489 | https://historysoa.com/items/show/489 | The Author, Vol. 14 Issue 04 (January 1904) | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+14+Issue+04+%28January+1904%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 14 Issue 04 (January 1904)</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a> | 1904-01-01-The-Author-14-4 | | | | | 85–112 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=14">14</a> | | | | | | | | | | | <a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1904-01-01">1904-01-01</a> | | | | | | | 4 | | | 19040101 | Che Hutbor.<br />
<br />
(The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors.<br />
<br />
FOUNDED BY SIR<br />
<br />
Monthly.)<br />
<br />
WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Vou. XIV.—No. 4.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
TELEPHONE NUMBER :<br />
374 VICTORIA.<br />
<br />
TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS :<br />
AUTORIDAD, LONDON.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—_ ><br />
<br />
OR the opinions expressed in papers that are<br />
signed or initialled the authors alone are<br />
responsible. None of the papers or para-<br />
<br />
graphs must be taken as expressing the opinion<br />
of the Committee unless such is especially stated<br />
to be the case.<br />
<br />
Tuer Editor begs to inform members of the<br />
Authors’ Society and other readers of 7he Author<br />
that the cases which are from time to time quoted<br />
in The Author are cases that have come before the<br />
notice or to the knowledge of the Secretary of the<br />
Society, and that those members of the Society<br />
who desire to have the names of the publishers<br />
concerned can obtain them on application.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
List of Members.<br />
<br />
Tue List of Members of the Society of Authors<br />
published October, 1902, at the price of 6d., and<br />
the elections from October, 1902, to July, 1903, as<br />
a supplemental list, at the price of 2d., can now be<br />
obtained at the offices of the Society.<br />
<br />
They will be sold to members or associates of<br />
the Society only.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
The Pension Fund of the Society.<br />
<br />
THE investments of the Pension Fund at<br />
present standing in the names of the Trustees are<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
This is a statement of the actual stock; the<br />
<br />
VoL, XIV.<br />
<br />
JANUARY Ist, 1904.<br />
<br />
[Price SIXPENCE.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
money value can be easily worked out at the current<br />
price of the market :—<br />
<br />
Be £1000 0 0<br />
<br />
Wiocal Uioans 26s 500 0 0<br />
<br />
Victorian Government 8 % Consoli-<br />
dated Inscribed Stock ............... oot 19 18<br />
OY Eo oes nss pete 201 9 8<br />
Mota. ...0.2...3. £1,993 9 2<br />
<br />
Subscriptions from October, 1903.<br />
£ s. a.<br />
Noy. 13, Longe, Miss Julia. : - 0 5.0<br />
Dec. 16, Trevor, Capt. Philip 0 5 0<br />
<br />
Donations from October, 1908.<br />
<br />
4<br />
<br />
Oct. 27, Sturgis, Julian é ; oo<br />
Nov. 2, Stanton, V.H. .<br />
<br />
Nov. 18, Benecke, Miss Ida.<br />
<br />
Nov. 28, Harraden, Miss Beatrice<br />
<br />
Dec. Minniken, Miss<br />
<br />
The following members have also made subscrip-<br />
tions or donations :—<br />
<br />
Meredith, George, President of the Society.<br />
Thompson, Sir Henry, Bart., F.R.C.S.<br />
Rashdall, The Rev. H.<br />
<br />
Guthrie, Anstey.<br />
<br />
Robertson, C. B.<br />
<br />
Dowsett, C. F.<br />
<br />
There are in addition other subscribers who do<br />
not desire that either their names or the amount<br />
they are subscribing should be printed.<br />
<br />
ourFaAe<br />
nooo So<br />
ooo oo<br />
<br />
<> 6<br />
<br />
FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
Ar the meeting of the Committee held on<br />
Monday, December 7th, twenty members and asso-<br />
ciates were elected, bringing the total number of<br />
elections for the current year to just over 200.<br />
<br />
Among the subjects discussed and dealt with<br />
were financial matters, the unveiling of the<br />
memorial to Sir Walter Besant (which took place<br />
86<br />
<br />
on the 11th of December), cheap postage on maga-<br />
zines to the Colonies, and finally the article signed<br />
“ Proxy” in the December number of Ze Author.<br />
The Committee decided that a paragraph should<br />
be inserted in the next number of Ze Author<br />
condemning the practice described by “ Proxy.”<br />
Sir Gilbert Parker sept in his resignation as<br />
a member of the Committee, owing to the heavy<br />
pressure of his Parliamentary and other work. In<br />
doing so, he wished the Society all prosperity.<br />
<br />
ot<br />
<br />
Cases.<br />
<br />
Srxcz the publication of the last number of The<br />
Author seventeen cases—an unusually large num-<br />
ber—have been taken in hand by the Secretary on<br />
behalf of members, and, in addition, two County<br />
Court cases have been authorised by the Chairman<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
The seventeen cases may be divided as follows :—<br />
<br />
Hight cases for money or for money and accounts,<br />
three cases for accounts only, five cases for the<br />
return of MSS., and one case for the proper settle-<br />
ment of a contract. So far, only one case has<br />
been settled. The MS. has been received by the<br />
Secretary and returned to the author. ‘There is no<br />
reason to believe that the other cases will not<br />
<br />
terminate satisfactorily, but at this time of the year<br />
it is difficult to get money out of those people who<br />
<br />
desire to withhold it. In a future issue no doubt<br />
satisfactory conclusions will be chronicled.<br />
<br />
Of the cases referred to in previous numbers<br />
there are five still incomplete.<br />
<br />
‘As two of the matters in contention have to do<br />
with the United States it is possible that they may<br />
be still further delayed. The length of time that<br />
a letter takes to reach the United States is not the<br />
only cause of delay. It is often, unfortunately, the<br />
fact that distance appears to make the offender<br />
callous to his obligations.<br />
<br />
Two of the cases will have to be abandoned<br />
owing to technical and other reasons which prevent<br />
the enforcing of the author’s just rights. The<br />
<br />
fifth case is still in negotiation, and is proceeding<br />
satisfactorily.<br />
<br />
—— +<br />
<br />
December Elections.<br />
17, Newburgh Road,<br />
Acton.<br />
<br />
Braintree House, Cob-<br />
ham, Surrey.<br />
<br />
Ashe, Leslie<br />
Cartwright, Miss A. M. .<br />
<br />
Corkran, Miss Alice<br />
Laurence, Lionel<br />
Maudsley, Athol<br />
<br />
Twyford, Winchester.<br />
Needham, R. W. Bradshaw<br />
<br />
Land Tax, Somerset<br />
House, W.C.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Orr, Mrs. Mount Eagle Lodge<br />
Brosna, Co. Kerry<br />
Treland.<br />
<br />
19, Chesham Place,<br />
5.W.<br />
<br />
21, Inglewood Road,<br />
West Hampstead,<br />
N.W.<br />
<br />
Care of Messrs. Power,<br />
Drury & Co., Madeira<br />
<br />
16, Dorset Square,<br />
N.W.<br />
<br />
Colinton, Midlothian.<br />
<br />
Pauncefote, The Hon.<br />
Maud : ‘<br />
<br />
Pierson, C. Harvard<br />
<br />
Ramsey, Miss Lilian<br />
Sheringham, H. T.<br />
<br />
Skae, Miss Hilda<br />
<br />
“‘ Stephen Walthair ”<br />
<br />
Syrett, Miss Netta . 3, Morpeth Terrace,<br />
Ashley Place, 8.W.<br />
<br />
Saltwood, Hythe, Kent.<br />
<br />
Ladies’ Army and Navy<br />
Club, Burlington<br />
Gardens, W.<br />
<br />
Stigand, Mrs.<br />
“Tiger Rose ”<br />
<br />
Urwick, Edward<br />
Vaughan, Capt. A. O. Aberdovey, N. Wales.<br />
<br />
_One member does not desire the publication<br />
either of his name or address.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
Pension FunpD.<br />
<br />
In order to give members of the Society, should<br />
they desire to appoint a fresh member to the<br />
Pension Fund Committee, full time to act, it has<br />
been thought advisable to place in 7he Author a<br />
full statement of the method of election under the<br />
scheme for administration of the Pension Fund.<br />
Under that scheme the Committee is composed of<br />
three members elected by the Committee of the<br />
Society, three members elected by the Society at<br />
the General Meeting, and the chairman of the<br />
Society for the time being, ex officio. The three<br />
members elected ‘at the general meeting when the<br />
fund was started were Mr. Morley Roberts, Mr.<br />
M. H. Spielmann, and Mrs. Alec Tweedie.<br />
<br />
According to the rules it is the turn of Mr.<br />
M. H. Spielmann to resign his position on the Com-<br />
mittee. In tendering his resignation he submits<br />
his name for re-election.<br />
<br />
The members have power to put forward other<br />
names under Clause 9, which runs as follows :—<br />
<br />
“ Any candidate for election to the Pension Fund Com-<br />
mittee by the members of the Society (not being a retiring<br />
member of such Committee) shall be nominated in writing<br />
to the secretary, at least three weeks prior to the general<br />
meeting at which such candidate is to be proposed, and<br />
the nomination of each such candidate shall be subscribed<br />
by, at least, three members of the Society. A list of the<br />
candidates so nominated shall be sent to the members of<br />
the Society with the annual report of the Managing Com-<br />
mittee, and those candidates obtaining the most votes at<br />
<br />
the general meeting shall be elected to serve on the Pension<br />
Fund Committee.” :<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 87<br />
<br />
In case any member should desire to refer to<br />
the list of members, a copy complete, with the<br />
exception of those members referred to in the note<br />
at the beginning, can be obtained at the Society’s<br />
office.<br />
<br />
It would be as well, therefore, should any of the<br />
members desire to put forward candidates, to take<br />
the matter within their immediate consideration.<br />
The general meeting of the Society has usually<br />
been held towards the end of February or the<br />
beginning of March. It is essential that all<br />
nominations should be in the hands of the<br />
secretary before the 31st of January, 1904.<br />
<br />
— se 7<br />
<br />
SERIAL ISSUE—AUTHORS AND<br />
PUBLISHERS OR EDITORS.<br />
<br />
ee<br />
Afialo and Cook v. Lawrence and Bullen.<br />
<br />
OW that the case of Aflalo and Cook v.<br />
Lawrence and Bullen has been finally<br />
settled by the judgment of the House of<br />
<br />
Lords, it is necessary to consider its bearing on<br />
authors’ property and the methods employed for<br />
the sale of that property.<br />
<br />
There is no need to set forth at length the<br />
18th Section. Members can refer to the last<br />
number of The Author.<br />
<br />
But it is necessary to remember three points.<br />
<br />
Firstly, employment.<br />
<br />
Secondly, that the work shall have been com-<br />
posed in such employment on the terms that the<br />
Copyright shall belong to the proprietor.<br />
<br />
Thirdly, payment for such work.<br />
<br />
Where. these three points are proved the copy-<br />
right will belong absolutely to the proprietor, etc.,<br />
of the Encyclopzedia and will belong to the pro-<br />
prietor, etc., of the review, magazine, or other<br />
periodical work, subject to the provisoes at the<br />
end of the section.<br />
<br />
It has been decided that the second of the three<br />
points set out above may be inferred, and need not<br />
be actually set forth in an express contract.<br />
<br />
The question, however, according to the judges<br />
in the House of Lords is one of fact and each case<br />
must be decided on its own evidence.<br />
<br />
In order that it may be possible to ascertain what<br />
deductions are likely to be made from the evidence,<br />
it will be necessary to look, firstly, into each decided<br />
ease and to notice the inference drawn ; secondly,<br />
whether such inference is growing wider in scope<br />
or more restricted ; thirdly, whether more in favour<br />
of the proprietor or the original owner of the<br />
property, the author.<br />
<br />
The Lord Chancellor stated “‘ The case is covered<br />
<br />
by authority,” and that he thought it impossible,<br />
after the decision arrived at about half a century<br />
ago and confirmed by the decision of the Court of<br />
Appeal, to give any judgment except one in favour<br />
of the appellants.<br />
<br />
The recent case is thus stated to be covered by<br />
authority. }<br />
<br />
Firstly then, it is necéssary to consider the<br />
authorities and the inferences drawn from them,<br />
before considering this special case and the further<br />
inferences that may be drawn from it.<br />
<br />
The authorities which to the Four Law Lords<br />
and Lord Justice Vaughan Williams appeared to<br />
decide the case in one way, and which to Mr.<br />
Justice Joyce, Lord Justice Stirling, and Lord<br />
Justice Romer seemed to suggest the opposite<br />
decision, were Sweet v. Benning and Lamb v.<br />
vans.<br />
<br />
In Sweet v. Benning various members of the Bar<br />
furnished reports of cases to the plaintiffs, the pro-<br />
prietors of the Jurist. They were reports merely.<br />
The barristers employed selected the cases they<br />
thought fit to report and composed the head notes<br />
and short summaries. They were paid for their<br />
work. The arrangements were oral and nothing<br />
was said about copyright. The property in dispute<br />
on this occasion could hardly be called original,<br />
except so far as the head notes and the abridge-<br />
ment of the product of other people’s brains may<br />
show originality. The case was decided in the<br />
Court of Common Pleas, and the inference was<br />
drawn that the copyright belonged to the proprietors<br />
of the Jurist.<br />
<br />
In Lamb vy. Evans the plaintiff employed and<br />
paid for persons to canvass for advertisements<br />
and arrange them under appropriate headings in a<br />
trade directory. Here again the work in question<br />
could hardly be called literary work of a high and<br />
original order.<br />
<br />
Lord Justice Lindley, in giving judgment, stated<br />
that the burden of proof that the copyright belonged<br />
to the plaintiff was on the plaintiff, and the statute<br />
did not say the kind of evidence which had to be<br />
adduced for the purpose of proving this. If there<br />
is no express agreement the question is, ‘ What is<br />
the inference to be drawn?’ and the inference<br />
was drawn that the copyright belonged to the<br />
plaintiff.<br />
<br />
It is worth noticing that in both these cases the<br />
<br />
ersons claiming the copyright were suing pirates<br />
and the defendants’ objections were technical only.<br />
And farther that the head notes in question could<br />
only have been published by the authors in a form<br />
which would compete with the publication for<br />
which they had been written. In both cases it<br />
would have been unbusinesslike to assume that<br />
the authors intended to reserve a copyright which<br />
could only be useful for a rival publication.<br />
88<br />
<br />
These were two cases that may be classed under<br />
Encyclopedias.<br />
<br />
The facts of Aflalo and Cook v. Lawrence and<br />
Bullen were fully set forth in last month’s Author,<br />
and the inference drawn from these facts was that<br />
the copyright belonged to the proprietor of the<br />
Encyclopedia.<br />
<br />
Does this judgment extend the former judgments,<br />
as to the inferences that may be drawn from the<br />
facts, and is such extension in favour of the<br />
publisher or author? On the whole it must be<br />
held to extend them considerably, and in favour<br />
of the publisher or proprietor.<br />
<br />
It would have been thought, that it is the<br />
publisher’s business to know the law and make<br />
his bargains accordingly.<br />
<br />
Authors, especially young authors, are often quite<br />
inexperienced in the legal aspect of the case, and<br />
much more likely than a publisher to enter into<br />
bargains the full nature and consequences of which<br />
they do not understand. It would have been no<br />
hardship to the publisher to secure the copyright<br />
by express provision in his contract.<br />
<br />
The decision is revolutionary and must compel<br />
some of the well-known writers on copyright to<br />
alter their deduction from Sweet v. Benning and<br />
The Bishop of Hereford v. Griffin in the next edition<br />
of their works.<br />
<br />
The evidence of employment was complete.<br />
that point there was no need for argument. There<br />
<br />
On<br />
<br />
was evidence of payment. Of that there can be<br />
no dispute. But one essential point must be con-<br />
sidered—how far that payment could be reckoned<br />
substantial for the copyright of the literary pro-<br />
perty in question, when compared with the ordinary<br />
literary prices of an expert writer on any given<br />
subject.<br />
<br />
Would Mr. Aflalo, for instance, for a sum of<br />
£500, sell the idea of the Encyclopedia, give up<br />
two years work and devote himself to the editor-<br />
ship of it, writing without further fee, 7,000 words<br />
and contributing all the unsigned articles that<br />
might be required ? This would be poor pay for<br />
the employment of the technical knowledge that<br />
Mr. Aflalo possesses, and it is hardly likely that for<br />
so small a fee he would care to sell the copyright<br />
of his work. Again, Mr. Cook contracted to do a<br />
certain amount of work at £2 per thousand words.<br />
Anyone with Mr. Cook’s reputation as a fisherman,<br />
and with his great technical knowledge, would not<br />
be likely to sell his work to any magazine or<br />
periodical, for a fee so small if he was not to hold<br />
some subsequent rights; but the Court inferred<br />
that Mr. Cook did so, and it is impossible not to<br />
consider that the inference drawn in this present<br />
case widens enormously the field of inference as<br />
compared with the former cases. In this case you<br />
get highly technical knowledge, the result of years<br />
<br />
THER AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
of work and study of particular kinds of sport.<br />
You get that knowledge set out in original form<br />
and paid for at a peculiarly low price. Is it possible<br />
that in the next case which may be brought before<br />
the Courts under the 18th section from less con-<br />
clusive facts, a still wider inference may be drawn<br />
—more salutary to the publisher, more disastrous<br />
to the author ?<br />
<br />
Their Lordships did not seem to consider that<br />
the position of literary property nowadays is vastly<br />
different from what it was fifty years ago, and that<br />
therefore as the circumstances have changed, it is<br />
impossible to make the same deductions.<br />
<br />
It is clear that in the future authors should be<br />
exceedingly careful of the circumstances in which<br />
they contribute to Encyclopeedias,reviews,magazines<br />
or periodical works, and some further points must<br />
be put forward.<br />
<br />
In this judgment very little was said of the<br />
question of employment, as the employment was<br />
clear and undisputed, but it is quite possible that<br />
this question may be raised at some future date<br />
and that the author’s position may be further<br />
endangered. Mr. MacGillivray in his able work<br />
on Copyright is inclined to think, from the cases<br />
which have been already heard, that the employ-<br />
ment must be antecedent, and so far, this deduction<br />
appears to be satisfactory. There is no decision<br />
on the subject, and the point does not appear to<br />
have been actually argued. It is to be hoped,<br />
however, that it may never be held that the<br />
publication of a work submitted unsolicited to a<br />
magazine proprietor and published by him without<br />
any definite contract, will be sufficient to show<br />
employment by the proprietor, of the contributor.<br />
But this point has never been decided, and authors<br />
should be exceedingly careful that they do not<br />
allow themselves to depend on the broken reed<br />
of the 18th section.<br />
<br />
If such publication can amount to employment<br />
the second deduction that the copyright should<br />
belong to the proprietor would be the merest step<br />
farther, and the author would find himself in<br />
difficulties, even though, possibly, he had received<br />
an entirely inadequate price for such sacrifice.<br />
Evidence, unfortunately, is constantly coming<br />
forward that the Bench and English juries have<br />
very little appreciation of the real value of literary<br />
productions.<br />
<br />
That the danger is a serious one may be seen<br />
from the fact that a great deal was made in the —<br />
present case of the amount of money the proprietors<br />
were sinking in the venture, but this is an obviously<br />
unfair argument, unless, at the same time, the<br />
return the publishers hoped for or actually realised<br />
had also been stated. No one would object to<br />
spend £50,000 to-day if he obtained £100,000 at<br />
the end of six months, or thought he could.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 89<br />
<br />
It seems certain that if only the amount<br />
ventured by the publisher in the production of a<br />
magazine, review, or encyclopedia is large enough,<br />
it must follow as a matter of course, according to<br />
these lines of argument, that the employment will<br />
be on the terms that the copyright shall belong to<br />
the proprietor. No thought appears to have been<br />
given to the opposite view that the publisher is a<br />
man of business, and, as such, quite capable of<br />
protecting himself from any danger of being<br />
deprived of the full benefit of the literary wares<br />
which he desired to buy, and that the price paid<br />
to the author may be entirely inadequate to cover<br />
the sale of copyright. The idea which seems to<br />
have influenced the Law Lords was that if the<br />
copyright in the articles had not passed to the<br />
publishers, the authors might all have joined<br />
together and republished their articles as a rival<br />
encyclopedia, but surely the law of England would<br />
be strong enough to stop such an unfair act of<br />
derogating from their own grant, and in any event<br />
the idea is a far fetched one. A much more<br />
pertinent consideration would be that under the<br />
present decision publishers might commission and<br />
pay for articles for an encyclopedia over which they<br />
announced their intention of spending large sums,<br />
and then bring out the articles as cheap popular<br />
books at large profit to themselves, or publish in<br />
other remunerative manner before they finally<br />
collected them into the encyclopedia,<br />
<br />
That this idea is not imaginary may be shown<br />
by the case of some publishers who purchase a<br />
work with a view to book production, and then try<br />
to sell the serial rights in a magazine, to the great<br />
annoyance of the author, who may, through his<br />
carelessness or ignorance, have left himself<br />
defenceless.<br />
<br />
Lord Shand, in his remarks, constantly mentioned<br />
the word “magazine” in addition to “encyclo-<br />
pedia.” There seems no doubt, therefore, that in<br />
his mind, the same inference might be drawn in the<br />
case of a magazine proprietor, as in the case of the<br />
proprietor of an encyclopedia. He also referred to<br />
the publisher as conceiving the creation of the<br />
magazine which he publishes as his undertaking<br />
for his profit. In this case, however, the concep-<br />
tion of the work was the Plaintiff’s, Mr. Aflalo’s.<br />
<br />
There is no need to consider at length the<br />
judgments of those learned Judges of the Court of<br />
First Instance and the Court of Appeal, when<br />
verdicts were given in favour of the plaintiffs, but<br />
in considering the present verdict an endeavour has<br />
been made to show the increasing dangers that<br />
surround authors ; and the members of the society<br />
should be warned when, in future, they contribute<br />
to an encyclopedia, review, or magazine, whether<br />
they have been employed by the proprietor, or<br />
whether they send in their work on their own<br />
<br />
initiation, to be careful to state in a covering letter<br />
the terms on which they are willing to dispose of<br />
it. They should also be careful to keep a copy of<br />
that letter, so that in any action it will lie with<br />
the publishers to prove that the terms of the letter<br />
have been subsequently varied.<br />
<br />
The terms which the letter should contain must,<br />
of course, depend upon the magazine for which the<br />
author is writing and his position as a writer. It<br />
is dangerous to sell serial rights without any<br />
limitation.<br />
<br />
Members will, no doubt, recollect the article that<br />
appeared in The Author, where the serial rights in<br />
an essay were sold to an American magazine, and<br />
the author was astonished to find that his work<br />
was being reprinted in a periodical in England.<br />
<br />
There has been no decision in the Law Courts<br />
to determine the exact definition of serial rights,<br />
but the custom of the trade has been sufficiently<br />
established to show that a conveyance of these<br />
rights does not in any way convey the copyright,<br />
but merely conveys the right to produce articles in<br />
serial form—that is, in a review, magazine, or<br />
other paper of periodical issue.<br />
<br />
In further explanation it must be remembered<br />
that the Courts have decided that an annual is a<br />
periodical issue, and that some magazines print<br />
long stories in one issue. When an author, there-<br />
fore, sells his serial rights, either to a magazine<br />
which undertakes to print his work in one issue,<br />
or to an annual, he should be careful that he gets<br />
an adequate price, as a single serial issue may have<br />
some effect in spoiling the circulation of the story<br />
in book form. This remark, however, does not<br />
apply to short stories.<br />
<br />
Dealing then, with the ordinary sale of a work<br />
in serial form, the price per thousand words that<br />
the author is willing to accept should be distinctly<br />
stated, and the exact limitation of the serial rights<br />
he is willing to sell, z.e, if possible, they should be<br />
limited to one issue of a given magazine or<br />
periodical. The author must remember that it<br />
may be possible for him to obtain second serial<br />
rights from other papers or to sell the further serial<br />
use in other countries.<br />
<br />
A fact incidental to this matter must not be<br />
omitted. It is the custom of many of the popular<br />
magazines of the day, when no contract has been<br />
made in the first instance, to forward cheques to<br />
their contributors, with notices stamped on the<br />
back that the endorsement of the cheque is an<br />
acknowledgment of the transfer of the copyright.<br />
This custom is a distinct danger to authors, for<br />
although the endorsement of such a cheque will<br />
not in any way vary any eapress contract that<br />
may have been entered into before publication,<br />
yet it might be evidence of an implied term in a con-<br />
tract if the cheque was endorsed without dispute.<br />
<br />
<br />
90<br />
<br />
Since the decision which has been given in the<br />
case of Aflalo and Cook vy. Lawrence and Bullen,<br />
it is especially dangerous, as the slightest evidence<br />
may afford a chance of drawing a deduction<br />
disadvantageous to the author.<br />
<br />
If a publisher desires to obtain special terms or<br />
the copyright, he has merely to say so beforehand,<br />
and the author will know his exact position. It<br />
is not fair that the purchaser should endeavour to<br />
incorporate into a contract terms which never<br />
existed in the mind of the author when the contract<br />
was made.<br />
<br />
Finally, by way of repetition, it cannot be too<br />
strongly impressed on the minds of all members,<br />
(1) that a letter should be sent with the “ copy’;<br />
(2) that if no letter be sent with the “ copy ” an<br />
express agreement should be made before publica-<br />
tion; and (8) that in no circumstances, whether<br />
a letter has been sent with the “copy,” whether<br />
an express contract has been made before publica-<br />
tion, or whether no contract has been made at all,<br />
should an author sign a cheque that is issued to<br />
him on the lines stated above.<br />
<br />
Clearness and finality in contract is essential<br />
to a good understanding between authors and<br />
publishers or editors. If the two latter, instead of<br />
abusing the methods of the Society, endeavoured<br />
to work on more businesslike lines the wheels<br />
would run much smoother for all parties. In<br />
book production a clear understanding is now<br />
nearly always the rule—a doubtful contract the<br />
exception.<br />
<br />
The time, perhaps, may come when the same<br />
remark may be applied to the contract for serial<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
G. H.T-<br />
<br />
——>—_¢ —____—--<br />
<br />
OUR BOOK AND PLAY TALK.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
E are glad to say that our Vice-Chairman’s<br />
latest book, “The & Becketts of Punch,”<br />
has scored a success. These “ Memories<br />
<br />
of Father and Sons,” within the compass of one<br />
volume, make interesting reading. We should<br />
like to quote at length from its pages, but lack<br />
of space allows of one extract only. Referring<br />
(page 236) to the Dramatic Authors’ Society,<br />
Mr. d Beckett says the circuit system of Mr.<br />
Crummles was the order of the day when it was<br />
organised.<br />
<br />
“Every theatre in the country belonged to it, and was<br />
assisted according to its means of payment. It was the<br />
duty of each subscriber to pay so much a night, and then<br />
send up the bill of the evening’s performance to the Sec-<br />
retary of the Dramatic Authors’ Society, who entered the<br />
amount to the credit of the member. Thus, say Smith had<br />
written a one-act farce, Snooks a two-act comedy, and<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Larkins a one-act burlesque, the amount would be divided<br />
into fourths, of which Snooks would take one half, to the<br />
quarters apportioned to Smith and Larkins. . .. This<br />
system worked very well while the remuneration of the<br />
dramatist remained at £100 an act, which was the regu-<br />
lation sum in the mid-Victorian era. But all this was<br />
changed when Dion Boucicault introduced the system of<br />
percentages. The moment that a dramatist’s remuneration<br />
depended upon the takings of the house his fortune was<br />
made. It was very much the royalty system applied to<br />
plays. . . . There was an immediate revolution. Tom<br />
Robertson, W. 8. Gilbert, and the present editor of Punch<br />
naturally wished to get something better than a few<br />
shillings a night for their newest plays in the provinces,<br />
and a resolution was passed giving them the necessary<br />
powers of reservation. The provincial managers com-<br />
plained that all the newest London pieces were out of the<br />
provincial market, and asked what was the use of being<br />
assessed for old and unattractive plays. So by degrees<br />
the Society disappeared.”<br />
<br />
Mr. a Beckett has another book in hand which<br />
will be published early in 1904, dealing with his<br />
career entirely outside Bouverie Street.<br />
<br />
Sir F. C. Burnand’s two volumes of ‘“ Records<br />
and Reminiscences,” with numerous illustrations<br />
and facsimile letters (Methuen), is another inte-<br />
resting book recently published. It has been<br />
widely reviewed and much quoted. It has been<br />
read (or will be read), no doubt, by all our members.<br />
<br />
The annual annotated volume of “Statutes of<br />
Practical Utility” passed in 1903, which will<br />
shortly appear under the editorship of Mr. J. M.<br />
Lely (Sweet and Maxwell, Stevens and Sons), will<br />
contain, with 17 other Acts selected from the 47<br />
passed, the Motor Car Act, the Poor Prisoners<br />
Defence Act (both of these two being fitted out<br />
with extra notes), the London Education Act, the<br />
Employment of Children Act, the County Courts<br />
Act, the Pistols Act, the Finance Act, and the<br />
Housing of the Working Classes Act. Some<br />
interesting Departmental Regulations, e.g., those<br />
of the Local Government Board under the Motor<br />
Car Act, as well as the Cremation and Midwives<br />
Rules under Acts of 1902, will also be included ;<br />
and in the Preface attention will be called to the<br />
desirability of some Parliamentary action being<br />
taken to prevent, so far as preventible, the recur-<br />
rence of obscurities in legislation. Acts relating<br />
to Scotland or Ireland only are not printed in this<br />
collection.<br />
<br />
Sixpenny reprints are, happily, not limited to<br />
fiction. In those issued thus far by Messrs. Watts<br />
and Co. on behalf of the Rationalist Press Associa-<br />
tion, there is included Herbert Spencer’s masterly<br />
treatise on “Education,” of which some 40,000<br />
<br />
copies have been sold in that form. Messrs. Watts’<br />
<br />
next book in this cheap series will be Edward<br />
Clodd’s “Story of Creation,” published by arrange-<br />
ment with Messrs. Longmans, the first issue to<br />
consist of 30,000 copies.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
oA<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
AY<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
Mr. Herbert Bentwich, LL.B., who published<br />
a short time ago a pamphlet entitled “ A Plea for<br />
a General School of Law,” is now taking up<br />
seriously a long projected work on “ International<br />
Copyright.” :<br />
<br />
The publication by Messrs. Isbister & Co. of<br />
Mr. G. S. Layard’s novel, at present entitled<br />
“ Dolly’s Governess,” has been postponed until the<br />
spring of next year. Mr. Layard is now engaged<br />
upon “ The Life of Kate Greenaway,” in collabora-<br />
tion with Mr. M. H. Spielmann. Any information<br />
not already furnished concerning the deceased<br />
artist and lover of children should be sent to Mr.<br />
Layard at Bull’s Cliff, Felixstowe.<br />
<br />
“Home Life under the Stuarts,” by Elizabeth<br />
Godfrey (Grant Richards), is about to be followed<br />
by a study of social life during the same period,<br />
1603—1649. This will describe art and literature,<br />
amusements, the literary coterie, travelling, friend-<br />
ship, the religious life, and kindred topics. It will<br />
be uniform with the preceding volume, which in<br />
fact it completes, and will be illustrated.<br />
<br />
Messrs. H. Sotheran & Co. (37, Piccadilly, W.)<br />
are prepared to supply “ Kilboylan Bank,” by Mrs.<br />
E. M. Lynch. It is an Irish story illustrating the<br />
working of that humble form of finance—Agri-<br />
cultural Co-operative Credit. The book should<br />
prove useful at the present time, when the new<br />
Irish Land Act is turning many peasants into<br />
proprietors.<br />
<br />
Captain G. E. W. Hayward, whose two articles<br />
entitled ‘‘ Cosas de Espaia” appeared in the Feb-<br />
ruary and June numbers of Blackwood, is now<br />
completing a one volume novel which he hopes to<br />
see published in the spring.<br />
<br />
The Baroness de Bertouch is at work on her<br />
*“ Life of Father Ignatius,” which Messrs. Methuen<br />
have accepted and will publish early in 1904. In<br />
order that the work might be done under the<br />
supervision of Father Ignatius himself, the<br />
authoress has spent nearly a year at Llanthony in<br />
the guest-house of the monastery.<br />
<br />
Mr. Leslie Cope Cornford, author of “ Captain<br />
Jacobus,” &c., &c., has just completed a story<br />
dealing with a phase of eighteenth century life.<br />
It is to be published in 1904.<br />
<br />
Mr. Bertram Mitford’s new novel, “ The Sirdar’s<br />
Oath,” will be published by Messrs. F. V. White<br />
and Co. some time in January. The scene is laid<br />
on the northern border of India and the action<br />
deals with the tribesmen inhabiting that locality.<br />
The story has been running serially during this<br />
year through several British and Colonial news-<br />
papers under the title of “ Raynier’s Peril.”<br />
<br />
Miss Theodora Wilson Wilson’s new novel,<br />
“Ursula Raven,” is now running through the<br />
Daily News as a serial. The scene of the story<br />
4s laid in Westmoreland, and the chief interest<br />
<br />
91<br />
<br />
lies in the description of a struggle against<br />
monopoly.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Finnemore will publish shortly through<br />
Messrs. Hurst and Blackett, a story entitled<br />
“Tally.” It is of domestic interest, the period<br />
being the early years of last century. It is a<br />
shorter story than “A Man’s Mirror”? (Cassell,<br />
October, 1908) and quite different in character.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Finnemore is at present busy upon a story<br />
which she hopes to have completed early in 1904.<br />
The setting is the Welsh hills—Mrs. Finnemore’s<br />
own neighbourhood, a solitary and wild bit of<br />
country between the Berwyns and the sea.<br />
<br />
“An Oath in Heaven” is the title of a new<br />
novel by Mr. John Ryce. It is published by<br />
Messrs. James Clarke & Co. at 6s.<br />
<br />
Mr. Algernon Rose’s handbook for wind-instru-<br />
mentalists entitled “Talks with Bandsmen,” a<br />
thousand copies of which have been sold in this<br />
country, has been pirated for serial purposes by the<br />
Dominant, a musical paper of New York.<br />
<br />
The Rt. Hon. Joseph Chamberlain has accepted<br />
a copy of Mr. Algernon Rose’s book “ On Choosing<br />
a Piano” (Scott), one chapter of which deals<br />
with the fiscal question as it regards pianoforte<br />
manufacturers in this country.<br />
<br />
We hear that a new and enlarged edition of Mr.<br />
Reynolds-Ball’s Guide to the Winter Resorts of<br />
the Mediterranean will be published very soon.<br />
A new and useful feature will be a supplement<br />
containing articles on the principal Colonial and<br />
other extra European winter resorts, such as the<br />
Canaries, the West Indies, and the Cape High-<br />
lands.<br />
<br />
Miss Florence M. King (Jfaud Carew), who has<br />
been prevented by unavoidable causes from writing<br />
anything for some time, is engaged on a new<br />
children’s book.<br />
<br />
“Songs of Summer,” by Mr. C. Whitworth<br />
Wynne, has been published by Mr. Grant Richards.<br />
<br />
Mrs. Caroline A. White’s book “Sweet Hamp-<br />
stead and its Associations ” is now in asecond and<br />
revised edition. It is dedicated to the Conser-<br />
vators of the Heath and to all who love sweet<br />
Hampstead for its own sake. The volume is<br />
well illustrated. Messrs. Elliot Stock are its<br />
publishers.<br />
<br />
For the benefit of those among our readers who<br />
saw the review in the Guardian (December 2nd) of<br />
“A Queen of Nine Days,” by Miss Edith C. Kenyon,<br />
suggesting that she had not written the book<br />
herself, but only supplied a modern rendering, we<br />
give her reply, which appears in the same journal<br />
(December 9th) :—<br />
<br />
S1z,—In allusion to your review of “A Queen of Nine<br />
Days” in this week's Guardian, will you kindly allow me<br />
to say that I wrote the whole of the book, and the idea<br />
that it was written by one of Lady Jane’s gentlewomen is<br />
only a part of the story. Moreover, if your reviewer reads<br />
92<br />
<br />
history, he will find that Lady Jane was singularly humble<br />
and truth loving, and, like all great souls, in advance of her<br />
eo EpitH C. KENYON.<br />
<br />
“High Treason” (The Primrose Press: 64d.<br />
nett) is Mr. Allen Upward’s latest contribution<br />
to the Romance of Politics series. In his preface<br />
Mr. Upward says: “Many of the incidents, I<br />
think, will be fresh in the memory of most news-<br />
paper readers, though the connection here traced<br />
between them may not be perceived. For others,<br />
I can produce my authorities, should the truth of<br />
these pages be challenged. ;<br />
<br />
Except for articles in papers and magazines, Mr.<br />
Clive Holland’s chief work during the past year<br />
bas been the writing of two plays. One is a<br />
comedy (founded on his two Japanese novels,<br />
“My Japanese Wife” and ‘‘Musme”), written in<br />
collaboration with an American playwright, Miss<br />
Florence Hopkins ; the other a modern comedy of<br />
French and English life, written by himself. _<br />
<br />
The former will probably see the light first in<br />
New York; the latter will, Mr. Holland hopes, be<br />
produced in London.<br />
<br />
The Franciscan Friars of the Collegio di San<br />
Bonaventura at Quaracchi, near Florence, who are<br />
their own printers and publishers, have just brought<br />
out the first critical edition ever attempted of the<br />
writings of Saint Francis of Assisi. The rights of<br />
<br />
translation into English have been assigned to M.<br />
Carmichael.<br />
<br />
We understand that Mr. Sidney Lee will deliver<br />
a lecture (January 26th) on “Shakespeare” to<br />
the members of the British Empire Shakespeare<br />
<br />
Society. He will also deliver a lecture early in<br />
the year at the Royal Institution, on “Shakespeare<br />
as Contemporaries knew Him.”<br />
<br />
Mr. W. L. Courtney is to deliver two lectures on<br />
“Comedy, Ancient and Modern,” at the Royal<br />
Institution, on the afternoons of February 6th and<br />
13th. Mr. Alfred Austin and Mr, Henry Arthur<br />
Jones are also to lecture at the same famous Institu-<br />
tion in Albemarle Street.<br />
<br />
i<br />
<br />
AMERICAN NOTES.<br />
<br />
re<br />
<br />
MONG the six books now most in demand<br />
throughout the States I note that only one,<br />
Sir A. Conan Doyle’s “Adventures of<br />
Gerard,” is a work that is not of American author-<br />
ship. This is significant of the growing nationalisa-<br />
tion of our literature. The best English books<br />
still come to us, and are no doubt read and appre-<br />
ciated ; but they are no longer, as they once were,<br />
our exclusive models, and they take, generally<br />
speaking, but a secondary place in the market.<br />
Yet no great star can be said to have risen above<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
our horizon of late ; nor has any American work of<br />
such wide appeal as Mr. Morley’s “ Life of Glad-<br />
stone” been issued on this side. The advance is<br />
rather horizontal than vertical, to say truth.<br />
<br />
As if to atone for the loss of Frank Norris’s<br />
promise, Mr. Jack London has sprung up and<br />
attained something like distinction already. But<br />
the merits of his “Call of the Wild” must be too<br />
well known to readers of Zhe Author to require<br />
comment from me at this time of day. He has<br />
no doubt a great future before him. But Mr.<br />
London’s book stands second in the list of “ big<br />
sellers.” At the top is a spirited tale of the<br />
Civil War by Mr. John Fox, junior. The scene<br />
of “The Little Shepherd of Kingdom Come”<br />
is the border state of Kentucky, and its most im-<br />
portant character, John Morgan, the raider ;<br />
though Grant is introduced. The book naturally<br />
challenges comparison with Winston Churchill’s<br />
«The Orisis.”<br />
<br />
Another civil war story—not so good, though,<br />
as Mr. Fox’s—is Frederick Palmer’s “ The Vaga-<br />
bond,” which contains some well described war<br />
scenes, notably a vivid account of the battle of<br />
Bull Run.<br />
<br />
Among the established favourites in historical<br />
fiction Mr. Chambers has added to his record “ The<br />
Maids of Paradise,” who are not houris, but<br />
damsels of a Breton village. The period is that of<br />
the Franco-German War. Brittany is also the<br />
scene of Margaret Horton Potter's ‘‘ Castle of<br />
Twilight”; but in this case it is the old-world<br />
feudal province. Cyrus Townsend Brady has<br />
deserted the historical field and broken new<br />
ground in “A Doctor of Philosophy”; but his<br />
success can scarcely be described as unqualified.<br />
<br />
Two notable novels of modern life, each by a<br />
woman, treat of university society. Miss Anna<br />
McClure Sholl, in “The Law of Life,” recounts<br />
the struggle of a Puritan conscience with femi-<br />
nine instinct, and also raises the difficult problem<br />
of the relations of a university towards a meddling<br />
and not too scrupulous benefactor. The author is<br />
generally supposed to have had Cornell in her<br />
mind—not that the circumstances exist there.<br />
“he Millionaire’s Son,” by Mrs. Robeson Brown,<br />
is also concerned with a moral conflict, in this case<br />
between the wish to carry on the paternal business —<br />
and an overpowering scholarly bent inherited from<br />
a grandfather.<br />
<br />
James Lane Allen has once more exhibited his.<br />
fine sense for style; but “The Mettle of the —<br />
Pasture,” like “The Reign of Law,” falls far —<br />
below the high standard attained by the book ~<br />
which gave him fame.<br />
<br />
The strangely-named “ Silver Poppy” (it is the —<br />
title of the heroine’s first novel) by Arthur<br />
Stringer, is a striking but imperfectly-conceived —<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
tale of love and literature in New York. The<br />
latter, represented by the American woman, gets<br />
the better of the former in the person of an Eng-<br />
lish journalist.<br />
<br />
Thomas Dixon’s “The One Woman” has<br />
attained popularity rather on account of its subject<br />
—socialism and sex—than its literary merits,<br />
which are of the sensational order.<br />
<br />
George Barr McCutcheon has made an ambitious<br />
experiment in “The Sherrods,” which has been<br />
the fictional attraction of the Bookman during the<br />
greater part of the year. Other novelists who have<br />
fully maintained their reputations are Mr. Stewart<br />
White with “The Forest,” Charles Major in<br />
“A Forest Hearth,’ and Mrs. Wharton in ‘“ The<br />
Sanctuary.”<br />
<br />
Of the older hands, I remark that Kate Douglas<br />
Wiggin figures among the big sellers with her<br />
“Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm.” Mr. Marion<br />
Crawford has written another story of Roman<br />
life ; and Mr. Howells, in “Letters Home,” has<br />
handled with great skill the difficult instrument<br />
of epistolary fiction. é<br />
<br />
A slight but well-nigh perfect piece of work is<br />
Miss Alice Brown’s ‘‘ Judgment,” in which justice<br />
and mercy in the person of a husband and wife are<br />
most artistically contrasted; and a word of praise<br />
should be given to Mrs. Tilia W. Peattie’s pretty<br />
collection of tales called ‘“‘ The Edge of Things.”<br />
<br />
We pass to more solid literature, after remarking<br />
that Mormonism has found a novelist in the author<br />
of “The Spenders,” who has dealt with the subject<br />
in his “Lions of the Lord”; and the multi-<br />
millionaire his exposer in Mr. David Graham<br />
Phillips, whose “Master Rogue” is to be com-<br />
mended to the perusal of anyone in danger of<br />
becoming one.<br />
<br />
In biographical publications this fall has been<br />
rather prolific. The two outstanding books in this<br />
department have been, of course, the posthumous<br />
recollections of Richard Henry Stoddard and the<br />
autobiography of Senator Hoar ; but there are others<br />
scarcely inferior to them in interest. Stoddard,<br />
whose work was finished for him by Mr. Ripley<br />
Hitchcock, and introduced by his life-long friend,<br />
Edmund Clarence Stedman, has something interest-<br />
ing to say of most of his literary contemporaries,<br />
not a few of whom he knew intimately. Lowell,<br />
Bryant, Poe, N. P. Willis, and especially Bayard<br />
Taylor, the translator of “ Faust,” are celebrities<br />
who cross his pages ; but probably the chief interest<br />
of them lies in the account of his own boyhood and<br />
early struggles.<br />
<br />
Senator Hoar’s “ Autobiography of Seventy<br />
Years” covers a somewhat similar period in the<br />
political world. The eminent Republican was at<br />
<br />
Harvard under Channing, made his first public<br />
speech, in 1850, at Worcester, Mass., as a substitute<br />
<br />
93<br />
<br />
for Judge Allen, and in 1880 presided over the<br />
party convention at which Garfield was nominated<br />
for the Presidency. A great admirer of Grant, he<br />
gives a pointed description of his unconciliatory<br />
manners. Always a strong partisan, he explains<br />
to his readers that he has never given a vote<br />
against his conscience and justifies his adhesion<br />
to Imperialism.<br />
<br />
Searcely less important than the works I have<br />
just glanced at is General John B. Gordon’s<br />
“‘ Reminiscences of the Civil War,” which presents<br />
various aspects of the great struggle from the<br />
Confederate view-point, but in a thoroughly im-<br />
partial spirit and in a most entertaining, simple<br />
style. The writer held important commands at<br />
the first battle of Bull Run, at Antietam, and<br />
Gettysburg ; was largely responsible for the sur-<br />
prise at Cedar Creek; and was with Lee in the<br />
last despairing efforts of the South. The General<br />
thinks that the war strengthened the American<br />
character ; and his geniality pervades a book which<br />
is equally instructive and amusing, abounding, as<br />
it does, in good stories. “My Own Story, with<br />
Recollections of Noted Persons,” by John Townsend<br />
Trowbridge, contains anecdotes of some of the great<br />
New England writers, such as Holmes, Emerson,<br />
Bronson Alcott, and Walt Whitman, and some<br />
curious evidence as to the undoubted influence of<br />
the Concord sage upon the author of ‘“ Leaves of<br />
Grass.”<br />
<br />
Not the least remarkable of autobiographic<br />
works is Miss Helen Keller’s story of her wonder-<br />
ful education, partly told in her own words, partly<br />
in those of the gifted teacher whose genius and<br />
patience enabled her, with her imperfect senses, to<br />
stand at least on a level with normally-endowed<br />
mortals. In this connection it may also be men-<br />
tioned that the daughters of Dr. Howe, the famous<br />
teacher of the blind and deaf mutes, have recently<br />
published an account of how he educated Laura<br />
Bridgman.<br />
<br />
Another book has been written upon Thomas<br />
Jefferson ; and a personage nearer our own day,<br />
Henry Ward Beecher, has found a biographer in<br />
Dr. Lyman Abbott.<br />
<br />
An admirable survey of American literature<br />
appeared early in the fall from the pen of<br />
Professor William P. Trent.<br />
<br />
“American Tariff Controversies,” by Edward<br />
Stanwood, is a work which will, no doubt, be<br />
studied by others besides the author’s countrymen.<br />
It merits attention from the thorough and com-<br />
prehensive manner in which the subject is treated.<br />
<br />
Consternation must have been experienced in<br />
some quarters after the perusal of a little book<br />
with the seemingly harmless title of “The Home:<br />
its Work and Influence”; for the author, Mrs.<br />
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, has dared to belittle<br />
94<br />
<br />
the domestic virtues, to maintain that cooking<br />
should not be done at home, and to brand with<br />
the fearful accusation of arrogance the mother<br />
who undertakes the sole training of her own<br />
child.<br />
<br />
The veteran author, Thomas Bailey Aldrich,<br />
has given fresh delight to the reading public by<br />
his quaintly - named “Ponkapog Papers”; and<br />
Mark Twain has republished in a revised form<br />
that ancient favourite “The Jumping Frog.”<br />
Mr. Clemens has also been turning his attention<br />
to those tiresome people, the votaries of “ Christian<br />
Science.”<br />
<br />
‘A new science, called “ Anthropo-Geography,”<br />
would seem to have arisen, and its first American<br />
exponent is Miss Ellen Semple in her “ American<br />
History and its Geographic Conditions.”<br />
<br />
In the purely historical field we have had two<br />
new books on the Civil War, the one by Mr. Birk-<br />
beck Wood and Colonel Edwards, the other by Dr.<br />
Guy Carleton Lee, in addition to E. Benjamin<br />
Andrews’s supplement to his “ History of the last<br />
Quarter Century.”<br />
<br />
A highly interesting work, which takes us some<br />
considerable way further back, is Thomas A. Jan-<br />
vier’s “The Dutch Founding of New York.”<br />
<br />
Reuben Gold Thwaites has done good service<br />
by his careful editing of a reprint of Father Louis<br />
Hennequin’s “ New Discovery” (1698) ; and he is<br />
now engaged upon an edition of the “ Original<br />
Journals of Lewis and Clark.” He has also pub-<br />
lished a volume of historical essays in western<br />
history. a.<br />
<br />
Three new volumes of the extensive work of<br />
Emma Helen Blair and James Alex Robertson<br />
upon the “Philippine Islands” have appeared ;<br />
and Arthur Howard Noll has written more upon<br />
the history of Mexico. Mr. Francis Johnson’s<br />
compilation, “ Famous Assassinations of History,”<br />
ranges from Philip of Macedon to the late King<br />
and Queen of Servia, and is a veritable bath of<br />
international gore. -<br />
<br />
Among curious nondescript works I notice the<br />
anonymous “ Wanted—A Wife,” by “ A Bachelor,”<br />
just issued by Daniel V. Wien, of New York.”<br />
It is not surprising to learn that two editions of<br />
this were quickly disposed of.<br />
<br />
The Poe revival still continues. The latest<br />
evidence is Mr. Sherwin Cody’s critical edition<br />
executed for A. C. McClurg & Co.<br />
<br />
Some unpublished extracts from Emerson’s<br />
private journals are to see the light in the<br />
Atlantic Monthly during next year. They will be<br />
welcome, though one has heard a great deal of the<br />
philosopher-poet of late. But it is really to be<br />
hoped that the last has now been heard of Mistress<br />
Margaret Fuller and her egregious love-letters.<br />
<br />
Two meritorious contributions to philosophical<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
study have appeared in America during the past<br />
year. Dr. William Turner’s “History of Philo-<br />
sophy” comes from Boston; Mr. Arthur Stone<br />
Dewing’s more popular “ Introduction to the History<br />
of Modern Philosophy ” from Philadelphia. Pro-<br />
fessor J. Laurence Laughlin has issued a first<br />
instalment of the extensive work which he con-<br />
templates upon the “Principles of Money.” He<br />
is a strenuous upholder of the policy of adherence<br />
to a gold standard. He has evolved a new theory-<br />
of credit. Other economical works which may<br />
be of interest to students are Miss Breckridge’s<br />
“Legal Tender” and Professor William A. Scott’s<br />
“Money and Banking.”<br />
<br />
Photogravure portraits of the Presidents adorn<br />
the new edition which Messrs. Harper are bringing<br />
out of President Woodrow Wilson’s ‘‘ History of<br />
the American People.”<br />
<br />
Our obituary list is neither long nor important.<br />
It contains the names of Colonel Richard Henry<br />
Savage, best known as the author of “ My Official<br />
Wife,” who just lived to see in print his last book,<br />
“Monte Christo in Khaki”; of Mrs. Elizabeth<br />
Cherry Waltz, a hard-working journalist who wrote<br />
the humorous “ Pa Gladden” stories; of General<br />
Edward McGrady, the historian of South Carolina ;<br />
and of James Robert Gilmore, founder of the Con-<br />
tinental Monthly, editor of the ‘Cyclopedia of<br />
American Biography,” and author of several novels<br />
of Southern life published under the pseudonym<br />
“ Edmund Kirke.” The last was a personal friend<br />
of Lincoln and Greeley, as well as the intimate of<br />
Longfellow and Holmes.<br />
<br />
PARIS NOTES.<br />
<br />
1<br />
<br />
HE Academy prizes were distributed at the<br />
fe annual meeting at the close of the year. A<br />
prize for his poem on “ Victor Hugo ” was<br />
awarded to M. Depont. The Toirac prize fell to<br />
M. Donnay for his play, “L’Autre Danger.”<br />
Madame Bentzon received the Née prize, and M.<br />
Boissier spoke in the highest terms of her work,<br />
and at the same time indulged in a side-thrust at<br />
certain novels which have recently been published.<br />
“On ge souvient,’’ he said, “ que sa réputation a<br />
commence par des romans qui ont eu ce privilege<br />
rare d’obtenir un grand succés, sans rien cotter a<br />
la dignité de son caractere. . . . Le prix Née, que<br />
nous donnons 2 Mme. Béntzon, nous |’avions<br />
décerné, il y a deux ans, 8 Mme. Arvéde Barine.<br />
L’ Académie a tenu a rapprocher ces deux poms: ils<br />
sont l’honneur des femmes de France. Ils mon-<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
trent, une fois de plus, qu en littérature il n’y a<br />
pas de privilége pour un sexe, et qu’une femme,<br />
quia du talent, n’a pas besoin de se mettre en<br />
révolte, de former des ligues et de s’armer en<br />
guerre contre la société pour obtenir la renommée,<br />
quand elle la mérite.”<br />
<br />
M. Boissier spoke highly of the novels by Henry<br />
Bordeaux, Claude Ferval, Plessis, Yunga, Moreau,<br />
and de Comminges. He then mentioned the<br />
authors of various works of education, history and<br />
biography, terminating with M. Pierre de Nolhac,<br />
who received the Gobert prize for his admirable<br />
series of works on Versailles and its historical<br />
personages.<br />
<br />
France is the country par excellence where art<br />
and literature are appreciated and encouraged.<br />
<br />
After the Academy prizes came those awarded<br />
annually by the Société des Gens de Lettres to<br />
talented writers.<br />
<br />
Among the names of the authors to whom this<br />
year’s prizes have been given are: MM. Camille<br />
Lemonnier, Georges d’Esparbes, Louis de Robert,<br />
Junka, Dalsem, Champol and Pascal. Women<br />
writers also come in for their share of the awards.<br />
Mme. Brada, Mme. de Peyrebrune, Mlle. Maugeret<br />
and Mme Lafon, have received prizes varying from<br />
£20 to £12.<br />
<br />
Some excellent articles have appeared in many<br />
of the French reviews and papers on Herbert<br />
Spencer, who was greatly appreciated in France.<br />
<br />
In a book recently published by M. Gabriel<br />
Compayré there are some interesting pages on the<br />
life and works of Spencer.<br />
<br />
A French journalist in London, writing to one<br />
of the principal papers here, was struck with the<br />
evident lack of appreciation of the great philosopher<br />
in England. He says that ninety-nine out of<br />
every hundred of Herbert Spencer’s compatriots<br />
ignore not only the works of the great man who<br />
has just passed away, but even his name. He<br />
goes on to say that it is one of the characteristics<br />
of the English people that they are not attracted<br />
by the works of their greatest writers, their greatest<br />
thinkers and their greatest savants.<br />
<br />
The first book published by M. René Bazin,<br />
since his election to the Academy, is entitled<br />
“Récits de la Plaine et de la Montagne.” Itis a<br />
most charming description of travels in various<br />
countries, with anecdotes and stories which add<br />
greatly to the interest of the volume. There are<br />
chapters entitled : “Journal de Route au bord du<br />
Rhone” ; “Une Excursion de Chasse en Hol-<br />
lande”; “Histoire de Dindons”; “ Dans la<br />
banlieue de Londres”; “ Le Palefrenier du Prince<br />
de Galles” ; “ Un Village de Savoie” ; “ La Forét<br />
de Méria”; “La Vallée d’Aoste” and “Le<br />
Registre d’un Ouré.”<br />
<br />
A book by M. André Fontaine, entitled “ Con-<br />
<br />
95<br />
<br />
férences inédites de |’ Académie Royale de Pein-<br />
ture et de Sculpture,” is well worth reading. In<br />
the days of Colbert, lectures were given by the<br />
French Academicians on the merits and faults of<br />
celebrated pictures. Discussions were held on<br />
subjects connected with art, for the benefit of the<br />
students of the Ecole des Beaux Arts, the other<br />
Academicians and artists generally.<br />
<br />
M. Fontaine has collected some of these lectures<br />
and published a volume of them. The most<br />
interesting are those by de Champaigne and Le<br />
Brun, on the question of the primary importance<br />
of drawing or colour in a picture.<br />
<br />
There are others on the merits and faults of<br />
many celebrated pictures by Raphael, Titien,<br />
Poussin and other artists.<br />
<br />
“ Mélanges de Littérature et d’Histoire ” is the<br />
title of a most entertaining book by M. A. Gazier,<br />
on various subjects. Among other articles there<br />
is one on Pascal and Mile. de Roannés, another on<br />
the Abbé de Prades, and a letter from Voltaire<br />
giving some interesting details about his sojourn<br />
and his private affairs at Potsdam. There is also<br />
an account, which reads like a novel, of an<br />
extraordinary woman who lived alone for several<br />
years in the mountains of the Pyrenees. She<br />
belonged to a noble family, but at the age of<br />
fifteen, to avoid marrying, escaped from her own<br />
people and lived as a servant.<br />
<br />
There are other interesting studies in the volume<br />
on the subject of Moliére, and the probability that<br />
the Prince de Conti served as the model for<br />
“Tartuffe.”<br />
<br />
Among the new books are “ Le Second Rang<br />
du Collier,’ by Mme. Judith Gautier; “ Caglios-<br />
tro,” by M. d’Alméras ; “ Propos Littéraires,” by<br />
M. Faguet ; “ L’Empire du Milieu,” by Elisée et<br />
Onésime Reclus, and among the illustrated books<br />
specially intended for New Year’s gifts are<br />
“T’Epopée Biblique,” with fifty engravings from<br />
Gustave Doré’s works; “ La Lune Rousse,” by<br />
Champol ; “ L’Année frangaise: Un héros par<br />
jour,” by Ponsonailhe ; “ Aux pays de la Priére,”<br />
by Henri Guerlin, and “La vieille France qui<br />
s’en va,” by Charles Géniaux.<br />
<br />
A book which should be specially interesting to<br />
the English has just been written by M. Henry<br />
d’Allemagne. ‘The title is “Sports et Jeux<br />
d’adresse,” and all games and sports are traced to<br />
their origin, with a series of coloured illustrations<br />
to show the modifications our present games have<br />
undergone.<br />
<br />
The question is once more being raised whether<br />
actors shall be admitted as Academicians to the<br />
Institute of France.<br />
<br />
M. Mounet Sully, by presenting himself for<br />
election, opens a debate which will be followed<br />
everywhere with the keenest interest.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
96<br />
<br />
“Le Retour de Jérusalem” is one of the finest<br />
pieces that M. Maurice Donnay has written. The<br />
idea upon which the play appears to be based is<br />
that there exists between the Jewish and the<br />
Aryan races a gulf which cannot be bridged over,<br />
and that any attempt to unite them must prove a<br />
failure. oe<br />
<br />
In this play Michel Aubier is a Christian, and<br />
Judith de Chouzay a Jewess, who has adopted the<br />
Catholic religion in order to marry the Viscount<br />
de Chouzay. Michel, too, is married, but imagin-<br />
ing that they are in love with each other, he and<br />
Judith leave their respective homes in order to<br />
unite their destinies. They discover, when too<br />
late, their mistake. Their ideas, their principles<br />
and their habits are so totally different that in the<br />
end they decide to separate. Such in brief is the<br />
piece, which as a psychological study is most<br />
fascinating. The dialogue is brilliant, as in all<br />
M. Donnay’s plays, and the character of Michel an<br />
excellent portrait of the modern Frenchman.<br />
Mme. Le Bargy, M. Dumény, and Mlle. Mégard<br />
interpret their réles to perfection.<br />
<br />
The first night of M. Sardou’s new play “La<br />
Sorciére,’ has been one of the great theatrical<br />
events of the month. At the close of the dress<br />
rehearsal, Madame Sarah Bernhardt received an<br />
ovation, and many of the principal artistes and<br />
dramatic authors came forward to offer their<br />
congratulations.<br />
<br />
It is with the greatest pleasure that everyone<br />
sees M. Bour at last in a suitable theatre. The<br />
piece he is now giving, “Cadet Roussel,” by<br />
M. Jacques Richepin, is, thanks to his excellent<br />
interpretation, so great a success that M. Bour has<br />
been compelled to move to the Porte St. Martin.<br />
Some two years ago, in the famous play<br />
“ Alleluia,” M. Bour made his mark, and with a<br />
small company of artistes started the International<br />
Thédtre for the production of plays from all<br />
languages.<br />
<br />
In every piece M. Bour had great success, and<br />
his removal to a larger theatre, on the Boulevards,<br />
will probably make him a formidable rival for M.<br />
Antoine.<br />
<br />
La Renaissance Latine has some very interesting<br />
articles in the December number. Among others:<br />
“« Les Idées littéraires de Nietzsche,” by M. Emile<br />
Faguet ; some letters to the “Bon Ange,” from<br />
Mirabeau; “ L’Esprit romain et l’Art francais,” by<br />
M. Mauclair, and “La Crise méridionale en<br />
Italie.”<br />
<br />
Anys HALLARD.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE CONTRACT OF BAILMENT. ©<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
TYNHE point which “ G. H. T.” has raised, under<br />
the above heading, in the December number<br />
of The Author, is of great practical interest<br />
<br />
to authors, editors, and publishers; and it is<br />
<br />
eminently desirable that it should be settled.<br />
<br />
“G. H.T.” has put the author’s view. Leaving<br />
<br />
the publisher to speak for himself, I propose to say<br />
<br />
a word on behalf of the editor, merely premising<br />
<br />
that, being myself, in a humble way, also a writer,<br />
<br />
I have no bias against the author’s just claims.<br />
<br />
“q. H. T.’s” arguments are cautiously worded,<br />
as becomes one in his responsible position. But I<br />
think it fair to assume, that he regards an editor to<br />
whom unsolicited MSS. are sent, in the course of<br />
post or by mere messenger, as responsible for<br />
the safety, perhaps even for the return, of the MSS. ;<br />
and this, whether or not the editor has given<br />
public notice disclaiming such responsibility. In<br />
the nature of things, such notice must be indirect ;<br />
it is clearly impossible for an editor to serve per-<br />
sonal notice on every inhabitant of the British<br />
Isles, nor would it, I think, be contended, by any<br />
serious advocate, that he is bound to spend money<br />
in advertising his intentions in the Press.<br />
<br />
It seems to me that “G. H. T.’s” argument is,<br />
to begin with, seriously damaged by the very title<br />
with which he heads his article. As he justly<br />
asserts, bailment is, or at least implies, a contract.<br />
Now a contract, in every system of law with which<br />
I am acquainted —certainly in English law—<br />
requires the co-operation of at least two persons.<br />
One person cannot make a contract ; there must<br />
be the mutual consent of two minds. If I throw<br />
a book in at a man’s window, my act may be<br />
a trespass ; it certainly cannot, of itself, constitute<br />
a contract—of bailment or anything else. The<br />
most favourable interpretation that can be put<br />
upon it is, that it is an offer to sell or lend the<br />
book, which the person into whose house it is<br />
thrown may or may not accept, at his option.<br />
This construction has been put by Courts of Justice,<br />
over and over again, on the act of leaving unsolicited<br />
goods at a house ; and scathing remarks have been<br />
made by judges upon those enterprising persons<br />
who have tried to found a legal claim on such<br />
proceedings.<br />
<br />
“GQ, H. T.” seems, therefore, to me, to miss a<br />
vital point when he says that the question is: “Is<br />
an MS. sent in for the benefit of both parties or<br />
not?” It is not sufficient that the MS. should be<br />
sent for the benefit of both parties; it must also be<br />
accepted for the benefit of both parties.<br />
<br />
And I think that “G@. H. T.” would not care to<br />
argue, that the mere fact of opening an envelope<br />
containing an MS. is an acceptance. How can the<br />
<br />
person to whom a sealed envelope is addressed<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
possibly tell the nature of its contents, until he<br />
opens it? It may contain an article which he has<br />
commissioned, and is anxiously expecting. The<br />
difference between mere receipt and acceptance is<br />
well known to all lawyers, certainly to “G. H. ie<br />
himself.<br />
<br />
But I gather that “G. H. T.” proposes to get<br />
over this difficulty by the bold argument, that the<br />
mere founding of a periodical constitutes, in law,<br />
an offer to accept for consideration any article<br />
which any one may choose to send in. Some<br />
editors do, undoubtedly, make this offer, in express<br />
terms, qualified, however, as a rule, by a disavowal<br />
of liability. Whether such a disavowal would be<br />
deemed legally inconsistent with the general offer,<br />
is a point which I do not care to argue. My point<br />
is, that when no such offer is made by an editor,<br />
& fortiori, when an_ editor expressly warns con-<br />
tributors against sending him their MSS. without<br />
previous communication, no such offer can be<br />
implied from the mere founding of the periodical.<br />
An impresario who opens a theatre does not, surely,<br />
undertake to give every actor who offers his services<br />
a trial ; the proprietor of a private picture gallery<br />
does not offer to admit, or even to examine, the<br />
work of every artist who chooses to send in a<br />
picture. If the theatre or the gallery were public<br />
property, maintained by the State or by public<br />
subscription, the case might be different.<br />
<br />
Ifthe claim of contract be untenable, “G. HLT s?<br />
argument comes to this : that there is a duty upon<br />
an editor, simply as such, or, as the jurist would<br />
say, a duty m rem, to accept for consideration<br />
every MS. sent to him. This is also a startling<br />
argument. Duties in rem are familiar to our law ;<br />
but it is a well-known principle, that such duties<br />
are of a negative character only—v.e., they are<br />
duties to abstain from doing acts which may result<br />
in harm or damage to the public or one’s neigh-<br />
pours. Duties in rem of a positive character—<br />
ie., to do some act at the request of all and sundry,<br />
or at peril of responsibility, arise only from the<br />
express provisions of statute law; and I do not<br />
recollect any Act of Parliament which imposes upon<br />
editors the duty of reading and returning, or of<br />
safeguarding, unsolicited MSS.<br />
<br />
The only exception to this rule which is known<br />
to me, is the duty cast upon a man who harbours<br />
dangerous substances, or embarks upon an under-<br />
* taking peculiarly likely to cause harm, to take all<br />
precautions against the happening of such harm.<br />
But I do not think that “G. H. T.” would be<br />
cynic enough to urge that the founding of a<br />
periodical was an undertaking of such a nature,<br />
<br />
To descend from purely legal argument to the<br />
argument from common sense. Ts it unreasonable<br />
to expect that an author, or his literary agent,<br />
should make himself personally acquainted. with<br />
<br />
97<br />
<br />
the contents of a periodical to which he proposes<br />
to contribute? If he neglects to do so, how can<br />
he possibly tell whether his proposed contribution<br />
is likely to be at all suitable in matter, style, or<br />
length ? Is not an editor entitled to resent such<br />
neglect as savouring of contempt, or, at least, of<br />
laziness, and indifference to the claims upon his<br />
time? Is he bound to pay a clerk for the express<br />
purpose of returning MSS. which are utterly unsuit-<br />
able for his pages? What would be thought of<br />
the man who wrote to the curator of a library:<br />
“ Herewith I send you a highly intelligent monkey.<br />
If he is not suitable for your shelves, kindly give<br />
him a carefully selected meal, and despatch him by<br />
the 9.55 to Norwich, carriage paid” ? Would<br />
not the librarian be entitled to regard the sender<br />
of the monkey as a troublesome lunatic? If the<br />
author, and, still more, the literary agent—who is<br />
supposed to be a man of business—does not take<br />
the trouble to acquaint himself with the conditions<br />
on which alone the editor has expressed himself as<br />
willing to treat, he has but himself to thank if the<br />
busy editor regards him as a nuisance.<br />
<br />
In conclusion, I may venture to doubt whether<br />
the periodical which is fed entirely, or almost<br />
entirely, by commissioned articles, is not already<br />
more common than “G. H. T.” is inclined to<br />
allow, and whether it is not likely to be still more<br />
common in the future. An organ founded for a<br />
definite purpose, (widely announced in the Press),<br />
drawing its financial support from people interested<br />
in that purpose, and relying on an organised staff,<br />
can hardly win success by any other means. Nor<br />
am I prepared to admit, that such an organ is any<br />
less worthy a product of the Republic of Letters<br />
than the miscellany which aims merely at the<br />
amusement of the leisure hour,<br />
<br />
An EDITOR.<br />
<br />
———__+ +<br />
<br />
LITERARY, DRAMATIC, AND MUSICAL<br />
PROPERTY.<br />
<br />
+<br />
English “Serials” in the American Market.<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENT tells us that “serials”<br />
which have appeared in England, and are<br />
copyright both in England and the United<br />
States, even in the journals generally conceded to<br />
buy the best class of serial fiction, do not command<br />
good prices in the United States market. £50 is<br />
a very outside price, and £30 is considered a price<br />
above the average, the general price being £15 to<br />
£20 for the serial use of from 80,000 to 100,000<br />
words, The truth is that the market is severely<br />
limited, owing to the fact that most of the United<br />
States publishers, who go in for this kind of work,<br />
<br />
<br />
98<br />
<br />
prefer to furbish up and bring up to date, with the<br />
aid of cheap literary hacks, serials which appeared<br />
years ago, and present them, thus “ modernised,” as<br />
new stories to their readers. If this processshould<br />
continue, in the year 2000 the curious may be able<br />
to discover in United States fiction ‘“ Ivanhoe,”<br />
“Vanity Fair,” or “Oliver Twist,” in distorted<br />
form, altered and arranged to suit the decadent<br />
palate of the future American. Comment on this<br />
sort of action is superfluous.<br />
<br />
a So oe.<br />
<br />
MAGAZINE CONTENTS.<br />
<br />
——+~<— —<br />
BLACKWOOD’s MAGAZINE.<br />
<br />
John Chilcote, M.P. By Katherine Cecil Thurston.<br />
<br />
A Nation at Play: The Peril of Games.<br />
<br />
Silk o’ the Kine: A Tale of the Isles. By Alfred Noyes.<br />
<br />
The Trader of Last Notch. By Perceval Gibbon.<br />
<br />
To. the “Whole Hog”: An Allegorical Ode. By<br />
Dum-Dum.<br />
<br />
Some Big Lost Norway Salmon. By Gilfrid W. Hartley.<br />
<br />
“Sally”: A Study. By Hugh Clifford, C.M.G.<br />
<br />
Heraldry.<br />
<br />
The Appearances at the Black Knoll.<br />
<br />
Herbert Spencer : A Portrait.<br />
<br />
A Turkish Farm.<br />
<br />
The Military Book-shelf.<br />
<br />
Richard Cobden.<br />
<br />
Musings without Method.<br />
<br />
The Earl of Stair.<br />
<br />
THE CORNHILL MAGAZINE.<br />
<br />
The Sea-Born Man. By Mrs. Woods.<br />
<br />
The Truants (Chapters i.—iii.). By A. E. W. Mason.<br />
<br />
Charles Dickens and the Guild of Literature and Art.<br />
By the late Sir John R. Robinson.<br />
<br />
Colonial Memories: Old New Zealand, Il. By Lady<br />
Broome.<br />
<br />
No. 10 Downing Street. By the Right Hon. Sir<br />
Algernon West, G.C.B.<br />
<br />
Blackstick Papers, No, 8. By Mrs, Richmond Ritchie.<br />
<br />
Alms for Oblivion. By Richard Garnett, C.B., LL.D.<br />
<br />
Theodore Hook. By Viscount St. Cyres.<br />
<br />
In a Viceregal City. By Mrs, Archibald Little,<br />
<br />
Historical Mysteries (1.). The Mystery of Kaspar<br />
Hauser, the Child of Europe. By Andrew Lang.<br />
<br />
A Nineteenth Century Philosopher. By F. J. H.<br />
Darton.<br />
<br />
The Young Fisher. By Stephen Gwynn.<br />
<br />
The Ingenuity of Mr. Clinton Bathurst. By T. Baron<br />
Russell.<br />
<br />
LONGMAN’S MAGAZINE,<br />
<br />
Nature’s Comedian :(Chapters xiii., xiv.). By W. E.<br />
Norris.<br />
<br />
Marine Steam Turbines. By Robert Cromie.<br />
<br />
The King’s Nose. By Margaret Armour.<br />
<br />
Some Scouts—but not Scouting. By Captain A. 0,<br />
‘Vaughan.<br />
<br />
Lament for Fionavar. By Eva Gore-Booth.<br />
<br />
Humours of Eastern Travel. By Louisa Jebb.<br />
<br />
The Brown Puppy. By Ellen Ada Smith.<br />
<br />
Rahel Varnhagen : The German Sibyl of the Nineteenth<br />
Century. By Mary Hargrave.<br />
<br />
At the Sign of the Ship. By Andrew Lang.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
PALL MALL MAGAZINE,<br />
<br />
The Children of the Potteries. By the Duchess of<br />
Sutherland.<br />
<br />
The Sensations and Emotions of Aerial Navigation. By<br />
A. Santos Dumont.<br />
<br />
The Guest of the Admiral: The Mediterranean Fleet at<br />
Home. By Arnold White.<br />
<br />
An Episode in a Country House: A Story. By<br />
Frances Harrod (Frances Forbes Robertson).<br />
<br />
A Song. By Lady Lily Greene.<br />
<br />
On the Trail of the Opal. By P. F. 8. Spence (Alex-<br />
ander Macdonald).<br />
<br />
The Lady and the Property: A Story. ByMarie van Vorst.<br />
<br />
Literary Geography : The Bronté Country. By William<br />
Sharp.<br />
<br />
A Matter of Honour: A Story. By R. Neish.<br />
<br />
The Queen’s Quair: Book II., Chapters V., VI. By<br />
Maurice Hewlett.<br />
<br />
Master Workers : X. Sir Oliver Lodge. With portraits.<br />
By Harold Begbie.<br />
<br />
Captives: A Poem. By V. V.<br />
<br />
The Wilderness: A Story. By H. B. Marriott-Watson.<br />
<br />
The Vineyard: Chapters XVIII, XIX. By John<br />
Oliver Hobbes (Mrs. Craigie).<br />
<br />
Benjamin’s Mess: A Story. By Eden Phillpotts.<br />
<br />
Sunrise: A Poem. By E, Nesbit.<br />
<br />
The Round Table :—A Famous Doctor and his Friends.<br />
By Ernest Rhys. Nursery Pictures: ‘Little Jack<br />
Horner.” By S. H. Sime. A Critic Criticised: Mr,<br />
Sidney Lee and the Baconians. By G. Stronach.<br />
<br />
The Month in Caricature. By G. R. H.<br />
<br />
THE WORLD’S WorRK.<br />
<br />
The March of Events: An Illustrated Editorial Record<br />
and Comment.<br />
The Old Year.<br />
The Fiscal Battlefield,<br />
A Step in Civilisation.<br />
Another Little War ? ;<br />
Radium and the Beginnings of Matter.<br />
The Fiscal Issue Joined. By J. St. Loe Strachey (Editor<br />
of the Spectator).<br />
Motorists under the New Act. By Henry Norman, M.P.<br />
A British Industry Really Ruined. By Edwin Sharpe<br />
Grew.<br />
Producing a Pantomime. (Illustrated.)<br />
A Modern London, Office Building. (illustrated.)<br />
Milking Cows by Electricity. (Illustrated.)<br />
The Steam Turbine. (Illustrated.) By Robert Cromie<br />
and Frederick E. Rebbeck,<br />
The. Pressing Question of our Canals. By Edwin<br />
Clements.<br />
The Working of a London Bank. By J. E. Woolacott.<br />
The Lady Chef.<br />
The Wonders of Modern Surgery. (illustrated.) By<br />
C. W. Saleeby, M.B., Ch. B.<br />
Three New Schools. (Illustrated.) By Eustace Miles, M.A.<br />
Scientific Pheasant Farming. (lllustrated.) By W.<br />
Bovill.<br />
<br />
The Work of a Japanese Craftsman, (lllustrated.) By .<br />
<br />
Herbert G. Ponting.<br />
<br />
Municipal Loans for Small Investors. (Illustrated.). By<br />
Edouard Charles.<br />
<br />
British Trade with France.<br />
<br />
The Derwent Valley Waterworks.<br />
<br />
The Making of an American Newspaper.<br />
<br />
The World of Women’s Work.<br />
_ Fresh Eggs and Poultry. illustrated.) “Home<br />
Counties.”<br />
<br />
The Work of the Book World.<br />
<br />
Among the World’s Workers : A Record of Industry.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO THE PRODUCERS<br />
OF BOOKS.<br />
<br />
—— +<br />
<br />
ERE are a few standing rules to be observed in an<br />
agreement. There are four methods of dealing<br />
with literary property :—<br />
<br />
I. Selling it Outright.<br />
<br />
This is sometimes satisfactory, if a proper price can be<br />
oltained. But the transaction should be managed by a<br />
competent agent, or with the advice of the Secretary of<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
II. A Profit-Sharing Agreement (a bad form of<br />
agreement).<br />
<br />
In this case the following rules should be attended to:<br />
<br />
C1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br />
duction forms a part without the strictest investigation.<br />
<br />
(2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br />
profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br />
in his own organs, or by charging exchange advertise-<br />
ments. Therefore keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Not to allow a special charge for “office expenses,”<br />
unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br />
<br />
(4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
(5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br />
<br />
(6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br />
As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br />
doctor !<br />
<br />
Ill. The Royalty System.<br />
<br />
This is perhaps, with certain limitations, the best form<br />
of agreement. It is above all things necessary to know<br />
what the proposed royalty means to both sides. It isnow<br />
possible for an author to ascertain approximately the<br />
truth. From time to time very important figures connected<br />
with royalties are published in Zhe Author.<br />
<br />
IY. A Commission Agreement.<br />
<br />
The main points are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) Be careful to obtain a fair cost of production.<br />
(2.) Keep control of the advertisements.<br />
<br />
(3.) Keep control of the sale price of the book.<br />
<br />
General.<br />
<br />
All other forms of agreement are combinations of the four<br />
above mentioned.<br />
<br />
Such combinations are generally disastrous to the author,<br />
<br />
Never sign any agreement without competent advice from<br />
‘the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
Stamp all agreements with the Inland Revenue stamp.<br />
<br />
Avoid agreements by letter if possible.<br />
<br />
The main points which the Society has always demanded<br />
from the outset are :—<br />
<br />
(1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br />
means.<br />
<br />
(2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br />
fo the author. We are advised that this is a right. in the<br />
nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br />
withheld.<br />
<br />
(3.) Always avoid a transfer of copyright.<br />
<br />
————_+—~>»<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO DRAMATIC AUTHORS.<br />
———9<br />
“AT EVER sign an agreement without submitting it to the<br />
Secretary of the Society of Authors or some com-<br />
petent legal authority,<br />
2. {t is well to be extremely careful in negotiating for<br />
the production of a play with anyone except an established<br />
manager,<br />
<br />
99<br />
<br />
3. There are three forms of dramatic contract for plays<br />
in three or more acts :—<br />
<br />
(a.) Sale outright of the performing right. This<br />
is unsatisfactory. An author who enters into<br />
such a contract should stipulate in the contract<br />
for production of the piece by a certain date<br />
and for proper publicatioa of his name on the<br />
play-bills.<br />
<br />
(4.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of percentages on<br />
gross receipts. Percentages vary between 5<br />
and 15 per cent. An author should obtain a<br />
percentage on the sliding scale of gross receipts<br />
in preference to the American system. Should<br />
obtain a sum in advance of percentages. A fixed<br />
date on or before which the play should be<br />
performed.<br />
<br />
(c.) Sale of performing right or of a licence to<br />
perform on the basis of royalties (i.c., fixed<br />
nightly fees). This method should be always<br />
avoided except in cases where the fees are<br />
likely to be small or difficult to collect. The<br />
other safeguards set out under heading (0.) apply<br />
also in this case,<br />
<br />
4. Plays in one act are often sold outright, but it is<br />
better to obtain a small nightly fee if possible, and a sum<br />
paid in advance of such fees in any event. It is extremely<br />
important that the amateur rights of one-act plays should<br />
be reserved.<br />
<br />
5. Authors should remember that performing rights can<br />
be limited, and are usually limited, by town, country, and<br />
time. This is most important.<br />
<br />
6. Authors should not assign performing rights, but<br />
should grant a licence to perform. The legal distinction is<br />
of great importance.<br />
<br />
7, Authors should remember that performing rights in a<br />
play are distinct from literary copyright. A manager<br />
holding the performing right or licence to perform cannot<br />
print the book of the words.<br />
<br />
8. Never forget that United States rights may be exceed-<br />
ingly valuable. ‘hey should never be included in English<br />
agreements without the author obtaining a substantial<br />
consideration.<br />
<br />
9. Agreements for collaboration should be carefully<br />
drawn and executed before collaboration is commenced.<br />
<br />
10. An author should remember that production of a play<br />
is highly speculative: that he runs a very great risk of<br />
delay and a breakdown in the fulfilment of his contract.<br />
He should therefore guard himself all the more carefully in<br />
the beginning.<br />
<br />
11. An author must remember that the dramatic market<br />
is exceedingly limited, and that for a novice the first object<br />
is to obtain adequate publication.<br />
<br />
As these warnings must necessarily be incomplete, on<br />
account of the wide range of the subject of dramatic con-<br />
tracts, those authors desirous of further information<br />
are referred to the Secretary of the Society.<br />
<br />
oe<br />
<br />
WARNINGS TO MUSICAL COMPOSERS.<br />
to<br />
<br />
ITTLE can be added to the warnings given for the<br />
assistance of producers of books and dramatic<br />
authors. It must, however, be pointed out that, as<br />
<br />
a rule, the musical publisher demands from the musical<br />
composer a transfer of fuller rights and less liberal finan-<br />
cial terms than those obtained for literary and dramatic<br />
property. The musical composer has very often the two<br />
rights to deal with—performing right and copyright. He<br />
<br />
<br />
100<br />
<br />
should be especially careful therefore when entering into<br />
an agreement, and should take into particular consideration<br />
the warnings stated above.<br />
<br />
— ee<br />
<br />
HOW TO USE THE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
a. VERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br />
advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br />
lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br />
<br />
business or the administration of his property. The<br />
<br />
Secretary of the Society is a solicitor, but if there is any<br />
<br />
special reason the Secretary will refer the case to the<br />
<br />
Solicitors of the Society. Further, the Committee, if they<br />
<br />
deem it desirable, will obtain counsel’s opinion. All this<br />
<br />
without any cost to the member.<br />
<br />
2. Remember that questions connected with copyright<br />
and publishers’ agreements do not fall within the experi-<br />
ence of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple to use<br />
the Society.<br />
<br />
3. Send to the Office copies of past agreements and past<br />
accounts, with a copy of the book represented. The<br />
Secretary will always be glad to have any agreements, new<br />
or old, for inspection and note. The information thus<br />
obtained may prove invaluable.<br />
<br />
4, Before signing any agreement whatever, send<br />
the document to the Society for examination.<br />
<br />
5, Remember always that in belonging to the Society<br />
you are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you<br />
are reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are<br />
advancing the best interests of your calling in promoting<br />
the independence of the writer, the dramatist, the composer.<br />
<br />
6. The Committee have now arranged for the reception<br />
of members’ agreements and their preservation in a fire-<br />
proof safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as<br />
confidential documents to be read only by the Secretary,<br />
who will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers :<br />
—(1) To read and advise upon agreements and to give<br />
advice concerning publishers. (2) To stamp agreements<br />
in readiness for a possible action upon them. (3) To keep<br />
agreements. (4) To enforce payments due according to<br />
agreements. Fuller particulars of the Society’s work<br />
can be obtained in the Prospectus.<br />
<br />
7. No contract should be entered into with a literary<br />
agent without the advice of the Secretary of the Society.<br />
Members are strongly advised not to accept without careful<br />
consideration the contracts with publishers submitted to<br />
them by literary agents, and are recommended to submit<br />
them for interpretation and explanation to the Secretary<br />
of the Society.<br />
<br />
8. Many agents neglect to stamp agreements This<br />
must be done within fourteen days of first execution. The<br />
Secretary will undertake it on behalf of members.<br />
<br />
9. Some agents endeavour to prevent authors from<br />
referring matters to the Secretary of the Society; so<br />
do some publishers. Members can make their own<br />
deductions and act accordingly.<br />
<br />
10. The subscription to the Society is £1 1s. per<br />
annum, or £10 10s. for life membership.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
THE READING BRANCH.<br />
<br />
— ++<br />
<br />
EMBERS will greatly assist the Society in this<br />
branch of its work by informing young writers<br />
of its existence. Their MSS. can be read and<br />
<br />
treated as a composition is treated by a coach, The term<br />
MSS. includes not only works of fiction, but poetry<br />
and dramatic works, and when it is possible, under<br />
special arrangement, technical and scientific works. The<br />
Readers are writers of competence and experience. The<br />
fee is one guinea.<br />
<br />
+ 2 ——_—_<br />
<br />
NOTICES.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
HE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of<br />
<br />
the Society that, although the paper is sent to them<br />
<br />
free of charge, the cost of producing it would be a<br />
<br />
very heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br />
<br />
many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br />
5s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br />
<br />
Communications for Zhe Author should be addressed to<br />
the Offices of the Society, 39, Old Queen Street, Storey’s<br />
Gate, §.W., and should reach the Editor not later than<br />
the 21st of each month.<br />
<br />
All persons engaged in_ literary work of any kind,<br />
whether members of the Society or mot, are invited to<br />
communicate to the Editor any points connected with their<br />
work which it would be advisable in the general interest to<br />
publish.<br />
<br />
————_+ + —_<br />
<br />
Communications and letters are invited by the<br />
Editor on all subjects connected with literature, but on<br />
no other subjects whatever. Every effort will be made to<br />
return articles which cannot be accepted.<br />
<br />
—<br />
<br />
The Secretary of the Society begs to give notice<br />
that all remittances are acknowledged by return of post,<br />
<br />
and he requests members who do not receive an<br />
<br />
answer to important communications within two days to<br />
<br />
write to him without delay. All remittances should be —<br />
crossed Union Bank of London, Chancery Lane, or be sent ©<br />
<br />
by registered letter only.<br />
<br />
———__+—_+—__—_<br />
<br />
THE LEGAL AND GENERAL LIFE<br />
ASSURANCE SOCIETY.<br />
<br />
ot<br />
<br />
N offer has been made of a special scheme of.<br />
<br />
Endowment and Whole Life Assurance,<br />
<br />
admitting of a material reduction off the<br />
<br />
ordinary premiums to members of the Society<br />
Full information can be obtained from J. P. Blake,<br />
<br />
5<br />
<br />
158, Leadenhall Street, E.C.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Leval and General Insurance Society (City Branch), —<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ae a<br />
<br />
ne<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
AUTHORITIES.<br />
<br />
—————<br />
<br />
WE see in an extract from the Westminsier<br />
Gazette that the Société des Gens de Lettres has<br />
recently inherited two legacies, one of them<br />
valued at 35,000 francs, and the other, consisting<br />
of real property, estimated to produce 18,000 francs<br />
when realised. Both these legacies will go to sup-<br />
port the Pension Fund of the Société.<br />
<br />
The Société des Gens de Lettres is a wealthy<br />
society owing to the fact that it has certain rights<br />
over the works of members who belong to it, and<br />
<br />
can obtain financial support from the sale of these -<br />
<br />
rights.<br />
<br />
An arrangement of this kind would, of course, be<br />
impossible under the constitution of our Society,<br />
but no doubt, as time goes on, the capital at the<br />
back of the Society will be increased by grateful<br />
members either during their lifetime by donations<br />
or after their death by legacies, till the time<br />
will at length come when neither the Society<br />
nor the Society’s Pension Fund will need further<br />
assistance.<br />
<br />
The Société des Gens de Lettres, it is stated,<br />
has at the present time 145 pensioners, but the<br />
value of the pensions are only £12 a year, and are<br />
awarded as a matter of right to the members of<br />
the Société in order of seniority whenever funds<br />
permit. Many of the more wealthy authors who<br />
are members waive their rights to the pensions to<br />
which they are entitled.<br />
<br />
Mr. J. R. Kewry, of “ The London Directory,”<br />
has been interviewed by a correspondent of a daily<br />
paper. He made one point referring to copyright<br />
which was amusing as well as instructive.<br />
<br />
Infringement of copyright in a directory is<br />
often exceedingly hard to prove, as the facts con-<br />
tained in its pages are, as a rule, open to all<br />
parties ; and as long as anyone acting bond fide<br />
goes to the original source for information so long<br />
may he make use of that information in any way<br />
that seems fit to him.<br />
<br />
We do not refer to the question of the peculiar<br />
form in which the information may be conveyed to<br />
the public, this is another and difficult branch of<br />
copyright ; for instance, in the case of the “A. B. C.<br />
Railway Guide,” there is a certain copyright, not<br />
in the matter, but in the form.<br />
<br />
Mr. Kelly tells how on one occasion a certain<br />
merchant came to his office and said he had been<br />
asked to advertise in a new directory that was<br />
guaranteed a circulation of 15,000 copies. Mr.<br />
Kelly was naturally interested, and looked at the<br />
Copy which the merchant brought with him.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
101<br />
<br />
He referred to one name in the directory, and<br />
seeing the manner in which it had been spelt he<br />
was at once aware that the contents had been<br />
stolen from his own book, as he had himself in-<br />
vented the name and inserted it. Mr. Kelly’s<br />
firm started a prosecution and won the day, and<br />
all copies of the pirated book were ordered to be<br />
destroyed.<br />
<br />
We quote Mr. Kelly’s own words.<br />
<br />
“TI shall never forget the ferocious question put<br />
to me in cross-examination by the defendant’s<br />
counsel. ‘ What,’ he cried, ‘do you stand there,<br />
Mr. Kelly, and confess that you, a gentleman of<br />
honour and position, were actually laying a trap ?’<br />
‘You have to lay traps to catch vermin,’ I took<br />
the liberty of replying.”<br />
<br />
The counsel, no doubt, felt the rebuke.<br />
<br />
This calls to mind another story of copyright<br />
infringement, where the result was equally satis-<br />
factory to the real owner. We believe it occurred<br />
to Mr. Gambier Boulton, the well-known photo-<br />
grapher of wild animals, but cannot at the moment<br />
verify the statement. The hero of the story,<br />
whoever he was, had, with considerable difficulty,<br />
after watching for many days, photographed one<br />
of the lions at the Zoological Gardens in the act of<br />
yawning. On this photograph great time and<br />
trouble had been expended, and he was, in conse-<br />
quence, very proud of the result. Not long after-<br />
wards he found the photograph reproduced in a<br />
magazine, and brought an action for infringement.<br />
The magazine contributor defended the case, and<br />
stated that the photograph was original and was<br />
not a copy. The reply from the plaintiff was<br />
conclusive.<br />
<br />
“It is a curious point,” he said, “that both<br />
lions we have photographed should have had a<br />
cancer on their tongues.”<br />
<br />
The Court gave a verdict for the plaintiff.<br />
<br />
THE Nobel Prize for literature has this year<br />
been assigned to the great Norwegian author,<br />
Bjornstjerne Bjornson.<br />
<br />
There was a report current that this would be<br />
<br />
- the case, and we think the Stockholm Committee<br />
<br />
amply justified in their selection. Mr. Bjornson<br />
was born on the 8th of December, 1832, and is,<br />
therefore, now in his seventy-second year.<br />
<br />
Though a constant traveller, he spends most of<br />
his summer on a little farm which he has purchased<br />
in the heart of Norway.<br />
<br />
His works are well known in this and all<br />
English-speaking countries, and many of them<br />
have been translated. He is not only a novelist,<br />
but a dramatist and a poet.<br />
<br />
<br />
2,<br />
<br />
102<br />
<br />
«Tye Amalgamated Press,” Limited, according<br />
to the papers which have given reports of the<br />
annual meeting, is in a flourishing condition.<br />
<br />
Mr. Alfred C. Harmsworth stated that the<br />
company, after writing off £25,000 for depreciation,<br />
had £266,000 to divide as dividends, and further<br />
if this is not aslip of the pen) had made a nett<br />
profit of £180,000 out of “With the Flag to<br />
Pretoria.”<br />
<br />
These figures are exceedingly interesting to all<br />
members of the profession of authorship.<br />
<br />
If the publishers have made these enormous<br />
profits, no doubt the authors employed have<br />
received their fair and just remuneration at the<br />
same time. We have much pleasure, therefore, in<br />
congratulating the author of “ With the Flag to<br />
Pretoria”? on the small fortune which he must<br />
<br />
have acquired.<br />
<br />
—————<br />
<br />
On December 10th, in the Guildhall Library,<br />
the bust of Geoffrey Chaucer was unveiled. It<br />
was presented by Sir Recinald Hanson, and was<br />
the work of Mr. George Frampton, R.A.<br />
<br />
Many distinguished men were present, either<br />
writers or those who take an interest in literature.<br />
<br />
The ceremony of unveiling was undertaken by<br />
Dr. Furnivall, the Chaucer scholar and founder of<br />
the Chaucer Society.<br />
<br />
Mr. Alfred Austin, the Poet Laureate, seconded<br />
a resolution thanking Sir Reginald Hanson for the<br />
gift.<br />
That the work should have been placed in the<br />
Guildhall Library has a point of interest beyond<br />
the literary. Chaucer was not only a poet, but a<br />
commercial man and a diplomatist. He was<br />
despatched to Genoa in 1372 as the representative<br />
of England in order to bring about a commercial<br />
treaty with that city. The members of the Corpora-<br />
tion have therefore every reason to look upon him<br />
as one of themselves.<br />
<br />
We have much pleasure in printing on another<br />
page a_ short article referring to the sale of<br />
the MS. of “Paradise Lost,” and Mr. Sidney<br />
Lee’s letter which appeared in The Times of<br />
December 14th.<br />
<br />
‘A matter so important to all lovers of literature<br />
cannot be too often placed before the public. It is<br />
hoped, with the help of Mr. Lee and many others<br />
who prize English literature and its connections,<br />
<br />
that it will be possible to save the MS. from being<br />
taken out of England.<br />
<br />
We feel sure that any National movement for<br />
its purchase will obtain the ready support of all<br />
Members of the Society.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
SHOULD WELL-KNOWN WRITERS<br />
“FARM OUT” FICTION ?<br />
<br />
———<br />
From THE COMMITTEE.<br />
<br />
L the first of the notices which are regularly<br />
inserted on the first page of Zhe Author it is<br />
announced that “ For the opinions expressed<br />
<br />
in the papers that are signed or initialled the<br />
authors alone are responsible. None of the papers<br />
or paragraphs must be taken as expressing the<br />
opinion of the Committee, unless such is especially<br />
stated to be the case.”<br />
<br />
The Committee had considered, and their atten-<br />
tion has now been called by more than one<br />
member of the Society to, an article on pages<br />
80 and 81 of the December number, signed<br />
“Proxy,” and entitled, “Should Well-known<br />
Writers ‘Farm-out’ Fiction ?”<br />
<br />
The correspondents appear to assume, Or to<br />
imagine that others might assume, that the pub-<br />
lication of this article may, in the absence of<br />
editorial comment, be taken to imply that the<br />
Committee think the view put forward in it is<br />
worthy to be taken seriously.<br />
<br />
By many readers of Zhe Author the article<br />
was regarded as an ironical jew @esprit, but it<br />
has been accepted by others as a bond fide de-<br />
fence of an existing practice, and it is undoubtedly<br />
open to this interpretation.<br />
<br />
The Committee, therefore, to avoid possible<br />
misunderstanding, feel it their duty to say that,<br />
in their opinion, such practices as are described<br />
and defended by “Proxy” are gravely discredit-<br />
able to those concerned, and constitute a gross<br />
fraud both on the publisher and the public.<br />
<br />
In thus expressing their opinion on the points<br />
raised in “ Proxy’s” article, the Committee, it may<br />
be well to add, must not be understood to condemn<br />
such forms of co-operation as are frequently<br />
resorted to in works involving extensive research,<br />
or where, in other branches of literature, the<br />
co-operation is acknowledged in such a manner<br />
that no purchaser can reasonably complain of<br />
having been misled.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Tur Editor has received from Members of the<br />
Society a number of letters which would more<br />
than fill the space reserved for correspondence in<br />
the present number, commenting on “ Proxy’s”<br />
article. Having before their receipt been in-<br />
structed to insert the note from the Committee<br />
printed above, which meets most of the points<br />
raised by his correspondents, he has, with the<br />
Commitiee’s approval, refrained from publishing<br />
<br />
any selection from these letters in the current<br />
<br />
number.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
aeuneey<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
HERBERT SPENCER, 1820—1903.<br />
<br />
an ep<br />
<br />
. HE suns go swiftly out, and I see no suns to<br />
follow; nothing but a universal twilight<br />
of the semi-divinities.” So wrote Robert<br />
<br />
Louis Stevenson, apropos of the deaths of Renan,<br />
Browning, and Tennyson, and his plaint has echo<br />
among those who have sat at the feet of departed<br />
masters in scienceand philosophy—Darwin, Huxley,<br />
Spencer. For thoughts of a vanished day rather<br />
than of a coming dawn are uppermost ; thoughts<br />
restrained only by the knowledge that the influence<br />
of these teachers, men of lofty aims and unsullied<br />
life, is a part of our imperishable heritage, and<br />
that, consciously or not, we are swayed by it to<br />
further, as at our poor best we may, their high<br />
emprise.<br />
<br />
The obituary notices of Herbert Spencer have<br />
familiarised us with the outlines of his career. No<br />
eventful one, such as comes to men of action, yet<br />
full of incident in struggle bordering on the heroic,<br />
in unflinching purpose and large accomplishment.<br />
Son of a Derby schoolmaster, he was educated<br />
partly at home, partly by an uncle; then came<br />
nine years of civil engineering, with little heart in<br />
the work, and, ultimately, escape into journalism.<br />
In 1850, while sub-editing the Hconomist, Spencer<br />
published “ Social Statics,” wherein ‘“ the conditions<br />
essential to human happiness are specified, and the<br />
relation of them to a general law of development<br />
indicated.” In this last phrase the keynote of his<br />
life-work is struck. One chapter of the book<br />
contains hints of the great doctrine with which<br />
Spencer’s name is associated for all time, while<br />
throughout the book there is present the feeling<br />
that, in the words of Hume, “all sciences have a<br />
relation, greater or less, to man.”<br />
<br />
Neither in the moral nor the material sphere is<br />
their special creation. All that has been achieved,<br />
whether in discovery, invention, or speculation<br />
which research has confirmed, is the fruitage of the<br />
unhasting, unresting past. And the conception<br />
of the universe, as in some way the product of<br />
mechanical processes, is not modern. Ages before<br />
Spencer made clear to us the unity of the cosmos,<br />
there had been approaches to that supremely<br />
ennobling conception. But, save through a voice<br />
crying here and there as in a wilderness, the spirit<br />
of enquiry, born in Ionia five centuries before<br />
Christ, was stifled for two thousand years by creeds<br />
that would brook no rival and permit no ques-<br />
tioning. As late as the middle of the eighteenth<br />
century, Buffon, covertly hinting at a possible<br />
common ancestor of the horse and ass, and of the<br />
ape and man, adds, with an eye on the Sorbonne,<br />
that since scripture teaches the contrary, the thing<br />
cannot be. But the timid suggestion bore fruit in<br />
<br />
103<br />
<br />
the bravely enounced theories of Lamarck and<br />
Darwin’s distinguished grandfather, the poetical<br />
Lichfield doctor. A succession of workers in the<br />
fields of geology, palzeontology and biology brought<br />
a body of evidence in support of those theories<br />
which ultimately demolished the tenacious belief<br />
in the fixity of species. Among these there can in<br />
this brief paper be reference only to Von Baer, the<br />
formulator of the “ Law of Development ” manifest<br />
in the fundamental likenesses between the embryos<br />
of the higher animals and man, because Spencer<br />
tells us that, becoming acquainted with this ‘ Law ”<br />
in 1852, he at once saw its bearing on the theory<br />
adumbrated in “Social Statics.’ So far as organic<br />
evolution was concerned, the master-key to the<br />
causes of the origin of the millions of species of<br />
plants and animals was lacking, but this was to be<br />
supplied six years later by Darwin and Wallace.<br />
Thus were all things being made ready for the<br />
advent of a man with the penetrating insight of<br />
genius, and with the saving and indispensable<br />
sense of relation, who should, by his skill in syn-<br />
thesis, demonstrate the interaction, unity and con-<br />
tinuity of all phenomena, and their subservience<br />
to one process which, if it operates anywhere,<br />
operates everywhere—the process known as Evolu-<br />
tion. In the fulness of time he came. He had<br />
bad health ; he was poor ; he was almost unknown,<br />
therefore little heeded. In January, 1858, six<br />
months before the meeting of the Linnean Society<br />
at which Darwin and Wallace’s memorable paper<br />
“On the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by<br />
Natural Selection” was read, Spencer wrote out<br />
his scheme of the ‘Synthetic Philosophy ” which,<br />
it is interesting to note, was submitted to his father<br />
for comment. In 1860 the prospectus of the pro-<br />
posed series of volumes was issued, and secured a<br />
sufficient response from friends to warrant a venture<br />
whose risks Spencer could not afford to run unaided.<br />
Not till he was forty did he sce the inception<br />
of a plan which he had nurtured when writing<br />
in his twenty-second year a series of letters on<br />
“The Proper Sphere of Government’”’ in the<br />
Nonconformist.<br />
<br />
The Synthetic Philosophy comprehended all<br />
phenomena in this formula: ‘ Evolution is an<br />
integration of matter and concomitant dissipation<br />
of motion during which the matter passes from an<br />
indefinite, incoherent homogeneity to a definite,<br />
coherent heterogeneity, and during which the<br />
retained motion undergoes a parallel transforma-<br />
tion.” The method followed is the inductive, the<br />
established premise being the “persistence of<br />
force ” involving endless cycles of ceaseless change,<br />
resulting in redistribution of matter and motion,<br />
whereby adyance is made from the like to the<br />
unlike, from the simple to the complex; for<br />
example, the vapours and unstable stuff of the<br />
<br />
<br />
104<br />
<br />
universe slowly condensing into sun and solar<br />
systems, life emerging on our planet (of which<br />
alone we have knowledge) along physical and<br />
psychical stages till the transcendent genius of<br />
man appears. Postulating the inscrutableness of<br />
the Power which underlies all phenomena, and<br />
ever quickening the sense of wonder begotten by<br />
the stupendous spectacle of evolution and dissolu-<br />
tion, Spencer advanced along the lines of his great<br />
argument, from statements of the general in<br />
«First Principles” to application of the special<br />
in the “ Principles of Biology,” with its details of<br />
development of plants and animals ; in the<br />
“Principles of Psychology,” wherein the story<br />
passes from life to mind in the development of<br />
gelf-consciousness from blurred, undetermined feel-<br />
ing in the lowest responsive organism ; and finally,<br />
in the “ Principles of Sociology,” wherein is traced<br />
the evolution of family, tribal and allied relations,<br />
of religion and its ceremonies, of politics and<br />
institutions—in brief, of all the apparatus of<br />
human life, individual and collective, with large<br />
insistence on the basis of ethics as not supernatural,<br />
but social. So we have, first, the imorgantc, or<br />
evolution of the not-living ; second, the organic,<br />
or evolution of the living ; (Spencer sees in mind<br />
and matter only “two phases of one cosmical pro-<br />
cess”); and third, the superorganic, or evolution<br />
into social groups, with their institutions, beliefs,<br />
and customs. No break in the series is recognised ;<br />
the keynotes of evolution are unity and continuity.<br />
Science knows no finality ; but, recognising that<br />
revisions here and there will be needed as know-<br />
ledge advances, it is difficult to believe that the<br />
main structure raised by the genius of Spencer<br />
will not abide. It was his rare privilege to see in<br />
old age the fulfilment of the plan of his early<br />
manhood, and whatever of impermanence may<br />
attach to his work, his place as one of the greatest<br />
of the world’s master-builders in the intellectual<br />
and spiritual domain is secure. A concluding word<br />
or two about Spencer’s style and personality. The<br />
one has been called cumbersome, lacking in ease<br />
and grace ; but massive thought demands dignified,<br />
masculine diction, and the careful reader will<br />
quickly find that in clearness and definiteness the<br />
style is perfectly adapted to the subject-matter.<br />
In some of the minor works, notably those on<br />
“Education” and the delightful “Study of<br />
Sociology,” we find abundance of felicitous and<br />
familiar illustration. As for the man, his carefully-<br />
guarded health led to some degree of fussiness and<br />
fidgetiness, while a certain aloofness kept company<br />
with a frigid manner under which, nevertheless,<br />
there beat a kindly heart, ever moved by the needs<br />
and troubles of his friends.<br />
<br />
Tt was in 1894 that our Society had the dis-<br />
tinction of adding to its member-roll the name of<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
a man to whom all titular dignities were repellent,<br />
and whose adhesion to any movement was never<br />
given without deliberation.<br />
<br />
EDWARD CLODD.<br />
<br />
<> —______<br />
<br />
THE MS. OF MILTON’S “ PARADISE LOST.”<br />
<br />
——>——<br />
<br />
R. SIDNEY LEE sent to The Times a<br />
<br />
letter on this subject which appeared on<br />
<br />
Dec. 14. We reprint his communication<br />
<br />
with some slight changes and omissions which we<br />
have his authority for making.<br />
<br />
Mr. Lee wrote :—“ It is to be hoped that every<br />
one who has the reputation of this country at heart<br />
and is in a position to bring influence to bear on<br />
its rulers will take note of Mr. Churton Collins’<br />
<br />
warning and spare no endeavour to prevent the<br />
<br />
passing into ownership beyond the seas of the<br />
original MS. press copy of the First Book of<br />
Milton’s ‘ Paradise Lost.’ The peril is very real.<br />
Unless strenuous efforts be made, the chances<br />
against the keeping of the document at home are<br />
overwhelming. If no public pressure be exerted,<br />
there is an obvious likelihood that this literary<br />
treasure will follow the recent fortunes of the only<br />
known copies of the original edition of Malory’s<br />
‘Le Morte d’Arthur’ and of many another of our<br />
early literary masterpieces, and henceforth adorn<br />
the private library of some American citizen of<br />
wealth and enterprise.”<br />
<br />
“The occasion demands exceptional exertion. The<br />
nation’s prestige owes an immense debt to its<br />
literary achievements, and to no literary achieve-<br />
ment (save to Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies) does<br />
it owe more than to Milton’s ‘ Paradise Lost.’<br />
No autograph MS. of the poem has ever existed,<br />
for Milton in his blindness was not able to write,<br />
but the copy which he sent to the licenser for the<br />
press with his own characteristic corrections of the<br />
spelling is the nearest possible approach to his<br />
original MS. This MS. of a portion of Milton’s<br />
epic is, in effect, one of the nation’s title-deeds to<br />
poetic and intellectual renown. Is it unreasonable<br />
to expect that the Government will recognise its<br />
obligation, now that the opportunity presents itself,<br />
to convert this national title-deed to fame into a<br />
national heirloom, and secure it in perpetuity for<br />
the British Museum ?”<br />
<br />
“ Experience does not admit of doubt as to the<br />
answer that, were similar circumstances to arise in<br />
foreign countries, this question would receive from<br />
foreign Governments. It is difficult to believe<br />
that, with so potent an incentive to action as is<br />
offered by the forthcoming sale, the Treasury will<br />
hesitate to provide the necessary increase of grant<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
whereby the national library may become the final<br />
home of Milton’s MS.”<br />
<br />
“The sale is announced to take place ‘early in<br />
the spring.’ Apparently, no precise day has yet<br />
been fixed. The Trustees of the British Museum<br />
and other public bodies will thus have time<br />
wherein to approach the Government, and learn<br />
their intentions. Probably, to meet all eventu-<br />
alities, it would be safest at once to form privately<br />
a guarantee fund, whose members would undertake,<br />
in the case of the failure of an application to the<br />
Government, to defray the cost of securing the MS.<br />
for the British Museum. Disclosure of details as<br />
to the amount likely to be required would defeat<br />
the purpose of the fund.”<br />
<br />
The owner of the MS. has just announced<br />
through the auctioneers that he will dispose of it<br />
to the highest bidder at public auction on January<br />
25th.<br />
<br />
A scholarly account of the textual interest<br />
attaching to the MS. appeared in The Times<br />
Literary Supplement of Dec. 18th. Some news-<br />
paper correspondents may have attached an unduly<br />
high value to the MS., but the opposing statement<br />
made by Dr. Furnivall in The Times of Dec.<br />
19th, that it is a valueless scrivener’s copy, is<br />
incorrect. No extravagant sum ought to be<br />
offered for the document, because it is not an<br />
author’s autograph MS. But it is eminently<br />
desirable that every attempt should be made to<br />
secure it for the national collection. We should be<br />
glad to hear from any who would co-operate in<br />
efforts in that direction.<br />
<br />
——————<br />
<br />
A NEW BOOK ON COPYRIGHT.<br />
<br />
—_—<br />
<br />
E have read with interest a little book just<br />
V published by A. H. Bullen, entitled<br />
“ Copyright Law,” by Henry A. Hinkson.<br />
The book is a very small one to deal with so<br />
large and difficult a subject. In this point lies its<br />
main fault, It is written clearly and plainly with-<br />
out any unnecessary legal argument, and is mainly<br />
a statement of the facts and the results of the<br />
working of the law.<br />
So far the book is admirable. The faults are<br />
very few and far between and the blunders slight.<br />
It is a matter of some doubt whether a little<br />
knowledge is not in the case of copyright a<br />
dangerous thing, and whether a text book for the<br />
young author and young writer is not more likely<br />
to lead him into difficulties than to improve his<br />
knowledge of how to deal with his property.<br />
We must, however, thank Mr. Hinkson for his<br />
well-endeavoured effort and congratulate him on<br />
the result.<br />
<br />
105<br />
<br />
Without desiring to be hypercritical, it is<br />
necessary to draw attention to one or two small<br />
errors.<br />
<br />
For instance, on page 49, when dealing with<br />
the 18th Section—that most difficult of all Sections<br />
—the author states that after twenty-eight years<br />
the copyright reverts to the author. This state-<br />
ment is, of course, incorrect, the words of the Act<br />
being “the right of publishing in separate form<br />
shall revert to the author.” Now the right of<br />
publication and the copyright are two distinct<br />
things, and the legal distinction cannot be too<br />
accurately maintained or too frequently insisted<br />
upon.<br />
<br />
When dealing with International Copyright he<br />
includes Montenegro among the Signatories to the<br />
Berne Convention. Though Montenegro was origin-<br />
ally a Signatory, she has since withdrawn.<br />
<br />
With regard to Artistic Copyright he again falls<br />
into error. He states: “‘ Before publication the pro-<br />
prietor has a common law right in his picture<br />
engraving or drawing,” and seems to draw the<br />
deduction that copyright runs from the publica-<br />
tion of the “picture engraving or drawing.”<br />
If he studies the Act more closely and the<br />
books which have been written endeavouring to<br />
explain that Act, he will see that the copyright<br />
in a “picture engraving or drawing” begins on<br />
the making thereof and not from the publication.<br />
This is one of the difficult points in the Artistic<br />
as distinct from the Literary Copyright Law.<br />
<br />
However, the book is accurately and carefully<br />
written, and so far as it is possible for any legal<br />
copyright amateur to gain satisfaction from a small<br />
work, so far will he be able to derive assistance<br />
from Mr. Hinkson’s “Copyright Law.”<br />
<br />
A NOVELIST ON HIS ART.*<br />
<br />
—_<br />
<br />
T is always a melancholy task to criticise the<br />
i work of a man of great talent who has died<br />
before the full fruition of his gift, and the<br />
melancholy is deepened when the work in question<br />
is not of such a kind as to deserve unrestricted<br />
praise. No one, I think, even of those to whom<br />
his peculiar powers make the least appeal, will deny<br />
that in “ The Octopus ” and “ McTeague ” the late<br />
Mr. Frank Norris manifested extraordinary promise<br />
and discovered fresh territory ; no one, again, of<br />
his most fervent worshippers could honestly affirm<br />
that his work is faultless. A rough and careless<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* «The Responsibilities of the Novelist,’ by Frank<br />
Norris. (Grant Richards.)<br />
<br />
<br />
106<br />
<br />
style, sometimes effective, often wounding, is the least<br />
delightful characteristic of “The Responsibilities<br />
of the Novelist.” Its author allowed the force of his<br />
convictions to express itself in noise ; he was so<br />
certain of the truth of his theories that he forgot<br />
what a traitor to truth didacticism may prove<br />
unless it is allied with subtle restraint. He has<br />
none of the fine shades of persuasion.<br />
<br />
Yet if the style is marred by such redundant<br />
expressions as “I tell you ” and such elementary<br />
errors as “Macbeth and Tamerlane réswmé the<br />
whole spirit of the Elizabethan age,” and “ Violet le<br />
Due’s ‘ Dictionaire du Mobilier,’” there are, at any<br />
rate, many fine and honest, if not hugely original,<br />
judgments on the art of the novelist. Mr. Norris<br />
realised that the artistic temperament is not a<br />
thing that one can put on and take off, like a hat<br />
or an air of virtue, but that it is the very spring<br />
and essence of life.<br />
<br />
“You must be something more than a novelist if you<br />
ean, something more than just a writer. There must be<br />
that nameless sixth sense in you... . the thing that<br />
does not enter into the work, but that is back of it; the<br />
thing that would make of you a good man as well as a<br />
good novelist.”<br />
<br />
Something of this kind has been said before, but<br />
Mr. Norris was an independent thinker, and that<br />
he should have come to the same conclusion as his<br />
predecessors is a great tribute to their common<br />
theory. Sincerity is the watchword of his essays<br />
which deal most intimately with the novelist’s art;<br />
he denounces the vulgar trick of cramming the<br />
public with garbage that has neither life nor<br />
beauty, and reiterates the importance of studying<br />
the ordinary aspects of existence, aspects as full of<br />
romantic possibility as any age when men loved<br />
and fought in doublet and hose. This truth he<br />
illustrates from American history. But here, too,<br />
he rushes wildly where a more careful thinker<br />
would pause. He is wonderfully optimistic con-<br />
cerning the public taste, and believes that in the<br />
end the plain people, the burgesses, the grocers,<br />
will prefer “Walter Scott to G. P. R. James,<br />
Shakespeare to Marlowe, Flaubert to Goncourt.”<br />
Why, in the name of logic, Shakespeare to Marlowe?<br />
A damning comparison of the “ Aigina Marbles”<br />
with the frieze of Pheidias would be about as<br />
pertinent. Did Mr. Norris really imagine that<br />
Marlowe was the G. P. R. James of the Elizabethan<br />
era, just as a recent writer on Sicily termed one of<br />
the three greatest Attic dramatists the Henry<br />
Arthur Jones of Greece? Faults of taste of this<br />
kind mar the excellence of his book, which will<br />
nevertheless have a value as containing the sincere<br />
if hasty conclusions of one whose premature<br />
death is mourned by all who care for honesty in<br />
literature.<br />
<br />
Sr. J. Le<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
G. P. v. SPECIALIST.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
HAVE noticed recently a recrudescence of the<br />
old discussion as to whether specialists or<br />
general practitioners should be called in to<br />
<br />
express opinions on the corpus vile of fiction,<br />
whether experts or ordinary readers are the proper<br />
persons to review books in the Press ; and, on the<br />
principle, perhaps, that fools may hit when wiser<br />
men may miss, I venture to shoot my bolt with my<br />
betters, protesting in advance that common sense<br />
has before now been known to be covered by the<br />
cap and bells, and that responsibility is more<br />
frequently an obstacle to the utterance of truth<br />
than irresponsibility.<br />
<br />
I wish that in these conversational debates the<br />
disputants would take the preliminary trouble to<br />
define their terms ; even if they did, there would<br />
be small likelihood of their bringing their argu-<br />
ments to aconclusion, but without such preliminary<br />
labour there is no possibility of their doing so.<br />
What is an expert? Let it be observed that I do<br />
not ask who is an expert: to do so would be to<br />
represent myself as unfamiliar with “ Who’s who ?”<br />
at this instant reflecting my blushes, due to my not<br />
being mentioned therein ; but what do these leaders<br />
of light and learning mean by experts, and reviews,<br />
and half-a-hundred other things which they<br />
discuss so frequently and at such length? What<br />
distinction do they make between a criticism and a<br />
review, and for whose benefit do they contend that<br />
books are reviewed in the Press at all? The<br />
looseness with which they employ the terms is<br />
surely the reason of half the pother.<br />
<br />
Literature is an art, not a profession, and the<br />
author has discharged his primary function when<br />
he has brought his work to perfection and knows<br />
that he can do no more with it: that, so far as he<br />
can make it so, it is a finished thing. But from<br />
another point of view that is only the end of the<br />
beginning. In due course the book is made public,<br />
and then it is the publisher who is immediately<br />
concerned, and trade considerations properly come<br />
into the matter. He advertises the fact that he<br />
has a book to sell; if he is clever he advertises it<br />
in a variety of ways, but generally, of course, by<br />
the simple expedient of inserting notices of it<br />
in newspapers, in consequence of seeing which<br />
people may be induced to buy. The publisher's<br />
primary business is to make money for himself,<br />
and he would not be a business man if on the one<br />
hand he did not spend money with the object<br />
of making more, and if on the other he did not<br />
seek to get some advertisement of his wares for<br />
next to nothing. In the former case he spends<br />
upon advertising as much as he thinks the book<br />
will bear, and to the latter end he sends out<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ile<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 107<br />
<br />
“review copies,” asking for the favour of an<br />
editorial notice, a notice, or a review, and for a<br />
copy of the issue of the paper containing any such<br />
notice. I never remember having seen the word<br />
‘criticism ” used by any publisher on any such<br />
occasion; at the present moment twenty-seven<br />
volumes await attention from me, and the word<br />
“criticism” does not occur in one of the accom-<br />
panying printed slips from the publishers; it is<br />
notice, not criticism, they desire.<br />
<br />
The editor again does not desire to procure it as<br />
a general rule. Times are such that he consults<br />
the wishes of his readers by giving them reviews<br />
instead of criticism, and for that purpose he<br />
employs reviewers and not critics, general prac-<br />
titioners not specialists ; and this not only because<br />
they are less expensive and more easily come by,<br />
but because they are the better men for the job. In<br />
all this part of the matter, art is not even being<br />
considered : it is business pure and simple between<br />
the publisher, the editor, and the public. The first<br />
wants the cheap advertisement ; the second wants<br />
copy dealing with one of the myriad subjects<br />
interesting some of his regular readers and wants<br />
cheap copy—let those who deny that reviewing is<br />
poorly paid work quote figures ; the third want—<br />
what ?—notice or criticism ?<br />
<br />
So far as fiction is concerned I am convinced<br />
they do not want criticism. They want to know<br />
what a book is about, and only one thing more—<br />
whether it is interesting. One may prate about<br />
art until the ceiling falls. That a book is interest-<br />
ing is the first, the middle, and the last point of<br />
importance to the great public: it is the one thing<br />
the publisher’s reader watches for, the editor<br />
watches for, the publisher watches for. A novelist<br />
may write a story the plot of which is moth eaten,<br />
the characters in which are conventional almost to<br />
the point of absurdity, the style of which is faulty<br />
and, from the point of view of art, deplorable ; if<br />
it is interesting the publisher’s reader would forfeit<br />
his appointment by declining it, the editor would<br />
be confronted with a similar possibility by commit-<br />
ting a similar blunder, and the publisher would<br />
rage furiously at losing a good thing. Immortality<br />
is an abstraction, but temporal supremacy is practi-<br />
cal politics ; but the mind that is set upon things<br />
above is commonly indifferent, if not actually<br />
blind, to things below. The analogy has point.<br />
<br />
Criticism has been defined as the exercise of<br />
judgment in the province of art and literature, and<br />
the critic as a person who is possessed of the<br />
knowledge necessary to enable him to pronounce<br />
right judgments upon the merit or worth of such<br />
works as come within this province. Matter,<br />
manner, and the quality of giving pleasure, or in<br />
other words: the power of appealing to the imagina-<br />
tion, are the three characteristic qualities of<br />
<br />
literature—the principles; construction of plot,<br />
metre, diction, and such other lesser elements as<br />
are governed by canons, are the rules ; and criticism<br />
tends in an increasing degree to disregard rules<br />
and concentrate its attention upon principles.<br />
The expert critic cannot, however, be expected to<br />
do other than act as a resistant force to this<br />
tendency ; it is his function to maintain a high<br />
standard of merit in performance, and to insist<br />
upon the importance of the rules: he is the champion<br />
of art, and the artist’s well-greaved friend ; but the<br />
training and scholarship which make him what he<br />
is are obstacles in the way of his being a practically<br />
useful reviewer of fiction for the daily, or even<br />
weekly, Press. A dissertation upon principles and<br />
rules in the “literary column” of a daily paper,<br />
with a considered judgment upon the merits of a<br />
novel as tested thereby, is not wanted by anybody<br />
except the author. The expert critic’s knowledge<br />
and reverence for principles and rules make him<br />
intolerant of any work where they are not observed<br />
and incapable of finding anything interesting in it :<br />
his place is the quarterly reviews : the daily papers<br />
have no use for him.<br />
<br />
Is that a matter for regret to authors? Only<br />
in part, it seems to me. At that stage in his<br />
development what he needs is notice, as wide as<br />
possible, in order that his books may sell ; utili-<br />
tarian considerations legitimately affect him too.<br />
Moreover, if what he has produced be art, in<br />
the true sense of the word, he must know that<br />
everything is very well as it is. No interesting<br />
book has ever yet been written that has failed<br />
to find its way to the world: that is one truth ;<br />
another is that fame has never yet been withheld<br />
when it has been deserved. With the author who<br />
cannot comfort himself with the belief that if he<br />
deserves fame he will win it, and who finds a griev-<br />
ance in the thought that it may be posthumous, it<br />
is not easy to be patient. If he is of such<br />
comparative importance that he is made the subject<br />
of considered criticism as distinct from mere<br />
review, he must still remember that contemporary<br />
criticism can only be provisional: appeal to<br />
posterity, by whom the judgment may be reversed,<br />
is not only permissible, but inevitable. It is with<br />
posterity only that the final judgment lics. What<br />
matters most to the author in the present is<br />
review.<br />
<br />
It is of fiction that I have spoken because it<br />
is in connection with fiction that the old discussion<br />
has been revived; and so far as fiction is con-<br />
cerned, let me record my vote by plumping in<br />
favour of the general practitioner. Consideration<br />
of the question in connection with other depart-<br />
ments of literature may be left to another time<br />
and to another mind.<br />
<br />
V. E. M.<br />
<br />
<br />
108<br />
<br />
THE UNVEILING OF THE MEMORIAL TO<br />
SIR WALTER BESANT.<br />
<br />
oo<br />
<br />
HE memorial to our late chairman and<br />
founder, Sir Walter Besant, was unveiled<br />
in the crypt of St. Paul’s Cathedral by<br />
<br />
Lord Monkswell on December 11th. It will be<br />
remembered by many members of the Society that<br />
the memorial, arelief in bronze, admirably executed<br />
by George Frampton, R.A., was commissioned and<br />
mainly subscribed for by the members of the<br />
Society, and that it was hung in the sculpture-<br />
room at Burlington House last May. The position<br />
of the memorial is now in the crypt of St. Paul’s,<br />
on the wall, between that to the memory of Charles<br />
Reade and the brass of John M. Smith. On the<br />
tablet, beneath the portrait, is this inscription :<br />
<br />
NovEListT,<br />
HisToRIAN OF LoNnpDoN,<br />
SECRETARY OF THE PALESTINE Exploration FUND<br />
ORIGINATOR OF THE PEOPLE’S PALACE,<br />
AND<br />
FouUNDER OF THE SOCIETY OF AUTHORS.<br />
<br />
Tuts MoNUMENT IS ERECTED<br />
BY<br />
His GRATEFUL BRETHREN IN LITERATURE.<br />
<br />
Born 14th August, 1836; Died 9th June, 1901.<br />
<br />
The ceremony of unveiling was short. Mr.<br />
Douglas Freshfield, the Chairman of the Com-<br />
mittee of the Society, regretted that Mr. George<br />
Meredith, our President, was too ill to appear.<br />
Hence it fell upon him to call upon Lord Monks-<br />
well to unveil the memorial. Many Members had<br />
already seen the memorial in the Academy, and<br />
approved it. To them the act of unveiling was<br />
but a formality. No better man could have been<br />
asked to unveil the memorial than Lord Monks-<br />
well, the Chairman of the London County Council ;<br />
and, perhaps, here, in the quiet corner of the<br />
crypt beneath the Cathedral of London, and<br />
London’s roar, was the best place for a lasting<br />
monument to one who had given the best years of<br />
his life to London and to London’s good. He did<br />
his best to enlighten the darkness of the lives of the<br />
masses, entered keenly into a thorough investiga-<br />
tion of the sweating system, and gave the people<br />
new sources of intellectual or, at any rate,<br />
intelligent recreation.<br />
<br />
Dean Gregory and Canon Newbolt read a short<br />
dedication service, and Lord Monkswell unveiled<br />
the memorial. Certainly, it looks infinitely better<br />
in its present position than it did in Burlington<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
House. The sombre light, the grey walls, the<br />
impressive silence of the great crypt, seeming to<br />
stretch away in an endless vista of arched halls<br />
and chambers and echoing passages, are in quiet<br />
harmony with the soft-toned bronze of the relief.<br />
<br />
Lord Monkswell, unveiling the memorial, spoke<br />
of Sir Walter Besant as one who, though a<br />
foreigner to London by birth, and largely by<br />
education, yet knew London and loved it, as no<br />
one else in the world knew London. Its streets<br />
and its lanes, its docks and its river were to him<br />
an open book. He was a social reformer, a man<br />
of ideas, sound feasible ideas, and no mere<br />
dreamer. With this side of him, the County<br />
Council thoroughly sympathised. Like Dickens,<br />
Besant preached social reform. But Dickens was<br />
a destructive element. His giant pen seized upon<br />
the demons of wickedness and thrust their names<br />
and their fames into the mouths of all. Besant<br />
sought the same demons, but his craft was to do<br />
more than to show them up. It was to destroy<br />
them and replace them by other organisations in<br />
which the demoniac spirit was absent. And in<br />
part he was successful. From his ideas—romantic<br />
ideas in “All Sorts and Conditions of Men,” an<br />
impossible story—Besant’s own criticism—sprung<br />
the People’s Palace, situate in the heart of White-<br />
chapel, the centre of the working life of thousands<br />
and tens of thousands of Londoners.<br />
<br />
Besant was not a vain man. He was not a<br />
jealous man. But his admiration was for all that<br />
was good, that was healthy. His sympathies were<br />
thorough-going and cosmopolitan. One of his<br />
last acts was to join himself to the Atlantic Union,<br />
a union to entertain Americans and Canadians<br />
and Colonials who visited England. He was a<br />
good man if ever there was a good man; a lovable<br />
man if ever there was one.<br />
<br />
The greater part of the organic work of this<br />
Atlantic Union is, by the way, now in the hands<br />
of Miss Celia Besant.<br />
<br />
Among those present at the ceremony were<br />
Lady Besant, her two daughters, Misses Celia and<br />
Ailie Besant, her second son—her eldest son,<br />
Captain Eustace Besant, is still serving in South<br />
Africa—Mr. Douglas Freshfield, Chairman of the<br />
Managing Committee of the Society, Mr. Edgar<br />
Besant, Sir Walter’s youngest brother, to whom,<br />
by the way, we owe the origin of “The Golden<br />
Butterfly,” Prof. Bonney, Mr. Hall Caine, Sir<br />
Martin Conway, Mr. George Frampton, R.A., Mr.<br />
A. H. Hawkins, Colonel Lamb, of the Salvation<br />
Army, in which Sir Walter Besant was greatly<br />
interested, and many others.<br />
<br />
SaaS AE_cith Se<br />
®<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR. 109<br />
<br />
. THE SAMUEL PEPYS CLUB.<br />
<br />
ee a<br />
<br />
HIS new Literary Club was founded on May<br />
26th, 1903, in commemoration of the two-<br />
hundredth anniversary of the death of its<br />
<br />
patron—saint or sinner, shall we say, or merely style<br />
him the father-confessor of our frail humanity, and<br />
the elub’s pater benignus, Samuel Pepys ?<br />
<br />
The founders were Mr. Henry B. Wheatley, Sir<br />
Frederick Bridge, Mr. D’Arcy Power, and Mr. George<br />
Whale, who, on the aforesaid anniversary, after the<br />
manner of Englishmen with a great project in hand,<br />
did solemnly dine together, and initiate the club.<br />
A general meeting was duly held on July 8th, when<br />
the number of members was fixed at seventy. This<br />
number came rapidly together by a kind of rare<br />
chemical affinity, and there are already many can-<br />
didate atoms that feel the potent attraction, and<br />
only await a vacant place in the new body cor-<br />
porate. The objects of the club, besides that of<br />
doing honour to the author of the most human of<br />
human documents, are: First, to dine together,<br />
with or without guests, three times a year, on or<br />
about the anniversaries of certain important events<br />
in the life of Samuel Pepys ; and, secondly, to read<br />
and discuss papers concerning Pepys and his time,<br />
with power to add to such objects as occasion may<br />
arise.<br />
<br />
The inaugural dinner was held on Tuesday,<br />
December 3rd, 1903, in the Hall of the Cloth-<br />
workers’ Company, of which Pepys was Master in<br />
1677, Mr. Henry B. Wheatley, editor of the most<br />
complete edition of the Diary, and the club’s first<br />
President, occupying the chair, with the Master of<br />
the Clothworkers, Mr. Snow, on his right hand;<br />
while behind them shone the historic plate of the<br />
Company. Among the valuable pieces there dis-<br />
played the most interesting to the club and its<br />
guests were the cup and cover of silver gilt, and<br />
the gilt ewer and basin, or rose-water dish, pre-<br />
sented to the Company by Pepys during his Master-<br />
ship. ‘The members of the club assembled in force<br />
on this occasion, and brought many distinguished<br />
guests.<br />
<br />
The toasts proposed from the chair, after the<br />
usual ones of ‘The King” and “ The Queen and<br />
Royal Family,” were “The Immortal Memory of<br />
Samuel Pepys” and “The Clothworkers’ Company,”<br />
the latter responded to by the Master.<br />
<br />
The toast of “Our Visitors” was proposed by<br />
Mr. George Whale, and responded to by Sir<br />
William Collins.<br />
<br />
“The Club” was proposed by Viscount Dillon,<br />
and responded to by Mr. Edmund Gosse.<br />
<br />
Sir Alexander Binnie afterwards, in a most<br />
interesting speech, directed the attention of the<br />
club to some localities in London either mentioned<br />
<br />
by Pepys or suggesting memories of him. Indeed,<br />
the speeches, taken all round, were singularly<br />
interesting in substance, and well - delivered.<br />
Perhaps the note most frequently sounded was<br />
that of homage to Pepys’s many-sided humanity,<br />
his immense aptitude for work, and happy energy<br />
in both work and play. This was but a just<br />
tribute to the man, whose sterling qualities are<br />
even now scarcely appreciated as they deserve by<br />
the general public. Anyone who is in a position<br />
to estimate the actual work he did as Clerk of the<br />
Acts, and Secretary to the Admiralty, can hardly<br />
fail to give him a place among the great English-<br />
men of his day. He brought his common-sense,<br />
love of mastering details, and loyal fidelity to the<br />
duties of his office to bear upon many abuses ; and<br />
he left the Navy, his chief care, in a much more<br />
efficient condition than that in which he found it.<br />
Any sympathetic student of his Diary, moreover,<br />
must feel the charm of his personality: his child-like<br />
delight in life ; his easy-going love of his wife and<br />
friends, and of those rough-notes of contemporary<br />
history that we call gossip and scandal, but which<br />
add a spice to the historic plum-pudding ; his<br />
eager curiosity about everything that came in his<br />
way, and divine lust after precise information on all<br />
possible subjects ; and withal his genuine religion.<br />
For Pepys, in spite of his sensuous temperament,<br />
and the not uncommon weaknesses, follies, and<br />
unchastened appetites, he has so frankly chronicled,<br />
was a religious man in that irreligious age; living<br />
his particoloured life with a feeling that the eye of<br />
God was upon him. It is no doubt true that the<br />
God he worshipped was not the stern and wrathful<br />
Deity of the Puritans, but more akin to that good-<br />
natured Creator of all flesh of whom Beranger<br />
sings :<br />
“Le verre en main, gaiement je me confie<br />
Au Dieu des bonnes gens !”<br />
<br />
But Pepys’s faith was not only more grave and<br />
decorous than that of Béranger seems to have been,<br />
but deeper and more abiding.<br />
<br />
After dinner there was a pleasant ‘ Concert of<br />
Musick,” under the direction of Sir Frederick<br />
Bridge. Pepys’s own favourite song, “ Beauty,<br />
Retire,” composed by himself, was the first vocal<br />
piece given, and it was followed by other songs,<br />
and a duet for a male and a female voice, by com-<br />
posers of the period; some of the songs either<br />
having been sung by Pepys or mentioned in his<br />
Diary. Of one of them, “The Larke,” he says:<br />
«Thence to Change, where Wife did a little busi-<br />
ness, while Mercer and I staid in the Coach ; and<br />
in a quarter of an hour I taught her the whole<br />
Larke’s Song perfectly.” This was creditable to<br />
both master and pupil, as the song, by Milton’s<br />
friend, Henry Lawes, is a difficult one.<br />
<br />
<br />
110<br />
<br />
Besides the vocal music, the Rev. Mr. Galpin,<br />
a clever amateur musician who collects old instru-<br />
ments, gave the company a sample of that “ wind<br />
musique ” which so ravished Pepys’s soul that it<br />
“made him sick,” and, as he characteristically<br />
adds, “ makes me resolve to practise wind-musique,<br />
and to make my wife do the like.” This was<br />
represented by a couple of airs on the flageolet,<br />
one, I think, composed by Pepys; both of which<br />
the little pipe was made to warble very daintily.<br />
There were also two pieces for that “ Recorder ”<br />
mentioned by Hamlet—a long and stfaight wood-<br />
instrument, with a certain resemblance to a large<br />
bassoon, but blown from a mouthpiece at the<br />
upper end. It must be difficult to “govern the<br />
stops” perfectly, as it seems to have a trick of<br />
suddenly jumping from a lower octave to a higher<br />
in a rather whimsical manner ; yet the notes are<br />
mellov. A third instrument, the “Trumpet<br />
Marine,” which Pepys heard played by a French-<br />
man, and was, as usual, “ mightily pleased with,”<br />
is not a wind-instrument, as the name might<br />
suggest, but a kind of emaciated viol, with a pigmy<br />
body and enormously long neck for the key-board.<br />
It has what Pepys calls an “ echo,” produced, as<br />
he suspected, by concealed sympathetic strings,<br />
which respond to the notes played by the bow.<br />
<br />
Altogether the evening was a pleasant one, and<br />
the Samuel Pepys’Club may claim the right to<br />
take its place as a going concern.<br />
<br />
JoHN TODHUNTER.<br />
Or —_—<br />
<br />
THE FIRE DESCENDS!<br />
<br />
———<br />
<br />
LEAVES FROM THE DIARY OF A CERTAIN SORT<br />
OF FOOL IN PARADISE.<br />
<br />
T has come straight down, from Heaven or<br />
nowhere, an original and glorious Idea!<br />
There is nothing in that. Ideas strike me<br />
<br />
very often, and they are always original and<br />
glorious—at first. They are all, too, equally un-<br />
expected and startling, hitting me between the<br />
eyes, hard as a cricket ball at point, and knocking<br />
all the common-sense out of me. Sometimes they<br />
seem to arise out of facts, a paragraph in a news-<br />
paper, a look of secret history on a face, a phrase<br />
in a letter; but frequently they spring from no<br />
source more definite than the churning of unrelated<br />
thoughts when I pretend to compose myself for<br />
sleep at night.<br />
<br />
This, my last Idea, has, however, come to me<br />
under somewhat unusual conditions. It seems to<br />
be connected with a forgotten dream, having no<br />
conscious antecedent, but taking possession of me<br />
as I awoke, at the time when we are least given to<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
fantasy, most under sway of the senses. I have<br />
had to rise, to dress, to eat my breakfast with the<br />
others, to avoid showing any glimmer of inward<br />
fire. When addressed I have had to answer in a<br />
matter-of-fact and off-hand manner, as if I knew,<br />
or cared to know, anything about the weather, or<br />
the household, or the dull doings of men in Parlia-<br />
ment. These things smote upon my ears like the<br />
distant sound of drums, tuneless and void. They<br />
were unreal compared with my Idea.<br />
<br />
At last I was able to sneak away by myself, out<br />
of the house and into the garden, which has ever<br />
been my dearest friend and confidant. All my life<br />
I have wandered in waking dreams about its<br />
winding paths: as a little child, when I told myself<br />
stories of fairies and goblins; in my Scott days,<br />
when I revelled in knights and fair ladies ; and,<br />
later on, in throes of modern sentiment—chewing,<br />
as I went along, the fragrant buds of fruit bushes, or<br />
“bread and cheese” from the hedges. To-day I<br />
slipped first to the greenhouse, where no eye from<br />
the windows might see me, for I wanted to be out<br />
of sight with my Idea, to blend it with the scent of<br />
flowers, to exult over it, and shape it prayerfully,<br />
lest it turn into a thing without wings. An Idea,<br />
like a sunset, cannot be painted in a few strokes of<br />
the brush by a careless hand. Its beauty lies in<br />
its vague possibilities and suggestions of imeffable<br />
glories beyond; in the mystery that it makes<br />
about us. And to express this, even faintly, needs<br />
all the concentrated power of heart and brain, art<br />
and will. One must be prepared for weary travail<br />
and heart-breaking doubts; because these ever<br />
attend an act of creation—if we may dare to call<br />
our reproduction and imitations “creation.” So,<br />
before my Idea can be valued at all, it must be<br />
taken into the solitudes of thought and every in-<br />
fluence of what I call my soul must be brought to<br />
bear upon it.<br />
<br />
How am I to give it form? Rhymeand rhythm<br />
cramp me; in writing an essay I am always<br />
tempted to become didactic, if not garrulous.<br />
There seems to be only one way open—the way of<br />
the prose idyll ; in which a filmy veil of fiction is<br />
thrown over a dimly seen figure. For to have the<br />
nude shape of my Idea too definitely visible would<br />
be fatal to its suggestiveness and charm.<br />
<br />
I gathered in the greenhouse a spray of oak-<br />
leafed geranium and a long stalk bearing three<br />
little cups of the freesia, splashed with gold and<br />
filled with orange and honey, to keep a hold on my<br />
Idea in the rush of everyday things. Then I was<br />
summoned in from the garden, and all the hateful,<br />
stifling tangibilities of life fell upon me. There is<br />
always this to be finished, that to be looked<br />
through, while letters demanding acknowledgment<br />
gape at me, a herd of time-devourers. The<br />
<br />
morning flew away on bluebottle wings—nothing<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
t<br />
ia<br />
&<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
faster into the world—and all the while my giorious<br />
Idea burned like a rosy flame before my dazzled<br />
eyes.<br />
<br />
* Visitors swallowed the afternoon with vapid talk<br />
of personalities ; and, when they had gone, I was<br />
more exhausted than if I had been studying<br />
logarithms for twelve hours! If there be any-<br />
thing more paralysing to the brain than the<br />
animated conversation of the average person on<br />
matters of local or general interest I have yet to<br />
discover it! Dead tired, I had to fasten upon a<br />
sleepy old gardening book and read the fog out of<br />
my mind.<br />
<br />
Then to bed; and at last I am alone with my<br />
glorious Idea! 1 grow warm, and thrill deliciously<br />
as I proceed to fashion it into a shape of my<br />
liking. This is worth living—worth dying for!<br />
‘And it is mine, all mine, this exquisite thing, this<br />
flower of fire from the high heavens. No one can<br />
tuke it from me; no one even knows of its exist-<br />
ence. Yet it does exist, and it shall do so, not<br />
only in me but in the material world. It shall not<br />
be still-born. To-morrow I will give it form and<br />
life—to-morrow—I am falling asleep.<br />
<br />
Tuesday.—\ have not written a word to-day.<br />
There was a meet of the Woodland Pytchley this<br />
morning, and I could not resist the temptation to<br />
go. Then I was tired out with the exercise and<br />
fresh air. Have done nothing but yawn ever<br />
since. My Idea has haunted me through the<br />
music of horns and baying of hounds, the thud of<br />
hoofs on the spongy turf and all the shouting.<br />
The sprig of rosemary I wore in my buttonhole<br />
seemed to make the atmosphere about me aromatic<br />
and flip me with suggestions. There is certainly a<br />
relationship between rosemary and hunting; no<br />
morbid thought can exist with them. Night finds<br />
me, as usual, full of vague aspirations and creative<br />
optimism ; but I am too weary to write. J must<br />
sleep.<br />
<br />
Wednesday.—Having neglected everything to<br />
follow the hounds yesterday, I found a great deal<br />
to do this morning. ‘The end of it was a worried<br />
headache, such as women are wont to bring upon<br />
themselves by trying to do several things at once.<br />
I spent the afternoon in nursing it. The day is<br />
wet, warm and muggy. My mind is sluggish. I<br />
have physicked it with an exciting novel and have<br />
sat up late to finish it. My Idea has faded a little<br />
during the day; but now, at night, it revives to<br />
keep me awake.<br />
<br />
_ Lhursday.—How one dreads the first plunge<br />
into expression! I have gazed for hours at the<br />
white paper which seems to stare back at me<br />
fatuously. Even my pen, usually so sympathetic,<br />
gives no help. I feel as if I were engaged in an<br />
imbecile attempt to catch the sunshine and colour<br />
of a summer day in a butterfly net ! How did the<br />
<br />
iti<br />
<br />
monstrous Arabian genie get into the vase? And<br />
shall I ever be able to pour my luminous Idea into<br />
the mould of words? It seems impossible. It<br />
always does—when one begins. There is a shirk-<br />
ing, a skimming round, a coy shrinking from the<br />
brazen display and indelicacy of language. Then<br />
—the time has gone—no more to day.<br />
<br />
A week later.—At last the moment has arrived<br />
when I can attack my Idea and shape it out on<br />
paper ! There is a bright sunshine to help me, and<br />
the song of birds. The air is of such intoxicating<br />
clearness that I feel light of limb, and heart, and<br />
brain. How cold the paper looks before me ! How<br />
tame and utterly inept the words I put upon it ! If<br />
something does not happen, all the rapturous<br />
glory of my Idea will be quenched into mere<br />
prose, it will be like a soap bubble that has<br />
collapsed into suds! But something is happening.<br />
I feel a glow stealing through me. ‘The fire is<br />
here again, in the cold veins ; the thing starts to<br />
live. It is not so beautiful as it was—oh, of<br />
course not—but it may gain yet, it has the power<br />
to grow into a work of art. I have been sitting<br />
three hours over it now; I shall be with it again<br />
this afternoon, and at night. It holds me firmly<br />
and will not let me go. No more shirking, shrink-<br />
ing, dreaming, but work—work—work !<br />
<br />
‘Next day.—I have re-written my Idea twice.<br />
It is half the length it was at first. I finish in an<br />
ecstasy! It is a wonderful, lovely thing. My feet<br />
do not touch the ground. Everybody remarks<br />
how curiously amiable I am to-day. I feel in love<br />
with all my fellow-creatures, including the worms<br />
and weeds! The very air is rose-colour! I laugh<br />
idiotically at nothing, and go to bed so excited<br />
that I do not expect to sleep till the first thrush<br />
cries, “I come to see you—I come to see you,”<br />
outside my window in the morning.<br />
<br />
Next day.—I have just re-written my Idea again<br />
and sent it to be typed.<br />
<br />
Three days later.—My manuscript has come back<br />
from the typist. I began to read it with despair,<br />
but ended in a mild, only a mild, very mild<br />
triumph. It is not the marvel I thought it, but L<br />
love it and am thankfal. After receiving the final<br />
touches, it will pass, I think, among those who can<br />
have no notion of its first inspired glory.<br />
<br />
A month later—I sent my Idea forth into the<br />
world, and the world, represented by one discern-<br />
ing editor, has welcomed it graciously. I ought<br />
to be happy. Many of my precious brain children<br />
have had to become wandering outcasts, turned<br />
from door to door, to die in the dust ; but this one<br />
is taken by the hand and kindly treated. Oh,<br />
yes, I ought to feel relieved, gratified, even<br />
delighted.<br />
<br />
But alas! alas! Is it my own fault, or the<br />
world’s fault, or the fault of that great horrible<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
112<br />
<br />
Irony that seems to govern our life, that my beau-<br />
tiful, chaste, dainty Idea has grown suddenly<br />
vulgar and unworthy? It is no longer exquisite,<br />
no longer holy. Earthly fingers have smudged it ;<br />
the fragrance of orange-flower, and lemon geranium,<br />
and rosemary, have ceased to cling about it. Now<br />
it smells only of the mould—not the garden mould<br />
that is sweetened by summer rain, but the dust of<br />
ashes. Someone has come to me and said:<br />
‘“‘ What a pretty little story you have in the Output<br />
this week”? and I have not yet left off inwardly<br />
writhing. My Idea, my glorious conception, kindled<br />
by a flame from heaven—“a pretty little story ”—<br />
ye gods, pity me ! :<br />
<br />
What did [ expect ? Ah, that’s the point. One<br />
does not expect ; one feels, and loves, and works,<br />
and hopes—all in a phrensy, without a definite<br />
desire. But passion seems destined to end this way,<br />
in art as in—other things.<br />
<br />
Well, in years to come, perhaps, I shall take<br />
out my poor shrivelled Idyll, look at it fondly,<br />
swell with mother pride again, and thank the<br />
Powers that be there is nobody by to tell me it is<br />
“a pretty little story!” No rapture then; only<br />
the tenderness of the creator will be left. With<br />
all its glamour gone, its faults laid bare to my<br />
critical eyes, its delicious colours faded, it will still<br />
be my own, my dearly-loved. And the old,<br />
sweet fragrance of orange and lemon, of freesia<br />
and oak-leafed geranium, will steal upward to me<br />
from its yellow pages, a faint incense of memory<br />
from the altar of a once adored Idea.<br />
<br />
By tHe AuTuHor or “Musk oF Rosss.”<br />
<br />
ee oe<br />
<br />
CORRESPONDENCE.<br />
<br />
Bee<br />
PUBLISHERS’ RIGHTS.<br />
<br />
Sr1r,—If a man with no legal training may claim<br />
some lenience in an honest endeavour to understand<br />
the copyright decision lately arrived at by the<br />
Lord Chancellor and his learned brothers, may<br />
J thus venture to interpret their generous apprecia-<br />
tion of the rights of publishers of encyclopedic<br />
literature ? The publisher may, having got out of<br />
them all the use he wants, sell the articles, indi-<br />
vidually or collectively, to newspaper syndicates.<br />
This would have two results. In the first place,<br />
the specialist, who may have spent years and money<br />
in acquiring his expert knowledge, would have the<br />
mortification of reading articles signed by himself in<br />
inferior provincial news-sheets to which he would<br />
never dream of contributing direct. In the second,<br />
his pocket would be hit as well as his vanity, for<br />
there can be no doubt that this cheapening of his<br />
name in country papers would prejudice his chances<br />
of placing new work in more respectable quarters.<br />
<br />
THE AUTHOR.<br />
<br />
If this is really what Lord Halsbury—am I wrong<br />
in thinking that he occupies the post of President<br />
of the Royal Society of Literature ?—desires to see<br />
authors reduced to, then there is nothing more to<br />
be said, and the only remedy is to alter the law,<br />
and, pending that, for authors to defend themselves<br />
individually by special clauses setting this prece-<br />
dent aside. If, however, he is rather of opinion<br />
that such a position is as unreasonable in respect<br />
of encyclopsedic literature as in the case of articles<br />
contributed to periodicals, then, sir, I submit with<br />
respect that it is a pity he did not make this clear.<br />
I have not hypothecated such a case merely as a<br />
frivolous reductio ad absurdum, but in a wholly<br />
correct spirit of curiosity. May I take this oppor-<br />
tunity of stating that I never claimed any right to<br />
make separate use of the article in question. My<br />
contention was merely that, as it had been com-<br />
missioned for one work, of which I was both the<br />
originator and part-editor, the publishers had no<br />
right, without my permission, to use it in another<br />
work in which I had no direct or indirect interest.<br />
Lord Halsbury and his learned colleagues have<br />
thought otherwise, but I hope, given a reasonable<br />
term, to live to see the law, for which I have a<br />
great respect, brought in line with common sense,<br />
for which I have a reverence.<br />
Your obedient servant,<br />
F, G. AFLALO.<br />
Teignmouth, Devon.<br />
<br />
a<br />
<br />
Tue REMUNERATION OF TRANSLATIONS AND<br />
ORIGINAL WORK COMPARED.<br />
<br />
Dear Srr,—In a note that appeared in The<br />
Author, with reference to the remuneration received<br />
by translators for Messrs. Methuen’s Dumas series,<br />
you mention that the average remuneration per<br />
1,000 words for translation of French work into<br />
English may be reckoned at about 7s. 6d.<br />
<br />
If I may venture to differ from you I should<br />
say that, at all events for fiction, few English<br />
publishers pay more than 5s. per 1,000.<br />
<br />
But in connection with Messrs. Methuen’s rates<br />
<br />
it is instructive to note that not long ago this firm<br />
offered an author for the writing of one of their<br />
well-known series of topographical monographs a<br />
sum which worked out at a little less than seven<br />
shillings a thousand words, and this was for original,<br />
not translation, work! Not only this, but the<br />
offer was made to an author who is a well-known<br />
authority on the special subject he was asked to<br />
write upon. Further, this princely offer was<br />
handicapped by the work having to be written on<br />
approval.<br />
<br />
Yours faithfully,<br />
Ursus Magor. =j | https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/489/1904-01-01-The-Author-14-4.pdf | publications, The Author |