Omeka IDOmeka URLTitleSubjectDescriptionCreatorSourcePublisherDateContributorRightsRelationFormatLanguageTypeIdentifierCoveragePublisher(s)Original FormatOxford Dictionary of National Biography EntryPagesParticipantsPen NamePhysical DimensionsPosition End DatePosition Start DatePosition(s)Publication FrequencyOccupationSexSociety Membership End DateSociety Membership Start DateStart DateSub-Committee End DateSub-Committee Start DateTextToURLVolumeDeathBiographyBirthCommittee End DateCommittee of Management End DateCommittee of Management Start DateCommittee Start DateCommittee(s)Council End DateCouncil Start DateDateBibliographyEnd DateEvent TypeFromImage SourceInteractive TimelineIssueLocationMembersNgram DateNgram TextFilesTags
306https://historysoa.com/items/show/306The Author, Vol. 08 Issue 03 (August 1897)<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=49&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=%3Cem%3EThe+Author%3C%2Fem%3E%2C+Vol.+08+Issue+03+%28August+1897%29"><em>The Author</em>, Vol. 08 Issue 03 (August 1897)</a><a href="https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015049239455" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015049239455</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=51&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=Publication">Publication</a>1897-08-02-The-Author-8-357–88<a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=89&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=8">8</a><a href="/items/browse?advanced%5B0%5D%5Belement_id%5D=76&advanced%5B0%5D%5Btype%5D=is+exactly&advanced%5B0%5D%5Bterms%5D=1897-08-02">1897-08-02</a>318970802XL he Hutbor*<br /> (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Aidhors. Monthly.)<br /> CONDUCTED BY WALTER BESANT.<br /> Vol. VIII.—No. 3.] AUGUST 2, 1897. [Price Sixpence.<br /> CONT<br /> FAQ I<br /> General Memoranda 87<br /> From the Committee 59<br /> Literary Properly—1. The Home of Lords Committee. 2. The<br /> New Copyright Bill. 3. The Eight of CriiioiBm. 4. University<br /> of Cambridge r. Blackie and Sons 59<br /> Copyright (Amendment) Bill (H. of L.) 63<br /> Civil List Pensions 67<br /> Notes and News. By the Editor 67<br /> The Proposed Net System &quot;1<br /> A Warning to Authors and Others 72<br /> A Case in Pofnt 74<br /> ENTS.<br /> PAOI<br /> &#039;International Library Conference 75<br /> Book Talk 78<br /> Fashions in Language. By H. O. K ... 81<br /> Correspondence.—1. Corruptions of the Language. 2. Editor<br /> and Contributor. 8. English Novels In Germany. 4. A Query.<br /> 5. Transliteration. 6. Subjunctive Mood: its Present Day use.<br /> 7. Cost of Production. S. How Long; 82<br /> Literature in the Periodicals 85<br /> Personal 86<br /> Obituary 87<br /> The Books of the Month 87<br /> PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.<br /> 1. The Annual Report, That for January 1897 can be had on application to the Secretary.<br /> 2. The Author. A Monthly Journal devoted especially to the protection and maintenance of Literary<br /> Property. Issued to all Members, 6*. 6d. per annum. Back numbers are offered at the<br /> following prices: Vol. I., 10*. 6d. (Bound); Vols. II., III., and IV., 8«. 6d. each (Bound);<br /> Vol. V., 6s. 6J. (Unbound).<br /> 3. Literature and the Pension List. By W. Morris Colles, Barrister-at-Law. (Henry Glaisher,<br /> 95, Strand, W.C.) 3$.<br /> 4. The History of the Societe des Gens de Lettres. By S. Squire Spriooe, late Secretary to<br /> the Society, is.<br /> 5. The Cost of Production. In this work specimens are given of the most important forms of type,<br /> size of page, &lt;fec, with estimates showing what it costs to produce the more common kinds of<br /> books. Henry Glaisher, 95, Strand, W.C. 2*. 6d.<br /> 6. The Various Methods of Publication. By S. Squire Sprigoe. In this work, compiled from the<br /> papers in the Society&#039;s offices, the various forms of agreements proposed by Publishers to<br /> Authors are examined, and their meaning carefully explained, with an account of the various<br /> kinds of fraud which have been made possible by the different clauses in their agreements.<br /> Henry Glaisher, 95, Strand, W.C. 3*.<br /> 7. Copyright Law Reform. An Exposition of Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill now before Parlia-<br /> ment. With Extracts from the Report of the Commission of 1878, and an Appendix<br /> containing the Berne Convention and the American Copyright Bill. By J. M. Lely. Eyre<br /> and Spottiswoode. is. 6d.<br /> 8. The Society of Authors. A Record of its Action from its Foundation. By Walter Besant<br /> (Chairman of Committee, 1888—1892). is.<br /> 9. The Contract of Publication in Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Switzerland. By Ernst<br /> Lunge, J.U.D. 2*. 6d.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 56 (#470) #############################################<br /> <br /> 11<br /> AD VER TISEMENTS.<br /> ^i)e gociefj} of Jlufljors (§ttcotporafe6).<br /> 8ib Edwin Arnold, K.C.I.E., C.S.I.<br /> J. M. Barbie.<br /> A. W. X Beckett.<br /> Robert Bat em an.<br /> F. E. Beddard, F.R.S.<br /> Sir Henry Bkrgne, K.C.M.G.<br /> Sib Walter Besant.<br /> ATjOUBTINE BlRRELL, M.P.<br /> Rev. Prop. Bonnet, F.R.S.<br /> Right Hon. James Brtce, M.P.<br /> Right Hon. Lord Burohclire, P.C.<br /> Hall Cains.<br /> Eoerton Castle, F.S.A.<br /> P. W. Clatden.<br /> Edward Clodd.<br /> W. Morris Colles.<br /> Hon. John Collier.<br /> Sir W. Martin Conwat.<br /> F. Marion Crawford.<br /> The Eabl of Desart.<br /> president.<br /> o-ieozroce :mz:e:k.:e:dit;e3:.<br /> COUNCIL.<br /> Adstin Dobson.<br /> a. conan dotle, m.d.<br /> A. W. Dubouro.<br /> Prof. Michael Foster, F.R.S.<br /> D. W. Freshfield.<br /> Richard Garnett, C.B., LL.D.<br /> Edmund Gosse.<br /> H. Rider Haqgard.<br /> Thomas Hardy.<br /> Anthony Hope Hawkins.<br /> Jerome K. Jerome.<br /> RuDYARD KlPLINO.<br /> Prof. E. Ray Lankester, F.R.S.<br /> W. E. H. Lecky, P.C.<br /> J. M. Lely.<br /> Mrs. E. Lynn Linton.<br /> Rev. W. J. Loftie, F.S.A.<br /> Sir A. C. Mackenzie, Mas.Doc.<br /> Prof. J. M. D. Meiklejohn.<br /> Herman C. Merivale.<br /> Eon. Counsel — E. M. Underdown,<br /> Rev. C. H. Middleton-Wake.<br /> Sir Lewis Morris.<br /> Henry Norman.<br /> Miss E. A. Ormerod.<br /> J. C. Parkinson.<br /> Right Hon. Lord Pirbrioht, P.C,<br /> F.R.S.<br /> Sir Frederick Pollock, Bart., LL.D.<br /> Walter Herries Pollock.<br /> W. Baptiste Scoones.<br /> Miss Flora L. Shaw.<br /> G. R. Sims.<br /> S. Squire Spriqoe.<br /> J. J. Stevenson.<br /> Francis Store.<br /> William Moy Thomas.<br /> H. D. Traill, D.C.L.<br /> Mrs. Humphry Ward.<br /> Miss Charlotte M. Yonoe.<br /> Q.C.<br /> A.. W. X Beckett.<br /> Sir Walter Besant.<br /> Eoerton Castle, F.S.A.<br /> W. Morris Colles.<br /> ART.<br /> Hon. John Collier (Chairman).<br /> Sir W. Martin Conway.<br /> M. H. Spielmann<br /> COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT<br /> Chairman—H. Rider Haggard.<br /> Sir W. Martin Conway.<br /> D. W. Freshfield.<br /> Anthony Hope Hawkins.<br /> J. M. Lely.<br /> SU B-COM M ITTEES.<br /> MUSIC.<br /> C. Villiers Stanford, Mas.D. (Chairman)<br /> Jacques Blumenthal.<br /> J. L. Molloy.<br /> Sir A. C. Mackenzie, Mub.Doc.<br /> Henry Norman.<br /> Francis Storr.<br /> Solicitors—<br /> f Field, Roscoe, and Co., Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields<br /> DRAMA.<br /> Henry Arthur Jones (Chairman).<br /> A. W. a Beckett.<br /> Edward Rose.<br /> Herbert Thring, B.A., 4, Portugal-street. Secretary—G. Herbert Thrino, B.A.<br /> OFFICES: 4, Portugal Street, Lincoln&#039;s Inn Fields, W.C.<br /> .A.. IP. WJ^TT &amp; SOINT,<br /> LITERARY AGENTS,<br /> Formerly of 2, PATERNOSTER SQUARE,<br /> Have now removed to<br /> HASTINGS HOUSE, NORFOLK STREET, STRAND,<br /> LONDON&quot;. W.C.<br /> Published every Friday morning; price, without Reports, 9&lt;L; with<br /> Reports, Is.<br /> THE LAW TIMES, the Journal of the Law and the<br /> Lawyers, which has now been established for over half a century,<br /> supplies to the Profession a complete Record of the Progress of Legal<br /> Reforms, and of all matters affecting the Legal Profession. The<br /> Reports of the Law Times are now recognised as the most complete<br /> and efficient Beries published.<br /> Offices: Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.0<br /> THE ART of CHESS. By James Mason. Price 5s.<br /> net, by post 5s. 4d.<br /> London: Horace Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.0.<br /> THE KNIGHTS and KINGS of CHESS. By the Rev.<br /> G. A. MACDONNELL, B.A. With Portrait and 17 Illustra-<br /> tions. Crown 8vo., cloth boards, price 2s. «d. net.<br /> London: HouACE Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.O.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 57 (#471) #############################################<br /> <br /> be Hutbor*<br /> (The Organ of the Incorporated Society of Authors. Monthly.)<br /> CONDUCTED BY WALTER BESANT.<br /> Vol. VIII.—No. 3.] AUGUST 2, 1897. [Price Sixpence.<br /> For the Opinions expressed in papers that are<br /> signed or initialled the Authors alone are<br /> responsible. None of the papers or para-<br /> graphs must be taken as expressing the<br /> collective opinions of the Committee unless<br /> they are. officially signed by G. Herbert<br /> Thring, Sec.<br /> THE Secretary of the Society begs to give notice that all<br /> remittances are acknowledged by return of post, and<br /> requests that all members not receiving an answer to<br /> important communications within two days will write to him<br /> without delay. All remittances should be crossed Union<br /> Bank of London, Chancery-lane, or be sent by registered<br /> letter only.<br /> Communications and letters are invited by the Editor on<br /> all subjects connected with literature, but on no other sub-<br /> jects whatever. Articles which cannot be accepted are<br /> returned if stamps for the purpose accompany the MSS.<br /> GENERAL MEMORANDA.<br /> FOB some years it has been the praotioe to insert, in<br /> every number of The Author, certain &quot; General Con-<br /> siderations,&quot; Warnings, Notices, &amp;c, for the guidance<br /> of the reader. It has been objeoted as regards these<br /> warnings that the tricks or frauds against which they are<br /> directed cannot all be guarded against, for obvious reasons.<br /> It is, however, well that they should be borne in mind, and<br /> if any publisher refuses a clause of precaution he simply<br /> reveals his true character, and should be left to carry on<br /> his business in his own way.<br /> Let us, however, draw up a few of the rules to be<br /> observed in an agreement. There are three methods of<br /> dealing with literary property:—<br /> I. That of Belling it outright.<br /> This is in some respects the most satisfactory, if a proper<br /> price can be obtained. But the transaction should be<br /> managed by a competent agent.<br /> II. A pro&amp;t-sharing agreement.<br /> In this case the following rules should be attended to &gt;<br /> (1.) Not to sign any agreement in which the cost of pro-<br /> duction forms a part.<br /> (2.) Not to give the publisher the power of putting the<br /> profits into his own pocket by charging for advertisements<br /> VOL. VIII.<br /> in his own organs: or by charging exchange advertise-<br /> ments.<br /> _ (3.) Not to allow a special charge for &quot; offioe expenses,&quot;<br /> unless the same allowance is made to the author.<br /> (4.) Not to give up American, Colonial, or Continental<br /> rights.<br /> (5.) Not to give up serial or translation rights.<br /> (6.) Not to bind yourself for future work to any publisher.<br /> As well bind yourself for the future to any one solicitor or<br /> doctor!<br /> (7.) To stamp the agreement.<br /> III. The royalty system.<br /> In this system, which has opened the door to a most<br /> amazing amount of overreaching and trading on the<br /> author&#039;s ignorance, it is above all things necessary to know<br /> what the proposed royalty means to both °ides. It is now<br /> possible for an author to ascertain approximately and very<br /> nearly the truth. Prom time to time the very important<br /> figures conneoted with royalties are published in The Author.<br /> Readers can also work out the figures themselves from the<br /> &quot;Cost of Production.&quot; Let no one, not even the youngest<br /> writer, sign a royalty agreement without finding out what<br /> it gives the publisher as well as himself.<br /> It has been objeoted. that these precautions presuppose a<br /> great success for the book, and that very few books indeed<br /> attain to this great success. That is quite true: but there is<br /> always this uncertainty of literary property that, although<br /> the works of a groat many authors carry with them no risk<br /> at all, and although of a great many it is known within a few<br /> copies what will be their minimum circulation, it is not<br /> known what will be their maximum. Therefore every<br /> author, for every book, should arrange on the chance of a<br /> success whioh will not, probably, come at all; but which<br /> may come.<br /> The four points whioh the Society has always demanded<br /> from the outset are:—<br /> (1.) That both sides shall know what an agreement<br /> means.<br /> (2.) The inspection of those account books which belong<br /> to the author. We are advised that this is a right, in the<br /> nature of a common law right, which cannot be denied or<br /> withheld.<br /> (3.) That there shall be no secret profits.<br /> (4.) That nothing shall be charged whioh has not been<br /> actually paid—for instance, that there shall be no charge for<br /> advertisements in the publisher&#039;s own organs and none for<br /> exchanged advertisements and that all dissounta shall b&quot;<br /> duly entered.<br /> If these points are carefully looked after, the author may<br /> rest pretty well assured that he is in right hands. At the<br /> same time he will do well to send his agreement to the<br /> secretary before he signs it.<br /> F 2<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 58 (#472) #############################################<br /> <br /> 58 THE AUTHOR.<br /> HOW TO USB THE SOCIETY.<br /> I. &quot;TTWERY member has a right to ask for and to receive<br /> I* J advice upon his agreements, his choice of a pub-<br /> lisher, or any dispute arising in the conduct of his<br /> business or the administration of his property. If the advice<br /> sought is such as can be given best by a solicitor, the member<br /> has a right to an opinion from the Society&#039;s solicitors. If the<br /> case is such that Counsel&#039;s opinion is desirable, the Com-<br /> mittee will obtain for him Counsel&#039;s opinion. All this<br /> without any cost to the member.<br /> 2. Eemember that questions connected with oopyright<br /> and publisher&#039;s agreements do not generally fall within the<br /> experience of ordinary solicitors. Therefore, do not scruple<br /> to use the Society first—our solicitors are continually<br /> engaged upon such questions for us.<br /> 3. Send to the office copies of past agreements and past<br /> accounts with the loan of the books represented. This is in<br /> order to ascertain what has been the nature of your agree-<br /> ments, and the results to author and publisher respectively<br /> so far. The Seoretary will always be glad to have any<br /> agreements, new or old, for inspection and note. The infor-<br /> mation thns obtained may prove invaluable.<br /> 4. If the examination of your previous business trans-<br /> actions by the Secretary proves unfavourable, you should<br /> take advice as to a change of publishers.<br /> 5. Before signing any agreement whatever, send the pro-<br /> posed dooument to the Society for examination.<br /> 6. The Society is acquainted with the methods, and—in<br /> the cose of fraudulent houses—the tricks of every publish-<br /> ing firm in the country.<br /> 7. Remember always that in belonging to the Society you<br /> are fighting the battles of other writers, even if you are<br /> reaping no benefit to yourself, and that you are advancing<br /> the best interests of literature in promoting the indepen-<br /> dence of the writer.<br /> 8. Send to the Editor of The Author notes of everything<br /> important to literature that you may hear or meet with.<br /> 9. The committee have now arranged for the reception of<br /> members&#039; agreements and their preservation in a fireproof<br /> safe. The agreements will, of course, be regarded as con-<br /> fidential documents to be read only by the Secretary, who<br /> will keep the key of the safe. The Society now offers:—(1)<br /> To read and advise upon agreements and publishers. (2) To<br /> stamp agreements in readiness for a possible action upon<br /> them. (3) To keep agreements. (4) To enforce payments<br /> due according to agreements.<br /> THE AUTHORS&#039; SYNDICATE.<br /> MEMBERS are informed:<br /> 1. That the Authors&#039; Syndicate takes charge of<br /> the business of members of the Society. That it<br /> submits MSS. to publishers and editors, concludes agree-<br /> ments, examines, passes, and collects accounts, and, gene-<br /> rally, relieves members of the trouble of managing business<br /> details.<br /> 2. That the terms upon which its services can be secured<br /> will be forwarded upon detailed application.<br /> 3. That the Authors&#039; Syndicate works only for those<br /> members of the Society whose work possesses a market<br /> value.<br /> 4. That the Syndicate can only undertake any negotiations<br /> whatever ou the distinct understanding that those negotia-<br /> tions are placed exclusively in its hands, and that all<br /> communications relating thereto are referred to it.<br /> 5. That clients can only be seen by the Direotor by<br /> appointment, and that, when possible, at least two days&#039;<br /> notice should be given.<br /> 6. That every attempt is made to deal with all communi-<br /> cations promptly. That stamps should, in ail cases, be sent<br /> to defray postage.<br /> 7. That the Authors&#039; Syndicate does not invite MSS.<br /> without previous correspondence; does not hold itself<br /> responsible for MSS. forwarded without notice; and that<br /> in all cases MSS. must be accompanied by stamps to defray<br /> postage.<br /> 8. That the Syndicate undertakes arrangements for<br /> lectures by some of the leading members of the Society;<br /> that it has a &quot;Transfer Department&quot; for the sale and<br /> purchase of journals and periodicals; and that a &quot; Register<br /> of Wants and Wanted&quot; is open. Members are invited to<br /> communicate their requirements to the Manager.<br /> There is an Honorary Advisory Committee, whose services<br /> will be called upon in any case of dispute or difficulty. It<br /> is perhaps necessary to state that the members of the<br /> Advisory Committee have no pecuniary interest whatever in<br /> the Syndicate.<br /> NOTICES.<br /> THE Editor of The Author begs to remind members of the<br /> Society that, although the paper is sent to them free<br /> of charge, the cost of producing it would be a very<br /> heavy charge on the resources of the Society if a great<br /> many members did not forward to the Secretary the modest<br /> 6s. 6d. subscription for the year.<br /> The Editor is always glad to receive short papers and<br /> communications on all subjects connected with literature<br /> from members and others. Nothing can do more good to<br /> the Society than to make The Author complete, attractive,<br /> and interesting. Will those who are willing to aid in this<br /> work send their names and the special subjects on which<br /> they ore willing to write?<br /> Communications for The Author should reach the Editor<br /> not later than the 21 st of each month.<br /> All persons engaged in literary work of any kind, whether<br /> members of the Society or not, are invited to communicate<br /> to the Editor any points connected with their work which<br /> it would be advisable in the general interest to publish.<br /> Members and others who wish their MSS. read are<br /> requested not to send them to the Office without previously<br /> communicating with the Secretary. The utmost practicable<br /> despatch is aimed at, and MSS. are read in the order in<br /> which they are received. It must also be distinctly under-<br /> stood that the Society does not, under any circumstances,<br /> undertake the publication of MSS.<br /> The Authors&#039; Club is now open in its new premises, at<br /> 3, Whitehall-court, Charing Cross. Address the Secretary<br /> for information, rules of admission, Ac.<br /> Will members take the trouble to ascertain whether they<br /> have paid their subscriptions for the year? If they will do<br /> this, and remit the amount, if still unpaid, or a banker&#039;s<br /> order, it will greatly assist the Secretary, and save him the<br /> trouble of sending out a reminder.<br /> Members are most earnestly entreated to attend to the<br /> following warning. It is a most foolish and may be a<br /> most disastrous thing to enter into an agreement binding<br /> for a term of years. Let them ask themselves if they<br /> would give a solicitor the collection of their rents for five<br /> years to come, whatever his conduct, whether he was honest<br /> . I<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 59 (#473) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 59<br /> or dishonest? Of coarse they would not. Why then<br /> hesitate for a moment when they are asked to sign them-<br /> selves into literary bondage for three or five years?<br /> Those who possess the &quot;Cost of Production&quot; are<br /> requested to note that the cost of binding has advanced 15<br /> per cent. This means, for those who do not like the trouble<br /> of &quot;doing sums,&quot; the addition of three shillings in the<br /> pound on this head. In other words, if the cost of binding<br /> is set down in our book at eight pounds, to this must now be<br /> added twenty-four shillings more, bo that it now stands<br /> at £g 48. The figures in our book are as near the exact<br /> truth as can be procured; but a printer&#039;s, or a binder&#039;s,<br /> bill is so elastic a thing that nothing more exact can be<br /> arrived at.<br /> Some remarks have been made upon the amount charged<br /> in the &quot; Cost of Production &quot; for advertising. Of course, we<br /> have not included any sums which may be charged for<br /> inserting advertisements in the publisher&#039;s own magazines,<br /> or in other magazines by exchange. As agreements too<br /> often go, there is nothing to prevent the publishor from<br /> sweeping the whole profits o a book into his own pocket,<br /> by inserting any number of advertisements in his own<br /> magazines, and by exchanging with others. Some there are<br /> who call this a form of fraud; it is not known what those<br /> who practise this method of swelling their own profits call it.<br /> FROM THE COMMITTEE.<br /> ON Thursday, July 26, a meeting of the Com-<br /> mittee was held at the Medical Association<br /> Rooms, Hanover-square. It was Resolved:<br /> &quot;That in view of the proposed action of the<br /> Publishers&#039; Association towards the booksellers,<br /> a committee be appointed to consider the whole<br /> questiou, and to arrive at the opinions and inte-<br /> rests of the persons most concerned. That the<br /> committee should consist of five, who should have<br /> power to extend their number to twelve, but not<br /> more.&quot;<br /> It is expected that the committee will begin<br /> their work in September.<br /> Owing to the great pressure upon our space<br /> this month, Mr. Hapgood&#039;s New York Letter, and<br /> Mr. Sherard&#039;s Notes from Elsewhere, have been<br /> unavoidably held over.<br /> LITERARY PROPERTY.<br /> I.—The House of Loeds Committee.<br /> THE Select Committee of the House of Lords<br /> which has been appointed to deal with the<br /> copyright law promoted by the Society, and<br /> drafted for the Society by Mr. J. Rolt, of 4, New-<br /> square, sat for the first time on Thursday, July 1.<br /> As previously stated in The Author, the Bill is<br /> being brought forward on behalf of the Society<br /> by Lord Monkswell, who acted as chairman of<br /> the Lords&#039; Committee.<br /> Mr. Daldy, who was a member of the com-<br /> mission of 1878, and who is secretary of the<br /> Copyright Association, was the first witness<br /> called.<br /> He gave evidence on the various points of the<br /> Bill, and answered the numerous questions put to<br /> him by their Lordships as to the effect of the Bill<br /> and its bearing with regard to change in the exist-<br /> ing law.<br /> The witness, in answer to their Lordships,<br /> touched on the point of the inclusion of transla-<br /> tion rights in a definition of copyright and its<br /> effect on the International law; on the question<br /> of the definition of &quot; book&quot; shall include &quot; news-<br /> paper&quot;; on the existing law with respect to<br /> lectures ; on the proposed amendment of that law;<br /> and generally on all the other points dealt with<br /> in the Bill.<br /> After the witness had given his evidence on<br /> the point relating to the definition &quot;book shall<br /> include newspaper,&quot; the room was cleared, and on<br /> the re-admission of the public the chairman said<br /> that the committee had come to the conclusion<br /> that they would not include any alteration in the<br /> law with regard to the copyright in newspapers<br /> in the present Bill.<br /> Mr. Daldy was taken through various objec-<br /> tions, and suggested amendments, which objec-<br /> tions and amendments he had furnished to the<br /> secretary of the Society, who in turn had forwarded<br /> them to the chairman of the committee.<br /> Their Lordships listened with attention to his<br /> statements, and reserved the points for their con-<br /> sideration.<br /> At the conclusion of Mr. Daldy&#039;s evidence,<br /> Mr. C. J. Longman, representing the Publishers&#039;<br /> Association, was called. His evidence was given<br /> in support of the Bill in all its important essen-<br /> tials. He did not touch on the points that had<br /> already been covered by the former witness except<br /> when it appeared to him that errors of law or<br /> fact had been put before their Lordships. His<br /> evidence was very strongly in favour of the fullest<br /> protection for the performance of dramatic works,<br /> whether such performance took place in a place<br /> of dramatic entertainment or in a private house.<br /> Although not supporting the suggestion in the<br /> Bill for registration at the British Museum, he<br /> stated that he looked forward to a time when<br /> registration should be made compulsory.<br /> Mr. G. H. Thring, the secretary of the Society,<br /> as representing the promoters of the Bill, was<br /> called last so as, if necessary, to supplement or<br /> correct the evidence already given, and to put<br /> before the Committee, should they desire, the views<br /> of the promoters of the Bill on any of the sepa-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 60 (#474) #############################################<br /> <br /> 6o<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> rate clauses. As most of the difficulties had<br /> already been explained (both of the former wit-<br /> nesses being mainly in favour of the Bill), there<br /> was very little to add, but the secretary pressed<br /> those points which appeared to be of the greatest<br /> benefit to authors, namely, the repeal of the 18th<br /> section of the existing Act and the adoption of<br /> the present clauses; the retention in the author<br /> of rights of dramaiisation of his novels, and the<br /> necessity for complete registration.<br /> The committee then adjourned to Thursday,<br /> July 8.<br /> On Thursday, July 8th, their Lordships&#039; Special<br /> Committee again sat, Mr. Bram Stoker, Sir<br /> Henry Irving&#039;s manager, was called as being<br /> able to answer for the theatrical managers on the<br /> points relating to the drama and dramatic rights.<br /> He stated that the practice of dramatising novels<br /> was on the increase, and he thought it was<br /> absolutely essential both that the author of a<br /> book should be protected from dramatisation,<br /> and the author of a drama from novelisation.<br /> He submitted that dramatic authors should be<br /> able to prohibit performances in public or private.<br /> He desired to see a simplification if possible of<br /> the method of obtaining an injunction against the<br /> infringing parties, and stated that managers<br /> would prefer such simplified legal remedy rather<br /> than merely the power of obtaining penalties.<br /> He also touched on the subject of copyright in<br /> lectures.<br /> At the close of his evidence the room was<br /> ■cleared for the consideration of the Bill by their<br /> Lordships.<br /> The Bill has now been revised by the Special<br /> Committee, Lord Thring undertaking the redraft-<br /> ing of it on behalf of their Lordships&#039; Special<br /> Committee.<br /> On Monday, July 19, Lord Monkswell on the<br /> motion to go into committee on the Bill made the<br /> following speech. The House then went into<br /> committee, and the amendments proposed by the<br /> Special Committee were agreed to.<br /> Lord Monkswell asked to be allowed to say<br /> a few words as to the proceedings of the<br /> Select Committee to which the Bill was referred.<br /> The benches opposite were represented by Lord<br /> Knutsford, Lord Pirbright, Lord Hatherton,<br /> and Lord Tennyson; while Lord Farrer, Lord<br /> Thring, and Lord Wei by represented that side.<br /> The committee sat several days, and went into<br /> the subject carefully. The first point which<br /> they devoted a great deal of attention to was that<br /> of translation. It was absolutely necessary to<br /> amend the law with regard to translations. It<br /> was now in a sad state of confusion. Trans-<br /> lation into foreign tongues were dealt with<br /> under the Berne Convention and under the<br /> International Copyright Act. But as to trans-<br /> lations into Hindustani, Welsh, Gaelic, and other<br /> tongues current within the British Dominions the<br /> law was in a doubtful state indeed. With regard<br /> to this he could not do better than quote from<br /> the evidence of Mr. Daldy, one of the Commis-<br /> sioners of 1878, and who was now, and had been<br /> for many years, honorary secretary of the Copy-<br /> right Association.<br /> Lord Monkswell then read the portion of the<br /> evidence bearing on this point, and then pro-<br /> ceeded :—It was certain, therefore, that the matter<br /> of translation ought to be dealt with as soon as<br /> possible, and the promoters of the Bill proposed<br /> to deal with it by giving, as was proposed in the<br /> original Bill, the absolute right during the whole<br /> period of the copyright to prevent unauthorised<br /> translations. An endeavour had been made to<br /> lighten the Bill so that it might be got through<br /> their Lordships&#039; House this Session, and it dealt<br /> only with those subjects which were most press-<br /> ing and least contentious. All reference to news-<br /> paper copyright had been struck out. With<br /> regard to magazine copyright, it was proposed to<br /> make it retrospective, but as there was a diffe-<br /> rence of opinion as to that, the clause in the Bill<br /> making the copyright retrospective had been<br /> omitted. With regard to lectures the Bill<br /> had also been considerably lightened. The<br /> great point on which the committee wished<br /> to insist was that eojiyright should be given not<br /> only in lectures when published in a book, but<br /> when delivered, and that they had tried to effect<br /> by the Bill. It was further suggested in the<br /> original Bill that the law should be altered so as<br /> to give copyright, which did not now exist, to<br /> lectures delivered in endowed buildings. The<br /> Select Committee were on the whole favourable to<br /> that proposition, but, at the same time, they re-<br /> cognised that any alteration of the law to effect<br /> that must seriously affect very considerable inte-<br /> rests; and they thought it was not desirable,<br /> without taking a great deal of evidence and going<br /> into the matter very thoroughly, to recommend<br /> such an alteration in the law, consequently they<br /> had inserted in the amended Bill a proviso set-<br /> ting up again the provision that now existed—<br /> not allowing copyright to lectures in endowed<br /> buildings. For the present it had been decided<br /> not to propose any change in the law with<br /> regard to the difficult and thorny question of<br /> registration. Another alteration had been made<br /> which he thought would commend itself to their<br /> lordships. The principil Act of 1842 now<br /> applied to all British possessions, unless by Order<br /> in Council they should bo exempted either from<br /> the whole Act or part of it. It was proposed<br /> in the amended Bill to give the British posses-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 61 (#475) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 61<br /> sion8 much greater freedom of action by declar-<br /> ing that the Act, if it passed, should not run in<br /> any of the British possessions unless they them-<br /> selves asked either for the whole or part of it.<br /> The net result, therefore, of the labours of the<br /> Select Committee had been to greatly lighten<br /> the Bill, and to clear it of almost every subject<br /> of controversy, whilst at the same time it intro-<br /> duced a great many alterations of the law which<br /> were of considerable value. He might, perhaps,<br /> be allowed to say that the best thanks of the<br /> committee were due to Lord Thring for the great<br /> care and attention he had bestowed on the draft-<br /> ing of this measure. (Hear.) He found that<br /> two or three amendments would have to be made,<br /> which, however, did not touch the Bill in this<br /> respect. In order that noble lords might have<br /> an opportunity of considering the amendments<br /> he had put down, he proposed to take the<br /> report stage to-morrow, and the amendments<br /> on Thursday or Friday, when he hoped the<br /> House would give a third reading to the Bill.<br /> (Hear, hear.) He begged to move that the<br /> House now resolve itself into Committee on the<br /> Bill.<br /> On Friday, July 23, the Bill was read a third<br /> time.<br /> Lord Monkswell stated that at the wish of the<br /> Colonial Office he desired to move that Clause 12<br /> be omitted.<br /> The omission was agreed to.<br /> II.—The New Copyright Bill.<br /> I. FBOM THE &quot;TIMES.&quot;<br /> A gentleman engaged in a publishing business<br /> recently wrote to Lord Monkswell suggesting that<br /> it was desirable to take steps to protect the titles<br /> of series of books, and so to prevent the foisting<br /> upon the public of hasty imitations of deservedly<br /> popular volumes. &quot;I have been,&quot; he said, &quot;in<br /> correspondence both with the Stationers&#039; Hall<br /> authorities and the Trade Mark Office of the<br /> Board of Trade; and recently I took occasion to<br /> have an interview with the respective chiefs of<br /> these offices. The Eegistrar of Trade Marks told<br /> me that, unquestionably, such titles fall outside<br /> the scope of the present Trade Mark Acts; but<br /> he seemed to see no objection whatever to the re-<br /> gistration of such titles, only he thought that<br /> such a matter would fall more fittingly within the<br /> province of Stationers&#039; Hall. The chief man at<br /> Stationers&#039; Hall said: (1) That my application<br /> was by no means the first of the sort, that, on the<br /> contrary, more people came to his office with<br /> similar requests than with any other; (2) that he<br /> thought that means for registering novel titles of<br /> businesses and series of books should be given to<br /> the public; (3) that he had noted with surprise<br /> that the new Copyright Bill which your lordship<br /> was introducing into the House of Lords contained<br /> no provision for this purpose; (4) that he thought<br /> it very possible that, if the matter were brought<br /> before your lordship, your lordship would see the<br /> desirability of making such an addition.&quot; Lord<br /> Monkswell&#039;s reply was as follows: &quot;I will lay<br /> your statement before the Copyright Committee<br /> at its next meeting; but, as the amendments you<br /> suggest would enlarge the scope of the Bill, I do<br /> not think they will consider themselves justified<br /> in recommending them to the House.&quot;<br /> II. FBOM THE &quot; DAILY NEWS.&quot;<br /> Lord Monkswell&#039;s Copyright Bill has been<br /> printed and circulated with the amendments made<br /> by the Select Committee of the House of Lords.<br /> These were accepted in committee of the whole<br /> House yesterday afternoon, and the Bill now<br /> stands for third reading. As it has not yet passed<br /> through the House of Commons, the chances of<br /> its becoming law this session must be regarded as<br /> remote. But it has now been brought into the<br /> best shape which legal minds can give it, and<br /> there may be some hope for it in 1898. Even<br /> this year, if some general agreement could be<br /> obtained, a judicious attempt to deal with a<br /> difficult subject might be crowned with success.<br /> Social reform is not achieved in England with<br /> reckless or thoughtless haste. The essence of this<br /> measure formed the subject of a Bill which the<br /> present Duke of Rutland, then Lord John<br /> Manners and Postmaster-General, introduced<br /> into the House of Commons in 1879. That<br /> was, if we are not mistaken, the year in<br /> which the late Sir John Holker moved the<br /> second reading of the Criminal Code Bill, which<br /> has never got beyond a second reading since.<br /> There are presentable, we do not say conclusive,<br /> arguments against the codification of the criminal<br /> law. But the law of copyright has been osten-<br /> sibly codified for more than half a century, and<br /> all that is now required may be accomplished by<br /> a short amending Bill. In 1878 there was a<br /> Royal Commission on Copyright, to which Lord<br /> John Manners&#039; Bill was due, and thirteen years<br /> afterwards, in 1891, Lord Monkswell again<br /> endeavoured to legislate upon the Commission&#039;s<br /> Report. But there is none of &quot;that slippery<br /> stuff,&quot; as Mr. Morley calls party capital, to be<br /> made out of copyright, and so copyright, like the<br /> Corporation of London, remains unreformed. In<br /> 1891 Lord Monkswell&#039;s Bill was read a second<br /> time. This year it has advanced a step further,<br /> and has gone through Committee. The first<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 62 (#476) #############################################<br /> <br /> 62<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> clause makes translation an infringement of copy-<br /> right. This is obviously just, if there is to be<br /> any copyright at all, whether the right has or has<br /> not been expressly reserved. A very important<br /> change is made in the copyright of magazines.<br /> In 1842, when the principal Copyright Act was<br /> passed, there were very few magazines, except the<br /> old quarterlies, with Blachicood&#039;s and the Gentle-<br /> man&#039;s. Now there are almost as many magazines<br /> in a month as there are days in a year, and a large<br /> number of the articles contributed to them have a<br /> really permanent value. At present the author of<br /> an article has a right of separate publication for<br /> eight-and-twenty years. Macaulay, for instance,<br /> could not without permission from the editor of<br /> the Edinburgh Review—which was, of course,<br /> given, but which might have been refused—have<br /> republished during his lifetime any of his essays<br /> except those on Milton, Machiavelb, and, perhaps,<br /> one or two more.<br /> The Bill provides that while the proprietor of<br /> the magazine shall have the sole right of pub-<br /> lishing the magazine itself, and the articles as<br /> part of it, the author of an article may publish<br /> it separately after three years. This is a great<br /> change, but a change wholly, in our opinion,<br /> for the better. Copyright is essentially the asser-<br /> tion of property. But whei-e a special kind of<br /> property, which did not exist at common law, is<br /> created by statute, Parliament should be careful<br /> to regulate it in the public interest. The interest<br /> of the public lies in the rapid diffusion of readable<br /> matter, and cannot be served by locking up<br /> interesting essays for a generation. Seven years<br /> before the Copyright Act of 1842 there was passed<br /> the Lectures Copyright Act of 1835. This Act<br /> gives a lecturer the exclusive right of publication.<br /> But it requires a preliminary notice to Justices of<br /> the Peace, which savours of the terror inspired by<br /> the French Revolution, when lectures were<br /> regarded much as dynamite w-as regarded a hun-<br /> dred years later. It is doubtful whether the Act<br /> applies to sermons, and there must, we should<br /> imagine, be very few magistrates who have been<br /> formally notified that a new volume of sermons<br /> was about to dazzle the world. The Bill abolishes<br /> this rather ridiculous formality, and gives the<br /> lecturer, as well as the preacher, an absolute<br /> copyright. But it allows a lecture to be reported<br /> in a newspaper unless the lecturer expressly<br /> states that he does not wish to be reported.<br /> There are not many lectures which would suffi-<br /> ciently attract the general reader to be reported<br /> at any great length, nor would many newspapers<br /> have space for them. But a paid lecturer, who<br /> delivers the same lecture, which may have cost<br /> him much labour and research, at several places,<br /> is entitled to protection against a form of<br /> publicity which would destroy his market. Suchr<br /> at least, is the view popular in the literary class,<br /> and the view to which Carlyle gave such forcible<br /> emphasis in his famous petition to the House of<br /> Commons. There is, of course, the theory,<br /> understood to find favour with at least one<br /> eminent statesman, that copyright is an infringe-<br /> of public right, and that authors should be com-<br /> pensated by a royalty. But that is not within<br /> the range of practical politics. One of Johnson&#039;s<br /> biographers narrates an argument upon a Scottish<br /> case, which went from the Court of Session to<br /> the House of Lords, and which raised the point<br /> of copyright at common law in lectures or<br /> sermons. Dr. Johnson declared that it was<br /> unjust to stereotype a man&#039;s doctrines and ideas,<br /> which he might afterwards see cause to alter.<br /> That motive had not previously restrained the<br /> sage from reporting Parliamentary debates in<br /> what he was pleased to call the &quot;Senate of<br /> Liliput.&quot;<br /> Wot the least important clauses in the Bill are<br /> those which deal with abridgments. As Lord<br /> Monkswell says in the useful memorandum pre-<br /> fixed to the Bill: &quot;It is now easy without any<br /> infringement of copyright, in a few weeks, by<br /> skilful abridgment, to appropriate the fruit of<br /> the labours of many years, and to compete with<br /> the original copyright bought and published at a<br /> very great expense.&quot; The art of judicious<br /> abridgment is not perhaps quite so common as<br /> Lord Monkswell supposes. But a farrago of<br /> extracts any fool can turn out, and they may<br /> be so copious or so vital as to prevent many<br /> readers from approaching the original work.<br /> Under this Bill copyright carries with it the right<br /> of abridgment as well as the right of transla-<br /> lation, and the author would be empowered to<br /> insist upon a disclaimer of his authorship being<br /> printed upon the title-page. There is no copy-<br /> right in ideas. That is to say, that an illegitimate<br /> reproduction of another man&#039;s work must be a.<br /> verbal one, or there is no remedy. Any one,<br /> therefore, is at liberty to make a play out of<br /> somebody else&#039;s novel, or a novel out of somebody<br /> else&#039;s play. The whole plot may in either case be<br /> stolen. But no penalty is imposed upon the thief.<br /> It is for this reason that novelists who intend<br /> afterwards to dramatise their own novels arrange<br /> for one colourable performance on the stage so-<br /> soon as the story appears, so as to bring them-<br /> selves under the protection of the Dramatic Copy-<br /> right Act. It is proposed to make a statutory<br /> copyright in ideas, and to make the unauthorised<br /> dramatisation of a novel an infringement of it.<br /> Such are the chief features of this excellent Bill.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 63 (#477) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 63<br /> III.—The Eight of Criticism.<br /> In the action brought by Sir John Carr in<br /> 1808 against Messrs. Hood and Sharpe, the<br /> exact words of Lord Ellenborough were as<br /> follows:—<br /> Every man who publishes a book commits himself to the<br /> judgment of the public, and anyone may comment upon his<br /> performance. Ridicule is often the fittest weapon that can<br /> be employed for such a purpose. Reflection on personal<br /> character is another thing. Show me an attack on the<br /> moral character of this plaintiff, or any attack upon his<br /> character unconnected with his authorship, and I shall be<br /> as ready as any judge who ever sat here to protect him;<br /> but I cannot hear of malice on acconnt of turning his works<br /> into ridicule.<br /> In the more recent case of Merivale v. Carson<br /> (20 Q. B. Div. at pp. 280-1), Lord Esher, M.E.,<br /> said, carrying the doctrine, if possible, even<br /> further:—<br /> Every latitude must be given to opinion and to prejudice,<br /> and then an ordinary set of men with ordinary judgment<br /> must say whether any fair man would have made such a<br /> comment. . . . Mere exaggeration, or even gross exag-<br /> geration, would not make the comment unfair. However<br /> wrong the opinion expressed may be in point of truth, or<br /> however prejudiced the writer, it may still be within the<br /> prescribed limit. The question which the jury must con-<br /> sider is this. Would any fair man, however prejudiced he<br /> may be, however exaggerated or obstinate his views, have<br /> said that which this criticism has said of the work which is<br /> criticised?<br /> IV.—University op Cam bridge v. Blacxie<br /> and Sons.<br /> (Before Mr. Justice Kekewich.)<br /> In this ease the plaintiffs as proprietors of the<br /> &quot;Pitt Press&quot; brought this action and now moved<br /> the court for an injunction in respect of an alleged<br /> infringement of their copyright in annotated<br /> editions of Pope&#039;s &quot;Essay on Criticism&quot; and<br /> Milton&#039;s &quot; Lycidas,&quot; &quot;Allegro,&quot; and &quot;II Pense-<br /> roso.&quot; Copyright was, of course, claimed solely<br /> in respect of the annotations.<br /> Mr. Millar, Q.C., and Mr. Ingpen appeared<br /> for the plaintiffs, and Mr. Stokes for the defen-<br /> dants.<br /> It was now arranged that on the defendants<br /> undertaking to keep an account of all books sold<br /> by them, and to file affidavits and deliver copies of<br /> exhibits within the first seven days of October, the<br /> motion should stand over until the second motion<br /> day in Michaelmas sittings; and<br /> Mr. Justice Kekewich made an order to that<br /> effect.— Times, July 23.<br /> VOL. Till.<br /> COPYRIGHT (AMENDMENT) BILL. [H. L]<br /> [As Amended by the Select Committee.]<br /> MEMORANDUM.<br /> THIS Bill is intended to amend some of the<br /> most serious defects in the present law of<br /> copyright. Its provisions do not mate-<br /> rially differ from the provisions on the same<br /> points contained in the Bill introduced by Lord<br /> John Manners (on behalf of the then Govern-<br /> ment) in the House of Commons in 1879, and in<br /> the Bill introduced by Lord Monkswell in the<br /> House of Lords in 1891. Both these Bills were<br /> mainly founded on the report of the Royal Com-<br /> mission on Copyright of 1878. Lord Monkswell&#039;s<br /> Bill passed a second reading in the House of<br /> Lords.<br /> The amendments are directed to the following<br /> points :—<br /> I.—Translations.<br /> Translation is made an infringement of copy-<br /> right.<br /> II.—Magazine Copyright.<br /> Since the passing of the Copyright Act, 1842,<br /> this kind of copyright property has probably<br /> increased a hundredfold in value and importance,<br /> both to authors and publishers, much literature<br /> of high merit being constantly published in the<br /> first instance in magazine form. The 18th section<br /> of the Act of 1842, which deals with the subject,<br /> is expressed in language so obscure as to be<br /> almost unintelligible, and defers the author&#039;s<br /> right of separate publication to the end of a<br /> period of twenty-eight years. It is proposed that<br /> that section should be repealed, and that the<br /> copyright should be vested in the author, subject<br /> to the following qualifications :—<br /> (1.) The proprietor of the magazine to have<br /> the sole right of publishing as part of the<br /> magazine.<br /> (2.) The author not to publish separately until<br /> after the expiration of three years from<br /> publication.<br /> The entire copyright in encyclopaedias is vested<br /> in the publisher as before, but in a separate<br /> section.<br /> III.—Lectures.<br /> The Lectures Copyright Act, 1835, gives to the<br /> lecturer the exclusive right of publication, but<br /> requires a preliminary notice to justices of the<br /> peace, and probably does not apply to sermons.<br /> It is proposed to repeal this Act, and to give the<br /> lecturer (including the preacher) copyright with-<br /> out any useless formalities, but permitting a<br /> newspaper report unless expressly prohibited by<br /> the lecturer. It will be observed that a proviso<br /> has been inserted maintaining the present law as<br /> G<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 64 (#478) #############################################<br /> <br /> 64<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> to lectures in endowed buildings, &amp;c. The com-<br /> mittee have taken this course because they did<br /> not think it desirable to alter the law without<br /> taking more evidence than time permitted.<br /> IV.—Abridgments.<br /> It is now easy, without any infringement of<br /> copyright, in a few weeks, by skilful abridgment,<br /> to appropriate the fruit of the labours of many<br /> years, and to compete with the original copyright,<br /> bought and published at very great expense. This<br /> will be prevented by the&quot; simple enactment that<br /> copyright shall carry with it the right to abridge.<br /> The reputation of the author is also safeguarded<br /> by a provision that a disclaimer of his author-<br /> ship of the abridgment shall, if required by the<br /> author, be printed on the title page ; and that the<br /> abridgment shall not be issued without the<br /> author&#039;s consent in eases where the author retains<br /> an interest in the sale (by royalties or otherwise)<br /> though not in the copyright.<br /> V.—Dramatisation of Novels.<br /> As there is no copyright in ideas, it is easy for<br /> any person to take the whole plot of a novel and<br /> practically reproduce the novel itself in dramatic<br /> form without any legal infringement of copyright,<br /> and a similar injury can be inflicted by the<br /> novelisation of dramas. It is proposed to convert<br /> these moral into legal infringements of copyright.<br /> Owners of dramatic copyright are also given a<br /> summary remedy against infringement which is<br /> much needed, as pirates are often difficult to<br /> detect, or are not worth the expense of an action<br /> in the High Court when detected ; and the remedy<br /> is to be available against those who •■ permit&quot; as<br /> well as those who &quot; cause &quot; the representation.<br /> AEEANGEMENT OF CLAUSES.<br /> Translations.<br /> Clause.<br /> 1. Translations and infringement of copy-<br /> right. Copyright in translations.<br /> Copyright in Periodical Works.<br /> 2. Copyright in articles in periodical works.<br /> 3. Registration of article by author.<br /> 4. Registration by owner of periodical work.<br /> 5. Articles in encyclopaedias.<br /> Copyright in Lectures.<br /> 6. Lectures.<br /> Abridgments.<br /> 7. Abridgments without consent prohibited.<br /> Copyright owner not to abridge without<br /> author&#039;s consent in certain cases. Notice<br /> on title page that abridgment is not by<br /> author.<br /> Dramatisation.<br /> 8. Dramatisation of novels prohibited.<br /> 9. Conversion or adaptation of dramatic<br /> works prohibited.<br /> Summary Remedy for Infringement of Dramatic<br /> Copyright.<br /> 10. Liability to fine of person representing<br /> drama without consent of owner of per-<br /> forming right.<br /> Repeal.<br /> 11. Repeal.<br /> 12. Application of Act.<br /> 13. Short title.<br /> 14. Commencement of Act.<br /> Schedules.<br /> A Bill (as amended by the Select • Committee)<br /> intituled an Act to amend the Law relating to<br /> Copyright in Periodical Works, Lectures,<br /> Abridgments, and otherwise. — [The Lord<br /> Monkswell.]<br /> Be it enacted by the Queen&#039;s most Excellent<br /> Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of<br /> the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons,<br /> in this present Parliament assembled, and by the<br /> authority of the same, as follows:—<br /> Translations.<br /> 1. —(1.) In the case of a book, it shall be an<br /> infringement of the copyright therein if any<br /> person shall, without the consent of the owner<br /> of the copyright, translate the book:<br /> (2.) The author of an authorised translation<br /> of a book shall be entitled to copyright therein<br /> in the same manner as if it was an original<br /> work.<br /> Copyright in Periodical Works.<br /> 2. Where any article, essay, poem, or other<br /> work is first published in and forms part of a<br /> review, magazine, or other periodical, the copy-<br /> right in such article, essay, poem, or other work<br /> shall, in the absence of any agreement in writing<br /> to the contrary, be the property of the author<br /> thereof. Provided that where the author is paid<br /> for the writing of such work as aforesaid by or<br /> on behalf of the owner of the review, magazine,<br /> or other periodical, then—<br /> (i.) the owner of the review, magazine, or<br /> periodical shall, during the subsistence of<br /> copyright in such article, essay, poem, or<br /> other work, have the sole right of publishing<br /> the same as part of the review, magazine,<br /> or periodical, but not otherwise;<br /> (ii.) neither the author nor his assigns shall,<br /> without the consent of the owner of the<br /> review, magazine, or periodical, print or<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 65 (#479) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 65<br /> publish such article, essay, poem, or other<br /> work in any form until after the expiration<br /> of three years from its first publication in<br /> the review, magazine, or periodical, and any<br /> printing or publication contrary to this pro-<br /> vision shall be an infringement of the rights<br /> of the owner of the review, magazine, or<br /> periodical.<br /> 3. The author of any such article, essay, poem,<br /> or other work as aforesaid, or his assigns, may<br /> either before or after the expiration of the said<br /> term of three years register the same at Stationers&#039;<br /> Hall as a separate work, and shall thereupon be<br /> entitled to restrain and obtain damages for any<br /> infringement of the copyright therein as a separate<br /> work.<br /> 4. —(i.) The owner of a review, magazine, or<br /> other periodical may register the same at<br /> Stationers&#039; Hall, and shall thereupon be entitled<br /> to restrain and obtain damages for any infringe-<br /> ment of his rights in the same or any part<br /> thereof.<br /> (ii.) Registration of a review, magazine, or<br /> other periodical shall be in the form set forth in<br /> the First Schedule hereto, or as near thereto as<br /> circumstances will permit.<br /> (iii.) It shall be necessary to register only the<br /> first number, volume, or part of a review, magazine,<br /> or other periodical published in numbers, volumes,<br /> or parts.<br /> 5. Where any article, essay, poem, or other<br /> work is first published in and forms part of an<br /> encyclopaedia or similar collective work, and the<br /> author is paid for the writing thereof by or on<br /> behalf of the owner of the encyclopaedia or similar<br /> collective work, the copyright in such article,<br /> essay, poem, or other work shall, in the absence of<br /> any agreement in writing to the contrary, belong<br /> to the owner of the encyclopaedia or similar collec-<br /> tive work.<br /> Copyright in Lectures.<br /> 6. The author of any lecture shall be entitled<br /> to copyright therein as if the same were a<br /> book, subject to the following modifications and<br /> additions:—<br /> (i.) The first delivery of a lecture shall be<br /> deemed to be the first publication thereof.<br /> (ii.) So long as a lecture has not been published<br /> as a book by or with the consent of the<br /> author, the copyright therein shall include<br /> the exclusive right of delivering the same in<br /> public, but when so published the copyright<br /> in the book shall date from the first delivery<br /> of the lecture.<br /> (iii.) It shall not be necessary to register the<br /> copyright in a lecture which has not been<br /> published as a book by or with the consent of<br /> the author.<br /> VOL. Till.<br /> (iv.) A report of a lecture delivered in public,<br /> in the ordinary current edition of a newspaper<br /> after the delivery of such lecture, shall not<br /> be deemed an infringement of the copy-<br /> right unless the author before delivering the<br /> same gives public notice that he prohibits<br /> the same being reported, but no such report<br /> shall be deemed to be a publication of the<br /> lecture within the meaning of sub-sect, (ii.)<br /> (v.) The notice referred to in the last preceding<br /> clause may be given either by affixing the<br /> same to the door of the place where the<br /> lecture is delivered, or by advertisement in<br /> one or more newspapers published and circu-<br /> lating in the district, or by a declaration<br /> made by the lecturer before the delivery of<br /> his lecture at the place where he delivers the<br /> same.<br /> (vi.) The term &quot;lecture&quot; shall include a piece<br /> for recitation, address, or sermon.<br /> (vii.) Provided that this enactment shall not<br /> extend to any lectures delivered in any uni-.<br /> versity or public school or college or on any<br /> public foundation, or by any individual in<br /> virtue of or according to any gift, endowment<br /> or foundation [5 &amp; 6 Will 4, c. 65, s. 5.]<br /> Abridgments.<br /> 7.—(i.) It shall be an infringement of the<br /> copyright in a book if any person shall, without<br /> the consent of the owner of the copyright, print or<br /> otherwise multiply, or cause to ba printed or<br /> otherwise multiplied, any abridgment of such<br /> book, or shall export or import any abridgment<br /> so unlawfully produced, or shall sell, publish, or<br /> expose for sale or hire, or cause to be sold, pub-<br /> lished, or exposed for sale or hire, any abridg-<br /> ment, knowing, or having reasonable grounds to<br /> suspect, that the same has been so unlawfully<br /> produced or imported.<br /> (ii.) Where the author of a book has sold the<br /> copyright thereof in consideration (whether wholly<br /> or in part) of a royalty or a share of the profits to<br /> be derived from the publication thereof, or is<br /> otherwise, notwithstanding such sale, possessed of<br /> a pecuniary interest therein, such book shall not,<br /> during the continuance of the copyright therein,<br /> and so long as the author shall be entitled to such<br /> royalty, share of profits, or shall be so interested<br /> as aforesaid, be abridged by the purchaser of such<br /> copyright without the consent in writing of tht<br /> author or his assigns.<br /> (iii.) Where the author has sold the exclusive<br /> right of publication of a book without assigning<br /> the copyright, he shall not be at liberty to publish<br /> an abridgment of the work without the consent<br /> of the owner of the exclusive right of publication.<br /> (iv.) If the owner of the copyright in a book<br /> o 2<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 66 (#480) #############################################<br /> <br /> 66<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> to the abridgment whereof the author&#039;s consent<br /> is not required under the preceding proviso<br /> intends to publish an abridgment thereof made<br /> by some person other than the author of the<br /> original book, he shall give notice of such inten-<br /> tion to the author, if living, by registered letter,<br /> directed to his last known address, and shall, if so<br /> required by such author, either state or cause to<br /> be stated on the title page of each part or volume<br /> of the abridgment that the abridgment is not by<br /> the author of the original book, or shall in like<br /> manner state or cause to be stated the name of the<br /> maker of the abridgment.<br /> (v.) The author of a book shall be entitled to<br /> restrain and obtain damages for any abridgment<br /> published in contravention of the above provisions<br /> of the section.<br /> Dramatisation.<br /> 8. In the case of a book which is a work of<br /> fiction in prose or in verse, it shall be an infringe-<br /> ment of the copyright therein if any person shall<br /> without the consent of the owner of the copyright,<br /> take or colourably imitate the title of such book,<br /> or take from such book any material or substan-<br /> tial part thereof, and use or convert it into or<br /> adapt it for a dramatic work, or knowing or<br /> having reasonable grounds to suspect such<br /> dramatic work to have been so made shall<br /> perform or permit or cause the same to be<br /> performed.<br /> 9. In the case of a dramatic work it shall be an<br /> infringement of the copyright therein if any<br /> person shall, without the consent of the owner of<br /> the copyright, take or colourably imitate the title<br /> of such book, or take from such book any material<br /> or substantial part thereof and convert or adapt<br /> such part into any other form of work, whether<br /> dramatic or otherwise, or knowing or having<br /> reasonable grounds to suspect any work to have<br /> been so made shall print or otherwise multiply, or<br /> cause to be printed or otherwise multiplied, copies<br /> thereof for sale or exportation, or shall export or<br /> import, or sell, publish, or expose for sale or hire,<br /> or cause to be sold, published, or exposed for sale<br /> or hire, any copies thereof, or shall perform such<br /> work, or permit or cause the same to be per-<br /> formed.<br /> Summary Remedy for Infringement of Dramatic<br /> Copyright.<br /> 10. If any person shall represent or cause or<br /> permit any dramatic work to be represented<br /> without the consent in writing of the owner of<br /> the performing right in such work, it shall be<br /> lawful for the owner of the performing right<br /> (without prejudice to any action for damages or<br /> other remedy he may be entitled to) to apply<br /> within two months after the commission of the<br /> offence to a court of summary jurisdiction having<br /> jurisdiction in the place where the representation<br /> has taken place, or where the offender dwells, and<br /> such court shall, on production of the certificate<br /> of registration, order the offender to pay as a civil<br /> debt a sum not exceeding fifty pounds and costs,<br /> and such sum shall go to the owner of the per-<br /> forming right by way of compensation. Provided<br /> that not more than one penalty shall be recovered<br /> in respect of each representation.<br /> Repeal.<br /> 11. The Acts or parts of Acts specified in the<br /> Second Schedule hereto are hereby repealed as<br /> from the passing of this Act, but except as<br /> hereinbefore expressly provided, such repeal<br /> shall not prejudice or affect any rights acquired<br /> previously to such repeal, and such rights may be<br /> enforced and enjoyed as if such repeal had not<br /> been made.<br /> Extent of Act.<br /> 12. —(i.) This Act shall extend only to the<br /> British Islands, but if Her Majesty the Queen<br /> is satisfied that the Legislature of any<br /> British possession has by resolution declared<br /> its assent to this Act or any part thereof<br /> being extended to such possession, Her Majesty<br /> may direct by Order in Council that this Act<br /> or such part thereof shall apply to such<br /> possession, and this Act or such part shall apply<br /> accordingly.<br /> (ii.) Any such Order in Council may, with such<br /> assent as aforesaid, from time to time, be revoked<br /> or altered by any further Order in Council.<br /> (iii.) Every such Order in Council shall, as<br /> soon as may be after the making thereof, be<br /> published in the London Gazette.<br /> (iv.) A copy of every such Order in Council<br /> shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament<br /> within six weeks after the issuing thereof if<br /> Parliament is then sitting, and if not, then<br /> within six weeks after the commencement of the<br /> next session of Parliament.<br /> (v.) No such Order in Council shall affect<br /> prejudicially any right acquired at the date of<br /> its coming into operation.<br /> 13. This Act may be cited as the Copyright<br /> (Amendment) Act, 1897, and shall, except so<br /> far as is inconsistent with this Act, be read and<br /> construed with the Copyright Acts.<br /> 14. This Act shall come into operation on the<br /> first day of January, one thousand eight hundred<br /> and ninety-eight.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 67 (#481) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 67<br /> SCHEDULES.<br /> First Schedule.<br /> Form of Entry of a Periodical Work.<br /> Date of Publica-<br /> tion of first<br /> Volume, Part, or<br /> Number.<br /> Name and<br /> Address<br /> of Owner.<br /> Name and<br /> Address<br /> of Publisher.<br /> Title of Work.<br /> Second Schedule.<br /> Ads Repealed.<br /> Session and Chapter.<br /> Short Title.<br /> Extent of Repeal.<br /> 5 &amp; 6 Will. 4 0. 65.<br /> 5 4 6 Vict. c. 45.<br /> Lectures Copyright The whole Act.<br /> Act, 1835.<br /> Copyright Act, 1842 Sections eighteeen<br /> and nineteen.<br /> CIVIL LIST PENSIONS.<br /> APAELIAMENTARY return which has just<br /> been issued gives the following list of all<br /> pensions granted during the year ended<br /> June 20, 1897, and charged upon the Civil<br /> List:—<br /> Mary Anne, Lady Broome, &lt;£ioo, in considera-<br /> tion of the public services of ber late husband, Sir<br /> F. N. Broome, K.C.M.G., especially as Governor<br /> of Western Australia, and of her own literary<br /> merits.<br /> Mr. William Alexander Hunter, £200, in con-<br /> sideration of his labours in connection with<br /> Roman law and scientific jurisprudence.<br /> Dr. John Thomas Arlidge, .£150, in considera-<br /> tion of his valuable labours in the cause of<br /> public health, and especially his investigation into<br /> the hygienic results of particular industries and<br /> occupations.<br /> Miss Beatrice Hatch, .£30, Miss Ethel Hatch,<br /> JB30, Miss Evelyn Hatch, ,£30, in consideration<br /> of the services of their father, the late Rev. Edwin<br /> Hatch, in connection with ecclesiastical history.<br /> Amelia, Lady Thurston, £150, in recognition of<br /> the distinguished services of her husband, the<br /> late Sir John Bates Thurston, as Governor of<br /> Fiji and High Commissioner for the Western<br /> Pacific.<br /> Mrs. Elizabeth Dickens, £100, in consideration<br /> of the literary eminence of the late Mr. Charles<br /> Dickens, and of the straitened circumstances in<br /> which she has been left by the death of her<br /> husband, Mr. Charles Dickens, jun.<br /> Mrs. Rose Trollope, £100, in consideration of<br /> the distinguished literary merits of her husband,<br /> the late Mr. Anthony Trollope, and of her<br /> straitened circumstances.<br /> Miss May Martha Mason, £30.<br /> Mrs. Mary Caroline Florence Wood, £30, in<br /> recognition of the originality and merit of the<br /> work of their father, the late Mr. George Mason,<br /> in painting.<br /> Mr. Augustus Henry Keane, F.R.G.S., £50, in<br /> consideration of his labours in the field of<br /> ethnology.<br /> Dr. Francis Steingass, £50, in consideration<br /> of his services to Oriental scholarship in England.<br /> Mrs. Maria Garrett, £50, in recognition of the<br /> merits of her husband, the late Dr. George<br /> Garrett, as a composer of church music.<br /> Mrs. Jane Wallace, £50, in recognition of the<br /> philosophical labours of her husband, the late<br /> Whyte&#039;s professor of moral philosophy in the<br /> University of Oxford.<br /> Mr. Archibald Hamilton Bryce, D.C.L., £50, in<br /> recognition of his services in the cause of secon-<br /> dary education in Scotland.<br /> The total is £ 1200.<br /> NOTES AND NEWS.<br /> TINHERE is an article in the current number<br /> I of the Quarterly Review entitled &quot;Ou<br /> Commencing Author,&quot; which purports to<br /> be based on this journal and its contents for the<br /> last seven years. The paper is in many respects,<br /> as I shall show immediately, quite satisfactory<br /> and even sympathetic. The writer begins with<br /> recognising the right of the author to a full<br /> understanding at least of what is meant by the<br /> estate which his publisher administers: therefore,<br /> of course, his further right to understand what<br /> the publisher makes by his administration. As<br /> to the sympathetic side, we will return to that<br /> immediately. Let us first take the points to<br /> which I must take exception.<br /> It has been our contention in this paper, over<br /> and over again, that the literary and the com-<br /> mercial side of literature are totally distinct.<br /> The poet at work, if he allows any other con-<br /> sideration to enter his brain — any touch of<br /> commercialism—must infallibly mar that work.<br /> In every art, the artist must be absorbed while<br /> he is at work. The work done, he may be as<br /> commercial as he pleases. That is the just<br /> and obvious deduction. But this writer cannot<br /> understand such a distinction. His view is that<br /> an artist, when his work is finished, must not,<br /> without detriment to that work, pay any atten-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 68 (#482) #############################################<br /> <br /> 68<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> tion to its commercial value. He says, &quot;To<br /> such men&quot;—i.e., men who, when their work is<br /> finished, do consider its literary value—&quot; there<br /> comes a literary half and a commercial half.&quot;<br /> Just so. Why not ?&quot; Where the commercial half<br /> arrives at being real, there is some danger that it<br /> will drive out the literary half.&quot; No : because the<br /> two have nothing to do with each other. If the<br /> writer means that there is danger that the artist<br /> may have his brain filled with commercialism<br /> while he is at work, one can only reply that he<br /> must be a very mean and miserable artist. Apply<br /> the same kind of conventional talk to painting.<br /> All great painters receive large sums of money for<br /> their work. No one in his senses has ever re-<br /> proached them with doing so: no one has ever<br /> asserted that they have ruined their art as their<br /> price went up. In the name of common sense,<br /> then, why cannot literary men be treated as on<br /> the same footing as painters?<br /> There is, again, another distinction between<br /> the literary and the commercial side of literature<br /> which must not be forgotten. It by no means<br /> follows that a writer of the highest kind will<br /> become popular, while a person of tenth-rate<br /> merit may command the shillings of millions.<br /> This consideration alone should show the futility<br /> of the common talk about commercialism. My<br /> position is this: If an author chooses to give his<br /> property to a publisher, let him. If he chooses to<br /> keep his property for himself, or to administrate<br /> it for himself, or to let its administration out at a<br /> rent or royalty, or to sell it, there is no danger<br /> whatever that the same care of his commercial<br /> interests will damage that completed tcork<br /> any more than the same care icill damage a<br /> painting. There is, perhaps, the danger that he<br /> may scamp the next poem, and that commercialism<br /> may &quot;infect it.&quot; Surely, however, something<br /> must be allowed to the artistic sense which<br /> governs and controls artistic production.<br /> Again, the writer says: &quot;In some of our lesser<br /> men, it is conceivable that a journeyman&#039;s credit-<br /> able faculty of going straight on, and of produc-<br /> ing yet another book, and yet another book, will<br /> survive.&quot; Here we seem to discern the bogey of<br /> &quot;inspiration.&quot; The writer plainly understands, I<br /> have no doubt, that the painter must go on paint-<br /> ing because he is a painter; yet he cannot see that<br /> the poet, the story-teller, the dramatist—where<br /> are we to stop ?—the critic, the essayist—everyone<br /> who writes because he is to the manner born,<br /> must go on—must go on writing till he dies.<br /> Lo boa Diea me dit, &quot; Chante,<br /> Chante, paavre petit.&quot;<br /> The writer quote3 these lines—full of tears as<br /> well as of consolation—yet cannot understand that<br /> they contradict flatly what he has just advanced<br /> about the dangers of &quot; going on.&quot;<br /> He finds fault with The Author for hoping-<br /> that copyright may be so enlarged as to enable a<br /> successful and popular writer to found a family.<br /> Says that it is an ignoble wish. Why does he<br /> think so? Because he confuses the literary<br /> and the artistic value of a book. He says, he who<br /> could act &quot; on a pill-vendor&#039;s conditions, namely,<br /> that he keep his private property for ever, must<br /> receive only as a pill-vendor.&#039;&#039; This is nonsense.<br /> One might as well say that the Marquis of<br /> Salisbury if he receives his rents and keeps-<br /> his property does so as a pill vendor. But<br /> this kind of rubbish will continue to be talked<br /> so long as literary value and literary property are<br /> mixed.<br /> The Reviewer speaks of a certain writer who<br /> would abolish criticism. I wonder who that<br /> writer is. The position taken up by The Author<br /> has always been (i) that criticism should be a<br /> distinction—that is to say, that a paper should,<br /> as some papers do, select books for careful criti-<br /> cism by competent persons; (2) that the system of<br /> &quot;reviewing&quot; books in a batch is injurious to<br /> literature because it does not give importance to<br /> important books, because &quot; notice &quot; is not criticism,<br /> and because it is impossible for the writer, with the<br /> best intentions, to read the books he notices, and<br /> that the system is injurious to the paper because it<br /> ruins the literary character of that paper; (3)<br /> that to notice harmless weak productions is useless,<br /> because such a notice does not educate the writer<br /> nor does it help the pubbc, which, whatever its<br /> faults, does not buy or read we.ak books; (4)<br /> that the space in the paper taken up by little<br /> notices written without reading the books would<br /> be much better bestowed upon an important<br /> notice; (5) that the present depressed condition<br /> of criticism is due mainly to the system of the little<br /> notices, which simply will not allow their writers<br /> to read the books; and, lastly, that the public<br /> never read, and pay no heed, to these little notices.<br /> This is the position taken up in these columns on<br /> the subject of reviewing. It will be seen that this<br /> is very, very far from wishing to abolish criticism.<br /> The Reviewer is also very angry with some<br /> uuknown persons who, it seems, object to literary<br /> men advising publishers. Who, again, are these<br /> people? The position of adviser to publishers is<br /> one of the greatest responsibility and importance.<br /> Most men of letters have at various times done<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 69 (#483) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 69<br /> such work: some, occasionally: some by engage-<br /> ment and on salary. It seems to me quite<br /> unnecessary to defend the work, and I do not<br /> know who has attacked it. Personally, I have<br /> myself done such work, and I see no reason at all<br /> to be ashamed of it.<br /> Nor do I think it necessary in these columns to<br /> do more than enter a protest against the implied<br /> accusation that The Author, the only publication<br /> standing at the head of the article, finds any fault<br /> with any literary man or woman who advises for<br /> pay a publishing house.<br /> He says that in demanding inspection of docu-<br /> ments I myself have done a &quot; grea,t service&quot; and<br /> have been right, &quot;however injudiciously&quot; I may<br /> be held to have done it. My methods—or rather the<br /> methods of the Committee—have always been<br /> perfectly simple. There has been throughout a<br /> steady determination to get at the facts and the<br /> figures and to publish them; to pour a flood of<br /> light on facts strenuously concealed. There has<br /> been no other method, and that method will be<br /> continued. _<br /> In many points: on the necessity for main-<br /> taining the responsibility and the honour of<br /> authorship: on the differences which mark men<br /> of genius: on the writer as teacher: and so forth,<br /> one has nothing but gratitude to this Reviewer,<br /> because it is good that such things should be said.<br /> But the whole paper is tainted and spoiled by<br /> this inability to distinguish literary value from<br /> commercial value: so that the writer, while he is<br /> fain to acknowledge the genius of Scott and<br /> Dickens, must needs try to explain away or to lament<br /> the fact that they were good at business. Nearly<br /> all popular writers have thought very much of the<br /> separate commercial side: Scott: Dickens: Trol-<br /> lope: George Eliot: Macaulay: Byron: every-<br /> body.<br /> At the same time one must certainly not obtrude<br /> the subject. As our writer says: &quot;If the public<br /> once hears too much about profits—it has not<br /> bothered itself yet about the matter—but if it<br /> should?&quot; In The Author the question of profits<br /> is a question of principle: there is no mention<br /> of any single writer&#039;s returns: or of what he<br /> obtained from any book: and there never will be<br /> any. It is the trade organ of literary men and<br /> women generally: its object is to give such facts<br /> and figures as illustrate principles. But the<br /> writer is quite wrong about the matter. The public<br /> has heard about these profits: it hears often : not<br /> from us, but from other papers, what this and<br /> that writer is receiving.<br /> Again, the Beviewer protests against the use of<br /> the phrase &quot; thousand words,&quot; &quot; so many thousand<br /> words:&quot; &quot;so much for so many thousand words.&quot;<br /> Now this is not the phrase of the author, but of<br /> the editor. He wants an article of a certain<br /> length, and no longer: it is to fill a definite space<br /> in his magazine: he may say, if he likes, so<br /> many pages: or he may say so many thousand<br /> words. What on earth does it matter? Or the<br /> author, in that commercial spirit which the<br /> reviewer confuses with the artistic spirit, may<br /> say, &quot;Here is my work. It occupies so many<br /> pages,&quot; or &quot;Here is my work. It occupies so<br /> many thousand words.&quot; Will anybody in his<br /> senses contend that there is any difference? It<br /> is a fctfon de parler. I am myself, for instance,<br /> under agreement to hand in, by a certain time,<br /> a certain story to a certain editor. My editor tells<br /> me, &quot; I want a story of 8o,coo words.&quot; He means<br /> that it is to occupy a certain number of months<br /> in his serial. Whether it is 70,000 words, or<br /> 80,000 words, or 90,000 words he will not mind,<br /> nor will he count. But he means that I am not<br /> to take lip the old space, and that he will not fill<br /> up his pages with the old-fashioned three-volume<br /> novel. He must assign a limit: he must say how<br /> much space he can give. Whether he says words<br /> or pages, I repea&quot;, what does it matter?<br /> In a word, this Reviewer means well: he sees<br /> that we are absolutely in the right, and he says so:<br /> but because he confuses literary and commercial<br /> value he has got hopelessly muddled ; while in such<br /> little matters, as one or two which I have quoted,<br /> he is wrong simply because he does not know the<br /> practice.<br /> There are one or two remarks which I should<br /> like to quote:<br /> There is this special feature in the writing business, that<br /> it is entirely volunteered.<br /> Some few years ago writers awoke to the belief that they<br /> had not received a fair share in the net profit of their<br /> wares. More particularly they desired to make a declara-<br /> tion of their right to know the amount of expense incurred<br /> in the publication of their volumes. In this they have<br /> nothing bnt our sympathies, and part of their work is yet<br /> to do.<br /> What are the more prevalent motives which set genuine<br /> men of letters to work? We fear that the first motive we<br /> assign will appear to many most honourable men of the day<br /> l; perilously near to cant.&quot; Yet, upon omviction, we<br /> cannot but put it in the forefront of the battle. We speak<br /> of a mission, a vocation, a priestly office; a priestly office<br /> assuredly in a wider natural church. And this office no<br /> man lightly takes upon himself. The real men are never<br /> likely to take it upon themselves lightly, for they slide<br /> into it involuntarily and unconsciously. And they slide<br /> into it too with a good deal of that suffering, whioh, in the<br /> genuine man of letters, seems inevitable.<br /> Business men who have selected as their path to fortune<br /> the financial side of books, are, from one commercial point<br /> of view at least, exceptionally lucky. They are hardehells<br /> who have to deal with softshelU. It is not to be wondered<br /> at that the softshells have not been conspicuous for getting<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 70 (#484) #############################################<br /> <br /> 7°<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> the best of it. Many a publisher might say perhaps, as<br /> Robert Clive said in the gold vaults of the Indian city, &quot; By<br /> heaven ! I am surprised at my own moderation!&quot;<br /> A man oan only be an author in so far as he is a man who<br /> has perceived, or known, or done real things, and possesses<br /> the gift and feels the duty of speaking about them.<br /> A woman and an author must be either something above<br /> the average robust male or something below him.<br /> The following information is here published as<br /> a warning to typewriters:<br /> &quot;Some time ago a friend lent me a small but<br /> interesting pamphlet, and as it is out of print I<br /> was allowed to have a typewritten copy made<br /> of it. The friend recommended as type-<br /> writer a young lady, orphan daughter of a clergy-<br /> man, recently deceased, who courageously sup-<br /> ported herself by typewriting, She copied the<br /> pamphlet for me very nicely, and when I paid<br /> her bill she said she wished to get regular work<br /> from authors, so I advised her to advertise in<br /> The Author, which she has done every month since<br /> January, 1897. She now writes to say that some<br /> one, whose name she does not mention, has<br /> written to ask her terms, but says his MS. is so<br /> precious that she must pay him a guinea as<br /> caution money before he sends her the MS. She<br /> naturally declines to have anything to do with a<br /> person of this sort.&quot;<br /> I would only add to the above that the object of<br /> the demand is made obvious by the fact that when<br /> a manuscript, which is very rare, is precious, it is<br /> probably worth many hundred guineas. Asking<br /> a guinea as caution money for a manuscript which<br /> the writer declares to be &quot;precious,&quot; is too thin<br /> to deceive anybody. I shall be much obliged if<br /> papers generally will be so good as to copy this<br /> warning in the interests of typewriters, who have<br /> not, probably, too much experience of the world.<br /> The Civil List, which is published in another<br /> column, is the very best list that has ever ap-<br /> peared since its commencement. There are sixteen<br /> recipients of pensions. Among them, eleven are<br /> widows and daughters. One observes that these<br /> pensions are granted more and more to widows<br /> and daughters instead of the workers themselves.<br /> The change will be accepted by everybody with<br /> satisfaction. One observes, also, that it is not yet<br /> possible to obtain a list completely in accord with<br /> the famous resolution of 1837. That resolution<br /> undoubtedly gave power to place in this list<br /> persons who had claims upon the Sovereign. Thus,<br /> the Queen&#039;s tutors and teachers were placed upon<br /> the list by authority of that clause. Yet the list<br /> was then, and has always been, intended for persons<br /> distinguished or connected with literature, science,<br /> and art. There are two ladies in this list who<br /> are widows of Colonial Governors. One of these,<br /> Lady Broome, better known as Lady Jackson, is<br /> herself a writer of some distinction; the other,<br /> Lady Thurston, is simply the widow of a Colonial<br /> Governor. As such, her pension has no place on<br /> this list. The power of foisting all kinds of<br /> people into this meagre provision for literature,<br /> science, and art could be removed by passing<br /> another resolution omitting the clause referred to.<br /> I observed in a certain paper a question meant<br /> to be &quot; smart.&quot; &quot;Is it,&quot; the writer asked, &quot; the<br /> wickedness of the publisher which causes the<br /> names of Dickens and Trollope to appear in this<br /> list?&quot; It is not in these pages that private affairs<br /> will be discussed. The late Charles Dickens, jun.,<br /> however, was not a writer, except of one or two guide<br /> books. He was a printer. Perhaps publishers<br /> showed their &quot;wickedness&quot; by not paying his<br /> accounts. As for the name of Trollope, it was<br /> stated at the time of Anthony Trollope&#039;s death<br /> that he was possessed of a large sum saved from<br /> the proceeds of his novels. Publishers have<br /> hardly been so &quot;wicked &quot; as to take that money<br /> from his family. But what silly nonsense it is to<br /> ask such a question!<br /> I have received from a correspondent a collec-<br /> tion of extracts from letters received from various<br /> publishers, which inform him that they cannot<br /> undertake the responsibility of publishing his<br /> manuscript.<br /> The letters are very curious and instructive.<br /> Various reasons were assigned, all of which were<br /> different, but all contained one cardinal fact in<br /> which they were agreed: that the work was too<br /> long.<br /> One firm frankly admitted that what they<br /> wanted was a manuscript of about 60,000<br /> words.<br /> What may be gathered from all these letters<br /> is, in fact, that some publishers are becoming<br /> increasingly anxious to bring out books at 6*.<br /> which contain the minimum leugth for which the<br /> long suffering public will pay 4s. 6d. In these<br /> columns mention has already been made of a<br /> little book, containing about 24,000 words, and<br /> taking very little more than an hour to read, and<br /> costing 4.S&#039;. 6d. cash.<br /> To what lengths is this practice going to be<br /> carried?<br /> A certain result will be that before long the<br /> advertised price of 6*. and the real price of<br /> 4«. 6d. will fall into contempt, and the public<br /> will refuse to pay more than a shilling for a little<br /> book which can be read in one hour.<br /> It is true there may be cases in which the<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 71 (#485) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> author&#039;s name is great enough to carry off a high<br /> price for a short story, but these cases must<br /> always be very rare.<br /> It seems that it should always be the duty of<br /> novelists to provide the public with work which,<br /> in length, at least, will give them some fair return<br /> for the cost of the book.<br /> Let us turn to lighter themes. The following<br /> appeared in the Times, July 24, in the form of a<br /> letter from Mr. Walter Wren. He kindly<br /> gives me permission to reproduce it here. Mr.<br /> Wren is well known as a profound student of<br /> Dickens. The origin of Do-the-boys Hall seems<br /> settled by this discovery beyond the reach of<br /> reasonable doubt. One pities the unfortunate<br /> Mr. Simpson, of Easby, near Richmond, York-<br /> shire:<br /> &quot;In your article of June 12, on the coronation<br /> number of the Times, telling your readers that<br /> they would be presented gratis with a reproduc-<br /> tion in facsimile of the Times of Friday, June 29,<br /> 1838, you call attention to these two advertise-<br /> ments as containing a hint of some of the abuses<br /> which Dickens (whose &#039;Oliver Twist&#039; is here an-<br /> nounced as appearing in Bentley&#039;s Miscellany)<br /> was already setting himself to scourge. &#039;These<br /> are of schools—one in Yorkshire—at which<br /> youths are boarded and instructed according to<br /> age, including clothes, books, and other neces-<br /> saries. No extras and no vacations.&#039;<br /> &quot;I respectfully submit that you might have put<br /> this more strongly, and that these must be the<br /> originals from which Dickens made up Mr.<br /> Squeers&#039;s card. &#039;Nicholas Nickleby&#039; was published<br /> in 1839. It seems to me clear that Mr. Squeers&#039;s<br /> card was based on them. It will be found on<br /> page 20 of the original edition. Please print all<br /> three.<br /> &#039;&quot; Education.—At Winton Hall, near Kirby<br /> Stephen, in Westmoreland, young gentlemen are<br /> boarded, clothed, provided with books, and edu-<br /> cated, by Mr. Twycross, in whatever their future<br /> prospects may require, at £20 per annum. There<br /> are no extras nor vacations. Prospectuses and<br /> references may be had at Peele&#039;s Coffee-house,<br /> Fleet-street, where Mr. T. attends daily, between<br /> 12 and 2 o&#039;clock.&#039;<br /> &quot;&#039; Education.—At Mr. Simpson&#039;s Academy,<br /> Easby, near Richmond, Yorkshire, youth are<br /> boarded, and instructed by Mr. S. and proper<br /> assistants in whatever their future prospects may<br /> require, at twenty and twenty-three guineas a<br /> year, according to age, including clothes, books,<br /> and other necessaries. No extras and no vaca-<br /> tions. Cards with references to be had from Mr.<br /> S., who attends from 12 to 2 o&#039;clock daily at<br /> VOL VIII.<br /> the Saracen&#039;s Head, Snow-hill. Conveyance by<br /> steam vessel weekly.&#039;<br /> &#039;&quot; Education.—At Mr. Wackford Squeers&#039;s<br /> Academy, Dotheboys-hall, at the delightful village<br /> of Dotheboys, near Greta-bridge, in Yorkshire,<br /> youth are boarded, clothed, booked, furnished<br /> with pocket money, provided with all necessaries,<br /> instructed in all languages living and dead,<br /> mathematics, orthography, geometry, astronomy,<br /> trigonometry, the use of the globes, algebra,<br /> single stick (if required), writing, arithmetic,<br /> fortification, and every branch of classical litera-<br /> ture. Terms twenty guineas per annum. No<br /> extras, no vacations, and diet unparalleled. Mr.<br /> Squeers is in town, and attends daily, from one<br /> to four, at the Saracen&#039;s Head, Snow-hill.&#039;<br /> &quot;Dickons added to the advertisements in your<br /> issue of 1838. But the leading principles are in<br /> all three—viz., ,£20 a year for clothes, books, and<br /> education; no extras, no vacations; and both Mr.<br /> Simpson and Mr. Squeers, the two Yorkshire<br /> schoolmasters, &#039;attended daily at the Saracen&#039;s<br /> Head.&#039;&quot;<br /> Mr. Howard Collins projxises to take up and<br /> continue the subject of the subjunctive mood in<br /> the October number of The Author if possible.<br /> He is consulting.as many men of letters as he can<br /> reach as to their opinion of his j&gt;osition.<br /> Walter Besant.<br /> THE PROPOSED NET SYSTEM.<br /> ACOMMITTEE has been appointed by the<br /> Society for the investigation of the whole<br /> subject. It would be injudicious therefore<br /> to express any opinion until that committee has<br /> given in its report. There has already appeared<br /> a sheaf of papers and articles dealing with the<br /> proposal. It is well known that among the book-<br /> sellers—the persons most concerned—there is con-<br /> siderable difference of opinion. Perhaps it would<br /> be well, before their views are ascertained, and<br /> before the committee completes its labours, that<br /> there should be a general silence. On the produc-<br /> tion of the report, no doubt, the floods will be<br /> let loose. The bare facts of the case seem fairly<br /> stated in a brief article which appeared in the<br /> Pall Mall Gazette of July 13. There is one word,<br /> however, which should be altered. It is there said<br /> that the publishers &quot;intend to boycott discount<br /> booksellers.&quot; They do not intend: they propose<br /> —a very different thing.<br /> One Book, One Price.<br /> Shall we buy a book at gd. or is.? The outside<br /> public say, unhesitatingly, gd.; the booksellers<br /> H<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 72 (#486) #############################################<br /> <br /> 72<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> say, unhesitatingly, i«. Both natural enough,<br /> when you come to look at it. The advantages of<br /> selling at is. and buying at gd. are so obvious<br /> that there is no need to go further into them.<br /> But the most casual observer who remarks the<br /> prices on the bookstalls and compares them with<br /> the rumours that reach us from the traHe cannot<br /> help seeing that a Battle of the Books is only a<br /> question of time. Here and there we find six-<br /> penny magazines sold at 4.|«?., and books pub-<br /> lished at 6*. going at 4*. 6d.<br /> The thing seems simple enough. Can a retail<br /> bookseller sell at what price he likes r He gets<br /> his books at a discount of 25 per cent., or some-<br /> thing more than that; has he a free hand after<br /> that? With the vague idea we all have of the<br /> principles of law, we declare offhand that any-<br /> thing else would be interfering with the liberty<br /> of the subject. The question is nothing new. It<br /> has been gone into years ago. The only novelty<br /> now is that the booksellers have got an associa-<br /> tion, and have the powers of a trade union.<br /> They are the only people who object to the<br /> discount. The publishers do not. The authors<br /> do not. If an author is getting a royalty on the<br /> published price it is nothing to him how the book<br /> is sold. In any case the lower rate is probably to<br /> his advantage, for it increases the sale of his work.<br /> The same thing would apply to the publisher. In<br /> fact, the opinions of all the great writers of the<br /> day were taken on the subject, and were published<br /> in Sir W. Besant&#039;s paper, The Author. Speaking<br /> from memory, we recollect they were practically<br /> unanimous and decided in saying the retail<br /> price was the bookseller&#039;s affair. The price at<br /> which the wholesale bookseller buys from the<br /> publisher is quite another matter. It is allowed<br /> that to break this is to ruin the book for regular<br /> trade.<br /> Against all this the fact remains that most of<br /> the big publishers intend to boycott the discount<br /> booksellers. Taking it logically, the publishers<br /> are really the employes, and are going on strike.<br /> To the average onlooker it would seem to lje just<br /> a case in which a strike would not succeed. The<br /> discount man can get his books indirectly if he<br /> likes; and he can appeal to the public to support<br /> him. The reduction of yl. in the shilling is an<br /> argument which touches the British public in its<br /> tenderest point. It is the argument which he<br /> has always made till now whenever the difficulty<br /> has come up; and in these days of libraries the<br /> British public wants every possible encourage-<br /> ment in buying books.<br /> However, publishers are not ignorant of the<br /> world, nor are they, by any means, incapable<br /> men of business. Obviously, the new Book-<br /> sellers&#039; Association have found their power, and<br /> can put pressure on the publisher which he is-<br /> unable to resist. But the fight has hardly yet<br /> begun.<br /> The publication of a book appears a simple<br /> thing at first sight. When you come to look<br /> into it, or, worse still, have anything to do with<br /> it, it is a problem which runs close South African<br /> politics or the Irish question itself.—Pall Mall<br /> Gazette, July 13.<br /> A WARNING- TO AUTHORS-AND OTHERS.<br /> ITHINK the following story may interest<br /> some readers of The Author, if only as a<br /> curious instance of human effrontery. It<br /> may, however, act as a warning against a certain<br /> class of &quot;literary agents.&quot;<br /> About a year ago Madame X., a French lady,<br /> wished to have some short articles and stories,<br /> which she had written in English, corrected for<br /> the press, and inserted an advertisement in a local<br /> London paper. It brought several replies, and<br /> among them one from a gentleman whom I will<br /> call Mr. A. He stated that he was &quot;late editor<br /> of the Readers&#039; Gazette&quot; (I give a fictitious<br /> title), and named several persons as his referees;<br /> among them, a well-known publishing firm, &quot;for<br /> literary publications &quot;; and for &quot; scholastic pub-<br /> lications &quot; a certain &quot;Jones, Manchester.&quot; in a<br /> foot-note he also named a gentleman, very well<br /> known in the scholastic world, as able to speak<br /> to his literary qualifications. I will call him<br /> &quot;Mr. N.&quot; Mine. X. was delighted. She<br /> fancied that fortune had directed her to a literary<br /> man, and she hastened to communicate with A.<br /> He called upon her, and in conversation told<br /> her he held an official post in the Civil Service.<br /> It was agreed that he should undertake the<br /> corrections, the only thing contemplated up to<br /> now. But, in the course of the interview, he<br /> intimated that he was prepared to undertake the<br /> duties of literary agent, and to place the MSS.<br /> as well as to correct them.<br /> Mine. X. said that she could not afford&#039; to<br /> pay for this, but Mr. A. replied that she had told<br /> him she was acquainted with many French<br /> journalists. Now, it was the wish &quot;of his heart<br /> to become a correspondent of the Continental<br /> Press, and if she would give him an introduction<br /> he would consider himself paid. On this Mme.<br /> X. confided to him a number of MSS., and gave<br /> him an introduction to the editor of one of the<br /> most widely known of continental journals.<br /> Months passed, during which Mr. A. wrote<br /> from time to time, speaking vaguely of his efforts<br /> on Mine. X.&#039;s behalf—they had been uusuccess-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 73 (#487) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 73<br /> ful, but he expressed himself as by no means<br /> discouraged. During this time he corrected the<br /> longest of the articles—it was a short story. I<br /> saw the copy he had made—the MS. was entirely<br /> in his handwriting, and so far his assertion that<br /> he had &quot;re-written&quot; it was true. But his<br /> corrections were a farce. As I myself had to<br /> &quot;re-write&quot; it, I speak from knowledge, and a<br /> gentleman, who is himself a writer, said of it that<br /> it was not worth having, even if done for nothing,<br /> that no one with the least literary ear could<br /> possibly have passed the foreign turns of expres-<br /> sion. Even obvious omissions of parts of sen-<br /> tences were not supplied, and the general<br /> incompetence displayed in this specimen of A.&#039;s<br /> powers confirmed our suspicions that he was not<br /> what he had represented himself to be. We<br /> were not at all surprised to find that the foreign<br /> editor had been puzzled by his letter, had evi-<br /> dently conceived an unfavourable opinion of A.,<br /> and declined to have anything to do with him. I<br /> should say that A. asked and received 5*. for<br /> correcting this short story.<br /> On my return to England after an absence,<br /> Mme. X. had confided her doubts to me. I<br /> advised her to get her MSS. back as soon as<br /> possible—especially as she had a chance of dispos-<br /> ing of them herself. She wrote explaining this.<br /> A. replied in a manner which struck us as evasive,<br /> but at last, after many weeks and many letters<br /> from Mme. X., he returned all but one. .In the<br /> accompanying letter, lie said that he had sent all,<br /> and also said that he had &quot;re-written&quot; two<br /> others of the MSS.; but the parcel, on being<br /> opened, did not contain these copies, nor were<br /> the returned MSS. &quot;corrected.&quot; Mme. X. felt<br /> that she had simply wasted six months—A. had<br /> done absolutely nothing—his corrections were<br /> worthless in the instance in which he made them,<br /> and, in the majority of instances, he had done no<br /> work at all. Of course he could not be held<br /> responsible for failing to dispose of the MSS.,<br /> supposing lie ever tried, which the sequel makes<br /> us gravely doubt. Mme. X. wrote in vain, asking<br /> for the missing MS. and the two &quot;copies.&quot; A.<br /> replied that he had sent the MS., and he ignored<br /> the question of the copies. And in a few days he<br /> sent in a bill for ,£3 3*. for &quot;professional ser-<br /> vices.&quot; Mme. X. was in despair, she was utterly<br /> unable to pay £3 38., and A. had known this<br /> from the first. She wrote reminding him that<br /> he had himself offered those services in return for<br /> an introduction which she had given; and added<br /> that she was ready to pay on the same scale as<br /> before for the &quot;corrections&quot; of the MSS. which<br /> he had said he had&quot; re-written,&quot; when she received<br /> the rc-tcritten copies. The reply was a threat of<br /> the County Court. Neither then, nor afterwards,<br /> did A. ever allude to the (verbal) agreement, or<br /> to the missing copies. He simply repeated his<br /> threats of the County Court if a remittance was<br /> not sent &quot; to-morrow,&quot; or &quot; next Tuesday,&quot; as the<br /> case might be. It was almost amusingly evident<br /> that he was trying to strike terror into a helpless<br /> foreigner. He numbered his letters &quot;second and<br /> third &quot; application.&quot; His first threat of the County<br /> Court came barely a fortnight after the &quot;first<br /> application,&quot; and in reply to a civil request for the<br /> work he was demanding payment for. Mme. X.<br /> was in very bad health, and was much distressed<br /> at the prospect of appeariug in Court, and<br /> perhaps being made to say what she did not mean.<br /> Under these circumstances a friend began to<br /> make inquiries of the persons given by A. as<br /> referees.<br /> The first person applied to was the present<br /> editor of the Readers Gazette. He replied<br /> that there must be some mistake—he himself<br /> had been editor many years—and he suggested<br /> imposture. Next, the Civil Service List was<br /> tried, with the result that nothing whatever<br /> was known of Mr. A. A slight clue, however,<br /> was followed up, and at last Mr. A. was dis-<br /> covered—not as a Civil servant, but as under-<br /> master in a primary school in an adjacent<br /> parish. Meantime, the firm of publishers was<br /> written to. They at length remembered—not<br /> Mr. A.&#039;s name, but a now, de plume which he<br /> had mentioned as the name he wrote under.<br /> A MS. by a writer with this nom de plume had<br /> been submitted to the firm, and declined. The<br /> &quot;scholastic&quot; side of Mr. A. was next probed;<br /> and here, strange to say, we came upon the first<br /> piece of bond fides we had yet discovered.<br /> &quot;Jones, Manchester,&quot; whose name had sounded<br /> to us so apocryphal that we had not thought it<br /> worth while to waste a letter upon him, turned<br /> out to be a most respectable firm of publishers<br /> —almost entirely, it seemed, of school books for<br /> primary schools. They knew Mr. A., and thought<br /> well of him. He had published an &quot; elementary<br /> book &quot; and a leaflet or two for children to learn.<br /> It was not precisely a testimony to &quot;scholastic&quot;<br /> qualification, but at least he was known. More-<br /> over, Mr. N, whom A. had mentioned as able to<br /> speak to his literary qualifications, replied favour-<br /> ably, and said that A. had held &quot; high positions,&quot;<br /> and was &quot;an educated gentleman,&quot; but added<br /> that he knew nothing of his literary qualifications.<br /> Thinking there was a mistake in identity, and that<br /> A. was trading on a similarity of name, we asked<br /> for further particulars, and learned that Mr. N.<br /> had obviously no personal knowledge of A., but<br /> that A. really had been inspector of some diocesan<br /> schools in the provinces, and afterward* head-<br /> master of a &quot; high school.&quot; All this while, A.&#039;s<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 74 (#488) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE A UTHOR.<br /> threats were becoming more urgent, and he repre-<br /> sented himself as on the eve of placing the<br /> matter in the hands of his solicitor. The friend<br /> who made the inquiries thought it was time to do<br /> something, and wrote a letter to A., repeating the<br /> facts as stated by Mine. X., and informing A.<br /> of the result of the inquiries. The letter con-<br /> cluded with a renewed offer to pay him 58. each<br /> for the corrected stories, on receiving the correc-<br /> tions. A reply came by return of post. It<br /> appeared to be written by A.&#039;s wife at. his dicta-<br /> tion, and stated that Mr. A. could not answer the<br /> letter now, as the matter had passed out of his<br /> hands.<br /> Before this, at first, in order to learn whether<br /> A. was already known to our Society, 1 had con-<br /> sulted Mr, Thring, who with the greatest kind-<br /> ness gave me counsel. He now reiterated his<br /> opinion that wc ought to get a &quot; friendly solicitor&quot;<br /> to write A. a letter. A legal friend of my own<br /> most kindly consented to do this, and wrote deny-<br /> ing any indebtedness for &quot;professional services,&quot;<br /> but again renewing the offer to pay for the cor-<br /> rections. It brought the following answer again<br /> by return:<br /> &quot;Sib,—-I have received yours of the , and<br /> it has been duly filed.&quot;<br /> This extraordinary reply, and the effrontery of<br /> A.&#039;s whole attitude, astonished the solicitor, and is<br /> still a puzzle to us all. We are, however, consoled<br /> by seeing that A. is really not so clever. For six<br /> weeks after this, when we all thought the matter<br /> was ended, he suddenly wrote once more to Mme.<br /> X., threatening to put the matter into a<br /> lawyer&#039;s hands if the money was not sent within<br /> three days. By this time the threat had lost its<br /> terrors—even Mme. X. was able to laugh at it,<br /> and so I trust all was well that ended well. But<br /> it is a singular story, for there can be no doubt<br /> that A. was at no distant period in an excellent<br /> position, and yet his calm effrontery would seem<br /> to show a practised hand. It is my deliberate<br /> conviction, basrd on several small indications,<br /> that he never showed the MSS. to a single editor.<br /> This, of course, we cannot prove, but if he had<br /> ventured to force us into court he would have<br /> heen required to mention names. I should say<br /> that in this last letter he repeated that he had<br /> been editor of the Readers&#039; Gazette — it was<br /> the only allusion he ever made to the unmasking<br /> of his pretensions. Finally, I would entreat, not<br /> only authors, but everybody, to &quot;look up their<br /> references&quot;—though, as a gentleman I consulted<br /> over this business said very frankly, &quot; When does<br /> one look them up, if they are good ones?&quot; And<br /> I confess that I should have thought it impossible<br /> that a man would venture falsely to call himself<br /> ex-editor of a paper—it is a statement so easily<br /> verified. But perhaps A. is a student of human<br /> nature, and reckoned on our reasoning thus!<br /> And candour compels me to admit, that had<br /> inquiries been made at first, and had we happened<br /> to begin with Mr. N. and &quot;Jones, Manchester,&quot;<br /> we might have- been perfectly satisfied, and have<br /> gone no farther. Wherefore, when references are<br /> given you, write to them all. Y.<br /> A CASE IN POINT.<br /> IOUGHT to have joined the Society of<br /> Authors long ago; but I suppose it is a<br /> case of stinginess over the wrong thing, and<br /> that even the demands of a large family upon a<br /> slender income should not have hindered my<br /> finding that guinea subscription. Every author<br /> wants more or less protection under the present<br /> conditions of things: certainly the unwary one.<br /> Here is a case in point.<br /> A well-known publisher asked me to prepare a<br /> book for the present season. It was to be ready<br /> at the New Tear, and I was to receive =£50 in<br /> advance, on account of royalties, upon delivery of<br /> the MS. I sent in the complete work in the last<br /> days of December. I waited, and at length hud<br /> to remind the publisher that three weeks had<br /> elapsed, and I was expecting to hear from hiin.<br /> To my surprise his reply, and several subsequent<br /> communications, showed me that he was &quot; off the<br /> job,&quot; if possible, having doubts of its probable<br /> success. But I stuck to him. He suggested<br /> additions and improvements, which I loyally<br /> worked up with great benefit to the book. At<br /> length, early in April, I had the first proofs and a<br /> cheque for .-£25.<br /> The last sheets were returned, and I was look-<br /> ing for the completion of the payment. But,<br /> guess my astonishment on being informed by<br /> letter that many faults in composition, cant<br /> phrases, and so forth, had been discovered, and it<br /> had been necessary to take the thing to pieces<br /> —also &quot; whether the thing will ever pay is becom-<br /> ing more than ever a matter of doubt with me.&quot;<br /> With the best possible grace I accepted the<br /> possibility that my style was open to criticism,<br /> but I asserted that for acquiescence in his<br /> improvements I must first have the opportunity<br /> of weighing their value. Now that the book is<br /> published I find that, far from &quot; improvement,&quot;<br /> the book has been utterly damaged by interpola-<br /> tions and omissions, and many alterations of very<br /> slight importance but destructive to that coherent<br /> unity of style which should throughout reveal an<br /> author&#039;s personality. There are six verbal altera-<br /> tions which I should consent to. The remainder<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 75 (#489) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 75<br /> are of a piece with the specimens I have marked<br /> in the copy of the work inclosed for your inspec-<br /> tion, which amount to nothing more nor less than<br /> interpolated blunders.<br /> The book has been brought out, price 7«. 6d.<br /> As it looks more like a 4*. or 58. volume, the<br /> booksellers won&#039;t touch it, and it has fallen still-<br /> born upon a season especially favourable for the<br /> sale of such a work. Our publisher tells me it is<br /> &quot;complete failure,&quot; and ascribes the failure to<br /> the numerous alterations rendered necessary after<br /> the thing was in type, and which added heavily to<br /> the printer&#039;s bill. What this has to do with the<br /> shyness of the retail booksellers passes me, but I<br /> have been so worked upon by the sad story of<br /> £150 or more thrown away upon my &quot; diabolical&quot;<br /> (tie) book as to give a renunciation of all further<br /> right or claim upon payment of ,£5 5*. There is<br /> nothing now to hinder Mr. X. T. from reforming<br /> his mode of publication, and making a small<br /> income out of it.<br /> Simpleton, you will say! I deserve it.<br /> S.<br /> INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY CONFERENCE.<br /> President—Sir John Lubbock. Chairman of<br /> Committee—Kichard Garnett, LL.D. Hon.<br /> Treasurer—H. K. Tedder. Hon. Secretary—<br /> J. Y. W. MacAlister. Secretary—J. D. Brown.<br /> f I ^HE Conference was opened on Tuesday, July<br /> I 14, by the Lord Mayor, in the Council<br /> Chamber of the Guildhall. The following<br /> notes of the principal proceedings are taken from<br /> the Times:—<br /> PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS.<br /> The President (Sir J. Lubbock) then gave his<br /> inaugural address. He said that the existence of<br /> this congress was an indirect result of an Act<br /> passed by a private member of Parliament (Mr.<br /> Ewart) in the year 1850. The Act was a striking<br /> example of beneficent legislation passed by a<br /> private member. It had been adopted by some<br /> 350 places, containing nearly half our people.<br /> From 1857 to 1866 it was adopted by fifteen<br /> localities, from 1867 to 1876 by forty-five, from<br /> 1877 to 1886 by sixty-two, from 1887 to 1896 by<br /> no fewer than 190. In London the recent pro-<br /> gress had been even more remarkable. From<br /> 1850-66 only one public library was established,<br /> and Westminster had the honour of taking the<br /> lead; from 1867 to 1876 not one, from 1876 to<br /> 1886 only two, from 1887 to 1896 no fewer than<br /> thirty-two. These libraries now contained over<br /> 5,000,000 volumes, the annual issues amounted to<br /> 27,000,000, and the attendances to 60,000,000.<br /> Australia had 844 public libraries with 1,400,000<br /> volumes, New Zealand 298 with 330,000, South<br /> Africa about 100 with 300,000. In Canada the<br /> public libraries contained over 1,500,000 of<br /> volumes. The United States possessed in 1890<br /> 1686 public libraries, containing 13,800,000<br /> volumes. These numbers, however, were hardly<br /> comparable with ours, as they included in some<br /> cases college and law libraries. Moreover, we had<br /> many public libraries which were not included in<br /> the above numbers. The British Museum alone<br /> contained 2,000,000 volumes. Those who doubted<br /> the advantage of public libraries generally based<br /> their argument on the assertion that an immense<br /> preponderance of the books read were novels.<br /> But it must be remembered that a book of poems,<br /> and even more a work of science, would take much<br /> longer to read than a novel. Moreover, many<br /> novels were not only amusing and refreshing, but<br /> also instructive. No doubt the wise choice of books<br /> was becoming more and more difficult. The<br /> National Home Reading Union had done, and was<br /> doing, excellent service in assisting our country-<br /> men and countrywomen to what to read, and how<br /> to read. A recent writer had referred to the<br /> treasures of ancient lore in Egyptian papyri,<br /> which were now scattered in large numbers<br /> through the museums of Europe, where, for want<br /> of catalogues and descriptions, they lay well nigh<br /> as profoundly buried as if they were in their<br /> original tombs. Many authors buried their own<br /> creations by misleading titles, or by bringing<br /> together incongruous subjects, which led to un-<br /> fortuuate results, like other ill-assorted marriages.<br /> A friend of his had recently mentioned a remark-<br /> able case in point. In the year 1850, Dr.<br /> Mitchell, the Director of the Observatory of<br /> Cincinnati, which was then the only astro-<br /> nomical observatory in the United States,<br /> brought out a perfectly beautiful book, and<br /> it came over here for sale in the ordi-<br /> narv way. It was called &quot;The Planetary and<br /> Stellar Worlds.&quot; The publisher of the book<br /> complained bitterly about it, and said that he had<br /> not sold a single copy. His friend said, &quot;Well,<br /> you have killed the book by its title. Why not<br /> call it &#039; The Orbs of Heaven&#039;?&quot; That was acted<br /> upon, and 6000 copies were sold in a month.<br /> (Cheers and laughter.) As regarded Govern-<br /> ment, our own had set a very good example. An<br /> American writer (E. H. Walworth), in an article<br /> on &quot; The Value of National Archives,&quot; had paid<br /> us the compliment of stating that &quot;perhaps no<br /> nation had been more careful than England in<br /> the preservation of her archives; and perhaps no<br /> nation has been more careless in this direction<br /> than the United States.&quot; (Cheers.) This was,<br /> however, no longer true of the United States<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 76 (#490) #############################################<br /> <br /> 76<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Government, which now issued excellent monthly-<br /> catalogues. India also had for some time taken<br /> much pains to make her publications as available<br /> as possible. The Eoyal Colonial Institute had<br /> recently taken an important step in adopting and<br /> forwarding to every colonial Government a reso-<br /> lution, &quot;That the colonial Governments be<br /> respectfully invited to issue—through the medium<br /> of their Government gazettes or otherwise—<br /> registers containing entries of all publications<br /> within given periods, and also all other locally<br /> published works, with their full titles, so as to<br /> furnish for general information complete records<br /> of the literature of each colony.&quot; To turn to the<br /> scientific societies, our own Eoyal Society had<br /> accomplished a great and most useful work in its<br /> catalogue of scientific papers, contained in nine<br /> thick quarto volumes. These had been extremely<br /> useful. The society was moreover organising a<br /> catalogue which aimed at completeness, and was<br /> intended to contain the titles of scientific publica-<br /> tions, whether appearing in periodicals or inde-<br /> pendently. In such a catalogue the titles of<br /> scientific publications would be arranged, not only<br /> according to authors&#039; names, but also according to<br /> subject-matter, the text of each paper and not the<br /> title only being consulted for the latter purpose.<br /> The preparation and publication of such a com-<br /> plete catalogue was far beyond the power and<br /> means of any single society. Led by the above<br /> considerations, the president and council of the<br /> Royal Society had appointed a committee to<br /> inquire into and report upon the feasibility of<br /> such a catalogue being compiled through inter-<br /> national co-operation. (Hear, hear.) There was<br /> one other catalogue to which he should like to<br /> refer, namely, the classified index of the London<br /> Library in which were given the names of the<br /> principal authors who had written on each sub-<br /> ject; and the assistance there given to the student<br /> was invaluable. To every true lover of books it<br /> was sad to see our countrymen and countrywomen<br /> neglecting the great masterpieces of science and<br /> literature, and wasting their time over &quot; books<br /> that were no books,&quot; merely because they were<br /> new—in many cases, to use Buskin&#039;s words,<br /> &quot;fresh from the fount of folly.&quot; (Cheers.)<br /> EVOLUTION OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY.<br /> Mr. Henry Tedder read a paper on &quot;The<br /> Evolution of the Public Library.&quot; Mr. Herbert<br /> Spencer had, he said, traced the origin of all our<br /> professions. The processes of development and<br /> differentiation had been as clearly shown in the<br /> case of public libraries as in other departments.<br /> The earliest librarians were priests, and the<br /> earliest libraries ienples. The earliest civilisa-<br /> tions—those, e.g., of Assyria and Egypt—had<br /> their public libraries, which, however, were purely<br /> of an ecclesiastical character. Aulus Gellus said<br /> that Pisistratus in the sixth century b.c. was the<br /> first founder of a real public library, whilst others<br /> ascribed their origin to Aristotle. One of<br /> Caesar&#039;s projects was the establishment of a great<br /> public library, and Varro had written a treatise<br /> on the subject; and at Herculaneum a beauti-<br /> fully arranged small room was found with 1756<br /> manuscripts, which gave an insight into the<br /> arrangements of libraries of that time. Christian<br /> libraries, of course, dated from Constantine; and<br /> his successors, especially Theodosius, busied<br /> themselves with their establishment, and St.<br /> Augustine gave his library to the church at<br /> Hippo. The early church was, however, more or<br /> less hostile to the ancient literature of Greece and<br /> Rome. But the Benedictines early in the sixth,<br /> century were the first of the Christian bodies to<br /> establish libraries, and their example was followed<br /> by the Carthusians, Cistercians, Prasmonstraten-<br /> sians, and others; and the Cistercians were the<br /> first to allow persons outside their orders to<br /> borrow books. In the thirteenth century a<br /> library was formed at St. Germain des Pres.<br /> Paris, where, in 1513, a noble library was<br /> founded. For much which was in his paper he<br /> wished to acknowledge his obligations to Mr.<br /> J. Willis Clarke, who had clearly traced the con-<br /> nection between collegiate and monastic libraries<br /> —a connection specially manifest at Merton<br /> College, Oxford. Mr. Tedder also gave interest-<br /> ing accounts of the construction and arrangements<br /> of college libraries; and particularly of the<br /> Escurial Library founded in 1584. He also<br /> described cathedral libraries, of which he took<br /> Westminster as a type. The old type was mainly<br /> for the benefit of the professional scholar; and it<br /> was not until the middle of the eighteenth<br /> century t hat the needs of the people at large were<br /> considered, and the Bodleian and Mazarin<br /> libraries were splendid instances of private<br /> munificence. The free library movement started<br /> by E wart&#039;s Act was mainly educational, and the<br /> rapid growth of rate-supported libraries—which<br /> were peculiar to this country—had been described<br /> by Sir John Lubbock. In the United States a<br /> similar movement had been going on, and France<br /> afforded numerous examples of public libraries on<br /> every scale of magnitude. Belgium, Austria-<br /> Hungary, and Scandinavia were also well<br /> equipped, and in recent years a vast number of<br /> library associations had grown up both here and<br /> in the United States. In conclusion, Mr. Tedder<br /> described public libraries as the real universities<br /> of the unattached, and said that the librarian<br /> should remeinbir that he was a priest of litera-<br /> ture. (Cheers.)<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 77 (#491) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 77<br /> PUBLIC LIBRARY AUTHORITIES.<br /> Mr. Herbert Jones read a paper on &quot;Public<br /> Library Authorities, their Constitution and<br /> Powers, as they are and as they should be.&quot;<br /> Our present system, he observed, was due to<br /> the happy-go-lucky methods which were so<br /> characteristic of the British people. The results<br /> had, no doubt, on the whole been good, but the<br /> time had come for a reconstruction on a more<br /> logical and consistent basis. Library committees<br /> were variously constituted in different centres,<br /> and the numbers were fluctuating and sometimes<br /> too great for useful action, and their relations to<br /> other local bodies vague and ill-defined. But<br /> when commissioners were appointed a better<br /> system prevailed. Our free library legislation<br /> needed amendment, and it was not desirable tliat<br /> a possibly hostile vestry should be able to super-<br /> sede the regular library authority. A small body<br /> appointed or elected ad hoc was surely better than<br /> a large body constituted for a variety of purposes.<br /> He was in favour of the appointment in each<br /> district of a distinct library authority—not<br /> constituted of too many persons, but varying<br /> according to population—whose sole work would<br /> be the supervision of libraries. In this way<br /> a uniformity of action and a security which<br /> was greatly to be desired would be effected.<br /> (Cheers.)<br /> Mr. Alderman Rawson, of Manchester, said<br /> that his city was the first to adopt Mr. Ewart&#039;s<br /> Act. A like movement had almost simultaneously<br /> started in the United States. Since the estab-<br /> lishment of the libraries the numbers of books<br /> and readers in Manchester had increased tenfold.<br /> Notwithstanding the enormous circulation of<br /> books, the loss by missing or injured books was a<br /> mere trifle. The employment of women in the<br /> libraries had produced most beneficial effects in<br /> the maintenance of silence and order. The cor-<br /> poration, though entitled to elect outsiders on the<br /> library committees, had not done so, and had, with<br /> pardonable vanity, thought themselves competent<br /> to manage their libraries. The Manchester<br /> libraries were peculiar in one respect, that they<br /> never levied fines, and their confidence in the public<br /> had never been abused. (Cheers.) The Inland<br /> Revenue had tried to exact income-tax, and the<br /> case had been carried to the House of Lords,<br /> where in the end the library authority of Man-<br /> chester achieved a notable victory for themselves<br /> and all the public libraries of the country.<br /> THE TRAINING OF LIBRARIANS.<br /> Mr. Charles Welch, Guildhall Librarian, read a<br /> paper on &quot;The Training of Librarians.&quot; He<br /> insisted on the primary importance of a wide and<br /> liberal education.<br /> BOOKS AND TEXT-BOOKS.<br /> A paper on &quot;Books and Text-Books: The<br /> Function of the Library in Education,&quot; was<br /> read by Mr. F. M. Crunder, librarian, Public<br /> Library, St. Louis, U.SA., who said that the<br /> problem was to provide the best education for the<br /> masses. Could text-books furnish that educa-<br /> tion P He remembered his surreptitious enjoy-<br /> ment as a schoolboy of a book of extracts—chiefly<br /> poetry and oratory—and those poems and speeches<br /> were to him worth all the arithmetic and text-<br /> book learning which he was compelled to learn.<br /> To use Sir John Lubbock&#039;s words, &quot;the main •<br /> thing is not so much that every child should be<br /> taught as that every child should wish to learn.&quot;<br /> Franklin&#039;s was the ideal education—that no child<br /> should be taught until he desired to learn.<br /> Books were the true university, and the true edu-<br /> cation was to stimulate the love of good literature,<br /> and to enable the child to discriminate between<br /> what is good and bad in books. Education<br /> should seek to make not lawyers, engineers,<br /> farmers, &amp;c., but men; and the larger aim would<br /> be found also invariably to have included the<br /> narrower. The text-book should only be employed<br /> as the guide to what was of permanent value and<br /> interest in literature.<br /> NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY AND BIBLIOGRAPHY.<br /> Mr. Sidney Lee, editor of the Dictionary of<br /> National Biography, read the next paper on<br /> &quot;National Biography and National Biblio-<br /> graphy.&quot; He said he should make his immediate<br /> purpose plainer if he said a few words about the<br /> aims and scope of the Dictionary of National<br /> Biography, which might be defined as a bio-<br /> graphical census of all dwellers in the British<br /> dominions who had achieved anything worthy of<br /> commemoration. The most notable feature in<br /> their methods of execution was the effort to give<br /> authority for every fact recorded. The life of<br /> Shakespeare, for instance, would be practically<br /> useless were not the authenticity of each of the<br /> traditions which had accumulated about his name<br /> carefuly determined. He had himself attempted<br /> on a modest scale a bibliography of Shakesperiana<br /> arranged in the order in which the student of<br /> Shakespearian biography was likely to find it<br /> convenient to approach the books. His biblio-<br /> graphy was far from complete; the catalogues<br /> of the British Museum Library, with its 3680<br /> entries; the Barton collection in the Boston<br /> Public Library, with its 2500 entries; and the<br /> Birmingham Public Library, with 9640 volumes,<br /> supplied far longer lists of Shakesperiana. But he<br /> had endeavoured to observe some logical principle<br /> of classification which the larger library cata-<br /> logues did not attempt. After a reference to the<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 78 (#492) #############################################<br /> <br /> 78<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> bibliography respecting Milton, Sir Walter Scott,<br /> Sir W. Raleigh, Dryden, and others, he said that<br /> all that was possible was to mention, as a rule<br /> in chronological sequence, the chief articles or<br /> memoirs previously published. The Dictionary&#039;s<br /> list of authorities contained much that was<br /> material for the preparation of a subject<br /> catalogue of literature, and a subject catalogue<br /> was obviously of high importance in developing<br /> the utility of public libraries. The making<br /> of subject catalogues was a subsidiary branch<br /> of the science of bibliography. In its essence<br /> bibliography was the science of describing<br /> books as books, in contradistinction to books as<br /> literature. For the literature of Great Britain<br /> and Ireland there existed at present four notable<br /> experiments in national bibliography. At the<br /> beginning of the century Eobert Watt, a poor<br /> surgeon of Paisley, sacrificed twenty years of<br /> arduous labour in compiling his &quot;Bibliotheca<br /> Britannica,&quot; an elaborate catalogue mainly of<br /> British literature, though a few foreign works<br /> were included, arranged in two indices—one of<br /> authors&#039; names, the other of the titles of books.<br /> The next effort in national bibliography was made<br /> by William Thomas Lowndes, who in his<br /> &quot;Bibliographers&#039; Manual,&quot; first published in<br /> 1834, endeavoured to arrange the titles of books<br /> (under authors&#039; names) with some regard to their<br /> intrinsic interest. Lowndes, after many years of<br /> abject poverty, lost his reason and died in 1843.<br /> The third great attempt at a bibliography of<br /> English literature was made in America, and it was<br /> to the credit of that great country that its history<br /> involved no distressing incidents like those which<br /> accompanied the efforts of Watts and Lowndes.<br /> Allibone&#039;s ample &quot; Dictionary of English Litera-<br /> ture&quot; was projected in 1850, and the last proof<br /> sheets were read by the author on the last day of<br /> 1870. The work was published by Messrs.<br /> Lippincottof Philadelphia, in three large volumes,<br /> and a supplement in two volumes, almost equally<br /> large, appeared in 1891. Living authors were<br /> included as well as the dead, and to all books<br /> of importance there were appended illustrative<br /> quotations from critical reviews. Although<br /> Allibone&#039;s book was open to criticism and con-<br /> tained many blunders, jet the work was an<br /> invaluable book of reference, as every librarian<br /> would acknowledge. The fourth great experi-<br /> ment in national bibliography was the printed<br /> British Museum catalogue, which is a permanent<br /> memorial of the skill, knowledge, and industry<br /> of Dr. Garnett, the Keeper of Printed Books, and<br /> his staff.<br /> BOOE TALE.<br /> THE Earl of Desart&#039;s new novel will be<br /> entitled &quot; The Raid of the Detrimental.&quot;<br /> In it he has made a new departure. The<br /> tale deals with the true history of the Great<br /> Disappearance of 1862, and is related by several<br /> of those implicated, and others. The book will<br /> be published early in September by Messrs. C.<br /> Arthur Pearson Limited.<br /> Professor Laughton is engaged upon &quot;The<br /> Life and Letters of Henry Reeve.&quot; The book<br /> will be published by Messrs. Longmans, Green,<br /> and Co. Among other forthcoming publications<br /> by this firm are &quot;The Validity of the Papal<br /> Claims,&quot; by Dr. Nutcombe Oxenham, with a<br /> preface by the Archbishop of &quot;Xork; and a<br /> biography of Dr. Maples, Bishop of Likoma, in<br /> Central Africa, by his sister.<br /> Colonel H. M. Vibart has written a work on<br /> &quot;The Siege of Delhi, in the Indian Mutiny,&quot; in<br /> which he gives to Colonel Bard Smith&#039;s services a<br /> more adequate recognition than he believes they<br /> have hitherto been granted. The book will be<br /> published by Messrs. A. Constable and Co.<br /> Mr. Bret Harte&#039;s new novel is called &quot;Three<br /> Partners,&quot; and treats of a strike in a mining<br /> camp. It will be published next month by<br /> Messrs. Chatto and Windus.<br /> Mr. Meredith&#039;s volume of selected poems will<br /> appear shortly.<br /> Mr. W. Clark Russell&#039;s articles on the life of<br /> Nelson, which are running in one of the maga-<br /> zines, will be issued in book form in the autumn<br /> by Mr. James Bowden.<br /> Mr. Sidney G. Murray is the author of &quot;A<br /> Popular Manual of Finance,&quot; which will be issued<br /> immediately by Messrs. Blackwood.<br /> The late Mr. Du Maurier&#039;s novel, &quot;The<br /> Martian,&quot; will be published by Messrs. Harper<br /> on Sept. 17.<br /> Mine. Sarah Grand&#039;s new novel is to be published<br /> by Mr. Heinemann.<br /> Mr. Herbert Warren, the president of Magdalen<br /> College, is having his poems published by Mr.<br /> Murray, under the title &quot; By Severn Sea.&quot; Some<br /> time ago they were printed by Mr. Daniel, of<br /> Oxford, but only circulated privately. They are<br /> now to be available to the public.<br /> Mr. Geo. Haven Putnam has a scheme for the<br /> institution of literary courts or boards of arbitra-<br /> tion, to settle disputes arising between the writing<br /> and publishing professions. Details of it are to<br /> be given in the revised edition of his work,<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 79 (#493) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 79<br /> &quot;Authors and Publishers,&quot; which is to appear<br /> shortly.<br /> Sir Ellis Ashmead Bartlett, M.P., has written<br /> &quot;The War in Thessaly, with Personal Experiences<br /> in Turkey and Greece.&quot; It will be remembered<br /> that one of the &quot;personal experiences&quot; of the<br /> author was to be captured by a Greek torpedo<br /> boat and carried to Athens.<br /> Mr. Fitzgerald Molloy has aimed at presenting<br /> a complete picture of Irish society in the last<br /> century, in his forthcoming work entitled &quot;The<br /> Romance of the Irish Stage.&quot; Messrs. Downey<br /> and Co., who will publish the book, are also about<br /> to issue a uniform edition of Mr. Molloy&#039;s social<br /> and historical studies at a popular price.<br /> Mr. D. J. O&#039;Donoghue, the biographer of<br /> Carleton, will shortly conclude &quot; The Life and<br /> Writings of James Clarence Mangan,&quot; a work he<br /> has been engaged at for some time. It will tell<br /> for the first time the story of the young poet&#039;s<br /> tragic career in the Young Ireland days; and<br /> there will also be reminiscences of Mangan by Sir<br /> Frederick Burton, Sir Charles Gavan Duffy, Dr.<br /> J. K. Ingram, and others.<br /> A biography of the engineer who laid the first<br /> Atlantic cable—Sir Charles Tilston Bright—is<br /> being prepared for publication (by subscription)<br /> by Messrs. Constable and Co. A brother and a<br /> son of the distinguished pioneer have compiled<br /> the work from the diaries which Sir Charles kept;<br /> therefore it will be largely autobiographical in<br /> character.<br /> Lord Eibblesdale, who was Master of the<br /> Buckhounds under the last administration, is<br /> writing his recollections of &quot; The Queen&#039;s Hounds<br /> and Stag Hunting,&quot; to which will be contributed<br /> illustrations by prints and drawings from Her<br /> Majesty&#039;s collections at Windsor Castle and at<br /> Cumberland Lodge. The book will be published<br /> by Messrs. Longmans.<br /> Mr. Theodore A. Cook will write a book about<br /> Rouen, and Miss Margaret Symonds (daughter of<br /> the late John Addington Symonds) one about<br /> Perugia, for a series of volumes dealings with<br /> mediaeval towns which Messrs. J. M. Dent and<br /> Co. are to publish. The late Mrs. Oliphant was<br /> writing &quot;Sienna,&quot; but had only completed three<br /> chapters of it.<br /> The biography of Professor Huxley is not<br /> likely to be ready before the autumn of 1898.<br /> Prince Ranjitsinhji&#039;s book on cricket is to be<br /> published by Messrs. Blackwood, and will be<br /> dedicated to the Queen. There will be an ddition<br /> de luxe in crown quarto, with the author&#039;s auto-<br /> graph, twenty photogravures, and eighty full-<br /> page plates; a fine-paper edition in royal octavo,<br /> with a photogravure frontispiece and ninety-nine<br /> plates; and a popular edition in large crown<br /> octavo, with eighty page illustrations and twenty<br /> in the text.<br /> Mr. George Bernard Shaw is revising his plays<br /> for their coming publication in book form under<br /> the title &quot; Plays Pleasant and Unpleasant.&quot; They<br /> will be in two volumes, to be published by Mr.<br /> Grant Richards in the autumn.<br /> The several stories contained in Mr. Coulson<br /> Kernahan&#039;s &quot;Book of Strange Sins,&quot; are being<br /> published in separate numbers by Messrs. Ward,<br /> Lock and Co.<br /> Mr. Fraser Rae is at work upon a new edition<br /> of Sheridan, in which he will correct the accepted<br /> text to a considerable extent.<br /> Mr. William Le Queux&#039;s new Tuscan novel, now<br /> in the press, is to be called &quot;A Madonna of the<br /> Music Halls.&quot;<br /> Mr. F. E. Robinson, M.A., the latest recruit to<br /> the ranks of London publishers, announces that<br /> he has nearly completed arrangements for a series<br /> of Oxford and Cambridge College Histories,<br /> which will be written by dons and other well-<br /> known graduates.<br /> Mr. Frank A. Munsey—whose enterprise has<br /> lately been spoken of by Mr. Hapgood in the<br /> New York Letter of The Author—has been in<br /> London making preliminary arrangements for an<br /> English edition of Mungey&#039;s Magazine. He will<br /> probably send a manager from New York, and<br /> open a branch establishment here. Mr. Munsey<br /> has secured a story by Mr. Max Pemberton for<br /> the magazine, to succeed Mr. Hall Caine&#039;s &quot; The<br /> Christian.&quot;<br /> Mr. Alfred Kingston is engaged upon a work<br /> entitled &quot; East Anglia and the Great Civil War,&quot;<br /> in which he tells the story of the rising of Crom-<br /> well&#039;s Ironsides in the counties of Cambridge,<br /> Huntingdon, Lincoln, Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex,<br /> and Hertford.<br /> The &quot;Victorian Era&quot; series of books, to be<br /> issued by Messrs. Blackie, is intended as an<br /> authoritative record of the great movements of<br /> the century. Mr. J. H. Rose, M.A., late Scholar<br /> of Christ&#039;s College, Cambridge, will edit the<br /> series, and contribute a volume on &quot; The Rise of<br /> the Democracy.&quot; Canon J. H. Overton will write<br /> &quot;The Anglican Revival ;&quot; Dean Stubbs, a<br /> biography of Charles Kingsley; Mr. George<br /> Gissing, a biography of Charles Dickens; Mr.<br /> H. Holman, &quot;National Education;&quot; Mr. G.<br /> Aimitage Smith, &quot; Free Trade and Its Results;&quot;<br /> Mr. Lawrence Gomme,&quot; Modern London;&quot; &amp;c.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 80 (#494) #############################################<br /> <br /> 8o<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Mr. F. Anstey&#039;s &quot;Baboo Jabberjee&quot; will be<br /> published by Messrs. Dent this autumn.<br /> Mr. Barry Pain&#039;s new novel, which Messrs.<br /> Harper will publish immediately, is entitled &quot; The<br /> Octave of Claudius.&quot;<br /> Colonel L. J. Trotter has written the &quot; Life of<br /> John Nicholson, Soldier and Administrator,&quot;<br /> which Mr. Murray will publish.<br /> A series of stories by Mr. Barry Pain, dealing<br /> with the career of Eobin Hood; a series by Mr.<br /> Max Pemberton, dealing with the French<br /> Revolution; and a series of detective stories by<br /> Major Arthur Griffith, are among the forth-<br /> coming projects of the English Illustrated<br /> Magazine,<br /> Mr. Andrew Lang has edited a volume of selec-<br /> tions from Wordsworth, which is in the press, and<br /> which will be the first of a new series of &quot;Selec-<br /> tions from the Poets,&quot; to be published by Messrs.<br /> Longmans.<br /> Mr. William Harbutt Dawson has written a<br /> comprehensive account of the present day social<br /> movement in Switzerland in its various branches.<br /> The volume, entitled &quot;Social Switzerland,&quot; will<br /> be published by Messrs. Chapman and Hall at<br /> once.<br /> &quot;The Typewriter Girl&quot; is the title of a story<br /> dealing with an aspect of London life untouched<br /> hitherto, which Messrs. Pearson are about to<br /> publish. &quot;Olive Pratt Rayner&quot; is the name<br /> assumed by the writer.<br /> A work on English monastic history, by the<br /> Rev. Ethelred L. Taunton, will be published by<br /> Mr. John C. Nimnio in the autumn. It will be<br /> called, &quot;The English Black Monks of St. Bene-<br /> dict: A Sketch of their History from the Coming<br /> of St. Augustine to the Present Day.&quot;<br /> The third volume of the series entitled &quot; Litera-<br /> tures of the World,&quot; which Mr. Heinemann<br /> publishes, will be &quot;Italian Literature,&quot; by Dr.<br /> Richard Garnett. It will appear early in the<br /> autumn. Three months later &quot;English Litera-<br /> ture,&quot; by Mr. Edmund Gosse, the editor of<br /> the series, will be ready.<br /> Mr. G. Forrest, Director of Records, Govern-<br /> ment of Tndia, is to write &quot;A History of<br /> British India&quot; for the important project, the<br /> Cambridge Historical Series.<br /> The Historical Society of Trinity College,<br /> Dublin, is co-operating with the National Literary<br /> Society of Dublin to celebrate the centenary<br /> of Burke&#039;s death. It is proposed to hold a<br /> public meeting in November, and to erect a<br /> tablet on the house in which Burke was born.<br /> Miss Phoebe Allen, whose work in interesting<br /> children and spreading their love for Nature is<br /> well known, is the editor of a small botanical<br /> quarterly called the Sunchildren&#039;s Budget, which<br /> is the organ of two botany clubs, the second of<br /> which is for children. Readers of this paper who<br /> are interested in the subjects are invited to make<br /> the acquaintance of the magazine for their<br /> children.<br /> Mrs. Butcher, wife of Dean Butcher of Cairo,<br /> will publish in October a book on Egypt, where<br /> she has lived for nearly twenty years. It gives<br /> an outline of the history of Egypt from the time<br /> of the Roman occupation in the year 30 b.c. to the<br /> English occupation in the year 1882 a.d., and so<br /> will fill a blank in our knowledge of that ancient<br /> country. As the Christianity of Egypt is the<br /> connecting thread for all the various epochs com-<br /> prehended in these twenty centuries, the book<br /> will be called &quot;The Story of the Church of<br /> Egypt.&quot; Messrs. Smith and Elder are the<br /> publishers, and it will appear in two volumes.<br /> A story of public school life, entitled &quot; The Gift<br /> of God,&quot; is about to be brought out in volume<br /> form. It is by Mrs. Laffan, the wife of the Prin-<br /> cipal of Cheltenham College; better known to the<br /> reading public by her former name—&quot; Mrs. Leith<br /> Adams.&quot; Mrs. Laffan gave a lecture at the<br /> Ladies&#039; College, Cheltenham, last month, on the<br /> subject of &quot;Fictional Literature as a Profession<br /> for Women.&quot; It has created great interest, and<br /> will be repeated. New editions of &quot;Madelon<br /> Lemoine,&quot; and&quot; The Old Pastures,&quot; by this<br /> writer, are in the press.<br /> Volume 2 of Mr. Edwin 0. Sachs&#039; monumental<br /> work, &quot;Modern Opera Houses and Theatres,&quot; has<br /> now been issued, and with it, perhaps, that part<br /> of the undertaking which appeals most to the<br /> general public has seen its completion, for the<br /> third volume, due in December, will mainly deal<br /> with the historical and practical details of theatre<br /> construction, finance, and management, and have<br /> an essentially technical character. Mr. Sachs has<br /> been able to extend materially the scope of the<br /> second volume beyond what was originally in-<br /> tended, so that the part now completed contains<br /> descriptions of over fifty playhouses in Europe,<br /> with no less than 450 illustrations. Most of the<br /> latter are on plates. Every country is represented,<br /> including Russia with three theatres, Roumania<br /> and Greece with one each. Garnier&#039;s charming<br /> theatre at Monte Carlo even stands to do credit<br /> for the principality of Monaco. The playhouse<br /> most elaborately illustrated in vol. 2 is the Paris<br /> Opera House, and the French capital is further<br /> represented by the new Opera Comique in course<br /> of construction, and the Eden Varietv Theatre.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 81 (#495) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 81<br /> The great Vienna Opera House heads the Austrian<br /> examples in vol. 2, whilst Her Majesty&#039;s takes<br /> a similar position among our metropolitan houses.<br /> Mr. Sachs has received great assistance from<br /> many foreign Governments whilst preparing the<br /> work, and many of the names prominently asso-<br /> ciated with drama on the one hand, and with<br /> architecture on the other, will also be found on<br /> his list of subscribers.<br /> Mr. Arthur Lee Knight has a new book for<br /> boys in the press, entitled &quot;Under the White<br /> Ensign; or, for Queen and Empire.&quot; Messrs.<br /> Jarrold are the publishers, and the volume will<br /> be profusely illustrated by Mr. J. B. Greene, who<br /> makes a special study of naval subjects.<br /> &quot;The King&#039;s Oak&quot; will be the title of a volume<br /> of stories by Robert Cromie, which Messrs. E.<br /> Aickin and Co., Limited, of Belfast, have in the<br /> press. Mr. Cromie is best known as the author<br /> of &quot; The Crack of Doom,&quot; which had an extraordi-<br /> nary circulation in Sir GeorgeNewnes&#039; &quot;Famous<br /> Books &quot; series.<br /> The author of &quot; The Song-Book of Bethia Hard-<br /> acre&quot; (Chapman and Hall) is Mrs. (not Miss)<br /> Fuller Maitland.<br /> &quot;The Demon of Santa Fc,&quot; by Mr. Farquhar<br /> Palliser (Heber K. Daniels), commences in the<br /> current number of Eureka: The Playgoers&#039;<br /> Magazine, conjointly with &quot;A Romance of Nor-<br /> way,&quot; from the same pen, in No. 4 of the<br /> &quot;Favourite Illustrated Stories.&quot; A sequel to Mr.<br /> Palliser&#039;s &quot; Me and Jim,&quot; entitled &quot; Our Tenants,&quot;<br /> will also be published by the same publishers—<br /> the Favourite Publishing Company, Pentonville-<br /> road.<br /> The Navy and Army Illustrated (edited by<br /> Commander C. N. Robinson, R.N.) is devoting a<br /> series of special numbers to the Yeomanry and<br /> Volunteers. The title of the work is &quot;Our<br /> Citizen Army,&quot; and the entire letterpress is by<br /> Callum Beg, author of &quot; The Life of a Soldier,&quot;<br /> &amp;c. The second number of the series was lately<br /> published and contains some fifty or sixty<br /> illustrations descriptive of the duties falling<br /> to the lot of our citizen soldiers in camp and<br /> elsewhere.<br /> &quot;Cruelties of Civilisation.&quot;—Early in August<br /> the Humanitarian League will issue the third<br /> volume of its publications. It will contain the<br /> following essays: &quot;Literce Humaniores: An<br /> Appeal to Teachers,&quot; by Henry S. Salt; &quot;Public<br /> Control of Hospitals,&quot; by Harry Roberts; &quot;The<br /> Shadow of the Sword,&quot; by G. W. Foote; &quot;What<br /> it Costs to be Vaccinated,&quot; by Joseph Collinson;<br /> &quot;The Gallows and the Lash,&quot; by Hypatia Brad-<br /> laugh Bonner; &quot;The Sweating System,&quot; by<br /> Maurice Adams; &quot;The Humanities of Diet,&quot; by<br /> H. S. Salt. One of the League&#039;s new pamphlets<br /> will deal with the English Game Laws.<br /> FASHIONS IN LANGUAGE.<br /> VERT great men may almost be said to be<br /> &quot;of no time.&quot; The English of Shakspeare<br /> is still modern, and one reads it with more<br /> ease and pleasure than that of much more recent<br /> writers; the reason being that he writes sincerely,<br /> and is but little swayed by the thoughtless<br /> fashions of his day. This is not the case with a<br /> vast majority of even good authors; most of whom<br /> are content to swim with the tide, and to gain a<br /> temporary success at the cost of all chance<br /> of immortality. Addison, Gray, Coleridge,<br /> Macaulay, Tennyson, are all instances of men who<br /> have stedfastly resisted such temptations, and of<br /> whom, therefore, we may feel sure that their<br /> works will endure and will become classics.<br /> It is when one turns to the colloquial idiom<br /> recorded by writers of various times that one<br /> observes how fashions affect our language, and<br /> realises what changes are in store for it among<br /> the multitudes of so-called &quot;English-speaking<br /> people&quot; that are growing up in America and the<br /> Colonies. Yet precisely similar changes have been<br /> always going on, even in the comparatively small<br /> and well-trained circle of London society, without<br /> seriously affecting the purity of written English.<br /> Time and space would not suffice for a com-<br /> plete exemplification of these remarks; we may<br /> however, find enough to justify them in con-<br /> sidering one class of words—the adjectives and<br /> adverbs by which indolent and ill-trained men and<br /> women have been wont to express intenseness and<br /> superlative quality. Thus, in the London of the<br /> Revolution, when institutions began to be fixed<br /> and West-end society to become organised, we<br /> find colloquialism of this sort recorded by Con-<br /> preve and the Spectator; and the fine ladies and<br /> their beaux at once began to coin current epithets<br /> which circulated with but little regard to their<br /> intrinsic value. Mrs. Fainall hates her husband<br /> &quot;transcendentally&quot;; Mirabell is a &quot;pretty&quot;<br /> fellow; Cleantha has been &quot;hugely&quot; diverted.<br /> Then comes the Hanoverian age, beginning with<br /> George II. and ending with George IV., when<br /> convention was lord of all, and &quot; enthusiasm&quot;<br /> was regarded as a form of insanity. Here we<br /> come upon yet more artificial epithets, the paper-<br /> money of social intercourse. Not only are words<br /> used without any pretence of their proper signifi-<br /> cation, but the lords and ladies who set the<br /> fashion do not even deign to employ the neces-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 82 (#496) #############################################<br /> <br /> 82<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> sary termination to indicate an adverbial meaning<br /> The characters in Miss Burney&#039;s novels talk of a<br /> &quot;monstrous handsome woman,&quot; and a &quot;prodi-<br /> gious pretty place;&quot; like the mediaeval emperor,<br /> they are above grammar, though they can hardly<br /> be said to have mastered that humble science.<br /> Many other instances will occur to readers of<br /> eighteenth century books, and will be even found<br /> in sermons and works intended to be dignified.<br /> &quot;Respectable &quot; is used as a high form of praise;<br /> few words, indeed, can have more changed their<br /> value.<br /> Boswell writes of &quot;Chief Baron Smith of<br /> respectable and pious memory,&quot; where he evidently<br /> means to exhaust eulogy. Two other favourite<br /> epithets of the period have fallen from their high<br /> estate—&quot;elegant&quot;and &quot;genteel,&quot; the former used<br /> to mean much what we mean when we say that a<br /> lady is refined, or that her hospitality is gracious;<br /> the latter meant well bred or polite.<br /> Lord Chesterfield, about the middle of the<br /> period, touched the subject with his habitual<br /> plesantry:—<br /> &quot;Not content,&quot; writes the witty peer, &quot;with<br /> enriching our language with words absolutely<br /> new, my fair countrywomen have gone still<br /> farther and improved it by the application and<br /> extension of old ones to various and very different<br /> significations. They take a word and change it,<br /> like a guinea into shillings for pocket-money, to<br /> be employed in the several occasional purposes of<br /> the day. For instance, adjective vast, and its<br /> adverb vastly, mean anything. . . . Large<br /> objects are vastly great, small ones are vastly<br /> little; and I had lately the pleasure to hear a<br /> fine woman pronounce a very small gold snuff-<br /> box that was produced in company to be vastly<br /> pretty because it was vastly little.&quot;<br /> On this Walpole noted: &quot;Humming is a cant<br /> word for vast. A person meaning to describe a<br /> very large bird, said &#039;It was a humming bird.&#039;&quot;<br /> Surely we seem to be on familiar ground here.<br /> Is it not the fact that for the last thirty years we<br /> have had &quot;cant words,&quot; or intensive expletives,<br /> of at least equal absurdity?<br /> What is the meaning of a lady who is awfully<br /> ugly, but has an airfu/ly jolly house?&quot; Or of<br /> the young officer who comes down to breakfast in<br /> a strange house declaring that he has had &quot;a<br /> rippin&#039; night&#039;s rest?&quot;<br /> H. G. K.<br /> CORRESPONDENCE.<br /> I.—Corruptions of the Language,<br /> THE AUTHOR&quot; is fulfilling several useful<br /> functions, and its usefulness seems to<br /> grow with every month.<br /> The suggestion of &quot; E. W. H.&quot; appears to me<br /> to be an excellent one; and I shall be glad to<br /> support it.<br /> But I am hunting smaller game just now; and<br /> I ask for only a few lines of your journal to call<br /> attention to a minor nuisance. The English<br /> language is in daily danger of being corrupted<br /> by slovenly phrases introduced by journalists<br /> and reporters in a hurry; and it might be one of<br /> the duties, and one of the privileges, of The<br /> Author to guard the purity of the language, in<br /> so far as this is possible and practicable for any<br /> one journal. But, as The Author is read by<br /> hundreds of men and women who write, and who<br /> have an honest respect for the language they<br /> write in, it is, probably, a task that becomes it<br /> well, to exclude from the language words and<br /> phrases that are &quot;bad English&quot; or ungram-<br /> matical, or ill-sounding.<br /> An obituary notice of Mrs. Oliphant in the<br /> July number of The Author, concludes with<br /> the words: &quot;Mrs. Oliphant was predeceased by<br /> her husband and two sons.&quot; Now, I did not<br /> expect to find that in The Author. Let me talk<br /> grammar for a minute; I will try not to bore you.<br /> &quot;Predeceased by &quot; is clearly a verb in the passive<br /> voice. If one can &quot;be predeceased,&quot; it follows<br /> that one can &quot;decease&quot; and even &quot;predecease.&quot;<br /> Then &quot; decease&quot; is an active verb. What is to<br /> decease/ There is no such verb in the English<br /> language. Still less is there the verb to pre-<br /> decease. The writer might have given the sad<br /> facts in a truer way if he had not gone after<br /> Latin words, but kept within the bounds of his<br /> mother tongue: &quot;Mrs. Oliphant was a widow;<br /> and all her children had died before her.&quot;<br /> There is another Latin word that is hauled in<br /> by every penny-a-liner with fatal facility and<br /> unpleasant results. I saw this heading in a<br /> country newspaper the other day: &quot;Demise of a<br /> Dundee Baker in Canada.&quot; What is a demise*<br /> It is a demissio—a handing down (of the crown<br /> or of some title). Shakespeare has the verb to<br /> demise in the sense of to bequeath. Mr. Greville,<br /> in his Memoirs (quoted in the Century Dictionary),<br /> writes: &quot;Now arose anew difficulty—whether the<br /> property of the late king demised to the king or<br /> to the Crown.&quot; Here the word demise is rightly<br /> used. An act of demise is a handing down of<br /> something to somebody. But the small journalist<br /> saw the word, liked the sound of it and the look<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 83 (#497) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 83<br /> of it, didn&#039;t know what it meant, took the ignotum<br /> pro magnifico, and applied it to the death of the<br /> first person he had to mention the departure of.<br /> As I am on the prowl for a few minutes, I will<br /> mention another piece of bad English that seems<br /> likely to gain and to keep a place in our language.<br /> It is the American vulgarism &quot; at that.&quot; Anyone<br /> whose ear has been trained by the reading of the<br /> best English prose, must be shocked by the use of<br /> a phrase so unrhythmical.<br /> I should like to suggest to you the usefulness<br /> of setting apart a column as a sort of Index<br /> Expurgatorius, in which all kinds of bad English<br /> and slovenly grammar would be gibbeted, as the<br /> gamekeeper nails stoats and other vermin to the<br /> barn door. J. M. D. Meiklejohn.<br /> St. Andrew&#039;s, July 6.<br /> II.—Editor and Contributor.<br /> What is the law in the following supposed<br /> case? I write an article, more or less ephemeral,<br /> and send it to a daily paper. I receive a proof;<br /> on it is a notice that such proof is no guarantee<br /> that the article will be accepted or published.<br /> There is, therefore, no contract.<br /> I send a copy of the same article to another<br /> daily paper, which at once prints and pub-<br /> lishes it.<br /> It happens that on the first of the Greek<br /> Kalends my article appears in both papers.<br /> Has either paper any remedy against me, or<br /> are they both equally in my debt?<br /> Delay spells ruin to an ephemeral article; how<br /> am I to view the notice printed on the proof<br /> slip? Dubious.<br /> [My opinion is that, if the author of the article<br /> in question was not able, or willing, to take his<br /> chance, he should have kept the proof and<br /> informed the editor of his intention to offer it<br /> elsewhere, unless he received a note of acceptance<br /> or contract to publish. I do not think that he<br /> was justified in sending it to the second paper<br /> without such warning or notification to the first<br /> paper. Clearly, the editor of the first paper<br /> was entitled to believe that the article was offered<br /> to him alone. By the decision of the Westminster<br /> County Court in the case of &quot;Macdonald v.<br /> National Revieic,&quot; the forwarding of a proof is<br /> in itself an acceptance of the article, or a contract<br /> to pay for it, if not to publish it. The notice<br /> that the proof is not a guarantee of acceptance<br /> is probably sent with the proof in consequence of<br /> that decision.—Ed.]<br /> III.—English Novels in Germany.<br /> I have read with considerable surprise the<br /> statement of your contributor, &quot; E. W. H.,&quot; to the<br /> effect that &quot; Germans have found it necessary to-&#039;<br /> forbid the perusal by young girls of English<br /> novels.&quot; The italics are his.<br /> After a comprehensive study of the works of<br /> prominent German writers of to-day, I confess it<br /> would seem to me quite unnecessary to banish<br /> even some very advanced English novels from the<br /> library unless, at the s:ime time, an enormous per-<br /> centage of the romances read, with or without<br /> permission of the parents, by girls of seventeen or<br /> younger, were forbidden at the same time. Per-<br /> sonally, I have the greatest admiration for the<br /> style and literary merits of works I could men-<br /> tion, written by leading Teuton (men and women)<br /> authors; but it is impossible to deny that few<br /> books which attain general popularity in the<br /> Fatherland would escape the verdict in England<br /> of &quot;highly pernicious,&quot; or that they would<br /> instantly be locked away on the shelf with the<br /> glass windows, of which only &quot; papa&quot; is supposed<br /> to have the key.<br /> As the assertion in question is not&quot; E. W. H.&#039;s&quot;<br /> own, I trust he will forgive me for taking up the<br /> cudgels in defence of English literature.<br /> Gwendoline Ashworth-Edwards.<br /> Germany. ii&lt;ri<br /> IV.—A Query.<br /> I should feel much obliged if any reader of &#039;The<br /> Author could give a definite rule, or refer to a<br /> satisfactory authority, in the following cases:<br /> (a) The correct form of the predicate verb,<br /> &quot;when two or more pronouns of different persons,<br /> are connected by alternative conjunctions.&quot;<br /> According to Professor Bain, there is a diver-<br /> gence of use among classical writers.<br /> (/?) The correct auxiliary to be used with<br /> verbs of motion.<br /> (y) The present day use of, and distinction<br /> between, the prepositions &quot; by &quot; and &quot; with.&quot;<br /> A. E. Aldington.<br /> V.—Transliteration.<br /> With reference to the note by &quot;H. G. K.&quot; on<br /> &quot;Transliteration&quot; in The Author for this month,<br /> I beg to point out that the congress he wishes for<br /> has sat, and to a great extent settled the question.<br /> At the Tenth Oriental Congress, held at Geneva<br /> in 1894, on the motion of Lord Reay, President<br /> of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain, a<br /> commission was appointed to consider this<br /> subject. The scheme adopted by the commission<br /> was printed in the Proceedings of the Congress,<br /> and a translation of it was published in the<br /> Asiatic Society&#039;s Journal for October, 1895.<br /> This system has, with a few alterations, been<br /> adopted by the society, and earnestly recom-<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 84 (#498) #############################################<br /> <br /> 84<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> mended for adoption by all writers on Oriental<br /> subjects.<br /> As one who has written and published a good<br /> deal on Indian languages, I am deeply impressed<br /> with the necessity of uniformity on this point—<br /> not for the sake of Oriental scholars, to whom,<br /> knowing as they do the words in their Oriental<br /> alphabets, transliteration is of little moment, but<br /> for the general public, who are apt to be bewil-<br /> dered by diversity of spelling. The system<br /> adopted by the Geneva Congress does not com-<br /> mend itself to me in every particular, and in such<br /> of my writings as are intended for students of<br /> Oriental languages only I could not conscien-<br /> tiously adopt some of the Roman equivalents<br /> proposed, as I consider them misleading. But in<br /> writing for the general public this objection<br /> would not arise, and the Geneva system might<br /> be used. I think, however, for general use<br /> the employment of dots and diacritical signs<br /> would have to be dispensed with, as the public<br /> would not understand them without previous<br /> study—and the public has no time to study such<br /> matters.<br /> In the Arabic language there are four letters,<br /> all of which in India are pronounced as z, three<br /> which are pronounced s, and two pronounced t.<br /> It would suffice to write all these letters as they<br /> are pronounced without putting dots under them.<br /> But then the four letters pronounced as z in India<br /> are pronounced differently in other Mahomedan<br /> countries. For instance, the name of the month<br /> during which all good Muslims fast is pronounced<br /> in India and Persia Ramzan, while in Arabia and<br /> Turkey it is pronounced Ramadhan (i.e., like the<br /> two English words &quot;rummer &quot; and &quot;darn,&quot; not<br /> like &quot;rammer&quot; and &quot;dan&quot;). I do not think<br /> any system, except one which hideously distorted<br /> them, would enable the Englishman who is unac-<br /> quainted with Arabic to pronounce these words<br /> properly at sight—one would not like to see the<br /> word written &quot; rummer darn!&quot; The short indis-<br /> tinct vowel which is so very frequent in Oriental<br /> languages creates a great difficulty. The sound<br /> of it is exactly the same as the u in English<br /> bun, sun, run. It is also the same as the unac-<br /> cented e in the French le, jc, me; and the half<br /> audible c at the end of German eine, meine, gate.<br /> But it is also the same as the final unaccented a in<br /> America, woman. Consequently the Geneva<br /> Congress, following an already established rule,<br /> has adopted a to express this sound, and this<br /> course is now followed by all Oriental scholars.<br /> French writers (not scholars), however, use e.<br /> Thus the general whose name we should pro-<br /> nounce in India as Uzzum Pasha, appears in<br /> Thessaly as Edhem, and Muhammad is written<br /> Mehemet.<br /> While, therefore, absolute uniformity is,per haps,<br /> not likely to be attained soon, it might be an<br /> advantage if the alphabet adopted by the Geneva<br /> Congress were made more geuerally known, and<br /> used by English writers at least. Foreign writers<br /> may perhaps in time consent to use it also.<br /> John Beames.<br /> Netherclay House, Bishop&#039;s Hull,<br /> Taunton, July 6.<br /> VI.—Subjunctive Mood: Its Present Day<br /> Use.<br /> Your correspondent might have ascertained<br /> Mr. Lang&#039;s views on this subject by a shorter<br /> process than the study of 68,000 words.<br /> &quot;I,&quot; says Prince Prigio, &quot;unworthy as I am,<br /> represent the sole hope of the Royal Family.<br /> Therefore to send me after the Fired rake were*<br /> both dangerous and unnecessary.&quot; To which the<br /> author appends a note: *&quot; Subjunctive mood!<br /> He was a great grammarian!&quot;<br /> Apparently a suspicion of priggishness attaches<br /> at the present day even to the use of &quot;the sub-<br /> junctive of to be after if.&quot; E. C. S.<br /> VII.—Cost of Production.<br /> In re the letter of &quot;S. R.,&quot; published on page<br /> 38 of the current issue of The Author, I think he<br /> is quite wrong in his deduction that because a<br /> decent publisher declines to accept a book that<br /> therefore it is not worth publishing! Not so,<br /> friend &quot; S. R.&quot;! However meritorious a book is,<br /> many publishers will not accept it unless the<br /> author has already a well-known name in the<br /> literary world, as they think that without this the<br /> work will not &quot;catch on.&quot; The commercial side<br /> comes in, you see, and publishers will not take<br /> the first plunge.<br /> The refusal of a book by a decent publisher is<br /> no sign that it is not worth publishing, for it is<br /> not its literary merit so much as the status of<br /> the author that the publisher considers. Many<br /> historic cases—&quot; Vanity Fair,&quot; &quot;Jane Eyre,&quot;<br /> &amp;c. — prove this. My own book, &quot;Fisherman<br /> Fancies,&quot; Elliot Stock declined to bring out at<br /> his own risk, and yet it was much praised by Mr.<br /> R. D. Blackmore, and had capital reviews from<br /> good London and provincial journals.<br /> F. B. Doveton.<br /> VIII—How Long?<br /> Here is another choice experience of the<br /> courtesy of editors. Last December I submitted<br /> a contribution to a weekly paper circulating in<br /> the parish where I reside. No acknowledgment<br /> was vouchsafed. After a couple of reminders, it<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 85 (#499) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 85<br /> has to-day been sent back, declined with thanks.<br /> Seven months to consider a short story! It is<br /> difficult to believe that a small suburban news-<br /> paper can find any valid excuse for so long a<br /> detention of manuscript. C. C.<br /> Authors&#039; Club, July 15.<br /> —■»•«&gt;<br /> LITERATURE IN THE PERIODICALS.<br /> On Commencing Author. Quarterly Review for July.<br /> On the Complaints op Authors. A. T. Q. C<br /> Speaker for July 3.<br /> The Proposed School op Fiction. A. T. Quiller<br /> Coach. Pall Hall Magazine for Jaly.<br /> John Sterling, and a Correspondence between<br /> Sterling and Emerson. Edward Waldo Emerson.<br /> Atlantic Monthly for July.<br /> Some Reminiscences op English Journalism Sir<br /> Wemysa Reid. Nineteenth Century for July.<br /> Pascal. Leslie Stephen. Fortnightly Review for July.<br /> A Woman Poet [Mme. Marceline Valmore]. Fort-<br /> nightly Review for July.<br /> The paper in the Quarterly Review has been<br /> treated elsewhere (see Notes and News).<br /> A practical suggestion the Quarterly Review<br /> makes has regard to the work of agents. At the<br /> present time, many agents only look at the work<br /> of well-known people; but the writer seems to<br /> foresee considerable remuneration to a firm who<br /> will announce themselves as the depositaries of<br /> everything—sonnets, epics, turnovers for a paper,<br /> or anything else, by servant girls, duchesses, or<br /> eminent men. For these they would have to give<br /> an immediate receipt. They would be free to send<br /> back at once anything considered unmarketable.<br /> They would be at liberty to charge (say) ten per<br /> cent, on whatever they obtained for the item, and to<br /> pay themselves. There would be no temptation to<br /> dishonesty, because the action of the percentage<br /> and the immediate receipt for the document would<br /> be so self-working. It will be noticed that the<br /> idea is substantially that which Mr. Isidore G.<br /> Ascher put forward in the July number of The<br /> Author.<br /> Just before the latest Quarterly appeared,<br /> Mr. Quiller Couch had been writing his view that<br /> the commercial side of the literary calling has<br /> been too prominent of late. He believes &quot; that<br /> writing has aims and rewards of its own which<br /> must and always will escape what I may call a<br /> bagman&#039;s estimate, and that if a man can only<br /> bring a bagman&#039;s estimate to this calling, a bag-<br /> man he had better be.&quot; The author and the<br /> publisher, is a case of the workman and the<br /> capitalist; and &quot;give and take&quot; is the best<br /> motto for each. There is a class of authors,<br /> one would point out to Mr. Couch, who take<br /> their money, as much as they can get, and then<br /> pretend not to care how much it is. There is, as<br /> a rule, no one more anxious for money than the<br /> writer who talks big about bagmen. Those who<br /> know how to separate literary from commercial<br /> value do not talk about the sordidness of keeping<br /> watch over property.<br /> An interesting friendship between Emerson and<br /> Sterling is revealed by Mr. E. Waldo Emerson.<br /> The correspondence (they never met) that passed<br /> between the American poet and the British man<br /> of letters, here published for the first time, shows<br /> their relations to have originated by Emerson<br /> sending a presentation copy of his &quot;Essays.&quot;<br /> Sterling acknowledges this in a letter from<br /> Clifton, dated Sept. 30,1839. &quot;I have read very,<br /> very little modern English writing that has<br /> pleased, me so much,&quot; he says; &quot;among recent<br /> productions almost only those of our friend<br /> Carlyle, whose shaggy-browed and deep-eyed<br /> thoughts have often a likeDess to yours which is<br /> very attractive and impressive, neither evidently<br /> being the double of the other.&quot; Emerson, in re-<br /> plying, criticises Sterling&#039;s volume of poems,<br /> saying, &quot;I must count him happy who has this<br /> delirious music in his brain;&quot; and &quot; I am natu-<br /> rally keenly susceptible of the pleasures of rhythm,<br /> and cannot believe but that one day—I ask not<br /> where or when—I shall attain to the speech of<br /> this splendid dialect.&quot; There are twenty letters<br /> altogether, eight of them Emerson&#039;s. They are<br /> made up of criticisms of literature, and passages<br /> of tender personal sympathy with trouble.<br /> &quot;Ill-health, many petty concerns, much loco-<br /> motion, and infinite laziness,&quot; are Sterling&#039;s first<br /> excuse for delay; and the Eame reason of ill-<br /> health continues until in June, 1844, when he is<br /> dying, he writes from Ventnor that his condition<br /> is one of &quot; expecting to be dead in five minutes,<br /> and noticing the pattern of the room paper<br /> and of the doctor&#039;s waistcoat as composedly<br /> as if the whole had been a dream.&quot; We find<br /> Sterling saying, in 1840, that &quot;Hartley Cole-<br /> ridge, Alfred Tennyson, and Henry Taylor are<br /> the only younger men I now think of who have<br /> shown anything like genius, and the last—<br /> perhaps the most remarkable—has more of voli-<br /> tion and understanding than imagination.&quot;<br /> In 1842 Sterling thought of visiting New Eng-<br /> land. &quot;Come and bring your scroll in hand,&quot;<br /> promptly writes the American sage. &quot;Come to<br /> Boston and Concord, and I will go to Niagara<br /> with you. I have never been there.&quot; Again he<br /> writes, introducing his countryman Bronson Alcott<br /> as &quot; a man who cannot write, but whose conver-<br /> sation is unrivalled in its way—such insight, such<br /> discernment of spirits, such pure intellectual play,<br /> such revolutionary impulses of thought.&quot; Another<br /> friend Emerson introduces is Henry James, of New<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 86 (#500) #############################################<br /> <br /> 86<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> York, &quot;a man of ingenuous and liberal spirit, and<br /> a chief consolation to me when I visit his city.&quot;<br /> Here is one paragraph from a letter of Emerson&#039;s,<br /> dated January 31, 1844.<br /> I learned by your last letter that you had builded a<br /> house, and I glean from Russell all I can of your health and<br /> aspect; and as James is gone to your island, I think to come<br /> still nearer to you through his friendly and intelligent eyes.<br /> Send me a good gossiping letter, and prevent all my proxies.<br /> What can I tell you to invite such retaliation? I dwell<br /> with my mother, my wife, and two little girl -. the eldest five<br /> years old, in the midst of flowery fields. I wasted much<br /> time from graver work in the last two months in reading<br /> lectures to Lyceums far and near; for there is now a<br /> &quot;lyceum,&quot; so oalled, in almost every town in New Eogland,<br /> and, if I would accept every invitation, I might read a<br /> lecture every night. My neighbours in this village of<br /> Concord are Ellery Cbanning, who sent his poems to you, a<br /> yontb of genius; Thoreau, whose name you may have Been<br /> in the Dial ; and Hawthorne, a writer of tales and historiettes,<br /> whose name you may not have Been, though he, too,<br /> prints books. All these three persons are superior to their<br /> writings, and, therefore, not obnoxious to Kant&#039;s observa-<br /> tion, &quot; Detestable is the company of literary men.&quot;<br /> Emerson was trying to arrange for the printing<br /> of Sterling&#039;s poems in America, but the project<br /> hung fire. The reasons are given by Emerson in<br /> his letter of June 30, 1843, which shows the un-<br /> satisfactory state of the book law at that time:<br /> Oar whole foreign book market has suffered a revolution<br /> within eighteen months, by the new practice of printing<br /> whatever good books or vendible books you send ns, in the<br /> cheapest newspaper form, and hawking them in the streets<br /> at twelve, eighteen, and twenty-five cents the whole work;<br /> and I suppose that fears, if his book should prove<br /> popular, that it would be pirated at once. I printed Carlyle&#039;s<br /> •&#039; Past and Present&quot; two months ago, with a preface beseech-<br /> ing all honest men to spare our book; but already a wretched<br /> reprint has appeared, published, to be sure, by a man<br /> unknown to the trade, whose wretchedness of type and<br /> paper, I have hope, will still give my edition the market for<br /> all persons who have eyes and wish to keep them. But,<br /> beside the risk of piracy, this cheap system hurts the sale<br /> of dear books, or such whose price contains any profit to<br /> an author. Add one more unfavonrable incident whioh<br /> damped the design, that a Philadelphia edition of<br /> &quot;Sterling&#039;s Poems &quot; was published a year ago, though bo ill<br /> got up that it did not succeed well, our booksellers think.<br /> To judge from this year&#039;s issue of Professor<br /> Kiirschner&#039;s &quot;Deutsche Litteratur Kalender,&quot;<br /> which has been fully described in this journal<br /> before, the guild of writers must be on the<br /> increase in Germany. It numbers sixty pages<br /> more than last year&#039;s issue, and contains much<br /> new and valuable information. The portraits<br /> inserted in the present volume are of special<br /> interest. The one facing the title-page represents<br /> the popular and prolific romancer Mas Ring, who,<br /> as we learn from Kiirschner, is a doctor of<br /> medicine, and will celebrate on the 4th of next<br /> month his eightieth birthday. Among his<br /> various successful novels the one entitled &quot;John<br /> Milton und seine Zeit&quot; has attracted in Germany<br /> particular attention. The second portrait is that<br /> of the well-known poet . Detlev von Liliencron.<br /> As for the rest, the useful literary and biographical<br /> annual fully maintains its standard, and we<br /> may cordially recommend it to all who take an<br /> interest in current German literature.<br /> PERSONAL.<br /> &quot;|V TE- GEORGE SMITH gave a dinner at<br /> IVI the Hotel Mctropole, on July 8, to his<br /> friends and the contributors to the<br /> &quot;Dictionary of National Biography.&quot; In pro-<br /> posing the health of Mr. Sidney Lee, Mr. Smith<br /> said that twenty-one volumes of the &quot;Dic-<br /> tionary&quot; had appeared under the editorship of<br /> Mr. Leslie Stephen, with the assistance of Mr.<br /> Sidney Lee; five were edited jointly by Mr.<br /> Stephen and Mr. Lee; and twenty-five had been<br /> produced under the editorship of Mr. Lee. The<br /> number of contributors was 634; and each volume<br /> contained between 400 and 500 separate biogra-<br /> phies. Mr. Lee, in replying to the toast, said<br /> that when ill-health unhappily compelled Mr.<br /> Stephen to retire from the editorship, it was the<br /> force of his example that had enabled him to<br /> carry the work forward to the stage it had<br /> reached. Mr. Stephen also acknowledged the<br /> toast. Mr. Lee gave &quot; The Health of the Con-<br /> tributors,&quot; and Canon Ainger replied. &quot;The<br /> Guests who were not Contributors&quot; was proposed<br /> by the Chairman, who coupled with it the names<br /> of Viscount Peel and Mr. Lecky. One of the<br /> most remarkable features of the time, said Mr.<br /> Lecky, was the manner in which individual exer-<br /> tion had been replaced by corporate work, by<br /> syndicates and companies. It was old fashioned<br /> now to think that a history could only be written<br /> by one hand in a uniform style.<br /> The Tennyson Memorial in the Isle of Wight<br /> will be unveiled by Lady Tennyson, and dedicated<br /> by the Archbishop of Canterbury, on Friday, the<br /> 6th inst., at 3 p.m. It is placed in Freshwater<br /> Down, the favourite walk of the late Laureate.<br /> Mark Twain has declined the fund which was<br /> set on foot for him by the New York Herald, and<br /> supported in London by the Westminster Gazette.<br /> A man who is able to work, he says, should not<br /> accept charity. The appeal was meeting with<br /> ready response.<br /> A successful Dickens fete was held at Broad-<br /> stairs in the first week of July. The principal<br /> feature was a fancy dress bazaar, in which the<br /> stall-holders impersonated characters in the<br /> novelist&#039;s books. The proceeds will be devoted to<br /> erecting a club-house and other buildings in<br /> memory of Charles Dickens.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 87 (#501) #############################################<br /> <br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> 87<br /> OBITUARY.<br /> MISS JEAN INGELOW died at Kensing-<br /> ton on July 20, at the age of seventy-<br /> seven. She came, like Tennyson, of a<br /> Lincolnshire family (her mother was a Scotch,<br /> woman of literary inclinations), and was one of a<br /> banker&#039;s eleven children. Her first volume which<br /> attained fame was &quot;Poems&quot; (1863), which has<br /> been popular through the half century that has<br /> elapsed since. This was her second work, the<br /> first, &quot;A Rhyming Chronicle of Incidents and<br /> Feelings,&quot; having been published anonymously in<br /> 1850. &quot;The Brothers,&quot; &quot; Divided,&quot; and &quot; Songs<br /> of Seven&quot; were likewise well received; and<br /> Mr. Swinburne, for one, paid very high praise<br /> to &quot;Requiescat in Pace.&quot; Both in this country<br /> and in the United States her works com-<br /> manded large sale in the sixties and seventies.<br /> Her stories in blank verse included &quot; Lawrance&quot;<br /> and &quot;Gladys and Her Island &quot;; &quot;Supper at<br /> the Mill&quot; and &quot;Afternoon at a Parsonage&quot;<br /> were dainty sketches. The poem by which<br /> Miss Ingelow is best known is &quot;High Tide<br /> on the Coast of Lincolnshire,&quot; which is a<br /> favourite piece with public reciters. She also<br /> wrote fairy stories for children and novels for the<br /> young. &quot;Off the Skelligs&quot; was perhaps her<br /> best prose work. Miss Ingelow seldom revised<br /> her poems after she had once committed them to<br /> paper. She shunned publicity, and was a generous<br /> friend of the poor.<br /> Sir John Skelton, K.C.B., LL.D., Advocate,<br /> late Vice-President of the Local Government<br /> Board for Scotland, died in his native city, Edin-<br /> burgh, on the 20th ult., aged sixty-six. He was<br /> the author of several books on public health and<br /> the poor law; of &quot;Nugse Criticse,&quot; a volume of<br /> essays published in 1862; and of historical and<br /> other works, including &quot; A Campaigner at Home,&quot;<br /> &quot;The Impeachment of Mary Stuart,&quot; &quot; Maitland<br /> of Lethington and the Scotland of Mary Stuart,&quot;<br /> &quot;Mary Stuart,&quot; &quot;Essays in Romance,&quot; and<br /> one novel, &quot;Crookit Meg.&quot; It was Disraeli&#039;s<br /> admiration for &quot;Crookit Meg&quot; that removed<br /> the young barrister from Parliament House at<br /> Edinburgh to be Secretary of the old Board<br /> of Supervision. His latest work was &quot;Table<br /> Talk of Shirley&quot; (1895), of which a second<br /> series appeared last winter. This work contains<br /> reminiscences of some of the foremost writers of<br /> the present reign. Dr. Skelton was a consistent<br /> admirer of the unfortunate Queen of Scots, but<br /> this did not interfere with his close friendship<br /> with Froude. Under the pseudonym of &quot; Shirley&quot;<br /> lie was a frequent contributor to Frasers and<br /> Blackwood&#039;s. He was the original of Lord<br /> Glenalmond in Stevenson&#039;s&quot; Weir of Hermiston.&quot;<br /> &quot;&#039; Shirley&#039; is the last of them,&quot; the late Miss<br /> Isabella Blackwood used to say in speaking<br /> of the former but departed glories of literary<br /> Edinburgh.<br /> Sir John Charles Bucknill, M.D., F.R.C.P.,<br /> F.R.S., who died at Bournemouth on the 19th<br /> ult., aged seventy-nine, originated, in 1853, the<br /> Journal of Mental Science—which for nine years<br /> he edited, was one of the original editors—and<br /> Brain; and wrote numerous psychological works.<br /> The most important of these are: &quot;Unsound-<br /> ness of Mind in Relation to Criminal Acts,&quot;<br /> &quot;The Mad Folk of Shakespeare,&quot; &quot;Notes on<br /> American Asylums,&quot; &quot;Habitual Drunkards and<br /> Insane Drunkards,&quot; and &quot; Care of the Insane and<br /> their Legal Control.&quot;<br /> THE BOOKS OP THE MONTH.<br /> [June 24 to July 23.—154 Books.]<br /> About, Edmond. The King of the Mountains, [trans, by Richard<br /> Davey.] 3/6. Heinemann.<br /> Allen, Grant. An African Millionaire. 6&#039;- Richards.<br /> Allingham, Francis. Crooked Paths. 6/- Longmans.<br /> Aloysius, Slater Mary. Memories of the Crimea. Burns and Oates.<br /> Anglican, An. Some Thoughts on the Third Order of St. Francis.<br /> I/- Skeffington.<br /> Anonymous. A Catalogue of the Egyptian Antiquities in tho Posses-<br /> sion of F. G. Hilton Price. Quaritch.<br /> Anonymous [*&#039;E.&quot;]. Peggy&#039;s Decision. 1/- Simpkin.<br /> Anonymous. Notes on tho Painted Glass in Canterbury Cathedral.<br /> Canterbury: E. Crow.<br /> AnonymouB. The Oxford Debate on tho Textual Criticisms of the New<br /> Testament. Bell.<br /> Anonymous [•&#039;One of H. M.&#039;s servants.&quot;] The Private Life of tho<br /> Queen. 2/6. Pearson.<br /> Armitage, E. S. A Key to English Antiquities, with special reference<br /> to the Sheffield and Roiherham District. 7, - Sheffield:<br /> W, Townsend.<br /> ABtlns, G. S. Wayside Echoes. 2/- King, Sell, and Railton.<br /> Austin, Alfred. Victoria: June 20, 1S37—June 20, 1897. 6d.<br /> Macmillan.<br /> Bailey, James. Sunday School Teaching. 1/6. R. Cully.<br /> Barnes, W. E. An Apparatus Criticus to Chronicles in the Pesbitta<br /> Version. 5/- Clay.<br /> Harnett. P. A. (ed.) Teaching and Organisation. 6/6. Longmans.<br /> Barr, Robert. Tho Mutable Many, (i - Methueu.<br /> Bathurst, J. K. The Royal Houses of Great Britain. Genealogical<br /> Chart, with notes. Comparative Synoptical Chart Company.<br /> Be a van, A. A. Popular Royalty. 10 6. Low.<br /> Bell, R. S. Warren. The Cub in Love and Other Stories. 18.<br /> Richards.<br /> Bellamy, Edward. Equality 0 - Heinemann.<br /> Besant, Sir W. The Queen&#039;s Reign and its Commemoration.<br /> The Werner Company.<br /> Bingham, Clive. With the Turkish Army in Thessaly. C tj net.<br /> Macmillan.<br /> Blrrel), Augustine. Four Lectures on the Law of Employers&#039; Liability<br /> at Home and Abroad. 2/6. Macmillan.<br /> Boae. W. P. Du. The Ecumenical Councils. 6 - Edinburgh: Clark.<br /> Bower, Marfan. The Story of Molly. 3;(J. Andrews.<br /> Brown, J. D., and Stratton, S. S. British Musical Biography. 10,6<br /> net. Birmingham: S. S. Stratton.<br /> Browning, Oscar (ed.) The Journal of Sir George Rooke, Admiral<br /> of the Fleet. Navy Records Society.<br /> Bryant, Sophie. The Teaching of Morality in the Family and the<br /> School. 8/- Sonnenschein.<br /> Bryden, H. A. The Victorian Era in South Africa. Offices of<br /> African Criiic.<br /> Caine, Caisar (editor). AnaVcta Eboracensia: Some Hemaynesof the<br /> Ancient City of York. 42 - Phillimore.<br /> Cameron, MrB. Lovott. A Man&#039;s Undoing. White.<br /> Campbell, C. T. British South Africa: A History of the Colony of<br /> the Cape of Good Hope. 7 C. Haddon<br /> Campbell, F. Index-Catalogue of Bibliographical Works (chiefly<br /> in the English language) relating to India. Library Bureau.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 88 (#502) #############################################<br /> <br /> 88<br /> THE AUTHOR.<br /> Cavalry Officer, A. Cavalry Titetics. 4 - Stanford.<br /> Clarke, L. W. Tlie Miracle Play in England. 3/6. Andrews.<br /> Cocking. B. D. A Primer of French Etymology. 1/6. Innes.<br /> Cotton, John. Thoughts and Fancies. Simpkin.<br /> Cowell, E. B. (ed.) The Jataka. Vol. III. 12/6. Clay.<br /> Crawford, J. W. Wild Flowers of Scotland. 6/- net. Hacqueen.<br /> Davenport, Cyril. The English Regalia. 21 - net. Kegan Paul.<br /> Donaldson, T. Walt Whitman, The Man. 6/- (lay and Bird.<br /> Druery, O. T. The New Gulliver, or Travels in Athomia. 3/6.<br /> Roxburghe.<br /> Earlo, Mrs. C. W. Pot-Pourri from a Surrey Oarden. 7/6. Smith,<br /> Elder.<br /> England, Frances. Small Concerns. 1/- Dlgby.<br /> Farquharson, C. D. The Federation of the Powers. 1/- Warno.<br /> Forlong, J. G. R. Short StudieB in the Science of Comparative<br /> Bcligion, embracing all the religions of Asia. Quaritch.<br /> Fowler, Edith H. The Professor&#039;s Children. 6/- Longmans.<br /> Oarbctt, Captain H. Naval Gunnery. 6/- Bell.<br /> Gardiner, S. It. What Gunpowder Plot Was. o/- Longmans.<br /> Gardner, J. Starkie. Armour in England. 3/6 net. Seeley.<br /> Glnsburg. C. D. Introduction to the Massoretieo—Critical Edition of<br /> the Hebrew Bible. Tractarian Bible Society.<br /> Gorst, MrB. Harold. E. Possessed of Devils. 6/- Macqueen.<br /> Gregor, N. Ter. The Star of the Sea. 6/- Hoywood.<br /> Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S. (editors land trs.) AOriA IHCOY:<br /> Sayings of our Lord. From an early Greek Papyrus. 2 - net,<br /> and 6d. net. Frowde.<br /> Haldane, J. W. C. Bailway Engineering, Mechanical and Electrical.<br /> 15/- Spon.<br /> Hallard, J. H. Gold and Silver: an Elementary Treatise on Bimetall-<br /> ism. 2/6. Bivington.<br /> Hammond, Joseph. A Coinish Parish. [St. Austell ] 10/6.<br /> Skeffington.<br /> Hancock, F. The Parish of Selworthy. Taunton: Barnicott and<br /> Pea re e.<br /> Harris, C. F. The Science of Brickmaking. H. Grevile Montgomery.<br /> Harvey, M. Newfoundland in 181)7. 6/- Low.<br /> Hay, J. Speech at Unveiling of the Scott Bust. 1/- net. Lane-<br /> Herbert, W. de Brocy. A Handbook of the Law of Banks and<br /> Bankers. 2/6. C. Wilson.<br /> Hewitt, J. D. It. Creation with Development, or Evolution. &lt;; -<br /> Kegan Paul.<br /> Hewitt, J. T. Organic Chemical Manipulation. 7/6. Whittaker.<br /> Hill, G. F. Scenes from Greek History between tho Persian and<br /> Peloponnesian Wars. 10/6. Froude.<br /> Holt, B. B. Whitby PaBt and Present. Copas<br /> Howard. J. J., and Crisp, F. A. Visitation of England »nd Wales.<br /> Vol. V. 21/- F. A. Crisp, Grove Park, Denmark Hill, S.E.<br /> Hull, E. Our Coal Resources at the Close of the 19th century. Spon.<br /> James, R. N. Painters and their Works. Vol. III. Gill.<br /> Jane, Fred. T. The Torpedo Book. 1/- Bcoman.<br /> Jane, Fred. T. To Venice in Five Seconds. 1/6. Innes.<br /> Jay. Rose. A Missionary Family. 3/6. Marshall Bros.<br /> Johnson. A. H. Europe in the Sixteenth Century. 7/6. Rivington.<br /> Johnston, Sir H. H. British Central Africa. Mcthuen.<br /> Jones, H. A. The Case of Rebellious Susan. 2/6. Macmillan.<br /> Klrsop, Jos. Life of Thomas N. Carthew. Crombie.<br /> Lamond, B. The Sporting Adventures of M. Lolotte. 1/- Dlgby.<br /> Lang, Andrew, Modern Mythology. 9/. Longmans.<br /> Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. LI.<br /> Smith, Elder.<br /> Leith, Mrs. Disney. Three Visits to Iceland. 5/G. J. Masters and Co.<br /> Levett-Yeata, S. The Chevalier d&#039;Aurlac. 6/- LongmanB.<br /> Lillie, A. Croquet: Its HiBtory, Rules, and Secrets. 6/- Longmans.<br /> Lowndes, Frederic S. Bishops of the Day. 5/- Richards.<br /> Lyrienne, B. de. The Quest of the Qilt-Edged Girl. 1/-net Lane.<br /> Macgregor, Sir William. British New Guinea. 4/. Murray.<br /> Macleane, D. A HiBtory of Pembroke College, Oxford. Oxford His-<br /> torical Society.<br /> Macray, W. D. A Register of the Members of St. Mary Magdalen<br /> College, Oxford. New Series, Vol. II.—Fellows, 1522-1575.<br /> 7,6. net. Frowde.<br /> Maeterlinck, M. Aglavaine and Selysette. (tr. by A. Sutro). 2 6.<br /> net. Richards.<br /> Marlon, Neville. Sweet Scented Grass. 1/- Digbv.<br /> MarBh, F. E. Five Hundred Bible Readings. 6/- Marshall Bros.<br /> Martin, E. A. Nature Cbat.l/- Taylor.<br /> Maurice, Major-General. National Defences. 2/6. Macmillan.<br /> Mlall, L. C. Thirty Years of Teaching. 8/6. Macmillan.<br /> Morloy, George. In Russet Mantle Clad. 10,6. Skeffington.<br /> Morris, Sir Lewis. The Diamond Jubilee, an Ode. 6d. Kegan Paul.<br /> Morris, Wm. O&#039;Connor. Hannibal. 5/- Putnam&#039;s.<br /> Oates, John. The Sorrow of God, and Other Sermons. 8/6. Bowden.<br /> Oliver, Pasfleld (tr. and editor). The Voyages made by the Sieur<br /> D. B. to Madagascar and Bourbon in 1669, 1670, 1671, and 1672.<br /> 10/6 net. Nutt.<br /> Omond, T. S. English Verse-Structure. 1/- Edinburgh: D. Douglas.<br /> Pallnurus. The Paper Boat. 8/6. Bowden.<br /> Papenfus, F. W. The &quot; Grondwet&quot; of the South African Republic,<br /> wllh the Thirty-three Articles. Dunbar Brothers.<br /> Parish, Edmund. Hallucinations and Illusions, G- Scott.<br /> Pearmain, T. H., and Moor, C. G. The Analysis of Focd and Drugs.<br /> »/- BalUere.<br /> Pearson, the late Bishop. Words of Counsel. Stock.<br /> Phelps, Philip E. The Odea of Horace in English, and the Original<br /> Metres. 4 C net. Parker.<br /> Pollock, Wilfred. War and a Wheel. 1/- Cbwtto.<br /> Pope, J. Buckingham. Conservatives or Socialists? 1- Riving/ton.<br /> Prescott, J. E. (editor). The Bcgister of the Priory of Wetherhal.<br /> 18/- Kendal: T. Wilson.<br /> Primmer, J. Jacob Primmer in Borne. 2 fi net. Dunfermline:<br /> Citizen Office.<br /> Pryde, D. The Queer Folk of Fife. Glasgow: Morison.<br /> Pryer, W. Stephen. Rowena and Harold. 1/6. Ward, Lock.<br /> Rnien of Reviewz. Notables of Britain. [Portraits and Autographs. ]<br /> 5/- Office of Rcrhic of Revietc*.<br /> Bidden, Mrs. J. H. A Bich Man&#039;s Daughter. 6/- White.<br /> Bigg, Jas. Wild Flower Lyrics and other Poems. Gardner.<br /> Roberts, T. R. The Spas of Wales. 1/- J. Hog/r.<br /> Bobertson, F. E. A Practical Treatiso on Organ Building. Low.<br /> Ro8, Mrs. A. McK. Irene Iddesleigh. W. and G. Baird.<br /> Bothenstein, Will. English Portraits. Part III 2 G net. Richards.<br /> Bye, W. Songs, Stories, and Sayings of Norfolk. 2 - net.<br /> Norwich: A. H. Goose.<br /> Sachs, E. O. Modern Opera Houses and Theatres. Vol V. Batsford.<br /> Salntsbury, George. Sir Walter Scott [•&#039;Famous Scots.&quot;] 1/6.<br /> Oliphant.<br /> Seymour, Gordon. A Homburg Story. 2 - Dent.<br /> Shuttleworth, E. The County Courts Act, 1S88. J. Smith and Co.<br /> Sill, E. B. What Happens at Death? *e. 16. Skiff!ngton.<br /> Skeat, W. W. (cd ). Chaucerian and Other Pieces. A Supplement to<br /> Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer (1894). 18&#039;- Frowde.<br /> Smith, J. Fruits and Farinacea the Proper Food. Ideal Publ. Union.<br /> Solly, S. E. A Handbook of Medical Climatology. If./- ChurehllL<br /> Stanley, Hiram M. Essays on Literary Art. 3 6. Sonnenschofn.<br /> Stunner. H. H. The Counsels of William de Britaine. 3 6. Robinson.<br /> Swan, Annie S. The Curse of Cowden. 1/- Hutchinson.<br /> Taylor, Job. The Public Man: His Duties. Ac. 3 6 net E.Wilson.<br /> Temple, A. G. England&#039;s History as Pictured by Famous Painters.<br /> 10/6. NewneB.<br /> Thomas, Bertha. Camera Lucida, or Strange Passages in Common<br /> Life. 6/- Low.<br /> Thomas, J. LI. Journeys among the Gentle Jsps. 7/6. Low.<br /> Thompson. J. A. Contribution to the History of Leprosy in<br /> New Zealand. 2 6 net. Macmillan.<br /> Traill, H. D. (ed.). Social England. Vol. VI.—1815-85. 18 - Cassell.<br /> Various Contributors. Paying Pleasures of Country Life. 1/-<br /> Routledge.<br /> Various Contributors (Bishop of Stepney and others). The Church<br /> Historical Society Lectures. Third Series. 2/- S.P.C K.<br /> Vaughan, J. N. Thoughts for All Times. 5/- Boxburghe.<br /> Venn, J. Biographical History of Gonvllle and Caius College, 1849-<br /> 189 7. Vol.1. 20,- net. Clay.<br /> Vye, Birch. From the Womb of the Morning. 1 - Boxburghe.<br /> Wachtmeister, Countess C, and Davis, K. B. (editors). Practical<br /> Vegetarian Cookery. 3 6 net. TheoBophical Publishing Co.<br /> Walker, A. Manual of Needlework and Cutting Out. ■&#039;./- Blackie.<br /> Wells, J. Oxford and Its Colleges. 3/- Methuen.<br /> Wentworth, B. Tho Master of Hurlingham Manor. 1&#039;- Digby.<br /> Williams. E. E. The Foreigner in the Farmyard. Heinemann.<br /> Wlngfleld, W. Bicycle Gymkhana and Musical Bides. 5/- net.<br /> Harrison.<br /> Wooldridge, H. E. Early English Harmony. Vol I.—Facsimiles,<br /> prepared for the members of the Plainseng and Medieval Music<br /> Society. 25.&#039;- Quaritch.<br /> Wright, S. The Law Eclating to Landed Estates. 12/6. Eztates<br /> Gazette Office.<br /> Wyatvllle, G. Victoria, Begina et Itnperatrix, and Other Poems.<br /> 3/6 net. Birmingham: Cornish Bros.<br /> Xenopoulos, Gregory. Tho Stepmother (tr. by MrB. Edmonds).<br /> 2/6 net. Lane.<br /> Zeto. Vashtl. a tragedy, and Other Poems. 5;- Kegan Paul.<br /> &#039;• Zuresta.&quot; Ye Booke of Ye Cards. 1/- Boxburghe.<br /> Among the books of the month of July ought<br /> to have been mentioned &quot; The Fairies&#039; Favourite;<br /> or, the Story of Queen Victoria,&quot; told for children<br /> by T. Mullett Ellis. It was published nominally<br /> on Commemoration Day, but actually a little<br /> earlier. The publishers are Messrs. Ash Partners,<br /> Limited, and the price is is.<br /> In the books of the month, &quot;Armstrong,<br /> Q-. F. S., Queen, Empress, and Empire,&quot; should<br /> have been entered as &quot;Savage-Armstrong, G. F.,<br /> Queen, Empress, and Empire.&quot;<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 88 (#503) #############################################<br /> <br /> ADV<br /> Now Ready, Crown 8vo., Cloth Boards, Silver<br /> Price 68.<br /> A LADY OF WAI<br /> &quot;A Story of the Siege of Chester, 1i<br /> BY THE<br /> Rev. VINCENT J. LEATHERDAL<br /> London: Horace eox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;e-tmili<br /> SEMENTS.<br /> Ill<br /> Now ready, demy 8vo., cloth boards, price 10s<br /> IN NEW SOUTH AFf<br /> Travels in the Transvaal and Rhoa<br /> With Map and Twenty-six Illustrations.<br /> By H. LINCOLN TAN<br /> In demy 8vo., price 12s. net, by poet 12s. 6d.<br /> Six Months in a Syrian Monastery.<br /> Being the Record of a Visit to the Headquarters of the Syrian<br /> Church in Mesopotamia, with some account of the Yazidis, or Devil<br /> Worshippers of Mosul, and El Jilwah, their Sacred Book.<br /> By OSWALD H. PARRY, B.A.<br /> (Of Magdalen College, Oxford.)<br /> Illustrated by the Author. With a Prefatory Note by the<br /> Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Durham.<br /> 41 The author of this handsome volume presents 1 a detailed study of<br /> a relic of history pursued off the track of general research;&#039; he has<br /> sought to give, and has succeeded in giving. &#039;a picture of quiet life in<br /> a country much abused, and among a people that command less than<br /> their share of ordinary interest.&#039; 1 Westward the tide of Empire takei<br /> its way,&#039; sang a prophetic divine of the olden days, and no less<br /> certainly, as Mr. Parry points out, does the ebb of travel roturn<br /> towards the East. ... As a volume descriptive of life and travel<br /> among a distant people, his work is welt worth reading, but for those<br /> persons who are more particularly concerned with the old Syrian<br /> Church, or in the solution of the problem indicated above, it is one of<br /> quite unique attraction. A pathetic interest attaches to the account<br /> of the YazidiB included in this volume for it contains part of their<br /> sacred writings, the original manuscript of which was in the hands<br /> of Professor Robertson Smith for translation at the time of his<br /> death.&#039; —Publisher? Circular,<br /> CONTENTS.<br /> Introductory.<br /> PART I.<br /> Chapter I.—The Land of Gold and the Way there.<br /> II.—Across Desert and Veldt.<br /> III. —Johannesburg the Golden.<br /> IV. —A Transvaal Coach Journey.<br /> V.—Natal: the South African Garden.<br /> VI.—Ostracised in Africa. Home with the Swalt<br /> PART II —RAMBLES IS RHODESIA<br /> Chapter L—Eendragt Maakt Magt.<br /> ,, IL—Into the Country of Lobengula.<br /> III.—The Trail of War.<br /> ,, IV.—Gold mining. Ancient and Modern.<br /> V.—Sic Transit Gloria Mundi.<br /> „ VI.—To Northern Mashonaland.<br /> „ VIL—Primitive Art. The Misadventures of a Wa<br /> Index.<br /> London: H0Ri.cs Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-builc<br /> Crown 8vo., cloth boards, price 6s.<br /> HATHERSAC<br /> A Tale of North Derbyshij<br /> BY<br /> CHARLES EDMUND H<br /> Author of &quot; An Ancient AnoeBtor,&quot; ftc|<br /> London: HORACE Cox, Wlnd»or House, Breun&#039;s-bull<br /> London: Horace Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.C.<br /> Eoyal 8vo., price 16s. net.<br /> SPORTING DAYS<br /> IN<br /> SOUTHERN INDIA:<br /> BEING<br /> REMINISCENCES OF TWENTY TRIPS IN PURSUIT<br /> OF BIG GAME,<br /> CHIEFLY IN THE MADRAS PRESIDENCY.<br /> Lieut.-Col. A. J. O. POLLOCK,<br /> Eoyal Scots Fusiliers.<br /> WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS BY WHYMPER<br /> AND OTHERS.<br /> Contents.<br /> Chapters I., II., and III—The Bear.<br /> IV. and V.—The Panther.<br /> VI., VII., and VIII.—The Tiger.<br /> IX. and X.—The Indian Bison.<br /> XI. and XII.—The Elephant.<br /> XHI.—Deer (CervicUe) and Antelopes.<br /> XIV. —The Ibex.<br /> XV. and XVI.—Miscellaneous.<br /> ndon : Horace Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.C.<br /> <br /> <br /> ## p. 88 (#504) #############################################<br /> <br /> ADVErERTKNTS.<br /> IV<br /> THE TEMPLE 1<br /> UTING OFFICE. §<br /> kail<br /> | rpYPEWEITING EXCEPTIONALLY ACCTJ T| fl KriceB. Duplicates of Circulars by the latest |<br /> ^ ■&gt; ,_.TrT,-r&gt;V ITT DON C &lt;J, 1&lt; .L. H.Xl&lt;-1- OJ-iVJaiaii<br /> 3 ^y^^^3.r^»^mr<br /> be ns. a-1L<br /> TYPE-WRITING OFFICE,<br /> LUDGATE HILL, E.C.<br /> &quot;TYP.ws.Tixa by S»™1&#039;!ijtfl&#039;1,SlKl<br /> 13 Wol^erton Gardens, Hammersmtth, R jflj^ J. (ESTABLISHED 1883.)<br /> (EsTAnusnED IBM.) \ ;~M<br /> t am) General Copyi..„.<br /> TywwrMen Circular, by Copying Process. ,ing8&lt; E.0.<br /> AUTHORS&#039; BEFEBKSCEB.<br /> EUSS carefully copied from In. per 1000 words. Duplicate<br /> M&lt; price. Skilled typists sent out by hour day. or week.<br /> W; accurately copied, or typewritten English translations<br /> kindly permitted to Sir Walter Bcsant: also<br /> , P Watt and Son, Literary Agents, Hastings House,<br /> Meet, Strand, W.C.<br /> ACCURATELY AND PROMPTLY EXECXJTEI d(<br /> RLeadenhall Street, London, n.C<br /> H<br /> POSTAGE I&#039;AID. PUAW »i-» t<br /> MISS HAINES, 11. FALCONER CHAMBERS, SCARB&lt;\<br /> luTHOR&#039;S HAIRLESS PAPER-PAD.<br /> (The Leadeshau. Press Ltd.),<br /> q esio<br /> <br /> Super-royal Svo., price 20a., post free.<br /> CROCKFORD&#039;S<br /> CLERICAL DIRECTORY 1<br /> BEING A<br /> STATISTICAL BOOK OF EEFEEENC<br /> For fa ts Muting to the Clergy in England, Wales, Scotia<br /> and the Colonies: with n fuller Index relating to P<br /> Benefices thim any ever yet given to the public.<br /> Chockkord&#039;s CLERICAL Directory is more than a Direc<br /> taini concise Biographical details of all the mlnlstersandd<br /> the Church of England, Wales, Scotland. Ireland, and th<br /> also a List of the Parishes of each Diocese in Englandffon<br /> arranged in Hural Deaneries.<br /> ins hairless paper, over which the pen<br /> „ h perfect freedom.<br /> 1 -v^x.&quot;1 %xpence each: 5«. per dozen, ruled or plain.<br /> Pocket Size, price fid.; by post, fi.Jd.<br /> LAWS OF GOLF,<br /> jpted by the Royal and Ancient Gulf Club of<br /> 1 St. Andrc^ve.<br /> tii:il Kulcs for Medal Plav.<br /> uette of Golf.<br /> rners of the Golfing Championship,<br /> pen and Kunners-up for the Amateur Championship.<br /> <br /> Q Horace Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.C<br /> Crown Svo., limp cloth, price 2s. Cd.<br /> HANDBOOK<br /> Horace COX. Windsor House, Bream-s-buildiugs,<br /> Crown 8vo.,<br /> 3d. extra<br /> PROCEDURE<br /> OF THE<br /> USE of COMMONS,<br /> WITH<br /> Second Edition, B-*- -d<br /> PRINCIPLES™* OP 4r&#039; MEN™Y D&#039;BATING S0C&#039;ETIES&#039;<br /> „„v and PRACT1C1&#039; &gt; „ „^ ✓ &lt; t&gt; t v x^,„<br /> HE:<br /> &#039;.SUGGESTIONS AND PRECEDENTS<br /> FOR THE CSE OF<br /> ,N THEORY AND PRACT1CI<br /> Combination. *■ .<br /> Windsor House. Bream&#039;s-buB<br /> 3. Combination.<br /> London: Hobace Cox<br /> r GEO. G. GRAY, Esq.,<br /> Ind.), J.P., Barrister-at-Law, Ac., Author of &quot;A Manual of<br /> _ —. ptcy,&quot; a Treatise on 11 The Right to Support from Land and<br /> ^\ J J I Jj ^Si&quot; &amp;C., Speaker of the Hastings Local House of Commons.<br /> : Horace Cox, Windsor House, Bream&#039;s-buildings, E.C<br /> &quot;panted and Published by<br /> ^~^dlng«, E.C. fie&gt; Bream&#039;e-btiildings, London, E.C.https://historysoa.com/files/original/5/306/1897-08-02-The-Author-8-3.pdfpublications, The Author