347 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/347 | The Author, Vol. 12 Issue 04 (November 1901) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+12+Issue+04+%28November+1901%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 12 Issue 04 (November 1901)</a> | | | <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015006979390" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015006979390</a> | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1901-11-01-The-Author-12-4 | | | | | 29–52 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=12">12</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1901-11-01">1901-11-01</a> | | | | | | | 4 | | | 19011101 | The Author.<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Vol. XII.—No. 4.<br />
NOVEMBER 1, 1901.<br />
PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
--- =-<br />
----<br />
-----<br />
CONTENTS.<br />
PAGE<br />
PAGE<br />
..<br />
...<br />
...<br />
34<br />
...<br />
...<br />
...<br />
42<br />
General Memoranda ....<br />
Warnings to Dramatic Authors ... ...<br />
How to Use the Society<br />
The Reading Branch ... ... ... ...<br />
Notices ... ... ... ... ...<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society of Author:<br />
From the Committee ...<br />
The Work of the Society<br />
Authorities<br />
...<br />
30, 31<br />
:* ::::<br />
Author and Literary Agent<br />
Literary, Dramatic, and Musical Property<br />
An Old to a Young Reviewer ...<br />
"" ...<br />
The Publication of Educational Books<br />
Bookselling ... ...<br />
King Alfred as an Author...<br />
The Authors' Club<br />
Book and Play Talk ... ...<br />
Correspondence... ... ...<br />
... ... ...<br />
...<br />
...<br />
...<br />
51<br />
PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.<br />
hlication. By us forms of is explained: diff<br />
1. The Annual Report for the current year. ls.<br />
2. The Author. A Monthly Journal devoted especially to the protection and maintenance of Literary<br />
Property. Issued to all Members gratis. Price to non-members, 6d., or 58. 6d. per annum,<br />
post free. Back numbers from 1892, at 10s. 6d. per vol.<br />
3. Literature and the Pension List. By W. MORRIS COLLES, Barrister-at-Law. 2s.<br />
4. The History of the Société des Gens de Lettres. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. 1s.<br />
5. The Cost of Production. (Out of print.)<br />
6. The Various Methods of Publication. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. In this work, compiled from the<br />
papers in the Society's offices, the various forms of agreements proposed by Publishers to<br />
Authors are examined, and their meaning carefully explained, with an account of the<br />
various kinds of fraud which have been made possible by the different clauses in their<br />
agreements. 3s.<br />
Addenda to the Above. By G. HERBERT THRING. Being additional facts collected at<br />
the office of the Society since the publication of the “Methods." With comments and<br />
advice. 2s.<br />
7. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition of Lord Monkswell's Copyright Bill of 1890. With<br />
Extracts from the Report of the Commission of 1878, the Berne Convention, and the<br />
American Copyright Bill. By J. M. LELY. ls. 6d.<br />
8. The Society of Authors. A Record of its Action from its Foundation. By WALTER BESANT<br />
(Chairman of Committee, 1888–1892). ls.<br />
9. The Contract of Publication in Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Switzerland. By ERNST<br />
LUNGE, J.U.D. 28. 6d.<br />
10. Forms of Agreement issued by the Publishers' Association; with Comments. By<br />
G. HERBERT THRING, and Illustrative Examples by Sir WALTER BESANT. 2nd Edition. 1s.<br />
[All prices net. Amply to the Secretary, 39, ou Queen Street, Storey's Gate, S.JI.]<br />
Ameri<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 28 (#408) #############################################<br />
<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
-<br />
The Society of Authors (Incorporated).<br />
PRESIDENT,<br />
GEORGE MEREDITH.<br />
COUNCIL.<br />
SIR EDWIN ARNOLD, K.C.I.E., ('.S.I. | AUSTIN DOBSON.<br />
THE REV. C. H. MIDDLETOX-WAKE.<br />
J. M. BARRIE.<br />
A. CONAN DOYLE, M.D.<br />
SIR LEWIS MORRIS.<br />
A. W. A BECKETT.<br />
A. W. DU BOURG,<br />
HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br />
ROBERT BATEMAN.<br />
SiR MICHAEL FOSTER, K.C.B., M.P., GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br />
F. E. BEDDARD, F.R.S.<br />
F.R.S.<br />
J. C. PARKINSON.<br />
SIR HENRY BERGNE, K.C.M.G.<br />
D, W. FRESHFIELD,<br />
A. W. PINERO.<br />
AUGUSTINE BIRRELL, K.C.<br />
RICHARD GARNETT, C.B., LL.D. THE RIGHT Hox. THE LORD PIR-<br />
THE REV. PROF. BONNEY, F.R.S. EDMUND GOSSE.<br />
BRIGHT, F.R.S<br />
THE RIGHT Hox. JAMES BRYCE, M.P. | SYDNEY GRUNDY,<br />
SIR FREDERICK POLLOCK, Bart.,<br />
THE RIGHT Hon. THE LORD BURGH. ! H. RIDER HAGGARD,<br />
LL.D.<br />
CLERE.<br />
THOMAS HARDY.<br />
WALTER HERRIES POLLOCK.<br />
HALL CAINE.<br />
ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS.<br />
E. Rose.<br />
EGERTON CASTLE, F.S.A.<br />
JEROME K. JEROME.<br />
W. BAPTISTE SCOONES.<br />
P. W. CLAYDEN.<br />
J. SCOTT KELTIE, LL.D.<br />
Miss FLORA L. SHAW.<br />
EDWARD CLODD.<br />
RUDYARD KIPLING.<br />
G. R, SIMS.<br />
W. MORRIS COLLES.<br />
PROF. E. RAY LANKESTER, F.R.S. S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br />
THE HON. JOHN COLLIER.<br />
THE RIGHT Hox.W.E. H.LECKY, M.P. J.J. STEVENSON.<br />
SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br />
J. M. LELY.<br />
FRANCIS STORR.<br />
MRS. CRAIGIE.<br />
THE REV. W. J. LOFTIE, F.S.A.<br />
WILLIAM MOY THOMAS.<br />
E. MARION CRAWFORD,<br />
SIR A. C. MACKENZIE, Mus.Doc. MRS. HUMPHRY WARD,<br />
THE RIGHT Hox. THE LORD ('URZON PROF. J. M. D, MEIKLEJOHN.<br />
OF KEDLESTON.<br />
llon. Counsel - E. M. UNDERDOWN, K.C.<br />
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT.<br />
Chairman-A. HOPE HAWKINS.<br />
A. W. , BECKETT.<br />
A. CONAN DOYLE, M.D).<br />
D. W. FRESHFIELD.<br />
SYDNEY GRUNDY,<br />
J. M. LELY.<br />
HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br />
GILBERT PARKER, V.P.<br />
E. ROSE.<br />
FRANCIS STORR.<br />
SUB-COMMITTEES.<br />
Hox. John COLLIER (Chairman).<br />
I<br />
M. H. SPIELMANN,<br />
ART.<br />
SIR W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br />
COPYRIGHT.<br />
A. HOPE HAWKINS.<br />
A. W. À BECKETT.<br />
W. M, COLLES.<br />
J. M. LELY.<br />
GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br />
HENRY ARTHUR JONES (Chairman).<br />
A. W. À BECKETT.<br />
DRAMA.<br />
F. C. BURNAND.<br />
SYDNEY GRUNDY.<br />
A. W. PINERO.<br />
EDWARD ROSE.<br />
Solicitors_<br />
FIELD), ROSCOE, and Co., Lincoln's Inn Fields.<br />
i G. HERBERT THRING, 39, Old Queen Street, S.W.<br />
Secretary-G. HERBERT THRING.<br />
OFFICES: 39, OLD QUEEN STREET, STOREY'S GATE, S.W.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 29 (#409) #############################################<br />
<br />
The Author.<br />
( The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR WALTER BESANT.<br />
VOL. XII.--No. 4.<br />
NOVEMBER 1st, 1901.<br />
[PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
-<br />
-<br />
GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
ITERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
M agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br />
price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br />
managed by a competent agent, or with the advice of the<br />
Secretary of the Society.<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of patting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,"<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor!<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
It is above all things necessary to know what the<br />
proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now possible<br />
for an author to ascertain approximately and very nearly<br />
the truth. From time to time the very important figures<br />
connected with royalties are published in The Author.<br />
Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br />
“Cost of Production.'<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
The main points are :-<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
13.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
General.<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :-<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
VOL. XII.<br />
EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager.<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for PLAYS<br />
IN THREE OR MORE ACTS :-<br />
(a.) SALE OUTRIGHT OF THE PERFORMING RIGHT.<br />
This is unsatisfactory. An author who enters<br />
into such a contract should stipulate in the con-<br />
tract for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
(6.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF PERCENTAGES<br />
on gross receipts. Percentages vary between<br />
5 and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
(c.) SALE OF PERFORMING RIGHT OR OF A LICENCE<br />
TO PERFORM ON THE BASIS OF ROYALTIES (i.e.,<br />
fixed nightly fees). This method should be<br />
always avoided except in cases where the fees<br />
are likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (6.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
4. PLAYS IN ONE ACT are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important.<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance.<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
8. Never forget that AMERICAN RIGHTS may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. They should never be included in English<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 30 (#410) #############################################<br />
<br />
30<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements. This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so do<br />
some publishers. Members can make their own deductions<br />
and act accordingly.<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning,<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, THOSE AUTIJORS DESIROUS OF FURTHER INFORMA-<br />
TION ARE REFERRED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY.<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
M EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of their work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes NOT ONLY WORKS OF FICTION, BUT POETRY<br />
AND DRAMATIC WORKS, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
lieaders are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
NOTICES.<br />
TIHE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
58. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
Communications for The Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey's<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor NOT LATER<br />
THAN THE 21st OF EACH MONTH.<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or not, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
1. D VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the<br />
advice sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor,<br />
the member has a right to an opinion from the Society's<br />
solicitors. If the case is such that Counsel's opinion is<br />
clesirable, the Committee will obtain for him Counsel's<br />
opinion. All this without any cost to the member.<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers' agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society.<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
4. BEFORE SIGNING ANY AGREEMENT WHATEVER, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
5. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of literature in promoting the<br />
independence of the writer,<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members' agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br />
-(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements.<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts submitted to them by literary<br />
agents, and are recommended to submit them for inter-<br />
pretation and explanation to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
for<br />
For the Opinions expressed in papers that are signed<br />
or initialled the Authors alone are responsible.<br />
None of the papers or paragraphs must be taken<br />
as expressing the opinion of the Committee unless<br />
such is especially stated to be the case.<br />
COMMUNICATIONS AND LETTERS ARE INVITED BY THE<br />
EDITOR on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
THE SECRETARY OF THE SOCIETY begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be<br />
crossed Inion Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 31 (#411) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
31<br />
CHANGE OF ADDRESS.<br />
The office of the Incorporated Society of Authors<br />
has been removed to-<br />
39, OLD QUEEN STREET,<br />
STOREY'S GATE, S.W.<br />
The Secretary during the last month has dealt<br />
with seven fresh cases, in three of which he has<br />
already been successful. With the exception of<br />
three cases which are still in the course of negotia-<br />
tion, he has satisfactorily terminated those that<br />
were before him at the date of publication of last<br />
month's Author. The Committee have determined<br />
to take counsel's opinion on behalf of one of their<br />
members in a complicated case on the interpretation<br />
of an agreement where a large amount of literary<br />
property is involved.<br />
The Committee have decided to call a meeting of<br />
the Copyright Sub-committee, with a view to again<br />
raising the question of the Copyright Bill. The<br />
course that the Copyright Sub-committee adopts<br />
will be reported in due course in these columns.<br />
NOTICE.<br />
M HE EDITOR begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors' Society and other readers of The<br />
Author that the cases which are from time<br />
to time quoted in The Author are cases that hare<br />
come before the notice or to the knowledge of the<br />
Secretary of the Society, and that those members<br />
of the Society who desire to have the names of<br />
the publishers concerned can obtain them on<br />
application.<br />
THE PENSION FUND OF THE SOCIETY<br />
OF AUTHORS.<br />
M HE following is the total of donations and<br />
1 subscriptions promised or received up to<br />
the 1st October, 1901.<br />
Further sums will be acknowledged from month<br />
to month as they are received, as it has been con-<br />
sidered unnecessary to print the full list with<br />
every issue.<br />
Donations ........<br />
...........£1439 16 6<br />
Subscriptions...<br />
......... 107 18 6<br />
Sir Walter Besant Memorial.<br />
The Committee feel that the debt of gratitude<br />
owed by the Society to their founder, Sir Walter<br />
Besant, should be adequately recorded in a per-<br />
manent memorial, and are sure that all members<br />
of the Society will share this feeling. In their<br />
opinion such memorial should commemorate not<br />
only his distinction as a novelist, and as an<br />
historian and a citizen of London, but also his<br />
services to his fellow writers, and the special<br />
position he occupied amongst them.<br />
The summer holidays intervening have caused<br />
a certain amount of delay in the Committee's<br />
action, but they have conferred with Lady Besant,<br />
who gives the project her cordial approval. The<br />
approval of George Meredith, the President of<br />
the Society, has also been accorded to it, and it<br />
has been decided, with the sanction of the Dean<br />
and Chapter, to place a memorial in the crypt of<br />
St. Paul's, adjacent to the tablet that commemorates<br />
Charles Reade.<br />
Mr. George Frampton, A.R.A., has promised to<br />
undertake the work, and it is hoped that such a<br />
sum will be raised as will enable the scheme to be<br />
carried out in a manner worthy of its object.<br />
A letter has already been sent to the members<br />
of the Council of the Society, and in due course<br />
a circular containing further particulars will be<br />
sent out to all mernbers, and from time to time<br />
the list of subscriptions will be published in The<br />
Author.<br />
The Committee make this statement as a pre-<br />
liminary notice, in order that it may not appear<br />
to those who loved and admired our late founder<br />
that any unnecessary delay has taken place in<br />
organising the expression of the affection and<br />
regret felt towards their founder by the members<br />
of the Society.<br />
Oct. 10, Harrison, Mrs. (Lucas Malet)<br />
Oct. 15, Rossi, Miss L. ...<br />
5 5<br />
0 10<br />
0<br />
6<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
The Work of the Society.<br />
VER. OWEN SEAMAN has been elected<br />
y a member of the Council of the Society of<br />
Authors and member of the Committee<br />
of Management.<br />
Mrs. Harrison (Lucas Malet) has been elected a<br />
member of the Council.<br />
The Committee elected at their meeting in<br />
vctober twenty-five members and eight associates<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 32 (#412) #############################################<br />
<br />
32<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
TT will be our endeavour to publish in every<br />
1 number of The Author at least one article from<br />
the pen of some well-known member of our<br />
Society. Several have already promised to write<br />
articles on some literary subject which will be of<br />
interest to their fellow-writers, and we trust that,<br />
on reading this notice, other members will volun-<br />
tarily offer their services. The length of such<br />
articles ought to be about four columns.<br />
The above paragraph points the reason of the<br />
failure of the commission book. A publisher has<br />
nothing to work for if he publishes a commission<br />
book, and therefore, in the great majority of cases.<br />
a work put on the market under an arrangement<br />
of this kind is bound to fail. If it is successful, it<br />
is generally owing to the action of the author. not<br />
of the publisher<br />
Until the publisher rise<br />
Until the publisher rises up who will publish<br />
nothing but commission books, the same resnlt will<br />
alway<br />
always occur.<br />
We have inserted a notice in The Author con-<br />
cerning the bona fides of the cases quoted in its<br />
pages. It has been necessary to do so owing to the<br />
fact that a great many detractors of the Society have<br />
stated that these cases never really occurred. The<br />
main reasons for withholding names are generally<br />
two. Firstly, the fear of the member concerned lest<br />
he should be involved in an action for libel ; and<br />
secondly, his dislike for any publicity which he con-<br />
siders may prejudice him should he be seeking<br />
further publication.<br />
The latter point, no doubt, acts as a very strong<br />
lever. Members of the Society used to fear the<br />
publication of the fact that they were members, on<br />
the ground that publishers would refuse to deal with<br />
them, and even now there are some who are afraid<br />
of this position. This is one of the reasons why<br />
the votes of the members of the Society were against<br />
the publication of a list of members. This fear,<br />
however, has to a great extent passed away, and<br />
subscribers to the Society are only too anxious to<br />
proclaim their membership when they are in diffi-<br />
culties with publishers. As a matter of fact, there<br />
are those who are not members, and never have<br />
been, who are only too glad at times to make a<br />
false statement in order to bring a publisher to a<br />
reasonable understanding.<br />
The discussion of this subject calls to our mind<br />
the question of the one-book man, which has<br />
been mentioned in The Author from time to time.<br />
Now that the war has been raging in South Africa<br />
for some time, the point is perhaps brought more<br />
forcibly before the public.<br />
Many on their return from South Africa desire<br />
to publish their reminiscences, and laying their<br />
maiden effort at the feet of a publisher are met<br />
with the usual answer that there are too many books<br />
of the kind on the market, but that, if the author<br />
cares to pay for the cost of production, he will<br />
publish the book on commission. This is the<br />
publisher's harvest. It is quite certain that the<br />
one-book man, whether he is a yeoman returning<br />
from the war, or whether he is a man of distinction<br />
writing his memoirs, will not, as a rule, obtain<br />
advice on a matter of this kind. He will trust<br />
himself to the publisher as he would to his con-<br />
fidential adviser—the pity of it.<br />
The absurdity of the position has often been<br />
mentioned, but the fact remains the same. The<br />
consequence is, a considerable outlay by the author<br />
usually exceeding the ordinary market price of the<br />
cost of production of the book, and no return in<br />
the way of profits. The reason of the lack of profits<br />
arises, firstly, because—coming back to Sir Walter<br />
Scott's statement—the publishers have no stimulus<br />
to push the book ; secondly, because of the over-<br />
charge (this word is not the word used by the<br />
publishers) for printing, paper, advertising, and<br />
other details of the cost of production,<br />
It may be instructive to draw the attention of<br />
the members of the Society to the opinion of pub-<br />
lishers expressed by Sir Walter Scott, quoted in<br />
“ Lockhart's Life," vol. 2, chapter 4. Sir Walter<br />
states as follows:--<br />
“ The publishers are very like farmers who flourish best<br />
to high rent, and in general take most pains to sell a book<br />
that has cost them money to purchase.”<br />
From experience at the Society's office, it is quite<br />
clear that Sir Walter Scott was well aware of the<br />
peculiarities of the publishing trade, and his state-<br />
ment continues as true now as it was then. If an<br />
author will but value himself at his proper standard,<br />
he is much more likely to obtain satisfactory<br />
arrangements, and have his books more liberally<br />
pushed, than his fellow who may be constantly<br />
underselling his own market.<br />
It is curious to note that in the case of theatrical<br />
performances the tendency of the public is to<br />
demand pieces which are light, pleasing and<br />
amusing. For every serious drama that is pro-<br />
duced there must be at least two of a lighter and<br />
more amusing kind, yet, on turning to literature,<br />
we see wonderfully few amusing writers compared<br />
with the number who write serious, problematical<br />
and heavy fiction.<br />
It would be interesting if some of the latter-day<br />
philosophers would write an article dealing with<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 33 (#413) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
33<br />
this question from the psychological point of view.<br />
It is impossible to think that those who read the<br />
works of fiction placed on the market read them<br />
with a view to a serious study of life, rather than<br />
with a view to their personal amusement.<br />
will forward statements containing figures--that<br />
is, of the price given, of the circulation, and of<br />
other details—we will gladly work out the returns<br />
to the publisher and the author, and again test the<br />
truth of the publishers' statement regarding the<br />
profits from school books.<br />
The following paragraph taken from the New<br />
Zealand Times will have a mournful significance<br />
to many members of the Authors' Society :-<br />
* A visit to the grave of R. L. Stevenson would disappoint<br />
many people. While some time back visits to this famous<br />
hill were most frequent, the limit must now be six persons<br />
yearly. And no wonder! The place is quite overgrown<br />
with weeds, and perhaps will some day be hard to discover.<br />
I understand that on receiving a complaint from a Sydney<br />
resident, a little while back, the British Consul sent some<br />
of his men up and the place was cleared. It is now time<br />
for another clearing."<br />
"To write a book is an easy task ; it requires only pen and<br />
ink and some patient paper. To print a book is slightly<br />
more difficult, because genius often expresses itself in<br />
illegible manuscript. To read a book is still more difficult,<br />
as one must struggle against sleep. But the most difficult<br />
task that anyone may attempt is to sell a book. -Felir<br />
Dahn.”<br />
The above cutting from the Publishers' Circular<br />
is mildly satirical. It is also inaccurate. We let<br />
it pass. It is not the first time The Author has<br />
been reminded that genius lies with the publisher,<br />
and that the great literary undertakings of the<br />
world would fall flat without “a goose to lay the<br />
golden egg.”<br />
In the last number we had reason to make some<br />
remarks about epigrams ; the following, culled from<br />
a comic paper, may suggest an idea to some member<br />
on the point of writing an article on the subiect<br />
on the point of writing an article on the subject.<br />
She (to unromantic brother) : He called me the apple<br />
of his eye. Is that an epigram ?<br />
He: No, it's piffle.<br />
We have taken the liberty of printing the late<br />
James Runciman's opinion on the subject of<br />
literary men being businesslike ; it is pithy and<br />
powerful. It may act as an antidote to those who<br />
from time to time objected to some of the methods<br />
of our Founder.<br />
“ No babble sickens me so much as that about the fading<br />
about the fading<br />
of noble aspirations. The talk about contempt for money<br />
mostly comes from men who are too self-indulgent to<br />
undergo exertion, but who will readily take whatever they<br />
can get without trouble. In my own experience of life, I<br />
have found that if you want to see an unscrupulous grabber<br />
of the worst type you must seek out a wild poet who despises<br />
Philistines. He will not deny himself anything ; he will<br />
feed from any hand, and he will write lightsome sarcasms<br />
about everyone who feeds him. He is generous to himself,<br />
and he is overpoweringly bitter towards those who make<br />
life an affair of half-pence; but he snatches half-pence<br />
greedily enough when they have been earned by other<br />
people. He is secretly ashamed because his own impotence<br />
reduces him to being beholden to the Philistine, and he<br />
eases his shame by making scornful comments on his<br />
providers.<br />
“ The men who do the lordly acts of generosity, the men<br />
who are beneficent to their families, to the poor, to the<br />
State, are the hard fellows who take their work as they find<br />
it, live rationally, forego indulgences, and gather the form<br />
of force which we call money. They can afford to be<br />
munificent, and they are good citizens, for the simple reason<br />
that they recognise the laws of existence and preserve their<br />
self-respect. There is more real poetry in the heart of a<br />
merchant who goes soberly homeward wondering what he<br />
can do to gratify his wife and children than there is in the<br />
whole tribe of fribbles who think that the main duties of<br />
life are to wear ugly hats and derive'impressions.' People<br />
like Firth and Nasmyth and Armstrong have given more<br />
happiness to the world than have all the rhymers and<br />
prosers that ever moaned about the waywardness of fate<br />
and the accursed influence of .dross.'<br />
" JAMES RUNCIMAN."<br />
Mr. Robert MacLehose, of the well-known<br />
Glasgow firm, has kindly written an article on<br />
“ The Net System,” which is published in this<br />
month's Author.<br />
The matter may not appear of much importance<br />
to members of the Society, but the price at which<br />
books are sold to the public, and the maintenance<br />
of a flourishing book trade throughout the country,<br />
should not be looked upon with indifference by the<br />
producers.<br />
With the author should lie ultimately the power<br />
of determining in what manner and at what price<br />
his wares should be marketed, that he may receive<br />
the fair reward of his labour.<br />
In those countries where the publisher and<br />
booksenler by strong combination rule the market,<br />
the author suffers and the tradesmen flourish.<br />
The policy of all should be to obtain a just return.<br />
It is to be hoped that further articles on the book<br />
rade m uture numbers may lead to the clearing<br />
up of certain disputed points.<br />
We have put forward in the last number of The Quite recently a case came before the Society of<br />
Author and are printing in this number some a book published in cheap form in England under<br />
remarks on the production of educational works. an author's name which had never been written by<br />
If any member of the Society, or the public, the author.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 34 (#414) #############################################<br />
<br />
34<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
The Society readily dealt with the matter and American writers. For Continental rights, too, an<br />
the book was withdrawn from circulation with agent in each of the countries where translations<br />
apologies.<br />
are issued is a necessity if anything like the full<br />
We regret to say that the same mistake has pecuniary value is to be extracted for them. Then<br />
frequently occurred the other side of the water, again, for an English writer living abroad (say, in<br />
and is much more difficult to deal with.<br />
a colony) or travelling, a London literary agent is,<br />
The American pirate has in many cases grown if not a necessity, at any rate a luxury. The<br />
bold, through freedom from persecution. He finds literary agent may be of service also to the “one-<br />
an English writer whose works sell in quantities in book” man--the writer who publishes only now<br />
America, proceeds to take a certain amount of copy and again, the writer who knows that his books<br />
-Heaven knows where he gets it from-binds it will not sell, and does not look to get a profit out<br />
up in cheap form, and publishes it, with the name of them.<br />
of the popular writer referred to.<br />
As to whether the London literary agent will<br />
This naturally causes the author in England consent to handle the work of this latter class, is<br />
inany heart-burnings, as his literary reputation is another matter.<br />
at stake, and the damage that may accrue may But for the professional writer, the writer who<br />
possibly be very large.<br />
pens matter which sells, the writer who looks to<br />
To strike at this grievance, although a matter of make a living, or part of a living, out of his books<br />
import, is a question of considerable difficulty, as and serial rights, I emphatically hold that the<br />
it is very often the case that the author, unwilling literary agent, as at present on offer in London, is<br />
to journey to the other side of the water, does not a clog and a hindrance.<br />
care about starting an action in America. He The literary agent's first object is very naturally<br />
accordingly refrains from taking up the matter, to make his own living. Observe how the author's<br />
with the exception, perhaps, of writing a few letters interest clashes with this at the very outset. The<br />
to the American papers, and the pirate flourishes agent has, say, three short tales by three tolerably<br />
on his ill-gotten gains. The Society, however, has well-known pens, A., B. and C., in his hands, each<br />
some influence in New York, and has succeeded on worth for serial use about £20. He wants to sell<br />
one or two occasions in settling cases of this kind, all three to one magazine, as he knows that other<br />
owing to the weight of its name, without the markets are crowded. He knows quite well that<br />
necessity of commencing action.<br />
the pay-sheet of that particular magazine will not<br />
There is another amusing trick that some of the stand £60, though it would be quite equal to taking<br />
American publishers indulge in. This is not so one tale at £20, which at 10 per cent. commission<br />
harmful from the literary standpoint, but to the would produce him £2. This also would leave the<br />
author is rather a cause for amusement than a other two tales on his hands and cause him further<br />
reason for alarm.<br />
trouble. But instead of selling this one tale at<br />
When in America we noticed several cheap full price, he prefers to make a bargain for the<br />
editions of books written by famous authors, with three at £10, which produces him £4, and the<br />
the portraits of the authors on the paper cover bother of the thing is over as far as he is con-<br />
outside. In many cases the portraits bore no cerned. It is a case of small profits and quick<br />
resenıblance whatever to the author in the flesh as returns.<br />
we knew him in England, and in many cases went I think a point of view has been missed over<br />
beyond this and bore an extremely strong resemb- this matter. Authors should remember that they<br />
lance to other well-known authors with whom we are all in competition against one another, and<br />
have the honour of being acquainted.<br />
why competitors in the same affairs should employ<br />
G. H. T. the same agent to represent them, is a riddle which<br />
no sane business man can answer.<br />
Authors should remember, too, that they are per-<br />
AUTHOR AND LITERARY AGENT. sonally responsible for anything this agent chooses<br />
to bind them to, accidentally or otherwise. Lite-<br />
rary agents are notorious for making slipshod<br />
agreements. Literary agents are constantly ignor-<br />
S the Secretary of the Society of Authors asks ing their principal's definite instructions on the<br />
1 my opinion on the utility of the Author's doubtful ground of expediency. Literary agents<br />
Agent, I wish to say that in most cases he (presumably on the old plea that all writers are<br />
seems to me a useless and expensive excrescence. fools) charge, at the lowest, the grotesquely ex-<br />
To take first the exceptions. For an English cessive fee of 10 per cent. on all monies received.<br />
writer, an American agent is a necessity, and the From a beginner this charge might not be<br />
converse may to a lesser degree hold true for exorbitant; but then the literary agent is far too<br />
I.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 35 (#415) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
35<br />
wise to handle a beginner's work. For a writer among the incompetent. Mr. Heinemann, with<br />
whose writing income is over, say, £500 a year, a protective zeal, complains that it is against the<br />
charge of £50 per £500 is ridiculous. A man in interests of literature that an author should be<br />
that position would, with the exercise of a little pledged body and soul “ years ahead.” An author<br />
common sense, have no trouble whatever in selling who can be overworked by his agent, or forced by<br />
his wares, and if he grudged the hour or two a "pledges” into over-production, is an author who<br />
week necessary to attend to a few simple letters, will ruin himself in any case. Tragedy of this<br />
he could with his £50 hire the services of a clerk kind depends on those circumstances of life which<br />
or secretary who would serve him far more profit drive other men than authors to desperate-in-<br />
ably than any general agent.<br />
variably killing-efforts to fight an unphilanthropic<br />
Finally, what does experience show? How many world. So far as my own experience of agents is<br />
of the writing men and women, who are at the top concerned, I can but say that in the first instance<br />
of the ladder to-day as regards money receipts for I managed my own transactions. I did not manage<br />
their work, employ a London literary agent ? them badly : I have no grievances to air: I am<br />
There is one doubtful exception : all the rest do quite willing that the publisher should make his<br />
not. (Remember, I am not speaking of American legitimate profit on what is always for him not<br />
or Continental agents.)<br />
merciful patronage, but speculation absolutely. I<br />
The writers to whom the services of the present have now given the arrangement of my contracts to<br />
literary agents may be recommended, are those who a well-known, very able, and very courteous agent.<br />
are lazy, incompetent, or self-indulgent. The others I do not find my “ physical and mental health”.<br />
should give up one entire half-day to mastering the sinking under his influence. I write when I please,<br />
very simple business aspects of the matter, and then as I please, and for a sum of money which I myself<br />
either handle their own affairs personally, or (if fix-either on account of royalties, or for a fee<br />
they are abnormally large) put them in the hands outright. My agent collects this, deducts a reason-<br />
of a secretary, or an agent or solicitor who in able commission for his trouble, sees that my agree-<br />
literary matters acts for them, and for no one else. ments--subject to my own approval--are in order,<br />
OMEGA. that my interests are protected abroad and else-<br />
where. Publishers may not like him : I have no<br />
fault to find.<br />
II.<br />
In the case of the author with his first<br />
I HAVE been asked to offer some reply to Mr. Success :- An agent will not advise him against<br />
Heinemann's straightforward letter in the October his interest. This is certain. In the case of the<br />
number of The Author.<br />
unknown author--who wishes for information, for<br />
I do not propose to discuss the agent from the an introduction, the agent will not mislead him.<br />
publisher's point of view. That is not my business. Quite the reverse. He will tell him actual facts<br />
But as an author 1 may perhaps be allowed to hold about the commercial side of “art." And why<br />
a strong opinion with regard to writers generally not? What is the matter with commerce that a<br />
and literature.<br />
person of supposed refinement is expected to shrink<br />
What is this nonsense about the author's "greed” from it with disgust? If men have been expressly<br />
for an “immediate money return ” ? This snobbish taught to get their bread by preaching the Word<br />
attitude in the matter of an artist and his fees was of God, there is certainly no reason why they<br />
never found at any time among the distinguished. Should rate their own compositions as too precious<br />
Michael Angelo wanted his money paid, and his for any earthly payment, or too sublime to be<br />
contracts arranged, many years in advance. Shake- treated with in legal contracts. Mr. Heinemann<br />
speare, Molière, Balzac, George Sand, George Eliot, has the reputation of being a generous publisher<br />
de Maupassant, and Sir Walter Scott were never so. and an appreciative one. He cannot have had<br />
vulgar as to affect indifference to financial affairs. a disheartening struggle with the “literary”<br />
I take it that of all peculiar signs of an essential classes. But he must know that the weak among<br />
commonness in an artist, this one of prattling them were born weak, and not made so by un-<br />
about the indignity of accepting money for "art" scrupulous middlemen.Authors are marred by<br />
is the most striking. I have never met a person over-advertisement and worthless praise--never<br />
with such insincere views who did not live on the because they insist on adequate payment, and are<br />
complaining generosity of relatives and friends. represented by efficient men of business.<br />
Art is work; the artist is a working man or<br />
PEARL MARY TERESA CRAIGIE.<br />
woman, and the moment that an author, or a critic,<br />
or a craftsman seeks to better a condition of such<br />
honesty by making it a mood or a pose instead of<br />
a necessity and a calling, he may be counted<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 36 (#416) #############################################<br />
<br />
36<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
.<br />
III.<br />
for complaint on this score. It, on the other hand,<br />
he does find that this is the case, it seems to me a<br />
An Answer to Mr. Heinemann.<br />
very good argument, from the author's point of<br />
view, for employing an agent, even at the sacri-<br />
In the October number of the Author there fice of that “intimate intercourse with the pub-<br />
appeared a most interesting letter from Mr. lisher” which Mr. Heinemann finds so helpful.<br />
W. Heinemann, on the subject of the literary Nor, again, do I see that the “immediate money<br />
agent, which stated very distinctly and lucidly return” (on account of royalties, I suppose) which<br />
the view of an eminent publisher on this ques. Mr. Heinemann accuses the agent of fostering is<br />
tion. He took no middle line, and from the procured “at the cost of all dignity and artistic<br />
point of view of both author, publisher and litera- repose.” Personally I have published books both<br />
ture, condemned the agent with resonant anathe- with and without immediate money return, but I<br />
mas. This was very valuable, because it stated do not recollect any disturbance in my own repose-<br />
the case of the publisher frankly and without fulness. In fact, I do not quite see what Mr.<br />
loophole for misunderstanding, and leaves no doubt Heinemann means.<br />
as to why the publisher-for we cannot be wrong I suppose there are bad agents as well as good<br />
in taking Mr. Heinemann's utterances as excellently ones; I suppose also there are bad publishers as<br />
representative—dislikes the agent.<br />
well as good ones, but I am happy to say I have<br />
On certain points I feel myself hopelessly incap- never yet met an inferior variety in either kind,<br />
able of agreeing with Mr. Heinemann : he says, nor do I wish to. More especially I desire to steer<br />
for instance, that “no author would be so quixotic clear of the figure, which Mr. Heinemann's vigorous<br />
as to employ a literary agent if he did not hope protest calls up—a sort of Mephistopbeles, by<br />
to get as much more out of the publisher as the whom the unfortunate author is “ pledged and<br />
agent's commission represents." Would Mr. Heine- sold body and soul to syndicates and publishers<br />
mann, therefore, argue that the landlord who on time bargains years ahead!” Now, authors are<br />
employs an agent hopes to get as much more out not probably a business-like class; they are much<br />
of the tenant as his agent's income represents ? too futile and dreamy-that, indeed, is why they<br />
Both author and landlord appear to me to employ are right to employ agents—and it is exactly to save<br />
an agent-primarily-for a very different reason, an author some gross mistake of binding himself<br />
namely, that by using one they save themselves a that agents may be, and I think often are, useful.<br />
good deal of trouble, and of time which they find Certainly I have never met with one who would<br />
they can otherwise employ more profitably. More not strongly dissuade an author from the very<br />
especially is this true, I think, of any author wbo course which, it appears to Mr. Heinemann, they<br />
either contributes to magazines or desires a serial are apt to inculcate. But here, again, publishing<br />
appearance for his work. In his case (particu- is a business, and it would surely be equally ill-<br />
larly if the author does not habitually read the judged on the part of a publisher to buy the yet<br />
magazines in which he wishes his work to appear) unwritten produce of an over-driven author, for<br />
the agent is invaluable. If he is at all competent he would probably make a very bad bargain.<br />
he will be far more likely to know that magazine Nor, again, do I see why the author should not<br />
which will be suitable for his author's work, and get as much as he can for his work. Given that<br />
in the case of serialisation what magazines have he has completed his book, his artistir effort is<br />
openings, than the author himself. Given then over. His book is now a property, to be sold,<br />
that the agent has arranged a good serialisation and the agent, rightly, so it seems to me, gets as<br />
for a story, is the publication of it then to be much for it as he can, asking terms (unless his<br />
taken out of his hands ? That does not seem to author has a strong predilection for a certain<br />
me quite fair.<br />
publisher-and I think most authors have) not<br />
Publishing is a business. At least, in the from one house only, but, it the terms there offered<br />
majority of cases I do not suppose that a man do not seem sufficient, from another, or, if he<br />
embraces that calling with the sole and altruistic chooses, from a third. Why he should let one<br />
aim of bringing masterpieces within the reach of publisher have it cheap, if, ceteris paribus, he can<br />
the million (though he is probably quite happy in get more from another, or why such a proceeding<br />
reaching the million); and, while no good publisher is derogatory to literature, I cannot imagine. But,<br />
would wish that the imprint of his house should as this business of securing the best market for<br />
godfather a work of rank and beastly tendency, the goods is a matter requiring time, trouble, and<br />
yet his object is primarily to make his business experience, and is not to all a congenial employ.<br />
pay. Unless, then, he finds that the employment ment, it seems to me only wise of the author to<br />
of an agent by an author tends to make his busi- entrust it to someone who presumably has the<br />
ness less paying, I do not see what grounds he has experience, and for whose time and trouble he is<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 37 (#417) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
37<br />
content to pay. And here, I imagine, Mr. Heine- so to do, and, as a rule, I think he does it. Besides,<br />
mann's far more serious accusation against the he thereby increases his own dividends.<br />
agents applies. He says he has not always found One word more. If all publishers were like<br />
them scrupulously honest. It is very distressing Mr. Heinemann, I think the calling of the agent<br />
that it is so, but, on the other hand, from the would be seriously endangered. But in the present<br />
author's point of view, it is equally distressing to state of this imperfect world they are not. Mr.<br />
find he has in his ignorance signed some contract Heinemann with a becoming modesty assumes<br />
which gives his publisher a quite undue share of that they are. I wish I agreed with him.<br />
profit in the success of his book. Such contracts<br />
E. F. BENSON.<br />
have been signed. But it is really beside the point<br />
to argue the question on such grounds. Dishonest<br />
agents I hope are as rare as dishonest publishers,<br />
IV.<br />
and bona fides must be assumed for the abstract<br />
argument.<br />
With regard to the very interesting discussion<br />
Nor is it on such grounds that personally I now being carried on in your paper in reference<br />
employ an agent. As I have said, I have never to Literary Agents, I venture to offer a few<br />
yet met with a dishonest publisher, and I do not suggestions<br />
employ an agent to save me from his possible A n inexperienced author—I mean an author who<br />
clutches. On the other hand, in the case of a is not well acquainted with the publications or<br />
book which I once published without employing the personal characters and characteristics of large<br />
an agent, I found that no account had been rendered numbers of publishers—is very likely to attack the<br />
to me for over three years, and that when, with wrong publisher, or to attack the right publisher<br />
suitable courtesy I hope, I applied for it, it was in the wrong way or at the wrong time. I<br />
not without some personal trouble and "dunning" know this by bitter experience. Fortunately (or<br />
that I succeeded in getting it. Now, I object to unfortunately), I still believed that my books<br />
dunning anybody : I do not happen to like it. ought to be published. But the number of<br />
But I do not in the least object to instructing my possible publishers was too vast. It was the same<br />
agent to do so. That is one of the things for which with editors. There were too many of them, and<br />
“he is there." And, in this case, I regretted I. I did not know which (if any) would be likely to<br />
had not employed him before.<br />
accept this or that article at this or that time.<br />
Finally, I disagree with Mr. Heinemann in his One of my chief mistakes was to try the old-<br />
assertion that agents are of no use to the untried established firms first.<br />
author who at present has no market. It seems Then I found an experienced agent, and he<br />
to me that it is exactly here—if they are com- immediately said, “ This piece of work will be<br />
petent—where they are most useful. The agent accepted by A. or by B. or by C. or-by no one.<br />
knows, more or less, what ten per cent. on a six. That piece of work we'll offer to A., if he does<br />
shilling book means. The untried author has no idea. not accept the first piece. This third piece of<br />
And this innocent child of nature is confronted work is, I fear, hopeless." Within a few weeks<br />
with a document which says that twelve copies he had placed all the MSS., except two, that I<br />
are counted as eleven, or thirteen (I forget which), put into his hands, and had bearded several lions<br />
that he receives ten per cent. on the first thousand (as I then thought them) and had arranged for<br />
and twelve and a half per cent. on the second future works. Apart from this agent I think I<br />
that in case of a colonial edition he gets 211, per should have given up in despair.<br />
copy, and something obscure occurs to remainders, With another agent, however, I might have<br />
which are also obscure. More particularly there paid initial fees and then have been just as badly<br />
may be a sublime silence about American sales and off as before. But it seems to me that the<br />
American copyright, and he knows nothing of the inexperienced author is likely to do better if he<br />
stringency of law prevailing in that remarkable tries to choose an agent than if he tries to choose<br />
continent, which really seems expressly designed a publisher or editor. For there are far fewer agents<br />
for the confusion of budding authors, and as likely than publishers or editors. It is far harder to make<br />
as not American rights and protection then get mistakes in attempts to find a good agent.<br />
left out of the contract altogether. Poor bleating There is another point. The sensitive author<br />
lamb! yet that sinister shepherd the agent could despairs because he has his MS. rejected, let us<br />
have saved him.<br />
say, by two publishers. They state that they do<br />
And here I speak from bitter experience. True, not see a public for the book. The agent is not<br />
it is not in any sense at all the business of the sensitive : offer him a good commission, and he<br />
English publisher to make his author acquainted will try again and again. He may be refused by<br />
with copyright law. But it is the agent's business some publisher who would have accepted the MS,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 38 (#418) #############################################<br />
<br />
38<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
direct from the author. But I fancy that few for complaint. All other arguments against the<br />
publishers are such fools as to refuse a good book agent having failed, it is now declared that the<br />
because it comes through an agent, or to accept a literary diplomatist is only of use to authors of<br />
bad book because it comes direct from the author. established reputation. That I can deny as far as<br />
How little right an author has to be discouraged my own experience has shown. Years ago, when I<br />
simply and solely because one or two publishers was unknown, and as yet scarcely published, it was<br />
have refused some book, numerous authors past my agent who took me by the hand. To him I<br />
and present can testify. Within a week I had a have applied for advice in more than one crisis of<br />
MS. refused by one publisher (A.), as having no a somewhat adventurous career, and to his good<br />
likely sale, and then quite eagerly accepted by judgment and guidance I owe whatever fruit of<br />
another publisher (B.). B. at the same time my work I now enjoy. It is the young and in-<br />
refused a second MS. for the very reason that A. experienced writer who is in need of advice. To<br />
had just given, and this second MS. was straight the established author the agent is an absolute<br />
way accepted by A.<br />
necessity, in order to look after his interests in<br />
The agent, then, is likely to save the author various directions, and more especially so when, as<br />
from too hasty despair ; but, on the other hand, in my own case, the author habitually resides out<br />
should the author have mistaken his profession in of England, and is unable to have personal inter-<br />
life, then no despair can be too hasty. And the views with editors or publishers.<br />
agent who honestly or dishonestly encourages false Finally, I should like to ask Mr. Heinemann,<br />
hopes may be wasting some of the most valuable who has (in print) such a marked antipathy to the<br />
months or years of a man's whole life. I should literary agent, a single but direct question. My<br />
add that, if the author refuses to pay the agent brother authors and myself would be interested to<br />
anything until he shall have placed the MS., and know whether it is not a fact that in order to effect<br />
agrees to pay a royalty then, the agent will not be the sale of his English books in America he<br />
encouraged to take up MSS. which he knows to be actually employs a literary agent in New York !<br />
utterly “unlikely.” The worst possible plan seems Until the question is answered further comment<br />
to me to pay the agent his full pay in advance, is needless.<br />
whether he shall succeed or not. For then he<br />
Yours truly,<br />
only has the expense of carrying or posting the<br />
WILLIAM LE QUEUX.<br />
MS. to fresh publishers or editors at varying Castor, Peterborough,<br />
intervals. He has comparatively little interest October 12th, 1901.<br />
in really exerting himself and interviewing the<br />
publisher or editor personally, as my agent did<br />
with such good effect.<br />
EUSTACE MILES.<br />
SIR,—It happens occasionally that a publisher<br />
may act as an agent. For instance, a well-known<br />
v.<br />
firm succeeded in serialising a novel which it had<br />
To the Editor of THE AUTHOR.<br />
undertaken to issue for me, the commission was<br />
fifty per cent! I am not complaining of the rate,<br />
SIR,—In common with many other authors I<br />
because it had been specified in the previous agree-<br />
have been much amused and somewhat surprised<br />
ment. I have by me other agreements signed by<br />
at Mr. Hcinemann's remarks regarding that much-<br />
a different firm in which also it is stated that the<br />
abused necessity to the novelist, the literary<br />
commission in the event of serialisation is to be<br />
agent. It seeins to me that the majority of the<br />
fifty per cent. Now, my agent's commission is<br />
reasons given for objecting to the agent are the<br />
only ten per cent.<br />
very reasons why an author should employ him.<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
But, apart from these, Mr. Heinemaun makes a<br />
Fact.<br />
distinct assertion which is certainly open to con-<br />
tradiction when he complains that the agent fosters<br />
in the author a spirit of greed. I have no know-<br />
DURING the summer months the Secretary<br />
ledge of the methods of other agents save my own, received a letter, of which the following is a<br />
but I can honestly say that my own agent, in<br />
copy :-<br />
selling one of my books, keeps before him the fact<br />
that the sale is not in my best interests if the<br />
“Dear Sir, I have decided to discontinue my sabscrip-<br />
publisher does not have an opportunity of making<br />
tion to the Authors' Society. I have put my affairs as<br />
regards my literary work into the hands of an agent. With<br />
a fair profit.<br />
many thanks for the kind help you have so often given me,<br />
Personally I fail to see Mr. Heinemann's cause believe me to be, very truly yours,"<br />
VI.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 39 (#419) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
39<br />
We would like to make some remarks upon it.<br />
In the early days of the Society the publishers were<br />
very naturally opposed to the idea of having their<br />
agreements and their methods of doing business<br />
overlooked by the Society of Authors, and one of<br />
the best known houses sent round a circular to all<br />
the authors who published with it, asking them<br />
not to join the Society. Those days, we are glad<br />
to say, have long passed ; not only have authors as<br />
a mass found the Society useful, but even in some<br />
instances the publishers have been bound to<br />
acknowledge that the work it does is good and<br />
fair. From the letter quoted above it would<br />
appear that the agent is also objecting to have his<br />
methods looked into from the point of view of the<br />
Authors' Society. That a feeling against having<br />
their business arrangements overlooked has been<br />
growing amongst agents is clear from the informa-<br />
tion that has come to the Society. The interest of<br />
publisher and author is bound to be antagonistic ;<br />
it is natural, therefore, that the publisher should<br />
object. The interest of agent and author is<br />
identical. It is very serious, therefore, for the<br />
author when the agent assumes an attitude of<br />
antagonism. We must state finally that the<br />
placing of your work in the hands of an agent<br />
is an additional reason for belonging to the<br />
Society, as an author in this position has two<br />
people to look after, firstly the publisher,<br />
secondly the agent.<br />
Perhaps after all the letter was only an outcome<br />
of the silly season.<br />
standing against the total from “ The Cost of Pro-<br />
duction ” of £7 13s. The moulding is the same<br />
price in both estimates, and the binding also.<br />
When a fresh edition of“ The Cost of Production”<br />
is brought out it will have to be entirely revised,<br />
and it is hoped that it will be possible to include<br />
an exhaustive statement at the same time of the<br />
American cost, which American publishers boast<br />
is as low if not lower than the English.<br />
Authors, note this statement.<br />
ESTIMATE FROM " THE COST OF PRODUCTION.”<br />
500 Copies, crown 8vo, Small Pica type,<br />
Composition, 17 sheets at €1 78. 6d.<br />
per sheet .......... ............. 423 7 6<br />
Printing, 17 sheets at 58, 9d. per sheet 4 17 9<br />
Paper, , „ 98.<br />
7 13 0<br />
Moulding,<br />
:58.<br />
5 0<br />
Binding, at 4d, a vol. .... ....... 8 6 8<br />
.<br />
£48 911<br />
RECENT PRINTER'S ESTIMATE.<br />
500 Copies, crown 8vo, set in Small Pica.<br />
Composition, 17 sheets at 228. 6d ....... €19 26<br />
Printing, 17 sheets at 58. 3d............. 4 9 3<br />
Paper, 8£ reams, 60 double-crown 158. 6 7 6<br />
Moulding only, 5s. ..........<br />
Binding, 4d....<br />
8 6 8<br />
£42 10 11<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
PROPERTY.<br />
I.-Cost of Production.<br />
THE first estimate printed below is taken from<br />
1 the third edition of “The Cost of Production,”<br />
which was issued in 1891.<br />
The book is now out of print; but to show that<br />
the prices for printing, paper, etc., were fair at the<br />
time of issue-although at first this was frequently<br />
denied by the publishers—and are fair at the<br />
present date, a second estimate is put forward<br />
which was obtained from a printer only a year<br />
ago. The printer's name is not given, but it is<br />
sufficient to state that he is a man in a large way<br />
of business, with works in the neighbourhood of<br />
London, who does extensive trade with the chief<br />
publishers.<br />
On comparing the two estimates, it will be seen<br />
that the composition is considerably cheaper, as<br />
much as õs, a sheet, and the printing 6d. a sheet.<br />
The paper is also cheaper, the total £6 78. 6d.<br />
II.-American Copyright.<br />
The Publishers' Circular has an article with<br />
regard to the production and circulation of books<br />
in America, and complains, as is not unnatural,<br />
of the lack of reciprocity in the American Copy-<br />
right Law. It points out that many publishing<br />
houses have started branch offices in America.<br />
This effort of English publishers is, no doubt, use-<br />
ful, both for the trade and for the English authors ;<br />
but the Publishers' Circular makes a suggestion<br />
that English printers ought rather to start branch<br />
establishments in New York. This suggestion,<br />
from the author's point of view, would be much<br />
more satisfactory than a branch publishing house,<br />
and we commend it to the notice of some of the<br />
larger printing firms. It is useless at this hour of<br />
the day to grumble about the American Copyright<br />
Law. It is better than no copyright law, but the<br />
Americans, save only a small intellectual minority,<br />
have failed to grasp the great principles referring<br />
to literary property<br />
The day may come, and we hope at no distant<br />
date, when they will take a more enlightened view<br />
of the position, and join the signatories of the<br />
Berne Convention.<br />
What authors have to do at present is to make the<br />
best of existing circumstances, and it will be more<br />
satisfactory for the profession to have a trustworthy<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 40 (#420) #############################################<br />
<br />
40<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
English printer established in New York than an no reason why it should not also become of unlimited<br />
English publisher, however trustworthy.<br />
duration.<br />
"A new law published in the latest Gazette brings Siam<br />
into line with Western nations in the matter of copyright.<br />
The preamble points out that hitherto authors have had no<br />
III.-A Publisher's Trick.<br />
protection for their work in this country, anyone baving<br />
A well-kuown publisher, writing to an author<br />
the right to republish and sell any book. The new enact-<br />
ment follows the lines of the English law, giving protection<br />
who objected to the terms of his agreement, stated<br />
for forty-two years, or the period of the author's life, with<br />
as follows, “ that the agreement was settled by a grace of seven years, whichever is the longer. To copy-<br />
--- , K.C., and is identical with the one signed right a book it has to be registered at the Royal Scribe<br />
by all my authors."<br />
Department within twelve months after publication ; the<br />
fee charged is five ticals, and a copy has to be presented to<br />
We have frequently pointed out before that the<br />
the Department mentioned, another to the Royal Library,<br />
Publishers' Agreements issued by the Publishers' and another to the Royal Buddhist Library at Wat<br />
Association were approved by Mr. Joseph Walton, Benchamabopit. Translation is also prohibited. The<br />
K.C., who has recently been raised to the Bench,<br />
passing of such a law is a wise proceeding, even if the<br />
result on literature cannot be expected to be very notice-<br />
and we have shown in the pamphlet published<br />
able. We hope it may have the effect of encouraging the<br />
by the Society how disastrous they are to authors. Siamese author. But as trade bulks so very much larger<br />
Mr. Walton, no doubt, followed his instructions than letters in modern Siam, it is to be trusted that the<br />
and approved the agreements that best served bis<br />
Government will without delay follow up this law with<br />
another giving protection to trade marks. The need of<br />
clients, the publishers. So that the point which<br />
some system of registration which will protect both the<br />
the publisher is putting forward, although it has seller and the buyer of genuine articles is very real. The<br />
been frequently successful in silencing the objec consular courts in Bangkok enforce laws to prevent the<br />
tions of authors, is really no argument whatever<br />
perpetration of such frauds, and the anomaly of the<br />
Siamese courts being unable to do anything in the matter<br />
to induce an author to sign an agreement. In<br />
has been pointed out often enough."<br />
fact, if anything, it should at once lead him in<br />
the opposite direction. A clever K.C., when asked<br />
to draw an agreement, would be bound to make<br />
that agreement more strongly in favour of his<br />
V.–Press Copyright.<br />
client than the layman who might be drawing a The letter in your last number signed “Old<br />
similar document.<br />
Bird," and a recent correspondence in a contem-<br />
The second part of the publisher's statement is porary anent the republication of a leading article<br />
untrue. But if it were true, it is no argument, in a London newspaper practically unaltered in<br />
because certain authors are ill-advised in signing matter or phrase, the second version differing only<br />
an agreement, that other authors should be equally from the first in the signature appended, suggest<br />
ill-advised, and we have pointed out on former a larger question than any personal dispute. The<br />
occasions with regard to the publication of books subject of press copyright is one which has often<br />
in a series what a trap this argument has been to been discussed, and the possible legislation for its<br />
the unwary author.<br />
betterment has been many times forecast, but the<br />
Again we find it necessary to put forward these result so far is nil. A quarter of a century ago,<br />
remarks, because again the publisher brings forward when the mills of the press, following a high pre-<br />
his misleading statements.<br />
cedent, ground slowly, the grievance of journalistic<br />
theft was not so keenly felt and the delinquent<br />
was only in a small way of business. At present<br />
the malpractice has become so systematic and<br />
IV.—Copyright in Siam.<br />
universal that we have arrived at the preposterous<br />
We print the following cutting from the Bangkok position of a journal being deliberately undersold<br />
Times.<br />
and paradoxically pushed out of the market by<br />
It is interesting as showing the gradual evolution the illegitimate sale of its own contents.<br />
of literary copyright in foreign countries. It was This is a sweeping statement. Let us examine<br />
not long ago that Japan joined the Berne Conven- it. Examples of the Tit Bit order of papers in<br />
tion, and now Siam has passed a Copyright Law. which the same paragraph goes the round of all<br />
This, perhaps, may be followed by their becoming and appears consecutively in the whole series are<br />
signatories to the treaty.<br />
not relied on. The identical item apparently<br />
There seems to be little doubt that as friendly serves as well for all as for each, and from the<br />
intercourse between nations increases, copyright regularity with which it reappears, and from the<br />
will become universal at no distant date, and it dim memories which it often reawakens, it was<br />
is to be hoped that when this point is realised, not original to the paper first issuing it. Nor is<br />
legislators will also realise that there is absolutely the dissemination of the world's news, the beneficent<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 41 (#421) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
41<br />
growth of knowledge through journalistic inter- No doubt it is hard for a Government, or a<br />
change, the popularisation of the eternal verities Parliament, smothered in a maze of heterogeneous<br />
in the form of meteorological reports, or the duties which range from the conduct of a great<br />
apotheosis of the commonplace in paragraphs, or war abroad to the transfer of a constable or the<br />
mishaps to battleships, herein impeached. No trespass of a goat at home, to undertake new<br />
newspaper possesses copyright in the incidence of legislation on any question which presents im-<br />
events or their direction; the weather is the (some- mediate as well as ultimate difficulties. And<br />
times undesirable) heritage of mankind. But the certainly the question of press copyright presents<br />
comments of the editor on the mismanagement of both. Nevertheless it should be attacked. The<br />
the universe, and the experiences of the contributor present anomalous conditions are unfair to honest<br />
in this insignificant microcosm, are as much their journals, unjust to industrious contributors, and a<br />
own copyright, and should be as rigidly protected fraud on the purchasing public.<br />
by the law, as the jocularities of the farceur or the<br />
OUTLANDER.<br />
inventions of the fictionist. Take a concrete<br />
instance of the journalistic buccaneer and note his<br />
NOTE.— The law on the subject is quite clear. If<br />
nefarious influence.<br />
a paper does not care to enforce its rights, the<br />
There is a well-known high-class weekly matter is different. The Times has on sundry<br />
provincial paper, with an enormous circulation, occasions brought actions and has shown very<br />
published at one penny, which reprints in every effectively that a paper, if it desires, can, under the<br />
issue several columns from London sixpenny existing law, absolutely protect its articles and<br />
journals. In some cases the acknowledgment of contributions.-ED.<br />
the source from which these are lifted is given<br />
prominently at the beginning or end of the matter<br />
annexed. Often, however, it is embodied in the<br />
VI.<br />
middle of the article—"says a writer in,” “writes<br />
The following cutting from the Daily Chronicle<br />
Mr. — in” – so that to a casual observer the<br />
will be of interest to dramatic authors :-<br />
article in question is original matter specially<br />
contributed to the paper. This great provincial<br />
An author's rights are strangely interpreted by the com.<br />
mittee and stage management of the Comédie Française.<br />
newspaper also prints weekly a notice in heavy<br />
It appears that M. Gaston Schefer, whose piece, “ Le Roi,"<br />
type to the effect that it requires no outside is about to be produced, has been harassed during the<br />
contributions and will pay for none such. I rehearsal period by being forced to alter and cut his scenes<br />
cannot afford to buy the London journal at six-<br />
to please M. Le Bargy, who is entrusted with the staging<br />
according to the rules of the theatre. The playwright<br />
pence when I can get all of it I have time to read<br />
revolted at last when he was coolly asked to change the<br />
in the provincial paper for a penny. The provin dénouement which makes the "King" abdicate from sheer<br />
cial paper cannot afford to pay me for an original discouragement. M. Jules Claretie has under pressure<br />
contribution when it, and the contemporaries with<br />
resolved to produce “Le Roi" in its intact form almost<br />
immediately.<br />
which it must compete, can appropriate what they<br />
please gratis from journals which have paid A dispute of this kind not infrequently arises<br />
liberally for the “copy" of which they are thus with regard to theatrical representation. It can<br />
audaciously dispossessed.<br />
only be settled in two ways, (1) by agreement,<br />
This state of affairs is disgraceful. The law (2) by the doctrine of expediency.<br />
must deal with it. It must be made as penal to There are many dramatic writers of established<br />
steal a journal's matter as a man's hat. Library position who insist upon inserting a clause in their<br />
books and umbrellas have long, by a curious mental agreement that their piece must not be altered,<br />
obliquity, been regarded as communal. But this but must be acted verbatim. They sell a licence<br />
specialisation is wholly irrational. As it exists, to perform to an actor-manager. If any dispute<br />
however, we must put up with it. And in the arises as to the wording of the play or its alteration,<br />
same way journals which reciprocate each other's the author can either refer to the agreement and<br />
theft may very well be left to fight the matter out enforce his rights as against the manager, or, if he<br />
amongst themselves. The law does not concern deems it expedient, accept the alteration and let<br />
itself very intimately with the lighter wrangles of the matter go forward.<br />
professed lawbreakers, and a man in Whitechapel In the case of young dramatic authors it is very<br />
may kick his wife to death at leisure provided he often impossible to insert a clause of this kind.<br />
observe the amenities by not doing it in the street. Under these circumstances, if the manager has<br />
But it is certainly time that journals which employ merely a licence to perform the play, he must per-<br />
their own staff and pay their own contributors form that play and no other play, and may not<br />
should have legal protection from the hooligans alter it.<br />
of the press.<br />
The question of expediency may again arise, as<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 42 (#422) #############################################<br />
<br />
42<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
sibethor<br />
it is more important for a young author to have inadequate private income by reviewing. In this<br />
his play put before the public than it is to obtain career I was very fairly successful. Not that I flatter<br />
a monetary return by way of damages from a myself that I was qualified for my task by any<br />
manager, however large.<br />
special interest in or knowledge of literature. Apart<br />
The attention of all dramatic authors must be from a certain natural turn for epigram, I consider<br />
drawn to the point which is put forward in the that my success was due to the practical view I<br />
“Warnings to Dramatic Authors," namely, that it is took of my occupation. I have no doubt from<br />
essential to give to a manager a licence to perform what I know of you and of your work that your<br />
only. If he transfers the whole of his rights, he talents are superior to any of which I could boast,<br />
hands over a piece of property which, within certain while you have always shown a genuine love of<br />
bounds, a manager will be able to alter and vary. letters, a taste which I have been free to develope<br />
If he gives the licence to perform, a manager only in later years. I doubt, however, if either<br />
can only perform what has been handed to him as faculty or enthusiasm will compensate for the new-<br />
a whole play, and can make no alteration without fangled scruples by which I understand that you<br />
the consent and sanction of the author.<br />
are hampered.<br />
From the foregoing quotation it is really impos- Let me deal with some of these. I hear that it<br />
sible to see what were the author's rights, as every. is a fixed principle with you never to review<br />
thing must depend upon the form of agreement, a book unless you have read it, or at least the<br />
but it is sufficient to state that authors should avoid greater part of it. Things must certainly have<br />
all chance of such disputes arising by settling the changed since the good old times. You surely<br />
agreement on a satisfactory basis before the play is realise how such a method must limit your output.<br />
handed over.<br />
Unless the standard of remuneration has been<br />
greatly raised, I cannot understand how the most<br />
modest income can be earned on such terms. Nor<br />
VII.<br />
can I believe that this system prevails generally<br />
The“Journal of the American Society of Authors” among your contemporaries. I notice, for example,<br />
states that Mr. Vanderbilt has had his house that one of the “weeklies " reviews, in a single<br />
both the exterior and the interior-photographed issue, from six to twelve novels, all the notices<br />
from all points of vantage with a view of pro- being, so far as I can judge, by the same hand.<br />
tecting himself, by copywriting every negative; Cau it be supposed that the reviewer reads from<br />
against the man with the Kodak.<br />
six to twelve novels to make “copy” worth at most<br />
From the English point of view, the execution from two to four guineas ?<br />
of Mr. Vanderbilt's idea does not afford him any In my own time the problem for us reviewers was<br />
protection. There is no doubt that to whatever far more strict. Besides receiving our honorarium<br />
extent a private house has been brought under the for “copy," we kept and sold the book reviewed, a<br />
camera by one person, this would not prevent any custom which I understand is now less common.<br />
one else from taking a photograph from exactly the The volume fetched more if the pages were uncut ;<br />
same standpoint with exactly the same effect, if and in order to reap the full harvest, we had to<br />
this were possible; but it would be a distinct criticise on the strength of such limited examina-<br />
infringement of copyright to photograph another tion as this condition prescribed. This may seem<br />
person's photograph or in any way to copy his to you to be a difficult or risky method. In point<br />
original negative.<br />
of fact, it was quite possible to concoct a plausible<br />
judgment from glimpses between the sheets. Often<br />
the arrangement of these admitted of a glance at<br />
AN OLD TO A YOUNG REVIEWER.<br />
the Preface, which might prove invaluable : the<br />
method of the book was usually ascertainable from<br />
accessible portions : samples of style and quotations<br />
M Y DEAR GEORGE,--Your relatives, who could be extracted and adapted to the critical<br />
I are naturally anxious for your success in the attitude assumed by the reviewer ; and many<br />
career on which you have now for some time other methods were developed by practice. Indeed,<br />
been embarked, have asked me to advise you from my among the confraternity with which I associated,<br />
own past experience, especially with regard to certain he would have passed as a mere “ 'prentice hand”<br />
scruples which I hear that you entertain, and which who thought it necessary to mutilate his books by<br />
seem likely to injure your prospects. You are cutting their pages. I do indeed recall that on<br />
aware that before my marriage with your poor one occasion I got into trouble with my editor in<br />
aunt, which brought me, if not domestic happiness, consequence of an insufficient examination of a<br />
at least the modest competence which I still enjoy, work he had submitted to me. I had condemned<br />
I was compelled for many years to supplement an it for giving no illustrations, though the subject<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 43 (#423) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
43<br />
was one which eminently demanded them. On would be more beneficial to the interests of a book<br />
closer examination the book proved to be full of than one of censure. I remember, for example,<br />
illustrations, though these, being mainly on the that a friend of mine, by a savage onslaught, sent<br />
pages, had escaped my notice. This misadventure a book through three editions. He had written<br />
was, however, condoned in consideration of my long that “if the public was prepared to wade through<br />
tried devotion to the interests of the paper. a desert of dulness in search of an occasional oasis<br />
You, as I hear, maintain that you can form an of impropriety," that was the book for it. The<br />
opinion of a book only after full perusal. In my public was so prepared, and made a rush for it, such<br />
own experience the reviewer was rarely called upon as no "puff” could have secured. Remember, too,<br />
for an independent judgment. Either his cue was that no author of experience ever protests, and if<br />
given him, or his acquaintance with the interests he does, no editor need take any notice. Besides,<br />
or tendency of the paper indicated what sort of when all is said and done, you, as the father of a<br />
notice would be acceptable. There were in those young family, have no right to take any such line<br />
days very distinct divisions of political or literary as will limit your earnings or alienate your<br />
faction which had to be reckoned with : there was employers. Do not allow any whimsical scruples<br />
also keen rivalry between publishing firms, as to hamper your career. Justice, like Charity,<br />
between those of “Bungay and Bacon.” Even if begins at home.<br />
these considerations did not indicate the line to be If, after all that I have said, you are still deter-<br />
taken, we could be sure that the proprietors of the mined to waste your time in reading your books, I<br />
paper would not be too well pleased if we “ slated " advise you to adopt a plan, not unknown in my<br />
a work put out by a publisher who spent hundreds own day. You must make your reading go as far<br />
a year in advertisements with us, or in praising as possible by multiplying your reviews. I myself<br />
the publications of those who neglected us. And, at one time adopted this method with some success.<br />
if the author's reputation suffered in consequence, I wrote anonymously (as many notices as I could<br />
surely author and publisher are in the same boat. place), under a nom de plume, and in my own name.<br />
They have combined their interests, and must sink There was in this system the charm of variety.<br />
or swim together. The remedy, moreover, was in One had to adapt the several notices to the views<br />
the publisher's own hands. Also it not infrequently of each editor, or the interests of each paper, and<br />
happened that author or publisher had been asked to vary the style so as to escape identification. If<br />
and selfishly refused some favour : early sheets, for I were reviewing the work of any writer of influence,<br />
example, or an interview ; and it was only just I usually arranged that the most laudatory notice<br />
that he should suffer for his curmudgeonliness. should be that which appeared under my own<br />
And, apart from these considerations of business, name. By this means it not infrequently happened<br />
it seldom occurred that the author was entirely that, while my various notices neutralised each<br />
dissociated from our personal likes or dislikes. other, there accrued to my account a valuable<br />
Either he was a friend or enemy, or the friend or friendship and literary alliance, as well as the<br />
relation of some one towards whom we had favour reputation of a kindly critic. This may prove to<br />
or the reverse. No one, surely, would grudge the you by no means the least valuable hint I am able<br />
reviewer his satisfaction in fulfilling the claims of to give.<br />
friendship ; nor consider him less justified in using I am told that it is becoming a common practice<br />
his opportunity so soon as his enemy had, by for editors of the higher class to entrust the books<br />
publication, delivered himself into his hands. I sent them to specialists on the subject treated, to<br />
well remember the thrill of anticipation with which authors, and to men of literary culture and of<br />
we watched the publishers' announcements.<br />
leisure, to whom the honorarium is of less impor-<br />
In the absence of any such predisposing senti- tance than interest in the subject. As for the<br />
ments or interests, the reviewer had to consider specialist, I would ask such editors what they<br />
what kind of notice best suited his style and the suppose encyclopædias were made for ; and, with<br />
ear of the public. My own manner lent itself regard to the employment of amateurs, whether<br />
more readily to incisiveness, and in those days they think it fair to take the bread out of the<br />
the public loved dissection. These considerations mouths of a diligent, long-suffering, and honour-<br />
necessarily influenced the tone of my anonymous able profession in order to increase the already suffi-<br />
reviews.<br />
cient incomes of dilettanti ? Personally I have<br />
You will ask, no doubt, how this method could no fear that this movement will go far. Such<br />
secure justice to authors. Is it not clear that, for superior persons are little likely to fall in with the<br />
them, it all came right in the end ? If the Argus rules of the game : they will insist on taking their<br />
condemned from such motives as I have indicated, own line, and there will be an inevitable return to<br />
the Fulminator would praise on analogous grounds; the regular hand, prepared to perform his allotted<br />
nor could it be assumed that a laudatory notice task punctually and obediently. For my own part,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 44 (#424) #############################################<br />
<br />
44<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
I may confidently say that from the moment I When will educational writers as a body come to<br />
became independent I have never deprived my late learn the real value of the product of their brain ?<br />
profession of a sixpence. I have honourably When will they join together to combat the<br />
abstained from writing, and have simply enjoyed present prices, to prevent the oft-repeated claim of<br />
my leisure. Though never a bookish man, I have certain publishers that they make their profits on<br />
acquired a considerable taste for letters, a taste educational works ? and when will they remember<br />
which, during my literary career, I had neither that the value of the smallest primer must not be<br />
time nor inclination to cultivate, and have often calculated from the mere time it takes to put pen<br />
been ainused to find how great a delight I can take to paper, but must be reckoned from the time<br />
in books which I had pronounced unreadable. spent in obtaining a life-long experience as scholar<br />
I sincerely hope that this long letter may not be and teacher ?<br />
thrown away on you, and that, by giving due atten The Committee of the Society have from time<br />
tion to the precepts and example I have endeavoured to time proclaimed this. It is not without its use<br />
to put before you, you may attain to the success to state it once again.<br />
which I am sure your talents are able to command. When the leaders of one of the greatest pro-<br />
fessions have realised that selling their stored<br />
I am,<br />
knowledge cheap is not generous, is not altruistic,<br />
Your affectionate Uncle,<br />
does not benefit the vast numbers who are yearning<br />
JUDAS QUILLDRIVER. for that knowledge, but only puts profits into<br />
the pocket of the publisher, they will not only<br />
deservedly reap what they have laboriously sown,<br />
THE PUBLICATION OF EDUCATIONAL but will be acting in a kindly and generous spirit<br />
BOOKS.<br />
towards those who are beginning to struggle along<br />
the paths that they as masters have long ago left<br />
behind them.<br />
Another Illustration.<br />
To show that this is no imagined statement, it<br />
SIR,- The article on “ Literary Earnings” in your issue<br />
is sufficient to mention that in one or two cases<br />
of Tuesday last, by Mr. A. J. Church, is very interesting that have come before the Society where educa-<br />
May 1, as one who has had a similar experience, be allowed tional writers have troubled to publish their own<br />
to make a brief statement of its practical results! Like<br />
books-in spite of all the disadvantages of fight-<br />
Mr. Church, I began with a book of school exercises, which<br />
is still on sale. This was in 1876, twenty-six years ago to<br />
ing against trade prejudices and trade prices—they<br />
the present year, inclusive. During this time I have gathered in for themselves a substantial and, in<br />
edited or compiled twenty books in all, for which I have<br />
some cases, a golden harvest.<br />
received (in round numbers) £2,400-i.e., not far off €100<br />
It must once again be stated that the circula-<br />
per annum. These include (1) Elementary school books,<br />
such as Latin and Greek exercises and selected passages<br />
tion of successful educational books is enormous<br />
for translation ; (2) school editions of classical authors, and continued, and surpasses by thousands the<br />
with notes and introductions ; (3) annotated editions of circulation of any work of fiction.<br />
two English classics. The last cost more time and trouble<br />
G. H. T.<br />
than all the rest, and the result has been that I have<br />
received on an average less than 65 per annum for one of<br />
these books and nothing at all for the other, against which<br />
a considerable debt is still standing. As to the school<br />
BOOKSELLING.<br />
books, nearly three-fourths of the protit has come from the<br />
selected extracts and exercises, compilations requiring very<br />
little brain-work-only a certain amount of judgment gained<br />
by experience in teaching. Of the classical texts with notes<br />
The “Net” System.<br />
I find that those which cost the most labour in production M HE object of this paper, which is written at<br />
have proved least remunerative. During the past year<br />
1 the request of the Editor of The Author, is<br />
about 2,000 copies of these editions were sold, comprising<br />
thirteen volumes, of which only five gained any profits ; of<br />
two-fold : in the first place, I wish to show<br />
the " selection" books (five in all) were sold 3,124 copies, that the “net" system was not devised in the<br />
yielding a profit of over £100. I have not yet had a interests of one class, the booksellers, at the<br />
statement of accounts for the English books above men.<br />
expense of the authors and the publishers, but that<br />
tioned, which are published by another firm ; but, judging<br />
by the average of former years, I should say the profits<br />
the interests of authors and publishers have been<br />
from them will not be over £5, probably somewhat less. considered equally with those of the booksellers ;<br />
Yours, &c.,<br />
and, secondly, to deal with a few of the objections<br />
C. S. JERRAM. raised against the system.<br />
Oxford, September 14.<br />
The usual discount given by the booksellers to<br />
By the kind permission of the author, the above the public for cash payment on“ ordinary” books,<br />
letter, which appeared in the Westminster Gazette, is i.e., on books not published at “net" prices, is<br />
printed in these pages.<br />
25 per cent. off the published prices, or “3d. in the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 45 (#425) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
45<br />
shilling.” Now it has been proved that with such consideration if it were the case, as is contended<br />
a discount, that part of a bookseller's business by, some critics, that the days of bookselling are<br />
which consists of the selling of new books, cannot past. If the conditions of the time had brought<br />
be made to pay. I say “cannot be made to pay” it about that the decay of bookselling did not<br />
advisedly, for the “new books” department must matter, then the booksellers would have to be left<br />
pay its share of the cost of rent, assistance, and to their fate. It is true that the conditions of<br />
incidental expenses of the business, and under these the time have changed. The spread of education,<br />
conditions this department yields no profit, and and the introduction of free libraries, have made the<br />
often involves a loss. It has long been known in position of the bookseller different from what it<br />
a general way that this was so, and that book- was. But though it is generally agreed that his<br />
selling was fast decaying ; but it has now been position is different, it is equally felt that his<br />
shown from figures that with the heavy expenses existence is necessary. Sir Walter Besant has<br />
required for the upkeep of a bookselling business, frequently insisted in The Author, with much<br />
it is impossible to make it pay at “threepence in emphasis, that the bookseller's counter is an<br />
the shilling” discount. The booksellers who do essential element in the publication of a book,<br />
make a living out of their business, do not make and that no book is really published till it has<br />
it off the sale of new books; they make it off other found its place there.<br />
things, such as second-hand books, or stationery, or We are thus placed in this dilemma :--On<br />
remainders, or fancy goods, or a circulating library. the one hand, we have booksellers working under<br />
It will thus be seen that there is not much conditions which leave them no profit on the<br />
encouragement to the bookseller to push the “new sale of new books; on the other hand, we have<br />
books” department of his business. Publishers, authors and publishers requiring the assistance<br />
especially the publishers of the more ephemeral of booksellers for the sale of the books they<br />
literature and of non-copyright books, have sought have written and published. It is perfectly<br />
to remedy this evil by increasing their allowance clear, then, that the demand of the book-<br />
to the booksellers. But this has only made matters sellers that the authors and publishers should<br />
worse, for while, on the one hand, the allowance to help them in devising some scheme which should<br />
the booksellers from the publisher has increased in make bookselling profitable, was a demand as<br />
the case of " light literature,” it has not increased much in the interests of the authors and<br />
to the same extent on the less popular books, and publishers as of the booksellers.<br />
on books of a more permanent standing; and on The problem of how to make bookselling profit-<br />
the other hand, the discount given by the book- able is no new problem. It has exercised the<br />
seller to his customer has increased. The retail minds of booksellers and publishers for many<br />
discount, which at one time was 10 per cent., has years. But it is only within the last two years<br />
increased from 20. in the shilling to 3d. in the that a practicable working scheme has been given<br />
shilling, and in the case of some libraries to 4d. in a fair trial. The difficulty was to devise a scheme<br />
the shilling and even more! Further, while, as which should be compulsory, and yet allow a<br />
all readers of The Author know, the allowances to certain measure of freedom to author, publisher, and<br />
booksellers by the publishers vary from about bookseller alike. It was strongly urged at one<br />
25 per cent, to about 42 per cent. off the published time that there should be a compulsory limit of<br />
prices of different books, the discount given by discount on all books. This was objected to on<br />
the bookseller to the public off them all is uniform. the ground that it left no freedom to any one. On<br />
The bookseller can afford to give a large discount the other hand, the increase of discount given by<br />
off books on which he receives an allowance of some publishers to booksellers was valueless, as it<br />
12 per cent., but he obviously cannot afford the was met by an increase of discount given by the<br />
same discount off books on which he receives an booksellers to the public. The introduction by<br />
allowance of 30 per cent. After allowing for some enterprising publishers of net books, i.e., of<br />
working expenses, which must be reckoned at from books off which no discount was to be given to the<br />
12 per cent. to 15 per cent. on his “turnover,” he public, was a step in the right direction ; as the<br />
can still give a discount of 25 per cent. on novels public, though it demands a uniform discount and<br />
of a very popular nature, and leave a slight margin as large a discount as it can get, is contented, as a<br />
of profit; but the same discount given off “solid” rule, with no discount, if a book is published at a<br />
literature often means actual loss to him. But net price. But this step was not sufficient, as<br />
the public does not realise this, and demands a some booksellers began to give a discount off net<br />
uniform discount on all books. It takes little books, and if this had become general, the advantage<br />
calculation to see that, under these conditions, of having books published at net prices would be<br />
bookselling cannot be made remunerative.<br />
neutralised.<br />
This state of matters would not warrant serious The plan which has now been adopted is<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 46 (#426) #############################################<br />
<br />
46<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
this : Books are divided into two classes : (1) " ordi- made by the publishers and the great majority of<br />
nary” books, off which booksellers can give booksellers to compel the very small minority of<br />
what discount they like to the public without unwilling booksellers to sell net books at net prices.<br />
interference from any one ; and (2)“ net” books, (2) The country booksellers sometimes complain<br />
off which it is agreed that no discount may be that while on “ordinary” books they can charge<br />
given either to the public or to libraries. This rather more than the charges made in London,<br />
plan, it will be seen, meets the objections of those they cannot charge more on net books. Country<br />
authors or publishers who object to compulsion, as booksellers, it is contended, have to pay carriage<br />
they can publish their books as “ ordinary” books. from London, while London booksellers are saved<br />
At the same time it meets the demand of those this expense. In reply to this last contention, the<br />
who have shown that compulsion is necessary, as London booksellers state that their expenses for<br />
all books published at net prices must be sold “collectors ” about equalise the expense of carriage<br />
without discount to the public.<br />
to the country. But whether this be so or not, if<br />
The objections which have been raised against the country bookseller has a sufficient profit on<br />
the present “net" system are chiefly four: “net” books and cannot be undersold, it is no<br />
(1) That it is compulsory. (2) That it makes hardship to him if the London bookseller makes<br />
it necessary for country booksellers to supply larger profits. His other complaint is that while<br />
books at the same rate as in London. (3) That he can charge, say, 4s. 9d. for a 6s. novel which is<br />
no advantage is gained by cash payment; and charged 4s. 6d. in London, he cannot charge more<br />
(4) Libraries and schools which buy many books, than 4s. 6d, for a net book that is charged 4s. 617.<br />
and large purchasers, are charged at the same rate in London. While this is true, he forgets that it<br />
as small purchasers.<br />
pays him better to sell a 4s. 61. net book at 4$, 611.<br />
I admit that all these objections are valid objec- than to sell a 68. "ordinary” book at 4s. 9.<br />
tions; but I am equally convinced that in all cases Further, if he has to order a net book specially for<br />
the advantages of the net system outweigh the a customer, he is quite entitled to charge 2d. or 31.<br />
disadvantages.<br />
for carriage if he likes.<br />
(1) While “free trade" in books, as in every- (3) The objection that a customer who pays<br />
thing else, may be an excellent thing, book selling, cash gets no advantage is a more serious one. But<br />
as a trade, ceases to be “ free” when the discount this is an objection that holds true in other trades.<br />
given by one bookseller becomes of necessity the It is not customary, so far as I know, to give<br />
standard of discount among all the booksellers in discount for cash payment for meat or groceries<br />
the same town. With few exceptions it has been or the like. Indeed the customer who runs an<br />
found that if one bookseller increases the discount account often gets a small allowance when he pays<br />
to the public all his neighbours must follow suit. his account, while the cash purchaser gets none.<br />
In some towns there has been for years an agree. It is certainly a hardship that a bookseller who<br />
ment among the booksellers as to the terms on cannot get payment for, say, two years, should not<br />
which books are to be sold; but such agreements be able to charge more than he does to a cash<br />
are frequently upset by an increase in discount purchaser. On " ordinary” books he can do so,<br />
being given by a new bookseller, or by a draper or for a 6s, novel that is charged 4s. 6il, or 5s. for<br />
a chemist who wishes to get the name of being a cash will be charged 6s, net if not paid for in two<br />
cheap draper or a cheap chemist because he sells years. But it seems to me that the proper way to<br />
books cheaper than the legitimate bookseller. deal with this difficulty is to charge interest on<br />
Voluntary agreements are not sufficient, as they unpaid accounts. This is already done in other<br />
can be destroyed at any moment. A bookseller trades, and I see no reason why it should not be<br />
knows that he cannot be undersold in “net” adopted with books.<br />
books, and the more books become net the more (4) Lastly, it is objected that large purchasers<br />
will he be able to afford to make his stock more pay the same rate as small purchasers. But the<br />
attractive, and to pay for better assistants; and if giving of special terms to large purchasers is not a<br />
the public have to pay a little more for their books, matter of principle, and is not always expedient.<br />
they will gain compensatory advantages.<br />
For instance, it is obviously much more expensive<br />
But the subject of “ Free Trade” is a wide one, for a railway company to carry a passenger one<br />
and cannot be argued out here. It is sufficient to mile for one penny than 400 miles for 400 pence.<br />
note that the whole value of the present system But the large purchaser of 400 miles of railway<br />
turns on its compulsory character. And if authors travelling gets no advantage over the small<br />
and publishers are free to publish books as purchaser of one mile of travelling. It is a<br />
“ ordinary” books, which are not liable to inter. question of averages. One librarian may give a<br />
ference, and booksellers are free to refuse to stock bookseller a great deal of trouble, another may give<br />
net books, none need complain if an agreement is no trouble ; but the bookseller cannot differentiate<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 47 (#427) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
47<br />
between the two. The advisability of giving a done. The King called his common-placebook<br />
discount off net books to libraries and schools was “Enchiridion," and liked to have it always at<br />
fully discussed, but it was decided that it was hand. It must have contained, besides Latin<br />
expedient to make no exceptions to the rule of quotations, memoranda written by the King him-<br />
supplying net books at net prices.<br />
self. A few fragments of it are preserved in<br />
The "net" system is now on its trial. It William of Malmesbury.<br />
remains to be seen whether “ordinary” books It was after this that the King became an<br />
or “net ” books will gain the day. The rapid author. All his works are translations. The first<br />
increase in the number of books published at net was the “ Consolations of Boëthius," a book ex-<br />
prices, and the general welcome given by the public tremely popular throughout the middle ages, in<br />
to the net system, argues well for its future. So which the last remnants of the classical spirit are<br />
far the net system has not spread to any extent to mingled with the Christian thought of a later<br />
novels and light literature; but it is gradually epoch. At the date of the translation the King<br />
doing so. But I think it is better that the system was not entirely master of Latin, and must have<br />
should be adopted gradually rather than at a had Asser's assistance.<br />
forced rate. It is better that authors and the The next work was a translation of Orosius'<br />
public should see for themselves that it is the “History of the World.” Orosius, a Spanish priest,<br />
best, as it is the most rational system of book- became, in 410, acquainted with Augustine of<br />
selling, than that they should feel in any way that Hippo. At Augustine's suggestion he undertook<br />
they are forced to adopt a system which they do a history of the world, with a view to demonstrating<br />
not understand. In America, where the same that Christianity had not been the cause of the<br />
problems have had to be faced, it is proposed to fall of the Roman Empire-a view held by the<br />
make the net system practically universal, and to aristocratic pagan party. The historically worth-<br />
apply it at once not only to the more expensive less work became popular with the clergy, and<br />
books, but also to novels. Whether our American supplanted better means of self-instruction.<br />
friends are wise in trying to adopt suddenly the The merits of Boëthius are not great ; Orosius<br />
system which we are desiring to introduce gradually, has none. Alfred's translations have a value not<br />
time only will show; but it is at least satisfactory possessed by the originals, in consequence of his<br />
to know that the system which has been adopted having been a very free translator. He not only<br />
here has been accepted as the model for America. omitted much, but added without hesitation matter<br />
ROBERT MACLEHOSE. of his own.<br />
Thus he appends to Boëthius historical matter<br />
of a subsequent date; and supplements Orosius'<br />
KING ALFRED AS AN AUTHOR, imperfect geography by his own more accurate<br />
knowledge of Northern Europe. He adds little<br />
Ta date when the celebration of the millen- scraps of information here and there, and now and<br />
A nium of the death of King Alfred the Great then makes an allusion to himself.<br />
is justly commanding national attention, we His third work was a translation of Bede's<br />
offer our 'small tribute of a brief record of the Ecclesiastical History. In making this the King<br />
King's literary labours.<br />
omitted much that was of interest only to<br />
They belong to the later part of his life, the Northumbrians, but carefully retained everything<br />
second half of that interval during which the relating to the early Kings of Wessex. He made<br />
struggle with the Danes was suspended.<br />
no additions, and it is to be regretted that he<br />
Strange to say, the very day of their commence should not have given himself the trouble to<br />
ment is known-the feast of St. Martin, the 11th supply from his own knowledge historical facts<br />
of November, 887. Before that Alfred had written with which Bede was unacquainted.<br />
himself a little prayer-book, a copy of the Hours, to Thus far the King's works were mainly historical<br />
which he had added various devotions. On the date and philosophic. His last book was purely theo-<br />
mentioned, his tutor, Aeser, * was reading to him. logical, a translation of St. Gregory the Great's<br />
Struck by a certain passage, Alfred requested Asser “Regula Pastoralis,” a sort of “ Whole Duty of<br />
to write it in his prayer-book. Every page had Priests." This work may have been taken up in<br />
been filled by the additions which the King had at 890, for in the Preface Alfred alludes to the<br />
different times made. Asser suggested that they assistance he had received in his previous works<br />
should begin a new book, a separate collection from Asser and others. The most interesting<br />
of passages that pleased the King. This was morsel of all that he wrote is his own really<br />
admirable Preface to this book. In it we possess<br />
* Asser was a mouk of Saint David's, subsequently pro-<br />
moted by Alfred to the bishopric of Sherbourne. He was<br />
a valuable memorial of his own mind, and of the<br />
the King's biographer.<br />
purposes which he had in setting forth his works.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 48 (#428) #############################################<br />
<br />
48<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
He explains that he desired by his own example to some time next year. “Rural England” will<br />
revive the learning which had so entirely vanished, probably be the title of this volume which deals<br />
and to this end he reminds his readers of those with a subject of national importance.<br />
better times long passed, whose glory could only Says the author :_<br />
be regained by means of education and instruction.<br />
"I can conscientiously say that no fatigue or effort has<br />
Allusions are made to other books begun by him, been spared—and I may add that the work involved in<br />
among them a translation of the Book of Psalms, dealing with many localities and among many people<br />
but the remaining works ascribed to him are with these problems and investigations is not light. It<br />
is, in short, something not unlike the labours of a Royal<br />
either very doubtful, or certainly the work of other<br />
Commission faced single-handed."<br />
writers. He may have had a hand in some of<br />
The effort is at once the most arduous, the most<br />
them. Some may be due to his influence or<br />
suggestion. But literary myths soon gathered<br />
exhausting, and the most interesting of the author's<br />
life. He has striven to treat his task in a tem-<br />
around him. Works in which he had taken no part<br />
perate and impartial spirit, to weigh and sift the<br />
were assigned to him. Folk literature fell under<br />
the spell of his name, and such productions as col-<br />
evidence, and to set down nothing he does not<br />
believe to be true.<br />
lections of popular sentences, proverbs, and parables<br />
circulated as “ The Proverbs of King Alfred.”<br />
Mr. G. Bernard Shaw is to re-issue, in a revised<br />
His real claim to literary greatness rests upon<br />
form and with a new preface, his early novel,<br />
the higlı aims with which he wrote, and the great “ Cashel Byron's Profession.”<br />
impetus which he gave to a vernacular English He is also publishing, through Mr. Grant<br />
literature.<br />
Richards, a new version of the story in Elizabethan<br />
blank verse, entitled “ The Admirable Bashville ;<br />
THE AUTHORS' CLUB.<br />
or, Constancy Unrewarded”; and “A Note on<br />
Modern Prize Fighting.”<br />
Mr. W. H. Wilkins, the author of “The Love of<br />
W ITH the return of members from their<br />
an Uncrowned Queen,” is publishing, through<br />
V holidays the Authors' Club, like other<br />
Messrs. Longmans, a new historical work in two<br />
clubs, is showing renewed life.<br />
volumes — “ Caroline the Illustrious." It is a<br />
Preparations are being made for a series of<br />
of memoir of Caroline of Anspach, wife of George II.<br />
dinners in the autumn, when the Club will enter-<br />
There are portraits and illustrations.<br />
tain, as heretofore, a number of distingushed guests.<br />
Simultaneous editions of Mr. Rudyard Kipling's<br />
These dinners have for a long time been a feature<br />
“ Kim” have been published in England, the<br />
of the Club, and take place on Monday nights.<br />
Colonies, Canada, and the United States, as well<br />
Many of the most famous men of the day have<br />
honoured the Club with their presence-ambassa-<br />
as in France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, and<br />
Denmark.<br />
dors, lawyers, generals, doctors, artists, musicians,<br />
and others.<br />
Messrs. Macmillan are issuing an édition de lure<br />
Admiral Sir E. H. Seymour. G.C.B., has accepted besides; and later on “Kim” will be included in<br />
the invitation of the Club for November 4th.<br />
the Outward Bound edition of the author's works<br />
published by Charles Scribner and Sons, of New<br />
York.<br />
BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
Some of Mr. Kipling's stories are, we under-<br />
stand, being translated into the Malayan language.<br />
TN his new book, “A Winter's Pilgrimage" Although Lucas Malet's big novel “ Sir Richard<br />
1 (Longmans), Mr. Rider Haggard gives an Calmady ” was only published on September 13th,<br />
account of travels in Italy, Egypt, Cyprus, the first and second editions are exhausted owing<br />
and Palestine. The author believes he has to the enormous demand for it. A third edition is<br />
identified Golgotha. He says, “ As it chances, on being issued. Messrs. Methuen are issuing a special<br />
the cliff at this spot, the face of the rock looking edition as well. It is limited to 500 copies in<br />
towards Jerusalem has undoubtedly a fantastic, but two vols., 12s.<br />
to my fancy, a very real resemblance to a rotting The same firm is publishing, in 3s. 6d. form,<br />
human skull.” The photograph which illustrates Lucas Malet's earlier novels: “The Wages of<br />
the spot helps to strengthen the author's statement Sin,” “ Colonel Enderby's Wife,” “ The Gateless<br />
in a striking manner.<br />
Barrier,” &c.<br />
The substance of the articles by Mr. Rider It seems that up to the end of September soupe<br />
Haggard, entitled “Back to the Land,” which have 190,000 copies of Mr. Hall Caine's "The Eternal<br />
been appearing in The Daily Express week after City ” were sold in England and America. The<br />
week since May, will be published in book form demand steadily continues.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 49 (#429) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
49<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope's “ Tristram of Blent” Sharp is known as the authoress of “ Wymps," and<br />
stands high on the list of recent novels selling other popular stories.<br />
well ; there is a steady demand for it.<br />
Mr. Thomas Cobb has written a new story for<br />
Miss R. N. Carey's “Herb of Grace" also children. It will be issued shortly in the series of<br />
continues popular. Rita's “ A Jilt's Journal”; Dumpy Books for Children. The same author's<br />
Maxwell Grey's “A Four-leaved Clover”; and successful story, “ Bountiful Lady," appeared as<br />
Mr. Frankfort Moore's “ A Nest of Linnets” are one of the Dumpy Books. Mr. Grant Richards is<br />
doing well.<br />
the publisher.<br />
“The Secret Orchard,” Mr. and Mrs. Egerton “Old Knowledge," a story of present-day<br />
Castle's new novel (Macmillan, 6s.), is doing Donegal, is the name of Mr. Stephen Gwynn's<br />
excellently well. The scene is laid in France, in new book. In it the author relates the experiences<br />
a great château owned by the Duke of Cluny, a of an English girl who goes to lodge in an Irish<br />
descendant of the Stuarts, who inherits their cottage in order to fish and paint.<br />
charm and their faithlessness.<br />
The central figure in the story is an old peasant,<br />
It will be remembered that Mr. and Mrs. Kendal a man rarely gifted, a visionary who paints his own<br />
produced “ The Secret Orchard " in the form of visions. The “ Old Knowledge" means the folk-<br />
a play.<br />
beliefs of the peasants, which are interpreted by<br />
Mr. F. Marion Crawford has just published him in the light of modern mysticism.<br />
through the same firm his new novel, « A Maid Miss Jane Barlow's new book, “ From the Land<br />
of Venice.”<br />
of the Shamrock,” is a collection of sketches of<br />
A new and uniform edition of this popular Trish<br />
Irish life and character.<br />
author's works is being issued fortnightly by The Board of Education has selected as the his-<br />
Messrs. Macmillan at 38. 6d. a volume.<br />
torical subject in 1902, for students in men's training<br />
“ Deep Sea Plunderings” is the title of Mr. colleges, “The History of Europe from 1814-1848,"<br />
Frank T. Bullen's new book just issued by Messrs.<br />
and Mr. Oscar Browning has written a work to<br />
and Mr. O<br />
Smith Elder & Co. There are eight illustrations<br />
meet the demand thus created for a convenient book.<br />
by Arthur Twidle.<br />
In fourteen chapters he sketches the restoration of<br />
the Bourbons, and the ascendancy of the Holy<br />
The same author is publishing through Messrs.<br />
Alliance and absolutist principles throughout<br />
Hodder & Stoughton “The Apostles of the South<br />
Europe ; the dawn of the revolutionary spirit in<br />
East,” 6s.<br />
Greece and her liberation ; the abortive revolutions<br />
Miss Agnes Giberne has just published, at 5s., of 1830, and the gradual growth of the reaction<br />
“ The Mighty Deep, and what we know of it." against unlimited monarchy and aristocratic privi-<br />
Messrs. Pearson are the publishers.<br />
lege in the several European countries; and finally,<br />
“Great Lowlands” is the name of Annie E. in France, the fall of the monarchy of July. Messrs.<br />
Holdsworth’s new novel. Messrs. Hodder & Macmillan publish it.<br />
Stoughton are the publishers.<br />
Mr. Horace G. Hutchinson's new book is entitled<br />
Mr. George R. Sims is editing Messrs. Cassell “Dreams and their Meanings." There are many<br />
& Co.'s “ Living London.” This big work deals accounts of experiences sent by correspondents, and<br />
with London from the human side. Mr. Pett two chapters, contributed mainly from the journals<br />
Ridge is among the contributors.<br />
of the Psychical Research Society, on Telepathic<br />
Another contribution to King Alfred literature and Premonitory Dreams. Messrs. Longmans,<br />
is the Rev. Stopford A. Brooke's “ King Alfred,” Green & Co. are the publishers.<br />
ls, net. There is an appendix of passages from The same publishers have ready the third volume<br />
the writings of Alfred, selected and translated from of Mr. John Beattie Crozier's “ History of Intellec-<br />
the old English by Kate M. Warren.<br />
tual Development on the Lines of Modern Evolu-<br />
Also there is “God Save King Alfred” by the tion.” This volume is political, educational and<br />
Rev. E. Gilliat, late of Harrow School. This book social, including an attempted reconstruction of the<br />
for boys is a romance of Alfred's life ; his youth, politics of England, France and America for the<br />
exploits, courtship, betrothal, and kingship are twentieth century.<br />
dealt with. It is illustrated with drawings by Mr. Andrew Lang's new book, “Magic and Reli-<br />
Gutzan-Borghum.<br />
gion” (10s. 6d. net, Longmans), contains a series of<br />
Miss Evelyn Sharp's new book, for girls in their criticisms of recent speculations regarding early<br />
teens, is called “ The Youngest Girl in the School.” religion, dealing especially with Mr. Frazer's theories<br />
There are illustrations by C. E. Brock. Miss in “The Golden Bough.” Other essays deal with<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 50 (#430) #############################################<br />
<br />
50<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
the latest results of anthropological research in the<br />
religious field, and in that of magic.<br />
“ The Essays of an Ex-Librarian,” by Dr. Richard<br />
Garnett, C.B. (716, Heinemann), is a volume of<br />
literary criticisms. There are critical studies on<br />
Peacock, Beckford, Moore, Coleridge, and Matthew<br />
Arnold, and essays on Shelley, Lord Beaconsfield,<br />
&c., &c.<br />
The “Illustrated History of English Literature,"<br />
which Dr. Garnett and Mr. Edmund Gosse are<br />
publishing through Mr. Heinemann, in four volumes,<br />
has been prepared on entirely new lines by the authors,<br />
who have given a life-study to the subject.<br />
A consecutive history of the entire course of<br />
English literature, from the Anglo-Saxon to our<br />
own day, will be given in one type, so that this, if<br />
the reader so desires, can be read alone as a narrative<br />
of the evolution of English style.<br />
A biography of each author is to be supplied in<br />
a different type, and from the work of each leading<br />
writer at least one characteristic quotation will be<br />
made.<br />
Jean Delaire, author of “A Dream of Fame,"<br />
has recently published a new book called “Two<br />
Girls and a Dream.” The writer tells how the two<br />
girls, Gem the painter and Loise the waiter, struggle<br />
in London to make a living. Ultimately Loise<br />
becomes a famous writer, but a heart-lonely woman;<br />
while Gem marries happily. There is an obvious<br />
moral in the story.<br />
The first of Messrs. Anthony Treherne & Co.'s<br />
1s. series of sporting novels is “ Little Cherie, or<br />
The Trainer's Daughter," by Lady Florence Dixie.<br />
His Majesty the King has accepted a copy.<br />
The Leadenhall Press are also issuing Part I. of<br />
a book of poems written by Lady Florence Dixie<br />
when she was a child, under the pseudonym of<br />
- Darling." The book consists of nearly 400 pages<br />
and contains selections of poems written between<br />
the ages of ten and seventeen vears. It is dedicated<br />
to the first Lord Lytton and contains a poem of<br />
some fifteen lines by him recording his first meeting<br />
with the child authoress. The popular edition is<br />
2s.6d., but the édition de luce costs 7s. 61.<br />
Mr. H. B. Baildon, M.A. Cantab., formerly<br />
lecturer on English in the University of Vienna,<br />
has been appointed to the lectureship in English<br />
Language and Literature in University College,<br />
Dundee. Mr. Baildon was a contemporary at<br />
school and college of Robert Louis Stevenson, and<br />
stevenson, and<br />
a second edition of his “Life-Study and Criticism".<br />
of that writer was published in September last.<br />
Messrs. Duckworth have just issued a translation<br />
of Mr. Charles Hastings' “ The Theatre," 8s. net.<br />
The authorised translation is by Miss Frances A.<br />
Welby.<br />
Mr. Pinero's “Iris" is doing so well, and is so<br />
likely to hold the boards for months to come, that<br />
Mr. Bourchier has not troubled to make any<br />
definite arrangements regarding its successor.<br />
After the run of “ The Second in Command,"<br />
which has been played over 300 times, and has had<br />
a very successful tour in the provinces, Messrs.<br />
Maude and Harrison will produce at the Hay-<br />
market Theatre a four-act adaptation from the<br />
French, by Mr. Sydney Grundy.<br />
“The Emerald Isle" at the Savoy is to be<br />
replaced very shortly by the musical version of<br />
Captain Basil Hood's playlet “Ib and Little<br />
Christina -<br />
Mr. Martin Harvey intends to produce his new<br />
play “After All” in London as soon as possible.<br />
“ After All” was received with great enthusiasm<br />
when played in Dublin last month.<br />
The third special Wednesday matinée of “ The<br />
Second Mrs. Tanqueray,” given by Mrs. Patrick<br />
Campbell at the Royal Theatre, takes place on the<br />
6th inst.<br />
A new book by the Rev. W. Robertson Nicoll.<br />
LL.D., is announced by Messrs. Hodder &<br />
Stoughton.<br />
Stor<br />
Its title is “ The Church's One<br />
Foundation : Christ and Recent Criticism.” Price<br />
De ce<br />
Also by the same author a series of articles<br />
which appeared in the British Weekly have been<br />
put into volume form and called “Sunday After-<br />
noon Prayers.” Its price is also 3s. 6d.<br />
Messrs. Hodder & Stoughton are also publish-<br />
ing “ The Pulpit Bible," by the Rev. Joseph<br />
Parker, D.D. The original notes and comments<br />
on Holy Scripture, from Genesis to Revelation,<br />
are printed in the margin of a quarto Bible,<br />
specially printed in new type and strongly bound<br />
in Persian levant.<br />
Messrs. Methuen have published an unusually<br />
large first edition of the “Life of Robert Louis<br />
Stevenson," by his cousin, Mr. Graham Balfour.<br />
The interest in Stevenson is, however, so great<br />
that a second edition has been immediately called<br />
for to meet the demand. The Life is in two<br />
volumes, 258. net.<br />
Dr. Conan Dovle is bringing his history of the<br />
South African War up to date for the new edition<br />
to be issued by Messrs. Smith, Elder & Co.<br />
Sir Wemyss Reid, who kuew the late William<br />
Black intimately, has nearly finished his life of<br />
that popular novelist.<br />
The popular shilling edition of Prince Kropot-<br />
kin's book, “ Fields, Factories, and Workshops,"<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 51 (#431) #############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
. 51<br />
which was published about three months ago, has A monograph on the Russian musical instrument,<br />
been quite exhausted, and another large edition is “The Balalaika,” by Algernon Rose, has just been<br />
now in the press.<br />
published by the Musical Association. The essay<br />
The first editions of Mr. James Baker's new treats of the instrument in its various forms, and<br />
journalistic novel, “ A Double Choice,” have been sizes, from the piccolo to the contra-basso balalaïka.<br />
quickly exhausted, and seem to have aroused the The leading makers of the instrument are men-<br />
public's curiosity. The Morning Post concluded tioned, and a minute description of the structure<br />
its review with the words :<br />
and method of playing forms the body of the<br />
article.<br />
- Journalism is surely the freest profession in the world,<br />
and every paper is open to anyone who has something to<br />
say, and knows how to say it.".<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
That bright little weekly, “ The People's Friend,”<br />
for 21st inst. contains an interview with Edith C.<br />
Kenyon, authoress of “ The Hand of His Brother,"<br />
FICTION.<br />
who has of late years devoted herself more especially SIR, --Mr. Egerton Castle has lately put out an<br />
to serial writing. The same journal has taken her ingenious defence of fiction--a branch of art which<br />
new serial, “ Love's Golden Thread.”<br />
may perhaps be thought capable of taking up its<br />
Mrs. E. Rentoul Esler's new book, " The own defence on the obvious ground of success.<br />
Awakening of Helena Thorpe,” has just been But a suspicion may be lurking in minds of<br />
issued by Messrs. S. W. Partridge & Co. It exceptional intelligence like his, that a little reac-<br />
treats of the perennial problems that become fresh tion may threaten its enormous popularity. If,<br />
when seen through a fresh temperament.<br />
urges Mr. Castle, characters and events in a story<br />
The floral farms at Wisbech form the opening<br />
be of convincing power, “it can make no differ-<br />
scene of Mrs. Bertram Tanqueray's new novel,<br />
ence in the intellectual pleasure of the reader<br />
“ The Call of the Future,” which has been published<br />
whether what he is made to realise so vividly is a<br />
this autumn by Messrs. Hurst & Blackett.<br />
record of fact or mere fancy.” But surely pleasure,<br />
even if intellectual, is not the whole object of life,<br />
“ The Week's Survey " is the title of a new<br />
and the pleasure derived from watching the course<br />
penny Weekly Review of Literature, Politics, and of a “ love affair "--such being the usual interest<br />
Social Affairs. It is strongly supported both on of an English novel---can hardly claim any very<br />
the literary and the business sides. The ideal of high level of intellect. Is not Diana Vernon ... as<br />
the paper is to be at once substantial and interest-<br />
living now as Rob Roy Macgregor? Do we not<br />
ing. Its low price should enable it to reach a see in our mind's eye the lovable John Ridd ...<br />
large number of people.<br />
or Mr. Samuel Pepys ... or King James ? It<br />
Miss May Bateman's new novel, “ The Glow- may be so, but ought it? The story of James the<br />
worm” (formerly announced as “ The Idealist”), Second is full of useful warning; the story of Di<br />
has just been issued by Mr. Heinemann. Miss Vernon or that of Lorna Doone can but be an<br />
Bateman has had to change her title owing to the expression of an author's fancy. One is a decora-<br />
appearance of another work of fiction bearing the tive painting, the other a serviceable chart. Some,<br />
same name.<br />
indeed, appear to assume that the historic romance<br />
A selection of new pieces which have been printed 18 of more value than history itself, but they do<br />
in journals of repute is a feature of Mr. Mackenzie not bear in mind that by the very exigencies of his<br />
Bell's “ Collected Poems” to be published at once by<br />
art the romancer is bound to distort the truth.<br />
Mr. Thomas Burleigh.<br />
The object of “ Ivanhoe” or “ The Talisman” was<br />
to provide a pleasant pastime, that of Thierry and<br />
Messrs. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. are<br />
Freeman was quite different. Subject to personal<br />
the publishers of Mr. Ernest A. Tietken's volume<br />
limitations these show what our ancestors were and<br />
of poems, “ The Heavenly Link," price 5s.<br />
what they did not draped in the elegancies of a<br />
Under the title “ Mr. Punch's Dramatic Sequels” fancy ball, but in their own barbaric vigour. The<br />
Messrs. Bradbury, Agnew & Co., Limited, will great use of history is to connect the present with<br />
republish at the end of October the series of con- the past; the great weakness of fiction is that it<br />
tinuations to famous plays by St. John Hankin helps to stimulate emotions for which it can find<br />
which appeared in Punch in the early part of the no employment. It is true that Thierry gave<br />
year. Mr. E. J. Wheeler has provided fourteen high praise to Scott's perception of life in Norman<br />
illustrations for the “Sequels” in which the times; Scott was the fashion when Thierry wrote,<br />
portraits of many prominent actors will be and his pleasant ways completed the hypnotism.<br />
recognised. The price will be five shillings (net). But Thackeray came and torpedoed the paradox.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 52 (#432) #############################################<br />
<br />
52<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
one of fact, which I could bring abundance of<br />
unquestionable authority to support, while the<br />
article generally was on a subject concerning which<br />
I have a specialist's knowledge. Consequently I<br />
do not know which to admire most, the rudeness<br />
of the editor in defacing a MS. as such, or the<br />
impertinent annotations on a subject of which he<br />
palpably knew nothing, and I, admittedly, a good<br />
deal. I say “admittedly" because I write there-<br />
upon for five journals every week, and I have not<br />
yet found a proprietor complacent enough to pay<br />
specialist's prices without value received.<br />
A MEMBER.<br />
(The Editor will give the name of the magazine<br />
to any member of the Society who may desire the<br />
information - Ej<br />
“ Ivanhoe," as read by him, was clearly not history.<br />
Indeed, in all Scott's gallery there is not one<br />
historical figure introduced that is true to nature<br />
--even Louis Onze in “ Quentin Durward ” is<br />
idealised. The reason is in the very nature of the<br />
art. But if this be the case in the higher ranges of<br />
fiction and in the hands of the greatest masters,<br />
what must it be with fiction as an industry, with<br />
tales which depend for prosperity on their power<br />
to stimulate barren emotions and to excite idle<br />
curiosity ? And observe, there is here no question<br />
of quality ; novelists of great momentary vogue<br />
could be named whose work is not literature at all.<br />
If we are told, then, of the enormous popularity of<br />
such works we need not surrender our case—we<br />
merely turn in another direction. We muse on the<br />
taste of the reading public and on the indications<br />
atforded of its intellectual and moral conditions.<br />
It is easy to see that such criticism will not apply<br />
to the masterpieces of the art, so long, at least, as<br />
it does not distort our historical impressions. But<br />
the public will prefer--absolutely prefer- bad novels<br />
to good, just as a Kaffir would not exchange his<br />
bottle of “ Cape smoke" for a flask of wine from<br />
Prince Metternich's vineyard. The glorification<br />
of a royal Stuart, the defamation of the Eliza-<br />
bethan Catholics, are as much an abuse of pen and<br />
ink as the production of trashy trade love stoires ;<br />
fortunately these are not as influential or enduring<br />
as great works of pure imagination. Against such<br />
there is no law: but it is to be feared that the<br />
public won't discriminate.<br />
SENEX.<br />
“THE HANDLING OF MSS.”<br />
SIR, Mr. F. H. Freshfield asks whether the<br />
defacement of MSS. is ever practised “by really<br />
good houses”? Let me give an example. Some<br />
three or four months ago I forwarded a type-<br />
written article to the editor of a magazine pub-<br />
lished by one of the best-known houses in the<br />
the hostelznown houses in the<br />
world. In a few weeks the MS. was returned<br />
and, of course, I do not complain of that. I<br />
addressed an envelope to another high-class publi-<br />
cation, and was just enclosing the MS., when I<br />
decided to glance through it anew. To my surprise,<br />
I found several passages scored in pencil at the<br />
sides, and in one place the word “Rubbish !” was<br />
written in the margin.<br />
Having removed these obnoxious marks, I posted<br />
the MS. In four days it was in type, without a<br />
word excised, and in less than a month I had<br />
received £8 188. 6d. as payment. Presumably,<br />
therefore, the article was not without worth.<br />
What I particularly desire to explain, however, is<br />
that the incidental statement which the editor of<br />
the first magazine had marked as “rubbish” was<br />
“HALL CAINE, THE MAN AND THE NOYELIST."<br />
To the Editor of THE AUTHOR.<br />
SIR, I regret to find in the October number of<br />
The Author a paragraph co the effect that Mr.<br />
Hall Caine has “ revised” the MS. of my forth-<br />
coming book relating to himself and his work. I<br />
have seen this paragraph in other papers, but have<br />
left it uncontradicted, because it was my intention<br />
to wait until the publication of my book in order<br />
to give the erroneous statement the refutation for<br />
which it called. But now that the paragraph has<br />
appeared in The Author—a paper in which all<br />
literary news is not only correct but “official ”—I<br />
feel compelled to state the true facts of the case.<br />
I can do this best by quoting from a letter<br />
addressed to me by Mr. Hall Caine a few weeks<br />
ago-<br />
DEAR MR. KENYON,—I have looked over the portion of<br />
your manuscript which you sent me, and have made a few<br />
comparatively unimportant changes. They concern what<br />
you say of my friends, living and dead, and therefore I<br />
have felt it to be my duty to set you right where I thought<br />
you were wrong. With what you say of myself, whether<br />
in the way of criticism or biography. I do not feel that I<br />
have any right to interfere, and I fear I must deny myself<br />
the pleasure of writing the Preface which you are good<br />
enough to request. If your view of my life and my books is to<br />
have any value for the public, it must stand as your own,<br />
without any criticism or endorsement from me. ...<br />
Yours very truly,<br />
HÅLL CAINE.<br />
This letter speaks for itself. My MS. has in no<br />
sense been “revised” by Mr. Caine-part of it<br />
was read by him and a few errors of fact put<br />
right. That, and the loan of some interesting<br />
letters, constitute the whole sum of his respon-<br />
sibility for the text of my monograph.<br />
I am, etc.,<br />
C. FRED. KENYON.<br />
Ellesmere Park, Eccles,<br />
October 13th, 1901.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 52 (#433) #############################################<br />
<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
ARRANGEMENTS FOR<br />
SALE OF MSS. OF EVERY KIND.<br />
ULTERARY AGENCY<br />
Literary Advice, Revision, Research, etc.<br />
Printing, Publishing, Illustration, Translation, etc.<br />
THE LITERARY AGENCY OF LONDON,<br />
5, HENRIETTA STREET, W.C.<br />
G. H. PERRIS.<br />
C. F. CAZENOVE.<br />
TYPEWRITING COMPANY, Oswald House, Queen Victoria Road, Coventry.<br />
<br />
var<br />
FONDON<br />
Typewriting of every description, from Ninepence per Thousand Words<br />
(including good paper). Specimens on application.<br />
Special Work undertaken (not necessarily for publication); neatly and carefully executed<br />
in Two Colours, at Special Charges.<br />
Testimonial.-“Undoubtedly the finest piece of work I have ever seen produced on a Typewriter."<br />
" REMINGTON STANDARD » up-to-date Instruments.<br />
DARLINGTON'S HANDBOOKS<br />
MRS. GILL,<br />
TYPE-WRITING OFFICE,<br />
35, LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br />
(ESTABLISHED 1883.)<br />
Authors' MSS. carefully copied from 1s. per 1000 words. Duplicate<br />
copies third price. Skilled typists sent out by hour, day or week.<br />
French MSS. accurately copied, or typewritten English translations<br />
supplied. References kindly permitted to Messrs. A. P. Watt & Son,<br />
Literary Agents, Hastings House, Nortolk Street, Strand, W.C.<br />
THE WEST KENSINGTON TYPEWRITING AGENCY.<br />
SIKES and SIKES,<br />
13, Wolverton Gardens, Hammersmith Road, W.<br />
ESTABLISHED 1893.<br />
Authors' MSS. carefully and promptly copied. Usual Terms.<br />
Leod and General Copying. Typewritten Circulars by Copying Process.<br />
LESSONS GIVEN. AUTHORS' REFERENCES.<br />
“Sir Henry Ponsonby is<br />
commanded by the Queen to<br />
She thank Mr. Darlington for a<br />
* copy of his Handbook."<br />
“Nothing better could be wished for."-BRITISH WEEKLY.<br />
“ Far superior to ordinary guides."-LONDON DAILY CHRONICLE.<br />
Edited by RALPH DARLINGTON, F.R.G.S. 18. each. Illustrated.<br />
Maps by John BARTHOLOMEW, F.R.G.S.<br />
THE ISLE OF WIGHT.<br />
THE CHANNEL ISLANDS.<br />
THE VALE OF LLANGOLLEN. THE NORFOLK BROADS.<br />
BRECON AND ITS BEACONS. THE SEVERN VALLEY.<br />
BOURNEMOUTH AND THE NEW FOREST. THE WYE VALLEY<br />
BRIGHTON, EASTBOURNE, HASTINGS, AND ST. LEONARDS<br />
ABERYSTWITH, TOWYN, BARMOUTH, AND DOLGELLY.<br />
MALVERN, HEREFORD, WORCESTER, AND GLOUCESTER,<br />
LLANDRINDOD WELLS AND THE SPAS OF MID-WALES.<br />
BRISTOL, BATH, CHEPSTOW, AND WESTON-SUPER-MARE.<br />
LLANDUDNO, RHYL, BANGOR, CARNARVON, ANGLESEA.<br />
CONWAY, COLWYN BAY, BETTWS-Y-COED, FESTINIOG,<br />
SNOWDON.<br />
STIKPHAST<br />
PASTE STIKS<br />
"The best Handbook to London ever issued."-LIVERPOOL DAILY Post,<br />
“THE Handbook to London-it very emphatically tops them all." --<br />
DAILY GRAPHIC.<br />
3rd Edition, Revised, Bs. 60 Illustrations, 24 Maps and Plans.<br />
LONDON AND ENVIRONS.<br />
By E. C. Cook and E. T. Cook, M.A.<br />
Feap. Svo. 18. THE HOTELS OF THE WORLD.<br />
A Handbook to the leading Hotels throughout the world.<br />
Llangollen : DARLINGTON & Co. London: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL & Co.<br />
LTD. Railway Bookstalls and all Bookseliers.<br />
PHOTOGRAPHS.-BIRTHDAY and Seasox Cards from negatives by<br />
RALPH DARLINGTON, F.R.G.S., of Scenery, Ruins, &c., in Italy, Greece,<br />
Asia Minor, and Egypt, 1s., ls. 6.1., 28., and 2s. 6d. List, post free, of<br />
DARLINGTON & Co., LLANGOLLEN.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR."<br />
SCALE FOR ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
(ALLOWANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY 20 PER CENT.]<br />
THE<br />
AUTHOR'S HAIRLESS PAPER-PAD<br />
Front Page<br />
... £4 0 0<br />
Other Pages<br />
... ... 3 0 0<br />
Hall of a Page<br />
... ... ... 1 10 0<br />
Quarter of a Page<br />
... 0 15 0<br />
Eighth of a Page<br />
... 0 7 6<br />
Single Column Advertisemeni<br />
per inch 0 0 0<br />
Bills for Insertion<br />
per 2,000 3 0 0<br />
Reduction of 20 per cent. made for a Series of Si and of 25 per cent. for<br />
(The LEADENHALL PRESS LTD., Publishers & Printers,<br />
Twelve Insertions.<br />
Advertisements should reach the Office not later than the 20th for<br />
insertion in the following inonth's issue.<br />
All letters respecting Advertisements should be addressed to the<br />
ADVERTISEMENT MANAGER, The Author Office, 39, Old Queen Street,<br />
Storey's Gate, S.W.<br />
50, Leadenhall Street, London, E.c.)<br />
Contains hairless paper, over which the pen slips with perfect<br />
freedom. Sixpence each. 5s. per dozen, ruled or plain. New Pocket<br />
Size, 3s. per dozen, ruled or plain, Authors should note that THE<br />
LEADENHALL PRESS LTD, cannot be responsible for the loss of MSS.<br />
I by fire or otherwise. Duplicate copies should be retained.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 52 (#434) #############################################<br />
<br />
iv<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
ESTABLISHED)<br />
The Athenæum Press, Taunton.<br />
(XVIII. CENT.<br />
BARNICOTT & PEARCE<br />
INVITE ENQUIRIES RESPECTING PRINTING.<br />
ESTIMATES OF COST, AND OTHER DETAILS, PROMPTLY GIVEN.<br />
Monthly. 3d. “The Writer,”<br />
Post free to any address in the United<br />
Kingdom, 4s. per annum.<br />
A MONTHLY JOURNAL FOR LITERARY PEOPLE.<br />
Devoted to the interests of Book-buyers, Booksellers, Authors and Readers. The general aim of “ The Writer" will be<br />
to maintain a high standard of Literary Criticism.<br />
Printed at the Walsall Press, Walsall.<br />
Published at Bank Chambers, Blackburn.<br />
London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co., Ltd.<br />
THE BUSH LANE HOUSE TYPEWRITING & SHORTHAND OFFICE,<br />
Principal:<br />
Bush Lane House, Bush Lane,<br />
MISS MORGAN.<br />
Cannon Street, London, E.C.<br />
Authors' MSS. carefully and promptly copied from 10d. per 1,000 words. General Typewriting, Shorthand and<br />
Translations executed by skilled workers. Privacy and accuracy guaranteed.<br />
• Special Terms for large quantities or contract work. Estimates and Specimens free on application.<br />
THE WHITEFRIARS PRESS, LONDON AND TONBRIDGE.<br />
BRADBURY, AGNEW, & Co. LD.<br />
Will give Estimates for and undertake the production of any description of<br />
BOOK AND MAGAZINE PRINTING AND BINDING.<br />
Telegrams: Charlyarl, London ; Charivari, Tonbridge.<br />
Telephones : 28 Holborn ; 19 Tonbridge.<br />
AUTHORS' MS. TYPED<br />
AUTHORS' TYPEWRITING. TYPEWRITING. 9d. per 1,000 words.<br />
ACCURACY AND DISPATCH.<br />
Miss KATHARINE TYNAN, Author of “A Union of<br />
Hearts," &c., writing to Mr. St. John says:-"I have<br />
Miss RISDON,<br />
never met with anything approaching your intelligence,<br />
quickness of apprehension, carefulness and promptitude.<br />
6, Racquet Court,<br />
... Your work is not only educated, but in the case of<br />
114, Fleet Street, E.C.<br />
unfamiliar words in the Irish idiom, you have been<br />
ainazingly quick and ready."<br />
Novels typewritten, from 9d. per 1,000 words;<br />
By Experienced Hand. 9d. thousand words.<br />
two copies, 1-.<br />
PRICE LIST AND AUTHORS' OPINIONS ON APPLICATION.<br />
M. J. C., 31, LAMMAS PARK ROAD, EALING, W.<br />
Literary Agents.--Authors are warned against dealing with<br />
L. A. ST. JOHN, 104, Churston Av., Upton Park, E.<br />
any Literary Agent without referring to the Society for infor-<br />
mation. Authors are also warned not to sign Agreements on the<br />
advice of Literary Agents alone. All Agreements should be<br />
submitted to the Society for advice.<br />
TYPEWRITING.<br />
By Order, G. HERBERT THRING,<br />
Secretary Society of Authors,<br />
39, Old Queen Street, Storey's Gate, S.W.<br />
Authors' MSS. accurately copied from 8d. per 1,000<br />
The « Forms of Agreements" issued by the Publishers'<br />
words. Experienced in all kinds of scientific and<br />
Association can be obtained at the Office, with a full explanation<br />
difficult MSS. Reduction for large quantities.<br />
of their meaning, price 1s. post free. Authors are warned not<br />
to sign any agreement which may embody the Clauses expose 1<br />
without submitting it first to the Society.<br />
MISS CARRINGTON,<br />
By Order, G. HERBERT THRING,<br />
27, Kelmscott Road, Clapham, S.W.<br />
Secretary Society of Authors,<br />
39, Old Queen Street, Storey's Gate, S.W.<br />
Printed by BRADBURY, AGNEW, & Co. LD., and Published by them for THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS (INCORPORATED),<br />
at 10, Bouverie Street, London, E.C. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/347/1901-11-01-The-Author-12-4.pdf | publications, The Author |