285 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/285 | The Author, Vol. 06 Issue 08 (January 1896) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+06+Issue+08+%28January+1896%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 06 Issue 08 (January 1896)</a> | | | <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015013732253</a> | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1896-01-01-The-Author-6-8 | | | | | 173–196 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=6">6</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1896-01-01">1896-01-01</a> | | | | | | | 8 | | | 18960101 | C be El u t b or,<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
Monthly.)<br />
C O N DU C T E D BY W.A. L T E R B E S A. N. T.<br />
VoI. VI.-No. 8.]<br />
JANUARY 1, 1896.<br />
[PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
For the Opinions earpressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as eaſpressing the<br />
collective opinions of the committee unless<br />
they are officially signed by G. Herbert<br />
Thring, Sec.<br />
*- ~ *-*<br />
**<br />
HE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br />
remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br />
requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br />
important communications within two days will write to him<br />
without delay. All remittances should be crossed Union<br />
Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br />
all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br />
jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br />
returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br />
*~ * *<br />
e-- * -—s<br />
WARNINGS AND ADVICE.<br />
I. RAWING THE AGREEMENT. It is not generally<br />
understood that the author, as the vendor, has the<br />
absolute right of drafting the agreement upon<br />
whatever terms the transaction is to be carried out.<br />
Authors are strongly advised to exercise that right. In<br />
every form of business, this among others, the right of<br />
drawing the agreement rests with him who sells, leases, or<br />
has the control of the property.<br />
2. SERIAL RIGHTS.–In selling Serial Rights remember<br />
that you may be selling the Serial Right for all time; that<br />
is, the Right to continue the production in papers. If you<br />
object to this, insert a clause to that effect.<br />
3. STAMP You R AGREEMENTs. – Readers are most<br />
URGENTLY warmed not to neglect stamping their agreements<br />
immediately after signature. If this precaution is neglected<br />
for two weeks, a fine of £Io must be paid before the agree-<br />
ment can be used as a legal document. In almost every<br />
case brought to the secretary the agreement, or the letter<br />
which serves for one, is forwarded without the stamp. The<br />
author may be assured that the other party to the agree-<br />
ment seldom neglects this simple precaution. The Society,<br />
to save trouble, undertakes to get all the agreements of<br />
members stamped for them at no ea pense to themselves<br />
eaccept the cost of the stamp. .<br />
4. AscERTAIN whAT A PROPOSED AGREEMENT GIVES TO<br />
Both SIDES BEFORE SIGNING IT.-Remember that an<br />
arrangement as to a joint venture in any other kind of busi-<br />
ness whatever would be instantly refused should either party<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
*<br />
refuse to show the books or to let it be known what share he<br />
reserved for himself.<br />
5. LITERARY AGENTS.-Be very careful. You cannot be<br />
too careful as to the person whom you appoint as your<br />
agent. Remember that you place your property almost un-<br />
reservedly in his hands. Your only safety is in consulting<br />
the Society, or some friend who has had personal experience<br />
of the agent. Do not trust advertisements alone.<br />
6. CoST OF PRODUCTION.——Never sign any agreement of<br />
which the alleged cost of production forms an integral part,<br />
until you have proved the figures.<br />
7. CHOICE OF PUBLISHERS.–Never enter into any cor-<br />
respondence with publishers, especially with those who ad-<br />
vertise for MSS., who are not recommended by experienced<br />
friends or by this Society.<br />
8. FUTURE Work.--Never, on any account whatever,<br />
bind yourself down for future work to anyone.<br />
9. PERSONAL RISK.—Never accept any pecuniary risk or<br />
responsibility whatever without advice.<br />
Io. REJECTED MSS.—Never, when a MS. has been re-<br />
fused by respectable houses, pay others, whatever promises<br />
they may put forward, for the production of the work.<br />
II. AMERICAN RIGHTS.—Never sign away American<br />
rights. Keep them by special clause. Refuse to sign any<br />
agreement containing a clause which reserves them for the<br />
publisher, unless for a substantial consideration.<br />
12. CESSION OF COPYRIGHT.-Never sign any paper,<br />
either agreement or receipt, which gives away copyright,<br />
without advice.<br />
13. ADVERTISEMENTs. –- Keep some control over the<br />
advertisements, if they affect your returns, by a clause in<br />
the agreement.<br />
I4. NEVER forget that publishing is a business, like any<br />
other business, totally unconnected with philanthropy,<br />
charity, or pure love of literature. You have to do with<br />
business men. Be yourself a business man.<br />
Society’s Offices :-<br />
4, PORTUGAL STREET, LINCOLN's INN FIELDs.<br />
*~ 2. ~"<br />
a- - -<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
I. WERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub.<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. If the advice<br />
sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor, the member<br />
has a right to an opinion from the Society’s solicitors. If the<br />
case is such that Counsel’s opinion is desirable, the Com-<br />
mittee will obtain for him Counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publisher’s agreements do not generally fall within the<br />
T 2<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#528) ################################################<br />
<br />
I 74<br />
THE AUTHOR,<br />
experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br />
to use the Society first—our solicitors are continually<br />
engaged upon such questions for us. -<br />
3. Send to the office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts with the loan of the books represented. This is in<br />
order to ascertain what has been the nature of your agree-<br />
ments, and the results to author and publisher respectively<br />
so far. The Secretary will always be glad to have any<br />
agreements, new or old, for inspection and note. The infor-<br />
mation thus obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
4. If the examination of your previous business trans-<br />
actions by the Secretary proves unfavourable, you should<br />
take advice as to a change of publishers.<br />
5. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br />
posed document to the Society for examination.<br />
6. The Society is acquainted with the methods, and—in<br />
the case of fraudulent houses—the tricks of every publish-<br />
ing firm in the country.<br />
7. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br />
are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you are<br />
reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br />
the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br />
dence of the writer.<br />
8. Send to the Editor of the Awthor notes of everything<br />
important to literature that you may hear or meet with.<br />
9. The committee have now arranged for the reception of<br />
members’ agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br />
safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br />
fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br />
will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:—(1)<br />
To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br />
stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br />
them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br />
due according to agreements.<br />
*- a 2-seº<br />
** * *—s<br />
THE AUTHORS’ SYNDICATE.<br />
EMBERS are informed :<br />
1. That the Authors’ Syndicate takes charge of<br />
the business of members of the Society. That it<br />
submits MSS. to publishers and editors, concludes agree-<br />
ments, examines, passes, and collects accounts, and, gene-<br />
rally, relieves members of the trouble of managing business<br />
details.<br />
2. That the terms upon which its services can be secured<br />
will be forwarded upon detailed application.<br />
3. That the Authors' Syndicate works only for those<br />
members of the Society whose work possesses a market<br />
value.<br />
4. That the Syndicate can only undertake any negotiations<br />
whatever on the distinct understanding that those negotia-<br />
tions are placed ea clusively in its hands, and that all<br />
communications relating thereto are referred to it.<br />
5. That clients can only be seen by the Director by<br />
appointment, and that, when possible, at least two days’<br />
notice should be given.<br />
6. That every attempt is made to deal with all communi-<br />
cations promptly. That stamps should, in all cases, be sent<br />
to defray postage.<br />
7. That the Authors' Syndicate does not invite MSS.<br />
without previous correspondence; does not hold itself<br />
responsible for MSS. forwarded without notice; and that<br />
in all cases MSS. must be accompanied by stamps to defray<br />
postage.<br />
&<br />
8. That the Syndicate undertakes arrangements for<br />
lectures by some of the leading members of the Society;<br />
that it has a “Transfer Department' for the sale and<br />
purchase of journals and periodicals; and that a “Register<br />
of Wants and Wanted '' is open. Members are invited to<br />
communicate their requirements to the Manager.<br />
There is an Honorary Advisory Committee, whose services<br />
will be called upon in any case of dispute or difficulty. It<br />
is perhaps necessary to state that the members of the<br />
Advisory Committee have no pecuniary interest whatever in<br />
the Syndicate.<br />
-**<br />
NOTICES.<br />
HE Editor of the Author begs to remind members of the<br />
Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br />
of charge, the cost of producing it would be a very<br />
heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
6s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
The Editor is always glad to receive short papers and<br />
communications on all subjects connected with literature<br />
from members and others. Nothing can do more good to<br />
the Society than to make the Awthor complete, attractive,<br />
and interesting. Will those who are willing to aid in this<br />
work send their names and the special subjects on which<br />
they are willing to write P<br />
Communications for the Author should reach the Editor<br />
not later than the 21st of each month.<br />
All persons engaged in literary work of any kind, whether<br />
members of the Society or not, are invited to communicate<br />
to the Editor any points connected with their work which<br />
it would be advisable in the general interest to publish.<br />
Members and others who wish their MSS. read are<br />
requested not to send them to the Office without previously<br />
communicating with the Secretary. The utmost practicable<br />
despatch is aimed at, and MSS. are read in the order in<br />
which they are received. It must also be distinctly under-<br />
stood that the Society does not, under any circumstances,<br />
undertake the publication of MSS.<br />
The Authors’ Club is now open in its new premises, at<br />
3, Whitehall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary<br />
for information, rules of admission, &c.<br />
Will members take the trouble to ascertain whether they<br />
have paid their subscriptions for the year P If they will do<br />
this, and remit the amount, if still unpaid, or a banker's<br />
order, it will greatly assist the Secretary, and save him the<br />
trouble of sending out a reminder.<br />
Members are most earnestly entreated to attend to the<br />
warning numbered (8). It is a most foolish and may be a<br />
most disastrous thing to enter into an agreement binding<br />
for a term of years. Let them ask themselves if they<br />
would give a solicitor the collection of their rents for five<br />
years to come, whatever his conduct, whether he was honest<br />
or dishonest ? Of course they would not. Why then<br />
hesitate for a moment when they are asked to sign them-<br />
selves into literary bondage for three or five years P<br />
Those who possess the “Cost of Production ” are<br />
requested to note that the cost of binding has advanced 15<br />
per cent. This means, for those who do not like the trouble<br />
of “doing sums,” the addition of three shillings in the<br />
pound on this head. In other words, if the cost of binding<br />
is set down in our book at eight pounds, to this must now be<br />
added twenty-four shillings more, so that it now stands<br />
at £9 4s. The figures in our book are as near the exact<br />
truth as can be procured; but a printer's, or a binder's,<br />
bill is so elastic a thing that nothing more exact can be<br />
arrived at.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#529) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
I 75<br />
Some remarks have been made upon the amount charged<br />
in the “Cost of Production ” for advertising. Of course, we<br />
have not included any sums which may be charged for<br />
inserting advertisements in the publisher's own magazines,<br />
or in other magazines by exchange. As agreements too<br />
often go, there is nothing to prevent the publisher from<br />
sweeping the whole profits of a book into his own pocket,<br />
by inserting any number of advertisements in his own<br />
magazines, and by exchanging with others. Some there are<br />
who call this a form of fraud; it is not known what those<br />
who practise this method of swelling their own profits call it.<br />
*-ºs- a -º<br />
r-- - -—s<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE,<br />
HE Committee beg to remind members that the Sub-<br />
scription for the year is due on January the First.<br />
The most convenient form of payment is by order<br />
on a Bank. This method saves the trouble of remembering.<br />
The Secretary will in future send reminders to members<br />
who are in arrear in February.<br />
The Author will not be sent to members in arrear after<br />
the month of March.<br />
G. H. THRING, Secretary.<br />
*... ak =s*<br />
Q- * *<br />
ADDRESS OF ENGLISH TO AMERICAN<br />
MEN AND WOMEN OF LETTERS,<br />
WHE following Address has been sent out by<br />
the Society of Authors for signature. As<br />
soon as possible it will be forwarded to<br />
the United States. Its importance will rest<br />
entirely on the weight of the names appended:<br />
it is earnestly hoped that all those men and<br />
women of English blood who have made them-<br />
selves respected by their writings across the<br />
Atlantic will sign the paper:—<br />
“At this crisis in the history of the Anglo-<br />
Saxon race, when two paths lie before us, and on<br />
the choice between them depends the future of<br />
that race, it seems to be the plain duty of us who<br />
sign this paper, being followers of literature in<br />
Great Britain, to address upon the subject of<br />
that choice you who follow literature in the<br />
|United States. -<br />
“There are two paths before us. One leads us<br />
we know not whither, but in the end through<br />
war with all its accompaniments of carnage, un-<br />
speakable suffering, limitless destruction, and<br />
hideous desolation to the inevitable sequel of<br />
hatred and bitterness and the disruption of our<br />
race. It is this path which we ask you to join<br />
with us in an effort to make impossible. The<br />
present is neither the time nor the place, nor are<br />
we the persons to deal with the crisis on its<br />
technical issues, but it should not be difficult for<br />
any of us as men and women of reading and<br />
imagination, not liable to be carried away by<br />
political passion, to understand the general bear-<br />
ings of the case on both sides. We, on our part,<br />
are prepared to understand that the United<br />
States, as the greatest nation in America, looks<br />
with proper jealousy on the extension of Euro-<br />
pean powers of influence and territory on the<br />
American continent. And you, on your part,<br />
will not fail to realise that European Powers in<br />
general, and Great Britain in particular, have<br />
never made any effort to enlarge their dominions<br />
on your continent at any time within the past<br />
hundred years. e<br />
“But it is not on grounds of political equity<br />
that we now address you. We are united to you<br />
by many ties, and the first and closest of our ties<br />
is the bond of blood. We are proud of the<br />
United States. There is nothing in our history<br />
that has earned us more glory than the conquest<br />
of the vast American continent by the Anglo-<br />
Saxon race. When our pride is humbled by the<br />
report of some things which you do better than<br />
ourselves, it is also lifted up by the consciousness<br />
that you are our kith and kin. We see very<br />
much of you, and you see much of us. During<br />
the last quarter of a century the influx of<br />
American visitors to these shores has been very<br />
great, while every year sends more and yet more<br />
of our people across the Atlantic. There is<br />
hardly a household in this country without its<br />
American relations, its American friends, without<br />
its sons and daughters settled in America; and<br />
everywhere in England the American people are<br />
settled in our midst. Our public men go to you<br />
for the inspiration of your youthful nation, and<br />
you receive them with boundless hospitality.<br />
Your public men come to us for the interest of<br />
our ancient institutions, and we welcome them as<br />
our brethren. There is no anti-American feeling<br />
among Englishmen, and it is impossible that there<br />
can be any anti-English feeling among Americans.<br />
For two such nations, then, to take up arms<br />
against each other would be civil war, not differing<br />
from your calamitous struggle of thirty years<br />
ago, except that the cause would be immeasurably<br />
less human, less tragic, and less inevitable.<br />
“There is another tie that unites our nations,<br />
and more especially unites those of us who sign<br />
this paper and you who receive it—the tie of<br />
literature. Party problems may solve or exhaust<br />
themselves, burning questions may burn them-<br />
selves out, but the literature which a great race,<br />
divided into two nations, holds as a joint<br />
inheritance will live on after the fever of political<br />
strife has passed away. But though it will live<br />
it may also suffer, and from nothing can a people<br />
take such injury to its moral nature as from the<br />
wounds and scars of its literature; if war should<br />
occur between England and America, English<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#530) ################################################<br />
<br />
176<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
literature would be dishonoured and disfigured<br />
for a century to come. The patriotic songs, the<br />
histories of victory and defeat, the records of<br />
humiliation and disgrace, the stories of burning<br />
wrong and unavenged insult, these would be<br />
branded deep into the hearts of our peoples, they<br />
would so express themselves in poems and novels<br />
and plays as to make it impossible for any of us<br />
who had lived through such a fratricidal war to<br />
take up again the former love and friendship.<br />
“For the united Anglo-Saxon race that owns<br />
the great names of Cromwell and Washington;<br />
of Lincoln and Nelson; of Gordon and Grant ;<br />
of Shakespeare and Milton ; there is, we trust,<br />
such a future as no other race has yet had in the<br />
history of the world—a future that will be built<br />
on a confederation of Sovereign States, living in<br />
the strength of the same liberties. We ask you<br />
to join us in helping to protect that future.<br />
Poets and creators, scholars and philosophers,<br />
men and women of imagination and of vision, we<br />
call upon you in the exercise of your far-reaching<br />
influence to save our literature from dishonour<br />
and our race from lasting injury.”<br />
*... * *<br />
MR, HALL CAINE'S MISSION.<br />
I.—CANADIAN RECEPTION.<br />
T is gratifying to record that Canada has<br />
herself been the first to acknowledge the<br />
work of our ambassador. On the night<br />
before Mr. Hall Caine left Ottawa, he was enter-<br />
tained at a dinner, which was first conceived of as<br />
a tribute to him as a man of letters, and ended<br />
by being in all senses a ministerial farewell.<br />
Nearly all the Ministers of the Dominion Govern-<br />
ment were present, and the Minister of Justice,<br />
Sir Charles Hibbert Tupper, was in the chair.<br />
In proposing the toast of the evening he said that<br />
his presence side by side with the guest would be<br />
a sufficient answer to the reports so industriously<br />
circulated that the question of Canadian copy-<br />
right had made them public and personal enemies.<br />
All the world knew Mr. Hall Caine as a novelist,<br />
but since his arrival in Canada, he had established<br />
for himself another reputation—that of a great<br />
diplomatist. He used the word advisedly and<br />
with a proper sense of responsibility. Mr.<br />
Caine had conducted difficult and delicate<br />
negotiations with a tact which had awakened the<br />
admiration of his colleagues, and brought to what<br />
appeared to be a settlement, amid the applause of<br />
nearly all the parties concerned, a question which<br />
had for years been a cause of difference between<br />
the Dominion and the old country. Amongst<br />
the other speakers were Mr. Foster, Minister of<br />
Finance, and Mr. Daly, Minister of the Interior.<br />
II.-FROM MR. R.IDOUT.<br />
Toronto, Nov. 18, 1895.<br />
I now inclose a copy of a resolution passed by<br />
The Ontario Society of Artists which has been<br />
forwarded to the Minister of Justice, Ottawa. I<br />
also inclose you a copy of the resolution passed by<br />
the Canadian Institute, on Nov. 16 last, which has<br />
also been forwarded to the Minister of Justice,<br />
Ottawa.<br />
The Canadian Institute is an old and well-<br />
known institute, and representative of Canadian<br />
art, literature, and science. The resolution from<br />
this institute will no doubt have weight with the<br />
Government. As an old member of this Canadian<br />
Institute, I succeeded in getting the resolution<br />
passed. It would be well if a petition were also<br />
presented. Mr. Hall Caine mentioned to me that<br />
such a one was going to be passed round for<br />
signature. I have not seen it yet.<br />
JOHN G. RIDOUT.<br />
III.—THE ONTARIO SOCIETY OF ARTISTs.<br />
Toronto, November 14, 1895.<br />
At the monthly meeting of our Society held<br />
on Tuesday last the following resolution was<br />
adopted:—<br />
“That this Society is of opinion that the<br />
Canadian Copyright Act of 1889, now before the<br />
English Government for ratification, is detri-<br />
mental to the interests of artists in Canada, and<br />
would much regret the withdrawal of Canada<br />
from the International Copyright Convention.”<br />
ROBT. F. GAGEN.<br />
IV.--THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE.<br />
At a meeting of this Association, held on<br />
Saturday, Nov. 16, 1895, a resolution was passed<br />
that the Canadian Government be memorialised<br />
to remain within the Berne Convention.<br />
W.—FROM MR. GoLDw1N SMITH.<br />
To the Editor of the Times.<br />
Sir, Thanks to the eloquence of Mr. Hall<br />
Caine, who spoke admirably well, and to his<br />
diplomacy combined with that of Mr. Daldy, it<br />
appears that we have arrived at a settlement of<br />
the copyright question; though I do not myself<br />
believe that any settlement will prove in the end<br />
satisfactory except that of a uniform copyright<br />
for the whole Empire. Our retail booksellers are<br />
still in arms against the article of the agreement<br />
interfering with the importation of editions<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#531) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE<br />
A UTHOIP. 177<br />
printed in England. They have reason for their<br />
protest. The Canadian High Commissioner says<br />
that no nation except Great Britain treats her<br />
colonies as foreign countries. Can he name any<br />
colonies except those of Great Britain which treat<br />
their mother country as a commercial enemy and<br />
protect themselves against her products?<br />
A wider question, however, and one affecting<br />
the entire constitution of the Empire, has been<br />
raised by this dispute. The British North<br />
America Act reserves to the Imperial Govern-<br />
ment a veto to be exercised in the general inte-<br />
rests of the Empire on all Canadian legislation.<br />
The Act is barely thirty years old, so that its<br />
provisions can hardly have lost their force. Yet<br />
our Minister of Justice, Sir C. Hibbert Tupper,<br />
said the other evening at a public dinner in<br />
Toronto that “the advisers of Her Majesty<br />
would not now dare to disallow the Acts of the<br />
Federal Legislature (of Canada) as had been done<br />
before.” The Imperial veto, in other words, is to<br />
be treated as a practical nullity. Canada asserts<br />
her legislative independence; in insisting on her<br />
right of withdrawing from the Berne Convention<br />
she asserts her diplomatic independence also. If<br />
Sir C. Hibbert Tupper's reading of the Imperial<br />
Constitution is right, the Parliament and the<br />
Parliamentary Ministry of Great Britain are<br />
merely local, like those of Canada or any other<br />
colony; and nothing is Imperial but a Crown<br />
constitutionally divested of its power. To the<br />
Imperial country no distinction is left except that<br />
of her sole responsibility for Imperial defence.<br />
This theory of the Imperial Constitution has, in<br />
fact, been almost formally advanced in the course<br />
of the copyright discussion. Are you prepared<br />
to accept it? It is time that your minds should<br />
be made up, as this controversy, from which,<br />
perhaps, we have not yet wholly emerged, shows.<br />
—Yours faithfully, GOLDw1N SMITH.<br />
Toronto, Dec. 2.<br />
WI.-CANADIAN COPYRIGHT.<br />
A SHORT Account (from the point of the English<br />
author) of the DRAFT ACT agreed upon by<br />
the Canadian Copyright Association, the<br />
Canadian Publishers’ Association, the Cana-<br />
dian Press Association, on the One part, and<br />
Mr. Hall Caine, representing the English<br />
Society of Authors, on the other part, and<br />
submitted by them to the Dominion Ministers<br />
at the Copyright Conference held at Ottawa,<br />
Monday, Nov. 25, 1895.<br />
I. That when an English author is about to<br />
publish a book simultaneously in England and a<br />
foreign country he shall enter its name and<br />
deposit a copy of it at Ottawa, or (by payment of<br />
a higher fee) at the Canadian High Commis-<br />
sioner’s Office in London.<br />
2. That by this registration he shall undertake<br />
to print and publish that book in Canada within<br />
sixty days, or, if he can show cause for delay,<br />
within ninety days, of its first publication.<br />
3. That printing in Canada shall mean the<br />
printing from plates made elsewhere.<br />
4. That if an author has not published simul-<br />
taneously in England and in a foreign country<br />
(that is to say, if he has lost his American copy-<br />
right) his copyright in Canada shall remain as at<br />
present (under English law) until his book has<br />
been published without copyright and authority<br />
in, say, America. Then it shall be within the<br />
right of a publisher in Canada to apply to the<br />
Minister for a licence to publish it in the<br />
Dominion.<br />
5. Or if an author has not fulfilled his under-<br />
taking to publish in Canada within the time<br />
prescribed it shall be within the right of a<br />
publisher in Canada to apply for a licence.<br />
6. But before the license can be granted by the<br />
Minister the author must be informed of the<br />
application and given his choice of accepting it or<br />
of publishing for himself within sixty days.<br />
7. Publishing for himself means publishing in<br />
his own name, in the name of his agent, of his<br />
English publisher, or of his foreign publisher.<br />
8. If he should elect to accept the application<br />
for a licence he must receive at least Io per cent.<br />
On a book published at not less than 25 cents,<br />
with not fewer than 500 copies to an edition, his<br />
royalty must be paid in advance, and there must<br />
be only one licence granted for one book.<br />
9. An author who is about to publish a serial<br />
story in England and in a foreign country (say<br />
America) may protect it during the time of its<br />
publication in parts by entering its name, a<br />
general description of its length and character,<br />
and his own name, &c., at Ottawa or (by payment<br />
of a higher fee) at London.<br />
Io. That if he does not do this, or if he does<br />
not publish in a foreign country (say America)<br />
and his serial is stolen there, the proprietors of<br />
any number of Canadian newspapers may apply<br />
to Ministers for a licence to print it.<br />
II. The author may stop them from doing so<br />
by undertaking to arrange for the publication<br />
in Canada within sixty days.<br />
I2. Or he may accept the applications, and in<br />
that case they must bring him small payments of<br />
twenty-five dollars from newspapers published in<br />
towns of under one hundred thousand inhabi-<br />
tants, and fifty dollars from newspapers published<br />
in towns of over one hundred thousand.<br />
13. There are various penalties for violation of<br />
copyright, &c.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#532) ################################################<br />
<br />
178<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
14. The rights enjoyed by English authors<br />
are to be enjoyed by American authors and by<br />
the authors of every country having a copyright<br />
treaty with England.<br />
WII.-LETTER FROM MR. HALL CAINE TO THE<br />
-- TIMEs.<br />
Sir, With the knowledge and goodwill of Sir<br />
Charles Hibbert Tupper, the Minister of Justice<br />
at Ottawa, and with the consent and sympathy of<br />
the Canadian Copyright Association and the<br />
Publishers’ Association of Toronto, I wish to<br />
make a general explanation of the draft Bill<br />
which authors and publishers recommended to<br />
the Dominion Government yesterday as a basis<br />
for any fresh legislation on Canadian copyright<br />
which in the exercise of their judgment they may,<br />
perhaps, submit to the Canadian Parliament.<br />
The object of making this draft Bill public at the<br />
present moment is to afford to English authors,<br />
publishers, and owners of copyrights a proper<br />
and timely opportunity, before the Dominion<br />
ministers have attempted to give shape to new<br />
legislation, of saying if they foresee any serious<br />
disadvantages in the operation of a Canadian<br />
Copyright Act which should be founded on these<br />
lines:—<br />
SYNOPSIS OF DEAFT ACT.<br />
I. Any citizen of any country which grants copyright to<br />
British subjects may secure copyright in Canada for forty-<br />
two years.<br />
2. The Act is not retroactive.<br />
3. Any work hereafter issued that may have copyright<br />
under this Act shall have copyright in Canada without<br />
printing in Canada, subject to certain restrictions in the<br />
case of a book.<br />
4. Any such work, and any work first produced in<br />
Canada, may secure exclusive copyright in Canada.<br />
5. Every book published in a foreign country, simultane-<br />
ously with its publication in the British Dominions, must be<br />
registered simultaneously at Ottawa. If the book is pub-<br />
lished in the country of origin only, the owner may register<br />
at Ottawa at any time until a licence has been applied for.<br />
If a book is to be or is first published in Canada, it must be<br />
registered on or before day of publication.<br />
6. Three copies of every copyrighted book or work,<br />
printed or produced in Canada, must be delivered at<br />
Ottawa.<br />
7. From the day of registration importation must cease,<br />
except as to two copies which any person may import, and<br />
except as to copies of the book printed and published for<br />
circulation in the United Kingdom, which may be imported<br />
for sixty days, when the Canadian edition is to be ready.”<br />
8. Application to print a book under licence, stating the<br />
proposed retail price, may be made to the Department :<br />
(a) When the book is registered at Ottawa and is not<br />
produced in Canada, within sixty days; or,<br />
(b) When the book is published in the country of origin<br />
only, and is published or announced for publication, with-<br />
out, copyright, in a foreign country.<br />
(c) When the book is published simultaneously in the<br />
* See P.S. to this letter.<br />
British Dominions and in a foreign country, or vice versa,<br />
but not registered or published simultaneously in Canada.<br />
9. The registration mentioned above may be made at<br />
Ottawa ; or, for the convenience of authors abroad, it may<br />
be made at the office of the High Commissioner of Canada<br />
at London, provided the author pays the cost of cabling the<br />
fact of registration to Ottawa.<br />
I9. This registration involves an undertaking to print and<br />
publish an edition of the book in Canada within the sixty<br />
days following.<br />
THE AUTHOR GIVEN A SECOND CHANCE TO SECURE;<br />
COPYRIGHT.<br />
II. It will be seen that the author has already been given<br />
one opportunity to secure exclusive copyright in Canada.<br />
He is now given a second opportunity as follows:<br />
I2. On receipt of the application for a licence, the Minister<br />
is to telegraph or cable particulars to the publisher of the<br />
book in the country of origin, offering the choice of two<br />
plans, as follows:—<br />
(a) The copyright owner may accept the application, in<br />
which case the licence will issue forthwith ; or,<br />
(b) He may refuse the application and decide to retain<br />
the copyright himself, in which case he must register<br />
within seven days of the notice from the Minister, and<br />
must produce the book in Canada within the sixty days<br />
following. -<br />
13. Should no answer be received by the Minister within<br />
seven days, the licence is to issue. All licences are to be<br />
given on certain conditions, as follows:<br />
I4. The applicant to agree to publish without alteration<br />
or abridgment, to pay the author a royalty of Io per cent.<br />
on the retail price, which royalty is in no case to be less<br />
than 23 cents, on each copy, and to pay the royalty on<br />
editions of 500 copies at a time, each copy of each edition to<br />
be stamped by the Department of Inland Revenue before<br />
being in any way disposed of.<br />
I5. The licence may be cancelled should a new edition<br />
with material alterations or additions be produced in the<br />
country of origin. The author is entitled to copyright on<br />
the new edition as though it were a new book. Should the<br />
author not register the new edition, the licence shall revert<br />
to the original licensee.<br />
I6. Importation ceases in the case of application for<br />
licence, the same as in the case of registration for copyright.<br />
17. A copyright book going out of print must be reprinted<br />
within sixty days, otherwise a licence may be issued.<br />
18. Books to be published under licence are to be printed<br />
within thirty days after issue of licence.<br />
19. The Minister may, for cause, allow an extension of<br />
thirty days beyond any term specified as that in which a book<br />
must be printed in Canada.<br />
SERIAL COPYRIGHT.<br />
2O. The author has the right to arrange for exclusive<br />
serial publication in Canada. Also by registration at<br />
Ottawa, he may protect his serial while it is in course of<br />
publication in any country.<br />
21. Should he fail to do so, application for a licence to<br />
publish serially under licence may be made. Here, again,<br />
the author is given a second opportunity to retain exclusive<br />
eopyright, as follows:—<br />
22. On receipt of the application for a serial licence the<br />
Minister is to telegraph or cable particulars to the publisher<br />
of the paper publishing the work in the country of issue,<br />
offering the choice of two plans, as follows:—<br />
(1) He may accept the application, in which case the<br />
licence issues forthwith ; or,<br />
(2) He may refuse the application, and decide to arrange<br />
for serial publication himself, in which case he must<br />
register within seven days of the notice from the Minister,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#533) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
I 79<br />
and arrange for serial publication of the work within sixty<br />
days.<br />
23. Should no answer be received by the Minister within<br />
seven days the licence issues forthwith, on conditions as<br />
follows:<br />
24. The publisher agrees to publish the work in full.<br />
25. The licence conveys exclusive right for the city, town,<br />
or village for which issued.<br />
26. The licensee is to pay fifty dollars for papers in<br />
cities of Ioo,ooo population or over, and twenty-five dollars<br />
for cities, &c., of less than IOO,OOO.<br />
27. Thereafter, a licence is to be issued to all applicants<br />
on above conditions without further cabling.<br />
28. Every registration for copyright or serial copyright<br />
and for every application for licence is to be published once<br />
in Canada Gazetle.<br />
29. This serial licence gives no other right to print aud<br />
publish the work in any other form whatever.<br />
I now submit this draft Bill, with respectful<br />
homage, for the consideration of the Secretary of<br />
State for the Colonies, of Sir William Martin<br />
Conway and the Society of Authors, and of<br />
English publishers. It is a Bill to which the<br />
Canadian Copyright Association and other<br />
interested classes in Canada pledge themselves,<br />
and it is a basis on which, I have the best reason<br />
to think, fresh legislation might, perhaps, be<br />
framed, agreeably to the wish of the Canadian<br />
Government. I shall not traverse the points at<br />
which it seems to me better for English authors<br />
than the proposed Act of 1889, or attempt to<br />
show the particulars in which the interested<br />
parties in Canada have made concessions to our<br />
claims. Neither shall I discuss the constitutional<br />
question of Canada's rights to legislate so as to<br />
cover the interests of English authors, or yet<br />
touch the vexed problem of manufacture as a<br />
limitation of the principle of copyright. But I<br />
will try to indicate the operation of an Act which,<br />
in the wisdom of the Dominion Government,<br />
might, perhaps, be based on these general lines:—<br />
I. Such an Act would be limited in its opera-<br />
tion to the works of the popular authors. This<br />
would meet one of the objections of Mr. Goldwin<br />
Smith to the clause requiring that a book should<br />
be printed in the Dominion.<br />
2. If a book would not pay to print and pub-<br />
lish in Canada, it would not therefore fail of copy-<br />
right there. The original edition could go into<br />
the Dominion, as at present, during the whole<br />
term of its copyright in the country of its origin.<br />
This would meet the case described in the valu-<br />
able letter of Mr. Herbert Spencer.<br />
3. Though a new writer might lose his copy-<br />
right in America by failing to comply with the<br />
American Copyright Act, he would not therefore<br />
lose his copyright in Canada, where he would<br />
hold it absolutely until the end of his term. This<br />
would meet the painful case of such young<br />
writers as Miss Beatrice Harraden.<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
4. Such an Act would not exclude from Canada<br />
the English book which had been copyrighted in<br />
the United States, but never registered or licensed<br />
in the Dominion, but it would exclude the<br />
American reprint of a book which had been<br />
registered or licensed, and it would also exclude<br />
the English colonial reprint, which was meant to<br />
meet a condition that is gone—the condition of<br />
general piracy in the United States—and would<br />
then be useless and mischievous; and it would<br />
also exclude the English edition after the pub-<br />
lication of the Canadian edition.<br />
5. Our understanding with the United States<br />
would not be endangered, because American<br />
authors would enjoy the same privileges and be<br />
under the same obligations as English authors.<br />
6. Such an Act would not imperil the great<br />
advantages to English authors of American copy-<br />
right, because it would put it within the author's<br />
control (both under the condition of registration<br />
and under the condition of license) to see that<br />
his American market could not be injured in<br />
Canada.<br />
7. Such an Act should not be inconsistent with<br />
the spirit of the Berne Convention. As the<br />
excellent report of the departmental representa-<br />
tives (1892) very properly says: “The Conven-<br />
tion merely stipulates that foreign copyright<br />
owners are to be entitled to the same rights and<br />
privileges as British copyright owners, and if the<br />
rights of British copyright owners are cut down<br />
by such licences, foreign copyright owners are not<br />
entitled to complain of their rights being cut<br />
down to a similar extent.<br />
8. Such an Act ought to enable the Dominion<br />
Government to withdraw its application to<br />
denounce the Berne Convention, and so to remove<br />
the danger under which Canadian authors now<br />
stand of being put into a position of isolation.<br />
9. The interposition of a Government depart-<br />
ment (the Department of Agriculture) in the pub-<br />
lishing industry of Canada—now perplexed by<br />
the uncertainties of the Foreign Reprints Act,<br />
and threatened with the intricacies of the pro-<br />
posed legislation of 1889—would be confined to<br />
a single and simple transaction, which would<br />
probably be the less frequent form of arrange-<br />
ment.<br />
In conclusion I venture to counsel my brother<br />
authors not to inquire too curiously into the<br />
constitutional question involved in Canada's<br />
demand to legislate for herself, and I promise<br />
them, after yesterday's public conference with the<br />
Premier, Sir Mackenzie Bowell, and the Minister<br />
of Justice, Sir Charles Hibbert Tupper, as well<br />
as with the representatives of the publishing,<br />
printing, and bookselling industries throughout<br />
the Dominion, that Canada is at this moment in<br />
TJ<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#534) ################################################<br />
<br />
18O<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
the mood to deal with us, if we are conciliatory<br />
and reasonable, not only justly, but generously.<br />
In the last word I desire to make acknowledg-<br />
ment of the valuable assistance of Mr. F. R.<br />
Daldy. I must not charge him with any re-<br />
sponsibility for the principle of this Bill, which<br />
must be laid to my own account entirely; but I<br />
should be very wanting in gratitude if I did not<br />
say how much I owe to his special knowledge of<br />
copyright law and to his warm sympathy and<br />
untiring help. Mr. Daldy is to remain some days<br />
longer in Ottawa, and he will, I am sure, obtain<br />
some further concessions on points of detail.—<br />
Yours very truly, HALL CAINE.<br />
Ottawa, Nov. 26.<br />
P.S.—Since writing the foregoing Mr. Daldy<br />
and I have heard from the Dominion Ministers<br />
that they cannot propose to exclude any English<br />
book except the colonial edition after publication<br />
of the Canadian edition. The exclusion of the<br />
English edition was a concession made by me<br />
to secure certain of the authors’ rights. To-night<br />
(Tuesday) the Canadian Copyright Association<br />
writes asking me if I would agree to the with-<br />
drawal of the prohibition on English editions. I<br />
have answered that I would agree. Therefore,<br />
this clause of the foregoing draft may, I think,<br />
be read as abandoned. HALL CAINE.<br />
Dec. 5, 1895.<br />
VIII.-CANADIAN COPYRIGHT IIEGISLATION.<br />
Canadian copyright legislation has been ad-<br />
vanced by another not unimportant stage. The<br />
draft Act which Mr. Hall Caine brought back to<br />
England as the basis of compromise which had<br />
been submitted to the Dominion Government has<br />
been reported upon by the home authorities and<br />
revised by Parliamentary counsel, and will pro-<br />
bably be returned to Ottawa at an early date.<br />
It is understood that the revision consists in the<br />
main of technical changes which are intended to<br />
bring the Act into harmony with the terms of<br />
Imperial legislation, and that it removes the<br />
prohibition on books lawfully printed and pub-<br />
lished for general circulation in countries of the<br />
Berne Copyright Union.<br />
This change will no doubt meet the only objec-<br />
tion urged against the Bill in Canada on behalf of<br />
Canadian readers and retail booksellers, and it is<br />
therefore not unlikely that the Minister of Justice<br />
will put the Act in hand before the dissolution of<br />
the Dominion Parliament in the spring. In that<br />
event it seems probable that there will be no<br />
further opposition in this country. — Times,<br />
Dec. 23, 1895.<br />
changes.<br />
EDUCATIONAL BOOKS.<br />
T a meeting of the committee of manage-<br />
ment held on Monday, Dec. 9, a sub-com-<br />
mittee was appointed to investigate and<br />
to report upon the question of the publishing of<br />
educational works. The sub-committee will be<br />
extremely obliged if members of the Society will<br />
interest themselves in this important work and<br />
forward to the secretary their own experience, or<br />
that of their friends, with the accounts and the<br />
agreements. It is understood that no cases will<br />
be published with names unless by permission of<br />
the authors concerned.<br />
The following, for instance, is the experience of<br />
one writer of educational books:—<br />
“For my first book I agreed with my publisher<br />
to receive a royalty of Io per cent., to begin after<br />
the first thousand were sold. This book has done<br />
extremely well—so well that I think the publishers<br />
ought to have gone beyond the agreement and<br />
paid me royalties as from the beginning. I have<br />
done two other books for the same publishers on<br />
Io per cent. from the beginning; the work was<br />
of a kind which necessitated considerable sums of<br />
umoney spent in copying books and other pay-<br />
ments, amounting to about £50 in all. This<br />
money has been paid by me, not by the publishers.<br />
I do not know what proportion of profit has<br />
been taken by the publishers and what has gone<br />
to me.<br />
“I next made arrangements with a general<br />
editor of a certain firm to edit a book for which I<br />
was to receive a certain sum—quite a small sum.<br />
I worked at this for nearly a year, and had done<br />
about half the work, when the general editor<br />
resigned, and his place was taken by another man<br />
who refused to accept the work on which his pre-<br />
decessor had engaged me, and which I had already.<br />
half finished. I have done another book for an<br />
educational series for which I am receiving a .<br />
royalty of 7% per cent. on the published price.<br />
With regard to this book, I made it a condition<br />
when I contributed it to the series that it should<br />
be planned in a certain manner.<br />
“Thris was agreed to, and I spent a year's hard<br />
work upon it. This summer, however, without<br />
any warning to me, the publishers have issued in<br />
the same series an “alternative’ book to my own.<br />
It is a work closely modelled on mine with certain<br />
I should like to ask whether there<br />
ought not to be some protection for contributors<br />
to an educational series against the introduction<br />
of ‘alternative' volumes embodying, as far as<br />
may be convenient, the fruits of their labour.”<br />
This case illustrates the need for the inquiry of<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#535) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
181<br />
the newly appointed sub-committee. The royal-<br />
ties are simply sweating. As for the introduction<br />
of an “alternative” volume, this extraordinary<br />
statement demands further investigation.<br />
* * ==s*<br />
r----,<br />
OFFICE EXPENSES.<br />
HE question whether a publisher is entitled<br />
to charge for office expenses is growing<br />
larger and more important. In fact, the<br />
relations between author and publisher cannot be<br />
discussed, to say nothing of being settled, until<br />
this question has been thoroughly thrashed out.<br />
Every honest man is agreed that there must be<br />
no secret charge of any kind; that to spend £80<br />
and to tell the author in the accounts that £IOO<br />
has been spent is—but it is quite unnecessary to<br />
say here what that is.<br />
We wish to speak of agreements and terms of<br />
partnership between two honourable men, both of<br />
whom desire nothing more than is fair, and both<br />
of whom would scorn the dirty tricks of Secret<br />
profits and lying returns.<br />
Let us set forth the conditions of the question<br />
as fairly and as dispassionately as possible.<br />
We will here consider only that kind of book<br />
which carries with it no risk. By this we mean a<br />
book which is certain to pay for the actual cost of<br />
production with some margin, great or small; a<br />
book of which the publisher knows that he can<br />
dispose of a certain minimum which will at<br />
least clear his liability, and which he hopes will<br />
greatly exceed that sum. In every branch of<br />
literature there are a great many authors whose<br />
books fall under this head—books without risk.<br />
Of course we cannot admit that kind of risk<br />
incurred when a publisher, for the sake of saving<br />
a little on the cost of production, issues a much<br />
larger edition than he can depend upon selling.<br />
Thus, if a writer has recently written a book which<br />
has gone through an edition of 2000, the publisher<br />
would not be justified in complaining of the risk<br />
he had undertaken if he were to begin with an<br />
edition of 4OOO.<br />
Let us, as usual, deal with our customary<br />
example, the 6s. book; not necessarily a novel.<br />
There are three methods of publishing : that<br />
of purchase, which is perhaps the best of all if<br />
the author obtains the proper price : of profit-<br />
sharing, also very good if the author gets his<br />
proper share : of royalties, which is very good if<br />
the author gets a proper royalty.<br />
Now, when any one of these methods is dis-<br />
cussed, the publisher, too often, objects, generally<br />
putting the two together, the cost of advertise-<br />
ment, and his enormous office expenses.<br />
As regards the former, that forms part of the<br />
cost of production, and is only mentioned here<br />
because it is sometimes lumped together with office<br />
expenses in the desire to pass the latter because<br />
the former cannot well be disputed. One word re-<br />
garding the cost of advertising. It is as well<br />
to remind the reader what it means. Thus the<br />
expenditure of £10 on advertising means:<br />
On the first thousand copies an addi-<br />
tion of .................................... 2#d.<br />
On the first two thousand ............... Iłd.<br />
On the first three thousand ............ #d.<br />
Of the first ten thousand 9-d.<br />
to the cost of every volume. .<br />
So that if £30 is spent on advertising a book<br />
which has a sale of Io,000, the cost of production<br />
is increased by #d. for every volume. Of course<br />
this does not include advertising in a publisher's<br />
own newspapers or exchanges, either open or<br />
concealed.<br />
Let us return to the clause for charging office<br />
expenses.<br />
It is a new thing. Formerly a publisher<br />
agreed, if he thought a book likely to succeed, to<br />
take the risk and give his services in considera-<br />
tion of half, or one-third, of the profits. The<br />
word “profits” was understood to mean the<br />
difference between the gross receipts and the<br />
money spent on production. This point is estab-<br />
lished by Charles Knight, who gives the accounts<br />
of Gibbon’s “Decline and Fall,” on a profit-sharing<br />
agreement (see p. 183). Knight wrote fifty years<br />
ago, but he calls attention to the tampering with<br />
accounts which had then become too common a<br />
practice.<br />
The point, however, is this: that a hundred<br />
years ago a profit-sharing agreement in which the<br />
publisher gave his risk and his services in return<br />
for an agreed share of profits did not allow him,<br />
nor was it ever thought of, to deduct his office<br />
expenses, and then begin to share. The bargain<br />
was that in return for his share he should take<br />
the risk and give his services. Now his services<br />
meant then, and they mean now, the use of the<br />
whole of his machinery.<br />
We have here eliminated the question of risk.<br />
That is to say, we are considering only that class<br />
of books, now become very large, in the produc-<br />
tion of which there is no risk,<br />
The services of the publisher remain; and for<br />
these services he must be remunerated on such a<br />
scale as will pay him a fair margin over and above<br />
his office expenses.<br />
What are these services P. That is the question<br />
on which depends the adjustment of the relations<br />
between author and publisher. What does the<br />
publisher actually do for the book? His own<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#536) ################################################<br />
<br />
182<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
personal work lies first in giving the machinery<br />
of his office and clerks whereby the book can get<br />
printed, and bound, and distributed, and the<br />
accounts collected. All this is pure routine, and<br />
is the daily work of clerks, accountants and<br />
travellers. There is not the least mystery or<br />
difficulty about it. Knowledge there must be,<br />
viz., as to the proper charges for printing, binding<br />
and paper; but knowledge that the clerks and<br />
accountants may possess as much as the principal.<br />
There is, next, the decision as to the best number<br />
to start with, a difficulty easily met in the case of<br />
the book we are considering—a book that carries<br />
no risk. Then comes the amount of expense that<br />
the book will “bear” in advertising—a point<br />
as to which all publishers differ in practice.<br />
One does not desire in the least to undervalue the<br />
personal work done for the book by the publisher;<br />
but can anyone find any other contribution to the<br />
success of the book P. In other words, what does<br />
a publisher do for a book whose production carries<br />
no risk, more than has been stated above P -<br />
Yet for doing this simple routine work by the<br />
hands of his clerks some publishers claim the<br />
right of charging first for office expenses, and<br />
then actually going halves—if not worse—with<br />
the owner and creator of the property<br />
On what grounds can this claim be allowed P<br />
Do other people—agents — stewards — trades-<br />
men—ever make such a claim P What would be<br />
thought of a rent collector—a solicitor—a land<br />
agent—a house agent--demanding first a deduc-<br />
tion for the Office expenses, and, next, half what is<br />
left for himself? The thing would be monstrous.<br />
In all work done for other people, of whatever<br />
kind, the office expenses must be met by the man<br />
who does the work. It is his affair. He has got<br />
to make his own machinery; to buy his own tools.<br />
The doctor does not charge for the carriage in<br />
which he drives about: the solicitor does not charge<br />
for the clerks who do his writing: the barrister<br />
does not charge for his rent and his clerks; on<br />
the contrary, the charges of all these men are<br />
uniform, and on the same scale, whether there<br />
are few clerks or many. There cannot, in fact,<br />
be named any kind of trade or profession, except<br />
that of publishing, in which it is pretended that<br />
the shop or the office is charged for separately.<br />
That there must be a first charge on the shop-<br />
keeper's returns for rent and servants is obvious;<br />
and there must be a margin, otherwise the shop-<br />
keeper could not live.<br />
Some time ago an interesting interview with a<br />
publisher, already referred to in these columns,<br />
appeared in the New Budget. This publisher,<br />
speaking of a popular six shilling novel, lamented<br />
bitterly that the author got eighteenpence a copy,<br />
but that he himself, after deducting the cost of<br />
production, the advertisements, and his office<br />
eapenses, only made sevenpence a copy. Only<br />
sevenpence Poor man. It was a very popular<br />
book. It sold a great many thousands. If it<br />
sold 40,000 copies this publisher received, there-<br />
fore, no more than £1 166 in three months for<br />
doing—what? We have seen above all that he<br />
did. His figures, besides, require auditing.<br />
Since, however, it is desired to decide upon a fair<br />
adjustment with the publisher, one which shall<br />
include office expenses and leave a proper margin,<br />
there are two or three other things necessary to<br />
be considered. Thus, we must ascertain what are<br />
office expenses, and what proportion they bear to<br />
each book. In order to do this it would be<br />
necessary to have access to the publisher's books<br />
—all his books—a thing not easy to get. Yet<br />
without these books it is impossible to arrive at<br />
any answer.<br />
The expenses include rent, taxes, readers, clerks,<br />
servants, fire and lighting, travellers, stationery,<br />
and all the ordinary expenses of an office. In the<br />
case of the new publisher, with his two rooms<br />
and his two boys and no traveller, these expenses<br />
are not, of course, considerable; a few hundreds<br />
a year would cover them.<br />
In the case of a great house they are,<br />
naturally, very large indeed. One is quite willing<br />
to admit the fact. The question is, first, how<br />
much are they, year by year, on an average as<br />
shown by the books P. Next, what are the average<br />
sales, year by year, of all the firm’s publications,<br />
as shown by the books?<br />
For instance, the publisher above referred to<br />
calculated the office expenses on each volume at<br />
something like 50l., i.e., the share of office expenses<br />
on that one successful book would be—putting the<br />
circulation at 40,000—3833 for three months<br />
If one book out of all those in his list cost £833<br />
for three months to distribute, how terrible must<br />
be his office expenses taken as a whole and divided<br />
among all the books The figures are the pub-<br />
lisher's own—not ours. But does this include<br />
the advertising P Yes: but the sum of £100,<br />
which is enormous, spent in advertising would<br />
not mean so much as three farthings a volume.<br />
However, let us take a more reasonable view of<br />
things. We will suppose that the sum of £3000<br />
covers all office expenses. There are houses<br />
where, no doubt, this sum would not nearly cover<br />
expenses; there are also smaller ones where this<br />
sum is not nearly reached. We may fairly con-<br />
sider that one volume may be taken with another.<br />
That is to say, there is as much trouble and work<br />
over the distribution of a half-crown volume as<br />
over a half-guinea, volume. So that if, for in-<br />
stance, the whole sales of the year amount to<br />
24O,OOO volumes, we have to divide the office<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#537) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
183<br />
expenses by this number of volumes in order to<br />
arrive at the share of each.<br />
Now £3000 divided by 240,000 gives the sum of<br />
3d. for each volume, i.e. if 3 s. 6d. be the trade price<br />
of the volume, 7 per cent. On the gross receipts<br />
will be wanted for office copies. But these figures<br />
are purely imaginary. Nor can any general<br />
percentage be arrived at, because the pro-<br />
portion must vary with the business done by any<br />
house.<br />
The next consideration is very important. It<br />
is this. If the office expenses of the publisher<br />
are to be charged, those of the author must<br />
also be charged as well. Now, the office expenses<br />
of the author are sometimes very heavy indeed.<br />
A case was recorded in these pages some time ago<br />
in which an author who wrote a small book for a<br />
sum of £1oo found it necessary to make three<br />
journeys at a cost of £35 in order to verify<br />
certain points. Were not these office expenses?<br />
Then there is the rent of his study; the payment<br />
of the typewriter; that of the occasional or regular<br />
shorthand writer; the cost of fire and lights; the<br />
share of servant’s work; paper; books bought<br />
—often an extremely heavy outlay; sometimes<br />
research and copying to be done and paid for.<br />
Are not those things as much office expenses as<br />
the publisher's office P Of course they are.<br />
Think what they mean. The rent of the study<br />
can hardly be placed at less than £30; the type-<br />
writer takes perhaps & IO; the shorthand writer<br />
may perhaps be had for part of the time at, say,<br />
IOS. a week, or say only £20 a year; books, paper,<br />
and other things easily rise into another £2O a<br />
year. His office expenses, therefore, amount to<br />
£8o a year, say £80 for the one book.<br />
We are sometimes told that office expenses<br />
mean Io per cent. of the gross receipts: we are<br />
not informed how that figure has been arrived at.<br />
Let it pass, however. Now, IO per cent. On a 6s.<br />
book means Io per cent. On 3.s. 6d., or 4+d. If a<br />
writer of whose book 3000 copies are sold received<br />
the same allowance he would still be a loser,<br />
because he would only receive £52 IOS. for his<br />
office expenses. In other words, if a writer is to<br />
receive Io per cent. on the returns for his office<br />
expenses, he must have a sale of 4600 before his<br />
office expenses for one year are paid.<br />
To sum up. First of all, a claim for office<br />
expenses is a new thing invented of late years.<br />
(2) The publisher's services, for which alone,<br />
in a book without risk, he can claim anything,<br />
mean the use of his office, which can no more<br />
be considered separately, in such a book as<br />
we are considering, than it is when dealing<br />
with a solicitor, a doctor, a barrister, a printer,<br />
a carrier, a rent collector, an agent, or one who<br />
does any kind of work for any other man. The<br />
WOL. VI.<br />
publisher and his office are one. (3) If the pub-<br />
lisher's office expenses are to be charged to his<br />
account separately, so must the author's. (4) The<br />
real office expenses, together with the average<br />
number of volumes sold, cannot be arrived at<br />
without examination of the books, and no charge<br />
can be allowed in any kind of account or bill<br />
which cannot be audited and verified.<br />
Two methods are possible. The first is for both<br />
author and publisher to take a percentage—the<br />
same—on the receipts, or on the cost of production,<br />
for office expenses, and then to proceed with the<br />
division. Of course this is the same thing as<br />
taking no notice of them—the old plan. The<br />
other method is for the author to have nothing to<br />
do with the publisher's office expenses at all, but<br />
to give him a royalty as remuneration for his<br />
services which shall include office expenses with<br />
a fair margin for himself.<br />
*-- ~ --"<br />
e- * *—s<br />
A HUNDRED YEARS AGO,<br />
HE following extract, taken from Knight's<br />
“Shadow of the Old Bookseller,” shows<br />
what was meant a hundred years ago by<br />
a profit-sharing agreement — two-thirds of the<br />
profits to go to the author and one-third to the<br />
publisher; the actual cost of production to be<br />
taken from the gross returns; the publisher's<br />
remuneration or share to include his services, i.e.,<br />
his office, clerks, and general machinery. What<br />
else, indeed, could the publisher of Gibbon’s<br />
“Decline and Fall ” do for the book P<br />
“State of the account of Mr. Gibbon’s “Roman Empire.”<br />
Third edition. Ist vol. No. IOOO. April 3°,1777.<br />
S.<br />
Printing 80 sheets at £1 6s. with notes at the<br />
bottom of the paper ...... ........... ........ I 17 o o<br />
180 reams of paper at 19s. ........................ I7 I O O<br />
Paid the corrector extra care ..................... 5 5 O<br />
Advertisements and incidental expenses ......... I6 I5 o<br />
3IO O O<br />
3 S. d.<br />
IOOO books at 16s. .................. 8OO o o<br />
Deduct as above ..................... 3IO O O<br />
Profits on the edition......... 490 O O<br />
Mr. Gibbon's two-thirds is ........................ 326 I3 4<br />
Messrs. Strahan and Cadell's........... * . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 6 8<br />
490 O O<br />
I should be unwilling to raise any invidious<br />
comparisons between the publishers of the<br />
eighteenth and those of the nineteenth century;<br />
but, if I am not mistaken, the ordinary profits<br />
would—say twenty-five years ago — have been<br />
taken upon a different principle, and the account<br />
X<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#538) ################################################<br />
<br />
184<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
would have assumed something like the follow-<br />
ing shape:<br />
Hypothetical account, wbom the half profit system, of a<br />
book which cost £31o.<br />
3 s. d.<br />
1000 at 16s. ............................................. 8oo o o<br />
Less IO per cent. for publisher ..................... 8o o o<br />
720 o o<br />
Deduct as above ............... 3IO O O<br />
4IO O O<br />
Half share to author ............... 2O5 O O<br />
Half share to publisher, with<br />
£80 commission .................. 205 o o'<br />
By “five and twenty years ago.” Knight<br />
clearly means his own time of writing, which was<br />
about thirty years ago, when cookery applied to<br />
publishers' accounts was already one of the Fine<br />
Arts. Let us give another hypothetical case<br />
showing a modern account not worse than has been<br />
found in certain cases brought to the Society<br />
within the last ten years. Of course the pro-<br />
cess of Cookery was not shown in the account<br />
rendered.<br />
True Cost. Charge.<br />
48 S. d. 48 S. d.<br />
Printing.............................. II 7 O O I28 I 4 O<br />
Paper................................. I71 o o 188 2 O<br />
Corrections ..................... ... .5 S O IO IO O<br />
Advertisements..................... 16 15 O Y<br />
Do. in publisher's own organ ... 33 5 o y so O O<br />
Postage, &c. ........................ 5 O O<br />
382 6 o<br />
Profit on editions .................. 3IQ 4 IO<br />
701 Io Io<br />
Receipts.<br />
IOOO books at 16s., 13 as 12 ... 738 9 o<br />
Less 5 per cent, for bad debts... 36 18 5<br />
7OI IO Io<br />
Half profit to author ................................. I59 I2 5<br />
39 to publisher.............................. } each.<br />
True profit to publisher, 22.41 18s. 5d. So that<br />
in a “half-profit” system the publisher would<br />
get by these figures 382 6s. more than his<br />
partner.<br />
THE RETURN OF MISS.<br />
CASE was tried before one of the City<br />
Courts last month, which presents a<br />
point of some interest. It has not been<br />
reported, so far as we know, in any paper, and<br />
the statement of the case as presented here is<br />
that of the plaintiff only. In the absence of<br />
documentary proofs, or a Press report, let it stand<br />
as a hypothetical case only. - – t<br />
The plaintiff stated that a certain editor of a<br />
weekly paper—not the proprietor—invited him to<br />
send in contributions, adding that he could not<br />
give him the order unconditionally, as he was not<br />
the proprietor, but stating that he would arrange<br />
for their acceptance. -<br />
The plaintiff thereupon sent in three separate<br />
contributions. The papers were sent in on<br />
July 8, Aug. 13, and Aug. 24. Then nothing<br />
more was heard about the contributions. The<br />
plaintiff called and wrote repeatedly. Nobody<br />
was ever at home, and no reply came to the letters.<br />
He sent in an account and asked for payment.<br />
No reply. He then brought an action for the<br />
amount. The defence was that the customary<br />
paragraph concerning MSS., which appears weekly<br />
in the paper, released the defendants from any<br />
liability. This was the paragraph:<br />
NOTICE TO CONTRIBUTORS.<br />
The editor will not guarantee the return of any MSS. sent<br />
in on approval, but he will use his best endeavours where<br />
stamps are forwarded for the purpose.<br />
The judge agreed with this view, but asked<br />
why the MS. was not returned in accordance<br />
with this paragraph. The defendants said that<br />
they had the MS. in the court. The judge ordered<br />
the MS. to be handed over and dismissed the<br />
Ca,Sé.<br />
The plaintiff, therefore, got his M.S. at the<br />
cost of IOS. and a wasted morning.<br />
The point to observe is that the editor, or<br />
proprietor, who inserts such a notice is clearly<br />
within his right, even when the MS. has been<br />
invited to be sent in on approval. The contri-<br />
butor who accepts such an invitation must protect<br />
himself, therefore, beforehand, by getting an<br />
assurance from the editor, in writing, that his<br />
MS. will be returned if it is not acceepted. Of<br />
course, the conduct of an editor who invites a<br />
contribution and then spitefully refuses to return<br />
it, under cover of such a “notice,” needs no<br />
comment.<br />
*– ~ -º<br />
g- - -<br />
NEW YORK LETTER,<br />
New York, Dec. 14, 1895.<br />
R. HALL CAINE will have reached your<br />
shores long before this letter leaves New<br />
York, and he will be able to report in<br />
person the success of his mission to Canada.<br />
The most of the authors and the publishers with<br />
whom I have chanced to talk about the new<br />
Canadian bill do not approve of it. They are in<br />
favour of leaving things as things are now. The<br />
authors for the most part care very little about<br />
the matter, for the Canadian market is not large,<br />
and it seems to prefer British books to American.<br />
The publishers feel very keenly on the subject, as<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#539) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
185<br />
they have reason to fear that the Canadian<br />
re-printer is already making arrangements to<br />
pour into the Western States, through the post-<br />
office, a mass of books copyright in the United<br />
States.<br />
One would think that the Canadians who do<br />
most of their trading with us would not be in<br />
favour of anything likely to tighten the restric-<br />
tions which already interfere with the liberty of<br />
commerce between the two countries. It must be<br />
remembered always that Canada, although the<br />
nearest neighbour of the United States, is not<br />
very friendly to us. This unfriendliness is due<br />
in part to an inheritance of hate brought into<br />
the Dominion by the exiled loyalists who had to<br />
leave the United States after the Revolutionary<br />
War. And the element in the Canadian people<br />
free from this unfriendliness, the element most in<br />
sympathy with the life and the ideals of the<br />
people of the United States, is not large, and is<br />
never likely to be, since the Canadian who likes<br />
the United States is prone to immigrate here. I<br />
heard the other day that there are now more<br />
native Canadians residing in the United States<br />
than there are native Canadians residing in<br />
Canada. The temptation must always be very<br />
great to the strong and the energetic to go to the<br />
place where they can better themselves, and there-<br />
fore to abandon a native land which is bleak, and<br />
infertile, and heavily in debt.<br />
But this has nothing to do with Mr. Hall<br />
Caine's experiences here, or with the pleasant im-<br />
pressions he left behind him. The Aldine Club,<br />
composed chiefly of members of the publishing<br />
trade, gave him a dinner. He spoke one evening<br />
last month before the Nineteenth Century Club<br />
on the “Moral Responsibility in the Novel and<br />
the Drama,” having a manuscript before him but<br />
using it only occasionally. He illuminated his<br />
discourse with two or three Manx anecdotes,<br />
capitally told; and he illustrated his assertion<br />
that this present century is far and away the most<br />
romantic and interesting of any yet known to<br />
mankind, by an American anecdote of a telegraph<br />
operator, narrated with knowledge and sympathy<br />
and point. Another British author, Mr. Gilbert<br />
Parker—if he is to be called a British author, in<br />
spite of the fact that he was born in Quebec, I<br />
believe—has been spending the autumn months<br />
in New York. He was married last week to a<br />
young lady of this city, Miss Wantine; and the<br />
happy couple propose settling in London next<br />
month, I understand. Yet a third British author<br />
is here, “John Oliver Hobbes,” and here I am<br />
even more in doubt as to the nationality since<br />
Mrs. Craigie was born in the United States, but<br />
brought up and married in England. Mrs.<br />
Craigie is being much entertained and frequently<br />
interviewed by all sorts of newspapers. She has<br />
arrived here in time to be present at the first<br />
performance of her little play, “Journeys End in<br />
Lovers Meeting,” by Miss Ellen Terry at Abbey's<br />
Theatre this week.<br />
The performances of Miss Terry and of Sir<br />
Henry Irving and of the London Lyceum Com-<br />
pany have been attended as faithfully as they<br />
always are here in New York. At the request of<br />
the Shakespeare Society of Columbia College,<br />
Sir Henry delivered a lecture on the “Character<br />
of Macbeth,” before some thousand or so of the<br />
officers and students of the University. It was a<br />
brilliant gathering which Sir Henry addressed in<br />
the lofty and beautiful library of Columbia, from<br />
which the tables had been removed, and on the<br />
bookcases of which many of the younger students<br />
had perched themselves picturesquely. And Sir<br />
Henry’s lecture was worthy of the occasion. Of<br />
course it was to some extent an explanation of<br />
that reading of the character which the actor<br />
follows in his own performances of Macbeth.<br />
The address was beautifully delivered and it was<br />
most cordially received.<br />
As I have seen more than one reference in the<br />
pages of the Author to the New York society<br />
called the “Uncut Leaves,” at the meetings of<br />
which authors read their imprinted writings to<br />
appreciative audiences, it may be of interest to<br />
record here that Mr. L. J. B. Lincoln, the origi-<br />
nator of the scheme, has issued his circular for<br />
the winter of 1895-6. Readings for the fifth<br />
season will be held at Sherry's Rooms on Satur-<br />
day evenings, Nov, 23, Dec. 2 I, Jan. 25, Feb. 29,<br />
March 28, and April 25. In response to many<br />
requests, an afternoon series will be held at<br />
Sherry's on Tuesdays, Dec. 17, Jan. 7, Feb. I I,<br />
March IO, April 7 and 28, at 3.30. At these<br />
meetings prominent actors, whose presence would<br />
be impossible at the evening meetings, will take<br />
part, as well as authors. The subscription for<br />
either the evening or afternoon course will be ten<br />
dollars, admitting two persons to each reading.<br />
For both courses the subscription will be seven-<br />
teen dollars for two persons. An initiation fee<br />
of five dollars will be required from new members<br />
for the evening readings. It is to be recorded<br />
that the authors who read are always well paid<br />
for this labour.<br />
The London Spectator not long ago, in noticing<br />
the fact that Macmillan and Co. had become the<br />
British agents of the Century Magazine, expressed<br />
the hope that they would soon abandon the so-<br />
called American spelling. Of course this was<br />
written in ignorance of the fact that the London<br />
agents of the Century, of Harper's Magazine,<br />
and of Scribner's Magazine have nothing what-<br />
ever to do with the management of authose<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#540) ################################################<br />
<br />
I86<br />
THE AUTHOI8.<br />
magazines; their sole function is to sell a certain<br />
number of copies consigned to them. These<br />
three magazines are edited here in New York and<br />
for American readers with but little thought for<br />
the British reader, since the circulation in Great<br />
Britain of any one of the three is probably not<br />
one-fifth of its total circulation. And the habit<br />
of advertising in magazines is not so far developed<br />
in Great Britain as it is in the United States;<br />
the Century and Harper's appear here frequently<br />
with more than one hundred pages of advertise-<br />
ments all carefully classified. Obviously it is<br />
on the American reader and on the American<br />
advertiser that the American magazine must<br />
rely; the circulation it may gain in England it is<br />
glad to have, for these sales in Tondon are so<br />
arranged as to be almost clear profit with little or<br />
no risk in most cases.<br />
So far from their being any probability that the<br />
American people as a whole will give up their<br />
simplifications of English orthography, any keen<br />
observer can see that the simplifying movement is<br />
steadily advancing. The latest symptom of this is<br />
the organisation of the “Orthografic Union,” the<br />
object of which is to secure the simplification of<br />
English orthography. The president of this new<br />
society is Mr. Benjamin E. Smith, the managing<br />
editor of the “Century Dictionary;” and among<br />
the vice-presidents are Francis J. Child, Professor<br />
of English in Harvard University; Thomas R.<br />
Tounsbury, Professor of English in Yale Univer-<br />
sity; Francis A. March, Professor of English in<br />
Lafayette College; Brander Matthews, Professor<br />
of Literature in Columbia College; William R.<br />
Harper, President of the University of Chicago;<br />
Alexander Melville Bell, Thomas Wentworth<br />
Higginson, William Dean Howells, Edward<br />
Eggleston, Andrew D. White, formerly President<br />
of Cornell University.<br />
The Orthografic Union has issued a circular<br />
calling for further advance in spelling reform.<br />
As this is a subject in which all authors are<br />
interested I append the modifications the society<br />
suggest :<br />
The Orthografic Union aims to organise effort for the<br />
adoption and persistent use of uniform improvements in<br />
English spelling. In the first series of improvements, con-<br />
sisting of the three classes given below, are introduced only<br />
such changes as there is reason to believe a considerable<br />
number of eminent authors, editors, and publishers are<br />
ready to unite in using.<br />
The first and second classes of improvements selected,<br />
and most of the words in the third class, have been recom-<br />
mended by the Philological Society of England, the<br />
American Philological Association, and the Modern Lan-<br />
guage Association of America, and are recognised in the<br />
columns of “A Standard Dictionary,” and in lists given<br />
in “The Century” and “Webster's International * dic-<br />
tionaries.<br />
The Orthografic Union recommends the following improve-<br />
ments for immediate use in books, journals, commercial and<br />
private correspondence, &c. :<br />
Class I. Final ed pronounced as t : after a short vowel or<br />
diphthong, spell simply t, and simplify preceding double<br />
consonants, as : blest, exprest, past, backt, lookt, wisht,<br />
slipt, patcht, toucht.<br />
Class 2. Silent final e : in words ending in -íde, -íle,<br />
-íne, -īte, mme, -tte, and -gue, omit the e and preceding<br />
silent letters, when the change will not suggest another<br />
quality for a preceding letter, as : chlorid, fertil,<br />
glycerin, definit, definitly, gram, program, quartet, catalog,<br />
dialog.<br />
Class 3. Special cases: (a) Miscellaneous words: spell<br />
according to the simpler forms given in the columns of<br />
“Webster's International,” “The Century,” “A Stan-<br />
dard,” or other good dictionary, as: ax, theater, mold,<br />
rime, maneuver, hemorrhage, esophagus; (b) Chemical<br />
terms: as recommended by the American Association for<br />
the Advancement of Science, and “A Standard Dic-<br />
tionary,” and as largely used in the text of “The Century<br />
Dictionary,” as : bromin, bromid, sulfur ; (c) Names of<br />
places and peoples: as recommended by the Royal Geo-<br />
graphical Society, or the United States Board of Geographic<br />
Names, and given in “The Century Cyclopedia of Names’<br />
and “A Standard Dictionary,” as: Bering, Korea, Fiji.<br />
X. Y. Z.<br />
*- - -º<br />
* w -<br />
NOTES FROM PARIS.<br />
TV.HE election of an Academician to fill the<br />
fauteuil vacated by the death of Alexandre<br />
Dumas will take place at the French<br />
Academy in May, when Pasteur's fauteuil will<br />
also be filled. At the next elections, which will be<br />
held directly after the reception of M. Jules Le-<br />
maître, the fauteuils of MM. de Lesseps and<br />
Camille Doucet will be balloted for. For the de<br />
Lesseps fauteuil there are now five candidates<br />
(not including Zola, the perpetual candidate).<br />
These are Francis Charmes, Desjardins, Barboux,<br />
Jean Aicard, and Anatole France. The fauteuil<br />
will go to one of the two last named. My opinion<br />
is that Anatole France will be elected. Camille<br />
Doucet's fauteuil will be filled either by Emile<br />
Deschanel or the Marquis Costa de Beauregard,<br />
One is inclined to think that the latter will be the<br />
successful candidate, as the Dukes (le parti des<br />
Ducs) will probably give the preference and their<br />
votes to the grand seigneur. The Marquis has<br />
also substantial claims as a man of letters, his<br />
“Un Homme d’Autrefois” having been “crowned.”<br />
by the French Academy. Deschanel, however,<br />
has a large following, and it is possible that the<br />
election will have to be postponed for want of an<br />
absolute majority. The most interesting election<br />
will be the one to fill the fauteuil Dumas, the<br />
candidates being Henri Becque, Jean Richepin,<br />
and, of course, Emile Zola. I should back Henri<br />
Becque, for his “Les Blasphèmes’ are against<br />
Richepin, and Zola has not, I think, any chance, in<br />
spite of the campaign in his favour in the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#541) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
187<br />
principal papers. I see that Daudet is mentioned<br />
as a candidate also. He has told me that he is<br />
no candidate, and that he never will be one, and I<br />
believe him.<br />
Whenever I am asked, as I often am, in Paris<br />
about les jeunes in English literature, I invari-<br />
ably tell my questioner that the author who,<br />
in my opinion, is most worthy of attention<br />
amongst the newer men is Morley Roberts.<br />
Roberts, I explain, has not so far attained the<br />
great popular success which should certainly be<br />
his, in consideration of his wide—almost universal<br />
—knowledge of the world and life, of men and<br />
places, his fine unique style, and a profundity of<br />
human sympathy which puts him on a level with<br />
men who on this score alone are eminently suc-<br />
cessful in the commercial sense of the word. I<br />
have recommended his “Question of Instinct” to<br />
the translators. It is a book which would be<br />
better understood—and therefore more appre-<br />
ciated—in Paris than in London, and I shall be<br />
curious to watch its reception. There are also<br />
many of his short stories which would be very<br />
popular in France. I do not think his “Western<br />
Avernus" would meet with much sympathy in<br />
Paris. “Qu'allait-il faire dans cette galère.”<br />
would be the general remark. The French do not<br />
travel, and do not believe in travelling stories.<br />
“A beau mentir,” &c. They do not sympathise<br />
with travellers' woes. “Let us have no meander-<br />
ing,” they say with the old lady in “David Copper-<br />
field.”<br />
I hear on very good authority that since the<br />
death of Victor Hugo the receipts from his works<br />
have totalled up to close upon seven and a half<br />
millions of francs (£30,000). I agree with the<br />
editor of La Plume that under these circum-<br />
stances it is rather strange that the £2OOO<br />
necessary to complete the sum required for his<br />
statue are not forthcoming.<br />
required, only £6000 have been collected during<br />
the ten years which have elapsed since his<br />
death.<br />
At a recent sitting of the Académie de<br />
Médecine, two doctors, MM. Cazal and Catrin,<br />
declared very emphatically that the risk of con-<br />
tagion by the use of books which have been in<br />
the hands of persons suffering from infectious<br />
diseases is a very great one, and they described a<br />
number of experiments by which they had estab-<br />
lished the truth of this statement. One is glad<br />
to hear that the risk is greatly enhanced in the<br />
case of those objectionable persons who moisten<br />
their fingers in order to turn over the leaves.<br />
They recommend that any book which may be<br />
suspected should be baked for disinfection in an<br />
oven. The best advice, Ithink, to give under these<br />
circumstances is never to borrow books, but for<br />
Of the £8000<br />
each man and woman to buy his or her own<br />
copy. Authors can only benefit by MM. Cazal<br />
and Catrin's communiqué to the Academy of<br />
Medicine.<br />
I heard a French man of letters express the<br />
opinion that much of the Anglophobia which has<br />
recently manifested itself in America may be the<br />
effect of the mass of Napoleonic literature, almost<br />
entirely of a pronounced Anglophobic nature,<br />
which has recently been circulated in the States.<br />
I should not be surprised to find that this opinion<br />
could be largely corroborated.<br />
The Figaro has resumed its weekly column of<br />
literary gossip, which is now published in the<br />
Wednesday issue. It is, however, no longer<br />
edited by M. Jules Huret, who has taken over the<br />
daily column of theatrical gossip, known as<br />
“Courrier des Théâtres.”<br />
The famous Journal des Débats no longer<br />
appears as a morning paper, the recently founded<br />
evening edition alone appearing. It is to be<br />
hoped that it may fill a real want in Paris—that<br />
of a good evening paper containing news. Such<br />
a paper does not exist in Paris at present. My<br />
opinion is that in the future it will be the evening<br />
paper which will have the largest chance of great<br />
success. In Paris most people get up late—at an<br />
hour when the morning papers are already out<br />
of date. The Débats continues to be the One<br />
paper to which one looks for sound and useful<br />
literary criticism.<br />
M. Jean Aicard’s translation of “Othello” has<br />
been received a l'unanimité by the Comité de<br />
Lecture of the Comédie Française, and the play<br />
will be eventually staged there. It has never been<br />
performed in its entirety, though portions of it<br />
have been played, with Mounet-Sully as Othello<br />
and Sarah Bernhardt as Desdemona.<br />
Sarah Bernhardt is making good progress with<br />
her Memoirs. She is said to be receiving the<br />
most brilliant offers from syndicates for their<br />
publication in serial form.<br />
Emile Zola's libretto for M. Bruneau's new<br />
opera “Messidor” is not, as has been stated, based<br />
on the author's novel “La Terre,” but is an<br />
entirely original work. M. Bruneau hopes to<br />
finish his music in time for the production of the<br />
opera, next autumn.<br />
M. Jean Ajalbert has discovered a new poet, a<br />
new Mistral—the Mistral of Auvergne. This is<br />
interesting, as Auvergne of all countries is the<br />
least likely nurse of any poetic child. The new<br />
Mistral, whose personality and work are attract-<br />
ing great attention in literary Paris at present, is<br />
a wine-seller, Arsène Vermenouze by name, who<br />
lives at Aurillac. His volume of poems, written<br />
in the ugly Auvergnat patois, which is familiar<br />
to Parisians as the language of the coal-men and<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#542) ################################################<br />
<br />
I 88<br />
THE AUTHOR,<br />
hawkers of roasted chestnuts in the capital, is<br />
called “Flour de Brousso’ (Gallicé, “Fleur de<br />
Bruyère”). Says Jean Ajalbert: “Lamartine wrote<br />
of Mistral that he had made of Provence a book.<br />
Toutes proportions gardées, Vermenouze has<br />
made of Auvergne a book also.” The question<br />
is, Was Auvergne worth making into a book P. It<br />
is a terribly ugly, uninteresting country. Apropos<br />
of the publication of a very interesting “History<br />
of the French Novel during the 19th Century "<br />
(“Le Roman en France pendant le XIX' Siècle,”<br />
par Eug. Gilbert) by Plon, it is to be noted<br />
that, with the exception of a few writers like<br />
Zola and Daudet, literary men in France are<br />
generally expressing the opinion that as a<br />
vehicle of thought the novel is quite “played<br />
out ’” — archiusé is the expression generally<br />
used. Quite so; and high time it is (pace<br />
Zola) that the novel with a purpose should<br />
be played out. Mr. Gilbert's book, by the<br />
way, merits attention by students of French<br />
literature. I should like to see it translated into<br />
French.<br />
I receive quite a number of letters with refer-<br />
ence to my remarks on the blackleg genus. I<br />
am glad to find that in more senses than one these<br />
remarks seemed to have touched the spot. I<br />
do not want, however, to say anything more on<br />
the subject. A country has only the literary<br />
blacklegs which it deserves, and, if English<br />
people like to tolerate these farceurs, tant pis<br />
pour eua.<br />
It is always interesting to hear what an author<br />
considers the best scene in his book, and accord-<br />
ingly I was interested to hear from Nordau that<br />
in his opinion the best touch in his “Comedy of<br />
Sentiment” was where the hero finds out that<br />
Paula, who has come to Dresden “to be sepa-<br />
rated from him again only by death,” as she<br />
says, had supplied herself with a return ticket,<br />
for use in case her blandishments proved<br />
unavailing. By the way, speaking of return<br />
tickets, I never take one without a shiver as<br />
I remember how Mme. Fenayron, conducting<br />
Aubert to the house at Pecq, took for herself<br />
a return ticket, but for the intended victim a<br />
single only. He was not to return, nor did<br />
he. This horrible detail was proved at the trial,<br />
and went far to establish the premeditation of<br />
the crime.<br />
R. H. SHERARD.<br />
- - -<br />
Fºx's rºse—<br />
NOTES AND NEWS,<br />
R. HALL CAINE has returned. It is<br />
premature to congratulate ourselves upon<br />
the success of his mission until the<br />
question has been brought before the Canadian<br />
Parliament and decided. But it is not premature<br />
to congratulate ourselves upon the masterly ability<br />
displayed by Mr. Hall Caine in the whole conduct<br />
of his negotiations. Any blunder might have<br />
been followed by consequences the most disastrous<br />
to literature. The Canadian susceptibilities have<br />
been respected: their claims have not been dis-<br />
puted: a way has been found: and the goodwill<br />
of Canada has been apparently secured. These<br />
are the services of Mr. Hall Caine. Let us hope<br />
that the welcome with which he is to be received<br />
will be worthy of the occasion.<br />
I wrote the above from the communications and<br />
letters which have appeared in the papers during<br />
the last three months. Since this paragraph was<br />
set up in type, I have had no opportunity of<br />
hearing from Mr. Hall Caine's own lips an<br />
account of the whole mission. It is a story<br />
which must be told by himself at his own time<br />
and in his own way. Meantime it may be per-<br />
mitted to say in this place that the words used<br />
above are not strong enough to express my own<br />
sense of his work. The difficulties which existed<br />
have not been understood here; the conflicting<br />
interests have not been studied. Not only the<br />
goodwill of the Canadians has been secured, but<br />
that of the Americans. Especially admirable<br />
has been the manner in which Mr. Hall Caine<br />
was received by the Canadians. Last, but not<br />
least, Mr. Chamberlain has addressed a letter to<br />
Mr. Caine, recognising amply the value of his<br />
services and the skill of his diplomacy.<br />
It is proposed that Mr. Hall Caine will address<br />
a general meeting of this Society some time this<br />
month. He remains in town for some weeks on<br />
business connected with his mission.<br />
It ought I think to be generally known that<br />
Mr. Hall Caine has most generously given to the<br />
Society three months and more of very hard and<br />
trying work; he has also given to the Society the<br />
whole of the expenses incurred in this long<br />
journey. With these munificent gifts in our<br />
mind we shall not be so ready to accuse men of<br />
letters as selfishly pursuing their own interests<br />
alone. Two objects were in view : the first was<br />
to save the American Copyright Act of 1891;<br />
the second was to show the world that men and<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#543) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 189<br />
women of letters have seriously united for the<br />
defence of their own affairs, and are competent to<br />
defend them. From my own point of view I do<br />
not know which is the more important of these<br />
two objects.<br />
It is now two or three months since I cut a<br />
paragraph out of a certain newspaper for com-<br />
ment in these pages. I put it aside, however, so<br />
that my remarks might not be taken either as an<br />
attack upon any publisher, or as an attack upon<br />
any author. Now that the subject has been<br />
partly forgotten, one may speak. Let us put the<br />
case in general terms. The paragraph made the<br />
following assertions:<br />
(I.) That should a successful author offer the<br />
administration of his property on the terms of a<br />
royalty of 2s. On a six-shilling book, it would be<br />
necessary for the publisher to sell 30,000 copies<br />
before getting any profit at all for himself.<br />
Now, the cost of such a book, including adver-<br />
tisements, does not, under ordinary circum-<br />
stances, amount to more than Is. The average<br />
price paid by the trade may be taken as 3s. 6d.-<br />
though it is really more. The profit to the pub-<br />
lisher therefore would be 6d. a volume; or, on<br />
3O,OOO copies, the profit would amount to £750.<br />
Does anybody in his senses believe that it would<br />
cost £750 to distribute, by the ordinary machinery,<br />
3O,OOO volumes and to collect the accounts P But<br />
just observe what a very simple little sum in<br />
arithmetic it requires to knock over this loose and<br />
misleading assertion.<br />
(2.) The paragraph says, further, that at all<br />
events the novelist in question “has not much<br />
to complain of in regard to the remuneration of<br />
novelists.” How much longer will it take to<br />
make people understand that literary property<br />
belongs to the creator, not to the middleman?<br />
A successful writer creates a property; it is his<br />
own property; he may sell it or do what he likes<br />
with it ; but it is his own property. In the case<br />
before us the writer says, “If you like to ad-<br />
minister my property for me on the terms of<br />
paying me 2s. for every volume you sell, you shall<br />
have it. If not, somebody else shall have it.<br />
But understand that it is my property. When<br />
I take that royalty I am taking my own property;<br />
I am not remunerated. I am receiving my rents,<br />
of which you are the steward.”<br />
Some day, I suppose, we shall get these<br />
simple and elementary facts recognised and acted<br />
upon.<br />
I am informed, by one who knows of one case<br />
at least, that an attempt is still being made to<br />
induce an author to sign contracts to publish with<br />
one firm only for a term of years. It is difficult to<br />
believe that anyone can be so incredibly foolish.<br />
What? In the face of all the dangers and the<br />
tricks exposed—of secret profits, of charges for<br />
advertisements got for nothing, of one-sided<br />
agreements, of broken agreements—a miserable<br />
author is to bind himself to the man who has the<br />
power to commit these acts P He is to give that<br />
man a free hand to do what he likes with his<br />
victim for a term of years. Was anything ever<br />
proposed more monstrous P Consider a parallel<br />
case: does the medical man dare to bind his<br />
patient to remain with him, whether he treats<br />
him skilfully or not ? Does the solicitor P Does<br />
any professional man P Nay—does any employer<br />
of labour make his hands bind themselves for a<br />
term of years ? But it is difficult to believe that<br />
any author can be so incredibly foolish after all<br />
the light that we have poured upon the methods<br />
of publishing. Perhaps, however, one way might<br />
be found out of such a contract.<br />
A second paper on the Literary Hack and his<br />
work has appeared in the Forum. It is extremely<br />
interesting, but I fail to see where the Literary<br />
Hack comes in. Does he exist in this country P<br />
If so, I do not know him. A Literary Hack—as I<br />
understand it—is a person who executes literary<br />
jobs of any kind without regard to his own<br />
convictions, if he has any ; or to his own<br />
fitness; or to his own special knowledge. He is<br />
a man who, being a Conservative, writes leaders<br />
for a Radical paper; or, being a Radical, writes<br />
leaders for a Conservative paper. He is a man<br />
who makes and compiles books to order on any<br />
subject, being equally ready to produce a<br />
dictionary of the English language, or an account<br />
of Polynesia. The bookmaker to order at so<br />
much the job is very nearly extinct. One hears<br />
of him from time to time, but he has grown<br />
very scarce. The old-fashioned hack, who wrote up<br />
a party to order, simply no longer exists. He is<br />
as dead as a door nail. The Conservatives can find<br />
plenty of Conservative papers; the Liberals can<br />
find plenty of Liberal papers; while there are<br />
hundreds of men who write for the newspapers<br />
on topics not connected with politics, so that they<br />
need not concern, themselves as to the opinions of<br />
the journals for which they write.<br />
A cutting from the British and Colonial<br />
Printer has been sent me. It contains an appeal<br />
based on practical figures for a shilling edition of<br />
a popular book. The writer argues that a<br />
shilling, not a sixpenny, edition is wanted at the<br />
present time. For sixpence we cannot get such a<br />
book as we should like to put upon our shelves;<br />
but a book can now be produced by the new pro-<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#544) ################################################<br />
<br />
190<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
cesses, well printed and well bound, at so small a<br />
price as to render a shilling quite a practicable<br />
price to put upon a volume. The writer supposes<br />
a book of 240 pages printed upon a “think-<br />
handling twopenny” paper. The cost would be,<br />
he says, as follows:<br />
Ioo,000 Edition. £<br />
Linotype composition at 2% per IOOO—say– 20<br />
Paper Ilb. per copy at 2d. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 850<br />
Machining and folding... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75<br />
Pulp corrugated cases ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I IO<br />
Making up and casing ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22O<br />
Incidentals...’................... 50<br />
31325<br />
Which comes to less than 3}d. a copy. In<br />
other words, if the retail price of the book be 8d.<br />
and the booksellers allow no discount, the value<br />
of the author's estate as represented in this book<br />
may be taken at 4:#d. a copy, out of which he will<br />
have to remunerate his publisher, if he have one.<br />
Or, to look at it another way, he must sell 40,000<br />
copies before he clears his expenses. The remain-<br />
ing 60,000 would be clear profit.<br />
But how to get at the people who are to<br />
buy books in this wholesale manner? How to<br />
persuade them, if they can be persuaded, to take<br />
a hundred thousand P. The present machinery<br />
is, as everybody can understand, antiquated<br />
and unequal to the task. The booksellers’ shops<br />
must add to their machinery the house-to-house<br />
retail vendor. This, in fact, is the only way of<br />
bringing books within the reach of the people.<br />
Shops cannot do it; advertisements cannot<br />
do it; the last thing in the paper read by the<br />
common people is the column of book adver-<br />
tisements; books must be brought to the very<br />
door. That this method will be adopted by the<br />
trade before very long it is not difficult to<br />
prophecy. The book-selling of the future will<br />
be largely carried on by the house-to-house<br />
vendor. One only hopes that those who take up<br />
this method will provide really good literature,<br />
such as our public libraries are now teaching the<br />
people to demand.<br />
The following magnificent offer was recently<br />
made by a firm of publishers of no small note.<br />
It illustrates the necessity of knowing above all<br />
things the cost of production.<br />
They offered to bring out the book at 3s. 6d.<br />
The first 500 copies were to go to the publisher.<br />
The author would then receive 5 per cent. royalty."<br />
After the first IOOO copies the author was to<br />
receive Io per cent. ; after that I 2% per cent.<br />
How does this work out P<br />
The first edition would be probably of 2000 at<br />
a cost of (say) 3IOO.<br />
of the Forties and the Fifties.<br />
Results of first edition of 2000 copies:—<br />
Sale of 2000 at Say 2s. ............... £2OO<br />
Cost IOO<br />
Profit ............ 3 Ioo<br />
Of which the author receives... 322 7s. 6d.<br />
And the publisher . . . . . . . . . . . 377 12s. 6d.<br />
If another edition of 2000 goes off the whole<br />
profit will be about £130, of which the publisher<br />
will take £86 5s. and the author £43 158.<br />
Did the publisher explain what proportion of<br />
profit he proposed to take P If so, he was within<br />
his rights. If he relied on the ignorance of the<br />
author, he was within his wrongs.<br />
The risk actually incurred was the difference<br />
between the first six months’ subscription and<br />
the cost of production, which would have to be<br />
paid six months after publication. In order to<br />
meet this bill there must be sold about a thousand<br />
copies. How great was that risk P Probably<br />
not much, since the book had been so well re-<br />
ported on by the reader as to be taken without<br />
hesitation.<br />
The death of George Augustus Sala has called<br />
forth a notice in every newspaper in this and<br />
perhaps in all other English-speaking countries.<br />
He had come to be regarded as the representative<br />
journalist. Certainly there was no one like him<br />
as a correspondent, or as a writer of those social<br />
articles in which he showed so marvellous a grasp<br />
of facts and such an endless command of anecdote.<br />
He was a member of the Society from the begin-<br />
ning, one of the honorary members who were<br />
elected at the outset as vice-presidents. He took<br />
no active part in our proceedings, but was present<br />
at one or two of our dinners. He delighted in<br />
the gathering together of men and women<br />
engaged in the literary life, but I think he never<br />
understood the serious side of the Society. He<br />
belonged to the old Bohemian school, with whom<br />
a publisher was regarded as the natural enemy,<br />
who would certainly screw the most work out of<br />
an author for the least pay, and whom it was<br />
laudable to scathe with epigrams. That there<br />
was any practical way of having one's property<br />
administered with equity, or that a writer's work<br />
was his property, never occurred to the Bohemian<br />
The school of<br />
which Sala was the last surviving representative<br />
has been well described by Vizetelly in his Recollec-<br />
tions. -<br />
The literary contest invented by the New<br />
Pork Herald has been decided. Prizes were<br />
offered for the best novels, the best “novelette,”<br />
the best short story, and the best epic poem.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#545) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE<br />
I9 I<br />
A UTH () I.<br />
There were sent in eleven hundred novels,<br />
a thousand novelettes, between two and three<br />
thousand short stories, and nearly a thou-<br />
sand poems—all epic P Imagine a thousand<br />
new epic poems all sprung upon a bewildered<br />
world at the same moment—a thousand Miltons,<br />
inglorious as yet, but not mute It is pleasing<br />
to note that the prizes, with one exception, were<br />
carried off by professional writers. The first<br />
prize for novels of £2000 fell to Julian Haw-<br />
thorn : the second, of £400, to the Rev. W. C.<br />
Blakeman, before this event unknown : the third,<br />
of £200, to Edith Carpenter, said to be known in<br />
America. For the novelette the only prize of<br />
£600 was awarded to Miss Molly Seawell, already<br />
well known : for the short story, the only prize of<br />
£4OO was given to Mr. Edgar Fawcett, also well<br />
known. The epic, or “Abraham Lincoln,” fell to<br />
an unknown pseudonym. WALTER BEs ANT.<br />
a-sº<br />
- * *-<br />
THE AUTHORS' JOURNAL,<br />
HE December number of the New York<br />
Authors’ Journal lies before me. The<br />
number contains two or three papers of<br />
advice to literary candidates—advice for the<br />
most part of the obvious kind—but then there<br />
are plenty of people who always want directions<br />
of the most obvious kind, so that it is not pro-<br />
bably advice thrown away. There is a full<br />
account of the literary competition invited and<br />
carried out by the New York Herald. A meet-<br />
ing of the Authors’ Guild is reported. They<br />
elected twenty-three members; they received a<br />
letter setting forth a “case” against certain<br />
publishers; and they ended the meeting with<br />
recitations and speeches. There is a paper on<br />
“Public, Taste in Literature,” and another by<br />
Mr. Hall Caine, probably the paper referred to in<br />
our New York Letter, on the “Moral Responsi-<br />
bility of Novelists.” There is a paper on the<br />
“Editor's Point of View”—very good; there is<br />
the complaint of the contributor that the editor<br />
will not explain why a paper is rejected. The<br />
Contributor never can understand that an editor<br />
simply has not the time to become a critic; he can<br />
only Say Yes or No. We have the same com-<br />
plaints here. There is an article on writing<br />
advertisements which in America has become one<br />
of the fine arts. There are notes and replies,<br />
and paragraphs and poetry. Altogether it is a<br />
pleasant and agreeable journal, useful to its<br />
readers. We might with advantage borrow some<br />
of its features.<br />
Its advertisement columns present one feature,<br />
at least, which is absent from ours. It is this:<br />
while it is everywhere and well known and<br />
notorious that the American editor is more pelted<br />
with MSS. than even the London editor, it seems<br />
to pay the American writer to advertise himself<br />
and to offer his work for sale. Here, it is true,<br />
we see occasionally an advertisement offering a<br />
novel for sale, but no one ever heard that any<br />
response was received. For instance, here are<br />
two or three advertisements cut out of two<br />
columns :<br />
EGIN 1896 with bright, confidential “Ed. Copy.” It<br />
pays. Politics to suit. Booklet and “points' sent<br />
editors and publishers only. G. T. HAMMOND, Newport,<br />
R. I.<br />
WRITE one act Curtain Raisers, between two thousand<br />
and three thousand words. Also short stories for<br />
children. Glad to receive orders. AMY D’ARCY WET-<br />
MORE, 859, Park Ave., Baltimore, Md.<br />
WRITE verse, humorous and sentimental. Would do<br />
Valentines or adv’g verse. Nothing makes so effective<br />
an ad. Also write short stories, sketches, &c. Would<br />
conduct a column of book and magazine reviews. Editors<br />
send me copies of papers containing your prize competition<br />
offers. BYRON HOWARD, Esperance, N. Y.<br />
TORIES for Little Boys and Girls. I write good stories<br />
for children. MSS. submitted on application. A. D. B.,<br />
Box 25, care AUTHORS’ Journ AL.<br />
These are practical and to the point. Yet one<br />
would rather not advertise one's own work or one’s<br />
own literary powers in a newspaper. The third<br />
advertisement, that of Mr. Byron Howard, makes<br />
one long to see more of his work, his sentimental<br />
verse, for example.<br />
sº- * *<br />
LITERATURE IN THE PERIODICALS,<br />
FREEDOM IN SPELLING. Leading article in Times for<br />
Dec. 17.<br />
MATTHEw ARNOLD. Right Hon. John Morley. Nine-<br />
teenth Centwry for December.<br />
THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS.<br />
teenth Centwry for December.<br />
THE LITERARY AGENT. Sir Walter Besant. Nineteenth,<br />
Centwry for December.<br />
Sir W. M. Conway. Nine-<br />
TJNTO THIS LAST. Frederic Harrison. Nineteenth<br />
Centwry for December. *<br />
GUSTAVE FLAUBERT. Ernest Newman. Fortnightly<br />
Review for December.<br />
LIVING CRITICS. III. : MR. LESLIE STEPHEN. J. Ash-<br />
croft Noble. Bookman for December.<br />
OLD EDINBURGH AND THE “EVERGREEN.” W. Brant-<br />
ford. Bookman for December.<br />
MR. WILLIAM MORRIS.<br />
December.<br />
PUBLISHERS AND THE ASSOCIATED BOOKSELLERS.<br />
Bookseller for December.<br />
MR. HALL CAINE. Interview on return from America.<br />
Daily Chronicle for Dec. 12.<br />
CoPYRIGHT IN CANADA AND MR. GOLDw IN SMITH.<br />
Letter by Sir Charles Tupper. Satwrday Review for Dec. 7.<br />
Interview. Bookselling for<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#546) ################################################<br />
<br />
I 92<br />
THE AUTII O/º.<br />
CoPYRIGHT AND THE IMPERIAL Constitution. Letter<br />
by Mr. Goldwin Smith. Times for Dec. 13.<br />
CANADA AND THE CoPYRIGHT. Draft of Bill. Letter<br />
by Mr. Hall Caine in Times for Dec. 7.<br />
THE CARLYLE CENTENARY. Frederic Harrison. Daily<br />
Chronicle for Dec. 7.<br />
A REMINISCENCE OF CARLYLE. (Interview in 1873).<br />
J. C. C. Saturday Review for Nov. 30. -<br />
HILL TOPPERY. Speaker for Nov. 30.<br />
p.": LATEST SCOTCH For AY. New York Nation for<br />
ec. 5.<br />
PRESENT-DAY SCOTTISH NovKLISTs.<br />
Weekly Swn for Dec. I.<br />
William Wallace.<br />
NOTABLE REVIEWs.<br />
Of “Matthew Arnold’s Letters.”<br />
Saturday Review for Dec. 7.<br />
Of Björnson's New Play, “Over AEvne.” Daily Chronicle<br />
for Dec. I I. -<br />
Professor Dowden.<br />
#: #: §: 3%<br />
Replies to Mr. Laurie's paper of the previous<br />
month are made separately in the December<br />
Nineteenth Century by Sir W. M. Conway and<br />
Sir Walter Besant. The Society of Authors<br />
exists and prospers because it supplies a demand<br />
and does work that needs to be done, says Sir<br />
Wm. Conway. The charge of its destroying the<br />
old friendship between authors and publishers he<br />
denies, because once the publication of a book is<br />
agreed upon author and publisher become part-<br />
ners. “The Society has merely enabled the<br />
author to negotiate this partnership with a full<br />
knowledge of what it is that is bargained for.”<br />
As to newly successful authors binding them-<br />
selves ahead to over production, they bind them-<br />
selves not with the Society, not with agents, but<br />
with publishers. The question of prices paid by<br />
publishers is one of ordinary bargain and economy.<br />
The other reply defends the literary agent.<br />
The Society, he says, found the facts and figures<br />
of publishing, but literary men have not the time<br />
and in few cases the business faculty for treating<br />
personally with publishers. Therefore the agent,<br />
with special knowledge, acts for them; and the<br />
ill-advised publisher who dares to protest against<br />
meeting him stands self-condemned, because his<br />
only reason must be the desire to overreach the<br />
author when the agent is not present to defend<br />
him. Further, the agent is required for looking<br />
after publication rights in the various countries,<br />
translation rights, and the rights of dramatisa-<br />
tion.<br />
Some interesting correspondence has been<br />
appearing in the Times on the subject of Spelling.<br />
Professor Earle and Dr. Abbott argue for greater<br />
freedom in the matter. Mr. Horace Hart, printer<br />
to the University of Oxford, and Mr. Randall, of<br />
the Association of Correctors of the Press, plead<br />
for uniformity, the former remarking upon the<br />
innumerable applications from printers at home<br />
and abroad for his set of rules recently drawn up<br />
for the spelling of doubtful words. “Language<br />
is a product of life,” writes Professor Earle,<br />
“and if not exactly a living thing it certainly<br />
shares the incidents of life. Of these incidents<br />
none is more pervading than abhorrence of<br />
fixity.” In its articles on the letters the Times<br />
says most people will be convinced of the reason-<br />
ableness of what may be called constitutional<br />
freedom in spelling, while in a private letter<br />
latitude is permissible without inconvenience.<br />
An author must be consistent in spelling if his<br />
pages are not to be unsightly and perplexing.<br />
The article thus concludes:—<br />
Woltaire, who derided the orthography of the French<br />
books of his time as ridiculous—adding that English<br />
orthography was still more absurd—described the ideal<br />
system when he said: “Writing is the painting of the<br />
voice ; the closer the resemblance the better the picture.”<br />
Unfortunately the perfect likeness is not attainable; and it<br />
is found more convenient to agree upon a conventional<br />
representation than to circulate a multitude of bad copies<br />
unlike each other.<br />
The Bookseller agrees that there can be no<br />
two opinions about the desirability of forming a<br />
Publishers’ Association, but is not satisfied with<br />
the non possumus attitude taken up at the<br />
publishers’ meeting towards the booksellers.<br />
Our contemporary thinks the “paramount neces-<br />
sity in these matters of a combined and consistent<br />
policy, such as exists in Germany, was not<br />
sufficiently recognised.”<br />
The Nation article deals with the “sudden and<br />
great popularity" of the Scotch story writers,<br />
finding the explanation merely in the love of<br />
constant change in the novel-consuming public.<br />
“We observe,” it says, “that the canniest of<br />
them are themselves persuaded that their day of<br />
grace may soon be written away, and are thriftily<br />
gathering together every available bit of plunder<br />
before being compelled to retire to their fast-<br />
nesses beyond the border.” Mr. Wallace's<br />
article, comparing Scotch novelists of the day,<br />
places Mrs. Oliphant first, though he would<br />
have done so more outright had she written<br />
but a fifth of what she has written and made<br />
that fifth perfect. Even as things are, he gives<br />
“Firsteen" first place among recent Scottish<br />
novels. -<br />
A statement made by the way in Mr. Morley's<br />
paper is worth noting in these days of biographies<br />
of everybody. “There are probably not six<br />
Englishmen over fifty now living,” he said,<br />
“whose lives need to be written, or should be<br />
written.” This relative to the prohibition of a<br />
biography by Arnold, who was not, says Mr.<br />
Morley, a great correspondent beyond his own<br />
family. He was one of the most occupied men<br />
of his time. “He was not the least of an egotist,<br />
in the common, ugly, and odious sense of that<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#547) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE<br />
I 93<br />
A UTHOI8.<br />
terrible word”; unselfish, he had not a spark of<br />
envy or jealousy, and he took the deepest and<br />
most active interest in the well-being of his<br />
country and countrymen.<br />
In a comprehensive paper on Flaubert, Mr.<br />
Ernest Newman says that with the knowledge of<br />
the nervous malady from which he suffered we<br />
have the key to his life and art. His philosophy<br />
was not pessimism or cynicism ; he keeps his<br />
characters and their motives in the ideal atmo-<br />
sphere of art, and never allows that personal note<br />
of contempt and bitterness to be heard that<br />
sounds so frequently in the work of Maupassant.<br />
As to his method:—<br />
Where a novelist keeps himself so sedulously in the back-<br />
ground as Flaubert does, it requires all the more assiduity<br />
on the part of the reader to combine the multiform portions<br />
of the picture. An imartistic novelist like George Eliot,<br />
who is continually obtruding herself among her characters,<br />
may annoy us by the obvious clumsiness of her method, but<br />
she at least saves every man the trouble of being his own<br />
artist.<br />
*-<br />
- * ~<br />
BOOK TALK.<br />
HE name of Mr. F. Marion Crawford’s latest<br />
novelty is “Taquisira.” It will appear<br />
serially in the Queen, beginning this<br />
month.<br />
The Hon. Frederick Moncrieff has written a<br />
Scottish romance of the time of James VI.,<br />
entitled “The X Jewel,” which Messrs. Black-<br />
wood and Sons will issue immediately.<br />
Mr. G. W. Appleton, author of “The Co-<br />
respondent,” has written another novel entitled<br />
“A Philanthropist at Bay,” which Messrs. Downey<br />
and Co. will publish.<br />
Miss Beatrice Harraden has gone back to<br />
California, and in the course of the year she<br />
will write a series of short stories of Califor-<br />
nian life. A novel from her on English topics<br />
will, however, appear earlier—probably in the<br />
Spring.<br />
Mr. A. H. Norway has written a “History of<br />
the Post-Office Packet Service, 1793-1815,” which<br />
Messrs. Macmillan will issue in a few days—a<br />
somewhat romantic subject, and one not much<br />
remembered about in these days. The post-office<br />
kept a fleet of fifty to sixty armed ships for a<br />
century and a half, the principal station being at<br />
Falmouth, where, from 1688 to 1823 there were<br />
packets solely under post-office control. Much<br />
stiff fighting was done by them too—in the<br />
three years 1812-15 no fewer than thirty-two<br />
actions with American privateers were engaged<br />
in by the Falmouth packets. Mr. Norway has<br />
had access to official records in preparing the<br />
work.<br />
A volume of reminiscences by Mr. Charles<br />
Bertram, prestidigitateur, will be published at an<br />
early date by Messrs. Swan Sonnenschein and<br />
Co., with illustrations by Mr. Phil May, Mr.<br />
Cour rold, and others. The title will be “Isn’t<br />
it Wonderful ? A History of Magic and<br />
Mystery.”<br />
Mr. Robert W. Chambers has written another<br />
story of Paris life, this time selecting the period<br />
a quarter of a century ago, when the city was in<br />
the hands of the Communists. The title is “The<br />
Red Republic,” and Messrs. Putnam's Sons will<br />
issue the work very soon.<br />
Mr. Egerton Clairmonte, husband of “George<br />
Egerton,” is the author of a volume which<br />
Mr. Fisher Unwin is about to publish, entitled<br />
“The Africander: a Plain Story of South<br />
Africa.”<br />
Louis Stevenson’s work “Fables' will be<br />
published on an early day by Messrs. Longmans,<br />
Green, and Co.<br />
A dictionary of the musical artists, authors,<br />
and composers of Great Britain and the Colonies<br />
is being prepared for issue to subscribers by Mr.<br />
J. D. Brown (Librarian, Clerkenwell Public<br />
Library) and Mr. Stephen S. Stratton, under<br />
the title “British Musical Biography.” Mr.<br />
Brown invites information as to any of the<br />
above professions likely to have escaped his<br />
notice, so that the work may be as complete as<br />
possible.<br />
The “Life and Letters of George John<br />
Romanes, M.A., LL.D.,” is in preparation by<br />
Mrs. Romanes for issue by Messrs. Longmans, ,<br />
but will not be ready for some time. There will<br />
be a portrait and other illustrations.<br />
Mr. T. L. Southgate read a paper before the<br />
Musical Association on the Ioth ult., on “The<br />
Treatment of Music by Novelists.” He gave<br />
instances from the works of many leading<br />
authors to show the ignorance they displayed of<br />
IllllS1C. -<br />
In a paragraph report of the lecture the Times<br />
said it lost much of the weight which might have<br />
been attached to it because nearly the whole of<br />
Mr. Southgate's examples were those in which<br />
ignorance played the chief part, while “there<br />
exist very many instances of equally great<br />
blunders perpetrated by professed musicians;”<br />
and, furthermore, “after all is said and and done,<br />
the errors of novelists in regard to music are<br />
perhaps not greater than those of musicians as a<br />
class with regard to other arts.”<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#548) ################################################<br />
<br />
194<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
Mr. Ernest A. Gardner, formerly Director of<br />
the British School of Archæology at Athens, is<br />
engaged on a two-volume “Handbook of Greek<br />
Sculpture,” in which he distinguishes the diffe-<br />
rent schools and periods, and selects typical<br />
examples to show the development of each. The<br />
first volume will appear this month, and the<br />
second some time later.<br />
Mr. Thomas March is writing a “History of<br />
the Paris Commune of 1871,” which Messrs.<br />
Swan Sonnenschein will issue this month, with<br />
two maps of the city at that period.<br />
Mr. Thomas MacKnight, an Irish editor, has<br />
prepared two volumes of reminiscences and ex-<br />
periences, which will be published under the title<br />
“Ulster As It Is,” by Messrs. Macmillan.<br />
Miss Kingsley, who made a daring and remark-<br />
able journey through West Africa, some months<br />
ago, has submitted her diaries to a London pub-<br />
lisher, and the work will probably be ready in the<br />
spring. It will be illustrated with the author's<br />
sketches and photographs.<br />
Mr. Standish O'Grady has written an Irish<br />
romance of the reign of Elizabeth, which is to be<br />
issued by Messrs. Downey, probably under the<br />
title “Ulrick Ready.” He will present the last<br />
stand of the Irish chieftans from the Irish point<br />
of view, in contradistinction to Froude's “Chiefs<br />
of Dunboy” from the British.<br />
Mr. Stead is launching a series of “Penny<br />
Novelists” on the same lines as his “Penny<br />
Poets,” which has proved a very popular<br />
enterprise. The idea of the novel series is to<br />
counteract or abolish the “penny dreadful”<br />
type of boys’ literature. A better beginning<br />
could not be made than with Mr. Rider Haggard’s<br />
* She.”<br />
The Commonwealth is a new monthly maga-<br />
zine, at threepence, edited by Canon Scott<br />
Holland. Messrs. Innes and Co. have transferred<br />
the Minster magazine to the Artistic Publishing<br />
Company, who are going to introduce new<br />
features into it.<br />
An adaptation of Mr. Anthony Hope's<br />
“Prisoner of Zenda,” which has successfully<br />
appeared in New York, will be produced at the<br />
St. James's Theatre early this year. Another<br />
dramatised adaptation to be given in London<br />
soon will be by Mr. Joseph Hatton, of his recent<br />
novel “When Greek Meets Greek.”<br />
The members of the Savage Club, men of<br />
letters and artists, are contributing to a volume<br />
of “Savage Club Papers,” to be issued in the<br />
spring, under the editorship of Mr. J. E. Muddock.<br />
Messrs. Hutchinson and Co. are the publishers.<br />
A Burns Exhibition of MS., pictures, and<br />
other relics, and also portraits and pictures of<br />
the people and places who figure in his works,<br />
will be held in Glasgow in celebration of the<br />
centenary of the poet's death. Lord Rosebery is<br />
hon. president of the Exhibition, and Sir James<br />
Bell (Lord Provost) president, while the other<br />
office-bearers and patrons include many of the<br />
foremost literary people of the day.<br />
Mr. James Baker will lecture at the Imperial<br />
Institute, on Feb. 3, on “Egypt of to-day; Her<br />
People and their Country.” He was up the Nile<br />
as special correspondent last winter, and will<br />
illustrate his lecture with over sixty photographs,<br />
taken by himself, of the natives and their religious<br />
ceremonies, &c. He takes the chair at the<br />
Author's Club, at the first dinner of the New<br />
Year, on Jan. 6.<br />
Mr. Horace Cox will publish early in January<br />
a new novel, in one volume, entitled “Hather-<br />
sage: A Tale of North Derbyshire,” by Charles<br />
Edmund Hall, author of “An Ancient Ances-<br />
tor,” &c.<br />
Two new volumes of verse are announced for<br />
immediate publication by Mr. Elliot Stock, viz.,<br />
“Urania, and other Astronomical Poems,” by<br />
Samuel Jefferson,” and “Meetings and Partings,”<br />
by E. C. Ricketts.<br />
Mr. Gladstone is writing a series of articles for<br />
the North American Review on “The Future<br />
State and the Condition of Man In It,” the<br />
first appearing this month, also a series on<br />
Bishop Butler for Good Words, beginning in<br />
February.<br />
A Library Edition of Mr. George Meredith’s<br />
novels is being arranged for, its issue to begin,<br />
probably, in the summer.<br />
At a sale of rare books held by Messrs. Sotheby,<br />
Wilkinson, and Hodge, the “Album ” of Giacomo<br />
Lauri at Rome, 1608-29, continued and extended<br />
by Anne Le Febvre in 1687-88, and com-<br />
prising letters and signatures from many of<br />
the most eminent persons of the time, brought<br />
ten guineas; “Rime di Antichi Autori Toscani,”<br />
Venice, 1532, Lord Byron's copy, with his<br />
autography on the title and the date 1820,<br />
£6 Ios.; and a fine copy of the first edition of<br />
Chapman’s translation of Homer's Odyssey, 1614,<br />
3II IOS. -<br />
Mr. W. M. Noble has investigated the material<br />
concerning how the county of Huntingdon pre-<br />
pared to meet the 1588 invasion, and a volume by<br />
him on the subject will shortly be published by<br />
Mr. Elliot Stock under the title “Huntingdon-<br />
shire and the Spanish Armada.”<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#549) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
I95<br />
The most important books of December were<br />
the first volume of “Literary Anecdotes of the<br />
Nineteenth Century,” edited by Dr. Robertson<br />
Nicoll and Mr. Thomas J. Wise (Hodder and<br />
Stoughton); Mr. John Davidson’s second series<br />
of “Fleet-street Eclogues '' (John Lane); Dean<br />
Stanley’s “Letters and Verses,” edited by Mr.<br />
R. E. Prothero (John Murray); and “Ironclads<br />
In Action,” by H. W. Wilson (Sampson<br />
Low).<br />
In one of his letters Dean Stanley gives this<br />
impression of Renan, whom he met at Paris<br />
with Turgeniev : “He showed a curious mix-<br />
ture of interest and want of interest ; had<br />
not been to Damascus because there were<br />
no monuments there ; was disappointed in<br />
Jerusalem, because there were so few monu-<br />
ments; had made every effort, with special<br />
recommendations, to enter the mosque, but found<br />
it totally impracticable unless by storming the<br />
town.”<br />
In the list of articles quoted in “Literature<br />
and the Periodicals” of last month’s Author,<br />
a valuable paper by Miss Alice M. Christie<br />
on Sir Philip Sidney’s “Defence of Poetry”<br />
was omitted. It appeared in the October<br />
and the November numbers of the Monthly<br />
JPacket.<br />
Mrs. Marshall’s last historical story The<br />
Master of the Musicians, was published by<br />
Messrs. Seeley in November. The White King’s<br />
Daughter, by the same author, published by<br />
Messrs. Seeley in May, has reached its 30OO, and<br />
is included in the Tauchnitz edition, making the<br />
twentieth volume of Mrs. Marshall’s works<br />
which have appeared in that series. Many of<br />
Mrs. Marshall’s books are translated into<br />
German and French.<br />
Mrs. Rentoul Esler's new book, just issued by<br />
Messrs. Sampson Low, Marston, and Co., is<br />
entitled “Mid Green Pastures.” In an exhaus-<br />
tive and literary review of this book The<br />
National Observer says: “Of all living writers<br />
Mrs. Esler is probably the nearest we now have<br />
to the author of “Cranford.”<br />
Whatever else may go out of fashion, detective<br />
literature does not seem on the wane. According<br />
to a recent return of the output of vernacular<br />
literature in India several of the well-known Dick<br />
Donovan's volumes have been translated for the<br />
benefit of “Tamil-speaking Christians.” The<br />
detective story seems to be as popular in India<br />
as it is in this country; but we believe that Mr.<br />
Donovan is the first author of this class of litera-<br />
ture who has ever had the honour of being trans-<br />
lated into Tamil.<br />
Messrs. Hutchinson and Co. have just issued<br />
Dick Donovan's entertaining romance of “Eugene<br />
Vidocq.” The story deals with the life and adven-<br />
tures of that extraordinary character, who was<br />
in turn soldier, thief, spy, detective, and lecturer.<br />
Reviewing the book the other day the Glasgow<br />
Herald said: “None of Dick Donovan’s rivals<br />
in this class of literature have yet outstripped<br />
him.”<br />
Early in January Chatto and Windus will<br />
issue yet another Dick Donovan volume entitled<br />
“The Mystery of Jamaica Terrace.”<br />
* * *<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
I.—NOTES AND Common-PLACE Books.<br />
& & O One except students ever did make<br />
notes or keep common-place books, and<br />
these do so still.” True, yet your<br />
paragraph shows that your own “common-place<br />
book” is not a book at all, and how can it<br />
be in these days P. To get the book and turn<br />
the pages requires too much time. And then<br />
the A pages, the M’s, the S's get filled up<br />
too soon, while O and K are still nearly empty.<br />
Besides there are so many newspaper cuttings<br />
in these days. So for notes we catch up the<br />
nearest half-sheet of paper, and for the disposal<br />
of notes and cuttings we devise a suitable recep-<br />
tacle. Your own plan is a good one, loose sheets<br />
of paper put into brown paper envelopes. Mine<br />
is different and may be useful as an alternative.<br />
At a shopfitter's I bought a frame of boxes such<br />
as is used by grocers for their teas or iron-<br />
mongers for brass nails and tin tacks. * With five<br />
rows and six in a row, it is convenient to make<br />
the vowels lead the files, and then everything is<br />
easily found. Four boxes are still available for<br />
special notes. The compositor's arrangement<br />
would not do for the student, and I think the<br />
plan below is even better that that of the poste<br />
Testante.<br />
<br />
|A | p q ºd<br />
E | F | g | H TT<br />
I || | | K-Ti, TM Nº<br />
O | P | Q || R. S T<br />
U | V | W X | Y Z<br />
GEO. ST. CLAIR.<br />
Cardiff, Dec. 11, 1895.<br />
• - - - -º-º-º-º- .<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#550) ################################################<br />
<br />
196<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
II.-PROVISIONAL CoPYRIGHT REGISTRATION.<br />
The idea contained in this letter is due to the<br />
suggestion of Mr. George Haven Putnam, men-<br />
tioned in the article “The Working of the Copy-<br />
right Law,” on p. 6 of the Author of June, 1894.<br />
Mr. Putnam's suggestion is to the effect that the<br />
title of a work may be registered, and copyright<br />
in it be thereby acquired for a period of six<br />
months from the date of registration ; and that,<br />
if by or before the expiration of that period,<br />
the work be completed, copyright for it shall<br />
date from the day on which the title was regis-<br />
tered.<br />
This is an excellent suggestion, and one with<br />
which I entirely agree. It is the equivalent in<br />
the literary sphere to provisional protection for<br />
an invention or discovery under the patent law.<br />
In that, by filing a provisional specification<br />
describing the invention in general terms, and<br />
then, within a limited time thereafter, filing a<br />
complete specification describing it in detail, the<br />
patent is obtained from the date of the provisional<br />
specification.<br />
My proposal is to draw this parallel still closer,<br />
and to extend this proposed provisional protection<br />
to something more than the title. However useful<br />
and valuable a title may be, it is useless without<br />
the work, and one may protect the former by the<br />
simple process of not communicating it to any<br />
one. My proposal deals with a more practical<br />
question of publishing, where, besides the title,<br />
the style and arrangement of the work is fixed<br />
upon; where, by the mature of the case, one is<br />
bound to disclose them; and where, therefore,<br />
one cannot protect them by the simple process of<br />
silence.<br />
In the case of the proposed publication of some<br />
periodical which, though printed matter, cannot<br />
truly be classed as literature, a work in which<br />
composition does not enter into the question—as,<br />
for instance, a time-table or other work of refer-<br />
ence, in which the arrangement is the most im-<br />
portant point, more important even than the title.<br />
In such a case, where the outlay of capital has<br />
to be considered, it may be desired to ascertain,<br />
before going to much expense, what prospect<br />
there is of the venture’s meeting with success ;<br />
and, therefore, it may be necessary to issue, Con-<br />
siderably in advance of the first serial number of<br />
the proposed publication, a specimen number<br />
thereof, with a view to ascertaining what support<br />
can be obtained for it.<br />
The arrangement and design of such a work<br />
cannot be protected under the Patents, Designs,<br />
and Trade Marks Act, and, though one might<br />
register it under the existing Copyright Law, one<br />
would have secured copyright only for the speci-<br />
men number, and not either for the title or<br />
arrangement of the actual publication at all.<br />
That comes because, under the existing law,<br />
registration at the Copyright Office affords no<br />
protection until the actual work is published. In<br />
such a case as this, the contents of the specimen<br />
would be bound to be old or fictitious, as it would<br />
be impossible to insert the matter that number one<br />
of the proposed publication would contain, for the<br />
simple reason that it would not be ascertainable<br />
so long in advance, besides which there is no copy-<br />
right in it.<br />
This, then, is what might happen under the<br />
existing law, that, as copyrighting the specimen<br />
afforded no protection to the actual work, anyone<br />
else (perhaps more favourably placed) having<br />
seen the specimen, might arrange to issue No. 1<br />
of such a publication before the date announced<br />
by the person issuing the former ; and there<br />
would be nothing whatever to prevent his adopt-<br />
ing the title and arrangement, and securing<br />
copyright for them both to the exclusion of the<br />
person with whom they originated.<br />
What I propose is, that there should be pro-<br />
visional protection for such a specimen number,<br />
Securing copyright in the title and arrangement,<br />
for a period of, say six or twelve months from the<br />
date of registration ; and that, if No. 1 of the<br />
actual publication be not issued before or by the<br />
expiration of that time anyone else should be at<br />
liberty to make use of either or both of the ideas,<br />
but no one be able to obtain copyright in either<br />
of them. It would not be necessary, as with<br />
provisionally protected inventions, to demand a.<br />
second fee, as no second description would be<br />
filed.<br />
It is suggested in Lord Monkswell's Bill that<br />
the Copyright Registration Office might be com-<br />
bined with the Registry of Designs and Trade<br />
Marks; as designs and trade marks are under<br />
the same administration as patents for inventions,<br />
perhaps they may all, eventually, come under the<br />
same control, and, as each deals but with a<br />
different way of expressing ideas, there is nothing<br />
unreasonable in this.<br />
It is stated at the end of the article above re-<br />
ferred to that provisional protection of a title is<br />
provided for in this Bill. I have read it through<br />
carefully, and, having failed to find any reference<br />
to it, shall be glad to be informed which clause<br />
covers that point. This seems to me to be the<br />
the only omission from an otherwise perfect Bill.<br />
HUBERT HAEs. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/285/1896-01-01-The-Author-6-8.pdf | publications, The Author |