Omeka IDOmeka URLTitleSubjectDescriptionCreatorSourcePublisherDateContributorRightsRelationFormatLanguageTypeIdentifierCoveragePublisher(s)Original FormatOxford Dictionary of National Biography EntryPagesParticipantsPen NamePhysical DimensionsPosition End DatePosition Start DatePosition(s)Publication FrequencyOccupationSexSociety Membership End DateSociety Membership Start DateStart DateSub-Committee End DateSub-Committee Start DateTextToURLVolumeDeathBiographyBirthCommittee End DateCommittee of Management End DateCommittee of Management Start DateCommittee Start DateCommittee(s)Council End DateCouncil Start DateDateBibliographyEnd DateEvent TypeFromImage SourceInteractive TimelineIssueLocationMembersNgram DateNgram TextFilesTags
347https://historysoa.com/items/show/347The Author, Vol. 12 Issue 04 (November 1901)<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+12+Issue+04+%28November+1901%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 12 Issue 04 (November 1901)</a><a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015006979390" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015006979390</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a>1901-11-01-The-Author-12-429–52<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=12">12</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1901-11-01">1901-11-01</a>419011101The Author.<br /> (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br /> -<br /> -<br /> Vol. XII.—No. 4.<br /> NOVEMBER 1, 1901.<br /> PRICE SIXPENCE.<br /> --- =-<br /> ----<br /> -----<br /> CONTENTS.<br /> PAGE<br /> PAGE<br /> ..<br /> ...<br /> ...<br /> 34<br /> ...<br /> ...<br /> ...<br /> 42<br /> General Memoranda ....<br /> Warnings to Dramatic Authors ... ...<br /> How to Use the Society<br /> The Reading Branch ... ... ... ...<br /> Notices ... ... ... ... ...<br /> The Pension Fund of the Society of Author:<br /> From the Committee ...<br /> The Work of the Society<br /> Authorities<br /> ...<br /> 30, 31<br /> :* ::::<br /> Author and Literary Agent<br /> Literary, Dramatic, and Musical Property<br /> An Old to a Young Reviewer ...<br /> &quot;&quot; ...<br /> The Publication of Educational Books<br /> Bookselling ... ...<br /> King Alfred as an Author...<br /> The Authors&#039; Club<br /> Book and Play Talk ... ...<br /> Correspondence... ... ...<br /> ... ... ...<br /> ...<br /> ...<br /> ...<br /> 51<br /> PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.<br /> hlication. By us forms of is explained: diff<br /> 1. The Annual Report for the current year. ls.<br /> 2. The Author. A Monthly Journal devoted especially to the protection and maintenance of Literary<br /> Property. Issued to all Members gratis. Price to non-members, 6d., or 58. 6d. per annum,<br /> post free. Back numbers from 1892, at 10s. 6d. per vol.<br /> 3. Literature and the Pension List. By W. MORRIS COLLES, Barrister-at-Law. 2s.<br /> 4. The History of the Société des Gens de Lettres. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. 1s.<br /> 5. The Cost of Production. (Out of print.)<br /> 6. The Various Methods of Publication. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. In this work, compiled from the<br /> papers in the Society&#039;s offices, the various forms of agreements proposed by Publishers to<br /> Authors are examined, and their meaning carefully explained, with an account of the<br /> various kinds of fraud which have been made possible by the different clauses in their<br /> agreements. 3s.<br /> Addenda to the Above. By G. HERBERT THRING. Being additional facts collected at<br /> the office of the Society since the publication of the “Methods.&quot; With comments and<br /> advice. 2s.<br /> 7. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition of Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill of 1890. With<br /> Extracts from the Report of the Commission of 1878, the Berne Convention, and the<br /> American Copyright Bill. By J. M. LELY. ls. 6d.<br /> 8. The Society of Authors. A Record of its Action from its Foundation. By WALTER BESANT<br /> (Chairman of Committee, 1888–1892). ls.<br /> 9. The Contract of Publication in Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Switzerland. By ERNST<br /> LUNGE, J.U.D. 28. 6d.<br /> 10. Forms of Agreement issued by the Publishers&#039; Association; with Comments. By<br /> G. HERBERT THRING, and Illustrative Examples by Sir WALTER BESANT. 2nd Edition. 1s.<br /> [All prices net. Amply to the Secretary, 39, ou Queen Street, Storey&#039;s Gate, S.JI.]<br /> Ameri<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 28 (#408) #############################################<br /> <br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> -<br /> The Society of Authors (Incorporated).<br /> PRESIDENT,<br /> GEORGE MEREDITH.<br /> COUNCIL.<br /> SIR EDWIN ARNOLD, K.C.I.E., (&#039;.S.I. | AUSTIN DOBSON.<br /> THE REV. C. H. MIDDLETOX-WAKE.<br /> J. M. BARRIE.<br /> A. CONAN DOYLE, M.D.<br /> SIR LEWIS MORRIS.<br /> A. W. A BECKETT.<br /> A. W. DU BOURG,<br /> HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br /> ROBERT BATEMAN.<br /> SiR MICHAEL FOSTER, K.C.B., M.P., GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br /> F. E. BEDDARD, F.R.S.<br /> F.R.S.<br /> J. C. PARKINSON.<br /> SIR HENRY BERGNE, K.C.M.G.<br /> D, W. FRESHFIELD,<br /> A. W. PINERO.<br /> AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C.<br /> RICHARD GARNETT, C.B., LL.D. THE RIGHT Hox. THE LORD PIR-<br /> THE REV. PROF. BONNEY, F.R.S. EDMUND GOSSE.<br /> BRIGHT, F.R.S<br /> THE RIGHT Hox. JAMES BRYCE, M.P. | SYDNEY GRUNDY,<br /> SIR FREDERICK POLLOCK, Bart.,<br /> THE RIGHT Hon. THE LORD BURGH. ! H. RIDER HAGGARD,<br /> LL.D.<br /> CLERE.<br /> THOMAS HARDY.<br /> WALTER HERRIES POLLOCK.<br /> HALL CAINE.<br /> ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS.<br /> E. Rose.<br /> EGERTON CASTLE, F.S.A.<br /> JEROME K. JEROME.<br /> W. BAPTISTE SCOONES.<br /> P. W. CLAYDEN.<br /> J. SCOTT KELTIE, LL.D.<br /> Miss FLORA L. SHAW.<br /> EDWARD CLODD.<br /> RUDYARD KIPLING.<br /> G. R, SIMS.<br /> W. MORRIS COLLES.<br /> PROF. E. RAY LANKESTER, F.R.S. S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br /> THE HON. JOHN COLLIER.<br /> THE RIGHT Hox.W.E. H.LECKY, M.P. J.J. STEVENSON.<br /> SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br /> J. M. LELY.<br /> FRANCIS STORR.<br /> MRS. CRAIGIE.<br /> THE REV. W. J. LOFTIE, F.S.A.<br /> WILLIAM MOY THOMAS.<br /> E. MARION CRAWFORD,<br /> SIR A. C. MACKENZIE, Mus.Doc. MRS. HUMPHRY WARD,<br /> THE RIGHT Hox. THE LORD (&#039;URZON PROF. J. M. D, MEIKLEJOHN.<br /> OF KEDLESTON.<br /> llon. Counsel - E. M. UNDERDOWN, K.C.<br /> COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT.<br /> Chairman-A. HOPE HAWKINS.<br /> A. W. , BECKETT.<br /> A. CONAN DOYLE, M.D).<br /> D. W. FRESHFIELD.<br /> SYDNEY GRUNDY,<br /> J. M. LELY.<br /> HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br /> GILBERT PARKER, V.P.<br /> E. ROSE.<br /> FRANCIS STORR.<br /> SUB-COMMITTEES.<br /> Hox. John COLLIER (Chairman).<br /> I<br /> M. H. SPIELMANN,<br /> ART.<br /> SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br /> COPYRIGHT.<br /> A. HOPE HAWKINS.<br /> A. W. À BECKETT.<br /> W. M, COLLES.<br /> J. M. LELY.<br /> GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br /> HENRY ARTHUR JONES (Chairman).<br /> A. W. À BECKETT.<br /> DRAMA.<br /> F. C. BURNAND.<br /> SYDNEY GRUNDY.<br /> A. W. PINERO.<br /> EDWARD ROSE.<br /> Solicitors_<br /> FIELD), ROSCOE, and Co., Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields.<br /> i G. HERBERT THRING, 39, Old Queen Street, S.W.<br /> Secretary-G. HERBERT THRING.<br /> OFFICES: 39, OLD QUEEN STREET, STOREY&#039;S GATE, S.W.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 29 (#409) #############################################<br /> <br /> The Author.<br /> ( The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br /> FOUNDED BY SIR WALTER BESANT.<br /> VOL. XII.--No. 4.<br /> NOVEMBER 1st, 1901.<br /> [PRICE SIXPENCE.<br /> -<br /> -<br /> GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br /> (2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br /> to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br /> nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br /> withheld.<br /> WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br /> ITERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br /> M agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br /> with literary property :<br /> I. Selling it Outright.<br /> This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br /> price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br /> managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br /> Secretary of the Society.<br /> II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br /> agreement).<br /> In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br /> (1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br /> duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br /> (2.) Not to give the publisher the power of patting the<br /> profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br /> in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br /> ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br /> (3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,&quot;<br /> unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br /> (4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br /> rights.<br /> (5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br /> (6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br /> As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br /> doctor!<br /> III. The Royalty System.<br /> It is above all things necessary to know what the<br /> proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br /> for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br /> the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br /> connected with royalties are published in The Author.<br /> Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br /> “Cost of Production.&#039;<br /> IY. A Commission Agreement.<br /> The main points are :-<br /> (1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br /> (2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br /> 13.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br /> General.<br /> All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br /> above mentioned.<br /> Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br /> Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br /> the Secretary of the Society.<br /> Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br /> Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br /> The main points which the Society has always demanded<br /> from the outset are :-<br /> (1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br /> means.<br /> VOL. XII.<br /> EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br /> Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br /> petent legal authority.<br /> 2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br /> the production of a play with anyone except an established<br /> manager.<br /> 3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for PLAYS<br /> IN THREE OR MORE ACTS :-<br /> (a.) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT.<br /> This is unsatisfactory. An author who enters<br /> into such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br /> tract for production of the piece by a certain date<br /> and for proper publication of his name on the<br /> play-bills.<br /> (6.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br /> TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF PERCENTAGES<br /> on gross receipts. Percentages vary between<br /> 5 and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br /> percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br /> in preference to the American system. Should<br /> obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br /> date on or before which the play should be<br /> performed.<br /> (c.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br /> TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF ROYALTIES (i.e.,<br /> fixed nightly fees). This method should be<br /> always avoided except in cases where the fees<br /> are likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br /> other safeguards set out under heading (6.) apply<br /> also in this case.<br /> 4. PLAYS IN ONE ACT are often sold outright, but it is<br /> better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br /> paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br /> important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br /> be reserved.<br /> 5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br /> be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br /> time. This is most important.<br /> 6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br /> should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br /> of great importance.<br /> 7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br /> play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br /> holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br /> print the book of the words.<br /> 8. Never forget that AMERICAN RIGHTS may be exceed-<br /> ingly valuable. They should never be included in English<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 30 (#410) #############################################<br /> <br /> 30<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br /> must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br /> Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br /> 9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br /> referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so do<br /> some publishers. Members can make their own deductions<br /> and act accordingly.<br /> agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br /> consideration.<br /> 9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br /> drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br /> 10. An author should remember that production of a play<br /> is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br /> delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br /> He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br /> the beginning,<br /> 11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br /> is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br /> is to obtain adequate publication.<br /> As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete on<br /> account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br /> tracts, THOSE AUTIJORS DESIROUS OF FURTHER INFORMA-<br /> TION ARE REFERRED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY.<br /> THE READING BRANCH.<br /> M EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br /> branch of their work by informing young writers<br /> of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br /> treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br /> MSS. includes NOT ONLY WORKS OF FICTION, BUT POETRY<br /> AND DRAMATIC WORKS, and when it is possible, under<br /> special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br /> lieaders are writers of competence and experience. The<br /> fee is one guinea.<br /> HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br /> NOTICES.<br /> TIHE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br /> the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br /> free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br /> very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br /> many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br /> 58. 6d. subscription for the year.<br /> Communications for The Author should be addressed to<br /> the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s<br /> Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor NOT LATER<br /> THAN THE 21st OF EACH MONTH.<br /> All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br /> whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br /> communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br /> work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br /> publish.<br /> 1. D VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br /> advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br /> lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br /> business or the administration of his property. If the<br /> advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor,<br /> the member has a right to an opinion from the Society&#039;s<br /> solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel&#039;s opinion is<br /> clesirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel&#039;s<br /> opinion. All this without any cost to the member.<br /> 2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br /> and publishers&#039; agreements do not generally fall within the<br /> experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br /> to use the Society.<br /> 3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br /> accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br /> Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br /> or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br /> obtained may prove invaluable.<br /> 4. BEFORE SIGNING ANY AGREEMENT WHATEVER, send<br /> the document to the Society for examination.<br /> 5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br /> you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br /> are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br /> advancing the best interests of literature in promoting the<br /> independence of the writer,<br /> 6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br /> of members&#039; agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br /> proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br /> confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br /> who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br /> -(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br /> advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br /> in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br /> agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br /> agreements.<br /> 7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br /> agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society<br /> Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br /> consideration the contracts submitted to them by literary<br /> agents, and are recommended to submit them for inter-<br /> pretation and explanation to the Secretary of the Society.<br /> for<br /> For the Opinions expressed in papers that are signed<br /> or initialled the Authors alone are responsible.<br /> None of the papers or paragraphs must be taken<br /> as expressing the opinion of the Committee unless<br /> such is especially stated to be the case.<br /> COMMUNICATIONS AND LETTERS ARE INVITED BY THE<br /> EDITOR on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br /> no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br /> return articles which cannot be accepted.<br /> THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY begs to give notice<br /> that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br /> and he requests members who do not receive an<br /> answer to important communications within two days to<br /> write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br /> crossed Inion Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br /> by registered letter only.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 31 (#411) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 31<br /> CHANGE OF ADDRESS.<br /> The office of the Incorporated Society of Authors<br /> has been removed to-<br /> 39, OLD QUEEN STREET,<br /> STOREY&#039;S GATE, S.W.<br /> The Secretary during the last month has dealt<br /> with seven fresh cases, in three of which he has<br /> already been successful. With the exception of<br /> three cases which are still in the course of negotia-<br /> tion, he has satisfactorily terminated those that<br /> were before him at the date of publication of last<br /> month&#039;s Author. The Committee have determined<br /> to take counsel&#039;s opinion on behalf of one of their<br /> members in a complicated case on the interpretation<br /> of an agreement where a large amount of literary<br /> property is involved.<br /> The Committee have decided to call a meeting of<br /> the Copyright Sub-committee, with a view to again<br /> raising the question of the Copyright Bill. The<br /> course that the Copyright Sub-committee adopts<br /> will be reported in due course in these columns.<br /> NOTICE.<br /> M HE EDITOR begs to inform members of the<br /> Authors&#039; Society and other readers of The<br /> Author that the cases which are from time<br /> to time quoted in The Author are cases that hare<br /> come before the notice or to the knowledge of the<br /> Secretary of the Society, and that those members<br /> of the Society who desire to have the names of<br /> the publishers concerned can obtain them on<br /> application.<br /> THE PENSION FUND OF THE SOCIETY<br /> OF AUTHORS.<br /> M HE following is the total of donations and<br /> 1 subscriptions promised or received up to<br /> the 1st October, 1901.<br /> Further sums will be acknowledged from month<br /> to month as they are received, as it has been con-<br /> sidered unnecessary to print the full list with<br /> every issue.<br /> Donations ........<br /> ...........£1439 16 6<br /> Subscriptions...<br /> ......... 107 18 6<br /> Sir Walter Besant Memorial.<br /> The Committee feel that the debt of gratitude<br /> owed by the Society to their founder, Sir Walter<br /> Besant, should be adequately recorded in a per-<br /> manent memorial, and are sure that all members<br /> of the Society will share this feeling. In their<br /> opinion such memorial should commemorate not<br /> only his distinction as a novelist, and as an<br /> historian and a citizen of London, but also his<br /> services to his fellow writers, and the special<br /> position he occupied amongst them.<br /> The summer holidays intervening have caused<br /> a certain amount of delay in the Committee&#039;s<br /> action, but they have conferred with Lady Besant,<br /> who gives the project her cordial approval. The<br /> approval of George Meredith, the President of<br /> the Society, has also been accorded to it, and it<br /> has been decided, with the sanction of the Dean<br /> and Chapter, to place a memorial in the crypt of<br /> St. Paul&#039;s, adjacent to the tablet that commemorates<br /> Charles Reade.<br /> Mr. George Frampton, A.R.A., has promised to<br /> undertake the work, and it is hoped that such a<br /> sum will be raised as will enable the scheme to be<br /> carried out in a manner worthy of its object.<br /> A letter has already been sent to the members<br /> of the Council of the Society, and in due course<br /> a circular containing further particulars will be<br /> sent out to all mernbers, and from time to time<br /> the list of subscriptions will be published in The<br /> Author.<br /> The Committee make this statement as a pre-<br /> liminary notice, in order that it may not appear<br /> to those who loved and admired our late founder<br /> that any unnecessary delay has taken place in<br /> organising the expression of the affection and<br /> regret felt towards their founder by the members<br /> of the Society.<br /> Oct. 10, Harrison, Mrs. (Lucas Malet)<br /> Oct. 15, Rossi, Miss L. ...<br /> 5 5<br /> 0 10<br /> 0<br /> 6<br /> FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br /> The Work of the Society.<br /> VER. OWEN SEAMAN has been elected<br /> y a member of the Council of the Society of<br /> Authors and member of the Committee<br /> of Management.<br /> Mrs. Harrison (Lucas Malet) has been elected a<br /> member of the Council.<br /> The Committee elected at their meeting in<br /> vctober twenty-five members and eight associates<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 32 (#412) #############################################<br /> <br /> 32<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> AUTHORITIES.<br /> TT will be our endeavour to publish in every<br /> 1 number of The Author at least one article from<br /> the pen of some well-known member of our<br /> Society. Several have already promised to write<br /> articles on some literary subject which will be of<br /> interest to their fellow-writers, and we trust that,<br /> on reading this notice, other members will volun-<br /> tarily offer their services. The length of such<br /> articles ought to be about four columns.<br /> The above paragraph points the reason of the<br /> failure of the commission book. A publisher has<br /> nothing to work for if he publishes a commission<br /> book, and therefore, in the great majority of cases.<br /> a work put on the market under an arrangement<br /> of this kind is bound to fail. If it is successful, it<br /> is generally owing to the action of the author. not<br /> of the publisher<br /> Until the publisher rise<br /> Until the publisher rises up who will publish<br /> nothing but commission books, the same resnlt will<br /> alway<br /> always occur.<br /> We have inserted a notice in The Author con-<br /> cerning the bona fides of the cases quoted in its<br /> pages. It has been necessary to do so owing to the<br /> fact that a great many detractors of the Society have<br /> stated that these cases never really occurred. The<br /> main reasons for withholding names are generally<br /> two. Firstly, the fear of the member concerned lest<br /> he should be involved in an action for libel ; and<br /> secondly, his dislike for any publicity which he con-<br /> siders may prejudice him should he be seeking<br /> further publication.<br /> The latter point, no doubt, acts as a very strong<br /> lever. Members of the Society used to fear the<br /> publication of the fact that they were members, on<br /> the ground that publishers would refuse to deal with<br /> them, and even now there are some who are afraid<br /> of this position. This is one of the reasons why<br /> the votes of the members of the Society were against<br /> the publication of a list of members. This fear,<br /> however, has to a great extent passed away, and<br /> subscribers to the Society are only too anxious to<br /> proclaim their membership when they are in diffi-<br /> culties with publishers. As a matter of fact, there<br /> are those who are not members, and never have<br /> been, who are only too glad at times to make a<br /> false statement in order to bring a publisher to a<br /> reasonable understanding.<br /> The discussion of this subject calls to our mind<br /> the question of the one-book man, which has<br /> been mentioned in The Author from time to time.<br /> Now that the war has been raging in South Africa<br /> for some time, the point is perhaps brought more<br /> forcibly before the public.<br /> Many on their return from South Africa desire<br /> to publish their reminiscences, and laying their<br /> maiden effort at the feet of a publisher are met<br /> with the usual answer that there are too many books<br /> of the kind on the market, but that, if the author<br /> cares to pay for the cost of production, he will<br /> publish the book on commission. This is the<br /> publisher&#039;s harvest. It is quite certain that the<br /> one-book man, whether he is a yeoman returning<br /> from the war, or whether he is a man of distinction<br /> writing his memoirs, will not, as a rule, obtain<br /> advice on a matter of this kind. He will trust<br /> himself to the publisher as he would to his con-<br /> fidential adviser—the pity of it.<br /> The absurdity of the position has often been<br /> mentioned, but the fact remains the same. The<br /> consequence is, a considerable outlay by the author<br /> usually exceeding the ordinary market price of the<br /> cost of production of the book, and no return in<br /> the way of profits. The reason of the lack of profits<br /> arises, firstly, because—coming back to Sir Walter<br /> Scott&#039;s statement—the publishers have no stimulus<br /> to push the book ; secondly, because of the over-<br /> charge (this word is not the word used by the<br /> publishers) for printing, paper, advertising, and<br /> other details of the cost of production,<br /> It may be instructive to draw the attention of<br /> the members of the Society to the opinion of pub-<br /> lishers expressed by Sir Walter Scott, quoted in<br /> “ Lockhart&#039;s Life,&quot; vol. 2, chapter 4. Sir Walter<br /> states as follows:--<br /> “ The publishers are very like farmers who flourish best<br /> to high rent, and in general take most pains to sell a book<br /> that has cost them money to purchase.”<br /> From experience at the Society&#039;s office, it is quite<br /> clear that Sir Walter Scott was well aware of the<br /> peculiarities of the publishing trade, and his state-<br /> ment continues as true now as it was then. If an<br /> author will but value himself at his proper standard,<br /> he is much more likely to obtain satisfactory<br /> arrangements, and have his books more liberally<br /> pushed, than his fellow who may be constantly<br /> underselling his own market.<br /> It is curious to note that in the case of theatrical<br /> performances the tendency of the public is to<br /> demand pieces which are light, pleasing and<br /> amusing. For every serious drama that is pro-<br /> duced there must be at least two of a lighter and<br /> more amusing kind, yet, on turning to literature,<br /> we see wonderfully few amusing writers compared<br /> with the number who write serious, problematical<br /> and heavy fiction.<br /> It would be interesting if some of the latter-day<br /> philosophers would write an article dealing with<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 33 (#413) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 33<br /> this question from the psychological point of view.<br /> It is impossible to think that those who read the<br /> works of fiction placed on the market read them<br /> with a view to a serious study of life, rather than<br /> with a view to their personal amusement.<br /> will forward statements containing figures--that<br /> is, of the price given, of the circulation, and of<br /> other details—we will gladly work out the returns<br /> to the publisher and the author, and again test the<br /> truth of the publishers&#039; statement regarding the<br /> profits from school books.<br /> The following paragraph taken from the New<br /> Zealand Times will have a mournful significance<br /> to many members of the Authors&#039; Society :-<br /> * A visit to the grave of R. L. Stevenson would disappoint<br /> many people. While some time back visits to this famous<br /> hill were most frequent, the limit must now be six persons<br /> yearly. And no wonder! The place is quite overgrown<br /> with weeds, and perhaps will some day be hard to discover.<br /> I understand that on receiving a complaint from a Sydney<br /> resident, a little while back, the British Consul sent some<br /> of his men up and the place was cleared. It is now time<br /> for another clearing.&quot;<br /> &quot;To write a book is an easy task ; it requires only pen and<br /> ink and some patient paper. To print a book is slightly<br /> more difficult, because genius often expresses itself in<br /> illegible manuscript. To read a book is still more difficult,<br /> as one must struggle against sleep. But the most difficult<br /> task that anyone may attempt is to sell a book. -Felir<br /> Dahn.”<br /> The above cutting from the Publishers&#039; Circular<br /> is mildly satirical. It is also inaccurate. We let<br /> it pass. It is not the first time The Author has<br /> been reminded that genius lies with the publisher,<br /> and that the great literary undertakings of the<br /> world would fall flat without “a goose to lay the<br /> golden egg.”<br /> In the last number we had reason to make some<br /> remarks about epigrams ; the following, culled from<br /> a comic paper, may suggest an idea to some member<br /> on the point of writing an article on the subiect<br /> on the point of writing an article on the subject.<br /> She (to unromantic brother) : He called me the apple<br /> of his eye. Is that an epigram ?<br /> He: No, it&#039;s piffle.<br /> We have taken the liberty of printing the late<br /> James Runciman&#039;s opinion on the subject of<br /> literary men being businesslike ; it is pithy and<br /> powerful. It may act as an antidote to those who<br /> from time to time objected to some of the methods<br /> of our Founder.<br /> “ No babble sickens me so much as that about the fading<br /> about the fading<br /> of noble aspirations. The talk about contempt for money<br /> mostly comes from men who are too self-indulgent to<br /> undergo exertion, but who will readily take whatever they<br /> can get without trouble. In my own experience of life, I<br /> have found that if you want to see an unscrupulous grabber<br /> of the worst type you must seek out a wild poet who despises<br /> Philistines. He will not deny himself anything ; he will<br /> feed from any hand, and he will write lightsome sarcasms<br /> about everyone who feeds him. He is generous to himself,<br /> and he is overpoweringly bitter towards those who make<br /> life an affair of half-pence; but he snatches half-pence<br /> greedily enough when they have been earned by other<br /> people. He is secretly ashamed because his own impotence<br /> reduces him to being beholden to the Philistine, and he<br /> eases his shame by making scornful comments on his<br /> providers.<br /> “ The men who do the lordly acts of generosity, the men<br /> who are beneficent to their families, to the poor, to the<br /> State, are the hard fellows who take their work as they find<br /> it, live rationally, forego indulgences, and gather the form<br /> of force which we call money. They can afford to be<br /> munificent, and they are good citizens, for the simple reason<br /> that they recognise the laws of existence and preserve their<br /> self-respect. There is more real poetry in the heart of a<br /> merchant who goes soberly homeward wondering what he<br /> can do to gratify his wife and children than there is in the<br /> whole tribe of fribbles who think that the main duties of<br /> life are to wear ugly hats and derive&#039;impressions.&#039; People<br /> like Firth and Nasmyth and Armstrong have given more<br /> happiness to the world than have all the rhymers and<br /> prosers that ever moaned about the waywardness of fate<br /> and the accursed influence of .dross.&#039;<br /> &quot; JAMES RUNCIMAN.&quot;<br /> Mr. Robert MacLehose, of the well-known<br /> Glasgow firm, has kindly written an article on<br /> “ The Net System,” which is published in this<br /> month&#039;s Author.<br /> The matter may not appear of much importance<br /> to members of the Society, but the price at which<br /> books are sold to the public, and the maintenance<br /> of a flourishing book trade throughout the country,<br /> should not be looked upon with indifference by the<br /> producers.<br /> With the author should lie ultimately the power<br /> of determining in what manner and at what price<br /> his wares should be marketed, that he may receive<br /> the fair reward of his labour.<br /> In those countries where the publisher and<br /> booksenler by strong combination rule the market,<br /> the author suffers and the tradesmen flourish.<br /> The policy of all should be to obtain a just return.<br /> It is to be hoped that further articles on the book<br /> rade m uture numbers may lead to the clearing<br /> up of certain disputed points.<br /> We have put forward in the last number of The Quite recently a case came before the Society of<br /> Author and are printing in this number some a book published in cheap form in England under<br /> remarks on the production of educational works. an author&#039;s name which had never been written by<br /> If any member of the Society, or the public, the author.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 34 (#414) #############################################<br /> <br /> 34<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> The Society readily dealt with the matter and American writers. For Continental rights, too, an<br /> the book was withdrawn from circulation with agent in each of the countries where translations<br /> apologies.<br /> are issued is a necessity if anything like the full<br /> We regret to say that the same mistake has pecuniary value is to be extracted for them. Then<br /> frequently occurred the other side of the water, again, for an English writer living abroad (say, in<br /> and is much more difficult to deal with.<br /> a colony) or travelling, a London literary agent is,<br /> The American pirate has in many cases grown if not a necessity, at any rate a luxury. The<br /> bold, through freedom from persecution. He finds literary agent may be of service also to the “one-<br /> an English writer whose works sell in quantities in book” man--the writer who publishes only now<br /> America, proceeds to take a certain amount of copy and again, the writer who knows that his books<br /> -Heaven knows where he gets it from-binds it will not sell, and does not look to get a profit out<br /> up in cheap form, and publishes it, with the name of them.<br /> of the popular writer referred to.<br /> As to whether the London literary agent will<br /> This naturally causes the author in England consent to handle the work of this latter class, is<br /> inany heart-burnings, as his literary reputation is another matter.<br /> at stake, and the damage that may accrue may But for the professional writer, the writer who<br /> possibly be very large.<br /> pens matter which sells, the writer who looks to<br /> To strike at this grievance, although a matter of make a living, or part of a living, out of his books<br /> import, is a question of considerable difficulty, as and serial rights, I emphatically hold that the<br /> it is very often the case that the author, unwilling literary agent, as at present on offer in London, is<br /> to journey to the other side of the water, does not a clog and a hindrance.<br /> care about starting an action in America. He The literary agent&#039;s first object is very naturally<br /> accordingly refrains from taking up the matter, to make his own living. Observe how the author&#039;s<br /> with the exception, perhaps, of writing a few letters interest clashes with this at the very outset. The<br /> to the American papers, and the pirate flourishes agent has, say, three short tales by three tolerably<br /> on his ill-gotten gains. The Society, however, has well-known pens, A., B. and C., in his hands, each<br /> some influence in New York, and has succeeded on worth for serial use about £20. He wants to sell<br /> one or two occasions in settling cases of this kind, all three to one magazine, as he knows that other<br /> owing to the weight of its name, without the markets are crowded. He knows quite well that<br /> necessity of commencing action.<br /> the pay-sheet of that particular magazine will not<br /> There is another amusing trick that some of the stand £60, though it would be quite equal to taking<br /> American publishers indulge in. This is not so one tale at £20, which at 10 per cent. commission<br /> harmful from the literary standpoint, but to the would produce him £2. This also would leave the<br /> author is rather a cause for amusement than a other two tales on his hands and cause him further<br /> reason for alarm.<br /> trouble. But instead of selling this one tale at<br /> When in America we noticed several cheap full price, he prefers to make a bargain for the<br /> editions of books written by famous authors, with three at £10, which produces him £4, and the<br /> the portraits of the authors on the paper cover bother of the thing is over as far as he is con-<br /> outside. In many cases the portraits bore no cerned. It is a case of small profits and quick<br /> resenıblance whatever to the author in the flesh as returns.<br /> we knew him in England, and in many cases went I think a point of view has been missed over<br /> beyond this and bore an extremely strong resemb- this matter. Authors should remember that they<br /> lance to other well-known authors with whom we are all in competition against one another, and<br /> have the honour of being acquainted.<br /> why competitors in the same affairs should employ<br /> G. H. T. the same agent to represent them, is a riddle which<br /> no sane business man can answer.<br /> Authors should remember, too, that they are per-<br /> AUTHOR AND LITERARY AGENT. sonally responsible for anything this agent chooses<br /> to bind them to, accidentally or otherwise. Lite-<br /> rary agents are notorious for making slipshod<br /> agreements. Literary agents are constantly ignor-<br /> S the Secretary of the Society of Authors asks ing their principal&#039;s definite instructions on the<br /> 1 my opinion on the utility of the Author&#039;s doubtful ground of expediency. Literary agents<br /> Agent, I wish to say that in most cases he (presumably on the old plea that all writers are<br /> seems to me a useless and expensive excrescence. fools) charge, at the lowest, the grotesquely ex-<br /> To take first the exceptions. For an English cessive fee of 10 per cent. on all monies received.<br /> writer, an American agent is a necessity, and the From a beginner this charge might not be<br /> converse may to a lesser degree hold true for exorbitant; but then the literary agent is far too<br /> I.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 35 (#415) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 35<br /> wise to handle a beginner&#039;s work. For a writer among the incompetent. Mr. Heinemann, with<br /> whose writing income is over, say, £500 a year, a protective zeal, complains that it is against the<br /> charge of £50 per £500 is ridiculous. A man in interests of literature that an author should be<br /> that position would, with the exercise of a little pledged body and soul “ years ahead.” An author<br /> common sense, have no trouble whatever in selling who can be overworked by his agent, or forced by<br /> his wares, and if he grudged the hour or two a &quot;pledges” into over-production, is an author who<br /> week necessary to attend to a few simple letters, will ruin himself in any case. Tragedy of this<br /> he could with his £50 hire the services of a clerk kind depends on those circumstances of life which<br /> or secretary who would serve him far more profit drive other men than authors to desperate-in-<br /> ably than any general agent.<br /> variably killing-efforts to fight an unphilanthropic<br /> Finally, what does experience show? How many world. So far as my own experience of agents is<br /> of the writing men and women, who are at the top concerned, I can but say that in the first instance<br /> of the ladder to-day as regards money receipts for I managed my own transactions. I did not manage<br /> their work, employ a London literary agent ? them badly : I have no grievances to air: I am<br /> There is one doubtful exception : all the rest do quite willing that the publisher should make his<br /> not. (Remember, I am not speaking of American legitimate profit on what is always for him not<br /> or Continental agents.)<br /> merciful patronage, but speculation absolutely. I<br /> The writers to whom the services of the present have now given the arrangement of my contracts to<br /> literary agents may be recommended, are those who a well-known, very able, and very courteous agent.<br /> are lazy, incompetent, or self-indulgent. The others I do not find my “ physical and mental health”.<br /> should give up one entire half-day to mastering the sinking under his influence. I write when I please,<br /> very simple business aspects of the matter, and then as I please, and for a sum of money which I myself<br /> either handle their own affairs personally, or (if fix-either on account of royalties, or for a fee<br /> they are abnormally large) put them in the hands outright. My agent collects this, deducts a reason-<br /> of a secretary, or an agent or solicitor who in able commission for his trouble, sees that my agree-<br /> literary matters acts for them, and for no one else. ments--subject to my own approval--are in order,<br /> OMEGA. that my interests are protected abroad and else-<br /> where. Publishers may not like him : I have no<br /> fault to find.<br /> II.<br /> In the case of the author with his first<br /> I HAVE been asked to offer some reply to Mr. Success :- An agent will not advise him against<br /> Heinemann&#039;s straightforward letter in the October his interest. This is certain. In the case of the<br /> number of The Author.<br /> unknown author--who wishes for information, for<br /> I do not propose to discuss the agent from the an introduction, the agent will not mislead him.<br /> publisher&#039;s point of view. That is not my business. Quite the reverse. He will tell him actual facts<br /> But as an author 1 may perhaps be allowed to hold about the commercial side of “art.&quot; And why<br /> a strong opinion with regard to writers generally not? What is the matter with commerce that a<br /> and literature.<br /> person of supposed refinement is expected to shrink<br /> What is this nonsense about the author&#039;s &quot;greed” from it with disgust? If men have been expressly<br /> for an “immediate money return ” ? This snobbish taught to get their bread by preaching the Word<br /> attitude in the matter of an artist and his fees was of God, there is certainly no reason why they<br /> never found at any time among the distinguished. Should rate their own compositions as too precious<br /> Michael Angelo wanted his money paid, and his for any earthly payment, or too sublime to be<br /> contracts arranged, many years in advance. Shake- treated with in legal contracts. Mr. Heinemann<br /> speare, Molière, Balzac, George Sand, George Eliot, has the reputation of being a generous publisher<br /> de Maupassant, and Sir Walter Scott were never so. and an appreciative one. He cannot have had<br /> vulgar as to affect indifference to financial affairs. a disheartening struggle with the “literary”<br /> I take it that of all peculiar signs of an essential classes. But he must know that the weak among<br /> commonness in an artist, this one of prattling them were born weak, and not made so by un-<br /> about the indignity of accepting money for &quot;art&quot; scrupulous middlemen.Authors are marred by<br /> is the most striking. I have never met a person over-advertisement and worthless praise--never<br /> with such insincere views who did not live on the because they insist on adequate payment, and are<br /> complaining generosity of relatives and friends. represented by efficient men of business.<br /> Art is work; the artist is a working man or<br /> PEARL MARY TERESA CRAIGIE.<br /> woman, and the moment that an author, or a critic,<br /> or a craftsman seeks to better a condition of such<br /> honesty by making it a mood or a pose instead of<br /> a necessity and a calling, he may be counted<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 36 (#416) #############################################<br /> <br /> 36<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> .<br /> III.<br /> for complaint on this score. It, on the other hand,<br /> he does find that this is the case, it seems to me a<br /> An Answer to Mr. Heinemann.<br /> very good argument, from the author&#039;s point of<br /> view, for employing an agent, even at the sacri-<br /> In the October number of the Author there fice of that “intimate intercourse with the pub-<br /> appeared a most interesting letter from Mr. lisher” which Mr. Heinemann finds so helpful.<br /> W. Heinemann, on the subject of the literary Nor, again, do I see that the “immediate money<br /> agent, which stated very distinctly and lucidly return” (on account of royalties, I suppose) which<br /> the view of an eminent publisher on this ques. Mr. Heinemann accuses the agent of fostering is<br /> tion. He took no middle line, and from the procured “at the cost of all dignity and artistic<br /> point of view of both author, publisher and litera- repose.” Personally I have published books both<br /> ture, condemned the agent with resonant anathe- with and without immediate money return, but I<br /> mas. This was very valuable, because it stated do not recollect any disturbance in my own repose-<br /> the case of the publisher frankly and without fulness. In fact, I do not quite see what Mr.<br /> loophole for misunderstanding, and leaves no doubt Heinemann means.<br /> as to why the publisher-for we cannot be wrong I suppose there are bad agents as well as good<br /> in taking Mr. Heinemann&#039;s utterances as excellently ones; I suppose also there are bad publishers as<br /> representative—dislikes the agent.<br /> well as good ones, but I am happy to say I have<br /> On certain points I feel myself hopelessly incap- never yet met an inferior variety in either kind,<br /> able of agreeing with Mr. Heinemann : he says, nor do I wish to. More especially I desire to steer<br /> for instance, that “no author would be so quixotic clear of the figure, which Mr. Heinemann&#039;s vigorous<br /> as to employ a literary agent if he did not hope protest calls up—a sort of Mephistopbeles, by<br /> to get as much more out of the publisher as the whom the unfortunate author is “ pledged and<br /> agent&#039;s commission represents.&quot; Would Mr. Heine- sold body and soul to syndicates and publishers<br /> mann, therefore, argue that the landlord who on time bargains years ahead!” Now, authors are<br /> employs an agent hopes to get as much more out not probably a business-like class; they are much<br /> of the tenant as his agent&#039;s income represents ? too futile and dreamy-that, indeed, is why they<br /> Both author and landlord appear to me to employ are right to employ agents—and it is exactly to save<br /> an agent-primarily-for a very different reason, an author some gross mistake of binding himself<br /> namely, that by using one they save themselves a that agents may be, and I think often are, useful.<br /> good deal of trouble, and of time which they find Certainly I have never met with one who would<br /> they can otherwise employ more profitably. More not strongly dissuade an author from the very<br /> especially is this true, I think, of any author wbo course which, it appears to Mr. Heinemann, they<br /> either contributes to magazines or desires a serial are apt to inculcate. But here, again, publishing<br /> appearance for his work. In his case (particu- is a business, and it would surely be equally ill-<br /> larly if the author does not habitually read the judged on the part of a publisher to buy the yet<br /> magazines in which he wishes his work to appear) unwritten produce of an over-driven author, for<br /> the agent is invaluable. If he is at all competent he would probably make a very bad bargain.<br /> he will be far more likely to know that magazine Nor, again, do I see why the author should not<br /> which will be suitable for his author&#039;s work, and get as much as he can for his work. Given that<br /> in the case of serialisation what magazines have he has completed his book, his artistir effort is<br /> openings, than the author himself. Given then over. His book is now a property, to be sold,<br /> that the agent has arranged a good serialisation and the agent, rightly, so it seems to me, gets as<br /> for a story, is the publication of it then to be much for it as he can, asking terms (unless his<br /> taken out of his hands ? That does not seem to author has a strong predilection for a certain<br /> me quite fair.<br /> publisher-and I think most authors have) not<br /> Publishing is a business. At least, in the from one house only, but, it the terms there offered<br /> majority of cases I do not suppose that a man do not seem sufficient, from another, or, if he<br /> embraces that calling with the sole and altruistic chooses, from a third. Why he should let one<br /> aim of bringing masterpieces within the reach of publisher have it cheap, if, ceteris paribus, he can<br /> the million (though he is probably quite happy in get more from another, or why such a proceeding<br /> reaching the million); and, while no good publisher is derogatory to literature, I cannot imagine. But,<br /> would wish that the imprint of his house should as this business of securing the best market for<br /> godfather a work of rank and beastly tendency, the goods is a matter requiring time, trouble, and<br /> yet his object is primarily to make his business experience, and is not to all a congenial employ.<br /> pay. Unless, then, he finds that the employment ment, it seems to me only wise of the author to<br /> of an agent by an author tends to make his busi- entrust it to someone who presumably has the<br /> ness less paying, I do not see what grounds he has experience, and for whose time and trouble he is<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 37 (#417) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 37<br /> content to pay. And here, I imagine, Mr. Heine- so to do, and, as a rule, I think he does it. Besides,<br /> mann&#039;s far more serious accusation against the he thereby increases his own dividends.<br /> agents applies. He says he has not always found One word more. If all publishers were like<br /> them scrupulously honest. It is very distressing Mr. Heinemann, I think the calling of the agent<br /> that it is so, but, on the other hand, from the would be seriously endangered. But in the present<br /> author&#039;s point of view, it is equally distressing to state of this imperfect world they are not. Mr.<br /> find he has in his ignorance signed some contract Heinemann with a becoming modesty assumes<br /> which gives his publisher a quite undue share of that they are. I wish I agreed with him.<br /> profit in the success of his book. Such contracts<br /> E. F. BENSON.<br /> have been signed. But it is really beside the point<br /> to argue the question on such grounds. Dishonest<br /> agents I hope are as rare as dishonest publishers,<br /> IV.<br /> and bona fides must be assumed for the abstract<br /> argument.<br /> With regard to the very interesting discussion<br /> Nor is it on such grounds that personally I now being carried on in your paper in reference<br /> employ an agent. As I have said, I have never to Literary Agents, I venture to offer a few<br /> yet met with a dishonest publisher, and I do not suggestions<br /> employ an agent to save me from his possible A n inexperienced author—I mean an author who<br /> clutches. On the other hand, in the case of a is not well acquainted with the publications or<br /> book which I once published without employing the personal characters and characteristics of large<br /> an agent, I found that no account had been rendered numbers of publishers—is very likely to attack the<br /> to me for over three years, and that when, with wrong publisher, or to attack the right publisher<br /> suitable courtesy I hope, I applied for it, it was in the wrong way or at the wrong time. I<br /> not without some personal trouble and &quot;dunning&quot; know this by bitter experience. Fortunately (or<br /> that I succeeded in getting it. Now, I object to unfortunately), I still believed that my books<br /> dunning anybody : I do not happen to like it. ought to be published. But the number of<br /> But I do not in the least object to instructing my possible publishers was too vast. It was the same<br /> agent to do so. That is one of the things for which with editors. There were too many of them, and<br /> “he is there.&quot; And, in this case, I regretted I. I did not know which (if any) would be likely to<br /> had not employed him before.<br /> accept this or that article at this or that time.<br /> Finally, I disagree with Mr. Heinemann in his One of my chief mistakes was to try the old-<br /> assertion that agents are of no use to the untried established firms first.<br /> author who at present has no market. It seems Then I found an experienced agent, and he<br /> to me that it is exactly here—if they are com- immediately said, “ This piece of work will be<br /> petent—where they are most useful. The agent accepted by A. or by B. or by C. or-by no one.<br /> knows, more or less, what ten per cent. on a six. That piece of work we&#039;ll offer to A., if he does<br /> shilling book means. The untried author has no idea. not accept the first piece. This third piece of<br /> And this innocent child of nature is confronted work is, I fear, hopeless.&quot; Within a few weeks<br /> with a document which says that twelve copies he had placed all the MSS., except two, that I<br /> are counted as eleven, or thirteen (I forget which), put into his hands, and had bearded several lions<br /> that he receives ten per cent. on the first thousand (as I then thought them) and had arranged for<br /> and twelve and a half per cent. on the second future works. Apart from this agent I think I<br /> that in case of a colonial edition he gets 211, per should have given up in despair.<br /> copy, and something obscure occurs to remainders, With another agent, however, I might have<br /> which are also obscure. More particularly there paid initial fees and then have been just as badly<br /> may be a sublime silence about American sales and off as before. But it seems to me that the<br /> American copyright, and he knows nothing of the inexperienced author is likely to do better if he<br /> stringency of law prevailing in that remarkable tries to choose an agent than if he tries to choose<br /> continent, which really seems expressly designed a publisher or editor. For there are far fewer agents<br /> for the confusion of budding authors, and as likely than publishers or editors. It is far harder to make<br /> as not American rights and protection then get mistakes in attempts to find a good agent.<br /> left out of the contract altogether. Poor bleating There is another point. The sensitive author<br /> lamb! yet that sinister shepherd the agent could despairs because he has his MS. rejected, let us<br /> have saved him.<br /> say, by two publishers. They state that they do<br /> And here I speak from bitter experience. True, not see a public for the book. The agent is not<br /> it is not in any sense at all the business of the sensitive : offer him a good commission, and he<br /> English publisher to make his author acquainted will try again and again. He may be refused by<br /> with copyright law. But it is the agent&#039;s business some publisher who would have accepted the MS,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 38 (#418) #############################################<br /> <br /> 38<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> direct from the author. But I fancy that few for complaint. All other arguments against the<br /> publishers are such fools as to refuse a good book agent having failed, it is now declared that the<br /> because it comes through an agent, or to accept a literary diplomatist is only of use to authors of<br /> bad book because it comes direct from the author. established reputation. That I can deny as far as<br /> How little right an author has to be discouraged my own experience has shown. Years ago, when I<br /> simply and solely because one or two publishers was unknown, and as yet scarcely published, it was<br /> have refused some book, numerous authors past my agent who took me by the hand. To him I<br /> and present can testify. Within a week I had a have applied for advice in more than one crisis of<br /> MS. refused by one publisher (A.), as having no a somewhat adventurous career, and to his good<br /> likely sale, and then quite eagerly accepted by judgment and guidance I owe whatever fruit of<br /> another publisher (B.). B. at the same time my work I now enjoy. It is the young and in-<br /> refused a second MS. for the very reason that A. experienced writer who is in need of advice. To<br /> had just given, and this second MS. was straight the established author the agent is an absolute<br /> way accepted by A.<br /> necessity, in order to look after his interests in<br /> The agent, then, is likely to save the author various directions, and more especially so when, as<br /> from too hasty despair ; but, on the other hand, in my own case, the author habitually resides out<br /> should the author have mistaken his profession in of England, and is unable to have personal inter-<br /> life, then no despair can be too hasty. And the views with editors or publishers.<br /> agent who honestly or dishonestly encourages false Finally, I should like to ask Mr. Heinemann,<br /> hopes may be wasting some of the most valuable who has (in print) such a marked antipathy to the<br /> months or years of a man&#039;s whole life. I should literary agent, a single but direct question. My<br /> add that, if the author refuses to pay the agent brother authors and myself would be interested to<br /> anything until he shall have placed the MS., and know whether it is not a fact that in order to effect<br /> agrees to pay a royalty then, the agent will not be the sale of his English books in America he<br /> encouraged to take up MSS. which he knows to be actually employs a literary agent in New York !<br /> utterly “unlikely.” The worst possible plan seems Until the question is answered further comment<br /> to me to pay the agent his full pay in advance, is needless.<br /> whether he shall succeed or not. For then he<br /> Yours truly,<br /> only has the expense of carrying or posting the<br /> WILLIAM LE QUEUX.<br /> MS. to fresh publishers or editors at varying Castor, Peterborough,<br /> intervals. He has comparatively little interest October 12th, 1901.<br /> in really exerting himself and interviewing the<br /> publisher or editor personally, as my agent did<br /> with such good effect.<br /> EUSTACE MILES.<br /> SIR,—It happens occasionally that a publisher<br /> may act as an agent. For instance, a well-known<br /> v.<br /> firm succeeded in serialising a novel which it had<br /> To the Editor of THE AUTHOR.<br /> undertaken to issue for me, the commission was<br /> fifty per cent! I am not complaining of the rate,<br /> SIR,—In common with many other authors I<br /> because it had been specified in the previous agree-<br /> have been much amused and somewhat surprised<br /> ment. I have by me other agreements signed by<br /> at Mr. Hcinemann&#039;s remarks regarding that much-<br /> a different firm in which also it is stated that the<br /> abused necessity to the novelist, the literary<br /> commission in the event of serialisation is to be<br /> agent. It seeins to me that the majority of the<br /> fifty per cent. Now, my agent&#039;s commission is<br /> reasons given for objecting to the agent are the<br /> only ten per cent.<br /> very reasons why an author should employ him.<br /> Yours faithfully,<br /> But, apart from these, Mr. Heinemaun makes a<br /> Fact.<br /> distinct assertion which is certainly open to con-<br /> tradiction when he complains that the agent fosters<br /> in the author a spirit of greed. I have no know-<br /> DURING the summer months the Secretary<br /> ledge of the methods of other agents save my own, received a letter, of which the following is a<br /> but I can honestly say that my own agent, in<br /> copy :-<br /> selling one of my books, keeps before him the fact<br /> that the sale is not in my best interests if the<br /> “Dear Sir, I have decided to discontinue my sabscrip-<br /> publisher does not have an opportunity of making<br /> tion to the Authors&#039; Society. I have put my affairs as<br /> regards my literary work into the hands of an agent. With<br /> a fair profit.<br /> many thanks for the kind help you have so often given me,<br /> Personally I fail to see Mr. Heinemann&#039;s cause believe me to be, very truly yours,&quot;<br /> VI.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 39 (#419) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 39<br /> We would like to make some remarks upon it.<br /> In the early days of the Society the publishers were<br /> very naturally opposed to the idea of having their<br /> agreements and their methods of doing business<br /> overlooked by the Society of Authors, and one of<br /> the best known houses sent round a circular to all<br /> the authors who published with it, asking them<br /> not to join the Society. Those days, we are glad<br /> to say, have long passed ; not only have authors as<br /> a mass found the Society useful, but even in some<br /> instances the publishers have been bound to<br /> acknowledge that the work it does is good and<br /> fair. From the letter quoted above it would<br /> appear that the agent is also objecting to have his<br /> methods looked into from the point of view of the<br /> Authors&#039; Society. That a feeling against having<br /> their business arrangements overlooked has been<br /> growing amongst agents is clear from the informa-<br /> tion that has come to the Society. The interest of<br /> publisher and author is bound to be antagonistic ;<br /> it is natural, therefore, that the publisher should<br /> object. The interest of agent and author is<br /> identical. It is very serious, therefore, for the<br /> author when the agent assumes an attitude of<br /> antagonism. We must state finally that the<br /> placing of your work in the hands of an agent<br /> is an additional reason for belonging to the<br /> Society, as an author in this position has two<br /> people to look after, firstly the publisher,<br /> secondly the agent.<br /> Perhaps after all the letter was only an outcome<br /> of the silly season.<br /> standing against the total from “ The Cost of Pro-<br /> duction ” of £7 13s. The moulding is the same<br /> price in both estimates, and the binding also.<br /> When a fresh edition of“ The Cost of Production”<br /> is brought out it will have to be entirely revised,<br /> and it is hoped that it will be possible to include<br /> an exhaustive statement at the same time of the<br /> American cost, which American publishers boast<br /> is as low if not lower than the English.<br /> Authors, note this statement.<br /> ESTIMATE FROM &quot; THE COST OF PRODUCTION.”<br /> 500 Copies, crown 8vo, Small Pica type,<br /> Composition, 17 sheets at €1 78. 6d.<br /> per sheet .......... ............. 423 7 6<br /> Printing, 17 sheets at 58, 9d. per sheet 4 17 9<br /> Paper, , „ 98.<br /> 7 13 0<br /> Moulding,<br /> :58.<br /> 5 0<br /> Binding, at 4d, a vol. .... ....... 8 6 8<br /> .<br /> £48 911<br /> RECENT PRINTER&#039;S ESTIMATE.<br /> 500 Copies, crown 8vo, set in Small Pica.<br /> Composition, 17 sheets at 228. 6d ....... €19 26<br /> Printing, 17 sheets at 58. 3d............. 4 9 3<br /> Paper, 8£ reams, 60 double-crown 158. 6 7 6<br /> Moulding only, 5s. ..........<br /> Binding, 4d....<br /> 8 6 8<br /> £42 10 11<br /> LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br /> PROPERTY.<br /> I.-Cost of Production.<br /> THE first estimate printed below is taken from<br /> 1 the third edition of “The Cost of Production,”<br /> which was issued in 1891.<br /> The book is now out of print; but to show that<br /> the prices for printing, paper, etc., were fair at the<br /> time of issue-although at first this was frequently<br /> denied by the publishers—and are fair at the<br /> present date, a second estimate is put forward<br /> which was obtained from a printer only a year<br /> ago. The printer&#039;s name is not given, but it is<br /> sufficient to state that he is a man in a large way<br /> of business, with works in the neighbourhood of<br /> London, who does extensive trade with the chief<br /> publishers.<br /> On comparing the two estimates, it will be seen<br /> that the composition is considerably cheaper, as<br /> much as õs, a sheet, and the printing 6d. a sheet.<br /> The paper is also cheaper, the total £6 78. 6d.<br /> II.-American Copyright.<br /> The Publishers&#039; Circular has an article with<br /> regard to the production and circulation of books<br /> in America, and complains, as is not unnatural,<br /> of the lack of reciprocity in the American Copy-<br /> right Law. It points out that many publishing<br /> houses have started branch offices in America.<br /> This effort of English publishers is, no doubt, use-<br /> ful, both for the trade and for the English authors ;<br /> but the Publishers&#039; Circular makes a suggestion<br /> that English printers ought rather to start branch<br /> establishments in New York. This suggestion,<br /> from the author&#039;s point of view, would be much<br /> more satisfactory than a branch publishing house,<br /> and we commend it to the notice of some of the<br /> larger printing firms. It is useless at this hour of<br /> the day to grumble about the American Copyright<br /> Law. It is better than no copyright law, but the<br /> Americans, save only a small intellectual minority,<br /> have failed to grasp the great principles referring<br /> to literary property<br /> The day may come, and we hope at no distant<br /> date, when they will take a more enlightened view<br /> of the position, and join the signatories of the<br /> Berne Convention.<br /> What authors have to do at present is to make the<br /> best of existing circumstances, and it will be more<br /> satisfactory for the profession to have a trustworthy<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 40 (#420) #############################################<br /> <br /> 40<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> English printer established in New York than an no reason why it should not also become of unlimited<br /> English publisher, however trustworthy.<br /> duration.<br /> &quot;A new law published in the latest Gazette brings Siam<br /> into line with Western nations in the matter of copyright.<br /> The preamble points out that hitherto authors have had no<br /> III.-A Publisher&#039;s Trick.<br /> protection for their work in this country, anyone baving<br /> A well-kuown publisher, writing to an author<br /> the right to republish and sell any book. The new enact-<br /> ment follows the lines of the English law, giving protection<br /> who objected to the terms of his agreement, stated<br /> for forty-two years, or the period of the author&#039;s life, with<br /> as follows, “ that the agreement was settled by a grace of seven years, whichever is the longer. To copy-<br /> --- , K.C., and is identical with the one signed right a book it has to be registered at the Royal Scribe<br /> by all my authors.&quot;<br /> Department within twelve months after publication ; the<br /> fee charged is five ticals, and a copy has to be presented to<br /> We have frequently pointed out before that the<br /> the Department mentioned, another to the Royal Library,<br /> Publishers&#039; Agreements issued by the Publishers&#039; and another to the Royal Buddhist Library at Wat<br /> Association were approved by Mr. Joseph Walton, Benchamabopit. Translation is also prohibited. The<br /> K.C., who has recently been raised to the Bench,<br /> passing of such a law is a wise proceeding, even if the<br /> result on literature cannot be expected to be very notice-<br /> and we have shown in the pamphlet published<br /> able. We hope it may have the effect of encouraging the<br /> by the Society how disastrous they are to authors. Siamese author. But as trade bulks so very much larger<br /> Mr. Walton, no doubt, followed his instructions than letters in modern Siam, it is to be trusted that the<br /> and approved the agreements that best served bis<br /> Government will without delay follow up this law with<br /> another giving protection to trade marks. The need of<br /> clients, the publishers. So that the point which<br /> some system of registration which will protect both the<br /> the publisher is putting forward, although it has seller and the buyer of genuine articles is very real. The<br /> been frequently successful in silencing the objec consular courts in Bangkok enforce laws to prevent the<br /> tions of authors, is really no argument whatever<br /> perpetration of such frauds, and the anomaly of the<br /> Siamese courts being unable to do anything in the matter<br /> to induce an author to sign an agreement. In<br /> has been pointed out often enough.&quot;<br /> fact, if anything, it should at once lead him in<br /> the opposite direction. A clever K.C., when asked<br /> to draw an agreement, would be bound to make<br /> that agreement more strongly in favour of his<br /> V.–Press Copyright.<br /> client than the layman who might be drawing a The letter in your last number signed “Old<br /> similar document.<br /> Bird,&quot; and a recent correspondence in a contem-<br /> The second part of the publisher&#039;s statement is porary anent the republication of a leading article<br /> untrue. But if it were true, it is no argument, in a London newspaper practically unaltered in<br /> because certain authors are ill-advised in signing matter or phrase, the second version differing only<br /> an agreement, that other authors should be equally from the first in the signature appended, suggest<br /> ill-advised, and we have pointed out on former a larger question than any personal dispute. The<br /> occasions with regard to the publication of books subject of press copyright is one which has often<br /> in a series what a trap this argument has been to been discussed, and the possible legislation for its<br /> the unwary author.<br /> betterment has been many times forecast, but the<br /> Again we find it necessary to put forward these result so far is nil. A quarter of a century ago,<br /> remarks, because again the publisher brings forward when the mills of the press, following a high pre-<br /> his misleading statements.<br /> cedent, ground slowly, the grievance of journalistic<br /> theft was not so keenly felt and the delinquent<br /> was only in a small way of business. At present<br /> the malpractice has become so systematic and<br /> IV.—Copyright in Siam.<br /> universal that we have arrived at the preposterous<br /> We print the following cutting from the Bangkok position of a journal being deliberately undersold<br /> Times.<br /> and paradoxically pushed out of the market by<br /> It is interesting as showing the gradual evolution the illegitimate sale of its own contents.<br /> of literary copyright in foreign countries. It was This is a sweeping statement. Let us examine<br /> not long ago that Japan joined the Berne Conven- it. Examples of the Tit Bit order of papers in<br /> tion, and now Siam has passed a Copyright Law. which the same paragraph goes the round of all<br /> This, perhaps, may be followed by their becoming and appears consecutively in the whole series are<br /> signatories to the treaty.<br /> not relied on. The identical item apparently<br /> There seems to be little doubt that as friendly serves as well for all as for each, and from the<br /> intercourse between nations increases, copyright regularity with which it reappears, and from the<br /> will become universal at no distant date, and it dim memories which it often reawakens, it was<br /> is to be hoped that when this point is realised, not original to the paper first issuing it. Nor is<br /> legislators will also realise that there is absolutely the dissemination of the world&#039;s news, the beneficent<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 41 (#421) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 41<br /> growth of knowledge through journalistic inter- No doubt it is hard for a Government, or a<br /> change, the popularisation of the eternal verities Parliament, smothered in a maze of heterogeneous<br /> in the form of meteorological reports, or the duties which range from the conduct of a great<br /> apotheosis of the commonplace in paragraphs, or war abroad to the transfer of a constable or the<br /> mishaps to battleships, herein impeached. No trespass of a goat at home, to undertake new<br /> newspaper possesses copyright in the incidence of legislation on any question which presents im-<br /> events or their direction; the weather is the (some- mediate as well as ultimate difficulties. And<br /> times undesirable) heritage of mankind. But the certainly the question of press copyright presents<br /> comments of the editor on the mismanagement of both. Nevertheless it should be attacked. The<br /> the universe, and the experiences of the contributor present anomalous conditions are unfair to honest<br /> in this insignificant microcosm, are as much their journals, unjust to industrious contributors, and a<br /> own copyright, and should be as rigidly protected fraud on the purchasing public.<br /> by the law, as the jocularities of the farceur or the<br /> OUTLANDER.<br /> inventions of the fictionist. Take a concrete<br /> instance of the journalistic buccaneer and note his<br /> NOTE.— The law on the subject is quite clear. If<br /> nefarious influence.<br /> a paper does not care to enforce its rights, the<br /> There is a well-known high-class weekly matter is different. The Times has on sundry<br /> provincial paper, with an enormous circulation, occasions brought actions and has shown very<br /> published at one penny, which reprints in every effectively that a paper, if it desires, can, under the<br /> issue several columns from London sixpenny existing law, absolutely protect its articles and<br /> journals. In some cases the acknowledgment of contributions.-ED.<br /> the source from which these are lifted is given<br /> prominently at the beginning or end of the matter<br /> annexed. Often, however, it is embodied in the<br /> VI.<br /> middle of the article—&quot;says a writer in,” “writes<br /> The following cutting from the Daily Chronicle<br /> Mr. — in” – so that to a casual observer the<br /> will be of interest to dramatic authors :-<br /> article in question is original matter specially<br /> contributed to the paper. This great provincial<br /> An author&#039;s rights are strangely interpreted by the com.<br /> mittee and stage management of the Comédie Française.<br /> newspaper also prints weekly a notice in heavy<br /> It appears that M. Gaston Schefer, whose piece, “ Le Roi,&quot;<br /> type to the effect that it requires no outside is about to be produced, has been harassed during the<br /> contributions and will pay for none such. I rehearsal period by being forced to alter and cut his scenes<br /> cannot afford to buy the London journal at six-<br /> to please M. Le Bargy, who is entrusted with the staging<br /> according to the rules of the theatre. The playwright<br /> pence when I can get all of it I have time to read<br /> revolted at last when he was coolly asked to change the<br /> in the provincial paper for a penny. The provin dénouement which makes the &quot;King&quot; abdicate from sheer<br /> cial paper cannot afford to pay me for an original discouragement. M. Jules Claretie has under pressure<br /> contribution when it, and the contemporaries with<br /> resolved to produce “Le Roi&quot; in its intact form almost<br /> immediately.<br /> which it must compete, can appropriate what they<br /> please gratis from journals which have paid A dispute of this kind not infrequently arises<br /> liberally for the “copy&quot; of which they are thus with regard to theatrical representation. It can<br /> audaciously dispossessed.<br /> only be settled in two ways, (1) by agreement,<br /> This state of affairs is disgraceful. The law (2) by the doctrine of expediency.<br /> must deal with it. It must be made as penal to There are many dramatic writers of established<br /> steal a journal&#039;s matter as a man&#039;s hat. Library position who insist upon inserting a clause in their<br /> books and umbrellas have long, by a curious mental agreement that their piece must not be altered,<br /> obliquity, been regarded as communal. But this but must be acted verbatim. They sell a licence<br /> specialisation is wholly irrational. As it exists, to perform to an actor-manager. If any dispute<br /> however, we must put up with it. And in the arises as to the wording of the play or its alteration,<br /> same way journals which reciprocate each other&#039;s the author can either refer to the agreement and<br /> theft may very well be left to fight the matter out enforce his rights as against the manager, or, if he<br /> amongst themselves. The law does not concern deems it expedient, accept the alteration and let<br /> itself very intimately with the lighter wrangles of the matter go forward.<br /> professed lawbreakers, and a man in Whitechapel In the case of young dramatic authors it is very<br /> may kick his wife to death at leisure provided he often impossible to insert a clause of this kind.<br /> observe the amenities by not doing it in the street. Under these circumstances, if the manager has<br /> But it is certainly time that journals which employ merely a licence to perform the play, he must per-<br /> their own staff and pay their own contributors form that play and no other play, and may not<br /> should have legal protection from the hooligans alter it.<br /> of the press.<br /> The question of expediency may again arise, as<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 42 (#422) #############################################<br /> <br /> 42<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> sibethor<br /> it is more important for a young author to have inadequate private income by reviewing. In this<br /> his play put before the public than it is to obtain career I was very fairly successful. Not that I flatter<br /> a monetary return by way of damages from a myself that I was qualified for my task by any<br /> manager, however large.<br /> special interest in or knowledge of literature. Apart<br /> The attention of all dramatic authors must be from a certain natural turn for epigram, I consider<br /> drawn to the point which is put forward in the that my success was due to the practical view I<br /> “Warnings to Dramatic Authors,&quot; namely, that it is took of my occupation. I have no doubt from<br /> essential to give to a manager a licence to perform what I know of you and of your work that your<br /> only. If he transfers the whole of his rights, he talents are superior to any of which I could boast,<br /> hands over a piece of property which, within certain while you have always shown a genuine love of<br /> bounds, a manager will be able to alter and vary. letters, a taste which I have been free to develope<br /> If he gives the licence to perform, a manager only in later years. I doubt, however, if either<br /> can only perform what has been handed to him as faculty or enthusiasm will compensate for the new-<br /> a whole play, and can make no alteration without fangled scruples by which I understand that you<br /> the consent and sanction of the author.<br /> are hampered.<br /> From the foregoing quotation it is really impos- Let me deal with some of these. I hear that it<br /> sible to see what were the author&#039;s rights, as every. is a fixed principle with you never to review<br /> thing must depend upon the form of agreement, a book unless you have read it, or at least the<br /> but it is sufficient to state that authors should avoid greater part of it. Things must certainly have<br /> all chance of such disputes arising by settling the changed since the good old times. You surely<br /> agreement on a satisfactory basis before the play is realise how such a method must limit your output.<br /> handed over.<br /> Unless the standard of remuneration has been<br /> greatly raised, I cannot understand how the most<br /> modest income can be earned on such terms. Nor<br /> VII.<br /> can I believe that this system prevails generally<br /> The“Journal of the American Society of Authors” among your contemporaries. I notice, for example,<br /> states that Mr. Vanderbilt has had his house that one of the “weeklies &quot; reviews, in a single<br /> both the exterior and the interior-photographed issue, from six to twelve novels, all the notices<br /> from all points of vantage with a view of pro- being, so far as I can judge, by the same hand.<br /> tecting himself, by copywriting every negative; Cau it be supposed that the reviewer reads from<br /> against the man with the Kodak.<br /> six to twelve novels to make “copy” worth at most<br /> From the English point of view, the execution from two to four guineas ?<br /> of Mr. Vanderbilt&#039;s idea does not afford him any In my own time the problem for us reviewers was<br /> protection. There is no doubt that to whatever far more strict. Besides receiving our honorarium<br /> extent a private house has been brought under the for “copy,&quot; we kept and sold the book reviewed, a<br /> camera by one person, this would not prevent any custom which I understand is now less common.<br /> one else from taking a photograph from exactly the The volume fetched more if the pages were uncut ;<br /> same standpoint with exactly the same effect, if and in order to reap the full harvest, we had to<br /> this were possible; but it would be a distinct criticise on the strength of such limited examina-<br /> infringement of copyright to photograph another tion as this condition prescribed. This may seem<br /> person&#039;s photograph or in any way to copy his to you to be a difficult or risky method. In point<br /> original negative.<br /> of fact, it was quite possible to concoct a plausible<br /> judgment from glimpses between the sheets. Often<br /> the arrangement of these admitted of a glance at<br /> AN OLD TO A YOUNG REVIEWER.<br /> the Preface, which might prove invaluable : the<br /> method of the book was usually ascertainable from<br /> accessible portions : samples of style and quotations<br /> M Y DEAR GEORGE,--Your relatives, who could be extracted and adapted to the critical<br /> I are naturally anxious for your success in the attitude assumed by the reviewer ; and many<br /> career on which you have now for some time other methods were developed by practice. Indeed,<br /> been embarked, have asked me to advise you from my among the confraternity with which I associated,<br /> own past experience, especially with regard to certain he would have passed as a mere “ &#039;prentice hand”<br /> scruples which I hear that you entertain, and which who thought it necessary to mutilate his books by<br /> seem likely to injure your prospects. You are cutting their pages. I do indeed recall that on<br /> aware that before my marriage with your poor one occasion I got into trouble with my editor in<br /> aunt, which brought me, if not domestic happiness, consequence of an insufficient examination of a<br /> at least the modest competence which I still enjoy, work he had submitted to me. I had condemned<br /> I was compelled for many years to supplement an it for giving no illustrations, though the subject<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 43 (#423) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 43<br /> was one which eminently demanded them. On would be more beneficial to the interests of a book<br /> closer examination the book proved to be full of than one of censure. I remember, for example,<br /> illustrations, though these, being mainly on the that a friend of mine, by a savage onslaught, sent<br /> pages, had escaped my notice. This misadventure a book through three editions. He had written<br /> was, however, condoned in consideration of my long that “if the public was prepared to wade through<br /> tried devotion to the interests of the paper. a desert of dulness in search of an occasional oasis<br /> You, as I hear, maintain that you can form an of impropriety,&quot; that was the book for it. The<br /> opinion of a book only after full perusal. In my public was so prepared, and made a rush for it, such<br /> own experience the reviewer was rarely called upon as no &quot;puff” could have secured. Remember, too,<br /> for an independent judgment. Either his cue was that no author of experience ever protests, and if<br /> given him, or his acquaintance with the interests he does, no editor need take any notice. Besides,<br /> or tendency of the paper indicated what sort of when all is said and done, you, as the father of a<br /> notice would be acceptable. There were in those young family, have no right to take any such line<br /> days very distinct divisions of political or literary as will limit your earnings or alienate your<br /> faction which had to be reckoned with : there was employers. Do not allow any whimsical scruples<br /> also keen rivalry between publishing firms, as to hamper your career. Justice, like Charity,<br /> between those of “Bungay and Bacon.” Even if begins at home.<br /> these considerations did not indicate the line to be If, after all that I have said, you are still deter-<br /> taken, we could be sure that the proprietors of the mined to waste your time in reading your books, I<br /> paper would not be too well pleased if we “ slated &quot; advise you to adopt a plan, not unknown in my<br /> a work put out by a publisher who spent hundreds own day. You must make your reading go as far<br /> a year in advertisements with us, or in praising as possible by multiplying your reviews. I myself<br /> the publications of those who neglected us. And, at one time adopted this method with some success.<br /> if the author&#039;s reputation suffered in consequence, I wrote anonymously (as many notices as I could<br /> surely author and publisher are in the same boat. place), under a nom de plume, and in my own name.<br /> They have combined their interests, and must sink There was in this system the charm of variety.<br /> or swim together. The remedy, moreover, was in One had to adapt the several notices to the views<br /> the publisher&#039;s own hands. Also it not infrequently of each editor, or the interests of each paper, and<br /> happened that author or publisher had been asked to vary the style so as to escape identification. If<br /> and selfishly refused some favour : early sheets, for I were reviewing the work of any writer of influence,<br /> example, or an interview ; and it was only just I usually arranged that the most laudatory notice<br /> that he should suffer for his curmudgeonliness. should be that which appeared under my own<br /> And, apart from these considerations of business, name. By this means it not infrequently happened<br /> it seldom occurred that the author was entirely that, while my various notices neutralised each<br /> dissociated from our personal likes or dislikes. other, there accrued to my account a valuable<br /> Either he was a friend or enemy, or the friend or friendship and literary alliance, as well as the<br /> relation of some one towards whom we had favour reputation of a kindly critic. This may prove to<br /> or the reverse. No one, surely, would grudge the you by no means the least valuable hint I am able<br /> reviewer his satisfaction in fulfilling the claims of to give.<br /> friendship ; nor consider him less justified in using I am told that it is becoming a common practice<br /> his opportunity so soon as his enemy had, by for editors of the higher class to entrust the books<br /> publication, delivered himself into his hands. I sent them to specialists on the subject treated, to<br /> well remember the thrill of anticipation with which authors, and to men of literary culture and of<br /> we watched the publishers&#039; announcements.<br /> leisure, to whom the honorarium is of less impor-<br /> In the absence of any such predisposing senti- tance than interest in the subject. As for the<br /> ments or interests, the reviewer had to consider specialist, I would ask such editors what they<br /> what kind of notice best suited his style and the suppose encyclopædias were made for ; and, with<br /> ear of the public. My own manner lent itself regard to the employment of amateurs, whether<br /> more readily to incisiveness, and in those days they think it fair to take the bread out of the<br /> the public loved dissection. These considerations mouths of a diligent, long-suffering, and honour-<br /> necessarily influenced the tone of my anonymous able profession in order to increase the already suffi-<br /> reviews.<br /> cient incomes of dilettanti ? Personally I have<br /> You will ask, no doubt, how this method could no fear that this movement will go far. Such<br /> secure justice to authors. Is it not clear that, for superior persons are little likely to fall in with the<br /> them, it all came right in the end ? If the Argus rules of the game : they will insist on taking their<br /> condemned from such motives as I have indicated, own line, and there will be an inevitable return to<br /> the Fulminator would praise on analogous grounds; the regular hand, prepared to perform his allotted<br /> nor could it be assumed that a laudatory notice task punctually and obediently. For my own part,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 44 (#424) #############################################<br /> <br /> 44<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> I may confidently say that from the moment I When will educational writers as a body come to<br /> became independent I have never deprived my late learn the real value of the product of their brain ?<br /> profession of a sixpence. I have honourably When will they join together to combat the<br /> abstained from writing, and have simply enjoyed present prices, to prevent the oft-repeated claim of<br /> my leisure. Though never a bookish man, I have certain publishers that they make their profits on<br /> acquired a considerable taste for letters, a taste educational works ? and when will they remember<br /> which, during my literary career, I had neither that the value of the smallest primer must not be<br /> time nor inclination to cultivate, and have often calculated from the mere time it takes to put pen<br /> been ainused to find how great a delight I can take to paper, but must be reckoned from the time<br /> in books which I had pronounced unreadable. spent in obtaining a life-long experience as scholar<br /> I sincerely hope that this long letter may not be and teacher ?<br /> thrown away on you, and that, by giving due atten The Committee of the Society have from time<br /> tion to the precepts and example I have endeavoured to time proclaimed this. It is not without its use<br /> to put before you, you may attain to the success to state it once again.<br /> which I am sure your talents are able to command. When the leaders of one of the greatest pro-<br /> fessions have realised that selling their stored<br /> I am,<br /> knowledge cheap is not generous, is not altruistic,<br /> Your affectionate Uncle,<br /> does not benefit the vast numbers who are yearning<br /> JUDAS QUILLDRIVER. for that knowledge, but only puts profits into<br /> the pocket of the publisher, they will not only<br /> deservedly reap what they have laboriously sown,<br /> THE PUBLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL but will be acting in a kindly and generous spirit<br /> BOOKS.<br /> towards those who are beginning to struggle along<br /> the paths that they as masters have long ago left<br /> behind them.<br /> Another Illustration.<br /> To show that this is no imagined statement, it<br /> SIR,- The article on “ Literary Earnings” in your issue<br /> is sufficient to mention that in one or two cases<br /> of Tuesday last, by Mr. A. J. Church, is very interesting that have come before the Society where educa-<br /> May 1, as one who has had a similar experience, be allowed tional writers have troubled to publish their own<br /> to make a brief statement of its practical results! Like<br /> books-in spite of all the disadvantages of fight-<br /> Mr. Church, I began with a book of school exercises, which<br /> is still on sale. This was in 1876, twenty-six years ago to<br /> ing against trade prejudices and trade prices—they<br /> the present year, inclusive. During this time I have gathered in for themselves a substantial and, in<br /> edited or compiled twenty books in all, for which I have<br /> some cases, a golden harvest.<br /> received (in round numbers) £2,400-i.e., not far off €100<br /> It must once again be stated that the circula-<br /> per annum. These include (1) Elementary school books,<br /> such as Latin and Greek exercises and selected passages<br /> tion of successful educational books is enormous<br /> for translation ; (2) school editions of classical authors, and continued, and surpasses by thousands the<br /> with notes and introductions ; (3) annotated editions of circulation of any work of fiction.<br /> two English classics. The last cost more time and trouble<br /> G. H. T.<br /> than all the rest, and the result has been that I have<br /> received on an average less than 65 per annum for one of<br /> these books and nothing at all for the other, against which<br /> a considerable debt is still standing. As to the school<br /> BOOKSELLING.<br /> books, nearly three-fourths of the protit has come from the<br /> selected extracts and exercises, compilations requiring very<br /> little brain-work-only a certain amount of judgment gained<br /> by experience in teaching. Of the classical texts with notes<br /> The “Net” System.<br /> I find that those which cost the most labour in production M HE object of this paper, which is written at<br /> have proved least remunerative. During the past year<br /> 1 the request of the Editor of The Author, is<br /> about 2,000 copies of these editions were sold, comprising<br /> thirteen volumes, of which only five gained any profits ; of<br /> two-fold : in the first place, I wish to show<br /> the &quot; selection&quot; books (five in all) were sold 3,124 copies, that the “net&quot; system was not devised in the<br /> yielding a profit of over £100. I have not yet had a interests of one class, the booksellers, at the<br /> statement of accounts for the English books above men.<br /> expense of the authors and the publishers, but that<br /> tioned, which are published by another firm ; but, judging<br /> by the average of former years, I should say the profits<br /> the interests of authors and publishers have been<br /> from them will not be over £5, probably somewhat less. considered equally with those of the booksellers ;<br /> Yours, &amp;c.,<br /> and, secondly, to deal with a few of the objections<br /> C. S. JERRAM. raised against the system.<br /> Oxford, September 14.<br /> The usual discount given by the booksellers to<br /> By the kind permission of the author, the above the public for cash payment on“ ordinary” books,<br /> letter, which appeared in the Westminster Gazette, is i.e., on books not published at “net&quot; prices, is<br /> printed in these pages.<br /> 25 per cent. off the published prices, or “3d. in the<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 45 (#425) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 45<br /> shilling.” Now it has been proved that with such consideration if it were the case, as is contended<br /> a discount, that part of a bookseller&#039;s business by, some critics, that the days of bookselling are<br /> which consists of the selling of new books, cannot past. If the conditions of the time had brought<br /> be made to pay. I say “cannot be made to pay” it about that the decay of bookselling did not<br /> advisedly, for the “new books” department must matter, then the booksellers would have to be left<br /> pay its share of the cost of rent, assistance, and to their fate. It is true that the conditions of<br /> incidental expenses of the business, and under these the time have changed. The spread of education,<br /> conditions this department yields no profit, and and the introduction of free libraries, have made the<br /> often involves a loss. It has long been known in position of the bookseller different from what it<br /> a general way that this was so, and that book- was. But though it is generally agreed that his<br /> selling was fast decaying ; but it has now been position is different, it is equally felt that his<br /> shown from figures that with the heavy expenses existence is necessary. Sir Walter Besant has<br /> required for the upkeep of a bookselling business, frequently insisted in The Author, with much<br /> it is impossible to make it pay at “threepence in emphasis, that the bookseller&#039;s counter is an<br /> the shilling” discount. The booksellers who do essential element in the publication of a book,<br /> make a living out of their business, do not make and that no book is really published till it has<br /> it off the sale of new books; they make it off other found its place there.<br /> things, such as second-hand books, or stationery, or We are thus placed in this dilemma :--On<br /> remainders, or fancy goods, or a circulating library. the one hand, we have booksellers working under<br /> It will thus be seen that there is not much conditions which leave them no profit on the<br /> encouragement to the bookseller to push the “new sale of new books; on the other hand, we have<br /> books” department of his business. Publishers, authors and publishers requiring the assistance<br /> especially the publishers of the more ephemeral of booksellers for the sale of the books they<br /> literature and of non-copyright books, have sought have written and published. It is perfectly<br /> to remedy this evil by increasing their allowance clear, then, that the demand of the book-<br /> to the booksellers. But this has only made matters sellers that the authors and publishers should<br /> worse, for while, on the one hand, the allowance to help them in devising some scheme which should<br /> the booksellers from the publisher has increased in make bookselling profitable, was a demand as<br /> the case of &quot; light literature,” it has not increased much in the interests of the authors and<br /> to the same extent on the less popular books, and publishers as of the booksellers.<br /> on books of a more permanent standing; and on The problem of how to make bookselling profit-<br /> the other hand, the discount given by the book- able is no new problem. It has exercised the<br /> seller to his customer has increased. The retail minds of booksellers and publishers for many<br /> discount, which at one time was 10 per cent., has years. But it is only within the last two years<br /> increased from 20. in the shilling to 3d. in the that a practicable working scheme has been given<br /> shilling, and in the case of some libraries to 4d. in a fair trial. The difficulty was to devise a scheme<br /> the shilling and even more! Further, while, as which should be compulsory, and yet allow a<br /> all readers of The Author know, the allowances to certain measure of freedom to author, publisher, and<br /> booksellers by the publishers vary from about bookseller alike. It was strongly urged at one<br /> 25 per cent, to about 42 per cent. off the published time that there should be a compulsory limit of<br /> prices of different books, the discount given by discount on all books. This was objected to on<br /> the bookseller to the public off them all is uniform. the ground that it left no freedom to any one. On<br /> The bookseller can afford to give a large discount the other hand, the increase of discount given by<br /> off books on which he receives an allowance of some publishers to booksellers was valueless, as it<br /> 12 per cent., but he obviously cannot afford the was met by an increase of discount given by the<br /> same discount off books on which he receives an booksellers to the public. The introduction by<br /> allowance of 30 per cent. After allowing for some enterprising publishers of net books, i.e., of<br /> working expenses, which must be reckoned at from books off which no discount was to be given to the<br /> 12 per cent. to 15 per cent. on his “turnover,” he public, was a step in the right direction ; as the<br /> can still give a discount of 25 per cent. on novels public, though it demands a uniform discount and<br /> of a very popular nature, and leave a slight margin as large a discount as it can get, is contented, as a<br /> of profit; but the same discount given off “solid” rule, with no discount, if a book is published at a<br /> literature often means actual loss to him. But net price. But this step was not sufficient, as<br /> the public does not realise this, and demands a some booksellers began to give a discount off net<br /> uniform discount on all books. It takes little books, and if this had become general, the advantage<br /> calculation to see that, under these conditions, of having books published at net prices would be<br /> bookselling cannot be made remunerative.<br /> neutralised.<br /> This state of matters would not warrant serious The plan which has now been adopted is<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 46 (#426) #############################################<br /> <br /> 46<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> this : Books are divided into two classes : (1) &quot; ordi- made by the publishers and the great majority of<br /> nary” books, off which booksellers can give booksellers to compel the very small minority of<br /> what discount they like to the public without unwilling booksellers to sell net books at net prices.<br /> interference from any one ; and (2)“ net” books, (2) The country booksellers sometimes complain<br /> off which it is agreed that no discount may be that while on “ordinary” books they can charge<br /> given either to the public or to libraries. This rather more than the charges made in London,<br /> plan, it will be seen, meets the objections of those they cannot charge more on net books. Country<br /> authors or publishers who object to compulsion, as booksellers, it is contended, have to pay carriage<br /> they can publish their books as “ ordinary” books. from London, while London booksellers are saved<br /> At the same time it meets the demand of those this expense. In reply to this last contention, the<br /> who have shown that compulsion is necessary, as London booksellers state that their expenses for<br /> all books published at net prices must be sold “collectors ” about equalise the expense of carriage<br /> without discount to the public.<br /> to the country. But whether this be so or not, if<br /> The objections which have been raised against the country bookseller has a sufficient profit on<br /> the present “net&quot; system are chiefly four: “net” books and cannot be undersold, it is no<br /> (1) That it is compulsory. (2) That it makes hardship to him if the London bookseller makes<br /> it necessary for country booksellers to supply larger profits. His other complaint is that while<br /> books at the same rate as in London. (3) That he can charge, say, 4s. 9d. for a 6s. novel which is<br /> no advantage is gained by cash payment; and charged 4s. 6d. in London, he cannot charge more<br /> (4) Libraries and schools which buy many books, than 4s. 6d, for a net book that is charged 4s. 617.<br /> and large purchasers, are charged at the same rate in London. While this is true, he forgets that it<br /> as small purchasers.<br /> pays him better to sell a 4s. 61. net book at 4$, 611.<br /> I admit that all these objections are valid objec- than to sell a 68. &quot;ordinary” book at 4s. 9.<br /> tions; but I am equally convinced that in all cases Further, if he has to order a net book specially for<br /> the advantages of the net system outweigh the a customer, he is quite entitled to charge 2d. or 31.<br /> disadvantages.<br /> for carriage if he likes.<br /> (1) While “free trade&quot; in books, as in every- (3) The objection that a customer who pays<br /> thing else, may be an excellent thing, book selling, cash gets no advantage is a more serious one. But<br /> as a trade, ceases to be “ free” when the discount this is an objection that holds true in other trades.<br /> given by one bookseller becomes of necessity the It is not customary, so far as I know, to give<br /> standard of discount among all the booksellers in discount for cash payment for meat or groceries<br /> the same town. With few exceptions it has been or the like. Indeed the customer who runs an<br /> found that if one bookseller increases the discount account often gets a small allowance when he pays<br /> to the public all his neighbours must follow suit. his account, while the cash purchaser gets none.<br /> In some towns there has been for years an agree. It is certainly a hardship that a bookseller who<br /> ment among the booksellers as to the terms on cannot get payment for, say, two years, should not<br /> which books are to be sold; but such agreements be able to charge more than he does to a cash<br /> are frequently upset by an increase in discount purchaser. On &quot; ordinary” books he can do so,<br /> being given by a new bookseller, or by a draper or for a 6s, novel that is charged 4s. 6il, or 5s. for<br /> a chemist who wishes to get the name of being a cash will be charged 6s, net if not paid for in two<br /> cheap draper or a cheap chemist because he sells years. But it seems to me that the proper way to<br /> books cheaper than the legitimate bookseller. deal with this difficulty is to charge interest on<br /> Voluntary agreements are not sufficient, as they unpaid accounts. This is already done in other<br /> can be destroyed at any moment. A bookseller trades, and I see no reason why it should not be<br /> knows that he cannot be undersold in “net” adopted with books.<br /> books, and the more books become net the more (4) Lastly, it is objected that large purchasers<br /> will he be able to afford to make his stock more pay the same rate as small purchasers. But the<br /> attractive, and to pay for better assistants; and if giving of special terms to large purchasers is not a<br /> the public have to pay a little more for their books, matter of principle, and is not always expedient.<br /> they will gain compensatory advantages.<br /> For instance, it is obviously much more expensive<br /> But the subject of “ Free Trade” is a wide one, for a railway company to carry a passenger one<br /> and cannot be argued out here. It is sufficient to mile for one penny than 400 miles for 400 pence.<br /> note that the whole value of the present system But the large purchaser of 400 miles of railway<br /> turns on its compulsory character. And if authors travelling gets no advantage over the small<br /> and publishers are free to publish books as purchaser of one mile of travelling. It is a<br /> “ ordinary” books, which are not liable to inter. question of averages. One librarian may give a<br /> ference, and booksellers are free to refuse to stock bookseller a great deal of trouble, another may give<br /> net books, none need complain if an agreement is no trouble ; but the bookseller cannot differentiate<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 47 (#427) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 47<br /> between the two. The advisability of giving a done. The King called his common-placebook<br /> discount off net books to libraries and schools was “Enchiridion,&quot; and liked to have it always at<br /> fully discussed, but it was decided that it was hand. It must have contained, besides Latin<br /> expedient to make no exceptions to the rule of quotations, memoranda written by the King him-<br /> supplying net books at net prices.<br /> self. A few fragments of it are preserved in<br /> The &quot;net&quot; system is now on its trial. It William of Malmesbury.<br /> remains to be seen whether “ordinary” books It was after this that the King became an<br /> or “net ” books will gain the day. The rapid author. All his works are translations. The first<br /> increase in the number of books published at net was the “ Consolations of Boëthius,&quot; a book ex-<br /> prices, and the general welcome given by the public tremely popular throughout the middle ages, in<br /> to the net system, argues well for its future. So which the last remnants of the classical spirit are<br /> far the net system has not spread to any extent to mingled with the Christian thought of a later<br /> novels and light literature; but it is gradually epoch. At the date of the translation the King<br /> doing so. But I think it is better that the system was not entirely master of Latin, and must have<br /> should be adopted gradually rather than at a had Asser&#039;s assistance.<br /> forced rate. It is better that authors and the The next work was a translation of Orosius&#039;<br /> public should see for themselves that it is the “History of the World.” Orosius, a Spanish priest,<br /> best, as it is the most rational system of book- became, in 410, acquainted with Augustine of<br /> selling, than that they should feel in any way that Hippo. At Augustine&#039;s suggestion he undertook<br /> they are forced to adopt a system which they do a history of the world, with a view to demonstrating<br /> not understand. In America, where the same that Christianity had not been the cause of the<br /> problems have had to be faced, it is proposed to fall of the Roman Empire-a view held by the<br /> make the net system practically universal, and to aristocratic pagan party. The historically worth-<br /> apply it at once not only to the more expensive less work became popular with the clergy, and<br /> books, but also to novels. Whether our American supplanted better means of self-instruction.<br /> friends are wise in trying to adopt suddenly the The merits of Boëthius are not great ; Orosius<br /> system which we are desiring to introduce gradually, has none. Alfred&#039;s translations have a value not<br /> time only will show; but it is at least satisfactory possessed by the originals, in consequence of his<br /> to know that the system which has been adopted having been a very free translator. He not only<br /> here has been accepted as the model for America. omitted much, but added without hesitation matter<br /> ROBERT MACLEHOSE. of his own.<br /> Thus he appends to Boëthius historical matter<br /> of a subsequent date; and supplements Orosius&#039;<br /> KING ALFRED AS AN AUTHOR, imperfect geography by his own more accurate<br /> knowledge of Northern Europe. He adds little<br /> Ta date when the celebration of the millen- scraps of information here and there, and now and<br /> A nium of the death of King Alfred the Great then makes an allusion to himself.<br /> is justly commanding national attention, we His third work was a translation of Bede&#039;s<br /> offer our &#039;small tribute of a brief record of the Ecclesiastical History. In making this the King<br /> King&#039;s literary labours.<br /> omitted much that was of interest only to<br /> They belong to the later part of his life, the Northumbrians, but carefully retained everything<br /> second half of that interval during which the relating to the early Kings of Wessex. He made<br /> struggle with the Danes was suspended.<br /> no additions, and it is to be regretted that he<br /> Strange to say, the very day of their commence should not have given himself the trouble to<br /> ment is known-the feast of St. Martin, the 11th supply from his own knowledge historical facts<br /> of November, 887. Before that Alfred had written with which Bede was unacquainted.<br /> himself a little prayer-book, a copy of the Hours, to Thus far the King&#039;s works were mainly historical<br /> which he had added various devotions. On the date and philosophic. His last book was purely theo-<br /> mentioned, his tutor, Aeser, * was reading to him. logical, a translation of St. Gregory the Great&#039;s<br /> Struck by a certain passage, Alfred requested Asser “Regula Pastoralis,” a sort of “ Whole Duty of<br /> to write it in his prayer-book. Every page had Priests.&quot; This work may have been taken up in<br /> been filled by the additions which the King had at 890, for in the Preface Alfred alludes to the<br /> different times made. Asser suggested that they assistance he had received in his previous works<br /> should begin a new book, a separate collection from Asser and others. The most interesting<br /> of passages that pleased the King. This was morsel of all that he wrote is his own really<br /> admirable Preface to this book. In it we possess<br /> * Asser was a mouk of Saint David&#039;s, subsequently pro-<br /> moted by Alfred to the bishopric of Sherbourne. He was<br /> a valuable memorial of his own mind, and of the<br /> the King&#039;s biographer.<br /> purposes which he had in setting forth his works.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 48 (#428) #############################################<br /> <br /> 48<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> He explains that he desired by his own example to some time next year. “Rural England” will<br /> revive the learning which had so entirely vanished, probably be the title of this volume which deals<br /> and to this end he reminds his readers of those with a subject of national importance.<br /> better times long passed, whose glory could only Says the author :_<br /> be regained by means of education and instruction.<br /> &quot;I can conscientiously say that no fatigue or effort has<br /> Allusions are made to other books begun by him, been spared—and I may add that the work involved in<br /> among them a translation of the Book of Psalms, dealing with many localities and among many people<br /> but the remaining works ascribed to him are with these problems and investigations is not light. It<br /> is, in short, something not unlike the labours of a Royal<br /> either very doubtful, or certainly the work of other<br /> Commission faced single-handed.&quot;<br /> writers. He may have had a hand in some of<br /> The effort is at once the most arduous, the most<br /> them. Some may be due to his influence or<br /> suggestion. But literary myths soon gathered<br /> exhausting, and the most interesting of the author&#039;s<br /> life. He has striven to treat his task in a tem-<br /> around him. Works in which he had taken no part<br /> perate and impartial spirit, to weigh and sift the<br /> were assigned to him. Folk literature fell under<br /> the spell of his name, and such productions as col-<br /> evidence, and to set down nothing he does not<br /> believe to be true.<br /> lections of popular sentences, proverbs, and parables<br /> circulated as “ The Proverbs of King Alfred.”<br /> Mr. G. Bernard Shaw is to re-issue, in a revised<br /> His real claim to literary greatness rests upon<br /> form and with a new preface, his early novel,<br /> the higlı aims with which he wrote, and the great “ Cashel Byron&#039;s Profession.”<br /> impetus which he gave to a vernacular English He is also publishing, through Mr. Grant<br /> literature.<br /> Richards, a new version of the story in Elizabethan<br /> blank verse, entitled “ The Admirable Bashville ;<br /> THE AUTHORS&#039; CLUB.<br /> or, Constancy Unrewarded”; and “A Note on<br /> Modern Prize Fighting.”<br /> Mr. W. H. Wilkins, the author of “The Love of<br /> W ITH the return of members from their<br /> an Uncrowned Queen,” is publishing, through<br /> V holidays the Authors&#039; Club, like other<br /> Messrs. Longmans, a new historical work in two<br /> clubs, is showing renewed life.<br /> volumes — “ Caroline the Illustrious.&quot; It is a<br /> Preparations are being made for a series of<br /> of memoir of Caroline of Anspach, wife of George II.<br /> dinners in the autumn, when the Club will enter-<br /> There are portraits and illustrations.<br /> tain, as heretofore, a number of distingushed guests.<br /> Simultaneous editions of Mr. Rudyard Kipling&#039;s<br /> These dinners have for a long time been a feature<br /> “ Kim” have been published in England, the<br /> of the Club, and take place on Monday nights.<br /> Colonies, Canada, and the United States, as well<br /> Many of the most famous men of the day have<br /> honoured the Club with their presence-ambassa-<br /> as in France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, and<br /> Denmark.<br /> dors, lawyers, generals, doctors, artists, musicians,<br /> and others.<br /> Messrs. Macmillan are issuing an édition de lure<br /> Admiral Sir E. H. Seymour. G.C.B., has accepted besides; and later on “Kim” will be included in<br /> the invitation of the Club for November 4th.<br /> the Outward Bound edition of the author&#039;s works<br /> published by Charles Scribner and Sons, of New<br /> York.<br /> BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br /> Some of Mr. Kipling&#039;s stories are, we under-<br /> stand, being translated into the Malayan language.<br /> TN his new book, “A Winter&#039;s Pilgrimage&quot; Although Lucas Malet&#039;s big novel “ Sir Richard<br /> 1 (Longmans), Mr. Rider Haggard gives an Calmady ” was only published on September 13th,<br /> account of travels in Italy, Egypt, Cyprus, the first and second editions are exhausted owing<br /> and Palestine. The author believes he has to the enormous demand for it. A third edition is<br /> identified Golgotha. He says, “ As it chances, on being issued. Messrs. Methuen are issuing a special<br /> the cliff at this spot, the face of the rock looking edition as well. It is limited to 500 copies in<br /> towards Jerusalem has undoubtedly a fantastic, but two vols., 12s.<br /> to my fancy, a very real resemblance to a rotting The same firm is publishing, in 3s. 6d. form,<br /> human skull.” The photograph which illustrates Lucas Malet&#039;s earlier novels: “The Wages of<br /> the spot helps to strengthen the author&#039;s statement Sin,” “ Colonel Enderby&#039;s Wife,” “ The Gateless<br /> in a striking manner.<br /> Barrier,” &amp;c.<br /> The substance of the articles by Mr. Rider It seems that up to the end of September soupe<br /> Haggard, entitled “Back to the Land,” which have 190,000 copies of Mr. Hall Caine&#039;s &quot;The Eternal<br /> been appearing in The Daily Express week after City ” were sold in England and America. The<br /> week since May, will be published in book form demand steadily continues.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 49 (#429) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 49<br /> Mr. Anthony Hope&#039;s “ Tristram of Blent” Sharp is known as the authoress of “ Wymps,&quot; and<br /> stands high on the list of recent novels selling other popular stories.<br /> well ; there is a steady demand for it.<br /> Mr. Thomas Cobb has written a new story for<br /> Miss R. N. Carey&#039;s “Herb of Grace&quot; also children. It will be issued shortly in the series of<br /> continues popular. Rita&#039;s “ A Jilt&#039;s Journal”; Dumpy Books for Children. The same author&#039;s<br /> Maxwell Grey&#039;s “A Four-leaved Clover”; and successful story, “ Bountiful Lady,&quot; appeared as<br /> Mr. Frankfort Moore&#039;s “ A Nest of Linnets” are one of the Dumpy Books. Mr. Grant Richards is<br /> doing well.<br /> the publisher.<br /> “The Secret Orchard,” Mr. and Mrs. Egerton “Old Knowledge,&quot; a story of present-day<br /> Castle&#039;s new novel (Macmillan, 6s.), is doing Donegal, is the name of Mr. Stephen Gwynn&#039;s<br /> excellently well. The scene is laid in France, in new book. In it the author relates the experiences<br /> a great château owned by the Duke of Cluny, a of an English girl who goes to lodge in an Irish<br /> descendant of the Stuarts, who inherits their cottage in order to fish and paint.<br /> charm and their faithlessness.<br /> The central figure in the story is an old peasant,<br /> It will be remembered that Mr. and Mrs. Kendal a man rarely gifted, a visionary who paints his own<br /> produced “ The Secret Orchard &quot; in the form of visions. The “ Old Knowledge&quot; means the folk-<br /> a play.<br /> beliefs of the peasants, which are interpreted by<br /> Mr. F. Marion Crawford has just published him in the light of modern mysticism.<br /> through the same firm his new novel, « A Maid Miss Jane Barlow&#039;s new book, “ From the Land<br /> of Venice.”<br /> of the Shamrock,” is a collection of sketches of<br /> A new and uniform edition of this popular Trish<br /> Irish life and character.<br /> author&#039;s works is being issued fortnightly by The Board of Education has selected as the his-<br /> Messrs. Macmillan at 38. 6d. a volume.<br /> torical subject in 1902, for students in men&#039;s training<br /> “ Deep Sea Plunderings” is the title of Mr. colleges, “The History of Europe from 1814-1848,&quot;<br /> Frank T. Bullen&#039;s new book just issued by Messrs.<br /> and Mr. Oscar Browning has written a work to<br /> and Mr. O<br /> Smith Elder &amp; Co. There are eight illustrations<br /> meet the demand thus created for a convenient book.<br /> by Arthur Twidle.<br /> In fourteen chapters he sketches the restoration of<br /> the Bourbons, and the ascendancy of the Holy<br /> The same author is publishing through Messrs.<br /> Alliance and absolutist principles throughout<br /> Hodder &amp; Stoughton “The Apostles of the South<br /> Europe ; the dawn of the revolutionary spirit in<br /> East,” 6s.<br /> Greece and her liberation ; the abortive revolutions<br /> Miss Agnes Giberne has just published, at 5s., of 1830, and the gradual growth of the reaction<br /> “ The Mighty Deep, and what we know of it.&quot; against unlimited monarchy and aristocratic privi-<br /> Messrs. Pearson are the publishers.<br /> lege in the several European countries; and finally,<br /> “Great Lowlands” is the name of Annie E. in France, the fall of the monarchy of July. Messrs.<br /> Holdsworth’s new novel. Messrs. Hodder &amp; Macmillan publish it.<br /> Stoughton are the publishers.<br /> Mr. Horace G. Hutchinson&#039;s new book is entitled<br /> Mr. George R. Sims is editing Messrs. Cassell “Dreams and their Meanings.&quot; There are many<br /> &amp; Co.&#039;s “ Living London.” This big work deals accounts of experiences sent by correspondents, and<br /> with London from the human side. Mr. Pett two chapters, contributed mainly from the journals<br /> Ridge is among the contributors.<br /> of the Psychical Research Society, on Telepathic<br /> Another contribution to King Alfred literature and Premonitory Dreams. Messrs. Longmans,<br /> is the Rev. Stopford A. Brooke&#039;s “ King Alfred,” Green &amp; Co. are the publishers.<br /> ls, net. There is an appendix of passages from The same publishers have ready the third volume<br /> the writings of Alfred, selected and translated from of Mr. John Beattie Crozier&#039;s “ History of Intellec-<br /> the old English by Kate M. Warren.<br /> tual Development on the Lines of Modern Evolu-<br /> Also there is “God Save King Alfred” by the tion.” This volume is political, educational and<br /> Rev. E. Gilliat, late of Harrow School. This book social, including an attempted reconstruction of the<br /> for boys is a romance of Alfred&#039;s life ; his youth, politics of England, France and America for the<br /> exploits, courtship, betrothal, and kingship are twentieth century.<br /> dealt with. It is illustrated with drawings by Mr. Andrew Lang&#039;s new book, “Magic and Reli-<br /> Gutzan-Borghum.<br /> gion” (10s. 6d. net, Longmans), contains a series of<br /> Miss Evelyn Sharp&#039;s new book, for girls in their criticisms of recent speculations regarding early<br /> teens, is called “ The Youngest Girl in the School.” religion, dealing especially with Mr. Frazer&#039;s theories<br /> There are illustrations by C. E. Brock. Miss in “The Golden Bough.” Other essays deal with<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 50 (#430) #############################################<br /> <br /> 50<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> the latest results of anthropological research in the<br /> religious field, and in that of magic.<br /> “ The Essays of an Ex-Librarian,” by Dr. Richard<br /> Garnett, C.B. (716, Heinemann), is a volume of<br /> literary criticisms. There are critical studies on<br /> Peacock, Beckford, Moore, Coleridge, and Matthew<br /> Arnold, and essays on Shelley, Lord Beaconsfield,<br /> &amp;c., &amp;c.<br /> The “Illustrated History of English Literature,&quot;<br /> which Dr. Garnett and Mr. Edmund Gosse are<br /> publishing through Mr. Heinemann, in four volumes,<br /> has been prepared on entirely new lines by the authors,<br /> who have given a life-study to the subject.<br /> A consecutive history of the entire course of<br /> English literature, from the Anglo-Saxon to our<br /> own day, will be given in one type, so that this, if<br /> the reader so desires, can be read alone as a narrative<br /> of the evolution of English style.<br /> A biography of each author is to be supplied in<br /> a different type, and from the work of each leading<br /> writer at least one characteristic quotation will be<br /> made.<br /> Jean Delaire, author of “A Dream of Fame,&quot;<br /> has recently published a new book called “Two<br /> Girls and a Dream.” The writer tells how the two<br /> girls, Gem the painter and Loise the waiter, struggle<br /> in London to make a living. Ultimately Loise<br /> becomes a famous writer, but a heart-lonely woman;<br /> while Gem marries happily. There is an obvious<br /> moral in the story.<br /> The first of Messrs. Anthony Treherne &amp; Co.&#039;s<br /> 1s. series of sporting novels is “ Little Cherie, or<br /> The Trainer&#039;s Daughter,&quot; by Lady Florence Dixie.<br /> His Majesty the King has accepted a copy.<br /> The Leadenhall Press are also issuing Part I. of<br /> a book of poems written by Lady Florence Dixie<br /> when she was a child, under the pseudonym of<br /> - Darling.&quot; The book consists of nearly 400 pages<br /> and contains selections of poems written between<br /> the ages of ten and seventeen vears. It is dedicated<br /> to the first Lord Lytton and contains a poem of<br /> some fifteen lines by him recording his first meeting<br /> with the child authoress. The popular edition is<br /> 2s.6d., but the édition de luce costs 7s. 61.<br /> Mr. H. B. Baildon, M.A. Cantab., formerly<br /> lecturer on English in the University of Vienna,<br /> has been appointed to the lectureship in English<br /> Language and Literature in University College,<br /> Dundee. Mr. Baildon was a contemporary at<br /> school and college of Robert Louis Stevenson, and<br /> stevenson, and<br /> a second edition of his “Life-Study and Criticism&quot;.<br /> of that writer was published in September last.<br /> Messrs. Duckworth have just issued a translation<br /> of Mr. Charles Hastings&#039; “ The Theatre,&quot; 8s. net.<br /> The authorised translation is by Miss Frances A.<br /> Welby.<br /> Mr. Pinero&#039;s “Iris&quot; is doing so well, and is so<br /> likely to hold the boards for months to come, that<br /> Mr. Bourchier has not troubled to make any<br /> definite arrangements regarding its successor.<br /> After the run of “ The Second in Command,&quot;<br /> which has been played over 300 times, and has had<br /> a very successful tour in the provinces, Messrs.<br /> Maude and Harrison will produce at the Hay-<br /> market Theatre a four-act adaptation from the<br /> French, by Mr. Sydney Grundy.<br /> “The Emerald Isle&quot; at the Savoy is to be<br /> replaced very shortly by the musical version of<br /> Captain Basil Hood&#039;s playlet “Ib and Little<br /> Christina -<br /> Mr. Martin Harvey intends to produce his new<br /> play “After All” in London as soon as possible.<br /> “ After All” was received with great enthusiasm<br /> when played in Dublin last month.<br /> The third special Wednesday matinée of “ The<br /> Second Mrs. Tanqueray,” given by Mrs. Patrick<br /> Campbell at the Royal Theatre, takes place on the<br /> 6th inst.<br /> A new book by the Rev. W. Robertson Nicoll.<br /> LL.D., is announced by Messrs. Hodder &amp;<br /> Stoughton.<br /> Stor<br /> Its title is “ The Church&#039;s One<br /> Foundation : Christ and Recent Criticism.” Price<br /> De ce<br /> Also by the same author a series of articles<br /> which appeared in the British Weekly have been<br /> put into volume form and called “Sunday After-<br /> noon Prayers.” Its price is also 3s. 6d.<br /> Messrs. Hodder &amp; Stoughton are also publish-<br /> ing “ The Pulpit Bible,&quot; by the Rev. Joseph<br /> Parker, D.D. The original notes and comments<br /> on Holy Scripture, from Genesis to Revelation,<br /> are printed in the margin of a quarto Bible,<br /> specially printed in new type and strongly bound<br /> in Persian levant.<br /> Messrs. Methuen have published an unusually<br /> large first edition of the “Life of Robert Louis<br /> Stevenson,&quot; by his cousin, Mr. Graham Balfour.<br /> The interest in Stevenson is, however, so great<br /> that a second edition has been immediately called<br /> for to meet the demand. The Life is in two<br /> volumes, 258. net.<br /> Dr. Conan Dovle is bringing his history of the<br /> South African War up to date for the new edition<br /> to be issued by Messrs. Smith, Elder &amp; Co.<br /> Sir Wemyss Reid, who kuew the late William<br /> Black intimately, has nearly finished his life of<br /> that popular novelist.<br /> The popular shilling edition of Prince Kropot-<br /> kin&#039;s book, “ Fields, Factories, and Workshops,&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 51 (#431) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> . 51<br /> which was published about three months ago, has A monograph on the Russian musical instrument,<br /> been quite exhausted, and another large edition is “The Balalaika,” by Algernon Rose, has just been<br /> now in the press.<br /> published by the Musical Association. The essay<br /> The first editions of Mr. James Baker&#039;s new treats of the instrument in its various forms, and<br /> journalistic novel, “ A Double Choice,” have been sizes, from the piccolo to the contra-basso balalaïka.<br /> quickly exhausted, and seem to have aroused the The leading makers of the instrument are men-<br /> public&#039;s curiosity. The Morning Post concluded tioned, and a minute description of the structure<br /> its review with the words :<br /> and method of playing forms the body of the<br /> article.<br /> - Journalism is surely the freest profession in the world,<br /> and every paper is open to anyone who has something to<br /> say, and knows how to say it.&quot;.<br /> CORRESPONDENCE.<br /> That bright little weekly, “ The People&#039;s Friend,”<br /> for 21st inst. contains an interview with Edith C.<br /> Kenyon, authoress of “ The Hand of His Brother,&quot;<br /> FICTION.<br /> who has of late years devoted herself more especially SIR, --Mr. Egerton Castle has lately put out an<br /> to serial writing. The same journal has taken her ingenious defence of fiction--a branch of art which<br /> new serial, “ Love&#039;s Golden Thread.”<br /> may perhaps be thought capable of taking up its<br /> Mrs. E. Rentoul Esler&#039;s new book, &quot; The own defence on the obvious ground of success.<br /> Awakening of Helena Thorpe,” has just been But a suspicion may be lurking in minds of<br /> issued by Messrs. S. W. Partridge &amp; Co. It exceptional intelligence like his, that a little reac-<br /> treats of the perennial problems that become fresh tion may threaten its enormous popularity. If,<br /> when seen through a fresh temperament.<br /> urges Mr. Castle, characters and events in a story<br /> The floral farms at Wisbech form the opening<br /> be of convincing power, “it can make no differ-<br /> scene of Mrs. Bertram Tanqueray&#039;s new novel,<br /> ence in the intellectual pleasure of the reader<br /> “ The Call of the Future,” which has been published<br /> whether what he is made to realise so vividly is a<br /> this autumn by Messrs. Hurst &amp; Blackett.<br /> record of fact or mere fancy.” But surely pleasure,<br /> even if intellectual, is not the whole object of life,<br /> “ The Week&#039;s Survey &quot; is the title of a new<br /> and the pleasure derived from watching the course<br /> penny Weekly Review of Literature, Politics, and of a “ love affair &quot;--such being the usual interest<br /> Social Affairs. It is strongly supported both on of an English novel---can hardly claim any very<br /> the literary and the business sides. The ideal of high level of intellect. Is not Diana Vernon ... as<br /> the paper is to be at once substantial and interest-<br /> living now as Rob Roy Macgregor? Do we not<br /> ing. Its low price should enable it to reach a see in our mind&#039;s eye the lovable John Ridd ...<br /> large number of people.<br /> or Mr. Samuel Pepys ... or King James ? It<br /> Miss May Bateman&#039;s new novel, “ The Glow- may be so, but ought it? The story of James the<br /> worm” (formerly announced as “ The Idealist”), Second is full of useful warning; the story of Di<br /> has just been issued by Mr. Heinemann. Miss Vernon or that of Lorna Doone can but be an<br /> Bateman has had to change her title owing to the expression of an author&#039;s fancy. One is a decora-<br /> appearance of another work of fiction bearing the tive painting, the other a serviceable chart. Some,<br /> same name.<br /> indeed, appear to assume that the historic romance<br /> A selection of new pieces which have been printed 18 of more value than history itself, but they do<br /> in journals of repute is a feature of Mr. Mackenzie not bear in mind that by the very exigencies of his<br /> Bell&#039;s “ Collected Poems” to be published at once by<br /> art the romancer is bound to distort the truth.<br /> Mr. Thomas Burleigh.<br /> The object of “ Ivanhoe” or “ The Talisman” was<br /> to provide a pleasant pastime, that of Thierry and<br /> Messrs. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner &amp; Co. are<br /> Freeman was quite different. Subject to personal<br /> the publishers of Mr. Ernest A. Tietken&#039;s volume<br /> limitations these show what our ancestors were and<br /> of poems, “ The Heavenly Link,&quot; price 5s.<br /> what they did not draped in the elegancies of a<br /> Under the title “ Mr. Punch&#039;s Dramatic Sequels” fancy ball, but in their own barbaric vigour. The<br /> Messrs. Bradbury, Agnew &amp; Co., Limited, will great use of history is to connect the present with<br /> republish at the end of October the series of con- the past; the great weakness of fiction is that it<br /> tinuations to famous plays by St. John Hankin helps to stimulate emotions for which it can find<br /> which appeared in Punch in the early part of the no employment. It is true that Thierry gave<br /> year. Mr. E. J. Wheeler has provided fourteen high praise to Scott&#039;s perception of life in Norman<br /> illustrations for the “Sequels” in which the times; Scott was the fashion when Thierry wrote,<br /> portraits of many prominent actors will be and his pleasant ways completed the hypnotism.<br /> recognised. The price will be five shillings (net). But Thackeray came and torpedoed the paradox.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 52 (#432) #############################################<br /> <br /> 52<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> one of fact, which I could bring abundance of<br /> unquestionable authority to support, while the<br /> article generally was on a subject concerning which<br /> I have a specialist&#039;s knowledge. Consequently I<br /> do not know which to admire most, the rudeness<br /> of the editor in defacing a MS. as such, or the<br /> impertinent annotations on a subject of which he<br /> palpably knew nothing, and I, admittedly, a good<br /> deal. I say “admittedly&quot; because I write there-<br /> upon for five journals every week, and I have not<br /> yet found a proprietor complacent enough to pay<br /> specialist&#039;s prices without value received.<br /> A MEMBER.<br /> (The Editor will give the name of the magazine<br /> to any member of the Society who may desire the<br /> information - Ej<br /> “ Ivanhoe,&quot; as read by him, was clearly not history.<br /> Indeed, in all Scott&#039;s gallery there is not one<br /> historical figure introduced that is true to nature<br /> --even Louis Onze in “ Quentin Durward ” is<br /> idealised. The reason is in the very nature of the<br /> art. But if this be the case in the higher ranges of<br /> fiction and in the hands of the greatest masters,<br /> what must it be with fiction as an industry, with<br /> tales which depend for prosperity on their power<br /> to stimulate barren emotions and to excite idle<br /> curiosity ? And observe, there is here no question<br /> of quality ; novelists of great momentary vogue<br /> could be named whose work is not literature at all.<br /> If we are told, then, of the enormous popularity of<br /> such works we need not surrender our case—we<br /> merely turn in another direction. We muse on the<br /> taste of the reading public and on the indications<br /> atforded of its intellectual and moral conditions.<br /> It is easy to see that such criticism will not apply<br /> to the masterpieces of the art, so long, at least, as<br /> it does not distort our historical impressions. But<br /> the public will prefer--absolutely prefer- bad novels<br /> to good, just as a Kaffir would not exchange his<br /> bottle of “ Cape smoke&quot; for a flask of wine from<br /> Prince Metternich&#039;s vineyard. The glorification<br /> of a royal Stuart, the defamation of the Eliza-<br /> bethan Catholics, are as much an abuse of pen and<br /> ink as the production of trashy trade love stoires ;<br /> fortunately these are not as influential or enduring<br /> as great works of pure imagination. Against such<br /> there is no law: but it is to be feared that the<br /> public won&#039;t discriminate.<br /> SENEX.<br /> “THE HANDLING OF MSS.”<br /> SIR, Mr. F. H. Freshfield asks whether the<br /> defacement of MSS. is ever practised “by really<br /> good houses”? Let me give an example. Some<br /> three or four months ago I forwarded a type-<br /> written article to the editor of a magazine pub-<br /> lished by one of the best-known houses in the<br /> the hostelznown houses in the<br /> world. In a few weeks the MS. was returned<br /> and, of course, I do not complain of that. I<br /> addressed an envelope to another high-class publi-<br /> cation, and was just enclosing the MS., when I<br /> decided to glance through it anew. To my surprise,<br /> I found several passages scored in pencil at the<br /> sides, and in one place the word “Rubbish !” was<br /> written in the margin.<br /> Having removed these obnoxious marks, I posted<br /> the MS. In four days it was in type, without a<br /> word excised, and in less than a month I had<br /> received £8 188. 6d. as payment. Presumably,<br /> therefore, the article was not without worth.<br /> What I particularly desire to explain, however, is<br /> that the incidental statement which the editor of<br /> the first magazine had marked as “rubbish” was<br /> “HALL CAINE, THE MAN AND THE NOYELIST.&quot;<br /> To the Editor of THE AUTHOR.<br /> SIR, I regret to find in the October number of<br /> The Author a paragraph co the effect that Mr.<br /> Hall Caine has “ revised” the MS. of my forth-<br /> coming book relating to himself and his work. I<br /> have seen this paragraph in other papers, but have<br /> left it uncontradicted, because it was my intention<br /> to wait until the publication of my book in order<br /> to give the erroneous statement the refutation for<br /> which it called. But now that the paragraph has<br /> appeared in The Author—a paper in which all<br /> literary news is not only correct but “official ”—I<br /> feel compelled to state the true facts of the case.<br /> I can do this best by quoting from a letter<br /> addressed to me by Mr. Hall Caine a few weeks<br /> ago-<br /> DEAR MR. KENYON,—I have looked over the portion of<br /> your manuscript which you sent me, and have made a few<br /> comparatively unimportant changes. They concern what<br /> you say of my friends, living and dead, and therefore I<br /> have felt it to be my duty to set you right where I thought<br /> you were wrong. With what you say of myself, whether<br /> in the way of criticism or biography. I do not feel that I<br /> have any right to interfere, and I fear I must deny myself<br /> the pleasure of writing the Preface which you are good<br /> enough to request. If your view of my life and my books is to<br /> have any value for the public, it must stand as your own,<br /> without any criticism or endorsement from me. ...<br /> Yours very truly,<br /> HÅLL CAINE.<br /> This letter speaks for itself. My MS. has in no<br /> sense been “revised” by Mr. Caine-part of it<br /> was read by him and a few errors of fact put<br /> right. That, and the loan of some interesting<br /> letters, constitute the whole sum of his respon-<br /> sibility for the text of my monograph.<br /> I am, etc.,<br /> C. FRED. KENYON.<br /> Ellesmere Park, Eccles,<br /> October 13th, 1901.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 52 (#433) #############################################<br /> <br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> ARRANGEMENTS FOR<br /> SALE OF MSS. OF EVERY KIND.<br /> ULTERARY AGENCY<br /> Literary Advice, Revision, Research, etc.<br /> Printing, Publishing, Illustration, Translation, etc.<br /> THE LITERARY AGENCY OF LONDON,<br /> 5, HENRIETTA STREET, W.C.<br /> G. H. PERRIS.<br /> C. F. CAZENOVE.<br /> TYPEWRITING COMPANY, Oswald House, Queen Victoria Road, Coventry.<br /> <br /> var<br /> FONDON<br /> Typewriting of every description, from Ninepence per Thousand Words<br /> (including good paper). Specimens on application.<br /> Special Work undertaken (not necessarily for publication); neatly and carefully executed<br /> in Two Colours, at Special Charges.<br /> Testimonial.-“Undoubtedly the finest piece of work I have ever seen produced on a Typewriter.&quot;<br /> &quot; REMINGTON STANDARD » up-to-date Instruments.<br /> DARLINGTON&#039;S HANDBOOKS<br /> MRS. GILL,<br /> TYPE-WRITING OFFICE,<br /> 35, LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br /> (ESTABLISHED 1883.)<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. carefully copied from 1s. per 1000 words. Duplicate<br /> copies third price. Skilled typists sent out by hour, day or week.<br /> French MSS. accurately copied, or typewritten English translations<br /> supplied. References kindly permitted to Messrs. A. P. Watt &amp; Son,<br /> Literary Agents, Hastings House, Nortolk Street, Strand, W.C.<br /> THE WEST KENSINGTON TYPEWRITING AGENCY.<br /> SIKES and SIKES,<br /> 13, Wolverton Gardens, Hammersmith Road, W.<br /> ESTABLISHED 1893.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. carefully and promptly copied. Usual Terms.<br /> Leod and General Copying. Typewritten Circulars by Copying Process.<br /> LESSONS GIVEN. AUTHORS&#039; REFERENCES.<br /> “Sir Henry Ponsonby is<br /> commanded by the Queen to<br /> She thank Mr. Darlington for a<br /> * copy of his Handbook.&quot;<br /> “Nothing better could be wished for.&quot;-BRITISH WEEKLY.<br /> “ Far superior to ordinary guides.&quot;-LONDON DAILY CHRONICLE.<br /> Edited by RALPH DARLINGTON, F.R.G.S. 18. each. Illustrated.<br /> Maps by John BARTHOLOMEW, F.R.G.S.<br /> THE ISLE OF WIGHT.<br /> THE CHANNEL ISLANDS.<br /> THE VALE OF LLANGOLLEN. THE NORFOLK BROADS.<br /> BRECON AND ITS BEACONS. THE SEVERN VALLEY.<br /> BOURNEMOUTH AND THE NEW FOREST. THE WYE VALLEY<br /> BRIGHTON, EASTBOURNE, HASTINGS, AND ST. LEONARDS<br /> ABERYSTWITH, TOWYN, BARMOUTH, AND DOLGELLY.<br /> MALVERN, HEREFORD, WORCESTER, AND GLOUCESTER,<br /> LLANDRINDOD WELLS AND THE SPAS OF MID-WALES.<br /> BRISTOL, BATH, CHEPSTOW, AND WESTON-SUPER-MARE.<br /> LLANDUDNO, RHYL, BANGOR, CARNARVON, ANGLESEA.<br /> CONWAY, COLWYN BAY, BETTWS-Y-COED, FESTINIOG,<br /> SNOWDON.<br /> STIKPHAST<br /> PASTE STIKS<br /> &quot;The best Handbook to London ever issued.&quot;-LIVERPOOL DAILY Post,<br /> “THE Handbook to London-it very emphatically tops them all.&quot; --<br /> DAILY GRAPHIC.<br /> 3rd Edition, Revised, Bs. 60 Illustrations, 24 Maps and Plans.<br /> LONDON AND ENVIRONS.<br /> By E. C. Cook and E. T. Cook, M.A.<br /> Feap. Svo. 18. THE HOTELS OF THE WORLD.<br /> A Handbook to the leading Hotels throughout the world.<br /> Llangollen : DARLINGTON &amp; Co. London: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL &amp; Co.<br /> LTD. Railway Bookstalls and all Bookseliers.<br /> PHOTOGRAPHS.-BIRTHDAY and Seasox Cards from negatives by<br /> RALPH DARLINGTON, F.R.G.S., of Scenery, Ruins, &amp;c., in Italy, Greece,<br /> Asia Minor, and Egypt, 1s., ls. 6.1., 28., and 2s. 6d. List, post free, of<br /> DARLINGTON &amp; Co., LLANGOLLEN.<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.&quot;<br /> SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> (ALLOWANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY 20 PER CENT.]<br /> THE<br /> AUTHOR&#039;S HAIRLESS PAPER-PAD<br /> Front Page<br /> ... £4 0 0<br /> Other Pages<br /> ... ... 3 0 0<br /> Hall of a Page<br /> ... ... ... 1 10 0<br /> Quarter of a Page<br /> ... 0 15 0<br /> Eighth of a Page<br /> ... 0 7 6<br /> Single Column Advertisemeni<br /> per inch 0 0 0<br /> Bills for Insertion<br /> per 2,000 3 0 0<br /> Reduction of 20 per cent. made for a Series of Si and of 25 per cent. for<br /> (The LEADENHALL PRESS LTD., Publishers &amp; Printers,<br /> Twelve Insertions.<br /> Advertisements should reach the Office not later than the 20th for<br /> insertion in the following inonth&#039;s issue.<br /> All letters respecting Advertisements should be addressed to the<br /> ADVERTISEMENT MANAGER, The Author Office, 39, Old Queen Street,<br /> Storey&#039;s Gate, S.W.<br /> 50, Leadenhall Street, London, E.c.)<br /> Contains hairless paper, over which the pen slips with perfect<br /> freedom. Sixpence each. 5s. per dozen, ruled or plain. New Pocket<br /> Size, 3s. per dozen, ruled or plain, Authors should note that THE<br /> LEADENHALL PRESS LTD, cannot be responsible for the loss of MSS.<br /> I by fire or otherwise. Duplicate copies should be retained.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 52 (#434) #############################################<br /> <br /> iv<br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> ESTABLISHED)<br /> The Athenæum Press, Taunton.<br /> (XVIII. CENT.<br /> BARNICOTT &amp; PEARCE<br /> INVITE ENQUIRIES RESPECTING PRINTING.<br /> ESTIMATES OF COST, AND OTHER DETAILS, PROMPTLY GIVEN.<br /> Monthly. 3d. “The Writer,”<br /> Post free to any address in the United<br /> Kingdom, 4s. per annum.<br /> A MONTHLY JOURNAL FOR LITERARY PEOPLE.<br /> Devoted to the interests of Book-buyers, Booksellers, Authors and Readers. The general aim of “ The Writer&quot; will be<br /> to maintain a high standard of Literary Criticism.<br /> Printed at the Walsall Press, Walsall.<br /> Published at Bank Chambers, Blackburn.<br /> London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent &amp; Co., Ltd.<br /> THE BUSH LANE HOUSE TYPEWRITING &amp; SHORTHAND OFFICE,<br /> Principal:<br /> Bush Lane House, Bush Lane,<br /> MISS MORGAN.<br /> Cannon Street, London, E.C.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. carefully and promptly copied from 10d. per 1,000 words. General Typewriting, Shorthand and<br /> Translations executed by skilled workers. Privacy and accuracy guaranteed.<br /> • Special Terms for large quantities or contract work. Estimates and Specimens free on application.<br /> THE WHITEFRIARS PRESS, LONDON AND TONBRIDGE.<br /> BRADBURY, AGNEW, &amp; Co. LD.<br /> Will give Estimates for and undertake the production of any description of<br /> BOOK AND MAGAZINE PRINTING AND BINDING.<br /> Telegrams: Charlyarl, London ; Charivari, Tonbridge.<br /> Telephones : 28 Holborn ; 19 Tonbridge.<br /> AUTHORS&#039; MS. TYPED<br /> AUTHORS&#039; TYPEWRITING. TYPEWRITING. 9d. per 1,000 words.<br /> ACCURACY AND DISPATCH.<br /> Miss KATHARINE TYNAN, Author of “A Union of<br /> Hearts,&quot; &amp;c., writing to Mr. St. John says:-&quot;I have<br /> Miss RISDON,<br /> never met with anything approaching your intelligence,<br /> quickness of apprehension, carefulness and promptitude.<br /> 6, Racquet Court,<br /> ... Your work is not only educated, but in the case of<br /> 114, Fleet Street, E.C.<br /> unfamiliar words in the Irish idiom, you have been<br /> ainazingly quick and ready.&quot;<br /> Novels typewritten, from 9d. per 1,000 words;<br /> By Experienced Hand. 9d. thousand words.<br /> two copies, 1-.<br /> PRICE LIST AND AUTHORS&#039; OPINIONS ON APPLICATION.<br /> M. J. C., 31, LAMMAS PARK ROAD, EALING, W.<br /> Literary Agents.--Authors are warned against dealing with<br /> L. A. ST. JOHN, 104, Churston Av., Upton Park, E.<br /> any Literary Agent without referring to the Society for infor-<br /> mation. Authors are also warned not to sign Agreements on the<br /> advice of Literary Agents alone. All Agreements should be<br /> submitted to the Society for advice.<br /> TYPEWRITING.<br /> By Order, G. HERBERT THRING,<br /> Secretary Society of Authors,<br /> 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s Gate, S.W.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. accurately copied from 8d. per 1,000<br /> The « Forms of Agreements&quot; issued by the Publishers&#039;<br /> words. Experienced in all kinds of scientific and<br /> Association can be obtained at the Office, with a full explanation<br /> difficult MSS. Reduction for large quantities.<br /> of their meaning, price 1s. post free. Authors are warned not<br /> to sign any agreement which may embody the Clauses expose 1<br /> without submitting it first to the Society.<br /> MISS CARRINGTON,<br /> By Order, G. HERBERT THRING,<br /> 27, Kelmscott Road, Clapham, S.W.<br /> Secretary Society of Authors,<br /> 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s Gate, S.W.<br /> Printed by BRADBURY, AGNEW, &amp; Co. LD., and Published by them for THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS (INCORPORATED),<br /> at 10, Bouverie Street, London, E.C.https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/347/1901-11-01-The-Author-12-4.pdfpublications, The Author