Omeka IDOmeka URLTitleSubjectDescriptionCreatorSourcePublisherDateContributorRightsRelationFormatLanguageTypeIdentifierCoveragePublisher(s)Original FormatOxford Dictionary of National Biography EntryPagesParticipantsPen NamePhysical DimensionsPosition End DatePosition Start DatePosition(s)Publication FrequencyOccupationSexSociety Membership End DateSociety Membership Start DateStart DateSub-Committee End DateSub-Committee Start DateTextToURLVolumeDeathBiographyBirthCommittee End DateCommittee of Management End DateCommittee of Management Start DateCommittee Start DateCommittee(s)Council End DateCouncil Start DateDateBibliographyEnd DateEvent TypeFromImage SourceInteractive TimelineIssueLocationMembersNgram DateNgram TextFilesTags
401https://historysoa.com/items/show/401The Author, Vol. 20 Issue 04 (January 1910)<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+20+Issue+04+%28January+1910%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 20 Issue 04 (January 1910)</a><a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027638405" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027638405</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a>1910-01-01-The-Author-20-497–124<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=20">20</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1910-01-01">1910-01-01</a>419100101(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br /> WoL. XX. —No. 4. JANUARY 1, 1910. [PRICE SIXPENCE.<br /> C O N T E N T S.<br /> - PAGE |PAGE.E.<br /> Notices ... tº º is tº $ tº tº º º e s º tº e Q e º º * * * 97–98 Warmings to Musical Composers ... tº sº º tº &amp; a * * * ... 114<br /> Committee Notes * * * tº º º e e sº * * * tº e º tº º º tº gº º 9S Stamping Music ... tº º º E ºn e tº e tº £ 6 tº * = e • * * ... 114<br /> Books published by Members of the Society ... ... ... 101 The Reading Branch ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 114<br /> Books published in America by Members... g º º e º e ... 103 “The Author’’ ... * * * &amp; Q &amp; &amp; e e &amp; ſº tº e º º tº a tº ... 114<br /> Literary, Dramatic and Musical Notes ... tº a º * * * ... 103 Remittances * * * * &amp; Cº. $ &amp; © * * * tº e º ... ... ... 114<br /> Paris Notes tº # 6. a ſº a tº &amp; tº tº tº ºn * c tº tº º º g sº tº ... 106 General Notes ..., * * * * is tº &amp; º e tº gº &amp; * * * ſº e º ... 113<br /> The Sub-Committee on the Price of Novels gº tº e * * * ... 107 Committee Election ... * e g tº * * * * * * e is tº * * * ... 113<br /> A Publishing Transaction e e e 9 p &amp; * * * * * g. ... 109 The Pension Fund Committee 115<br /> Libel without Intent ... tº a º tº e &amp; * * * e s &amp; * * * ... 110 United States Notes ... tº º q 116<br /> Paying Quarterly and on Demand ... tº º º tº e º e is tº ... I&#039;ll Difficulty in Writing ... 4 g = * * g. * &amp; * a s e * * * ... 117<br /> The Berlin Convention tº a º * &amp; ºt &amp; B &amp; * * * tº º º ... ll? The Reviewer and His Little Ways... * = &amp; tº e º tº tº º ... 119<br /> How to Use the Society ... ... ... ... ... ... 113 The Literary Year Book ... ... ... ... ... ... 121<br /> Warnings to the Producers of Books tº º º * = &amp; e s g ... 113 An Editor&#039;s Chair sº a tº © tº º gº º º tº a 4. tº € 9. tº Aº º ... 122<br /> Warnings to Dramatic Authors &amp; º º * * * * * e tº º &amp; ... 113 Fiction Through the Ages ... tº g º tº º º * &amp; &amp; tº # 4 ... 123<br /> Registration of Scenarios and Original Plays ... * * * ... 114 Correspondence ... tº tº º tº e 124<br /> PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.<br /> 1. The Annual Report for the current year, 1s.<br /> 2. The Author. Published ten months in the year (August and September omitted), devoted especially<br /> to the protection and maintenance of Literary, Dramatic, and Musical Property. Issued<br /> to all Members gratis. Price to non-members, 6d., or 5s. 6d. per annum, post free. Back<br /> numbers from 1892, at 10s. 6d. per vol.<br /> 3. Literature and the Pension List. By W. MORRIS COLLES, Barrister-at-Law. 3s.<br /> 4. The History of the Société des Gens de Lettres. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. 18.<br /> 5. The Cost of Production. (Out of print.)<br /> 6. The Various Methods of Publication. By S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE. In this work, compiled from the<br /> papers in the Society’s offices, the various forms of agreements proposed by Publishers to<br /> Authors are examined, and their meaning carefully explained, with an account of the<br /> various kinds of fraud which have been made possible by the different clauses therein. 3s.<br /> Addenda to the Above. By G. HERBERT THRING. Being additional facts collected at<br /> the office of the Society since the publication of the “Methods.” With comments and<br /> advice. 2s.<br /> 7. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition of Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill of 1890. With<br /> Extracts from the Report of the Commission of 1878, the Berne Convention, and the<br /> American Copyright Bill. By J. M. LELY. 18. 6d.<br /> 8. The Society of Authors. A Record of its Action from its Foundation. By WALTER BESANT<br /> (Chairman of Committee, 1888–1892). 1s.<br /> 9. The Contract of Publication in Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Switzerland. By ERNST<br /> LUNGE, J.U.D. 2s. 6d.<br /> 10. Forms of Agreement issued by the Publishers&#039; Association; with Comments. By<br /> G. HERBERT THRING, and Illustrative Examples by Sir WALTER BESANT. 2nd Edition. 18.<br /> 11. Periodicals and their Contributors. Giving the Terms on which the different Magazines<br /> and Periodicals deal with MSS. and Contributions. 6d.<br /> 12. Society of Authors. List of Members. Published October, 1907, price 6d.<br /> [All prices net. Apply to the Secretary, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s Gale, S. W.]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#474) ################################################<br /> <br /> ll<br /> * *<br /> AD VERTISEMENTS.<br /> (i,je surietn uf Aufburg (jnrurpuraten).<br /> Telegraphic Address : “A UTORIDAD, LONDON.”<br /> SIR ROBERT ANDERSON, K.C.B.<br /> SIR WM. REYNELL ANSON, Bart., D.C.L.<br /> THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD AVE-<br /> J. M. BARRIE. [BURY, P.C.<br /> SIR ALFRED BATEMAN, K.C.M.G.<br /> ROBERT BATEMAN.<br /> F. E. BEDDARD, F.R.S.<br /> THE RIGHT HON. AUGUSTINE BIR-<br /> RELL, P.C.<br /> MRS. E. NESBIT BLAND.<br /> THE REV. PROF. BONNEY, F.R.S.<br /> THE RIGHT HON. JAMES BRYCE, P.C.<br /> THE RIGHT HON. THE LORD BURGH-<br /> CLERE, P.C. -<br /> HALL CAIN E. ... -<br /> J. W. COMYNS CARR.<br /> EGERTON CASTLE, F.S.A. - -<br /> S. L. CLEMENS (“MARK TWAIN ?).<br /> EDWARD CLODD.<br /> W. MORRIS COLLES.<br /> THE HON, JOHN COLLIER,<br /> SIR. W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br /> THE EIGHT HON. THE LORD CURZON<br /> OF KEDLESTON, P.C.<br /> COMIMITTEE<br /> SIR ALFRED BATEMAN, K.C.M.G.<br /> MRS. E. NESBIT BLAND.<br /> J. W. COMYINS CARR.<br /> DOUGLAS FRESHFIELD.<br /> Chairman—SIR ARTHUR PINERO.<br /> H. GRAN VILLE BARKER.<br /> J. M. BARRIE.<br /> R. C. CARTON.<br /> MISS CICELY HAMILTON.<br /> PENSION FUND<br /> ANSTEY GUTFIRIE.<br /> ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS,<br /> PRESIDENT.<br /> TIEICTMC-ALS IH_A_IERIDY -<br /> COUNCIL.<br /> AUSTIN DOBSON.<br /> SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE.<br /> A. W. DUBOURG.<br /> DOUGLAS FRESHFIELD.<br /> SIR. W. S. GILBERT.<br /> EDMUND GOSSE, I.L.D.<br /> SYDNEY GRUNDY.<br /> H. RIDER HAGGARD,<br /> MRs. HARRISON (“LUCAS MALET&quot;).<br /> ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS,<br /> E. W. HORN UNG. -<br /> MAURICE HEWLETT.<br /> W. W. JACOBS.<br /> JEROME K. J EROMF.<br /> HENRY ARTHUR JONES.<br /> J. SCOTT KELTIE, LL.D.<br /> RUDYARD RIPLING.<br /> SIR EDWIN RAY LAN KESTER, F.R.S.<br /> THE REv. W. J. LOFTIE, F.S.A.<br /> THE RIGHT HON, SIR ALFRED<br /> LYALL, P.C.<br /> LADY LUGARD (MISS FLORA L.<br /> SHAW). -<br /> MRs. MAxw ELL (M. E. BRADDON).<br /> Chairman—MAURICE HEWLETT.<br /> W. W. JACOBS.<br /> ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br /> G. BERNARD SHAW.<br /> JEROME K. J.EROME.<br /> W. J. LOCKE.<br /> CAPT. ROBERT MARSHALL.<br /> CECIL RALEIGH.<br /> Chairman—MAURICE HEWLETT.<br /> MORLEY ROBERTS.<br /> M. H. SPIELMANN.<br /> Telephone No. : 374 Victoria.<br /> JUSTIN MCCARTHY.<br /> THE REV. C. H. MIDDLETON-WAKE.<br /> SIR HENRY NORMAN, M.P.<br /> SI R GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br /> SIR ARTEIUR PIN ERO.<br /> THE RIGHT HON. SIR HORACE<br /> PLUNKETT, K.P.<br /> ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br /> OWEN SEAMAN.<br /> G. BERNAlt D SHAW.<br /> G. R. SIMS.<br /> S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br /> FRANCIS STORR.<br /> SIR CHARLES WILLIERS STANFORD,<br /> Mus. Doc.<br /> WILLIAM MOY THOMAS.<br /> MRS. HUMPHRY WARD,<br /> PERCY WHITE.<br /> FIELD-MARSHAL THE RIGHT HON.<br /> THE WISCOUNT Wor,3HLEY, K.P.,<br /> P.C., &amp;c.<br /> SIDNEY WEBE.<br /> H. G. WELLS.<br /> OF MANAGEMENT.<br /> S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br /> FRANCIS STORR.<br /> SIDNEY WEBB.<br /> IDRAIMIATIC SUB-COIVIIVIITTEE.<br /> Vice-Chairman–HENRY ARTHUR JONES.<br /> G. BERNARD SHAW.<br /> ALFRED SUTRO.<br /> COMIMITTEE.<br /> MRS. ALEC TWEEDIE.<br /> MRS, HUMPHRY WARD.<br /> COPYRIGHT SUB-COMMITTEE.<br /> HAROLD HARDY.<br /> ANTHONY HOPE HAWKINS.<br /> E. J. MACGILLIVRAY.<br /> THE HON. JOHN COLLIER.<br /> SIR. W. MARTIN CONWAY.<br /> SIR GILBERT PARKER, M.P.<br /> SIR CHARLES WILLIERS STANFORD,<br /> Mus. Doc.<br /> ART.<br /> JOHN HASSALL, R.I.<br /> J. G. MILLAIS.<br /> FIELD, ROSCO E &amp; Co., 36, Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields, W.C. 4 &amp;<br /> G. HERBERT THEING, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s Gate, S.W. Solicitors.<br /> OFFICES.<br /> HERBERT SULLIVAN.<br /> SIR. JAMES YOXALL, M.P.<br /> ARTHUR RACKHAM.<br /> M. H. SPIELMANN.<br /> Secretary—G. H IGRBERT THRING,<br /> Solicitor in England to<br /> La Société des Gems de Lettres,<br /> 39, OLD QUEEN STREET, Sºrokhºy’s GATE, S.W.<br /> TYPEYº FITION. Gr<br /> ALL KINDS FROM 9d. PER 1,000.<br /> Playwrights&#039;, Clergymen&#039;s, &amp;c., MSS.<br /> Authors’,<br /> correctly and efficiently executed.<br /> Good Work combined with cheapness and quickness.<br /> Good References.<br /> SEND A SMALL ORDER NOW 1<br /> MISS RMLLING, 176, Loughborough Rd., London, S.W.<br /> In English, French, or German.<br /> TYPE WRITING,<br /> AUTHORS, MSS. meatly and accurately copied, 9d. per<br /> 1,000 words, including carbon copy.<br /> Also General Copying, Plays, Actors&#039; Parts, etc.<br /> Miss B. KERRY,<br /> Rohilla,<br /> Carshalton, Surrey.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#475) ################################################<br /> <br /> (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br /> FOUNDED BY SHR<br /> Monthly.)<br /> WALTER BESANT.<br /> WOL. XX.-No. 4.<br /> JANUARY 1st, 1910.<br /> [PRICE SIXPENCE.<br /> TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br /> 374 VICTORIA.<br /> TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br /> AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> NOTICES.<br /> —t—º-t—<br /> OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br /> signed or initialled the authors alone are<br /> responsible. None of the papers or para-<br /> graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br /> of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br /> to be the case.<br /> THE Editor begs to inform members of the<br /> Authors’ Society and other readers of The Author<br /> that the cases which are quoted in The Author are<br /> cases that have come before the notice or to the<br /> knowledge of the Secretary of the Society, and that<br /> those members of the Society who desire to have<br /> the names of the publishers concerned can obtain<br /> them on application.<br /> ADVERTISEMENTS.<br /> As there seems to be an impression among<br /> readers of The Author that the committee are<br /> personally responsible for the bona fides of the<br /> advertisers, the committee desire it to be stated<br /> that this is not, and could not possibly be, the case.<br /> Although care is exercised that no undesirable<br /> advertisements be inserted, they do not accept, and<br /> never have accepted, any liability.<br /> Members should apply to the secretary for advice<br /> if special information is desired.<br /> * *—a<br /> w-v- vºy<br /> THE SOCIETY&#039;S FUNDS.<br /> —º–sº-0–<br /> ROM time to time members of the Society<br /> desire to make donations to its funds in<br /> recognition of work that has been done for<br /> them. The committee, acting on the suggestion<br /> WOL. XX.<br /> of one of these members, have decided to place<br /> this permanent paragraph in The Author in order<br /> that members may be cognisant of those funds to<br /> which these contributions may be paid.<br /> The funds suitable for this purpose are : (1) The<br /> Capital Fund. This fund is kept in reserve in<br /> oase it is necessary for the Society to incur heavy<br /> expenditure, either in fighting a question of prin-<br /> ciple, or in assisting to obtain copyright reform,<br /> or in dealing with any other matter closely<br /> connected with the work of the Society.<br /> (2) The Pension Fund. This fund is slowly<br /> increasing, and it is hoped will, in time, cover the<br /> needs of all the members of the Society.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> LIST OF MEMBERS.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> HE List of Members of the Society of Authors,<br /> published October, 1907, can now be obtained<br /> at the offices of the Society at the price of<br /> 6d., post free 7#d. It includes elections to July,<br /> 1907, and will be sold to members and associates<br /> of the Society only.<br /> A dozen blank pages have been added at the<br /> end of the list for the convenience of those who<br /> desire to add future elections as they are chronicled<br /> from month to month in these pages.<br /> —e—sº-0–<br /> PENSION FUND.<br /> —e-º-o-<br /> N the 5th of February, 1909, the Trustees of<br /> the Pension Fund of the Society, after<br /> the secretary had placed before them the<br /> financial position of the Fund, decided to invest<br /> 3350 in the purchase of Corporation of London<br /> 2} per cent. Stock (1927–57).<br /> The amount purchased is £438<br /> added to the list printed below.<br /> The Trustees are glad to report that owing to<br /> the generous answer to the circular sent round at<br /> the end of 1908, they have been able to invest<br /> 2s. 4d., and is<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#476) ################################################<br /> <br /> 98 THE AUTHOR.<br /> more than £100 over the amount invested in<br /> 1907.<br /> Consols 24%.................... . . . . . . . . . . 31,000 0 0<br /> Local Loans .............................. 500 () ()<br /> Victorian Government 3% Consoli-<br /> dated Inscribed Stock ............... 291. 19 11<br /> War Loan ................................. 201 9 3<br /> London and North-Western 3% Deben-<br /> ture Stock .............................. 250 0 ()<br /> Egyptian Government Irrigation<br /> Trust 4% Certificates ............... 200 0 0<br /> Cape of Good Hope 33% Inscribed<br /> Stock .................................... 200 () ()<br /> Glasgow and South-Western Railway<br /> 4% Preference Stock.................. 228 () ()<br /> New Zealand 34% Stock. . . . . . . . ... 247 9 6<br /> Irish Land Act 23% Guaranteed Stock 258 0 0<br /> Corporation of London 25% Stock,<br /> 1927–57 .............................. 4.38 2 4.<br /> Total ............... #3,815 1 0<br /> Subscriptions.<br /> 1909.<br /> April 13, Gask, Miss Lilian &amp;<br /> May 17, Rorison, Miss Edith<br /> June 10, Voynich, Mrs. E. L.<br /> June 11, Grier, Mrs. Julia M.<br /> June 11, Field, C. . &amp; º<br /> June 11, Barrington, Mrs. Russell<br /> July 8, Burmester, Miss Frances<br /> July 9, Grindrod, Dr. G. F.<br /> July 10, Hargrave, Mrs. Basil<br /> Aug. 5, Stott, M. D. . tº<br /> Oct. 15, Greig, James<br /> Oct. 15, Jacomb, A. E.<br /> Oct. 16, Hepburn, Thomas<br /> Oct. 16, Trevelyan, G. M. .<br /> Oct. 16, “Haddon Hall”<br /> Oct. 22, Jessup, A. E. © º<br /> Oct. 25, Whishaw, Mrs. Bernhard<br /> Nov. 5, Dixon, A. Francis .<br /> Nov. 6, Helledoren, J.<br /> Dec. 4, Tearle, Christian<br /> Dec. 9, Tyrell, Miss Eleanor .<br /> Dec. 17, Somerville, Miss Edith CE.<br /> Donations.<br /> 1909.<br /> Jan. 1, Sprigge, Dr. S. S. .<br /> April 5, Burchell, Sidney H.<br /> April 15, Linton, C. Stuart<br /> April 19, Loraine, Lady . e e<br /> April 19, Durand, Sir Henry Mortimer<br /> April 20, Stephens, Riccardo ©<br /> May 24, Lefroy, Mrs. C. P.<br /> June 2, “Olivia Ramsey’”<br /> ;I<br /> 1<br /> II<br /> June 7, Horne, A. B.<br /> June 10, Muir, Ward<br /> June 10, Swan, Miss Myra<br /> June 17, Bradley, A. C.<br /> June 22, Trotére, H. .<br /> July 8, Harland, Mrs. o<br /> July 8, Sinclair, Miss May .<br /> Aug. 5, Cameron, Mrs. Charlotte &amp;<br /> Sept. 10, Hinkson, Katharine Tynan .<br /> Oct. 16, Hodson, Miss A. L. e<br /> Oct. 16, Wasteneys, Lady .<br /> Oct. 18, Bell, Mrs. G. H. §<br /> Nov. 3, Turnbull, Mrs. Peveril .<br /> Nov. 4, George, W. L. e<br /> Nov. 25, Tench, Miss Mary<br /> Dec. 1, Shedlock, Miss<br /> T}ec. 3, Esmohd, H. W.<br /> Dec. 9, Hewlett, Maurice . e<br /> Dec. 17, Reynolds, Mrs. Baillie .<br /> Dec. 17, Martin, Miss Violet<br /> All fresh subscribers and donors previous to<br /> April, 1909, have been deleted from the present<br /> announcement.<br /> The names of those subscribers and donors which<br /> are not included in the lists printed above are<br /> unavoidably held over to the next issue.<br /> 5<br /> I<br /> 1<br /> 1<br /> 2<br /> COMMITTEE NOTES.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> HE committee of management met for the<br /> last time, in 1909, on December 6, at 39,<br /> Old Queen Street. The minutes of the<br /> last meeting were read and signed. The com-<br /> mittee then proceeded to elect 31 members and<br /> associates, bringing the total elections for the year<br /> up to 298. This is an increase of 50 over the<br /> largest annual election to the Society since its<br /> foundation. The committee desire to congratulate<br /> the members on the increasing vitality of the<br /> Society. Four resignations brought the total<br /> number of resignations for the year up to 79.<br /> The next matter that came before the committee<br /> was the circular issued by some of the lending<br /> libraries, and a letter received from the Publishers&#039;<br /> Association setting out the resolutions passed by<br /> that body. A letter from Mr. Edmund Gosse which<br /> appeared in the Times was also considered, with<br /> several other letters from members. The chairman,<br /> after some discussion, placed before the committee<br /> a resolution he had drafted for the committee&#039;s<br /> consideration.<br /> The resolution in its final shape was passed<br /> unanimously, and is as follows:–<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#477) ################################################<br /> <br /> TISIES A CITISIOR,<br /> 99<br /> “The committee of management of the Society of<br /> Authors have considered the letter addressed by the<br /> circulating libraries to the Publishers&#039; Association and the<br /> Press. They observe upon it that it is in the discretion of<br /> the libraries to select what books they will offer to their<br /> customers, and that in point of fact this has always been<br /> done. The committee regard the demand for delay of<br /> publication to enable the libraries to make their selection<br /> as unwarrantable, and they cannot advise the publishers to<br /> assent to any such condition.<br /> “They are ready at all times to delegate to a sub-<br /> committee the duty of conferring with a similar body<br /> deputed by the Publishers’ Association, and will be pre-<br /> pared to receive through that body and consider any<br /> further representation which the Libraries’ Association<br /> may desire to make.”<br /> The secretary was instructed to forward it to the<br /> daily Press with a covering letter. The committee<br /> feel that the matter may become one of vital<br /> importance, and that they may be bound, if further<br /> action is taken, to consult all the members and<br /> to ascertain their opinion by referendum. In the<br /> meantime they have taken measures to appoint<br /> certain members of the society, under the presidency<br /> of Mr. Maurice Hewlett, chairman of the committee,<br /> to meet, if necessary, a sub-committee of the<br /> Publishers’ Association. After the meeting between<br /> these two bodies it will be easier for the committee<br /> to decide upon their future action.<br /> The next question before the committee was also<br /> one of importance. The chairman laid before the<br /> committee a letter which he had written to the<br /> Times in regard to the British Academy. The<br /> matter, after some discussion, was adjourned until<br /> the January meeting.<br /> Mr. Sidney Lee sent in the resignation of his<br /> Seat on the committee, stating that while he was<br /> greatly interested in the work, he felt that he<br /> Ought not to continue on the committee in view of<br /> the fact that he could not give to it the time<br /> and labour which it deserved. The committee,<br /> empowered under the constitution to fill up occa-<br /> Sional vacancies, asked Mr. W. W. Jacobs to<br /> undertake the duties of committee man, and he<br /> has kindly consented to do so.<br /> It was decided, in accordance with the statement<br /> printed in another column, that the names of<br /> candidates for election to the committee should be<br /> returnable on or before Tuesday, February 15.<br /> Mr. Anthony Hope Hawkins, the committee&#039;s<br /> nominee to the Pension Fund Committee, resigned<br /> in due course and was unanimously re-elected.<br /> The notice in respect of the election of the society&#039;s<br /> nominee to the same committee is set out in another<br /> column.<br /> Mr. Arthur Rackham and Mr. Francis Storr<br /> were appointed a sub-committee to settle the<br /> Report, which will be in the hands of the members<br /> in the early months of 1910. The committee<br /> decided to increase the salary of the head clerk by<br /> 5s. per week.<br /> The secretary laid before the committee a copy<br /> of the letter, which had already appeared in the<br /> |papers, from the Dramatic Sub-Committee of the<br /> Society on the censorship report. The committee<br /> agreed also to issue a circular, if the Dramatic Sub-<br /> Committee should so desire, with a view to calling<br /> a conference of the dramatists of the society.<br /> The Sub-Committee on the Price of Novels,<br /> having collected certain evidence on the question<br /> under their investigation, presented to the com-<br /> mittee of management an interim report based<br /> upon that evidence. The committee expressed<br /> their thanks to the sub-committee for the care<br /> which they had shown in dealing with the matter<br /> and Ordered the report to be printed in the columns<br /> of The Author. The committee sanctioned the<br /> purchase of a new typewriter for the office and an<br /> extension of the telephone service to the secretary&#039;s<br /> office.<br /> The first case which came before the com-<br /> mittee related to a literary libel. The work of<br /> a member of the society had been translated into<br /> German without his authority, and with consider-<br /> able alterations. Unfortunately, the writer had<br /> sold his copyright to the British publisher, but the<br /> committee were advised by the society&#039;s lawyer in<br /> Germany that this did not preclude him from<br /> taking action against the delinquent. The com-<br /> mittee decided to take up the case.<br /> The secretary then reported the settlement of a<br /> dramatic infringement which had been taken up<br /> on the authority of the chairman. As it might<br /> have been necessary to apply for an injunction,<br /> the chairman had authorised proceedings without<br /> reference to the committee. The secretary read<br /> to the committee a letter of thanks from the mem-<br /> ber on the satisfactory settlement of the dispute.<br /> The next case was also a dramatic case, and the<br /> member claimed accounts and money under an<br /> agreement for the performance of his work. This<br /> matter also the committee agreed to take up.<br /> Following these cases was one of an infringement<br /> of an author&#039;s copyright by a paper in San<br /> Francisco which had printed the work without<br /> authority. The committee decided to commence<br /> action for damages, and instructed the secretary to<br /> place the matter in the hands of a lawyer in that<br /> city.<br /> fº last question was one which the committee<br /> were asked to take to the Court of Appeal. The<br /> details of the case had been placed before the<br /> committee on a former occasion, when the com-<br /> mittee, after close investigation of the papers,<br /> decided not to take the matter up. The case was<br /> subsequently heard and a verdict given against the<br /> plaintiff. The committee adjourned the matter to<br /> the January meeting, when further information<br /> and further particulars are expected.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#478) ################################################<br /> <br /> 100<br /> TRIES A UTFIOIR,<br /> DRAMATIC SUB-COMMITTEE.<br /> The Dramatic Sub-Committee of the Society of<br /> Authors met on Tuesday, December 7, at the<br /> offices of the society.<br /> The Repertory Agreement was laid before the<br /> committee once more, and was gone through<br /> clause by clause. Some slight alterations and<br /> additions were made and the secretary was<br /> instructed to incorporate these in the Agree-<br /> ment and to submit the completed document<br /> to the sub-committee at their next meeting in<br /> January. -<br /> A suggestion relating to the summoning of<br /> a Conference of Dramatic Authors was, after<br /> considerable discussion, adjourned till the next<br /> meeting.<br /> SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE PRICE OF NOVELS.<br /> A MEETING of this sub-committee was held on<br /> Thursday, December 2.<br /> The secretary reported the receipt of a large<br /> mass of evidence from the booksellers, and of<br /> further evidence from novelists in answer to the<br /> circular letters.<br /> The sub-committee then considered the interim<br /> report which had been drafted by the chairman.<br /> After a few verbal alterations had been made, the<br /> report was settled, and appears, in its final form, in<br /> another page of this month&#039;s Author. As stated in<br /> the report, it has not yet been possible to issue any<br /> exhaustive survey of the subject. This must, of<br /> necessity, be deferred till the receipt of the further<br /> evidence which is expected in February. The sub-<br /> committee will, at that date, consider all the<br /> evidence from authors, which will by then have<br /> been arranged and tabulated, together with the<br /> evidence from booksellers (which needs most care-<br /> ful classification), and also the further evidence of<br /> the publishers.<br /> Cases.<br /> DURING the past month sixteen cases have been<br /> placed in the secretary&#039;s hands for settlement.<br /> The majority of these, as is usual, refer to<br /> claims for money. There are six under this<br /> heading. Two have been placed in the hands of<br /> the Society&#039;s solicitors, as it was impossible to get<br /> any satisfactory reply. In two the money has been<br /> paid and forwarded to the members. The remain-<br /> ing two are, as yet, unsatisfied, but they have only<br /> recently come into the office. Of three claims for<br /> accounts, one has been carried through, while the<br /> other two are still in the course of negotiation.<br /> The publishers have promised delivery. Of four<br /> cases for the recovery of MSS., one case has been<br /> successful ; in the other three no answers have, as<br /> yet, been received. One case of infringement of<br /> copyright is still in the course of negotiation. It<br /> will, most probably, terminate satisfactorily, but<br /> the infringer adopts an injured attitude. It<br /> happens not infrequently, when the infringement<br /> has been committed by a colonial or a provincial<br /> paper, that the editor feels hurt that the author is<br /> not delighted at the gratis advertisement which he<br /> receives. It may be a satisfactory advertisement<br /> or it may not, but it must lie with the author to<br /> decide whether or not he is willing to have such<br /> a gratis advertisement made by the use of<br /> his property. Editors must not take this for<br /> granted.<br /> There have been two disputes as to the proper<br /> reading of agreements. These cases, like questions<br /> of infringement of copyright, take some time to<br /> settle.<br /> Eight of the cases from former months still<br /> remain open. Five of these refer to matters abroad<br /> or in the colonies, and are likely to be open for<br /> some time to come owing to the delay in obtaining<br /> answers to letters. Three refer to the return of<br /> MSS. We have mentioned, frequently, in The<br /> Author, the reason why there is often much<br /> difficulty in obtaining satisfaction in these<br /> C8,SéS.<br /> December Elections.<br /> Allinson, Alfred 13, Claremont Ter-<br /> race, Exmouth.<br /> 4, Melbury Road,<br /> Kensington, W.<br /> Broad Meadow, King&#039;s<br /> Bagehot, Mrs. Walter<br /> Bantock, Granville .<br /> Norton.<br /> Beal, N. W. Roseneath, Queen<br /> Street, Hammer-<br /> Smith, W.<br /> Burn-Murdoch, W. G. Northfield, Berwick-<br /> (“Levensis”) shire ; Arthur<br /> Lodge, Dalkeith<br /> Road, Edinburgh.<br /> 7, Havelock Road,<br /> Croydon.<br /> Alton, Hants.<br /> 170, Kennington Park<br /> Road, S.E.<br /> 411, Argyle Road,<br /> Brooklyn, New<br /> York, U.S.A.<br /> Eagle Heart Incorporated<br /> O.<br /> Earland, Miss Ada<br /> Everett, Miss Ethel F.<br /> Grisewood, R. Norman<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#479) ################################################<br /> <br /> TFIES A CITISIOR.<br /> 101<br /> Hales, A. G. . e Authors’ Club, 2,<br /> Whitehall Court,<br /> S.W.<br /> Harrison, Frederic, LL.D., Elm Hill, Hawk-<br /> Litt.D. hurst.<br /> Brookfield House,<br /> Shanbrook, Beds.<br /> Hicks, Miss Frances.<br /> Ingpen, Roger. e ©<br /> Jessel, Ernest Edward . 8,0ueen&#039;s Gardens, W.<br /> Law, Ernest . . . The Pavilion, Hamp-<br /> ton Court Palace.<br /> 90, Broadhurst Gar-<br /> dens, Hampstead,<br /> N.W.<br /> Drishame, Skibbereen,<br /> Co. Cork.<br /> Wykeham Cave, High-<br /> trees, Loughton,<br /> Essex.<br /> 17, Bryanston Street,<br /> Portman Square, W.<br /> 9, Lyon Road, Harrow.<br /> Lazarus, Miss Olga .<br /> Martin, Miss Violet (Mar-<br /> tin Ross)<br /> Newte, Horace<br /> Palmer, Miss<br /> Richardson, Harry Handel<br /> Sherren, Wilkinson . Authors’ Club, 2,<br /> Whitehall Court,<br /> S.W.<br /> Somerville, Miss Edith CE. Drishane House, Skib-<br /> bereen, Co. Cork,<br /> Ireland.<br /> 54, Lower Mount<br /> Street, Dublin.<br /> 27, Cadogan Gardens,<br /> S.W.<br /> 21, Carlisle Mansions,<br /> Victoria Street,<br /> S.W.<br /> St. Katharine&#039;s, Hook<br /> Heath, Surrey.<br /> Stephens, James<br /> Strachey, Lady<br /> Sylvan, F.<br /> Tyrrell, Eleanor .<br /> Walkey, S. . 30, Kingberry Park,<br /> - Newton Abbot,<br /> Devon.<br /> Wright, W. P. e The Grey House, Lym-<br /> inge, Folkestone.<br /> Wyndham, Horace . . Authors’ Club, S.W.<br /> Young, Filson . e . 53, Upper Brook<br /> Street, Park Lane,<br /> W.<br /> —e—º-<br /> BOOKS PUBLISHED BY MEMBERS OF<br /> THE SOCIETY.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> WHILE every effort is made by the compilers to keep<br /> this list as accurate and as exhaustive as possible, they have<br /> some difficulty in attaining this object owing to the fact<br /> that many of the books mentioned are not sent to the office<br /> by the members. In consequence, it is necessary to rely<br /> largely upon lists of books which appear in literary and<br /> other papers. It is hoped, however, that members will<br /> co-operate in the compiling of this list and, by sending<br /> particulars of their works, help to make it sabstantially<br /> aCCurate. -<br /> ARCH.EOLOGY.<br /> THE ARTS AND CRAFTs of ANCIENT Egypt.<br /> FLINDERS PETRIE, F.R.S. 73 × 53.<br /> 58. m.<br /> STONEHENGE AND OTHER BRITISH STONE MONUMENTs<br /> By W. M.<br /> 159 pp. Foulis.<br /> ASTRONOMICALLY CONSIDERED. By SIR NorMAN<br /> LOCKYER, K.C.B., F.R.S. Second edition. 9} x 6.<br /> 499 pp. Macmillan. 14s. n.<br /> ART.<br /> THE SPORT OF CIVIC LIFE, or ART AND THE MUNICI-<br /> PALITY CARICATUREs of PROMINENT CITIZENs.<br /> Articles by W. ROTHENSTEIN, F. RUTTER, and others.<br /> 94 × 74. 24 pp. Liverpool : Handley, 2d.<br /> BIOGRAPHY.<br /> US FOUR. By S. MIACNAUGHTAN. 7; x 5.<br /> Murray. 6s.<br /> THE DAUPHINES CE FRANCE.<br /> 284 pp.<br /> By FRANK HAMEL.<br /> 9 × 53. 413 pp. Stanley Paul. 16s. n.<br /> MICHAEL SERVETUs. By W. OSLER, M.D., F.R.S. 9 × 6.<br /> 35 pp. Frowde. 1s. r.<br /> DR. JOHNSON AND MIRs. THRALE. Including Mrs. Thrale&#039;s<br /> unpublished journal of the Welsh Tour made in 1774, and<br /> much hitherto unpublished Correspondence of the<br /> Streatham Coterie, by A. M. BROADLEY. With an<br /> Introductory Essay (74 pp.), by T. SECCOMBE. 9 × 53.<br /> 338 pp. Lane. 16s. n.<br /> BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG.<br /> THE DOLL&#039;s DIARY. By Rose HAIG THOMAs.<br /> trated by JOHN HASSALL. 10 × 7%. 100 pp.<br /> Richards. 5s. m.<br /> DAME THIN-PIN AND OTHER STORIES. By HELEN MAR-<br /> GARET DIXON. Illustrated by RATE MARION RATHBONE.<br /> 8+ x 6%. 214 pp. Birmingham : Cormish Bros., Ltd.<br /> THE CHILDREN’s Hou R. Nine volumes, forming a com-<br /> plete Children&#039;s Library. With an Introduction. By<br /> HALL CAINE. 83 × 5%. Cloth, £2 2s. 6d. m. ; leather,<br /> £3. 3s. 6d. m.<br /> Illus-<br /> Grant<br /> HARDING&#039;s LUCK. By E. NESBIT. 8 × 5}. 281 pp.<br /> Hodder &amp; Stoughton. 6s.<br /> BOOKS OF REFERENCE.<br /> DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY. Vol. 22.<br /> Supplement. Edited by SIDNEY LEE. 9% x 63.<br /> 1 5S. n.<br /> 1,400 pp, Smith, Elder.<br /> By E. T. Coor.<br /> ROSE GROWING MADE EASY.<br /> 204 pp. Newnes. 18, m.<br /> CLASSICAL.<br /> EURIPIDIS FABUL.E RECOGNOVIT BREVIQUE ADNOTA-<br /> TIONE CRITICA INSTRUXIT GILBERTUS MURRAY.<br /> TOMUs III. 7} x 43. (Oxford Classical Texts.)<br /> Oxford : Clarendom Press. London : Frowde. 3s. 6d. n.<br /> EDUCATION.<br /> THE MASTERY OF DESTINY. By JAMES ALLEN. 43 × 6.<br /> 120 pp. “The Light of Reason,” Ilfracombe.<br /> BRITISH PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR GIRLS. By A.<br /> ALEXANDER, F.R.G.S., and MRS. ALEXANDER. 83 ×<br /> 5%. 230 pp. McDougall&#039;s Educational Company.<br /> 10s. 6d. n.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#480) ################################################<br /> <br /> 102<br /> THE A DITISIOR,<br /> AN AFTERNOON TEA PHILOSOPHY. By W. R.TITTERTON.<br /> 6% x 4%. 95 pp. F. Palmer. 1s. 6d. m.<br /> THE G.B.S. CALENDAR : A QUOTATION FROM THE Works<br /> OF GEORGE BERNARD SHAW For EVERY DAY IN THE<br /> YEAR. Selected by MARION NIxoN. Second edition.<br /> 6# X 4%. 91 pp. Palmer. 18. n.<br /> MISC ELLANEOUS.<br /> FARTHEST FROM THE TRUTH; A Series of Dashes. By<br /> the authors of “Wisdom While you Wait,” and GEORGE<br /> MORROW. 73 × 4%. 91 pp. Sir Isaac Pitman. Is... n.<br /> BRITANNIA&#039;s CALENDAR OF HEROES. Compiled by<br /> KATE, STANWAY. With an Introduction by the Rev.<br /> the Hon. E. LYTTELTON, B.D. 73 × 5. 412 p}}.<br /> Allen. 5s. n.<br /> THE ONE LIFE. A FREE AND OCCASIONAL PAPER. By<br /> JOHN TREVOR. Horsted Keynes, Sussex.<br /> THE KILLARTAN HISTORY BOOK. By LADY GREGORY.<br /> Illustrated by R. GREGORY, 7} x 5.<br /> ls. 6d. p.<br /> THE JOURNAL OF EDUCATION. Vol. for 1909. 12 × 9.<br /> 864 pp. Rice, 7s. 6d.<br /> FICTION.<br /> WHAT LAY BENEATH. By “COO-EE.” (WILLIAM SYLVES-<br /> TER WALKER). 301 pp. Ouseley. 6s.<br /> THE EDUCATION OF UNCLE PAUL. By ALGERNON BLACK-<br /> WOOD. 8 × 5}. 348 pp. Macmillan. 6s.<br /> ORDINARY PEOPLE. By UNA L. SILBERRAD.<br /> 420 pp. Constable. 6s.<br /> THE KING&#039;s MIGNON. By J. BLOUNDELLE BURTON.<br /> 8 × 5. 316 pp. Everett. 6s.<br /> PRINCE MADOG, DISCOVERER OF AMERICA : A Legendary<br /> 7; x 5.<br /> Story. By JOAN DANE. Illustrated by A. S. BOYD.<br /> 8% × 5. 222 pp. Stock. 68.<br /> THE DISC. By J. B. HARRIS-BURLAND. 73 × 5.<br /> Greening, 6s.<br /> DON Q&#039;s LOVE STORY. By K. and HESKETH PRICHARD.<br /> 73 x 5. 312 pp. Greening. 6s.<br /> THE KNIGHT OF THE GOLDEN SWORD.<br /> BARRINGTON. Chatto &amp; Windus. 6s.<br /> 318 pp.<br /> By MICHAEL<br /> THE ANNE QUEEN&#039;S CHRONICLE. By REGINALD FARRER.<br /> 7} x 43. 363 pp. Alston Rivers. 63.<br /> THEODORA&#039;s HUSBAND. By Lou ISE MACK.<br /> 329 pp. Alston Rivers. 6s.<br /> HARUM SCARUM&#039;S FORTUNE.<br /> 5. 312 pp. Jarrold. 3s. 6d.<br /> MIGNON&#039;S PERIL. By JEAN MIDDLEMASS.<br /> 304 pp. Digby, Long, 68.<br /> º<br /> 7% × 5.<br /> By ESME STUART. 73 ×<br /> 7% × 5.<br /> GARDENING.<br /> MoSTHLY GLEANINGS IN A SCOTTISH GARDEN. By<br /> L. H. Soutar. 5. 192 pp. Unwin. 6s.<br /> 7% × 5.<br /> EHISTORY.<br /> A HISTORY OF SARAWAK UNDER ITS Two WHITE<br /> RAJAHS, 1839–1908. By S. BARING-GOULD and C. A.<br /> BAMPFYLDE, F.R.G.S., late President of Sarawak.<br /> 9 × 5%, 464 pp. Sotheran. 153. m.<br /> THE MAKING OF IRELAND AND ITS UNDOING, 1200–<br /> 1600. By ALICE STOPFORD GREEN. 9 × 53. 573 pp.<br /> Macmillan. 10s, m.<br /> JUVENILE.<br /> THE LIMBERSNIGS : THE ADVENTURES OF PRINCE<br /> KEBOLE THE TALL. By FLORA and LANCELOT SPEED.<br /> London : Lawrence &amp; Jellicoe, Ltd. 3s. 6d.<br /> CINDERELLA. By E. NESBIT. 64 × 4}. 38 pp. Sidg-<br /> wick &amp; Jackson. 6d. n.<br /> A GIRL OF THE FOURTH The Story of an Unpopular<br /> Schoolgirl. By A. M. IRVINE. 73 × 53. 332 pp.<br /> Partridge. 2s. 6d.<br /> BRAVE SONS OF THE EMPIRE. By H. C. MooRE.<br /> 8 × 5%. 251 pp. R. T. S. 28. -<br /> A LITTLE FLEET. By JACK B. YEATs. 7 × 4}. Elkin<br /> Mathews. I s. n.<br /> FOR THE SAKE OF KITTY. By CHRISTINA GowANS<br /> WHYT.E. 7# x 5}. 348 pp, Collins. 3s. 6d.<br /> I,ITERARY.<br /> QUESTIONINGS ON CRITICISM AND BEAUTY. By the<br /> Right Honourable A. J. BALFOUR. Delivered in the<br /> Sheldonian Theatre, November 24th, 1909. (The<br /> Romances Lecture, 1909.) Oxford : Clarendon Press.<br /> London : Frowde. 2s. n.<br /> BETWEEN COLLEGE TERMS.<br /> NARD. 8 × 53. 271 pp.<br /> By CONSTANCE L. MAY-<br /> Nisbet. 5s. In.<br /> 52 pp. Maunsell.<br /> MUSIC.<br /> THE GATHERING SONG OF BLACK DONALD. From the<br /> Poem by Sir Walter Scott. Composed by JAMES<br /> M. GALLATLY. Keith Prowse &amp; Co., Ltd. 23. m.<br /> THE RHYTHM OF MODERN MUSIC. By C. F. ABDy<br /> WILLIAMS. 8 × 5%. 321 pp. Macmillan. 5s.<br /> NATURAL HISTORY.<br /> THE BOOK OF FLOWERS. By KATHERINE TYNAN AND<br /> FRANCES MAITLAND. 8 × 5}, 319 pp. Smith, Elder<br /> &amp; Co. 68. n. .<br /> PAMPHILETS.<br /> THE UNIVERSITY AND THE STUDY OF WAR. An Inaugural<br /> Lecture delivered before the University of Oxford,<br /> November 27, 1909. By SPENCER WILKINSON, Chichele<br /> Professor of Military History. Oxford : Clarendon Press.<br /> London : Frowde. 1s. m.<br /> WoRKING Wom EN AND THE POOR LAw. By B. L.<br /> HUTCEIINSON. Women&#039;s Industrial Council. Id.<br /> POETRY.<br /> A SONG OF THE ENGLISH. By RUDYARD RIPLING.<br /> Illustrated by W. HEATH ROBINSON, 113 x 9. Hodder<br /> &amp; Stoughton. 158, n.<br /> HARVESTING. By H. M. WAITHMAN, 7 x 4%. 134 pp.<br /> Kegan Paul. 3s. 6d. n.<br /> TIME&#039;s LAUGHINGSTOCKS, AND OTHER VERSEs. By<br /> THOMAS HARDY. 73 × 5. 206 pp. Macmillan. 4s. 6d. n.<br /> ENGLAND, AND OTHER POEMs. By LAURENCE BINYon.<br /> 73 × 5. 88 pp. Flkin Mathews. 3s. 6d. m.<br /> THE BORDER BREED. GEORGICS AND PASTORALS AND<br /> OTHER POEMS. By SIR GEORGE DOUGLAS, BART.<br /> 8 × 53. 448 pp. The St. Catherine Press. 3s. 6d. in.<br /> POLITICAL.<br /> THE HINDRANCES To Good CITIZENSHIP. By JAMES<br /> (Yale Lectures on the<br /> New Haven : Yale<br /> 68. n.<br /> BRYCE. 73 × 5}. 138 pp.<br /> Responsibilities of Citizenship.)<br /> University Press. London : Frowde.<br /> PSYCHICA.L.<br /> HERE AND HEREAFTER (APRES LA MORT). BY LÉON<br /> DENIS. Translated by GEORGE G. FLEUROT. W. Rider<br /> &amp; Son, 164, Aldersgate Street, E.C.<br /> REPRINTS.<br /> THE POCKET CARLYLE. Edited by ROSE GARDNER.<br /> 7 x 44, 264 pp. Routledge. 38. 6d. n.<br /> BosweLL&#039;s JoHNSON. Edited by ROGER INGPEN. Bicen-<br /> tenary Extra-Illustrated Edition. Parts 10, 11, &amp; 12.<br /> 10 × 7, 657–832. Sir Isaac Pitman. 6d. In each.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#481) ################################################<br /> <br /> TISIES A UITPSIOR.<br /> 103<br /> SCIENCE.<br /> CHARLES DARWIN AND THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES. By<br /> E. B. POULTON, D.Sc. 94 × 6. 362 pp. Longmans.<br /> 7s. 6d. n.<br /> ALL THE WORLD&#039;s AIRSHIPs, AEROPLANES, AND<br /> DIRIGIBLES. Founded and edited by FRED T. JANE,<br /> with a special chapter on “Aerial Engineering.” By<br /> CHARLES DE GRAVE SELLs, M. Inst. C.E. 73 × 12%.<br /> 374 pp. Sampson Low. 21s. n.<br /> SOCIOLOGY.<br /> THE GREAT IDEA : Notes by an Eye-witness on some of<br /> the Social Work of the Salvation Army. By ARNOLD<br /> WHITE. 73 × 53. 161 pp. Salvation Army, 101,<br /> Queen Victoria Street, E.C.<br /> SPORT.<br /> LIGHT COME, LIGHT Go. By RALPEI NEVILL. 9 × 53.<br /> 448 pp. Macmillan. 15s. n.<br /> THIEOLOGY.<br /> PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGION. Six Lectures delivered at<br /> Cambridge. By HASTINGS RASHDALL. 7% x 5. 189 pp.<br /> Duckworth. 2s. 6d. n.<br /> THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN SPEECH. By the late<br /> R. F. WEYMOUTH. Edited and Partly Revised by<br /> E. HAMPDEN-COOK. Third Edition (Re-set and Revised).<br /> 7; x 4%. 734 pp. J. Clarke. 2s. 6d. m.<br /> TOPOGRAPHY.<br /> THE HEART OF ENGLAND. By E. THOMAS. 7 × 5.<br /> 244 pp. Dent. 3s. 6d. In.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> BOOKS PUBLISHED IN AMERICA BY<br /> MEMBERS.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> ANTHOLOGIES.<br /> SOME FRIENDS OF MINE : A R ALLY OF MEN, By E. V.<br /> LUCAs. 362 pp. New York : Macmillan &amp; Co. $1.25 n.<br /> ART.<br /> CoNSTABLE. Illustrated with 8 reproductions in colour.<br /> By C. LEWIS HIND. 80 pp. New York : Frederick A.<br /> Stokes Co. Boards, 650. m. ; leather, $1.50 m.<br /> BIOGRAPHY.<br /> MR. POPE : HIS LIFE AND TIMES.<br /> illustrations. By GEORGE PASTON.<br /> New York: Putnam. $6.50 m.<br /> BOOKS FOR THE YOUNG,<br /> THE ARABIAN NIGHTS: Their best-known Tales. By<br /> KATE DOUGLAS WIGGIN AND NORA. A. SMITH. Illus-<br /> trated in colour. By MAXFIELD PATRISH. 339 pp. New<br /> York : Scribner. $2.50.<br /> DRAM.A.<br /> THE MASQUERADERs : A Play in Four Acts. By HENRY<br /> ARTHUR JONES. 135 pp. New York : Samuel French.<br /> 50c.<br /> FICTION.<br /> DAPHNE IN FITzRoy STREET. By E. NESBIT.<br /> New York : Doubleday, Page &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> With twenty-six<br /> 364 + 382 pp.<br /> 417 pp.<br /> THE LAND OF THE BLUE FLOWER. B y FRANCES HODG-<br /> son BURNETT. 67 pp. New York : Moffat, Yard &amp; Co.<br /> ( )6. Il.<br /> ABAFT THE FUNNEL. By RUDYARD KIPLING.<br /> New York : B. W. Dodge &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> ACTIONS AND REACTIONs. By RUDYARD KIPLING.<br /> 324 pp. New York: Doubleday, Page &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> ANND WERQNICA. By H. G. WELLs. 377 pp. New York :<br /> 360 pp.<br /> Harper Bros. $1.50.<br /> EMILY Fox-SETON : Being “THE MAKING or A<br /> MARCHIONESS’’’ and “THE METHODs or LADy<br /> WALDERHURST.” By FRANCEs Hodgson BURNETT.<br /> New York: Frederick A. Stokes. $1.50.<br /> THE TRAVELLING COMPANIONs: A Story in Scenes. By<br /> ANSTEY GUTHRIE and BERNARD PARTRIDGE. 194 199-<br /> New York : Dutton. $I. n.<br /> TRIAL BY MARRIAGE. By WILFRED SCARBOROUGH<br /> ſºos. 320 pp. New York : John Lane &amp; Co.<br /> $1.50. -<br /> TESTIMONY. By ALICE AND CLAUDE AsKEw. 320 pp.<br /> New York : John Lane Co. $1.50.<br /> THE NECROMANCERs. By R. H. BENSON.<br /> 37.4 pp. St.<br /> Louis : B. Herder. $1.50. p}<br /> CANDLES IN THE WIND. By MAUD DIVER, 392 DD.<br /> New York : John Lane Co. $1.50.<br /> SAILOR&#039;S KNOTs. By W. W. JACOBs. 283 pp. New<br /> York : Scribner. $1.50.<br /> SPARROWS : The Story of an Unprotected Girl. By<br /> HORACE W. C. NEWTE. 533 pp. New York : Mitcheil<br /> Kennerley. $1.50.<br /> THE BLINDNESS OF DR. GREY.<br /> CANON SHEEHAN, D.D., 488 pp.<br /> mans, Green, &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> THE FLORENTINE FRAME. By ELIZABETH Robins.<br /> 334 pp. New York: Moffat Yard &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> GARDENING.<br /> IN A YORKSHIRE GARDEN. By REGINALD FARRER.<br /> : 316 pp. New York : Longmans, Green &amp; Co. $3.50.<br /> JUVENILE.<br /> TALES OF WONDER. A fourth fairy book. Edited by<br /> KATE DOUGLAS WIGGIN and NORA ARCHIBALD SMITH.<br /> By THE REV. P. A.<br /> New York : Long-<br /> 440 pp. New York : Doubleday, Page &amp; Co. $1.50.<br /> POLITICAL.<br /> TURKEY IN TRANSITION. By G. F. ABBOTT. 370 pp.<br /> New York : Longmans, Green &amp; Co. $4.25 n.<br /> TRAVEL.<br /> BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. By MAUDE HOLBACH.<br /> Forty-one illustrations from photographs by O. HoDBACH.<br /> 249 pp. New York : John Lane Co. $1.50 m.<br /> THE HEART OF THE ANTARCTIC : Being the Story of the<br /> British Antarctic Exhibition, 1907–1909. With an intro-<br /> duction by H. R. M.ILL. An account of the first journey<br /> to the South Magnetic Pole. In two vols. 366 +<br /> 451 pp. Philadelphia : Lippincott. $10 m.<br /> —e—“Q-6–<br /> LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br /> NOTES.<br /> OBERT AITKEN&#039;S new novel, “The<br /> Ilantern of Luck,” which has recently been<br /> published in the United States and also in<br /> Canada, will be issued on this side early in 1910 by<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#482) ################################################<br /> <br /> 104<br /> TISIES A UſTSIOR,<br /> Mr. John Murray. Messrs. Greening &amp; Co. have<br /> on their list a cheap edition of “The Golden<br /> Horseshoe &#039;&#039; by the same author. .<br /> Messrs. Cassell &amp; Co. have just issued a fresh<br /> and revised edition of “Popular Fallacies Explained<br /> and Corrected,” by A. S. E. Ackermann. The work<br /> covers a very wide field of fallaciousness—domestic,<br /> legal, historical, technical—and treats also of various<br /> fallacies connected with ourselves in addition to the<br /> members of the animal kingdom.<br /> “The Mastery of Destiny” is the title of a new<br /> volume by Mr. James Allen which has just<br /> appeared. The volume deals with the subject of<br /> re-birth, and touches upon Social questions and on<br /> the training of the will and mind. Among the<br /> subjects dealt with are The Science of Self-Control ;<br /> Cause and Effect in Human Conduct ; Cultivation<br /> of Concentration ; Practice of Meditation ; and<br /> The Joy of Accomplishment. G. P. Putnam&#039;s Sons<br /> are the publishers in America.<br /> The pen sketch in Mary C. Rowsell&#039;s novel of<br /> “The Friend of the People” has come under the<br /> notice of M. Buffenoir, Member of the Société des<br /> Gens de Lettres. Miss Rowsell is by his wish<br /> translating the articles for the purpose of publica-<br /> tion in England. They are illustrated by numerous<br /> portraits of Robespierre, of which some bear special<br /> interest. Among these is the picture portrait of<br /> him in his room in the house of Duplay, in the<br /> Rue St. Honoré, and another is the cast of his head<br /> taken after the death by Madame Tussaud. Mr.<br /> John Tussaud has presented to the author of “The<br /> Friend of the People” two copyright photographs<br /> —profile and full face—of this memorial, and it<br /> will be added to the portraits which Mr. Buffenoir<br /> has with infinite pains and research collected.<br /> The matter in the December issue of Travel<br /> and Erploration is provided almost exclusively by<br /> members of the Society.<br /> Mrs. Bullock Workman tells of her ascent of the<br /> Nun Kun range of mountains in the Himalayas.<br /> Dr. J. Scott Keltie deals with notable fictitious<br /> narratives in travel and exploration, of which,<br /> perhaps, Baron Munchausen&#039;s adventures are a<br /> typical example.<br /> “A Traveller in Travel ” is the title of an<br /> article in the same journal by Mr. A. R. Hope<br /> Moncrieff, who describes some of his experiences<br /> gleaned from his professional travels as a guide-<br /> book editor.<br /> A review by Mr. E. A. Reynolds Ball of Sir<br /> |Ernest Shackleton’s “Record of his Antarctic<br /> Expedition ” is another item in this monthly.<br /> We regret that in our last issue we announced a<br /> book on “Fossil Botany ” as by Miss M. C. Stokes,<br /> whereas the correct spelling of the author&#039;s name<br /> is Stopes. We tender our apologies to Miss Stopes<br /> for the error.<br /> Messrs. Cornish Bros., of Birmingham, have<br /> favoured us with a sumptuous volume of stories<br /> for children by Miss H. Margaret Dixon. “Dame<br /> Thin-Pin and Other Stories” is the title given to<br /> the collection. There are ten stories in all, and<br /> twelve accompanying illustrations by Kate Marion<br /> Rathborne and other artists.<br /> Mr. Andrew Melrose&#039;s new Two-hundred-and-fifty<br /> Guinea Prize Novel Competition, which closed on the<br /> 30th ult., has brought in 162 MSS., seven more than<br /> last year&#039;s competition produced. The adjudicators<br /> in the present competition are Mrs. Flora Annie<br /> Steel, Miss Mary Cholmondeley and Mrs. Henry<br /> De La Pasture, and Mr. Melrose&#039;s staff is at<br /> present busy making the selection of novels which<br /> will be submitted to them. As this competition is<br /> not for a first novel it has brought a number of<br /> MSS. from manifestly practised writers, and the<br /> task of classification is proportionately difficult, but<br /> it is hoped to put the selected list in the adjudi-<br /> cators&#039; hands before the end of the month, and<br /> that a declaration of the result may be made some<br /> time in January.<br /> “Light Come, Light Go” is a new work<br /> announced for early publication by Messrs.<br /> Macmillan &amp; Co. Mr. Ralph Nevill, the author,<br /> has gathered together in the volume a collection of<br /> anecdotes concerning gaming, gamesters, wagers<br /> and the turf. In addition to this, much informa-<br /> tion is given about the public gaming tables, which<br /> were once such a conspicuous feature of the Palais<br /> Royal in Paris, and afterwards of Baden-Baden,<br /> Homburg, Ems, and other German spas. An<br /> entire chapter of the book is devoted to Monte<br /> Carlo, and a number of the various popular systems<br /> and methods of play are analysed and described.<br /> Printers&#039; Ink, a weekly journal for advertisers,<br /> has published, from the pen of Mr. Edward<br /> Urwick, a series of Sonnets to the poster artists.<br /> Mr. William Patrick Kelly&#039;s new novel, “The<br /> Senator Licinius,” a romance of ancient Rome in<br /> the days of Caligula, has just been published by<br /> Messrs. Routledge. It forms the third of the<br /> author&#039;s series of historical romances, of which the<br /> first two — “The Stonecutter of Memphis.” and<br /> “The Assyrian Bride&quot;—are already published.<br /> The fourth book of the series, “A Romance of<br /> Athens in the Age of Pericles,” will probably appear<br /> early next year.<br /> Mr. Henry Frowde and Messrs. Hodder and<br /> Stoughton have forwarded us the following<br /> Christmas books for children :-‘‘Books of British<br /> Ships,” 5s. ; “Young Franctireurs,” 3s 6d. ;<br /> “Farm Babies,” 5s. ; “Stories from Grimm,”<br /> 2s. 6d. ; “Robinson Crusoe,” 7s. 6d. net ; “Loco-<br /> motives of the World,” 5s. net ; “Ballads of Famous<br /> Fights,” 3s. 6d. net ; “Lamb&#039;s Tales from Shake-<br /> speare,” 6d. net ; “ Robinson Crusoe,” 6d. net ;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#483) ################################################<br /> <br /> TISIE AUTISIOR.<br /> 105<br /> “Mungo Park,” 6d. net ; “Hans Andersen,” 6d.<br /> net; “White Kitten Book,” 2s. 6d. net; “Children&#039;s<br /> Shakespeare,” 2s. 6d. net ; “Children&#039;s Dickens,”<br /> 2s. 6d. net; “Madam Mouse,” 1s. net ; “Squirrel<br /> Hall,” 1s. met. ; “Bunnikin Brown,” 1s. net. Per-<br /> haps itishardly correct to say that they are exclusively<br /> for children, as the illustrations are so beautiful and<br /> the get-up is so good that they would be likely to<br /> amuse and interest the older folk at this season of<br /> the year. The 6d. editions with their beautiful<br /> end-plates and their coloured frontispieces are<br /> wonderful at the price. The illustrated 18. books<br /> are exceedingly well got up, and the illustrations<br /> to two of them, by Mr. Cecil Aldin, are particularly<br /> clever. There is no need to recommend this artist&#039;s<br /> work. As presents these books ought to be exceed-<br /> ingly welcome, and their price is within the range<br /> of almost every Christmas giver.<br /> The large number of illustrated books issued at<br /> this period of the year emphasises the importance<br /> of the article on colour illustration which was<br /> published in last month&#039;s Author.<br /> Messrs. Chapman &amp; Hall have published “The<br /> History of St. Paul&#039;s School,” by Michael F. J.<br /> McDonnell. In this work, which contains forty-<br /> eight portraits and other illustrations, the author<br /> has received every assistance from the school<br /> authorities, and has secured access to various<br /> private MS. collections which throw light on the<br /> story of Dean Colet&#039;s foundation. The history,<br /> beginning with a consideration of the question of<br /> the continuity of the school with the ancient<br /> Cathedral Grammar School of St. Paul&#039;s, is carried<br /> down to modern times, so as to include an account<br /> of the revival of the fortunes of St. Paul’s under<br /> the late head master, Mr. Walker.<br /> “Here and Hereafter ’’ is the title which Mr.<br /> George G. Fleurot has given to his translation of<br /> Léon Denis’ “ Après la Mort,” of which Messrs.<br /> William Rider &amp; Son, 164, Aldersgate Street,<br /> E.C., are the English, and Messrs. Brentano, of<br /> New York, the American publishers. The first<br /> edition having been exhausted, a second edition is<br /> in the press.<br /> We have received from Messrs. A. &amp; C. Black<br /> copies of the year books issued from their house,<br /> viz., “Who&#039;s Who,” “‘Who&#039;s Who? Year Book,”<br /> “The Englishwoman&#039;s Year Book,” and “The<br /> Writers&#039; and Artists&#039; Year Book.”<br /> “Who’s Who’’ for 1910 Contains<br /> biographies.<br /> The “ . Who&#039;s Who&#039; Year Book” comprises the<br /> tables which were formerly a part of the larger<br /> volume. It includes lists of ambassadors,<br /> academies, clubs, societies, as well as many others<br /> which professional men and women will be glad to<br /> consult from time to time during the coming year.<br /> “The Englishwoman&#039;s Year Book,” which is<br /> 23,000<br /> now in its thirtieth year, is a compendium of<br /> information for women, in whatever department of<br /> life they may be engaged. Education, sport,<br /> literature, professions, industrial, and philan-<br /> thropic work are a few of the more prominent<br /> questions of which it treats.<br /> Messrs. James Clarke &amp; Co. have issued a third<br /> edition of the late R. F. Weymouth’s “New Testa-<br /> ment in Modern Speech.” This work, under the<br /> editorship of Mr. E. Hampden-Cook, has been re-set<br /> in new type, and, in order to add to the interest of<br /> the translation, all conversations have been spaced<br /> out in accordance with modern custom. Many<br /> errata have been corrected, and a very considerable<br /> number of what seemed to be infelicities or slight<br /> inaccuracies in the English have been removed.<br /> We offer our apologies to Mr. C. E. Gouldsbury<br /> for an error in our notice of his book in the last<br /> issue of The Author, which we entitled “Duall”<br /> instead of “Dulall, the Forest Guard.” The book<br /> contains a brief account of the proceedings of two<br /> young Englishmen in their pursuit of tiger, rhino-<br /> ceros, elephant, bear, etc., in the Bengal jungles.<br /> The chief character is Dulall Sing, a forest guard,<br /> a subordinate in the Forest Department, truthful,<br /> brave, faithful to his employers, running into<br /> danger himself, while careful of his charges.<br /> Messrs. Gibbings are the publishers.<br /> “The Life and Letters of James Wolfe,” by<br /> Beckles Willson, which Mr. William Heinemann<br /> publishes, is the outcome of much new material,<br /> including many hitherto unpublished letters<br /> placed at the author&#039;s disposal. To as great an<br /> extent as possible Mr. Beckles Willson has allowed<br /> the letters to tell the story.<br /> Her Majesty the Queen has had much pleasure<br /> in accepting a copy of Emily Shore&#039;s book, “Iland-<br /> Babies and Sea-Babies.”<br /> The current number of the Journal of the<br /> Royal Asiatic Society contains an instalment of<br /> the revised translation of the Bábar-Nāma, on<br /> which Mrs. Beveridge is now working. The<br /> portion published is the description of Fārghana,<br /> so much discussed by writers on Central Asia.<br /> DRAMA.<br /> Mr. Richard Pryce&#039;s dramatic adaptations of<br /> Mrs. Mann&#039;s stories, “Freddy&#039;s Ship” and “ The<br /> Eglamore Portraits,” were staged at the Playhouse<br /> on December 1st.<br /> The first, which was produced under the title of<br /> “The Visit,” deals with the humanising of a<br /> selfish woman as a result of her fulfilment of a<br /> disagreeable duty.<br /> The longer piece, produced under the title of<br /> “Little Mrs. Cummim,” treats of a battle between<br /> a newly-made benedict and an interfering mother-<br /> in-law.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#484) ################################################<br /> <br /> 106<br /> TISIES A DITISIOR.<br /> This latter piece was interpreted by a cast<br /> which included Miss Lottie Wenne, Mr. Kenneth<br /> Douglas, and Miss Marie Lohr.<br /> “The King&#039;s Cup,” by H. Dennis Braaley and<br /> E. Phillips Oppenheim was produced at a special<br /> maſſinée at the Adelphi Theatre on December 13th,<br /> 1909. The cast includes Mr. Nye Chart, Miss<br /> Nora Sevening and Mr. Paul Arthur.<br /> Sir William Gilbert&#039;s new opera, “Fallen Fairies;<br /> or, The Wicked World,” was produced at the<br /> Savoy Theatre early in December last. The music<br /> is by Edward German, and the cast includes Mr.<br /> C. H. Workman, Miss Nancy McIntosh and Miss<br /> Jessie Rose.<br /> PARIS NOTES.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> “CN OUVENIRS autour d&#039;un groupe littéraire,” by<br /> Madame Alphonse Daudet, is a book of the<br /> greatest interest to all lovers of French litera-<br /> ture. The widow of the great novelist is herself a<br /> gifted poetess, and her memoirs gain much by this<br /> fact. During the lifetime of her husband her<br /> salon was a rendezvous for the writers of the day.<br /> Madame Daudet&#039;s parents were poets, so that she<br /> had from her earliest years the greatest respect for<br /> literary work. Her mother and father published a<br /> volume of poetry entitled “Les Marges de la Vie,”<br /> and Madame Daudet gives us a letter from Madame<br /> Desbordes Valmore, who had just read it in manu-<br /> script. She then tells us of her acquaintance with<br /> Mistral, Paul Arène and Francisque Sarcey. She<br /> gives us a portrait of Barbey d&#039;Aurevilly and the<br /> most charming letter from him to Daudet. It was<br /> written after a slight misunderstanding caused by a<br /> terrible criticism of Flaubert by d&#039;Aurevilly.<br /> Madame Daudet gives us a description of her first<br /> visit to Victor Hugo. She tells us of her first<br /> meeting with the Goncourt brothers, who were to<br /> become life-long friends, of the reunions of “the<br /> Five,” Flaubert, Goncourt, Alphonse Daudet,<br /> Tourgéneff and Zola, and then of the “Médan<br /> Group,” Hennique, Céard Paul Alexis, Huysmans,<br /> Maupassant, and, later on, Rod. Madame Daudet<br /> tells us then of her Own Salon in the Marais, the<br /> old-world part of Paris, and when we read the<br /> names of the habitués we can only envy the writer<br /> the intellectual treats she must so frequently<br /> have had. Among these names are Théuriet,<br /> Blémont, Anatole France, Gil, Léon Allard, Sully<br /> Prudhomme, François Coppée, Hérédia, Pierre de<br /> Nolhac, Haraucourt, Massenet, Pugno, Rollinat,<br /> etC.<br /> We read, too, of the foundation of the Théâtre<br /> Libre by Antoine. In those days this was a little<br /> room at the end of a passage, where the arrange-<br /> ments were all so primitive that the last person to<br /> leave was requested to turn out the gas.<br /> Madame Daudet then tells us of some of the<br /> other Paris Salons, of that of the Princess Mathilde<br /> and of that of Madame Buloz and of Madame<br /> Juliette Adam. In this book Madame Daudet takes<br /> us with her through the literary Paris of her time.<br /> It was quite another Paris from that of to-day. The<br /> foreign invasion has, no doubt, had a certain<br /> influence on Paris, but the old world is still there<br /> behind all these modern buildings, and we are glad<br /> to get some echoes from it in such books as this of<br /> Madame Daudet. The last chapters are better<br /> read in the original. They are too sacred to touch<br /> on lightly. They begin from the year 1898, after<br /> the death of Alphonse Daudet.<br /> “Whenever I leave home,” says his widow, “it<br /> seems to me always that I shall find him on my<br /> return, but it is always the same disappointment.<br /> I cannot resign myself to death, to his continued<br /> absence.”<br /> “Les Infernales” is the title of a remarkable<br /> volume of short stories, or rather studies, by Nikto.<br /> This book comes as a surprise to all who know<br /> its author. Nikto is one of the most marvellous<br /> musicians of our times, a pupil of Liszt, of Teleffsen,<br /> and of Mikuli, Chopin&#039;s gifted pupil. To anyone<br /> who has heard Chopin and Liszt interpreted by<br /> Nikto, there seems mothing left to hear by these<br /> two great composers. With the force of a man<br /> and the delicacy and intuition of a woman, Nikto<br /> has discovered all the treasures hidden in the music.<br /> Execution, expression, fire, tenderness and deep<br /> feeling, Nikto interprets all that there is to<br /> interpret. The hours spent by the favoured few<br /> who are allowed the rare privilege of hearing her<br /> explain and interpret the works of her two masters<br /> are hours that will never be forgotten. At present<br /> we discover that this great musician is also a<br /> talented writer. In all these stories we have the<br /> fire and passion of the Slavonic soul described and<br /> painted by an artist. There are tragic stories of<br /> terrible cruelty, there is a Breton idyll which is<br /> exquisitely poetical, a story of diabolic revenge and<br /> a study, at the end of the volume, of tzigame music.<br /> Although Nikto is a Polish Russian, she has<br /> accomplished the task, almost impossible to foreign<br /> authors, of writing her book in French. Very<br /> many years ago that pitiless critic, Barbey<br /> d’Aurevilly, who was always more or less hard on<br /> women writers, wrote a somewhat scathing article<br /> on one of Nikto’s literary works. She dedicates<br /> her book to-day “To the memory of Barbey<br /> d’Aurevilly, the admirable author of ‘Les<br /> Diaboliques,’ from The one whom he scathed.”<br /> If all writers of merit could have an Egeria like<br /> Mlle. Louise Read, it would not be necessary for<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#485) ################################################<br /> <br /> TISIE A DITFIOR,<br /> 107<br /> them to trouble about their future fame. Thanks<br /> to her unceasing devotion in publishing posthumous<br /> works of Barbey d’Aurevilly, France has slowly,<br /> during the last twenty years, realized the fact that<br /> he was one of her great writers. Rarely has any<br /> Centenary been so universally féted in any country,<br /> and for a long time to come lectures, articles and<br /> books will prove to us that the author so few of us<br /> know is one of those whose works should not<br /> be neglected. Rodin&#039;s statue was inaugurated<br /> this last month, and a pilgrimage of lovers of<br /> literature set out from Paris to be present at the<br /> unveiling ceremony at St. Sauveur le Wicomte, in<br /> Normandy, Barbey d’Aurevilly&#039;s birth-place.<br /> Among the new books we have another volume<br /> of G. Lenôtre&#039;s “Paris Révolutionnaire&quot; (Vieilles<br /> maisons, vieux papiers). The subjects treated are :<br /> Papa Tam, Les Meubles de M. Berthélemy,<br /> Le Ménage Tison, Herman, Montcairzain, L’As<br /> de Pique, La fin de Thérèse Lavasseur, L&#039;Evêque<br /> d’Agra, Thomazeau, Madame Gasnier, l’Améri-<br /> caine, and Monsieur de Charette. The chapter on<br /> Thérèse Levasseur after Jean-Jacques&#039; death is<br /> very curious and instructive, whilst the story of the<br /> Comtesse de Montcairzain would make the plot for<br /> a novel.<br /> “La Rue Saint Honoré&#039;&#039; (de la Revolution à nos<br /> jours) is the second volume by Robert Hénard on<br /> this subject. It seems indeed as though this street<br /> must surely be more full of memories than any<br /> other street in Paris. We have a description of<br /> the scenes that took place there on the day of the<br /> taking of the Bastille, and on many other historical<br /> occasions. Marie Antoinette was taken down this<br /> street on her way to execution. Robespierre lived<br /> there. The famous Café de la Régence, the<br /> favourite resort of Musset, is still there. Under<br /> the Consulate and the Empire the Rue St. Honoré<br /> was a very fashionable resort. The volume gives<br /> many interesting details, and makes one realize how<br /> full of past history Paris is.<br /> In a recent number of the Revue hebdomadaire,<br /> there is an article on “Selma Lagerlof,” by Jacques<br /> de Coussange, and in another recent number of<br /> the same magazine is an article by Ernest Seillière<br /> on “Le Ménage du grand Frédéric.”<br /> The play “Susette,” by M. Brieux, given at<br /> the Comédie Française, is not intended as an<br /> argument against divorce, but against divorce too<br /> easily obtained. It is the story of a child between<br /> parents who are at loggerheads with each other.<br /> We see all the suffering of a child in this situation.<br /> M. Brieux has already treated this subject in the<br /> “Berceau,” but “Susette” is a much stronger and<br /> more convincing play,<br /> At the Théâtre Antoine “Papillon, dit Lyonnais<br /> le Juste,” by M. Louis Bénière, is having great<br /> success. It is the story of a simple workman Who<br /> comes into a fortune. It is an extremely natural<br /> and simple play, amusing and pathetic in parts.<br /> ALYS HALLARD.<br /> Souvenirs autour d&#039;un groupe littéraire’ (Fasquelle).<br /> “Les Infernales &quot; (Lemetre).<br /> * Paris Révolutionnaire&quot; (Perrin).<br /> “La Rue Saint Honoré&quot; (Emile Paul).<br /> —&amp;h–<br /> w ~–w<br /> THE SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE PRICE OF<br /> NOVELS.<br /> ——º-0–<br /> INTERIMI REPORT.<br /> Wº the sub-committee appointed to consider<br /> the question of the price at which new<br /> novels should be issued, think that we<br /> ought to make an interim report, having regard to<br /> the Serious nature of the present situation. We<br /> feel, also, that a conclusive and comprehensive<br /> report upon the matter can hardly be expected<br /> from us, remembering the variety of directions in<br /> which evidence must be sought, and the distinct<br /> understanding that we have received that the<br /> results of certain experiments in the change of<br /> price of new novels—which experiments are now<br /> being conducted—will be given to us.<br /> Our first step was to invite the opinion of seventy-<br /> eight novelists, almost all being members of our<br /> Society, who were Selected as far as possible because<br /> they seemed to us to represent varying degrees of<br /> position as men and women of letters and greatly<br /> different conditions of popularity. Further, we<br /> gave preference in our first letter of inquiry to<br /> those authors whose works we knew had been made<br /> the subject of some experiments in the lowering of<br /> the original price of issue. The result of that<br /> inquiry was that thirty authors declared them-<br /> Selves uncompromisingly opposed to any systematic<br /> reduction of the usual publishing price of the new<br /> novel, viz., 6s., believing that the reduction would<br /> bring to them, having regard to the reduced<br /> royalties offered, no return which would compen-<br /> sate them for the loss which they would sustain by<br /> not receiving the larger royalty upon the larger<br /> prices; seven authors believe the reverse of this,<br /> but their convictions were not expressed with any<br /> great force in all instances.<br /> Of the remaining authors to whom we wrote,<br /> fourteen were non-committal in their statements,<br /> certain of them giving information in answer to<br /> our questions, but without expressing opinions and<br /> leaving us to make deductions from the facts;<br /> nine stated that they were unable to give useful<br /> information, and from the remainder we have not<br /> yet heard. Much of this unclassified evidence was<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#486) ################################################<br /> <br /> 108<br /> THE A DITFIOR.<br /> informatory to ourselves, and the deduction we have<br /> drawn from it is that it contains no definite argu-<br /> ments in favour of the lowering of the original<br /> price of the new novel from 6s, either for the<br /> benefit of the author, the publisher, the book-<br /> seller, or the public.<br /> We propose to collect further evidence from<br /> novelists during the time that must elapse before<br /> we can report finally.<br /> Our interim conclusion, that novelists would be<br /> unwise to allow themselves, or their agents for<br /> them, to enter into any contracts whereby it is<br /> agreed that the initial price of the new novel<br /> should be lower than 6s., is much strengthened b<br /> the replies which we have received from the list of<br /> publishers to whom we addressed a letter asking<br /> whether the circulation obtained for novels pub-<br /> lished originally at a lower price than 68. Would,<br /> in their opinion, result in a proportionate increase<br /> if the price were lowered. The basis on which we<br /> asked for information was a 6s. novel of the<br /> ordinary length of about 80,000 to 100,000 words<br /> with a circulation of at least 3,000 copies; and,<br /> further, we asked if it would be practicable to pay<br /> an author royalties on a 28., a 2s. 6d. Or a 38. net<br /> book at so high a rate as on a 68. book ; and if it<br /> would be practicable to consider raising the Original<br /> price in certain cases.<br /> We desire to record our sense of the valuable<br /> and courteous manner in which our questions,<br /> necessarily of a searching nature, were responded<br /> to by the publishers.<br /> Several publishers said that at the present<br /> moment they were not prepared to answer definitely,<br /> while one, who may be mentioned by name, because<br /> his position has been made public by his own letter<br /> to The Publishers’ Circular, viz., Mr. Heinemann,<br /> pointed out to us that he was at the present<br /> moment engaged in an important experiment in<br /> the alteration of the prices at which new novels<br /> should be issued, of the results of which he would<br /> be in a position to inform us in February. Other<br /> publishers who have issued new fiction at lower<br /> prices than 68, have given us details showing that<br /> the experiments had failed.<br /> The consensus of opinion from the publishers is<br /> to the effect :<br /> (1) (a) that from 9,000 copies at least, to 12,000<br /> (the highest figure mentioned) must be sold at<br /> 2S. net ;<br /> (b) that 8,000 must be sold at 2s. 6d. net ; and<br /> (c) that 6,000 copies must be sold at 3s. net<br /> before the author would receive the amount equiva-<br /> lent to that which he usually receives on 3,000<br /> copies at 68., i.e., 48. 6d. net. -<br /> (2) That, leaving exceptional cases out of count,<br /> it does not appear probable that the author&#039;s<br /> circulation would be proportionately enhanced by<br /> a reduction in the price of the original issue. On<br /> this point figures relating to particular cases have<br /> been submitted in proof of the opinion.<br /> (3) That the same proportionate royalty could<br /> not be offered upon the lower prices. On this<br /> point the publishers are all very clear.<br /> Regarding these publishers, as we do, as<br /> thoroughly cognisant of the business side of the<br /> publication of fiction in the present conditions,<br /> and as competent to guide us as to the probable<br /> result of modifications or developments of those<br /> conditions, we think that their opinions constitute<br /> a grave warning to authors who may be invited to<br /> issue new novels of the ordinary length at any<br /> price below 6s.<br /> With regard to the issue of new novels in cloth.<br /> binding at the initial price of 2s., we hope that<br /> this innovation is not likely to affect any large<br /> number of writers. Few publishers will make the<br /> attempt to produce a new Work of fiction in such<br /> enormous quantities for a first edition as would be<br /> required to pay the author and recoup themselves.<br /> There can be no guarantee that the large prices<br /> which have been offered to authors as payment<br /> for serial rights and royalties in advance under<br /> this system will be maintained.<br /> We have definite information that, with regard<br /> to the 7d. reprints, the publishers are already<br /> offering far smaller sums in advance than in the<br /> first instance ; and that even in the cases of authors,<br /> whose books have practically earned these advances<br /> they are not now willing to make new contracts on<br /> the old terms.<br /> We possess a large amount of evidence from the<br /> booksellers upon the various questions involved,<br /> but this, which has only just reached us, requiress<br /> sifting and classification.<br /> We have received scattered information from<br /> several authors who have actually experienced the<br /> results of the issue of new novels, at prices lower<br /> than 6s. In every case the author has suffered.<br /> Having, then, regard to the weight of opinion<br /> from those novelists whom we have consulted, to<br /> the responsible remarks of leading publishers, and<br /> to details which we have received of the actual<br /> experience of authors, we repeat the recommenda-<br /> tion that the novelist should maintain the price of<br /> the original production of his works at 68. There<br /> is no evidence that a low price means a large<br /> circulation.<br /> ADDENDUM.<br /> One of us, having particular knowledge of the<br /> business side of literature in France, wishes to<br /> point out that even in the days when the regular<br /> price of the new novel in France was Fr. 3.50, all<br /> the leading French novelists, Daudet and Zola.<br /> among them, greatly regretted the lowering of the<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#487) ################################################<br /> <br /> THE A CITESIOR,<br /> 109<br /> standard price to that figure. France has since<br /> been flooded with new novels at 9%d., and the<br /> result has been most disastrous to French literature<br /> as well as to French authors. It has meant that<br /> the great mass of writers have now to produce<br /> novels that are short and sensational, and dependent<br /> for their popularity upon their violent appeal.<br /> (Signed) M. A. BELLOC-LOWNDES.<br /> CHARLES GARVICE.<br /> E. W. HORNUNG.<br /> W. W. JACOBS.<br /> - S. SQUIRE SPRIGGE.<br /> JDecember 2, 1909.<br /> a – A –a<br /> —v---<br /> A PUBLISHING TRANSACTION.<br /> —t—º-e—<br /> - HEN an author is asked by a publisher to<br /> contribute towards the production of his<br /> book, it is time for him to be on the<br /> alert. There are, it is true, certain books, the<br /> publication of which must be attended with a<br /> certain degree of risk, on account of the fact that<br /> they appeal only to very limited audiences, or<br /> because as a result of profuse illustrations or some<br /> other cause they are expensive to produce. In<br /> these cases, the bond ſides of a publisher who seeks<br /> to divide the risks with the author may be quite<br /> genuine, though even here the writer will be well<br /> advised to exercise a firm control over the expen-<br /> diture, and ascertain beforehand whether, given a<br /> fair sale, the venture will prove profitable to<br /> himself. -<br /> In the case of the novel, however, the position is<br /> different, and the author who is asked to bear any<br /> portion of the cost of production should refuse to<br /> do so. It may safely be claimed that the novel<br /> which is not published at the publisher&#039;s expense<br /> had better, in nine cases out of ten, remain unpub-<br /> lished, that is, if its author looks for financial<br /> reward for his work. If, however, the writer has<br /> a firm conviction that his book possesses all the<br /> potentialities of a commercial success, or has some<br /> other equally weighty reason for desiring his book<br /> to be placed on the market, and cares to back his<br /> belief by risking money in its production, two<br /> precautions are absolutely essential ; the first is to<br /> publish with a house of established reputation, and<br /> the second is to see that he retains such a control<br /> over the work (both as to the items in the cost of<br /> production, and as to the terms of Sale) as shall<br /> be commensurate with the amount which he<br /> is putting into the adventure.<br /> The failure to take these two precautions is<br /> bound to be attended with disastrous results to the<br /> author, as the following case will show.<br /> A certain author entered into a contract with a<br /> publisher for the publication of a novel under an<br /> agreement, the material parts of which are printed<br /> below:—<br /> MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT made this<br /> Of between<br /> hereinafter termed the author of the one part<br /> and hereinafter termed the publisher of the other<br /> part WHEREBY it is mutually agreed between the parties<br /> hereto for themselves and their respective executors<br /> administrators and assigns (or successors as the case may<br /> be) as follows:—<br /> 1. The author is the writer and holds the copyright of a<br /> work at present entitled , which he has submitted<br /> to the publisher with a view to his producing publishing<br /> and advertising the same in the United Kingdom of Great<br /> Britain and Ireland and elsewhere on the following<br /> terms —<br /> 2. That in consideration of the author paying to the<br /> publisher the sum of Ninety Five Pounds (Fifty Pounds<br /> when he signs this agreement, Thirty Pounds when the<br /> whole of the work is in type, and Fifteen Pounds from his<br /> share of the sales of the work) the publisher hereby agrees<br /> to produce the work in the best style print on good paper<br /> from new type bind in suitable cloth as trade demands<br /> warrant and publish the book in the English edition at the<br /> price of Six Shillings per copy. The said payment of<br /> Ninety Five Pounds shall constitute the author&#039;s sole<br /> liability. -<br /> 3. The author guarantees to the publisher that the said<br /> work is in no way whatever a violation of any existing<br /> copyright and that it contains nothing of a libellous or<br /> Scandalous character and that he will indemnify the<br /> publisher from all suits claims and proceedings damages<br /> and costs which may be made taken or incurred by or<br /> against him on the ground that the said work is an infringe-<br /> ment of copyright or contains anything libellous or<br /> scandalous.<br /> 4. The publisher agrees to pay to the author and the<br /> author agrees to accept the following royalties, that is to<br /> say :—<br /> (a) A royalty of one shilling and sixpence per copy on<br /> all copies sold of the English 6s. edition up to a sale of two<br /> thousand copies and afterwards a royalty of 20 per cent. Of<br /> the nominal published price of all copies sold of this<br /> particular 6s. edition.<br /> (b) A royalty of fifteen per cent. of the nominal published<br /> price of all copies sold of any cheaper edition or editions.<br /> (c) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br /> from the sale of the American copyright (if any).<br /> (d) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br /> from the sale of Foreign rights (if any).<br /> (e) A royalty of fifty per cent. of the net profits derived<br /> from the sale of the Serial rights (if any).<br /> (f) In the event of remainder sales, that is when the<br /> demand for the work has ceased, a royalty of five per cent.<br /> of the net sum received.<br /> 5. The publisher shall present to the author twenty<br /> copies of the work on publication and shall sell to him any<br /> further copies that he may require at the lowest trade price,<br /> all copies thus bought to be charged to the general sales<br /> account and royalties to be paid to the author on Same.<br /> 6. No royalties shall be paid on any copies given<br /> away for review or other purposes in the interests of the<br /> work.<br /> 7. Account sales shall be made up half-yearly to Decem-<br /> ber thirty-first and June thirtieth and delivered and settled<br /> within five months of those dates. In making up accounts,<br /> thirteen copies shall be reckoned as twelve in accordance<br /> with trade usage.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#488) ################################################<br /> <br /> 110<br /> TRIE AUTHOR.<br /> the publisher touching the meaning of this agreement or<br /> the rights or liabilities of the parties thereunder, the same<br /> shall be referred to the arbitration of two persons (one to<br /> be named by each party) or their umpire, in accordance<br /> with the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1889.<br /> 9. The term “PUBLISHER&#039;&#039; throughout this agreement<br /> shall be deemed to include the person or persons or Com-<br /> pany for the time being carrying on the business of the<br /> said under as well its present as any<br /> future style and the benefit of this agreement shall be<br /> transmissible accordingly.<br /> 10. That in consideration of the publisher undertaking<br /> the publication of the work hereinbefore mentioned, the<br /> author agrees to give to the publisher the first refusal, from<br /> one month of the date of the delivery of the manuscript, of<br /> the next three new novels which he may write, suitable for<br /> publication in 6s. volume form, and if the publisher accept<br /> all or any of them, they shall be published on terms to be<br /> mutually agreed upon. The term “next three new novels &quot;<br /> shall not include any novel which the author may have<br /> completed at the time of signing this agreement. -<br /> It is not necessary to offer any very exhaustive<br /> comment on this document, which, indeed, has<br /> been fully commented on in a previous issue of<br /> The Author.<br /> Every clause is full of difficulties which would<br /> work out to the author&#039;s disadvantage. Indeed no<br /> author could be recommended to sign such a<br /> document.<br /> We should like, however, to state very briefly<br /> Some of the more serious objections.<br /> It will be noticed that the author is asked to<br /> provide a sum of money, not towards the cost of<br /> production of the work, but as consideration for<br /> certain acts which the publisher undertakes to<br /> perform. No information is given to the author<br /> as to how the money is to be spent, how the amount<br /> fixed is arrived at, nor is any mention made of the<br /> number of copies which the publisher will actually<br /> print, bind and publish for the payment asked. It<br /> is true that in section 4 (a) of the agreement the<br /> author is promised a different royalty after the<br /> sale of 2,000 copies, but this reference to 2,000<br /> copies does not bind the publisher to anything,<br /> though it may deceive the author. Nowhere does<br /> the publisher agree to print that number. Indeed,<br /> under an agreement of this kind some publishers<br /> might produce a very small edition of, say, 400 or<br /> 500 copies, and by neglecting to advertise it—<br /> readers will notice that the agreement contains<br /> nothing which binds him to advertise—kill the<br /> book entirely. This might pay him well, as he<br /> would thereby secure to himself the greater portion<br /> of the £95. There is no identity of interest<br /> between the parties. While the author looks to a<br /> large sale to recoup him for his outlay, the<br /> publisher, under this arrangement, is very often<br /> independent of the public entirely as far as profit<br /> is concerned. The publisher has already made<br /> a profit on the production. He has little interest<br /> 8. If any difference shall arise between the author and<br /> in the subsequent fate of the book. If the book<br /> shows signs of selling, it is true that the publisher<br /> may find it profitable to “push ’’ it, but the point<br /> to remember is that a book which succeeds when<br /> published on these terms does so not because of the<br /> publisher, but in spite of him. All that has<br /> happened is that the publisher has committed an<br /> error of judgment ; has accepted a book which has<br /> “caught on.” despite the circumstances surrounding<br /> its publication.<br /> Moreover, there is nothing by which the author<br /> can demand from the publisher a statement of<br /> how the amount paid has been spent. He<br /> cannot demand details as to the cost of production,<br /> he cannot even demand any of the copies printed<br /> as his own, although his payment may have covered,<br /> and more than covered, their cost. The whole<br /> agreement is thoroughly bad. To make matters<br /> Worse, the author binds himself by the last clause<br /> in the agreement for his next three books. Even<br /> were the agreement as fair as it is grossly deplor-<br /> able, we should still object to an author binding<br /> himself for future works. With such an agree-<br /> ment as the present one the clause is nothing<br /> short of disastrous.<br /> —º-<br /> LIBEL WITHOUT INTENT.<br /> JONES v. E. HULTON &amp; Co., LTD.<br /> HE principle involved in this case, which has<br /> been confirmed by the House of Lords, is<br /> one which affects authors and journalists,<br /> and is of particular importance to writers of fiction.<br /> It has now been laid down by the highest court<br /> of appeal, that in an action for libel it is no.<br /> defence to show that the defendant wrote the<br /> defamatory statement with reference to some<br /> imaginary person, and with no intention of<br /> libelling the plaintiff. If the name of the<br /> imaginary person adopted by the writer is that of<br /> a living person, it seems to follow from the<br /> decision that a jury may award damages to any<br /> individual who happens to bear the name if the<br /> evidence is sufficient to prove that those who know<br /> the plaintiff would necessarily think that the<br /> defamatory statement referred to him.<br /> The libel was contained in an article in the<br /> Sunday Chronicle, published in Manchester,<br /> Written by the Paris correspondent and purporting<br /> to describe the life at Dieppe on the occasion of<br /> certain motor-car races. Incidentally the article<br /> mentioned “Artemus Jones,” as being with a<br /> woman who was not his wife, and described him as<br /> a churchwarden of Peckham ; and it contrasted<br /> the austerity of his parochial duties in the English,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#489) ################################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTEIOR.<br /> 11 f<br /> suburb with the gaiety of his proceedings upon<br /> the Continent.<br /> Mr. Artemus Jones, a barrister, brought an action<br /> against the publishers of the newspaper for libel.<br /> The evidence showed that the plaintiff was not a<br /> churchwarden, or a resident of Peckham, and that<br /> he was not married. But witnesses were called<br /> who said that they had read the article and thought<br /> that it referred to the plaintiff. The writer of the<br /> article stated, however, that he had never heard of<br /> the plaintiff, and that the name was suggested by<br /> the name of “Artemus Ward,” and was used merely<br /> for the purpose of representing a type of individual<br /> in the scene described. The jury found that it<br /> was a libel on the plaintiff, and awarded £1,750<br /> damages.<br /> The defendants appealed upon the ground of mis-<br /> direction, and upon the question whether the state-<br /> ment could be libellous when it was not intended<br /> to refer to the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal<br /> dismissed the appeal.<br /> In the House of Lords the Lord Chancellor<br /> (Lord Loreburn) expressed his opinion on the<br /> point as follows:– “A libel is a tortious act.<br /> What does the tort consist of 2 In using language<br /> which others, knowing the circumstances, would<br /> reasonably think to be defamatory of the person<br /> who complained of being injured by it. A person<br /> cannot defend himself from a charge of libel by<br /> saying that he intended not to defame the person<br /> complaining of being injured by the libel. By<br /> publishing the libel the defendant imputed some-<br /> thing disgraceful to the plaintiff, who had none the<br /> less cause to complain because the defendant said<br /> he did it unintentionally.” Lord Shaw stated that<br /> he adopted the view expressed by the Lord Chief<br /> Justice (Lord Alverstone), who in his judgment<br /> in the Court of Appeal had said : “The question,<br /> if it be disputed whether the article is a libel upon<br /> the plaintiff, is a question of fact for the jury, and<br /> in my judgment this question of fact involves not<br /> only whether the language used of a person in its<br /> fair and ordinary meaning is libellous or defamatory,<br /> but whether the person referred to in the libel<br /> would be understood by persons who knew him to<br /> refer to the plaintiff.”<br /> The decision has been the subject of considerable<br /> comment, and novelists may feel Some alarm lest<br /> the chance selection of a name for One of the<br /> characters in a novel may render them liable for<br /> damages in a libel action brought by a person<br /> whom they had no intention to defame and whose<br /> existence may have been unknown to them.<br /> Clearly some care is necessary in adapting names<br /> for imaginary characters, but the alarm of novelists<br /> may be exaggerated. There is a distinction<br /> between works of fiction and a newspaper article<br /> purporting to describe an actual scene taking<br /> place in real life at a seaside resort. A character<br /> in a novel is generally regarded as an imaginary<br /> person, whereas the mention of an individual by<br /> name in a descriptive narrative in a newspaper<br /> may reasonably be supposed to refer to a real<br /> person.<br /> . Mr. Justice Channell made this distinction clear<br /> in his direction to the jury, which was approved by<br /> the House of Lords, when he said : *The real<br /> point on which your verdict must turn is, ought or<br /> ought not sensible and reasonable people reading<br /> this article to to think that it was some imaginary<br /> Person, such as I have said—Tom Jones, Mr.<br /> Pecksniff, Mr. Stiggins, or any of that sort of<br /> name—that one reads of in literature used as<br /> types If you think that a reasonable person.<br /> Would think that, it is not actionable at all. If,<br /> on the other hand, you do not think that, but<br /> think that people would suppose it to mean some<br /> real person then the action is main-<br /> tainable.”<br /> It may be mentioned that in other cases of tort,<br /> for example, in an action for infringement of<br /> Copyright, it has been held that the absence of<br /> intention is no defence, and an innocent infringer<br /> of copyright may be liable for damages although<br /> he did not know of the existence of the Copyright.<br /> HAROLD HARDY.<br /> PAYING QUARTERLY AND ON DEMAND,<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> MEMBER has been a contributor to a<br /> weekly paper for seven or eight years. The<br /> paper has lately been sold to a company of<br /> the composition of which he knows nothing. The<br /> member, being somewhat loth to break a long con-<br /> nection, agreed to continue his contributions. The<br /> custom of the paper had been to pay monthly.<br /> Not receiving, when due, his first cheque under the<br /> new ownership, the member applied for payment,<br /> which was made in a short time. For his next<br /> payments he applied twice, but received no reply.<br /> Three months&#039; remuneration being then due, the<br /> member placed the matter in the hands of the<br /> society.<br /> On application by the secretary the company<br /> wrote the following note, signed “The Manager”:<br /> I am directed to inform you that this company’s pay-<br /> ments to contributors are made quarterly. The amounts,<br /> therefore, for June, July, and August, become payable: in<br /> September, and you may inform Mr. X. that as soon as the<br /> amount for that period is complete, he will receive his.<br /> cheque for the amount due to him.<br /> To the member the editor also wrote that, owing<br /> to the long credit asked by advertising agents and,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#490) ################################################<br /> <br /> 112<br /> TISIES A PrºTHOR.<br /> others, the company had decided to pay con-<br /> tributors quarterly. The editor regretted that the<br /> member had seen fit to communicate with the<br /> Authors’ Society, and added that if the quarterly<br /> arrangement did not fall in with his views he<br /> should tell him so.<br /> The member replied, with the cognisance of the<br /> secretary, that he regretted that he could not see<br /> his way to continue his contributions to the paper<br /> On a quarterly basis, and that when two applica-<br /> tions for payment had been made without reply,<br /> the editor could have no complaint to make of the<br /> matter being placed in the society&#039;s hands.<br /> The member, as he expected, has heard nothing<br /> further, and he has done no more work.<br /> Finally, the Society’s solicitors, under threat of<br /> a writ, obtained a cheque.<br /> There is a great deal to be said for the member&#039;s<br /> action in resisting, particularly in the case of a<br /> paper which belongs to a company the members<br /> of which are not known, an attempt to put off con-<br /> tributors with quarterly payments. The writer,<br /> who has been a journalist all his life, knows of mo<br /> paper other than that referred to which pays<br /> quarterly. He is informed, however, that some<br /> exist.<br /> The arrangement is, nevertheless, an inequitable<br /> one. The contributor’s work is begun and finished<br /> before the office staff and the printers have done a<br /> stroke. If there is to be any differentiation between<br /> those to whom payments are due, it should not be<br /> at the expense of those who have written the<br /> “copy’ that the staff and printers have to<br /> handle. *<br /> There is only one practice in connection with<br /> the payment of contributors that is as bad as the<br /> quarterly arrangement, and that is payment on<br /> demand. It is impossible for a contributor to see<br /> every issue of every paper to which he may send<br /> work, and even if he orders copies he cannot always<br /> obtain them. Copies have been reported “out of<br /> print’’ even when ordered in advance through the<br /> usual channels. This happened in a case lately in<br /> the hands of the secretary of the society. The<br /> time seems to have come when a protest should be<br /> made against the system of payment on demand.<br /> The net result of it is to leave in the hands of<br /> the newspaper proprietors concerned a consider-<br /> able balance on account of not paid-for contributions.<br /> In the case of a daily paper this must amount to a<br /> large sum in the course of a year. -<br /> The plan not only of paying on publication, but<br /> of sending a voucher copy of the issue containing<br /> the article to the contributor who has written it, is<br /> that to which proprietors should be pressed to<br /> conform as a matter of equity, courtesy and good<br /> business. The Manchester Guardian is conspicuous<br /> ..among daily papers in Sending a voucher copy.<br /> Even the Quarterly Review, which costs six shillings<br /> to buy, and carries a good deal of postage, is sent<br /> to those who have articles in it.<br /> As journals are increasingly owned by companies,<br /> the directors of which know little of and care littlé<br /> for the traditions of journalism, there will be<br /> no doubt a larger number of cases in which the<br /> payment of contributors is put off to the latest<br /> possible date, and it behoves those in the profession<br /> who value fair dealing to resist.<br /> I should be very glad to receive from readers<br /> of The Author the names of papers which pay<br /> quarterly or on demand, with a view, if the com-<br /> mittee of the Society approve, to publication of the<br /> names of the journals in these columns as a<br /> cautionary measure, or as a step to friendly<br /> remonstrance.<br /> It should be added that even the practice of the<br /> best publications, of paying on publication, may be,<br /> although an undoubted step in advance, by no<br /> means an ideal arrangement. A very special<br /> authority on the relations of editors and con-<br /> tributors writes to me: “I should like to say that<br /> I think payment on publication is in a great many<br /> cases almost as bad and, in Some cases, even worse<br /> than payment quarterly. I have known articles in<br /> the big reviews held up for two, and even three,<br /> years. I think editors, in order to be businesslike,<br /> ought really to drop a post-card as soon as they<br /> decide to accept an article and, if possible, to pay<br /> for all articles accepted within the week. The<br /> Way editors keep authors dangling on by non-<br /> publication and by no direct acceptance is some-<br /> times very unsatisfactory and unbusinesslike.”<br /> HOME COUNTIES.<br /> THE BERLIN convenTION.<br /> —e—sº-0—<br /> HE Report of the Departmental Committee on<br /> the Law of Copyright was issued to the public<br /> on December 20, just as The Author was<br /> going to press. In order to get the magazine out<br /> by January 1, 1910, it was necessary to send to<br /> Press earlier than usual on account of the Christ-<br /> mas holidays. The Report is of such importance<br /> that it would have been a mistake to publish any<br /> superficial comments upon it in the current issue<br /> of The Author. A considered criticism will be<br /> published in due course.<br /> We are glad to notice that the committee<br /> recommend an extension of the copyright term to<br /> life and fifty years, with only two dissentient<br /> members. Another point of importance is the<br /> fact that there is no minority report issued.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#491) ################################################<br /> <br /> TFIE AUTISIOR.<br /> 113<br /> HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> 1. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br /> advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br /> lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br /> business or the administration of his property. The<br /> Secretary of the Society is a solicitor; but if there is any<br /> special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br /> Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br /> deem it desirable, will obtain counsel&#039;s opinion without<br /> any cost to the member. Moreover, where counsel&#039;s<br /> opinion is favourable, and the sanction of the Committee<br /> is obtained, action will be taken on behalf of the aggrieved<br /> member, and all costs borne by the Society.<br /> 2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br /> and publishers&#039; agreements do not fall within the experi-<br /> ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br /> the Society.<br /> 3. Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br /> the document to the Society for examination.<br /> 4. Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br /> you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br /> are reaping no direct benefit to yourself, and that you are<br /> advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br /> the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br /> 5. The Committee have arranged for the reception of<br /> members&#039; agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br /> proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br /> confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br /> who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:<br /> (1) To stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action<br /> upon them. (2) To keep agreements. (3) To enforce<br /> payments due according to agreements. Fuller particu-<br /> lars of the Society’s work can be obtained in the<br /> Prospectus.<br /> 6. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br /> º: without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br /> Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br /> consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br /> them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br /> them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br /> of the Society.<br /> This<br /> The<br /> 7. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements.<br /> must be done within fourteen days of first execution,<br /> Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members,<br /> 8. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br /> referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br /> do some publishers. Members can make their own<br /> deductions and act accordingly.<br /> 9. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br /> annum, or £10 10s. for life membership.<br /> WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br /> OF BOOKS.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> E RE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br /> agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br /> with literary property —<br /> I. Selling it Outright.<br /> This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br /> obtained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br /> competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br /> the Society.<br /> II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br /> agreement). -<br /> In this case the following rules should be attended to :<br /> (1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br /> duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br /> (2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br /> profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br /> in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br /> ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br /> (3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,”<br /> unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br /> (4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br /> rights.<br /> (5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br /> (6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br /> As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br /> doctor |<br /> III. The Royalty System.<br /> This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br /> of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br /> what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It is now<br /> possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br /> truth, From time to time very important figures connected<br /> with royalties are published in The Author.<br /> IV. A Commission Agreement.<br /> The main points are :—<br /> (1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br /> (2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br /> (3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br /> General.<br /> All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br /> above mentioned.<br /> Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author.<br /> Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br /> the Secretary of the Society.<br /> Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br /> Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br /> The main points which the Society has always demanded<br /> from the outset are :-<br /> (1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement.<br /> IO 63.IlS.<br /> (2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br /> to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br /> nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br /> withheld. -<br /> (3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br /> WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS,<br /> º<br /> w<br /> - —dh-<br /> --~~<br /> - EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br /> Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br /> petent legal authority.<br /> 2. It is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br /> the production of a play with anyone except an established<br /> manageT.<br /> 3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br /> in three or more acts:—<br /> (a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br /> is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br /> such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br /> for production of the piece by a certain date<br /> and for proper publication of his name on the<br /> play-bills. -<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#492) ################################################<br /> <br /> 114<br /> THE A DTHOR.<br /> (b.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br /> perform on the basis of percentages on<br /> gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br /> and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br /> percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br /> in preference to the American system. Should<br /> obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br /> date on or before which the play should be<br /> performed.<br /> (e.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br /> perform on the basis of royalties (i.e., fixed<br /> nightly fees). This method should be always<br /> avoided except in cases where the fees are<br /> likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br /> other safeguards set out under heading (b.) apply<br /> also in this case.<br /> 4. Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br /> better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br /> paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br /> important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br /> be reserved.<br /> 5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br /> be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br /> time. This is most important.<br /> 6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br /> should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction<br /> is of great importance.<br /> 7. Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br /> play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br /> holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br /> print the book of the words.<br /> 8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br /> ingly valuable. They should never be included in English<br /> agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br /> consideration.<br /> 9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br /> drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br /> 10. An author should remember that production of a play<br /> is highly speculative : that he runs a very great risk of<br /> delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br /> He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br /> the beginning.<br /> 11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br /> is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br /> is to obtain adequate publication.<br /> As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br /> account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br /> tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br /> are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> REGISTRATION OF SCENARIOS AND<br /> ORIGINAL PLAYS.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> NCENARIOS, typewritten in duplicate on foolscap paper<br /> forwarded to the offices of the Society, together with<br /> a registration fee of two shillings and sixpence, will<br /> be carefully compared by the Secretary or a qualified assis-<br /> tant. One copy will be stamped and returned to the author<br /> and the other filed in the register of the Society. Copies<br /> of the scenario thus filed may be obtained at any time by<br /> the author only at a small charge to cover cost of typing.<br /> Original Plays may also be filed subject to the same<br /> aules, with the exception that a play will be charged for<br /> at the price of 2s. 6d. per act. -<br /> WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br /> -o-º-e—<br /> ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br /> L assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br /> authors. . It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br /> a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br /> composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br /> cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br /> property. The musical composer has very often the two<br /> rights to deal with—performing right and copyright. He<br /> should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br /> an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br /> the warnings stated above.<br /> STAMPING MUSIC.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> The Society undertakes to stamp copies of music on<br /> behalf of its members for the fee of 6d. per 100 or part<br /> of 100. The members&#039; stamps are kept in the Society&#039;s<br /> safe. The musical publishers communicate direct with the<br /> Secretary, and the voucher is then forwarded to the<br /> members, who are thus saved much unnecessary trouble.<br /> e—º- e.<br /> w = \º-<br /> THE READING BRANCH,<br /> ——3–0–<br /> EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br /> M branch of its work by informing young writers<br /> of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br /> treated as a composition is treated by a coach. The term<br /> MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br /> and dramatic Works, and when it is possible, under<br /> Special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br /> Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br /> fee is one guinea.<br /> * A<br /> —º-<br /> w-up- w<br /> “THE AUTHOR.”<br /> —t-º-º-<br /> HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br /> T the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br /> free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br /> very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br /> many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br /> 58. 6d. Subscription for the year.<br /> Communications for “The Author” should be addressed<br /> to the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey&#039;s<br /> Gate, S.W., and should reach the Editor not later than the<br /> 21st of each month.<br /> Communications and letters are invited by the<br /> Editor on all literary matters treated from the stand-<br /> point of art or business, but on no other subjects whatever.<br /> Every effort will be made to return articles which cannot<br /> be accepted.<br /> • —-º- a<br /> -º-<br /> vºy w<br /> REMITTANCEs.<br /> —4—º-t—<br /> The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br /> that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post.<br /> All remittances should be crossed Union of London and<br /> Smith&#039;s Bank, Chancery Lane, or be sent by registered<br /> letter only.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#493) ################################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 115<br /> GENERAL NOTES.<br /> —e—º-e— -<br /> COLLES v. MAUGHAM.<br /> AN important case, of interest to members of the<br /> Society, has just been decided before Mr. Justice<br /> Channell and a special jury. The case was brought<br /> by Mr. W. Morris Colles, literary agent, against<br /> Mr. W. Somerset Maugham, dramatic author, and<br /> related to a claim made by the plaintiff on the<br /> defendant for commission for agency work.<br /> The committee, before deciding to defend the<br /> case, took counsel&#039;s opinion, which was very<br /> strongly in favour of the Society&#039;s contesting the<br /> claim on the ground that the plaintiff had no cause<br /> of action. The committee, in addition, felt that it<br /> was most important to have some distinct judg-<br /> ment in order to be able to ascertain the rights<br /> and wrongs of agency claims.<br /> The verdict of the jury in the present case has,<br /> however, been given against the member of the<br /> Society to the extent of half the commission<br /> claimed by the agent, who accordingly obtained<br /> judgment for £21 10s. and costs. The present<br /> note is being written during the Christmas legal<br /> vacation, and the advisers of the Society are con-<br /> sidering the propriety of applying for a new trial,<br /> so that the case is still to some extent sub judice,<br /> and further comment on it must be deferred for a<br /> short time.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> COMMITTEE ELECTION.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> IN pursuance of Article 19 of the Articles of<br /> Association of the Society, the committee<br /> give notice that the election of members to<br /> the committee of management will be proceeded<br /> with in the following manner —<br /> (1) One-third of the members of the present<br /> committee of management retire from office in<br /> accordance with Article 17.<br /> (2) The members desiring to offer themselves for<br /> re-election who have been nominated by the com-<br /> mittee are Mrs. E. Nesbit Bland, Mr. Comyns<br /> Carr, Mr. G. Bernard Shaw, and Mr. Francis Storr.<br /> (3) The date fixed by the committee up to<br /> which nominations by the subscribing members<br /> of candidates for election to the new committee<br /> may be made is the 15th day of February.<br /> (4) The committee nominate the following<br /> candidates, being subscribing members of the<br /> Society, to fill the vacancies caused by the retire-<br /> ment of one-third of the committee, according to<br /> the new constitution :-<br /> Mrs. E. Nesbit Bland.<br /> Mr. Comyns Carr.<br /> Mr. G. Bernard Shaw.<br /> Mr. Francis Storr.<br /> The Committee remind the members that, under<br /> Article 19 of the amended articles of association,<br /> “any two subscribing members of the society may<br /> hominate one or more subscribing members, other<br /> than themselves, not exceeding the number of<br /> Vacancies to be filled up, by notice in writing sent<br /> tº the secretary, accompanied by a letter signed by<br /> the candidate or candidates expressing willingness<br /> to accept the duties of the post.”<br /> Members desiring to exercise their powers under<br /> this rule must send in the name of the candidate<br /> 9, candidates they nominate, not exceeding four in<br /> all, on or before the 15th day of February, together<br /> With an accompanying letter written by the candi-<br /> date, or candidates expressing readiness to accept<br /> nomination. The complete list of candidates will<br /> be printed in the March issue of The Auſ/or.<br /> Having regard to the fact that the present Com-<br /> mittee have been in office just over a year, the com-<br /> mittee consider it in the interest of the society not<br /> to suggest any change at the present time. They<br /> have therefore re-nominated the four retiring<br /> members. C<br /> A —º- A.<br /> ~y-<br /> w w<br /> THE PENSION FUND COMMITTEE.<br /> Is accordance with annual custom, and in order<br /> to give members of the society, should they<br /> desire to appoint a fresh member to the<br /> Pension Fund Committee, full time to act, it has<br /> been thought advisable to place in The Author a<br /> complete statement of the method of election under<br /> the scheme for administration of the Pension Fund.<br /> Under that scheme the committee is composed of<br /> three members elected by the committee of the<br /> society, three members elected by the society at the<br /> general meeting, and the chairman of the society<br /> for the time being, ex officio. The three members<br /> elected at the general meeting when the fund was<br /> started were Mr. Morley Roberts, Mr. M. H. Spiel-<br /> mann, and Mrs. Alec Tweedie. These have in turn<br /> during the past years resigned, and, submitting<br /> their names for re-election, have been unanimously<br /> re-elected. Mr. Morley Roberts resigned and was<br /> re-elected in 1909. This year Mr. M. H. Spielmann,<br /> under the rules of the scheme, tenders his resigna-<br /> tion, and submits his name for re-election. The<br /> members have power to put forward other names<br /> under clause 9, which runs as follows:–<br /> Any candidate for election to the Pension Fund Com-<br /> imittee by the members of the society (not being a retiring<br /> member of such committee) shall be nominated in writing<br /> to the secretary at least three weeks prior to the general<br /> meeting at which such candidate is to be proposed, and the<br /> nomination of each such candidate shall be subscribed by<br /> at least three members of the society. A list of the names<br /> of the candidates so nominated shall be sent to the members<br /> of the society, with the annual report of the Managing<br /> Committee, and those candidates obtaining the most votes<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#494) ################################################<br /> <br /> 116<br /> TFIES A UſTISIOR.<br /> at the general meeting shall be elected to serve on the<br /> Pension Fund Committee.<br /> In case any member should desire to refer to the<br /> list of members, the list, taking the elections up to<br /> the end of July, 1907, was published in October<br /> of that year. This list is complete, with the excep-<br /> tion of the thirty-eight members referred to in the<br /> short preface. All further elections have been duly<br /> notified in The Author. They can easily be referred<br /> to, as members receive a copy every month.<br /> It will be as well, therefore, should any of the<br /> members desire to put forward a candidate, to take<br /> the matter within their immediate consideration.<br /> The general meeting of the society has usually<br /> been held towards the end of February or the<br /> beginning of March. It is essential that all<br /> nominations should be in the hands of the secretary<br /> before the 31st of January, 1910.<br /> UNITED STATES NOTES.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> EFORE these notes are in type the new<br /> American Academy, which has been in<br /> embryo for the last five years, will have<br /> fairly come to the birth. Of the sixty-two originally<br /> selected members, seventeen have dropped out of<br /> the ranks, the latest casualties having been H. C. Lea<br /> and Richard Watson Gilder. If the desirableness of<br /> the institution itself be conceded, few will, we think,<br /> be found to quarrel with the names, a list of which<br /> appeared in a recent number of the Chicago Dial.<br /> It will be agreed by most Americans that the<br /> book of the fall, if not the book of the year, has<br /> been the veteran John Bigelow’s “Retrospections<br /> of an Active Life.” The three volumes cover no<br /> less a period than fifty years—from 1817 to 1867–<br /> and there is said to be more to come. Much of it<br /> is concerned with the diplomatic life of Mr. Bigelow<br /> at Paris, where he played a notable part at a<br /> critical period of his country&#039;s fortunes. There are<br /> also notable personal estimates of Lincoln and<br /> Seward ; and historical points of interest, such as<br /> the death of Toussaint l’Ouverture and the pro-<br /> gress of the Monroe Doctrine, receive much atten-<br /> tion. On the latter peril Mr. Bigelow is more<br /> cautious and conservative than the men of to-day.<br /> The third volume will be valuable to the historian<br /> for the mass of material in the shape of confiden-<br /> tial correspondence concerning the unfortunate<br /> Mexican adventure of Napoleon III.<br /> Several other notable biographical works are<br /> also signalising this season. There are George<br /> F. Parker’s “Recollections of Grover Cleveland,”<br /> and the story of Fulton&#039;s achievements by his<br /> descendant Alice Craty Sutcliffe, both of which<br /> come from the Century Company; “Home Letters<br /> of General Sherman’’ (extending from the West<br /> Point period in 1837 through the war till 1888),<br /> edited by M.A. De Wolfe. Howe, issued by<br /> Scribners ; “The Diary of President James<br /> K. Polk,” edited by Adlai E. Stevenson ; and<br /> Clark E. Carr’s “Study of Stephen Douglas,” by<br /> the McClurg Company ; not to mention Emerson’s<br /> Journals, Stanley’s “Autobiography,” William<br /> Winter’s “Life and Art of Richard Mansfield,”<br /> and Eugenie Paul Jefferson’s “Intimate Recollec-<br /> tions of Joseph Jefferson.” It is a veritable<br /> embarras de richesse.<br /> Cleveland&#039;s Vice-president and Polk&#039;s editor<br /> gives us some fine miscellaneous feeding in his<br /> “Something of Men I have Known,” which is full<br /> of good stories. &amp;<br /> Apropos of the “Pigskin Library” catalogue at<br /> the end of one of Mr. Roosevelt&#039;s recent Scribner<br /> articles, a writer in the Dial suggested that “The<br /> Pigskin Library,” edited by Theodore Roosevelt,<br /> might not be a bad venture for some enterprising<br /> publisher, “especially if he could announce the<br /> volumes as bound in skins of the distinguished<br /> editor&#039;s own procuring ”<br /> Judge Shute has followed up his “Real Diary of<br /> a Real Boy” with “Farming It,” which purports to<br /> be the narrative of his experiences as an amateur<br /> agriculturist in the region of Exeter, New Hamp-<br /> shire. The judge makes free with the names of<br /> his friends and neighbours, nay more, with his own,<br /> his wife&#039;s and his children&#039;s, and does not stick too<br /> closely to his text. Yet there are some who charge<br /> him with “fiction.”<br /> Professor Wilbur L. Cross’s “Life and Times of<br /> Laurence Sterne,” like Emerson&#039;s Journal, com-<br /> bines biographical and literary interest. Five<br /> years ago the author, in his edition of Sterne,<br /> was the first to print “The Journal to Eliza.” In<br /> the present work he has used other unedited<br /> material. Although he has made his objective a<br /> personal rather than a literary life, it seems likely<br /> that the book, from its fulness, accuracy and fresh-<br /> ness, will prove, in many aspects of the subject, a<br /> definitive record. .<br /> On October 21, the anniversary of the distin-<br /> guished Harvard professor&#039;s death, the Charles<br /> Eliot Norton Memorial Lectureship in the Archæo-<br /> logical Institute of America was endowed by Mr.<br /> James Loch. Preference in the choice of lecturers<br /> is to be given to European scholars, but Americans<br /> are not to be wholly barred.<br /> Nearly the same day appeared, with the imprint<br /> of the Houghton, Mifflin Company, “American<br /> Foreign Policy, by a Diplomatist,” both the con-<br /> tents and the authorship of which were calculated<br /> to excite no small interest.<br /> From the Chicago University Press comes<br /> “The Armenian Awakening,” by Leon Arpee, a<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#495) ################################################<br /> <br /> THE A LITH OFº.<br /> 117<br /> publication likely to be often referred to in the<br /> years to come.<br /> Henry James&#039;s “Italian Hours&quot; hardly needs<br /> Comment in The Author, and the same may perhaps<br /> be said of W. D. Howells&#039;s “Seven Cities,” which<br /> most of your readers will have seen or read<br /> about.<br /> In view of the raging, tearing suffrage agitation,<br /> they may, however, like their attention drawn to<br /> Dr. Edith Abbott&#039;s “Women in Industry,” which<br /> is issued by Messrs. Appleton.<br /> Anna A. Rogers&#039;s “Why American Marriages<br /> Fail” (Houghton, Mifflin)—we will not disclose<br /> the secret—may by some cynics also be held to<br /> bear upon the subject.<br /> On November 15 the new buildings of the Boston<br /> Art Museum were opened. The Museum has<br /> acquired some valuable Greek sculptures, and is<br /> increasing its deservedly high reputation.<br /> It is announced that Mr. and Mrs. Joseph<br /> Pennell are to begin a lecturing tour in America<br /> in January next, their subjects being “Whistler,<br /> Artist and Man,” “The History of Illustration,”<br /> and “Engraving.”<br /> “The Life and Letters of Edmund Clarence<br /> Stedman” is to be undertaken by his granddaughter,<br /> Moffat Yard &amp; Co. being her publishers.<br /> Messrs. Scribner are undertaking the Memorial<br /> Edition of Meredith in the United States.<br /> James Edward Rogers has essayed to defend “The<br /> American Newspaper’ in a large spirit. We do<br /> not envy him his task of examining fifteen thousand<br /> journals, but are constrained to applaud his thorough-<br /> neSS. It is Chicago that repels the attack of the<br /> foe, not the headquarters of the Yellow Press.<br /> The reprint of John Davis’s “Travels of Four<br /> Years and a Half in the United States” (H. Holt<br /> &amp; Co.)–1798 to 1802 they were—will be welcome<br /> to the curious.<br /> Fiction is not unduly prominent just at present,<br /> though Messrs. Holt are publishing for Professor<br /> Canby, of Yale, “A Guide to the Short Story in<br /> English.” “Happy Hawkins” has been hailed in<br /> some quarters as the best story of the West since<br /> “The Virginians.” The author is Robert Alexander<br /> Wason ; the publishers, Small, Maynard &amp; Co.<br /> Mr. Marion Crawford&#039;s posthumous “Stradella’’<br /> was a good love story ; Jack London did himself<br /> justice in his “Martin Eden,” as did Thomas<br /> Nelson Page in “John Marvel&#039;s Assistant.” “The<br /> Southerner,” a book of some force but slender<br /> artistic merit, seems to be of the nature of a roman<br /> à clef.<br /> “Lost Borders,” a collection of short stories by<br /> Harry Austin, is distinguished for a certain forceful<br /> simplicity.<br /> Mr. Chambers&#039;s new story is called “The Danger<br /> Mark;” that of Miss Elizabeth Robins, “The Floren-<br /> time Frame.”<br /> Theatre.”<br /> Hamlin Garland displays his old power of con-<br /> Veying atmosphere in “The Moccasin Ranch.”<br /> My obituary list includes Henry Charles Lea<br /> (who died at Philadelphia on October 24), the dis-<br /> tinguished historian of the Inquisition and author<br /> of other works on Spanish and ecclesiastical history,<br /> Who was a publisher by extraction as well as pursuit ;<br /> Col. Theodore Dodge (died at Versailles, October 26),<br /> Who lost liberty and a leg in the Civil War, but<br /> lived to write its history, as well as those of Alex-<br /> Ander, Hannibal, and other military heroes:<br /> Richard Watson Gilder (died in New York,<br /> November 18), editor of the Century Maſſazine,<br /> Scribner&#039;s Monthly, and other periodicals, distin-<br /> guished as poet and municipal reformer ; and<br /> William M. Laffan, publisher of the New York<br /> Sun for a quarter of a century, and author of<br /> “American Wood Engravers.”<br /> The latter is “a novel of the New<br /> a—º- a<br /> v-u-w<br /> DIFFICULTY IN WIRITING.<br /> —e—º-e—<br /> HILE many authors are blessed with a<br /> fluent pen, and give themselves no<br /> anxiety how they shall begin, or con-<br /> tinue, or leave off, others are afflicted with a kind<br /> of paralysis, and labour under an unaccountable<br /> friction, which obstructs them at every turn and<br /> makes composition a herculean task. This difficulty<br /> isin writing very much what stammering is in speech,<br /> the effort to bring out the words and to say a thing<br /> being wholly disproportionate to the result : extra-<br /> ordinary exertions are made, and after all the<br /> outcome is no more than ordinary speaking. The<br /> two disorders, moreover, appear to me to be alike<br /> in this, that both more or less are due to a certain<br /> nervousness. If the author, inflamed with ideas,<br /> could but compose himself, could lay aside exces-<br /> sive anxiety, and confront his subject squarely, he<br /> would no doubt be more “prosperously delivered ”<br /> of his thoughts. Indeed, I suppose most people<br /> find that what is written for private purposes is<br /> done much more expeditiously and freely than what<br /> is written for publication, and often better done<br /> into the bargain. Still, I do not mean to say that<br /> difficulty in writing is a complaint so superficial<br /> that it may be cured by a Sage precept or two ;<br /> for, on the contrary, quickness or slowness are<br /> qualities so deeply embedded in our nature that we<br /> never outlive them, but show our tendency to one<br /> or the other almost in our every act. Nor do I<br /> suggest by any means that it is the mark of an<br /> indifferent or inexperienced writer to be slow and<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#496) ################################################<br /> <br /> 118<br /> TriB Anthor.<br /> to express oneself with a struggle. Everyone knows<br /> that this is not so ; everyone knows that there has<br /> been no lack even among the greatest authors to<br /> give proof–what Vasari says in allusion to some<br /> drawings of Michael Angelo—that the hammer of<br /> Vulcan was necessary to bring Minerva from the<br /> head of Jupiter. Swift even goes so far as to assert<br /> that common fluency of speech is owing to scarcity<br /> of matter and scarcity of words: “people come<br /> faster out of a church when it is almost empty, than<br /> when a crowd is at the door,” he remarks.<br /> When we consider it in the abstract it certainly<br /> seems that writing ought to be a very easy thing,<br /> for it is nothing but putting down what you have<br /> to say. It really is hardly credible that a man can<br /> find such difficulty in it. Yet where is the author<br /> who does not know that it is a labour to write, a<br /> severe labour very often, and sometimes a desperate<br /> encounter in which he wrestles and contends as with<br /> an adversary On such occasions I have often<br /> asked myself what it is that impedes me, and why<br /> I cannot get on and despatch my business. For<br /> doubtless much that retards us in these instances<br /> has only to be brought to view to be set aside, or<br /> at least made less formidable. To this end I shall<br /> here notice some of the hindrances to fluency, or<br /> expedition, in writing.<br /> The first lies in bringing conceptions to earth,<br /> and making them specific. What we think for<br /> ourselves is done as it were in skeleton : here we<br /> are in immediate contact with the ideas themselves,<br /> so the merest tracery suffices; we know what we<br /> mean at once, and have no need to enter into<br /> details, arguments and long explanations. But in<br /> Writing we have to communicate thoughts, that is<br /> to say, we have to make other people understand,<br /> other people feel. This necessitates a certain<br /> radical transformation of the idea, in which what<br /> before was diffuse is condensed into something<br /> definite, as vapour is turned into rain. To corner<br /> our thoughts in this way, if I may so express it,<br /> and make them stand and deliver, often presents<br /> the greatest difficulty ; for thoughts are so far<br /> from immediately becoming words, as has been<br /> maintained, that a person may conceive in a few<br /> moments what will take him weeks to bring<br /> properly out. He has the guiding points, the<br /> essence of the thing in mind ; but that it may take<br /> communicable shape, steady development, rumina-<br /> tion, is required. This, then, is one of the<br /> hindrances to ready writing. It is obviated, at<br /> least to a great extent, by thinking before we begin<br /> to write, and making the subject perfectly clear to<br /> ourselves; for the more definite an idea is, the<br /> more easily it slips into Words.<br /> The question of order and arrangement is<br /> another fertile cause of delay. If in writing we<br /> had nothing else to do but put down the thoughts<br /> just as they came into our heads, and to go<br /> rambling on like a madman, there would indeed be<br /> little excuse for stopping. But a self-respecting<br /> author aims at being consequent and connected :<br /> and so he is necessarily often exercised as to how<br /> he shall dispose of his matter. This particular<br /> difficulty is greatest at the beginning, and<br /> diminishes with the progress of the work : for at<br /> first a hundred alternatives present themselves, but<br /> once a beginning is made one thing leads to<br /> another. A good beginning gives an impetus, and<br /> carries one along ; SO it is just as well to allow a<br /> little delay here, and not from impatience to rush<br /> blindly in. At the same time it is better to write<br /> something near to what we would, than by waiting<br /> indefinitely for the exact expression to write<br /> nothing at all.<br /> Next, transition must be mentioned. It brings<br /> the writer to a temporary halt whenever what he is<br /> about to say diverges from what he has just said.<br /> To pass smoothly from point to point in a piece of .<br /> writing, so that the whole runs on without abrupt<br /> jerks and changes, is not always easy to manage ;<br /> and thus, to be paradoxical, the very effort at<br /> fluency may hinder fluency, the writer pausing<br /> that the reader may afterwards the better go on.<br /> Akin to this is the difficulty of returning from a<br /> digression to take up the main theme again, and<br /> also that of trying to bring any special observation<br /> within the scope of the subject we have undertaken<br /> to write about. They are both best avoided by<br /> determining not to drag in alien malter. Other<br /> causes of obstruction to the free course of writing<br /> are trying to find examples, trying to begin or end<br /> in a particular way, trying to fit in special words<br /> or phrases, avoiding dissonance, and seeking<br /> variety of expression ; for all these and many<br /> other considerations prevent us from putting down<br /> the first thing that comes into our heads.<br /> But perhaps the chief hindrances to despatch in<br /> Writing are moral in their nature. Among these I<br /> have already mentioned anxiety. It is a great tie,<br /> and not only prevents a person from pushing<br /> adequately forward in his work, but makes what<br /> he does write calculated and halting, depriving him<br /> of his proper freedom, and so of the grace that<br /> naturally accompanies unconscious and unimpeded<br /> action. Instead of attending to his business, and<br /> saying what he has got to say, an author Very often<br /> is mainly intent upon making an impression. This<br /> pre-occupation to appear to advantage, this exces-<br /> sive caution not to make a mistake, brings constant<br /> hesitation, hampers the movements, and, in thus<br /> interrupting, cools and dries the stream of<br /> eloquence. To avoid slovenly writing is but due<br /> to the reader; but guardedness, which retards the<br /> pen far more, only shows distrust. Hence it is<br /> often a positive help to an author to make less of<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#497) ################################################<br /> <br /> TFE A CITFIOR.<br /> 119<br /> an undertaking of his work, and not to be too con-<br /> cerned about the success of it.<br /> To lie under an obligation to write in a given<br /> manner or at given length is another thing that<br /> prevents easy progress; for a man is thus put out<br /> of his natural stride, and moves under constraint.<br /> But the worst effect of any is produced by dis-<br /> inclination——a negative sort of electricity which<br /> repels ideas and scatters attention. When we are<br /> in this mood, dawdling is unavoidable. Some<br /> slight aversion of this kind is generally experienced<br /> in commencing to write, since it requires a certain<br /> interval to work up the circulation in the mind.<br /> Time and place, again, have great influence on the<br /> happiness of composition ; for, whatever people<br /> may say, there is no more fancy in an author not<br /> being able to write with equal ease at any time or<br /> in any place, than in his not being able to go to<br /> sleep whenever or wherever he wishes. Still,<br /> Control does much to master any undue fastidious-<br /> ness in this particular,<br /> In speaking above of the reduction of ideas from<br /> the form in which we dwell upon them for ourselves<br /> to that in which they must be embodied so as to<br /> become transmissible to others, I omitted to notice<br /> that hesitation is often caused by the poverty of<br /> the thought to be conveyed. At the last moment<br /> the writer discovers that his idea contains much<br /> less than at first seemed ; he does not like to come<br /> right out with it : and he must then either beat<br /> about the bush, or waste time in belated improvisa-<br /> tion. To avoid this, we must fatten up our<br /> chickens before we bring them to market, or, in<br /> other words, make sure that we have something to<br /> tell before preparing to tell it.<br /> I say nothing here of style, the question<br /> being about difficulty in writing, not about<br /> difficulty in the arts, or technique of writing,<br /> just as in a factory there is the question of power<br /> transmission, quite apart from that of the style<br /> and quality of the goods manufactured. What<br /> introduces needless friction ; what makes a writer<br /> gape about, and dilly-dally, and fritter away his<br /> time and energy ; what impedes his utterance,<br /> even when all attentive; these are the points we<br /> set out to consider. Having made our diagnosis,<br /> it remains to prescribe the remedies. They are, of<br /> course, several; but I must not be interminable,<br /> and therefore shall content myself with giving a<br /> single specific. But, so that I may no longer<br /> appeal to a sick man for advice how to be healthy,<br /> let me in this pass over my own opinions, and<br /> conclude with the sententious maxim of Cobbett :—<br /> Sit down to write what you have thought, and not<br /> to think what you shall write.<br /> NORMAN ALLISTON.<br /> THE REVIEWER AND HIS LITTLE WAYS.<br /> BY A WRITER.<br /> OME authors never read reviews of their own<br /> Works—or so they inform a credulous world.<br /> Others not only read them, but when they<br /> are favoured with a good review, cut it out and<br /> keep it. Others again, a noble few, cut out all<br /> the notices they receive, good and bad, and paste<br /> them into a book. This book serves as a means<br /> of Self-chastening when the author is conscious of<br /> feeling uplifted. Not only are the best notices<br /> of his works balanced by others which it is dis-<br /> agreeable to recall, but the reviewer who wishes<br /> to be kind does not always praise the right thing.<br /> If you are the sole European authority on the<br /> manners and customs of the Elecampane Indians,<br /> it jars upon you to find a jovial person writing of<br /> your book —“A thrilling narrative, but we think<br /> less of its main theme than does the author.<br /> Anyone can Write about Indians, and what appeals<br /> to us is the racy account of the doings on the<br /> Voyage out.” We knew an author once who was<br /> compared, year after year, by a certain paper to<br /> Jane Austen. High praise, one would say, and<br /> fairly certain to exceed his deserts. Ah, but the<br /> Works in question were thrilling romances of<br /> adventure, as desirous as the Fat Boy of making<br /> the flesh Creep. And they recalled Jane Austen<br /> because “they began quietly, went on quietly,<br /> ended quietly; they never stirred the blood; they<br /> Were more painstakingly decorous than &#039;&#039; even her<br /> books<br /> But these, after all, are good reviews, and if<br /> they are to be read for chastening, the bad may<br /> be recalled for comfort. Not so much the first<br /> bad review you ever received, which you read with<br /> a pained incredulity that anyone could be found<br /> to say such unkind, unfair things about a book<br /> which other critics had found so good, but those<br /> that came a little later, looking back on which<br /> you are tempted to wonder how you ever dared to<br /> go on writing at all. It was a question of setting<br /> your teeth and sitting tight, for the unpleasant<br /> review has a staying power that outlasts even that<br /> of the delightfully kind one that makes you go<br /> about smiling to yourself all day. But you lived<br /> through it somehow, and went on writing, and<br /> you have a certain feeling of triumph nowadays<br /> when the reviewers tell you how good your earlier<br /> books were. It is true they are not flattering to<br /> those of the present. “We expected better work<br /> than this from the hand that gave us ’ and<br /> * —,&#039;” they say. “In Mr. Smith pro-<br /> duced a masterpiece, even a classic, and the present<br /> book reveals, a sad falling-off from his earlier<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#498) ################################################<br /> <br /> 120<br /> TISIES A DITFIOR.<br /> methods.” In some surprise, you look up the<br /> review of the masterpiece in question, and find<br /> that the reviewer&#039;s love to it was so carefully<br /> dissembled that he had no hesitation in kicking it<br /> downstairs immediately on its appearance. And<br /> if your first books were better than you were ever<br /> allowed to suspect at the time, so also your<br /> personal dignity stood higher in the reviewer&#039;s<br /> estimation. “Mr. Smith should really not have<br /> come down to this line of business,” he says now,<br /> with pained surprise, and you wonder how any<br /> descent was possible from the extremely low level<br /> at which your reputation stood. If it be permitted<br /> to the trodden worm to indulge a grievance against<br /> its treader, you might find one in the Occasional<br /> inconsistency of your critic. “We cannot but<br /> trust,” he says, “that in the next instalment of<br /> the story we shall get plenty of that romantic<br /> political intrigue in the delineation of which<br /> |Mr. Smith has so often proved himself a master.”<br /> The next instalment does provide the required<br /> excitement, and with beating heart you await<br /> commendation, only to receive this dash of cold<br /> water :—“The story is well written, and some of<br /> the scenes are very striking ; but we cannot feel<br /> much interest in these politics &#039;&#039;<br /> But there is something to be thankful for even<br /> here, for many a reviewer is driven to frenzy by<br /> the discovery of a sequel—a thing that readers<br /> delight in and demand. No matter how complete<br /> the book is in itself, he washes his hands of it the<br /> moment he perceives it is not the first appearance<br /> of every character on any stage. Sometimes excess<br /> of resentment leads him to o&#039;erleap himself. Of a<br /> certain novel a reviewer said that “the heroine<br /> was preordained to die because in a former book,<br /> post-dated, her husband appeared as a widower.”<br /> But the gentleman referred to did not appear at<br /> all, save as a ghost, in the other book, and the<br /> author remains intermittently troubled by the<br /> problem whether a ghost can correctly be spoken<br /> of as a widower.<br /> There is another unpardonable sin in the<br /> reviewer’s eyes, and that is length. Here again<br /> his interest runs directly counter to that of the<br /> reader. Lordly in his seclusion, with his weekly<br /> dose of fiction delivered at his door in a neat<br /> parcel from the office, he has never waited in a<br /> circulating library, watching the women who<br /> extricate their books with difficulty from a string<br /> bag containing various materials for home dress-<br /> making and a cake for tea. He would see them<br /> weighing critically the merits of two novels on the<br /> score of number of pages and closeness of print.<br /> They discern at once the publishers&#039; catalogue<br /> which, with the aid of paper as thick as cardboard,<br /> pads out to six-shilling length the little gem which<br /> he ran through in twenty minutes and stamped<br /> with the seal of his high approval, and they reject<br /> it unhesitatingly. What use would so slight a<br /> production be in alleviating a toothache or a cold<br /> in the head It would be gone in no time, and<br /> there would be nothing more to read. As well set<br /> a cream meringue before a hungry man.<br /> If the reviewer could only be brought to see it,<br /> it is not the length of the book that is in fault,<br /> but the necessity for pretending to have tried to<br /> read it through. The pretence results in a notice<br /> something like this :—“‘The Pink Lobelia&#039; is a<br /> novel that suffers from being interminable. We<br /> have spent many weary hours over it, and failed<br /> to reach the end. Of course Lord Hugo and the<br /> heroine marry at last, but frankly, we were not<br /> sufficiently interested in them to find out how they<br /> did it.” Then the author, if he is young and<br /> innocent, writes timidly to point out that the<br /> whole object of the book is to show why the<br /> beauteous Angela did not espouse the gay Hugo,<br /> but her father’s old comrade-in-arms, and the<br /> editor appends to his communication the sarcastic<br /> note :-‘‘We print this letter as requested, but<br /> we are bound to say that we infinitely prefer our<br /> reviewer&#039;s ending to the author&#039;s, which strikes us<br /> as jejune in the extreme.” The unhappy author<br /> recovers from the blow by degrees, and learns the<br /> invaluable lesson that a contest is unequal in<br /> which your opponent is bound to have the last<br /> Word.<br /> Why should not the reviewer give up the<br /> pretence of reading through a long book by a<br /> little-known author P Even if he likes the book,<br /> his tender mercies are cruel, for he writes his<br /> notice in the form of a synopsis of the plot—<br /> generally all wrong. Why should there not be a<br /> formula of this kind—in which the publisher<br /> would no doubt assist by enclosing a list of the<br /> characters ?—“‘The Pink Lobelia.’ The scene<br /> of this book is laid in the Mountains of the Moon,<br /> whither an exploring party proceeds in quest of<br /> the treasure of the title.” (Observe the prudence<br /> which fails to specify whether the treasure is<br /> animal, vegetable, or mineral.) “The principal<br /> characters are Lord Hugo Stoneybroke, a dashing<br /> sprig of nobility, Colonel Trueheart, a soldier<br /> without fear and without reproach, and Angela<br /> Verifayre, a beautiful heiress. There are adven-<br /> tures and deeds of derring-do galore ” (no one,<br /> surely, would be so hard-hearted as to deprive the<br /> poor reviewer of these two indispensable words 2),<br /> “and the love-story ends in a way which we will<br /> not wound our readers by revealing.” Too much<br /> like the publisher&#039;s puff, you will say ; but is the<br /> publisher&#039;s puff never made use of in reviews<br /> already ?<br /> Every reviewer is omniscient by nature, and<br /> when he makes a hash of your plot in purporting<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#499) ################################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 121<br /> to Summarise it, that merely shows that Homer<br /> still nods occasionally. When a mistake occurs<br /> in matters of fact, it is because the reviewer has<br /> gone for his holiday, and his work is being done<br /> by the office-boy. If you doubt this, make a<br /> complaint of any such mistake to the journal in<br /> Which it appears, and see. One hopes that the<br /> reviewer (or office-boy) who recently placed the<br /> Peninsular War in “the fifties” is the same that<br /> Some years ago reviewed “The Great Proconsul’’<br /> under the impression that the trial of Warren<br /> Hastings ended in a verdict of “Guilty,” and that<br /> there are not two people whose historical studies<br /> ended presumably with the Norman Conquest<br /> running amuck in the critical world. If this type<br /> of reviewer knows too little about his subject to<br /> find any other fault, he can always bring a charge<br /> of plagiarism. What matters it that he is review-<br /> ing in two successive weeks two novels which<br /> appeared almost simultaneously It is smart<br /> and easy to say:—“Mr. Brown-Jones will never<br /> want for the sincerest form of flattery while Mr.<br /> Smith lives and writes,” and the public, which<br /> knows nothing about dates of publication, credits<br /> him with much critical acumen, Half the charges<br /> of plagiarism which afflict the modern author are<br /> based upon ignorance of the common authority<br /> upon which both writers have drawn, and a goodly<br /> proportion of the remainder on the fallacy that<br /> the writer has read everything that the reviewer<br /> has reviewed.<br /> If you are a writer with a purpose, there is<br /> another crow which you will often have to pick<br /> with the reviewer. When you have spent months<br /> of labour on the preparation of an impeccable<br /> index, in the modest hope of securing a word of<br /> jpraise from a paper which is strong on such<br /> matters, it is disappointing to find the point<br /> altogether ignored, and your book treated merely<br /> as a jumping-off place for the gambols of an expert<br /> whose views are not yours. But it is even more<br /> galling, when you have written, say, a Socialist<br /> novel, and it is reviewed in your own pet Socialist<br /> daily, to discover that its message is belittled and<br /> its anticipations ridiculed, precisely as if you had<br /> to thank The Primrose Messenger for the notice.<br /> The subject is one to be discreetly touched, for in<br /> it is involved the whole question of a man’s<br /> working for a paper whose political opinions he<br /> does not share. Oddly enough, there is no<br /> reciprocity about the thing. You never find<br /> your Socialism unexpectedly commended by The<br /> Primrose Messenger.<br /> Akin to this grievance is that of the existence<br /> of the multiple reviewer. Every author is con-<br /> vinced that he has an enemy who writes against<br /> each of his books in turn in Several papers, and<br /> there are some who can produce presumptive<br /> evidence of the fact in mis-spellings and tags of<br /> Spºch appearing with suspicious reiteration. Tut<br /> authors themselves are not wholly innocent in this<br /> Tespect. A certain novelist recently made, or<br /> allowed to be made for her, the calm confession<br /> that on the appearance of a book of poems by a<br /> relative she “herself reviewed the volume under<br /> Various pen-names in several periodicals, and later<br /> Wrote for the edition included in a certain series<br /> the introduction that is signed with initials other<br /> than her own.” If an adverse reviewer had made<br /> this confession, it would have been greeted with a<br /> Storm of protest. Is there any difference in<br /> Principle when the reviewing is favourable and<br /> done by one interested in the success of the book?<br /> Let us be just, then, even to the reviewer. If<br /> he can be horrid, he can also be Very, very nice.<br /> If he can obstinately pervert the most Original<br /> actions of your characters into Something old<br /> and commonplace, he can also display an insight<br /> into their motives that surprises you. And he<br /> likes you to purr when you are pleased. There is<br /> 9ne, literary journal which has the delightful<br /> habit of sending the author a copy of the issue<br /> Containing the review. One says “delightful&quot; with<br /> fear and trembling, for hitherto, like the sun-dial,<br /> the paper has marked only sunny hours. Would<br /> it be sent if the notice was a bad one 2 The<br /> Critic on the Hearth is resdy with the answer,<br /> “Rather and in double-quick time !”<br /> THE LITERARY YEAR BOOK.<br /> —t—º-e—<br /> LAW AND LETTERS.<br /> HERE seems to be no variation from the<br /> issue of last year under the heading of “Law<br /> and Letters” in the new Literary Year<br /> Book. Has no case of importance been tried<br /> during the past year * Has the United States<br /> passed no important Copyright Act 2<br /> The standing matter which has been reprinted is,<br /> on the whole, satisfactory; we mentioned this in<br /> our last year&#039;s review, but the Omission of such<br /> important things as the United States Copyright<br /> Act and the cases that have been tried reduces the<br /> value of the article immensely.<br /> With regard to what does appear, it is needless<br /> to put forward the same objections that we have<br /> put forward on previous occasions; but we might<br /> repeat that the portion of the article on “Ilaw and<br /> Letters ” which refers to agreements is the least<br /> satisfactory. The article on the “Royalty Agree-<br /> ment ’’ is still unchanged. The writer states, after<br /> setting out the parties to an agreement : “A<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#500) ################################################<br /> <br /> 122<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Royalty Agreement proceeds thus, or to this effect:<br /> ‘That in consideration that the copyright and<br /> plant, etc., shall forth with belong to and become<br /> the property of the publisher, etc.’” It would be<br /> most interesting to know from where this form of<br /> agreement was obtained. We are glad to say that<br /> there are very few authors—and they get fewer year<br /> by year—who are foolish enough to assign their<br /> copyright, and the great majority of publishers,<br /> especially those whose names for many years have<br /> stood high in the publishing trade, only take a<br /> licence to publish, limited in most cases to volume<br /> form, and do not think of asking for a transfer of<br /> copyright.<br /> We must repeat that, in a review of an important<br /> subject like forms of agreement, the contracts<br /> should be drawn in favour of the author. One<br /> reason for this is clear and irrefutable. The<br /> publishers make it the business of a lifetime,<br /> or ought to make it their business, to have a<br /> knowledge of copyright law and of contracts.<br /> Their very agreements show that they have studied<br /> their own interests in this matter. It is the author<br /> that desires help, for many men write books but<br /> do not live by their books. These are essen-<br /> tially in need of guidance. They can, of course,<br /> become members of the Society of Authors, but<br /> there are still some who have not heard of the<br /> society&#039;s existence. In that case they would no<br /> doubt desire to turn to some book of reference, and<br /> if that book of reference did not mention the<br /> society as giving the necessary assistance—-the<br /> Literary Year Book is inclined to avoid it——and<br /> does not give the necessary assistance itself, it is a<br /> useless book from the author&#039;s point of view—that<br /> is from the point of view of those persons alone<br /> who study its forms of agreement for advice.<br /> This little review does not deal with the other<br /> details of the book. These will be dealt with in<br /> another review by another hand.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> AN EDITOR&#039;S CHAIR.”<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> \ | R. ERNEST FOSTER narrates in a simple<br /> and straightforward style some of his<br /> experiences as editor of (assell&#039;s Safurday<br /> Journal and of (&#039;hºms, disarming criticism of an<br /> editor&#039;s literary style by saying in a “foreword ” :<br /> “In the belief that the matters dealt with will<br /> speak for themselves, no attempt has been made to<br /> elaborate them : nor, beyond being arranged in<br /> groups, are they presented in any particular order ;<br /> * “An Editor&#039;s Chair : A Record of Experiences and<br /> Happenings,” by Ernest Foster. London : Everett &amp; Co.<br /> and if, as a whole, the book is kaleidoscopic rather<br /> than formal and long-drawn-out, I hope it will not<br /> be accounted a fault.”<br /> It is possible to suggest that a book may be<br /> elaborated without being either formal or long-<br /> drawn-out, and to conjecture that probably Mr.<br /> Foster&#039;s contributors, even when imparting useful<br /> information to his readers, exhibited a more<br /> dexterous craftsmanship than his ; but, nevertheless,<br /> the matters which he says should speak for them-<br /> selves do so with tolerable clearness. Many<br /> who write, but do not always succeed in seeing<br /> their work in print, may study his pages with<br /> advantage, and draw inferences for their own<br /> guidance from the advice which he does not alto-<br /> gether omit, and from his experiences with those<br /> who wrote for him, with others whom he wanted<br /> to write for him, with those who wished to write<br /> for him but failed to appreciate the characteristics<br /> of his paper, with those who sought to help him<br /> with advice in editing it, and with others who<br /> commended him and showed their interest in the<br /> success of his efforts. It need hardly be added<br /> that an important proportion of the lessons conveyed<br /> is for the consideration and assimilation of those<br /> who worry editors with manuscripts wholly unsuited<br /> to the periodicals which they conduct, and then<br /> complain of lack of editorial discrimination, thus<br /> making the way harder for others who seek to<br /> approach from the outside, and to obtain acceptance<br /> as new or occasional contributors.<br /> Much advice has been given from time to time<br /> in the pages of The Author, derived from many<br /> Sources, to those who find it impossible to project<br /> themselves in imagination for a moment into an<br /> editor&#039;s chair, and to reflect on what may be his<br /> point of view in his official capacity, or his physical<br /> and mental limitations and weaknesses as a brother<br /> man. These should read with profit Mr. Foster&#039;s<br /> chapters entitled “Some Callers,” “Some Corre-<br /> spondents,” “Would - be Contributors,” “Free<br /> Lances as Contributors,” “Regular Contributors,”<br /> and “Some Dangers of Editing.” More practised<br /> writers, and those with the imaginative gift referred<br /> to, will not need to be told that “an editor has<br /> Settled convictions as to his needs, and it goes<br /> without saying that the more closely an article or<br /> story approximates to them the more it commends<br /> itself”; but even these may derive amusement,<br /> where they need no instruction, from an editor&#039;s<br /> stories of fifty-four manuscripts sent to him in a<br /> batch, of sheets pasted at their edges and thus joined<br /> one above the other so as to form a scroll several<br /> feet long ; of covering letters of all kinds, including<br /> appeals for charity, and containing in one instance<br /> the information that a wager depended on accept-<br /> ance or rejection. Most of us believe ourselves to<br /> be tactful—more so, at least, than the editors who<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#501) ################################################<br /> <br /> TRIES A UſTISIOR.<br /> 123<br /> reject our stories—so that few will apply as a<br /> warning to themselves Mr. Foster&#039;s anecdote of a<br /> contributor who sent a manuscript with an intima-<br /> tion that it was much too good for Cassell&#039;s Saſur-<br /> day, Journal, but that high-class magazines kept<br /> stories so long that it was offered on condition that<br /> a cheque was sent on acceptance, as the author<br /> had some pressing payments to make.<br /> Among Smbjects of general interest to authors<br /> Mr. Foster discusses “Plagiarism add Coincidence”<br /> in a chapter which describes somewhat euphemisti-<br /> cally as “direct plagiarism &quot; that fraud upon<br /> editors and authors which consists in copying an<br /> article from one periodical and forwarding it as an<br /> Original manuscript to another. Mr. Foster seems<br /> to think the attitude of “plagiarised &#039;&#039; authors to<br /> have been unduly severe towards himself, or even<br /> rapacious, when they suggested pecuniary compen-<br /> sation for the infringement (involuntary on the<br /> editor&#039;s part), of their rights. It is submitted,<br /> however, that such cases are to be determined<br /> according to circumstances. An author may be<br /> willing to waive a claim for compensation, and to<br /> assist an editor in bringing a knave to justice, if<br /> the editor on his part will take active and energetic<br /> steps to punish the guilty, and to contribute to the<br /> future protection of authors and editors by so doing.<br /> It must be remembered that an editor who, though<br /> he may have published a stolen article in good<br /> faith, declines to prosecute, and is even unwilling<br /> to acknowledge the fraud perpetrated upon him,<br /> acts precisely as he would do who deliberately<br /> “lifted &#039;&#039; the matter himself as a means of obtain-<br /> ing cheap copy for his paper. He may, in fact, be<br /> actuated by clemency, or he may fear to make<br /> public the ease with which such frauds are perpe-<br /> trated ; but the author who, perhaps, differs from<br /> him in disposition or opinion, may decline to<br /> acknowledge, as no doubt he should do, that editors<br /> in the position of Mr. Foster are beyond suspicion,<br /> and may say “A thief ought to be punished in the<br /> interests of justice and of honest men; if you intend<br /> to say nothing about it pay me for the contribution<br /> of which you have had the advantage. At the<br /> worst you will only pay twice over, and even then<br /> my story is worth more.” Authors who take up<br /> such an attitude ought not, however, to complain<br /> of the system by which contributions from unknown<br /> contributors are not paid for till a reasonable time<br /> after their appearance.<br /> One of Mr. Foster&#039;s stories is of a man who<br /> complained that some anecdotes which he had<br /> narrated had been borrowed by another Writer, and<br /> settled the question of whether they might have<br /> been derived from a common source by declaring<br /> ingenuously that he had invented them himself.<br /> Somewhat diverting anecdotes, by the Way, are<br /> narrated by Mr. Foster in two chapters devoted to<br /> “Interviews and Interviewing,” and to the “Diffi-<br /> culties of the Interviewer.” We can all of us<br /> understand, even without personal experience, that<br /> Some of the great people of the earth (and of the<br /> small ones) are very willing to be interviewed, and<br /> that others are not. It is less easy to appreciate<br /> the mental attitude, or, indeed, condition of those<br /> Who, after expressing willingness to be interviewed,<br /> 9r actually answering questions volubly, suddenly<br /> impose a condition that nothing is to be published.<br /> This may, of course, be accounted for by a sudden<br /> change of mind or realisation of the effect of the<br /> publication in cold print of a candid conversation<br /> With a beguiling lady or gentleman. But still,<br /> everyone knows nowadays what an “interview &quot;<br /> means, and to indulge deliberately in a conver-<br /> sation with an interviewer and then to stipulate<br /> that it is to be treated as confidential, savours of<br /> imbecility. Even less comprehensible, however, is<br /> the injunction “No notes, please,” which Mr.<br /> Foster or his interviewer (he acknowledges in-<br /> debtedness to Mr. C. Duncan Lucas) describes<br /> as a familiar one.<br /> We may sympathise with those who feel nervous<br /> at having their words taken down, but this was not<br /> the motive in the cases referred to. They con-<br /> sented to be interviewed and submitted to the<br /> Operation, but objected to have their words written<br /> down on the spot, a process which we need hardly<br /> point out would be resorted to by the interviewer<br /> for no dark or dangerous purpose, but merely for<br /> the sake of accuracy, and so employed as much for<br /> the benefit of his subject as his own. Did they<br /> Wish to leave a loophole of escape in order that if a<br /> statement or opinion of which they had cause after-<br /> Wards to be ashamed were fastened upon them,<br /> they might deny its paternity and attribute it to<br /> the inventive faculty of the interviewer 2 We<br /> must leave them to answer the questions, or<br /> possibly the reader may find it to be one of the<br /> “matters which speak for themselves,” and under-<br /> stand it better than We do.<br /> - E. A. A.<br /> FICTION THROUGH THE AGES.*<br /> —t—º-º-<br /> R. RANSOME gives us the impression of a<br /> man who writes because that is his Way of<br /> enjoying himself. His book has both the<br /> qualities and the defects commonly discoverable in<br /> work done from such a motive. Being himself<br /> * “A History of Story-telling,” by Arthur Ransome.<br /> Jack, 7s. 6d. llet,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#502) ################################################<br /> <br /> 124<br /> TISIES AICTFIOR.<br /> interested, he is generally interesting ; but he is<br /> not complete, or systematic, or careful of propor-<br /> tion. Whatever seems dull to him he leaves out ;<br /> wherever it pleases him to do so he enlarges; and<br /> he skips from literature to literature, and from<br /> country to country, as the fancy takes him—from<br /> England to France, from France to Spain, from<br /> Spain to Italy. Improvements in the technique of<br /> fiction are the principal objects of his quest ; but the<br /> paths on which he looks for them are somewhat arbi-<br /> trarily chosen. He says a good deal about Chateau-<br /> briand, and Gautier, and Mérimée , but he says<br /> nothing about either Madame de Staël or Benjamin<br /> Constant, though both of them mark epochs and<br /> have influenced their successors. Constant&#039;s<br /> “Adolphe ’’ was the first of all novels of analysis,<br /> and has been hailed as such by such masters of<br /> criticism as MM. Paul Bourget and Anatole France.<br /> Madame de Staël was the first of those who sounded<br /> what Mr. Courtney has called “the feminine note<br /> in fiction.” “Corinne’’ is the source of “Jane,”<br /> whether Miss Corelli is aware of her debt or not.<br /> In a short book, however, which does not profess<br /> to be a text-book, such omissions are bound to<br /> occur ; and the author must be judged, not by<br /> what he has omitted, but by what he has<br /> included. His merit is that he treats novelists<br /> as human beings, and endeavours to show how<br /> their books are related to their lives. That is<br /> Sainte-Beuve&#039;s method. It is the most readable,<br /> and it produces the best critical results. Mr. Ran-<br /> some might have followed it with more success if<br /> he had had either more space or a shorter list of<br /> subjects; but he writes pleasantly, though he has<br /> placed himself in conditions in which it was almost<br /> impossible for him to be more than superficial.<br /> CORRESPONDENCE.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> SMASHED MANUSCRIPTS.<br /> DEAR SIR,-My sympathies are entirely with<br /> your correspondent Mr. Bertram Smith in this<br /> matter. His sad experience has also been mine.<br /> Recently, goaded by fury to protest, I have<br /> written upon the sheet of cardboard enclosed with<br /> my MSS. my name and address, and below it,<br /> “Please return this card with manuscript.”<br /> So far this has had the desired effect, but it may<br /> merely be a coincidence. It may be that the office<br /> boys in those particular editorial offices upon which<br /> I have of late inflicted my manuscripts do not know<br /> the game involving sheets of cardboard, and are<br /> not bitten with the<br /> necessitating “mounts.”<br /> May I advise Mr. Bertram Smith to try my<br /> plan It may possibly save a few cards in his<br /> Case, as it has in mine.<br /> photographic mania—<br /> Yours faithfully,<br /> Fox FRENCH.<br /> —e—º-e<br /> ART AND TAXATION.<br /> DEAR SIR,--Mr. W. Shaw Sparrow hits the nail<br /> on the head with his remarks on copyright-expired<br /> works. If the Dukes of Marlborough and Welling-<br /> ton may live on property earned by illustrious<br /> ancestors, why should not the descendants of<br /> Dickens and Thackeray do the same thing 2 It is<br /> monstrous to think that while Charles Dickens&#039;<br /> Works are selling in their hundreds of thousands<br /> every year, his granddaughters should be forced to<br /> draw Civil List pensions, and very small ones at<br /> that. As it is obvious that a similar fate awaits<br /> the descendants of the distinguished writers who<br /> form the Society of Authors&#039; Council, let these<br /> clever men get to work and see if they cannot put<br /> things right !<br /> Yours faithfully,<br /> R. S. WARREN BELL.<br /> —º-º-º-<br /> REVIEWERS AND REVIEWED.<br /> DEAR SIR,--I read the letter signed H. J. A.<br /> with considerable interest, and I am of opinion<br /> that the answer to it may be found in Mr. Eveleigh<br /> Nash&#039;s article in “M. A. P.,” in which that pub-<br /> lisher states that the first book he produced was<br /> reviewed adversely, yet the work achieved con-<br /> siderable success. Viewing both these cases in<br /> every conceivable light, it seems to me that the<br /> value of reviews of books cannot be accepted<br /> as a criterion either of success or failure. The<br /> great arbiter of a book is not the critic, is not<br /> the publisher, and certainly is not the author : it<br /> is the public. As the writer of two or three<br /> books which were fortunate enough to secure the<br /> favourable opinion of the critics, I am in a position<br /> to state that notwithstanding my faith and con-<br /> fidence in my publishers, and notwithstanding the<br /> good reviews that welcomed the appearance of the<br /> books, still, from a financial point of view, neither<br /> my publishers nor myself scored very highly. I<br /> am of the opinion that book reviews are not worth<br /> a rap of one&#039;s fingers. However, from H. J. A.&#039;s<br /> own story it is quite clear that his publishers did<br /> all they possibly could to make a financial success<br /> of the book.<br /> - M. A.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#503) ################################################<br /> <br /> AD VERTISEMENTS.<br /> 11]<br /> WHERE KHNIFE IS DRIVEN. -<br /> By MAX TROTTER, M.D. A story of exceptional interest,<br /> with frontispiece on art paper. Is. net. -<br /> ‘‘A Hospital Story.”—77//es.<br /> “The tale shows a good deal of the business side of the<br /> surgeon&#039;s calling.”—Dzzydee Adžertiser.<br /> THE RMYSTERIOUS LIGHT : A Novel.<br /> By JANET B. ORR. With frontispiece on art paper.<br /> and wholesome love story. 2s. net.<br /> “A tale relating the attempt on the part of circumstances and<br /> a worldly mother to separate two lovers.”—Sheffie/d Daiſy<br /> Telegza//.<br /> “A charming story, with dramatic incidents that fascinate the<br /> reader.”—Blackbuzºn Gazette.<br /> &quot;THE COM!!!NG OF THE CHE L L - A D realm.<br /> A Tale of Belgravia and Brixton. By THEODORE PHILIPPy.<br /> A legend of peculiar and distinctive interest. Is. net.<br /> “A cleverly written story of a lady of ancient lineage.”—<br /> B777/zing/ia77. Daiſy Post.<br /> “An interesting story of the disappearance of the eldest son<br /> of Sir Thomas Blunt.”—Baſºtist.<br /> THE QUEEN&#039;s FAVOURITE, and other Poems,<br /> By M. H. A BRAHAMI-JEWELL. A capital book of poetry, which<br /> will be much enjoyed by verse lovers. 2s. net.<br /> STOBS&#039; FLYING MACHINE, anci other Adventures.<br /> By ILFORD LANGTON. 6d. met, in strong brochure cover.<br /> Capital little stories, full of fun and laughter. Just issued.<br /> SYBELLA (A Sketch in Japanese setting).<br /> By ETHEL CANNING. A splendid story, with handsome<br /> picture as frontispiece. Hound in bevelled boards, 1s. 6d. net only.<br /> Divided into three parts, the book is full of well-sustained<br /> interest and incident throughout. Now Ready.<br /> STOCKWELL, who will immediately advise, free<br /> of charge, as to publication.<br /> 29, L&#039;UIDGATE HILL, E.C.<br /> IFull lists on application, post free.<br /> A capital<br /> ...A / . SS Authors should forward MSS. of any description<br /> ºf . ..<br /> LONDON<br /> (Novels, Storics, Poems, Essays, &amp;c.) direct to Mr.<br /> ARTHUR. H. STOCKWELL,<br /> TO Authors and Journalists.<br /> Are you SATISFIED with the quality of<br /> your work?<br /> Does literary output find a ready<br /> market?<br /> These are pertinent questions and well worth<br /> answering.<br /> Many young writers would meet with success<br /> if they took the trouble to learn the technique<br /> of their art. Our Students are successful<br /> because we instil into them that subtle some-<br /> thing which makes for success. We cultivate<br /> their special bent and enable them to make the<br /> most of their natural gifts.<br /> A Course of Training under our supervision<br /> will, at the very outset, put you on the path of<br /> progress—the road that leads to the Editorial<br /> Sanctum, Let us tell you more about this ; we<br /> shall be pleased to send you full particulars on<br /> receipt of a post-card.<br /> your<br /> Address your application to the---<br /> LiTERARY CORRESPONDENGE 60LLEGE,<br /> 9, Arundel Street, Strand, W.C.<br /> About 2,000 Books Wanted<br /> Are advertised for weekly in<br /> THE PUBLISHERS’ CIRCULAR<br /> AND BOOKSELLERS’ RECORD<br /> (ESTABLISHED 1837),<br /> Which also gives Dists of the New Books published<br /> during the Week, Ammouncements of Forthcoming<br /> Books, &amp;c.<br /> Subscribers have the privilege of a Gratis Advertisement<br /> in the Books Wanted Columns.<br /> Send for 52 weeks, post free, for 10s. 6d. home and<br /> 13s. 6d. foreign.<br /> Speciment Copy Free on application.<br /> Price TWOPENCE Weekly.<br /> Office : 19, Adam Street, Adelphi, W.C.<br /> TYPEWRTHNG.<br /> A Member of the Authors’ Society will be glad to<br /> recommend Miss E. WARMINGTON as a thoroughly<br /> efficient Typewriter, very prompt, and skilful at<br /> deciphering difficult handwriting.<br /> For terms and particulars apply,<br /> Miss E. WARMINGTon,<br /> 114, Surmatra Road, W. Harm pstead, N.W.<br /> Authors :<br /> Study “How to write SALEABLE Fiction,”<br /> by George Magnus, who is selling MSS. to<br /> over 14o Publishers and Editors. One<br /> author writes : “Have sold 26o MSS. in<br /> three years, thanks solely to the invaluable<br /> information contained in this book.”<br /> Particulars on application—CAMBRIDGE<br /> LITERARY AGENCY, I 15, Strand, London.<br /> Middleton’s Military Plan of<br /> the Flat Earth.<br /> POST FREE, FIVE PENCE.<br /> Alone gives the all Red Route Mid-Canada, to<br /> |Farthest South !<br /> or Mid-Canada to Brisbane and Australia |<br /> From Middleton. St. Matthew&#039;s.<br /> St. Leonard&#039;s.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. (#504) ################################################<br /> <br /> iv - AD VERTISEMENTS.<br /> TO AN AUTHOR<br /> the APPEARANCE and STYLE of manuscript is<br /> An important Matter.<br /> Send your typewriting to me ! I have had a broad experience of<br /> Literary Work,<br /> and guarantee to execute all commissions promptly, and in<br /> a mannel warranted to tempt the consideration of the<br /> busiest Editors.<br /> Price List, Testimonials, etc., on application.<br /> C. HERBERT CAESAR, Homefield, wºol;<br /> t. Aibans, Herts.<br /> GOUPON.<br /> This Coupon entitles you to one Carbon<br /> Duplicate, Gratis, if sent with your order.<br /> TYPEWRITING.<br /> Authors’ MSS. copied from 9d. per 1,000<br /> words; in duplicate, 1/-, Plays and General<br /> Copying. List and specimen of work on appli-<br /> cation.<br /> ONE OF NUMEROUS TESTIMONIALS.<br /> “Miss M. R. HORNE has typed for me literary matter to the<br /> extent of some hundreds of thousands of words, I have nothing<br /> but praise for the accuracy, Speed, and neatness with which she<br /> does her work.-FRANK SAVILE.”<br /> Miss M. R. HoRNE,<br /> ESKDALE, WEST DRAYTON, MIDDIESEX.<br /> TWO popular Hotels in Central London.<br /> Opposite the British Museum.<br /> THAGKERAY HOTEL.<br /> Great Russell Street, London.<br /> Near the British Museum.<br /> KINGSLEY HOTEL.<br /> Hart Street, Bloomsbury Square, London.<br /> Passenger Lifts. Bathrooms on every Floor. Lounges<br /> and Spacious Dining, Drawing, Writing, Reading, Billiard<br /> and Smoking Rooms. Fireproof Floors. Perfect Sanita-<br /> tion. Telephones. Night Porters.<br /> Bedrooms (including attendance), single, from<br /> 3/6 to 6|=.<br /> Inclusive Charge for Bedroom, Attendance, Table d&#039;Hote<br /> Breakfast and Dinner, from 816 to 10/6 per day.<br /> Full Tariff and Testimonials on application.<br /> Telegraphic Addresses :<br /> Thackeray Hotel—“Thackeray, London.”<br /> Kingsley Hotel—“Bookcraft, London.”<br /> E8TABLISHED]<br /> The Wessex Press,<br /> [XVIII. cent.<br /> Tazt??ton.<br /> BARNICOTT &amp; PEARCE<br /> INVITE ENQUIRIES RESPECTING PRINT ING.<br /> ESTIMATES OF COST, AND OTHER DETAILS, PROMIPTLY GIVEN.<br /> TYPEWRITING<br /> from 10d. per 1,000 words, by experienced<br /> Typist. Authors’ MISS. and Technical<br /> work a speciality.<br /> ORDERS BY FOST PROMIFTLY ATT ENDED TO.<br /> MISS LUETCHFORD, 122, LONDON WALL, E.C.<br /> MRS. GILL, Typetoriting Cffice,<br /> (Established 1883.) 35, LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. carefully copied from 1s, per 1,000<br /> words. Duplicate copies third price. French and German<br /> MSS. accurately copied ; or typewritten English trans-<br /> lations supplied. References kindly permitted to Messrs.<br /> A. P. Watt &amp; Son, Literary Agents, Hastings House,<br /> Norfolk Street, Strand, W.C. Telephone 84.64 Central.<br /> AUTHORS’ TYPEWRTÉ NG-<br /> Novel and Story Work . 9d. per 1,000 words; 2 Copies, 1/-<br /> General Copying &amp; º ... 1/1 33 3 y 5 y 1/3<br /> Plays, ruled - - &amp; &amp; ... 1/- 95 3 * } % 1/4<br /> Specimens and Price List on application.<br /> MISS A. B. STEVENSON, Yew Tree Cottage,<br /> SUTTON, MACCLESFIELD.<br /> SIPKES and SIPKES,<br /> The West Kensington Typewriting 0ffices,<br /> . (Established 1893)<br /> 223a, Hammersmith Road, LONDON, W.<br /> Authors&#039; MSS. ; Translations; Duplicating ; Plays and Actors’ Parts;<br /> Legal, General and Commercial Documents. Private Dictation Room.<br /> |USUAL TJ RMS. LIESSONS. Ičeferences.<br /> TYPEWRITING.<br /> AUTHORS’ MSS. and GENERAL COPYING undertaken from<br /> 1s. per 1,000 words. Duplicate copies one third price.<br /> TRIAL ORDER SOLICITED.<br /> GOOD WORK GUARANTEED,<br /> A. wilson, 9, ALEXANDRA ROAD, STAMFORD.<br /> Printed by BRADBURY, AGNEw, &amp; Co. L.D., and Published by them for THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS (INCORPORATED)<br /> at 10, Bouverie Street, London, E.C.https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/401/1910-01-01-The-Author-20-4.pdfpublications, The Author