presidenc of<br />
Mr. C. J. Longman, and has batted its<br />
<br />
report to its members.<br />
<br />
The Authors’ Society has already had note of the<br />
steps that were taken last year with a view to<br />
dealing with the question of copyright. It is<br />
unnecessary, therefore, to repeat the extent to<br />
which the Association also rendered its valuable<br />
assistance in endeavouring to push forward legis-<br />
lation. :<br />
<br />
The President, in his speech, dealt with one or<br />
two interesting points, and, in addition to the<br />
questions connected with the report, mentioned<br />
the contract for serial rights. He stated as<br />
follows :—<br />
<br />
“Of course a good many matters come up at the<br />
Council meetings which it is not desirable to<br />
trouble you with or to put into the report, but here<br />
and there one comes up which may be of interest.<br />
Now there was a subject mentioned not long ago—<br />
a small affair if you will, and only of interest to a<br />
certain section of the members who are novel<br />
publishers. Buta case came up in regard to the<br />
question of serial rights. It has been not infre-<br />
quently the practice, particularly with literary<br />
agents, to sell not only what are known as serial<br />
rights, but what are known as second serial rights.<br />
Unless there is some limit in time put as to when<br />
these second serial rights are to run out, it may be<br />
an intolerable nuisance, and I know cases in my<br />
own business where it has become a nuisance.<br />
There are certain syndicates who buy serials for<br />
circulation in the Press. They buy absolute serial<br />
rights, which is understood to mean that so long<br />
as the term of copyright exists they go on cireu-<br />
lating the novel, or any other work, in the columns<br />
of newspapers, magazines, and so on. A publisher<br />
buys the copyright, but this spectre is never laid.<br />
You never know where it may turn up, and the<br />
thing gets out of control. Sometimes, as in the<br />
case which I have in my mind, the work gets<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
published under another title, or is abridged. The<br />
only reason I have in mentioning it is that I think<br />
it very desirable, in the interests of publishers,<br />
that they should decline to buy a novel in which<br />
the serial rights are sold without limit of time-—<br />
that is to say, the serial rights should cease when<br />
the book is published. If there is any question of<br />
the book being circulated again, which may possibly<br />
be done occasionally, that should be a matter<br />
decided by the copyright owner, who may be the<br />
publisher or author, or both, but I think it very<br />
undesirable either to buy or publish a novel with<br />
these indefinite rights hanging over it. That is<br />
not, perhaps, a very important point, and it only<br />
refers to one section of our members.”<br />
<br />
This question may be a small question to pub-<br />
lishers, and only touch a certain section of them,<br />
but to authors, to those who write fiction, is of<br />
great import.<br />
<br />
Firstly, we have always insisted, and now insist<br />
again, that it is absolutely essential that contracts<br />
with regard to the sale of serial rights should be<br />
clear and limited, and should not be general or<br />
indefinite ; that when serial rights are sold they<br />
should be sold either to one paper or to a limited<br />
circle of papers for one issue only, or for a limited<br />
time.<br />
<br />
Secondly, that under no circumstances should<br />
fiction writers sell the copyright of their works to<br />
the publisher for a sum down or otherwise; and,<br />
thirdly, if, contrary to all advice, they do sell the<br />
copyright, they are bound to disclose to the pur-<br />
chaser a contract of this kind for the sale of serial<br />
rights. If this is the case, then the publisher<br />
buys with full knowledge, and has no cause for<br />
complaint.<br />
<br />
From Mr. Longman’s statement it would appear<br />
that either the publisher has not taken the trouble<br />
to enquire into the point, or that the author has,<br />
unwittingly maybe, refrained from giving full<br />
information.<br />
<br />
Another important question was dealt with by<br />
the publishers.<br />
<br />
The matter was brought forward by Mr. Frederick<br />
Macmillan, of the firm of Macmillan & Co.<br />
<br />
It refers to the supply of educational books to<br />
the educational authorities. This matter is of no<br />
little consequence to the providers of educational<br />
books, and it is hoped that the cutting of prices<br />
which at present rules will not be allowed to con-<br />
tinue, and that the publishers will refuse to supply<br />
the educational centres direct, but will supply only<br />
through booksellers and retail agents. The question<br />
is one that affects the educational author very<br />
closely, as the following example may serve to<br />
show :—<br />
<br />
A certain member of the Society made his living<br />
out of the writing of educational books, and was<br />
<br />
207<br />
<br />
paid a fixed royalty by the publisher under a hard<br />
and fast agreement. Large orders were gent in to<br />
the publisher for the purchase of his books, and a<br />
demand was made that as the order was large<br />
special terms should be stated. ‘The publisher<br />
wrote to the author and asked him to accept half<br />
the royalty that he was being paid under the<br />
agreement, or otherwise it would be impossible<br />
for him to supply the orders mentioned, and a<br />
large sale would thereby be lost to the author.<br />
If the author’s profits had been reduced pro-<br />
portionately to the publisher’s profits it ig<br />
possible that the publisher's request might have<br />
been willingly acceded to, but the figures showed<br />
that this was not the case, and it lay with the<br />
author to decide whether he would yield to this<br />
extraordinary pressure of the publisher or whether<br />
he would lose the sale. In this special instance,<br />
the royalty on these books was, unfortunately, the<br />
bread and butter of the author, and he was obliged<br />
to give way. Thus the publisher procured a large<br />
sale at a reduced but not inadequate profit, while<br />
the author received starvation wages. The other<br />
alternative was for the author to refuse to yield, and<br />
Insist on the publisher keeping to his contract ; 0<br />
that case the publisher would have refused to supply<br />
the market, and the author would have had no<br />
remedy.<br />
<br />
It is hoped, therefore, if this question is satisfac-<br />
torily solved as far as authors are concerned, that<br />
it will be impossible for such a case to occur again<br />
or for undue pressure to be brought to bear upon<br />
an author to yield up even the small returns that<br />
some of the publishers are willing to pay him for<br />
his work.<br />
<br />
After some discussion it appears from the report<br />
of the general meeting of the Publishers’ Associa-<br />
tion, that the original question put forward was<br />
somewhat modified, and that the following amend-<br />
ment was passed :—<br />
<br />
“That a special committee be appointed to deal<br />
with questions affecting educational publishers,<br />
and that its first business be to consider the<br />
situation created by the Education Act, 1902.”<br />
<br />
We must congratulate Mr. C. J. Longman on<br />
his re-election to the Presidency of the Association<br />
—which now represents all the important houses of<br />
England.<br />
<br />
G. oy T.<br />
<br />
pn *—~>—_+ :<br />
<br />
SOME FREE LANCE EXPERIENCES.<br />
<br />
—+—>+—<br />
<br />
OME little time ago I set forth in these pages<br />
S certain experiences that had fallen to me<br />
while pursuing the calling of a free lance<br />
journalist. Since then a good deal of water has<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
208<br />
<br />
flowed under Westminster Bridge, and, as during<br />
this period I have continued on my career, further<br />
experiences have naturally come my way.<br />
number of these, it seems to me, are worth jotting<br />
down on the present occasion, for they are not<br />
altogether uninstructive, while a proportion of<br />
them have the additional virtue of breaking<br />
comparatively new ground.<br />
<br />
Those coming within this latter category have<br />
been gathered mainly in America. The United<br />
States, indeed, forms a virgin field for the English<br />
free lance. I know that there is a deeply-rooted<br />
impression to the effect that the Press on the other<br />
side of the Atlantic is a close preserve to all but<br />
those over whom the Eagle spreads its protecting<br />
wings, but I am convinced that, this isa fallacy.<br />
Speaking generally, every paper is open to every-<br />
body, and to a wide-awake editor (such as those in<br />
New York) the nationality of a potential con-<br />
tributor is, like his opinion on conscientious<br />
objections, the superiority of the American boot,<br />
or the educational value of musical comedy, a<br />
matter of complete indifference. Were it not for<br />
this fact, the path of the unattached free lance<br />
would be a good deal thornier than it is at<br />
present.<br />
<br />
My connection with American papers originated<br />
in rather curious fashion. About a year ago I<br />
wrote a short article dealing with a theatrical<br />
subject in which I was interested. This [ for-<br />
warded, together with a number of photographs,<br />
to a magazine which had just been started in<br />
London with rather a flourish of trumpets for the<br />
express purpose of “ministering to the best<br />
interests of the Drama.” My effort, however, to<br />
promote this high intention was evidently an ill-<br />
conceived one. At any rate, the article was<br />
returned, with a a curt note to the effect that it<br />
failed to reach the standard of “ literary excellence”<br />
insisted upon by, let us say, the Footlights Maga-<br />
zine. The intimation was also accompanied by<br />
an ingenuous suggestion that I should forthwith<br />
enrol myself as an annual subscriber to this some-<br />
what exigeant periodical, “ and thereby familiarise<br />
myself with the editorial requirements.”<br />
<br />
On receiving back my MS. (in a condition, by<br />
the way, that pointed strongly to its having been<br />
used as a doormat during the interval), I decided<br />
that the English market’ was too limited for it. A<br />
voyage across the Atlantic would, I thought, do<br />
the article good. I accordingly looked through an<br />
American newspaper directory, and, with the airy<br />
confidence that is part of the equipment of all free<br />
lances, despatched it to the most widely circulated<br />
magazine in the United States, and sat down to<br />
await the result. This came in three weeks’ time<br />
and took the form of a polite letter of acceptance,<br />
accompanied by a cheque for seventy-five dollars.<br />
<br />
altogether.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
The discriminating periodical in question was<br />
Frank Leslie’s Popular Monthly.<br />
<br />
Another American magazine which I have<br />
approached with even more success is Munsey’s.<br />
Within the past few months the editor has<br />
purchased five articles from me, paying in each<br />
instance at a rate that is at least equal to that<br />
obtaining among the leading periodicals of the<br />
same nature in this country. As my work has<br />
appeared in the Pall Mall, Strand, Windsor,<br />
and Cassell’s, I may claim to know something<br />
on this most important of points. The Cosmo-<br />
politan, too, of New York, has proved itself<br />
enterprising enough to print work of mine. In<br />
respect of weekly journals of Transatlantic origin,<br />
my most satisfactory dealings have been with<br />
Collier’s Weekly. This, which is also published<br />
in New York, has given hospitality to at least half-<br />
a-dozen contributions from me in recent numbers.<br />
The daily papers, however, have as a rule shown<br />
themselves disinclined to permit me to illumine<br />
their columns at space rates. They appear to<br />
prefer to insert bodily articles of mine which take<br />
their fancy when they make their début in English<br />
publications. As in doing so such journals seldom<br />
go through the formality of either acknowledging<br />
their origin or remunerating me for the same, the<br />
practice only meets with my qualified approval.<br />
Occasionally, I have expressed my views of the<br />
matter: so far, however, the result has not been<br />
satisfactory. One editor, indeed, relying appa-<br />
rently on the fact that the broad Atlantic rolled<br />
between us, replied on a type-written postcard as<br />
follows: ‘Sir, if you don’t like it, lump it!”<br />
<br />
Speaking generally, however, I am firmly of<br />
opinion that American editors transact their work<br />
in a manner that tends to promote the pleasantest<br />
possible relations between themselves and their<br />
<br />
contributors. To this end they are courteous,<br />
prompt, reliable, and business-like in their<br />
dealings. Whenever I have made a_ proposal<br />
<br />
for an article, or submitted a manuscript for<br />
consideration, the matter has been attended to<br />
without delay. Non-acceptances have been notified<br />
in so charming a fashion that the pangs of<br />
rejection have been in great measure removed<br />
As often as not such communications<br />
are almost apologetic in tone, and might reasonably<br />
give the novice the impression that his work is<br />
returned merely because its publication would set<br />
too high a standard of excellence. Of course, it<br />
merely amounts to the curt “declined with<br />
thanks” in vogue in this country; at the same<br />
time, however, it has decided points in its favour.<br />
<br />
The cordiality of the average American editor<br />
towards his unknown contributors is quite remark-<br />
able. The atmosphere of aloofness which is<br />
generally observed on this side of the Atlantic<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 209<br />
<br />
seems to have no existence in the United States.<br />
““My dear Sir,” is apparently the most formal<br />
opening ever employed in inaugurating a corre-<br />
spondence, while before two letters have passed<br />
this probably becomes “My very dear Sir.” It is<br />
the same thing with the terminations. When you<br />
are not assured that the editor is « Sincerely<br />
yours,” you are begged to regard him as “ Yours<br />
most cordially.” One of those to whom I once had<br />
occasion to write on a strictly business matter<br />
subscribed himself mine “ In all sincerity in every-<br />
thing calculated to foster what is best and brightest<br />
in contemporary literature.” This somewhat<br />
effusive individual conducted a society journal in<br />
Chicago.<br />
<br />
An American editor frequently uses terms that<br />
strike English ears a little strangely. I remember,<br />
for example, on an occasion when I had written to<br />
point out that payment for a certain contribution<br />
was overdue, receiving a “ check ” accompanied by<br />
a hope that “we should not run up against such<br />
snags in future.” A second editor, to whom I<br />
applied for a proof before publication, excused him-<br />
self on the grounds that I might “rely with<br />
confidence on his lynx-eyed compositors.” Another<br />
expressed his opinion of my capabilities in this<br />
fashion : “ Dear Sir, I like your stuff. It is real<br />
spry! Send me some more blocks of it as soon as<br />
you please. You are a live news-getter.”’ Occa-<br />
sionally, however, a wholesome corrective is<br />
administered. One such, sent in answer to a<br />
request for a decision respecting an article submitted<br />
several weeks earlier, ran as follows : “Dear Sir,<br />
your work doesn’t suit us. Our office-boy could<br />
write better copy blind-fold.”<br />
<br />
On the subject of returning unsuitable manu-<br />
scripts forwarded them from this country, American<br />
editors have a good deal to learn, They appear,<br />
for example, to be under the impression that all<br />
that is necessary is to put the article into an<br />
envelope and affix a one-cent stamp to it. Of<br />
course, it then travels as letter-post and is sub-<br />
jected to a considerable surcharge on delivery.<br />
Even when I have taken the precaution to send a<br />
properly stamped uewspaper-wrapper when sub-<br />
mitting a contribution, it is very seldom that any<br />
notice has been taken of it.. Once or twice I have<br />
ventured on a mild expostulation, but the only<br />
reply that this has elicited is that “the editor cf<br />
the prefers to use envelopes.” He also seems<br />
to prefer that their recipients should pay double<br />
postage on the same.<br />
<br />
It must not be thought from the preceding<br />
observations that I have permitted the English<br />
Press to languish for want of attention on my part<br />
during the last few months. So far from this<br />
being the case, I have conducted my campaign in<br />
this country contemporaneously with my American<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
one, and with equal vigour. The periodicals in<br />
which work of mine has seen the light within this<br />
interval range from the « serious” monthlies to<br />
the more frivolous dailies, from magazine articles<br />
and stories in Cassell’s and the Windsor, to<br />
“Celebrities at Home” in the World, and para-<br />
graph matter in Punch. [ wrote columns of<br />
Coronation matter in June and August, and did<br />
my best to keep alive public interest in the Boer<br />
War long after the declaration of peace. I also<br />
furnished for some weeks—in the absence of the<br />
regular correspondent—a “ London Letter” for a<br />
well-known Indian paper. After the second of<br />
these contributions appeared the editor was<br />
removed from office by his proprietors. I should<br />
be sorry to think that my connection with the<br />
paper had anything to do with this, but candour<br />
compels me to admit that I was not invited to<br />
continue my contributions.<br />
<br />
The greater portion of my output of late has<br />
been published in the different periodicals which owe<br />
their existence to the enterprise of Messrs. Pearson<br />
and Newnes. The host of “ Bits” journals which<br />
emanate from the offices of these Liptous of Litera-<br />
ture are a veritable gold-mine to the unattached<br />
free lance. They have an insatiable appetite for<br />
informative articles on the private lives of dis-<br />
tinguished personages, and give a ready welcome to<br />
anyone who can write thereon with an appearance<br />
of authority. At the same time, I must place it on<br />
record that Queer Bits, while expressing itself as<br />
pleased to consider a proposed series on “ Duchesses<br />
I have Dined with,” uncompromisingly rejected a<br />
second on “ Countesses I have Kissed.”<br />
<br />
The rate of payment obtaining among periodicals<br />
of this description is usually the fixed one of a<br />
guinea per column of about 750 words. As the<br />
standard of literary excellence insisted upon therein<br />
is not lofty, the scale is quite a fair one. Indeed,<br />
it is superior to that in force in many decidedly<br />
more ambitious journals. To one of these, for<br />
example (which grandiloquently describes itself as<br />
reflecting politics, literature, science, and art—and,<br />
no doubt, many other matters as well), I once sub-<br />
mitted an article on a military subject. A couple<br />
of months afterwards (no proof for revision, or<br />
notification of acceptance having been forwarded in<br />
the meantime) the contribution appeared. It was<br />
set up, however, in the form of a “ Letter to the<br />
Editor.” This struck me as a little frigid. Yet<br />
worse was to follow, for when—at the end of five<br />
weeks—I mildly pointed out that the cheque due<br />
to me had not yet reached me, I received a<br />
dignified intimation to the effect that “it was not<br />
the practice of the to pay for correspondence.”<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To this I naturally replied that it was not my prac-<br />
tice to write articles for publication as “corre-<br />
spondence.” I mentioned, however, that I would<br />
210<br />
<br />
be prepared to relax my rule in this partieular<br />
instance in so far that I would write a letter<br />
embodying my views on the conduct of periodicals<br />
which filled their columns without expense by the<br />
simple expedient of treating articles as “ Letters<br />
to the Editor” without the sanction of their<br />
authors. The offer still remains open.<br />
<br />
I have frequently heard it contended that when<br />
ladies conduct periodicals they do so in an un-<br />
pusinesslike fashion. For myself, I am disinclined<br />
to take this view, for I have always found that<br />
they are quite businesslike enough in their methods<br />
to get as much as they can for nothing. For<br />
instance, the editress of a monthly magazine called<br />
—let us say, the Perfect Lady—once stipulated<br />
that she could only accept an article of mine on<br />
the condition that I should induce the people<br />
referred to therein to bear the expense of having<br />
their photographs reproduced. The offer did not<br />
appeal to me. It was the same lady, by the way,<br />
who on the second occasion that I submitted -a<br />
contribution, offered me two guineas for three<br />
thousand words and nine photographs, the copy-<br />
right to belong to her. When I sent a district<br />
messenger boy to the office to say that I was not<br />
in the business for my health, she replied on a<br />
postcard, “ There is no oceasion to be rude.”<br />
<br />
This question of payment is a delicate one. Not<br />
even the most brazen of free lances likes to haggle<br />
over the matter, but when he receives an experi-<br />
ence such as the one just recounted he would<br />
scarcely be human if he did not venture on a<br />
protest. For myself, I have two working rules.<br />
One of them is to take all I can get, and the other<br />
is to cash a cheque first and draw attention to its<br />
inadequacy afterwards. I applied this latter on<br />
one occasion when a certain weekly journal, called,<br />
let me say, Our Girls, commissioned me to write a<br />
three-thousand word article (entailing the interview-<br />
ing of six different people, and the supplying of eight<br />
photographs), and then sent me four guineas for the<br />
same. On receipt of my letter of polite expostula-<br />
tion, the proprietors curtly informed me that if I<br />
was dissatisfied I might return the cheque and<br />
they would return the article. I explained that<br />
my system prevented me sending back the original<br />
cheque; I accordingly forwarded one of my own<br />
instead.<br />
<br />
Notwithstanding these little rebuffs I recently<br />
approached a third journal, the editorial direction<br />
of which was also in the hands of a lady. The<br />
paper was a weekly one, and had only just been<br />
started. It was, in fact, from reading its initial<br />
number that I conceived the idea that it contained<br />
an opening for some one who had a slight acquaint-<br />
ance with practical journalism. In “Number<br />
One,” for example, a prominent feature was made<br />
of “Answers to Correspondents,” although no<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
explanation was given as to how “ Constant<br />
Reader,” ‘Subscriber from the First,” and the<br />
other seekers after enlightenment had written their<br />
letters of inquiry before the. paper had even<br />
appeared. Several other points in the general<br />
make-up and management of Cackle—as I will call<br />
the bantling—also struck me as betraying the hand<br />
of the amateur.<br />
<br />
To the office of Cackle, therefore, I went, armed<br />
with a selection of articles and an assortment of<br />
ideas to be submitted diplomatically if occasion<br />
offered, and taking with me a letter of introduction<br />
provided by an acquaintance of the editor. At the<br />
top of avery long flight of stairs was a door marked<br />
“QackLE, Lrp. Srricrty Private.” Having<br />
negotiated a hundred and twenty steps, a little<br />
matter like this was not going to stand in my way.<br />
Accordingly, I rapped on the door and was bidden<br />
by a feminine chorus to enter. On doing so, I<br />
found myself in a small room occupied by five<br />
ladies, sitting round a table littered with manu-<br />
scripts and making a light luncheon off; a bag<br />
of mixed biscuits and a box of chocolates. I<br />
tendered one of them my card together with<br />
the letter of introduction, requesting her to<br />
convey it to the editor, and then sat down on<br />
the only unoccupied chair. While the messenger<br />
was absent her colleagues continued an animated<br />
discussion which my arrival seemed to have<br />
interrupted. From fragments that caught my<br />
ear it seemed evident that press-day was at hand.<br />
“ What is a stick, Gertie ?”” inquired one peroxide<br />
of hydrogen-tinted young woman of another.<br />
“Why do you want to know, Maudie?” “Oh,<br />
the horrid printer says that he is a stick short,”<br />
was the reply, “and I’m sure I don’t know what<br />
he means. Yesterday he sent to ask if I wanted<br />
galleys or page proofs? Why on earth can’t<br />
printers talk English ? "<br />
<br />
At the end of ten minutes or so the messenger<br />
returned. I rose expectantly. “ The editor says<br />
she can’t see you,” was the rather disconcerting<br />
announcement that met me.<br />
<br />
“That is sufficiently obvious,” I remarked,<br />
blandly, “unless she is looking through the<br />
keyhole.”<br />
<br />
“The editor of Cackle only interviews visitors<br />
by appointment,” explained a member of the<br />
staff, in the tone that would be adopted when<br />
referring to the Times. “ Perhaps you will call<br />
again.” There was no mistaking the hint con-<br />
veyed in the last observation. I took it without<br />
delay. Since then, ladies’ papers as a class have<br />
not received any great amount of attention from<br />
me. Iam unable to think, however, that this has<br />
had that adverse effect upon their circulation that<br />
it ought to.<br />
<br />
H. W.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
amt<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR, 211<br />
<br />
GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br />
1<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br />
price can be obtained, But the transaction should be<br />
managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement),<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to :<br />
<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements,<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for ‘office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author,<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
It is above all things necessary to know what the<br />
proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br />
for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br />
the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br />
connected with royalties are published in Zhe Author.<br />
Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br />
“Cost of Production.”<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :-—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
C1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
————_—_+—~»@—,______<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
IES:<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
\ Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager.<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for PLAYS<br />
IN THREE OR MORE ACTS :—_<br />
<br />
(a.) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT,<br />
This is unsatisfactory, An author who enters<br />
ito such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br />
tract for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills,<br />
<br />
(0.) SALE oF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS oF PERCENTAGES<br />
on gross receipts. Percentages vary between<br />
5 and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(¢.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF ROYALTIES Ge,<br />
fixed nightly fees). This method should be<br />
always avoided except in cases where the fees<br />
are likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (4.) apply<br />
also in this case,<br />
<br />
4, PLAYS IN ONE ACT are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important,<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform, The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance,<br />
<br />
7, Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that AMERICAN RIGHTS may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘Yhey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, THOSE AUTHORS DESIROUS OF FURTHER INFORMA-<br />
TION ARE REFERRED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY<br />
<br />
_ HO?<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
—+~—<br />
<br />
1. VERY member has a right toask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the<br />
<br />
advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor<br />
the member has a right to an opinion from the Society’s<br />
solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel’s opinion is<br />
<br />
desirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel’s<br />
opinion. All this without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
<br />
212<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not seruple<br />
to use the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. ‘The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4, BEFORE SIGNING ANY AGREEMENT WHATEVER, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of literature in promoting the<br />
independence of the writer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements.<br />
<br />
7. No confract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts submitted to them by literary<br />
agents, and are recommended to submit them for inter-<br />
pretation and explanation to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society ; so do<br />
some publishers. Members can make their own deductions<br />
and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
—_—_—_———__+—__+—__—_<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
—_——<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach, The term<br />
MSS. includes NOT ONLY WORKS OF FICTION, BUT POETRY<br />
AND DRAMATIC WORKS, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
—_—_———__+——_o—__———_<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Communications for Zhe Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor NOT LATER<br />
THAN THE 21st OF EACH MONTH.<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
—_——_—_—\§|o—< > __——<br />
<br />
COMMUNICATIONS AND LETTERS ARE INVITED BY THE<br />
Eprror on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
— a<br />
<br />
Tur SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
—-——s—_<br />
<br />
N the case of Judge Parry against Mr. Israel<br />
Gollancz, which dealt with the publication of<br />
<br />
“ Dorothy Osborne’s Love Letters,” a general<br />
injunction was granted to the plaintiff. Various<br />
views of the questions involved have been put<br />
forward in the papers during the past month<br />
In a letter to the Zimes, dated April 238, 1908,<br />
the plaintiff's solicitors state that the proceedings<br />
are not concluded. We must therefore defer any<br />
comment both on this ground and also because<br />
the matter has not yet come before our Committee.<br />
<br />
Mr. Loneman in his “ Notes on Books” (an<br />
interesting trade circular published by his firm)<br />
gives the following definitions :—<br />
<br />
DEFINITION OF THE TERMS “IMPRESSION,”<br />
“ EDITION,” “ RE-ISSUE.”<br />
ImprReEssron.—A number of copies printed at any one time.<br />
When a book is reprinted without change it should be<br />
called a new “impression,” to distinguish it from an<br />
<br />
“ edition,” as defined below.<br />
<br />
EpDrrron.—An impression in which the matter has under-<br />
gone some change, or for which the type has been<br />
reset.<br />
<br />
ReE-IssuE.—A re-publication at a different price, or ina<br />
different form, of part of an impression which has<br />
already been placed on the market.—From Longman’s<br />
“ Notes on Books.”<br />
<br />
We believe these definitions have been approved<br />
by the Publishers’ Association.<br />
<br />
There is one point, however, which has not been<br />
settled. It appears to us to be the most important<br />
point of all.<br />
<br />
We ask Mr. Longman if it is not possible to<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Cees<br />
<br />
&<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 213<br />
<br />
settle the unit of an edition or impression? In<br />
every other trade involving weights, measures, and<br />
numbers units have been settled long ago. It is<br />
only necessary for the Association to come to some<br />
conclusion and bind its members to recognise some<br />
definite system. A thousand copies seem to be a<br />
reasonable number to fix. Thus, if a limited issue<br />
of five hundred copies was produced, the publisher<br />
could state that he was about t6 produce half an<br />
edition, or that the issue would be limited to half an<br />
edition. Again, instead of seeing the advertise-<br />
ments of the large sales quoted in numbers, it<br />
would be sufficient merely to say twenty, thirty, or<br />
forty editions or impressions. We draw attention<br />
to this special point, as in one case that came<br />
before the Secretary of the Society the author com-<br />
plained that although his publisher was advertising<br />
his book as in its third edition, only twenty-five<br />
copies had been sold.<br />
<br />
This was naturally very annoying to the author,<br />
but he had no legal position, and could not claim<br />
damage, as the sole control of the issue of the book<br />
was left, by the agreement, in the hands of the<br />
publisher.<br />
<br />
Again, there is the guarantee agreement not in-<br />
frequently before the Secretary of the Society from<br />
another publishing house that states : “* This edition<br />
shall be the property of the publisher,” or that<br />
“The author shall receive 10 per cent. royalty after<br />
the sale of the first edition.” In neither case is the<br />
amount of the edition mentioned.<br />
<br />
It is important, therefore, to all those who trade<br />
in books that some settlement of the unit of an<br />
edition should be obtained, and when that unit is<br />
settled the Publishers’ Association should enforce<br />
observance of it on its members.<br />
<br />
It is well known that some of the editions of the<br />
daily papers are little more than formal issues, but it<br />
would be unfair to publishers and authors to put the<br />
publication of books on the same level as the issue<br />
of journalistic editions.<br />
<br />
Members of the Society will no doubt recall to<br />
mind that a discussion occurred not long ago in<br />
the Literary Supplement to the Zimes, on the<br />
subject of the payment for articles by a cheque<br />
with a copyright receipt printed on the back.<br />
<br />
The discussion arose out of the fact that a<br />
banker, acting on the instructions of his client,<br />
had refused payment in those cases where the<br />
receipt form was altered.<br />
<br />
It would be interesting to have a list, complete<br />
as far as possible, of those magazines and those<br />
firms which issue this form of cheque.<br />
<br />
We should be obliged if those members of the<br />
Society who have received such cheques within the<br />
<br />
last six months will forward to the Secretary the<br />
name of the magazine or publisher.<br />
<br />
In the early days of printing, when literary<br />
property began to have a bre definite aan<br />
value, there were two forces acting to obtain the<br />
profits of the author’s labour—(1) the power of<br />
the Crown, which was inclined to adopt printing as<br />
a monopoly for its own benefit; and (2) the<br />
power of the trade, which was inclined to think<br />
that the labour of authors should be for its private<br />
advantage,<br />
<br />
Accordingly, by degrees, legislation was evolved,<br />
primarily, for the protection of the Crown monopoly<br />
and the printing trade. :<br />
<br />
As printing developed and literature expanded,<br />
the public gradually came to view the matter in a<br />
different light, and to consider, after all, that the<br />
author might have some right in his own property.<br />
Legislation was then introduced, not on behalf of<br />
the trade, but to protect the author.<br />
<br />
In all the civilised countries of Europe modern<br />
legislation has tended to give a wider basis and<br />
firmer security to the author. Surely to this he is<br />
entitled. He is as much the owner of his property<br />
—perhaps more so—as the man who buys a piece<br />
of land is the owner of that land.<br />
<br />
In another column of The Author we have<br />
much pleasure in printing an article headed “ An<br />
American Point of View.” We see with some amuse-<br />
ment, not unmixed with sadness, that the American<br />
printing trades are still inclined to consider that<br />
legislation dealing with literary property should<br />
not be passed with a view to the protection of the<br />
author, but rather with a view to fostering the:<br />
trade. They have headed the article “ Of Interest<br />
to Authors, etc.” There is irony in this remark,<br />
no doubt suitable to the American humour.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
THE LATE LIEUT.-COLONEL G. F. R.<br />
HENDERSON, C.B.<br />
<br />
——~ +<br />
<br />
N the March number of Zhe Author we<br />
I expressed regret that the name of this officer<br />
had been inadvertently included among those:<br />
members who had died in 1902. We were un-<br />
happily only premature in the announcement, for<br />
he died on the 5th March, at Assouan, Upper Egypt,.<br />
where he had gone for the benefit of his health,.<br />
which had for some time been precarious. This<br />
was largely owing to his unremitting work. He<br />
never allowed himself proper rest from his literary<br />
labours, and so anxious was he to push on with the:<br />
official history of the Boer War, which had been<br />
entrusted to his able pen, that he insisted on taking.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
214<br />
<br />
his work with him, and had nearly completed the<br />
first volume, when he died, in his forty-ninth<br />
year. This much lamented officer was the eldest<br />
son of the Dean of Carlisle. He was educated at<br />
Oxford and entered the Service in 1878. He was<br />
appointed an Instructor at the Royal Military<br />
College in 1890, and in 1892 had become so well<br />
known by his studies and writings on Military<br />
History and Tactics that he was given the<br />
Professorship of Military History and Art at the<br />
Staff College in succession to Colonel F. Maurice.<br />
He obtained a brevet majority for his services<br />
in the Egyptian War of 1882. He distin-<br />
guished himself by his admirable tactical studies,<br />
“The Campaign of Fredericksburg,” “ The<br />
Battle of Spicheren,” and “ The Battle of Worth,”<br />
which were characterised by insight and power of<br />
analysis and a knowledge of men, as well as by a<br />
literary style to which such works seldom aspire.<br />
But his best known work is “Stonewall Jackson and<br />
the American War,” which was speedily translated<br />
into many European languages, and will ever<br />
remain as a model of military biography. Its<br />
publication stamped Colonel Henderson as one of<br />
the most important military writers since Sir<br />
William Napier, and had he lived he would un-<br />
doubtedly have had his name inscribed very high<br />
up on the roll of fame. He worked indefatigably<br />
in South Africa as Director of Intelligence, and<br />
was of the greatest assistance to Lord Roberts ; but<br />
his health, which had been undermined by over-<br />
work, broke down after Paardeberg, and he was<br />
invalided home. After an all too brief rest he<br />
began the History of the War, and travelled<br />
over to South Africa again to revisit the scenes<br />
of the battles he was describing as was his con-<br />
stant practice. This, though fatiguing, was of<br />
benefit to him as giving some little respite from<br />
work ; but when he resumed his writing and heavy<br />
brain work, it was seen that the strain was too<br />
great, and a winter in Egypt was prescribed. His<br />
splendid example of constant devotion to his<br />
profession, and his high character, exercised a<br />
lasting influence upon the officers of the present<br />
generation ; and his literary work, though pic-<br />
turesque and classical in style, was thoroughly<br />
practical in its aims. His descriptions were vivid,<br />
and he never ceased to search out the why and the<br />
wherefore of events. One of his latest efforts was<br />
the admirable and characteristic preface he wrote<br />
to Count Sternberg’s “ My Experiences of the Boer<br />
War” (Berlin: Reimer, 1901), which was trans-<br />
lated into English (Longmans), and which, though<br />
in the main a lively and amusing account of<br />
adventures as a war correspondent, contains many<br />
reflections upon modern war that are at least worth<br />
consideration. In every way—as an officer, as<br />
a strenuous and clear-minded instructor, and as a<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
writer—Colonel Henderson, who was of a most<br />
unassuming and amiable character, will be long<br />
regretted in the British Army, and, as a well-<br />
known writer of descriptions of foreign armies and<br />
their characteristics in his excellent letters written<br />
to the Zimes while attending foreign manceuvres,<br />
his loss will be much felt by the general public.<br />
<br />
—___+—>__+____<br />
<br />
OF COLLABORATION.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
I WONDER if it is a confession of weakness to<br />
acknowledge that I find something agreeable<br />
in a state of indecision—not with regard to<br />
matters of prime importance, be it understood, but<br />
with regard to those smaller matters of which the<br />
friendly discussion gives point to the conversation<br />
of cultivated men. To be poised between two<br />
friendly disputants, inclining now this way and now<br />
that as one or the other drops fresh crystals of<br />
reason into the scale, and finally to attain a state<br />
of rest midway between the two, thus testifying to<br />
all the world that once more much may be said<br />
upon both sides, and that where there is six of the<br />
one there is again half a dozen of the other, is a<br />
condition in which I like to be, a function I am<br />
ever happy to perform. Yet, the function dis-<br />
charged, I like to draw the disputants aside and<br />
with deference submit to their consideration such<br />
points about the matter of debate as I think they<br />
may have ignored or failed to see. It has been my<br />
invariable experience that I thus acquire some<br />
reputation of being an intelligent fellow, one with<br />
brains in his pate, sir, open to reason, and not too<br />
proud to learn. If I may thus achieve renown as<br />
being a clever man, I am well satisfied to let my<br />
ears do all the work, and give my tongue a rest.<br />
Others may dogmatise: I am content to suggest ;<br />
and if, when all is over, captious critics say it<br />
has been much ado about nothing. I can quote<br />
Shakespeare too, and say ‘“‘all’s well that ends<br />
well.”<br />
<br />
It was thus with me the other day, when the<br />
conversation turned upon collaboration in fiction.<br />
I found that most of those present had in their<br />
early days collaborated with some friend, being<br />
induced to do so by the old argument that two<br />
heads are better than one, or by their observation<br />
of the fact that babies frequently teach themselves<br />
to walk by holding on to chairs. I was interested,<br />
however, to find that the general vote was adverse<br />
to collaboration. Isolated instances of good novels<br />
written in collaboration were, of course, known<br />
and cited, but it was suggested that there was<br />
something in our national temper, or temperament,<br />
unfavourable to the method, and the suggestion<br />
was supported by the assertion that, with the<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
exception of Besant and Rice, there was no instance<br />
of British authors working together continuously<br />
and producing such happy results as did MM.<br />
Erckmann-Chatrian and Paul and Victor Mar-<br />
gueritte.<br />
<br />
With this view Besant himself agreed. “If I<br />
were asked for my opinion as to collaboration in<br />
fiction,” he says, “it would be decidedly against<br />
it, Isay this without the least desire to depreciate<br />
the literary ability of my friend and collaborateur.<br />
‘The arrangement lasted for ten years, and resulted<br />
in as many successful novels. I only mean that,<br />
after all, an artist must necessarily stand alone.<br />
- +. There will come atime when both men fret<br />
under the condition; when each desires, but is<br />
not able, to enjoy the reputation of his own good<br />
work ; and feels, with the jealousy natural to an<br />
artist, irritated by the loss of half of himself, and<br />
ready to accept the responsibility of failure in order<br />
to make sure of the meed of success... . The<br />
collaboration would have broken down, I believe,<br />
amicably. It would have been far better if it had<br />
broken down five years before the death of Rice, so<br />
that he might have achieved what has been granted<br />
to myself—an independent literary position.”<br />
<br />
The modesty and sincerity of Sir Walter Besant<br />
were such that it is absurd to try to read between<br />
these lines and discover any little-mindedness in<br />
roserve. That “jealousy natural to an artist ” is<br />
the quality which he discovers in the British<br />
temperament unfavourable to the method of joint<br />
production, and, so far as collaboration in fiction<br />
is concerned, there cannot be much dispute that<br />
his point is well taken.<br />
<br />
Sir Walter always declined to offer any explana-<br />
tion or give any account of the method on which<br />
he collaborated with Rice, although this was a<br />
matter with regard to which he was pestered for<br />
information. Why people should be so anxious to<br />
find out how collaboration is conducted is a form<br />
of curiosity that always inspires me with amused<br />
wonder. It seems to me that it should bea reason-<br />
ably easy matter, provided proper provision is made<br />
at the outset for the ‘personal equation.” For<br />
those, however, who desire light upon the subject,<br />
and have not had the passage brought before their<br />
notice, I may, perhaps, quote a couple of paragraphs<br />
from a recent issue of the Daily Mail having<br />
reference to Mr. and Mrs. Egerton Castle.<br />
<br />
“The collaboration of husband and wife is rare<br />
and interesting. Mr. and Mrs. Castle plan out<br />
their work together, talk it over thoroughly, and<br />
finally write it in unison, so that it is almost<br />
impossible in the end to decide with whom any<br />
particular idea originally started. The authors<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
never write of places or people they do not know<br />
familiarly. Mr. Castle states that he never begins<br />
to write out a romance until it has been complete<br />
<br />
215<br />
<br />
in his mind (as discussed and elaborated with his<br />
wife) for a very long time. It is only when both<br />
character and incident and the reciprocal influence<br />
of one on the other have become familiar that the<br />
story is begun.<br />
<br />
“After that the writing goes fast enough at an<br />
average rate of 2,000 words a day—writing in the<br />
morning and revising at odd moments of the day.<br />
Thus a long novel will be written in three months ;<br />
but, of course, the period from its conception is<br />
much longer—generally a year or more.”<br />
<br />
The obviousness of that explanation detracts<br />
not a whit from its interest, and any difficulty<br />
which other people may experience in applying the<br />
principle to practical use themselves will be found<br />
due to their own personality and that of the writer<br />
with whom they work. The old simile of cog-<br />
wheels applies to collaborators as well as to friends ;<br />
while it is essential that each party to the partner-<br />
ship should supply the other’s deficiencies, the<br />
wheels must be oiled if they are to run smoothly,<br />
and the kind of oil most suitable to the par-<br />
ticular machinery will be ascertained without<br />
difficulty.<br />
<br />
This sort of partnership between husband and<br />
wife is not, however, so rare as might be supposed.<br />
I know of several instances among writers of serial<br />
stories for the cheap newspapers. The editor of<br />
one of these told me he found the system worked<br />
admirably in practice, the wife generally supplying<br />
the battle, murder, and sudden death, while the<br />
husband supplied the tender passion and what one<br />
of Mr. Morley Roberts’s characters describes as<br />
“ideal poppycock.” The information struck me<br />
as being very illuminating.<br />
<br />
Upon the question of collaboration in fiction I<br />
thus remain in a state of, to me, agreeable inde-<br />
cision. With regard to collaboration in the other<br />
forms of literary work, I am, perhaps, less vague.<br />
In the writing of plays the association of two<br />
minds seems very often desirable—one to supply<br />
that brilliant superficial cleverness which modern<br />
playgoers seem to require at the hands of drama-<br />
tists, the other to construct the play on the practical<br />
lines necessary to make it effective from the front<br />
of the house and practicable from behind. One<br />
very well known novelist, and part author of<br />
several very successful plays, told me he could<br />
never get his people on the stage, If they were<br />
put there for him he could make them dazzling in<br />
their wit. “You put them in the right place,” he<br />
said, “at the right time, and I'll put the right<br />
things in their mouths. It’ll be terrific!” Un-<br />
fortunately my peculiar genius also runs in the<br />
direction of “cackle,” while I am as ignorant of<br />
“osses”” as the Jubilee Plunger, so that play is<br />
still unwritten. I did, however, write a play once<br />
in collaboration with a man whose forte was<br />
<br />
<br />
216<br />
<br />
construction. We had an agreement drawn up and<br />
engrossed and stamped; I almost decided to have<br />
my copy of it framed. My friend was to supply<br />
the bones and see that they were all properly<br />
articulated, and I was to put the meat upon them<br />
and clothe the finished article in the latest mode.<br />
The work was done, upon the whole, without<br />
excessive loss of blood, and in due course the play<br />
began its round of the managers. Writing a play,<br />
by the way, is the easiest part of the business ; the<br />
dramatist’s trouble does not begin until that is<br />
done.<br />
<br />
The first manager wrote very civilly to say he<br />
had read it with interest; and, whilst it was<br />
admirably constructed, it was written in so dull<br />
and illiterate a fashion that he was afraid he could<br />
do nothing with it. My friend explained that he<br />
was only responsible for the construction, and<br />
produced the agreement to prove his words and<br />
attest his competence to construct another play<br />
for the manager to be written by some one else<br />
than me.<br />
<br />
The second manager also wrote very civilly. He<br />
found the dialogue amazing in its brilliance ; the<br />
wit was pungent, the satire refined, and the whole<br />
writing in perfect taste. The construction, how-<br />
ever, was so amateurish, and showed such ignorance<br />
of stage technique, that he, too, was afraid he<br />
could do nothing with it. My friend explained<br />
that the writing was his, the construction mine ;<br />
and if the manager would supply him with a<br />
scenario, upon whatsoever subject, he would be<br />
happy to write it up. His explanation on this<br />
occasion was uncorroborated by documentary<br />
evidence.<br />
<br />
The third manager wrote more civilly still.<br />
Construction and dialogue were both superlatively<br />
good—far above the average. The story, how-<br />
ever, did not appeal tohim. He thought so highly<br />
of the work that he would like to consider the ques-<br />
tion of commissioning a play by the same authors.<br />
Would my friend explain the terms of the collabo-<br />
ration, and give him some information as to my<br />
position as a writer for the stage? My friend wrote<br />
by return of post to explain that the play was<br />
entirely his; he dictated it to me, and my name<br />
appeared as part author because, in the then state<br />
of his finances, it was inconvenient for him to pay<br />
me a weekly salary as secretary, and I agreed to be<br />
paid by a percentage of his royalties provided he<br />
would allow my name to be published on all pro-<br />
grammes and bills of the play.<br />
<br />
I do not think there is any moral in this<br />
anecdote. I tell it because it relates to my only<br />
experience of joint authorship, and is, therefore,<br />
not mal apropos in an article upon collaboration.<br />
<br />
V. E. M.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
AUTHORS AND MODERN THRIFT.<br />
<br />
es<br />
By Bass BLAKE.<br />
I. The Best Provision for Age.<br />
<br />
HATEVER the advantages may be of the<br />
career of a successful writer, a uniform<br />
income is not one of them. The merit<br />
<br />
of his work may show uo falling off ; but all the<br />
same, his profits are materially affected by changes<br />
in the public taste, and the various moods and<br />
maladies peculiar to readers. A commercial man,<br />
once his position is assured, in many cases produces<br />
his income by repetition of those faculties to which<br />
he owed its commencement; but with a writer,<br />
each year brings with it the necessity for origi-<br />
nality, and for the initiation and working out of<br />
fresh ideas. A prudent business man will each<br />
year set aside a sum for the depreciation of his<br />
machinery, with a view in a certain number of<br />
years to replace it by a new plant. It is upon far<br />
more delicate machinery that the bulk and quality<br />
of a writer’s work depends, and it is machinery<br />
which can never be replaced ; yet it is common to<br />
find that no provision is made for its depreciation.<br />
In most cases the writer lacks that foresight which<br />
teaches the commercial man to conserve a certain<br />
proportion of his income against bad times. The<br />
author frequently lives at the top of his income,<br />
disburses his capital as it arrives, and whilst being<br />
peculiarly at the mercy of changes and depressions,<br />
makes little or no preparation for them.<br />
<br />
A common reason for this omission is that the<br />
author’s circumstances and habit of mind do not<br />
bring him into touch with those means of thrift<br />
with which the man of business ig more or less<br />
familiar. That well without water which is termed<br />
“the City” is but a name to him, and his financial<br />
experiences are often confined to some chance<br />
scheme which falls in his way, or to disastrous<br />
incursions into the Stock Exchange. He may<br />
possess some vague notion that in insurance, pro-<br />
viding as it does co-operative protection for the<br />
individual, there are some elements of attraction ;<br />
but the number of policies are so many, and in<br />
their nature so complicated, that he is repelled<br />
from the subject. He has small experience of<br />
finance, and in the multitude of schemes, each<br />
purporting to be the best in the market, he sees<br />
only confusion.<br />
<br />
Modern life insurance nevertheless offers to the<br />
author perhaps the only means of providing his<br />
family with means at his death, or himself with a<br />
provision in age. The popular idea of the question<br />
is, that if a man happens to die young it is a good<br />
bargain for himself and a bad one for the company,<br />
but, should he happen to live, insurance becomes a<br />
very poor investment. A policy, however, suited to<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
a man who is dependent wholly upon his own<br />
powers as a means of income, must be one which<br />
guarantees to him not only life insurance, but a<br />
capital sum when his powers of production may be<br />
expected to be on the wane, and is therefore<br />
strictly a life, and not a death policy, as in<br />
ordinary insurance.<br />
<br />
The form of policy which on the whole is most<br />
suited to authors is that known as endowment<br />
assurance. This provides capital to his family at<br />
his death, as in ordinary insurance, but it also<br />
guarantees to him a sum in cash a stated number<br />
of years hence, when, it may be expected, it will be<br />
very necessary to him. ‘This contract is simple.<br />
The assured pays to the company a yearly premium<br />
for a stated number of years, at the end of which<br />
the policy matures and his premiums cease. If in<br />
the meantime he should die, the sum assured<br />
(together with profits attaching to the policy)<br />
is paid to his estate. But should he survive to the<br />
age stated, the sum assured (with the total profits)<br />
is paid to him in cash. Endowment assurances<br />
are effected for any term of years—say ten, twenty,<br />
thirty, or forty—and, of course, the shorter the<br />
term the higher the premium percent. Twenty or<br />
thirty years is, however, a suitable term, as being<br />
sufficient time to allow the profits allotted to his<br />
policy time to accumulate at compound interest to<br />
a material sum.<br />
<br />
A man with any sum to fifty pounds per annum<br />
to set aside has very limited channels for invest-<br />
ment. In financial circles the advantages are all<br />
with the capitalists who pull the strings, and to<br />
the profits of whom the small investor cheerfully<br />
contributes from his small income. But the<br />
author cannot afford to run risks. With a good<br />
British company the security is equal to that of a<br />
State institution, and an endowment assurance<br />
therein offers the best secure investment which,<br />
so far as I am able to judge, it is possible to<br />
obtain. An instance is provided by a man of<br />
thirty who sets aside twenty pounds per annum as<br />
apremium. For this he obtains a profit-sharing<br />
endowment assurance for £600. At the age of<br />
sixty the policy matures and he will receive,<br />
with accruing bonuses according to last declara-<br />
tion, a total sum of £1,000 in cash. He will<br />
have paid in by this time a sum of £600, and he<br />
receives £1,000, besides a life insurance cover<br />
provided during the whole of the term during<br />
which the policy has been maturing. But as a<br />
fact, the policy has been even more advantageous<br />
to him, as the Government allows a rebate of<br />
income tax, alone among all investments, upon<br />
life insurance premiums. Reckoning the tax at<br />
one shilling in the pound, his £20 premium is<br />
reduced to £19, and the amount therefore he<br />
actually disburses in thirty years is £570 instead<br />
<br />
217<br />
<br />
of £600. The return of £1,000 is close upon<br />
4 per cent. compound interest, with the addition<br />
of the cover provided of the sum assured, with<br />
profits to date, should he die in the interim.<br />
<br />
Compound interest is a result not achieved<br />
without some element of compulsion. There are<br />
few men with sufficient strength of mind to<br />
compel themselves faithfully to set aside each year<br />
in a bank such asum as £20 or £50, and allow it to<br />
accumulate at compound interest. Besides, such<br />
savings provide no life insurance in the event of<br />
early death. The form of a policy provides what<br />
may be termed obligatory thrift, inasmuch al-<br />
though, after a few years, there is a surrender<br />
value to the policy should it be discontinued, by<br />
far the best bargain is to be made by following<br />
out the policy to maturity.<br />
<br />
An author with a sense of his responsibilities<br />
must see in endowment assurance a matter of<br />
some importance. It provides for his family in<br />
the event of his death or for his own future in his<br />
age. But he is ill-advised to embark upon any<br />
scheme without some study and inquiry. Gener-<br />
ally, it may be said that a good British office of<br />
established reputation offers the best investment,<br />
but the results in some companies are decidedly<br />
better than in others, and care in selection will be<br />
amply repaid.<br />
<br />
I have shown above the result of an endowment<br />
payable at sixty with a premium of £20. The<br />
following table shows more completely the results<br />
of an endowment payable at fifty with a yearly<br />
premium of £50.<br />
<br />
Cox’s TABLE SHOWING THE WORKING OF AN ENDOW-<br />
MENT ASSURANCE. AGE AT ENTRY, 30. AMOUNT<br />
oF Poxicy, £1,000.<br />
<br />
Plan of policy : Twenty-year endowment assurance, viz.,<br />
payable at age 50 or previous death.<br />
<br />
£ s. da.<br />
<br />
Annual premium for twenty years ... 50 8 4<br />
Less income tax at ls, in the £ 210 4<br />
. ninteainamneonnae poet<br />
<br />
Net cost ... £47 18 0<br />
<br />
WORKING OF POLICY.<br />
<br />
C. At death of insured before age 50.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
| | In return for net |<br />
<br />
At end of year. | The company | premiums paid | Return for cost.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
| will pay— ORE<br />
| _ —<br />
3 | £1,045 £143 | £902<br />
5 1,095 239 | 856<br />
io im ae<br />
15 1,313 718 595<br />
19 1,378 910 463<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
218<br />
<br />
B. Inevent of surrender of policy before age 50 the company<br />
will grant—<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
)<br />
In return for<br />
premiums paid<br />
<br />
Or cash sur-<br />
<br />
lA paid-wp policy render value<br />
<br />
At end of year. She.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
| of— of—<br />
3 | 8195 ( Ane eka<br />
5 tb ee 139 | 229<br />
9 | «on oo we fe<br />
15 1,063 [ce 510 718<br />
19 1,323 | ons 677 | 910<br />
<br />
death. |<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
‘A. On survival to age 50.<br />
<br />
The company will pay (including bonuses) £1,438<br />
In return for total premiums paid of... 958<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Return over cost ee bo £480<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The subject of modern insurance is one of some<br />
complexity, but the cardinal facts are straight-<br />
forward. There are other forms of endowment<br />
assurance, but the simple with-profit policy is<br />
found to be the most profitable to the assured.<br />
It provides life insurance, and, what is very<br />
material, the largest possible sum in cash when his<br />
policy matures. For the rest, if there is any<br />
point which, to an author interested in the subject,<br />
is not sufficiently clear, the writer of this article<br />
is at his service.<br />
<br />
The above figures are those of a first-class<br />
representative British office.<br />
<br />
Se<br />
<br />
THE LAW OF COPYRIGHT.<br />
<br />
— t-—~— 9<br />
<br />
M* SCRUTTON has got tired of waiting, and<br />
no wonder. We welcome heartily the 4th<br />
Edition of his able work on Copyright.<br />
<br />
It has been needed for some time.<br />
<br />
Mr. Scrutton’s sound and careful deductions, the<br />
result of exhaustive and diligent labour, come as<br />
a “boon and a blessing” to those who have studied<br />
the intricacies and difficulties that surround all the<br />
questions of Copyright. °<br />
<br />
No writer has presented the subject so clearly<br />
and distinctly, has gone so thoroughly to the heart<br />
of the question, and swept away all those side<br />
issues that might tend to obscure any given point.<br />
The work is so ably written that it would be<br />
possible for a layman, after perusal of its pages,<br />
to deceive himself with the idea that he was an<br />
authority on the subject.<br />
<br />
The chapters dealing with Literary Copyright<br />
treat this division of statute and case law from<br />
every aspect, and bring forward the very latest<br />
decisions. The chapters dealing with Artistic Copy-<br />
right are perhaps not quite so full, ‘There are one<br />
or two points on which we should have been pleased<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
if Mr. Scrutton had turned his discriminating<br />
powers with more freedom. Take as an example<br />
the difficult question of Artistic Copyright and<br />
Book I]lustration. :<br />
<br />
With regard to Canadian Copyright (an exceed-<br />
ingly involved and difficult matter) the author has<br />
not brought together the very latest information.<br />
He makes no reference to the last Act of the<br />
Canadian Legislature, or the refusal of the Canadian<br />
Government to collect the royalties under the<br />
Foreign Reprints Act. Although the author has<br />
not dealt in any of the former editions with the<br />
subject of Copyright in foreign countries, it is a<br />
pity that he did not take it up now.<br />
<br />
As Copyright under the Berne Convention is<br />
almost universal it is of great importance to all<br />
those who hold literary property to have an epito-<br />
mised statement of the limits that surround their<br />
property in those countries included in the Con-<br />
vention. Mr. Copinger, in his able book, under-<br />
took this work, but since the last edition was pro-<br />
duced there has been considerable alteration in the<br />
laws of the different countries.<br />
<br />
With Mr. Macgillwray’s book and with Mr.<br />
Scrutton’s 4th edition, and we hope—at no distant<br />
date—a supplement containing the further informa-<br />
tion, Copyright has been lucky in its exponents.<br />
<br />
Whilst touching on these minor faults of omission,<br />
we must pay Mr. Scrutton every compliment and<br />
thank him for his labours, which are so amply<br />
justified by the result.<br />
<br />
———————E<br />
<br />
HOMES FOR WANDERING MSS.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
HE second volume of the “ Writers’ Year<br />
Book” is before us. The price is 1s. 6d.<br />
net. Itis published from Granville House,<br />
<br />
Arundel Street, Strand, W.C.<br />
<br />
The great point in a book of this kind must<br />
necessarily be its accuracy, and on looking care-<br />
fully through the lists compiled they seem to be<br />
satisfactory, though, no doubt, in the publication<br />
of all lists there are bound to be a few mistakes.<br />
The book is for the assistance of those authors<br />
who desire to find the proper channel for their<br />
talented productions. It puts before them the<br />
names and addresses of five hundred papers that<br />
receive MSS., photographs or drawings, and at<br />
the same time explains as far as possible the<br />
conditions on which these commodities are accepted.<br />
<br />
The book opens with three articles: “‘ How to<br />
Write for the Press,” “Journalism for English<br />
and American Women,” and “ Writing for the<br />
Magazines.”<br />
<br />
It is not our desire to criticise these articles, but<br />
it is our opinion that in a book of this kind they<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
USO PRRSOS IES<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
are out of place. It should confine itself entirely<br />
to one object, and make its sole aim to be as<br />
practical and as perfect as possible on the points<br />
it undertakes to elucidate. Articles on the ‘‘ How<br />
To” in literature are in evidence in many other<br />
works. It is not necessary to multiply them.<br />
<br />
Ifthe editor had been ambitious to deal with<br />
the legal and technical questions surrounding the<br />
marketing of MSS., drawings and photographs, a<br />
book at least three times the size of the present handy<br />
volume would hardly have exhausted his ambition.<br />
<br />
The book, however, cannot fail to be of use to<br />
those literary and journalistic tyros who are<br />
anxious either to widen their market or increase<br />
their income.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
a se<br />
<br />
THE IRRITABILITY OF AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
es<br />
HE irritability of authors is proverbial.<br />
What is proverbial may be, in a rough<br />
way, assumed to be not very far from the<br />
truth. Why the author should be a_ peculiarly<br />
touchy and snappish animal does not so clearly<br />
appear. The phenomenon can hardly be ex-<br />
plained in the latest fashionable way of<br />
accounting for everything by the single word<br />
‘heredity.’ Perhaps, however, in the secrets of<br />
Nature’s workshop there is some trick of warp and<br />
woof that, of necessity, occasions the peculiar com-<br />
plexion which constitutes irritability of nature to<br />
be a part of the composition of an author’s brain,<br />
just as it has been said that all nervous people are<br />
monarchists, and all melancholy people democrats ;<br />
which, after all, may not he true. Or, a more<br />
likely explanation may be sought in the fact that<br />
the exercise of an author’s profession, one which<br />
induces a nervous sensibility of a peculiarly com-<br />
plicated kind, possibly tends to nervous tension<br />
that causes the fibre of an author’s brain to jar<br />
under circumstances incapable of producing, in<br />
more slackly-strung natures, any vibration at all.<br />
Be all that as it may, this is indisputable, that<br />
only too many people, who have had a good deal<br />
to do with authors, are more than ready to bear<br />
witness to their being a very captious and touchy<br />
species, anything but delightful to their personal<br />
friends, and often trying in the extreme to the<br />
patience of those whom they ought to treat with<br />
forbearance and regard.<br />
<br />
All this is sufficiently unfortunate. Yet, perhaps,<br />
after all, no one is so bitterly punished by the<br />
author’s proclivity to snappishness as the author<br />
himself. For the only happy aspect of this sad<br />
failing of literary people is, that the culprit is not<br />
ignorant of his own excessive irritability.<br />
<br />
Only, seeing that literary people are fully con-<br />
scious of this weakness, why are not penmen of all<br />
<br />
219<br />
<br />
classes constantly on their guard against it ? Why<br />
do they not frequently ask themselves, in all serious-<br />
ness, ‘‘ What is the use of losing one’s temper ? ”<br />
It might have been supposed that a man, when<br />
meditating turning author, would recollect amongst<br />
other things, that one of the results of his enter-<br />
prise, whether successful or unsuccessful, must<br />
inevitably be a vast increase of whatever share of<br />
natural irritability Nature had put into him. But<br />
it is a well-known fact that men mostly become<br />
authors either without knowing it, or, at the best,<br />
without thinking at all definitely about what they<br />
are doing. And one of the consequences of this<br />
is, that when the hardships and difficulties of<br />
literary enterprises begin to appear, authors are<br />
enormously astonished, and not a little out of<br />
humour and out of heart. How people can<br />
suppose that any human enterprise can exist not<br />
beset with difficulties and disillusions is really<br />
inexplicable. Yet it is certain that no one thinks<br />
much beforehand of difficulties in authorship. The<br />
soldier and the sailor must run risks and encounter<br />
trials. The lives of solicitors, of medical men, of<br />
merchants, all imply many restrictions and much<br />
self-denial. Every calling in life has its draw-<br />
backs and its dangers. No one is ignorant of the<br />
fact. In making choice of a profession men reflect<br />
upon its hardships, and prepare themselves to face<br />
them. Seldom, however, in the case of literature.<br />
<br />
Qui nihil scripsit nullum putat esse laborem.<br />
<br />
Almost every man is persuaded that he could<br />
write a book well enough if he chose to take the<br />
trouble. After he has begun writing the difficulties<br />
appear, and then ensue the phenomena of the<br />
author’s peculiar irritability and proclivity to lose<br />
his temper.<br />
<br />
The first person with whom the author gets<br />
into a rage is himself. Little harm enough in<br />
that, it will be said—a just retribution! Only<br />
it is no jesting matter to the man conscious of<br />
possessing all the abilities and powers requisite for<br />
success—saviny the knack of keeping his temper.<br />
The story will not shape itself. The characters<br />
will not come out well defined. The scenario is a<br />
tangle. The pen will not obey the behests of<br />
imagination. So the author gets into a passion<br />
with them all. He smashes the pen, curses his<br />
dramatis persone, and pitches his manuscripts into<br />
the fire. And then, what is his work the for-<br />
warder for that ? No difficulties are surmounted by<br />
getting into a rage with them, but by taking time<br />
and pains patiently to effect what has to be done.<br />
<br />
The persons with whom the author next gets<br />
into a passion are invariably editors and publishers.<br />
After many holocausts, some manuscript is at last<br />
completed, often more by good luck than by good<br />
management. The editor or publisher, to whom<br />
<br />
<br />
220<br />
<br />
it is offered, then refuses it. In nineteen cases<br />
out of twenty the author is absolutely ignorant<br />
why it is refused—whether because it has been<br />
sent to the wrong place, or because it is really<br />
worthless, or because the publisher has just<br />
accepted a similar work, or for which of fifty<br />
other reasons. That does not prevent his form-<br />
ing hypotheses. “There is a clique.’ © Ebe<br />
publisher’s readers never look at manuscripts,<br />
unless they are written by their own friends.”<br />
“Nothing but bosh is ever accepted now.” And<br />
so forth. The author himself scarcely believes all<br />
these things that he says. But—suppose they<br />
were true. Then they would be facts about<br />
literary work with which he must reckon ; just as<br />
the market gardener must reckon with the fact<br />
that a single frost may ruin his peach crop for the<br />
year. Getting into rages will not alter the case.<br />
Why not think of the difficulties with which men<br />
contend in other professions? Why not have<br />
patience, learn wisdom from failure, and try to offer<br />
saleable work in the markets where it is wanted ?<br />
Later on the author is in a rage with the critics.<br />
Why ? Because they tell him disagreeable truths ?<br />
If they do, he is a lucky man. And seeing how<br />
<br />
difficult a thing it is, under any circumstances, to<br />
accept adverse criticism wisely, of what use is it<br />
for the author to complicate matters by losing his<br />
<br />
temper ?<br />
<br />
But the critics tell him nothing. They are<br />
asses! Be it so. And is not a man himself an<br />
ass who loses his temper with asses ?<br />
<br />
Still there remains the public—who have no<br />
discrimination ; and “ that great beast the general<br />
reader ’—whose Philistine tastes are ruining<br />
literature; and “the young person” whose<br />
mamma is the occasion of mawkishness marching<br />
triumphant through the land ; and the “ idiots ”—<br />
who persist in preferring some other man’s books ;<br />
and the general “‘ cussedness ” of everything. With<br />
all these the author is unceasingly getting into<br />
passions of different kinds.<br />
<br />
And of what use to him are his rages? Do<br />
they alter anything ?<br />
<br />
He says that he cannot help getting into a rage.<br />
But he ought to learn to be able to help it. And<br />
this is certain, if he would learn, he would have<br />
an enormous advantage over the other authors<br />
<br />
who will not.<br />
—_—____—_e—>_+___—_—__-<br />
<br />
SHAKESPEARE AND LONDON.<br />
<br />
——— +<br />
<br />
HE regret for the loss of Sir Walter Besant,<br />
which was touchingly expressed by Lord<br />
Rosebery at the last meeting of the London<br />
<br />
Topographical Society, might well apply to a recent<br />
project for the celebration of Shakespearein London.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
This movement has no fortuitous origin, it is<br />
the unfolding of a silent growth, and there has<br />
been no writer of equal influence and power so well<br />
fitted to be its exponent as Sir Walter Besant.<br />
His knowledge of history and of historical criti-<br />
cism would have enabled him to perceive that the<br />
recognition, in a special sense, of Shakespeare in<br />
London is the inevitable result of a process of<br />
development. A few words of explanation on this<br />
point will be, I think, the best means by which to<br />
recommend the matter to the attention of the<br />
Soviety of Authors and the readers of this<br />
journal.<br />
<br />
That Shakespeare spent his working life as poet<br />
and dramatist in London, and that his plays were<br />
published to the world in London theatres and<br />
printed at a London press are facts which have not<br />
penetrated the public cognisance. Why is this ?<br />
<br />
After the death of Shakespeare his vogue as a<br />
dramatist in London increased rather than dimi-<br />
nished under James and Charles; we can trace<br />
in the records of the Restoration period that the<br />
influence of Shakespeare was competing vigorously<br />
with new modes and a different dramatic con-<br />
vention; in the literary age of Queen Anne,<br />
Shakespeare was promoted from the theatre to his<br />
status as a literary classic, and his first biographer,<br />
Rowe, turned the attention of readers from the<br />
playhouse to the birthplace, Stratford-on-Avon.<br />
Ina later generation we find Dr. Johnson, who<br />
might almost be considered an embodiment and<br />
living-type of London, continuing the editorial<br />
labours of Pope and Theobald without a thought<br />
for the London associations of the plays in their<br />
origin and theatrical history. This example was<br />
improved upon by his great theatrical con-<br />
temporary, Garrick, who, inheriting the traditions<br />
of Davenant and Betterton, in a direct line from<br />
the time of Shakespeare himself, showed his<br />
unconsciousness of ‘history by becoming the most<br />
active promoter of that celebration at Stratford-<br />
on-Avon which served only too effectually to<br />
divert the minds of the dramatic world away from<br />
London, and ultimately, during the last century,<br />
to establish the Birth-place as the Mecca of the<br />
vast public of Shakespeare’s admirers. The<br />
recoil from this position has been slow and sure :<br />
its stages may be marked by a succession of<br />
literary investigators, from Malone at the beginning<br />
of the nineteenth century until the present time.<br />
The History of the Stage, which we owe to him; the<br />
investigations of Francis Douce ; the History of<br />
Shakespeare, and his Times by Drake ; the labours<br />
of John Payne Collier and the publications of the<br />
Shakespeare Society ; the works of Wright and of<br />
Halliwell ; the more popular expositions of Charles<br />
Knight and Walter Thornbury; the work and the<br />
influence of F. J. Furnival and the publications of<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
the New Shakspere Society ; the History of the<br />
Stage by F. G. Fleay; the recent biography by<br />
Sidney Lee; and, perhaps I may add, my own con-<br />
tributions to the snbject. These may serve to outline<br />
a progressive study of conditions and environment,<br />
by which Shakespeare has become visualised as a<br />
working playwright, in a London not too remote<br />
for realisation from historical evidence.<br />
<br />
With this brief introduction the prospectus of<br />
the London Shakespeare League may be read with<br />
a due perception of its significance. The first five<br />
paragraphs are as follows :—<br />
<br />
For long years past there has been an enthusiastic<br />
feeling among many Englishmen that the 23rd of April,<br />
the day of England’s Patron Saint, should be revived as<br />
an annual Festival in honour of the ever-living memory<br />
of England’s greatest son and noblest pride—William<br />
Shakespeare. “Certainly it was St. George for merry<br />
England,” wrote Dr. George Macdonald in 1864, “ when<br />
Shakespeare was born. But had St. George been the best<br />
saint in the calendar—which we have little enough ground<br />
for supposing he was—it would better suit our subject to<br />
say that the Highest was thinking of His England when He<br />
sent Shakespeare into it, to be a strength, a wonder, and a<br />
gladness to the nations of His earth.’’ The 23rd of April<br />
was the death-day, and, traditionally, also the birthday of<br />
the poet.<br />
<br />
At the birthplace an annual festival is held, and the<br />
“Shakespeare Week” is worthily celebrated ; but few can<br />
avail themselves of the celebration there, and many<br />
Londoners haye expressed the hope that an organised effort<br />
might be made, duly to observe in London by various<br />
festivals the greatest day in our calendar, so that the<br />
example of the capital might eventually be followed by the<br />
Empire generally, and “‘ Shakespeare Day’ become anational<br />
and Imperial celebration, helping to re-vivify the sentiments<br />
associated with the day in bygone times.<br />
<br />
The movement which has culminated in the formation of<br />
“The London Shakespeare League” took shape during<br />
“Shakespeare Week’ last year, and, as the outcome of<br />
careful consideration, the League places in the fore-front<br />
of its aims an annual celebration to be held in London ;<br />
but the celebration is to be merely one manifestation of the<br />
work it proposes to carry through for advancing the true<br />
knowledge and appreciation of the poet’s works. It is<br />
hoped in course of time to secure a permanent habitation<br />
for the League available for its many purposes.<br />
<br />
The accompanying programme is a first attempt at a<br />
London celebration, and indicates the manner in which the<br />
various learned and dramatic societies may rally round the<br />
League and observe the day.<br />
<br />
An even more effective celebration will, it is hoped, result<br />
if the managers of the London theatres, and ultimately<br />
theatrical managers throughout the Empire, may be pre-<br />
vailed upon to regard as their duty the performance of<br />
Shakespearian plays on or about the 23rd of April. Simi-<br />
larly, organisers of concerts may be induced to devote<br />
the day to Shakespearian music. The League commends its<br />
aims to the attention of Shakespeare societies and reading<br />
unions,*<br />
<br />
When this notice appears in 7e Author the<br />
celebration will have been held, and whether<br />
success or failure attends this first attempt, I<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* The Annual Subseription to the League is, at present,<br />
5/-. Application for Membership should be made to the<br />
Hon. Secretary, Dr. W. Martin, 2, Garden Court, Temple.<br />
<br />
221<br />
<br />
venture to think the objects of the London Shake-<br />
speare League are worthy of the active support of<br />
all literary craftsmen. Next year I hope the<br />
Society of Authors and the Authors’ Club. will<br />
associate themselves with the London Shakespeare<br />
Commemoration. The leadership of Sir Walter<br />
Besant need not be absent if his patriotism, his<br />
devotion, his love for London, his reverential<br />
attachment to the memory of Shakespeare, his<br />
desire to assist any movement having for its object<br />
and effect the awakening of the public mind to the<br />
treasures of its intellectual heritage, if his example,<br />
in a word, yet lives in the memory of his<br />
associates and contemporaries to inspire a resolute<br />
belief in the power of an idea.<br />
<br />
T. FarrmMan OrDISH.<br />
<br />
> +<br />
THE WORLD BEYOND!<br />
E<br />
<br />
HO over that gulf a bridge can throw,<br />
Which fearfully yawns between<br />
The world of Sense that we think we know<br />
And the other that is unseen ?<br />
Are there some nerve-cells in the brain,<br />
Seemingly fashioned all in vain,<br />
Where the sole path may lie ?<br />
A lesion slight in the matter grey!<br />
Those cells arranged in another way,<br />
And solved is the mystery !<br />
<br />
Il.<br />
<br />
Then—only then, will a flash of light<br />
Spring forth from the brain to span,<br />
Like a bridge of glory, that realm of night,<br />
Which shrouds ‘‘ the beyond ” from man !<br />
Yes, then the real world shall we see<br />
With eyes unsealed, and ‘iis dream shall flee,<br />
And we shall know at last<br />
That the things of Sense are but shadows all,<br />
Veiling the Spirit-land like a pall—<br />
But, we should stand aghast !<br />
<br />
III.<br />
Yea, happy for us that few will dare<br />
To span for us that profound,<br />
For nameless terrors may wait us there,<br />
Where horrors unguessed abound !<br />
Satyrs and Fauns of ancient Rome<br />
In that pale realm may have their home,<br />
And things never named by man !<br />
In opened eyes would a wonder strange<br />
Amoment dawn ! then to dread would change—<br />
We should see the Great God Pan !<br />
F. B. Doveton.<br />
Norre.—Suggested by Mr. Machen’s “The Great God<br />
Pan,”<br />
<br />
\<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2:22,<br />
<br />
SOME NOTES ON METHODS OF REJEC-<br />
TION AND REVIEW.<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
WO years ago I sent an article to a well-<br />
known monthly magazine. It was returned,<br />
with an unusual variant of the customary<br />
<br />
enclosing letter. I was told that the MS. was in-<br />
teresting, but that the editor was already supplied<br />
with material enough to last for six months. At the<br />
end of six months I again submitted the MS. Again<br />
it was praised, but 1 was informed that for several<br />
months to come there would be no vacancy for<br />
anything. I then dealt with the MS. in other<br />
ways, and at the end of a year from the date of the<br />
second rejection I submitted another article to the<br />
same periodical. On this occasion a similar but<br />
intenser form of reply was adopted. ‘ With sin-<br />
cere regret the Editor returns the enclosed, not<br />
because he fails to appreciate its interest and value,<br />
but because, for a few months at any rate, he can<br />
accept nothing whatever.”<br />
<br />
Naturally, it is not my intention to wait until<br />
this river goes by. But the system of laudatory<br />
indefinite postponement is not frank. No writer<br />
ought to complain of rejection after submitting a<br />
MS. to an editor who considers it, for an editor, if<br />
not always a good literary judge, is presumably<br />
the best authority as to the requirements of his<br />
periodical. If, however, an editor has a staff upon<br />
whom he exclusively relies, he should state plainly<br />
that he does not want outside help. I have no<br />
reason to complain of the staff system, since for<br />
many years a gentleman who controls a certain<br />
paper of somewhat humble and restricted scope,<br />
has habitually printed and paid for everything I<br />
have sent him, thus, indeed, obliging me in honour<br />
to edit my own contributions, and prepare them<br />
with exceptional care. But in this case outside<br />
work is freely admitted when it is suitable, and I<br />
suppose that in a world of competition the open<br />
door is the best policy. An editor who shuts the<br />
gates of consideration on mankind may discover<br />
that his readers, as well as his contributors, are a<br />
small group, and even the potent advertiser may in<br />
time adopt the principle of laudatory indefinite<br />
postponement.<br />
<br />
It may be that it is considered ‘‘neat”’ to<br />
reject with praise under colour of surfeit, or it<br />
may be that in some cases there is an “inner<br />
circle.” But I prefer an editor who will have<br />
the courage to say—‘ Not of the slightest<br />
use,” or “ Don’t want it. Please don’t send any<br />
more.”<br />
<br />
Rejections by publishers stand on another foot-<br />
ing. It is curious, however, that nowadays if you<br />
mention poetry to them they shudder as at pesti-<br />
lence. One is prepared for reluctance. The<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
commercial objections, based on wide and calami-<br />
tous experience, are well known. But what is<br />
happening to-day is that the hint of verse causes a<br />
fit. To such a miserable depth, of the fatuous and<br />
factitious, has this art been dragged by innumerable<br />
professors, that the publishing fraternity have<br />
generalised, and assume that the human race is no<br />
longer capable either of producing or of hearing<br />
language in its higher powers. It is assumed that<br />
your product will be, at best, of the well-known<br />
machine-made variety, to which even the greatest<br />
names in the last century not infrequently de-<br />
scended, and of which people are tired. Conse-<br />
quently, though for aught the publishers know to<br />
the contrary you may speak with the tongues of<br />
men and of angels, their ears are already filled with<br />
wax. Originality is supposed to have exhausted<br />
itself in Whitmanism, a product (by the way) of<br />
morbidity and American convention, differentiated<br />
from other alleged poetry mainly by chaotic manner.<br />
In the general Dunciad are included the raw<br />
amateur, the maker of dead mosaic, and the pos-<br />
sible genius who may be trying to utter some new,<br />
important truth, and whose work, designed to<br />
transcend all conventional types in matter and<br />
form, may bear the same relation to current poetry<br />
as the Marconi system of telegraphy bears to the<br />
<br />
penny post. 7<br />
<br />
This is not a wail. The hypothetical genius, of<br />
course, confronted by such difficulties, would find<br />
a way of overcoming them. He might go to some<br />
place where there is a tub, and, mounting thereon,<br />
give forth his verse orally to the world at large,<br />
thus incidentally creating a public that no book-<br />
seller would ignore. It would save much trouble,<br />
however, and many fits, if the state of affairs I<br />
have indicated were clearly recognised.<br />
<br />
The perpetration, some years ago, of a small<br />
book of verse (amongst other printed writings) is<br />
admitted by the present writer, who hastens to<br />
disclaim for it any pretence of transcendent revela-<br />
tion. But with regard to criticism, one further<br />
complaint may be made. The general racket of<br />
criticism any man ought to be able to stand “ with-<br />
out turning a hair,” especially as the critics are so<br />
often mutually destructive. Nor do I much mind<br />
the half-educated critic, a common variety, of<br />
which a specimen (writing in a newspaper of<br />
patrician, professional and fashionable readers)<br />
took me to task on a point of grammar. I had<br />
used a word in its strict etymological sense, and in<br />
such a way as would have given no offence either<br />
toa highly-cultured reader or to an uncultured one<br />
of simple perception. My usage was denounced,<br />
<br />
in a superior way, as proof of rusticity. Happily<br />
the context was quoted, and I was content that<br />
many readers would perceive the true state of the<br />
case.<br />
<br />
In fact, I felt something of the quiet joy of<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 223<br />
<br />
an angler who has landed a big trout—a trout that<br />
complacently generalised, and gobbled everything<br />
muscoid within view.<br />
<br />
* Different were the reviewers (unfair critics, I call<br />
them) who, after “faint praise,’ observed that,<br />
despite my efforts and certain similarities, I did<br />
not at all come up to the level of ‘‘ Mr. Henley”<br />
and “ Mr. Watson.” Curiously enough, I had never<br />
up to that time read a line of either Mr. Henley or<br />
Mr. Watson, but I proceeded to look into their<br />
work, and soon found that what they burned I<br />
adored and what they adored I burned. I could no<br />
more think of imitating those gentlemen in matter<br />
or style than (I am sure) they would think of<br />
imitating me. Beyond a possible genial sense of<br />
human fellowship consistent with a determination<br />
to continue gaily on our respective paths, there<br />
could be nothing in common between us—certainly<br />
the suggested straining and rivalry was absurd.<br />
And there is no likeness in the styles. I and my<br />
distinguished contemporaries certainly do not write<br />
in the language of the critical Press, but that does<br />
not constitute a mutual resemblance. Now, my<br />
indictment of these reviewers is this, that with the<br />
fullest range of good and bad adjectives at their com-<br />
mand—they might have pelted me to their hearts’<br />
content either with flints or with flowers—they<br />
chose to mislead their readers, and my possible<br />
readers, by a foolish comparison. It was much the<br />
same as telling the author of an astronomical treatise<br />
that he was not Chaucer, and was fairly outclassed<br />
by Horace. When will critics learn their trade ?<br />
<br />
Ruo.<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
——~+—<br />
<br />
THE ABSURDITY OF MODERN REVIEWING.<br />
<br />
Sir,—May I call attention to the inconsistency of<br />
the modern reviewer, who seems to do his level best<br />
to “boom” any book that strikes him as worthless.<br />
In a certain daily paper last week a criticism<br />
appeared of a certain book that has roused the ire<br />
of critics. It began by calling this book “ stupid,<br />
vulgar and offensive”; it ended with a recom-<br />
mendation that the volume should be thrown in<br />
the dustbin, “‘whence we can only hope that the<br />
female servants may not by any unlucky chance<br />
rescue it for unwholesome consumption at the<br />
kitchen supper table.” In the middle of this was<br />
<br />
a good half column about the book, which was<br />
freely quoted in large chunks for the whole world,<br />
“female servants” included, to read and digest !<br />
Could inconsistency and absurdity go further? If<br />
<br />
the book in question is only fit for the dustbin, is<br />
it fit to be quoted at length in a family newspaper<br />
with a large circulation ? :<br />
<br />
Other critics have spluttered in the same way, but<br />
nearly all have written columns about the book,<br />
showing their intense interest in it. Why can they<br />
not be candid and say, ‘“ This is the sort of stuff T<br />
like, and anyone who wants to be amused should<br />
read it”? instead of turning up their eyes to<br />
heaven over its iniquity, and, at the same time,<br />
advertising it for all they are worth. It is imbe-<br />
cility and it is humbug, this way of reviewing. If<br />
a book is “stupid, vulgar and offensive,” why hold<br />
it up as a lure for the public to run after; why<br />
spend hours of time and columns of print over it ?<br />
Let it die, or be honest enough to confess that it<br />
is vital and deserves to live.<br />
<br />
Mi Ee.<br />
<br />
———>—+ —_<br />
<br />
THE SOCIETY’S DINNER.<br />
A> Protest.<br />
<br />
Sir,—My annual shock in the form of an official<br />
intimation of the price at which is fixed the yearly<br />
dinner of the Society of Authors has just been<br />
experienced by me. I note that the amount on<br />
this occasion is to be half a sovereign, exclusive<br />
of any more exhilarating vintage than cold water,<br />
while the scene of the function is once more to be<br />
a leading hotel.<br />
<br />
Now, Sir, this is altogether wrong ; it is entirely<br />
opposed to the manner in which such a function<br />
should be organised. Would Shakespeare (or<br />
Bacon, if you prefer it) or Dr. Johnson have<br />
contemplated with equanimity the prospect of<br />
incurring this outlay for the mere privilege of<br />
eating a meal in the company of their fellow-<br />
writers at a big restaurant ? Assuredly no. They<br />
would have had souls above the gilded splendours<br />
of the Hotel Cecil and the ten shilling menus.<br />
Who are we, pray, that we cannot be equally<br />
moderate in our requirements? What, too, is<br />
gained by disbursing this sum? Nothing, I am<br />
convinced, that is at all commensurate therewith.<br />
I speak, Sir, from experience, for I have attended<br />
several of these annual orgies (each, I grieve to<br />
say, at an increased cost). On each occasion the<br />
poor but honest author has been conspicuous by<br />
his absence ; in his place have been serried ranks<br />
of uninteresting nonentities, whose sole claim to<br />
being present is that they have been able to pay<br />
for their seats. A ten-shilling dinner is for our<br />
Pierpoint Morgans, and; the number of these<br />
enrolled in the ranks of the Society is, I take it,<br />
limited.<br />
<br />
Then again, it is not as though the dinner were<br />
a good one ; on the contrary, it is a remarkably<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
224<br />
<br />
bad one when the cost thereof is taken into con-<br />
sideration. On one memorable occasion, indeed,<br />
-the price was a guinea, while the meal served.<br />
would have been dear at eighteenpence. -It seems<br />
to me, Sir, that we are making a great“mistake in<br />
this matter. I am no advocate for the chaste<br />
simplicity of Lockhart’s or Lyons’, but I am<br />
certainly of opinion that the gorgeous saloons of<br />
a first-class hotel are not necessary for the proper<br />
application of a feast of reason—such as should<br />
mark the annual dinner of our Society.<br />
<br />
I object, too, to the practice of the Committee<br />
in inviting guests of their own selection. ‘* Who<br />
pays the piper calls the tune” is a sound com-<br />
mercial axiom. As the members of the Society<br />
meet the bill for the same they should have a<br />
voice in inviting those on whose account it is<br />
incurred. It is the more excellent way. For<br />
myself, I am so constituted that it affords me no<br />
particular joy to pay for the dinner of an individual<br />
IT do not know (or want to) from Adam. I fancy<br />
that Iam not alone in this view. For the Com-<br />
mittee to invite outside guests at all is, in my<br />
opinion, a mistake. It reduces the annual dinner<br />
of the Society of Authors to the level of that of a<br />
charitable organisation touting for money. Surely<br />
we have enough members among ourselves to<br />
secure a satisfactory attendance—in point of num-<br />
bers at any rate. Of course, if the Society were<br />
on a proper basis it would give its members an<br />
annual dinner as a bonus ; failing the realisation<br />
of this pleasant state of affairs it ought at least to<br />
organise a dinner which should not cost those<br />
attending more than five shillings at the outside.<br />
<br />
I am, yours faithfully,<br />
<br />
HoracE WYNDHAM.<br />
April, 1903.<br />
<br />
“WHETHER OR NOT.”<br />
<br />
Srr,—Surely it is disappointing that even such<br />
an authority as Prof. Skeat can only refer one to<br />
“usage,” though it be the usage of a Shakespeare.<br />
Why should not a Scotchman also plead usage when<br />
he says, “I will drown and no one shall save me” ?<br />
What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.<br />
And the people who of late years have affected<br />
to be a “trifle” sorry, a “trifle” thoughtful—a<br />
erowing band, I fear—are fast making “usage”<br />
of a noun as the modifier of an adjective. If<br />
acknowledged as usage, one has nothing to say<br />
save that there is correct usage and incorrect<br />
usage.<br />
<br />
Your other correspondent, A. Armstrong, also<br />
quoting Shakespeare, at least suggests “whether<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
or no”’ might be a curtailed idiom, “ whether ay<br />
or no.” But when I say, “ Whether I go or not,”<br />
what is suppressed is not an imaginary “ ay,” bat<br />
the repetition of the verb.<br />
<br />
I suppose it is “usage” which makes nine out of<br />
ten, if not ninety-nine out of a hundred, of modern<br />
authors write “whether or not.” Why have we<br />
arrived at that usage ? And I doubt the English<br />
school examiner could be found who would pass<br />
“whether or no.” in a boy’s exercise book without<br />
at least telling him he had better say “or not.”<br />
Why so ?<br />
<br />
hat my inquiry of 7'he Author resulted in such<br />
answer (I had asked for good reason) only shows<br />
what weak legs our poor King’s English—beloved<br />
and beautiful withal—has to stand on! Our<br />
language, being so largely the spoil of other<br />
languages, is not securely founded in its own con-<br />
struction. All foreigners, at least every Frenchman<br />
and German learning English, know that. They<br />
have been well grounded in their grammar, and<br />
when they come to acquire our tongue, behold they<br />
find ‘usage ”—too often usage minus reason.<br />
<br />
Sorrowfully,<br />
Kine’s ENGLISH.<br />
<br />
TYPEWRITING.<br />
<br />
Sir,—If any of your readers want to know of a<br />
really good typewriter I shall be most happy to<br />
recommend one: she is a lady, very highly educated,<br />
with literary experience, and is thoroughly to be<br />
trusted with valuable MSS.<br />
<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
OuIveE KATHARINE Parr.<br />
<br />
WANTED A REFERENCE.<br />
<br />
Srr,—In reply to Mr. J. M. Lely, the passage<br />
which he quotes—<br />
<br />
“ Qui cessat esse melior cessat esse bonus,”<br />
<br />
was stated in the Daily Telegraph of Thursday,<br />
May 29th, 1902 (p. 9, c. 1), to be the motto<br />
written by Oliver Cromwell in his pocket Bible,<br />
in the possession of the Earl of Chichester.<br />
<br />
I, too, have endeavoured to ascertain the source<br />
of this sentence, but, so far, unsuccessfully, and,<br />
therefore, incline to the belief that it was Cromwell’s<br />
own composition.<br />
<br />
Hupert Hass. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/483/1903-05-01-The-Author-13-8.pdf | publications, The Author |