Omeka IDOmeka URLTitleSubjectDescriptionCreatorSourcePublisherDateContributorRightsRelationFormatLanguageTypeIdentifierCoveragePublisher(s)Original FormatOxford Dictionary of National Biography EntryPagesParticipantsPen NamePhysical DimensionsPosition End DatePosition Start DatePosition(s)Publication FrequencyOccupationSexSociety Membership End DateSociety Membership Start DateStart DateSub-Committee End DateSub-Committee Start DateTextToURLVolumeDeathBiographyBirthCommittee End DateCommittee of Management End DateCommittee of Management Start DateCommittee Start DateCommittee(s)Council End DateCouncil Start DateDateBibliographyEnd DateEvent TypeFromImage SourceInteractive TimelineIssueLocationMembersNgram DateNgram TextFilesTags
249https://historysoa.com/items/show/249The Author, Vol. 01 Issue 11 (March 1891)<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+01+Issue+11+%28March+1891%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 01 Issue 11 (March 1891)</a><a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031017927&amp;view=1up&amp;seq=20" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031017927</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a>1891-03-16-The-Author-1-11281–308<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1">1</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1891-03-16">1891-03-16</a>1118910316Vol. 1.- No. 11]<br /> MARCH 16, 1891.<br /> [Price, Sixpence.<br /> The Author.<br /> THE ORGAN OF THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS<br /> :: .. (INCORPORATED).<br /> CONDUCTED BY<br /> WALTER. BESANT.<br /> Published for the Society Bë<br /> ALEXANDER P. WATT, 2, PATERNOSTER SQUARE,<br /> LONDON, E.C.<br /> 1891.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 280 (#336) ############################################<br /> <br /> ii.<br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> Messrs. METHUEN&#039;S NEW BOOKS.<br /> | METHUEN&#039;S NOYEL SERIES.<br /> 55.<br /> English Leaders of Religion.<br /> Side By S. BARING GOULD.<br /> URITH : A Story of Dartmoor, By S. BARING GOULD,<br /> Author of &quot;Mehalah,&quot; &quot;Arminell,&quot; &amp;c. 3 vols.<br /> (Ready.<br /> Three Shillings and Sixpence.<br /> By HANNAH LYNCH.<br /> Messrs. METHUEN will issue from time to time a Series<br /> PRINCE OF THE GLADES. By HANNAH LYNCH, of copyright Novels, by well-known Authors, handsomely<br /> 2 vols.<br /> (Ready. bound, at the above popular price. The first voluntes (now<br /> GEORGE MEREDITH. A Study. Crown 8vo. (May. ready) are :<br /> By W. CLARK RUSSELL.<br /> F. MABEL ROBINSON.<br /> A MARRIAGE AT SEA. By W. CLARK RUSSELL,<br /> 1. THE PLAN OF CAMPAIGN.<br /> Author of &quot;The Wreck of the Grosvenor,&quot; &amp;c. 2 vols.<br /> (Ready, S. BARING GOULD. Author of “Mehalah,” Soc.<br /> THE LIFE OF ADMIRAL LORD COLLINGWOOD. . 2. JACQUETTA.<br /> By W. CLARK RUSSELL, Author of &quot;The Wreck of the Grosvenor.&quot; Mrs. LEITH ADAMS (MRS. DE COURCY LAFFAN).<br /> With Ilustrations by F. BRANGWYN. 8vo.<br /> (Ready.<br /> 3. MY LAND OF BEULAH.<br /> By W. H. POLLOCK..<br /> G. MANVILLE FENN. -<br /> FERDINAND&#039;S DEVICE. By WALTER HERRIES<br /> POLLOCK. Post 8vo. 1S.<br /> 4. ELI&#039;S CHILDREN.<br /> - (April<br /> By R. PRYCE. .<br /> S. BARING GOULD. Author of &quot; Mehalah,&quot; GoC.<br /> THE QUIET MRS. FLEMING. By RICHARD PRYCE.<br /> 5. ARMINELL: A Social Romance.<br /> Crown 8vo. 3. 6d.<br /> . (Ready. EDNA LYALL. Author of &quot; Donovan,&quot; Sr.<br /> By J. B, BURNE, M.A..<br /> 6. DERRICK VAUGHÁN, NOVELIST.<br /> PARSON AND PEASANT : Chapters of their Natural<br /> With portrait of Author.<br /> History. By J. B. BURNE, M.A., Rector of Wasing. Crown 8vo. F. MABEL ROBINSON.<br /> . [Ready.<br /> By E. LYNN LINTON.<br /> 7. DISENCHANTMENT.<br /> THE TRUE HISTORY OF JOSHUA DAVIDSON,<br /> Other Volumes will be announced in due course.<br /> Christian and Communist. By E. Lynn LINTON. Tenth and<br /> Cheaper Edition. Post 8vo. 15.<br /> (Ready.<br /> Works by S. BARING GOULD,<br /> Author of “Mehalah,&quot; &amp;c.<br /> Edited by A. M. M. STEDMAN, M.A.<br /> OLD COUNTRY LIFE. By S. BARING GOULD. With<br /> Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.<br /> Sixty-seven Illustrations by W. PARKINSON, F. D. BEDFORD, and<br /> . F. MASEY. Large Crown 8vo, cloth super extra, top edge gilt,<br /> A series of short biographies, free from party bias, of the<br /> 1os. 6d. Second Edition.<br /> most prominent leaders of religious life and thought in this<br /> &quot;Old Country Life, as healthy wholesome reading, full of breezy and the last century.<br /> life and movement, full of quaint stories vigorously told, will not be<br /> excelled by any book to be published throughout the year. Sound,<br /> CARDINAL NEWMAN. R. H. Hutton. (Reair.<br /> hearty and English to the core.&quot;-World.<br /> JOHN WESLEY. J. H. Overion,<br /> (Ready<br /> HISTORIC ODDITIES AND STRANGE EVENTS.<br /> By S. BARING Govlp. FIRST SEries. Demy Svo, ios, 6d.<br /> Second Edition.<br /> &quot;A collection of exciting and entertaining chapters. The whole<br /> volume is delightful reading.&quot; -Times.<br /> Crown 8vo. 28. 6d.<br /> SECOND SERIES.<br /> Under the above title Messrs. METHU EN have commenced<br /> HISTORIC ODDITIES AND STRANGE EVENTS. the publication of a series of books on historical, literary,<br /> SECOND SERIES. By S. BARING GOULD, Author of “Mehalah.&quot; ] and economic subjects, suitable for extension students and<br /> Demy 8vo. Tos, 6d.<br /> (Ready.<br /> “A fascinating book.&quot;- Leeds Mercury.<br /> home-reading circles.<br /> SONGS OF THE WEST : Traditional Ballads and Songs<br /> THE INDÚSTRIAL HISTORY OF ENGLAND.&#039; By<br /> of the West of England, with their Traditional Melodies. Collected<br /> H. DE B. GIBBINS, M.A., late Scholar of Wadham College, Oxon.,<br /> Cobden Prizeman. With Maps and Plans.<br /> (Ready.<br /> by S. BARING GOULD, M.A., and H. FLEETWOOD SHEPPARD, M.A.<br /> Arranged for Voice and Piano. in 4 Parts (containing 25 Songs<br /> LA HISTORY OF ENGLISH POLITICAL ECONOMY.<br /> each), 3s, each nett. Part I., Third Edition Part II., Second<br /> By L. L. PRICE, M.A., Fellow of Oriel College, Oxon., Extension<br /> Edition. Part III., ready. Part IV., in preparation.<br /> • Lecturer in Political Econoiny.<br /> (Ready.<br /> &quot;A rich and varied collection of humour, pathos, grace, and poetic<br /> | VICTORIAN POETS. By A. SHARP. (Nearly Keady.<br /> fancy.&quot;-Satunlay Review.<br /> PROBLEMS OF POVERTY: An Inquiry into the<br /> YORKSHIRE ODDITIES AND STRANGE EVENTS. Industrial Conditions of the Poor. By J. A. HOBSON, M.A., late<br /> By S. BARING GOULD. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo, 6s.<br /> Scholar of Lincoln College, Oxon., U. E. Lecturer in Economies.<br /> [Now Ready.<br /> (Ready.<br /> | THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. By J. E. Symes, M.A.,<br /> TWO BOUK&#039;S FOR BOYS. Cr. 8vo.<br /> Principal of University College, Nottingham. (Nearly Ready.<br /> MASTER ROCKAFELLAR&#039;S VOYAGE. By W.<br /> Clark Russell, Author of “The Wreck of the Grosvenor,&quot; &amp;c.<br /> Tilustrated by GORDON BROWNE.<br /> SYD BELTON; or, The Boy who would not go to Sea. 1. A series of volumes upon the most important topics of social,<br /> · By G. MANVILLE FENN, Author of “In the King&#039;s Namne,&quot; &amp;c. economic, and industrial interest-written by the highest<br /> Illustrated by GORDON BROWNE. .<br /> TWO BOOKS FOR GIRLS.<br /> authorities on the various subjects. The first two volumes<br /> Cr. 8vo. 35. 6d. will be<br /> DUMPS. By Mrs. Parr, Author of &quot;Adam and Eve,&quot; TRADES UNIONISM-New and Old. By G. Howell.,<br /> “ Dorothy Fox,&quot; &amp;c. Illustrated by W. PARKINSON.<br /> M.P.<br /> (Ready.<br /> A GIRL OF THE PEOPLE. By L. T. MEADE, Author POVERTY AND PAUPERISM. By Rev. L. R. PHELPS.<br /> of “Scamp and I,&quot; &amp;c. Illustrated by R. BARNES.<br /> M.A., Fellow of Oriel College, Oxon.<br /> (4 pril.<br /> <br /> UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERIES.<br /> <br /> SOCIAL QUESTIONS OF TO-DAY.<br /> METHUEN &amp; Co., 18, Bury Street, W.C.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 280 (#337) ############################################<br /> <br /> AD VER TISEMENTS.<br /> Zhc Society of Butbors (Jncorporateb).<br /> PRESIDENT.<br /> The Right Hon. the LORD TENNYSON, D.C.L.<br /> COUNCIL.<br /> Sir Edwin Arnold, K.C1.E.<br /> II. Rider Haggard.<br /> Alfred Austin.<br /> Thomas Hardy.<br /> A. W. k Beckett.<br /> Prof. E. Ray Lankester, F.R.S.<br /> Robert Bateman.<br /> J. M. Lely.<br /> Sir Henry Bergne, K.C.M.G.<br /> Rev. W. J. Loftie, F.S.A.<br /> Walter Besant.<br /> F. Max-Mullbr, LL.D.<br /> Augustine Birrell, M.P.<br /> George Meredith.<br /> R. D. Blackmore.<br /> Herman C. Merivale.<br /> Rev. Prof. Bonney, F.R.S.<br /> Rev. C. H. Middleton-Wake, F.LS.<br /> Lord Brabourne.<br /> J. C. Parkinson.<br /> James Bryce, M.P.<br /> The Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery.<br /> P. W. Clayden.<br /> Sir Frederick Pollock, Bart., LL.D.<br /> Edward Clodd.<br /> Walter Herries Pollock.<br /> W. Martin Conway.<br /> A. G. Ross.<br /> Marion Crawford.<br /> George Augustus Sala.<br /> Oswald Crawfurd, C.M.G.<br /> W. Baptiste Scoones.<br /> The Earl of Desart.<br /> G. R. Sims.<br /> A. W. Dubourg.<br /> J. J. Stevenson.<br /> John Eric Erichsen, F.R.S.<br /> Jas. Sully.<br /> Prof. Michael Foster, F.R.S.<br /> William Moy Thomas.<br /> Herbert Gardner, M.P.<br /> H. D. Traill, D.C.L.<br /> Richard Garnett, LL.D.<br /> Edmund Yates.<br /> Edmund Gosse.<br /> Hon. Counsel—E. M. Underdown, Q.C.<br /> COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT.<br /> Chairman—Walter Besant.<br /> Robert Bateman. i W. Martin Conway. I H. Rider Haggard. I Sir Frederick Pollock.<br /> A. W. a Beckett. | Edmund Gosse. | J. M. Lely. I A. G. Ross.<br /> Solicitors.<br /> Messrs. Field, Roscoe, &amp; Co., Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields.<br /> Secretary—S. Squire Sprigge.<br /> VOL. I.<br /> OFFICES.<br /> 4, Portugal Street, Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields, W.C.<br /> 2 A<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 280 (#338) ############################################<br /> <br /> AD VER TISEMENTS.<br /> <br /> The &quot;Swan&quot; is a beautiful Gold Pen joined to a rubber reservoir to hold any kind of ink, which it<br /> supplies to the writing point in a continuous flow. It will hold enough ink for two days&#039; constant work,<br /> or a week&#039;s ordinary writing, and can be refilled with as little trouble as to wind a watch. With the<br /> cover over the gold nib it is carried in the pocket like a pencil, to be used anywhere. A purchaser may<br /> try a pen a few days, and if by chance the writing point does not suit his hand, exchange it for another<br /> without charge, or his money returned if wanted.<br /> There are various points to select from, broad, medium, and fine, every handwriting can be suited, and<br /> the price of the entire instrument, with filler complete, post free, is only 10/6.<br /> <br /> The Gold Pens in the &quot; Swan &quot; are Mabie, Todd &amp; Co.&#039;s famous make; they are 14-carat tempered<br /> gold, very handsome, and positively unaffected by any kind of ink. They are pointed with selected<br /> polished iridium. The &quot;Encyclopaedia Britannica&quot; says—&quot;Iridium is a nearly white metal of high<br /> specific gravity, it is almost indestructible, and a beautifully polished surface can be gained upon it.&quot;<br /> They will not penetrate the paper, and writer&#039;s cramp is unknown among users of Gold Pens; one will<br /> outwear a gross of steel pens. They are a perfect revelation to those who know nothing about Gold<br /> Pens.<br /> Dr. Olives Wbsdell Holmes has used one of Mabie, Todd k Co.&#039;s Gold Pens since 1857, and is using the same<br /> one (his &quot; old friend &quot;) to-day.<br /> Sydney Grundy, Esq., says—&quot; It is a vast improvement on every Stylograph.&quot;<br /> Moberly Bell, Esq., Manager, The Times, says—&quot; One pen lasted me for six years.&quot;<br /> S. D. Waddy, Esq., Q.C., M.P., says—&quot; I have used them constantly for some years, and, as far as I can remember,<br /> have never failed me.&quot;<br /> Send Postal Card for Free Illustrated List (containing interesting Testimonials from<br /> the best people, who have used them for years) to<br /> MABIE, TODD I BARD, 93, CHEAPSIDE, LONDON.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 281 (#339) ############################################<br /> <br /> %\it JCtttljar.<br /> (The Organ oj the Incorporated Society of Authors, Monthly.)<br /> CONDUCTED BY WALTER BESANT.<br /> Vol. I.—No. ii.]<br /> MARCH 16, 1891.<br /> [Price Sixpence.<br /> CONTENTS.<br /> Conditions of Membership<br /> Warnings<br /> Notes and News<br /> A Note on the New Act<br /> In the I.ast Ditch<br /> Do English People Buy Books 1...<br /> Un Debut Dans La Vie<br /> The Signed Article<br /> In Grub Street ... t<br /> The Parnassus Publishing Company<br /> Correspondence and Cases<br /> The Production of Vouchers<br /> On Advertisements<br /> fAGE<br /> . 281<br /> . 281<br /> .. 38a<br /> . 286<br /> . 287<br /> . 288<br /> . 391<br /> • 293<br /> • 294<br /> .. 298<br /> • =99<br /> ■ 399<br /> . 300<br /> <br /> Correspondence and Cases—continued—<br /> Authors and Reviewers<br /> Accepted...<br /> Literary Godchildren<br /> Gratuitous Contributions<br /> A Coincidence?<br /> The Authors&#039; Club<br /> The Author&#039;s Book Stall<br /> New Books<br /> The Reading of MSS<br /> Publications of the Society<br /> Advertisements<br /> 300<br /> 301<br /> 301<br /> 301<br /> 303<br /> 303<br /> 303<br /> 304<br /> 3°6<br /> 306<br /> 307<br /> CONDITIONS OF MEMBERSHIP.<br /> The Subscription is One Guinea annually, payable on the<br /> 1st of January of each year. The sum of Ten Guineas for<br /> life memljership entitles the subscriber to full membership of<br /> the Society.<br /> Authors of published works alone are eligible for member-<br /> ship.<br /> Those who desire to assist the Society but are not authors<br /> are admitted as Associates, on the same subscription, but<br /> have no voice in the government of the Society.<br /> Cheques and Postal Oiders should be crossed &quot;The Im-<br /> perial Bank, Limited, Westminster Branch.&quot;<br /> Those who wish to be proposed as members may send<br /> their names at any lime to the Secretary at the Society&#039;s<br /> Offices, when they will receive a form for the enumeration<br /> of their works. Subscriptions entered after the 1st of<br /> October will cover the next year.<br /> The Secretary may be personally consulted between the<br /> hours of 1 p.m. and 5, except on Saturdays. It is preferable<br /> that an appointment should be made by letter.<br /> The Author, the Organ of the Society, can be procured<br /> through all newsagents, or from the publisher, A. P. Watt,<br /> 2, Paternoster Square, K.C.<br /> A copy will be sent free to any member of the Society for<br /> one twelvemonth, dating from May, 1889. It is hoped,<br /> however, that most members will subscribe to the paper.<br /> The yearly subscription is 6s. 6d., including postage, which<br /> may be sent to the Secretary, 4, Portugal Street, W.C.<br /> With regard to the reading of MSS. for young writers,<br /> the fee for this service is one guinea. MSS. will be read<br /> and reported upon for others than members, but members<br /> cannot have their works read for nothing.<br /> In all cases where an opinion is desired upon a manuscript,<br /> the author should send with it a table of contents. A type-<br /> written scenario is also of very great assistance.<br /> It must be understood that such a reader&#039;s report, however<br /> favourable, does not assist the author towards publication.<br /> WARNINGS.<br /> Readers of the Author are earnestly desired to make the<br /> following warnings as widely known as possible. They are<br /> based on the experience of six years&#039; work upon the dangers<br /> to which liteiary property is exposed :—<br /> (1) Never to sign any agreement of which the alleged cost<br /> of production forms an integral part, unless an<br /> opportunity of proving the correctness of the figures<br /> is given them.<br /> (2) Never to enter into any correspondence with publishers,<br /> especially with advertising publishers, who are not<br /> recommended by experienced friends, or by this<br /> Society.<br /> (3) Never, on any account whatever, to bind themselves<br /> down for future work to any one firm of publishers.<br /> (4) Never to accept any proposal of royalty without con-<br /> sultation with the Society, or, at least, ascertaining<br /> exactly what the agreement gives to the author and<br /> what to the publisher.<br /> (5) Never to accept any offer of money for MSS., with-<br /> out previously taking advice of the Society.<br /> (6) Never to accept any pecuniary risk or responsibility<br /> without advice.<br /> (7) Never, when a MS. has been refused by respectable<br /> houses, to pay others, whatever promises they may<br /> put forward, for the production of the work.<br /> (8) Never to sign away American or foreign rights.<br /> Keep them. Refuse to sign an agreement containing<br /> a clause which reserves them for the publisher. If<br /> the publisher insists, take away the MS. and offer it<br /> to another.<br /> (9) Never forget that publishing is a business, like any<br /> other business, totally unconnected with philanthropy,<br /> charity, or pure love of literature. You have to do<br /> with business men.<br /> Society&#039;s Offices:—<br /> 4, Portugal Street, Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields.<br /> vol. 1.<br /> 2 a 2<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 282 (#340) ############################################<br /> <br /> 282<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> NOTES AND NEWS.<br /> —4<br /> THE American Copyright Bill has passed,<br /> and unexpectedly. Thus ends, we hope,<br /> happily for all concerned, the long and<br /> bitter reproach of English authors and the hard<br /> battle of American authors. We shall no longer<br /> pirate and plunder and prey upon each other as<br /> the law permits. Now we begin to look round<br /> and to ask—what next? First, let us carefully<br /> consider the following question and answer found<br /> in the Parliamentary Debates on Saturday, March<br /> 7th.<br /> &quot;Mr. Vincent asked the following question :—<br /> Bearing in mind the renewed declaration of the<br /> Prime Minister, on March 4th, to the Associated<br /> Chambers of Commerce, that English remonstrance<br /> on foreign commercial policy prejudicial to British<br /> trade at home or abroad is wholly futile under the<br /> present fiscal system, as we have no means of sup-<br /> porting the remonstrance, or giving any advantage<br /> in return for favourable concessions, what definite<br /> domestic action, asdistinguished from remonstrance,<br /> with a foreign power Her Majesty&#039;s Government<br /> proposes to take to prevent injury being done to<br /> industry and labour in the United Kingdom, and<br /> the probable disemployment of many workpeople<br /> concerned in the book trade, to restrain the transfer<br /> to America of the productions of the works of<br /> British authors desirous of securing American copy-<br /> tight by the use in the United States of American<br /> type or plates, and simultaneously enjoying copy-<br /> right in Great Britain and Ireland.<br /> &quot;Mr. W. H. Smith.—We have no official know-<br /> ledge of the measure, and only know from the<br /> newspapers that it has been passed. It is quite<br /> impossible for me to express any opinion respecting<br /> its provisions until we see them. I do not know<br /> what changes may have been made in the Bill<br /> during its passage through Congress, and I am<br /> therefore quite unable to indicate what would be<br /> the policy or action of the Government with respect<br /> to it.&quot;<br /> 1<br /> Quite so. We do hot know exactly what changes<br /> have been made in the Bill during its passage<br /> through Congress. Therefore we must wait until<br /> we do know. Meantime we have telegraphed for<br /> a copy of the Act.<br /> A meeting of the Council was called on March<br /> 12th, to consider the situation as changed by the<br /> passing of the International Copyright Act. The<br /> chair was taken by Sir Frederick Pollock.<br /> The following Resolutions were proposed and<br /> adopted:—<br /> (1.) That at this stage of the long struggle for<br /> International Copyright carried on in America<br /> by the Copyright League and other citizens of<br /> the United States, to secure copyright to foreign<br /> authors in the States and td remove the long<br /> existing hindrance to the natural growth of<br /> American literature, the congratulations of the<br /> Society be, and hereby are, expressed by the<br /> Council now assembled.<br /> (2.) That the Secretary be instructed on the<br /> arrival of the Act, to have it printed and to send<br /> a copy to every member of the Society, inviting<br /> their advice, suggestions, or criticisms on the<br /> probable working of the Act.<br /> (3.) That the Copyright Committee be re-<br /> quested to receive these criticisms and to draw<br /> up a report on the subject.<br /> (4.) That authors be warned meanwhile not<br /> to sign any agreements giving up their American<br /> rights , and not to accept any offers whatever<br /> that may be made until the Act shall be in<br /> working order.<br /> (5.) That the Society without delay draw up<br /> a Petition to the House of Lords, urging the<br /> immediate consideration of Lord Monkswell&#039;s<br /> Bill.<br /> —*<br /> Here are a few points which may be of use to u&amp;<br /> They certainly will not be affected by any amend-<br /> ments that may have been carried.<br /> It will be news to many, as it was to me, to hear<br /> that in many cases it will be unnecessary to take<br /> out copyright, and that the practice will still con-<br /> tinue of sending over a whole edition in sheets and<br /> paying the duty, twenty-five per cent, on the cost<br /> of production. Take, for instance, a book which<br /> appeals to the scholarly and cultured class only,<br /> and therefore cannot possibly have a large sale.<br /> An edition of a thousand copies in sheets might<br /> Cost, say ;£ioo. The American publisher would<br /> pay .£125 for it. He would then produce it just<br /> as he does now, on the chance that no one else<br /> will pirate it. Why should they? It is too small<br /> a market to be interfered with. Or take a book<br /> with dainty and beautiful plates. This cannot be<br /> pirated because the plates cannot be cheaply and<br /> successfully imitated. It must be remembered<br /> that in considering whether it would pay to take<br /> out copyright, the cost of production in America<br /> is a much larger factor than it is in this country—<br /> wages are much higher, materials are higher. ♦—<br /> To those who expect a magnificent harvest<br /> immediately—a warning. Last month there was<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 283 (#341) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 283<br /> an attempt in the Author to show that America is<br /> taking rapid strides to the production of nearly all<br /> her own literature. Hitherto the great mass of her<br /> books have been of English origin. This is now<br /> true only of the ten cent novels. These, it is true,<br /> are English. But who can believe that the American<br /> will prefer to read of English manners and modes<br /> depicted in fiction, when he can get his own<br /> equally well presented and at the same price? At<br /> the same time, should there be any capable of really<br /> striking the popular imagination, he will do so in<br /> all the English-speaking countries alike. For him—-<br /> unless he gives himself away to the first offer—<br /> there is indeed hope. How many are there among<br /> the living who possess this power? In a few months<br /> we shall see.<br /> There is another point to be borne in mind.<br /> On this a word was said last month. The cheap<br /> libraries, even if they are not enlarged, will have<br /> another twenty years&#039; run at least. To compete<br /> with them is like competing with the works of the<br /> dead, which can be issued by anybody and at any<br /> price. But they will continue to be enlarged.<br /> They will say to the English writers who are not<br /> so much in demand in America as to call for a<br /> copyrighted edition, &quot;You will get nothing here<br /> except from us—we will give you twenty dollars<br /> for your rights.&quot; That offer will be accepted, and<br /> so the ten cent library will be continued. Again,<br /> even if a writer is popular, people will ask why they<br /> should give a dollar and a half for his new book<br /> when they can get all his old books at sixpence.<br /> The Anti-Jacobin suggests the danger that<br /> English writers may try to pander to American<br /> prejudices, manners, and custpms. I do not think<br /> this is a real danger, first, because no living<br /> English authors have ever remained long enough<br /> in the States to learn these prejudices. We know<br /> the American who travels on the Continent. We<br /> meet the American gentleman in society. But<br /> neither the rich American who can travel nor the<br /> American gentleman represents the great mass of<br /> the American people, who, again, differ widely<br /> among each other. There can be little resemblance<br /> between the prairie farmer and the New England<br /> lawyer—nor between the white folk of North<br /> Carolina and the trader of Chicago. Wp cannot<br /> pander to ordinary American prejudice, because we<br /> do not know anything about it.<br /> Lower down will be found a few notes on the<br /> practical working of the Bill which will not be<br /> affected by any amendments that may have been<br /> added. To these notes we add a very serious<br /> warning. Let the author be more than commonly<br /> careful in his agreements. He must reserve<br /> American rights by a special clause. He must<br /> take care not to accept the first offer that is made<br /> —men are already in the field trying to &quot;rush&quot;<br /> the British author, and, if he is wise, he will refuse<br /> to treat at all until he has seen how the new Act<br /> works.<br /> On the evening of the day when President<br /> Harrison signed the Bill, he received quite a little<br /> shower of letters and telegrams. They were lying<br /> on the Presidental pillow when, at midnight, he was<br /> about to climb into the gilded tour-poster assigned<br /> to the Chosen of the Caucus. One of them, from<br /> the shade of John Milton, began as follows:<br /> &quot;Grandson of my friend the Regicide,&quot; it said,<br /> &quot;I have witnessed with joy thine action of this<br /> day. Thy Republic at length proves itself a des-<br /> cendant of my own. Thou hast shaken off&quot; the<br /> Iniquity of a hundred years. Thou hast set free<br /> thine own people in doing justice to another nation.<br /> Lo! I see in my mind a noble and a puissant<br /> nation rousing herself like a strong man after sleep<br /> and shaking her invincible locks; a nation npt slow<br /> and dull, but of a quick, ingenious, and piercing<br /> spirit; acute to invent, subtile and sinewy to dis-<br /> course. I see her as an eagle mewing her mighty<br /> youth, and kindling her undazzled eyes at the ful)<br /> mid-day beam.&quot; The rest need riot be quoted.<br /> Another was from Charles Dickens. &quot;Fifty years<br /> ago,&quot; he said, &quot;I beat the air with my fists, fondly<br /> thinking that I was fighting an easy battle against<br /> ignorance and greed. &#039;For fifty years the best of<br /> your own people have been vainly, until now,<br /> fighting that easy battle. You have shared with<br /> us our noble inheritance, the literature of the past;<br /> but the baser sort among you have stolen the<br /> literature of the present. It was unworthy of a<br /> nation desirous to be thought great. The loss you<br /> have inflicted upon us is that of dollars only.<br /> Upon yourselves you have inflicted the starvation of<br /> your own literature. Henceforth, however, what is<br /> yours is ours, and what is ours is yours. Farewell.&quot;<br /> There were also telegrams from Charles Reade,<br /> Wilkie Collins, Thackeray, George Eliot, and<br /> others. They were the same in effect, though the<br /> words differed. &quot;We complain no longer,&quot; said<br /> Charles Reade. &quot;Earthly injustice affects us not.<br /> Its memory has no longer any sting. Yet we<br /> rejoice that we stood up for honour and equity<br /> while we lived. And for those who have followed<br /> us, we are glad that your people have at last chosen<br /> the better way.&quot; These are noticeable communi-<br /> cations, and I hear that they are to be preserved<br /> in the Washington Library.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 284 (#342) ############################################<br /> <br /> 284<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> I am very pleased to publish the following com-<br /> munication from Professor Middleton, of King&#039;s<br /> College, Cambridge :—<br /> &quot;After the many instructive warnings to authors<br /> which you have printed, with regard to what might<br /> politely be called the conventional morality of<br /> certain publishers, it may be a pleasure to turn to<br /> the other side of the picture, and receive a state-<br /> ment which will show that there are publishers in<br /> Britain whose practice is not only just in the<br /> highest sense of the word, but even goes beyond<br /> that, and amounts to real generosity.<br /> &quot;I had an agreement with a well-known firm that<br /> they would publish a book of mine, and pay me<br /> for it a certain sum of money down, as soon as the<br /> book was printed.<br /> &quot;This sum I received, expecting nothing further.<br /> &quot;Some time after, without any suggestion of<br /> mine, I was informed by my publishers that they<br /> proposed to give me half-profits in addition to the<br /> lump sum they had paid me for the copyright of<br /> my book—a quite voluntary piece of generosity cn<br /> their part. Since then I have received, as half-<br /> profits, a sum about equal to the original payment<br /> for which I had bargained.<br /> &quot;That is to say, that in consideration of<br /> my book being a success, the publishers have paid<br /> me nearly double of what they were bound to do.<br /> &quot;Though I have no authority to do so, it can, I<br /> hope, offend no one if I mention that the pub-<br /> lishers referred to are Messrs. A. and C. Black, of<br /> Edinburgh and Soho Square, London.&quot;<br /> This document should be read prayerfully by<br /> certain reverend and revered friends of ours.<br /> Religion, we know, is not a thing of works, which<br /> are rags. Yet the carnal man remarks with<br /> surprise that a thing like this is done by the<br /> secular, not the sacred, publisher. Messrs. A. and<br /> C. Black were influenced by that spirit of justice<br /> which goes beyond the letter of the agreement.<br /> Professor Middleton, having signed his agreement,<br /> had no further claim, made none, expected nothing<br /> more, and entertained no other feeling towards his<br /> publishers than that of friendly content. Yet they<br /> went beyond their agreement. One is willing to<br /> believe that other cases of the kind are not un-<br /> known, though they are certainly infrequent.<br /> Personally, I would prefer such a system of<br /> publishing as would allow both publisher and<br /> author to know beforehand in what proportion<br /> results would be apportioned, and such a system I<br /> hope that we shall arrive at Then indeed will come<br /> the Golden Age, and we may all crown ourselves<br /> with garlands, take down our harps and sing<br /> madrigals by purling brooks, authors and publishers<br /> together, while the world looks on envious and<br /> admiring.<br /> ♦<br /> There was held a dinner, the other day, of Pub-<br /> lishers and Booksellers. I hope that, before long,<br /> the other branch, perhaps the lower branch, of<br /> the Literary Profession—that of the Authors—<br /> may be admitted, as a branch, to this gathering.<br /> The chair was taken by Mr. John Murray, Junior.<br /> A person, whom I once believed to be a friend,<br /> brought me, the day after the dinner, a paper<br /> containing what purported to be an extract from<br /> his speech. I am a credulous creature, and I sent<br /> it to press. I have since discovered that I was<br /> the victim of a hoax. These words, in fact, did<br /> not form part of the speech. Nevertheless, as they<br /> seem to me brave and honest words, and such as one<br /> would expect from the heir apparent of the House<br /> of Murray, I prefer to believe that they were<br /> spoken. The following, then, is the forged docu-<br /> ment in question:—<br /> The Chairman then alluded—it does not appear<br /> from the reports that he so much as mentioned the<br /> Society—to the Society of Authors. &quot;This associa-<br /> tion of writers &quot;—really, he said nothing of the<br /> kind—&quot; has of late proved that it aims at becoming<br /> a great power in the world of living literature. It<br /> has detected and exposed many of the cheats and<br /> robberies practised by the dishonest members of<br /> our trade: it has caused restitution to be made to<br /> many victims; it has diverted a great amount of<br /> business into the hands of honourable houses.<br /> For these reasons, gentlemen, we have every cause<br /> to congratulate ourselves upon its prosperity and<br /> activity. We ought to welcome any step which<br /> helps to purify the moral atmosphere and maintain<br /> the honour of the calling by which we live.<br /> Recently the Society has issued two books which<br /> are, I venture to say, the most noteworthy things<br /> ever done for the higher interests of publisher and<br /> author. The first of these, called the &#039; Methods of<br /> Publication,&#039; shows exactly what is meant by every<br /> kind of agreement—what the publisher offers the<br /> author and the author cedes to the publisher. It<br /> also shows the frauds which are commonly practised.<br /> This exposure will be new to most of us here present.<br /> But it cannot fail to do great good. The next book<br /> is called the &#039;Cost of Production.&#039; By these two<br /> books the author is, for the first time, placed in<br /> the position of knowing what his agreement means,<br /> namely, what risks his publisher runs, if any, what<br /> are his reasonable expectations, and how the joint<br /> venture is shared. Gentlemen, an honourable man<br /> has nothing—he can have nothing—to conceal.<br /> We therefore rejoice at the publication of these<br /> books, and we congratulate the Society upon the<br /> steps it has taken.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 285 (#343) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 285<br /> The enclosed is a sign of the times. It has<br /> been sent to me by one of the promoters of the<br /> movement We shall rejoice to learn that the new<br /> Association is flourishing. Meantime, why women<br /> alone? Why not men and women?<br /> &quot;We the undersigned, pledge ourselves as<br /> authors who believe in pure literature and high<br /> standards of literary work, to co-operate as members<br /> of a Society to be known as—<br /> &quot;The Authors&#039; Guild of American Women.<br /> &quot;We are convinced that union is strength and<br /> consultation a source of education; and we hereby<br /> pledge ourselves to aid each other in all legitimate<br /> channels of work; to exercise our utmost diligence<br /> to purify publications; and to insist that literary<br /> work performed by women, if worthy of publication,<br /> is also worthy of just remuneration.&quot;<br /> ♦<br /> The following communication needs no com-<br /> ment. One might, however, point out to the<br /> people concerned, that these things get talked<br /> about and do not improve the name of the House<br /> concerned. Also, that authors are getting more<br /> shy and suspicious every day, and more inclined to<br /> inquiry.<br /> &quot;In December last, induced by a friend, I sent<br /> a MS. to a certain firm of publishers. Hearing<br /> nothing about it I wrote in January two letters to<br /> them, pointing out that delay would destroy my<br /> chance of publication for the season, and requesting<br /> their answer or the MS. They did not vouchsafe<br /> a word of reply for some weeks, when I received a<br /> curt note informing me that my MS. would be<br /> returned if I sent stamps for the purpose. I sent<br /> stamps, and after two or three days I got back the<br /> MS., all crushed, dirtied, and disordered. On<br /> putting it to rights I found one section missing, I<br /> wrote again, and after another delay of some days,<br /> the missing part was sent to me without one word<br /> of apology.&quot;<br /> The preceding case of discourtesy on the part<br /> of a publisher is capped by a case of equal dis-<br /> courtesy on the part of an editor—a religious paper<br /> this. Religion, we know, forgives every kind of sin,<br /> which is why sweaters flourish in religious societies<br /> and editors of religious papers behave like the<br /> gentleman mentioned below,<br /> &quot;In September an author sent to this editor an<br /> article for his magazine. He was careful to<br /> enclose a stamped and addressed envelope in<br /> accordance with the directions to contributors.<br /> &quot;He waited five months in patience. He then<br /> wrote, politely pointing out that he had heard<br /> nothing about it.<br /> &quot;No reply at all.<br /> &quot;He waited nine days and then wrote again, say-<br /> ing that if he obtained no reply he should lay the<br /> matter before this Society.<br /> &quot;The MS. was promptly returned, but without a<br /> single word of explanation or commentary.&quot;<br /> An editor has, no doubt, to wade through a vast<br /> quantity of rubbish, but that is no excuse for<br /> absolute discourtesy.<br /> The preliminary Committee of the Authors&#039; Club<br /> has been formed, It will begin to meet at once in<br /> order to draw up a working scheme for the foun-<br /> dation of the Club on a stable basis. The Authors&#039;<br /> House will not be forgotten, should there be found<br /> room for it after the establishment of the Club. I<br /> beg to announce that I am not a member of this<br /> Committee, a statement which will perhaps make<br /> it unnecessary henceforth for the irresponsible<br /> paragraph writer to call it my club. But I hope<br /> they will elect me a member.<br /> The little exhibition of bindings of which<br /> mention was made last month is at Tregaskis&#039;,<br /> Holborn. It is now open to the public. All those<br /> who care for binding should visit the place before<br /> the books are dispersed.<br /> I once more invite members of the Society to<br /> consider the Author the natural home for all kinds<br /> of questions, cases, points, difficulties, anecdotes,<br /> &amp;c, connected with literature. I do so because<br /> there is a danger that the paper should be regarded<br /> as nothing more than the organ of counsel and<br /> advice as regards agreements. That—most cer-<br /> tainly. But we are not always signing agreements,<br /> and in the world of letters there are many<br /> interests.<br /> ♦<br /> The lovers of the works of Richard Jefferies are<br /> rapidly increasing in numbers and in enthusiasm.<br /> I am sure that a great many of them are on the lists<br /> of the Society—among our 750. Be it known to<br /> these that a bust of this great interpreter of Nature<br /> has been executed, that the Eishop and Dean of<br /> Salisbury has granted permission to place it in the<br /> Cathedral—and that the subscriptions still fall<br /> short of the amount required. Will every reader<br /> of this note—that is, every reader who can appre-<br /> ciate the &quot;Pageant of Summer &quot;—send me some-<br /> thing towards the completion of this work? I do<br /> not beg in the name of Literature generally, of all<br /> authors, but only of those who belong with me to<br /> the company of those who feel that never did any<br /> man write of field and wood, of hillside and of<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 286 (#344) ############################################<br /> <br /> 286<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> hedge, as this man wrote. The treasurer of the<br /> fund is Mr. Arthur Kinglake, but I will receive<br /> subscriptions and send them on.<br /> On Friday last the first performance at the<br /> English Free Theatre took place. The piece was<br /> Ibsen&#039;s &quot; Ghosts.&quot; The accounts of the play differ a<br /> good deal. If the critic is an ardent Ibsenite he<br /> says that it is a most beautiful play. If he is not,<br /> he says that it has all the faults which an acting<br /> play ought not to have. If he is a disciple he<br /> says it is a most wonderful sermon. If he is not,<br /> he says that sermons are things which can, and<br /> should, be delivered before the whole people with<br /> open doors, not with shut doors and in fear of the<br /> Lord Chamberlain. One thing is agreed upon by<br /> all, that the piece owed whatever success it ob-<br /> tained entirely to the acting of one lady. I suppose<br /> that Ibsen has some message to deliver or he<br /> would not have so many admirers. Meantime, let<br /> us for the present suspend our judgment on the<br /> new Free Theatre.<br /> Walter Besant.<br /> *<br /> A NOTE ON THE NEW ACT.<br /> ON and after July ist, authors, no matter what<br /> their nationality, will be able to acquire<br /> copyright in the United States, to add sixty<br /> millions to their &quot;public.&quot; It is simply impossible<br /> to exaggerate the importance of such a change, not<br /> only to &quot;popular&quot; writers, but to the authors<br /> of all standard works. We hope in the next num-<br /> berof the Author to give the Revised Statute as it will<br /> pass into law. But, meanwhile, sundry considera-<br /> tions suggest themselves. The conditions attached to<br /> the acquisition of copyright are not a little onerous.<br /> Imprimis, it is necessary (i) that before the day of<br /> publication (in any country) the applicant should<br /> deliver at the office of the Librarian of Congress,<br /> &amp;c, a printed copy of the title of the &quot;book, map,<br /> chart, dramatic or musical composition, engraving,<br /> cut, print, photograph, or chromo, or a description<br /> of the painting, drawing, statue, statuary, or a model<br /> or the design for a work of the finearts for which he de-<br /> sires a copyright&quot;; and (2) &quot;not later than the day<br /> of publication&quot; (in any country), deliver at the<br /> office of the Librarian of Congress two copies of such<br /> copyright &quot; book,&quot; &amp;c, or in the case of a painting,<br /> &amp;c., a photograph of the same. But in the case of a<br /> &quot;book&quot; it is provided (3) that the said copies shall<br /> be &quot;printed from type set within the limits of the<br /> United States, or from plates made therefrom.&quot;<br /> This provision was extended by the famous &quot;chromo<br /> amendment,&quot; so as to require engravings, cuts,<br /> prints, photographs or chromo lithographs to be<br /> printed from engravings, cuts, negatives, or drawings<br /> on stone made within the limits of the United States,<br /> or from transfers made therefrom. But, according<br /> to Reuter&#039;s cablegram of the 2nd inst., this amend-<br /> ment was amended by the Conference Committee<br /> of the Senate and the House of Representatives so<br /> as to confine its operation to &quot;lithographs, chromos,<br /> and photographs,&quot; all of which, to be the subject of<br /> American copyright, must, we take it, have been<br /> &quot;produced&quot; within the States.<br /> A question at once arises as to the definition put<br /> by American law upon the term &quot;book.&quot; Does it<br /> include, as in England, &quot;every volume, part of a<br /> volume, pamphlet, sheet of letterpress, sheet of<br /> music, map, chart, or plan separately published &quot;?<br /> If so, obviously, the necessity of securing cony-<br /> right arises from the commencement of publication.<br /> It will be necessary, for instance, in order to obtain<br /> American copyright, to duly deliver each and every<br /> part of a serial story or work published in parts.<br /> But as against this it may surely be argued that the<br /> &quot;day of publication&quot; is the day of first publication<br /> in complete form. (4) The &quot;person claiming&quot; the<br /> copyright, may again, it appears, from Section 4952<br /> of the Revised Statutes, be the &quot;author, inventor,<br /> designer, or proprietor of any book,&quot; &amp;c.—a<br /> sufficiently wide definition. Is it intended that<br /> anyone, acquiring priority, should, by going through<br /> the necessary formalities, become the owner of the<br /> copyright? Or is it necessary that he must acquire<br /> rights from the author or his assigns?<br /> The effect of the Bill upon the English publishers,<br /> printers, compositors, bookbinders, and paper-<br /> makers cannot as yet be determined. But the<br /> fears which are openly expressed that New York<br /> will become the centre of the book trade, are, we<br /> believe, exaggerated. If English &quot;stereo&quot; is ex-<br /> cluded from the States, in the case of copyright<br /> works, it is practically certain that American<br /> &quot;stereo&quot; will prove useless in England. The differ-<br /> ence in typography alone would prove a fatal<br /> objection. The same remark applies to the im-<br /> portation of sheets or bound volumes from the<br /> States.<br /> It may, too, be remarked that in case it should<br /> be necessary, there exists a useful machinery under<br /> the Merchandize Marks Act. If there is any doubt<br /> as to the &quot;country of origin,&quot; the Customs author-<br /> ities can require this to be declared on every copy.<br /> &quot;Printed frpm type set within the limits of the<br /> United States &quot; would pot, in England, be a popular<br /> line on a title-page, The &quot;cost of production&quot;<br /> will, too, thanks to the McKinley tariff, remain<br /> much higher in the States than in England, and<br /> English papermakers and bookbinders have not<br /> much to fear.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 287 (#345) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 287<br /> IN THE LAST DITCH.<br /> &quot;/^VNE of the oddest and most unfortunate<br /> I I phenomena in the history of the copy-<br /> right discussion,&quot; says the New York<br /> Nation, &quot;is the appearance every now and then,<br /> when the Pirates are ready to throw up their hands<br /> and ask for quarter, of some moralist or theologian<br /> to cheer them up and encourage them to make<br /> some further resistance, by proclaiming that the<br /> poor men have done nothing wrong, and that we<br /> musi not call them hard names or despitefully use<br /> them.&quot;<br /> The last appearance of the moralist or the-<br /> ologian, one is pleased to observe, is that of<br /> an Englishman. Not an American at all. An<br /> Englishman of letters. A very distinguished man<br /> of letters. His name is here suppressed because<br /> he does not appear to have sent his protest to<br /> any English organ. He has been protesting in<br /> an American paper against certain harsh language<br /> used towards the House of Representatives for<br /> failing to pass the Copyright Bill last session.<br /> As regards the bad language, it never did any<br /> good to call names, and it never will. Yet we<br /> shall always continue to call names because it<br /> relieves the feelings. Hear, however, the Nation<br /> further in the matter.<br /> &quot;But what concerns us now is the reasons Mr.<br /> A. gives for deprecating vituperation. One of them<br /> is that all property, and especially literary property,<br /> is the creation of law, and that copyright is &#039;a<br /> purely artificial privilege,&#039; and that, therefore, it is<br /> highly indecent to speak of persons who publish<br /> other men&#039;s works without paying for them, as<br /> &#039;thieves&#039; or &#039;pirates.&#039; That this man should<br /> offer the world, in such a cause, the plea that<br /> property is the creation of law is very curious,<br /> because there is hardly a step in the creation of<br /> the present English Constitution, from Magna<br /> Charta down, which was not a protest, in some<br /> shape, against the doctrine that a man&#039;s moral<br /> right to his goods and chattels is at all dependent<br /> on the provision made by law for his protection in<br /> the enjoyment of them. The great doctrine that<br /> taxation without representation is a thing to be<br /> resisted with the sword, if necessary, rests on the<br /> very proposition which Mr. A. denies. When<br /> Hampden refused to pay the ship-money because<br /> he had not voted it through his representatives,<br /> seven of the twelve judges decided against him,<br /> and his refusal was therefore illegal; but he per-<br /> sisted in it, nevertheless, to the death, and all<br /> Englishmen now hold his memory in reverence<br /> therefor. The amount was trifling, but, as has been<br /> finely said, if he had paid it he would have been a<br /> slave.<br /> &quot;Property, in truth, in its moral aspect, is no more<br /> a creation of law than justice is. It was created,<br /> as justice was, by the appearance of a second man<br /> on the globe. On each of the two there then<br /> descended that great moral obligation which the<br /> friends of copyright now seek to have embodied in<br /> legislation—the obligation not to steal and not<br /> to covet his neighbour&#039;s goods, his ox or his ass,<br /> his man-servant or maid-servant, his wife, &#039;or any-<br /> thing that is his.&#039; This obligation existed before<br /> either Parliaments or kings, before even the Ten<br /> Commandments. It arose out of the very nature<br /> of things. Mr. A. confounds, as do thousands of<br /> inferior men, the question of right with the question<br /> of security. Law cannot give a man a moral right<br /> to the product of his labour, nor can it take it<br /> away from him, a good illustration of which rule is<br /> to be found in the institution of slavery. The law<br /> deprived the negro of all legal rights, but it could<br /> not touch any of his moral or natural right.&#039;.<br /> What the law does for property is to give it security.<br /> It can, by denying security, as in the case of<br /> literary property, make it worthless, but it cannot<br /> lessen the owner&#039;s right to it. It cannot diminish<br /> the moral guilt of stealing it from him. What the<br /> apologists of Pirates mean, therefore, when they<br /> talk of the law as a &#039;creator of property,&#039; is simply<br /> that no man can, without the help of the law, get<br /> from property the sum of those pleasures which<br /> make it valuable. This may be true, but how can<br /> this fact excuse in the forum of morals the man<br /> who avails himself of this absence of legal defence<br /> to appropriate as much of his neighbour&#039;s goods<br /> as he takes a fancy to? Is it possible that when<br /> Arabs strip travellers in the desert, the offence is<br /> not robbery, but a failure of the law to create pro-<br /> perty in watches, guns, and camels in that particular<br /> region?<br /> &quot;Mr. A., in like manner, when he comes to<br /> speak of copyright as &#039;a special privilege,&#039; con-<br /> founds plagiarism and piracy. This is the most<br /> fertile source of misunderstanding in the whole<br /> discussion. What is a plagiarist? It is, says the<br /> dictionary, a man 1 who purloins the words, writ-<br /> ings, or ideas of another and passes them off as his<br /> own.&#039; Now, it is no easy thing to convict a man<br /> of this offence unless he makes long textual<br /> extracts. The ownership of an idea, and even of<br /> forms of expression, is generally very difficult to<br /> trace. The same idea often occurs to hundreds<br /> of men at the same time, and often finds very<br /> similar expression at the hands of hundreds of<br /> different authors or writers. Therefore defenders<br /> of literary property have never attempted to set<br /> up the doctrine of &#039;property in ideas&#039; which<br /> opponents of copyright are so fond of attacking.<br /> They have never maintained that it is or ought to<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 288 (#346) ############################################<br /> <br /> 288<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> be unlawful to use a thought uttered by one man<br /> for the moral or mental culture of another man,<br /> or of forbidding the reproduction, in one man&#039;s<br /> book or speech, of as many ideas of other men as<br /> he can collect or re-cast to suit his purpose.<br /> Authors or writers who do this a good deal, un-<br /> doubtedly incur discredit by it with their fellows<br /> and the general public. It greatly damages a<br /> writer&#039;s fame to be rightfully accused of want of<br /> originality, or of imitation, or of getting materials<br /> at second-hand. But no one has ever proposed to<br /> punish or restrain this sort of misappropriation by<br /> law. No one has ever contended for the infliction<br /> on the purloiners of other men&#039;s ideas of any<br /> penalty but ridicule or disgrace, although their<br /> name is legion and their depredations ruthless and<br /> notorious; and yet a very large proportion of the<br /> Pirates and their apologists expend all their<br /> strength in showing that one man may lawfully<br /> appropriate another man&#039;s ideas for his own use or<br /> behoof, or even present them to the world as the<br /> product of his own brain,<br /> &quot;What the champions of copyright, both national<br /> and international, assail is, not the appropriation<br /> of one man&#039;s ideas for another man&#039;s use and<br /> behoof, but the sale of one man&#039;s ideas and forms<br /> of expression in open market by another man in com-<br /> petition with the author. This is &#039;piracy,&#039; This<br /> is what we ask to have stopped and punished by<br /> law. We do not say to Pirates, You shall not take<br /> the Blacks&#039; Encyclopaedia to your home and pre-<br /> pare articles and speeches or even books out of<br /> its rich stores of information, and, if you are dis-<br /> honest enough to do so, give them to the world as<br /> your own, or absorb as much of the facts and<br /> ideas as your mental powers will permit. What<br /> we say is, You shall not, while denying the right of<br /> property in it in the hands of the original author<br /> or compiler, tseat it as property in your own hands,<br /> and offer it for sale in competition with the man<br /> whom you are plundering.&quot;<br /> ■ *<br /> DO ENGLISH PEOPLE BUY BOOKS?<br /> THE theory that English people never buy<br /> books has long been a commonplace with<br /> writers of leading articles and press para-<br /> graphs. It is one of those fine old truths which<br /> are not to be questioned: it is taken as proved.<br /> The undoubted fact that novels are published at<br /> a price which prohibits their purchase, is held to<br /> establish the theory, which is irrefutable from a<br /> certain point of view—that naturally taken by one<br /> who buys books from him who creates them.<br /> Without doubt, while the prices of books were<br /> high, and when the book club provided all the<br /> new books, very few even of the richer households<br /> bought books at all. The book clubs, however,<br /> have nearly all vanished; their place has been<br /> only partly, not altogether, taken by the Circulating<br /> Libraries. The country has become very much<br /> richer than it was a half century since; it has also<br /> become much more populous: the education<br /> of the people has been enormously developed, and<br /> the taste for reading has grown with the education<br /> of the people. Therefore it would seem as if the<br /> circulating libraries alone would hardly suffice for<br /> the wants of the reading public, In addition, the<br /> last half century has witnessed the growth of the<br /> colonial empire from a few hundred thousands to<br /> something like twenty millions. And they have<br /> no circulating libraries at all. Yet they read.<br /> Let us, however, for the moment disregard the<br /> colonial demand. What do we see at first sight?<br /> Take, first, our own houses. Everybody knows the<br /> house where the dining room contains a bookcase<br /> filled with books which are never changed and<br /> never taken down. Gibbon is there; Robertson is<br /> there; probablyBlair&#039;ssermons; HumeandSmollett;<br /> a Gazetteer; an edition of the Spectator. Formerly,<br /> that is to say, twenty years ago, or so, this book-<br /> case contained all the books of the house. Now,<br /> however, there are other shelves—a case in the<br /> drawing room filled with poetry and pretty editions:<br /> a bookcase in the school room, or breakfast room,<br /> filled with modern and new books—there will you find<br /> Rider Haggard, Stevenson, Lang, Black, Hardy,<br /> Blackmore, the newest essayist, not to mention<br /> Dickens, Thackeray, George Eliot, Collins, and<br /> Reade. There you will find evidence that somebody<br /> or other in the house not only knows contemporary<br /> literature but buys it, and that plentifully, and with<br /> no sparing hand,<br /> Again, watch the bookstall at a London railway<br /> station. The place is not a stall, it is a great shop<br /> filled with new books. Here are all the newest<br /> works, the biographies, the dozens of Series, the<br /> novels, the essays—everything, Stand beside the<br /> place for a quarter of an hour before the departure<br /> of the express. Look at the people. They crowd<br /> about the stall: they are all buying books. Con-<br /> sider that this goes on every hour from morning<br /> till night—for twelve hours, or thereabouts, the<br /> people flock to this stall and buy books. Consider,<br /> further, that there are a dozen such stations in<br /> London, and that the same thing goes on at every<br /> big town in the United Kingdom. Will you still<br /> consider us a nation which does not buy books?<br /> But—a point which seems to make against the<br /> extension of the book trade—the country book-<br /> sellers&#039; shops have certainly decreased in import-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 289 (#347) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 289<br /> ance and in profits during the last half century.<br /> That is quite true. The bookseller of the old<br /> county town was a person of great weight and con-<br /> sideration. He had down all the new books, the<br /> clergy and the reading public of the place looked<br /> upon his shop as a place where literary news could<br /> be heard and the new books examined. But then<br /> there was no other way of getting the literary news.<br /> The country papers had none, the London literary<br /> papers went but little out of London, the people<br /> seldom went to town. They were therefore de-<br /> pendent upon the local bookseller, who, as one who<br /> studies his market, provided for his customers the<br /> things which he knew they would take. Also, a<br /> thing of the greatest importance, there was no dis-<br /> count of threepence in the shilling, and the published<br /> price was high. A bookseller who sold a book for<br /> 1 of. 6d. which he had purchased for 7*., managed<br /> to do very well. He was a substantial person: on<br /> the social ladder he ranked first among the trades-<br /> men: he stood next to the solicitor and the<br /> doctor. Now, he has to give a discount of three-<br /> pence in the shilling. His half-guinea volume is<br /> reduced to three and six, which he sells for two<br /> and eight, and for which he pays two shillings.<br /> Therefore, he is fain to sell, in addition to books,<br /> stationery, photographs, albums, fancy things, and<br /> perhaps toys. His customers are independent of<br /> him; they learn easily from the reviews all that<br /> goes on; they order their books from London, or<br /> from the railway stall, and they desert the local shop.<br /> The book trade, in fact, has increased a thousand-<br /> fold, and yet the bookseller has decayed.<br /> Consider, next, the publishers&#039; lists. I have<br /> before me the Athenaum, which contains, I sup-<br /> pose, more book advertisements than any other<br /> paper. This single number represents fourteen firms<br /> of publishers, most, in fact, of what are called leading<br /> publishers. It is by no means the best publishing<br /> time of the year. Yet, leaving out the books which<br /> are announced only, no price being affixed, we find<br /> an astonishing activity. Of biographical works there<br /> are 28, ranging in price from 2s. 6d. to £5 55.; of<br /> essays there are 29, namely, 9 at 2s. 6d., 3 at<br /> 3f. 6d., 3 at 5s., 7 at 6s., 1 at 7*., 1 at 7f. 6d, 1 at<br /> 9f., and 4 at iof. 6d. Of fiction there are some<br /> 90 works, counting new books and new editions,<br /> viz., 17 at 3 if. 6d., 9 at 2 if., 1 at i7f., 24 at 6s.,<br /> 1 at i2f., 3 at 7f. 6d., 29 at 3f. 6d., 1 at sf., 4 at<br /> 2f. 6d., and two or three at 2f. We may pass over<br /> art books, histories, and one or two books of<br /> travel. If we look at this advertisememt sheet in<br /> another three months, most of these books will be<br /> changed for others. Now, if you please, for whom<br /> are these books published? For the circulating<br /> libraries? They may take all the three volume<br /> novels. For whom are the other books issued?<br /> For the general public. These advertisements<br /> represent the sale of, at least, half a million<br /> volumes; and, to repeat, the lists will be all changed<br /> in three months&#039; time. Is that, then, the whole<br /> life&#039;s duration of our modern literature? It is of<br /> the great majority of books that are published.<br /> We remark on the price of these books. The<br /> favourite prices are 6s. and 3f. 6d. The books<br /> most bought are novels either at that price, or<br /> those in the cheaper form at 2f., which are not<br /> generally advertised in the Athenaum. And the<br /> novels which become popular retain their vitality<br /> for many years. Not to speak of Scott, Dickens,<br /> or Marryat, any popular novel of the last forty<br /> years is popular still.<br /> But these, remember, are only the advertisements<br /> of a casual week. Consider, one after the other,<br /> the general list of a great publisher, that long and<br /> encyclopaedic document embracing all subjects, and<br /> all authors, dead and living; think of the lists of the<br /> religious publishing houses, which cater chiefly for the<br /> uncultivated class, and administer doctrine disguised<br /> as fiction; think of the immense lists of books by<br /> the so-called popular houses, which issue cheap<br /> literature. One would like to have an enumeration<br /> and an analysis of all the books at this moment<br /> offered to the British public by the publishers.<br /> Certain it is that no shop could contain a tenth<br /> portion. Yet they are in demand—else they would<br /> be withdrawn from the list. For whom are these<br /> thousands of books published, and year after year<br /> reprinted? For this folk who never buy books.<br /> In fact, a great change has come over us in this<br /> as in every other respect. Increased ease in cir<br /> cumstances with an increased taste for letters has<br /> caused us to buy books as we never bought them<br /> before. We are now buyers on a gigantic scale.<br /> Every good book is caught up eagerly. There is<br /> no longer the slightest foundation for the old bogie<br /> of risk; there is no risk about a good book except<br /> the risk of over-printing, which no prudent man will<br /> incur; there are novelists, not by ones or twos, but<br /> by the score, whose books are in demand unknown<br /> even to such admirable writers as, say, Mrs. Gaskell,<br /> of thirty years ago. The three volume novel has<br /> its run as of old; I have not heard that it is<br /> decreasing in demand; but when the cheap edition<br /> of it comes out, if it is a favourite, it is bought by the<br /> very people who have first read it from the library.<br /> Whether we devote as large a proportion of our<br /> expenditure to buying books as we should is another<br /> question. The mind must be nourished as well<br /> as the body; it requires continual reception of new<br /> facts, new thoughts, new theories, new lights, new<br /> arguments. It requires continually to be refreshed<br /> by the exhibition of the old things. In an ordi-<br /> nary middleclass household the wife spends ^400 a<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 290 (#348) ############################################<br /> <br /> 290<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> year on her house ; the husband, ,£75 a year on his<br /> wine ; the family, jQi 50 a year on clothes ; the same<br /> amount on travelling; there is also rent; there<br /> are the hundred and fifty little things in which<br /> money is wasted all day long. How much is spent<br /> on books? Formerly, three guineas a year. That<br /> was all. Only three guineas a year for the circu-<br /> lating library and for books, nothing, except a<br /> birthday present or two, and what the children<br /> bought out of their pocket money. But as for any<br /> idea that it is the duty of a man of culture to buy<br /> his mental food as he buys his meat and bread, that<br /> had not dawned upon their minds, nor has it yet,<br /> though, for convenience sake, people have begun<br /> to buy, and will, before long, buy yet more largely.<br /> It will be now understood from these considera-<br /> tions why we drew up certain questions and sub-<br /> mitted them to certain well-known booksellers in<br /> London; our best thanks are due for the courtesy<br /> with which these questions have been answered.<br /> They were not meant to be inquisitive or prying<br /> questions, but general, and directed mainly to<br /> finding an answer to the question at the head of this<br /> paper. Had not the views already expressed been<br /> confirmed, in the main, by these answers, they would<br /> not have been advanced.<br /> The following, therefore, is summarised from the<br /> replies received. Those received from different<br /> houses are put together so as to present a con-<br /> tinuous opinion.<br /> Every well-educated Englishman buys some<br /> books. In every house will be found shelves filled<br /> with books, chiefly new, and in most houses there is<br /> a library, or study, or school room. Students of all<br /> kinds have to buy their text books—a large trade<br /> ir| itself; most professional men have a taste for<br /> reading, and are frequently very good buyers.<br /> Schoolboys, besides having to buy school books,<br /> and young clerks, are great buyers of the cheap<br /> reprints of Lytton, Ainsworth, Dickens, Jules Verne,<br /> &amp;c, which are sold at 4^1. a copy. Ladies are<br /> not, as a rule, good book buyers, except of books<br /> for children, and for household purposes; when<br /> they do buy, it is the two shilling novel. Country<br /> people and visitors buy a great many books. City<br /> men are often large and constant buyers. Some<br /> have their favourite authors, and buy everything<br /> that bears the name. The ordinary middle-class<br /> Englishman, he who lives by his shop, does not, as<br /> a rule, buy or read books at all. His daily paper<br /> is sufficient for him. Yet he will, on occasion, buy<br /> something that strikes his imagination, or that is<br /> much talked about.<br /> Opinions differ as to the best price for selling a<br /> novel. One, for instance, finds that the price of<br /> 6s. is paid as readily as that of 35. 6d. Another<br /> says that the best way to treat an author is to<br /> publish him in uniform binding at 3s. 6d. In the<br /> case of a really good and lasting work it seems<br /> best to have several editions at 6.?., at 3s. 6d., and<br /> at 2s. The 6d. books have an enormous sale.<br /> They are generally editions of books whose copy-<br /> right is lapsed. There is, therefore, no author to be<br /> considered. If 100,000 copies go off, the publisher<br /> gets id. a copy, and the bookseller id., and so a<br /> handsome profit is realised.<br /> There is always a great demand for old works of<br /> fiction. Dickens, Thackeray, George Eliot, Scott,<br /> Marryat, Charles Kingsley, and Wilkie Collins,<br /> still continue in greater popularity than any living<br /> writers. The bookseller suffers the living writers<br /> to drop out of his shelves, but always keeps them<br /> well stocked with these dead writers.<br /> Books of travel very quickly die when the first<br /> curiosity is satisfied. Yet there are a few excep-<br /> tions. Darwin&#039;s &quot;Voyage of the Beagle,&quot; the<br /> &quot;Voyage of the Sunbeam,&quot; Waterton&#039;s Travels,<br /> Cook s Voyages, are always in steady demand.<br /> Very few people buy new poetry. Yet for<br /> Tennyson, Browning, Swinburne, Edwin Arnold,<br /> Mathew Arnold, and Longfellow there is always a<br /> steady demand.<br /> As regards essays: these vary with the subjects.<br /> For steady demand we may mention John Morley&#039;s<br /> Essays, Charles Lamb, Lubbock&#039;s &quot;Pleasures of<br /> Life,&quot; Carlyle, &amp;c, while for sudden popularity<br /> may be cited Augustine Birrell and Jerome.<br /> Books of biography possess either a wide interest<br /> soon satisfied, as in the life of a man recently dead,<br /> or an abiding interest as is shown in the steady<br /> demand for the many series now before the world.<br /> Books of history are always in demand. The<br /> most popular are Macaulay, Green, and Froude.<br /> The &quot; Story of the Nations &quot; series is very popular.<br /> The most popular American authors are, taking<br /> them in order of demand—Mark Twain, Bret<br /> Harte. Marion Crawford (if he is to be reckoned<br /> an American), and Howells, Henry James, Holmes,<br /> Emerson.<br /> Foreign books do not compare in popularity<br /> with native productions. Daudet, Georges Ohnet,<br /> Boisgobey, Gaboriau, Dumas, Eugene Sue, Jules<br /> Verne, are largely asked for.<br /> The discount of $d. in the is. has been much<br /> discussed by the trade. A Booksellers&#039; Associa-<br /> tion has been formed to consider this among other<br /> matters. They have come to the conclusion that<br /> the discount must be retained, but that it must not<br /> be increased.<br /> As regards the extent of the colonial trade, no<br /> statistics have been furnished, and perhaps one<br /> cannot expect to arrive at any. But one book-<br /> seller pertinently points out that many houses are<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 291 (#349) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 291<br /> engaged in nothing else but the export of books, a<br /> fact which proves that the trade is very great.<br /> Enough has been adduced to prove that it can<br /> no longer be charged against us that we do not<br /> buy books. On the contrary, we buy vast quan-<br /> tities. Whether we buy as many as we ought,<br /> considering the number we read, is another matter.<br /> In our next number we may perhaps, by some<br /> analysis of publishers&#039; lists, arrive at a closer<br /> estimate of the vast national interest of what is<br /> familiarly called the Trade.<br /> UN DEBUT DANS LA VlE.<br /> &quot;OU are now, Martha Londers,&quot; said the<br /> Matron of the Orphanage, &quot;about to<br /> enter upon the duties and responsibilities<br /> of life. Your career begins to-day. It depends<br /> upon yourself where it ends. It may be that you<br /> will rise to be housekeeper in a mansion, or even<br /> —such things have happened—to be Matron of an<br /> Institution.&quot;<br /> Martha Londers blushed; that is to say, a<br /> naturally rosy face .became fiery red, or even, in<br /> spots, purple; then she smiled—with breadth;<br /> then her eyes became humid, and a big tear, not<br /> of sorrow, but of joyful, emotional hope, swam<br /> gently over the amplitude of her cheek; and her<br /> nose, naturally broad, widened and glistenedi The<br /> occasion was great; the emotion of Martha was<br /> natural; for the first time in her life she was going<br /> to leave the retreat of the Orphanage, and to enter<br /> upon the world. All was before her: she was<br /> seventeen years of age, and she was beginning her<br /> career as assistant housemaid. What then? Many<br /> a field marshal has begun as a common soldier:<br /> many an archbishop has risen from the plough.<br /> To have one foot upon the ladder, even it be the<br /> lowest rung, is something. Martha Londers had<br /> two—solid and substantial feet they were—and she<br /> felt as if she must rise.<br /> &quot;You must be ambitious,&quot; continued the<br /> Matron. &quot;Remember that your present wages—<br /> they will be ten pounds at first&quot;—Martha gasped<br /> and choked—&quot; are only a beginning to one who<br /> is ambitious. She who means to rise must show<br /> her ambition by her work. She must be active,<br /> early rising—I think I have detected in you, Martha,<br /> a tendency to an inclination to love your bed—<br /> thorough and zealous. Let all that you do be well<br /> done, thoroughly done—done in earnest—done as<br /> if you meant it to be so well done that not even<br /> the most scrupulous housewife could detect a<br /> fault With these maxims to guide you, Martha<br /> Londers, I may safely leave you. To some girls I<br /> should add a warning about beauty being only<br /> skin deep,&quot;—where, as in Martha&#039;s case, it is deeper<br /> than that, it sinks below the surface and becomes<br /> invisible.—&quot;To you I would only say that temp-<br /> tation to all women, beautiful or otherwise, fre-<br /> quently assumes the shape of Man. Beware,<br /> therefore.&quot;<br /> &quot;He will be home,&quot; said the housemaid, &quot;to<br /> morrow morning. The Master&#039;s study has been<br /> left to the last. You can do it this morning,<br /> Martha. As he won&#039;t have it touched while he is at<br /> home, make a good job of it&quot;<br /> It was eight o&#039;clock in the morning. The day<br /> was all before her. Martha felt that her work—<br /> she had only been- in the house two days—was<br /> already appreciated. She had been kindly allowed<br /> to scrub the greater part of the house from garret<br /> to cellar, and she was now entrusted with the<br /> important mission of cleaning up the Master&#039;s study.<br /> Everybody in the collecting line knows the<br /> name of that Master. No man had a safer judg-<br /> ment about Aldines and Elzevirs; his collection of<br /> Elizabethan poets was almost complete; he knew<br /> the prices of books better than Mr. Bain himself;<br /> and he could talk by the hour of the prices which<br /> books had fetched. Then for bindings, he knew<br /> the work of everyone, Maioli, Grolier, Eve, Derome<br /> —all—and he possessed specimens which were the<br /> envy of all his brother collectors. Again, he had<br /> books which belonged to the library of Marie<br /> Antoinette, of Madame Du Barry, Madame de<br /> Pompadour, and others whose books are valuable<br /> for their bindings and their rarity. In fine, the<br /> chase of books was the chief occupation of his life.<br /> What sayeth &quot;A. L&quot; in his book of the Library?<br /> &quot;Pour tout plaisir que Ton goute icy-bas<br /> La Grace a Dieu. Mieulx vaut, sans altercas,<br /> Chasser bouquin. Nul mat n&#039;en peult s&#039;eh suivre.<br /> Or sus au livre; il est le grand appas.<br /> Clair est le ciel. Amis, qui veult me suivre<br /> En bouquinant?&quot;<br /> He was a man—say, rather, a collector—of<br /> catholic tastes, not bounded by books alone<br /> though his real strength lay in books. He had,<br /> for instance, on a great study table beside the<br /> catalogues which formed his library of reference,<br /> trays of valuable coins; he had Things—he called<br /> them Things—in bronze, Things in brass, Things in<br /> silver; panels lay about with wood carvings upon<br /> them—precious carvings picked up at sales, in<br /> brie h. brae shops, Things from city churches which<br /> they were pulling down, Things from Egypt, Things<br /> from Etruscan tombs, Things from Phoenicia, Things<br /> from Tunis, Things from Spain, Things ancient,<br /> Things mediaeval. The study, in short, a large and<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 292 (#350) ############################################<br /> <br /> 292<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> handsome room on the first floor of a big house<br /> in Fitzjohn&#039;s Avenue, was crammed and crowded<br /> with old and curious Things.<br /> And Martha Londers, bursting with impatience<br /> to show her zeal, was turned into this room to clean<br /> it up.<br /> It was the last day of the Master&#039;s summer<br /> holiday. He had spent it wholly among the<br /> Italian shops. It was never too hot for him, so<br /> long as he could sit among the Things. Rome<br /> in August was as pleasant as Rome in April,<br /> provided there were Things to look at. Where<br /> are there no Things in Italy—Land of Things?<br /> It was over, and he was on his way home. And<br /> Martha Londers was in his study.<br /> She had the house all to herself, because the<br /> other servants went out for a holiday and left<br /> her alone with her work. Alone? No, not alone.<br /> There sat on a corner of the highest shelf, invisible<br /> to Martha, a Creature which grinned and mocked<br /> and laughed, and held its sides and rolled about<br /> with laughing. But not aloud—so that Martha<br /> neither heard nor saw, but went on with her work.<br /> Thorough work; zealous work; work in which<br /> not the most scrupulous housewife could find the<br /> least fault or omission. Work methodical and<br /> complete. Observe that Martha had never before<br /> seen a study or a library. There were books for<br /> the girls at the Orphanage ; they were distributed<br /> for Sunday reading between the three services;<br /> but a library she had never before seen.<br /> First she surveyed the whole; then she took<br /> down a book and found that it was dusty on the<br /> top, and that the shelf behind was very dusty.<br /> Then she saw that many of the books presented a<br /> faded and careworn exterior which she thought she<br /> could improve; and she observed with concern that a<br /> great quantity of the Things wanted cleaning badly.<br /> She went out and returned bearing a mop, a<br /> bucket of warm water, some soap, a scrubbing-<br /> brush, a knife for scraping, some plate powder, and<br /> other ingredients, with the help of which she pur-<br /> posed to pass a useful and a pleasant time.<br /> As she was alone in the house she sang over her<br /> work. At the Orphanage the girls only sang<br /> hymns. Martha, therefore, in a contented mur-<br /> murous kind of croon, while she scrubbed with zeal,<br /> beguiled the time with &quot;Lead, kindly Light.&quot;<br /> She first removed the books from the top shelf;<br /> then, mounted on a chair, she sluiced that shelf<br /> with water and scrubbed it with soap, wiping it dry<br /> with a towel. It was beautifully clean when she<br /> finished it. No one would blame her, of course,<br /> because the water dripped through upon the books<br /> below, lodged and lurked between their bindings,<br /> and splashed their backs. She took out those of<br /> the second row, wiped them dry with her towel—<br /> everybody knows how a book bound in Russia<br /> leather or Morocco is improved by a splash of<br /> water and a good rub with a damp towel—and<br /> proceeded to sluice and scrub the boards; and so<br /> on until the morning was spent—the shelves<br /> completely cleaned, and the books, one and all,<br /> beautified for ever with her towel.<br /> Martha, well content so far, now retired to the<br /> kitchen and made a hearty meal off the cold<br /> mutton and potatoes provided for her by the cook<br /> before she left the house. She then mounted the<br /> stairs once more and began the second part of her<br /> work, singing again; but she changed her tune<br /> and now encouraged herself with &quot;Art thou weary?<br /> art thou languid?&quot;<br /> All day long the Creature who sat on the highest<br /> shelf laughed and rolled about with laughing.<br /> But he was invisible to Martha.<br /> When, about seven in the evening, she com-<br /> pleted her job, she had scraped and polished the<br /> bronzes, the coins—for which she used a file—and<br /> the old silver; she had &quot;restored&quot; the old leather<br /> bindings with a material commonly used for<br /> saddles; she had cleaned and wiped the books;<br /> some, though very old, had never been cut—this<br /> omission she repaired; others, mostly pamphlets,<br /> which had ragged edges, she cut even and neat<br /> with a pair of scissors; the wood carvings she had<br /> scraped when that process seemed necessary, and<br /> in all cases had scrubbed so that the panels now<br /> looked really beautiful. No one would notice<br /> and, indeed, it could not matter, that a few bits<br /> had come off—a grape or two, a flower, a flourish,<br /> the round knob of a cherub&#039;s nose. Finally, the<br /> Things looked now so very, very much better for<br /> their thorough repair and so different from their<br /> former grimy condition that Martha&#039;s honest heart<br /> swelled with pride and pleasure. What would the<br /> Master say when he returned? He would look<br /> about him with surprised satisfaction; he would<br /> ask what new hand had done this: he would be<br /> told that it was the hand of the new under house-<br /> maid, Martha Londers; and he would nod his head,<br /> promising himself to keep his eye upon Martha.<br /> Perhaps he would send for her to express his satis-<br /> faction and his approbation. When Martha, on her<br /> knees that night, made the usual confession of her<br /> sins, she could not help—it was not in human<br /> nature—feeling that for once the good deeds<br /> outweighed the bad, and left a balance to carry<br /> forward. &#039;Twas a Papistical thought, but she<br /> knew not the errors of the Roman Church, and<br /> may be excused.<br /> The Master, who had been travelling all night,<br /> arrived about seven o&#039;clock. Martha observed<br /> him with curiosity. He was an elderly mm,<br /> somewhere in the fifties or perhaps in the early<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 293 (#351) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 293<br /> sixties; he was red-faced and of a full habit, but<br /> he moved with activity—a collector is always<br /> active; sometimes, to get before other collectors,<br /> he must even run. He entered the house.<br /> Martha was dusting the stairs and dropped a<br /> curtsey which he noticed with a nod. It will be a<br /> nod and a smile to-morrow, Martha thought. He<br /> went up stairs—but no—not yet—not into the<br /> study. He first had a change in his bed room,<br /> and then he descended to the dining room and<br /> took breakfast and the morning paper; he then,<br /> being fatigued with his night&#039;s travelling, fell asleep<br /> in his easy chair and so continued until noon or<br /> thereabouts.<br /> When he awoke he rose, yawned loudly, and<br /> walked to the door. Martha was dusting the<br /> hall clock. Now, at last, he was going into his<br /> own study.<br /> He was.<br /> As he went up the stairs Martha in her agitation<br /> nearly slipped off the chair on which she was<br /> standing. She stopped her dusting, and steadied<br /> herself to listen. Surely, surely he would notice—<br /> he would not fail to notice—the thoroughness of the<br /> cleaning, the zeal of the cleaner, the completeness<br /> of the job. He must notice it; he must ask who<br /> did it; he must be ready to-morrow with a smile<br /> of appreciation.<br /> What was that? The house trembled from<br /> rafter ridge to basement; the walls rocked to and<br /> fro; the glass on the side-board vibrated musically<br /> but strangely; the pictures rocked and swung;<br /> and Martha&#039;s heart stood quite still.<br /> A roar—a long prolonged roar j another roar;<br /> a third, louder and more terrifying. Martha&#039;s<br /> cheek turned white and her knees trembled<br /> beneath her as she stood upon the chair. Then a<br /> howl—a prolonged howl as of a wild beast in<br /> agony—and then the ringing of the bell—the study<br /> bell, as if all the bells in the whole house were<br /> ringing at once. Then a hasty footstep upon the<br /> landing, and the Master&#039;s head, purple, his eyes<br /> standing out, his arms outstretched, his fists<br /> clenched, showed over the balustrade, while he<br /> cursed and swore with such language as Martha<br /> had never before heard even from the lowest<br /> court, while the Orphans took their walks abroad.<br /> Her head reeled; she fell from the chair headlong<br /> and lay upon the floor.<br /> The housekeeper rushed up the stairs. &quot;Good<br /> Lord !&quot; she cried, &quot;what&#039;s the matter?&quot;<br /> The Master seized her by the arm and dragged<br /> her into the study. Now reduced to speechlessness,<br /> save for half articulate interjections which betrayed<br /> his emotion, he pointed to the trays of coins, to<br /> the bronzes, to the old silver, to the books—<br /> to the Things. The woman, who knew what<br /> Things meant, gazed in stupefaction. The Master<br /> roared again. He could now do nothing but<br /> roar.<br /> Downstairs, in the hall, Martha came to herself<br /> and sat up sick with fright. What was the<br /> matter?<br /> The other servants were gathered at the foot of<br /> the stairs listening. Presently, the roaring died<br /> away, and the voice of feminine weeping and<br /> lamentation, mixed with masculine thunderous<br /> rumblings, succeeded.<br /> Still the housekeeper came not down, and still<br /> they listened awestruck by the unknown disaster.<br /> No one took any notice of Martha, though she had<br /> got a lump as big as an egg at the back of her<br /> head by her fall, and though she was white with<br /> terror. For now she understood, somehow or<br /> other, that the trouble overhead was connected<br /> with herself.<br /> At last, the housekeeper came down, her eyes<br /> red with tears.<br /> &quot;Martha,&quot; she said, with an attempt at calmness,<br /> &quot;go upstairs and pack your box. Not another<br /> hour shall you stay. Go! You shall have your<br /> month&#039;s wages. Go back to your Orphanage.<br /> Tell them that sent you out that you&#039;re only fit to<br /> scrub the floors of your Asylum. Go! She&#039;s<br /> ruined,&quot; the housekeeper explained, &quot;the whole<br /> of the Master&#039;s collections—the finest collections<br /> in London. Ruined and spoiled them all, she<br /> has. That&#039;s all. Nothing more. Books and<br /> coins, and old silver and all. Go, I say, for fear<br /> I take and slap you. Ruined them all. The<br /> work of the Master&#039;s life ruined, and in a single<br /> day by a . . by a . . by a Drab.&quot; Martha<br /> screamed and fled. &quot;Oh! it&#039;s too much—it&#039;s too<br /> much! Poor dear gentleman! He&#039;s quite broken<br /> hearted. He can never, never get over it. He&#039;s<br /> quieted a bit, at last, and he&#039;s sittin&#039; on the floor<br /> now, with his ruined collections round him.&quot;<br /> This was Martha Londers&#039; entrance upon her<br /> Career. This was the lamentable fashion in which<br /> she returned to the Matron that same day,<br /> *<br /> THE SIGNED ARTICLE.<br /> THE proposal of Mr, Atkinson to compel the<br /> writers of editorial articles to sigh what<br /> they write has not led to the discussion<br /> one might have expected. But Mr. George<br /> Augustus Sala, in his &quot;Echoes of the Week,&quot; had<br /> some very interesting remarks on the merits and<br /> demerits of the signed article. He says, &quot;I have<br /> always been a strenuous advocate of the anony-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 294 (#352) ############################################<br /> <br /> 294<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> mous in journalism so far as leading articles are<br /> concerned.&quot; Few people are better qualified to<br /> speak with the authority of so experienced a<br /> journalist as Mr. Sala. If anything should be<br /> anonymous surely it is the leading article, which is<br /> supposed to be the expression of the opinion of the<br /> whole staff of a paper or party rather than of an<br /> individual. Nevertheless there seems to be a<br /> tendency now in favour of signed articles, other<br /> than editorials in the weeklies, for instance; and<br /> the monthly reviews are certainly more read than<br /> the stale confections of the Quarterly and Edin-<br /> burgh, which, if people ever read at all, they pay<br /> little heed to. True, there is a pleasant antiquarian<br /> flavour about the notorious reviews on Keats,<br /> Byron, Thackeray, Tennyson, and the Brontes.<br /> They are relics of the haute ecole of scurrility—<br /> that scurrility which, though like everything else,<br /> as we are told, is in its decadence, is found not<br /> in the new journalism^ but in the newest, the<br /> brand-new journalism. While endorsing the<br /> opinions of Mr. Sala, it is impossible to agree with<br /> Mr. W. H. Smith, that &quot; the liberty of the press,&quot;<br /> with rare exceptions, is far from being abused. The<br /> most disgusting personalities about eminent men<br /> are read every day with relish by thousands. We<br /> hear what an eminent poet eats for breakfast, what<br /> a politician drinks for dinner, the colour of the hair<br /> of the eldest daughter of an eminent painter, and<br /> the details of an internal disease that a well-<br /> known doctor is suffering from. If this is toler-<br /> ated would we be any better by knowing who the<br /> purveyor of such small talk was? What middle-<br /> man of journalism is responsible for jottings from<br /> the area, nursery, and servants&#039; hall?<br /> No, far better to let him or her remain<br /> anonymous. Again, the question of reviewing<br /> books is an insurmountable objection to signed<br /> articles. Some books are bad, and some we do<br /> not like. A reviewer would be plunged into an<br /> impossible correspondence, and the editor would<br /> come in for his share if a review were signed.<br /> Why review books at all? is the question some<br /> people ask; but authors, especially young authors,<br /> like other human beings, are vain, and prefer to<br /> have their works attacked than not noticed at all.<br /> Anonymity in an article on some general<br /> question by an unknown writer, gives that article<br /> a value it might not otherwise possess. It is a<br /> distinct blow to learn that some fine piece<br /> of criticism is not by a Pater or Saintsbury, or<br /> an Andrew Lang, but the first effort of a Mr.<br /> Snook, who has just left the University. Then,<br /> too, there are many really important things a<br /> journalist might say (personality and scurrility<br /> barred) that he could not and would not care to<br /> say if the article were signed. That is why the<br /> Saturday Review contains so much the best<br /> reading in the whole of any of the weeklies. The<br /> signed article should be left to the monthly<br /> reviews, where we can find out what Mr.<br /> Gladstone has been reading, and what Mr. Parnell<br /> is thinking of. This, we believe, is the public point<br /> of view. Many eminent writers take the other side<br /> of the question; but in a daily morning paper, at any<br /> rate, the only signed contributions should be<br /> Reuter&#039;s telegrams and the advertisements, so<br /> that false news and false witness may be traced to<br /> their original source. Perhaps the most offensive<br /> type of the brand-new journalism which is always<br /> anonymous, is art criticism. Like science, art<br /> requires a thorough expert, and while anyone is<br /> at liberty to dislike this or that painting, no one<br /> should indulge in personal abuse and offensive<br /> invective of the painter himself.<br /> In all journalism, where some qualification as<br /> well as opinion is requisite, it is as well that a name<br /> should appear; to use Mr. Atkinson&#039;s words, &quot;so<br /> that the public may know in each case how much<br /> or how little attention is due to each article.&#039;&#039;<br /> F.<br /> [This is one side of the question. Perhaps<br /> some readers might like to add, briefly, their views.<br /> —Editor.]<br /> *<br /> IN GRUB STREET.<br /> —»—<br /> TH R proprietors of Answers are certainly the<br /> most generous patrons of literature. They<br /> have forwarded j£i,ooo, I am told, to the<br /> widow of a man who was killed on the railway,<br /> because he had in his possession a copy of their<br /> entertaining periodical when he met his death.<br /> The advertisement was certainly a splendid one.<br /> The widow of any gentleman found dead with a<br /> copy of the Author on his person, will receive<br /> either a thousand copies of the current number,<br /> or a free copy for life. This generosity should<br /> be encouraged in all grades of journalism and<br /> letters. The Author, though only costing sixpence,<br /> is worth quite a guinea a number.<br /> There are many authors who will not sympathise<br /> with Ouida&#039;s complaint in the Titnes, and who<br /> would have considered it rather a compliment than<br /> otherwise to have their nom de plume utilised in<br /> the interests of commerce. It was an act, however,<br /> of flagrant literary piracy, and let us hope that the<br /> company will be courteous enough to find some<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 295 (#353) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 295<br /> no less musical and attractive sobriquet as that<br /> which at present belongs to a distinguished<br /> authoress. Shakespeare&#039;s creations have been<br /> used to advertise soap and pills, so that Ouida<br /> is certainly in excellent company.<br /> There is a &quot;melancholy and altogether pathetic<br /> interest&quot; attaching to the last story of Mr.<br /> Ignatius Donelly&#039;s Great Cryptogam, in which a<br /> Daniel indeed came to judgment. An American<br /> farmer, according to Black and White, had pur-<br /> chased his two volumes under the impression<br /> that Shakespeare would be exposed; when, how-<br /> ever, the tallyman came round for payment he<br /> professed himself unconvinced, and returned the<br /> books. A law suit followed, and the learned<br /> judge, who had something of an Arabian caliph in<br /> him, decided that the farmer would have to disprove<br /> the cryptogam before he would be exempt from pay-<br /> ment. Had it gone the other way, a very dangerous<br /> precedent would have been created. For, on the<br /> same principle, we might refuse to pay booksellers<br /> who supplied us with dull or disappointing works.<br /> The biography of John Wesley, by J. H. Overton<br /> (Methuen and Co.), is one of the very best of the<br /> many lives that have been written, and shows the<br /> great preacher in quite a new light. The compli-<br /> ments that are being paid by one sect of Christians<br /> to another now-a-days are very charming. At the<br /> same time it appears strange for the press, com-<br /> menting on the Wesley centenary, to say that<br /> Wesley &quot; belongs as much to the English Church&quot;<br /> as to the Nonconformists. The same thing has<br /> been said of Newman lately. Now these two<br /> eminent divines made themselves famous, either<br /> by leaving the English Church or causing others<br /> to leave it. I do not think, therefore, that the<br /> Anglican Church can lay much more claim to them<br /> than the Roman Communion can Dollinger or<br /> Renan.<br /> ♦<br /> To return once more to Mr. Andrew Lang&#039;s<br /> &quot;Essays in Little.&quot; The boldest of us may tremble<br /> before admitting that we disagree with him.<br /> There is no more appreciative writer living, unless<br /> it be Mr. Ruskin; then why cannot he see some-<br /> thing in the Russian novelists? He is always tilt-<br /> ing at them : whether he is speaking of Dumas,<br /> Thackeray, or Dickens. Perhaps it is the admirers<br /> of Tolstoi that Mr. I^ang objects to. There are<br /> three ways of taking Tolstoi: one of them is to read<br /> him, the second way is to admire him, and the<br /> third way is to abuse him. Mr. Lang has tried a<br /> vol. L<br /> combination of all three, but surely one may burn<br /> incense at the high altar of Shakespeare, let us say,<br /> and at the same time have a side chapel for Mr.<br /> Andrew Lang. Cannot the same argument be<br /> applied to Dumas and Dostoieffsky? In Tolstoi&#039;s<br /> short stories especially there are moments as good<br /> as any in English literature.<br /> Speaking of Dickens again, Mr. Andrew Lang<br /> is very angry with those people who say they<br /> cannot read Dickens, but it is much better to say<br /> so than to pretend to an admiration of the<br /> &quot;darling of the English people.&quot; In one of<br /> Mr. James Payn&#039;s delightful essays on the sham<br /> admiration of literature, he tells several amusing<br /> stories thereon, one of a lady who confessed she<br /> could not see the fun of John Gilpin, and a gentle-<br /> man who preferred the &quot;Earthly Paradise&quot; to<br /> &quot;Paradise Lost.&quot; Even at the expense of cutting<br /> a poor figure, surely it is better to be honest about<br /> what you like to read. I much prefer reading, for<br /> instance (I know many will, but in secret, agree<br /> with me), &quot;Essays in Little&quot; to Milton&#039;s reply to<br /> Salmasius.<br /> The death of Poet Close was a local rather than<br /> a national loss. No doubt some future Mr. Andrew<br /> Lang will be able to find something as amusing in<br /> his work, as Mr. Lang has found in that of Haynes<br /> Baily. Like Mr. Martin Tupper, he belonged to<br /> the good rather than to the great. The death of<br /> Fortune1 du Boisgobey, though hardly noticed in<br /> most of the English papers, received an eloquent<br /> obituary notice in the pages of the Saturday<br /> Revieiv. I confess that I envy those people who<br /> were amused by him. I think Hugh Conway told<br /> much better stories, and that several other English<br /> writers of sensational fiction are better than this<br /> French novelist on his own ground.<br /> All writers of sensational novels have at one time<br /> or another been hard pressed for an idea, and the<br /> mysterious disappearance of a lady from the Law<br /> Courts the other day is full of suggestion for a<br /> capital romance. Some enterprising journal might<br /> offer a prize for the best story founded on the<br /> incident. It would be very amusing to see how<br /> each person worked at the explanation of the<br /> mystery.<br /> Mr. Egerton Castle, having already distinguished<br /> himself as an author, has been winning further<br /> laurels at the Lyceum. &quot;Consequences&quot; has<br /> 2 13<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 296 (#354) ############################################<br /> <br /> 296<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> reached its second edition, so let us hope it will<br /> soon appear in one~ volume. If poetry is in<br /> danger, fiction is certainly safe when Mr. Castle<br /> has won the public applause. Perhaps he will<br /> be generous enough to give us also ere long a<br /> second edition of his delightful lecture.<br /> The March number of the Fortnightly Revinv<br /> which, with the exception of the Author, is the best,<br /> I think, of all the monthly periodicals, is particularly<br /> interesting. Mr. Swinburne has some splendid<br /> stanzas for a statue of Marlowe, and Mr.<br /> Meredith continues &quot;One of our Conquerors.&quot;<br /> Mr. Oscar Wilde gives a very original form of a<br /> preface for &quot;Dorian Grey,&quot; in which he rebukes<br /> his critics in a series of pregnant aphorisms.<br /> &quot;Dorian Grey,&quot; who shines like an evil thing in a<br /> very good story, will shortly appear with more<br /> harmonious surroundings than Lippincotfs Maga-<br /> zine. Among the many good articles in the<br /> Fortnightly, that on &quot;Rossetti and the Moralists&quot;<br /> is unfortunate. The writer seems to me to have<br /> entirely misconceived Rossetti&#039;s genius, and mis-<br /> understood the position he occupies in literature<br /> and art.<br /> Mr. George Moore has reprinted more than a<br /> dozen articles. They form a most interesting<br /> volume. It would be pleasant to notice many of<br /> them at some length. The articles on Balzac,<br /> Turgenieff, Verlaine, Rimbault, are highly<br /> suggestive, as is indeed all Mr. George Moore&#039;s<br /> work in this his special field of criticism. With<br /> regard to Turgenieff, I have never understood the<br /> disproportionate admiration felt for the least re-<br /> markable of the new Russian novelists. We have<br /> again studies on &quot; Le Reve &quot; and Ibsen&#039;s &quot;Ghosts.&quot;<br /> The &quot; Notes on Ghosts &quot; has come very opportunely<br /> before the appearance of the play at the Royalty.<br /> If there is anything to be said against Mr.<br /> George Moore&#039;s book, it is that the egoism which<br /> he displays is to be regretted.<br /> ♦<br /> Perhaps the article on the new pictures in the<br /> National Gallery is rather out of place in a volume<br /> on literary subjects, nor can I think that the<br /> pictures of Mr. Frith are otherwise than eminently<br /> in their place in the British School. Whether<br /> that school deserves a place in the Gallery is another<br /> matter.<br /> Verlaine is one of the most remarkable<br /> characters of the second half of the century,<br /> reminding us, as we are apt now to forget, that strong<br /> and sincere religious belief has always been found<br /> compatible with great disorder of life. A considera-<br /> tion of his life and works would be a wholesome<br /> occupation for &quot; Moralitarians &quot; of all kinds. They<br /> cannot do better than begin with Mr. George Moore&#039;s<br /> study. The &quot;Balzac &quot; is an article first printed<br /> in the Fortnightly, &quot;increased to nearly three times<br /> its original length,&quot; and greatly improved. As a<br /> realistic critic of Balzac, Mr. George Moore is<br /> far superior in power and appreciation to any other<br /> Englishman. His notice of that little appreciated<br /> and most powerful etude, &quot;La Vieille Fille,&quot; is<br /> masterly, and his remarks on &quot;Le Cure&quot; de Tours&quot;<br /> entitle him to even higher praise; they are<br /> peculiarly terse and elucidating, a really fine<br /> example of appreciative criticism. I cannot wholly<br /> agree with Mr. George Moore&#039;s rubric, &quot;that pro-<br /> bably the only way to convey a suggestion of the<br /> genius of the great novelist lies through the minor<br /> pieces.&quot; But certainly the minor pieces have never<br /> been sufficiently considered, and &quot; La Vieille Fille&quot;<br /> is one of the finest, superior in every respect to<br /> the better known&quot; Femme de trente ans.&quot;<br /> Apropos of Balzac, compilers of anecdotes con-<br /> cerning him generally forget the characteristic<br /> note of Hans Christian Andersen in his &quot;Mit<br /> Livs Eventyr.&quot; Describing his visit to Paris in<br /> 1843, ne says:—&quot; Balzac, whose acquaintance I<br /> made at this time, I first saw in the salon of<br /> Madame laComtesse de Bocarmd, as a fashionable,<br /> well-dressed personage. His white teeth gleamed<br /> between his red lips. He seemed a jovial man,<br /> but he did not talk much, at any rate in that<br /> circle. A lady who wrote verses fastened herself<br /> on to him and me; she drew us aside to a sofa<br /> and sat herself down between us. While she was<br /> talking with modest hesitation about how small she<br /> felt between us, I turned my head and caught<br /> sight behind her back of Balzac&#039;s laughing, satirical<br /> face and half-open mouth, slyly turned towards me.<br /> This was our first meeting. One day I was going<br /> through the Louvre. There I met a man in face,<br /> figure, and gait exactly like Balzac. But the man<br /> was dressed in shabby, worn-out clothes—really<br /> dirty they were. His shoes were all burst out, his<br /> trousers bespattered with dry mud, and his hat all<br /> misshapen and cracked. I stopped short; the<br /> man smiled at me, then I went on, but he was so<br /> incredibly like—I turned back, ran after him, and<br /> said, &#039;It can&#039;t be Herr Balzac!&#039; The man<br /> laughed, showing his white teeth, and said only,<br /> &#039;Monsieur Balzac started for St. Petersburg this<br /> morning.&#039; He pressed my hand, his own was fine<br /> and soft, he nodded, and was gone. It must<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 297 (#355) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 297<br /> have been Balzac; perhaps he had been on one of<br /> his exploring expeditions among the mysteries of<br /> Paris. Or was the man someone else, who,<br /> being extremely like Balzac, and having often<br /> been taken for him, was amusing himself by<br /> mystifying a foreigner? Two days afterwards,<br /> when I was talking to Madame Bocarml, she<br /> gave me a message of farewell from Balzac—he<br /> had gone to St. Petersburg.&quot;<br /> As we might have expected, a delicate, half-<br /> satiric sense of humour was the point of contact<br /> between the all-comprehensive Balzac and the<br /> charming, childlike Dane. How delighted Balzac<br /> would be with the exquisite blending of pathos<br /> and humour in the tale, &quot; En Hjertesorg,&quot; the grief<br /> of a little child who had no trouser button to pay<br /> the toll the other children exacted to attend the<br /> funeral of a dead pug.<br /> Everyone knows the story which Byron told<br /> Medwin. Shortly before Shelley&#039;s death he had a<br /> horrible nightmare. &quot;He thought that a figure<br /> wrapped in a mantle came to his bedside and<br /> beckoned him; he got up and followed it; when<br /> in the hall the phantom lifted up the hood of his<br /> cloak, showed Shelley the phantasm of himself,<br /> and saying &#039; Siete satisfatto ?&#039;—vanished. Shelley<br /> had been reading a strange drama, which is<br /> supposed to have been written by Calderon,<br /> entitled, &quot;El embozado, 6 el encapotado.&quot; It is<br /> so scarce that Washington Irving told me he had<br /> sought for it without success in several of the<br /> public libraries of Spain.&quot;<br /> Where did Shelley obtain this play? Was it a<br /> Spanish play at all which he had read? Were<br /> Byron or Medwin correct? Does Washington<br /> Irving throw any further light on the subject?<br /> The authorship of Calderon is immaterial; so<br /> many plays by other authors were printed as his in<br /> his lifetime that it was necessary for him to make<br /> a list of his works. This list is known to be<br /> incomplete, but the point for remark is that no<br /> play entitled &quot;El embozado &quot; or &quot;El encapotado&quot;<br /> is mentioned in any of the exhaustive editions of<br /> Calderon among plays erroneously attributed to<br /> him. The title, again, is not mentioned in the<br /> lists of anonymous Spanish dramas. On the other<br /> hand there is a play of Agustin Moreto which<br /> in certain details suggests that he may have<br /> known some such story. The subject is a fasci-<br /> nating one, suggesting, as it must have done, one<br /> of the finest tales of the greatest of English writers<br /> vol. 1.<br /> of short tales, and again brought to our memory<br /> by the wonderful pen and ink sketch of Rossetti<br /> called &quot;How they met themselves.&quot; The well-<br /> known stories of Theophile Gautier and Robert<br /> Louis Stevenson represent a similar but not the<br /> same idea; at any rate the point of view from<br /> which they regard the idea is different. Can any<br /> of our readers give any information concerning the<br /> play?<br /> Miss E. S. G. Saunders is bringing out a volume<br /> entitled, &quot; Thoughts for the present Lectionary; or,<br /> the New Christian Year.&quot;<br /> Mr. Stanley Little contributes an article entitled,<br /> &quot;The Camera&#039;s Service to Art,&quot; to the April<br /> number of the Photographic Quarterly.<br /> Mr. Hume Nisbet is producing this month, (1)<br /> &quot;A Colonial Tramp: Being Adventures through<br /> Australasia and New Guinea.&quot; 2 vols. 32^.<br /> Ward and Downey. (2) &quot;The Black Drop.&quot;<br /> 2s. 6d. Trischler and Co. (3) The third edition<br /> of &quot; Bail Up!&quot; Chatto and Windus.<br /> He has also an article on &quot;The Papuan and<br /> his Master,&quot; in the Fortnightly Review.<br /> Under the pseudonym of Evelyn Ballantyne,<br /> Mr. Eustace R. Ball has contributed on Continental<br /> Music Halls to the March number of the<br /> Theatre.<br /> An article on &quot; Weighing the Stars,&quot; by Mr. J.<br /> E. Gore, F.R.A.S., appears in the Gentleman&#039;s<br /> Magazine for February, and another on &quot;Planetary<br /> Nebula;&quot; in the February number of the Monthly<br /> Packet.<br /> ♦<br /> A new and cheaper edition of Mr. James Sully&#039;s<br /> &quot;Pessimism,&quot; with a review of pessimistic literature<br /> up to the present date, has just been issued by the<br /> publishers, Messrs. Kegan Paul, Trench and Co.<br /> Mr. William Westall has written a one volume<br /> story, entitled &quot;Back to Africa: A Confession.&quot;<br /> It will be published by Ward and Downey in the<br /> course of the present month. R.<br /> *<br /> 2 B 2<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 298 (#356) ############################################<br /> <br /> 298<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> THE PARNASSUS PUBLISHING<br /> ASSOCIATION.<br /> THE Association consists of one man, Mr.<br /> Joseph Haggerston Dalston. With him<br /> are associated as many literary aspirants<br /> as he can persuade to publish with him at their cost<br /> and risk.<br /> Here is my experience with Mr. Joseph Hag-<br /> gerston Dalston. Some time ago, while I was con-<br /> cluding a novel with which I intended to astonish<br /> the world, I received a letter from Mr. Dalston,<br /> stating that he was an author&#039;s agent, and as he<br /> enclosed what appeared to be bonA fide testimonials,<br /> I replied to his letter. This reply doubtless war-<br /> ranted him in assuming my inexperience of<br /> business.<br /> In subsequent letters he offered to read my<br /> story for a fee of one guinea. This, for what<br /> he called himself, &quot;an editorial expert whose<br /> opinion should be at once authoritative and final,&quot;<br /> was not expensive. Before closing with his offer,<br /> however, I asked for proof that he had that<br /> influence with publishers which he claimed. By<br /> return came a letter enclosing one of recent date,<br /> from a publishing house of the highest standing,<br /> which was to the effect that they were very much<br /> obliged to him for having brought them the MS.<br /> of Mr. •, which they were prepared to publish<br /> immediately, paying the author a royalty. This<br /> proof seemed to me sufficient, especially when<br /> read in connection with the following wail of Mr.<br /> Dalston. &quot;Unfortunately, however, even in large<br /> London publishing houses of assured authority and<br /> repute, few follow religiously the &#039;reading&#039; of a<br /> new MS. by an unknown writer, while so many<br /> knmvn (yet not always repeatedly successful)<br /> authors are at the &#039; beck and call&#039; of the majority<br /> of the large publishers to go on at any time<br /> mechanically writing &#039;to order&#039;—too often a curse<br /> to the &#039;pot-boiling&#039; reputation of the author, and<br /> ergo lesseningly attractive to these authors&#039; favourite<br /> readers—a majority of the stupid reading public,<br /> too easily and too stupidly satisfied, to the<br /> oft-time exclusion of a new writer waiting with<br /> better work, but unable to pass with it through<br /> the barrier that too often bars the way to talent<br /> and genius in other directions than 1 literary<br /> land.&quot;&#039;<br /> The &quot;rough copy&quot; of my manuscript I for-<br /> warded to his address for an opinion.<br /> Nearly a month elapsed before I obtained any<br /> reply, but repeated applications elicited the follow-<br /> ing: &quot;Your MS. has really demanded from me<br /> more attention and deliberate care than I had at<br /> first anticipated. In the first place, I may say,<br /> that I did not like your introduction, but the con-<br /> cluding chapters minimise my first objection, which<br /> we may now let pass. The opening is clever and<br /> startling, and prepares the reader&#039;s mind with a<br /> powerful piquancy for the more attractive artistic<br /> &#039;actualities&#039; so skilfully drawn throughout the<br /> book; and the successive chapters increasing, as<br /> they do in interest, will hold the reader in sensa-<br /> tional subjection—fascinated by that mental mes-<br /> merism which enthralls at every turn of your<br /> pages.<br /> &quot;Splendidly subjective and appalling are Chaps,<br /> xxi and xxii. &#039;The Captain&#039; also is interestingly<br /> introduced and cleverly conducted to his doom!<br /> &quot;Other chapters teeming with touches of talent<br /> will gain &#039;good words&#039; for your work from the<br /> Reading World and Critics, even as fine present-<br /> ments of human passion, the littleness of life, and<br /> the greatness of death pourtrayed by your pen, inter<br /> alia in , , , have never been formed<br /> in the one time ever-praised pages of Bulwer!<br /> Dickens!! and Wilkie Collins!!!<br /> &quot;So swayed in this connexion, then, I hold to<br /> the belief that there are &#039;situations&#039; in your nar-<br /> rative that will awaken attention from many who<br /> are now steeped in sluggish &#039;society&#039; stupor, whilst<br /> the psychological problems still awaiting solution<br /> will invite keener study from the scientist, and &#039;set<br /> the mind thinking&#039;!<br /> &quot;The lurid light of English intellectuality, quick-<br /> ening in its intensity by recent remarkable revela-<br /> tions in the Press, now searchingly turns toward<br /> what little is known of lawless life in Africa, that<br /> mysterious and uncivilized clime—and in the near<br /> future, perhaps, when we can discern more truths<br /> —coming to us, though they may, through the<br /> thinly-veiled romanticism of another Hanwell—<br /> then your and other philanthropic warning words<br /> shall stir the public pulse into indignation or re-<br /> volt, until the lightning message of rnercy, release,<br /> and reform is flashed from England to Mashona!&quot;<br /> I am still inclined to think that this gratifying<br /> opinion is worth the guinea it cost me, especially<br /> when it is compared with the trivial comments of<br /> friends who have begged my books, or of critics whom<br /> I have feasted, treated, and entertained at a much<br /> greater cost. The indefatigable Mr. Dalston did<br /> not, however, expect to rest with one guinea, for<br /> with the letter which accompanied his opinion, was<br /> one with &quot;Suggestions for Publishing,&quot; in which<br /> I was reminded that, &quot;Looking at the immediate<br /> interest that would probably result from bringing<br /> out the book at once, it may be considered ex-<br /> pedient to publish the book on the author&#039;s own<br /> account! Mr. Haggerston Dalston, trading as the<br /> Mongoose Publishing Co., and publisher of the<br /> Muses&#039; Herald, will undertake the work. &quot;The first<br /> cost would be ^ioo (the actual cost of producing<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 299 (#357) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 299<br /> the first edition of a book in same form as pro-<br /> posed by Mr. Dalston is £23 17-r.), after sending<br /> 100 copies for reviews, &amp;c, the sale of 900 books,<br /> 1 vol., at 6s. (less discount to trade, &amp;c), would<br /> leave about £80 net profit. A smaller size type<br /> and vol. would cost £60, first edition, and leave<br /> about £40 net profit. The total editions of the<br /> first twelve months would probably leave a net<br /> profit (if published as suggested) of ,£1,000 to<br /> It would be interesting to know the figures upon<br /> which the estimated profits are based; there is a<br /> preciseness about the £1,575 greatly at variance<br /> with the round sum of £100, the estimated cost<br /> of production.<br /> I did not close with the offer, and directed my<br /> man to &quot;place&quot; the story with a good firm of<br /> publishers.<br /> A few days later he wrote making a further offer<br /> to publish on same terms as had been accepted<br /> by an author whose agreement (!) he forwarded to<br /> me. &quot;You will forward me a cheque for £10,<br /> agreeing to pay a further £10 on receipt of proofs,<br /> and a final £10 when the book is in your hands,<br /> remaining risk and profits will be equally divided<br /> between publisher and author.&quot;<br /> Returning the stamped agreement of the author<br /> who had accepted these terms (his book has not<br /> yet appeared), 1 again asked Mr. Dalston to get my<br /> MS. accepted by a publisher. He wrote me that<br /> his offer was not &quot;unworthy of acceptance,&quot; seeing<br /> that, for the gradual outlay of ^30, an edition of<br /> 1,000 copies would have expeditiously followed,&quot;<br /> then for six weeks failed to reply to any of my letters.<br /> &quot;Respecting your MS.,&quot; he wrote in the last<br /> letter I received from him, &quot;I am greatly dis-<br /> appointed at receiving it back from , whose<br /> manager I had seen before submitting yours and<br /> two other MSS.—all now returned.<br /> &quot;When unaccepted, the daily consensus of suc-<br /> cessful scribblers seems to be—publish on your<br /> own account; but of course, this, as you know,<br /> is not an easy matter. However, I shall venture<br /> to publish the three MSS. (yours and the com-<br /> mercial&#039;s, and that written by a doctor&#039;s wife) under<br /> the following conditions, namely:—£10 in ad-<br /> vance, £10 further to be paid to me when proofs<br /> are in the hands of author, and £10 when the<br /> book is published and distributed, profits after<br /> publication to be equally divided between author<br /> and publisher.&quot;<br /> This being a similar offer to the one already<br /> proffered and refused, I determined to call upon<br /> the man and to secure my MS.<br /> The gentleman who is manager of the Mongoose<br /> Publishing Company, manager of the Muses&#039; Pub-<br /> lishing Association, editor and publisher of the<br /> Muses&#039; Herald, must surely be a busy man, yet I<br /> had to call many times at the room—it was on the<br /> second floor back—before I found the room occu-<br /> pied. Mr. Dalston is not a. young man, and he has<br /> a pleasing manner of address. He rarely speaks<br /> to the point, but abuses in general terms all the pub-<br /> lishing houses and their readers, and he never<br /> allows you to leave his presence without asking<br /> you for a money contribution to one or other of<br /> his ventures.<br /> As for the contents of his office there were two<br /> chairs, a table, a set of pigeon holes and MSS.<br /> In fact, the room was entirely furnished with MSS.<br /> It was simply full of &quot;copy&quot; piled from floor to<br /> ceiling, lying upon chairs and table, and floor, and<br /> fender. By a lucky chance my packet was upper-<br /> most of a newly made file, and was rescued without<br /> difficulty.<br /> Mr. Haggerston Dalston is now manager and<br /> everything else of a brand new association called<br /> the Parnassus Publishing Association. A clean<br /> sweep has been made of the MSS., and the name<br /> plate at the house and the Muses&#039; Herald being<br /> defunct, with the Mongoose Publishing Company,<br /> a new plate is in preparation showing that here are<br /> the Central Offices (second floor back) of the<br /> &quot;Parnassus Publishing Company&quot; and of &quot;Par-<br /> nassus Slopes,&quot; its magazine. Authors are now<br /> being invited by such papers as will take the ad-<br /> vertisements, to send their MSS. to the Company,<br /> and the old game has begun apain. The bait is<br /> the offer of &quot;remunerative openings&quot; and the<br /> promise that &quot; suitable MSS.J&#039; are promptly paid for.<br /> As for the magazine, every contributor must pay<br /> in advance for a whole year—it will probably<br /> collapse in a month or two, as happened with<br /> &quot;Parnassus Slopes.&quot;<br /> Then the Company will disappear too. What<br /> becomes in the end of all the MSS., nobody knows.<br /> Perhaps not one in a thousand is worth anything.<br /> Yet that such an end—disappearance in this sink<br /> of low cunning—should be the fate of MSS. about<br /> which so many glowing hopes were formed, is<br /> melancholy indeed.<br /> *<br /> CORRESPONDENCE AND CASES.<br /> ( The Editor is not responsible for the opinions expressed or<br /> the statements made by correspondents.)<br /> The Production of Vouchers.<br /> ACASE has been lately brought before a<br /> London Court which promises to become<br /> interesting and useful. It was to this<br /> effect. A certain publisher transferred his business<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 300 (#358) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> to another firm. Two of the authors whose books<br /> he had published on the &quot;half-profit&quot; system,<br /> moved by Counsel that the second firm should<br /> be called upon to find vouchers for all the items of<br /> receipts and expenditure supplied to the authors.<br /> Their Counsel argued that the first firm only was<br /> responsible for any claims. The judge, however,<br /> granted the order asked for, reserving the question<br /> of costs. We hope to publish the further history<br /> of this case.<br /> »<br /> On Advertisements.<br /> I wish to draw the attention of your readers to<br /> two points which are generally lost sight of by an<br /> author when signing his contract. When disposing<br /> of a book upon the royalty system, one of the usual<br /> clauses is, &quot;That all expenses of advertising shall<br /> be borne by the said publishers.&quot;<br /> It is by paying out monies for advertisements in<br /> addition to disbursing the cost of production that<br /> the publisher earns his right to his lion&#039;s share, i.e.,<br /> the amount of cash that remains after paying the<br /> royalty to the author.<br /> Now let us suppose the case of an author who<br /> is pretty well known and whose three volume novels<br /> will be assuredly subscribed, we will say, to be well<br /> within the mark, to five hundred copies. If the<br /> publisher does not advertise at all he nets the<br /> entire difference between the trade price and the<br /> cost of production less the author&#039;s royalties—upon<br /> the five hundred copies. Therefore the less he<br /> advertises the better for it.<br /> But this is not all, the author who is absolutely<br /> in the hands of his publishers in the matter of<br /> advertising, often finds his book a sort of Christian<br /> thrown to the lions. The reason is not far to seek;<br /> somebody has to be &quot;gibbeted,&quot; somebody has to<br /> be &quot;guyed,&quot; and naturally the books that are not<br /> advertised go upon the black list, and the reviewer<br /> is given a free hand and told to work his wicked<br /> will upon them.<br /> The result of such &quot;gibbeting&quot; is probably not<br /> felt by the author till he comes to dispose of his<br /> next venture, say to some other publisher. &quot;Your<br /> last book was very severely reviewed, Mr. Nibbs,&quot;<br /> says the publisher, &quot; and we have sent over to our<br /> friends, Messrs. Barabbas, who tell us that only five<br /> hundred copies were subscribed.&quot;<br /> It is thus that an author may lose ground, all<br /> for the want of a ha&#039;porth of tar in the shape of<br /> having a cut and dried clause as to hoto much is to<br /> be spent in advertisements, and where it is to be<br /> spent.<br /> For novels, at all events, a certain amount of<br /> advertisement is necessary; reviews even very<br /> favourable reviews, and the mere fact that the book<br /> is on Messrs. Smith&#039;s and Mudie&#039;s lists to be<br /> issued to first class subscribers only is not enough<br /> to keep the book before the public.<br /> Then where advertisements are to appear is m<br /> portant.<br /> The writer once published an eight and sixpenny<br /> book, on the half-profit system, which ran into a<br /> second edition. There were no profits, because the<br /> book was advertised not wisely, but too well. &quot;If,&quot;<br /> thought the writer, &quot;that mighty firm went on with<br /> a second edition, surely there must be profits, some<br /> profits, at all events, upon the first.&quot; Not a bit of<br /> it; the book was said to be swamped by advertise-<br /> ments. The writer went through the list of<br /> advertisements, and he found that his book had<br /> been advertised in the &quot; Piscatorial Bulletin.&quot; He<br /> innocently wondered at this selection; when he<br /> found who the Bulletin belonged to, his wonder<br /> ceased. Perhaps after all the Fishing Fraternity<br /> are fond of oriental experiences. Who knows but<br /> that they may buy up the whole second edition?<br /> Not that the writer cares one brass button, because<br /> even if it were so, he feels certain that no half<br /> profits would ever accrue to him, because of course<br /> they&#039;d be all mopped up by judicious advertise-<br /> ments in the &quot; Piscatorial Bulletin,&quot; &amp;c.<br /> Pachyderm.<br /> [The writer will find the subject of advertising<br /> treated in Mr. Sprigge&#039;s &quot;Methods of Publishing.&quot;<br /> —Ed.]<br /> Authors and Reviewers.<br /> There are two questions I should like answered.<br /> First—Do reviewers conscientiously read the books<br /> with which they deal? Second—Do their criti-<br /> cisms honestly reflect the opinions that they have<br /> formed?<br /> Now any author worthy of the name must value<br /> and appreciate criticism which, however adverse,<br /> is nevertheless honest, discriminating, and intelli-<br /> gent. So far, at any rate, even if no farther, do I<br /> consider myself worthy to be called an author. I<br /> like being told what points in a work of mine are<br /> good, and what are bad. It is an intellectual<br /> satisfaction to me, and I feel precisely the same<br /> sort of gratitude to any reviewer that an intelligent<br /> student of painting or music unquestionably feels<br /> towards an able teacher, however severe his stric-<br /> tures occasionally may be. But my faith in critics,<br /> and consequently my good disposition towards<br /> them, have been considerably shaken of late. I<br /> find they contradict each other so wildly, that it<br /> is impossible for the most humble-minded writer<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 301 (#359) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 301<br /> to learn anything from them; and they occasionally<br /> give grave grounds for the suspicion that they<br /> have never even read the book they are professing<br /> to review.<br /> Let me give an instance from my own experience.<br /> Two years ago or thereabouts, I published a novel.<br /> The book was widely reviewed, and I, a tyro in<br /> the art of fiction, felt very curious indeed to see<br /> how my first effort would be received by experts.<br /> Here are some of the verdicts.<br /> The Saturday said it was undeniably a clever<br /> book—satirical, humorous, and amusing; appa-<br /> rently the work of a man who had observed and<br /> thought; an original and readable novel.<br /> The AthetuBum said that it was the most com-<br /> pletely worthless novel the editor had seen for a<br /> long time.<br /> The Manchester Examiner said that were the<br /> critic compelled to characterise it by one epithet,<br /> that epithet would be &quot;vivacious.&quot; Unflagging<br /> vivacity was its great charm.<br /> The Sunday Times, on the other hand, con-<br /> demned it as &quot; always dull.&quot;<br /> The Manchester Examiner, again, praised my<br /> &quot;constructive ability&quot;; while—<br /> My publisher&#039;s reader informed me that a lack<br /> of constructive ability was my chief weakness.<br /> I might fill two columns of your paper with<br /> similar examples. But surely these are enough—<br /> enough to bewilder anybody. Am I dull, or am I<br /> vivacious? Am I clever, or am I a fool? Is my<br /> book original, satirical, humorous, &amp;c, or is it<br /> the most completely worthless novel out? Surely<br /> I am not unreasonable in asking whom I am to<br /> believe.<br /> One word more. I spoke to my publishers about<br /> one of the notices—a notice which appeared to me<br /> gratuitously and unintelligently insolent. &quot;Oh!&quot;<br /> replied the worthy man I was addressing, &quot;I think<br /> I can explain that. The gentleman who wrote<br /> that review of your book threatened to &#039;slate&#039;<br /> whatever we might send him, unless we advertised<br /> in his paper. We did not give him an advertise-<br /> ment, and you, unfortunately, are made to suffer.&quot;<br /> Perhaps this may throw some light on my second<br /> question. An Obscure Novelist.<br /> —»~—<br /> Accepted.<br /> In January, 1889, a MS. was accepted for a<br /> certain periodical. In May the publisher was<br /> changed. In July, the new publisher accepted<br /> three other MSS. and &quot;also the one sent to the<br /> late Editor,&quot; the price of the whole being stated<br /> by letter. My writing name was published among<br /> the other contributors, and I was urged in different<br /> ways to help to make the magazine known.<br /> None of the MSS. appearing, after eighteen months<br /> I wrote to ask the cause, and was coolly informed<br /> that the Editor had more MSS. on hand than he<br /> could use, and he would return them.<br /> I offered to wait, but positively declined to have<br /> them back, but by return of post they arrived in a<br /> very tattered condition. There was neither<br /> &quot;smash &quot; nor &quot;crash &quot; in this case—the periodical<br /> is said to be flourishing. M. J. D. S.<br /> Literary Godchildren.<br /> There is a literary Nemesis when a popular<br /> author suffers from the intrusion of the manuscripts<br /> of aspirants after fame. But when an unknown<br /> writer—who finds a difficulty in having an article<br /> accepted, and as great trouble to get paid for it—<br /> is troubled for advice and assistance in getting the<br /> work of others placed and remunerated—then the<br /> Furies are the old women one blames for the mis-<br /> management of affairs.<br /> Fifteen years ago a friend of mine wrote a play and<br /> demanded my opinion of it. I did not dare to give<br /> anyexpression of criticism of a tragedy thathe assured<br /> me was more tragical than Scott&#039;s &quot;Bride of Lam-<br /> mermoor,&quot; and more impregnated with humour<br /> than Schiller&#039;s &quot;Wallenstein.&quot; I was even able to<br /> refuse when I knew that one of the poet&#039;s friends<br /> said, &quot;No such work of genius had been written<br /> since Shakespeare&#039;s plays first saw the light.&quot; For-<br /> tunately, I escaped without much censure in this<br /> case. My friend said that he regretted my decision,<br /> because he &quot;had a certain amount of respect for<br /> my taste.&quot; He did not insist on submitting his<br /> proofs to me.<br /> The next experience was more amusing, if a little<br /> more costly. A schoolboy who had got into debt<br /> wrote to a member of my family asking for 7*.,<br /> stating that he was about to write a three volume<br /> novel, that he had money owing for a short story,<br /> and enclosing some of his essays. The money was<br /> sent without any literary advice. And by the next<br /> post came a request for 1is. more &quot; to save him<br /> from disgrace.&quot;<br /> Another manuscript was submitted to my judg-<br /> ment by a young woman who wished to make a<br /> profession of letters. It was clearly written, well<br /> paragraphed, and fairly interesting in matter. I<br /> had great pleasure in encouraging the writer, and<br /> urging her to perseverance. Now, I am glad to<br /> write, she is successfully supplementing her income<br /> by her pen.<br /> The last case is perhaps the most painful. In<br /> my desk at this moment there lies a morocco<br /> bound volume, in whose pages a beautiful, unfortu-<br /> nate girl has written part of her life experience. She<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 302 (#360) ############################################<br /> <br /> 302<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> asks my opinion of her confession. It has origin-<br /> ality and observation, but otherwise it is unreadable.<br /> The writer is sensitive, and so much spoiled by<br /> the flattery of her friends, that it will be puzzling<br /> for me to speak the truth without giving some<br /> pain. A.<br /> Gratuitous Contributions.<br /> I lately offered a short story to the editor of a<br /> popular magazine. It was accepted, but when I<br /> came to ask what was the scale of remuneration<br /> for such contributions I was blandly informed that<br /> ladies and gentlemen were usually willing to supply<br /> the magazine in question with &quot; copy,&quot; without hope<br /> of any other remuneration than the pleasure and<br /> glory of seeing themselves in print! Now this is<br /> by no means a rare instance of a practice on the part<br /> of authors which I think cannot be better described<br /> than as the process of &quot; cutting their own throats.&quot;<br /> The lamentable weakness with which writers<br /> consent to give away the work of such brains as they<br /> possess is one to be severely deprecated. It is to<br /> my thinking an act of arrant folly, injurious not only<br /> to those who indulge in it, but to others. I can,<br /> in fact, conceive nothing more mischievous, as<br /> lowering the price of literature in the market, than<br /> this habit, widely spread as it is, of gorging the<br /> pages of periodical publications with gratuitous con-<br /> tributions to the exclusion of matter that would<br /> otherwise be paid for. For is it to be expected<br /> that the proprietor of a magazine would pay for the<br /> stories, articles, &amp;c, offered to him by some writers<br /> when he is able to get any quantity of such com-<br /> positions from others at no cost whatever?<br /> The scale of pay allowed by many magazines is<br /> poor enough as it is. It is not uncommon for<br /> certain very well-known periodicals to offer such<br /> miserable remuneration as 2s. and 2s. 6d. a page,<br /> while 5*. a page is considered in such quarters as<br /> something magnificent in its liberality. I have<br /> really been surprised to find how strictly moderate<br /> are the views on the subject of payment entertained<br /> by the conductors of magazines which might be<br /> expected to offer at any rate something like ade-<br /> quate compensation for one&#039;s time and trouble.<br /> The reason of this parsimony is of course &quot;gratuit-<br /> ous contributions.&quot; It is poor stuff for the most<br /> part, no doubt, that is thus given away, but it seems<br /> to be good enough for the editor&#039;s purpose. But,<br /> I contend, everything, whether good, bad or<br /> indifferent, should have its price. It is not to be<br /> expected that the magazines should be filled in<br /> every page, every month, with first-class literature.<br /> Many of these periodicals are circulated among a<br /> class of readers who are not over particular as to<br /> the quality of the wares supplied to them, just as<br /> in other markets people are content with cheap and<br /> inferior articles. Yet everything is surely worth<br /> something, if it can be sold, and every story, or<br /> other lucubration, which is worth printing ought to<br /> be worth paying for.<br /> I am afraid it must be said that ladies are the<br /> worst offenders in this particular. I do not greatly<br /> blame them. They have, as a rule, little experience<br /> or knowledge of the business side of literature, and<br /> though some of them dream of making fortunes by<br /> their pens, too many, with an excess of diffidence,<br /> think they can hardly aspire so high as to be paid<br /> like what they call &quot;a regular author.&quot; It is these<br /> amateurs who cheapen the literary market, and<br /> many of them are worth a price, even though it be<br /> a small one. Let them at any rate not be content<br /> with the mere acceptance of their stories and<br /> sketches, but ask for pay, and, when refused, with-<br /> draw their contributions and send them elsewhere.<br /> Many an article which would be eagerly taken by<br /> one of those editors who never pay when they can<br /> help it, would be found acceptable by others of<br /> more liberal habit. At the worst, failing to get<br /> their contributions into the paying magazines, they<br /> could fall back upon the non-paying ones. These<br /> last only deserve to have the very dregs of the<br /> scribbling art.<br /> I therefore raise my voice in earnest protest<br /> against this pernicious custom of offering contri-<br /> butions for nothing, or allowing them to be pub-<br /> lished without any remuneration whatever. The<br /> Society of Authors, I think, could do no greater<br /> service to the cause at least of periodical literature<br /> than by making it as widely known as possible that<br /> all contributors to magazines, &amp;c, will be duly paid<br /> for if only the contributors are firm enough to<br /> refuse to write for nothing. If such an appeal did<br /> not put a stop to this practice it might at least<br /> diminish the mischief arising from it. Pray then<br /> advise all authors, amateur and otherwise, whenever<br /> it is proposed to print their contributions for noth-<br /> ing, to return the reply so often received by some<br /> of them—&quot; declined with thanks.&quot;<br /> No Pay, No Pen.<br /> —*—<br /> A Coincidence?<br /> Will you allow me to draw attention to a case of<br /> curious similarity between two stories—the one by<br /> Mr. Ernest Rhys, entitled &quot;The Last Drearn of<br /> Julius Roy,&quot; which appeared in Macmillan&#039;s Maga-<br /> zine last month, and the other signed by my name,<br /> which appeared in the Newbery House Magazine<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 303 (#361) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 3°3<br /> of July, 1890, and which was entitled, &quot;A Great<br /> Success&quot;? I sketch the outline of the two stories<br /> in parallel columns :—<br /> Mr. Ernest Rhys&#039;s story.<br /> My story.<br /> &quot;A GREAT SUCCESS.&quot;<br /> THE LAST DREAM OF<br /> TULIUS ROY.&quot;<br /> July, 1890.<br /> An author after a long life<br /> of failure starts from Trafalgar<br /> Square in a condition of ab-<br /> normal excitement, and rushes<br /> down the .Strand, intent upon<br /> lunching at a Tavern, Fleet<br /> Street being suggested. He<br /> orders a lunch which for him<br /> is unusually sumptuous. He<br /> has been full of unreal inflated<br /> hope, but overhears a con-<br /> versation in which he realises<br /> for the first time the abject -<br /> ness of his own failure. He<br /> has had ale with his lunch.<br /> He throws his arms over the<br /> table, lays his head on them,<br /> falls asleep and dreams. The<br /> dream takes the form of his<br /> own troubled experience.<br /> Again he is &quot;hurrying through<br /> the streets of the great city.&quot;<br /> He is on his way to the<br /> palace of Fame. There is a<br /> gate which has to be passed<br /> through; before he gets in he<br /> has to present a gift. This<br /> gift he holds in his hand, but<br /> it dwindles and vanishes.<br /> He falls before the door at<br /> last, defeated and in despair.<br /> Then the dream changes;<br /> the door is unexpectedly<br /> opened by an unseen hand,<br /> and he beholds a face known<br /> yet unknown, which smiles<br /> upon him. The poor author<br /> enters in to find the aspiration<br /> of his life satisfied in ways<br /> not looked for by him. When<br /> found by the people of the<br /> Tavern, he is dead.<br /> February, 1891.<br /> An author after ten years<br /> of failure, starts from Trafal-<br /> gar Square, goes to Pall Mall<br /> to put on a dress coat, and<br /> finally returns in an abnormal<br /> state of excitement on his way<br /> to a Tavern (&quot;The Three<br /> Friars&quot;) in Fleet Street, to<br /> have supper there. He orders<br /> an unusually sumptuous me al<br /> He has been realising the<br /> abjectness of his own failure,<br /> but on his way he meets with<br /> his old love, who gives him a<br /> flower, and he i« now in a state<br /> of wild, unreal hope. He has<br /> wine with his supper, and he<br /> throws his arms over the table,<br /> falls asleep, and dreams. The<br /> dream takes the form of his<br /> own troubled experience.<br /> He is &quot;being whirled rapidly<br /> through the streets of a dark<br /> and unknown city,&quot; in a car-<br /> riage with the beloved woman<br /> by his side. He gets to a<br /> place which is a Theatre, and<br /> sees a phantasm of himself on<br /> the stage struggling in vain<br /> to pass in at a Gate; the<br /> phantasm falls down at last<br /> before the Gate, baffled and<br /> defeated. He goes on to the<br /> Stage to look after his own<br /> Phantasm. He himself knocks<br /> at the Gate, and it is thrown<br /> open, and the beloved woman<br /> stands before him smiling.<br /> Then he receives in unex-<br /> pected ways the desire of his<br /> life. When the waiter comes<br /> to rouse him, he is dead.<br /> E. Fairfax Byrrne.<br /> The Authors&#039; Club.<br /> I am in favour of an Authors&#039; Club. I think it<br /> would be greatly to the advantage of authors to<br /> come together oftener than once a year at a big<br /> dinner, and to have more frequent opportunity<br /> of exchanging ideas and &quot;comparing notes.&quot; Of<br /> this I can give an illustration. Two years ago<br /> at our annual dinner, I sat next to a brother<br /> novelist, whose acquaintance I then made for the<br /> first time. That morning I had received from the<br /> vol. 1.<br /> editor of a weekly magazine of whose financial<br /> position I knew nothing, a request to write a<br /> Christmas story for him. Thinking my neighbour<br /> might be better informed, I inquired whether he<br /> had ever done ought for the periodical in question.<br /> &quot;Yes,&quot; says he, &quot;I did a Christmas story for it<br /> last year but one, and I have not got paid for it<br /> yet.&quot;<br /> On this hint I acted; when I answered the<br /> editor&#039;s letter, I named my price, and made it a<br /> condition that I should be paid on his receipt of<br /> my MS. With this condition he did not see fit<br /> to comply, and I did not see fit to write the story.<br /> Again, the other day I chanced to meet a<br /> member of the Society of Authors at the office in<br /> Portugal Street, to whom I mentioned that I had<br /> been requested to write a story for a well known<br /> magazine. &quot;Be sure you make a bargain before-<br /> hand,&quot; he observed, &quot;or you will get a good deal<br /> less than you expect.&quot; On this hint also I acted.<br /> I named my price, and was offered half—which I<br /> did not accept. Observe that in neither of these<br /> cases did the editor make any mention of terms.<br /> That, presumably, was to be left an open question,<br /> and would have proved a troublesome one for me,<br /> a trouble from which I was saved by being a<br /> member of the Society of Authors.<br /> The chief difficulty in the formation of an<br /> Authors Club&#039; seems to me to lie in the defini-<br /> tion of &quot;author.&quot; Will every man and woman<br /> who has written a trashy novel or volume of<br /> poetry, and paid for its production, be eligible<br /> for admission? And if not, where will you draw<br /> the line? W.<br /> [The line must be drawn by the Committee or<br /> the managing body of the Club.—Editor.]<br /> THE AUTHOR&#039;S BOOK STALL.<br /> [This column is open for lists of books wanted, books<br /> offered for exchange and books offered for sale. Initials<br /> must be given for reference, not for publication, and the<br /> editor will place correspondents in communication with each<br /> other. Books must not be sent to the office of the Society.<br /> Letters enclosing list may be addressed &quot;X,&quot;care of the<br /> Editor. It must be understood that no responsibility rests<br /> with the Editor or with the officers of the Society.]<br /> Books for Sale.<br /> Atalanta in Calydon. Original Edition.<br /> Leckie&#039;s Leader of Public Opinion in Ireland.<br /> Berzelin&#039;s Jahresbericht der Chemie. Complete set.<br /> vols. Address &quot;E.A.<br /> 2 C<br /> 27<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 304 (#362) ############################################<br /> <br /> 3°4<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Henry Irving Shakspeare. 8 vols. Edition de luxe, un-<br /> cut, in original cases. 11 guineas.<br /> The Odyssey. Translated by William Morris. I edition.<br /> 2 vols.<br /> Viollet le Due. Dictionnaire. Mobilier Francais. 6 vols.<br /> Half calf gilt edges.<br /> Ionica I and II. The very rare first edition with author&#039;s<br /> corrections; handsomely bound.<br /> Aucassin and Nicollette. Translated by Andrew Lang.<br /> (Nutt.)<br /> Cupid and Psyche. With an Introduction by Andrew Lang.<br /> (Nutt.)<br /> La Morte D&#039;Arthur. H.O.Sumner. (Nutt.) 2 vols.<br /> Musa Protova. A. H. Bullen. Privately printed; small<br /> paper.<br /> Lyrics of the Elizabethan Age. A. II. Bullen. Small paper.<br /> (Nimmo.)<br /> For Exchange.<br /> The English in Ireland. By J. A. Froude. Library Edition.<br /> 3 vols. Exchange for Cabinet Edition of Froude&#039;s<br /> History of England.<br /> Address1&#039; E. A.&quot;<br /> Morris&#039; Vision of Saints, for Epic of Hades.<br /> Kingsley&#039;s At Last.<br /> Trollope&#039;s Decade of Italian Women.<br /> Emerson&#039;s Representative Men.<br /> Lufcadic Hearn&#039;s Two Years in the French West Indies.<br /> M. Life and Letters of the Princess Alice.<br /> List for Sale or Exchange.<br /> Bell&#039;s Chaucer. 1782.<br /> Lord Lytton&#039;s Poems and Dramatic Works. 1853.<br /> Original Edition.<br /> Life of Conde\ By Lord Mahon. 1846.<br /> Massinger&#039;s Plays. Edited by W. Gifford. 1853.<br /> Schiller&#039;s Werke. 10 vols. Very handsomely half-bound.<br /> Stuttgart. 1844.<br /> Oeuvres de Moliere. 6 vols. With old engravings; au 13<br /> de Republique. Paris.<br /> Chansons de Victor Hugo. 1865.<br /> Would Lend.<br /> Works of Peter Pinder. Vol. II. London. 1816.<br /> Stories of Apparitions (Duchess of Mazarine, Mrs. Veal<br /> &amp;c. Title lost, old.)<br /> Pritchard&#039;s Heroines of Welsh I listory.<br /> Address G. M. Williams,<br /> Aberclydack, Nr. Brecon.<br /> NEW BOOKS AND NEW EDITIONS.<br /> Theology.<br /> BELL, C. D. The Archbishop&#039;s Judgment on the Ritual<br /> Case. With some Thoughts on Public Worship: a<br /> Sermon Preached in St. Matthew&#039;s Church. Cosserts<br /> Cheltenham). Simpkin. yl.<br /> Brooke, Rev. Stopford A. The Fight of Faith: Ser-<br /> mons Preached on Various Occasions. 6th Edition.<br /> Paul, Triibner and Co. 5J.<br /> Carpenter, W. Boyd. The Permanent Elements of Re-<br /> ligion: Eight Lectures Preached Iwfore the University<br /> of Oxford in the Year 1887, on the Foundation of the<br /> late Rev. John Bampton. 2nd Edition. Macmillan.<br /> 6j.<br /> Fowle, Rev. Edmund. We Praise Thee, O God: The<br /> Choir Boy&#039;s Little Book. Skeffington. 6d.<br /> Gore, Charles. Lux Mundi : a Series of Studies in the<br /> Religion of the Incarnation. Edited by. nth Edition.<br /> Murray. 14J.<br /> Jeaffreson, H. H. Magnificat: a Course of Sermons.<br /> Paul, Triibner and Co. 2s. 6d.<br /> Pollock, T. S. Vaughton&#039;s Hole: Twenty-five Years in<br /> It. Mowbray, is.<br /> Stearns, L. F. The Evidence of Christian Experience:<br /> Being the Ely Lectures for 1890. Nisbet. 75. 6d.<br /> Wesley, John. The Father of Methodism; or, Life of<br /> Rev. John Wesley. Written for Children by Nehemiah<br /> Curnock. Centenary Edition. Wesleyan Conference<br /> Office. 6d., gd., is. By J. H. Overton. Portrait. {English Leaders of<br /> Religion.) Methuen. 2s. (ul. By Francis Kevan. 5th Edition. (True Stories of<br /> God&#039;s Servants.) J. Holness. zs.bd.<br /> History and Biography.<br /> Cruickshank, George. Memoir. By Frederic G.<br /> Stephens; and an Essay on the Genius of George<br /> Cruickshank by W. M. Thackeray. (Great Artists.)<br /> Low. 3-r. 6d.<br /> Drake, Sir Francis. By Julian Corbett. Portrait.<br /> (English Men of Action.) Macmillan. is. 6d.<br /> Ericsson, John. The Life of. By W. C. Church.<br /> With 50 Illustrations. Low. 2 vols. 24X.<br /> Gladstone, W. E. Life of. By George Barnett Smith.<br /> 12th Edition. Ward, Lock and Co. 3/. 6d.<br /> Grace, W. G. A Biography. By W. Methven Brownlee.<br /> Together with a Life-like Portrait and a &quot;Treatise on<br /> Cricket &quot; by W. G. Grace.<br /> Holland, C. Gleanings from a Ministry of 50 years.<br /> E. Stock. 5s.<br /> Kingsford, William. The History of Canada. Vol. IV.<br /> 1756-1763. With Maps. Paul, Triibner and Co. 15-t.<br /> Thackeray, W. M. Life of. By Herman Merivale and<br /> Frank T. Marzials. (Great Writers.) W. Scott.<br /> is., 2s. 6&lt;/.<br /> General Literature.<br /> Allfn, Grant The Tents of Shem: a Novel. New<br /> Edition. Cliatto and Windus. 2s.<br /> Besant, Walter. To Call Her Mine, &amp;c. New Edition.<br /> With 9, Illustrations by A. Foreslier. Chatto and<br /> Windus. 3^. 6V/.<br /> Black, Willi am. Stand Fast, Craig Royston! 3rd<br /> Edition. 3 vols. Low. 31*. 6d.<br /> Buchheim, C. A. Materials for German Prose Composi-<br /> tion. 14th Edition. With a List of Subjects for<br /> Original Composition. Bell and Sons. 4!. 6d.<br /> Caine, Hall. The Bondman: a New Saga. New<br /> Edition. Heinemann. 3*. 6d.<br /> Cameron, Mrs. Lovett. This Wicked World: a Novel.<br /> 4th Edition. F. V. White, is., is. 6d.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 305 (#363) ############################################<br /> <br /> THE A UTIIOR.<br /> 3«5<br /> 3 vols. 2nd Edition.<br /> Castle, Egerton. Consequences.<br /> Bentley. 31*. 6d.<br /> Cobb, T. On Trust. 3 vols. Hurst and Blackett. 31s. 6 J.<br /> S. M. Beyond Cloudland. Cheap<br /> Gardner. 5*.<br /> The Freaks of Lady Fortune. F. V.<br /> Crawley-Boevf.y,<br /> Edition. Ale<br /> Crommelin, May.<br /> White. 2s. 6d.<br /> Fakjeon, B. L. The Mystery of M. Felix : a Novel.<br /> New Edition. F. V. White. 2s. 6d.<br /> Garnier, R. M. Land Agency. With Illustrations.<br /> &quot;Estate Gazette &quot; Office. lot.<br /> Gibney, Somerville. The Maid of London Bridge. A<br /> Story of the Time of Kett&#039;s Rebellion. Illustrated.<br /> Jarrold and Sons. y. 6d.<br /> Graham, Scott. A Bolt from the Blue. Sampson Low.<br /> 31s. 6d.<br /> Haggard, H. R. Cleopatra. New Edition. Longman<br /> and Co. y. 6d. The Witch&#039;s Head. With 16 full page Illustrations<br /> by Charles Kerr. New Edition. Spencer Blackett.<br /> y- 6,1.<br /> Hardy, T. Two on a Tcwer: a Romance. New Edition.<br /> Low. 2S., 2S. 6d.<br /> Harte, Bret. A Sappho of Green Springs, &amp;c. With<br /> Frontispiece and Vignette by Hume Nisbet. Chatto<br /> and Windus. 3*. 6d.<br /> James, Henry. The Tragic Muse. New Edition. Mac-<br /> millan. 3*. (xi.<br /> Keary, C. F, The Vikings in Western Christendom.<br /> A.D. 789 to A. D. 888. Fisher Unwin. 15s.<br /> Xenyon, Edith C. Little Knight. Chambers, is.<br /> Kipling, Rudyard. Wee Willie Winkle, and other Stories.<br /> Low. 3*. 6d.<br /> Knowles, R. B. S. Glencoonoge. 3 vols. Blackwood<br /> and Sons. 25.1. 6.7.<br /> Lang, Andrew. Essays in Little. With Portrait of the<br /> Author. (Whitefriars Library of Wit and Humour.)<br /> Henry and Co. 2s. 6d.<br /> Lamb&#039;s Adventures with Ulysses. With an Introduc-<br /> tion by Edward Arnold, is. 6d., 2s. 6d.<br /> Leland, C. G. Gypsy Sorcery and Fortune Telling.<br /> Illustrated by numerous Incantations, Specimens of<br /> Medical Magic, Anecdotes and Tales. Copiously<br /> Illustrated by the Author. Fisher Unwin. ids.<br /> Lovell, Arthur. The Ideal of Man. Chapman and<br /> Hall. y. 6d.<br /> Lowell, J. Russell. Political Essays and Writings. VoL<br /> V. Macmillan. 6;.<br /> McCarthy, Justin, M.P. Sir Robert reel. Being the<br /> 3rd vol. in the Queen&#039;s Prime Ministers Series. Edited<br /> by Stuart J. Reid, with Photogravure Portrait. Samp-<br /> son Low. y. 6d. Doom : an Atlantic Episode. New Edition. Chatto<br /> and Windus. is.<br /> Mitford, Bertram. A Romance of the Cape Frontier.<br /> Popular Edition. Heinemann. y. (xi.<br /> Murray, D. Christie, and Herman, Henry. He Fell<br /> among Thieves. 2 vols. Macmillan. 12s.<br /> NlSBET, Hume. A Colonial Tramp: Adventures through<br /> Australia and New Guinea. 2 vols. Illustrated by the<br /> Author. Ward and Downey. 30s.<br /> The Black Drop. Trischler and Co. 2s. (xi.<br /> Bail Up! 3rd Edition. Chatto and Windus. 3-r. (xi.<br /> The Papuan and his Master. (Fortnightly Rcviezu.)<br /> Oliphant, Mrs. Janet. 3 vols. Hurst and Blackett.<br /> 31s. 6d.<br /> Payn, James. The Burnt Million. New Edition. Chatto<br /> and Windus. 3.5. 6d.<br /> Pryce, R. Just Impediment. 2 vols. Ward and Downey.<br /> 2ls.<br /> Quiet Mrs. Fleming. Melhuen. ior. 6./.<br /> St.<br /> Reade, Mrs. R. H. The Goldsmith&#039;s Ward: a Tale of<br /> London City in the Fifteenth Century. With 27 Illus-<br /> trations. Chapman and Hall. 6s.<br /> Robinson, F. W. Her Love and His Life. 3 vols.<br /> Hurst and Blackett. 31J. 6d.<br /> - No Man&#039;s Friend. Hutchinson. 2s. 6d.<br /> Aubyn, A. A Fellow of Trinity. New Edition. With<br /> a Note by Oliver Wendell Holmes and a Frontispiece.<br /> Chatto and Windus. y. 6d.<br /> Thomas, Annie. That Affair. 3 vols. F. V. White.<br /> Vacher, F. Le Dragon Rouge: a short Story. 2nd<br /> Edition. Simpkin. 2s. (xi.<br /> Whitby, Beatrice. The Awakening of Mary Fenwick.<br /> Hurst and Blackett. 6s.<br /> Wills, C. J. John Squire&#039;s Secret. 5 vols. Ward and<br /> Downey. 31 J. 6d.<br /> Woods, Katharine. A Web of Gold. Cassell. 6r.<br /> Poetry and the Drama.<br /> Arnold, Sir Edwin. The Light of the World ; or, The<br /> Great Consummation. Longmans. 7/. 6&lt;z*.<br /> Austin, Alfred. Savonarola. A Tragedy. Macmillan.<br /> Austin, Alfred. Prince Lucifer. 3rd Edition. Mac-<br /> millan. 5*.<br /> Gibbs, W. A. What Next? or, The Power of Gold. A<br /> Glimpse of the World as it will be. Portrait. J. Boul-<br /> ton. is.<br /> Ibsen, Henrik. Hedda Gabler. A Drama in Four Acts.<br /> Translated from the Norwegian by Edmund Gosse.<br /> Portrait. Heinemann. $s.<br /> Mackail, J. W. Select Epigrams from the Greek An-<br /> thology. 2nd Edition, with a Revised Text, Intro-<br /> duction, Translation and Notes. Longmans. 16s.<br /> Shelley, P. B. Poetical Works. Edited by Edward<br /> Dowden. Macmillan. 7s. 6d.<br /> Stevenson, A. L. Raymond: a Story in Verse of London<br /> and Monte Carlo. Paul, Triibner and Co. 3^. 6d.<br /> Stevenson, R. L. Ballads. Chatto and Windus. 6s.<br /> Tennyson. The Coming of Arthur and the Passing of<br /> Arthur. With Introduction and Notes by F. J. Rowe.<br /> Macmillan. 2s.<br /> Art and Architecture.<br /> Jopi.ing, Louise. Hints to Amateurs: a Handbook on<br /> Art. Chapman and Hall, it, 6d.<br /> Loftie, W. J. Landseer and Animal Painting in England.<br /> With Reproductions of Celebrated Pictures by George<br /> Morland, Sir E. Landseer, H. W. B. Davis, Briton<br /> Riviere, and Walter Hunt. Practical Hints for Draw-<br /> ing and Painting Animals by Stephen T. Dadd. (Vere<br /> Foster&#039;s Water Colour Series.) Blackie and Sons.<br /> Is. (xi.<br /> Rhead, G. WOOLLISCROFT. Etching. With Illustrations<br /> by the Author. (Darton&#039;s Manuals for Home Work.)<br /> Gardner, Darton and Co. is. 6d.<br /> Slater, J. H. Engravings and their Value : a Guide Tor<br /> the Print Collector. L. W. Gill. 7s. 6d.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 306 (#364) ############################################<br /> <br /> 306<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Educational.<br /> Berkeley. Selections from Berkeley. With Introduction<br /> and Notes for the use of Students in the Universities, by<br /> Alexander C. Fraser. 4th Edition, Revised. Claren-<br /> don Press. 8/. 6d.<br /> Dixon, Edward T. The Foundations of Geometry.<br /> Deighton Bell and Co.<br /> Sidgwick, A. Greek Sentence Construction. Percival and<br /> Co. is. 6,1<br /> STEDMAN, A. M. M. First Latin Lessons. With Vocabu-<br /> lary. New and Enlarged Edition. Methuen. 2s.<br /> Music.<br /> Barrett, William Alexander. English Folk Songs.<br /> Collected, arranged, and provided with Symphonies<br /> and Accompaniments for the Pianoforte. Novello.<br /> 2s. 6d.<br /> Sizer, Kate T., and Kern, K. A. The Concert at Home:<br /> a Collection of Two-Part Songs for Schools and for<br /> General Use by Young People. Curwen. 2s.<br /> Law.<br /> Holland, S. L. The Juryman&#039;s Handbook. E. Wilson<br /> and Co. is.<br /> Lely, J. M. Copyright Law Reform : an Exposition of<br /> Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill now before Parliament.<br /> With Extracts from the Report of the Commission of<br /> 1878, and an Appendix containing the Berne Convention<br /> and the American Copyright Bill. Eyre and Spottis-<br /> woode. is. 6rf.<br /> *<br /> THE READING OF MANUSCRIPTS.<br /> WE beg to call attention to the following,<br /> which we reprint from the report of<br /> 1890 :—<br /> Regulations concerning the Reading of<br /> Manuscripts.<br /> The fee for this service will for the future be<br /> one guinea, unless any special reason be present<br /> for making it higher or lower. The amount must<br /> then be left to the Secretary&#039;s discretion.<br /> For this sum a report will be given upon MSS.<br /> of the usual 3 vol. length, or upon collections of<br /> stories making in the aggregate a work of that<br /> length.<br /> In every case the fee and stamps for return<br /> postage must accompany the MSS.<br /> The fee will be given entirely to the Reader.<br /> The Reader will not attempt to give an opinion<br /> upon works of a technical character.<br /> It is requested that a label may be sent with the<br /> MSS., having upon it the Author&#039;s name, the nom-<br /> de-plume (if any) under which the work is written,<br /> and the address to which the MSS. is to be<br /> returned. This communication will be held as<br /> confidential.<br /> PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY-<br /> 1. The Annual Report. That for January,<br /> 1891, can be had on application to the<br /> Secretary.<br /> 2. The Author. A Monthly Journal devoted<br /> especially to the protection and maintenance<br /> of Literary Property. Issued to all members.<br /> 3. The Grievances of Authors. (Field &amp;<br /> Tuer.) 2s. The Report of three Meetings<br /> on the general subject of Literature and its<br /> defence, held at Willis&#039;s Rooms, March,<br /> 1887.<br /> 4. Literature and the Pension List. By<br /> W. Morris Colles, Barrister-at-Law.<br /> (Henry Glaisher, 95, Strand, W.C.) 3-f.<br /> 5. The History of the Soctetd des Gens<br /> de Lettres. By S. Squire Sprigge,<br /> Secretary to the Society, is.<br /> 6. The Cost of Production. In this work<br /> specimens are given of the most important<br /> forms of type, size of page, &amp;c, with<br /> estimates showing what it costs to produce<br /> the more common kinds of books. 2s. 6d.<br /> 7. The Various Methods of Publication.<br /> By S. Squire Sprigge. In this work,<br /> compiled from the papers in the Society&#039;s<br /> offices, the various kinds of agreements<br /> proposed by Publishers to Authors are<br /> examined, and their meaning carefully ex-<br /> plained, with an account of the various<br /> kinds of fraud which have been made<br /> possible by the different clauses in their<br /> agreements. Price 3*. (A new Edition in<br /> the Press.)<br /> 8. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition<br /> of Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill now<br /> before Parliament. With Extracts from<br /> the Report of the Commission of 1878,<br /> and an Appendix containing the Berne<br /> Convention and the American Copyright<br /> Bill. By J. M. Lely. Eyre and Spottis-<br /> woode. is. 6d.<br /> Other works bearing on the Literary Profession will<br /> follow.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 307 (#365) ############################################<br /> <br /> AD VER TISEMENTS.<br /> 307<br /> Telegrams a Cablegrams:<br /> LONGEVITY. LONDON.<br /> <br /> TO AUTHORS.<br /> In view of the passing of the Copyright Bill in America,<br /> allow me to draw your attention to the fact that this measure,<br /> by securing Copyright to you there, will greatly increase the<br /> value of your future work, provided proper arrangements are<br /> made on your behalf in the United States.<br /> As you are no doubt aware, I have for many years acted as the Literary Agent, and conducted<br /> the entire commercial dealings, of many of the most eminent British Authors. I have friendly business<br /> relations with all the leading Publishers, both in this country and in America, and am, therefore, in the<br /> best position to take advantage of the present state of affairs, and obtain in both countries the very best<br /> terms for Authors.<br /> As Author&#039;s Agent—and, I may say, the first and only one to act in this capacity—I make it my<br /> study to advance the Author&#039;s interests, my remuneration being a commission on the amount received<br /> through my exertions.<br /> Should you decide to place your future work in my hands, I shall be glad to put my services at<br /> your disposal, and do my best in your interest.<br /> Among the Authors who have entrusted me with the negotiation of their literary business are:—<br /> The Right Hon. the Earl of<br /> Lytton, G.C.B., &amp;c.<br /> George McDonald, LL.D.<br /> D. Christie Murray.<br /> Mrs. Oi.iphant.<br /> W. Clark Russell.<br /> Stanley J. Weyman.<br /> &amp;c, Sec, &amp;c.<br /> Grant Allen.<br /> Walter Eesant.<br /> William Black.<br /> Mrs. W. K. Clifford.<br /> Author of &quot; Mrs. Keith&#039;s Crime.&quot;<br /> The Ven. Archdeacon Farrar.<br /> F. Anstey Guthrie.<br /> Capt. A. C. P. Haggard.<br /> H. Rider Haggard.<br /> Bret Harte.<br /> H. Herman.<br /> Henry James.<br /> Rudyard Kipling.<br /> Mrs. Lynn Linton.<br /> Edna Lyall.<br /> 2, Paternoster Square, London, E.C.<br /> \th March, 1891.<br /> A. P. WATT.<br /> <br /> 1. WORIt—Always in sight.<br /> 2. SPEED—Highest Record, 181 words per minute.<br /> ALItfSMEJT-Perfect and Permanent.<br /> 3. TYPE—Instantly interchangeable (21 kinds). ,<br /> IBUPlHaMHMMf— Uniform, being independent of touch.<br /> 4. PAPER—Takes any width, also 20 yards in length.<br /> THE HAMMOND TYPEWRITER CO.,<br /> 50,QUEEN VICTORIA ST., E.C.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 308 (#366) ############################################<br /> <br /> 308<br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> TYPE-WRITING. I MISS ETHEL DICKENS,<br /> TYPE-WRITING OFFICE,<br /> AUTHORS&#039; MSS. CAREFULLY TRANSCRIBED.<br /> 26, WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND<br /> Writings by Post receive prompt attention.<br /> (Over the Ofice of “ All the Year Round”).<br /> SCIENTIFIC &amp; MEDICAL PAPERS A SPECIALITY.<br /> MSS. copied. Price List on application.<br /> EDITED BY<br /> A New Vol. commenced<br /> MRS. GILL,<br /> MISSES ERWIN,<br /> TYPE-WRITING OFFICE,<br /> 13, DORSET STREET, PORTMAN SQUARE, W. ST. PAUL&#039;S CHAMBERS, 19, LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. carefully copied from<br /> CHARLES DICKENS. I/- per 1,000 words. One additional copy<br /> (carbon) supplied free of charge.<br /> References kindly permitted to many<br /> The MSS. of Two Important Poems<br /> well-known Authors and Publishers.<br /> Further particulars on application.<br /> for Sale.—Apply,<br /> TYPE - WRITING &amp; SHORTHAND.<br /> A. P. WATT,<br /> 2, Paternoster Square.<br /> JO. DARKE, M.T.S.,<br /> LION – CHAMBERS, * BROAD – STREET,<br /> “The best of all Journals.&quot;<br /> BRISTOL.<br /> Published every FRIDAY, price 2d.<br /> The advantages of Type-written Manuscript are LEGIBILITY,<br /> NEATNESS, RAPIDITY, and EASE of Manifolding.<br /> DR. ANDREW WILSON, F.R.S.E.<br /> Now is the time to subscribe.<br /> AUTHORS&#039; MANUSCRIPTS, &amp;c., prepared for the<br /> Publisher.<br /> 4th April, 1890.<br /> Companies* Reports and patent agents<br /> Specifications Written up and<br /> Post-card for<br /> Specimen Copy.<br /> Manifolded.<br /> LITHOGRAPHY froin TYPING done in the best<br /> To be had at all Railway Bookstalls and<br /> Style.<br /> Newsagents, or direct from the Publisher-<br /> MEMORY LESSONS IN TYPING GIVEN BY<br /> 2, PATERNOSTER SQUARE, LONDON, E.C.<br /> POST. WRITE FOR TERMS.<br /> ESTABLISHED 1851.<br /> BIR KBE C K BANK,<br /> SOUTHAMPTON BUILDINGS, CHANCERY LANE.<br /> THREE per CENT. INTEREST allowed on DEPOSITS, repayable on demand.<br /> TWO per CENT. INTEREST on CURRENT ACCOUNTS, calculated on minimum monthly balances, when not drawn<br /> below £100.<br /> STOCKS, SHARES, and ANNUITIES purchased and sold.<br /> SAVINGS DEPARTMENT.<br /> For the encouragement of Thrift the Bank receives small sums on deposit, and allows Interest, at the rate of THREE<br /> per CENT. per Annum, on each completed £i. Accounts are balanced and Interest added on the 31st March annually.<br /> FRANCIS RAVENSCROFT, Manager.<br /> W TO PURCHASE A HOUSE FOR TWO GUINEAS PER MONTH, OR<br /> A PLOT OF LAND FOR FIVE SHILLINGS PER MONTH, with immediate<br /> possession. Apply at Office of the BIRKBECK FREEHOLD LAND SOCIETY.<br /> THE BIRKBECK ALMANACK, with full particulars, post free on application.<br /> FRANCIS RAVENSCROFT, Manager.<br /> Send<br /> H E AIT HI.<br /> A WEEKLY JOURNAL OF SANITARY AND DOMESTIC SCIENCE,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 308 (#367) ############################################<br /> <br /> ADVERTISEMENTS<br /> 1<br /> I<br /> SA<br /> THANHH VERWALTAFUGEGUIDELIAM<br /> INHA<br /> <br /> W<br /> THE<br /> HAIN<br /> HET<br /> PIRIT OF<br /> 110<br /> WE USE<br /> &amp; The<br /> BAR-LOCK<br /> TYPE<br /> WRITER.<br /> / PROGRESS IS THE<br /> 27<br /> HARIA<br /> Hull<br /> HUH!<br /> HOME<br /> A<br /> DMIN<br /> THE BAR-LOCK&#039; TYPE-WRITER<br /> Is the only Machine combining the following Advantages<br /> PERFECT AND PERMANENT ALIGNMENT.<br /> AUTOMATIC LINE SPACING. A DUPLICATE KEY-BOARD.<br /> ADJUSTABLE BALL BEARINGS TO THE TYPE-BAR JOINTS.<br /> And it is the ONLY Type IVriter<br /> HAVING ABSOLUTELY VISIBLE WRITING,<br /> Some Type-Writers may have one or two of these Advantages, but no other combines them all.<br /> SOLD FOR CASH; ALSO ON THE EASY PAYMENT SYSTEM.<br /> THE TYPE-WRITER CO., LTD.,<br /> 12, QUEEN VICTORIA STREET, LONDON, E.C.<br /> MANCHESTER: 25, Market Street. LIVERPOOL: 40, North John St. CARDIFF: Exchange Building.<br /> GLASGOW : 22, Renfield St. SHEFFIELD: 39, Norfolk St. MELBOURNE: 385, Little Collins St.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 308 (#368) ############################################<br /> <br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> NEW MODEL REMINGTON<br /> STANDARD TYPEWRITER.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> For Fifteen Years the Standard,<br /> and to - day the most perfect<br /> development of the writing<br /> machine, embodying the latest<br /> and highest achievements of<br /> inventive and mechanical skill.<br /> We add to the Remington every<br /> improvement that study and<br /> capital can secure.<br /> EMINGTON STANDARD TYPEWRITERN<br /> WYCKOFF, SEAMANS &amp; BENEDICT,<br /> Principal Office-<br /> LONDON: 100, GRACECHURCH STREET, E.C.<br /> (CORNER OF LEADENHALL STREET).<br /> Branch Offices,<br /> LIVERPOOL: CENTRAL BUILDINGS, NORTH JOHN STREET.<br /> BIRMINGHAM : 23, MARTINEAU STREET,<br /> MANCHESTER : 8, MOULT STREET.<br /> Printed for the Society, by HARRISON &amp; SONS, 45, 46, and 47, St. Martin&#039;s Lane, in the Parish of St. Martin-in-the-Fields, in the City<br /> of Westminster.https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/249/1891-03-16-The-Author-1-11.pdfpublications, The Author