274 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/274 | The Author, Vol. 05 Issue 10 (March 1895) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+05+Issue+10+%28March+1895%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 05 Issue 10 (March 1895)</a> | | | <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253</a> | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1895-03-01-The-Author-5-10 | | | | | 253–280 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=5">5</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1895-03-01">1895-03-01</a> | | | | | | | 10 | | | 18950301 | C be El u t b or,<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
Monthly.)<br />
CON DUCTED BY WALTER BES ANT.<br />
VoI. V.-No. 10.]<br />
MARCH 1, 1895.<br />
[PRICE SIxPENCE.<br />
For the Opinions earpressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as earpressing the<br />
collective opinions of the committee unless<br />
they are officially signed by G. Herbert<br />
Thring, Sec.<br />
3- ~ *<br />
= * *-es<br />
HE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br />
remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br />
requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br />
important communications within two days will write to him<br />
without delay. All remittances should be crossed Union<br />
Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br />
all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br />
jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br />
returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br />
*— 2- --"<br />
* * *-*.<br />
WARNINGS AND ADVICE,<br />
I . RAWING THE AGREEMENT.-It is not generally<br />
understood that the author, as the vendor, has the<br />
absolute right of drafting the agreement upon<br />
whatever terms the transaction is to be carried out. . .<br />
Authors are strongly advised to exercise that right. In , ,<br />
every form of business, this among others, the right of<br />
drawing the agreement rests with him who sells, leases, or<br />
has the control of the property.<br />
2. SERIAL RIGHTS.—In selling Serial Rights remember<br />
that you may be selling the Serial Right for all time; that<br />
is, the Right to continue the production in papers. If you<br />
object to this, insert a clause to that effect. .<br />
3. STAMP YOUR AGREEMENTS. – Readers are mos<br />
URGENTLY warned not to neglect stamping their agreements<br />
immediately after signature. If this precaution is neglected<br />
for two weeks, a fine of £10 must be paid before the agree-<br />
ment can be used as a legal document. In almost every<br />
case brought to the secretary the agreement, or the letter<br />
which serves for one, is forwarded without the stamp. The<br />
author may be assured that the other party to the agree-<br />
ment seldom neglects this simple precaution. The Society,<br />
to save trouble, undertakes to get all the agreements of<br />
members stamped for them at no expense to themselves .<br />
eacept the cost of the stamp.<br />
WOL. V.<br />
4. ASCERTAIN WHAT A PROPOSED AGREEMENT GIVEs To<br />
BOTH SIDES BEFORE SIGNING IT.-Remember that an<br />
arrangement as to a joint venture in any other kind of busi-<br />
ness whatever would be instantly refused should either party<br />
refuse to show the books or to let it be known what share he<br />
reserved for himself.<br />
5. LITERARY AGENTS.—Be very careful. You cannot be<br />
too careful as to the person whom you appoint as your<br />
agent. Remember that you place your property almost un-<br />
reservedly in his hands. Your only safety is in consulting<br />
the Society, or some friend who has had personal experience<br />
of the agent. Do not trust advertisements alone.<br />
6. COST OF PRODUCTION.--Never sign any agreement of<br />
which the alleged cost of production forms an integral part,<br />
until you have proved the figures. -<br />
7. CHOICE OF PUBLISHERS.–Never enter into any cor-<br />
respondence with publishers, especially with those who ad-<br />
vertise for MSS., who are not recommended by experienced<br />
friends or by this Society.<br />
8. FUTURE WORK.—Never, on any account whatever,<br />
bind yourself down for future work to anyone.<br />
9. PERSONAL RISK.—Never accept any pecuniary risk or<br />
responsibility whatever without advice.<br />
IO. REJECTED MSS.—Never, when a MS. has been re-<br />
fused by respectable houses, pay others, whatever promises<br />
they may put forward, for the production of the work.<br />
II. AMERICAN RIGHTS.—Never sign away American<br />
rights. Keep them by special clause. Refuse to sign any<br />
agreement containing a clause which reserves them for the<br />
publisher, unless for a substantial consideration.<br />
12. CESSION OF COPYRIGHT.-Never sign any paper,<br />
either agreement or receipt, which gives away copyright,<br />
without advice.<br />
13. ADVERTISEMENTS.--Keep some control over the<br />
advertisements, if they affect your returns, by a clause in<br />
the agreement.<br />
14. NEVER forget that publishing is a business, like any<br />
other business, totally unconnected with philanthropy,<br />
charity, or pure love of literature. You have to do with<br />
business men. Be yourself a business man. *<br />
Society’s Offices — -<br />
4, PORTUGAL STREET, LINCOLN's INN FIELDs.<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
I. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub.<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the advice<br />
-- A. A 2<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 254 (#268) ############################################<br />
<br />
254<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor, the member<br />
has a right to an opinion from the Society’s solicitors. If the<br />
case is such that Counsel’s opinion is desirable, the Com-<br />
mittee will obtain for him Counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publisher's agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society first—our solicitors are continually<br />
engaged upon such questions for us.<br />
2:3. Send-to the office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts with the loan of the books represented. This is in<br />
order to ascertain what has been the nature of your agree-<br />
ments, and the results to author and publisher respectively<br />
so far. The Secretary will always be glad to have any<br />
agreements, new or old, for inspection and note. The infor-<br />
mation thus obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
4. If the examination of your previous business trans-<br />
actions by the Secretary proves unfavourable, you should<br />
take advice as to a change of publishers.<br />
5. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br />
posed document to the Society for examination.<br />
6. The Society is acquainted with the methods, and—in<br />
the case of fraudulent houses—the tricks of every publish-<br />
ing firm in the country.<br />
7. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br />
are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you are<br />
reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br />
the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br />
dence of the writer.<br />
8. Send to the Editor of the Author notes of everything<br />
important to literature that you may hear or meet with.<br />
- 9. The committee have now arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br />
safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br />
fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br />
will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :-(I)<br />
To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br />
stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br />
them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br />
due according to agreements. .<br />
*-- ~ *-*<br />
•-<br />
THE AUTHORS, SYNDICATE.<br />
i / TEMBERS are informed : -<br />
1. That the Authors' Syndicate takes charge of<br />
the business of members of the Society. That it<br />
submits MSS. to publishers and editors, concludes agree-<br />
ments, examines, passes, and collects accounts, and, gene-<br />
rally, relieves members of the trouble of managing business<br />
details. -<br />
2. That the terms upon which its services can be secured<br />
will be forwarded upon detailed application.<br />
3. That the Authors' Syndicate works only for those<br />
members of the Society whose work possesses a market<br />
value.<br />
4. That the Syndicate can only undertake any negotiations<br />
whatever on the distinct understanding that those negotia-<br />
tions are placed ea clusively in its hands, and that all<br />
communications relating thereto are referred to it.<br />
5. That clients can only be seen by the Director by<br />
appointment, and that, when possible, at least two days'<br />
notice should be given. . . . -<br />
6. That every attempt is made to deal with all communi-<br />
cations promptly..., That stamps should, in all cases, be sent<br />
to defray postage. * * - - - - - - - - - *, *<br />
7. That the Authors' Syndicate does not invite MSS.<br />
without previous correspondence ; does not hold itself<br />
responsible for MSS. forwarded without notice; and that<br />
in all cases MSS. must be accompanied by stamps to defray<br />
postage.<br />
8. That the Syndicate undertakes arrangements for<br />
lectures by some of the leading members of the Society;<br />
that it has a “Transfer Department ’’ for the sale and<br />
purchase of journals and periodicals; and that a “Register<br />
of Wants and Wanted ” is open. Members are invited to<br />
communicate their requirements to the Manager.<br />
There is an Honorary Advisory Committee, whose services<br />
will be called upon in any case of dispute or difficulty. It<br />
is perhaps necessary to state that the members of the<br />
Advisory Committee have no pecuniary interest whatever in<br />
the Syndicate. -<br />
NOTICES,<br />
HE Editor of the Author begs to remind members of the<br />
Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br />
of charge, the cost of producing it would be a very<br />
heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
6s. 6d. subscription for the year. r -<br />
The Editor is always glad to receive short papers and<br />
communications on all subjects connected with literature<br />
from members and others. Nothing can do more good to<br />
the Society than to make the Awthor complete, attractive,<br />
and interesting. Will those who are willing to aid in this<br />
work send their names and the special subjects on which<br />
they are willing to write P<br />
Communications for the Author should reach the Editor<br />
not later than the 21st of each month.<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind, whether<br />
members of the Society or not, are invited to communicate<br />
to the Editor any points connected with their work which<br />
it would be advisable in the general interest to publish.<br />
Members and others who wish their MSS. read are<br />
requested not to send them to the Office without previously<br />
eommunicating with the Secretary. The utmost practicable<br />
despatch is aimed at, and MSS. are read in the order in<br />
which they are received. It must also be distinctly under-<br />
stood that the Society does not, under any circumstances,<br />
undertake the publication of MSS. w<br />
The Authors’ Club is now open in its new premises, at<br />
3, Whitehall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary<br />
for information, rules of admission, &c.<br />
Will members take the trouble to ascertain whether they<br />
have paid their subscriptions for the year P If they will do<br />
this, and remit the amount, if still unpaid, or a banker’s<br />
order, it will greatly assist the Secretary, and save him the<br />
trouble of sending out a reminder. - - -<br />
Members are most earnestly entreated to attend to the<br />
warning numbered (8). It is a most foolish and may be a<br />
most disastrous thing to enter into an agreement binding<br />
for a term of years. Let them ask themselves if they<br />
would give a solicitor the collection of their rents for five<br />
years to come, whatever his conduct, whether he was honest<br />
or dishonest P Of course they would not. Why then<br />
hesitate for a moment when they are asked to sign them-<br />
selves into literary bondage for three or five years P<br />
Those who possess the “Cost of Production” are<br />
requested to note that the cost of binding has advanced 15<br />
per cent. This means, for those who do not like the trouble<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 255 (#269) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
255<br />
of “doing sums,” the addition of three shillings in the<br />
pound on this head. In other words, if the cost of binding<br />
is set down in our book at eight pounds, to this must now be<br />
added twenty-four shillings more, so that it now stands at<br />
£948. The figures in our book are as near the exact truth<br />
as can be procured; but a printer's, or a binder's, bill is so<br />
elastic a thing that nothing more exact can be arrived at.<br />
Some remarks have been made upon the amount charged<br />
in the “Cost of Production” for advertising. Of course, we<br />
have not included any sums which may be charged for<br />
inserting advertisements in the publisher's own magazines,<br />
or in other magazines by exchange. As agreements too<br />
often go, there is nothing to prevent the publisher from<br />
sweeping the whole profits of a book into his own pocket,<br />
by inserting any number of advertisements in his own<br />
magazines, and by exchanging with others. Some there are<br />
who call this a form of fraud; it is not known what those<br />
who practise this method of swelling their own profits call it.<br />
*= a -ºr<br />
wº- - -<br />
THE GENERAL MEETING OF THE<br />
SOCIETY,<br />
HE General Meeting of the Society of<br />
Authors was held on Monday, Feb. 25, at<br />
4.30 p.m., in the rooms of the Royal<br />
Medical and Chirurgical Society, at 20, Hanover-<br />
square. Mr. W. Martin Conway took the<br />
chair, and amongst those of the committee and<br />
council to support him were Mr. Hall Caine, Mr.<br />
Rider Haggard, Mr. Anthony Hope, Mr. W. E. H.<br />
Lecky, Mr. J. M. Lely, and Mr. E. Clodd.<br />
Mr. Conway stated that as the report had been<br />
circulated to all the members of the Society he<br />
would take it as read, but would be glad to hear<br />
if any of the members present had any sugges-<br />
tions to make, or anything to say on the matter.<br />
He further stated that the work done by the<br />
Society had been very satisfactory. They had<br />
settled virtually IOO cases during the past year,<br />
and had elected 233 new members.<br />
Mr. Stuart-Glennie proposed that there should<br />
be a more detailed statement of account in the<br />
next year's report, and Mr. Conway replied that<br />
he would gladly put the matter before the Com-<br />
mittee at their next meeting.<br />
The report was then unanimously approved by<br />
the meeting.<br />
Mr. Hall Caine was then called upon to propose<br />
the following resolution :-‘‘That in the opinion<br />
of this meeting of the members of the Incor-<br />
porated Society of Authors the Canadian Copy-<br />
right Act is unjust and impracticable, and<br />
calculated to affect injuriously the interests of all<br />
authors.” Mr. Hall Caine stated his diffidence in<br />
speaking on such a subject before the meeting,<br />
as authors were more at home with the pen. He,<br />
however, pointed out what had been the legisla-<br />
tion of all civilised countries with regard to the<br />
matter of copyright. That the property of<br />
authors had after many years of considerable<br />
struggle been recognised universally to be<br />
distinct and apart from any trade considerations.<br />
Then he proceeded to point out the danger of<br />
Canada obtaining the Royal Assent to the Copy-<br />
right Bill in its present condition, and finally<br />
summed up by saying that he thought all authors<br />
should bind together to oppose the passing of the<br />
Act. -<br />
Mr. Rider Haggard seconded the resolution;<br />
discussing shortly the provisions of the Canadian<br />
Act, and pointing out the impracticability of its<br />
working.<br />
Mr. W. Oliver Hodges, who acted on behalf<br />
of the society in conjunction with the Secretary<br />
on the General Committee which was summoned.<br />
last year to consider the question of Canadian<br />
copyright, pointed out the fallacy of the licensing<br />
clause in the Canadian Act, and how unsatis-<br />
factory the collection of the royalties had been in<br />
past years.<br />
Mr. W. E. H. Lecky also spoke of the necessity<br />
of energetic action, as it was understood that the<br />
Royal assent would be given, if at all, within the<br />
next four weeks.<br />
After short speeches on the subject by several<br />
other members, the motion was put and unani-<br />
mously carried. t<br />
Mr. Stuart-Glennie then rose to bring forward<br />
the following resolution: “That the executive of<br />
the Society be now instructed to take more<br />
vigorous action in ascertaining, defending, and<br />
enlarging the rights of authors; and that a<br />
special committee be appointed to report to the<br />
Society with reference to such more vigorous<br />
action.” He referred as one of his reasons to his<br />
own case which had been before the committee<br />
during the past year. He stated, however, that<br />
he did not mean to bring the motion forward as<br />
a vote of censure on the committee.<br />
Mr. Bigelow seconded the motion on Mr.<br />
Glennie's behalf.<br />
As the Chairman (Mr. Conway) considered<br />
that the action of the Committee of the Society had<br />
been called into question, he asked the solicitors<br />
of the Society to make a short statement in<br />
defence of the action of the committee. -<br />
Mr. Emery, the Society's solicitor, pointed out<br />
how it had been impossible to take up Mr.<br />
Glennie's case; that the Society had on two<br />
separate occasions taken legal advice on the sub-<br />
ject, and finally put the issues at stake from a<br />
statement of facts prepared by Mr. Glennie's and<br />
the Society solicitors before counsel; that counsel<br />
had given it as his opinion that Mr. Glennie could<br />
not succeed. Under the circumstances, therefore,<br />
the action of the committee had been thoroughly<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 256 (#270) ############################################<br />
<br />
256<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
justified, and there was no cause for blaming the<br />
committee.<br />
Mr. Rider Haggard then moved the rejection<br />
of the motion on the grounds of the facts stated<br />
by the solicitors, and he further pointed out that<br />
Mr. Glennie's motion virtually amounted to a<br />
vote of censure on the committee.<br />
Mr. Haggard's amendment was seconded by<br />
Mr. Douglas Sladen. -<br />
There were various other speakers, who all<br />
seemed to coincide with the opinion of Mr.<br />
Haggard that Mr. Glennie's motion amounted to<br />
a vote of censure on the committee. -<br />
Mr. Bigelow rose and stated that he had no<br />
idea in seconding the motion that a vote of<br />
Censure had been intended.<br />
Mr. Haggard’s amendment rejecting the reso-<br />
lution was then put, and was carried with but<br />
One dissentient.<br />
The proceedings then terminated.<br />
-**<br />
*<br />
LITERARY PROPERTY.<br />
I.—MUSICAL PUBLISHING.<br />
\PIE musical composer, like the dramatist, but<br />
unlike the author, has two rights in his<br />
work, the copyright and the performing<br />
right. He ought, therefore, if his work were pro-<br />
perly managed, to have two sources of income, but<br />
this is not the case. -<br />
The musical composer, like the author in<br />
the past, seems to be absolutely ignorant of his<br />
rights, and is still in shackles, bound hand<br />
and foot. The perusal of many of the musical<br />
publishers' agreements in all their varieties<br />
clearly shows this. And the case is more<br />
disastrous, as the performing right and the<br />
copyright might be of great value, both being<br />
good properties, whereas for the dramatic writer<br />
the performing right is virtually his only pro-<br />
perty, and for the author of literary wares his<br />
copyright.<br />
As a matter of fact, the musical composer<br />
recklessly assigns away both his rights to<br />
the publisher in absolute ignorance of their<br />
value. What does he get in return ? For<br />
the performing right nothing, and even the<br />
publisher very seldom uses what might be a<br />
good property.<br />
This abandonment of valuable property has<br />
been going on for so long that it has almost<br />
become a recognised custom. It is not, however,<br />
too late to change the procedure, but the difficulty<br />
is for the composer to bring about this alteration.<br />
If he endeavours to do so, he is met by alternative<br />
answers from the publisher:<br />
(I) A willingness to publish on certain terms,<br />
the composer retaining the performing<br />
right;<br />
(2) A refusal to publish without the assign-<br />
ment of this right.<br />
Under case (I) the terms are generally so<br />
stringent that the composer cannot possibly<br />
accept them. If, however, he should make an<br />
agreement the question is how, to utilise this<br />
right. An intending performer calls on the<br />
publisher and states what he wants. He receives<br />
the answer at once that the performing right is<br />
held by Mr. , who will probably make a<br />
charge, whereas if he purchases from them some<br />
other composer's work they will let him have the<br />
right of performing for nothing. -<br />
It is obvious that handicapped to this extent it<br />
is impossible for the composer alone to make the<br />
alteration. There ought, therefore, to be a<br />
combination between composers and publishers.<br />
For the latter, although originally mere agents,<br />
have become through the stringency of their<br />
agreements and the carelessness of composers<br />
holders of valuable property. Such a combina-<br />
tion would be easy, as the music publishers are<br />
few, and it would not be difficult to arrange so<br />
that the outside public would be forced to pay<br />
for other people's property which they now receive<br />
gratis. The publishers would at once feel the<br />
benefit, as they are the greatest holders of per-<br />
forming rights. The composers would, it is<br />
hoped, feel the benefit in the near future, when<br />
they have come to recognise the value of their<br />
own property.<br />
The argument that the publishers—who do<br />
not care about wandering from their old and<br />
well worn track—would at once bring forward is,<br />
of course, that the public would not pay for<br />
performing rights. This argument may, however,<br />
easily be repudiated, as is shown in the case of<br />
dramatic works. The English musical public is<br />
constantly on the increase, and is as eager for<br />
some new thing as the theatrical world.<br />
These remarks on the performing rights of com-<br />
posers refer chiefly to the longer compositions, such<br />
as Cantatas, oratorios, operas. They only refer<br />
in a minor degree to songs. For the difficulty<br />
in the way of enforcing a claim in the latter case<br />
is obvious, and the charge would be small. If,<br />
however, some simple method of collection<br />
could be devised, the right is still a valuable<br />
OT162,<br />
The next question to be considered is what the<br />
composer receives for his copyright. In many<br />
cases the pleasure of seeing his work produced is<br />
considered sufficient reward. If it should chance<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 257 (#271) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
257<br />
that terms are proposed, he is offered four different<br />
kinds of agreements. These agreements may be<br />
termed:<br />
(1) The commission agreement.<br />
(2) The purchase outright.<br />
(3) The royalty agreement.<br />
(4) The half-profit agreement.<br />
But they differ frºm the ordinary book pub-<br />
lisher's agreements of these names in that the<br />
music publisher appropriates all the performing<br />
rights and copyrights, and is otherwise more<br />
stringent in his terms, and in many cases threatens<br />
the composer with non-publication unless these<br />
rights are transferred.<br />
(I) is perhaps the most unsatisfactory system<br />
for the composer, for, although the publisher<br />
undertakes to publish the work, he in reality<br />
does little more than produce it. He makes<br />
no attempt to place it before singers, does not<br />
advertise it, does not send it round with his<br />
travellers (or, if he does, does so in a half-hearted<br />
way), but lets it lie in a neat brown paper parcel<br />
on One of the shelves of his warehouse. If the song<br />
is to have a success, it must come from the result of<br />
the composer's unaided efforts; but success does not<br />
attend this method of publishing except through<br />
some extraordinary chance. In addition, the com-<br />
poser pays for the cost of production, and this<br />
is generally put at £2 or £3 more than the real<br />
cost. The total result therefore is a considerable<br />
loss to the composer and a slight gain to the pub-<br />
lisher. If, however, through the untiring energy<br />
of the composer, the song is placed before the<br />
public, the publisher reaps a fair commission, a<br />
Commission for which he has mot worked. In<br />
fact, it pays the publisher to let the song lie idle.<br />
He cannot lose, he may make a fair amount; and<br />
perhaps, if the composer subsequently becomes<br />
famous, a great amount<br />
(2) When a publisher purchases a work out-<br />
right he generally does so with the idea of<br />
making it a success. He employs all the means<br />
in his power to bring it to notice. He sends out<br />
copies to singers; he advertises it in the papers;<br />
he gets up concerts for its performance; he pays<br />
singers to sing it, or parts of it; he sees that the<br />
concerts are well reported. The consequence is<br />
very often a great success, and the composer<br />
sees the publisher making hundreds of pounds<br />
where he has only made tens, and where he<br />
cannot hope to make any more. It must be<br />
remembered that the cost of production of a<br />
Cantata or a song compared with its selling price<br />
is much less than the cost of a book, so this is<br />
much sooner covered by the sales, and the profits<br />
are consequently greater. There is only one<br />
advantage to the composer in this method of<br />
publication, and this is a deferred advantage in<br />
case he desires to place another song or other<br />
musical composition before the public.<br />
(3) The royalty system is the only one in<br />
which under the present methods it appears that<br />
the author can reap any proportionate profit.<br />
The ordinary royalty is a variable quantity,<br />
varying sometimes, but not always, with the<br />
prices of the work if it chances that the price<br />
is mentioned in the agreement, an omission which<br />
frequently occurs. In any case the royalty is<br />
always smaller than with the author when the<br />
two costs of production are compared, and<br />
especially when in the payment of these royalties<br />
seven copies count as six. In the booksellers’<br />
trade thirteen copies count as twelve, or twenty-<br />
five as twenty-four, but the iniquity of seven as<br />
six is only reached in the publication of music.<br />
* There are various other arrangements in which<br />
a royalty is paid : sometimes after the sale of a<br />
certain number of copies, sometimes after the<br />
cost of production has been govered. It is, how-<br />
ever, impossible to exhaustively discuss the<br />
different forms of agreement or to show in what<br />
proportion the royalties should be raised in<br />
arrangements where the publisher is virtually<br />
protected from loss before the composer receives<br />
any remuneration. One point, however, it is<br />
necessary to mention before leaving royalty<br />
agreements, that is, on what form of production<br />
a royalty is paid. In the case of songs and small<br />
pieces of instrumental music it is paid on the<br />
vocal part with the piano score, or on the piano<br />
score; and this is fair, for this is the only form<br />
that has a sale. The sale and hire of band parts<br />
must be small, and would hardly cover the<br />
cost of production, possibly might never do so.<br />
In the case of Cantatas, oratorios, glees, and part<br />
songs, it is paid on the vocal part with the piano<br />
score, but there is this difference between the two<br />
instances: in the latter the publisher produces<br />
the vocal parts — treble, alto, tenor, bass —<br />
separately, and sells them or hires them in this<br />
form to choral societies. As on the separate<br />
parts no royalty is paid, he, to a great extent,<br />
nullifies his own agreement with the composer,<br />
and certainly puts his interest as agent and that<br />
•ot the composer as principal at variance. The<br />
curious part of this transaction is that the<br />
publisher, in a half-profit agreement, credits and<br />
debits the accounts with the moneys expended<br />
and received on this item, but in a royalty agree-<br />
ment does not recognise the sale. The composer<br />
should always take care that the publishers’<br />
interest and his own are parallel.<br />
(4) The objections to an half-profit agreement<br />
are most serious, yet can only be mentioned in<br />
this short paper and not discussed:<br />
(1) The complication of accounts.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 258 (#272) ############################################<br />
<br />
258<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
(2) The control of all expenditure, including<br />
advertisements, lying with the publisher.<br />
(3) The ignorance of the author of the cost of<br />
production.<br />
(4) The ignorance of the author of the methods<br />
and necessities of publication.<br />
In short, it must be stated that this form of<br />
agreement which sounds so fair is in reality the<br />
worst for the composer.<br />
Finally, it should be pointed out that there are<br />
certain elements in the cost of musical production<br />
that do not enter into the production of literary<br />
wares. The actual paper, &c., is no doubt much<br />
cheaper compared with the selling price, but in<br />
the first instance the writer of the words has to<br />
be paid. His claim is generally settled by a sum<br />
paid down. In case (1) it is paid by the author;<br />
in cases (2) and (3) by the publisher; and sometimes<br />
in case (3), and always in case (4), it is brought into<br />
account before royalty or profit is paid. Then<br />
the music of songs and smaller pieces is sent out<br />
gratis broadcast. Fifty or sixty copies of a book<br />
may be sent out for review. Five or six hundred<br />
copies of songs are sent out to musical people,<br />
singers, &c. Lastly, the singer has to be paid to<br />
sing the song in public ; for this he is paid by a<br />
sum down or by a royalty. All these items tend<br />
to reduce the profit in songs and pieces to which<br />
they specially apply.<br />
On the other hand, it must be taken into con-<br />
sideration that some of the musical publishers<br />
also run concerts, which are very lucrative invest-<br />
ments, for the special purpose of airing their own<br />
Wą,I'êS. - -<br />
From the business point of view, however, to<br />
sum up the whole situation, musical composers<br />
are in a shocking position, and the sooner they<br />
band together either to run a new publisher or to<br />
refuse to publish except on equitable terms the<br />
better it will be for them. The old stories are<br />
still cropping up of terms settled at the pub-<br />
lisher's dinner table, the unbusiness like propen-<br />
sities of composers, and the absolute impos-<br />
sibility of getting them to sign agreements.<br />
Surely it would be an easy thing for the publisher,<br />
who is a man of business, to insist on business-<br />
like arrangements. The only deduction that can<br />
be made is that it pays him better not to do so.<br />
II.-ANGLo-AUSTRIAN COPYRIGHT.<br />
Vienna, Wednesday.—The official Gazette to-<br />
day announces that the operation of the Anglo-<br />
Austrian copyright treaty has been extended to<br />
India, Newfoundland, Natal, Victoria, Queens-<br />
land, Western Australia, and New Zealand.—<br />
Reuter.<br />
III.—EDUCATIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC Books.<br />
Of all kinds of literary profits those in educa-<br />
tional and scientific works are hardest to estimate<br />
before actual publication. There is, however, the<br />
undoubted fact that the educational branch of<br />
literary property is by far the most valuable and<br />
the most profitable. If a work dealing with some<br />
educational or scientific subject gets once an estab-<br />
lished position as a standard book for school use in<br />
England or America, the returns are constant and<br />
most substantial. There would seem, however,<br />
to be no midway between a good and substantial<br />
return and virtually no return at all. Under<br />
these circumstances it is of great importance to<br />
educational and scientific writers never to sell out-<br />
right a work which may be a mine of gold, and<br />
never, under any circumstances whatever, to part.<br />
with the copyright of such a work. It has been<br />
stated by some publishers that they will refuse to<br />
deal in any educational or scientific work unless<br />
the author will assign the copyright to them, on<br />
the ground that it is necessary, should the work<br />
prove a success, that they should be able to<br />
benefit by that success as well as the author. On<br />
the other hand, it must be remembered that it is,<br />
of the most vital importance that the author<br />
should ot lose, but should retain, the command<br />
—which he can only do by retaining the copy-<br />
right—of his work. -<br />
The following are among the reasons why an<br />
author should retain his copyright: º<br />
I. An educational or a scientific book must be<br />
altered from time to time in order to be brought<br />
up to date. New scientific discoveries may make<br />
the best book antiquated. New methods may be<br />
introduced; new theories may be advanced. The<br />
only way for the author to meet these changes is.<br />
by making corresponding changes in his book.<br />
2. But the publisher is interested in these<br />
changes. He may be. He may not be. He may<br />
have a younger man to advance, thinking that he<br />
will be more popular. -<br />
3. He may sell his business, or go into bank-<br />
ruptcy, or buy another man's business. In<br />
either case an author's book goes with his other<br />
Copyrights, perhaps to find himself on the same<br />
shelf with his most important rival. -<br />
It is, of course, always possible to insert<br />
clauses in the agreement by which the publisher<br />
shall have the option of producing second, third,<br />
and subsequent editions on reasonable terms.<br />
Should the publisher refuse to deal except on<br />
the condition of getting the copyright, the author<br />
should go elsewhere. - -<br />
One case, however, has come before the Society.<br />
in which a publisher fully recognised the import.<br />
ance of giving the author a free hand with regard<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 259 (#273) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
259<br />
to alterations in a scientific work, and although<br />
the author had inadvertently assigned the copy-<br />
right to the publisher, the latter consented to<br />
reassign it on consideration that he should have<br />
the option of publishing subsequent editions. It<br />
is necessary that this warning should be con-<br />
stantly before educational and scientific authors,<br />
“that they should on no account whatever assign<br />
their copyright.” They may, if they so desire,<br />
give the publisher every help and assistance with<br />
regard to the right to publish future editions,<br />
but they must make no assignment. If they do<br />
not know how to draw the necessary agreement,<br />
the Society will advise them in the matter.<br />
IV.-AN IMPORTANT CASE.<br />
H. RIDER HAGGARD AND LoNGMANs, GREEN,<br />
AND Co., complainants, against THE WAVERLY<br />
CoMPANY, defendant.<br />
(Circuit Court of the United States, District of<br />
New Jersey.)<br />
Brief of Respondents on demurrer to the Bill of<br />
Complaint. -<br />
STATEMENT. — The principal ground of de-<br />
murrer urged by the defendant is the third :<br />
“That said bill fails to show that due and law-<br />
ful notice of said pretended copyright and copy-<br />
rights was inserted as required by section 4962<br />
of the Revised Statutes of the United States in<br />
the several copies of every edition published in<br />
manner and form in said section aforesaid speci-<br />
fically set forth.” The clauses of the bill thus<br />
attacked are as follows: “Fourth.—And your<br />
orators further show that the aforesaid editions<br />
of their said copyright book, entitled ‘Nada the<br />
Lily,’ were printed from plates made within and<br />
type set within the limits of the United States,<br />
as required by law. That due notice of said<br />
copyrights and entries, and that said copyrights<br />
had been completed, was given by the Secretary<br />
of the Treasury by publication in his official cata-<br />
logues of the title entries of books and other<br />
ar icles in the weekly lists of the title of all books<br />
wherein the copyright has been completed, all of<br />
which said catalogues are ready to be produced<br />
in court. That the notice required by section<br />
4962 of the Revised Statutes of the United<br />
States has been duly and lawfully given in the<br />
several copies of said editions so published as<br />
aforesaid.” Section 4962 of the Revised Statutes<br />
is as follows: “Section 4962. No person shall<br />
maintain an action for the infringement of his<br />
copyright unless he shall give notice thereof by<br />
inserting in the several copies of every edition<br />
published, on the title page, or the page imme-<br />
diately following, if it be a book, or if a map,<br />
chart, musical composition, print, cut, engraving,<br />
WOL. W. - *<br />
photograph, painting, drawing, chromo, statue,<br />
statuary, or model or design intended to be per-<br />
fected and completed as a work of the fine arts,<br />
by inscribing upon some visible portion thereof,<br />
or of the substance on which the same shall be<br />
mounted, the following words, viz.: “Entered<br />
according to Act of Congress, in the year 5<br />
by A. B., in the office of the Librarian of Con-<br />
gress, at Washington,’ or at his option, the word<br />
‘ copyright,’ together with the year the copyright<br />
was entered, and the name of the party by whom<br />
it was taken out, thus: “Copyright, 18 , by<br />
A. B.’” The demurrer claims that the bill is<br />
bad because it does not in its terms declare that<br />
the copyright notice has been inserted “in the<br />
several copies of every edition published; ” the<br />
actual averment being that the notice required<br />
was “duly and lawfully given in the several<br />
copies” of the editions published as set forth<br />
in the complaint, being all the editions men-<br />
tioned therein, except defendant’s alleged pira-<br />
tical edition. Subordinate grounds of demurrer<br />
are that the book in question was not composed<br />
by a citizen or resident of the United States—<br />
which attacks the constitutionality of the Inter-<br />
national Copyright Law—and that the com-<br />
plaimants by asking, in their prayer, for damages<br />
and the delivery for destruction of the unsold<br />
copies of the piratical edition demand more than<br />
a court of equity can grant. A further ground<br />
of demurrer is alleged indefiniteness in the charge<br />
of infringement. These points will be considered<br />
in the foregoing order, which is the order of im-<br />
portance as urged by demurrant.<br />
First.—I. The requirements of the statute<br />
which are conditions precedent to the perfection<br />
of copyright are—I. Deposit before publication<br />
of printed copy of the title. 2. Deposit after<br />
publication of two copies of the book. 3. Print-<br />
ing of the prescribed notice in the copies pub-<br />
lished: (Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Peters, 591 ;<br />
Merrell v. Tice, IO4 U. S. 557; Thompson v.<br />
Hubbard, 131 U. S. 123.) It has been held that<br />
as matter of fact the requirement of notice means<br />
that the prescribed words shall be inserted in the<br />
several copies of every edition which the proprietor<br />
of the copyright, as controlling the publication,<br />
publishes : (Thompson v. Hubbard, 131 U. S.<br />
123; Supreme Court of the United States,<br />
May 13, 1889.) Since the last-named decision<br />
the International Copyright Act has been passed<br />
(March 3, 1891), which greatly widens the field<br />
of application of copyright law. Is it still true<br />
that, to maintain an action on his copyright for<br />
infringement, a person must literally and exactly<br />
give the United States copyright notice “in the<br />
several copies of every edition published” by<br />
him P. The section in question (section 4962)<br />
IB B<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 260 (#274) ############################################<br />
<br />
26o<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
was not altered by the Act of 1891, but was in<br />
force previously. Doubtless the possible effects<br />
of not changing this section escaped the aqtention<br />
of the legislators. For, if there be no limitation<br />
in construction put upon the words “every edition<br />
published,” an English author, for example,<br />
publishing his book not only in the United States,<br />
but also in Great Britain, or in Australia, or in<br />
South Africa, or in China, loses his United States<br />
copyright unless notice of the latter be inserted<br />
in every copy published anywhere in the world.<br />
And this will be the case, notwithstanding he com-<br />
plies fully with the English copyright laws. We<br />
submit that this is not the legal intention of the<br />
Act. That such is not the intention is evidenced<br />
by the provisions of section 4956 of the Copy-<br />
right Act, to the effect that in order to complete<br />
copyright the two copies of the book required to<br />
be deposited with the Librarian of Congress<br />
must be “printed from type set within the limits<br />
of the United States or from plates printed there-<br />
from.” And during the existence of the copy-<br />
right the importation into the United States of<br />
any book so copyrighted, or any edition or edi-<br />
tions thereof, or any plates not made from type<br />
set within the United States, is prohibited. That<br />
is to say, in order to avail himself of the protec-<br />
tion of the copyright law of the United States,<br />
the author, foreign or otherwise, must print and<br />
publish within the United States, and the impor-<br />
tation of any edition printed from type not set or<br />
plates not made within the United States is for-<br />
bidden. It matters not, then, how many foreign<br />
manufactured editions are published outside.<br />
The United States law does not protect them, nor<br />
does it allow them to interfere with books manu-<br />
factured and copyrighted here. They are ex-<br />
cluded from the consideration of the Copyright<br />
Act. Hence it would be absurd to hold that the<br />
notice required by section 4962 means, literally,<br />
“every edition published ” by the person copy-<br />
righting. It means every edition published,<br />
printed from type set or plates made within the<br />
United States—that is, every edition manufactured<br />
in the United States. This must be so, because<br />
no other editions can be made the subject of<br />
copyright law at all. * *<br />
II. It is fundamental that in the construction<br />
of statutes the whole and every part must be con-<br />
sidered. “The intention of the law-maker will<br />
prevail over the literal sense of the terms; and<br />
its reason and intention will prevail over the strict<br />
letter:” (Kent's Com., 461 ; Sutherland on Sta-<br />
tutory Construction (1891), p. 32O.) “The mere<br />
literal construction ought not to prevail if it is<br />
opposed to the intention of the Legislature<br />
apparent from the statute; and if the words are<br />
sufficiently flexible to admit of some other con-<br />
complaint P<br />
struction by which that intention can be better<br />
effected, the law requires that intention to be<br />
adopted: ” (Sutherland on Stat. Construction,<br />
p. 321, and cases there cited.) These well-esta-<br />
blished doctrines have received application in<br />
regard to the international copyright law in the<br />
United States Circuit Court, District of Massa-<br />
chusetts, in the case of Werckmeister v. Pierce<br />
and Bushnell Mfg. Co., decided Aug. 7, 1894,<br />
Putnam, J. This was the case of a painting<br />
sought to be copyrighted by a German subject,<br />
on the original of which no notice of United<br />
States copyright, as required by section 4962, was<br />
ever inscribed, although the other conditions of<br />
copyright were complied with, and the copyright<br />
notice was inscribed on the published photo-<br />
graphs of the painting. In this case the court<br />
departs from the literal reading of the statute,<br />
and holds that the intent of the law must govern,<br />
and that under construction according to the<br />
intent, it is not necessary to place the copyright<br />
notice upon the original, though the statute<br />
expressly says, that if the article be a painting,<br />
the notice shall be inscribed, “upon some visible<br />
portion thereof, or of the substance on which the<br />
same shall be mounted.” If, for the purpose of<br />
sustaining the intent of the legislators, so bold a<br />
departure from the literal sense, as in this case,<br />
may be taken in construing section 4962, how<br />
much more, in the case at bar, is a construction<br />
warranted, which alone can make the Act har-<br />
monious in its parts, and without which the<br />
whole law would become a nullity. Its purpose<br />
in securing international copyright otherwise<br />
would be entirely defeated. As a matter of fact<br />
it is not the custom to put the United States<br />
copyright notice on English editions of a work<br />
copyrighted in America. Much more unlikely<br />
would such notice be thought important in<br />
editions published in more remote countries. The<br />
result would be to make the copyright protection<br />
evidently intended to be given to works manu-<br />
factured in the United States practically null<br />
and void, and to destroy the International Copy-<br />
right Law.<br />
III. Thus much premised, are the allegations<br />
in the bill sufficient? They set up the publica-<br />
tion of the editions described, “printed from<br />
plates made within and type set within the limits<br />
of the United States, as required by law. That<br />
the notice required by section 4962 of the Revised<br />
Statutes of the United States has been duly and<br />
lawfully given in the several copies of said<br />
editions so published as aforesaid.” The only<br />
question here would seem to be will the court<br />
presume, outside the record, that there are other<br />
editions of the work than those set forth in the<br />
If it should be the fact that the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 261 (#275) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
26 I<br />
editions pleaded constitute “every edition pub-<br />
lished,” there is, of course, a sufficient cause of<br />
action. Will the court presume otherwise upon<br />
demurrer? Reasonable presumptions are ad-<br />
mitted by demurrer as well as the matters<br />
expressly alleged : (Foster's Federal Practice,<br />
vol. I, p. 209; Amory v. Laurence, 3 Clifford,<br />
523, 526.) But, says the court in Warfield v.<br />
Fisk (1883; 136 Mass., p. 219), “We cannot draw<br />
inferences of fact upon demurrer.” If it appear<br />
that the required notice was given in the several<br />
copies of every edition of which the court can<br />
take any cognisance, it is a “reasonable pre-<br />
sumption ” that the law has been complied<br />
with. It would be a violent presumption<br />
to assume outside the record, that there are<br />
other editions in which no notice, or defective<br />
notice, was given. The bill would be sufficient<br />
on the hearing if the facts alleged were proved.<br />
It would not be necessary even to prove literally<br />
the insertion of the notice in every copy. Pro-<br />
duction of one copy with the notice and general<br />
testimony as to the issue of the edition would be<br />
sufficient: (Falk v. Gast Lith. and Eng. Co. Ld.,<br />
4o Fed. Rep. 168.) The contention of the defen-<br />
dant would make his pleading a “speaking de-<br />
murrer” where by argument or inference a mate-<br />
rial fact is suggested that is not alleged in the<br />
bill. Such a demurrer will be overruled: (Beach,<br />
Modern Equity Practice, vol. I, p. 265, and cases<br />
there cited.) Moreover, the copyright is per-<br />
fected by taking the three steps required by<br />
statute before and coincident with publication.<br />
Primă facie then, the copyright being perfect,<br />
the complainants are entitled to maintain their<br />
action. A copy of the record in the office of the<br />
Librarian of Congress, with the books showing<br />
the notice, make out a primá facie case against<br />
an infringer. If there has been any omission in<br />
subsequent or other editions than those pleaded,<br />
it is for the defendant to plead and prove that the<br />
complainant has by his omissions lost the copy-<br />
right he once had and which presumptively he<br />
still has. The notice is not a condition to the<br />
obtaining a copyright, but to the maintaining an<br />
action for infringement. If the facts allow it,<br />
the defendant, in case of lack of universality of<br />
the notice, must plead in abatement. He has no<br />
standing on demurrer. It may be added that the<br />
practice books giving forms of bills of complaint<br />
in copyright cases, give a pleading setting out<br />
generally that the complainants are the owners of<br />
a copyright taken out “previous to the publica-<br />
tion of the book in question, and secured according<br />
to law.” No other detail of fact is given in<br />
order to make out a primá facie case: (Beach,<br />
Modern Equity Pleading, vol. 2, p. 1281.) In<br />
Thompson v. Hubbard (131 U. S. 123), on which<br />
VOL. W.<br />
the demurrant seems to rely, the decision was<br />
rendered after the facts appeared on the trial and<br />
not on demurrer.<br />
Second.—Inasmuch as the demurrant in its<br />
brief does not insist upon the ground of demurrer<br />
questioning the constitutionality of the Interna-<br />
tional Copyright Act, the complainants will not<br />
discuss that topic at this time.<br />
Third.—There is no merit in demurrant's con-<br />
tention respecting failure to waive penalties end<br />
forfeitures. At the most the prayer of the com-<br />
plainants in this respect is surplusage. A bill to<br />
obtain relief against an infringement of a copy-<br />
right need not contain a waiver of the com-<br />
plainant’s statutory right to a forfeiture of the<br />
piratical plates: (Foster's Federal Practice (2nd<br />
ed.), vol. I, p. 175; Farmer v. Calvert Lith. Co.,<br />
I Flippin, 228.) If any part of the relief is<br />
proper, the demurrer on this point will be over-<br />
ruled. This is the latest doctrine in these cases:<br />
(Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Hartshorn,<br />
Treas., &c., 3O Fed. Rep., 54 I (1887; Shiras, J.);<br />
Town of Strawberry Hill v. C. M. & St. P. Ry.<br />
Co. et al, 4 I Fed. Rep. 568 (1890).)<br />
Fourth.-Nor is there room for argument that<br />
the charge of infringement is indefinite. The<br />
defendant is charged with having published,<br />
without authorisation, the book copyrighted.<br />
What has been copyrighted has been set forth in<br />
the bill. This is sufficient to put the defendant<br />
upon his answer.<br />
Fifth. — The questions involved before the<br />
court at this present time are purely questions of<br />
law. The defendant in his brief, has seen fit to<br />
talk “ to the galleries,” and to claim that this<br />
action was brought in bad faith, “solely for the<br />
purpose of intimidating the trade.” This autho-<br />
rises the complainants to say that there is no<br />
doubt whatever that the complainant, H. Rider<br />
Haggard (an author of no mean repute) is the<br />
author of the work “Nada the Lily;” that<br />
Longmans, Green, and Co. (the oldest firm of<br />
publishers in the world, and of undoubted re-<br />
spectability and standing) are the authorised<br />
publishers of the work; that the defendant, the<br />
Waverly Company, has published, without autho-<br />
rity, a piratical edition of this book, with the<br />
idea that through some technical lapse, the copy-<br />
right due to the complainants, and which they<br />
have believed they possess, has been vitiated ;<br />
and the said defendant is now trying to defeat<br />
complainants in the enforcement of these supposed<br />
rights upon which they have always in good faith<br />
relied. The complainants are prosecuting this<br />
action, not alone to secure their own rights, but<br />
also in behalf of the trade to ascertain, for the<br />
benefit of all, what the meaning of the Inter-<br />
national Copyright Law is, by its proper judicial<br />
B B 2<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 262 (#276) ############################################<br />
<br />
262<br />
THE AUTHOIR.<br />
onstruction. Too important interests are in-<br />
volved for the case to be determined upon tech-<br />
nicalities; and though the complainants are<br />
advised and firmly believe the demurrer should<br />
be overruled, they ask, in case the court should<br />
take a different view, that they may have leave<br />
to amend on the usual terms; whereupon they<br />
will so amend by setting forth fully the exact<br />
facts in the case, and all collateral facts, that a<br />
full adjudication may be obtained upon demurrer<br />
before the highest tribunal, as to the meaning of<br />
the new law. Resting upon such an adjudication<br />
the entire book and publishing trade may intelli-<br />
gently shape its course. The main question<br />
involved is as to the meaning of section 4962, the<br />
complainants' contention respecting which has<br />
been hereinbefore urged. Upon this point, espe-<br />
cially, the complainants pray for an authoritative<br />
expression of judicial opinion. And they asked<br />
that the demurrer in all respects be overruled,<br />
with costs.<br />
(Argued Oct. 6, 1894, before Hon. Marcus W.<br />
Acheson, at Philadelphia.)<br />
DICKINSON, THOMPson, AND MCMASTER,<br />
No. 1, Montgomery-street,<br />
Jersey City, N.J.,<br />
Solicitors for Complainants.<br />
DANIEL GREENLEAF THOMPson,<br />
No. 111, Broadway, N.Y. City,<br />
Of Counsel.<br />
W.—CANADIAN COPYRIGHT.<br />
The following letter appeared in the Times of<br />
the 26th Feb. : -<br />
“SIR,-Attention has already been called in<br />
your columns to the fact that the Canadian<br />
Copyright Bill, now awaiting the Royal assent,<br />
seriously menaces the interests of English authors<br />
and copyright owners. It is understood that<br />
a decision will shortly be arrived at on the<br />
question at issue between the Canadian and<br />
Imperial authorities. The danger being therefore<br />
imminent, those whose interests are threatened<br />
must now enter their protest against the Bill.<br />
By it any Canadian publisher will be permitted<br />
to produce, in any form and at any price he<br />
pleases, the work of any British author which has<br />
not, within one month of its first publication in<br />
this country, been reprinted and published in<br />
Canada, on the sole condition of paying a royalty of<br />
Io per cent. on the published price of the book.<br />
The officers of the Department of Inland Revenue<br />
are charged with the duty of collecting and<br />
paying these royalties, but they are specially<br />
exempted from any obligation to ‘account for<br />
any such royalty not actually collected.’<br />
“The objections to these proposals are weighty<br />
and obvious; it will suffice to indicate one or<br />
two.<br />
“The limit of one month is ridiculously insuffi-<br />
cient, and the provision suffices to deprive English<br />
authors, with the possible exception of a few<br />
writers of popular fiction, of any real copyright<br />
in Canada.<br />
“The absurd machinery which makes the Inland<br />
Revenue officials at once responsible and irrespon-<br />
sible for the collection of royalties is not new,<br />
and is of proved inefficiency. English authors<br />
and publishers can only look back with grim<br />
amusement on the futile attempt on the part of<br />
Canada to collect similar royalties on American<br />
pirated reprints with similar machinery. More-<br />
Over, in the absence of accounts, how is an<br />
English author to seek a remedy when he has<br />
reason to believe that a particular publisher has<br />
failed to make due payment P The needful<br />
evidence would not in practice be obtainable.<br />
It is true that the Canadian market is not<br />
large, nor, in the absence of a leisured and<br />
cultured class, is it likely to prove expansive. If<br />
Canada. Only were in question, English authors<br />
would probably submit to the injury likely to be<br />
caused by piracy of their works in a small<br />
literary area. But Canada does not stand alone.<br />
If this Bill becomes law, Canadian reprints will<br />
inevitably flood, as they are intended to flood,<br />
the market of the United States, and the rights<br />
which English owners of literary property now<br />
enjoy there will be seriously endangered. If, in<br />
Consequence of the action of Canada, the United<br />
States were to repeal their International Copyright<br />
Act, English authors would suffer great and<br />
irreparable loss.<br />
“In order to give united expression to the<br />
objections felt by persons whose interests are<br />
threatened by the proposed legislation, a petition<br />
to the Colonial Secretary has been prepared,<br />
which it is hoped will be largely signed<br />
during the next three weeks by authors, pub-<br />
lishers, artists, and owners of copyrights gener-<br />
ally. Copies of this petition may be obtained<br />
from the secretary of the Society of Authors, and<br />
signatures should be forwarded to him at the<br />
Society's offices, 4, Portugal-street, Lincoln’s-inn-<br />
fields, W.C.<br />
“I am, sir, your obedient servant,<br />
“W. M. ConwAy, Chairman of Committee of<br />
the Incorporated Society of Authors.”<br />
*- - -º<br />
w" -<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 263 (#277) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
263<br />
NOTES FROM NEW YORK,<br />
RATHER curious survival of the old<br />
A colonial attitude towards England is<br />
demonstrated by the fact that any impor-<br />
tant series issued in the mother country is sure<br />
to be published over here; while, on the other<br />
hand, when an American series is brought out,<br />
only those volumes having more than a local<br />
interest appear in England. Thus, of the Great<br />
Commanders Series, which contains biographies<br />
of “Admiral Farragut’ by Captain A. T. Mahan,<br />
of “General Taylor " by General O. O. Howard,<br />
U.S.A., of “General Jackson " by James Parton,<br />
of “General Greene’’ by Captain Francis W.<br />
Greene, U.S.A., of “General J. E. Johnston ’” by<br />
Robert M. Hughes, of “General Thomas” by<br />
Henry Copee, LL.D., of “General Scott’ by<br />
General Marcus J. Wright, of “General<br />
Washington’ by General Bradley T. Johnson,<br />
of “General Lee’” by General Fitzhugh Lee, and<br />
of “General Hancock’” by General Francis A.<br />
Walker, only one volume has so far been repro-<br />
duced in England, and that was the first, which<br />
was doubtless due to Captain Mahan's own<br />
reputation. It was evident that the subject of<br />
the biography was not well known, since in the<br />
Times it was announced as “a new book by<br />
Captain Mahan, a life of the great Confederate<br />
Admiral, Farragut.” To another of our impor-<br />
tant series, that on American Men of Letters,<br />
there has just been added the biography of<br />
“George William Curtis,” by Mr. Edward Cary.<br />
This series is edited by Mr. Charles Dudley<br />
Warner, who contributed the first volume, the<br />
life of “Irving.” The other volumes are “Noah<br />
Webster,” by Horace E. Scudder; “Thoreau,”<br />
by Frank B. Sanborn; “George Ribley,” by O. B.<br />
Frothingham; “Cooper,” by T. R. Lounsbury;<br />
“Margaret Fuller Ossoli,” by T. W. Higginson;<br />
“Emerson,” by Dr. Holmes; “Poe,” by George<br />
E. Woodberry; “N. P. Willis,” by Henry A.<br />
. Beers; “Benjamin Franklin,” by John B.<br />
McMaster ; “Bryant,” by John Bigelow; and<br />
“William Gilmore Simms,” by William P. Trent.<br />
Of all these, the volumes on Cooper and on<br />
Emerson are the only two published in England.<br />
Two books of the series are model biographies<br />
—the “Cooper’ by Professor Lounsbury, and<br />
the “Poe’” by Professor Woodberry. In each<br />
case the authors took an immense amount of<br />
trouble to amass material, and then wrote a clear,<br />
concise, and comprehensive biography, which<br />
protruded no trace of the work behind it. There<br />
are soon to be added to this series the lives of<br />
“Lowell,” by Professor Woodberry, of Columbia<br />
College; “Whittier,” by Professor George R.<br />
Carpenter, of Columbia; “Motley,” by Professor<br />
Brander Matthews,<br />
Jameson; and “Parkman,” by Mr. John Fiske.<br />
This series is modelled on Mr. John Morley's<br />
“English Men of Letters,” only that the<br />
American volumes always contain a steel<br />
engraved portrait and a careful index—adjuncts<br />
lacking in the British books.<br />
An instance of failure to give “every man his<br />
due,” which would never have occurred in America,<br />
is to be found in the case of the “Great Educators<br />
Series.” This series was thought out, planned,<br />
brought out, and edited by Professor Nicholas<br />
Murray Butler. It is an international series<br />
having volumes by American, French, and<br />
British authors. It is printed in America and<br />
published here by Scribner's. Certain of the<br />
volumes have been exported to England and<br />
issued by Heinemann, and it is there known<br />
as Heinemann’s “Great Educators Series,” no<br />
mention whatsoever being made about Professor<br />
Butler's share in its production, or of its<br />
American origin.<br />
Macmillan and Co. are continuing their two-<br />
volume experiment at a dollar a volume, or 8s.<br />
for the work. This experiment was begun with<br />
“ Marcella,” and then continued with “ Katherine<br />
Lauterdale,” and now with “The Ralstons.” Mr.<br />
Crawford is the most popular of American<br />
novelists, and every new book of his sells at the<br />
rate of from 50,000 to 60,000 copies, while its<br />
immediate predecessor has a renewed sale of<br />
about Io,000. Although an American, Mr.<br />
Crawford does not know his New York as he<br />
does his Italy, and it is pleasing to note that in<br />
“Casa Braccia *-now running in the Century—<br />
he has returned to his old fields of operation,<br />
and is telling a new melodramatic tale of cos-<br />
mopolitan life.<br />
Four seasons ago Mr. T. J. B. Lincoln founded<br />
a literary club, called “The Uncut Leaves.” The<br />
club began very modestly with only a few<br />
members, who met once a month either at each<br />
other's houses or in a small hall hired for the<br />
occasion, where they listened to authors of various<br />
nationalities read from their unpublished manu-<br />
scripts. The success of this venture has been so<br />
great that the club now has several hundred<br />
members enrolled on its lists, and a suite of rooms<br />
is engaged for its monthly meetings at one of the<br />
best known halls in New York. Six readings are<br />
given during a season, and prominent men of<br />
letters are most happy to read or talk before such<br />
a sympathetic audience as is found gathered<br />
together on these occasions. Strangers are<br />
heartily welcomed, and Mr. Christie Murray has<br />
twice been present at the meetings, and each time<br />
succeeded in amusing the members. Mark Twain,<br />
Edward Eggleston, Mrs.<br />
Wiggin, and Mr. H. C. Bunner have all either<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 264 (#278) ############################################<br />
<br />
264<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
read or spoken before the club this winter or last.<br />
There are no committees, nor is there even a<br />
president to run the club, Mr. Lincoln under-<br />
taking all the work, such as getting the speakers,<br />
fixing dates, hiring the hall, seeing to the<br />
announcements, and even constituting himself<br />
treasurer and presiding officer for the introduc-<br />
tion of the readers.<br />
An experiment has recently been tried by Mr.<br />
Alexander Black, who is both an amateur photo-<br />
grapher and a journalist. It is a form of enter-<br />
tainment which he calls a “picture play.” Mr.<br />
Black has written a story entitled “Miss Jerry,”<br />
which he reads to his audience, giving each<br />
character its own individuality by a slight change<br />
in his voice. At the same time numerous photo-<br />
graphs, which illustrate the many situatiºns, are<br />
thrown by a magic lantern slide on a large sheet.<br />
The plot of the story is a mere thread on which is<br />
strung many incidents that introduce well-known<br />
people. Miss Jerry is a bright, vigorous girl,<br />
who takes up the business of reporter as a con-<br />
genial means of livelihood, and her adventures in<br />
that capacity form the basis of the plot, around<br />
which is woven a slight love story. Mr. Black<br />
has been to much pains to make his photographs<br />
as realistic and natural as possible, and thus we<br />
See Miss Jerry boarding an elevated train, inter-<br />
viewing Mr. Chauncey Depew in his office, visiting<br />
the slums, and taking part in a brilliant ball.<br />
These are only a few of the many sides of New<br />
York that Mr. Black has written about and<br />
depicted. Whether this venture will prove a<br />
lasting success it is impossible to say, but that it<br />
is a mºst enjoyable form of entertainment, and<br />
has many as yet undeveloped possibilities in it, is<br />
very evident. -<br />
The travelled American has often stated that<br />
he wondered why no American periodical had as<br />
large a circulation as the Strand Magazine. As<br />
a matter of fact, two of our periodicals have over<br />
three-quarters of a million circulation, yet neither<br />
of them is published in New York, the centre of<br />
the publishing trade. The papers referred to are<br />
the Ladies' Home Journal, issued in Philadelphia,<br />
and the Pouth's Companion, issued in Boston. It<br />
was on the former of these that the English<br />
Woman at Home was modelled. The Ladies’<br />
Home Journal is a monthly of thirty or forty<br />
pages of the size of the Illustrated London News,<br />
and its sale is principally outside this metropolis,<br />
for it aims to appeal to a more provincial audience.<br />
From its title it would be judged exclusively a<br />
woman’s paper, but this is not the case. There<br />
are always running through the year some articles<br />
especially applicable to men, such as the series<br />
called “When He is Sixteen,” articles written by<br />
four prominent women on all that concerns a boy<br />
at that age—his studies, amusements, choice of<br />
professions, &c. Now a new series has been begun<br />
entitled one month “The Woman Who Has Most<br />
Influenced Me,” and the next “The Man Who Has<br />
Most Influenced Me ;” these naturally are written<br />
alternate months by men and women. The<br />
monthly always contains at least one serial story,<br />
and it was in this paper that Mr. Howell’s<br />
“Coast of Bohemia’’ appeared, and also Mr.<br />
Stockton’s “Pomona's Travels;” and there is,<br />
besides, generally a short story or two. A most<br />
delightful series of articles are now being written<br />
for it by Mr. Howells on “My Literary Passions.”<br />
The editorials are always timely, and on some<br />
broad subject. Besides this there are articles of<br />
general interest, comic or otherwise, and a poem<br />
or two. Another feature of this paper is the<br />
separation of the departments for answering<br />
correspondents, divided under the heads of<br />
“Floral Helps and Hints,” “Side-Talks with<br />
Girls,” “Hints on Home Dressmaking,” “Sug-<br />
gestions for Mothers,” “Art Help for Art<br />
Workers,” “Literary Queries,” and, lastly, “The<br />
Open Congress;” these (i.epartments are all under<br />
the direction of what might be called specialists.<br />
The illustrations and printing are both of a high<br />
order, and it would be hard to cite a periodical<br />
that has more widespread influence—an influence<br />
which is elevating both morally and intel-<br />
lectually.<br />
The Youth's Companion is a paper of an<br />
entirely different stamp, and with a different<br />
mission to fulfil. It is a wholesome weekly of<br />
good literary style, designed for readers of both<br />
sexes from fourteen to twenty-four years.<br />
Amongst its announcements for 1895 appear<br />
the following: A paper on “Nursing,” by<br />
Princess Helena of Schleswig-Holstein, and an<br />
account of a sculptor's work, called “The Story<br />
of a Statue,” by Princess Louise (Marchioness of<br />
Lorne); an article on the “Recollections of My<br />
Physician,” by Mr. Gladstone; a reminiscent<br />
account by Mr. J. M. Barrie, entitled “A School<br />
Revisited;” an article by Mr. Rudyard Kipling,<br />
“The Bold 'Prentice;” a speculative paper, “If<br />
Telescopes were Bigger,” by Camille Flammarion;<br />
an article on “How to Tell a Story,” by Mark<br />
Twain, and one on “An Editor's Relations with<br />
Young Authors,” by Mr. Howells; also “Bits of<br />
Scottish Character,” by the late Robert Louis<br />
Stevenson. From this array of names it is easy<br />
to see that the taste of the American youth is as<br />
much considered as that of his seniors. Indeed,<br />
we are singularly lucky in the type of our<br />
juvenile periodicals, for Harper's Young People<br />
and St. Nicholas have enormous circulations and<br />
much influence, and both have very high<br />
standards of literary and artistic merit. Thus<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 265 (#279) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
265<br />
the young American mind is not only catered to,<br />
but elevated.<br />
A circular has recently been sent around to the<br />
various members of the writing craft that a table<br />
of statistics concerning newspaper reviews had<br />
been made, and that the New York Times “led<br />
all the rest " in regard to the number of books<br />
criticised in its columns, and in regard also to the<br />
space it devoted to literature. On looking through<br />
the table, it is surprising to find that of the 419<br />
American and British works appearing during the<br />
period of Oct. I to Dec. 31, 1894, the Times has<br />
actually reviewed 277, and that these reviews<br />
have occupied 117 columns. The promptness<br />
with which these reviews appeared after the<br />
publication of the books is also much to be com-<br />
mended—out of the 277, at least 240 were reviewed<br />
within a month. The statistical pamphlet is<br />
arranged in alphabetical order as regards the pub-<br />
lishers, and thus, as an example, out of the<br />
fifteen books issued by Longmans, Green, and<br />
Co., the Times reviewed eleven, and devoted<br />
fifty and one-half columns to them, whereas the<br />
Tribune reviewed five of them, the Post four, and<br />
the Sun only two. But, on the other hand, the<br />
JPost has far more book advertisements than the<br />
Times; sometimes it has as many as three pages.<br />
It is a great convenience to authors and publishers<br />
to know where books are most likely to receive<br />
prompt attention, and so this table of statistics is<br />
welcome.<br />
Ibsen's latest play “Little Eyolf’’ has just<br />
been published by Stone and Kimball, of Chicago,<br />
in the Green Tree Library. The volume is a<br />
dainty specimen of bookmaking, being tastefully<br />
and well bound, of a convenient size, and printed<br />
with care and thought. It has been most warmly<br />
received. It is interesting to note how curiously<br />
alike it is in subject to Mrs. Margaret Deland’s<br />
recent novel, “Philip and His Wife.” Although<br />
differing in every detail and in most of the inci-<br />
dents, yet the two books are almost parallel in<br />
the problem they present. It is a pleasure to<br />
announce that Mrs. Deland’s book has been<br />
deservedly a great success, and is already in its<br />
fifth edition.<br />
It is astonishing how the “Trilby’’ boom keeps<br />
up, and even seems on the increase. Word has<br />
come from Harper and Brothers that so far in<br />
printing the book IOO tons of paper have been<br />
used. It is a great pleasure to mention the fair-<br />
ness with which Harpers have dealt with Mr.<br />
Du Maurier. Upon accepting “Trilby,” the<br />
publishers, believing in the book, offered Mr.<br />
Du Maurier a very handsome royalty; but the<br />
author preferred a lump sum in proportion to<br />
their belief in the book, which was very great.<br />
Now, seeing the enormous success of the story,<br />
: Hugo's remarks.<br />
Harper and Brothers have notified Mr. Du<br />
Maurier that from Jan. I of this year he<br />
will receive a royalty, and not only a royalty on<br />
“Trilby,” but also on “Peter Ibbetson,” for<br />
which they had also paid a large sum down, but<br />
which has been lately carried along by the success<br />
of its author’s more recent book. A parody has<br />
just appeared, entitled “Biltry,” and the drama-<br />
tisation of “Trilby " by Mr. Paul Potter<br />
is quite completed, and Mr. A. M. Palmer<br />
expects to produce it on March 4 in Boston. A<br />
“Trilby’’ afternoon has been arranged in aid of<br />
the New York Kindergarten Association. There<br />
are to be tableaux, taken from the illustrations,<br />
and all the songs mentioned in the story will be<br />
sung—thus it will be seem that “Trilby’’ has<br />
taken New York hearts by storm. One of the<br />
latest jokes current at present is the answer<br />
which supposedly appeared in a paper to an<br />
anxious inquirer—“No, Napoleon did not write<br />
‘Trilby;” you have confused the magazines.”<br />
HALLETT ROBINSON.<br />
*~ - ~-'<br />
r—- - ---,<br />
LETTER FROM PARIS,<br />
AM writing this in the melancholy of the<br />
loss of our dear Auguste Vacquerie, a<br />
friend of twelve years' standing, a very<br />
kindly man, who, for his way of life, was one<br />
to be looked up to in this career of ours. He<br />
was in every sense of the word a gentleman of<br />
letters, and these are few in France.<br />
The first time that I met Auguste Vacquerie was<br />
twelve years ago, at the house of Victor Hugo,<br />
whose inseparable companion he was. Of the<br />
two poets, the disciple—for Vacquerie always pro-<br />
claimed himself but the disciple of Victor Hugo—<br />
haddecidedly the superior distinction, and, to con-<br />
fess the truth, I listened with far more interest to<br />
the things that he said that night than to Victor<br />
I frequently met him after-<br />
wards at the same house, and was on one occasion<br />
invited to call and see him at his own home, a<br />
fine mansion in the Rue Durmont d'Urville. I<br />
called there one morning and found Vacquerie in<br />
bed, for, as he told me, he never rose till noon.<br />
“I wake at seven,” he said, “and immediately<br />
read all the morning papers ”—the floor of the<br />
bedroom and the counterpane of the bed were<br />
strewn with gazettes—“ and when I have read<br />
all the news, I write my daily article for the<br />
Rappel.” By the bedside stood a little table,<br />
with writing materials on it, and a bowl<br />
of bouillon, in draughts of which the editor<br />
sought inspiration. His process was different from<br />
that of Victor Hugo, and indeed he remarked on<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 266 (#280) ############################################<br />
<br />
266<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
this, for Hugo always wrote standing, imitating<br />
Voltaire in this respect. “But,” said Vacquerie,<br />
“I am only a disciple.” Ithink that it was a pity<br />
that he contented himself with his position of<br />
disciple and imitator of Hugo, for he had decided<br />
originality and a particular sweetness of style,<br />
which would have sufficed to give him an excellent<br />
standing of his own in French literature. I shall<br />
never forget the kindness of his reception of me<br />
on that occasion, miserable little journalistic hack<br />
that I was at the time. He insisted on keeping<br />
me to breakfast, and after breakfast showed me<br />
over his art collection. I remember with what<br />
glee he pointed to a Delacroix, a picture of the<br />
good Samaritan, which he had bought for<br />
50 francs, “a picture worth a hundred times that<br />
sum to-day.” He pressed me to return and see<br />
him, and I did so once or twice, but it is now a<br />
long time since I saw him last. I contented my-<br />
self with being his contemporary, and liked to<br />
think that there was a kindly Auguste Vacquerie,<br />
who was well disposed towards me, living in<br />
Paris. One has many friends like that. And<br />
now he is dead and buried, and I shall never<br />
see him again Paris seems different to me<br />
to-day.<br />
I noticed that several papers commented on the<br />
divorce between Jeanne Hugo and Léon Daudet<br />
with comments which were unjustifiable. Thanks<br />
to the excellent French law in this matter,<br />
no particulars of divorce cases may be published<br />
in the French papers—a law that might well be<br />
introduced, in despite of the penny and half-<br />
penny editors, into England—and, as In conse-<br />
quence nobody except the friends of the family<br />
knew anything about the case, nobody was in a<br />
position to comment upon it. It was a mere case<br />
of incompatibility of temper, and, though<br />
separated, the two ex-spouses have remained<br />
excellent friends. This is a good thing for the<br />
sake of the little boy, Victor Hugo’s great-grand-<br />
SOIl.<br />
I had expected to be able to give a description<br />
in this letter of the banquet which was to be<br />
given on Friday last to Edmund de Goncourt by<br />
his friends and admirers. In consequence, how-<br />
ever, of the sudden and regretted death of<br />
Auguste Vacquerie, M. de Goncourt wrote<br />
to the organisers of the banquet to ask them<br />
to postpone it till the following week. This<br />
being so, I fail to understand why certain French<br />
journalists have pointed to this postponement as<br />
another proof of the persistent bad luck which<br />
has pursued the de Goncourts through life. It<br />
is true that their first book was killed by the fact<br />
that it was published on the very day on which<br />
the coup d'état was carried out in Paris, and<br />
consequently passed unnoticed ; but since then<br />
Having done so,<br />
fortune has, in my opinion at least, made ample<br />
reparation to the surviving brother. He holds a<br />
unique place in French literature, and will remain<br />
standing after many of the apparently more<br />
fortunate ones have been swallowed up in<br />
obscurity. Certainly his books have not sold by<br />
the hundred thousand, but that is a circum-<br />
stance on which so perfect an artist may rather<br />
congratulate himself.<br />
I am greatly interested at present in the<br />
writings of the German philosopher Nietzsche,<br />
which are being greatly read in Paris. The<br />
writer, I am sorry to say, will be silent hereafter,<br />
for his brain has given way, and he is confined in<br />
some German madhouse. Possibly this may be a<br />
subject for congratulation, for it is evident, from<br />
the direly pessimistic tone of his enunciations,<br />
that he was a very unhappy man—a Schopenhauer<br />
without Schopenhauer’s obvious insincerity—a<br />
Leopardi without the consolation of the poet’s<br />
art; and where ignorance is bliss—you know<br />
the rest<br />
The following is one of Nietzche's sayings<br />
about bad books: “Das Buch soll nach Feder,<br />
Tinte und Schreibtisch verlangen: aber gewöhnlich<br />
verlangen Feder, Tinte und Schreibtisch nach.<br />
dem Buche. Deshalb ist es jetzt so wenig mit<br />
Büchern.”<br />
The study of pessimism is an excellent one for<br />
young people. Pessimism is a disease, which,<br />
like measles, attacks everybody at least once in a<br />
lifetime. It is well to inoculate oneself with it<br />
early in life, so as to be protected against it at a<br />
time when it might less easily be borne. Ten years<br />
ago I was the gloomiest of melancholy Jacques.<br />
To-day the world seems a charming place to live<br />
lll.<br />
Amongst my papers I find the following auto-<br />
graph letter from William Wordsworth. It has<br />
never been printed before, and so I give it.<br />
Things have not greatly changed in the matter<br />
of poetry since the day on which it was<br />
written :<br />
MY DEAR SIR,<br />
Very pressing engagements have prevented me.<br />
looking over the MSS. you sent me till this evening.<br />
and remembering your conversation<br />
with me upon the subject, it seems unnecessary that I<br />
should say more than that the verses in some respects do<br />
much credit to their author, and show an easy command of<br />
language and are not deficient in harmony; and the story of<br />
the tale, though not having much novelty in it, is agree-<br />
able.<br />
I mention to you what is apparent enough, that poetry is<br />
not much in favour with the public at present, and there-<br />
fore if I thought these specimens of merit much superior to<br />
what, candidly speaking, I reckon them to be, I could not<br />
feel confident that their publication would be profitable to<br />
the writer.<br />
I must add, however, on the other side, that, as tastes and<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 267 (#281) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
267<br />
fancies are so various, it is impossible to foresee what would<br />
or would not succeed.<br />
- I remain, my dear sir,<br />
Faithfully yours,<br />
WM. WORDSwor'IH.<br />
Rydal Mount,<br />
Jan. 28, 1841.<br />
Wordsworth used to be overwhelmed with<br />
MSS. from all parts of the world—an experience<br />
common to most writers whose names are known<br />
to the public. A whole room in Rydal Mount<br />
was set aside for the storage of these manuscripts,<br />
but, in spite of every precaution, many used to get<br />
lost. I remember my mother telling me that<br />
when she was quite a little girl, and was staying<br />
at Rydal Mount, she was one morning greatly<br />
upset by a pathetic letter from some poet in the<br />
South of England, who wrote saying that he had<br />
sent a long epic to Wordsworth some months<br />
previously, and that, though he had applied for<br />
its return several times, he had never received<br />
any answer. He added that all his hopes in this<br />
world were based on that epic, and implored for<br />
its return. She spent all that day, and the next<br />
day too, in looking for this manuscript, but was<br />
unable to find it. In the end she selected from<br />
a pile of poems, which for some reason or other<br />
could not be returned to their writers, one which<br />
was also an epic, and of about the same length<br />
as the missing one, and sent it to the poet, saying<br />
that she hoped that this one would as well. She<br />
inclosed in the letter the sum of half-a-crown,<br />
the whole contents of her savings-box, and asked<br />
the poet to accept this as a solatium. He was<br />
apparently satisfied, for he never wrote again.<br />
Speaking of the old days reminds me that a<br />
day or two ago I was looking over a book of<br />
accounts, which was kept in the house of an<br />
English nobleman, in the years 1622-23-24.<br />
It is most methodically kept, and includes every<br />
penny that was spent in that family during that<br />
period. The items vary from “Almesmonie,” as,<br />
for instance, “Item given to the prisoners in the<br />
Fleet,” or “Item given to my sister Anna Walker<br />
to helpe to buy her a wedinge gown,” to<br />
“Chardges in Travell,” &c. I have read all the<br />
items through without finding that during those<br />
three years there was spent in that nobleman's<br />
family a single penny on literature in any shape<br />
or form, and this in spite of the fact that<br />
periodical visits were paid by his lordship and<br />
family to town. Things have certainly improved<br />
in England since those days, and fortunate it is<br />
for us who write that this is so.<br />
Is it not a pity that the very best portrait of<br />
our gentle Stevenson should be in America, and<br />
that there is little chance of its ever being seen in<br />
England again P. This is the portrait painted by<br />
Mr. Alexander, of Paris, whom many consider,<br />
with Whistler and Sargent, the finest portrait<br />
painter in the world. More than this, it is, next<br />
to his remarkable portrait of Walt Whitman, the<br />
painter's best work. What good portraits of<br />
Stevenson are there in England for our great-<br />
grandchildren to look at P<br />
Any publisher or editor who wants a cheap<br />
advertisement need only follow the example of<br />
various American editors and publishers in offering<br />
fantastic sums to Count Tolstoi for the right of<br />
publishing his new works. Tolstoi always refuses<br />
any dealings with his books and so no risk is run<br />
and Messrs. Puff, Quack, Réclame, and Co., of<br />
Paternoster-row, can safely offer him 2 dollars<br />
a letter for his work, as the American publisher<br />
did the other day. Nay, they might offer<br />
£10 a word, provided that they let the fact be<br />
known, and the paragraphists would do the rest.<br />
Are we not all very glad of the great success of<br />
Mr. Sala's last book—the most entertaining set of<br />
memoirs which has appeared for some years P. It<br />
is a book that every literary aspirant should read<br />
for his encouragement—the story of a brave life in<br />
a hard career of persistent heroism. One is proud<br />
to be the confrère of such a man.<br />
Daudet's new book, “La Petite Paroisse,” is a<br />
very clever study of jealousy—a passion much<br />
à la mode for literary treatment in Paris just<br />
now. Lemaître expounds it after his fashion in<br />
“Le Pardon ’’ at the Comedie. In the copy which<br />
Daudet sent me he wrote that he hoped I had<br />
been jealous, so that I might tell him if his book<br />
were true. I was glad to be able to tell him that,<br />
since childish jealousies in the matter of tops or<br />
tarts, I had never experienced that feeling which<br />
is said to be the only mental suffering which is a<br />
physical suffering at the same time. I under-<br />
stand that jealousy produces a very painful<br />
feeling below the breastbone, as when one has<br />
eaten too many blackberries. These are not<br />
sensations that I run after. Daudet's hero suffers<br />
badly, but is very brave through it all, and here<br />
again Daudet has shown that, in spite of all, he<br />
will look on the bright side of life, and on what is<br />
good in human nature. This is what is so<br />
excellent in his work. -<br />
I was very sorry to hear of the death of John<br />
O'Neill, announced in last month's Author. I<br />
had never met him, but just before I last left<br />
London I received a very kind and encouraging<br />
letter from him, which came at a time when I<br />
was extremely despondent. Letters like that are<br />
a blessing to struggling authors. I had hoped<br />
to thank John O'Neill for writing to me in<br />
person, and now that can never be.<br />
Marcel Schwob’s translation of “Moll Flanders”<br />
is the book of the season in Paris, next to<br />
Daudet's latest. Schwob has an excellent know-<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 268 (#282) ############################################<br />
<br />
268<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
ledge of English literature, and is the personal<br />
friend of many of our leading writers. We<br />
English owe him a debt of gratitude for his<br />
championship of English literature in a country<br />
where people are singularly ignorant of its<br />
beauties. RobºFT H. SHERARD.<br />
I23, Boulevard Magenta, Paris.<br />
*- -*<br />
- * *-y<br />
NOTES AND NEWS,<br />
E need merely chronicle here the elections<br />
of Mr. W. Martin Conway as chairman<br />
of the committee of management, and of<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins as a member of the<br />
council and of the committee of management.<br />
A brief report of the general meeting of the<br />
Society, which was held in the room of the<br />
Medical and Chirurgical Society, on the afternoon<br />
of the 25th ult., will be found in another column.<br />
We wish to call the attention of members to the<br />
resolution moved by Mr. Hall Caine and seconded<br />
by Mr. Rider Haggard, relating to Canadian<br />
Copyright. In another column will be found<br />
the Chairman's invitation to members to sign the<br />
petition which has been drawn up, and is lying<br />
for signature at the offices. It should be borne<br />
mind that the threatened legislation would<br />
destroy the homogeneity of British copyright,<br />
and would jeopardise the whole of the benefits<br />
resulting from American copyright. The danger<br />
is real and urgent, and members are invited to<br />
send in their names forth with.<br />
A communication addressed by Mr. R. Under-<br />
wood Johnson, the secretary of the American<br />
Copyright League, to the (New York) Evening<br />
Post is disquieting. From this it appears that a<br />
Copyright Bill has been introduced and reported<br />
by the Committee on Patents with a proviso which<br />
limits the total sum to be recovered under the<br />
statute (sect. 4965, ch. 3, title 60) to double the<br />
value of the “thing infringed upon,” &c. Mr.<br />
Johnson enters a protest against this reform on<br />
many grounds, and points out that the proviso<br />
extends so as to cover literary as well as artistic<br />
work, so that, while this legislation is ostensibly<br />
intended to protect innocent infringers of photo-<br />
graphic copyright from blackmailing proceedings,<br />
it promises to enable any pirate to copy any<br />
periodical matter, whether literary or artistic,<br />
with comparative impunity.<br />
Though belated, for reasons which need not be<br />
explained, we lay a wreath upon the grave of<br />
Christina, Rossetti, The words found in another<br />
column are written by one who knew her. These<br />
are the occasions on which the mere critic, even<br />
the admiring or the reverential critic, must stand<br />
aside to let those speak who had the privilege of<br />
knowing the dead poet.<br />
*– ~ *<br />
e- - -<br />
THE LOSSES IN LITERATURE, 1894.<br />
BIE losses in literature, which have been both<br />
numerous and severe, include Professor<br />
James Anthony Froude, LL.D. ; Mr.<br />
Robert Louis Stevenson; Mr. Walter Pater; Dr.<br />
Oliver Wendell Holmes ; Professor William<br />
Robertson Smith, D.D., LL.D. ; Professor Henry<br />
Morley, LL.D.; Rev. Richard Morris, LL.D.; Sir<br />
James F. Stephen, the legal writer and essayist;<br />
Sir Austen H. Layard, of Nineveh fame; Miss<br />
Christina Georgina Rosetti; Professor John<br />
Nichol, biographer and poet, late Professor of<br />
English Literature in Glasgow University; Dr.<br />
John Weitch, Professor of Logic and Literature in<br />
Glasgow University; M. Leconte de Lisle, the<br />
distinguished French poet; the Comtesse Agenor<br />
de Gasparin; Professor William Dwight Whitney,<br />
the philological and Orientalist author; Mr.<br />
Edmund Yates ; the Hon. Roden Noel ; Mr.<br />
Charles H. Pearson, LL.D., the constitutional<br />
writer; Mrs. Augusta Webster; Mr. R. M.<br />
Ballantyne, the popular story writer; M. Maxime<br />
du Camp, the French author and academician;<br />
Professor James Darmesteter; Dr. George<br />
Bullen, formerly keeper of the Printed Books at<br />
the British Museum; Mr. William T. M'Cullagh,<br />
Torrens; Miss Alice King, the blind novelist ;<br />
Rev. R. Brown-Borthwick, the hymnologist; Mr.<br />
George Ticknor Curtis; Rev. Alexander J. D.<br />
D'Orsey; Rev. Edmund S. Ffoulkes; Dr. Brian<br />
Houghton Hodson, the Orientalist writer; F. W.<br />
Weber, the Prussian poet ; Dr. Francis Henry<br />
Underwood ; Señor Oliveira Martins, the eminent<br />
Portuguese historian ; Mr. John Francis Waller,<br />
LL.D.; Miss Elizabeth Peabody; Dr. H. W.<br />
Dulcken ; Miss Constance Fenimore Woolson;<br />
Dr. Terrien de Lacouperie, the Orientalist writer<br />
and scholar ; Dr. John Lord, LL.D., the his-<br />
torian; M. Armand Pagès, the French novelist;<br />
Dr. James M'Cosh, the philosophical writer;<br />
Captain Lovett Cameron ; Mrs. Pitt-Byrne; Mrs.<br />
Jane Austin, the American authoress; Miss<br />
Sophia Dobson Collett, writer on Theism and<br />
Atheism; Miss E. Owens Blackburne, the Irish<br />
novelist; the Rev. Robert Anchor Thompson,<br />
historical writer; Miss Patton-Bethune, writer of<br />
sporting novels; M. Dugast-Matifeux, an eminent<br />
French antiquary ; Rev. J. Hamilton Thom ; Rev.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 269 (#283) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
269<br />
John Nassau-Simpkinson; Ludwig Pfau, the<br />
German poet and art critic; Mrs. Augusta<br />
Theodosia Drame, a well-known Roman Catholic<br />
writer; M. Victor Fournel, the literary critic;<br />
Mr. Andreas Edward Cokayne, antiquarian<br />
writer; Professor Karl Dillmann the emi-<br />
ment Ethiopic writer; Mr. Thomas George<br />
Stevenson, an Edinburgh author and publisher;<br />
M. Foucaux, Professor of Sanskrit at the Collège<br />
de France; M. Astié, Professor of Philosophy at<br />
Lausanne ; the Rev. Naphthali Levy, Jewish<br />
writer; Mr. Walter H. Tregellas, a Cornish<br />
author; Mr. Thomas Farrall, a popular Cumber-<br />
land writer; Mr. Henry Vizetelly, author of<br />
“Glances back through Seventy Years,” &c.;<br />
Mr. J. J. Shean, of Hull, a county historian ; Mr.<br />
John Chessell Buckler, antiquarian writer; Mr.<br />
Mansfield Parkyns, writer on Abyssinia; Herr<br />
J. ter Gouw, author of the “History of<br />
Amsterdam. ”; Mr. Brackstone Baker, writer on<br />
Canadian and railway subjects; Herr Max Moltke,<br />
the German poet, philosopher, and translator;<br />
Mr. John Patrick Prendergast, author of “The<br />
Cromwellian Settlement of Ireland”; M. Dussieux,<br />
author of works on the reign of Louis XIV. ;<br />
Professor J. Von Dümichen, the eminent writer<br />
on Egyptology; Dr. J. Bradshaw, editor of<br />
“Grey ’’ and “Milton,” and of “The Chesterfield<br />
Letters ”; Voislav Ilic, the “Servian Heine ‘’;<br />
Helgi Hálfdanorson, the Icelandic poet ; Mr.<br />
Henry Manners Chichester, writer on British<br />
military history; Dr. William F. Poole, compiler<br />
of the “Index to Periodical Literature"; Dr.<br />
Frankl, Austrian poet and prose writer; Professor<br />
Wilhelm Roscher, the eminent political economist;<br />
Mr. Edward Capern, the postman poet of Bide-<br />
ford; Mr. Cecil Robertson; Rev. Josiah Wright,<br />
classical writer; M. Louis Roumieux, the French<br />
“Provincial Ovid’’; Mr. W. O'Neill Daunt,<br />
Irish historical writer; Mme. Betty Paoli (Barbara<br />
Glück), the Austrian poetess; Mr. Herbert Tuttle,<br />
historical writer; Mr. J. Dobie, Professor of<br />
Hebrew in Edinburgh University ; Nikolai<br />
Michailowitsch Astyrew, the Russian author;<br />
Mrs. Celia Thaxter; M. Jean Fleury; Mr. Eugene<br />
Lawrence, American historical writer; Dr. Siegfried<br />
Szamatolski, a promising German writer; Miss<br />
Augusta de Grasse Stevens; Mr. W. Douglas<br />
Hamilton, historical writer; Mr. John Russell,<br />
assistant editor of Chambers’s Journal; Dr. H.<br />
N. Van der Tunk, the greatest Malayan scholar<br />
of the century; Mr. Francis Romano Oliphant;<br />
Mr. John Askham, the Northamptonshire poet;<br />
M. Léon Palustre, a learned writer on the French<br />
Renaissance ; Professor Dr. Henrich Rudolf<br />
Hildebrand, the linguist and lexicographer; Mr.<br />
J. Bedford Leno, the Buckinghamshire poet; Mr.<br />
George H. Jennings; M. François de Caussade,<br />
of an almost unique personality.<br />
librarian of the Mazarine Collection; M. Claudio<br />
Jannet, Professor of Political Economy in the<br />
Catholic University of Paris; M. Victor Duruy,<br />
the historian; Rev. Caesar Malan, the Oriental<br />
scholar; Dr. John Chapman, proprietor and<br />
editor of the Westminster Review ; Mr. Alexander<br />
Ireland; Dr. Heinrich Hoffman, author of the<br />
famous “Struwwelpeter’”; and the Rev. William<br />
John Blew, hymnologist, &c.—The Times, Jan. I.<br />
*- : *-*<br />
* * -<br />
CHRISTINA, G, ROSSETTI.<br />
ſ TVHE editor of this periodical has courteously<br />
T requested me to say something about<br />
Christina Rossetti in the March number of<br />
the Author, and I comply with his request,<br />
though with diffidence.<br />
Words are only the means whereby we strive<br />
to express our conceptions or to convey our<br />
impressions. And never does a writer feel so<br />
keenly how inadequate words are at the best as<br />
when he strives to show to others in some<br />
measure the sweetness, the irresistible fascination<br />
For the<br />
influence of personal qualities, such as those<br />
possessed by Christina Rossetti in so remark-<br />
able a degree, is well-nigh untranslatable into<br />
words.<br />
Time, skill in word-painting, and above all<br />
much preparatory thought, are needed before any<br />
success, however small, can be attained in such an<br />
endeavour. But if a volume is ever written,<br />
revealing the inner aspects of her character, as far<br />
as these could be revealed with a due sense of<br />
delicacy and proportion, the volume will be a<br />
permanent and priceless addition to English litera-<br />
ture. And, despite the difficulty of his task, I<br />
envy him who shall write the volume; the con-<br />
templation of such a character as that of<br />
Christina Rossetti will alone recompense him for<br />
his labour.<br />
The critic of the far future, of whom we hear<br />
so much and think so little, will accord a high<br />
place among the great poets of the century to<br />
the poet to whom we owe “Amor Mundi,” “An<br />
Apple Gathering,” “Maude Clare,” “The Con-<br />
vent Threshold,” and “Maiden-Song.” He will<br />
single out as among the finest love songs in our<br />
language such a flawless lyric as “When I am<br />
dead, my dearest "-a lyric so full of atmosphere,<br />
so perfect in its tenderness and portrayal of<br />
unchanged and unchangeable affection. Nor<br />
must we forget that Christina Rossetti—whether<br />
we look to the quality or quantity of her<br />
devotional poetry—was pre-eminent among the<br />
illustrious English poets who have enriched<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 270 (#284) ############################################<br />
<br />
27O<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
Christian literature by their genius. As long as<br />
Christianity remains the most vital force in the<br />
lives of millions of English-speaking people<br />
the memory of that poet of their faith who<br />
gave them such a poem as “Passing away, saith<br />
the world, passing away,” or “Paradise,” with<br />
its exquisite last stanza, the very quintessence of<br />
Christian expectation — who gave them that<br />
beautiful hymn, part of which, beginning “The<br />
Porter watches at the gate,” was sung so fittingly<br />
at her funeral service — who gave them the<br />
perfect lines, beginning “Thy lovely saints<br />
do bring Thee love,” will be cherished and<br />
honoured.<br />
Personally, Christina Rossetti had the quiet<br />
simplicity of real greatness, and this simplicity<br />
was doubtless in itself an evidence of genius. In<br />
intercourse with her one lost consciousness of<br />
being in the presence of a distinguished poet,<br />
because one became conscious of being in the<br />
presence of a woman distinguished in the more<br />
noble womanly qualities. Nature evidently had<br />
endowed her not only with the gifts proper to a<br />
poet, and these in a lavish degree, but also with<br />
choicest gifts of the heart and soul. But if this<br />
was so, it was equally true that Christina Rossetti<br />
had herself matured and perfected her natural<br />
gifts by that sublimest education of all—the<br />
education of the soul.<br />
She was a recluse, but she never talked to me as<br />
such, and even amid weakness and suffering she<br />
was constantly cheerful. The very tones of her<br />
voice, in their slow and distinct intonation, were<br />
pleasant to hear. She was quite willing to talk<br />
about her favourite authors, and I remember the<br />
amusement she betokened on learning that a<br />
French translation of “David Copperfield,” which<br />
I had picked up secondhand on the Quais during<br />
a recent visit to Paris, was entitled “Le Neveu<br />
de Ma Tante.”<br />
Deeply religious, she never obtruded her piety,<br />
yet I felt instinctively that I was in the company<br />
of a holy woman. In a copy of her “Verses,”<br />
given to me, she wrote in her own clear hand-<br />
writing—handwriting firm as long as she could<br />
continue to write at all—“Faith is like a lily,<br />
lifted high and white,” and to her the things and<br />
persons of the future life were realities. Probably<br />
this was the reason of her wonderful—her<br />
heroic endurance of pain. Despite her profound<br />
humility, and her vivid sense of human short-<br />
comings, she was sustained by the conviction<br />
that God’s angel Death would soon release<br />
her, and she no more doubted the existence<br />
of a state of coming blessedness than the<br />
traveller doubts the existence of the place for<br />
which he is bound, when setting out on a<br />
journey. I shall always feel proud and glad<br />
that I knew personally one of the most lovable<br />
women who ever lived.<br />
MACKENZIE BELL.<br />
*~ - --"<br />
r- * ~,<br />
MRS. CARLYLE.<br />
ILL a voice ever be raised in defence<br />
of Carlyle P Much has been written<br />
touching Mrs. Carlyle’s married un-<br />
happiness, which everyone lays at the door of<br />
this long-suffering philosopher.<br />
In a recently published article, by the late<br />
Mrs. Alexander Ireland, she describes a visit she<br />
paid to Froude, in order to gain his permission<br />
to write Mrs. Carlyle's life. She gained Froude's<br />
permission because their view of Mrs. Carlyle's<br />
character was identical, for she says that Froude<br />
“deeply compassionated Mrs. Carlyle.”<br />
Perhaps it hovers closely on superfluousness.<br />
and temerity to argue so difficult a question, or<br />
to seek to readjust the balance between these<br />
two vexed and irreconcilable immortals; yet, in<br />
justice to Carlyle's memory, I would affirm that<br />
there was no lack of love, or even tenderness, on<br />
his part towards his wife.<br />
I have often heard one speak, who, in a quiet<br />
unobtrusive way, held intimate intercourse with<br />
the Carlyles, having experience of them in one of<br />
their gloomiest periods, for it was in the ten years<br />
during which Carlyle, under the shadow of his<br />
“Frederick the Great,” wrestled with the writing<br />
of his history. It was also the time when the<br />
unconscious philosopher paid his much resented<br />
visits to Lord and Lady Ashburton—at least, the<br />
period when Mrs. Carlyle most resented his so<br />
doing.<br />
But the impression this lady received, when<br />
she saw them together, which she did often, was<br />
of Carlyle's deep and abiding love for his wife,<br />
and of the high value he set upon her literary<br />
judgment, always reading to her his MS. and<br />
altering passages at her advice; how he strove<br />
with these emendations the following little<br />
touch by Mrs. Carlyle, related tâté-à-tête, best<br />
shows:–<br />
“The first day Mr. Carlyle came down very<br />
cross, in the evening, saying that he had done<br />
nothing all day, hang it ! had spent all the after-<br />
noon trying to alter that paragraph of hers, and<br />
he could not. The second day uneasy; the third<br />
day more so ; the fourth, sent J. in post haste to<br />
recall the proofs, that he might strike out<br />
the whole of “our melancholy friend's remarks.’<br />
Mrs. Carlyle sorry to find fault, and not to<br />
seemed pleased, as he is always dispirited himself<br />
at first, and wants encouraging.”<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 271 (#285) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
27 I<br />
One questions if from the mocking satirical<br />
spirit of Mrs. Carlyle there ever flowed much<br />
encouragement, prone as she was to discourse of<br />
him to friends and acquaintances in a carping,<br />
unkindly spirit. On the other hand, I have<br />
heard this lady before quoted assert that in his<br />
bearing to his wife there was a chivalrous,<br />
reverent strain, difficult to describe; said she<br />
always in conclusion, “his manner to Mrs.<br />
Carlyle was beautiful.” As tending to the cause<br />
of some unhappiness between them, much stress<br />
has been laid upon her superior position socially,<br />
and of the luxury and comfort she relinquished<br />
on her marriage; but between a Scotch country<br />
doctor's daughter, at the beginning of this<br />
century, and a farmer's son, was there such a<br />
yawning gulf fixed P Might not genius and love<br />
have bridged it over P at least if Mrs. Carlyle had<br />
been dowered with but a little more of the latter<br />
golden elixir—then perhaps she would not have<br />
deemed it such an unmitigated misfortune to<br />
have made a pudding, or baked a loaf of bread;<br />
though her biographers have dealt as darkly<br />
upon her days of domestic activity at Craigen-<br />
puttock as did Charles Dickens, with more reason,<br />
upon his days of degradation in the blacking<br />
factory. -<br />
Mrs. Carlyle, or rather wayward Miss Jane<br />
Welsh, desired before all things to marry a man<br />
of genius. It was the survival of an early girlish<br />
ambition, and, unlike the general course of girlish<br />
ambition, it was fulfilled, for fate, a trifle<br />
maliciously, as the sequel proved, chose to fasten<br />
it upon her by producing the man. It failed to<br />
make her happy, because she was unable, partly<br />
by health and temperament, to face all the<br />
discomforts and disenchanting details which fall<br />
to the lot of the wife of a struggling, ill-paid<br />
man of genius; and “the plain living and high<br />
thinking,” coupled with the absolute silence and<br />
solitude necessary to the “high thinking,” grew<br />
irksome to her. These were the conditions of her<br />
early married life; then, when success came, with<br />
social homage to herself, it found her a dis-<br />
appointed, embittered woman, bereft of any but<br />
the most fitful power of enjoyment, seeing all<br />
things clad in her own feverish distaste for them.<br />
In a letter written to her from her intended<br />
husband not long before their marriage, he<br />
strenuously insists upon that which eventually<br />
proved to be the essential need of her whole life,<br />
for he writes:<br />
“You have a deep, earnest, and vehement spirit,<br />
and no earnest task has ever been assigned to it.<br />
You despise and ridicule the meanness of the<br />
things about you. To the things you honour you<br />
can only pay a fervent adoration, which issues in<br />
no practical effect.” Was not this the root of the<br />
restless misery in her life? Destitute of any earnest<br />
purpose, her brilliant gifts found no outlet; instead<br />
her mocking spirit played round men and things,<br />
and her keen satire, like sheet lightning, lit up<br />
the words and the deeds of the men and women<br />
round her with the cold light of destructive irony,<br />
which recoiling at the last upon her heart, warped<br />
it from all invigorating effort. But she was a<br />
shrewd and kindly friend to those she loved. Far<br />
be it from me to dwell upon her character, or<br />
life, in a censorious spirit. Novalis has it,<br />
character is destiny; and her perpetual malady<br />
of unhappiness was in a measure due to lack<br />
of health, but still more to that which she<br />
herself described, in humorous despair, as an<br />
absence of “the faculty of being happy.” At<br />
times one is almost tempted to think she wore<br />
her grief as a fantastic garment, for in the<br />
dolorous liturgy of her diary there is some-<br />
thing theatrical and unreal. When all literary<br />
and fashionable London rolled up to her door,<br />
still she railed at fate, because it failed to amuse<br />
her.<br />
There must be a great many “mute, inglorious ”<br />
Mrs. Carlyles in the world who cannot give voice<br />
to their disillusionment with life as wittily as<br />
did she, who yet make a very cheerful fight of it,<br />
having successfully learnt the gentle art of being<br />
happy ; therefore is not the world a little harsh<br />
in its judgment when it ascribes all Mrs. Carlyle's<br />
lamentations due to the temper of the melancholy<br />
Creator of “Sartor Resartus P”<br />
GRACE GILCHRIST.<br />
*- Am aims--><br />
,- w -.<br />
AN AUTHORS BEST WORK<br />
T is important to an author to know the<br />
circumstances under which he ordinarily<br />
does his best work. The experience of the<br />
majority of writers shows that the hour at which<br />
a man works, the place, and not a few other<br />
attendant circumstances of his labours—circum-<br />
stances in themselves apparently unimportant—<br />
exercise a great effect upon his ordinary capacity<br />
for literary production. The phenomenon is not<br />
quite universal. Anthony Trollope trained him-<br />
self into writing at any time, and in almost any<br />
place. Charles Dickens, when he was young,<br />
would write his newspaper reports on the palm<br />
of his hand, by the light of a dim lamp, in a<br />
post-chaise. But these were exceptional cases.<br />
Later Dickens' letters mention predilections for<br />
quiet spots in which to write, and yearnings for<br />
strolls in the streets of London to inspire him;<br />
and probably nineteen authors out of twenty<br />
will echo the sentiments of a dramatist of some<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 272 (#286) ############################################<br />
<br />
272<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
note who has said that all his happiest ideas<br />
present themselves to him in his own library.<br />
Nevertheless, many authors seem to give no<br />
serious attention to the lessons that might be<br />
derived from their experience of the difference<br />
both in quantity and quality of copy produced<br />
under more or less favourable circumstances.<br />
That is a mistake. The time of an author who is<br />
at all successful soon becomes very valuable,<br />
and its loss by mismanagement—and more time<br />
is lost by mismanagement than in any other way—<br />
is a real misfortune. The greater too a man’s<br />
success, the greater his reason for doing every-<br />
thing in his power to maintain his work at its<br />
highest level. It would be, in consequence,<br />
mere common prudence for an author to watch<br />
himself, and to take to heart as many lessons<br />
about his own strength and weakness, and about<br />
the circumstances under which he does his best<br />
work, as his experience will afford him. Such<br />
lessons are sometimes valuable results of failures,<br />
things that “one learns by making mistakes *-<br />
to quote Metastasio.<br />
It is true that some writers fall into an oppo-<br />
site error. Quite recently, amongst an author’s<br />
papers, was found a journal, not of hours only<br />
but of minutes, covering months and years, in<br />
which the employment of every moment had been<br />
chronicled with scrupulous accuracy with a view<br />
to ascertaining what time had been most<br />
profitably employed. Such finicking attention to<br />
infinitesimal details is a temptation to minds of<br />
a certain mould. It leads, of course, to waste,<br />
and not to economy of energy.<br />
Without, however, falling into this mistake,<br />
those who will “know themselves” may learn<br />
from a little self-observation a great deal that<br />
is well worth remembering. Personal experience<br />
will immediately suggest in every case to what<br />
the individual should turn his more particular<br />
attention, and to enumerate all that an author<br />
might with advantage try to observe would far<br />
exceed the limits of the present article. The<br />
following seem to be leading points which might<br />
suggest others.<br />
Where does a man find his finest stimulants of<br />
thought and invention ? Dickens found them in<br />
the crowded streets of London. More men have<br />
found them in the completest solitude. Few<br />
realise to how great a degree all that seems most<br />
spontaneous is really recollection. In conse-<br />
quence many men never adequately work the<br />
mine of their own memories. Instead they go<br />
about seeking—honestly, painfully, and often<br />
with many disappointments—what they all the<br />
time carry within themselves. M. Dumas, Fils,<br />
observes that “books teach nothing.” Those<br />
who, like Molière, take men rather than books for<br />
their study, will immediately understand the<br />
statement. Still Molière's favourite author was<br />
Lucretius, and Lucretius was never yet a favourite<br />
with any man who was not a close and careful<br />
reader. M. Dumas' dictum has also been flatly<br />
contradicted, and the assertion made that “books<br />
teach everything.” That may be an exaggera-<br />
tion or an epigram, two things much alike; yet<br />
De Balzac observes, with truth, “the mission of<br />
art is not to copy nature, but to express nature,”<br />
which means, for the novelist, that the literary<br />
habit of thought is indispensable. But how wide<br />
a question is here opened for every author who<br />
would know what amount of inspiration he<br />
draws from the world, and how much from his<br />
reading.<br />
What assistance does an author get from his<br />
common-place books? Some years have passed<br />
since Mr. James Payn recommended the memo-<br />
randum-book to every one who desired to write.<br />
And it is needless to say how many authors have<br />
availed themselves of the help of note-books.<br />
But may not every author with advantage ask<br />
himself how much aid his note-books, have given<br />
him, or how little P And, if so, why little P<br />
One phenomenon connected with note-books must<br />
be familiar to all who have used them, their tire-<br />
Some suggestiveness of what is not wanted, and<br />
the temptation, never to be allowed an instant’s<br />
influence over the judgment, to use something,<br />
because it is in the note-book, and because it<br />
looks telling, when it is evidently not quite in<br />
place. An author, who has made his memoranda,<br />
has still something of importance to learn in dis-<br />
covering the best way of using them.<br />
What time and what labour an author saves<br />
who has found out what is, in his own case, the<br />
best method of perfecting a plot, and of resolving<br />
upon the lines of each successive chapter after<br />
the plot has been constructed Mr. William<br />
Black has said that many of his tales have been<br />
planned in the open air. M. Zola confesses his<br />
absolute inability to think out anything unless he<br />
has a pen in his hand. “My ideas only come in<br />
writing. I could never evolve any idea.<br />
by sitting in my arm-chair and thinking.” An<br />
English authoress has said the exact contrary.<br />
“I never attempt to write anything until I have<br />
Sat still for a long time thinking.” Here are<br />
three different ways of proceeding. And there<br />
are no doubt many others. Only it must be<br />
most important for an author to know which way<br />
is most helpful to himself. A man, who has not<br />
yet discovered that, might be in the position of<br />
Zola in an easy chair. On the other hand, here<br />
is a passage from a letter of Dickens: “I didn’t<br />
stir out yesterday, but sat and thought all day;<br />
not writing a line, not so much as the cross of a,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 273 (#287) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
273<br />
“t” or the dot of an “i’ I imagined forth a good<br />
deal of Barnaby by keeping my mind steadily<br />
upon him ; and am happy to say I have gone to<br />
work this morning in good twig, strong hope, and<br />
cheerful spirits.”<br />
Another complete contrast between Dickens<br />
and Zola, suggests how great a difference there<br />
may be in the degree of elaboration which diffe-<br />
rent authors find it worth their while to give a<br />
scenario. Zola's scenario is longer than his book.<br />
Dickens, when he made a scenario, wrote only a<br />
few suggestive lines for each chapter. One<br />
author may waste his energies and tie his own<br />
hands by preparing a scenario that affords no<br />
scope for the development which the tale will<br />
take under his hands; and another lose time by<br />
constructing a scenario inadequate for his needs,<br />
so that he is compelled to recommence inventing<br />
his tale when he wants to be writing it. A<br />
writer ought to know exactly what form of<br />
scenario is most helpful to himself. A little<br />
attention to his own experiences would always<br />
show him how to construct it.<br />
That naturally next suggests the question of<br />
rapidity of composition. Rapid work is generally<br />
successful work. Hurried work is never rapid<br />
work. Any attempt to hurry invariably results<br />
in the composition dragging and everything going<br />
wrong. On the contrary, composition that flows<br />
out rapidly of itself is ordinarily a man’s best<br />
work. “The works and passages in which I have<br />
succeeded have uniformly been written with the<br />
greatest rapidity the parts in which I<br />
have come off feebly were by much the more<br />
laboured,” says Sir Walter Scott. “Slowness of<br />
production,” wrote Eugéne Delacroix, “is a blot<br />
on the talent of the artist. It leaves a stamp of<br />
fatigue.” Now, no phenomenon of literary work<br />
is so remarkable as the astonishing speed at which<br />
literary work can be done, at which some of the<br />
most remarkable literary work in the world has<br />
been done. Does it not follow that a man, who<br />
discovers something perpetually standing in the<br />
way of his getting on with his work, is probably<br />
pursuing a mistaken method, one perhaps con-<br />
genial to another man, but fatal to himself. He<br />
has not yet discovered the circumstances under<br />
which he does his best work. Many writers, for<br />
instance, never find a rapid flow of composition<br />
possible until after they have been writing for an<br />
hour or two. Dickens mentions this peculiarity.<br />
“I worked pretty well last night, but I have four<br />
slips to write to complete the chapter; and, as I<br />
foolishly left them till this morning, have the<br />
steam to get up afresh.” Suppose that a man<br />
who had thus “to get up steam ” thought that<br />
he could write easily and without fatigue by<br />
“doing a little every day,” then he would never<br />
reach the point where, in his case, the real flow of<br />
spirits and invention commenced.<br />
Connected with this difficulty of “getting up<br />
the steam ” may be the indisposition some men<br />
feel to set to work. Others start with a real zest.<br />
Perhaps these do not have to get up steam. But<br />
many can certainly echo De Balzac's Je m'y mets<br />
avec désespoir. It is almost impossible to exag-<br />
gerate the reluctance such men feel to beginning.<br />
When this is the case an author should certainly<br />
discover what is, in his case, the best method of<br />
dealing with this dislike to going to work.<br />
Another question there is of a very different<br />
kind. An ancient adage runs, “Tailors and<br />
writers must follow the fashion.” The highest<br />
work will always lead the fashion rather than<br />
follow it; but failures are occasioned by insuffi-<br />
cient attention to what people desire to read, and<br />
it is possible for an author, annoyed by ill-<br />
success, to turn his attention to writing rather<br />
what is popular than what his own feelings<br />
prompt him to write. It would be most valuable<br />
to him to observe the results of his experiment.<br />
More is involved than at first sight appears in a<br />
consequent success or failure. He may find that<br />
it was a mistake to quit, a speciality that suited<br />
him. He may discover that he has a much<br />
greater versatility than he suspected himself of<br />
possessing. He may even descry a path leading<br />
to successes never previously obtained because<br />
the direction in which they lay had escaped his<br />
observation.<br />
This is touching up on a few salient points<br />
alone. Only in the cases mentioned would it be<br />
possible to overrate the value to the author of<br />
knowing the circumstances in which he could<br />
reckon upon doing his best work.<br />
HENRY CRESSWELL.<br />
*--<br />
z- - --><br />
THE WALUE OF A NOWEL,<br />
Tº: following case is reported, as follows, in<br />
the Daily Chronicle for Feb. 17:<br />
Yesterday, in the Westminster County Court, the case of<br />
Johnson v. Dicks came before his Honour Judge Lumley<br />
Smith, Q.C., and was a claim in formá pawperis for £50,<br />
as damages for the loss of MS. The plaintiff said that in<br />
1888 he was at the house of Mr. John Dicks, at Streatham,<br />
and he asked him to write a story, which he sent to the<br />
defendant's place of business in the Strand, and was told<br />
a cheque would be forwarded, but he was afterwards<br />
informed that the story had been destroyed. He therefore<br />
claimed 350 for the damage. He had published many<br />
books, “Fairy Tales” in 1869, and others. Plaintiff said<br />
this was a large volume novel, and he was a well-known<br />
author. His Honour: But “Paradise Lost’’ was sold for<br />
£15, was it not P Plaintiff : But Black gets £1000 for a<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 274 (#288) ############################################<br />
<br />
274<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
short novel, and reserves to himself the copyright. I have<br />
had 3 Io a week for thirteen weeks from the London<br />
Journal. Defendant said he never saw the story, and was<br />
not a member of the firm now. His Honour : I think 392<br />
will pay you well. Defendant : But I am not liable. His<br />
Honour: 382 will not hurt you. (Laughter.) Judgment for<br />
the plaintiff for £2.<br />
If this case is accurately reported, and there is<br />
no reason for believing the contrary, it is a most<br />
extraordinary and wonderful case. The author<br />
sues in formá pauperis (thus keeping up the<br />
glorious traditions of the literary profession)<br />
for the sum of £50 as damages for the loss of<br />
a MS. -<br />
Very good. He said that he was at the house<br />
of Mr. John Dicks in 1888, and was by him<br />
invited to write a story for him, i.e., one supposes<br />
for one of his papers. Here come one or two<br />
questions: (1) Was he asked to write a story<br />
without specification of length or subject? (2)<br />
Was his story to be sent in on approval, or was<br />
the author's reputation taken as a guarantee of<br />
good work P. (3) What price was proposed by<br />
the publisher ? (4) What price did the author's<br />
stories usually command, i.e., what was he accus-<br />
tomed to receive P (5) Would the author name<br />
some of his stories, and mention what prices he<br />
received for them P (6) Was Mr. John Dicks<br />
authorised to invite novelists in the name of the<br />
firm or company P<br />
These questions, observe, are not hostile to<br />
either party; they are only necessary to get at<br />
the truth. The plaintiff then said that he was<br />
promised when he delivered the story that a<br />
cheque should be sent. What was the amount<br />
he was to get by that cheque? It does not<br />
appear. He was then told that the MS. had been<br />
destroyed. How P By fire! If so it would be<br />
arguable whether the firm was liable.<br />
dentally P Also it might be arguable whether<br />
the firm was liable. He assessed his own damages<br />
at £50, and said it was a “large volume novel.”<br />
What is a “large volume novel P” Is it a three-<br />
volume novel, or one of the average length of a<br />
three-volume novel, which is about 180,000<br />
words P<br />
The defendant said that he had never seen the<br />
story; that he was not a member of the firm ;<br />
and that he was not liable.<br />
to leave a firm in which he has been a partner,<br />
is he still liable to that firm’s engagements P<br />
Then the judge, after some irrelevance about<br />
“Paradise Lost,” ordered the defendant to pay<br />
£2 | Now, either the defendant was liable or<br />
he was not. If he was not, why should he pay<br />
anything P If he was, he ought to have paid the<br />
value of the work, calculate 1 on the value of<br />
other works by the same author. As it is, the<br />
author appears to have been insulted, and the<br />
Acci-<br />
If a man is allowed<br />
publisher appears to have been fined. One more<br />
question ought to have been asked, Why did<br />
the author wait for seven years before bringing<br />
his claim P<br />
*- a -º<br />
r- - -<br />
ON, SELLING A BOOK OUTRIGHT.<br />
HIS is a method which has one or two<br />
obvious advantages. It gives the author<br />
what he very likely wants, a sum of money<br />
down; and it relieves him of any anxiety about<br />
the commercial success of his book. On the other<br />
hand, it sometimes makes him part with a very<br />
valuable copyright for a song ; and it tempts him<br />
to spend at once what should be spread over a<br />
term of years, viz., the whole life of his book.<br />
Most of the miseries of authors have been due to<br />
their regarding as income the lump sum obtained<br />
by selling the work of years. When, however,<br />
an author wishes to sell his book outright, or a<br />
publisher wishes to buy it, there are certain<br />
obvious considerations. To capitalise an author's<br />
interest in his book should be Conducted, as in<br />
every piece of business, with due regard to the<br />
probable, or the certain, results of the book. For<br />
instance, to buy a book of an author for a sum of<br />
money not one-tenth of what it will produce, as<br />
the purchasers know, but the author does not<br />
Know, is very commonly done.<br />
The following figures will show some of the<br />
points to be considered : We take our old friend<br />
the 6s. volume. It costs, we will say, Is. a copy<br />
to produce. It is sold to the trade at 3s. 7#d. ;<br />
the author on a 20 per cent. royalty would receive<br />
about 1s. 2%d. a copy; the publisher about 1s. 5d.<br />
If an author sells his book for a certain sum,<br />
what amount of sales would that cover ?<br />
Say he takes £50, that would cover royalties<br />
representing a sale of 825 copies.<br />
Say he takes £100, that would cover royalties<br />
representing a sale of 1650 copies.<br />
Say he takes £400, that would cover royalties<br />
representing a sale of 3400 copies,<br />
and so on. All copies beyond that limit would<br />
belong to the publisher, together with his own<br />
royalty on the preceding copies. -<br />
If, on the other hand, there is a certainty that<br />
the book will sell so many copies as a minimum,<br />
and a probability that it will sell so many more,<br />
the sum to be paid must represent that minimum<br />
first and the probability next ; and, of course, in<br />
such a transaction there is always the element<br />
of chance on both sides, so that one may<br />
give too much—of which we seldom hear—and<br />
the other may get too little, of which we often<br />
hear. -<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 275 (#289) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
275<br />
In making any such calculation or bargain as<br />
the above one must remember that the old-<br />
fashioned half-profit system still lingers as a<br />
rough-and-ready recognised method of apportion-<br />
ing the returns. Without accepting it formally,<br />
one may take it as a basis.<br />
The purchase of a book for a small sum, either<br />
knowing that it is going to prove a certain pro-<br />
perty or in the well-founded hope that it will do<br />
so, is a very important secret in the art of getting<br />
rich by the labour and brains of other people.<br />
Readers of the Author will remember how the<br />
venerable and religious Society for the Promotion<br />
of Christian Knowledge was proved to be in pos-<br />
session of this important secret, and how its<br />
righteous committee used the secret in a manner<br />
truly Christian by purchasing for £12, 320, £25,<br />
books which ran into thousands upon thousands.<br />
Let us take another case—a book sold for<br />
3s. 6d. costing, in quantities, about 8d., a copy.<br />
As a rule it would be less.<br />
The author receives, say, £20, £25, or 330.<br />
The book is sold for 2s., which leaves a profit of<br />
Is. 4d.<br />
Tor the price of<br />
.820 means a royalty of 7d. for a<br />
sale of ................................. 700 copies.<br />
£25 means a royalty of 7d. for a<br />
sale of .............. ................ 850 copies.<br />
330 means a royalty of 7d. for a -<br />
sale of ................................. I IOO copies.<br />
After which the publisher has the whole future<br />
proceeds o' the book for himself.<br />
* ~ *-**<br />
e- * =<br />
BOOK TALK,<br />
Sº authors will doubtless appre-<br />
ciate the following extract from Harriet<br />
Martineau’s “Autobiography:” “I do not<br />
very highly respect reviews, nor like to write<br />
them ; for the simple reason that in ninety-<br />
nine cases out of a hundred the author under-<br />
stands his subject better than the reviewer.<br />
It can hardly be otherwise while the author<br />
treats one subject, to his study of which his<br />
book itself is a strong testimony; whereas the<br />
reviewer is expected to pass from topic to topic to<br />
any extent, pronouncing, out of his brief survey,<br />
on the results of deep and protracted study. Of<br />
all the many reviews of my books on America and<br />
Egypt there was not, as far as I know, one which<br />
did not betray ignorance of the respective coun-<br />
tries. And, on the other hand, there is no book,<br />
except a very few which have appeared on my own<br />
particular subjects, that I could venture to pro-<br />
nounce on ; as, in every other case, I feel myself<br />
compelled to approach a book as a learner, and<br />
not as a judge. This is the same thing as saying<br />
that reviewing, in the wholesale way in which it.<br />
is done in our time, is a radically vicious practise;<br />
and such is indeed my opinion. I am glad to see<br />
scientific men, and men of erudition, and true<br />
connoiseurs in Art, examining what has been done<br />
in their respective departments; and everybody<br />
is glad of good essays, whether they appear in<br />
books called Reviews, or elsewhere. But of the<br />
reviews of our day, properly so-called, the vast<br />
majority must be worthless, because the reviewer<br />
knows less than the author of the matter in<br />
hand.”<br />
The sixth volume of the fifth edition of<br />
“Chitty's Statutes of Practical Utility,” which is<br />
being published in about twelve volumes by<br />
Sweet and Maxwell Limited and Stevens and<br />
Sons Limited, under the editorship of Mr. J. M.<br />
Lely, has just appeared. The arrangement of the<br />
statutes is in alphabetical and chronological<br />
Order, under about 200 titles, such as “Act<br />
of Parliament,” “Adulteration,” “Copyright,”<br />
“Death Duties,” “Intoxicating Liquors,” “Local<br />
Government,” “Poor,” “Water,” and the like.<br />
Each title is prefaced by a separate table of<br />
contents, and so are many of the particular Acts.<br />
The foot-notes give the effect of or reference to<br />
decided cases and statutory rules. The final<br />
volume will contain a chronological table of the<br />
statutes printed in the work, an alphabetical table<br />
of short and popular titles of statutes, and a<br />
“general index,” in the compilation of which Mr.<br />
Ormsby will assist. Assistance in the annotation<br />
has been given by Mr. Craies as to the Metropolitan<br />
Acts, the Local Government Act 1894, and other<br />
subjects; by Mr. Mundahl as to the Extradition<br />
Acts; by Mr. W. A. Peck as to the Conveyancing<br />
Acts, the Settled Lands Acts, and the Trustee<br />
Acts; by Mr. Pulling as to the Merchant Shipping<br />
Act; and Mr. Simey as to the Factors Act and<br />
Highway Acts. The price of the whole work to<br />
subscribers was six guineas, but the price is now<br />
One guinea per volume.<br />
“A Mountain Path" is the title of a book by<br />
Mr. John A. Hamilton (Sampson Low, Marston,<br />
and Co. Price 3s. 6d.). It is a collection of<br />
parables, fables, and talks about natural things<br />
which have already appeared in periodicals. The<br />
author states that the only aim in writing this<br />
book was to foster natural piety in children.<br />
“Walter Inglisfield” is publishing through<br />
Messrs. Sonnenschein a new volume of verse. .<br />
Miss F.F. Monterson has produced (Hutchinson<br />
and Co.) her new work, “Into the Highways and<br />
Hedges.” g<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 276 (#290) ############################################<br />
<br />
276<br />
THE AUTHOIR.<br />
Mrs. Cliffe's translation of Longuardi's poems<br />
ls about to appear in a second edition.<br />
Byrne's story called “A Fragment,” together<br />
with his Parliamentary speeches, is published in<br />
the fifth volume of the Tauchnitz edition of his<br />
complete works.<br />
In recognition of his numerous historical<br />
articles that have appeared in the magazines and<br />
reviews, but perhaps more especially for his<br />
important contribution to fourteenth and fifteenth<br />
century history, the volume entitled “A Forgotten<br />
Great Englishman,” Mr. James Baker, the author,<br />
has just been elected a Fellow of the Royal<br />
Historical Society. He is at present travelling in<br />
Egypt, from whence he is writing a series of<br />
articles on that country.<br />
Miss Margaret Cross has completed a new<br />
novel, which Messrs. Hurst and Blackett will<br />
publish next month. It is called “Newly<br />
Fashioned,” and it will have on its title-page<br />
the suggestive motto,<br />
Such is the power of that sweet passion,<br />
That it all sordid baseness doth expel,<br />
And the refined mind doth newly fashion<br />
Into a fairer form.<br />
Mr. William Tirebuck's new story, “Miss<br />
Grace of All Souls,” will be published by<br />
Beinemann and Co. in the spring. It is dedicated<br />
to the author's brother, the Rev. Thomas<br />
Tirebuck, of Birmingham. The arrangements<br />
were concluded by the Authors' Syndicate.<br />
Mr. Basil Thomson’s “Diversions of a Prime<br />
Minister” (Blackwood and Sons). The Prime<br />
Minister is Mr. Thomson himself, and the realm<br />
which he administered was the island of Tonga.<br />
Messrs. A. and C. Black will publish this month<br />
a novel in one volume called “The Grasshopper.”<br />
It is by Mrs. Alfred Sidgwick, who under the<br />
name of Mrs. Andrew Dean has contributed<br />
several stories to the Pseudonym Library.<br />
“His Egyptian Wife,” a novel by Hilton Hill,<br />
will be issued in March by Digby, Long and Co.<br />
The book will be published simultaneously in New<br />
York and London.<br />
“Conscience makes the Martyr,” by S. M.<br />
Crawley Boevey is published by Mr. Arrowsmith,<br />
and has been kindly criticised by the Literary<br />
Płorld, The Academy, and other papers.<br />
The Authors' Syndicate has arranged for the<br />
publication of Mr. John Lloyd Warden Page's<br />
new book, “The Coasts of Devon and Lundy<br />
Island,” through Mr. Horace Cox. The volume<br />
will be profusely illustrated.<br />
M. Dim. Vikelas, the eminent novelist, is the<br />
president of the International Committee of the<br />
Olympic games to be held at Athens from<br />
April 5th to 15th, 1896. The official programme<br />
of the games is now in type.<br />
Mr. Gladstone, the inexhaustible, is ready with<br />
another volume—his edition of the Psalter, to be<br />
published in Europe and America immediately.<br />
IIe contributes a concordance and a condensed<br />
commentary.<br />
Mr. Balfour's book on “ The Foundations of<br />
Belief.” has undoubtedly been the book of the<br />
past month. As usual, someone has turned up<br />
to accuse the writer of having stolen his ideas.<br />
This time it is Dr. Beattie Crozier, who publishes<br />
his plaint in the Chronicle.<br />
Sir Benjamin Richardson has confided to a con-<br />
temporary not only that he possesses a number of<br />
sketches and jottings made by Cruikshank for his<br />
own biography, but that he also hopes some day<br />
to write this hitherto neglected book, and embody<br />
his valuable material.<br />
It is hard reading for authors whose manu-<br />
scripts are returned to read that there are quite<br />
a number in the habit of declining publisher's<br />
invitations. A contemporary says that Mrs. J.<br />
R. Green, for instance, is unable to do any literary<br />
work for at least four years; while Dr. Jessop is<br />
said to have mortgaged the next six years. Mr.<br />
Stanley Weyman, we believe, has gone for a<br />
year's holiday, during which he refuses to work;<br />
while Mr. S. R. Crockett has contracts signed,<br />
sealed, and delivered for all the work that he can<br />
possibly produce during the present century.<br />
The Westminster Gazette wishes to know what<br />
has become of the Life of Adam Smith, by Mr.<br />
Leonard Courtney, and that of Bishop Berkeley,<br />
by professor Huxley. To these might be added<br />
a number of bookly promises not performed. For<br />
instance, first and foremost, where is Mr. John<br />
Morley's Life of John Stuart Mill? Second,<br />
where is the long expected and greatly desired<br />
Life of John Delane of the Times 2 Third,<br />
where is Lord Rowton’s Life of the Earl of<br />
Beaconsfield P<br />
Professor Rhys Davids, upon whose pension<br />
from the Civil List such a bitter attack was<br />
made in Parliament, has been delivering a course<br />
of lectures called “The Literature and Religion<br />
of India,” at Harvard and John Hopkins Univer-<br />
sities, in the United States, and Messrs. Putnam<br />
will shortly publish them simultaneously on both<br />
sides of the Atlantic under the above title.<br />
Messrs. Osgood will begin the publication of<br />
the collected works of Mr. Thomas Hardy in a<br />
few weeks with “Tess.” The volumes will be<br />
monthly, and the second will be “Far from the<br />
Madding Crowd.”<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 277 (#291) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
277<br />
The following interesting series of impromptu<br />
dedications written by Stevenson in a set of his<br />
works given to his American physician, Dr.<br />
Trudeau have appeared in the New York Book-<br />
Öuyer.<br />
“A CHILD’s GARDEN OF VERSEs.”<br />
——To win your lady (if, alas ! it may be)<br />
Let's couple this one with the name of<br />
Baby |<br />
“TREASURE ISLAND.”<br />
I could not choose a patron for each one :<br />
But this perhaps is chiefly for your son.<br />
“KIDNAPPED.”<br />
——Here is the one sound page of all my writing,<br />
The one I’m proud of, and that I delight in.<br />
“DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE.”<br />
Trudeau was all the winter at my side :<br />
I never spied the nose of Mr. Hyde.<br />
“ UNDERWOODs.”<br />
Some day or other ('tis a general curse)<br />
The wisest author stumbles into verse.<br />
“THE DYNAMITER.”<br />
As both my wife and I composed the thing,<br />
Let's place it under Mrs. Trudeau's wing.<br />
“MEMORIES AND PORTRAITs.”<br />
Greeting to all your household, small and big,<br />
In this one instance, not forgetting—Nig<br />
“THE MERRY MEN.”<br />
If just to read the tale you should be able,<br />
I would not bother to make out the fable.<br />
“TRAVELs witH A DONKEY.”<br />
It blew, it rained, it thawed, it snowed, it thundered—<br />
Which was the Donkey P I have often wondered<br />
“PRINCE OTTO.”<br />
This is my only love tale, this Prince Otto,<br />
Which some folks like to read, and others not to.<br />
“MEMOIR OF FLEEMING JENKIN.”<br />
The preface mighty happy to get back<br />
To its inclement birthplace, Saranac<br />
“FAMILIAR STUDIES OF MEN AND Books.”<br />
My other works are of a slighter kind;<br />
Here is the party to improve your MIND !<br />
VIRGINIBUs PUERISQUE.”<br />
I have no art to please a lady’s mind.<br />
Here's the least acid spot,<br />
Miss Trudeau, of the lot.<br />
If you’d just try this volume, 'twould be kind<br />
Mr. Le Gallienne's name is prominent among<br />
the announcements of new books. His “Book-<br />
Bills of Narcissus,” the first and, perhaps, the<br />
most charming book he has written, has just been<br />
published in an enlarged edition, and a new edition<br />
of his “English Poems” is to be issued imme-<br />
diately. Besides these a new volume of verses<br />
called “Robert Louis Stevenson : an Elegy; and<br />
Other Poems, Mainly Personal,” and a collection<br />
of odds and ends of literary criticism entitled<br />
“Retrospective Reviews: a Literary Log,” are<br />
announced. Mr. Lane is, of course, the pub-<br />
lisher.<br />
The next volume in Arrowsmith's Bristol<br />
Library will be “The Adventures of Arthur<br />
Roberts: by Railroad and River,” told by him-<br />
self and chronicled by Mr. Richard Morton. It<br />
is to be an anecdotal biography of the famous<br />
burlesque actor.<br />
The forthcoming season promises to be specially<br />
rich in biographies. For instance, Mr. John Rae’s<br />
“Life of Adam Smith;” a “Biography of Sir<br />
John Drummond Hay, for forty years our Repre-<br />
sentative in Morocco,” by his daughters; a “Life<br />
of George Borrow,” by Professor Knapp, of<br />
Chicago; a “Biography of Dr. Holmes,” by Mr.<br />
John T. Morse, jun. ; “Reminiscences of Richard<br />
Cobden,” by Mrs. Schwabe, with a preface by<br />
Lord Farrer; the “Life of Sir Samuel Baker;”<br />
and Mr. Leslie Stephen's Memoirs of his brother,<br />
Sir James Fitzjames Stephen. -<br />
Mudie's Library is said to have refused Mr.<br />
Arthur Machen’s book, “The Great God<br />
Pan.” -<br />
Mr. Fisher Unwin, who publishes already half-<br />
a-dozen “libraries '' or series of books, announces<br />
yet another, with the comparatively commonplace<br />
title of “The Half-Crown Series.” Mr. Robert<br />
Buchanan’s “Diana's Hunting ” will be the first,<br />
and Mrs. Rita L. Humphreys—who is best known<br />
by her Christian name—the second, called “A<br />
Gender in Satin.” -<br />
It seems strange that Mr. Stanley should have<br />
waited so long before giving the world an account<br />
of “My Early Travels and Adventures.” Much<br />
of this book has never been reprinted from the<br />
newspapers to which it was originally contributed,<br />
and part of it is entirely new. It will be con-<br />
cerned with Indian warfare in America and the<br />
tragic end of General Custer, who was out-<br />
manoeuvred and killed by Sitting Bull; the early<br />
history of the Suez Canal; and the exploration of<br />
Palestine, Persia, the Caucasus, and Armenia.<br />
Messrs. Sampson Low and Co. will issue the book<br />
about Easter.<br />
Messrs. Cassell and Co. have hit upon an idea<br />
for an important series of books, to be entitled the<br />
“Century Science ’’ series, of which Sir Henry<br />
Roscoe is the editor. The first, to be published<br />
immediately, will be by the editor himself, and<br />
called “John Dalton and the Rise of Modern<br />
Chemistry.” It will be followed by “The Rise<br />
of English Geography,” by Mr. Clements R.<br />
Markham, the distinguished President of the<br />
Royal Geographical Society.<br />
Two new reprints of standard authors are just<br />
making their appearance. The first is Messrs.<br />
J. M. Dent's complete edition of Defoe, in sixteen<br />
volumes, with editorial notes and illustrations,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 278 (#292) ############################################<br />
<br />
278<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
produced in the delightful style to which this<br />
firm has accustomed us. The series costs 28. 6d.<br />
a volume, net, and will be completed by October.<br />
The second reprint is the new edition of George<br />
Eliot’s works, which Messrs. Blackwood will issue.<br />
It is to be known as the “Standard” edition, and<br />
to consist of twenty-one volumes, also at 2s. 6d.<br />
“Adam Bede’’ is to appear at once in two<br />
volumes, and “The Mill on the Floss '' will<br />
follow.<br />
The star of Ouida does not shine so brightly as<br />
it once did. Perhaps her forthcoming book,<br />
which Messrs. Methuen announce, will win her<br />
back something of the public approval which<br />
seems rather unjustly to have left her. The titles<br />
of some of its articles—such as “The Failure of<br />
Christianity,” “The Sims of Society,” “Some<br />
Fallacies of Science,” “The State as an Immoral<br />
Factor,” and “The Penalties of a Well-known<br />
Name "—promise, however, more polemics than<br />
entertainment. *<br />
Mr. Henry Arthur Jones has been a devoted<br />
contributor to the magazines, and lecturer before<br />
playgoing societies, on theatrical topics. No<br />
doubt his forthcoming book, “The Renascence of<br />
the English Drama,” to be published immediately<br />
by Messrs. Macmillan and Co., is a reprint<br />
of these. Mr. Jones's plays are of varying<br />
interest, but his opinions, whether expressed on<br />
the stage, the page, or the platform, are always<br />
original and interesting — as Matthew Arnold<br />
found when he was captivated by “Saints and<br />
Sinners.”<br />
Three new monthly magazines have to be<br />
chronicled as the month's contribution to the<br />
flowing tide of periodical literature. First,<br />
London Home, an obvious competitor to the<br />
Strand Magazine, at half the price, edited by<br />
Mr. Ralph Caine, and published by Horace Cox.<br />
Second, On Watch, edited by Mr. Herbert<br />
Russell, the son of Mr. Clark Russell, and pub-<br />
lished by Sampson Low at 6d., is to be entirely<br />
given up to naval subjects and news. Third,<br />
Messrs. Chapman and Hall are about to join the<br />
ranks of publishers who have magazines of their<br />
own, and announce, for publication in May,<br />
Chapman's Magazine, a 6d. monthly, to be<br />
edited by Mr. Oswald Crawfurd, the chairman of<br />
Chapman and Hall Limited. Besides these, the<br />
indefatigable Mr. Shorter has issued during the<br />
past month the Album, a 6d. weekly collection of<br />
photographs; and he is about to launch still<br />
another illustrated weekly, devoted entirely to<br />
sport.<br />
. A new series called “The Northern Library” is<br />
announced by Mr. Nutt. Among the early<br />
volumes to appear will be “The Saga of King<br />
Olaf Tryggwason,” translated by the Rev. John<br />
Sephton ; “The Ambales Saga,” edited and<br />
translated by Mr. Israel Gollancz; and “The<br />
Faereyinga Saga,” translated by Mr. F. York<br />
Powell, Regius Professor of Modern History at<br />
Oxford.<br />
Two books by Colonel Reginald Hart, Director<br />
of Military Education in India, entitled “Reflec-<br />
tions on the Art of War,” and “Sanitation and<br />
Health,” have just been published by Messrs.<br />
W. Clowes and Sons Limited. They have both<br />
been very well reviewed.<br />
Messrs. Dent and Co. will shortly issue a<br />
revised and illustrated edition of Mrs. Alford<br />
Baldwin’s “Story of a Marriage.”<br />
“A Year of Sport and Natural History,” edited<br />
by Mr. Oswald Crawfurd, C.M.G., has just been<br />
published by Messrs. Chapman and Hall. It is<br />
composed of a series of natural history articles<br />
that were issued in Black and White. The work<br />
is beautifully illustrated, and is in every way<br />
first class.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE,<br />
I.—“EDITIONs.”<br />
HE announcement in the last number of the<br />
Author that Pierre Loti’s new book bears on<br />
the title page the legend of its being the<br />
“twenty-eighth edition,” though, in fact, the work<br />
is not yet issued to the public, raises the old ques-<br />
tion of what is an “edition;” whether it is worth<br />
the publisher's while to continue such literary<br />
fictions as “second edition, “third edition ”—or<br />
even “twenty-eighth edition ?” An “edition ”<br />
may mean any number of copies from 50 to<br />
50,000. At one time it meant that the volume<br />
had been reprinted a specified number of times,<br />
and was therefore some guarantee that the book<br />
was not only in good demand, but had received<br />
the author's latest corrections; in fact, what is<br />
now termed a “new edition.” In a day of<br />
universal printing from stereos, this is no longer<br />
the case, even with technical treatises. In short,<br />
this numbering of “ edition,” is little better than<br />
a transparent fraud on the less sophisticated part<br />
of the publishers “public.” By a sort of vague<br />
understanding, never reduced to any protocol,<br />
and therefore never acted upon, an “edition ”<br />
was supposed to be IOOO copies, though why sales<br />
need have been counted in this rather cumbersome<br />
fashion it is rather difficult to understand. If it<br />
is allowable to estimate the merits of a book by its<br />
sale, would it not be more in accordance with reason,<br />
not to say common honesty, to intimate that the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 279 (#293) ############################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
279<br />
booksellers have taken 500, 800, 15OO, to 5000, or<br />
whatever may be the numerical expression of their<br />
confidence in the selling value of the author's<br />
name P But even then this does not quite meet<br />
the merits ºf the case. There are, as poor authors<br />
sometimes learn on settling up accounts with the<br />
modern Sosii, such things as “ sale or return,”<br />
which enable them to discount the inflated an-<br />
nouncements about the number of copies ordered<br />
“by the trade,” or which have been subscribed<br />
for in the after-enthusiasm of Mr. So and So's<br />
annual dinner. Pierre Loti’s twenty-eighth-<br />
edition-in-anticipation is no doubt perfectly<br />
justified by experience. But what is to be said of<br />
the minor novelist who prints at least three<br />
“editions” at the same time, though actually the<br />
total number of copies may be counted by<br />
hundreds P. On the other hand, it would not be<br />
difficult to point to popular books which sell by<br />
the thousand, without the publishers thinking it<br />
necessary to stimulate the flagging zeal of the<br />
public by announcements which, at best, are<br />
meaningless, and at worst might be characterised<br />
by a word not to be whispered where the dealings<br />
•of such honourable men as the purveyors of<br />
literature are concerned. R. B.<br />
II.-A DEFENCE OF RUSTIC READING.<br />
I think your contributor who speaks of village<br />
reading is dealing with what was the case thirty<br />
or forty years ago, rather than at the present<br />
time. I have had the means of knowing a good<br />
deal of what is the course of literature in an<br />
average south country parish, in great part<br />
agricultural, but not far from a large railway<br />
station.<br />
A man who acts as agent for a local weekly<br />
'paper, and is also clerk to the parish council, and<br />
secretary to the village club and reading room,<br />
tells me that there are not above a dozen houses<br />
where a newspaper of some sort is not taken in,<br />
either Lloyd's or a local one ; and I have certainly<br />
found even the elder children at the schools<br />
aware of public events.<br />
There is a centre in the county which lends out<br />
books to village reading rooms, and for the last<br />
six or eight years this has kept up a constant<br />
exchange of biography, travels, good novels, and<br />
tales of adventure. Marryatt, Kingston, Mayne<br />
Reid, Harrison Ainsworth are favourites with the<br />
younger men and lads, and they read eagerly any<br />
tale of seafaring life. -<br />
There are besides, two lending libraries, chiefly<br />
for the women and children, but that the men<br />
also read the books is shown by the inquiries for<br />
print large enough for father. I know from the<br />
reports of a society for which I am the literary<br />
associate, that most parishes have likewise<br />
good libraries, generally well resorted to. The<br />
women also are apt to obtain books of the<br />
penny dreadful order, of course on their own<br />
account.<br />
“Fox's Book of Martyrs’’ is often to be met<br />
with, generally an inheritance ; and the two books<br />
that all have heard of and wish to read are the<br />
“Pilgrim’s Progress" and “Robinson Crusoe,”<br />
but I cannot think that the writer of “Rustic<br />
Reading ” can really know John Bunyan's great<br />
classic if he thinks it likely to terrify children into<br />
the way of virtue. It generally contains only one<br />
illustration at all alarming, e<br />
I doubt, too, whether he can be familiar with<br />
parish magazines. The two most popular ones,<br />
The Banner of Faith and the Church Monthly,<br />
certainly contain tales and papers that do not<br />
deserve the term mawkish. Perhaps I may also<br />
observe that the nickname Hodge is one that<br />
greatly displeases both the peasant and all that<br />
are interested in him. C. M. Y.<br />
III.-LITERATURE IN RUSSIA.<br />
The new young Tsar, Nicholas II., apparently<br />
holds men of letters in high esteem, and is capable<br />
of estimating the true worth of their efforts for<br />
the dissemination of knowledge among the classes<br />
through the medium of the press and other<br />
channels, he having granted a sum of £50,000<br />
(500,000 roubles) to be paid out of the exchequer<br />
for the formation of a special fund to relieve<br />
journalists, authors, and others engaged in<br />
literature, in distress, and to permanently pro-<br />
vide for their widows and orphans at death. A<br />
grand and general burst of joy and jubilation<br />
went forth from the united Russian Press at the<br />
reception of the glad news, as every indigent<br />
pressman is now sure that, when the breadwinner<br />
is removed, his wife and family will not be left to<br />
starve. The Russian Emperor has truly set a<br />
noble example, which might with advantage be<br />
emulated by our Government.<br />
Count Leo Tolstoi has completed a new work<br />
entitled “Master and Servant.” It will make its<br />
appearance in the columns of the Northern<br />
Gazette in the course of a month or so. A few<br />
details of the everyday life of this veteran writer<br />
may be of interest to the readers of the Author.<br />
When I visited him at Yasuaja Poliana, on his<br />
own estate, I was very hospitably entertained by<br />
him and his family, and shall never forget the<br />
kindness shown me. Count Tolstoi is a staunch<br />
teetotaler, a strict vegetarian, and a non-smoker.<br />
He invariably rises at 8 a.m., and, after partaking<br />
of a cup of coffee, adjourns to his study, a sparely<br />
furnished room, which he tidies up and dusts<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. 280 (#294) ############################################<br />
<br />
28O<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
himself, as no abigail is allowed to enter its<br />
sacred precincts, where he writes until ten. He<br />
then takes his constitutional, returning for lunch<br />
about twelve. The bill of fare during my stay<br />
was boiled millet, cabbage sprouts, cauliflower,<br />
and stewed apples and plums. Lunch ended,<br />
he enjoys a snooze. An hour later he is hard at<br />
work again in his sanctum. At six he dines of<br />
much the same fare as at lunch. His family are<br />
not all vegetarians and teetotalers; in fact, the<br />
countess, his wife, strongly disapproves of his<br />
ascetic habits, and takes no trouble to conceal her<br />
dislike of them. The count sometimes mows<br />
the grass, but he has given up tilling the ground,<br />
as his medical advisers have forbidden over<br />
exertion as dangerous in the weak state and poor<br />
action of his heart. Coffee has also been pro-<br />
scribed, and he is gradually weaning himself<br />
from its use. The count is still hale and hearty,<br />
and when he can take “Shank’s pony” to<br />
Moscow and back without feeling any evil<br />
effects from his pedestrian feat, one is inclined<br />
to prophesy a good lease of life yet for the<br />
great novelist. He has crossed the span of life<br />
alloted to man by the Psalmist, and now stands<br />
on the threshold of the outside limit, which can<br />
only be attained by reason of strength.<br />
Odessa, 27 Feb. 8. W. ADDIson.<br />
IV.-A World of ENCOURAGEMENT.<br />
then resigned their membership. An instance is<br />
also cited in the Author for the current month of<br />
a writer, who, under such circumstances, became<br />
a member, his obligation to the Society being<br />
£15 at the time of his resignation against a set-<br />
off of one guinea entrance fee. I, for one, most<br />
strongly protest against such an abuse being<br />
permissible a second time, and consider that in<br />
justice to the Society we should protect our-<br />
selves against such vampires, who would only<br />
cripple its interests and usefulness. Cannot a<br />
resolution be passed rendering any member<br />
abusing an advantage of the Society ineligible<br />
for re-election ? ANNIE BRADSHAw.<br />
Feb. 16.<br />
W.—How LONG TO WAIT P<br />
I think “S. B.'s.” suggestions in your last issue<br />
are well worthy the attention of the Society of<br />
Authors, especially that of a limit of time as to<br />
payment after publication.<br />
The great uncertainty as to the date of pay-<br />
ment is the cause of much difficulty and distress<br />
amongst women writers especially, who do not<br />
like to press for payment, and yet often need the<br />
money sadly.<br />
I write for several periodicals, the publisher of<br />
one of which sends a cheque regularly at the end<br />
of the following month after publication; another,<br />
once in three months; one, only once in the year,<br />
i.e., in January.<br />
I do not object to any of these arrangements,<br />
for, although I consider the first-named the best,<br />
I know when to expect the money due, and can<br />
arrange accordingly. But in the case of other<br />
periodicals, which profess to settle accounts every<br />
three months, the money is usually, after the first<br />
quarter of the year, withheld until the following<br />
January (this year until Feb. 1), and therefore<br />
the sum due to me in June, 1893, does not reach<br />
my hands for seven months, while that due in<br />
September is four months late in payment. In<br />
my own case this does not press so hardly as it<br />
might in many others, as I happen to have an<br />
income independent of my writings; but I<br />
tremble to think to what depths of despair my<br />
poorer sisters must be reduced by this long drawn-<br />
out “hope deferred.”<br />
Moreover, it is a species of dishonesty, for the<br />
money thus withheld for seven months should<br />
bear interest, and this is a clear gain to the<br />
publisher, and a similar loss to the writer.<br />
I notice in the report of the Committee of<br />
Management for the year ending in January, a<br />
statement to the effect that writers have joined<br />
the Society when in difficulty, and upon being<br />
released from their difficulty, at possibly both<br />
trouble and expense to the Society, they have<br />
Surely this might be remedied by a “certain set of<br />
rules” being drawn up (as suggested by “S. B.”),<br />
by which all the , members of the Society of<br />
Authors should abide, forwarding with the MS.<br />
a printed copy of these rules, and thus avoiding<br />
the unpleasant necessity of either “dunning” the<br />
editor (with the probable result of dismissal, or<br />
rejection of future MSS.) or living on expecta-<br />
tions, instead of cash down, for an unlimited<br />
number of months. R. L. I.<br />
VI.-AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERs.<br />
I have read with interest the letter from the<br />
Secretary of the Incorporated Society of Authors<br />
in the issue of the Athenaeum of 23rd Feb. It is<br />
evident from the statement of facts that it would<br />
have been impossible for the Society to support<br />
such a case. I have no doubt its decision will<br />
strengthen the Society’s hands. The judicial<br />
manner in which you have acted throughout will,<br />
I am sure, very much strengthen the feeling of<br />
confidence which members of the Society have in<br />
your judgment and discretion. I think that you<br />
have been largely instrumental in preventing the<br />
Society from drifting into aimless and inutile<br />
litigation. A WELL-WISHER. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/274/1895-03-01-The-Author-5-10.pdf | publications, The Author |