278 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/278 | The Author, Vol. 06 Issue 01 (June 1895) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+06+Issue+01+%28June+1895%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 06 Issue 01 (June 1895)</a> | | | <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253</a> | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1895-06-01-The-Author-6-1 | | | | | 1–28 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=6">6</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1895-06-01">1895-06-01</a> | | | | | | | 1 | | | 18950601 | C be El u t b or,<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
Monthly.)<br />
CONDUCTED BY SIR wal.TER BESANT.<br />
VoI. VI.-No. 1.]<br />
JUNE 1, 1895.<br />
[PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
For the Opinions earpressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as eacpressing the<br />
collective opinions of the committee unless<br />
they are officially signed by G. Herbert<br />
Thring, Sec.<br />
*- - --"<br />
- - -<br />
HE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br />
remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br />
requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br />
important communications within two days will write to him<br />
without delay. All remittances showld be crossed Union<br />
Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br />
all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br />
jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br />
returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br />
*- A -<br />
•- w -<br />
WARNINGS AND ADVICE.<br />
I • RAWING THE AGREEMENT.--It is not generally<br />
understood that the author, as the vendor, has the<br />
absolute right of drafting the agreement upon<br />
whatever terms the transaction is to be carried out.<br />
Authors are strongly advised to exercise that right. In<br />
every form of business, this among others, the right of<br />
drawing the agreement rests with him who sells, leases, or<br />
has the control of the property.<br />
2. SERIAL RIGHTS.—In selling Serial Rights remember<br />
that you may be selling the Serial Right for all time; that<br />
is, the Right to continue the production in papers. If you<br />
object to this, insert a clause to that effect.<br />
3. STAMP You R AGREEMENTs. – Readers are most<br />
URGENTLY warned not to neglect stamping their agreements<br />
immediately after signature. If this precaution is neglected<br />
for two weeks, a fine of £10 must be paid before the agree-<br />
ment can be used as a legal document. In almost every<br />
case brought to the secretary the agreement, or the letter<br />
which serves for one, is forwarded without the stamp. The<br />
author may be assured that the other party to the agree-<br />
ment seldom neglects this simple precaution. The Society,<br />
to save trouble, undertakes to get all the agreements of<br />
members stamped for them at no ea pense to themselves<br />
eaccept the cost of the stamp.<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
4. ASCERTAIN WEIAT A PROPOSED AGREEMENT GIVES TO<br />
BOTH SIDES BEFORE SIGNING IT.-Remember that an<br />
arrangement as to a joint venture in any other kind of busi-<br />
ness whatever would be instantly refused should either party<br />
refuse to show the books or to let it be known what share he<br />
reserved for himself.<br />
5. LITERARY AGENTS.–Be very careful. You cannot be<br />
too careful as to the person whom you appoint as your<br />
agent. Remember that you place your property almost un-<br />
reservedly in his hands. Your only safety is in consulting<br />
the Society, or some friend who has had personal experience<br />
of the agent. Do not trust advertisements alone.<br />
6. COST OF PRODUCTION.—Never sign any agreement of<br />
which the alleged cost of production forms an integral part,<br />
until you have proved the figures.<br />
7. CHOICE OF PUBLISHERS.–Never enter into any cor-<br />
respondence with publishers, especially with those who ad-<br />
vertise for MSS., who are not recommended by experienced<br />
friends or by this Society.<br />
8. FUTURE WORK.—Never, on any account whatever,<br />
bind yourself down for future work to anyone.<br />
9. PERSONAL RISK.—Never accept any pecuniary risk or<br />
responsibility whatever without advice.<br />
Io. REJECTED MSS.—Never, when a M.S. has been re-<br />
fused by respectable houses, pay others, whatever promises<br />
they may put forward, for the production of the work.<br />
II. AMERICAN RIGHTS.—Never sign away American<br />
rights. Keep them by special clause. Refuse to sign any<br />
agreement containing a clause which reserves them for the<br />
publisher, unless for a substantial consideration.<br />
12. CESSION OF COPYRIGHT.-Never sign any paper,<br />
either agreement or receipt, which gives away copyright,<br />
without advice. -<br />
13. ADVERTISEMENTs. --Keep some control over the<br />
advertisements, if they affect your returns, by a clause in<br />
the agreement.<br />
I4. NEVER forget that publishing is a business, like any<br />
other business, totally unconnected with philanthropy,<br />
You have to do with<br />
Be yourself a business man.<br />
charity, or pure love of literature.<br />
business men.<br />
Society’s Offices :-<br />
4, PORTUGAL STREET, LINCOLN's INN FIELDs.<br />
*- A --"<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
I. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub.<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the advice<br />
B 2<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#356) ################################################<br />
<br />
2 THE AUTHOR.<br />
Sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor, the member<br />
has a right to an opinion from the Society’s solicitors. If the<br />
case is such that Counsel’s opinion is desirable, the Com-<br />
mittee will obtain for him Counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publisher's agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society first—our solicitors are continually<br />
engaged upon such questions for us.<br />
3. Send to the office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts with the loan of the books represented. This is in<br />
order to ascertain what has been the nature of your agree-<br />
ments, and the results to author and publisher respectively<br />
So far. The Secretary will always be glad to have any<br />
agreements, new or old, for inspection and note. The infor-<br />
mation thus obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
4. If the examination of your previous business trans-<br />
actions by the Secretary proves unfavourable, you should<br />
take advice as to a change of publishers.<br />
5. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br />
posed document to the Society for examination.<br />
6. The Society is acquainted with the methods, and—in<br />
the case of fraudulent houses—the tricks of every publish-<br />
ing firm in the country.<br />
7. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br />
are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you are<br />
reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br />
the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br />
dence of the writer.<br />
8. Send to the Editor of the Author notes of everything<br />
important to literature that you may hear or meet with. . .<br />
9. The committee have now arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br />
safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br />
fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br />
will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:—(1)<br />
To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br />
stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br />
them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br />
due according to agreements.<br />
><br />
THE AUTHORS’ SYNDICATE,<br />
EMBERS are informed :<br />
1. That the Authors' Syndicate takes charge of<br />
the business of members of the Society. That it<br />
submits MSS. to publishers and editors, concludes agree-<br />
ments, examines, passes, and collects accounts, and, gene-<br />
rally, relieves members of the trouble of managing business<br />
details.<br />
2. That the terms upon which its services can be secured<br />
will be forwarded upon detailed application.<br />
3. That the Authors' Syndicate works only for those<br />
members of the Society whose work possesses a market<br />
value.<br />
4. That the Syndicate can only undertake any negotiations<br />
whatever on the distinct understanding that those negotia-<br />
tions are placed eaclusively in its hands, and that all<br />
communications relating thereto are referred to it.<br />
5. That clients can only be seen by the Director by<br />
appointment, and that, when possible, at least two days’<br />
notice should be given.<br />
6. That every attempt is made to deal with all communi-<br />
cations promptly. That stamps should, in all cases, be sent<br />
to defray postage,<br />
7. That the Authors' Syndicate does not invite MSS.<br />
without previous correspondence ; does not hold itself<br />
responsible for MSS. forwarded without notice; and that<br />
in all cases MSS. must be accompanied by stamps to defray<br />
postage.<br />
8. That the Syndicate undertakes arrangements for<br />
lectures by some of the leading members of the Society;<br />
that it has a “Transfer Department' for the sale and<br />
purchase of journals and periodicals; and that a “Register<br />
of Wants and Wanted” is open. Members are invited to<br />
communicate their requirements to the Manager.<br />
There is an Honorary Advisory Committee, whose services<br />
will be called upon in any case of dispute or difficulty. It<br />
is perhaps necessary to state that the members of the<br />
Advisory Committee have no pecuniary interest whatever in<br />
the Syndicate.<br />
- - -º<br />
NOTICES.<br />
HE Editor of the Awthor begs to remind members of the<br />
Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br />
of charge, the cost of producing it would be a very<br />
heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
6s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
The Editor is always glad to receive short papers and<br />
communications on all subjects connected with literature<br />
from members and others. Nothing can do more good to<br />
the Society than to make the Awthor complete, attractive,<br />
and interesting. Will those who are willing to aid in this<br />
work send their names and the special subjects on which<br />
they are willing to write P<br />
Communications for the Author should reach the Editor<br />
not later than the 21st of each month.<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind, whether<br />
members of the Society or not, are invited to communicate<br />
o the Editor any points connected with their work which<br />
t would be advisable in the general interest to publish.<br />
Members and others who wish their MSS. read are<br />
requested not to send them to the Office without previously<br />
communicating with the Secretary. The utmost practicable<br />
despatch is aimed at, and MSS. are read in the order in<br />
which they are received. It must also be distinctly under-<br />
stood that the Society does not, under any circumstances,<br />
undertake the publication of MSS.<br />
The Authors’ Club is now open in its new premises, at<br />
3, Whitehall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary<br />
for information, rules of admission, &c.<br />
Will members take the trouble to ascertain whether they<br />
have paid their subscriptions for the year P. If they will do<br />
this, and remit the amount, if still unpaid, or a banker’s<br />
order, it will greatly assist the Secretary, and save him the<br />
trouble of sending out a reminder.<br />
Members are most earnestly entreated to attend to the<br />
warning numbered (8). It is a most foolish and may be a<br />
most disastrous thing to enter into an agreement binding<br />
for a term of years. Let them ask themselves if they<br />
would give a solicitor the collection of their rents for five<br />
years to come, whatever his conduct, whether he was honest<br />
or dishonest ? Of course they would not. Why then<br />
hesitate for a moment when they are asked to sign them-<br />
selves into literary bondage for three or five years P<br />
Those who possess the “Cost of Production ” are<br />
requested to note that the cost of binding has advanced 15<br />
per cent. This means, for those who do not like the trouble<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#357) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 3<br />
of “doing sums,” the addition of three shillings in the<br />
pound on this head. In other words, if the cost of binding<br />
is set down in our book at eight pounds, to this must now be<br />
added twenty-four shillings more, so that it now stands<br />
at £948. The figures in our book are as near the exact<br />
truth as can be procured; but a printer's, or a binder’s,<br />
bill is so elastic a thing that nothing more exact can be<br />
arrived at.<br />
Some remarks have been made upon the amount charged<br />
in the “Cost of Production” for advertising. Of course, we<br />
have not included any sums which may be charged for<br />
inserting advertisements in the publisher's own magazines,<br />
or in other magazines by exchange. As agreements too<br />
often go, there is nothing to prevent the publisher from<br />
sweeping the whole profits of a book into his own pocket,<br />
by inserting any number of advertisements in his own<br />
magazines, and by exchanging with others. Some there are<br />
who call this a form of fraud; it is not known what those<br />
who practise this method of swelling their own profits call it.<br />
*-- * ~ *<br />
g- ºr -ºs.<br />
LITERARY PROPERTY,<br />
I.—CANADIAN COPYRIGHT.<br />
HE following “case” has been drawn up for<br />
the committee by Mr. James Rolt, barrister-<br />
at law —<br />
“It is impossible to deal with the Canadian<br />
Copyright Act of 1889, or to estimate the effect<br />
it will produce if it is allowed to come into force,<br />
without in the first place, shortly referring to the<br />
present position of copyright (a) as an imperial<br />
question, and (b) as an international question.<br />
(I) International copyright.<br />
(i.) The principal countries of Europe, and, in<br />
fact, from a literary point of view, the principal<br />
countries of the world, with the exception of the<br />
United States, have at last, in the Berne Con-<br />
vention, recognised that the rights of an author<br />
in the fruits of his labour should be free from all<br />
conditions and restrictions whatever, except such<br />
as may be enforced by the laws of the country<br />
where it is first produced.<br />
(ii.) The United States unfortunately, owing<br />
to political and trade pressure, have not been<br />
able to allow authors their full and just rights.<br />
Foreign authors can, however, under the Act of<br />
1891, obtain protection on the terms of printing<br />
their works in the States. The condition is<br />
unquestionably wrong and unfair in principle,<br />
but the recognition by the States of the rights of<br />
foreign authors is, even where subject to such a<br />
condition, of immense importance, especially to<br />
British authors.<br />
Acceptance of the terms imposed does not<br />
imply a recognition of their justice, and should<br />
not under any circumstances be allowed to be<br />
drawn into a precedent. On the other hand, we<br />
should be most careful to avoid doing anything<br />
which might imperil the recognition of the rights<br />
of British authors which has been so hardly won<br />
from the United States of America.<br />
The Canadian Act, if allowed to come into<br />
force, would, it is believed, lead to the with-<br />
drawal from British authors of the United States<br />
Act of 1891.<br />
(2) Imperial copyright.<br />
The foundation of imperial copyright as it at<br />
present exists is to be found in the Act of 1842,<br />
which gives protection throughout the British<br />
dominions to every work which is first published<br />
in the United Kingdom. The Colonies justly<br />
complained that under this Act a work which<br />
was published in a colony had no copyright in<br />
the United Kingdom or in any other colony, but<br />
this grievance has been removed by the Act of<br />
1886; a work published in a colony now enjoys<br />
precisely the same protection as one first pub-<br />
lished in the United Kingdom,<br />
(3) Canadian copyright as it exists at present.<br />
It was a common complaint of the Colonies,<br />
especially of Canada, that owing to the operation<br />
of the Imperial Copyright Act they were unable<br />
to obtain a sufficient supply of English literature.<br />
In order to remove this ground of complaint the<br />
Foreign Reprints Act was passed, and under<br />
its provisions Canada has been allowed to import<br />
pirated copies of English works on the under-<br />
taking that a duty of 12% per cent. should be<br />
collected by the colony upon all such copies for<br />
the benefit of the author. As a matter of<br />
fact the duty has not been collected, nor has<br />
any serious attempt been made by Canada to<br />
comply with the undertaking.<br />
In 1875 an Act was passed in Canada giving<br />
copyright to foreign authors upon condition of<br />
their republishing in the colony either simul-<br />
taneously with or at any time after publication<br />
elsewhere. This Canadian Act was expressly<br />
authorised by an Act of the Imperial Legislature,<br />
and therefore the Canada printers and publishers<br />
contended that the Imperial Copyright Act was<br />
repealed so far as Canada was concerned, and that<br />
English authors could only obtain copyright in<br />
Canada upon complying with the conditions of<br />
the Canadian Act. This contention was, however,<br />
decisively negatived by the Canadian courts in the<br />
case of “Smiles v. Belford,” and the position<br />
therefore at present is that English authors are<br />
only obliged to republish in Canada if they wish<br />
to avoid the operation of the Foreign Reprints<br />
Act.<br />
(4) Canada’s present proposals.<br />
The Canadian Act, passed by Colonial Legisla-<br />
ture in 1889, but reserved for the sanction of the<br />
Imperial Government, provides that, in order to<br />
obtain copyright in Canada, works must be regis-<br />
tered with the Minister of Agriculture before<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#358) ################################################<br />
<br />
4. THE AUTHOR,<br />
or simultaneously with their first publication,<br />
wherever such publication takes place, and must<br />
be reprinted and republished in Canada within<br />
one month of their publication elsewhere; and (2)<br />
that if the author does not comply with these<br />
conditions the minister may grant licences for the<br />
publication of the work, the licensees paying a<br />
royalty of Io per cent. for the benefit of the<br />
author. This Act is promoted solely by and in the<br />
interests of the Canadian printers and publishers,<br />
who claim to have the right to make a profit out<br />
of the works of English authors.<br />
The following are some of the reasons why the<br />
Act should not be allowed to come into force :<br />
(I) It is reactionary, and contrary to the prin-<br />
ciples adopted by this country after full con-<br />
sideration in acceding to the Berne Convention.<br />
It would, of course, deprive the Canadian author<br />
of the benefit of that Convention.<br />
(2) It is an attempt to deprive authors of their<br />
recognised rights for the benefit of the Canadian<br />
printers and publishers.<br />
(3) It is (except from the view of the printer<br />
and publisher) entirely unnecessary. The Cana-<br />
dian reader is amply provided for under the<br />
Foreign Reprints Act.<br />
(4) It will involve the repeal, so far as British<br />
authors are concerned, of the United States Copy-<br />
right Act of 1891, and the revival of legalised<br />
piracy in that country.<br />
(5) If it should by any chance accomplish its<br />
object, the action of the Canadians will thus recoil<br />
on their own heads. Canada will again be flooded<br />
by pirated copies printed in the United States,<br />
and the last condition of the Canadian printers<br />
and publishers will be far worse than the first.<br />
The short-sightedness of the Canadian policy is<br />
almost incredible. It will involve the flooding of<br />
English and other markets with cheap reprints, to<br />
the great detriment of publishers who have to pay<br />
a fair price for the work they publish. It has<br />
been proved over and over again that legislation<br />
is powerless to prevent the importation of these<br />
cheap reprints.<br />
(6) Having regard to the entire failure of<br />
Canada to collect the duties under the Foreign<br />
Reprints Act, there is no security whatever that<br />
authors will receive even the Io per cent. royalty<br />
provided by the Act.<br />
A manifesto has been issued by the Canadian<br />
Copyright Association in support of the Act.<br />
The reasons given may be stated as follows:<br />
(1) Canada has the right to legislate fully on<br />
copyright. Canada's right to legislate on copy-<br />
right is confined to the case of Canadian authors.<br />
She has no right whatever to take away from<br />
British authors their rights under the Imperial<br />
Acts. This was expressly decided by her own<br />
courts in “Smiles v. Belford,” and is the reason<br />
why she is now seeking the advice of the Imperial<br />
Legislature.<br />
(2) Copyright is analogous to patent right, and<br />
the Imperial Government did not disallow the<br />
Canadian Patent Act. But, in the first place,<br />
copyright is not analogous to patent right. Copy-<br />
right is given to the form only, not to the thought<br />
expressed. It does not prevent another author<br />
dealing, with the same subject or idea. Patent<br />
right deprives the second inventor, who has<br />
independently arrived at the same result, of the<br />
profits of his labours. Patent right is a monopoly<br />
in restraint of other original inventions. Copy-<br />
right is not. Secondly, the Canadian Copyright<br />
Act is not in the least on the same lines as the<br />
Canadian Patent Act. The Patent Act allows<br />
twelve months for obtaining a patent in Canada,<br />
after one has been obtained in England, and a<br />
further twelve months for commencing to manu-<br />
facture. This gives time to ascertain whether the<br />
market will warrant the outlay.<br />
(3) That under the present conditions the<br />
Canadian rights of English authors are included<br />
in the sale to United States publishers, to the<br />
injury of the Canadian printers and publishers.<br />
Here we have the true and only reason for the<br />
proposed legislation.<br />
It is based on a fallacy. It is no injustice what-<br />
ever to Canadian printers and publishers that<br />
British authors should be able to choose for them-<br />
selves where and through whom they will print<br />
and publish their works. To be consistent, the<br />
Canadians should demand that no artists should<br />
have protection for their works except such as<br />
used paints and canvas made in Canada. And the<br />
remedy is simple. English authors have to reprint<br />
in the United States. English publishers do not<br />
therefore demand protection or set up imaginary<br />
rights, but meet the difficulty in a business-like<br />
way. They set up branches in New York and<br />
Boston. Let the Canadians do the same.<br />
English authors, other things being equal, would<br />
rather deal with a Canadian publisher than an<br />
American. And let the Canadians join with us<br />
in endeavouring to obtain the removal of the<br />
unjust restrictions imposed by U.S.A. legislation<br />
instead of endeavouring to perpetuate and extend<br />
them.<br />
The real interests of English authors and<br />
Canadian publishers and printers in this matter<br />
are the same, and the latter are pursuing a most<br />
short sighted and suicidal policy.<br />
In any case the English authors submit with<br />
some confidence that the Canadian proposals are<br />
not such as ought to receive the sanction or<br />
assistance of the Imperial Legislature.<br />
May 13, 1895. J. ROLT.”<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#359) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. s<br />
II.--THE LAW of CoPYRIGHT.<br />
Amongst the Bills proposed to be introduced<br />
during the ensuing session of Parliament is one to<br />
amend the law relating to the protection of copy-<br />
right against the importation of foreign reprints<br />
into this colony, and to the registration of books.<br />
The second clause provides that Act No. 4 of<br />
1854, and so much of the seventh section of the<br />
Copyright Act, 1873, as entitles the proprietor<br />
of the copyright of any book to demand the<br />
delivery to him of all copies of foreign reprints of<br />
such books unlawfully imported under that Act,<br />
shall be repealed. Clause 3 will suspend the<br />
existing order prohibiting the importation of<br />
foreign reprints of British books, and give force<br />
and effect to every provision of Acts of the<br />
Imperial Parliament having regard to the<br />
prohibition against the importation of foreign<br />
reprints of British books into this colony.<br />
Clause 4 makes it illegal for any person not being<br />
the registered proprietor of the copyright, or some<br />
person authorised by him, to import into the<br />
colony any reprint of any book in which there<br />
shall be registered copyright under the provisions<br />
of the Copyright Act, 1873, as to which such<br />
proprietor shall have given to the Collector of<br />
Customs a notice, in writing, duly declared before<br />
a justice of the peace, that such copyright exists,<br />
such notice also stating when such copyright will<br />
expire. And if any unathorised person shall<br />
import or bring any such reprint into the colony,<br />
or shall knowingly sell, let, publish, or expose for<br />
sale or hire any such reprint, then every such<br />
reprint shall be forfeited, and shall be seized by<br />
any officer of customs, and shall be destroyed or<br />
disposed of in such manner as the Governor<br />
shall direct; and every person so offending, being<br />
duly convicted, shall also for every such offence<br />
forfeit the sum of £Io and double the value of<br />
every copy of such book which he shall so import<br />
into the colony, or shall knowingly sell, let,<br />
publish, or expose for sale or hire, or shall have<br />
in his possession for sale or hire; £5 of such<br />
penalty to the use of the officer of customs, and<br />
the remainder to the proprietor of the copyright.<br />
By clause 5 the proprietor of the copyright is<br />
reserved the right of action for damages for<br />
infringement of the Act. According to the<br />
seventh clause lists of all books in respect to<br />
which copyright shall be subsisting in the colony<br />
must be posted at the customs houses of Colonial<br />
ports.-Cape Times, April 6.<br />
III.-AMERICAN CoPYRIGHT LAw.—IMPORTANT<br />
DECISION.<br />
The Law Department of the United States<br />
gave an important decision yesterday bearing .<br />
upon the law of copyright. It says that the law<br />
in the United States as it at present stands does<br />
not prevent the sale in the States of American<br />
copyright books that have been printed in Canada.<br />
The point is one of such importance to United<br />
States authors that an agitation for their better<br />
protection will be started forthwith.-St. James’s<br />
Gazette, May 4.<br />
IV.-BoITON v. ALDIN AND OTHERs.<br />
(Queen's Bench Division.—Before Mr. Justice<br />
Grantham and a Common Jury).<br />
This was an action to recover damages for the<br />
infringement of copyright in a photograph by<br />
publishing it in the Sketch and in another publi-<br />
cation, and an injunction was asked for to<br />
restrain future publication. The representatives<br />
of the Illustrated London News, it was said, were<br />
ready to submit to an injunction going against<br />
them, and to pay costs up to a certain point; and<br />
they were therefore discharged from the action.<br />
Mr. Willes Chitty was for the plaintiff, and Mr.<br />
Kemp, Q.C., and Mr. Willis Bund for the remain-<br />
ing defendant.<br />
It was said that Mr. Gambier Bolton, the<br />
plaintiff, was a Fellow of the Zoological Society,<br />
and he had spent a large part of his life at the<br />
Zoological Gardens and in travelling in various<br />
parts of the world taking photographs of a great<br />
number of wild animals in various attitudes. He<br />
had a collection of 30OO of these photographs,<br />
which the authorities of the British Museum had<br />
framed and hung upon their walls for the benefit<br />
of future generations. This was very important,<br />
as many varieties of animals were fast becoming<br />
extinct, and, indeed, the plaintiff had in his<br />
possession photographs of two or three kinds of<br />
animals which were already extinct. The photo-<br />
graphs in the Museum would show to future<br />
generations the animals as they now exist. He<br />
had incurred great expense, and had run very<br />
great personal risk in getting the photographs.<br />
He had been in great danger on two or three<br />
occasions at the Zoological Gardens. Among<br />
others, he took at the Zoological Gardens a photo-<br />
graph of a tigress yawning. The difficulty in that<br />
particular case was that the tigress was asleep,<br />
and he had to wait for hours and hours until she<br />
should wake and yawn, and then there was great<br />
doubt as to whether the yawn could be caught at<br />
a proper attitude. He registered the photograph<br />
under the Copyright Act of 25 and 26 Vict. c. 68,<br />
in June, 1894, and it would be shown that the re-<br />
maining defendant made a sketch of this photo-<br />
graph and sold it for publication. It was pub-<br />
lished in the Sketch, and it was to stop a proceed-<br />
ing of that kind that the present action was<br />
brought. It was most important to the plaintiff<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#360) ################################################<br />
<br />
6 THE AUTHOR.<br />
that this should be accomplished, because artists<br />
of high standing were in the habit of using his<br />
photographs for studying wild animals in various<br />
positions, and his source of profit would be endan-<br />
gered if people were allowed to publish sketches<br />
of them.<br />
Evidence was given that the tigress in question<br />
had a cancerous mouth, and the tigress in the<br />
sketch had the same complaint. Mr. J. P. Nettle-<br />
ship, artist and animal painter, expressed his<br />
opinion that the published sketch was taken from<br />
the plaintiff’s photograph. It was admitted that<br />
the defendant’s sketch was sold for £3. There<br />
was other evidence that the publication of the<br />
sketch would be likely to seriously affect the sale<br />
of the plaintiff's photographs.<br />
Mr. Kemp, upon the conclusion of the evidence,<br />
submitted that the plaintiff had made out no<br />
case, and he quoted various decided cases in sup-<br />
port of his contention that what had happened<br />
was no infringement of copyright within the mean-<br />
ing of the Act.<br />
Mr. Justice Grantham had no doubt that the<br />
sketch was taken from the photograph, and that<br />
there was an infringement of copyright. He<br />
therefore gave judgment for the plaintiff for an<br />
injunction, and he awarded him one penalty of<br />
£IO and 34o damages.<br />
Judgment for the<br />
Observer, May 17.<br />
plaintiff with costs.-<br />
W.—MUSICAL COPYRIGHT.<br />
A telegram from America has been received by<br />
the plaintiffs in the musical copyright test case of<br />
Novello v. Ditson to say that the Appellate Court<br />
last Friday upheld the decision of the court below,<br />
in favour of the British publishers. The question<br />
referred to the so-called “manufacturing ” clauses<br />
of the American Copyright Act of 1891 ; or, in<br />
other words, the point raised was whether music,<br />
like books, must be printed from plates engraved<br />
or type-set in the United States in order to secure<br />
copyright at Washington. Both courts have now<br />
decided that music is exempt from the “manu-<br />
facturing ” clauses, and although it would perhaps<br />
be somewhat rash to consider the matter quite<br />
settled until the full text of the judgment is<br />
received a week hence, it nevertheless seems to<br />
have been held that music, unlike books, need not<br />
be reprinted in the United States in order to<br />
secure American copyright. The action was so<br />
far a friendly one in that the facts were agreed to<br />
by both parties; but the case was regularly<br />
fought out, the costs as we understand being<br />
defrayed by the members of the Music Publishers'<br />
Association of England.—Daily News, April 30.<br />
*... a -º<br />
sº- w -<br />
THE PROBLEM OF PUBLISHING,<br />
I" has been remarked by many of our members<br />
that the Society has never put forward a<br />
model agreement, or a series of model agree-<br />
ments. The reasons for not doing so are obvious.<br />
At the outset, while the facts were as yet only<br />
partly known, and the whole question was<br />
obscure, it would have been absurd to attempt a<br />
model agreement. For instance, no one had then<br />
ventured to demand the audit of accounts; no<br />
one had dared claim the right of learning the real<br />
facts as to the administration of his own estate;<br />
no one had even begun to understand that there<br />
is no risk whatever in the publication of a very<br />
large number of writers' works; no one had as yet<br />
begun to understand that there ought to be any<br />
connection between the price paid when a work<br />
was bought and the sum it realised ; and, though<br />
the royalty system had been introduced, no one<br />
had even begun to ask what any royalty offered<br />
meant for the publisher as compared with the<br />
author.<br />
All this is now changed; we know what it<br />
actually costs to produce a book; we know what<br />
the publisher charges the retail bookseller; and<br />
we know what is meant by risk.<br />
The time may seem, therefore, convenient for<br />
some consideration of the problem from the<br />
author's point of view, with the increased light<br />
thrown upon it since the question first arose, now<br />
ten years ago.<br />
There are three methods of publishing:<br />
I. Those in which the author sells his work for<br />
what it will fetch ; or, which is another way of<br />
putting it, prefers to capitalise his royalties. In<br />
the case of a successful writer this method should<br />
only be adopted with the advice of an agent.<br />
2. That in which a profit-sharing agreement is<br />
accepted.<br />
3. That in which a royalty is accepted.<br />
There are sub-divisions in these three classes.<br />
As, for instance, when the profit-sharing agreement<br />
means a half or two-thirds to the author; and, in<br />
the third case, what amount of royalty is offered,<br />
and whether the royalty is deferred or to begin<br />
with the first copy.<br />
We will consider some of the relations of the<br />
publisher to the book he issues.<br />
I. He used to say that he took the risk. We<br />
do not hear so much about the risk of late. As<br />
regards successful writers, that is, two or three<br />
hundred writers at least, there is no risk, no<br />
risk at all. Not the least shadow of risk. The<br />
publisher knows very well beforehand that he is<br />
safe for a certain minimum of copies, and that<br />
this minimum will not only cover his expenditure<br />
but will leave a margin of profit. Outside this<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#361) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 7<br />
circle of successful writers there may be, no doubt,<br />
risk; most publishers, however, in such a case<br />
make the author pay for production, or, at least,<br />
guarantee such a number of copies as will repay<br />
themselves, with a margin. The number of books<br />
thus paid for by the author is enormous ; there<br />
are small firms which do nothing else.<br />
2. When there is risk, what is it P<br />
Of course we are not considering the starting<br />
of a magazine, or the production of great works<br />
like an encyclopædia, a dictionary of natural<br />
biography, or the like ; or a book elaborately and<br />
expensively illustrated; or an edition de lua.e; or<br />
technical books in small demand. The author in<br />
such a case must generally be considered as the<br />
employé of the publisher; he contributes his work;<br />
he is paid for his work; he is not concerned with<br />
the rest. In this place we are talking only of<br />
ordinary books—travel books, history, memoirs,<br />
and biography, essays, poetry, plays, fiction,<br />
theology, sermons, educational books, &c.<br />
The risk is the difference between the number<br />
that the publisher can reckon on being taken by<br />
subscription, and the initial cost. Thus a book<br />
may cost £120 to produce and advertise, which<br />
the publisher will only subscribe at the outset<br />
for £1 12. The risk in that case is therefore 38.<br />
Most people talk as if the risk was the whole cost<br />
of production. On the other hand, those who pay<br />
for producing their own poetry and fiction will do<br />
well to remember that the risk will probably be<br />
represented to them as the whole cost of produc-<br />
tion. In some cases, where the book is worthless<br />
and ought not to be published, the risk really may<br />
be the whole cost of production. A case was<br />
brought to the Society the other day in which an<br />
author had paid for the production. The number<br />
of copies sold was nineteen<br />
3. The use of money. Accounts are made up,<br />
as a rule, once a year, and payment is made three<br />
months afterwards. This means the use of all the<br />
money received, and since the first run of the book<br />
is by far the most important, the use for eight to<br />
twelve months. In the case of a highly suc-<br />
cessful book, say a 6s. book, of which 40,000<br />
copies go off in the first three months, the pub-<br />
lisher retains in his own hands for nearly a year<br />
the difference between the returns and the cost of<br />
production ; that is, he has the use of all the<br />
author's royalties, amounting in such a case to<br />
about £3000. This would mean to the author<br />
about £IOO interest, but to the publisher, as<br />
money used in his business, a sum which may be<br />
estimated at from IO to 20 per cent., i.e., from<br />
£300 to £600.<br />
extreme case, and very unusual. Quite so ; but<br />
we must always take an extreme case in order to<br />
test an agreement in publishing, just as in a<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
But, it will be said, this is an<br />
theory of mathematics. Take, however, another<br />
case, in which only 2000 copies are sold. Here the<br />
publisher holds in hand for a year royalties at, say,<br />
one shilling a copy, amounting to £IOO. He<br />
therefore pockets from £10 to £20 in addition to<br />
what the royalty leaves him. This extra profit is,<br />
it will be seen, a serious factor in the accounts of<br />
a book, and one which must be taken into con-<br />
sideration.<br />
4. The agency for American rights. An author<br />
should be careful to retain these rights. A literary<br />
agent will take care of them for him at IO per<br />
cent. Several publishers’ letters have been<br />
received lately in which, while denouncing<br />
vigorously the extreme wickedness of the literary<br />
agent who takes IO per cent., the writer has<br />
kindly offered to undertake the American rights<br />
at 30 per cent. or 50 per cent.<br />
5. The cost of production.<br />
It cannot be too strongly impressed upon<br />
authors that cost of production must be taken to<br />
mean actual cost — money actually paid and<br />
nothing else. There are st'll some people left who<br />
systematically falsify their accounts. Readers<br />
of the Author will remember that a case was<br />
submitted to counsel, whose opinion, published<br />
in tº e Author, was that no judge would<br />
uphold such falsification on any pretence what-<br />
ever. Whether such a case could be brought into<br />
the criminal courts remains to be seen. Perhaps<br />
this may be ascertained by experiment before<br />
long.<br />
Nothing, to repeat, must be charged that is<br />
not actually paid, e.g., not advertisements in a<br />
publisher's own organ ; not advertisements that<br />
are actually, or practically, exchanges. Discounts,<br />
which are sometimes very heavy, must be entered<br />
in the joint account.<br />
6. There must be no secret profit of any kind.<br />
7. The accounts must be open to inspection<br />
8. The author must be told the whole of the<br />
facts about the production and the sale of his own<br />
book. -<br />
9. Then comes the question of the “establish-<br />
ment expenses.”<br />
A charge for these expenses is sometimes made<br />
in the agreement. Should it be allowed P<br />
There are three persons connected with every<br />
book.<br />
I. The author, who creates the property. Has<br />
he no “establishment expenses P” One does<br />
not reckon his household expenses; but there are<br />
many other things, He has to pay his agent; his<br />
study is his office; he has probably a shorthand<br />
clerk; he employs people to copy things; he has<br />
to buy many books; he has sometimes to go<br />
many journeys; he has to spend large sums<br />
in acquiring his knowledge—surely these are<br />
C<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#362) ################################################<br />
<br />
8 THE AUTHOR.<br />
‘' establishment expenses.” Hitherto, however,<br />
he has not charged them.<br />
2. There is the bookseller. He has a heavy<br />
rent to pay; he has taxes, assistants, and all the<br />
charges of a shop to defray before he touches<br />
anything at all for himself. These are his “esta-<br />
blishment expenses.” Hitherto he has not asked<br />
them to be allowed first, before his “profit”<br />
begins. The simple man continues to call the<br />
difference between the price he gets and the price<br />
he pays, his profit.<br />
3. The publisher, alone of the three, demands<br />
a first charge of “establishment expenses.” But<br />
he is careful not to recognise the same claim in<br />
the case of the other two.<br />
Io. Then follows the question of the proportion<br />
that should be paid to the publisher.<br />
What are the services which he renders He<br />
lends his office and his servants; his clerks give<br />
out the book, they also collect the money. The<br />
publisher arranges with printer and binder; he<br />
decides on the amount that may be spent in<br />
advertising the book. As a rule it is per-<br />
fectly simple routine work. What should he<br />
receive P There must be a margin, of course,<br />
over and above the establishment expenses,<br />
for the publisher as well as for the author<br />
and the bookseller. How large should that<br />
margin be P<br />
A publisher has been complaining lately in the<br />
New Budget that all he could get for himself out<br />
of a certain book which had a very wide circulation<br />
was a paltry 6d. a copy. Note that with a very<br />
successful book—it is only a very successful book<br />
for which so large a royalty can be claimed—<br />
namely, 25 per cent.—with a book selling 40,000<br />
copies, the wretched 6d. over which this person<br />
whines means 29 Iood | This 6d. was reckoned<br />
after deducting sevenpence for alleged establish-<br />
ment expenses. Imagine the happiness of an<br />
agent who should be allowed to take £IOOO out<br />
of £5000 for himself, with his office expenses as<br />
well ! The case is highly instructive.<br />
II. The deferred royalty ought not to be, but<br />
too often is a trick of the very worst kind. It seems<br />
perfectly reasonable that the cost of production<br />
should be first defrayed before profits are declared.<br />
Thus, suppose an edition of 3OOO copies is printed<br />
—all that the publisher thinks will be sold.<br />
Suppose also that the publisher is nearly right.<br />
IIe sells 2500 copies. The book has cost him<br />
216o. He sells it at 6s., i.e., 3s. 6d. It therefore<br />
takes him 920 copies to clear himself: every other<br />
copy is clear gain. What do we think then of<br />
publishers offering a miserable IO per cent. or<br />
15 per cent. royalty to begin after a thousand<br />
copies? At the latter royalty, for instance, the<br />
author would receive about £70 and the publisher<br />
about £200. This can hardly be called a just<br />
share of profit for managing this little estate.<br />
What, then, ought the publisher to receive P<br />
Obviously, more in proportion for a book of<br />
small circulation than for one of wide circulation.<br />
With these facts before us let us endeavour to<br />
arrive at some kind of conclusion.<br />
A proportion actually based on principles of<br />
equity cannot be expected from the nature of the<br />
case. For who can decide what ought to be the pay-<br />
ment of an agent P One can only state the facts,<br />
and deduce from them some conclusion that will<br />
be accepted by honourable men on both sides.<br />
Sir Frederick Pollock, speaking at a public<br />
meeting of the society when he took over the<br />
chairmanship, said, very strongly, that it was<br />
simply impossible that honourable men should<br />
be unable to arrive at an agreement as to the<br />
rights of author and publisher respectively. It<br />
does seem impossible. Let us therefore make an<br />
attempt to arrive at a solution of the problem.<br />
The above are, roughly speaking, the data. If<br />
the members of the society will consider the<br />
problem, (I) for a book about which there can be<br />
no talk of risk, and (2) for a book which carries<br />
risk there may be found some way out of the<br />
difficulty.<br />
For my own part, I would suggest, as a small<br />
contribution towards clearing up this question,<br />
that we leave off talking about the author's royalty<br />
and begin to speak and think of the royalty<br />
granted by the author to the publisher. This<br />
will be a practical method of asserting the pro-<br />
prietor's rights in his own property.<br />
*~~<br />
* --<br />
NOTES FROM PARIS,<br />
\ LPHONSE DAUDET has no intention of<br />
writing his impressions about London.<br />
He emphatically said so this very<br />
morning. He said that he has se-n far too little<br />
of our great city to venture to express an opinion<br />
on it that it would be presumptuous,<br />
and so on. He will probably, however, use his<br />
experiences in some future novel.<br />
His stay on the whole has been a pleasant one,<br />
and he will leave England on Monday next, “not<br />
without regret.” He has been greatly interested<br />
in all he has seen, and has filled note-books with<br />
notes on the same. He says that the characte-<br />
ristic of the English race is pride, that the French<br />
have no such pride, and that it is a good thing.<br />
Our English habit of tea-drinking, on the other<br />
hand, he thinks a detestable thing. “Tea in the<br />
morning,” he says, “tea at noon, tea all day. I<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#363) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 9<br />
gave it up in time. It was ruining my nerves.”<br />
He still suffers a great deal. “I feel as if my<br />
legs were being stabbed with knives, and as<br />
though there was a harrow going over my body.”<br />
However, he keeps in good spirits, and may often<br />
be heard singing. His favourite tune just now is<br />
that of “Her Golden Hair,” which, he says, is<br />
the Leit-Motiv of London.<br />
I say that his stay has been a pleasant one “on<br />
the whole”; that is to say, in spite of various<br />
annoyances from which, it would appear, no<br />
celebrity on a visit to London is exempted. The<br />
interviewers, to begin with, who by indiscreet<br />
statements have involved him—as thanks to him<br />
for placing himself at their disposal—in inter-<br />
minable controversies. Then the Leo-Hunters.<br />
Various people—including one or two noble ladies<br />
—treating him like an actor or curiosity on show<br />
—have written—strangers to him a stranger—to<br />
bid him to their houses, without taking the<br />
trouble of showing the preliminary courtesy of<br />
calling on him or of leaving cards. These have<br />
received lessons in savoir vivre which one hopes<br />
may profit them. Anonymous letters, many con-<br />
taining insults, have reached him by every post.<br />
Inventors have asked him to further their inven-<br />
tions, and needy Frenchmen have demanded<br />
funds where with to repatsiate themselves.<br />
I was present the other day at an interview<br />
between M. Daudet and a person who described<br />
himself as a French musician, who wanted a<br />
“few words in private.” Daudet told him to<br />
speak up, and he began speaking offensively<br />
about the English. However, seeing that Daudet<br />
by no means agreed with him in his comments<br />
on “ces Anglais,” he deftly turned his insults<br />
into compliments, and went on to say that he<br />
wanted the money to pay his fare back to Paris.<br />
Daudet said he had no money with him, but asked<br />
Léon, who was present, for his purse. Léon<br />
said that there was very little in it, and Daudet<br />
then told the man that he should have all there<br />
was, and emptied the purse on the table. The<br />
destitute musician went away, radiant, with<br />
about two pounds in his pocket. That was a<br />
week ago. To-day I saw him in the bar of a<br />
public-house in the Strand. He has not left for<br />
Paris yet.<br />
Léon Daudet has just finished correcting the<br />
proofs of his satirical novel “Les Kamcatka,”<br />
which will be published at the beginning of June<br />
by Charpentier, who expressed himself to me at<br />
the Wernissage of the New Salon as very sanguine<br />
about it. He will then start upon a work<br />
of imagination, to be called “Le Voyage de<br />
Shakespeare.” He imagines Shakespeare travel-<br />
ling in the North of Europe collecting the impres-<br />
sions from which “Hamlet” eventually springs.<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
It will be a difficult task, but, if successfully<br />
worked out, should make a very interesting book.<br />
I understand that George Hugo, who has been<br />
staying in London with the Daudets, will illustrate<br />
the work.<br />
I hear that of late many of the most dis-<br />
tinguished men of letters in France—the Daudets,<br />
the Rosnys, Pierre Loti, and others—have placed<br />
the management of their entire English and<br />
American business interests in the hands of Mr.<br />
A. P. Watt.<br />
Crockett writes me a charming letter from<br />
Bellagio. “Since I came to Italy,” he says, “I<br />
have been full of work. My book of ‘Cleg<br />
Relly, Arab of the City,” begins in the Cornhill<br />
for July, and this in addition to ‘The Grey<br />
Man’ for the Graphic, and other things. Then<br />
there have been incidentals to do, short things,<br />
which are neither here nor there, but which take<br />
time.”<br />
I have often thought that for writing a book<br />
for children a child would be one's best col-<br />
laborator. S. R. Crockett seems to share my<br />
opinion, for he tells me that he is writing a<br />
Christmas book in collaboration with his little<br />
daughter Maisie, the bonniest little child that<br />
God ever sent to earth. “It is a Christmas<br />
book about our travels,” he writes. “It will make<br />
the superior person very sick; but will please all<br />
children, big and little, or so I think. And I<br />
care little what the person who can’t write<br />
himself, but tells you how you must write, will<br />
say of the matter.”<br />
He is exemplary in his remarks on criticism.<br />
“I heard that I had been annihilated in some<br />
review by a gentleman whose name was un-<br />
familiar ; but I did not see the article, which<br />
must, I think, have been blank cartridge, since<br />
nobody was a penny piece the worse.” He also<br />
tells me that he hopes to be back in July,<br />
“when we are going to St. Andrews for the<br />
seaside, to dig in the sand—all of us.”<br />
Amongst the late Leconte de Lisle's papers<br />
was found a set of notes, in which the great poet<br />
summed up, in a few words devoted to each, his<br />
opinion on his comrades in the Muse. Of Lama -<br />
time he says: “An abundant imagination, an<br />
intelligence endowed rather with a thousand noble<br />
and ambitious desires than with real capacities.<br />
A nature d’élite, an incomplete artist, a great poet<br />
by chance. He has left behind him—as it were<br />
in expiation—a multitude of stillborn beings,<br />
with liquified brains and hearts of stone, the<br />
Wretched family of an illustrious father.” Alfred<br />
de Musset, in Leconte de Lisle's opinion, was a<br />
“mediocre poet, nil as an artist, a very witty<br />
writer of prose.” Victor Hugo was “the greatest<br />
known lyrical poet. Exaggerated in all things,<br />
C 2<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#364) ################################################<br />
<br />
IO THE AUTHOR.<br />
puerile and yet sublime, with an inexhaustible<br />
reservoir of splendid and incoherent images, a<br />
marvellous dreamer, with extraordinary blanks in<br />
his intellect.”<br />
About Baudelaire he wrote: “Very intelligent<br />
and original, but of limited imagination, lacking<br />
in breadth. His art is too often clumsy. About<br />
Théodore de Banville: “Witty, amiable, good-<br />
natured, a skilful, brilliant, but superficial artist.”<br />
Alfred de Vigny, according to the great Parmas-<br />
sian, was “a great and noble artist, in spite of<br />
frequent laches of expression, who has always<br />
lived in retirement, poor and dignified, faithful<br />
to the end to his one creed—the beautiful.”<br />
Theophile Gautier : “An excellent poet, an<br />
excellent writer. Very unjustly neglected.” As<br />
to Béranger, he is of opinion : “His chansons de<br />
circonstance and his God of a cabaret philanthro-<br />
pique have all had their vogue ; and having all<br />
had their vogue, are now and for evermore dust<br />
and ashes.” One would like now to be able to<br />
have the opinions of Béranger, Theophile Gautier,<br />
Baudelaire, and the others on Leconte de Lisle.<br />
I hear that arrangements have already been<br />
made in London for the publication in serial form<br />
of Mr. Vizetelly's translation of Emile Zola's<br />
new novel “Rome.” That is to say, arrangements<br />
in anticipation, as but little of the book has been<br />
written. The story, apart from descriptions of<br />
Rome and Roman life, deals with a tragic love<br />
affair. Zola is working himself to death over it.<br />
I met him at the Wernissage, and asked him why<br />
he was looking so pale. “Le travail,” he said,<br />
“Le travail!” Work ought not to make one pale.<br />
It is absurd if it does.<br />
Why are literary men, who usually lead a<br />
very healthy life, almost invariably “sicklied o'er<br />
with the pale cast of thought " ? De Musset<br />
said their faces gave a reflection of the white<br />
paper which was always before them. But then<br />
the paper is not long white, and I, for my part,<br />
never saw an author turn negro from the reflec-<br />
tion of the written sheet. The doctors might<br />
explain the matter.<br />
I have seen it reported that Madame Sarah<br />
Bernhardt is engaged in writing her memoirs.<br />
This is not true, and the report was doubtless<br />
spread abroad with the kind intention of injuring<br />
a work which has been in preparation for some<br />
time. I saw the lady shortly before her depar-<br />
ture from Paris, and she said that she was in no<br />
wise so engaged. What leisure she enjoys is<br />
spent in her atelier on sculpture, in which art she<br />
has already achieved some success. A model<br />
attends her every day when she is at home in<br />
Paris. I do not know what she does when en<br />
voyage.<br />
I had a grotesque experience at her house in<br />
the Boulevard Pereire on the occasion referred<br />
to. We were talking about a very pathetic and<br />
tragic thing, and the great lady was wringing<br />
her hands and had tears in her eyes. She was<br />
sitting with her back to a cage in which was a<br />
large Senegalese monkey, and the whole time<br />
that she was speaking the ape was grimacing<br />
horribly, sticking out his tongue, blinking his<br />
eyes, and performing various gymnastic feats.<br />
The contrast was a striking one, and, heavy-<br />
hearted as I was, I could not master a laugh—a<br />
laugh of the Sardinian kind.<br />
I suppose that everybody is reading Mr.<br />
Roche’s masterly translation of the “Memoirs<br />
of Barras.” One wants to hear the other side<br />
about Napoleon, and Barras gives it, full and<br />
strong. Of course Barras, by reason of his<br />
jealousy about Josephine, was a prejudiced<br />
witness, but then most of the witnesses on the<br />
other side, from Ménéval downwards, were also<br />
prejudiced. Mr. Charles Roche is a very dis-<br />
tinguished journalist, of world-wide experience,<br />
of whom M. Daudet has expressed a very high<br />
opinion. He is connected by marriage with the<br />
family of Charles Dickens.<br />
May 23. ROBERT H. SHERARD.<br />
Authors’ Club, 3, Whitehall Court.<br />
* * ~ *<br />
a- - --e.<br />
NEW YORK LETTER,<br />
New York, May 18.<br />
ITH increasing experience of the diffi-<br />
W W culty of expression in black and white, I<br />
am coming more and more to be of the<br />
belief that it is absolutely impossible to say any-<br />
thing in print so that it cannot be misunder-<br />
stood. For example, there was a letter in the<br />
Author two or three months ago in which it was<br />
shown that a British series of books is pretty<br />
certain to find an American publisher, while an<br />
American series is very unlikely to find a British<br />
publisher ; and now comes Mr. Andrew Lang in<br />
the Illustrated London News and calls this plain<br />
statement of fact a complaint. Certainly it was<br />
not prompted by any feeling of grievance. It was<br />
prompted by a desire to fulfil the wishes of the<br />
editor of the Author, who requested me to<br />
explain any conditions in the American book<br />
market which the reader in England was not<br />
likely to know.<br />
Now, one of the conditions an English reader is<br />
not likely to suspect is that the American market<br />
is more freely opened to a British book of average<br />
merit than the British market is opened to an<br />
American book of average merit. This is a fact.<br />
To state it is not to make a complaint. -<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#365) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. I I<br />
To account for it is not easy, although the<br />
reason is probably to be found in the former<br />
colonial dependence of the United States toward<br />
Great Britain; the effect of which was to give the<br />
British a poor opinion of what came from<br />
America, and to give the Americans a high<br />
opinion of what came from England. Many<br />
American authors have noticed that there is still<br />
in the United States a lingering survival of<br />
colonial deference toward British authors.<br />
Curiously enough, this colonialism exists in<br />
America only in regard to literature. For<br />
example, British art, pictorial or plastic, is held<br />
in very low esteem, as the American painters and<br />
sculptors and architects look to France for their<br />
masters. In a recent essay on “Trade Winds in<br />
Literature,” Col. Higginson discussed the subject<br />
with his usual felicity of illustration.<br />
“The sailors of Columbus,” he began, “ in<br />
crossing the Atlantic were not alarmed by oppos-<br />
ing winds, but because the wind blew always in<br />
their favour. It was certain, they held, that such<br />
winds cut off all hope of return. In literature<br />
these same winds have blown ever since; the fame<br />
of an English author spreads rapidly to America,<br />
whereas that of an American, though it may<br />
ultimately reach Europe, goes far more slowly.<br />
Dr. Conan Doyle, who has thus far identified his<br />
name with but a single character in fiction,<br />
comes here and receives 500 dollars per lecture;<br />
whereas if Edgar Poe had gone to England, in<br />
his day, and had offered to lecture, he would<br />
have been fortunate if he had cleared a profit of<br />
3s. 6d. Americans to whom the very names of<br />
Dr. Doyle and Mr. Christie Murray and Dean<br />
Hole were previously unknown, made haste to<br />
read some of their books in order to attend their<br />
lectures. It is impossible to see in this any-<br />
thing but a survival of that trade wind called<br />
Colonialism.”<br />
And after giving other instances, Col. Higgin-<br />
son declared that “The history of literature is,<br />
far more than we recognise, a series of vibrations<br />
of the pendulum for the two great branches of<br />
the English-speaking race; sometimes the one<br />
takes the lead, sometimes the other. Forty years<br />
ago no book produced in England compared in<br />
world-wide circulation with “Uncle Tom’s<br />
Cabin, and even to this day it is said to be<br />
found in English farmhouses more frequently,<br />
with ‘The Wide, Wide World,’ than any other<br />
book. Twenty years ago the travelling American<br />
rarely met an Englishman who was not familiar<br />
with Mark Twain, or an English woman who was<br />
not eager to hear anything about Longfellow. It<br />
is probable that Emerson had, and still has, on<br />
the minds of thoughtful Englishmen more direct<br />
influence than Carlyle had among Americans.<br />
It is only a few years since American magazines<br />
conquered London, which they still hold; and<br />
since it was generally admitted that Americans<br />
excelled their transatlantic cousins in short<br />
stories. This year there is a swing of the pendu-<br />
lum. In spite of Mr. Howells—who doubtless<br />
prophesied somewhat rashly—there is a reaction<br />
in favour of tales of historical romance, in which<br />
English writers have taken the unquestioned<br />
lead.”<br />
The fact is that England is the older country,<br />
and that, therefore, there is a certain prejudice in<br />
England against an American author ; while<br />
America is the younger country, and therefore<br />
there is a certain prejudice in America in favour<br />
of an English author. That is why an American<br />
publisher was readily found to issue Mr. Lang's<br />
series of volumes on “English Worthies,”<br />
although that series proved to be a financial<br />
failure, and was abandoned before two of the<br />
most interesting of its books appeared—Mr. Lang's<br />
own “Izaak Walton’’ and R. L. Stevenson’s<br />
“Wellington,” both of which remained unwritten.<br />
That is why the “Great Educators’” series, which<br />
was planned here in New York by Prof. Nicholas<br />
Murray Butler (who assigned the separate<br />
volumes to writers in America, in England, and<br />
in France), and which is printed here by Charles<br />
Scribner's Sons (who sell sheets to Mr. Heine-<br />
mann), is published in London with a new title-<br />
page, from which Prof. Butler's name is omitted<br />
—this new title-page being the only part of the<br />
so-called “Heinemann’s Great Educators’ Series'’<br />
which is printed in England.<br />
It is pleasant to be able to record that books of<br />
solid merit have sales sometimes as large as those<br />
of the mere book of the hour. I was told not<br />
long ago that two thousand sets of the new edition<br />
of Mr. James Bryce's book on the “American<br />
Commonwealth” were placed with the trade here<br />
in the city of New York alone in a single day.<br />
By the publisher's advertisements I see that Mr.<br />
John Fiske’s “Discovery of America” is in its<br />
thirteenth thousand, while most of his other<br />
historical and philosophical works have reached<br />
at least a tenth edition.<br />
Macmillan and Co. will commence in May the<br />
publication of their “Miniature Series,” one<br />
number of which will appear each month. The<br />
little books will be bound in paper, and will be<br />
sold at 25 cents each. In shape and in size, and<br />
in neatness of typography, they resemble the<br />
pretty little collection of books by American<br />
authors issued by Mr. David Douglas, of Edin-<br />
burgh. The volumes announced for the coming<br />
year are: “Shakespeare's England,” by William<br />
Winter; “The Friendship of Nature,” by Mabel<br />
Osgood Wright; “A Trip to England, by Gold-<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#366) ################################################<br />
<br />
I 2 THE AUTHOR.<br />
win Smith; “From a New England Hillside,” by<br />
William Potts; “The Pleasures of Life,” by Sir<br />
John Lubbock; “Old Shrines and Ivy,” by<br />
William Winter; “The Choice of Books,” by<br />
Frederick Harrison; “Gray Days and Gold,”<br />
by William Winter; “The Aims of Literary<br />
Study,” by Hiram Corson, LL.D. ; The Novel—<br />
What It Is,” by F. Marion Crawford; and<br />
“Amiel's Journal,” translated by Mrs. Humphry<br />
Ward. It is to be noticed that, although the<br />
publishers are a British house, only two of these<br />
eleven books are by residents of England.<br />
In the May number of the Book Buyer, the<br />
little monthly publication issued by Charles<br />
Scribner's Sons, appears the first instalment of a<br />
Bibliography of First Editions of John Greenleaf<br />
Whittier, compiled by Mr. Edward H. Bierstadt,<br />
of the Grolier Club. No detailed and descriptive<br />
bibliography of this writer has been published here-<br />
tofore, and the compiler has endeavoured to make<br />
his work complete, and as fully descriptive as is<br />
convenient in view of the undertaking. It is the<br />
purpose of the publishers of the Book Buyer in<br />
future to make contributions of literary study,<br />
which they believe will be found convenient<br />
standards of accurate information upon the<br />
subject. The Whittier Bibliography will be<br />
completed in four instalments. The publishers<br />
expect to follow it with bibliographies of James<br />
Russell Lowell, Nathaniel Hawthorn, Robert Louis<br />
Stevenson, and other authors whose works are<br />
of interest to collectors. The May number of the<br />
Book Buyer has for its frontispiece an engraving<br />
on wood of the latest portrait of Mr. Stedman.<br />
The editor of the new American edition of the<br />
Bookman—which now owes very little to its<br />
London namesake save the name—is one of the<br />
Columbia College Professors of Latin ; and<br />
it is therefore perhaps not unfair to credit him<br />
with the following adaptation, called “Titerary<br />
Log-rolling in Ancient Rome’’:—<br />
Hor. Epist. ii., 2, 87.<br />
Frater erat Romae consulti rhetor, ut alter<br />
Alterius sermone meros audiret honores,<br />
Gracchus ut hic illi, foret huic ut Mucius ille,<br />
Qui minus argutos vexat furor iste poétas P<br />
Carmina compono, hic elegos. “Mirabile visu<br />
Caelatumque movem Musis opus !” Adspice primum,<br />
Quanto cum fastu, quanto molimine circum-<br />
Spectemus vacuam Romanis vatibus aedem -<br />
Mox etiam, si forte vacas, sequere et procul audi,<br />
Quid ferat et quare sibi nectat utergue coronam.<br />
Caedimur et totidem plagis consumimus hostem<br />
Lento Samnites ad lumina prima duello.<br />
Discedo Alcaeus puncto illius ; ille meo quis P<br />
Quis nisi Callimachus P Si plus adposcere visus,<br />
Fit Mimnermus et optivo cognomine crescit.<br />
Multa ferout placem genus irritabile vatum,<br />
Cum scribo et supplex populi suffragia capto ;<br />
Idem, finitis studiis et mente recepta,<br />
Obturem patulas impune legentibus aures.<br />
[The same, Englished.]<br />
Two Romans, counsellor and pleader, went<br />
Through life on terms of mutual compliment;<br />
One called the other Gracchus, he supposed<br />
His brother Mucius ; so they praised and prosed.<br />
Our bards to-day the selfsame madness goads:<br />
My friend writes elegies, and I write odes.<br />
O how we puff each other “’Tis divine !<br />
The Muses had a hand in every line.”<br />
Remark our swagger as we pass the dome<br />
Built to receive the future bards of Rome;<br />
Then follow us and see the fame we make,<br />
How each by turn awards and takes the cake.<br />
Like Samnite fencers with elaborate art,<br />
We hit in tierce to be hit back in quart.<br />
I’m dubbed Alcaeus, and retire in force :<br />
And who is he P Callimachus of course !<br />
If this seem feeble, then I bid him rise<br />
Mimmermus, and he swells to twice his size.<br />
Writing myself, I’m tortured to appease<br />
Those wasp-like creatures, our poetic bees;<br />
But when my pen's laid down, my sense restored,<br />
I rest from boring and from being bored.<br />
The Paris correspondent of the Author voices<br />
M. Marcel Prevost’s protest against an unautho-<br />
rised American translation of his unspeakable<br />
Demi-Vierges.” The translation, it is true, is pub-<br />
lished in America, but the translator, Mr. Arthur<br />
Hornblow, is an Englishman. H. R.<br />
*– ~ --><br />
sº- ~~<br />
NOTES AND NEWS.<br />
THINK that I may very properly make this<br />
the place for a brief note concerning the<br />
distinction lately conferred upon me. It is,<br />
in fact, a national recognition of this Society and<br />
of its work in advancing the dignity and the inde-<br />
pendence of literature. The Earl of Rosebery in<br />
his letter to me expressly pointed out that this<br />
distinction was offered in recognition of services<br />
which, he kindly says, have been rendered by<br />
me to the dignity of literature. These humble<br />
services could only be effective through such an<br />
organisation as our own. It is, therefore, the<br />
Society itself which has, for the first time, received<br />
recognition.<br />
We have also to chronicle the same distinction<br />
conferred upon our chairman, Sir William Martin<br />
Conway. The fact that he is our chairman, in<br />
addition to the many achievements by which he<br />
has lifted himself above the heads of his fellows,<br />
may be taken as having had its weight.<br />
Last, but not least, is to be noted, as very<br />
suggestive of new departure, the same distinction<br />
bestowed upon a poet—Sir Lewis Morris.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#367) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. I3<br />
In the lamented death of Lord Pembroke the<br />
Society has lost one of its strongest friends.<br />
Lord Pembroke was a member of our council; he<br />
attended the meetings of council—which are<br />
few ; he was present at several of our public<br />
meetings; he took the chair for us at one of our<br />
dinners; and he always showed the greatest<br />
interest in our work and aims.<br />
In a recent “interview,” which appeared in the<br />
Daily Chronicle, Mr. Hall Caine gave public<br />
utterance, for the first time, to a suggestion which<br />
has been in the minds of many, and is now being<br />
talked of freely. “The authors,” he said, “who<br />
have the hearts of the public would’—under<br />
certain circumstances—“ have to do as Ruskin<br />
did—create new publishers—or else attempt the<br />
perhaps not impossible task of doing without<br />
publishers altogether, and going direct to the<br />
booksellers.” This is what is whispered or spoken<br />
outright. What is to prevent, if authors choose,<br />
the opening of an office, with a manager paid on<br />
Commission, and not allowed to publish on his<br />
own account P The thing is perfectly plain and<br />
perfectly simple. For my own part I hope—<br />
though my hope is not, I confess, so strong as<br />
formerly—that the old machinery will continue,<br />
but adjusted to altered conditions. All that we<br />
demand as a preliminary to any serious attempt<br />
to settle the question is the recognition of four<br />
points which no honest man can, for very shame,<br />
refuse, viz.: -<br />
I. No secret profits—i.e., no falsifying of<br />
a CCOUnts.<br />
2. No charge unless of money actually paid—as<br />
no charge for advertisements except those paid<br />
for ; all discounts to be entered in the books, &c.<br />
3. Open accounts—i.e., an author to see the<br />
account books which concern himself.<br />
4. A clear understanding of what the agree-<br />
ment leaves to either party in the event of<br />
SUICCéSS.<br />
I have submitted these points to many business<br />
men. Their opinion has uniformly been the same.<br />
If anyone in the City, they say, should dare to<br />
object to any such conditions between himself and<br />
his partner or fellow venturer in any enterprise,<br />
he would be shown the door instantly.<br />
If, therefore, we find that a certain publisher is<br />
constantly vomiting charges of this and of that<br />
against the Society or any of its committee; if<br />
he further learns that this publisher is one of<br />
those who still falsify their accounts, keep the<br />
books dark, and persevere in the bad old ways of<br />
treating the author as their humble dependent, it<br />
is surely our plain and obvious duty at least to<br />
avoid that person; not to give him our books;<br />
and not to admit him to our society. Do we not<br />
owe so much—it is not much—to the cause of<br />
literature, as well as our own self-respect P. This<br />
is one of the points which we ought to cultivate—<br />
the absolute social boycotting of the dishonest<br />
and the tricky publisher.<br />
Here is a case, not of dishonesty, nor of tricki-<br />
ness, but one which exposes the way in which<br />
certain publishers have come to regard their own<br />
rights over a book. The man in question was<br />
interviewed by a certain paper, and he wept over<br />
the wickedness and the greediness of the un-<br />
speakable author. The case of wicked greed was<br />
this. He produced a book by a highly popular,<br />
though, perhaps, unspeakable, author. This<br />
author took a royalty of eighteenpence out of a<br />
nominal six shillings. How did the case stand P<br />
The figures are not to be denied. They are as<br />
follows:<br />
The average price of the book to the trade is<br />
s. 6d.<br />
3 The cost, with advertising, is less than a shil-<br />
ling—say I I d.<br />
The author receives Is. 6d. for every copy sold.<br />
The publisher receives Is. Id.<br />
This man said that he must first subtract the<br />
“establishment expenses” and, these all deducted,<br />
he was left only sixpence. The “expenses”<br />
therefore amount to about as much—say 31250<br />
for the one book, which had a sale of about<br />
50,000 copies, and is still going on. Really, when<br />
one looks at the modest exterior of this publisher's<br />
establishment, one is surprised that one book can<br />
cost so much merely to manage, without counting<br />
the production. Therefore, the publisher having<br />
had no risk whatever—having simply used the<br />
machinery of a small office, and ordered the<br />
advertisements—gets 31250 for himself by his<br />
own showing. And he goes on to say that<br />
things are coming to such a pass—i.e., when<br />
a publisher can make no more than £1250<br />
for himself out of one book—that “the successful<br />
author will find no publisher willing to undertake<br />
his books at the price he demands.” What? Not<br />
for twelve hundred and fifty pounds? Really<br />
Here is self sacrifice But is not this demanding<br />
almost too much of a credulous public P<br />
As for “establishment expenses,” the question<br />
will have to be argued out. For my own part,<br />
I should begin by arguing that the bookseller's<br />
and the author’s “establishment expenses” must<br />
be allowed as well as the publisher's. The former,<br />
clearly, has rent and assistants and taxes to pay :<br />
and he has also the very considerable risk of<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#368) ################################################<br />
<br />
14<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
unsold stock. The latter—the author—has at<br />
least the rent of his study, which is his office;<br />
his shorthand clerk; his agent; his typewriting;<br />
the books he must buy ; the journeys he must<br />
take. For instance, I once wrote a little book<br />
on Captain Cook. It was one of Macmillan's<br />
series, for which T received a hundred guineas.<br />
The price was, I dare say, quite as much as the<br />
book was worth, commercially. I do not complain<br />
at all about the price. I was very glad to write<br />
the book for other reasons apart from the small<br />
cheque. Now, this book took me down to York-<br />
shire twice; and once to a certain cathedral city<br />
to see a certain clergyman, who had information<br />
of a kind previously unpublished, and very useful<br />
for the book. I had to pay for the copying of a<br />
previously unpublished log. I had to get a good<br />
deal of typewriting done. All these were “esta-<br />
blishment expenses,” and they amounted, I<br />
reckoned up, to about £45. But it never entered<br />
my head to charge these expenses, although they<br />
swallowed up nearly half the little cheque. If,<br />
however, the practice of charging for “establish-<br />
ment expenses” is allowed to one of the three<br />
persons named, I shall argue that it must be<br />
allowed to all.<br />
It seems likely that we shall have a good deal<br />
of talk upon these subjects before long, perhaps<br />
with some results. The booksellers, whose case is<br />
really hard, seem waking up. One of them, Mr.<br />
Burleigh, wrote to the Times saying, with great<br />
bitterness, that authors and publishers between<br />
them are killing the bookseller. Sir William<br />
Conway pointed out in an able letter that authors,<br />
at least, are innocent of any such action or<br />
intention. As a matter of fact, the alleged<br />
Squeezing by agents, which has by no means as<br />
yet even reached the old half-profit system, is a<br />
thing of the last half dozen years, and no change<br />
whatever, as Mr. Burleigh must know very well,<br />
has been made of late in the relations of bookseller<br />
and publisher. The booksellers, in fact, if they only<br />
knew it, are the real masters of the situation. They<br />
should combine, but not to run up the prices of<br />
books. They should combine, leaving to each<br />
perfect freedom as to the price at which he would<br />
sell his books.<br />
upon me I will show him certain other objects for<br />
which booksellers could combine with very<br />
excellent results to themselves. But if he calls he<br />
must not begin by calling authors bad names:<br />
first, because I won’t allow it; next, because we<br />
don't deserve these bad names; and lastly, because<br />
calling names doesn’t advance matters.<br />
At the Authors’ Club on the 27th ult. Rider<br />
Haggard was the guest of the evening. If there<br />
And if Mr. Burleigh will call<br />
was wanted a proof that literary men are not,<br />
as a rule, devoured with jealousy and hatred<br />
towards each other, it was provided in the recep-<br />
tion which he met with at that dinner.<br />
A friend of many readers of this paper is dead.<br />
George Bentley died last week at the age of sixty-<br />
seven. He had long been suffering from asthma,<br />
which drove him every winter to take refuge at<br />
Tenby. Courtly, genial, kindly, he was the model<br />
of the old-fashioned publisher of the most honour-<br />
able kind. Nor was he without literary ability, as<br />
was shown by the occasional papers which he con-<br />
tributed to his own magazine, Temple Bar, of<br />
which he was for nearly thirty years the editor,<br />
These essays he collected into a little volume,<br />
which he published some years ago, with what<br />
success I know not. His magazine continues, I<br />
believe, to enjoy a wide and increasing circulation;<br />
and it has always been remarkable for its excel-<br />
lent novels, written chiefly by ladies, and for its<br />
biographical sketches. At this moment, that of<br />
going to press, it is impossible to do justice to<br />
the memory of George Bentley. In our next<br />
number I hope that one who knew him intimately<br />
will communicate to the Author a longer notice<br />
of this kindliest of publishers.<br />
I hear also at the same moment that James<br />
Dykes Campbell, the author of the “Life of<br />
Coleridge,” is dead. It was his one book, but it<br />
is the life of Coleridge. No other memoir of the<br />
philosopher-poet will be written, unless it is one<br />
based upon Campbell's. The author was for many<br />
years a partner in the house of Ireland, Fraser, and<br />
Co., in Mauritius; he was always, from boyhood.<br />
attracted towards literary pursuits; and when I<br />
first made his acquaintance, now thirty-two<br />
years ago, was already deeply interested in every-<br />
thing that concerned Coleridge and his friends.<br />
He was fortunate in being able to retire from<br />
business soon after forty with a moderate fortune,<br />
which enabled him to live as he pleased, and to<br />
take up in earnest the literary life without being<br />
shackled by the necessity of providing the daily<br />
bread. To this enviable independence we owe<br />
the “Life of Coleridge"—a book which contains<br />
the research, the travels, and the patient labour<br />
of years. He died at a comparatively early age,<br />
but his life was happy, fortunate, and successful.<br />
To have written that one book, which will remain<br />
long after the perishable work of more popular<br />
writers, to be inseparably associated with the<br />
name of Coleridge, is an achievement which by<br />
itself makes a successful career.<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#369) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 15<br />
ANNUAL DINNER OF THE INCORPORATED<br />
SOCIETY OF AUTHORS,<br />
R. MOBERLY BELL presided last even-<br />
ing (May 23) at the Holborn Restaurant,<br />
over the annual dinner of this Society,<br />
at which about 180 ladies and gentlemen were<br />
present, including the American Ambassador, Sir<br />
F. and Lady Jeune, Mr. A. W. a Beckett, Mrs.<br />
Oscar Beringer, the Rev. Canon Bell, D.D., Mr.<br />
Mackenzie Bell, Mr. C. F. Clifford Borrer, Mr.<br />
J. Theodore Bent, Mrs. Brightwen, Mr. Walter<br />
Besant, Miss Marie Belloc, Mrs. Moberly Bell,<br />
Professor C. A. Buchheim, Mr. F. H. Balfour, yet I am not here to ask absolution, to plead<br />
Mrs. H. C. Black, Dr. Sutherland Black, Mr.<br />
Poulteney Bigelow, Miss Mathilde Blind, Mr.<br />
Henry Blackburn, Lieutenant-Colonel Campbell,<br />
Sir W. T. Charley, Q.C., Mr. Edward Clodd, Mr.<br />
W. Martin Conway, Mrs. Conway, Mr. Moncure<br />
T). Conway, Miss E. R. Chapman, Mr. A. Chatto,<br />
Mr. and Mrs. Horace Cox, Miss Beatrice<br />
Chambers, Mr. and Mrs. Hall Caine, Mr. Ralph<br />
Hall Caine, Major Seton Churchill, the Earl of<br />
Desart, Mrs. Gerard Ford, Miss L. Friswell, Sir<br />
William Fraser, Mr. Harry Furniss, Mr. Edmund<br />
Gosse, Mrs. Aylmer Gowing, Dr. R. Garnett,<br />
Mr. Upcott Gill, Mme. Sarah Grand, Mr.<br />
Anthony Hope Hawkins, Dr. G. Harley, F.R.S.,<br />
Mr. Holman Hunt, Mr. Isaac Henderson, Pre-<br />
bendary Harry Jones, Mr. C. F. Keary, Miss<br />
Florence Marryatt, Lord Monkswell, Mrs. Millie,<br />
Mr. S. B. G. M'Kinney, the Rev. C. H. Middleton-<br />
Wake, Mr. Justin C. MacCartie, Mr. and Mrs.<br />
Henry Norman, Miss E. Pitcairn, Mr. W. H.<br />
Pollock, the President of the Royal College of<br />
Surgeons, the President of the Institute of<br />
Journalists, Lord Reay, Mr. W. Fraser Rae, Mr.<br />
John Rae, Mr. J. Morgan Richards, Mr. J. Ashby<br />
Sterry, Mr. A. M. M. Stedman, Mr. M. H. Spiel-<br />
mann, the Rev. Clementi-Smith, Mr. Douglas<br />
Sladen, Mrs. Burnett Smith, Dr. Burnett Smith,<br />
Miss Shaw, Mr. and Mrs. H. M. Stanley, Miss L.<br />
Shaw, Mr. and Mrs. G. W. Sheldon, Mr. Clement<br />
R. Shorter, Sir Henry Thompson, Mrs. Alec<br />
Tweedie, Mr. Andrew W. Tuer, Mr. G. Herbert<br />
Thring, Mrs. Thring, Miss Grace Toplis, Miss<br />
Tobin, Miss G. Traver, Mr. H. Townsend (New<br />
Pork Herald), Mr. Thomas Townend, Mr. William<br />
Tirebuck, Mr. P. Villars (Figaro), Mrs. Neville<br />
Walford, Mr. C. T. Hagberg Wright, Mr. Walter,<br />
Mr. Sydney F. Walker, Mr. Theodore Watts, and<br />
Mr. Wesselitsky.<br />
The following is a report of the speeches:—<br />
The CHAIRMAN.—Your Excellency, my Lords,<br />
Ladies, and Gentlemen: I ask you to drink<br />
to that toast which needs no words——“The<br />
Queen.”<br />
The CHAIRMAN.—Your Excellency, my Lords,<br />
Ladies, and Gentlemen : Before I propose the<br />
toast of the evening, I think it incumbent on me<br />
to offer some explanation of my apparent pre-<br />
sumption in venturing to address from this chair<br />
a Society of Authors. I am painfully conscious<br />
that I stand, as it were, in the footprints of men<br />
whose shoelatchets I am unworthy to unloose; that<br />
I address authors whose names are “household<br />
words,” and that to most of you to whom I am<br />
utterly unknown, except by name, if by that,<br />
I must seem to have rashly and unnecessarily<br />
placed myself amongst that vast majority of man-<br />
kind who “rush in where angels fear to tread.”<br />
guilty, nor even to urge extenuating circum-<br />
stances, for if on my own merits I have barely<br />
right to ask admission as a simple member of the<br />
Society of Authors—for I hold that the term<br />
“author’’ is not too lightly to be applied to<br />
every scribbler (hear, hear) — if I have still<br />
less the right to speak with the authority which<br />
befits your chairman, yet I ask you to see<br />
in this chair to-night not my own insignificant<br />
personality, but rather the representative, if an<br />
inadequate one, of that great author who, though<br />
anonymous, may yet in some respects claim to<br />
be the greatest author of all time, the Press.<br />
(Hear, hear.) I am deeply sensible that the<br />
Society of Authors, in asking me to take the chair<br />
to-night, have been anxious to pay a graceful and<br />
generous compliment not to myself, not to any<br />
section of the Press, but to the Press as a whole,<br />
to the Press in the widest acceptation of the term,<br />
to that power, great for good and evil—I trust<br />
greater for good than for evil—which owes its<br />
existence to a large extent to the co-operation of<br />
authors, and to which authors themselves some-<br />
times owe a little. (Hear, hear.) I speak of the<br />
Press as an author because I like to think of<br />
every portion in it as forming a part of one<br />
individual whole, animated by one common object,<br />
choosing, it must be, different ways of arriving at<br />
that object, quarrelling, it may be, within Our<br />
body corporate, but yet, if differing in our means,<br />
never differing in our end, and that end I take to<br />
be to voice without fear or favour, without bias<br />
or prejudice, above all without personal motive—<br />
(hear, hear)—that which we honestly believe to<br />
be the public intelligence and the public con-<br />
science. I call the Press a great author because<br />
to ninety-nine hundredths of readers authors are<br />
known not by their individuality, but by their<br />
Works, and I think that even in this distinguished<br />
assembly of authors it will hardly be denied that<br />
the Press, if not the greatest, is, at all events of<br />
all authors, the most prolific and the most<br />
voluminous. (Hear, hear, and laughter.) The<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#370) ################################################<br />
<br />
I6 THE AUTHOR.<br />
most popular amongst you count your readers<br />
by thousands—we count ours by tens and<br />
hundreds of thousands. The most industrious<br />
amongst you can only write—well, ten or a dozen<br />
volumes in the course of a year. (Laughter.)<br />
We publish that every day. (Laughter.) The<br />
most versatile amongst you cannot claim to be a<br />
profound authority on more than three or four<br />
subjects. The author I represent is omniscient.<br />
(Laughter.) . He speaks with profound authority<br />
on every subject and at the very shortest notice.<br />
We write tragedy in our police courts, we write<br />
comedy in our Parliamentary reports, and fiction<br />
in our advertisements (laughter); but the Press,<br />
though it uses the first personal plural, is never<br />
egotistic, and our business to-night is with the<br />
Society of Authors. There are two societies of<br />
authors. To the greater it is given to but few<br />
in a generation, or even in a century to belong;<br />
but the long list of immortals, which begins,<br />
perhaps, with Homer and will not finish, with the<br />
names of your two presidents, the late Lord<br />
Tennyson and Mr. George Meredith. If few can<br />
attain all can aspire, and you and the world will<br />
be better for the aspiration, and I think it fitting<br />
in proposing the toast of what must be an<br />
ephemeral society of authors not to altogether<br />
omit mention of that great immortal Society, of<br />
whose works it was said more than four hundred<br />
years ago “they are the masters who instruct us<br />
without rods or ferrules, without harsh words<br />
or anger, without money or clothes. If you<br />
approach them they are not asleep. If inves-<br />
tigating you interrogate them they conceal<br />
nothing, if you mistake them they never<br />
grumble, if you are foolish they never laugh<br />
at you.” The other society of authors is<br />
Our noble selves. If we cannot illuminate all<br />
time we shed a very brilliant light upon the pre-<br />
sent generation. We are a most virtuous society,<br />
the most virtuous that ever existed. Imake that<br />
assertion on the unimpeachable authority of a<br />
committee of the society itself, for we have been<br />
informed in the public press that no member of<br />
this society is greedy—(laughter)—inordinately<br />
greedy. That remark was not made in reference<br />
to this banquet. It referred to the greed of<br />
pecuniary profit. I do not know that it is a<br />
serious charge to bring against anyone that he<br />
should be greedy of the full remuneration which<br />
he can honestly claim for his work (hear, hear),<br />
but, however that may be, we are devoid of even<br />
that, and therefore I am sure I am justified<br />
in saying that we are a peculiarly virtuous<br />
Society, that we have a strong sense of virtue<br />
—whether we have an equal sense of humour,<br />
that, as one of our Society hath said, is quite<br />
another story (laughter)—but we have great<br />
claims upon your goodwill. We have led a<br />
respectable, useful, and not utterly obscure<br />
existence, for more than eleven years. Originally<br />
started, I believe, for the protection of the<br />
unfledged authors from the wiles of those animals.<br />
—ferae naturae—who prowl in the field of litera-<br />
ture in the guise of the Profession we all honour<br />
and respect, the publisher, you now number<br />
twelve hundred members, all authors more or less.<br />
distinguished, more than half of whom have<br />
sought the assistance of the committee : and<br />
we have another claim—we are co-operative<br />
and self supporting. We do not send round the<br />
hat. (Laughter.) We ask nothing of our visitors,<br />
except to dine with us, and that which is,<br />
perhaps, I admit, already a severe tax, to listen.<br />
to our speeches, but even that is not compulsory.<br />
(Laughter.) I have spoken of your past and<br />
present. Allow me a few words as to your<br />
future. As a member of your Society, as one<br />
whom you have peculiarly honoured to-night, I<br />
naturally wish you a long and prosperous career,<br />
but I fear that my hopes are stronger than my<br />
faith. I am credibly informed that many of you<br />
neglect the latest gospel of labour. Some of you<br />
work more than eight hours a day, many of you<br />
have other professions, and are therefore out-<br />
siders; others, I am told, are so devoted to<br />
literature that they work without exacting a living<br />
wage, and then, worst of all, you do not each of<br />
you insist upon exactly the same payment—<br />
pounds, shillings, and pence, per word, or per<br />
page, or per week. (Laughter). Well, if these<br />
horrible charges are true, it is my duty to tell<br />
you that you are blacklegs, and that you must<br />
expect in a very short time that either the House<br />
of Commons or the London County Council, or<br />
one of those numerous institutions which exist<br />
to restore to us the beneficent socialism of the<br />
sixteenth century, will come down upon you, and<br />
they will, perhaps, establish a ministry or a<br />
department for the protection of the authors, and<br />
thus will destroy the reason of your existence.<br />
The department will collect statistics, they will be<br />
able to say that two, or possibly three, men are<br />
studying at the same time the same period of<br />
history, that possibly half a dozen young ladies<br />
are writing novels, in each case the motif<br />
of which may be the gentle passion, and it would<br />
be very easy for them to point out that this is an<br />
enormous waste of labour, that it could be done<br />
much more cheaply and much more expeditiously<br />
by a ministry of literature, with the help of<br />
assistant secretaries for prose, poetry, and so forth.<br />
This is not utterly irrelevant, because in the past<br />
you have fought the pseudo publisher, otherwise<br />
the pirate. For the future your object is to<br />
combat pseudo philanthropy, otherwise Socialism<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#371) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 17<br />
—it is the only way by which you can keep the<br />
Society alive, and by which we in the Society can<br />
exist. I have to associate with this toast the<br />
name of your chairman, Mr. William Martin<br />
Conway, a gentleman who has climbed to dis-<br />
tinction on the Alps, the Apennines, and the<br />
Himalayas; who is equally prominent as an art<br />
lecturer, mountaineer, author, and who now<br />
desires to enter into that singular assembly con-<br />
sisting of commoners who desire to become peers,<br />
and peers who desire to become commoners. I<br />
am peculiarly unable to speak of Mr. Conway;<br />
luckily you know him better than I do. I am<br />
unable, because my opportunities have never led<br />
me much into the study of art, and my inclina-<br />
tions have never led me to mountaineering, except<br />
with the friendly help of a locomotive. But there<br />
is just one point for which Mr. Conway is very<br />
remarkable, and upon which I am able to speak<br />
with the highest authority. Mr. Conway is a man<br />
of a most extraordinarily good judgment, and ex-<br />
traordinary good taste. He has brought the<br />
proofs of that here to-night, and they sit on my<br />
left hand. (Laughter and hear, hear.) Ladies and<br />
gentlemen, I ask you to drink to the toast of the<br />
Incorporated Society of Authors, associated with<br />
the name of Mr. W. M. Conway.<br />
M.R. W. M. ConwAY.—Mr. Chairman, Your<br />
Excellency, My Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen :<br />
I have often thought that this annual dinner of the<br />
Society of Authors might be made a very much<br />
more amusing function than it is. We un-<br />
fortunately meet only to dine. We don’t meet, I<br />
am thankful to say, to collect money, neither do<br />
we meet to sell the products of our labour. I<br />
have sometimes thought that if on these occasions<br />
every member of the Society of Authors attended<br />
with his manuscripts, and if we invited the<br />
publishers of London to dine with us, and if,<br />
after duly baptising the whole show in champagne,<br />
we held an auction, that the frolic would be some-<br />
thing worth attending. (Laughter.) However, you<br />
have drunk the health of the Society of Authors,<br />
and it is for me to attempt to justify that some-<br />
what rash act. Sir, the Society of Authors is at<br />
all events an active society—when it has nothing<br />
else to do it falls upon Mr. Gosse (laughter), we<br />
fill up odd moments by quarrelling amongst our-<br />
selves, and when we get a chance we fall upon a<br />
common enemy. Squabbling is said to be a sign<br />
of life, and I am sure that the Authors’ Society,<br />
throughout the whole course of its not too long<br />
existence, has been engaged in one successive<br />
series of squabbles. It was once my pleasure—at<br />
least, my duty—to be the secretary, or, rather, to<br />
run, a thing called the Art Congress for the three<br />
years of its chequered existence. During that<br />
time I attained a somewhat minute and peculiar<br />
dinner.<br />
acquaintance with the attitude of the artistic mind<br />
in the face of business. Since I have been intimately<br />
associated with the Society of Authors I have had<br />
proofs—derived from this former experience—I<br />
have had proofs that the author is really an artist.<br />
I find that in many matters of business the<br />
author approaches the situation with that kind<br />
of attitude which is distinctly characteristic of<br />
the artist who abuses everyone all round, but more<br />
especially his own attorney (laughter), and we<br />
who have sat for some time on the committee of<br />
this Society are now thoroughly accustomed to<br />
the artistic attitude of authors—we have become<br />
so accustomed to it that unless we are abused by<br />
the members we don’t consider that we can be<br />
possibly doing our duty. (Taughter.) There is<br />
my friend Mr. Besant, who at intervals boils with<br />
indignation. I say that this boiling with indig-<br />
nation on the part of our founder, Mr. Besant,<br />
is the great source and origin, and, I hold, the<br />
moving force, that has created and maintained<br />
this Society. (Applause and laughter.) Unfor-<br />
tunately for myself, I am unable so to boil when<br />
I hear that an author has entered into a ridiculous<br />
agreement. Mr. Besant does the boiling with<br />
indignation, and it is for me to advise him to<br />
carry out his contract. It seems to me that the<br />
first thing that an author who has played the<br />
perfect fool in the matter of the making of his<br />
agreement has to do is to suffer the penalty of<br />
his folly for the time being, and to afterwards go<br />
to the Society of Authors to guard him in the future<br />
against similar blunders. (Hear, hear.) Another<br />
member of the Society wrote to us the other day<br />
and said he would like to become a member of the<br />
Society, not because he intended to make any use<br />
of it, but because he wanted to have a guinea's<br />
worth of fighting for his money. We elected that<br />
gentleman immediately (laughter), being, I hope, a<br />
sporting committee, and we have since been sitting<br />
around waiting for the fray. (Laughter.) Un-<br />
fortunately the only sport we have been able to<br />
have out of him has been a letter communicated<br />
to the public press in which he abused us for<br />
dining here to-night. (Loud laughter.) Well,<br />
we have heard something of late about book-<br />
sellers, and I had a sort of idea of talking about<br />
them myself, but it occurred to me that it would<br />
lead to a disquisition on political economy which<br />
1 feared would be rather a heavy morsel after<br />
So we will pass by the booksellers, and<br />
come to our other friends the publishers. Gentle-<br />
men, our relations with publishers—the relations,<br />
that is to say, with the main body of authors with<br />
whom we come in contact—appear at the present<br />
time to be highly satisfactory, for the number of<br />
disputes—most of them small ones — that has<br />
been brought to our notice of late has been ex-<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#372) ################################################<br />
<br />
I 8 THE AUTHOR.<br />
tremely low, and I conclude that, through the<br />
medium of the Society of Authors, publishers<br />
and authors have come to understand each other<br />
a little better than before, and this common<br />
understanding has been brought about by the<br />
common recognition of each side of its own folly<br />
and its own interest, and I believe that hereafter<br />
we shall find that the Society, far from being a<br />
necessarily militant body, will be in friendly<br />
contact with that body of men who are really its<br />
partners, and should be its allies. I believe that<br />
in future we shall find that we are attaining<br />
more and more to a common understanding, and<br />
are able better and better to work to our common<br />
end. But at the present time we are united —<br />
we and the publishers are assuredly united in<br />
One common cause, for we are threatened by a<br />
common danger. I allude, of course, to the ques-<br />
tion of the Canadian copyright. (Hear, hear.)<br />
There, gentlemen, is a question which has arisen<br />
recently in an acute form, and which, if there had<br />
not been a Society of Authors to take it up, would<br />
assuredly have been settled in a manner that would<br />
have done the greatest possible injury to the<br />
interests of British authors. I trust that, owing<br />
to the vigorous ini iative that we have taken in<br />
this matter, no injurious decision will be come to;<br />
but there, at all events, is a matter which threatens<br />
authors and publishers alike, and in which both<br />
are equally and keenly interested. (Hear, hear.)<br />
Well, gentlemen, I think I have said enough, and<br />
more than enough, to justify in having drunk to<br />
the health of yourselves—to the Society of Authors<br />
—and I trust that in the coming year, until we<br />
meet here again, we shall go on along the lines<br />
we have adopted, and shall advance in the pro-<br />
motion of those just interests which the Society<br />
exists to promote. (Loud applause.)<br />
The RIGHT Hon. SIR FRANCIs H. JEUNE, P.C.,<br />
in proposing the toast of “Literature,” said—<br />
Mr. Moberly Bell, Your Excellency, My Lords,<br />
Ladies, and Gentlemen: I have the honour to<br />
propose to you the toast of “Literature,” asso-<br />
ciated with the name of Mr. Anthony Hope<br />
Hawkins. (Here a band, playing in a neigh-<br />
bouring room, opportunely interrupted with a<br />
startling burst of music, which, to the merriment<br />
of the company, seemed specially designed to<br />
pay honour to the toast and to the name of<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins.) I could hardly<br />
imagine, sir, a more inspiriting incident, under<br />
what must be admitted to be circumstances of<br />
some difficulty, then the sound of that distant,<br />
but, I hope, not distressing band. (Laughter.)<br />
But I admit I do acquire some comfort and some<br />
consolation in entering upon the task which has<br />
devolved upon me, for I presume that I have<br />
been selected to propose this toast because I never<br />
wrote a book, and because my contributions to<br />
ephemeral literature have been so few as to be a<br />
negligable quantity, and I am quite content to be<br />
ranked in that large class of meritorious persons<br />
whose only business with newspapers is to read<br />
them, and whose only additional duty with regard<br />
to books is to buy them. (Laughter.) But, sir,<br />
I think it is not unfitting that a man whose life<br />
has been spent in the pursuit of a laborious pro-<br />
fession should make his acknowledgments to the<br />
charms of literature, because it is he, and persons<br />
such as he, who owe to literature the happiest<br />
relaxation of their lives, with an occupation that<br />
never wearies, and with pleasures that never pall.<br />
(Applause.) But, Sir, a prudent lawyer never<br />
makes an admission except for the purpose of<br />
avoiding an inconvenient inquiry, and I am not<br />
prepared on this occasion, especially after the<br />
speech of the chairman, to admit a complete dis-<br />
severence between literature and law. It is quite<br />
true, sir, that in those legal treatises in which we<br />
delight, or are supposed to delight, you cannot<br />
find those charms of literature other than such as<br />
may be obtained by clearness of style and lucidity<br />
of arrangement. It was not, Sir, always so. We<br />
have, I am afraid, in later days changed for the<br />
worse. Old writers allowed themselves greater<br />
license. Lord Coke, in commenting on a mis-<br />
taken and earlier author, after his observations<br />
proceeded to a sort of obituary notice of it, and<br />
said: “He lived without love, and died without<br />
pity, save that of those who thought the pity was<br />
that he had lived so long.” (Loud laughter.)<br />
Sir, I regret to say characterise the personal<br />
qualifications of our predecessors, however<br />
erroneous we may think their notions to have<br />
been. But, Sir, the connection between Litera-<br />
ture and Law is, I venture to think, a close one.<br />
I don’t claim that many have found their place on<br />
the roll of fame, and I do not forget that England<br />
contributed Lord Bacon, or that Sir Walter Scott<br />
hailed at once from the land of lawyers and the<br />
land of Scotland, but I admit that the roll of fame<br />
is short. But when we come to that branch of<br />
literature which your chairman represents, there,<br />
I venture to say, a wholly different position may<br />
be taken up. Your chairman has told you that<br />
every day some twelve volumes—I think it was—<br />
of ephemeral literature are produced. Well, Sir,<br />
I think that we lawyers contribute our full share<br />
to that. I believe that public speakers attain a<br />
length in the columns of the daily papers propor-<br />
tionate to their eminence—that the first-class man<br />
is allowed to say all he has said at full length,<br />
that the second class are those who are allowed to<br />
say a part of what they have said, and that the<br />
third class consists of those who have to content<br />
themselves with reading what they ought to have<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#373) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
IQ<br />
said. (Doud laughter.) Now, Sir, I think that<br />
we may claim the first of those places. I<br />
recollect a short time ago—well, a time ago—<br />
reading in the same day a judgment by a<br />
certain Lord Chancellor—whose name I decline<br />
to mention (laughter)—and a political speech<br />
by the same authority. The judgment, Sir,<br />
occupied two columns and a half — the<br />
speech occupied something less than half a<br />
column. I do not know whether the political<br />
and judicial utterances were of value in direct<br />
relation to their length, but I think it must be<br />
admitted that in his legal capacity the Chancellor<br />
made a larger contribution to journalism. than<br />
ever he could or did as a politician. (Laughter.)<br />
Well, your chairman has reminded you that there<br />
is another side where we may contribute largely,<br />
at least to daily literature. He has told you that<br />
the Courts produce at once tragedies and come-<br />
dies, that literature from the time of Shakespeare<br />
down to those of Molière, Trollope, and Dickens<br />
have been always ready to produce these scenes,<br />
and I am sorry to say they are chiefly charac-<br />
terised by a sense of humour rather at the ex-<br />
pense of the lawyers, or by some extremely bad<br />
law. (Laughter.) But, Sir, I am not altogether<br />
surprised, or at all surprised, that literature finds<br />
a field for its exertions in that direction. A trial<br />
combines many elements of interest. There is<br />
the continual display of gladiatorial skill. There<br />
is the constant revelation of incident, and there is<br />
the glorious uncertainty of result. A famous<br />
trial seems to combine the various attractions of<br />
an interesting cricket match with those of a suc-<br />
cessful drama. (Laughter.) I think, Sir, for<br />
these contributions journalism ought to be thank-<br />
ful. It may well be that there are some parts of<br />
these contributions which could be better spared,<br />
and I think this is no unfitting occasion,<br />
speaking as I do to an audience composed<br />
both of men and women, and to an audience<br />
highly capable of judging on such a subject, to<br />
express a respect for those journals which,<br />
exercising their independent judgment, have<br />
thought it right to refuse publication to matter<br />
which, in their opinion, ought to be suppressed.<br />
(Applause.) But, Sir, I am quite conscious that<br />
those journals who practise that abnegation do<br />
so at considerable loss to themselves, and they<br />
deserve respect because it may well be that they<br />
give advantages to less scrupulous rivals. I<br />
should be glad, Sir, if it were not so. I think it<br />
impossible that the proceedings in Courts of<br />
Justice should be held otherwise than in public,<br />
and from personal experience I have no reason<br />
whatever to complain of the proceedings of the<br />
public Press, but I am aware that there are some<br />
papers who cannot put a sufficient check upon<br />
themselves, and I confess I should be glad if it<br />
were possible to provide that some authority,<br />
responsible and cognisant in the matter, should<br />
be allowed to forbid the publication of that which<br />
ought not to be published. I think that would be<br />
for the interests of morality, and I believe it would<br />
be for the interests of journalism, because I think<br />
it would tend to raise the lower class of journals,<br />
perhaps against their will, but still to raise them<br />
to the standard of the highest (applause). Sir,<br />
I approach the task of saying something about<br />
literature—and it has fallen to my lot to do it<br />
more than once—with a somewhat uneasy feeling<br />
in one respect, and the presence of your chairman<br />
brings about that feeling. I was once in the<br />
chairman’s presence, and the presence of the<br />
American Minister reminds me of it, and I<br />
was once rash enough to say that journalism<br />
was “literature in a hurry,” and after I<br />
had said it I received so many remonstrances and<br />
read so much criticism in the papers that I<br />
almost began to think that my poor little obser-<br />
vation was original. (Laughter.) Mr. George<br />
Augustus Sala told me it was not true that all<br />
newspapers were produced in the small hours<br />
of the morning. An authority, Mr. Arthur<br />
Walter, in a judicious and even judicial spirit,<br />
said that a part of literature was so produced<br />
and part was not ; but, Sir, our chairman this<br />
evening has reinforced me because he has told me<br />
that it is the great merit of the Press to produce<br />
its matter at the smallest possible notice. There-<br />
fore I decline the white sheet, I am not prepared<br />
to do penance for the observation, and I still<br />
venture to maintain that journalism is literature<br />
in a hurry. (Taughter.) You attend the theatres<br />
on the first night, and you see the busy pencils<br />
all around you, and you read the criticism next<br />
morning. It is brilliant criticism, but is it not<br />
brilliant criticism in a hurry P (Laughter.) There<br />
is a story told of Mr. Delane, coming down late<br />
at night to his club full of the account he had<br />
heard of the illness of Mr. Disraeli. It was said<br />
that Mr. Disraeli was seriously ill—even danger-<br />
ously ill—and Mr. Delane's terror and regret<br />
were extreme. He said to everyone “Have you<br />
heard the terrible news, the awful news P” His<br />
friends heard him somewhat surprised, and<br />
someone said “No doubt it is very sad and<br />
very sudden, but I never knew you had such an<br />
admiration for Mr. Disraeli,” and Mr. Delane<br />
said “Oh no, it is not that at all, but here<br />
it is ten o’clock at night and I have not<br />
got a word written about him. (Laughter.)<br />
Now, sir, I daresay that if Mr. Disraeli had then<br />
died there would, after all, have appeared a<br />
brilliant and complete biography of him, but<br />
would it not have been biography in a hurry P<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#374) ################################################<br />
<br />
2O THE AUTHOR.<br />
Sir, I have the greatest possible respect for the<br />
leading articles of the Times; I think they are<br />
very full of good sense, of profundity and wisdom—<br />
and I nearly always agree with them. (Laughter.)<br />
But, sir, I have never heard that it was given to<br />
many men in the world, to quote Mr. Russell<br />
Lowell, “lifelong convictions to extemporise,” and<br />
when I have read these articles I have sometimes<br />
thought it is wisdom in a hurry. Well, sir, I<br />
hope I have justified that phrase.<br />
it is—as I trust it is not—disparaging to<br />
journalism, it is certainly not disparaging to<br />
literature. (Applause). I say all honour ought<br />
to be paid to the laborious student by whom our<br />
great works have, with toil and labour, been pro-<br />
duced; and, sir, what is more, the whole history<br />
of the literature of this country is the history of<br />
a literature that has not been in a hurry. The<br />
remarkable feature about it is that century after<br />
century the tree has put forth flowers ever new,<br />
although of varied beauty, and has produced fruits<br />
ever new, although of varied value. Well, sir, I<br />
think that is a great comfort to which we look. I<br />
am sorry to hear from Mr. Conway that authors<br />
have their domestic and external difficulties. They<br />
apparently have difficulties both with their home<br />
and foreign policy. (Laughter.) They apparently<br />
have difficulties with the publisher and with the<br />
|bookseller; and the trio of publishers, booksellers,<br />
and authors form a combination which does not<br />
altogether appear to be a happy family. I can-<br />
not, Sir, offer them the consolation of a lawyer,<br />
because I am afraid that the instinct of a lawyer<br />
is that where three people are quarrelling there<br />
must be something very substantial to be quarrel-<br />
ling about.<br />
consolation of the distressed agriculturist. The<br />
relations between them appear to be very much<br />
the same as those of landlord and farmer and the<br />
labourer, and I think it is true that whatever else<br />
has happened in these unfortunate difficulties<br />
which have arisen in that sphere of life, whatever<br />
else has happened it is not the labourer who has<br />
suffered. Sir, there may be other difficulties and<br />
dangers which beset the labourer. It may be<br />
that at the present time some clouds rest upon<br />
his prospects. It may be that writers such as<br />
Mr. Max Nordau, in pointing out degeneracy,<br />
apart from matters of great exaggeration, put<br />
their fingers upon some points of truth; it may<br />
be, sir, that in an age which apparently is unable<br />
to elect a Poet Laureate, that there is something<br />
wrong with the poets or with the age ; but if<br />
some of these matters tend to a foreboding I think<br />
we may look at the past of our literature, and<br />
take comfort in the fact that literature is the<br />
best antidote to pessimism ; and if it be true that<br />
literature, high, and pure, and national, filled the<br />
At any rate, if<br />
Perhaps, sir, I may offer them the<br />
“spacious times of great Elizabeth,” it is equally<br />
true that the sounds of that literature have often<br />
echoed since and echo still. Sir, I have great<br />
pleasure in connecting with this toast the name<br />
of my friend, Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins. I<br />
had almost said my relative, because he is, I am<br />
glad to think, connected with my legal brother,<br />
the brilliant and distinguished Sir Henry<br />
Hawkins. At any rate, I am sure that in Mr.<br />
Anthony Hope Hawkins, not even Max Nordau<br />
himself, in his most scientific moments, could<br />
discover the stigma of degeneracy. It was no<br />
decadent, I think, that produced the weird and<br />
startling fiction of the “Prisoner of Zenda,” or<br />
the raillery of the “Dolly Dialogues,” or the<br />
easy sarcasm and startling incident of his last<br />
effort “The Man of Mark.” Mr. Hawkins has,<br />
I hope, himself made a mark upon the literature<br />
of the day, and I hope that he will gain for<br />
himself a notable place in the literature of the<br />
country. (Applause.)<br />
r. ANTHONY HoPE HAWKINs, replying to<br />
the toast, said—Mr. Chairman, Sir Francis Jeune,<br />
Your Excellency, My Lords, Ladies, and Gentle-<br />
men : I regret for some reasons that one who<br />
pursues the branch of literature that I do should<br />
have been called upon to reply to this toast.<br />
Almost the first remark that I heard when I<br />
came into this room was the question of why I<br />
should be selected to reply to this toast. Gentle-<br />
men, I am unable to answer the question, but I<br />
am, after all, glad that it is so, because it has given<br />
me the opportunity and the pleasure of listening<br />
to the kindly and generous words which Sir<br />
Francis Jeune has spoken of me, but I was afraid<br />
that it would foster that vanity to which novelists,<br />
I understand, are prone. Gentlemen, that is an<br />
unjust charge. We are very conscious of one<br />
another's defects. (Laughter.) And if you were<br />
aware of the dispassionate consideration, in a very<br />
limited amount of time, we bring to bear upon<br />
One another’s writings, you would not consider<br />
that we unduly exalted our branch of literature.<br />
The fact is that we authors are somewhat in the<br />
position of ladies, who, believing themselves sus-<br />
pected of beauty, take refuge in an exaggerated<br />
appreciation of the charms of others, to which<br />
they have not paid much attention. (Laughter.)<br />
Mr. Conway, as became his position, did not<br />
speak in terms of extravagant eulogy of the<br />
Organisation of which he is the active chief, but<br />
we who occupy less responsible positions may<br />
speak more freely of what we consider our merits<br />
and our mission. For my part, I look forward<br />
to a great mission for this Society, and I am<br />
prepared to endure as many jokes as the wit<br />
of our opponents may suggest for the price<br />
of taking it seriously. Our primary object is to<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#375) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 2 I<br />
abolish Grub-street. (Hear, hear.) But I think<br />
there is another, and I think that the committee<br />
of this Society did well to think that there<br />
was another—and that is that in time, and<br />
as this Society justifies itself in the eyes of the<br />
world, it may establish not onlv a Court of<br />
Appeal for distressed authors, but also a court<br />
of honour for its own members. (Hear, hear.)<br />
If we look round at the other professions—I don’t<br />
need to say “learned professions,” for it needs<br />
no learning to write books (laughter)—you will<br />
See corporate bodies existing to which members<br />
of the profession willingly submit their disputes,<br />
and by whose decrees they willingly allow their<br />
conduct to be governed. Gentlemen, I believe<br />
that that reputation and position is not beyond<br />
the prospects of this Society. (Applause.) I<br />
think that the Society will live above criticism,<br />
and we shall see it come to occupy that position<br />
to which, in my opinion, it has a right to aspire.<br />
We don’t want this Society to be merely a society<br />
for the prevention of cruelty to children<br />
(laughter)—that is a very laudable and excellent<br />
function, and a function with which this Society<br />
is employed from day to day, but we also wish it to<br />
be a Society to which its own members and our<br />
friends the enemy—the publisher—can come with<br />
confidence, sure that a dispassionate judgment<br />
will be taken, and sure that the Society will be as<br />
Severe towards the faults of its own members as<br />
upon those with whom members come into con-<br />
tact in the course of business. (Hear, hear).<br />
I think there is one more word that I ought<br />
to say before I sit down, for I should not be<br />
doing my duty, having the honour to reply<br />
for literature, if I did not say one word<br />
about the great loss which literature has suffered<br />
in the year gone by in the death of Mr. Robert<br />
Louis Stevenson. The romantic school of English<br />
fiction was deprived by his death of its acknow-<br />
ledged king and chief, and a personality was lost<br />
of rare thought and distinction and sweetness.<br />
It is not possible for most of us—I may say<br />
safely without offence that it is not possible for<br />
any of us—to hope to emulate Mr. Stevenson’s<br />
achievements, or claim to share his gifts. (Hear,<br />
hear.) . But we are many of us able to<br />
remember the kindness which he invariably<br />
showed to younger and less distinguished<br />
Writers, and we are all able to learn some-<br />
thing from the example of his high ideal, and<br />
the untiring, unresting energy with which he<br />
pursued it. So, sir, although we cannot<br />
stand on his high level, we may feast our<br />
eyes upon the high mountains that it is not<br />
for our feet to tread, and, with a thousand un-<br />
satisfied aspirations, rest at least in the tranquility<br />
of the satisfaction of our own little piece of .<br />
work done as well as we could do it. (Loud<br />
applause.)<br />
Mr. WALTER BESANT then proposed the toast<br />
of “The Visitors” in the following terms: Mr.<br />
Chairman, your Excellency, my Lords, ladies<br />
and Gentlemen,_I have to propose the toast of<br />
“The Visitors.” I am sure that at this late hour<br />
of the evening you will not think it shows any<br />
disrespect to our visitors if I give you this toast in<br />
a very few words. We have always been particu-<br />
larly happy and fortunate at all our dinners in the<br />
visitors who have done us the honour to attend,<br />
and on this occasion I think we are more fortunate<br />
than usual. For, first of all, we have with us this<br />
evening the American Ambassador. Wherever<br />
English authors are gathered together, on the<br />
rare occasions that they do assemble, it is only fit<br />
and right that America should be represented in<br />
the most adequate form possible, because those of<br />
us here, or in America, who are able to contribute<br />
anything towards literature at all, are doing it<br />
not only for America, but for both countries, and<br />
for all that vast world which comprises the<br />
English-speaking race. We have next with us the<br />
President of the Institute of Journalists, and I am<br />
sure that no one is more fittingly here, because<br />
literature and journalism so closely overlap that<br />
no one knows where one begins and the other<br />
ends. We have also with us the President of the<br />
Royal College of Surgeons, whom I take to repre-<br />
sent the literature of surgery. Then we have<br />
next with us representatives of the chief London<br />
papers, and some of the provincial ones, and we<br />
also have representatives from France, Australia,<br />
America, Italy, and from Russia, all gathered<br />
together as Our guests on this occasion. Law is<br />
represented not only by our own members who<br />
are lawyers, of whom we have many, but also by<br />
one of our judges, to whom you have already<br />
had the pleasure of listening. India is repre-<br />
sented by one who has administered a province,<br />
and lastly Africa is represented by a most<br />
dist nguished traveller—perhaps the most dis-<br />
tinguished traveller of any time or any country.<br />
I have therefore the pleasure and the honour, in<br />
the name of the Society, to we'come the visitors<br />
On this occasion, and I ask you to do honour to<br />
the toast, with which I couple the name of the<br />
American Ambassador. (Applause.)<br />
His Excellency the AMERICAN AMBAssADoR,<br />
replying to the toast, said: Mr. Chairman, My<br />
Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am deeply sensi-<br />
tive to the cordiality of your welcome. I am asked<br />
to respond for the guests of the English authors.<br />
The paradise of politicians is supposed to lie in a<br />
majority, and were Ia politician I should find my-<br />
self in the largest majority that the most hopeful<br />
politician could expect, for if I speak for the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#376) ################################################<br />
<br />
22 THE AUTHOR.<br />
guests of the authors it is not for the little repre-<br />
sentative handful that have gathered round this<br />
charming board to-night, but it is for the count-<br />
less army of the vast majority of civilised men and<br />
women who have fed so well and so long at the<br />
tables of the authors, and have enjoyed the fine<br />
fruits of the authors’ wit and fancy. In order to<br />
enlarge the scope of Literature, the phrase was<br />
invented, “The Republic of Letters,” and yet I<br />
am inclined to take a leaf from the book of one<br />
of my countrymen, and let the American sailor,<br />
Captain Mahan (applause) show the superiority<br />
of sea power over land power, to call to your mind<br />
how Nelson, with the sea power of England, made<br />
the safety of England possible under Wellington<br />
at Waterloo. It is therefore upon the high seas<br />
of authorship and literature that I would ask you<br />
to embark :<br />
Far as the breeze can bear the ocean’s foam,<br />
Behold your empire, and survey your home.<br />
I don’t think that the land can hold the mind<br />
of man—it must embark upon the sea, and it<br />
must be wafted as the gales may blow—freely,<br />
unhesitatingly. Wherever genius shall direct the<br />
course, there the human mind must follow it.<br />
And so authors must become seafaring folk—<br />
they have been so, they must be so, and, coming<br />
from a country kindred in literature and in feeling<br />
to this—(loud applause)—I feel that literature<br />
forms the strongest bond between the two nations.<br />
(Applause.) You are free to freight your ship<br />
with what you will—with learning, with poesy,<br />
with prose, with wit, with fancy, with philosophy<br />
—you may freight your ship with what you will,<br />
and you may choose your course. You are not<br />
confined by hard dry land, but on the high seas<br />
of human feeling and human relations you steer<br />
your bark to what course you will, and whatever<br />
port you find open to the good things with which<br />
your vessel is freighted. There can be no such<br />
thing to-day as exclusion of the human mind—<br />
there can be no such thing as a pent-up author.<br />
If he is pent-up, depend upon it the bonds and<br />
shackles are found within his own mind. I am<br />
disposed to think of this empire of authorship<br />
and literature that there is no thing into which<br />
it does not enter, and over which it does not<br />
exert a potential control. In these islands, and<br />
everywhere else almost, there is great agricultural<br />
depression, and the question might be asked<br />
“What have authors to do with the tilling of<br />
ground, and what has literature to do with agri-<br />
culture ?” Now, I would put it to any clear-<br />
minded Scotchman, and I would put it also<br />
to his hard-headed English brother, what effect<br />
upon the principles of real estate in Scotland<br />
and in England has the literature of Sir<br />
Walter Scott had P Subtract that influence and<br />
let the calculation be made—how much poorer<br />
on the whole score of money value, of houses<br />
and lands, would the kingdom of Great Britain<br />
be without the mind and the soul of that<br />
magician. (Applause.) Why, Gentlemen, I would<br />
ask my friend Sir Francis Jeune whether there<br />
was not lately tried in the court over which he<br />
presides, a suit to avoid a contract for real estate<br />
upon the ground that a ghost inhabited the<br />
house that had been purchased, and whether<br />
Amy Robsart was not brought into court, and<br />
his purchase sought to be avoided, because the<br />
man found that Sir Walter had killed Amy<br />
Robsart in the wrong place P (Laughter.) Now,<br />
Gentlemen, if the ghosts of literature can be<br />
brought into court and have their money value<br />
essayed, what are we to say of the realities of<br />
literature, and of the power of authorship in our<br />
daily transactions? So that I think we can<br />
expand, by very easy efforts of logical and<br />
rational deduction, the touch of authorship and<br />
literature to everything that affects the happiness<br />
of men, women, and children the civilised world<br />
over. Thus you see that in attempting to answer<br />
for a small portion of your guests, I speak in the<br />
tongue of my own land—and, I suppose, with a<br />
certain inflection (“No, no,”) I may also say I<br />
speak yours—and I thank you most sincerely for<br />
the pleasure that we have derived from the<br />
Society of Authors to-night, and for the pleasure<br />
that all derive from the work of authors every-<br />
where. (Applause.)<br />
Mr. H. M. STANLEY then proposed the last<br />
toast of the evening, that of “The Chairman.”<br />
He said: Your Excellency, my Lords, Ladies and<br />
Gentlemen,_-From what the American Minister<br />
has said just now, I gather that in behalf of the<br />
visitors here to-night he has expressed the feelings<br />
of pleasure of all your guests at being here this<br />
evening and I gather that they have enjoyed a<br />
great deal of pleasantness. To me this is a<br />
memorable evening, because it is the first time I<br />
have had the pleasure and honour of being at an<br />
Authors' dinner. From what Mr. Conway has<br />
stated it appears that there is a great deal of un-<br />
happiness sometimes within the circle of Authors,<br />
but I never expected to see any disturbance at an<br />
Authors' dinner; and if I were to express my own<br />
feelings I should describe them as being those<br />
of extreme felicity that I have the honour to sit<br />
at this table this evening. In fact, I am free to<br />
confess that, from what I have seen and heard<br />
of the party here present, a somewhat warmer<br />
feeling takes possession of me now than when I<br />
entered this hall, for you are all so modest and<br />
unassuming in manner—in fact this is the quietest<br />
public dinner I have ever been at ; but it seems<br />
to me that you do not carry in your bearing that<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#377) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
23<br />
pride which we might have expected from children<br />
spoiled by the world’s applause. (Laughter). I<br />
have to propose the last toast of this evening.<br />
The fluency with which speeches have been deli-<br />
vered made me almost despair of being able to<br />
interest you at all, but I gather some confidence<br />
and comfort from the nature of my subject. You<br />
have heard your chairman—you have seen him<br />
for yourselves. You have heard a speech,<br />
weighted with good sense and humour, and you<br />
will take him, as I take him, to be more than a<br />
mere ornament for a banquet, and you may<br />
gauge his worth each one for yourselves. I do<br />
not think Mr. Moberly Bell has distinguished<br />
himself in the fields of fiction—of which there<br />
are so many representatives here this even-<br />
ing, ladies and gentlemen—but he has dis-<br />
tinguished himself in other fields of litera-<br />
ture. He has been away for many years in a<br />
distant land, as a narrator of facts, as a student of<br />
history, as an observer of political strategy, as an<br />
analyst of human motives. Week after week his<br />
letters have appeared in this country, and by<br />
them we were able to diagnose public feeling in<br />
that land. I dare say that he will submit to your<br />
superior 'gifts of divine imagination. He may<br />
not be able to raise a mortal to the skies, or bring<br />
an angel down to earth, like some of you can, but<br />
he can at least write most veracious political<br />
letters, and in his book “ Pharaohs and Fellahs '’<br />
you will be able to find the keen discrimination<br />
and varied talents of a Plutarch. (Laughter.)<br />
I have known Mr. Moberly Bell for many years.<br />
Those who may only have been able to claim a<br />
slight acquaintance with him may be able to say<br />
that they would like to cultivate his acquaintance<br />
more closely, but I am sure those who are already<br />
possessed of his friendship can boast of a thing<br />
of which they are, and may well be proud. This<br />
is the gentleman to whose health I ask you to<br />
drink heartily—to his health and long life—and<br />
it is with all affection and sincerity that I give you<br />
“Our Chairman, Mr. Moberly Bell.” (Applause.)<br />
The CHAIRMAN.—Mr. Stanley, Your Excellency,<br />
My Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen: I thought I<br />
had forgotten how to blush, but Mr. Stanley is<br />
an artist of the renaissance, and he has dis-<br />
covered the lost art. I never before heard myself<br />
compared with Plutarch, and I never knew half<br />
the great things I had done, but I attribute a<br />
great deal of what Mr. Stanley has said to an<br />
acquaintance of twenty-eight years, and I beg<br />
that you will take Mr. Stanley's remarks about<br />
myself in a very different way to what you would<br />
take his remarks upon other matters with which<br />
he is even more acquainted—that you will take it<br />
with a grain of salt. (Laughter.) As I was<br />
coming into this room I was told by a lady that<br />
the speech of the chairman in reply to his health<br />
was expected to be extremely witty. That would<br />
have appalled me—did appal me, until I sud-<br />
denly remembered what is the soul of wit. I<br />
therefore approach my task with that consolation<br />
in mind, and I have nothing more to do than to<br />
thank you very heartily for the support you have<br />
given me, for the way in which you have welcomed<br />
me, for the warmth with which you have drunk<br />
my health, and on behalf of the Society of<br />
Authors I thank everyone here for their presence<br />
to-night. (Applause.)<br />
The company then rose.<br />
** * *<br />
g- ºr -se<br />
BOOK TALK.<br />
UTOBIOGRAPHICAL memoranda, were left<br />
by the late Lord Selborne, and are now in<br />
course of preparation for issue. The work<br />
will be published by Messrs. Macmillan.<br />
Mr. George Barlow has written a story of<br />
artistic life, styled “Woman Regained,” which<br />
will appear shortly from the Roxburghe Press.<br />
Two art works of importance are announced by<br />
Messrs. Geo. Bell and Sons for publication in the<br />
autumn. One is on the paintings of Velasquez,<br />
and is being brought out by Mr. R. A. M. Steven-<br />
son, the eminent art critic, who is also cousin of<br />
the late Robert Louis Stevenson. The other con-<br />
cerns Sir Frederick Leighton, and among the<br />
hundred reproductions of his pictures which it<br />
will contain will be that of “Cimabue,” by per-<br />
mission of Her Majesty. Mr. Ernest Rhys has<br />
written a biography of the P.R.A. for the work,<br />
while an appreciation of him as artist is from the<br />
pen of Mr. F. S. Stephens.<br />
A technical dictionary of sea terms, phrases,<br />
and words used in the English and French<br />
languages has been compiled by Mr. William<br />
Pirrie, and will be issued shortly from the house<br />
of Messrs. Crosby Tockwood and Son.<br />
M. Alphonse Daudet, who has, of course, been<br />
the centre of attraction for literary London during<br />
May, is writing the story of his youth—or, rather,<br />
he is telling it to his intimate friend, Mr. Robert H.<br />
Sherard, who will put it into form and write it.<br />
For “Premier Voyage—Premier Mensonge ’’ is<br />
to be published in English, and the work of<br />
collaboration has been begun.<br />
Works relating to the Far East come just now<br />
not singly but in battalions. Another book on<br />
Rorea has just been published under the title of<br />
“Quaint Korea,” the writer being Mrs. Louise<br />
Jordan Miln, who is known for her larger work<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#378) ################################################<br />
<br />
24 THE AUTHOR.<br />
“When We Were Strolling Players in the East;”<br />
Mr. Lafcadio Hearn will shortly make a further<br />
addition to the stock with “Out of the East :<br />
Reveries and Studies in New Japan,” with the<br />
same publishers, Osgood, McIlvaine, and Co.<br />
Japan is also the subject of a volume of letters<br />
by Amy Wilson-Carmichael, which Messrs.<br />
Marshall Brothers are bringing out under the<br />
style “From Sunrise Land.” Then Mr. J.<br />
Morris, who was many years in Tokio, in the<br />
service of the Board of Works, has written<br />
a work called “Advance Japan: A Nation<br />
Thoroughly in Earnest,” a feature of which will<br />
be the Japanese national anthem done into<br />
English by Sir Edward Arnold. It is in the<br />
press of Messrs. W. H. Allen and Co. “Old-<br />
World Japan,” by Mr. Frank Rinder, is a volume<br />
which Mr. George Allen will issue shortly. Mr.<br />
Henry Norman’s important and already well-<br />
known work, too, “The Peoples and Politics of<br />
the Far East,” has during the month entered its<br />
third edition.<br />
Two other works on subjects of contemporary<br />
political interest are “Five Years in Madagascar,”<br />
by Colonel Francis C. Maude (Messrs. Chapman<br />
and Hall), and a book on Nicaragua by Mr.<br />
Archibald Colquhoun, special corresponeent of<br />
the Times.<br />
Mr. Charles G. Leland has gone in among the<br />
people of Florence, and sought to know their<br />
world of legend, and his book of record is<br />
announced for early publication by Mr. Nutt,<br />
entitled “Legends of Florence.”<br />
Mr. Aubyn Trevor-Battye's adventures in the<br />
Arctic regions are embodied in “Icebound on<br />
Rolguev,” which Messrs. Archibald Constable<br />
and Co. will publish for him very soon.<br />
Mr. Lionel Johnson and Mr. Le Gallienne have<br />
written the letterpress of “Bits of Old Chelsea,”<br />
which Messrs. Kegan Paul will issue in an artist’s<br />
proof edition, Mr. Walter Burgess having drawn<br />
for it about forty etchings. Few subjects could<br />
be more interesting, associated as Chelsea is with<br />
the great names of Carlyle, Turner, Rossetti, and<br />
Leigh Hunt — to mention only these. One<br />
notable sketch is of “A Corner in Sir Thomas<br />
More's Garden.” Only a hundred copies will<br />
make up the edition, and the price is Io guineas.<br />
An association has been formed among the<br />
prominent houses which do business in foreign<br />
books, with the object of keeping a look-out upon<br />
questions concerning the improvemant of their<br />
trade, and generally to live in harmony and<br />
defend their interests. The society is called<br />
“The Association of Foreign Booksellers in<br />
London.” Mr. H. Kleinan, of Messrs. Hatchette<br />
and Co., is president, and Mr. Kohn, of Messrs.<br />
Asher and Co., hon. Secretary.<br />
Mr. D. Christie Murray will publish, in the<br />
course of a week, through Messrs. Smith, Elder,<br />
and Co., his new novel in one volume, “The<br />
Martyred Fool.”<br />
The story “Lochinvar,” which Mr. S. R.<br />
Crockett is writing, deals with the life of a High-<br />
lander exiled in Holland. Messrs. Methuen will<br />
publish it. A new romance by Mr. Gilbert<br />
Parker, entitled “When Walmond came to<br />
Pontiac; the Story of a Lost Napoleon’’ is due<br />
from Methuen's press to-day.<br />
The Hon. Denis Arthur Bingham will shortly<br />
issue, through Chapman and Hall, a volume of<br />
“Recollections of Paris.” He is the author of<br />
“A Journal of the Siege of Paris” and “The<br />
Marriages of the Buonapartes.” French life is also<br />
the subject of a book by Mr. Albert D. Vandam,<br />
which the same publishers have in hand, entitled<br />
“French Men and French Manners.”<br />
A new series of short novels by well-known<br />
writers will be commenced towards the end of the<br />
month by Messrs. Smith, Elder, and Co. The<br />
first volume is to be “The Story of Bessie<br />
Cottrell,” by Mrs. Humphry Ward, which is<br />
appearing serially in Cornhill and Scribner's.<br />
Messrs. Routledge and Sons also announce a new<br />
fiction series at 3s. 6d., of which the first will<br />
be “Two Women and a Fool,” by H. Chatfield<br />
Taylor.” Another is to be produced by Messrs.<br />
Archd. Constable and Co., who in it will make no<br />
distinction of names, but regard simply the merit<br />
of a story.<br />
Mr. Lang edits a new edition of “The Death<br />
Wake,” the poem by Thomas Tod Stoddart,<br />
which first appeared in 1831, and is now ex-<br />
tremely rare. It will be issued from the Bodley<br />
Head.<br />
Two works of history which are to appear<br />
shortly are “The Model Republic,” in which Mr.<br />
Grenfell Baker traces the evolution of Switzer-<br />
land; and a history of the Australasian Colonies,<br />
from their foundation to the ye, r 1893, by Pro-<br />
fessor E. Jenks, of University College, Liverpool.<br />
The latter will be the next volume in the Cam-<br />
bridge Historical Series, edited by Professor<br />
Prothero; while Mr. Baker's book will be pub-<br />
lished by Messrs. H. S. Nichols and Co.<br />
Mr. Grant Allen (who is dramatising his recent<br />
much-debated novel, “The Woman Who Did,”<br />
assisted by a theatrical collaborator in the person<br />
of Mr. Dyce Scott) is one of several leading<br />
authors who will contribute to a new series of<br />
complete stories to be published by Messrs. Tillot-<br />
son and Son, of Bolton. Mr. Crockett is of the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#379) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 25<br />
number, with a tale called “The Enlistment of a<br />
Cameronian; ” and Miss Corelli contributes “The<br />
Withering of a Rose.” -<br />
Chief among the books published during May<br />
was “The Life and Letters of Edward A. Free-<br />
man, D.C.L., LL.D.,” by the Dean of Winchester<br />
(W. R. W. Stephens, B.D.), which Messrs.<br />
Macmillan issued in two volumes. It is interest-<br />
ing to note that the great historian had an<br />
“ insuperable repugnance to reading or writing<br />
in a public library.” “As if,” he said once, “to<br />
take the lowest ground, money were not better<br />
and more cheaply spent in buying one's own<br />
books, than in buying railway tickets to go read<br />
other men's books a long way off.” From the<br />
same publishing house early in the month came<br />
the first volume of a notable work, “A History of<br />
English Poetry,” by Mr. W. J. Courthope. The<br />
definition of English poetry given by Mr. Court-<br />
hope is metrical compositions in the language<br />
“from the period at which it becomes fairly<br />
intelligible to readers of the present day.” The<br />
author anticipates his work will be completed<br />
before the end of the century. The first two<br />
volumes of the “Memoirs of Barras, Member<br />
of the Directorate,” were published by Messrs.<br />
Osgood, McIlvaine, and Co. Mr. George Duruy<br />
edits the work, and in his introduction defends<br />
Napoleon from the attacks of Barras, and gene-<br />
rally exhibits the latter as a scoundrel.<br />
Mr. H. S. Hoole Waylen has compiled a selec-<br />
tion of “Thoughts from the Writings of Richard<br />
Jefferies,” which Messrs. Longmans will publish<br />
immediately. The same firm will send out Sir<br />
Edward Arnold’s new book of verse, called “The<br />
Tenth Muse, and Other Poems; ” and a volume of<br />
“Russian Rambles,” by Isabel F. Hapgood, who<br />
relates inter alia a visit to Count Tolstoy in his<br />
home.<br />
What is likely to be an excellent catalogue of<br />
the manuscripts in the Fitzwilliam Museum has<br />
been prepared by the director, Dr. M. R. James,<br />
and will come from the Cambridge University<br />
Press on an early day. Twenty pages of photo-<br />
graphic reproductions of important manuscripts<br />
are given. The work is priced net at 25s.<br />
“The Rise and Growth of the English Nation,<br />
with special reference to Epochs and Crises,” by<br />
Dr. W. H. S. Aubrey, is announced for publication<br />
by Mr. Elliott Stock. It will be completed in<br />
three volumes, the first being published early in<br />
May and the rest at short intervals.<br />
The June number of the Antiquary will con-<br />
tain an interesting illustrated paper on “Some of<br />
the Round Towers of France;” also an article on<br />
the R. A. Exhibition under the title “The Anti-<br />
quary among the Pictures.”<br />
The London Library has added 40,000 volumes<br />
to its shelves since 1888, when the present catalogue<br />
was published, and the census of January showed<br />
that the stock has grown to a total of 167,000.<br />
While the accommodation is thus severely taxed,<br />
the income also increases steadily—there are<br />
2279 members—and at the general meeting on<br />
the 13th inst, a proposal will come up for the<br />
appointment of a professional auditor. A new<br />
catalogue will be ready three or four years hence.<br />
Mr. J. F. Hogan, M.P. has written “The Sister<br />
Dominions,” in which he gives the impressions<br />
Canada and Australia made upon him during a<br />
recent tour. As he is secretary of the Colonial<br />
party in the House of Commons, the author had<br />
special means of receiving the opinions of public<br />
men in the colonies. The book will be published<br />
soon by Messrs. Ward and Downey. Australian<br />
life (along with that of Scotland) is also the<br />
concern of a novel called “By Adverse Winds,”<br />
which Mr. Oliphant Smeaton, editor of the<br />
Liberal, has written, and Messrs. Oliphant,<br />
Anderson, and Ferrier will publish.<br />
The produce of the past month in the depart-<br />
ment of periodicals includes a new monthly, on<br />
general lines, edited by Mr. William Graham, and<br />
called the Twentieth Century, devoted to articles<br />
on subjects of the day, but containing also fiction<br />
and verse; and a new quarterly of the same price<br />
as the Yellow Book and, like it, concerned with<br />
literature and art. This latter is the Evergreen,<br />
“a northern seasonal,” published in Edinburgh<br />
by Patrick Geddes and Colleagues, and in London<br />
by Mr. Fisher Unwin. The contents of each issue<br />
are to correspond with the season of the year it<br />
appears in.<br />
Mrs. Emma Marshall will shortly add to the<br />
series of her historical romances a story entitled<br />
“The White King's Daughter. Messrs. Seeley<br />
and Co. are the publishers of these stories, of<br />
which “Under Salisbury Spire’ and “Ken-<br />
sington Palace ’’ are amongst the most popular.<br />
“Roughly Told Stories,” is a book apparently<br />
by a new hand, named John Ingold. He aims<br />
at originality and epigram. He is also a cynic.<br />
One sketch in the volume at least is noticeable<br />
—that called “The Tramp.” (The Leadenhall<br />
Press.)<br />
The authorship of “A Superfluous Woman”<br />
has at length become public. That it was from<br />
a practised hand every one knew, but there was<br />
some doubt as to the sex of the writer. The book<br />
was quite one of the successes of 1894, and ran<br />
through several editions. Another novel by the<br />
same author, Miss Emma Brooke, entitled “Tran-<br />
sition,” has just been published. Let us wish it<br />
as large a success.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#380) ################################################<br />
<br />
26 THE AUTHOR.<br />
A prettily bound book, with its silver and<br />
grey, is Mathilde Blind’s “Birds of Passage.”<br />
It is a book of songs—“Songs of the Orient”—<br />
“Songs of the Occident’” — “Shakespeare<br />
Sonnets”—and miscellaneous poems. Let the<br />
poet speak for herself in one of her Shakesperian<br />
Sonnets, that called “Cleve Woods: ”<br />
Sweet Avon glides where clinging rushes seem<br />
To stay his course, and, in his flattering glass,<br />
Meadows and hills and mellow woodlands pass,<br />
A fairer world as imaged in a dream.<br />
And sometimes, in a visionary gleam,<br />
From out the secret covert's tangled mass,<br />
The fisher-bird starts from the rustling grass,<br />
A jewelled shuttle shot along the stream.<br />
Even here methinks where moon-lapped shallows smiled<br />
Eound isles no bigger than a baby cot,<br />
Titania found a glowworm-lighted child,<br />
Led far astray, and, with anointing hand<br />
Sprinkling clear dew from a forget-me-not,<br />
Hailed him the Laureate of her Fairyland.<br />
“A Life's Mistake” is a story told by Charles<br />
Garvice, and published in New York by “George<br />
Munro’s Son’s.” Mr. Garvice writes like one<br />
who has a future before him. But he should<br />
compress. A story ought to be very good indeed<br />
to be continued for 35o long pages of closely<br />
packed type. -<br />
“Creation’s Hope” (Baker and Son, Clifton)<br />
is a religious poem whose aim and scope are indi-<br />
cated by the title. It is by the Rev. Marcus<br />
S. C. Rickards, M.A. The following is an<br />
extract :<br />
In this fair life scene, over everything<br />
There hangs a chilling fear—as the bright Noon<br />
Is spoilt by haze, or as the smiling Spring<br />
Is marred by blight—a fear, that late or soon<br />
Tempers all bliss, and clouds each native boon.<br />
Close as an ever-brooding presence sits<br />
That fear of death, which now makes Nature swoon,<br />
Now braces her for what this clime befits,<br />
Which Ignorance alone for a brief spell outwits.<br />
The warbler flitting on from spray to spray<br />
Fears not the gun that compasses its doom :<br />
The schoolboy stealing up to cap his prey<br />
Starts not the shy moth settling on the bloom ;<br />
The sunny May-fly scorns eve's pending gloom :<br />
The feasting grub recks not that ampler size<br />
Yields the hid foe within more food and room :<br />
The gleaming trout darts at the summer flies,<br />
Nor shuns the murderous hook arrayed in kindred guise.<br />
But we know we must die, and can but wait:<br />
We lounge 'mid flowers and shine while distant claps<br />
From gathering thunder-clouds forebode our fate;<br />
Large rain-drops fall, and inky gloom enwraps,<br />
Tho' Sunbeams linger on awhile perhaps.<br />
We roam life’s strand, and eye the nearing tide,<br />
Which gains on each, and all at length entraps :<br />
We gather shells, we strut with childish pride,<br />
We play about while Death creeps on with fatal stride.<br />
The Rev. Atherton Knowles has produced a<br />
little book which ought to become widely popular,<br />
for its subject alone. Most of us are interested<br />
in Anglican Service Music, its history and de-<br />
velopment. It is a contribution not only to the<br />
history of religion but also to that of social<br />
manners and customs in which churchgoing<br />
occupies so large a place. (Elliot Stock.)<br />
“Poems,” by Louis H. Victory, is published by<br />
Elliot Stock. Here is one of them : *<br />
I walk the world in thought-engendered grief:<br />
I grieve for all the pain that taints the years;<br />
I grieve for wrongs that rend the soul of seers<br />
Who find no power to bring the world relief.<br />
I grieve for kings whose golden-sorrowed leaf<br />
Of life's brief book is filled with kingly fears;<br />
I grieve for beggars starving through their years,<br />
Whose consolation dwells in sweet Belief.<br />
If I could weep for all the wrongs I see<br />
I would be blest with some relief from woe,<br />
But my dim eyes will never yield the flow<br />
My wearied heart one moment to set free.<br />
And as I wander down the path of years,<br />
I pray to God for His good gift of tears.<br />
“A Japanese Marriage” (A. & C. Black), by<br />
Douglas Sladen. Here is a novel laid in that<br />
enchanted land of colour and sunshine which is<br />
now being talked about by everybody. The<br />
setting is strange, and the characters move about<br />
under new conditions among an Anglo-Japanese<br />
life which is new and delightful. It should be as<br />
popular as Loti’s “Chrysanthème.” -<br />
A new and cheaper edition of “A Prince of<br />
Como,” by Mrs. E. M. Davy has just been issued by<br />
the authoress’s publishers, Messrs. Jarrold and<br />
Sons. We are glad to see this solid recognition<br />
of the work of a young author. . It will be<br />
followed, we venture to hope, by many other<br />
editions.<br />
Miss Eleanor Holmes has completed a new<br />
novel entitled “To-day and To-morrow.” It will<br />
be issued shortly in 3 vols. by Messrs. Hurst and<br />
blackett.<br />
A completed edition of the “Works of the late<br />
Griffith Edwards,” consisting mainly of local<br />
histories in Wales, will be produced shortly<br />
(Elliot Stock). A number of the author's<br />
poems, both in Welsh and English, are added to<br />
the work, which is edited by Mr. Elias Owen, and<br />
is fully illustrated.<br />
Mrs. Stevenson has just had another story<br />
published. It is in Messrs. Hutchinson’s “Home-<br />
spun Series,” both in cloth and paper covers. It<br />
is called “Woodrup's Dinah,” and is a tale of<br />
Nidderdale, the beautiful Yorks Valley, lying<br />
between Great Whernside and Knaresbro' and<br />
Harrogate. One who knows the dale says: “It<br />
simply makes me live there again, and the dialect,<br />
customs, and habits come back with more vivid-<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#381) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 27<br />
ness than I could have believed possible after<br />
twenty years.”<br />
The author of “Ernest England,” mentioned in<br />
“Book Talk” of last month, is not “J. A.<br />
Tucker” but “J. A. Parker,” to whom an apology<br />
is due for the mistake.<br />
It was also in error that Mr. Harry Furniss<br />
was stated to “ have accepted control of the art<br />
section ” of the New Budget. He is the<br />
originator, chief proprietor, editor, and manager<br />
of the New Budget.<br />
The March edition of 2000 copies of “A Maid<br />
of the Manse,” by Mrs. E. Rentoul Esler, being<br />
exhausted, Messrs. Sampson Low, Marston, and<br />
Co. are preparing a larger edition for immediate<br />
ISSUl€.<br />
Messrs. Bliss, Sands, and Foster have just<br />
published a novel by Miss H. P. Redden, entitled<br />
“McClellan of McClellan.” The book is illus-<br />
trated by the author. Price 6s.<br />
*-- ~ -º<br />
CORRESPONDENCE,<br />
I.—MUSIC AND WoRDs.<br />
N reading Miss Helen Marion Burnside's<br />
reasonable letter regarding the lot of minor<br />
poets, I would take exception to one remark<br />
only.<br />
#he poet should certainly have a share in the<br />
performing rights of a larger musical work, but<br />
in a song these rights are practically worth<br />
nothing, they having completely lapsed from<br />
force of circumstances. Unless they were recog-<br />
nised universally insistence upon them would<br />
kill the song. I should suggest that the poet's<br />
initial remuneration should cover the sale of a<br />
certain number of hundreds of copies, and upon<br />
the sale exceeding this amount a royalty should<br />
be given by the publisher to the poet.<br />
MRs. MARY A. C. SALMond.<br />
21, St. Leonard’s-terrace, Royal Chelsea<br />
Hospital, May 24.<br />
II.-DREAM POEMs.<br />
May I add to the number of dream-poems?<br />
Many a time I have wakened with metre and<br />
rhyme on my lips; but of only three such in-<br />
spirations have I kept a record. Once I dreamed<br />
that I was pouring out tea for a large party, and,<br />
growing tired, made the following remark:<br />
It is not fair<br />
To make poor little me,<br />
Who am small and spare,<br />
Pour out all the tea.<br />
The word spare must have been used for sake<br />
of the rhyme, as it does not at all describe my<br />
figure | Another night I dreamed a whole long<br />
poem, describing, as if for children, the career of<br />
a good little boy. I woke with the following<br />
couplet:<br />
To follow this goodly example he’s bound,<br />
And he’s sure to be happy wherever he's found.<br />
My third example is an excerpt from a serious<br />
poem, all of which is lost except these lines:<br />
Faces we have not seen for years,<br />
And some which last we saw in tears.<br />
They struck me as rather pathetic.<br />
F. BAYFor D HARRISON.<br />
TTI.-PERSONAL.<br />
The American journalist who, in the Mail and<br />
Eapress (New York), has seen fit, on what he<br />
terms “internal evidence,” to formulate the<br />
charges categorically denied by Mr. John Bloun-<br />
delle-Burton in the following letter, appears to<br />
have indulged in an outbreak of abuse that is not<br />
common even on the other side of the Atlantic.<br />
What that abuse and those charges are will be<br />
plainly seen by Mr. Bloundelle-Burton’s plain and<br />
convincing denial of them :<br />
Constitutional Club, London.<br />
May 13, 1895.<br />
The Editor, the New York Mail and Ea'press,<br />
New York.<br />
SIR,-A cutting from your paper, published last month,<br />
has been shown me, in which, under the heading “Mr.<br />
Safe,” you state that there is an edition of my novel “The<br />
Hispaniola Plate,” published in America by the Castle Pub-<br />
lishing Company,” and that in this edition there is a bio-<br />
graphy of me which “bears internal evidence of having been<br />
written by the author.”<br />
Permit me to show you, therefore, what such “internal<br />
evidence” is worth.<br />
|Until I read the column so headed in your paper, I was<br />
totally unaware that any arrangements had been made by<br />
the publishers of “The Hispaniola Plate ’’ (Cassell and Co.,<br />
London) for reproduction by any firm in the United States,<br />
and, consequently, did not know that the edition from<br />
which you are undoubtedly quoting was in existence. Con-<br />
sequently, also, I know nothing of the biography to which<br />
you refer as “bearing internal evidence ’’ of having been<br />
written by me. And, “internal evidence ’’ notwithstand-<br />
ing, the statement that I wrote the biography is false. I<br />
have never seen it yet, since naturally it is not in the<br />
London edition; I repeat that I know nothing whatever<br />
about it, except that which I can glean from your article,<br />
and, moreover, no biography of me has ever been written or<br />
suggested by myself. I gather also, from what you say,<br />
that comparison favourable to me has been made in this<br />
production between myself and Mr. , a piece of<br />
vulgarity which—in this country at least !—would have<br />
been quite sufficient to prove to any critic (as I imagine the<br />
writer of your article considers himself to be) that it could<br />
not possibly emanate from any author claiming to possess<br />
the slightest feelings of self-respect.<br />
But, since the discussion of such a claim as this is,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#382) ################################################<br />
<br />
28<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
perhaps, superfluous in my refutation of your writer's ideas<br />
and statements, I desire simply to inform you that this part<br />
of the so-called “biography” was no more written by me,<br />
or known by me, than was any other portion of it, and also<br />
that, until doing so at this present moment, I have never<br />
written Mr. — 's name.<br />
In conclusion, I ask you to give this denial as much pub-<br />
licity as you have given the statement,<br />
And I remain, Sir,<br />
Your obedient servant,<br />
(Signed) JOHN BLOUNDELLE-BURTON.<br />
IV.-DISCOUNT.<br />
Here is a case for the consideration of pub-<br />
lishers. A firm offers a 7s. 6d. book for 5s. 9d.,<br />
and to encourage the publishers we order the<br />
work. It arrives by Carter, Paterson, and we<br />
have to pay 4d. carriage.<br />
If we order the book of Bickers, or Bumpus,<br />
we obtain it for 5s. 7#d. or 5s. 8d., and it is<br />
delivered free of charge.<br />
Does the arrangement profit the author more<br />
in case I than in case 2 P And if not, why should<br />
we pay 4d. to oblige the publisher, and put a few<br />
extra pence in his pocket P S.<br />
[The author has nothing at all to do with it.—<br />
ED.]<br />
W.—ENCOURAGEMENT v. DISCOURAGEMENT.<br />
My vicissitudes as an author may be of inte-<br />
rest as somewhat remarkable. My first novel,<br />
published anonymously, was accepted by a leading<br />
firm, had excellent reviews in first-class papers,<br />
was pirated in America most successfully. The<br />
second, in my maiden name, brought out in first-<br />
class style by the same firm, had still better<br />
reviews. However, it attracted no attention. I<br />
was asked by my publishers if I were not disap-<br />
pointed, They had expected much from it; but<br />
the subject was painful—that of a woman's<br />
intemperance, and its telling was “too graphic,<br />
too clever, to get the second reading it deserved,”<br />
so they said. A master in fiction has since said<br />
“It was a book for a second edition.” Then<br />
came my third. The same approbation from the<br />
reviews, but I verily believe it was killed by one<br />
that breathed the word “psychological.” Hard<br />
for it was not so. I would not insult the Spirit of<br />
the Times by crediting it with time or digestion for<br />
such subtlety. This hurrying age adds to its fever<br />
by demanding incident in fiction on a par with<br />
that which society and travel endeavour to secure<br />
for it. The terse and pungent are in favour, no<br />
longer the discursive which takes you by pleasant<br />
bye-paths off the high road of the story into touch<br />
with the writer's personal thoughts and opinions,<br />
out of broad sunshine into restful shade. What<br />
is there in the modern novel to make you close it<br />
with a careful thumb as your marker, and look<br />
out of the window and reflect with the writer?<br />
Nothing. Tife is hard facts, and so are latter-<br />
day books. I thing it is Mr. Hall Caine who says<br />
a writer has no right to digress to his own<br />
opinions and observations; one must be kept at<br />
full strain after the characters. But “The Golden<br />
Butterfly ’’ is in a sixpenny edition, and there are<br />
readers who hail digressions such as we find in it<br />
as milestones where one may pause and meditate.<br />
Well, my third novel died before its best reviews<br />
—Guardian, Athenæum, and Academy—were<br />
out; the former foretold great things for me.<br />
On the strength of my book the C.E.T.S asked<br />
me to write a story for them. I did so, in a fort-<br />
night. It come out in their Chronicle, and both<br />
paper and cloth editions—a stroke of success.<br />
My last story is just out, both in paper and cloth<br />
too, a large edition in a well-known series. I<br />
am venturing on another three-decker, and have<br />
another short one in the market. But my<br />
reviews warrant me in expecting far greater<br />
success. Is the reviewing system at fault some-<br />
where P A book is often reviewed when it is either<br />
everywhere or virtually dead. All my books have<br />
been called powerful and realistic. In my temper-<br />
ance story, it was almost suggested in the columns<br />
of a paper that my facts must be personal—I hope<br />
not from myself as an inebriate | These terms<br />
are fashionable praise, but I have not been the<br />
fashion. Shorter stories, however, seem to be<br />
“getting me forwarder.” But how tantalising is<br />
the buffeting between intensely appreciative<br />
reviews bearing out a publisher's confidence and<br />
public indifference I have been warranted in<br />
nourishing great expectations of a full tide, and<br />
found myself stranded high and dry on the beach.<br />
I have been likened, to my own astonishment, to<br />
Mr. Thos. Hardy and Mr. Geo. Meredith. But<br />
the public remain stolid. My “pathos, humour,<br />
picturesqueness and power” are not for their<br />
enthusiasms. Yet I must write. I believe as<br />
firmly as Mr. Crockett in the gift being God-<br />
given, to be used. I live greatly with imaginary<br />
people; when they live with me I must put pen<br />
to paper and oust one set to make room for<br />
another. But I am not now working up to my<br />
powers—deliberately. I have found it exhaust-<br />
ing to do so, realising my emotional and dramatic<br />
situations too strongly ; so am lowering my<br />
standard. Was I born under an unlucky star,<br />
and is it my fate to have to be most discouraged<br />
by encouragements P Where are the powers that<br />
will adjust the balance by making recognition<br />
consistent with reviewing P I don’t grudge<br />
labour, but I yearn for its just reward. Mean-<br />
while I hear my case is a rare one, so I chronicle<br />
it. M. E. S. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/278/1895-06-01-The-Author-6-1.pdf | publications, The Author |