401 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/401 | The Author, Vol. 20 Issue 04 (January 1910) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+20+Issue+04+%28January+1910%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 20 Issue 04 (January 1910)</a> | | | <a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027638405" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027638405</a> | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1910-01-01-The-Author-20-4 | | | | | 97–124 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=20">20</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1910-01-01">1910-01-01</a> | | | | | | | 4 | | | 19100101 | (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br />
WoL. XX. —No. 4. JANUARY 1, 1910. [PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
C O N T E N T S.<br />
- PAGE |PAGE.E.<br />
Notices ... tº º is tº $ tº tº º º e s º tº e Q e º º * * * 97–98 Warmings to Musical Composers ... tº sº º tº & a * * * ... 114<br />
Committee Notes * * * tº º º e e sº * * * tº e º tº º º tº gº º 9S Stamping Music ... tº º º E ºn e tº e tº £ 6 tº * = e • * * ... 114<br />
Books published by Members of the Society ... ... ... 101 The Reading Branch ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 114<br />
Books published in America by Members... g º º e º e ... 103 “The Author’’ ... * * * & Q & & e e & ſº tº e º º tº a tº ... 114<br />
Literary, Dramatic and Musical Notes ... tº a º * * * ... 103 Remittances * * * * & Cº. $ & © * * * tº e º ... ... ... 114<br />
Paris Notes tº # 6. a ſº a tº & tº tº tº ºn * c tº tº º º g sº tº ... 106 General Notes ..., * * * * is tº & º e tº gº & * * * ſº e º ... 113<br />
The Sub-Committee on the Price of Novels gº tº e * * * ... 107 Committee Election ... * e g tº * * * * * * e is tº * * * ... 113<br />
A Publishing Transaction e e e 9 p & * * * * * g. ... 109 The Pension Fund Committee 115<br />
Libel without Intent ... tº a º tº e & * * * e s & * * * ... 110 United States Notes ... tº º q 116<br />
Paying Quarterly and on Demand ... tº º º tº e º e is tº ... I'll Difficulty in Writing ... 4 g = * * g. * & * a s e * * * ... 117<br />
The Berlin Convention tº a º * & ºt & B & * * * tº º º ... ll? The Reviewer and His Little Ways... * = & tº e º tº tº º ... 119<br />
How to Use the Society ... ... ... ... ... ... 113 The Literary Year Book ... ... ... ... ... ... 121<br />
Warnings to the Producers of Books tº º º * = & e s g ... 113 An Editor's Chair sº a tº © tº º gº º º tº a 4. tº € 9. tº Aº º ... 122<br />
Warnings to Dramatic Authors & º º * * * * * e tº º & ... 113 Fiction Through the Ages ... tº g º tº º º * & & tº # 4 ... 123<br />
Registration of Scenarios and Original Plays ... * * * ... 114 Correspondence ... tº tº º tº e 124<br />
PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.<br />
1. The Annual Report for the current year, 1s.<br />
2. The Author. Published ten months in the year (August and September omitted), devoted especially<br />
to the protection and maintenance of Literary, Dramatic, and Musical Property. Issued<br />
to all Members gratis. Price to non-members, 6d., or 5s. 6d. per annum, post free. Back<br />
numbers from 1892, at 10s. 6d. per vol.<br />
3. Literature and the Pension List. By W. MORRIS COLLES, Barrister-at-Law. 3s.<br />
4. The History of the Société des Gens de Lettres. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. 18.<br />
5. The Cost of Production. (Out of print.)<br />
6. The Various Methods of Publication. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. In this work, compiled from the<br />
papers in the Society’s offices, the various forms of agreements proposed by Publishers to<br />
Authors are examined, and their meaning carefully explained, with an account of the<br />
various kinds of fraud which have been made possible by the different clauses therein. 3s.<br />
Addenda to the Above. By G. HERBERT THRING. Being additional facts collected at<br />
the office of the Society since the publication of the “Methods.” With comments and<br />
advice. 2s.<br />
7. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition of Lord Monkswell's Copyright Bill of 1890. With<br />
Extracts from the Report of the Commission of 1878, the Berne Convention, and the<br />
American Copyright Bill. By J. M. LELY. 18. 6d.<br />
8. The Society of Authors. A Record of its Action from its Foundation. By WALTER BESANT<br />
(Chairman of Committee, 1888–1892). 1s.<br />
9. The Contract of Publication in Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Switzerland. By ERNST<br />
LUNGE, J.U.D. 2s. 6d.<br />
10. Forms of Agreement issued by the Publishers' Association; with Comments. By<br />
G. HERBERT THRING, and Illustrative Examples by Sir WALTER BESANT. 2nd Edition. 18.<br />
11. Periodicals and their Contributors. Giving the Terms on which the different Magazines<br />
and Periodicals deal with MSS. and Contributions. 6d.<br />
12. Society of Authors. List of Members. Published October, 1907, price 6d.<br />
[All prices net. Apply to the Secretary, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey's Gale, S. W.]<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#474) ################################################<br />
<br />
ll<br />
* *<br />
AD VERTISEMENTS.<br />
(i,je surietn uf Aufburg (jnrurpuraten).<br />
Telegraphic Address : “A UTORIDAD, LONDON.”<br />
SIR ROBERT ANDERSON, K.C.B.<br />
SIR WM. REYNELL ANSON, Bart., D.C.L.<br />
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD AVE-<br />
J. M. BARRIE. [BURY, P.C.<br />
SIR ALFRED BATEMAN, K.C.M.G.<br />
ROBERT BATEMAN.<br />
F. E. BEDDARD, F.R.S.<br />
THE RIGHT HON. AUGUSTINE BIR-<br />
RELL, P.C.<br />
MRS. E. NESBIT BLAND.<br />
THE REV. PROF. BONNEY, F.R.S.<br />
THE RIGHT HON. JAMES BRYCE, P.C.<br />
THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD BURGH-<br />
CLERE, P.C. -<br />
HALL CAIN E. ... -<br />
J. W. COMYNS CARR.<br />
EGERTON CASTLE, F.S.A. - -<br />
S. L. CLEMENS (“MARK TWAIN ?).<br />
EDWARD CLODD.<br />
W. MORRIS COLLES.<br />
THE HON, JOHN COLLIER,<br />
SIR. W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br />
THE EIGHT HON. THE LORD CURZON<br />
OF KEDLESTON, P.C.<br />
COMIMITTEE<br />
SIR ALFRED BATEMAN, K.C.M.G.<br />
MRS. E. NESBIT BLAND.<br />
J. W. COMYINS CARR.<br />
DOUGLAS FRESHFIELD.<br />
Chairman—SIR ARTHUR PINERO.<br />
H. GRAN VILLE BARKER.<br />
J. M. BARRIE.<br />
R. C. CARTON.<br />
MISS CICELY HAMILTON.<br />
PENSION FUND<br />
ANSTEY GUTFIRIE.<br />
ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS,<br />
PRESIDENT.<br />
TIEICTMC-ALS IH_A_IERIDY -<br />
COUNCIL.<br />
AUSTIN DOBSON.<br />
SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE.<br />
A. W. DUBOURG.<br />
DOUGLAS FRESHFIELD.<br />
SIR. W. S. GILBERT.<br />
EDMUND GOSSE, I.L.D.<br />
SYDNEY GRUNDY.<br />
H. RIDER HAGGARD,<br />
MRs. HARRISON (“LUCAS MALET").<br />
ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS,<br />
E. W. HORN UNG. -<br />
MAURICE HEWLETT.<br />
W. W. JACOBS.<br />
JEROME K. J EROMF.<br />
HENRY ARTHUR JONES.<br />
J. SCOTT KELTIE, LL.D.<br />
RUDYARD RIPLING.<br />
SIR EDWIN RAY LAN KESTER, F.R.S.<br />
THE REv. W. J. LOFTIE, F.S.A.<br />
THE RIGHT HON, SIR ALFRED<br />
LYALL, P.C.<br />
LADY LUGARD (MISS FLORA L.<br />
SHAW). -<br />
MRs. MAxw ELL (M. E. BRADDON).<br />
Chairman—MAURICE HEWLETT.<br />
W. W. JACOBS.<br />
ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br />
G. BERNARD SHAW.<br />
JEROME K. J.EROME.<br />
W. J. LOCKE.<br />
CAPT. ROBERT MARSHALL.<br />
CECIL RALEIGH.<br />
Chairman—MAURICE HEWLETT.<br />
MORLEY ROBERTS.<br />
M. H. SPIELMANN.<br />
Telephone No. : 374 Victoria.<br />
JUSTIN MCCARTHY.<br />
THE REV. C. H. MIDDLETON-WAKE.<br />
SIR HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br />
SI R GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br />
SIR ARTEIUR PIN ERO.<br />
THE RIGHT HON. SIR HORACE<br />
PLUNKETT, K.P.<br />
ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br />
OWEN SEAMAN.<br />
G. BERNAlt D SHAW.<br />
G. R. SIMS.<br />
S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br />
FRANCIS STORR.<br />
SIR CHARLES WILLIERS STANFORD,<br />
Mus. Doc.<br />
WILLIAM MOY THOMAS.<br />
MRS. HUMPHRY WARD,<br />
PERCY WHITE.<br />
FIELD-MARSHAL THE RIGHT HON.<br />
THE WISCOUNT Wor,3HLEY, K.P.,<br />
P.C., &c.<br />
SIDNEY WEBE.<br />
H. G. WELLS.<br />
OF MANAGEMENT.<br />
S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br />
FRANCIS STORR.<br />
SIDNEY WEBB.<br />
IDRAIMIATIC SUB-COIVIIVIITTEE.<br />
Vice-Chairman–HENRY ARTHUR JONES.<br />
G. BERNARD SHAW.<br />
ALFRED SUTRO.<br />
COMIMITTEE.<br />
MRS. ALEC TWEEDIE.<br />
MRS, HUMPHRY WARD.<br />
COPYRIGHT SUB-COMMITTEE.<br />
HAROLD HARDY.<br />
ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS.<br />
E. J. MACGILLIVRAY.<br />
THE HON. JOHN COLLIER.<br />
SIR. W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br />
SIR GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br />
SIR CHARLES WILLIERS STANFORD,<br />
Mus. Doc.<br />
ART.<br />
JOHN HASSALL, R.I.<br />
J. G. MILLAIS.<br />
FIELD, ROSCO E & Co., 36, Lincoln's Inn Fields, W.C. 4 &<br />
G. HERBERT THEING, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey's Gate, S.W. Solicitors.<br />
OFFICES.<br />
HERBERT SULLIVAN.<br />
SIR. JAMES YOXALL, M.P.<br />
ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br />
M. H. SPIELMANN.<br />
Secretary—G. H IGRBERT THRING,<br />
Solicitor in England to<br />
La Société des Gems de Lettres,<br />
39, OLD QUEEN STREET, Sºrokhºy’s GATE, S.W.<br />
TYPEYº FITION. Gr<br />
ALL KINDS FROM 9d. PER 1,000.<br />
Playwrights', Clergymen's, &c., MSS.<br />
Authors’,<br />
correctly and efficiently executed.<br />
Good Work combined with cheapness and quickness.<br />
Good References.<br />
SEND A SMALL ORDER NOW 1<br />
MISS RMLLING, 176, Loughborough Rd., London, S.W.<br />
In English, French, or German.<br />
TYPE WRITING,<br />
AUTHORS, MSS. meatly and accurately copied, 9d. per<br />
1,000 words, including carbon copy.<br />
Also General Copying, Plays, Actors' Parts, etc.<br />
Miss B. KERRY,<br />
Rohilla,<br />
Carshalton, Surrey.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#475) ################################################<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
FOUNDED BY SHR<br />
Monthly.)<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
WOL. XX.-No. 4.<br />
JANUARY 1st, 1910.<br />
[PRICE SIXPENCE.<br />
TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br />
AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
NOTICES.<br />
—t—º-t—<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
THE Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br />
that the cases which are quoted in The Author are<br />
cases that have come before the notice or to the<br />
knowledge of the Secretary of the Society, and that<br />
those members of the Society who desire to have<br />
the names of the publishers concerned can obtain<br />
them on application.<br />
ADVERTISEMENTS.<br />
As there seems to be an impression among<br />
readers of The Author that the committee are<br />
personally responsible for the bona fides of the<br />
advertisers, the committee desire it to be stated<br />
that this is not, and could not possibly be, the case.<br />
Although care is exercised that no undesirable<br />
advertisements be inserted, they do not accept, and<br />
never have accepted, any liability.<br />
Members should apply to the secretary for advice<br />
if special information is desired.<br />
* *—a<br />
w-v- vºy<br />
THE SOCIETY'S FUNDS.<br />
—º–sº-0–<br />
ROM time to time members of the Society<br />
desire to make donations to its funds in<br />
recognition of work that has been done for<br />
them. The committee, acting on the suggestion<br />
WOL. XX.<br />
of one of these members, have decided to place<br />
this permanent paragraph in The Author in order<br />
that members may be cognisant of those funds to<br />
which these contributions may be paid.<br />
The funds suitable for this purpose are : (1) The<br />
Capital Fund. This fund is kept in reserve in<br />
oase it is necessary for the Society to incur heavy<br />
expenditure, either in fighting a question of prin-<br />
ciple, or in assisting to obtain copyright reform,<br />
or in dealing with any other matter closely<br />
connected with the work of the Society.<br />
(2) The Pension Fund. This fund is slowly<br />
increasing, and it is hoped will, in time, cover the<br />
needs of all the members of the Society.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
LIST OF MEMBERS.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
HE List of Members of the Society of Authors,<br />
published October, 1907, can now be obtained<br />
at the offices of the Society at the price of<br />
6d., post free 7#d. It includes elections to July,<br />
1907, and will be sold to members and associates<br />
of the Society only.<br />
A dozen blank pages have been added at the<br />
end of the list for the convenience of those who<br />
desire to add future elections as they are chronicled<br />
from month to month in these pages.<br />
—e—sº-0–<br />
PENSION FUND.<br />
—e-º-o-<br />
N the 5th of February, 1909, the Trustees of<br />
the Pension Fund of the Society, after<br />
the secretary had placed before them the<br />
financial position of the Fund, decided to invest<br />
3350 in the purchase of Corporation of London<br />
2} per cent. Stock (1927–57).<br />
The amount purchased is £438<br />
added to the list printed below.<br />
The Trustees are glad to report that owing to<br />
the generous answer to the circular sent round at<br />
the end of 1908, they have been able to invest<br />
2s. 4d., and is<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#476) ################################################<br />
<br />
98 THE AUTHOR.<br />
more than £100 over the amount invested in<br />
1907.<br />
Consols 24%.................... . . . . . . . . . . 31,000 0 0<br />
Local Loans .............................. 500 () ()<br />
Victorian Government 3% Consoli-<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ............... 291. 19 11<br />
War Loan ................................. 201 9 3<br />
London and North-Western 3% Deben-<br />
ture Stock .............................. 250 0 ()<br />
Egyptian Government Irrigation<br />
Trust 4% Certificates ............... 200 0 0<br />
Cape of Good Hope 33% Inscribed<br />
Stock .................................... 200 () ()<br />
Glasgow and South-Western Railway<br />
4% Preference Stock.................. 228 () ()<br />
New Zealand 34% Stock. . . . . . . . ... 247 9 6<br />
Irish Land Act 23% Guaranteed Stock 258 0 0<br />
Corporation of London 25% Stock,<br />
1927–57 .............................. 4.38 2 4.<br />
Total ............... #3,815 1 0<br />
Subscriptions.<br />
1909.<br />
April 13, Gask, Miss Lilian &<br />
May 17, Rorison, Miss Edith<br />
June 10, Voynich, Mrs. E. L.<br />
June 11, Grier, Mrs. Julia M.<br />
June 11, Field, C. . & º<br />
June 11, Barrington, Mrs. Russell<br />
July 8, Burmester, Miss Frances<br />
July 9, Grindrod, Dr. G. F.<br />
July 10, Hargrave, Mrs. Basil<br />
Aug. 5, Stott, M. D. . tº<br />
Oct. 15, Greig, James<br />
Oct. 15, Jacomb, A. E.<br />
Oct. 16, Hepburn, Thomas<br />
Oct. 16, Trevelyan, G. M. .<br />
Oct. 16, “Haddon Hall”<br />
Oct. 22, Jessup, A. E. © º<br />
Oct. 25, Whishaw, Mrs. Bernhard<br />
Nov. 5, Dixon, A. Francis .<br />
Nov. 6, Helledoren, J.<br />
Dec. 4, Tearle, Christian<br />
Dec. 9, Tyrell, Miss Eleanor .<br />
Dec. 17, Somerville, Miss Edith CE.<br />
Donations.<br />
1909.<br />
Jan. 1, Sprigge, Dr. S. S. .<br />
April 5, Burchell, Sidney H.<br />
April 15, Linton, C. Stuart<br />
April 19, Loraine, Lady . e e<br />
April 19, Durand, Sir Henry Mortimer<br />
April 20, Stephens, Riccardo ©<br />
May 24, Lefroy, Mrs. C. P.<br />
June 2, “Olivia Ramsey’”<br />
;I<br />
1<br />
II<br />
June 7, Horne, A. B.<br />
June 10, Muir, Ward<br />
June 10, Swan, Miss Myra<br />
June 17, Bradley, A. C.<br />
June 22, Trotére, H. .<br />
July 8, Harland, Mrs. o<br />
July 8, Sinclair, Miss May .<br />
Aug. 5, Cameron, Mrs. Charlotte &<br />
Sept. 10, Hinkson, Katharine Tynan .<br />
Oct. 16, Hodson, Miss A. L. e<br />
Oct. 16, Wasteneys, Lady .<br />
Oct. 18, Bell, Mrs. G. H. §<br />
Nov. 3, Turnbull, Mrs. Peveril .<br />
Nov. 4, George, W. L. e<br />
Nov. 25, Tench, Miss Mary<br />
Dec. 1, Shedlock, Miss<br />
T}ec. 3, Esmohd, H. W.<br />
Dec. 9, Hewlett, Maurice . e<br />
Dec. 17, Reynolds, Mrs. Baillie .<br />
Dec. 17, Martin, Miss Violet<br />
All fresh subscribers and donors previous to<br />
April, 1909, have been deleted from the present<br />
announcement.<br />
The names of those subscribers and donors which<br />
are not included in the lists printed above are<br />
unavoidably held over to the next issue.<br />
5<br />
I<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
COMMITTEE NOTES.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
HE committee of management met for the<br />
last time, in 1909, on December 6, at 39,<br />
Old Queen Street. The minutes of the<br />
last meeting were read and signed. The com-<br />
mittee then proceeded to elect 31 members and<br />
associates, bringing the total elections for the year<br />
up to 298. This is an increase of 50 over the<br />
largest annual election to the Society since its<br />
foundation. The committee desire to congratulate<br />
the members on the increasing vitality of the<br />
Society. Four resignations brought the total<br />
number of resignations for the year up to 79.<br />
The next matter that came before the committee<br />
was the circular issued by some of the lending<br />
libraries, and a letter received from the Publishers'<br />
Association setting out the resolutions passed by<br />
that body. A letter from Mr. Edmund Gosse which<br />
appeared in the Times was also considered, with<br />
several other letters from members. The chairman,<br />
after some discussion, placed before the committee<br />
a resolution he had drafted for the committee's<br />
consideration.<br />
The resolution in its final shape was passed<br />
unanimously, and is as follows:–<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#477) ################################################<br />
<br />
TISIES A CITISIOR,<br />
99<br />
“The committee of management of the Society of<br />
Authors have considered the letter addressed by the<br />
circulating libraries to the Publishers' Association and the<br />
Press. They observe upon it that it is in the discretion of<br />
the libraries to select what books they will offer to their<br />
customers, and that in point of fact this has always been<br />
done. The committee regard the demand for delay of<br />
publication to enable the libraries to make their selection<br />
as unwarrantable, and they cannot advise the publishers to<br />
assent to any such condition.<br />
“They are ready at all times to delegate to a sub-<br />
committee the duty of conferring with a similar body<br />
deputed by the Publishers’ Association, and will be pre-<br />
pared to receive through that body and consider any<br />
further representation which the Libraries’ Association<br />
may desire to make.”<br />
The secretary was instructed to forward it to the<br />
daily Press with a covering letter. The committee<br />
feel that the matter may become one of vital<br />
importance, and that they may be bound, if further<br />
action is taken, to consult all the members and<br />
to ascertain their opinion by referendum. In the<br />
meantime they have taken measures to appoint<br />
certain members of the society, under the presidency<br />
of Mr. Maurice Hewlett, chairman of the committee,<br />
to meet, if necessary, a sub-committee of the<br />
Publishers’ Association. After the meeting between<br />
these two bodies it will be easier for the committee<br />
to decide upon their future action.<br />
The next question before the committee was also<br />
one of importance. The chairman laid before the<br />
committee a letter which he had written to the<br />
Times in regard to the British Academy. The<br />
matter, after some discussion, was adjourned until<br />
the January meeting.<br />
Mr. Sidney Lee sent in the resignation of his<br />
Seat on the committee, stating that while he was<br />
greatly interested in the work, he felt that he<br />
Ought not to continue on the committee in view of<br />
the fact that he could not give to it the time<br />
and labour which it deserved. The committee,<br />
empowered under the constitution to fill up occa-<br />
Sional vacancies, asked Mr. W. W. Jacobs to<br />
undertake the duties of committee man, and he<br />
has kindly consented to do so.<br />
It was decided, in accordance with the statement<br />
printed in another column, that the names of<br />
candidates for election to the committee should be<br />
returnable on or before Tuesday, February 15.<br />
Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins, the committee's<br />
nominee to the Pension Fund Committee, resigned<br />
in due course and was unanimously re-elected.<br />
The notice in respect of the election of the society's<br />
nominee to the same committee is set out in another<br />
column.<br />
Mr. Arthur Rackham and Mr. Francis Storr<br />
were appointed a sub-committee to settle the<br />
Report, which will be in the hands of the members<br />
in the early months of 1910. The committee<br />
decided to increase the salary of the head clerk by<br />
5s. per week.<br />
The secretary laid before the committee a copy<br />
of the letter, which had already appeared in the<br />
|papers, from the Dramatic Sub-Committee of the<br />
Society on the censorship report. The committee<br />
agreed also to issue a circular, if the Dramatic Sub-<br />
Committee should so desire, with a view to calling<br />
a conference of the dramatists of the society.<br />
The Sub-Committee on the Price of Novels,<br />
having collected certain evidence on the question<br />
under their investigation, presented to the com-<br />
mittee of management an interim report based<br />
upon that evidence. The committee expressed<br />
their thanks to the sub-committee for the care<br />
which they had shown in dealing with the matter<br />
and Ordered the report to be printed in the columns<br />
of The Author. The committee sanctioned the<br />
purchase of a new typewriter for the office and an<br />
extension of the telephone service to the secretary's<br />
office.<br />
The first case which came before the com-<br />
mittee related to a literary libel. The work of<br />
a member of the society had been translated into<br />
German without his authority, and with consider-<br />
able alterations. Unfortunately, the writer had<br />
sold his copyright to the British publisher, but the<br />
committee were advised by the society's lawyer in<br />
Germany that this did not preclude him from<br />
taking action against the delinquent. The com-<br />
mittee decided to take up the case.<br />
The secretary then reported the settlement of a<br />
dramatic infringement which had been taken up<br />
on the authority of the chairman. As it might<br />
have been necessary to apply for an injunction,<br />
the chairman had authorised proceedings without<br />
reference to the committee. The secretary read<br />
to the committee a letter of thanks from the mem-<br />
ber on the satisfactory settlement of the dispute.<br />
The next case was also a dramatic case, and the<br />
member claimed accounts and money under an<br />
agreement for the performance of his work. This<br />
matter also the committee agreed to take up.<br />
Following these cases was one of an infringement<br />
of an author's copyright by a paper in San<br />
Francisco which had printed the work without<br />
authority. The committee decided to commence<br />
action for damages, and instructed the secretary to<br />
place the matter in the hands of a lawyer in that<br />
city.<br />
fº last question was one which the committee<br />
were asked to take to the Court of Appeal. The<br />
details of the case had been placed before the<br />
committee on a former occasion, when the com-<br />
mittee, after close investigation of the papers,<br />
decided not to take the matter up. The case was<br />
subsequently heard and a verdict given against the<br />
plaintiff. The committee adjourned the matter to<br />
the January meeting, when further information<br />
and further particulars are expected.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#478) ################################################<br />
<br />
100<br />
TRIES A UTFIOIR,<br />
DRAMATIC SUB-COMMITTEE.<br />
The Dramatic Sub-Committee of the Society of<br />
Authors met on Tuesday, December 7, at the<br />
offices of the society.<br />
The Repertory Agreement was laid before the<br />
committee once more, and was gone through<br />
clause by clause. Some slight alterations and<br />
additions were made and the secretary was<br />
instructed to incorporate these in the Agree-<br />
ment and to submit the completed document<br />
to the sub-committee at their next meeting in<br />
January. -<br />
A suggestion relating to the summoning of<br />
a Conference of Dramatic Authors was, after<br />
considerable discussion, adjourned till the next<br />
meeting.<br />
SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE PRICE OF NOVELS.<br />
A MEETING of this sub-committee was held on<br />
Thursday, December 2.<br />
The secretary reported the receipt of a large<br />
mass of evidence from the booksellers, and of<br />
further evidence from novelists in answer to the<br />
circular letters.<br />
The sub-committee then considered the interim<br />
report which had been drafted by the chairman.<br />
After a few verbal alterations had been made, the<br />
report was settled, and appears, in its final form, in<br />
another page of this month's Author. As stated in<br />
the report, it has not yet been possible to issue any<br />
exhaustive survey of the subject. This must, of<br />
necessity, be deferred till the receipt of the further<br />
evidence which is expected in February. The sub-<br />
committee will, at that date, consider all the<br />
evidence from authors, which will by then have<br />
been arranged and tabulated, together with the<br />
evidence from booksellers (which needs most care-<br />
ful classification), and also the further evidence of<br />
the publishers.<br />
Cases.<br />
DURING the past month sixteen cases have been<br />
placed in the secretary's hands for settlement.<br />
The majority of these, as is usual, refer to<br />
claims for money. There are six under this<br />
heading. Two have been placed in the hands of<br />
the Society's solicitors, as it was impossible to get<br />
any satisfactory reply. In two the money has been<br />
paid and forwarded to the members. The remain-<br />
ing two are, as yet, unsatisfied, but they have only<br />
recently come into the office. Of three claims for<br />
accounts, one has been carried through, while the<br />
other two are still in the course of negotiation.<br />
The publishers have promised delivery. Of four<br />
cases for the recovery of MSS., one case has been<br />
successful ; in the other three no answers have, as<br />
yet, been received. One case of infringement of<br />
copyright is still in the course of negotiation. It<br />
will, most probably, terminate satisfactorily, but<br />
the infringer adopts an injured attitude. It<br />
happens not infrequently, when the infringement<br />
has been committed by a colonial or a provincial<br />
paper, that the editor feels hurt that the author is<br />
not delighted at the gratis advertisement which he<br />
receives. It may be a satisfactory advertisement<br />
or it may not, but it must lie with the author to<br />
decide whether or not he is willing to have such<br />
a gratis advertisement made by the use of<br />
his property. Editors must not take this for<br />
granted.<br />
There have been two disputes as to the proper<br />
reading of agreements. These cases, like questions<br />
of infringement of copyright, take some time to<br />
settle.<br />
Eight of the cases from former months still<br />
remain open. Five of these refer to matters abroad<br />
or in the colonies, and are likely to be open for<br />
some time to come owing to the delay in obtaining<br />
answers to letters. Three refer to the return of<br />
MSS. We have mentioned, frequently, in The<br />
Author, the reason why there is often much<br />
difficulty in obtaining satisfaction in these<br />
C8,SéS.<br />
December Elections.<br />
Allinson, Alfred 13, Claremont Ter-<br />
race, Exmouth.<br />
4, Melbury Road,<br />
Kensington, W.<br />
Broad Meadow, King's<br />
Bagehot, Mrs. Walter<br />
Bantock, Granville .<br />
Norton.<br />
Beal, N. W. Roseneath, Queen<br />
Street, Hammer-<br />
Smith, W.<br />
Burn-Murdoch, W. G. Northfield, Berwick-<br />
(“Levensis”) shire ; Arthur<br />
Lodge, Dalkeith<br />
Road, Edinburgh.<br />
7, Havelock Road,<br />
Croydon.<br />
Alton, Hants.<br />
170, Kennington Park<br />
Road, S.E.<br />
411, Argyle Road,<br />
Brooklyn, New<br />
York, U.S.A.<br />
Eagle Heart Incorporated<br />
O.<br />
Earland, Miss Ada<br />
Everett, Miss Ethel F.<br />
Grisewood, R. Norman<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#479) ################################################<br />
<br />
TFIES A CITISIOR.<br />
101<br />
Hales, A. G. . e Authors’ Club, 2,<br />
Whitehall Court,<br />
S.W.<br />
Harrison, Frederic, LL.D., Elm Hill, Hawk-<br />
Litt.D. hurst.<br />
Brookfield House,<br />
Shanbrook, Beds.<br />
Hicks, Miss Frances.<br />
Ingpen, Roger. e ©<br />
Jessel, Ernest Edward . 8,0ueen's Gardens, W.<br />
Law, Ernest . . . The Pavilion, Hamp-<br />
ton Court Palace.<br />
90, Broadhurst Gar-<br />
dens, Hampstead,<br />
N.W.<br />
Drishame, Skibbereen,<br />
Co. Cork.<br />
Wykeham Cave, High-<br />
trees, Loughton,<br />
Essex.<br />
17, Bryanston Street,<br />
Portman Square, W.<br />
9, Lyon Road, Harrow.<br />
Lazarus, Miss Olga .<br />
Martin, Miss Violet (Mar-<br />
tin Ross)<br />
Newte, Horace<br />
Palmer, Miss<br />
Richardson, Harry Handel<br />
Sherren, Wilkinson . Authors’ Club, 2,<br />
Whitehall Court,<br />
S.W.<br />
Somerville, Miss Edith CE. Drishane House, Skib-<br />
bereen, Co. Cork,<br />
Ireland.<br />
54, Lower Mount<br />
Street, Dublin.<br />
27, Cadogan Gardens,<br />
S.W.<br />
21, Carlisle Mansions,<br />
Victoria Street,<br />
S.W.<br />
St. Katharine's, Hook<br />
Heath, Surrey.<br />
Stephens, James<br />
Strachey, Lady<br />
Sylvan, F.<br />
Tyrrell, Eleanor .<br />
Walkey, S. . 30, Kingberry Park,<br />
- Newton Abbot,<br />
Devon.<br />
Wright, W. P. e The Grey House, Lym-<br />
inge, Folkestone.<br />
Wyndham, Horace . . Authors’ Club, S.W.<br />
Young, Filson . e . 53, Upper Brook<br />
Street, Park Lane,<br />
W.<br />
—e—º-<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS OF<br />
THE SOCIETY.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
WHILE every effort is made by the compilers to keep<br />
this list as accurate and as exhaustive as possible, they have<br />
some difficulty in attaining this object owing to the fact<br />
that many of the books mentioned are not sent to the office<br />
by the members. In consequence, it is necessary to rely<br />
largely upon lists of books which appear in literary and<br />
other papers. It is hoped, however, that members will<br />
co-operate in the compiling of this list and, by sending<br />
particulars of their works, help to make it sabstantially<br />
aCCurate. -<br />
ARCH.EOLOGY.<br />
THE ARTS AND CRAFTs of ANCIENT Egypt.<br />
FLINDERS PETRIE, F.R.S. 73 × 53.<br />
58. m.<br />
STONEHENGE AND OTHER BRITISH STONE MONUMENTs<br />
By W. M.<br />
159 pp. Foulis.<br />
ASTRONOMICALLY CONSIDERED. By SIR NorMAN<br />
LOCKYER, K.C.B., F.R.S. Second edition. 9} x 6.<br />
499 pp. Macmillan. 14s. n.<br />
ART.<br />
THE SPORT OF CIVIC LIFE, or ART AND THE MUNICI-<br />
PALITY CARICATUREs of PROMINENT CITIZENs.<br />
Articles by W. ROTHENSTEIN, F. RUTTER, and others.<br />
94 × 74. 24 pp. Liverpool : Handley, 2d.<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
US FOUR. By S. MIACNAUGHTAN. 7; x 5.<br />
Murray. 6s.<br />
THE DAUPHINES CE FRANCE.<br />
284 pp.<br />
By FRANK HAMEL.<br />
9 × 53. 413 pp. Stanley Paul. 16s. n.<br />
MICHAEL SERVETUs. By W. OSLER, M.D., F.R.S. 9 × 6.<br />
35 pp. Frowde. 1s. r.<br />
DR. JOHNSON AND MIRs. THRALE. Including Mrs. Thrale's<br />
unpublished journal of the Welsh Tour made in 1774, and<br />
much hitherto unpublished Correspondence of the<br />
Streatham Coterie, by A. M. BROADLEY. With an<br />
Introductory Essay (74 pp.), by T. SECCOMBE. 9 × 53.<br />
338 pp. Lane. 16s. n.<br />
BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG.<br />
THE DOLL's DIARY. By Rose HAIG THOMAs.<br />
trated by JOHN HASSALL. 10 × 7%. 100 pp.<br />
Richards. 5s. m.<br />
DAME THIN-PIN AND OTHER STORIES. By HELEN MAR-<br />
GARET DIXON. Illustrated by RATE MARION RATHBONE.<br />
8+ x 6%. 214 pp. Birmingham : Cormish Bros., Ltd.<br />
THE CHILDREN’s Hou R. Nine volumes, forming a com-<br />
plete Children's Library. With an Introduction. By<br />
HALL CAINE. 83 × 5%. Cloth, £2 2s. 6d. m. ; leather,<br />
£3. 3s. 6d. m.<br />
Illus-<br />
Grant<br />
HARDING's LUCK. By E. NESBIT. 8 × 5}. 281 pp.<br />
Hodder & Stoughton. 6s.<br />
BOOKS OF REFERENCE.<br />
DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY. Vol. 22.<br />
Supplement. Edited by SIDNEY LEE. 9% x 63.<br />
1 5S. n.<br />
1,400 pp, Smith, Elder.<br />
By E. T. Coor.<br />
ROSE GROWING MADE EASY.<br />
204 pp. Newnes. 18, m.<br />
CLASSICAL.<br />
EURIPIDIS FABUL.E RECOGNOVIT BREVIQUE ADNOTA-<br />
TIONE CRITICA INSTRUXIT GILBERTUS MURRAY.<br />
TOMUs III. 7} x 43. (Oxford Classical Texts.)<br />
Oxford : Clarendom Press. London : Frowde. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
EDUCATION.<br />
THE MASTERY OF DESTINY. By JAMES ALLEN. 43 × 6.<br />
120 pp. “The Light of Reason,” Ilfracombe.<br />
BRITISH PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR GIRLS. By A.<br />
ALEXANDER, F.R.G.S., and MRS. ALEXANDER. 83 ×<br />
5%. 230 pp. McDougall's Educational Company.<br />
10s. 6d. n.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#480) ################################################<br />
<br />
102<br />
THE A DITISIOR,<br />
AN AFTERNOON TEA PHILOSOPHY. By W. R.TITTERTON.<br />
6% x 4%. 95 pp. F. Palmer. 1s. 6d. m.<br />
THE G.B.S. CALENDAR : A QUOTATION FROM THE Works<br />
OF GEORGE BERNARD SHAW For EVERY DAY IN THE<br />
YEAR. Selected by MARION NIxoN. Second edition.<br />
6# X 4%. 91 pp. Palmer. 18. n.<br />
MISC ELLANEOUS.<br />
FARTHEST FROM THE TRUTH; A Series of Dashes. By<br />
the authors of “Wisdom While you Wait,” and GEORGE<br />
MORROW. 73 × 4%. 91 pp. Sir Isaac Pitman. Is... n.<br />
BRITANNIA's CALENDAR OF HEROES. Compiled by<br />
KATE, STANWAY. With an Introduction by the Rev.<br />
the Hon. E. LYTTELTON, B.D. 73 × 5. 412 p}}.<br />
Allen. 5s. n.<br />
THE ONE LIFE. A FREE AND OCCASIONAL PAPER. By<br />
JOHN TREVOR. Horsted Keynes, Sussex.<br />
THE KILLARTAN HISTORY BOOK. By LADY GREGORY.<br />
Illustrated by R. GREGORY, 7} x 5.<br />
ls. 6d. p.<br />
THE JOURNAL OF EDUCATION. Vol. for 1909. 12 × 9.<br />
864 pp. Rice, 7s. 6d.<br />
FICTION.<br />
WHAT LAY BENEATH. By “COO-EE.” (WILLIAM SYLVES-<br />
TER WALKER). 301 pp. Ouseley. 6s.<br />
THE EDUCATION OF UNCLE PAUL. By ALGERNON BLACK-<br />
WOOD. 8 × 5}. 348 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br />
ORDINARY PEOPLE. By UNA L. SILBERRAD.<br />
420 pp. Constable. 6s.<br />
THE KING's MIGNON. By J. BLOUNDELLE BURTON.<br />
8 × 5. 316 pp. Everett. 6s.<br />
PRINCE MADOG, DISCOVERER OF AMERICA : A Legendary<br />
7; x 5.<br />
Story. By JOAN DANE. Illustrated by A. S. BOYD.<br />
8% × 5. 222 pp. Stock. 68.<br />
THE DISC. By J. B. HARRIS-BURLAND. 73 × 5.<br />
Greening, 6s.<br />
DON Q's LOVE STORY. By K. and HESKETH PRICHARD.<br />
73 x 5. 312 pp. Greening. 6s.<br />
THE KNIGHT OF THE GOLDEN SWORD.<br />
BARRINGTON. Chatto & Windus. 6s.<br />
318 pp.<br />
By MICHAEL<br />
THE ANNE QUEEN'S CHRONICLE. By REGINALD FARRER.<br />
7} x 43. 363 pp. Alston Rivers. 63.<br />
THEODORA's HUSBAND. By Lou ISE MACK.<br />
329 pp. Alston Rivers. 6s.<br />
HARUM SCARUM'S FORTUNE.<br />
5. 312 pp. Jarrold. 3s. 6d.<br />
MIGNON'S PERIL. By JEAN MIDDLEMASS.<br />
304 pp. Digby, Long, 68.<br />
º<br />
7% × 5.<br />
By ESME STUART. 73 ×<br />
7% × 5.<br />
GARDENING.<br />
MoSTHLY GLEANINGS IN A SCOTTISH GARDEN. By<br />
L. H. Soutar. 5. 192 pp. Unwin. 6s.<br />
7% × 5.<br />
EHISTORY.<br />
A HISTORY OF SARAWAK UNDER ITS Two WHITE<br />
RAJAHS, 1839–1908. By S. BARING-GOULD and C. A.<br />
BAMPFYLDE, F.R.G.S., late President of Sarawak.<br />
9 × 5%, 464 pp. Sotheran. 153. m.<br />
THE MAKING OF IRELAND AND ITS UNDOING, 1200–<br />
1600. By ALICE STOPFORD GREEN. 9 × 53. 573 pp.<br />
Macmillan. 10s, m.<br />
JUVENILE.<br />
THE LIMBERSNIGS : THE ADVENTURES OF PRINCE<br />
KEBOLE THE TALL. By FLORA and LANCELOT SPEED.<br />
London : Lawrence & Jellicoe, Ltd. 3s. 6d.<br />
CINDERELLA. By E. NESBIT. 64 × 4}. 38 pp. Sidg-<br />
wick & Jackson. 6d. n.<br />
A GIRL OF THE FOURTH The Story of an Unpopular<br />
Schoolgirl. By A. M. IRVINE. 73 × 53. 332 pp.<br />
Partridge. 2s. 6d.<br />
BRAVE SONS OF THE EMPIRE. By H. C. MooRE.<br />
8 × 5%. 251 pp. R. T. S. 28. -<br />
A LITTLE FLEET. By JACK B. YEATs. 7 × 4}. Elkin<br />
Mathews. I s. n.<br />
FOR THE SAKE OF KITTY. By CHRISTINA GowANS<br />
WHYT.E. 7# x 5}. 348 pp, Collins. 3s. 6d.<br />
I,ITERARY.<br />
QUESTIONINGS ON CRITICISM AND BEAUTY. By the<br />
Right Honourable A. J. BALFOUR. Delivered in the<br />
Sheldonian Theatre, November 24th, 1909. (The<br />
Romances Lecture, 1909.) Oxford : Clarendon Press.<br />
London : Frowde. 2s. n.<br />
BETWEEN COLLEGE TERMS.<br />
NARD. 8 × 53. 271 pp.<br />
By CONSTANCE L. MAY-<br />
Nisbet. 5s. In.<br />
52 pp. Maunsell.<br />
MUSIC.<br />
THE GATHERING SONG OF BLACK DONALD. From the<br />
Poem by Sir Walter Scott. Composed by JAMES<br />
M. GALLATLY. Keith Prowse & Co., Ltd. 23. m.<br />
THE RHYTHM OF MODERN MUSIC. By C. F. ABDy<br />
WILLIAMS. 8 × 5%. 321 pp. Macmillan. 5s.<br />
NATURAL HISTORY.<br />
THE BOOK OF FLOWERS. By KATHERINE TYNAN AND<br />
FRANCES MAITLAND. 8 × 5}, 319 pp. Smith, Elder<br />
& Co. 68. n. .<br />
PAMPHILETS.<br />
THE UNIVERSITY AND THE STUDY OF WAR. An Inaugural<br />
Lecture delivered before the University of Oxford,<br />
November 27, 1909. By SPENCER WILKINSON, Chichele<br />
Professor of Military History. Oxford : Clarendon Press.<br />
London : Frowde. 1s. m.<br />
WoRKING Wom EN AND THE POOR LAw. By B. L.<br />
HUTCEIINSON. Women's Industrial Council. Id.<br />
POETRY.<br />
A SONG OF THE ENGLISH. By RUDYARD RIPLING.<br />
Illustrated by W. HEATH ROBINSON, 113 x 9. Hodder<br />
& Stoughton. 158, n.<br />
HARVESTING. By H. M. WAITHMAN, 7 x 4%. 134 pp.<br />
Kegan Paul. 3s. 6d. n.<br />
TIME's LAUGHINGSTOCKS, AND OTHER VERSEs. By<br />
THOMAS HARDY. 73 × 5. 206 pp. Macmillan. 4s. 6d. n.<br />
ENGLAND, AND OTHER POEMs. By LAURENCE BINYon.<br />
73 × 5. 88 pp. Flkin Mathews. 3s. 6d. m.<br />
THE BORDER BREED. GEORGICS AND PASTORALS AND<br />
OTHER POEMS. By SIR GEORGE DOUGLAS, BART.<br />
8 × 53. 448 pp. The St. Catherine Press. 3s. 6d. in.<br />
POLITICAL.<br />
THE HINDRANCES To Good CITIZENSHIP. By JAMES<br />
(Yale Lectures on the<br />
New Haven : Yale<br />
68. n.<br />
BRYCE. 73 × 5}. 138 pp.<br />
Responsibilities of Citizenship.)<br />
University Press. London : Frowde.<br />
PSYCHICA.L.<br />
HERE AND HEREAFTER (APRES LA MORT). BY LÉON<br />
DENIS. Translated by GEORGE G. FLEUROT. W. Rider<br />
& Son, 164, Aldersgate Street, E.C.<br />
REPRINTS.<br />
THE POCKET CARLYLE. Edited by ROSE GARDNER.<br />
7 x 44, 264 pp. Routledge. 38. 6d. n.<br />
BosweLL's JoHNSON. Edited by ROGER INGPEN. Bicen-<br />
tenary Extra-Illustrated Edition. Parts 10, 11, & 12.<br />
10 × 7, 657–832. Sir Isaac Pitman. 6d. In each.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#481) ################################################<br />
<br />
TISIES A UITPSIOR.<br />
103<br />
SCIENCE.<br />
CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES. By<br />
E. B. POULTON, D.Sc. 94 × 6. 362 pp. Longmans.<br />
7s. 6d. n.<br />
ALL THE WORLD's AIRSHIPs, AEROPLANES, AND<br />
DIRIGIBLES. Founded and edited by FRED T. JANE,<br />
with a special chapter on “Aerial Engineering.” By<br />
CHARLES DE GRAVE SELLs, M. Inst. C.E. 73 × 12%.<br />
374 pp. Sampson Low. 21s. n.<br />
SOCIOLOGY.<br />
THE GREAT IDEA : Notes by an Eye-witness on some of<br />
the Social Work of the Salvation Army. By ARNOLD<br />
WHITE. 73 × 53. 161 pp. Salvation Army, 101,<br />
Queen Victoria Street, E.C.<br />
SPORT.<br />
LIGHT COME, LIGHT Go. By RALPEI NEVILL. 9 × 53.<br />
448 pp. Macmillan. 15s. n.<br />
THIEOLOGY.<br />
PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION. Six Lectures delivered at<br />
Cambridge. By HASTINGS RASHDALL. 7% x 5. 189 pp.<br />
Duckworth. 2s. 6d. n.<br />
THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN SPEECH. By the late<br />
R. F. WEYMOUTH. Edited and Partly Revised by<br />
E. HAMPDEN-COOK. Third Edition (Re-set and Revised).<br />
7; x 4%. 734 pp. J. Clarke. 2s. 6d. m.<br />
TOPOGRAPHY.<br />
THE HEART OF ENGLAND. By E. THOMAS. 7 × 5.<br />
244 pp. Dent. 3s. 6d. In.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
BOOKS PUBLISHED IN AMERICA BY<br />
MEMBERS.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
ANTHOLOGIES.<br />
SOME FRIENDS OF MINE : A R ALLY OF MEN, By E. V.<br />
LUCAs. 362 pp. New York : Macmillan & Co. $1.25 n.<br />
ART.<br />
CoNSTABLE. Illustrated with 8 reproductions in colour.<br />
By C. LEWIS HIND. 80 pp. New York : Frederick A.<br />
Stokes Co. Boards, 650. m. ; leather, $1.50 m.<br />
BIOGRAPHY.<br />
MR. POPE : HIS LIFE AND TIMES.<br />
illustrations. By GEORGE PASTON.<br />
New York: Putnam. $6.50 m.<br />
BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG,<br />
THE ARABIAN NIGHTS: Their best-known Tales. By<br />
KATE DOUGLAS WIGGIN AND NORA. A. SMITH. Illus-<br />
trated in colour. By MAXFIELD PATRISH. 339 pp. New<br />
York : Scribner. $2.50.<br />
DRAM.A.<br />
THE MASQUERADERs : A Play in Four Acts. By HENRY<br />
ARTHUR JONES. 135 pp. New York : Samuel French.<br />
50c.<br />
FICTION.<br />
DAPHNE IN FITzRoy STREET. By E. NESBIT.<br />
New York : Doubleday, Page & Co. $1.50.<br />
With twenty-six<br />
364 + 382 pp.<br />
417 pp.<br />
THE LAND OF THE BLUE FLOWER. B y FRANCES HODG-<br />
son BURNETT. 67 pp. New York : Moffat, Yard & Co.<br />
( )6. Il.<br />
ABAFT THE FUNNEL. By RUDYARD KIPLING.<br />
New York : B. W. Dodge & Co. $1.50.<br />
ACTIONS AND REACTIONs. By RUDYARD KIPLING.<br />
324 pp. New York: Doubleday, Page & Co. $1.50.<br />
ANND WERQNICA. By H. G. WELLs. 377 pp. New York :<br />
360 pp.<br />
Harper Bros. $1.50.<br />
EMILY Fox-SETON : Being “THE MAKING or A<br />
MARCHIONESS’’’ and “THE METHODs or LADy<br />
WALDERHURST.” By FRANCEs Hodgson BURNETT.<br />
New York: Frederick A. Stokes. $1.50.<br />
THE TRAVELLING COMPANIONs: A Story in Scenes. By<br />
ANSTEY GUTHRIE and BERNARD PARTRIDGE. 194 199-<br />
New York : Dutton. $I. n.<br />
TRIAL BY MARRIAGE. By WILFRED SCARBOROUGH<br />
ſºos. 320 pp. New York : John Lane & Co.<br />
$1.50. -<br />
TESTIMONY. By ALICE AND CLAUDE AsKEw. 320 pp.<br />
New York : John Lane Co. $1.50.<br />
THE NECROMANCERs. By R. H. BENSON.<br />
37.4 pp. St.<br />
Louis : B. Herder. $1.50. p}<br />
CANDLES IN THE WIND. By MAUD DIVER, 392 DD.<br />
New York : John Lane Co. $1.50.<br />
SAILOR'S KNOTs. By W. W. JACOBs. 283 pp. New<br />
York : Scribner. $1.50.<br />
SPARROWS : The Story of an Unprotected Girl. By<br />
HORACE W. C. NEWTE. 533 pp. New York : Mitcheil<br />
Kennerley. $1.50.<br />
THE BLINDNESS OF DR. GREY.<br />
CANON SHEEHAN, D.D., 488 pp.<br />
mans, Green, & Co. $1.50.<br />
THE FLORENTINE FRAME. By ELIZABETH Robins.<br />
334 pp. New York: Moffat Yard & Co. $1.50.<br />
GARDENING.<br />
IN A YORKSHIRE GARDEN. By REGINALD FARRER.<br />
: 316 pp. New York : Longmans, Green & Co. $3.50.<br />
JUVENILE.<br />
TALES OF WONDER. A fourth fairy book. Edited by<br />
KATE DOUGLAS WIGGIN and NORA ARCHIBALD SMITH.<br />
By THE REV. P. A.<br />
New York : Long-<br />
440 pp. New York : Doubleday, Page & Co. $1.50.<br />
POLITICAL.<br />
TURKEY IN TRANSITION. By G. F. ABBOTT. 370 pp.<br />
New York : Longmans, Green & Co. $4.25 n.<br />
TRAVEL.<br />
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. By MAUDE HOLBACH.<br />
Forty-one illustrations from photographs by O. HoDBACH.<br />
249 pp. New York : John Lane Co. $1.50 m.<br />
THE HEART OF THE ANTARCTIC : Being the Story of the<br />
British Antarctic Exhibition, 1907–1909. With an intro-<br />
duction by H. R. M.ILL. An account of the first journey<br />
to the South Magnetic Pole. In two vols. 366 +<br />
451 pp. Philadelphia : Lippincott. $10 m.<br />
—e—“Q-6–<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
NOTES.<br />
OBERT AITKEN'S new novel, “The<br />
Ilantern of Luck,” which has recently been<br />
published in the United States and also in<br />
Canada, will be issued on this side early in 1910 by<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#482) ################################################<br />
<br />
104<br />
TISIES A UſTSIOR,<br />
Mr. John Murray. Messrs. Greening & Co. have<br />
on their list a cheap edition of “The Golden<br />
Horseshoe '' by the same author. .<br />
Messrs. Cassell & Co. have just issued a fresh<br />
and revised edition of “Popular Fallacies Explained<br />
and Corrected,” by A. S. E. Ackermann. The work<br />
covers a very wide field of fallaciousness—domestic,<br />
legal, historical, technical—and treats also of various<br />
fallacies connected with ourselves in addition to the<br />
members of the animal kingdom.<br />
“The Mastery of Destiny” is the title of a new<br />
volume by Mr. James Allen which has just<br />
appeared. The volume deals with the subject of<br />
re-birth, and touches upon Social questions and on<br />
the training of the will and mind. Among the<br />
subjects dealt with are The Science of Self-Control ;<br />
Cause and Effect in Human Conduct ; Cultivation<br />
of Concentration ; Practice of Meditation ; and<br />
The Joy of Accomplishment. G. P. Putnam's Sons<br />
are the publishers in America.<br />
The pen sketch in Mary C. Rowsell's novel of<br />
“The Friend of the People” has come under the<br />
notice of M. Buffenoir, Member of the Société des<br />
Gens de Lettres. Miss Rowsell is by his wish<br />
translating the articles for the purpose of publica-<br />
tion in England. They are illustrated by numerous<br />
portraits of Robespierre, of which some bear special<br />
interest. Among these is the picture portrait of<br />
him in his room in the house of Duplay, in the<br />
Rue St. Honoré, and another is the cast of his head<br />
taken after the death by Madame Tussaud. Mr.<br />
John Tussaud has presented to the author of “The<br />
Friend of the People” two copyright photographs<br />
—profile and full face—of this memorial, and it<br />
will be added to the portraits which Mr. Buffenoir<br />
has with infinite pains and research collected.<br />
The matter in the December issue of Travel<br />
and Erploration is provided almost exclusively by<br />
members of the Society.<br />
Mrs. Bullock Workman tells of her ascent of the<br />
Nun Kun range of mountains in the Himalayas.<br />
Dr. J. Scott Keltie deals with notable fictitious<br />
narratives in travel and exploration, of which,<br />
perhaps, Baron Munchausen's adventures are a<br />
typical example.<br />
“A Traveller in Travel ” is the title of an<br />
article in the same journal by Mr. A. R. Hope<br />
Moncrieff, who describes some of his experiences<br />
gleaned from his professional travels as a guide-<br />
book editor.<br />
A review by Mr. E. A. Reynolds Ball of Sir<br />
|Ernest Shackleton’s “Record of his Antarctic<br />
Expedition ” is another item in this monthly.<br />
We regret that in our last issue we announced a<br />
book on “Fossil Botany ” as by Miss M. C. Stokes,<br />
whereas the correct spelling of the author's name<br />
is Stopes. We tender our apologies to Miss Stopes<br />
for the error.<br />
Messrs. Cornish Bros., of Birmingham, have<br />
favoured us with a sumptuous volume of stories<br />
for children by Miss H. Margaret Dixon. “Dame<br />
Thin-Pin and Other Stories” is the title given to<br />
the collection. There are ten stories in all, and<br />
twelve accompanying illustrations by Kate Marion<br />
Rathborne and other artists.<br />
Mr. Andrew Melrose's new Two-hundred-and-fifty<br />
Guinea Prize Novel Competition, which closed on the<br />
30th ult., has brought in 162 MSS., seven more than<br />
last year's competition produced. The adjudicators<br />
in the present competition are Mrs. Flora Annie<br />
Steel, Miss Mary Cholmondeley and Mrs. Henry<br />
De La Pasture, and Mr. Melrose's staff is at<br />
present busy making the selection of novels which<br />
will be submitted to them. As this competition is<br />
not for a first novel it has brought a number of<br />
MSS. from manifestly practised writers, and the<br />
task of classification is proportionately difficult, but<br />
it is hoped to put the selected list in the adjudi-<br />
cators' hands before the end of the month, and<br />
that a declaration of the result may be made some<br />
time in January.<br />
“Light Come, Light Go” is a new work<br />
announced for early publication by Messrs.<br />
Macmillan & Co. Mr. Ralph Nevill, the author,<br />
has gathered together in the volume a collection of<br />
anecdotes concerning gaming, gamesters, wagers<br />
and the turf. In addition to this, much informa-<br />
tion is given about the public gaming tables, which<br />
were once such a conspicuous feature of the Palais<br />
Royal in Paris, and afterwards of Baden-Baden,<br />
Homburg, Ems, and other German spas. An<br />
entire chapter of the book is devoted to Monte<br />
Carlo, and a number of the various popular systems<br />
and methods of play are analysed and described.<br />
Printers' Ink, a weekly journal for advertisers,<br />
has published, from the pen of Mr. Edward<br />
Urwick, a series of Sonnets to the poster artists.<br />
Mr. William Patrick Kelly's new novel, “The<br />
Senator Licinius,” a romance of ancient Rome in<br />
the days of Caligula, has just been published by<br />
Messrs. Routledge. It forms the third of the<br />
author's series of historical romances, of which the<br />
first two — “The Stonecutter of Memphis.” and<br />
“The Assyrian Bride"—are already published.<br />
The fourth book of the series, “A Romance of<br />
Athens in the Age of Pericles,” will probably appear<br />
early next year.<br />
Mr. Henry Frowde and Messrs. Hodder and<br />
Stoughton have forwarded us the following<br />
Christmas books for children :-‘‘Books of British<br />
Ships,” 5s. ; “Young Franctireurs,” 3s 6d. ;<br />
“Farm Babies,” 5s. ; “Stories from Grimm,”<br />
2s. 6d. ; “Robinson Crusoe,” 7s. 6d. net ; “Loco-<br />
motives of the World,” 5s. net ; “Ballads of Famous<br />
Fights,” 3s. 6d. net ; “Lamb's Tales from Shake-<br />
speare,” 6d. net ; “ Robinson Crusoe,” 6d. net ;<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#483) ################################################<br />
<br />
TISIE AUTISIOR.<br />
105<br />
“Mungo Park,” 6d. net ; “Hans Andersen,” 6d.<br />
net; “White Kitten Book,” 2s. 6d. net; “Children's<br />
Shakespeare,” 2s. 6d. net ; “Children's Dickens,”<br />
2s. 6d. net; “Madam Mouse,” 1s. net ; “Squirrel<br />
Hall,” 1s. met. ; “Bunnikin Brown,” 1s. net. Per-<br />
haps itishardly correct to say that they are exclusively<br />
for children, as the illustrations are so beautiful and<br />
the get-up is so good that they would be likely to<br />
amuse and interest the older folk at this season of<br />
the year. The 6d. editions with their beautiful<br />
end-plates and their coloured frontispieces are<br />
wonderful at the price. The illustrated 18. books<br />
are exceedingly well got up, and the illustrations<br />
to two of them, by Mr. Cecil Aldin, are particularly<br />
clever. There is no need to recommend this artist's<br />
work. As presents these books ought to be exceed-<br />
ingly welcome, and their price is within the range<br />
of almost every Christmas giver.<br />
The large number of illustrated books issued at<br />
this period of the year emphasises the importance<br />
of the article on colour illustration which was<br />
published in last month's Author.<br />
Messrs. Chapman & Hall have published “The<br />
History of St. Paul's School,” by Michael F. J.<br />
McDonnell. In this work, which contains forty-<br />
eight portraits and other illustrations, the author<br />
has received every assistance from the school<br />
authorities, and has secured access to various<br />
private MS. collections which throw light on the<br />
story of Dean Colet's foundation. The history,<br />
beginning with a consideration of the question of<br />
the continuity of the school with the ancient<br />
Cathedral Grammar School of St. Paul's, is carried<br />
down to modern times, so as to include an account<br />
of the revival of the fortunes of St. Paul’s under<br />
the late head master, Mr. Walker.<br />
“Here and Hereafter ’’ is the title which Mr.<br />
George G. Fleurot has given to his translation of<br />
Léon Denis’ “ Après la Mort,” of which Messrs.<br />
William Rider & Son, 164, Aldersgate Street,<br />
E.C., are the English, and Messrs. Brentano, of<br />
New York, the American publishers. The first<br />
edition having been exhausted, a second edition is<br />
in the press.<br />
We have received from Messrs. A. & C. Black<br />
copies of the year books issued from their house,<br />
viz., “Who's Who,” “‘Who's Who? Year Book,”<br />
“The Englishwoman's Year Book,” and “The<br />
Writers' and Artists' Year Book.”<br />
“Who’s Who’’ for 1910 Contains<br />
biographies.<br />
The “ . Who's Who' Year Book” comprises the<br />
tables which were formerly a part of the larger<br />
volume. It includes lists of ambassadors,<br />
academies, clubs, societies, as well as many others<br />
which professional men and women will be glad to<br />
consult from time to time during the coming year.<br />
“The Englishwoman's Year Book,” which is<br />
23,000<br />
now in its thirtieth year, is a compendium of<br />
information for women, in whatever department of<br />
life they may be engaged. Education, sport,<br />
literature, professions, industrial, and philan-<br />
thropic work are a few of the more prominent<br />
questions of which it treats.<br />
Messrs. James Clarke & Co. have issued a third<br />
edition of the late R. F. Weymouth’s “New Testa-<br />
ment in Modern Speech.” This work, under the<br />
editorship of Mr. E. Hampden-Cook, has been re-set<br />
in new type, and, in order to add to the interest of<br />
the translation, all conversations have been spaced<br />
out in accordance with modern custom. Many<br />
errata have been corrected, and a very considerable<br />
number of what seemed to be infelicities or slight<br />
inaccuracies in the English have been removed.<br />
We offer our apologies to Mr. C. E. Gouldsbury<br />
for an error in our notice of his book in the last<br />
issue of The Author, which we entitled “Duall”<br />
instead of “Dulall, the Forest Guard.” The book<br />
contains a brief account of the proceedings of two<br />
young Englishmen in their pursuit of tiger, rhino-<br />
ceros, elephant, bear, etc., in the Bengal jungles.<br />
The chief character is Dulall Sing, a forest guard,<br />
a subordinate in the Forest Department, truthful,<br />
brave, faithful to his employers, running into<br />
danger himself, while careful of his charges.<br />
Messrs. Gibbings are the publishers.<br />
“The Life and Letters of James Wolfe,” by<br />
Beckles Willson, which Mr. William Heinemann<br />
publishes, is the outcome of much new material,<br />
including many hitherto unpublished letters<br />
placed at the author's disposal. To as great an<br />
extent as possible Mr. Beckles Willson has allowed<br />
the letters to tell the story.<br />
Her Majesty the Queen has had much pleasure<br />
in accepting a copy of Emily Shore's book, “Iland-<br />
Babies and Sea-Babies.”<br />
The current number of the Journal of the<br />
Royal Asiatic Society contains an instalment of<br />
the revised translation of the Bábar-Nāma, on<br />
which Mrs. Beveridge is now working. The<br />
portion published is the description of Fārghana,<br />
so much discussed by writers on Central Asia.<br />
DRAMA.<br />
Mr. Richard Pryce's dramatic adaptations of<br />
Mrs. Mann's stories, “Freddy's Ship” and “ The<br />
Eglamore Portraits,” were staged at the Playhouse<br />
on December 1st.<br />
The first, which was produced under the title of<br />
“The Visit,” deals with the humanising of a<br />
selfish woman as a result of her fulfilment of a<br />
disagreeable duty.<br />
The longer piece, produced under the title of<br />
“Little Mrs. Cummim,” treats of a battle between<br />
a newly-made benedict and an interfering mother-<br />
in-law.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#484) ################################################<br />
<br />
106<br />
TISIES A DITISIOR.<br />
This latter piece was interpreted by a cast<br />
which included Miss Lottie Wenne, Mr. Kenneth<br />
Douglas, and Miss Marie Lohr.<br />
“The King's Cup,” by H. Dennis Braaley and<br />
E. Phillips Oppenheim was produced at a special<br />
maſſinée at the Adelphi Theatre on December 13th,<br />
1909. The cast includes Mr. Nye Chart, Miss<br />
Nora Sevening and Mr. Paul Arthur.<br />
Sir William Gilbert's new opera, “Fallen Fairies;<br />
or, The Wicked World,” was produced at the<br />
Savoy Theatre early in December last. The music<br />
is by Edward German, and the cast includes Mr.<br />
C. H. Workman, Miss Nancy McIntosh and Miss<br />
Jessie Rose.<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
“CN OUVENIRS autour d'un groupe littéraire,” by<br />
Madame Alphonse Daudet, is a book of the<br />
greatest interest to all lovers of French litera-<br />
ture. The widow of the great novelist is herself a<br />
gifted poetess, and her memoirs gain much by this<br />
fact. During the lifetime of her husband her<br />
salon was a rendezvous for the writers of the day.<br />
Madame Daudet's parents were poets, so that she<br />
had from her earliest years the greatest respect for<br />
literary work. Her mother and father published a<br />
volume of poetry entitled “Les Marges de la Vie,”<br />
and Madame Daudet gives us a letter from Madame<br />
Desbordes Valmore, who had just read it in manu-<br />
script. She then tells us of her acquaintance with<br />
Mistral, Paul Arène and Francisque Sarcey. She<br />
gives us a portrait of Barbey d'Aurevilly and the<br />
most charming letter from him to Daudet. It was<br />
written after a slight misunderstanding caused by a<br />
terrible criticism of Flaubert by d'Aurevilly.<br />
Madame Daudet gives us a description of her first<br />
visit to Victor Hugo. She tells us of her first<br />
meeting with the Goncourt brothers, who were to<br />
become life-long friends, of the reunions of “the<br />
Five,” Flaubert, Goncourt, Alphonse Daudet,<br />
Tourgéneff and Zola, and then of the “Médan<br />
Group,” Hennique, Céard Paul Alexis, Huysmans,<br />
Maupassant, and, later on, Rod. Madame Daudet<br />
tells us then of her Own Salon in the Marais, the<br />
old-world part of Paris, and when we read the<br />
names of the habitués we can only envy the writer<br />
the intellectual treats she must so frequently<br />
have had. Among these names are Théuriet,<br />
Blémont, Anatole France, Gil, Léon Allard, Sully<br />
Prudhomme, François Coppée, Hérédia, Pierre de<br />
Nolhac, Haraucourt, Massenet, Pugno, Rollinat,<br />
etC.<br />
We read, too, of the foundation of the Théâtre<br />
Libre by Antoine. In those days this was a little<br />
room at the end of a passage, where the arrange-<br />
ments were all so primitive that the last person to<br />
leave was requested to turn out the gas.<br />
Madame Daudet then tells us of some of the<br />
other Paris Salons, of that of the Princess Mathilde<br />
and of that of Madame Buloz and of Madame<br />
Juliette Adam. In this book Madame Daudet takes<br />
us with her through the literary Paris of her time.<br />
It was quite another Paris from that of to-day. The<br />
foreign invasion has, no doubt, had a certain<br />
influence on Paris, but the old world is still there<br />
behind all these modern buildings, and we are glad<br />
to get some echoes from it in such books as this of<br />
Madame Daudet. The last chapters are better<br />
read in the original. They are too sacred to touch<br />
on lightly. They begin from the year 1898, after<br />
the death of Alphonse Daudet.<br />
“Whenever I leave home,” says his widow, “it<br />
seems to me always that I shall find him on my<br />
return, but it is always the same disappointment.<br />
I cannot resign myself to death, to his continued<br />
absence.”<br />
“Les Infernales” is the title of a remarkable<br />
volume of short stories, or rather studies, by Nikto.<br />
This book comes as a surprise to all who know<br />
its author. Nikto is one of the most marvellous<br />
musicians of our times, a pupil of Liszt, of Teleffsen,<br />
and of Mikuli, Chopin's gifted pupil. To anyone<br />
who has heard Chopin and Liszt interpreted by<br />
Nikto, there seems mothing left to hear by these<br />
two great composers. With the force of a man<br />
and the delicacy and intuition of a woman, Nikto<br />
has discovered all the treasures hidden in the music.<br />
Execution, expression, fire, tenderness and deep<br />
feeling, Nikto interprets all that there is to<br />
interpret. The hours spent by the favoured few<br />
who are allowed the rare privilege of hearing her<br />
explain and interpret the works of her two masters<br />
are hours that will never be forgotten. At present<br />
we discover that this great musician is also a<br />
talented writer. In all these stories we have the<br />
fire and passion of the Slavonic soul described and<br />
painted by an artist. There are tragic stories of<br />
terrible cruelty, there is a Breton idyll which is<br />
exquisitely poetical, a story of diabolic revenge and<br />
a study, at the end of the volume, of tzigame music.<br />
Although Nikto is a Polish Russian, she has<br />
accomplished the task, almost impossible to foreign<br />
authors, of writing her book in French. Very<br />
many years ago that pitiless critic, Barbey<br />
d’Aurevilly, who was always more or less hard on<br />
women writers, wrote a somewhat scathing article<br />
on one of Nikto’s literary works. She dedicates<br />
her book to-day “To the memory of Barbey<br />
d’Aurevilly, the admirable author of ‘Les<br />
Diaboliques,’ from The one whom he scathed.”<br />
If all writers of merit could have an Egeria like<br />
Mlle. Louise Read, it would not be necessary for<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#485) ################################################<br />
<br />
TISIE A DITFIOR,<br />
107<br />
them to trouble about their future fame. Thanks<br />
to her unceasing devotion in publishing posthumous<br />
works of Barbey d’Aurevilly, France has slowly,<br />
during the last twenty years, realized the fact that<br />
he was one of her great writers. Rarely has any<br />
Centenary been so universally féted in any country,<br />
and for a long time to come lectures, articles and<br />
books will prove to us that the author so few of us<br />
know is one of those whose works should not<br />
be neglected. Rodin's statue was inaugurated<br />
this last month, and a pilgrimage of lovers of<br />
literature set out from Paris to be present at the<br />
unveiling ceremony at St. Sauveur le Wicomte, in<br />
Normandy, Barbey d’Aurevilly's birth-place.<br />
Among the new books we have another volume<br />
of G. Lenôtre's “Paris Révolutionnaire" (Vieilles<br />
maisons, vieux papiers). The subjects treated are :<br />
Papa Tam, Les Meubles de M. Berthélemy,<br />
Le Ménage Tison, Herman, Montcairzain, L’As<br />
de Pique, La fin de Thérèse Lavasseur, L'Evêque<br />
d’Agra, Thomazeau, Madame Gasnier, l’Améri-<br />
caine, and Monsieur de Charette. The chapter on<br />
Thérèse Levasseur after Jean-Jacques' death is<br />
very curious and instructive, whilst the story of the<br />
Comtesse de Montcairzain would make the plot for<br />
a novel.<br />
“La Rue Saint Honoré'' (de la Revolution à nos<br />
jours) is the second volume by Robert Hénard on<br />
this subject. It seems indeed as though this street<br />
must surely be more full of memories than any<br />
other street in Paris. We have a description of<br />
the scenes that took place there on the day of the<br />
taking of the Bastille, and on many other historical<br />
occasions. Marie Antoinette was taken down this<br />
street on her way to execution. Robespierre lived<br />
there. The famous Café de la Régence, the<br />
favourite resort of Musset, is still there. Under<br />
the Consulate and the Empire the Rue St. Honoré<br />
was a very fashionable resort. The volume gives<br />
many interesting details, and makes one realize how<br />
full of past history Paris is.<br />
In a recent number of the Revue hebdomadaire,<br />
there is an article on “Selma Lagerlof,” by Jacques<br />
de Coussange, and in another recent number of<br />
the same magazine is an article by Ernest Seillière<br />
on “Le Ménage du grand Frédéric.”<br />
The play “Susette,” by M. Brieux, given at<br />
the Comédie Française, is not intended as an<br />
argument against divorce, but against divorce too<br />
easily obtained. It is the story of a child between<br />
parents who are at loggerheads with each other.<br />
We see all the suffering of a child in this situation.<br />
M. Brieux has already treated this subject in the<br />
“Berceau,” but “Susette” is a much stronger and<br />
more convincing play,<br />
At the Théâtre Antoine “Papillon, dit Lyonnais<br />
le Juste,” by M. Louis Bénière, is having great<br />
success. It is the story of a simple workman Who<br />
comes into a fortune. It is an extremely natural<br />
and simple play, amusing and pathetic in parts.<br />
ALYS HALLARD.<br />
Souvenirs autour d'un groupe littéraire’ (Fasquelle).<br />
“Les Infernales " (Lemetre).<br />
* Paris Révolutionnaire" (Perrin).<br />
“La Rue Saint Honoré" (Emile Paul).<br />
—&h–<br />
w ~–w<br />
THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE PRICE OF<br />
NOVELS.<br />
——º-0–<br />
INTERIMI REPORT.<br />
Wº the sub-committee appointed to consider<br />
the question of the price at which new<br />
novels should be issued, think that we<br />
ought to make an interim report, having regard to<br />
the Serious nature of the present situation. We<br />
feel, also, that a conclusive and comprehensive<br />
report upon the matter can hardly be expected<br />
from us, remembering the variety of directions in<br />
which evidence must be sought, and the distinct<br />
understanding that we have received that the<br />
results of certain experiments in the change of<br />
price of new novels—which experiments are now<br />
being conducted—will be given to us.<br />
Our first step was to invite the opinion of seventy-<br />
eight novelists, almost all being members of our<br />
Society, who were Selected as far as possible because<br />
they seemed to us to represent varying degrees of<br />
position as men and women of letters and greatly<br />
different conditions of popularity. Further, we<br />
gave preference in our first letter of inquiry to<br />
those authors whose works we knew had been made<br />
the subject of some experiments in the lowering of<br />
the original price of issue. The result of that<br />
inquiry was that thirty authors declared them-<br />
Selves uncompromisingly opposed to any systematic<br />
reduction of the usual publishing price of the new<br />
novel, viz., 6s., believing that the reduction would<br />
bring to them, having regard to the reduced<br />
royalties offered, no return which would compen-<br />
sate them for the loss which they would sustain by<br />
not receiving the larger royalty upon the larger<br />
prices; seven authors believe the reverse of this,<br />
but their convictions were not expressed with any<br />
great force in all instances.<br />
Of the remaining authors to whom we wrote,<br />
fourteen were non-committal in their statements,<br />
certain of them giving information in answer to<br />
our questions, but without expressing opinions and<br />
leaving us to make deductions from the facts;<br />
nine stated that they were unable to give useful<br />
information, and from the remainder we have not<br />
yet heard. Much of this unclassified evidence was<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#486) ################################################<br />
<br />
108<br />
THE A DITFIOR.<br />
informatory to ourselves, and the deduction we have<br />
drawn from it is that it contains no definite argu-<br />
ments in favour of the lowering of the original<br />
price of the new novel from 6s, either for the<br />
benefit of the author, the publisher, the book-<br />
seller, or the public.<br />
We propose to collect further evidence from<br />
novelists during the time that must elapse before<br />
we can report finally.<br />
Our interim conclusion, that novelists would be<br />
unwise to allow themselves, or their agents for<br />
them, to enter into any contracts whereby it is<br />
agreed that the initial price of the new novel<br />
should be lower than 6s., is much strengthened b<br />
the replies which we have received from the list of<br />
publishers to whom we addressed a letter asking<br />
whether the circulation obtained for novels pub-<br />
lished originally at a lower price than 68. Would,<br />
in their opinion, result in a proportionate increase<br />
if the price were lowered. The basis on which we<br />
asked for information was a 6s. novel of the<br />
ordinary length of about 80,000 to 100,000 words<br />
with a circulation of at least 3,000 copies; and,<br />
further, we asked if it would be practicable to pay<br />
an author royalties on a 28., a 2s. 6d. Or a 38. net<br />
book at so high a rate as on a 68. book ; and if it<br />
would be practicable to consider raising the Original<br />
price in certain cases.<br />
We desire to record our sense of the valuable<br />
and courteous manner in which our questions,<br />
necessarily of a searching nature, were responded<br />
to by the publishers.<br />
Several publishers said that at the present<br />
moment they were not prepared to answer definitely,<br />
while one, who may be mentioned by name, because<br />
his position has been made public by his own letter<br />
to The Publishers’ Circular, viz., Mr. Heinemann,<br />
pointed out to us that he was at the present<br />
moment engaged in an important experiment in<br />
the alteration of the prices at which new novels<br />
should be issued, of the results of which he would<br />
be in a position to inform us in February. Other<br />
publishers who have issued new fiction at lower<br />
prices than 68, have given us details showing that<br />
the experiments had failed.<br />
The consensus of opinion from the publishers is<br />
to the effect :<br />
(1) (a) that from 9,000 copies at least, to 12,000<br />
(the highest figure mentioned) must be sold at<br />
2S. net ;<br />
(b) that 8,000 must be sold at 2s. 6d. net ; and<br />
(c) that 6,000 copies must be sold at 3s. net<br />
before the author would receive the amount equiva-<br />
lent to that which he usually receives on 3,000<br />
copies at 68., i.e., 48. 6d. net. -<br />
(2) That, leaving exceptional cases out of count,<br />
it does not appear probable that the author's<br />
circulation would be proportionately enhanced by<br />
a reduction in the price of the original issue. On<br />
this point figures relating to particular cases have<br />
been submitted in proof of the opinion.<br />
(3) That the same proportionate royalty could<br />
not be offered upon the lower prices. On this<br />
point the publishers are all very clear.<br />
Regarding these publishers, as we do, as<br />
thoroughly cognisant of the business side of the<br />
publication of fiction in the present conditions,<br />
and as competent to guide us as to the probable<br />
result of modifications or developments of those<br />
conditions, we think that their opinions constitute<br />
a grave warning to authors who may be invited to<br />
issue new novels of the ordinary length at any<br />
price below 6s.<br />
With regard to the issue of new novels in cloth.<br />
binding at the initial price of 2s., we hope that<br />
this innovation is not likely to affect any large<br />
number of writers. Few publishers will make the<br />
attempt to produce a new Work of fiction in such<br />
enormous quantities for a first edition as would be<br />
required to pay the author and recoup themselves.<br />
There can be no guarantee that the large prices<br />
which have been offered to authors as payment<br />
for serial rights and royalties in advance under<br />
this system will be maintained.<br />
We have definite information that, with regard<br />
to the 7d. reprints, the publishers are already<br />
offering far smaller sums in advance than in the<br />
first instance ; and that even in the cases of authors,<br />
whose books have practically earned these advances<br />
they are not now willing to make new contracts on<br />
the old terms.<br />
We possess a large amount of evidence from the<br />
booksellers upon the various questions involved,<br />
but this, which has only just reached us, requiress<br />
sifting and classification.<br />
We have received scattered information from<br />
several authors who have actually experienced the<br />
results of the issue of new novels, at prices lower<br />
than 6s. In every case the author has suffered.<br />
Having, then, regard to the weight of opinion<br />
from those novelists whom we have consulted, to<br />
the responsible remarks of leading publishers, and<br />
to details which we have received of the actual<br />
experience of authors, we repeat the recommenda-<br />
tion that the novelist should maintain the price of<br />
the original production of his works at 68. There<br />
is no evidence that a low price means a large<br />
circulation.<br />
ADDENDUM.<br />
One of us, having particular knowledge of the<br />
business side of literature in France, wishes to<br />
point out that even in the days when the regular<br />
price of the new novel in France was Fr. 3.50, all<br />
the leading French novelists, Daudet and Zola.<br />
among them, greatly regretted the lowering of the<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#487) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE A CITESIOR,<br />
109<br />
standard price to that figure. France has since<br />
been flooded with new novels at 9%d., and the<br />
result has been most disastrous to French literature<br />
as well as to French authors. It has meant that<br />
the great mass of writers have now to produce<br />
novels that are short and sensational, and dependent<br />
for their popularity upon their violent appeal.<br />
(Signed) M. A. BELLOC-LOWNDES.<br />
CHARLES GARVICE.<br />
E. W. HORNUNG.<br />
W. W. JACOBS.<br />
- S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br />
JDecember 2, 1909.<br />
a – A –a<br />
—v---<br />
A PUBLISHING TRANSACTION.<br />
—t—º-e—<br />
- HEN an author is asked by a publisher to<br />
contribute towards the production of his<br />
book, it is time for him to be on the<br />
alert. There are, it is true, certain books, the<br />
publication of which must be attended with a<br />
certain degree of risk, on account of the fact that<br />
they appeal only to very limited audiences, or<br />
because as a result of profuse illustrations or some<br />
other cause they are expensive to produce. In<br />
these cases, the bond ſides of a publisher who seeks<br />
to divide the risks with the author may be quite<br />
genuine, though even here the writer will be well<br />
advised to exercise a firm control over the expen-<br />
diture, and ascertain beforehand whether, given a<br />
fair sale, the venture will prove profitable to<br />
himself. -<br />
In the case of the novel, however, the position is<br />
different, and the author who is asked to bear any<br />
portion of the cost of production should refuse to<br />
do so. It may safely be claimed that the novel<br />
which is not published at the publisher's expense<br />
had better, in nine cases out of ten, remain unpub-<br />
lished, that is, if its author looks for financial<br />
reward for his work. If, however, the writer has<br />
a firm conviction that his book possesses all the<br />
potentialities of a commercial success, or has some<br />
other equally weighty reason for desiring his book<br />
to be placed on the market, and cares to back his<br />
belief by risking money in its production, two<br />
precautions are absolutely essential ; the first is to<br />
publish with a house of established reputation, and<br />
the second is to see that he retains such a control<br />
over the work (both as to the items in the cost of<br />
production, and as to the terms of Sale) as shall<br />
be commensurate with the amount which he<br />
is putting into the adventure.<br />
The failure to take these two precautions is<br />
bound to be attended with disastrous results to the<br />
author, as the following case will show.<br />
A certain author entered into a contract with a<br />
publisher for the publication of a novel under an<br />
agreement, the material parts of which are printed<br />
below:—<br />
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT made this<br />
Of between<br />
hereinafter termed the author of the one part<br />
and hereinafter termed the publisher of the other<br />
part WHEREBY it is mutually agreed between the parties<br />
hereto for themselves and their respective executors<br />
administrators and assigns (or successors as the case may<br />
be) as follows:—<br />
1. The author is the writer and holds the copyright of a<br />
work at present entitled , which he has submitted<br />
to the publisher with a view to his producing publishing<br />
and advertising the same in the United Kingdom of Great<br />
Britain and Ireland and elsewhere on the following<br />
terms —<br />
2. That in consideration of the author paying to the<br />
publisher the sum of Ninety Five Pounds (Fifty Pounds<br />
when he signs this agreement, Thirty Pounds when the<br />
whole of the work is in type, and Fifteen Pounds from his<br />
share of the sales of the work) the publisher hereby agrees<br />
to produce the work in the best style print on good paper<br />
from new type bind in suitable cloth as trade demands<br />
warrant and publish the book in the English edition at the<br />
price of Six Shillings per copy. The said payment of<br />
Ninety Five Pounds shall constitute the author's sole<br />
liability. -<br />
3. The author guarantees to the publisher that the said<br />
work is in no way whatever a violation of any existing<br />
copyright and that it contains nothing of a libellous or<br />
Scandalous character and that he will indemnify the<br />
publisher from all suits claims and proceedings damages<br />
and costs which may be made taken or incurred by or<br />
against him on the ground that the said work is an infringe-<br />
ment of copyright or contains anything libellous or<br />
scandalous.<br />
4. The publisher agrees to pay to the author and the<br />
author agrees to accept the following royalties, that is to<br />
say :—<br />
(a) A royalty of one shilling and sixpence per copy on<br />
all copies sold of the English 6s. edition up to a sale of two<br />
thousand copies and afterwards a royalty of 20 per cent. Of<br />
the nominal published price of all copies sold of this<br />
particular 6s. edition.<br />
(b) A royalty of fifteen per cent. of the nominal published<br />
price of all copies sold of any cheaper edition or editions.<br />
(c) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br />
from the sale of the American copyright (if any).<br />
(d) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br />
from the sale of Foreign rights (if any).<br />
(e) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br />
from the sale of the Serial rights (if any).<br />
(f) In the event of remainder sales, that is when the<br />
demand for the work has ceased, a royalty of five per cent.<br />
of the net sum received.<br />
5. The publisher shall present to the author twenty<br />
copies of the work on publication and shall sell to him any<br />
further copies that he may require at the lowest trade price,<br />
all copies thus bought to be charged to the general sales<br />
account and royalties to be paid to the author on Same.<br />
6. No royalties shall be paid on any copies given<br />
away for review or other purposes in the interests of the<br />
work.<br />
7. Account sales shall be made up half-yearly to Decem-<br />
ber thirty-first and June thirtieth and delivered and settled<br />
within five months of those dates. In making up accounts,<br />
thirteen copies shall be reckoned as twelve in accordance<br />
with trade usage.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#488) ################################################<br />
<br />
110<br />
TRIE AUTHOR.<br />
the publisher touching the meaning of this agreement or<br />
the rights or liabilities of the parties thereunder, the same<br />
shall be referred to the arbitration of two persons (one to<br />
be named by each party) or their umpire, in accordance<br />
with the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1889.<br />
9. The term “PUBLISHER'' throughout this agreement<br />
shall be deemed to include the person or persons or Com-<br />
pany for the time being carrying on the business of the<br />
said under as well its present as any<br />
future style and the benefit of this agreement shall be<br />
transmissible accordingly.<br />
10. That in consideration of the publisher undertaking<br />
the publication of the work hereinbefore mentioned, the<br />
author agrees to give to the publisher the first refusal, from<br />
one month of the date of the delivery of the manuscript, of<br />
the next three new novels which he may write, suitable for<br />
publication in 6s. volume form, and if the publisher accept<br />
all or any of them, they shall be published on terms to be<br />
mutually agreed upon. The term “next three new novels "<br />
shall not include any novel which the author may have<br />
completed at the time of signing this agreement. -<br />
It is not necessary to offer any very exhaustive<br />
comment on this document, which, indeed, has<br />
been fully commented on in a previous issue of<br />
The Author.<br />
Every clause is full of difficulties which would<br />
work out to the author's disadvantage. Indeed no<br />
author could be recommended to sign such a<br />
document.<br />
We should like, however, to state very briefly<br />
Some of the more serious objections.<br />
It will be noticed that the author is asked to<br />
provide a sum of money, not towards the cost of<br />
production of the work, but as consideration for<br />
certain acts which the publisher undertakes to<br />
perform. No information is given to the author<br />
as to how the money is to be spent, how the amount<br />
fixed is arrived at, nor is any mention made of the<br />
number of copies which the publisher will actually<br />
print, bind and publish for the payment asked. It<br />
is true that in section 4 (a) of the agreement the<br />
author is promised a different royalty after the<br />
sale of 2,000 copies, but this reference to 2,000<br />
copies does not bind the publisher to anything,<br />
though it may deceive the author. Nowhere does<br />
the publisher agree to print that number. Indeed,<br />
under an agreement of this kind some publishers<br />
might produce a very small edition of, say, 400 or<br />
500 copies, and by neglecting to advertise it—<br />
readers will notice that the agreement contains<br />
nothing which binds him to advertise—kill the<br />
book entirely. This might pay him well, as he<br />
would thereby secure to himself the greater portion<br />
of the £95. There is no identity of interest<br />
between the parties. While the author looks to a<br />
large sale to recoup him for his outlay, the<br />
publisher, under this arrangement, is very often<br />
independent of the public entirely as far as profit<br />
is concerned. The publisher has already made<br />
a profit on the production. He has little interest<br />
8. If any difference shall arise between the author and<br />
in the subsequent fate of the book. If the book<br />
shows signs of selling, it is true that the publisher<br />
may find it profitable to “push ’’ it, but the point<br />
to remember is that a book which succeeds when<br />
published on these terms does so not because of the<br />
publisher, but in spite of him. All that has<br />
happened is that the publisher has committed an<br />
error of judgment ; has accepted a book which has<br />
“caught on.” despite the circumstances surrounding<br />
its publication.<br />
Moreover, there is nothing by which the author<br />
can demand from the publisher a statement of<br />
how the amount paid has been spent. He<br />
cannot demand details as to the cost of production,<br />
he cannot even demand any of the copies printed<br />
as his own, although his payment may have covered,<br />
and more than covered, their cost. The whole<br />
agreement is thoroughly bad. To make matters<br />
Worse, the author binds himself by the last clause<br />
in the agreement for his next three books. Even<br />
were the agreement as fair as it is grossly deplor-<br />
able, we should still object to an author binding<br />
himself for future works. With such an agree-<br />
ment as the present one the clause is nothing<br />
short of disastrous.<br />
—º-<br />
LIBEL WITHOUT INTENT.<br />
JONES v. E. HULTON & Co., LTD.<br />
HE principle involved in this case, which has<br />
been confirmed by the House of Lords, is<br />
one which affects authors and journalists,<br />
and is of particular importance to writers of fiction.<br />
It has now been laid down by the highest court<br />
of appeal, that in an action for libel it is no.<br />
defence to show that the defendant wrote the<br />
defamatory statement with reference to some<br />
imaginary person, and with no intention of<br />
libelling the plaintiff. If the name of the<br />
imaginary person adopted by the writer is that of<br />
a living person, it seems to follow from the<br />
decision that a jury may award damages to any<br />
individual who happens to bear the name if the<br />
evidence is sufficient to prove that those who know<br />
the plaintiff would necessarily think that the<br />
defamatory statement referred to him.<br />
The libel was contained in an article in the<br />
Sunday Chronicle, published in Manchester,<br />
Written by the Paris correspondent and purporting<br />
to describe the life at Dieppe on the occasion of<br />
certain motor-car races. Incidentally the article<br />
mentioned “Artemus Jones,” as being with a<br />
woman who was not his wife, and described him as<br />
a churchwarden of Peckham ; and it contrasted<br />
the austerity of his parochial duties in the English,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#489) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTEIOR.<br />
11 f<br />
suburb with the gaiety of his proceedings upon<br />
the Continent.<br />
Mr. Artemus Jones, a barrister, brought an action<br />
against the publishers of the newspaper for libel.<br />
The evidence showed that the plaintiff was not a<br />
churchwarden, or a resident of Peckham, and that<br />
he was not married. But witnesses were called<br />
who said that they had read the article and thought<br />
that it referred to the plaintiff. The writer of the<br />
article stated, however, that he had never heard of<br />
the plaintiff, and that the name was suggested by<br />
the name of “Artemus Ward,” and was used merely<br />
for the purpose of representing a type of individual<br />
in the scene described. The jury found that it<br />
was a libel on the plaintiff, and awarded £1,750<br />
damages.<br />
The defendants appealed upon the ground of mis-<br />
direction, and upon the question whether the state-<br />
ment could be libellous when it was not intended<br />
to refer to the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal<br />
dismissed the appeal.<br />
In the House of Lords the Lord Chancellor<br />
(Lord Loreburn) expressed his opinion on the<br />
point as follows:– “A libel is a tortious act.<br />
What does the tort consist of 2 In using language<br />
which others, knowing the circumstances, would<br />
reasonably think to be defamatory of the person<br />
who complained of being injured by it. A person<br />
cannot defend himself from a charge of libel by<br />
saying that he intended not to defame the person<br />
complaining of being injured by the libel. By<br />
publishing the libel the defendant imputed some-<br />
thing disgraceful to the plaintiff, who had none the<br />
less cause to complain because the defendant said<br />
he did it unintentionally.” Lord Shaw stated that<br />
he adopted the view expressed by the Lord Chief<br />
Justice (Lord Alverstone), who in his judgment<br />
in the Court of Appeal had said : “The question,<br />
if it be disputed whether the article is a libel upon<br />
the plaintiff, is a question of fact for the jury, and<br />
in my judgment this question of fact involves not<br />
only whether the language used of a person in its<br />
fair and ordinary meaning is libellous or defamatory,<br />
but whether the person referred to in the libel<br />
would be understood by persons who knew him to<br />
refer to the plaintiff.”<br />
The decision has been the subject of considerable<br />
comment, and novelists may feel Some alarm lest<br />
the chance selection of a name for One of the<br />
characters in a novel may render them liable for<br />
damages in a libel action brought by a person<br />
whom they had no intention to defame and whose<br />
existence may have been unknown to them.<br />
Clearly some care is necessary in adapting names<br />
for imaginary characters, but the alarm of novelists<br />
may be exaggerated. There is a distinction<br />
between works of fiction and a newspaper article<br />
purporting to describe an actual scene taking<br />
place in real life at a seaside resort. A character<br />
in a novel is generally regarded as an imaginary<br />
person, whereas the mention of an individual by<br />
name in a descriptive narrative in a newspaper<br />
may reasonably be supposed to refer to a real<br />
person.<br />
. Mr. Justice Channell made this distinction clear<br />
in his direction to the jury, which was approved by<br />
the House of Lords, when he said : *The real<br />
point on which your verdict must turn is, ought or<br />
ought not sensible and reasonable people reading<br />
this article to to think that it was some imaginary<br />
Person, such as I have said—Tom Jones, Mr.<br />
Pecksniff, Mr. Stiggins, or any of that sort of<br />
name—that one reads of in literature used as<br />
types If you think that a reasonable person.<br />
Would think that, it is not actionable at all. If,<br />
on the other hand, you do not think that, but<br />
think that people would suppose it to mean some<br />
real person then the action is main-<br />
tainable.”<br />
It may be mentioned that in other cases of tort,<br />
for example, in an action for infringement of<br />
Copyright, it has been held that the absence of<br />
intention is no defence, and an innocent infringer<br />
of copyright may be liable for damages although<br />
he did not know of the existence of the Copyright.<br />
HAROLD HARDY.<br />
PAYING QUARTERLY AND ON DEMAND,<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
MEMBER has been a contributor to a<br />
weekly paper for seven or eight years. The<br />
paper has lately been sold to a company of<br />
the composition of which he knows nothing. The<br />
member, being somewhat loth to break a long con-<br />
nection, agreed to continue his contributions. The<br />
custom of the paper had been to pay monthly.<br />
Not receiving, when due, his first cheque under the<br />
new ownership, the member applied for payment,<br />
which was made in a short time. For his next<br />
payments he applied twice, but received no reply.<br />
Three months' remuneration being then due, the<br />
member placed the matter in the hands of the<br />
society.<br />
On application by the secretary the company<br />
wrote the following note, signed “The Manager”:<br />
I am directed to inform you that this company’s pay-<br />
ments to contributors are made quarterly. The amounts,<br />
therefore, for June, July, and August, become payable: in<br />
September, and you may inform Mr. X. that as soon as the<br />
amount for that period is complete, he will receive his.<br />
cheque for the amount due to him.<br />
To the member the editor also wrote that, owing<br />
to the long credit asked by advertising agents and,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#490) ################################################<br />
<br />
112<br />
TISIES A PrºTHOR.<br />
others, the company had decided to pay con-<br />
tributors quarterly. The editor regretted that the<br />
member had seen fit to communicate with the<br />
Authors’ Society, and added that if the quarterly<br />
arrangement did not fall in with his views he<br />
should tell him so.<br />
The member replied, with the cognisance of the<br />
secretary, that he regretted that he could not see<br />
his way to continue his contributions to the paper<br />
On a quarterly basis, and that when two applica-<br />
tions for payment had been made without reply,<br />
the editor could have no complaint to make of the<br />
matter being placed in the society's hands.<br />
The member, as he expected, has heard nothing<br />
further, and he has done no more work.<br />
Finally, the Society’s solicitors, under threat of<br />
a writ, obtained a cheque.<br />
There is a great deal to be said for the member's<br />
action in resisting, particularly in the case of a<br />
paper which belongs to a company the members<br />
of which are not known, an attempt to put off con-<br />
tributors with quarterly payments. The writer,<br />
who has been a journalist all his life, knows of mo<br />
paper other than that referred to which pays<br />
quarterly. He is informed, however, that some<br />
exist.<br />
The arrangement is, nevertheless, an inequitable<br />
one. The contributor’s work is begun and finished<br />
before the office staff and the printers have done a<br />
stroke. If there is to be any differentiation between<br />
those to whom payments are due, it should not be<br />
at the expense of those who have written the<br />
“copy’ that the staff and printers have to<br />
handle. *<br />
There is only one practice in connection with<br />
the payment of contributors that is as bad as the<br />
quarterly arrangement, and that is payment on<br />
demand. It is impossible for a contributor to see<br />
every issue of every paper to which he may send<br />
work, and even if he orders copies he cannot always<br />
obtain them. Copies have been reported “out of<br />
print’’ even when ordered in advance through the<br />
usual channels. This happened in a case lately in<br />
the hands of the secretary of the society. The<br />
time seems to have come when a protest should be<br />
made against the system of payment on demand.<br />
The net result of it is to leave in the hands of<br />
the newspaper proprietors concerned a consider-<br />
able balance on account of not paid-for contributions.<br />
In the case of a daily paper this must amount to a<br />
large sum in the course of a year. -<br />
The plan not only of paying on publication, but<br />
of sending a voucher copy of the issue containing<br />
the article to the contributor who has written it, is<br />
that to which proprietors should be pressed to<br />
conform as a matter of equity, courtesy and good<br />
business. The Manchester Guardian is conspicuous<br />
..among daily papers in Sending a voucher copy.<br />
Even the Quarterly Review, which costs six shillings<br />
to buy, and carries a good deal of postage, is sent<br />
to those who have articles in it.<br />
As journals are increasingly owned by companies,<br />
the directors of which know little of and care littlé<br />
for the traditions of journalism, there will be<br />
no doubt a larger number of cases in which the<br />
payment of contributors is put off to the latest<br />
possible date, and it behoves those in the profession<br />
who value fair dealing to resist.<br />
I should be very glad to receive from readers<br />
of The Author the names of papers which pay<br />
quarterly or on demand, with a view, if the com-<br />
mittee of the Society approve, to publication of the<br />
names of the journals in these columns as a<br />
cautionary measure, or as a step to friendly<br />
remonstrance.<br />
It should be added that even the practice of the<br />
best publications, of paying on publication, may be,<br />
although an undoubted step in advance, by no<br />
means an ideal arrangement. A very special<br />
authority on the relations of editors and con-<br />
tributors writes to me: “I should like to say that<br />
I think payment on publication is in a great many<br />
cases almost as bad and, in Some cases, even worse<br />
than payment quarterly. I have known articles in<br />
the big reviews held up for two, and even three,<br />
years. I think editors, in order to be businesslike,<br />
ought really to drop a post-card as soon as they<br />
decide to accept an article and, if possible, to pay<br />
for all articles accepted within the week. The<br />
Way editors keep authors dangling on by non-<br />
publication and by no direct acceptance is some-<br />
times very unsatisfactory and unbusinesslike.”<br />
HOME COUNTIES.<br />
THE BERLIN convenTION.<br />
—e—sº-0—<br />
HE Report of the Departmental Committee on<br />
the Law of Copyright was issued to the public<br />
on December 20, just as The Author was<br />
going to press. In order to get the magazine out<br />
by January 1, 1910, it was necessary to send to<br />
Press earlier than usual on account of the Christ-<br />
mas holidays. The Report is of such importance<br />
that it would have been a mistake to publish any<br />
superficial comments upon it in the current issue<br />
of The Author. A considered criticism will be<br />
published in due course.<br />
We are glad to notice that the committee<br />
recommend an extension of the copyright term to<br />
life and fifty years, with only two dissentient<br />
members. Another point of importance is the<br />
fact that there is no minority report issued.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#491) ################################################<br />
<br />
TFIE AUTISIOR.<br />
113<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
1. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor; but if there is any<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel's opinion without<br />
any cost to the member. Moreover, where counsel's<br />
opinion is favourable, and the sanction of the Committee<br />
is obtained, action will be taken on behalf of the aggrieved<br />
member, and all costs borne by the Society.<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers' agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
3. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
4. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no direct benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
5. The Committee have arranged for the reception of<br />
members' agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br />
(1) To stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action<br />
upon them. (2) To keep agreements. (3) To enforce<br />
payments due according to agreements. Fuller particu-<br />
lars of the Society’s work can be obtained in the<br />
Prospectus.<br />
6. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
º: without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
This<br />
The<br />
7. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements.<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution,<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members,<br />
8. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
9. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br />
annum, or £10 10s. for life membership.<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
E RE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property —<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement). -<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to :<br />
(1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor |<br />
III. The Royalty System.<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth, From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in The Author.<br />
IV. A Commission Agreement.<br />
The main points are :—<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
General.<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :-<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement.<br />
IO 63.IlS.<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld. -<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS,<br />
º<br />
w<br />
- —dh-<br />
--~~<br />
- EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority.<br />
2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manageT.<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br />
in three or more acts:—<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publication of his name on the<br />
play-bills. -<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#492) ################################################<br />
<br />
114<br />
THE A DTHOR.<br />
(b.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
(e.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.e., fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (b.) apply<br />
also in this case.<br />
4. Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important.<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction<br />
is of great importance.<br />
7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. They should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
REGISTRATION OF SCENARIOS AND<br />
ORIGINAL PLAYS.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
NCENARIOS, typewritten in duplicate on foolscap paper<br />
forwarded to the offices of the Society, together with<br />
a registration fee of two shillings and sixpence, will<br />
be carefully compared by the Secretary or a qualified assis-<br />
tant. One copy will be stamped and returned to the author<br />
and the other filed in the register of the Society. Copies<br />
of the scenario thus filed may be obtained at any time by<br />
the author only at a small charge to cover cost of typing.<br />
Original Plays may also be filed subject to the same<br />
aules, with the exception that a play will be charged for<br />
at the price of 2s. 6d. per act. -<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
-o-º-e—<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
L assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. . It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal with—performing right and copyright. He<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
STAMPING MUSIC.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
The Society undertakes to stamp copies of music on<br />
behalf of its members for the fee of 6d. per 100 or part<br />
of 100. The members' stamps are kept in the Society's<br />
safe. The musical publishers communicate direct with the<br />
Secretary, and the voucher is then forwarded to the<br />
members, who are thus saved much unnecessary trouble.<br />
e—º- e.<br />
w = \º-<br />
THE READING BRANCH,<br />
——3–0–<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
M branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic Works, and when it is possible, under<br />
Special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
* A<br />
—º-<br />
w-up- w<br />
“THE AUTHOR.”<br />
—t-º-º-<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
T the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
58. 6d. Subscription for the year.<br />
Communications for “The Author” should be addressed<br />
to the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey's<br />
Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor not later than the<br />
21st of each month.<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the<br />
Editor on all literary matters treated from the stand-<br />
point of art or business, but on no other subjects whatever.<br />
Every effort will be made to return articles which cannot<br />
be accepted.<br />
• —-º- a<br />
-º-<br />
vºy w<br />
REMITTANCEs.<br />
—4—º-t—<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post.<br />
All remittances should be crossed Union of London and<br />
Smith's Bank, Chancery Lane, or be sent by registered<br />
letter only.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#493) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
115<br />
GENERAL NOTES.<br />
—e—º-e— -<br />
COLLES v. MAUGHAM.<br />
AN important case, of interest to members of the<br />
Society, has just been decided before Mr. Justice<br />
Channell and a special jury. The case was brought<br />
by Mr. W. Morris Colles, literary agent, against<br />
Mr. W. Somerset Maugham, dramatic author, and<br />
related to a claim made by the plaintiff on the<br />
defendant for commission for agency work.<br />
The committee, before deciding to defend the<br />
case, took counsel's opinion, which was very<br />
strongly in favour of the Society's contesting the<br />
claim on the ground that the plaintiff had no cause<br />
of action. The committee, in addition, felt that it<br />
was most important to have some distinct judg-<br />
ment in order to be able to ascertain the rights<br />
and wrongs of agency claims.<br />
The verdict of the jury in the present case has,<br />
however, been given against the member of the<br />
Society to the extent of half the commission<br />
claimed by the agent, who accordingly obtained<br />
judgment for £21 10s. and costs. The present<br />
note is being written during the Christmas legal<br />
vacation, and the advisers of the Society are con-<br />
sidering the propriety of applying for a new trial,<br />
so that the case is still to some extent sub judice,<br />
and further comment on it must be deferred for a<br />
short time.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
COMMITTEE ELECTION.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
IN pursuance of Article 19 of the Articles of<br />
Association of the Society, the committee<br />
give notice that the election of members to<br />
the committee of management will be proceeded<br />
with in the following manner —<br />
(1) One-third of the members of the present<br />
committee of management retire from office in<br />
accordance with Article 17.<br />
(2) The members desiring to offer themselves for<br />
re-election who have been nominated by the com-<br />
mittee are Mrs. E. Nesbit Bland, Mr. Comyns<br />
Carr, Mr. G. Bernard Shaw, and Mr. Francis Storr.<br />
(3) The date fixed by the committee up to<br />
which nominations by the subscribing members<br />
of candidates for election to the new committee<br />
may be made is the 15th day of February.<br />
(4) The committee nominate the following<br />
candidates, being subscribing members of the<br />
Society, to fill the vacancies caused by the retire-<br />
ment of one-third of the committee, according to<br />
the new constitution :-<br />
Mrs. E. Nesbit Bland.<br />
Mr. Comyns Carr.<br />
Mr. G. Bernard Shaw.<br />
Mr. Francis Storr.<br />
The Committee remind the members that, under<br />
Article 19 of the amended articles of association,<br />
“any two subscribing members of the society may<br />
hominate one or more subscribing members, other<br />
than themselves, not exceeding the number of<br />
Vacancies to be filled up, by notice in writing sent<br />
tº the secretary, accompanied by a letter signed by<br />
the candidate or candidates expressing willingness<br />
to accept the duties of the post.”<br />
Members desiring to exercise their powers under<br />
this rule must send in the name of the candidate<br />
9, candidates they nominate, not exceeding four in<br />
all, on or before the 15th day of February, together<br />
With an accompanying letter written by the candi-<br />
date, or candidates expressing readiness to accept<br />
nomination. The complete list of candidates will<br />
be printed in the March issue of The Auſ/or.<br />
Having regard to the fact that the present Com-<br />
mittee have been in office just over a year, the com-<br />
mittee consider it in the interest of the society not<br />
to suggest any change at the present time. They<br />
have therefore re-nominated the four retiring<br />
members. C<br />
A —º- A.<br />
~y-<br />
w w<br />
THE PENSION FUND COMMITTEE.<br />
Is accordance with annual custom, and in order<br />
to give members of the society, should they<br />
desire to appoint a fresh member to the<br />
Pension Fund Committee, full time to act, it has<br />
been thought advisable to place in The Author a<br />
complete statement of the method of election under<br />
the scheme for administration of the Pension Fund.<br />
Under that scheme the committee is composed of<br />
three members elected by the committee of the<br />
society, three members elected by the society at the<br />
general meeting, and the chairman of the society<br />
for the time being, ex officio. The three members<br />
elected at the general meeting when the fund was<br />
started were Mr. Morley Roberts, Mr. M. H. Spiel-<br />
mann, and Mrs. Alec Tweedie. These have in turn<br />
during the past years resigned, and, submitting<br />
their names for re-election, have been unanimously<br />
re-elected. Mr. Morley Roberts resigned and was<br />
re-elected in 1909. This year Mr. M. H. Spielmann,<br />
under the rules of the scheme, tenders his resigna-<br />
tion, and submits his name for re-election. The<br />
members have power to put forward other names<br />
under clause 9, which runs as follows:–<br />
Any candidate for election to the Pension Fund Com-<br />
imittee by the members of the society (not being a retiring<br />
member of such committee) shall be nominated in writing<br />
to the secretary at least three weeks prior to the general<br />
meeting at which such candidate is to be proposed, and the<br />
nomination of each such candidate shall be subscribed by<br />
at least three members of the society. A list of the names<br />
of the candidates so nominated shall be sent to the members<br />
of the society, with the annual report of the Managing<br />
Committee, and those candidates obtaining the most votes<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#494) ################################################<br />
<br />
116<br />
TFIES A UſTISIOR.<br />
at the general meeting shall be elected to serve on the<br />
Pension Fund Committee.<br />
In case any member should desire to refer to the<br />
list of members, the list, taking the elections up to<br />
the end of July, 1907, was published in October<br />
of that year. This list is complete, with the excep-<br />
tion of the thirty-eight members referred to in the<br />
short preface. All further elections have been duly<br />
notified in The Author. They can easily be referred<br />
to, as members receive a copy every month.<br />
It will be as well, therefore, should any of the<br />
members desire to put forward a candidate, to take<br />
the matter within their immediate consideration.<br />
The general meeting of the society has usually<br />
been held towards the end of February or the<br />
beginning of March. It is essential that all<br />
nominations should be in the hands of the secretary<br />
before the 31st of January, 1910.<br />
UNITED STATES NOTES.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
EFORE these notes are in type the new<br />
American Academy, which has been in<br />
embryo for the last five years, will have<br />
fairly come to the birth. Of the sixty-two originally<br />
selected members, seventeen have dropped out of<br />
the ranks, the latest casualties having been H. C. Lea<br />
and Richard Watson Gilder. If the desirableness of<br />
the institution itself be conceded, few will, we think,<br />
be found to quarrel with the names, a list of which<br />
appeared in a recent number of the Chicago Dial.<br />
It will be agreed by most Americans that the<br />
book of the fall, if not the book of the year, has<br />
been the veteran John Bigelow’s “Retrospections<br />
of an Active Life.” The three volumes cover no<br />
less a period than fifty years—from 1817 to 1867–<br />
and there is said to be more to come. Much of it<br />
is concerned with the diplomatic life of Mr. Bigelow<br />
at Paris, where he played a notable part at a<br />
critical period of his country's fortunes. There are<br />
also notable personal estimates of Lincoln and<br />
Seward ; and historical points of interest, such as<br />
the death of Toussaint l’Ouverture and the pro-<br />
gress of the Monroe Doctrine, receive much atten-<br />
tion. On the latter peril Mr. Bigelow is more<br />
cautious and conservative than the men of to-day.<br />
The third volume will be valuable to the historian<br />
for the mass of material in the shape of confiden-<br />
tial correspondence concerning the unfortunate<br />
Mexican adventure of Napoleon III.<br />
Several other notable biographical works are<br />
also signalising this season. There are George<br />
F. Parker’s “Recollections of Grover Cleveland,”<br />
and the story of Fulton's achievements by his<br />
descendant Alice Craty Sutcliffe, both of which<br />
come from the Century Company; “Home Letters<br />
of General Sherman’’ (extending from the West<br />
Point period in 1837 through the war till 1888),<br />
edited by M.A. De Wolfe. Howe, issued by<br />
Scribners ; “The Diary of President James<br />
K. Polk,” edited by Adlai E. Stevenson ; and<br />
Clark E. Carr’s “Study of Stephen Douglas,” by<br />
the McClurg Company ; not to mention Emerson’s<br />
Journals, Stanley’s “Autobiography,” William<br />
Winter’s “Life and Art of Richard Mansfield,”<br />
and Eugenie Paul Jefferson’s “Intimate Recollec-<br />
tions of Joseph Jefferson.” It is a veritable<br />
embarras de richesse.<br />
Cleveland's Vice-president and Polk's editor<br />
gives us some fine miscellaneous feeding in his<br />
“Something of Men I have Known,” which is full<br />
of good stories. &<br />
Apropos of the “Pigskin Library” catalogue at<br />
the end of one of Mr. Roosevelt's recent Scribner<br />
articles, a writer in the Dial suggested that “The<br />
Pigskin Library,” edited by Theodore Roosevelt,<br />
might not be a bad venture for some enterprising<br />
publisher, “especially if he could announce the<br />
volumes as bound in skins of the distinguished<br />
editor's own procuring ”<br />
Judge Shute has followed up his “Real Diary of<br />
a Real Boy” with “Farming It,” which purports to<br />
be the narrative of his experiences as an amateur<br />
agriculturist in the region of Exeter, New Hamp-<br />
shire. The judge makes free with the names of<br />
his friends and neighbours, nay more, with his own,<br />
his wife's and his children's, and does not stick too<br />
closely to his text. Yet there are some who charge<br />
him with “fiction.”<br />
Professor Wilbur L. Cross’s “Life and Times of<br />
Laurence Sterne,” like Emerson's Journal, com-<br />
bines biographical and literary interest. Five<br />
years ago the author, in his edition of Sterne,<br />
was the first to print “The Journal to Eliza.” In<br />
the present work he has used other unedited<br />
material. Although he has made his objective a<br />
personal rather than a literary life, it seems likely<br />
that the book, from its fulness, accuracy and fresh-<br />
ness, will prove, in many aspects of the subject, a<br />
definitive record. .<br />
On October 21, the anniversary of the distin-<br />
guished Harvard professor's death, the Charles<br />
Eliot Norton Memorial Lectureship in the Archæo-<br />
logical Institute of America was endowed by Mr.<br />
James Loch. Preference in the choice of lecturers<br />
is to be given to European scholars, but Americans<br />
are not to be wholly barred.<br />
Nearly the same day appeared, with the imprint<br />
of the Houghton, Mifflin Company, “American<br />
Foreign Policy, by a Diplomatist,” both the con-<br />
tents and the authorship of which were calculated<br />
to excite no small interest.<br />
From the Chicago University Press comes<br />
“The Armenian Awakening,” by Leon Arpee, a<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#495) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE A LITH OFº.<br />
117<br />
publication likely to be often referred to in the<br />
years to come.<br />
Henry James's “Italian Hours" hardly needs<br />
Comment in The Author, and the same may perhaps<br />
be said of W. D. Howells's “Seven Cities,” which<br />
most of your readers will have seen or read<br />
about.<br />
In view of the raging, tearing suffrage agitation,<br />
they may, however, like their attention drawn to<br />
Dr. Edith Abbott's “Women in Industry,” which<br />
is issued by Messrs. Appleton.<br />
Anna A. Rogers's “Why American Marriages<br />
Fail” (Houghton, Mifflin)—we will not disclose<br />
the secret—may by some cynics also be held to<br />
bear upon the subject.<br />
On November 15 the new buildings of the Boston<br />
Art Museum were opened. The Museum has<br />
acquired some valuable Greek sculptures, and is<br />
increasing its deservedly high reputation.<br />
It is announced that Mr. and Mrs. Joseph<br />
Pennell are to begin a lecturing tour in America<br />
in January next, their subjects being “Whistler,<br />
Artist and Man,” “The History of Illustration,”<br />
and “Engraving.”<br />
“The Life and Letters of Edmund Clarence<br />
Stedman” is to be undertaken by his granddaughter,<br />
Moffat Yard & Co. being her publishers.<br />
Messrs. Scribner are undertaking the Memorial<br />
Edition of Meredith in the United States.<br />
James Edward Rogers has essayed to defend “The<br />
American Newspaper’ in a large spirit. We do<br />
not envy him his task of examining fifteen thousand<br />
journals, but are constrained to applaud his thorough-<br />
neSS. It is Chicago that repels the attack of the<br />
foe, not the headquarters of the Yellow Press.<br />
The reprint of John Davis’s “Travels of Four<br />
Years and a Half in the United States” (H. Holt<br />
& Co.)–1798 to 1802 they were—will be welcome<br />
to the curious.<br />
Fiction is not unduly prominent just at present,<br />
though Messrs. Holt are publishing for Professor<br />
Canby, of Yale, “A Guide to the Short Story in<br />
English.” “Happy Hawkins” has been hailed in<br />
some quarters as the best story of the West since<br />
“The Virginians.” The author is Robert Alexander<br />
Wason ; the publishers, Small, Maynard & Co.<br />
Mr. Marion Crawford's posthumous “Stradella’’<br />
was a good love story ; Jack London did himself<br />
justice in his “Martin Eden,” as did Thomas<br />
Nelson Page in “John Marvel's Assistant.” “The<br />
Southerner,” a book of some force but slender<br />
artistic merit, seems to be of the nature of a roman<br />
à clef.<br />
“Lost Borders,” a collection of short stories by<br />
Harry Austin, is distinguished for a certain forceful<br />
simplicity.<br />
Mr. Chambers's new story is called “The Danger<br />
Mark;” that of Miss Elizabeth Robins, “The Floren-<br />
time Frame.”<br />
Theatre.”<br />
Hamlin Garland displays his old power of con-<br />
Veying atmosphere in “The Moccasin Ranch.”<br />
My obituary list includes Henry Charles Lea<br />
(who died at Philadelphia on October 24), the dis-<br />
tinguished historian of the Inquisition and author<br />
of other works on Spanish and ecclesiastical history,<br />
Who was a publisher by extraction as well as pursuit ;<br />
Col. Theodore Dodge (died at Versailles, October 26),<br />
Who lost liberty and a leg in the Civil War, but<br />
lived to write its history, as well as those of Alex-<br />
Ander, Hannibal, and other military heroes:<br />
Richard Watson Gilder (died in New York,<br />
November 18), editor of the Century Maſſazine,<br />
Scribner's Monthly, and other periodicals, distin-<br />
guished as poet and municipal reformer ; and<br />
William M. Laffan, publisher of the New York<br />
Sun for a quarter of a century, and author of<br />
“American Wood Engravers.”<br />
The latter is “a novel of the New<br />
a—º- a<br />
v-u-w<br />
DIFFICULTY IN WIRITING.<br />
—e—º-e—<br />
HILE many authors are blessed with a<br />
fluent pen, and give themselves no<br />
anxiety how they shall begin, or con-<br />
tinue, or leave off, others are afflicted with a kind<br />
of paralysis, and labour under an unaccountable<br />
friction, which obstructs them at every turn and<br />
makes composition a herculean task. This difficulty<br />
isin writing very much what stammering is in speech,<br />
the effort to bring out the words and to say a thing<br />
being wholly disproportionate to the result : extra-<br />
ordinary exertions are made, and after all the<br />
outcome is no more than ordinary speaking. The<br />
two disorders, moreover, appear to me to be alike<br />
in this, that both more or less are due to a certain<br />
nervousness. If the author, inflamed with ideas,<br />
could but compose himself, could lay aside exces-<br />
sive anxiety, and confront his subject squarely, he<br />
would no doubt be more “prosperously delivered ”<br />
of his thoughts. Indeed, I suppose most people<br />
find that what is written for private purposes is<br />
done much more expeditiously and freely than what<br />
is written for publication, and often better done<br />
into the bargain. Still, I do not mean to say that<br />
difficulty in writing is a complaint so superficial<br />
that it may be cured by a Sage precept or two ;<br />
for, on the contrary, quickness or slowness are<br />
qualities so deeply embedded in our nature that we<br />
never outlive them, but show our tendency to one<br />
or the other almost in our every act. Nor do I<br />
suggest by any means that it is the mark of an<br />
indifferent or inexperienced writer to be slow and<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#496) ################################################<br />
<br />
118<br />
TriB Anthor.<br />
to express oneself with a struggle. Everyone knows<br />
that this is not so ; everyone knows that there has<br />
been no lack even among the greatest authors to<br />
give proof–what Vasari says in allusion to some<br />
drawings of Michael Angelo—that the hammer of<br />
Vulcan was necessary to bring Minerva from the<br />
head of Jupiter. Swift even goes so far as to assert<br />
that common fluency of speech is owing to scarcity<br />
of matter and scarcity of words: “people come<br />
faster out of a church when it is almost empty, than<br />
when a crowd is at the door,” he remarks.<br />
When we consider it in the abstract it certainly<br />
seems that writing ought to be a very easy thing,<br />
for it is nothing but putting down what you have<br />
to say. It really is hardly credible that a man can<br />
find such difficulty in it. Yet where is the author<br />
who does not know that it is a labour to write, a<br />
severe labour very often, and sometimes a desperate<br />
encounter in which he wrestles and contends as with<br />
an adversary On such occasions I have often<br />
asked myself what it is that impedes me, and why<br />
I cannot get on and despatch my business. For<br />
doubtless much that retards us in these instances<br />
has only to be brought to view to be set aside, or<br />
at least made less formidable. To this end I shall<br />
here notice some of the hindrances to fluency, or<br />
expedition, in writing.<br />
The first lies in bringing conceptions to earth,<br />
and making them specific. What we think for<br />
ourselves is done as it were in skeleton : here we<br />
are in immediate contact with the ideas themselves,<br />
so the merest tracery suffices; we know what we<br />
mean at once, and have no need to enter into<br />
details, arguments and long explanations. But in<br />
Writing we have to communicate thoughts, that is<br />
to say, we have to make other people understand,<br />
other people feel. This necessitates a certain<br />
radical transformation of the idea, in which what<br />
before was diffuse is condensed into something<br />
definite, as vapour is turned into rain. To corner<br />
our thoughts in this way, if I may so express it,<br />
and make them stand and deliver, often presents<br />
the greatest difficulty ; for thoughts are so far<br />
from immediately becoming words, as has been<br />
maintained, that a person may conceive in a few<br />
moments what will take him weeks to bring<br />
properly out. He has the guiding points, the<br />
essence of the thing in mind ; but that it may take<br />
communicable shape, steady development, rumina-<br />
tion, is required. This, then, is one of the<br />
hindrances to ready writing. It is obviated, at<br />
least to a great extent, by thinking before we begin<br />
to write, and making the subject perfectly clear to<br />
ourselves; for the more definite an idea is, the<br />
more easily it slips into Words.<br />
The question of order and arrangement is<br />
another fertile cause of delay. If in writing we<br />
had nothing else to do but put down the thoughts<br />
just as they came into our heads, and to go<br />
rambling on like a madman, there would indeed be<br />
little excuse for stopping. But a self-respecting<br />
author aims at being consequent and connected :<br />
and so he is necessarily often exercised as to how<br />
he shall dispose of his matter. This particular<br />
difficulty is greatest at the beginning, and<br />
diminishes with the progress of the work : for at<br />
first a hundred alternatives present themselves, but<br />
once a beginning is made one thing leads to<br />
another. A good beginning gives an impetus, and<br />
carries one along ; SO it is just as well to allow a<br />
little delay here, and not from impatience to rush<br />
blindly in. At the same time it is better to write<br />
something near to what we would, than by waiting<br />
indefinitely for the exact expression to write<br />
nothing at all.<br />
Next, transition must be mentioned. It brings<br />
the writer to a temporary halt whenever what he is<br />
about to say diverges from what he has just said.<br />
To pass smoothly from point to point in a piece of .<br />
writing, so that the whole runs on without abrupt<br />
jerks and changes, is not always easy to manage ;<br />
and thus, to be paradoxical, the very effort at<br />
fluency may hinder fluency, the writer pausing<br />
that the reader may afterwards the better go on.<br />
Akin to this is the difficulty of returning from a<br />
digression to take up the main theme again, and<br />
also that of trying to bring any special observation<br />
within the scope of the subject we have undertaken<br />
to write about. They are both best avoided by<br />
determining not to drag in alien malter. Other<br />
causes of obstruction to the free course of writing<br />
are trying to find examples, trying to begin or end<br />
in a particular way, trying to fit in special words<br />
or phrases, avoiding dissonance, and seeking<br />
variety of expression ; for all these and many<br />
other considerations prevent us from putting down<br />
the first thing that comes into our heads.<br />
But perhaps the chief hindrances to despatch in<br />
Writing are moral in their nature. Among these I<br />
have already mentioned anxiety. It is a great tie,<br />
and not only prevents a person from pushing<br />
adequately forward in his work, but makes what<br />
he does write calculated and halting, depriving him<br />
of his proper freedom, and so of the grace that<br />
naturally accompanies unconscious and unimpeded<br />
action. Instead of attending to his business, and<br />
saying what he has got to say, an author Very often<br />
is mainly intent upon making an impression. This<br />
pre-occupation to appear to advantage, this exces-<br />
sive caution not to make a mistake, brings constant<br />
hesitation, hampers the movements, and, in thus<br />
interrupting, cools and dries the stream of<br />
eloquence. To avoid slovenly writing is but due<br />
to the reader; but guardedness, which retards the<br />
pen far more, only shows distrust. Hence it is<br />
often a positive help to an author to make less of<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#497) ################################################<br />
<br />
TFE A CITFIOR.<br />
119<br />
an undertaking of his work, and not to be too con-<br />
cerned about the success of it.<br />
To lie under an obligation to write in a given<br />
manner or at given length is another thing that<br />
prevents easy progress; for a man is thus put out<br />
of his natural stride, and moves under constraint.<br />
But the worst effect of any is produced by dis-<br />
inclination——a negative sort of electricity which<br />
repels ideas and scatters attention. When we are<br />
in this mood, dawdling is unavoidable. Some<br />
slight aversion of this kind is generally experienced<br />
in commencing to write, since it requires a certain<br />
interval to work up the circulation in the mind.<br />
Time and place, again, have great influence on the<br />
happiness of composition ; for, whatever people<br />
may say, there is no more fancy in an author not<br />
being able to write with equal ease at any time or<br />
in any place, than in his not being able to go to<br />
sleep whenever or wherever he wishes. Still,<br />
Control does much to master any undue fastidious-<br />
ness in this particular,<br />
In speaking above of the reduction of ideas from<br />
the form in which we dwell upon them for ourselves<br />
to that in which they must be embodied so as to<br />
become transmissible to others, I omitted to notice<br />
that hesitation is often caused by the poverty of<br />
the thought to be conveyed. At the last moment<br />
the writer discovers that his idea contains much<br />
less than at first seemed ; he does not like to come<br />
right out with it : and he must then either beat<br />
about the bush, or waste time in belated improvisa-<br />
tion. To avoid this, we must fatten up our<br />
chickens before we bring them to market, or, in<br />
other words, make sure that we have something to<br />
tell before preparing to tell it.<br />
I say nothing here of style, the question<br />
being about difficulty in writing, not about<br />
difficulty in the arts, or technique of writing,<br />
just as in a factory there is the question of power<br />
transmission, quite apart from that of the style<br />
and quality of the goods manufactured. What<br />
introduces needless friction ; what makes a writer<br />
gape about, and dilly-dally, and fritter away his<br />
time and energy ; what impedes his utterance,<br />
even when all attentive; these are the points we<br />
set out to consider. Having made our diagnosis,<br />
it remains to prescribe the remedies. They are, of<br />
course, several; but I must not be interminable,<br />
and therefore shall content myself with giving a<br />
single specific. But, so that I may no longer<br />
appeal to a sick man for advice how to be healthy,<br />
let me in this pass over my own opinions, and<br />
conclude with the sententious maxim of Cobbett :—<br />
Sit down to write what you have thought, and not<br />
to think what you shall write.<br />
NORMAN ALLISTON.<br />
THE REVIEWER AND HIS LITTLE WAYS.<br />
BY A WRITER.<br />
OME authors never read reviews of their own<br />
Works—or so they inform a credulous world.<br />
Others not only read them, but when they<br />
are favoured with a good review, cut it out and<br />
keep it. Others again, a noble few, cut out all<br />
the notices they receive, good and bad, and paste<br />
them into a book. This book serves as a means<br />
of Self-chastening when the author is conscious of<br />
feeling uplifted. Not only are the best notices<br />
of his works balanced by others which it is dis-<br />
agreeable to recall, but the reviewer who wishes<br />
to be kind does not always praise the right thing.<br />
If you are the sole European authority on the<br />
manners and customs of the Elecampane Indians,<br />
it jars upon you to find a jovial person writing of<br />
your book —“A thrilling narrative, but we think<br />
less of its main theme than does the author.<br />
Anyone can Write about Indians, and what appeals<br />
to us is the racy account of the doings on the<br />
Voyage out.” We knew an author once who was<br />
compared, year after year, by a certain paper to<br />
Jane Austen. High praise, one would say, and<br />
fairly certain to exceed his deserts. Ah, but the<br />
Works in question were thrilling romances of<br />
adventure, as desirous as the Fat Boy of making<br />
the flesh Creep. And they recalled Jane Austen<br />
because “they began quietly, went on quietly,<br />
ended quietly; they never stirred the blood; they<br />
Were more painstakingly decorous than '' even her<br />
books<br />
But these, after all, are good reviews, and if<br />
they are to be read for chastening, the bad may<br />
be recalled for comfort. Not so much the first<br />
bad review you ever received, which you read with<br />
a pained incredulity that anyone could be found<br />
to say such unkind, unfair things about a book<br />
which other critics had found so good, but those<br />
that came a little later, looking back on which<br />
you are tempted to wonder how you ever dared to<br />
go on writing at all. It was a question of setting<br />
your teeth and sitting tight, for the unpleasant<br />
review has a staying power that outlasts even that<br />
of the delightfully kind one that makes you go<br />
about smiling to yourself all day. But you lived<br />
through it somehow, and went on writing, and<br />
you have a certain feeling of triumph nowadays<br />
when the reviewers tell you how good your earlier<br />
books were. It is true they are not flattering to<br />
those of the present. “We expected better work<br />
than this from the hand that gave us ’ and<br />
* —,'” they say. “In Mr. Smith pro-<br />
duced a masterpiece, even a classic, and the present<br />
book reveals, a sad falling-off from his earlier<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#498) ################################################<br />
<br />
120<br />
TISIES A DITFIOR.<br />
methods.” In some surprise, you look up the<br />
review of the masterpiece in question, and find<br />
that the reviewer's love to it was so carefully<br />
dissembled that he had no hesitation in kicking it<br />
downstairs immediately on its appearance. And<br />
if your first books were better than you were ever<br />
allowed to suspect at the time, so also your<br />
personal dignity stood higher in the reviewer's<br />
estimation. “Mr. Smith should really not have<br />
come down to this line of business,” he says now,<br />
with pained surprise, and you wonder how any<br />
descent was possible from the extremely low level<br />
at which your reputation stood. If it be permitted<br />
to the trodden worm to indulge a grievance against<br />
its treader, you might find one in the Occasional<br />
inconsistency of your critic. “We cannot but<br />
trust,” he says, “that in the next instalment of<br />
the story we shall get plenty of that romantic<br />
political intrigue in the delineation of which<br />
|Mr. Smith has so often proved himself a master.”<br />
The next instalment does provide the required<br />
excitement, and with beating heart you await<br />
commendation, only to receive this dash of cold<br />
water :—“The story is well written, and some of<br />
the scenes are very striking ; but we cannot feel<br />
much interest in these politics ''<br />
But there is something to be thankful for even<br />
here, for many a reviewer is driven to frenzy by<br />
the discovery of a sequel—a thing that readers<br />
delight in and demand. No matter how complete<br />
the book is in itself, he washes his hands of it the<br />
moment he perceives it is not the first appearance<br />
of every character on any stage. Sometimes excess<br />
of resentment leads him to o'erleap himself. Of a<br />
certain novel a reviewer said that “the heroine<br />
was preordained to die because in a former book,<br />
post-dated, her husband appeared as a widower.”<br />
But the gentleman referred to did not appear at<br />
all, save as a ghost, in the other book, and the<br />
author remains intermittently troubled by the<br />
problem whether a ghost can correctly be spoken<br />
of as a widower.<br />
There is another unpardonable sin in the<br />
reviewer’s eyes, and that is length. Here again<br />
his interest runs directly counter to that of the<br />
reader. Lordly in his seclusion, with his weekly<br />
dose of fiction delivered at his door in a neat<br />
parcel from the office, he has never waited in a<br />
circulating library, watching the women who<br />
extricate their books with difficulty from a string<br />
bag containing various materials for home dress-<br />
making and a cake for tea. He would see them<br />
weighing critically the merits of two novels on the<br />
score of number of pages and closeness of print.<br />
They discern at once the publishers' catalogue<br />
which, with the aid of paper as thick as cardboard,<br />
pads out to six-shilling length the little gem which<br />
he ran through in twenty minutes and stamped<br />
with the seal of his high approval, and they reject<br />
it unhesitatingly. What use would so slight a<br />
production be in alleviating a toothache or a cold<br />
in the head It would be gone in no time, and<br />
there would be nothing more to read. As well set<br />
a cream meringue before a hungry man.<br />
If the reviewer could only be brought to see it,<br />
it is not the length of the book that is in fault,<br />
but the necessity for pretending to have tried to<br />
read it through. The pretence results in a notice<br />
something like this :—“‘The Pink Lobelia' is a<br />
novel that suffers from being interminable. We<br />
have spent many weary hours over it, and failed<br />
to reach the end. Of course Lord Hugo and the<br />
heroine marry at last, but frankly, we were not<br />
sufficiently interested in them to find out how they<br />
did it.” Then the author, if he is young and<br />
innocent, writes timidly to point out that the<br />
whole object of the book is to show why the<br />
beauteous Angela did not espouse the gay Hugo,<br />
but her father’s old comrade-in-arms, and the<br />
editor appends to his communication the sarcastic<br />
note :-‘‘We print this letter as requested, but<br />
we are bound to say that we infinitely prefer our<br />
reviewer's ending to the author's, which strikes us<br />
as jejune in the extreme.” The unhappy author<br />
recovers from the blow by degrees, and learns the<br />
invaluable lesson that a contest is unequal in<br />
which your opponent is bound to have the last<br />
Word.<br />
Why should not the reviewer give up the<br />
pretence of reading through a long book by a<br />
little-known author P Even if he likes the book,<br />
his tender mercies are cruel, for he writes his<br />
notice in the form of a synopsis of the plot—<br />
generally all wrong. Why should there not be a<br />
formula of this kind—in which the publisher<br />
would no doubt assist by enclosing a list of the<br />
characters ?—“‘The Pink Lobelia.’ The scene<br />
of this book is laid in the Mountains of the Moon,<br />
whither an exploring party proceeds in quest of<br />
the treasure of the title.” (Observe the prudence<br />
which fails to specify whether the treasure is<br />
animal, vegetable, or mineral.) “The principal<br />
characters are Lord Hugo Stoneybroke, a dashing<br />
sprig of nobility, Colonel Trueheart, a soldier<br />
without fear and without reproach, and Angela<br />
Verifayre, a beautiful heiress. There are adven-<br />
tures and deeds of derring-do galore ” (no one,<br />
surely, would be so hard-hearted as to deprive the<br />
poor reviewer of these two indispensable words 2),<br />
“and the love-story ends in a way which we will<br />
not wound our readers by revealing.” Too much<br />
like the publisher's puff, you will say ; but is the<br />
publisher's puff never made use of in reviews<br />
already ?<br />
Every reviewer is omniscient by nature, and<br />
when he makes a hash of your plot in purporting<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#499) ################################################<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
121<br />
to Summarise it, that merely shows that Homer<br />
still nods occasionally. When a mistake occurs<br />
in matters of fact, it is because the reviewer has<br />
gone for his holiday, and his work is being done<br />
by the office-boy. If you doubt this, make a<br />
complaint of any such mistake to the journal in<br />
Which it appears, and see. One hopes that the<br />
reviewer (or office-boy) who recently placed the<br />
Peninsular War in “the fifties” is the same that<br />
Some years ago reviewed “The Great Proconsul’’<br />
under the impression that the trial of Warren<br />
Hastings ended in a verdict of “Guilty,” and that<br />
there are not two people whose historical studies<br />
ended presumably with the Norman Conquest<br />
running amuck in the critical world. If this type<br />
of reviewer knows too little about his subject to<br />
find any other fault, he can always bring a charge<br />
of plagiarism. What matters it that he is review-<br />
ing in two successive weeks two novels which<br />
appeared almost simultaneously It is smart<br />
and easy to say:—“Mr. Brown-Jones will never<br />
want for the sincerest form of flattery while Mr.<br />
Smith lives and writes,” and the public, which<br />
knows nothing about dates of publication, credits<br />
him with much critical acumen, Half the charges<br />
of plagiarism which afflict the modern author are<br />
based upon ignorance of the common authority<br />
upon which both writers have drawn, and a goodly<br />
proportion of the remainder on the fallacy that<br />
the writer has read everything that the reviewer<br />
has reviewed.<br />
If you are a writer with a purpose, there is<br />
another crow which you will often have to pick<br />
with the reviewer. When you have spent months<br />
of labour on the preparation of an impeccable<br />
index, in the modest hope of securing a word of<br />
jpraise from a paper which is strong on such<br />
matters, it is disappointing to find the point<br />
altogether ignored, and your book treated merely<br />
as a jumping-off place for the gambols of an expert<br />
whose views are not yours. But it is even more<br />
galling, when you have written, say, a Socialist<br />
novel, and it is reviewed in your own pet Socialist<br />
daily, to discover that its message is belittled and<br />
its anticipations ridiculed, precisely as if you had<br />
to thank The Primrose Messenger for the notice.<br />
The subject is one to be discreetly touched, for in<br />
it is involved the whole question of a man’s<br />
working for a paper whose political opinions he<br />
does not share. Oddly enough, there is no<br />
reciprocity about the thing. You never find<br />
your Socialism unexpectedly commended by The<br />
Primrose Messenger.<br />
Akin to this grievance is that of the existence<br />
of the multiple reviewer. Every author is con-<br />
vinced that he has an enemy who writes against<br />
each of his books in turn in Several papers, and<br />
there are some who can produce presumptive<br />
evidence of the fact in mis-spellings and tags of<br />
Spºch appearing with suspicious reiteration. Tut<br />
authors themselves are not wholly innocent in this<br />
Tespect. A certain novelist recently made, or<br />
allowed to be made for her, the calm confession<br />
that on the appearance of a book of poems by a<br />
relative she “herself reviewed the volume under<br />
Various pen-names in several periodicals, and later<br />
Wrote for the edition included in a certain series<br />
the introduction that is signed with initials other<br />
than her own.” If an adverse reviewer had made<br />
this confession, it would have been greeted with a<br />
Storm of protest. Is there any difference in<br />
Principle when the reviewing is favourable and<br />
done by one interested in the success of the book?<br />
Let us be just, then, even to the reviewer. If<br />
he can be horrid, he can also be Very, very nice.<br />
If he can obstinately pervert the most Original<br />
actions of your characters into Something old<br />
and commonplace, he can also display an insight<br />
into their motives that surprises you. And he<br />
likes you to purr when you are pleased. There is<br />
9ne, literary journal which has the delightful<br />
habit of sending the author a copy of the issue<br />
Containing the review. One says “delightful" with<br />
fear and trembling, for hitherto, like the sun-dial,<br />
the paper has marked only sunny hours. Would<br />
it be sent if the notice was a bad one 2 The<br />
Critic on the Hearth is resdy with the answer,<br />
“Rather and in double-quick time !”<br />
THE LITERARY YEAR BOOK.<br />
—t—º-e—<br />
LAW AND LETTERS.<br />
HERE seems to be no variation from the<br />
issue of last year under the heading of “Law<br />
and Letters” in the new Literary Year<br />
Book. Has no case of importance been tried<br />
during the past year * Has the United States<br />
passed no important Copyright Act 2<br />
The standing matter which has been reprinted is,<br />
on the whole, satisfactory; we mentioned this in<br />
our last year's review, but the Omission of such<br />
important things as the United States Copyright<br />
Act and the cases that have been tried reduces the<br />
value of the article immensely.<br />
With regard to what does appear, it is needless<br />
to put forward the same objections that we have<br />
put forward on previous occasions; but we might<br />
repeat that the portion of the article on “Ilaw and<br />
Letters ” which refers to agreements is the least<br />
satisfactory. The article on the “Royalty Agree-<br />
ment ’’ is still unchanged. The writer states, after<br />
setting out the parties to an agreement : “A<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#500) ################################################<br />
<br />
122<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
Royalty Agreement proceeds thus, or to this effect:<br />
‘That in consideration that the copyright and<br />
plant, etc., shall forth with belong to and become<br />
the property of the publisher, etc.’” It would be<br />
most interesting to know from where this form of<br />
agreement was obtained. We are glad to say that<br />
there are very few authors—and they get fewer year<br />
by year—who are foolish enough to assign their<br />
copyright, and the great majority of publishers,<br />
especially those whose names for many years have<br />
stood high in the publishing trade, only take a<br />
licence to publish, limited in most cases to volume<br />
form, and do not think of asking for a transfer of<br />
copyright.<br />
We must repeat that, in a review of an important<br />
subject like forms of agreement, the contracts<br />
should be drawn in favour of the author. One<br />
reason for this is clear and irrefutable. The<br />
publishers make it the business of a lifetime,<br />
or ought to make it their business, to have a<br />
knowledge of copyright law and of contracts.<br />
Their very agreements show that they have studied<br />
their own interests in this matter. It is the author<br />
that desires help, for many men write books but<br />
do not live by their books. These are essen-<br />
tially in need of guidance. They can, of course,<br />
become members of the Society of Authors, but<br />
there are still some who have not heard of the<br />
society's existence. In that case they would no<br />
doubt desire to turn to some book of reference, and<br />
if that book of reference did not mention the<br />
society as giving the necessary assistance—-the<br />
Literary Year Book is inclined to avoid it——and<br />
does not give the necessary assistance itself, it is a<br />
useless book from the author's point of view—that<br />
is from the point of view of those persons alone<br />
who study its forms of agreement for advice.<br />
This little review does not deal with the other<br />
details of the book. These will be dealt with in<br />
another review by another hand.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
AN EDITOR'S CHAIR.”<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
\ | R. ERNEST FOSTER narrates in a simple<br />
and straightforward style some of his<br />
experiences as editor of (assell's Safurday<br />
Journal and of ('hºms, disarming criticism of an<br />
editor's literary style by saying in a “foreword ” :<br />
“In the belief that the matters dealt with will<br />
speak for themselves, no attempt has been made to<br />
elaborate them : nor, beyond being arranged in<br />
groups, are they presented in any particular order ;<br />
* “An Editor's Chair : A Record of Experiences and<br />
Happenings,” by Ernest Foster. London : Everett & Co.<br />
and if, as a whole, the book is kaleidoscopic rather<br />
than formal and long-drawn-out, I hope it will not<br />
be accounted a fault.”<br />
It is possible to suggest that a book may be<br />
elaborated without being either formal or long-<br />
drawn-out, and to conjecture that probably Mr.<br />
Foster's contributors, even when imparting useful<br />
information to his readers, exhibited a more<br />
dexterous craftsmanship than his ; but, nevertheless,<br />
the matters which he says should speak for them-<br />
selves do so with tolerable clearness. Many<br />
who write, but do not always succeed in seeing<br />
their work in print, may study his pages with<br />
advantage, and draw inferences for their own<br />
guidance from the advice which he does not alto-<br />
gether omit, and from his experiences with those<br />
who wrote for him, with others whom he wanted<br />
to write for him, with those who wished to write<br />
for him but failed to appreciate the characteristics<br />
of his paper, with those who sought to help him<br />
with advice in editing it, and with others who<br />
commended him and showed their interest in the<br />
success of his efforts. It need hardly be added<br />
that an important proportion of the lessons conveyed<br />
is for the consideration and assimilation of those<br />
who worry editors with manuscripts wholly unsuited<br />
to the periodicals which they conduct, and then<br />
complain of lack of editorial discrimination, thus<br />
making the way harder for others who seek to<br />
approach from the outside, and to obtain acceptance<br />
as new or occasional contributors.<br />
Much advice has been given from time to time<br />
in the pages of The Author, derived from many<br />
Sources, to those who find it impossible to project<br />
themselves in imagination for a moment into an<br />
editor's chair, and to reflect on what may be his<br />
point of view in his official capacity, or his physical<br />
and mental limitations and weaknesses as a brother<br />
man. These should read with profit Mr. Foster's<br />
chapters entitled “Some Callers,” “Some Corre-<br />
spondents,” “Would - be Contributors,” “Free<br />
Lances as Contributors,” “Regular Contributors,”<br />
and “Some Dangers of Editing.” More practised<br />
writers, and those with the imaginative gift referred<br />
to, will not need to be told that “an editor has<br />
Settled convictions as to his needs, and it goes<br />
without saying that the more closely an article or<br />
story approximates to them the more it commends<br />
itself”; but even these may derive amusement,<br />
where they need no instruction, from an editor's<br />
stories of fifty-four manuscripts sent to him in a<br />
batch, of sheets pasted at their edges and thus joined<br />
one above the other so as to form a scroll several<br />
feet long ; of covering letters of all kinds, including<br />
appeals for charity, and containing in one instance<br />
the information that a wager depended on accept-<br />
ance or rejection. Most of us believe ourselves to<br />
be tactful—more so, at least, than the editors who<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#501) ################################################<br />
<br />
TRIES A UſTISIOR.<br />
123<br />
reject our stories—so that few will apply as a<br />
warning to themselves Mr. Foster's anecdote of a<br />
contributor who sent a manuscript with an intima-<br />
tion that it was much too good for Cassell's Saſur-<br />
day, Journal, but that high-class magazines kept<br />
stories so long that it was offered on condition that<br />
a cheque was sent on acceptance, as the author<br />
had some pressing payments to make.<br />
Among Smbjects of general interest to authors<br />
Mr. Foster discusses “Plagiarism add Coincidence”<br />
in a chapter which describes somewhat euphemisti-<br />
cally as “direct plagiarism " that fraud upon<br />
editors and authors which consists in copying an<br />
article from one periodical and forwarding it as an<br />
Original manuscript to another. Mr. Foster seems<br />
to think the attitude of “plagiarised '' authors to<br />
have been unduly severe towards himself, or even<br />
rapacious, when they suggested pecuniary compen-<br />
sation for the infringement (involuntary on the<br />
editor's part), of their rights. It is submitted,<br />
however, that such cases are to be determined<br />
according to circumstances. An author may be<br />
willing to waive a claim for compensation, and to<br />
assist an editor in bringing a knave to justice, if<br />
the editor on his part will take active and energetic<br />
steps to punish the guilty, and to contribute to the<br />
future protection of authors and editors by so doing.<br />
It must be remembered that an editor who, though<br />
he may have published a stolen article in good<br />
faith, declines to prosecute, and is even unwilling<br />
to acknowledge the fraud perpetrated upon him,<br />
acts precisely as he would do who deliberately<br />
“lifted '' the matter himself as a means of obtain-<br />
ing cheap copy for his paper. He may, in fact, be<br />
actuated by clemency, or he may fear to make<br />
public the ease with which such frauds are perpe-<br />
trated ; but the author who, perhaps, differs from<br />
him in disposition or opinion, may decline to<br />
acknowledge, as no doubt he should do, that editors<br />
in the position of Mr. Foster are beyond suspicion,<br />
and may say “A thief ought to be punished in the<br />
interests of justice and of honest men; if you intend<br />
to say nothing about it pay me for the contribution<br />
of which you have had the advantage. At the<br />
worst you will only pay twice over, and even then<br />
my story is worth more.” Authors who take up<br />
such an attitude ought not, however, to complain<br />
of the system by which contributions from unknown<br />
contributors are not paid for till a reasonable time<br />
after their appearance.<br />
One of Mr. Foster's stories is of a man who<br />
complained that some anecdotes which he had<br />
narrated had been borrowed by another Writer, and<br />
settled the question of whether they might have<br />
been derived from a common source by declaring<br />
ingenuously that he had invented them himself.<br />
Somewhat diverting anecdotes, by the Way, are<br />
narrated by Mr. Foster in two chapters devoted to<br />
“Interviews and Interviewing,” and to the “Diffi-<br />
culties of the Interviewer.” We can all of us<br />
understand, even without personal experience, that<br />
Some of the great people of the earth (and of the<br />
small ones) are very willing to be interviewed, and<br />
that others are not. It is less easy to appreciate<br />
the mental attitude, or, indeed, condition of those<br />
Who, after expressing willingness to be interviewed,<br />
9r actually answering questions volubly, suddenly<br />
impose a condition that nothing is to be published.<br />
This may, of course, be accounted for by a sudden<br />
change of mind or realisation of the effect of the<br />
publication in cold print of a candid conversation<br />
With a beguiling lady or gentleman. But still,<br />
everyone knows nowadays what an “interview "<br />
means, and to indulge deliberately in a conver-<br />
sation with an interviewer and then to stipulate<br />
that it is to be treated as confidential, savours of<br />
imbecility. Even less comprehensible, however, is<br />
the injunction “No notes, please,” which Mr.<br />
Foster or his interviewer (he acknowledges in-<br />
debtedness to Mr. C. Duncan Lucas) describes<br />
as a familiar one.<br />
We may sympathise with those who feel nervous<br />
at having their words taken down, but this was not<br />
the motive in the cases referred to. They con-<br />
sented to be interviewed and submitted to the<br />
Operation, but objected to have their words written<br />
down on the spot, a process which we need hardly<br />
point out would be resorted to by the interviewer<br />
for no dark or dangerous purpose, but merely for<br />
the sake of accuracy, and so employed as much for<br />
the benefit of his subject as his own. Did they<br />
Wish to leave a loophole of escape in order that if a<br />
statement or opinion of which they had cause after-<br />
Wards to be ashamed were fastened upon them,<br />
they might deny its paternity and attribute it to<br />
the inventive faculty of the interviewer 2 We<br />
must leave them to answer the questions, or<br />
possibly the reader may find it to be one of the<br />
“matters which speak for themselves,” and under-<br />
stand it better than We do.<br />
- E. A. A.<br />
FICTION THROUGH THE AGES.*<br />
—t—º-º-<br />
R. RANSOME gives us the impression of a<br />
man who writes because that is his Way of<br />
enjoying himself. His book has both the<br />
qualities and the defects commonly discoverable in<br />
work done from such a motive. Being himself<br />
* “A History of Story-telling,” by Arthur Ransome.<br />
Jack, 7s. 6d. llet,<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#502) ################################################<br />
<br />
124<br />
TISIES AICTFIOR.<br />
interested, he is generally interesting ; but he is<br />
not complete, or systematic, or careful of propor-<br />
tion. Whatever seems dull to him he leaves out ;<br />
wherever it pleases him to do so he enlarges; and<br />
he skips from literature to literature, and from<br />
country to country, as the fancy takes him—from<br />
England to France, from France to Spain, from<br />
Spain to Italy. Improvements in the technique of<br />
fiction are the principal objects of his quest ; but the<br />
paths on which he looks for them are somewhat arbi-<br />
trarily chosen. He says a good deal about Chateau-<br />
briand, and Gautier, and Mérimée , but he says<br />
nothing about either Madame de Staël or Benjamin<br />
Constant, though both of them mark epochs and<br />
have influenced their successors. Constant's<br />
“Adolphe ’’ was the first of all novels of analysis,<br />
and has been hailed as such by such masters of<br />
criticism as MM. Paul Bourget and Anatole France.<br />
Madame de Staël was the first of those who sounded<br />
what Mr. Courtney has called “the feminine note<br />
in fiction.” “Corinne’’ is the source of “Jane,”<br />
whether Miss Corelli is aware of her debt or not.<br />
In a short book, however, which does not profess<br />
to be a text-book, such omissions are bound to<br />
occur ; and the author must be judged, not by<br />
what he has omitted, but by what he has<br />
included. His merit is that he treats novelists<br />
as human beings, and endeavours to show how<br />
their books are related to their lives. That is<br />
Sainte-Beuve's method. It is the most readable,<br />
and it produces the best critical results. Mr. Ran-<br />
some might have followed it with more success if<br />
he had had either more space or a shorter list of<br />
subjects; but he writes pleasantly, though he has<br />
placed himself in conditions in which it was almost<br />
impossible for him to be more than superficial.<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
SMASHED MANUSCRIPTS.<br />
DEAR SIR,-My sympathies are entirely with<br />
your correspondent Mr. Bertram Smith in this<br />
matter. His sad experience has also been mine.<br />
Recently, goaded by fury to protest, I have<br />
written upon the sheet of cardboard enclosed with<br />
my MSS. my name and address, and below it,<br />
“Please return this card with manuscript.”<br />
So far this has had the desired effect, but it may<br />
merely be a coincidence. It may be that the office<br />
boys in those particular editorial offices upon which<br />
I have of late inflicted my manuscripts do not know<br />
the game involving sheets of cardboard, and are<br />
not bitten with the<br />
necessitating “mounts.”<br />
May I advise Mr. Bertram Smith to try my<br />
plan It may possibly save a few cards in his<br />
Case, as it has in mine.<br />
photographic mania—<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
Fox FRENCH.<br />
—e—º-e<br />
ART AND TAXATION.<br />
DEAR SIR,--Mr. W. Shaw Sparrow hits the nail<br />
on the head with his remarks on copyright-expired<br />
works. If the Dukes of Marlborough and Welling-<br />
ton may live on property earned by illustrious<br />
ancestors, why should not the descendants of<br />
Dickens and Thackeray do the same thing 2 It is<br />
monstrous to think that while Charles Dickens'<br />
Works are selling in their hundreds of thousands<br />
every year, his granddaughters should be forced to<br />
draw Civil List pensions, and very small ones at<br />
that. As it is obvious that a similar fate awaits<br />
the descendants of the distinguished writers who<br />
form the Society of Authors' Council, let these<br />
clever men get to work and see if they cannot put<br />
things right !<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
R. S. WARREN BELL.<br />
—º-º-º-<br />
REVIEWERS AND REVIEWED.<br />
DEAR SIR,--I read the letter signed H. J. A.<br />
with considerable interest, and I am of opinion<br />
that the answer to it may be found in Mr. Eveleigh<br />
Nash's article in “M. A. P.,” in which that pub-<br />
lisher states that the first book he produced was<br />
reviewed adversely, yet the work achieved con-<br />
siderable success. Viewing both these cases in<br />
every conceivable light, it seems to me that the<br />
value of reviews of books cannot be accepted<br />
as a criterion either of success or failure. The<br />
great arbiter of a book is not the critic, is not<br />
the publisher, and certainly is not the author : it<br />
is the public. As the writer of two or three<br />
books which were fortunate enough to secure the<br />
favourable opinion of the critics, I am in a position<br />
to state that notwithstanding my faith and con-<br />
fidence in my publishers, and notwithstanding the<br />
good reviews that welcomed the appearance of the<br />
books, still, from a financial point of view, neither<br />
my publishers nor myself scored very highly. I<br />
am of the opinion that book reviews are not worth<br />
a rap of one's fingers. However, from H. J. A.'s<br />
own story it is quite clear that his publishers did<br />
all they possibly could to make a financial success<br />
of the book.<br />
- M. A.<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#503) ################################################<br />
<br />
AD VERTISEMENTS.<br />
11]<br />
WHERE KHNIFE IS DRIVEN. -<br />
By MAX TROTTER, M.D. A story of exceptional interest,<br />
with frontispiece on art paper. Is. net. -<br />
‘‘A Hospital Story.”—77//es.<br />
“The tale shows a good deal of the business side of the<br />
surgeon's calling.”—Dzzydee Adžertiser.<br />
THE RMYSTERIOUS LIGHT : A Novel.<br />
By JANET B. ORR. With frontispiece on art paper.<br />
and wholesome love story. 2s. net.<br />
“A tale relating the attempt on the part of circumstances and<br />
a worldly mother to separate two lovers.”—Sheffie/d Daiſy<br />
Telegza//.<br />
“A charming story, with dramatic incidents that fascinate the<br />
reader.”—Blackbuzºn Gazette.<br />
"THE COM!!!NG OF THE CHE L L - A D realm.<br />
A Tale of Belgravia and Brixton. By THEODORE PHILIPPy.<br />
A legend of peculiar and distinctive interest. Is. net.<br />
“A cleverly written story of a lady of ancient lineage.”—<br />
B777/zing/ia77. Daiſy Post.<br />
“An interesting story of the disappearance of the eldest son<br />
of Sir Thomas Blunt.”—Baſºtist.<br />
THE QUEEN's FAVOURITE, and other Poems,<br />
By M. H. A BRAHAMI-JEWELL. A capital book of poetry, which<br />
will be much enjoyed by verse lovers. 2s. net.<br />
STOBS' FLYING MACHINE, anci other Adventures.<br />
By ILFORD LANGTON. 6d. met, in strong brochure cover.<br />
Capital little stories, full of fun and laughter. Just issued.<br />
SYBELLA (A Sketch in Japanese setting).<br />
By ETHEL CANNING. A splendid story, with handsome<br />
picture as frontispiece. Hound in bevelled boards, 1s. 6d. net only.<br />
Divided into three parts, the book is full of well-sustained<br />
interest and incident throughout. Now Ready.<br />
STOCKWELL, who will immediately advise, free<br />
of charge, as to publication.<br />
29, L'UIDGATE HILL, E.C.<br />
IFull lists on application, post free.<br />
A capital<br />
...A / . SS Authors should forward MSS. of any description<br />
ºf . ..<br />
LONDON<br />
(Novels, Storics, Poems, Essays, &c.) direct to Mr.<br />
ARTHUR. H. STOCKWELL,<br />
TO Authors and Journalists.<br />
Are you SATISFIED with the quality of<br />
your work?<br />
Does literary output find a ready<br />
market?<br />
These are pertinent questions and well worth<br />
answering.<br />
Many young writers would meet with success<br />
if they took the trouble to learn the technique<br />
of their art. Our Students are successful<br />
because we instil into them that subtle some-<br />
thing which makes for success. We cultivate<br />
their special bent and enable them to make the<br />
most of their natural gifts.<br />
A Course of Training under our supervision<br />
will, at the very outset, put you on the path of<br />
progress—the road that leads to the Editorial<br />
Sanctum, Let us tell you more about this ; we<br />
shall be pleased to send you full particulars on<br />
receipt of a post-card.<br />
your<br />
Address your application to the---<br />
LiTERARY CORRESPONDENGE 60LLEGE,<br />
9, Arundel Street, Strand, W.C.<br />
About 2,000 Books Wanted<br />
Are advertised for weekly in<br />
THE PUBLISHERS’ CIRCULAR<br />
AND BOOKSELLERS’ RECORD<br />
(ESTABLISHED 1837),<br />
Which also gives Dists of the New Books published<br />
during the Week, Ammouncements of Forthcoming<br />
Books, &c.<br />
Subscribers have the privilege of a Gratis Advertisement<br />
in the Books Wanted Columns.<br />
Send for 52 weeks, post free, for 10s. 6d. home and<br />
13s. 6d. foreign.<br />
Speciment Copy Free on application.<br />
Price TWOPENCE Weekly.<br />
Office : 19, Adam Street, Adelphi, W.C.<br />
TYPEWRTHNG.<br />
A Member of the Authors’ Society will be glad to<br />
recommend Miss E. WARMINGTON as a thoroughly<br />
efficient Typewriter, very prompt, and skilful at<br />
deciphering difficult handwriting.<br />
For terms and particulars apply,<br />
Miss E. WARMINGTon,<br />
114, Surmatra Road, W. Harm pstead, N.W.<br />
Authors :<br />
Study “How to write SALEABLE Fiction,”<br />
by George Magnus, who is selling MSS. to<br />
over 14o Publishers and Editors. One<br />
author writes : “Have sold 26o MSS. in<br />
three years, thanks solely to the invaluable<br />
information contained in this book.”<br />
Particulars on application—CAMBRIDGE<br />
LITERARY AGENCY, I 15, Strand, London.<br />
Middleton’s Military Plan of<br />
the Flat Earth.<br />
POST FREE, FIVE PENCE.<br />
Alone gives the all Red Route Mid-Canada, to<br />
|Farthest South !<br />
or Mid-Canada to Brisbane and Australia |<br />
From Middleton. St. Matthew's.<br />
St. Leonard's.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
## p. (#504) ################################################<br />
<br />
iv - AD VERTISEMENTS.<br />
TO AN AUTHOR<br />
the APPEARANCE and STYLE of manuscript is<br />
An important Matter.<br />
Send your typewriting to me ! I have had a broad experience of<br />
Literary Work,<br />
and guarantee to execute all commissions promptly, and in<br />
a mannel warranted to tempt the consideration of the<br />
busiest Editors.<br />
Price List, Testimonials, etc., on application.<br />
C. HERBERT CAESAR, Homefield, wºol;<br />
t. Aibans, Herts.<br />
GOUPON.<br />
This Coupon entitles you to one Carbon<br />
Duplicate, Gratis, if sent with your order.<br />
TYPEWRITING.<br />
Authors’ MSS. copied from 9d. per 1,000<br />
words; in duplicate, 1/-, Plays and General<br />
Copying. List and specimen of work on appli-<br />
cation.<br />
ONE OF NUMEROUS TESTIMONIALS.<br />
“Miss M. R. HORNE has typed for me literary matter to the<br />
extent of some hundreds of thousands of words, I have nothing<br />
but praise for the accuracy, Speed, and neatness with which she<br />
does her work.-FRANK SAVILE.”<br />
Miss M. R. HoRNE,<br />
ESKDALE, WEST DRAYTON, MIDDIESEX.<br />
TWO popular Hotels in Central London.<br />
Opposite the British Museum.<br />
THAGKERAY HOTEL.<br />
Great Russell Street, London.<br />
Near the British Museum.<br />
KINGSLEY HOTEL.<br />
Hart Street, Bloomsbury Square, London.<br />
Passenger Lifts. Bathrooms on every Floor. Lounges<br />
and Spacious Dining, Drawing, Writing, Reading, Billiard<br />
and Smoking Rooms. Fireproof Floors. Perfect Sanita-<br />
tion. Telephones. Night Porters.<br />
Bedrooms (including attendance), single, from<br />
3/6 to 6|=.<br />
Inclusive Charge for Bedroom, Attendance, Table d'Hote<br />
Breakfast and Dinner, from 816 to 10/6 per day.<br />
Full Tariff and Testimonials on application.<br />
Telegraphic Addresses :<br />
Thackeray Hotel—“Thackeray, London.”<br />
Kingsley Hotel—“Bookcraft, London.”<br />
E8TABLISHED]<br />
The Wessex Press,<br />
[XVIII. cent.<br />
Tazt??ton.<br />
BARNICOTT & PEARCE<br />
INVITE ENQUIRIES RESPECTING PRINT ING.<br />
ESTIMATES OF COST, AND OTHER DETAILS, PROMIPTLY GIVEN.<br />
TYPEWRITING<br />
from 10d. per 1,000 words, by experienced<br />
Typist. Authors’ MISS. and Technical<br />
work a speciality.<br />
ORDERS BY FOST PROMIFTLY ATT ENDED TO.<br />
MISS LUETCHFORD, 122, LONDON WALL, E.C.<br />
MRS. GILL, Typetoriting Cffice,<br />
(Established 1883.) 35, LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br />
Authors' MSS. carefully copied from 1s, per 1,000<br />
words. Duplicate copies third price. French and German<br />
MSS. accurately copied ; or typewritten English trans-<br />
lations supplied. References kindly permitted to Messrs.<br />
A. P. Watt & Son, Literary Agents, Hastings House,<br />
Norfolk Street, Strand, W.C. Telephone 84.64 Central.<br />
AUTHORS’ TYPEWRTÉ NG-<br />
Novel and Story Work . 9d. per 1,000 words; 2 Copies, 1/-<br />
General Copying & º ... 1/1 33 3 y 5 y 1/3<br />
Plays, ruled - - & & ... 1/- 95 3 * } % 1/4<br />
Specimens and Price List on application.<br />
MISS A. B. STEVENSON, Yew Tree Cottage,<br />
SUTTON, MACCLESFIELD.<br />
SIPKES and SIPKES,<br />
The West Kensington Typewriting 0ffices,<br />
. (Established 1893)<br />
223a, Hammersmith Road, LONDON, W.<br />
Authors' MSS. ; Translations; Duplicating ; Plays and Actors’ Parts;<br />
Legal, General and Commercial Documents. Private Dictation Room.<br />
|USUAL TJ RMS. LIESSONS. Ičeferences.<br />
TYPEWRITING.<br />
AUTHORS’ MSS. and GENERAL COPYING undertaken from<br />
1s. per 1,000 words. Duplicate copies one third price.<br />
TRIAL ORDER SOLICITED.<br />
GOOD WORK GUARANTEED,<br />
A. wilson, 9, ALEXANDRA ROAD, STAMFORD.<br />
Printed by BRADBURY, AGNEw, & Co. L.D., and Published by them for THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS (INCORPORATED)<br />
at 10, Bouverie Street, London, E.C. | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/401/1910-01-01-The-Author-20-4.pdf | publications, The Author |